10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

Commission file number 001-12830

Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2173 Salk Avenue, Suite 200

Carlsbad, California92008

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (442) 287-8990

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common shares LCTX NYSE American LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of the registrant's common shares on the NYSE American on June 28, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $146.3 million.

The number of common shares outstanding as of March 4, 2025 was 228,356,290.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2025 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.

Table of Contents

PageNumber

Part I.

Item 1 Business 5

Item 1A Risk Factors 32

Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 79

Item 1C Cybersecurity 79

Item 2 Properties 80

Item 3 Legal Proceedings 80

Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures 80

Part II.

Item 6 Reserved 82

Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 92

Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 93

Item 9A Controls and Procedures 133

Item 9B Other Information 134

Item 9C Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 134

Part III.

Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 135

Item 11 Executive Compensation 135

Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services 135

Part IV.

Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules 136

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in Part I, Item 1. “Business,” Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” and Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” but are also contained elsewhere in this report. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “objective,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue” and “ongoing,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology intended to identify statements about the future. Forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•

the potential to receive developmental, regulatory, and commercialization milestone and royalty payments under our Collaboration and License Agreement with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc.;

•

our plans to research, develop and commercialize our product candidates;

•

the initiation, progress, success, cost and timing of our clinical trials and other product development activities;

•

the therapeutic potential of our product candidates, and the indications for which we intend to develop our product candidates;

•

our ability to successfully manufacture our product candidates for clinical development and, if approved, for commercialization, and the timing and costs of such manufacture;

•

the potential of our cell therapy platform;

•

our ability to obtain additional capital to fund our operations;

•

the potential that holders of outstanding warrants to purchase our common shares will exercise such warrants on a cash basis;

•

our expectations and plans regarding existing and potential future collaborations with third parties such as pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, government agencies, academic laboratories, and research institutes for the discovery, development, and/or commercialization of novel cell therapy products;

•

the size and growth of the potential markets for our product candidates and our ability to serve those markets;

•

the potential scope and value of our intellectual property rights; and

•

the effects on our operations of the Israeli regional conflict and broader regional conflict, other geopolitical conflicts, political and economic instability, public health emergencies and macroeconomic conditions.

Forward-looking statements reflect our views and expectations as of the date of this report about future events and our future performance and condition, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual activities, performance, results or condition to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. You should refer to Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this report for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual activities, performance, results and condition to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in Part I, Item 1A. of this report, our forward-looking statements may prove to be inaccurate, and the inaccuracy may be material. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments may cause our current views and expectations to change. However, while we may elect to update the forward-looking statements in this report at some point in the future, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date after the date of this report.

You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future performance, results and condition may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

This report also contains market data, industry forecasts and other data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other data about our industry. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the markets in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk.

All brand names or trademarks appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this report may be referred to without the symbols ® and TM, but such references should not be construed as any indication that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto.

Unless otherwise stated or the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “Lineage,” the “Company,” “our company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer collectively to Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Below is a summary of the material factors that make an investment in our common shares speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) before making investment decisions regarding our common shares.

•

We are dependent on our third-party collaboration with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc to develop and commercialize RG6501 (OpRegen®). If our collaborators are not successful in developing and commercializing OpRegen and/or they terminate the collaboration, we will lose a significant source of potential revenue, development and potential regulatory approval of OpRegen may be significantly delayed, and we may not be successful in establishing an alternative strategic collaboration or pursuing independent development and commercialization of OpRegen.

•

Any failure or delay in the successful transfer of manufacturing process know-how by us to Roche or the inability of Roche to manufacture comparable cells could halt or delay the continued development of OpRegen.

•

We have incurred operating losses since inception, and we do not know if or when we will attain profitability.

•

Our investigational allogeneic cell therapies represent a novel approach to the treatment of serious medical conditions, which gives rise to significant challenges. Clinical development of our product candidates is a lengthy and expensive process with a high level of uncertainty as to timing and ultimate outcome. We may not be successful in identifying new product candidates and neither we nor our collaborators may succeed in developing or obtaining regulatory approval to market and sell any of our product candidates.

•

We will continue to spend a substantial amount of our capital on research and development, but we might not succeed in developing products and technologies that are safe and effective for their target indications or commercially viable.

•

We will need to raise substantial additional capital to complete the development and seek regulatory approval of our product candidates and to commercialize products approved for marketing, if any, and capital raising transactions may cause dilution to our existing shareholders, restrict our operations, or require us to relinquish rights to or dilute our economic interest in our product candidates or technology. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we may delay, reduce, limit the pace of, suspend or discontinue our product and technology development programs, which could significantly harm our business and prospects and cause the market price of our common shares to decline.

•

We may expend our limited resources to identify or pursue particular product candidates and fail to identify other new product candidates or to capitalize on other product candidates that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

•

If we fail to meet our obligations under our in-license agreements, we may lose our rights to key technologies on which our business depends.

•

All of our manufacturing operations currently are conducted at our facility in Jerusalem, Israel, and any event or condition, such as political and economic conditions in Israel, war, terrorist attacks or other armed conflicts, that significantly disrupts our ordinary course of operations at our Jerusalem facility could harm our business and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. Further, our operations in Israel expose us to additional business, regulatory, political, operational, financial and economic risks associated with doing business outside of the United States.

•

Our subsidiary Cell Cure Neurosciences Ltd. has received Israeli government grants for certain of its research and development activities. The terms of these grants may require us to seek approvals and to satisfy specified conditions to manufacture products and transfer or license grant-supported technologies outside of Israel. In the context of such approvals, we will be required to pay penalties in addition to the repayment of the grants.

•

We have relied on grant funding from CIRM (defined below) to support clinical development of OPC1 and we may not be able to obtain additional CIRM funding on a timely basis, or at all, which could adversely impact our ability to conduct and complete the DOSED clinical study of OPC1 (described below). In addition, our profits from the sale of products resulting from CIRM-funded development, if any, will be reduced by amounts that we are required to pay CIRM.

•

Our business could be adversely affected if we lose the services of the key personnel upon whom we depend or if we fail to attract and retain senior management and key scientific personnel.

•

Taxing authorities could reallocate our taxable income among our subsidiaries, which could increase our overall tax liability.

•

Government-imposed bans or restrictions and religious, moral, and ethical concerns about the use of human embryonic stem cells could prevent us from developing and successfully marketing stem cell products.

•

Some of our product candidates may be considered combination products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and other regulatory authorities, which could increase the complexity, cost and timeline for their development and regulatory approval.

•

Considerable uncertainty exists regarding how federal government policy and budget decisions will unfold under the new U.S. presidential administration and legislation and legislative, executive and regulatory proposals and actions may adversely affect our business.

•

Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies, including due to a lack of funding, changes in leadership or significant personnel turnover, could delay or disrupt clinical and preclinical development and potential marketing approval of our product candidates and hinder our ability to raise additional capital.

•

The FDA granted orphan drug designation to OPC1 for the treatment of acute spinal cord injuries, but there is no guarantee we will be able to maintain, or obtain the benefits associated with, such designation.

•

The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results.

•

Interim, topline and preliminary data from clinical trials of our product candidates that we or our collaborators publicly disclose from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in final clinical data that is materially different and unfavorable.

•

The manufacture of our cell therapy product candidates is complex, highly regulated and subject to a multitude of risks. We have limited experience manufacturing our product candidates on a clinical scale and no experience manufacturing on a commercial scale. Any failure to manufacture our product candidates in sufficient quantities in accordance with applicable quality standards and regulatory requirements and at acceptable costs may result in significant clinical development delays, or impair the ability to obtain approval for or commercialize our product candidates.

•

Because developing cell therapy products is based on novel technologies that are unproven and may not result in approvable or marketable products, the lack of success, or perceived lack of success, of other companies developing or seeking to develop cell therapy products may adversely impact investor sentiment regarding our business and the market opportunities for our product candidates.

•

Changes in or disruptions to the manufacturing operations and processes for our product candidates could significantly delay and increase the costs of clinical development and commercialization, if approved.

•

The commercial success of any product candidate will depend upon the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients and third-party payors.

•

We face significant competition and the possibility that our competitors may develop therapies that are more effective, safer, more convenient, or less expensive than our product candidates. In addition, competitive products may be approved and successfully commercialized before ours, which may adversely affect our ability, or that of a strategic collaborator, to successfully commercialize our product candidates.

•

We face potential product liability claims, and, if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability and costs. If the use or misuse of our products or product candidates harm patients or is perceived to harm patients, our regulatory approvals could be revoked, suspended or otherwise negatively affected, and our reputation could suffer.

•

We currently have no marketing and sales force or distribution capabilities.

•

Our intellectual property may be insufficient to protect our products and we may become subject to claims of infringement of the intellectual property of others.

•

We rely on third parties, including strategic collaborators, clinical research organizations, medical institutions, clinical investigators, consultants, sole source suppliers of specialized materials and equipment, to advance the development of our product candidates and we may encounter significant challenges or delays as a result of our lack of control over those third parties, including increased costs and timelines for clinical trials of our product candidates.

•

The market price of our common shares has been and may continue to be volatile.

•

Insiders continue to have substantial influence over our company, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.

•

There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with the NYSE American’s continued listing standards, and failure to do so could result in the suspension of trading or delisting of our common shares, which could substantially impair our shareholders’ ability to sell their shares and our ability to raise additional capital.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel allogeneic, or "off-the-shelf," cell therapies for serious neurological and ophthalmic conditions. Our programs are based on our proprietary, cell-based technology platform and associated development, formulation, delivery and manufacturing capabilities. From this platform, we design, develop, manufacture, and test specialized human cells with anatomical and physiological functions similar or identical to cells found naturally in the human body. The cells we manufacture are produced by applying directed differentiation processes to established, well-characterized, and self-renewing pluripotent cell lines. These processes are based on specific developmental lineages and generated cells with desired characteristics. Functional cells developed from such lineages and which are relevant to the underlying condition are transplanted into patients in an effort to (a) replace or support cells that are absent or dysfunctional due to degenerative disease, aging, or traumatic injury, and (b) restore or enhance the patient's functional activity.

Our business strategy is to efficiently leverage our technology platform and our development and manufacturing capabilities to advance our programs internally or in conjunction with strategic partners to further enhance their value and probability of success.

A significant area of focus is a collaboration we entered into with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche Group (collectively or individually, “Roche” or “Genentech”), under which our lead cell therapy program known as OpRegen®, is being developed for the treatment of ocular disorders, including geographic atrophy (“GA”) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (“AMD”). OpRegen (also known as RG6501) is a suspension of human allogeneic retinal pigmented epithelial (“RPE”) cells and is currently being evaluated in a Phase 2a multicenter clinical trial in patients with GA secondary to AMD which is referred to as the “GAlette Study”. OpRegen subretinal delivery has the potential to counteract RPE cell loss in areas of GA lesions by supporting retinal cell health and improving retinal structure and function. Under the terms of the Collaboration and License Agreement we entered into with Roche in December 2021 (the “Roche Agreement”), we received a $50.0 million upfront payment in January 2022 and are eligible to receive up to an additional $620.0 million in developmental, regulatory, and commercialization milestone payments. We also are eligible to receive tiered double-digit percentage royalties on net sales of OpRegen in the U.S. and other major markets. In May 2024, we entered into an additional agreement with Genentech (“Services Agreement”) pursuant to which we agreed to provide Genentech with supplemental clinical, technical, training, manufacturing, and procurement services that support the ongoing advancement of the OpRegen program in exchange for certain payments. In September 2024, Roche and Genentech announced receipt of Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (“RMAT”) designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for OpRegen for the treatment of GA secondary to dry AMD.

Our most advanced internally owned product candidate is OPC1, an allogeneic oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy designed to improve recovery following a spinal cord injury (“SCI”). Improved functional activity can lead to greater mobility and enhanced quality of life for patients and significant cost-savings for caregivers and payors. OPC1 also has an extensive long-term safety profile based on two clinical trials conducted to date: a five-patient Phase 1 safety trial in acute thoracic SCI, where all active subjects have been followed for at least 13 years, and a 25-patient Phase 1/2a multicenter dose-escalation trial in subacute cervical SCI, where all active subjects were evaluated for at least 7 years. Results from these studies have been published in the Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. OPC1 clinical development has been supported in part by a $14.3 million grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”). We plan to apply for additional funding from CIRM to support continued clinical development of OPC1 for the treatment of SCI when CIRM begins accepting new applications, which they have indicated they will do in Spring 2025. See “Grants from Government Entities – Grants from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine,” below. In December 2023, we filed an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) amendment for OPC1 as it relates to our proposed DOSED (Delivery of Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells for Spinal Cord Injury: Evaluation of a Novel Device) clinical study, to evaluate the safety and utility of a novel spinal cord delivery device designed to administer OPC1 to the spinal parenchyma in subacute and chronic SCI patients. In March 2024, we received written correspondence from the FDA, advising us that due to their significant workload and conflicting PDUFA priorities at the agency, its review of our IND amendment and the DOSED study protocol was still ongoing, which remained so throughout 2024. On January 31, 2025, the FDA informed us that we could proceed with the DOSED study and shortly thereafter we announced that we were initiating the study. The study will enroll both subacute (between 21 to 42 days following injury) and chronic (between 1 to 5 years following injury) SCI patients. The DOSED study will be the first

study of OPC1 to include patients with a chronic injury, a condition which comprises the majority of SCI patients. We expect DOSED will enable subsequent studies aimed to demonstrate OPC1’s ability to impact functional outcomes.UC San Diego Health, was named as the first participating site for the DOSED study. The DOSED study is expected to commence enrollment in the second quarter of 2025. See “Clinical Stage Cell Transplant Programs – OPC1,” below for additional information.

Our complete pipeline of allogeneic, or “off-the-shelf”, neurology and ophthalmic cell therapy programs currently available to us for development includes:

•

OpRegen (RG6501), an allogeneic RPE cell replacement therapy currently in a Phase 2a multicenter, open-label, single arm clinical trial, the GAlette Study, being conducted by Genentech, for the treatment of GA secondary to AMD.

•

OPC1, an allogeneic oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy currently in a Phase 1b, multicenter, open -label safety trial, the DOSED study, which is designed to test the safety and utility of a novel spinal cord delivery device in subacute and chronic SCI patients. OPC1 continues to be evaluated in long-term follow-up from two completed Phase 1 and Phase 1/2a multicenter clinical trials in thoracic and subacute cervical SCI patients.

•

ReSonanceTM (ANP1), an allogeneic auditory neuron progenitor cell transplant currently in preclinical development for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.

•

PNC1, an allogeneic photoreceptor cell transplant currently in preclinical development for the treatment of vision loss due to photoreceptor dysfunction or damage.

•

RND1, a cell transplant program for an undisclosed indication, currently being developed through a gene editing collaboration with Factor Biosciences Limited.

•

A proprietary hypoimmune cell line, which may have utility in additional central nervous system indications.

Other Programs and Technologies

Although we have to date focused on neurological and ophthalmic cell types, the pluripotent cells which our platform is based on are capable of becoming any of the cell types of the human body. We currently maintain a list of additional undisclosed product candidates which may be considered for development, or partnership in the future, and which altogether cover a range of therapeutic areas and conditions. Generally, these product candidates are based on the same platform technology and employ a similar guided cell differentiation and transplant approach as the product candidates detailed above, but in some cases may also include genetic modifications designed to enhance efficacy and/or safety profiles. We may elect not to develop or partner any of these product candidates.

In addition to seeking to create value for shareholders by developing product candidates through clinical development, we also may seek to create value from our intellectual property or related technologies and capabilities, through licensing collaborations and/or other strategic transactions.

Select Business Highlights

We and our partners have achieved numerous clinical, strategic and operational milestones.

•

Ongoing execution of Lineage’s contributions to our collaboration with Roche and Genentech for the development of OpRegen (RG6501) across multiple functional areas.

•

Entered into a separate Services Agreement with Genentech to further support development of OpRegen (RG6501), including: (i) activities to support the ongoing Phase 1/2a study and currently enrolling Phase 2a GAlette study; and (ii) additional technical training and materials related to our cell therapy technology platform to support commercial manufacturing strategies.

•

OpRegen (RG6501) Phase 1/2a clinical study 24-month visual acuity results featured at 2024 Retinal Cell & Gene Therapy Innovation Summit.

•

Roche announced receipt of RMAT designation from the U.S. FDA for OpRegen, for the treatment of GA secondary to AMD.

•

Submitted an IND amendment for OPC1 for the treatment of chronic and subacute spinal cord injury, and initiated activities to enroll SCI patients in the DOSED clinical study; currently targeting enrollment to commence in the second quarter of 2025.

•

Closed two separate financings totaling $44 million in gross proceeds; potential to receive an additional $36 million in gross proceeds upon the full exercise in cash of OpRegen clinical milestone-linked warrants, which each have an exercise price of $0.91 per share.

•

Created and hosted the 2nd Annual Spinal Cord Injury Investor Symposium in partnership with the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation with additional support from CIRM.

•

ReSonance (ANP1) preclinical results presented at 59th Annual Inner Ear Biology Workshop: ReSonance manufactured by a proprietary process, developed in-house, at clinical scale, with relevant in-vitro functional activity; Immediate-use, thaw-and-inject formulation durably engrafted in preclinical hearing loss models.

Business Strategy

Our initial goal is to address serious neurological and ophthalmic disorders by developing and advancing allogeneic, or “off-the-shelf,” treatments comprised of functional cells transplanted to the body. Our biological therapies are derived from the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells from established and self-renewing cell lines. We direct these pluripotent cells to become specific cell types, or combinations of the desired cell types, and use those differentiated cells as the treatment to restore diseased or diminished functions, such as impaired vision, loss of movement, sensation, or hearing.

To support the furtherance of our product candidates, we aim to generate or have generated in vitro and in vivo functional data to support human testing. In some cases, we may collaborate with strategic partners, external advisors, or consultants to support the development of our cell therapy technology.

A key area of focus is our continued execution under our collaboration with Roche and Genentech across multiple functional areas, including support for the ongoing Phase 2a multicenter clinical study of OpRegen in patients with GA secondary to AMD, as well as in the follow-up portion of our 24-patient Phase 1/2a multicenter clinical study of OpRegen, in patients with dry AMD.

We recently announced the initiation of the DOSED clinical study at our first contracted clinical site, UC San Diego Health, which will evaluate the safety and utility of a novel spinal cord delivery device to deliver OPC1, to the spinal parenchyma, in both subacute and chronic spinal cord injuries.

Our preclinical and research product candidates, ANP1 for hearing loss and PNC1 for vision loss due to photoreceptor dysfunction or damage, will continue to be evaluated for their scientific and commercial merit to determine the suitability of each program to advance into initial human testing.

Our efforts to broaden the application of our cell therapy platform and support long-term growth also include a strategic collaboration with Factor Biosciences for the development of a novel hypoimmune iPSC line, which will be evaluated for differentiation into cell transplant product candidates for CNS diseases and certain neurology indications. Through this collaboration we are developing a cell transplant therapy named RND1 for the treatment of an undisclosed indication. We believe this collaboration allows us to leverage our expertise to develop innovative cell transplant therapies by capitalizing on the convergence of directed cell differentiation and manufacturing with modern ex vivo gene editing technologies. Our former gene editing partner, Eterna Therapeutics, assigned this agreement to Factor in September 2024.

We have identified, and we may seek to develop, additional product candidates based on our cell replacement approach. We may elect to conduct these activities on our own or through various collaborative arrangements. We may utilize various types of pluripotent cell lines as starting material for our product candidates. Presently, our process

development and manufacturing activities, including our current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) production of clinical trial material, are conducted at Cell Cure Neurosciences, Ltd., (“CCN”), our majority owned subsidiary.

Cell Therapy Technology Platform

We believe we are one of the leading companies in pluripotent, cell-based non-oncology product development, as evidenced by our proprietary directed differentiation processes for multiple cellular lineages, cell manufacturing capabilities and stage of clinical development across multiple programs. Pluripotent cells, which are widely published as capable of becoming any human cell type, have potential applications in many areas of medicine with large unmet patient needs, including certain age-related degenerative diseases, degenerative conditions, or traumatic injury. Our programs are built on a proprietary, cell technology platform that integrates process development, manufacturing capabilities, formulation, and administration. Our product candidates consist of functional cells that may be able to replace faulty or absent cells, attenuate disease progression, or facilitate tissue repair. We are currently in clinical development with two pluripotent cell-derived product candidates (RPE cells and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells), and preclinical and research development for two additional candidates (auditory neurons and photoreceptor cells). In addition, we are investing in additional edited and non-edited pluripotent cell lines and are considering the differentiation of those pluripotent cells into additional cell types that may have therapeutic benefits in other areas of unmet medical need.

Cellular therapies are often aimed at regenerating or replacing affected cells or tissues and therefore may have more durable, broader, or more suitable applicability than certain traditional pharmaceutical products which seek to influence a single molecular target or a group of biological pathways. Small molecules and biologic therapies that require systemic delivery into the body can have unexpected side effects that can limit their usefulness. When cell replacement is locally administered to a specific anatomical compartment, systemic side effects can be well-tolerated. Lineage’s cell therapy approach somewhat resembles transplant medicine, as it is focused on whether transplanted cells are retained or rejected by the body and whether the transplanted cells function as expected.

A key advantage of our approach is that it can provide us the opportunity to rapidly develop new programs without the extensive and costly steps traditionally required to develop a small molecule agonist or antagonist. Small molecule product development typically requires selection and validation of a drug target, followed by screening millions of molecules (e.g., a “library”) to identify hits, followed by chemical modification to develop a hit into a potent lead. The process of developing a new cell therapy from pluripotent lines can be comparatively faster because the target cell type is already “validated”, insofar as it is normally well-established in the literature as being the cell type which is dysfunctional or deficient in the patient and for which its’ identity and disease-related functional properties can be imitated.

A significant challenge broadly facing the cell therapy field is the ability to create a stable source cell line and cell product with the purity control, reproducibility, potency and other vital manufacturing attributes, and to do so at the scale and cost needed to adequately and profitably supply the addressable market population with broad penetration. We believe these features are vital to creating a successful allogeneic cell transplant product. We believe one of our key advantages is the progress we have made toward demonstrating these capabilities in a GMP environment with actual production lots, a necessary milestone which to our knowledge has not been reduced to practice by any of our competitors.

Figure 1. Lineage’s Internal cGMP Facility Capabilities

In addition to our corporate headquarters located in Carlsbad, California, we have a modern and innovative manufacturing facility in the Jerusalem Bio Park on the campus of the Hadassah University Hospital in Israel. That facility includes process development laboratories and a state-of-the-art, cGMP cell manufacturing facility. It is designed and equipped to run simultaneous cGMP processes as needed, and to produce a range of cell therapy products for human use in clinical trials as well as improve scalability for larger trials or potential commercialization (Figure 1). Currently, all of our cGMP manufacturing processes, including cell banking and product manufacturing for our cell therapy product candidates, are conducted in this facility.

Figure 2. Neuroscience Focused Cell Therapy Pipeline

Clinical Stage Cell Transplant Programs

OpRegen® (RG6501)

OpRegen is a RPE cell therapy in Phase 2a development for the treatment of GA secondary to AMD. Following subretinal delivery, OpRegen has the potential to counteract RPE cell loss in areas of GA lesions by supporting retinal structure and function. OpRegen is being developed under a worldwide collaboration between Lineage, Roche and Genentech. See Note 13 (Commitments and Contingencies) to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for discussion on the Roche Agreement.

OpRegen has been granted Fast Track and RMAT designations from the FDA, which includes an expedited regulatory path with the ability for increased interfacing with the FDA during the clinical development process.

AMD is a gradual, progressive, deterioration of the macula, the small sensitive area in the center of the retina that provides clear, high-definition central vision. It is a leading cause of vision loss in people over the age of 65 in the developed world. According to a 2022 report in JAMA Ophthalmology, 18.34 million individuals in the U.S. 40 years and older (11.64%) were living with early-stage AMD and 1.49 million (0.94%) were living with late-stage AMD in 2019. As the area of atrophy begins to include the fovea (the center of the macula), patients may lose their central vision, making facial recognition, reading, and driving difficult or impossible, and may ultimately become legally blind. The exact cause of GA secondary to AMD is unknown, but is thought to result from multiple factors, such as genetics, age, smoking history, and environmental effects. There are two clinical presentations of AMD, the dry form, and the wet, or neovascular form (growth of abnormal new blood vessels). Dry AMD typically advances slowly toward GA as RPE cells and photoreceptors become dysfunctional and deteriorate over time. RPE cells support and nourish the retina by metabolizing waste by-products and producing a number of components essential for photoreceptor health and function. If the metabolic waste products accumulate, lesions known as drusen may result. Approximately 85-90% of AMD patients suffer from the dry form of AMD, for which there are only two FDA approved therapeutic options at this time, pegcetacoplan injection (SYFOVRE®) and avacincaptad pegol intravitreal solution (IZERVAYTM). Both of these approved products are complement inhibitors, administered either monthly or every other month, and neither has clinically demonstrated improved or restored vision to date, which means patients may still experience gradual vision decline while on treatment. Additionally, dry AMD may also lead to wet AMD, a condition for which FDA-approved treatments are administered to inhibit the growth of new blood vessels. Physicians often recommend a healthy diet, exercise and/or nutritional supplements for dry AMD, but nutritional supplements have shown limited efficacy in delaying the onset of more progressive disease in longer-term studies. The schematics in Figures 3 and 4 show a representation of the process of drusen formation and the goal of cell replacement therapy.

We believe one of the most promising approaches to treat GA secondary to dry AMD is to replace the layer of damaged RPE cells with new, healthy, and functional RPE cells manufactured from a well-characterized, allogeneic cell line, transplanted to the subretinal space around the area of GA. OpRegen is a cell replacement therapy derived from our pluripotent cell technology in which our proprietary directed-differentiation methods convert pluripotent stem cells into nearly pure populations of RPE cells. Using this method, OpRegen is grown free of any animal products and consists of human RPE cells with high yield and purity that can be transplanted directly into the patient’s eye, where the patient’s own RPE cells are missing or dysfunctional. The goal of the OpRegen therapeutic approach is to slow or halt disease progression and to preserve and/or restore visual function.

OpRegen is intended to be an allogeneic, or “off-the-shelf,” product provided to retinal surgeons, prepared in a ready-to-use “thaw-and-inject” form for transplantation. We believe OpRegen could have a lasting benefit from a single administration or may be administered every several years. This approach differs from other investigational agents, as well as from the two FDA-approved drugs for treatment of GA secondary to AMD, pegcetacoplan injection (SYFOVRE®) and avacincaptad pegol intravitreal solution (IZERVAYTM), and approved agents currently marketed for wet AMD, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and aflibercept (Eylea®). All of these approaches require repeated, frequent (monthly or every-other-month) intravitreal injections into the eye.

In a Phase 1/2a clinical trial, OpRegen has demonstrated the potential to slow, stop or reverse disease progression in GA secondary to AMD. In addition, results of imaging analyses demonstrated rapid improvement in outer retinal structure from patients enrolled in this study, suggesting that OpRegen RPE cells may provide direct support to the patients’ remaining retinal cells within atrophic areas, improvements which can be detected within the first three months following a single administration. In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter, dose-escalation trial evaluating a single administration of OpRegen, the investigational product was delivered subretinally in patients with bilateral GA. Patient enrollment completed in November 2020, with twenty-four patients recruited into four cohorts. The first three cohorts enrolled only legally blind patients with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or worse. The fourth cohort enrolled 12 patients with impaired vision (BCVA from 20/65 to 20/250 with smaller mean areas of GA). Cohort 4 also included patients treated with a new “thaw-and-inject” formulation of OpRegen, which could be shipped directly to sites and used immediately upon thawing. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of OpRegen as assessed by the incidence and frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events. Secondary objectives evaluated the preliminary activity of OpRegen treatment by assessing the changes in ophthalmological parameters measured by various methods of primary clinical relevance. Long-term follow-up of patients in this study is currently ongoing.

Results from the primary endpoint, the safety and tolerability at two years post OpRegen transplant suggest that OpRegen RPE cells were generally well-tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Importantly, no unexpected ocular adverse events (AEs) were observed and those events that were observed were considered expected based on the surgical procedures involved in OpRegen administration, such as vitrectomy. Most AEs reported (Cohorts 1-3, 87%; Cohort 4, 93%) were mild in severity.

Phase 1/2a clinical study 24-month visual acuity results were presented at the 2024 Retinal Cell & Gene Therapy Innovation Summit in May 2024. Improvement in visual acuity and outer retinal structure in patients with extensive OpRegen bleb coverage of their GA area was present at 12 months (primary endpoint) and persisted through 24 months. BCVA gains in Cohort 4 patients (less advanced GA than in other cohorts) measured at 12 months were sustained at 24 months following a single subretinal administration of OpRegen. Mean change in BCVA among treated eyes for patients (n=10) completing 2-year follow up was +5.5 letters (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (“ETDRS”) assessment). Effects were greater on average in the five (5) patients with extensive OpRegen coverage of atrophic areas at the time of surgical delivery. In these patients’ treated eyes, the mean change in BCVA was +7.4 ETDRS letters for those completing 2-year follow-up (n=5). Maintenance or improvements in external limiting membrane (“ELM”) and RPE drusen complex (“RPEDC”) structure on OCT were observed in five patients in Cohort 4 with extensive OpRegen coverage of atrophic areas at the time of surgical delivery. Mean improvement of RPEDC area compared with baseline was maintained in treated eyes from 12 months (+2.6 mm2; n=5) to 24 months (+2.6 mm2; n=4). In comparison, mean change in RPEDC area decreased in untreated fellow eyes from 12 months (-1.1 mm2; n=5) to 24 months (-2.8 mm2; n=4). Mean change in ELM area increased in treated eyes from 12 months (+0.4 mm2; n=5) to 24 months (+0.8 mm2; n=4). In comparison, mean change in ELM area decreased in untreated fellow eyes from 12 months (-1.3 mm2; n=5) to 24 months (-1.9 mm2; n=4). Overall, these data suggest that OpRegen RPE cells may counteract RPE cell dysfunction and loss in GA by providing support to the remaining retinal cells within atrophic areas and such effects are durable through at least 24 months after a single administration.

36 months of follow-up in 10 of 12 patients with data available and treated as part of Cohort 4 (patients who had better baseline vision and smaller areas of GA at baseline than earlier cohorts who were legally blind), have recently been analyzed. Despite dry AMD being an irreversible and degenerative disease leading to progressive vision loss, visual acuity gains and retinal structure improvements observed in OpRegen-treated eyes in the Phase 1/2 clinical study continue to persist, suggesting that OpRegen RPE cells may provide durable support to patients’ remaining retinal cells, including those near or within atrophic areas. Evidence of durable engraftment of OpRegen RPE cells has surpassed 5 years in the earliest-treated patients, supporting the potential for OpRegen to be a one-time treatment for patients with dry AMD. Overall, in the Phase 1/2a study (N=24), OpRegen continues to show an acceptable safety profile, which remains unchanged following inclusion of the recently-collected long-term follow-up safety data.

RG6501 (OpRegen) is currently being developed under an exclusive worldwide collaboration between us and Roche and Genentech. See “Collaborations—Roche Collaboration Agreement,” below.

In November 2022, Genentech launched a Phase 2a, multicenter, open-label, single arm clinical study of RG6501 (OpRegen), the GAlette study with patient enrollment initiated in March 2023. The study is intended to optimize subretinal surgical delivery and evaluate biological activity of OpRegen in up to 60 patients with GA secondary to AMD. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate (i) the success of subretinal surgical delivery of OpRegen as measured by the proportion of patients with subretinal surgical delivery of OpRegen to target regions under the retina, and (ii) the safety of subretinal surgical delivery of OpRegen as measured by the incidence and severity of procedure-related adverse events at 3 months following surgery. The secondary objective is to evaluate the biological activity of OpRegen measured by the proportion of patients with qualitative improvement in retinal structure, as determined by Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) imaging, within 3 months following surgery.

OPC1

OPC1 is an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell therapy in Phase 1/2a development for the treatment of acute SCI. OPC1 has an extensive long-term safety profile and has been tested in two clinical trials to date: a five-patient Phase 1 safety trial in acute thoracic SCI, where all active subjects have been followed for at least 13 years; and a 25-patient Phase 1/2a multicenter dose-escalation trial in subacute cervical SCI, where all active subjects have been evaluated for at least 7 years. OPC1 is currently being tested in a phase 1 safety study of a novel delivery device, and in parallel, we are working on the design of a larger comparative clinical study. SCI occurs when the spinal cord is subjected to

a severe crush or contusion injury, such as that caused by a car or motorcycle accident, and typically results in severe functional impairment, including limb paralysis, aberrant pain signaling, and loss of bladder and/or sexual function. There are approximately 18,000 new spinal cord injuries annually in the U.S. (NSCIC SCI Facts and Figures at a Glance (2023)), and there are currently no FDA-approved drugs specifically for the treatment of SCI, although methylprednisolone, a corticosteroid generally used as an anti-inflammatory drug, is sometimes prescribed on an off-label basis to reduce acute inflammation in the injured spinal cord immediately after injury. Approaches to treat this complex injury may include multiple mechanisms of action, such as biologics that preserve surviving neurons and stimulate new nerve axon outgrowth, suppression of lesion cavity formation at the injury site, generation of new blood vessels to repair the ischemic damage from injury, and myelination of the demyelinated and newly formed nerve axons. A potential therapeutic target in SCI is replacement of oligodendrocytes that are selectively lost at the injury site. As the sole source of the insulating protein myelin in the brain and spinal cord, oligodendrocytes wrap around nerve axons and allow the conduction of electrical impulses throughout the CNS, as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells of the CNS and are critical for nerve signal conduction.

OPC1 is derived from our pluripotent cell technology under cGMP conditions using a directed differentiation method. These cells are stored frozen until ready for use and prepared for direct administration into the injured spinal cord. Based on preclinical studies, when OPC1 is transplanted into the injured spinal cord, the cells undergo further maturation to generate a replacement population of oligodendrocytes at the injury site that are capable of remyelinating denuded and newly formed nerve axons. Based on preclinical studies, prior to their maturation, the transplanted oligodendrocyte progenitor cells are believed to stimulate additional reparative processes, including promotion of neuron survival and nerve axon outgrowth, and induction of blood vessel formation in and around the injury site. In addition, OPC1 cells can migrate from the injection point to the injury site where they generate a supportive tissue matrix and suppress cavitation (Figure 6). Cavitation is a destructive process that occurs within the spinal cord following SCI, and typically results in permanent loss of motor and sensory function. A patient with cavitation can develop a condition known as syringomyelia, which results in additional neurological and functional damage to the patient and can result in chronic pain. Based on the multiple reparative properties associated with OPC1, we believe this candidate cell therapy product is ideally suited to treat neurological conditions such as SCI and other demyelination disorders of the CNS.

Figure 6. Suppression of spinal cavitation in a rat contusion model

The development of OPC1 has been supported by a $14.3 million clinical development grant from CIRM. We plan to apply for additional funding from CIRM to support continued clinical development of OPC1 for the treatment of SCI when CIRM begins accepting new applications. See “Grants from Government Entities – Grants from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine,” below.

To date, two clinical trials of OPC1 have been completed: a Phase 1 clinical safety trial in 5 patients with thoracic spinal cord injuries and a Phase 1/2a multicenter dose-escalation clinical trial in 25 patients with cervical spinal cord injuries. Results from both studies have been published in the Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. Key findings from these clinical studies are summarized in Figure 7.

Figure 7. OPC1 Thoracic & Cervical Clinical Trials Overview

The FDA designated OPC1 as a RMAT for the treatment of subacute SCI. RMAT designation allows for an accelerated development pathway and includes the ability for increased interfacing with the FDA during clinical development. The FDA has also granted OPC1 Orphan Drug Designation, providing a pathway to possible market exclusivity.

In 2019, we transferred all cGMP manufacturing processes, including the establishment of cell banks and the OPC1 process development and manufacturing for clinical studies, to CCN, our cell therapy manufacturing facility. Improvements to the manufacturing process were performed to create enhancements to the starting material, production process and scale and to achieve greater purity of OPC1. We also developed a ready-to-use thaw-and-inject formulation of OPC1 to simplify logistics and handling at the point of care and eliminate dose preparation at the clinical site. We have also manufactured clinical batches based on the improved process in a thaw-and-inject formulation in preparation for a larger-scale, late-stage clinical trial.

In February 2021, we announced an exclusive agreement with Neurgain Technologies, Inc. (“Neurgain”), to evaluate a novel delivery system for OPC1. Preliminary assessment of prototypes revealed promising compatibility with OPC1 product while simplifying the surgical procedure by providing surgeons with an instrument that is small, simple to use, and would not require stopping the patient’s ventilator to perform the injection, allowing for flexibility with accurate delivery to the injury site. We continued to evaluate the Neurgain device throughout 2021 through 2023.

In June 2023, we launched a newly created forum to discuss the recent innovation, advancements and challenges in the treatment of SCI: the 1st Annual Spinal Cord Injury Investor Symposium. In addition to CIRM, the sponsors and collaborators for this inaugural event included the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation, the Sanford Stem Cell Institute at the University of California San Diego, and AbbVie. The event presented an opportunity for an open and collaborative dialogue among leading therapeutic area experts in SCI, researchers, representatives from companies working to develop various treatment approaches for SCI, persons with lived experience, caregivers, advocacy organizations, investors, healthcare analysts, and members of the public and media. In 2024, we hosted the 2nd Annual Spinal Cord Injury Investor Symposium.

On February 11, 2025 we announced the initiation of our DOSED clinical study, to evaluate the safety and utility of a novel delivery device to deliver OPC1 to the spinal cord of patients with an SCI and UC San Diego Health, a CIRM Alpha Clinic, was named as the first participating study site. DOSED is a Phase 1b, open label, multi-center, device safety study, in 3-5 subacute and 3-5 stable chronic subjects with complete (ASIA Impairment Scale A) or incomplete (ASIA Impairment Scale B), traumatic, focal SCI affecting either cervical (C4-C7) or thoracic (T1-T10) vertebrae. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of a novel Manual Inject Parenchymal Spinal Delivery System (MI PSD System) to administer OPC1 to the spinal parenchyma. Theprimary endpoint is frequency and severity of the MI PSD System or injection procedure related adverse events (AEs) through 30 days (1 month). Secondary endpoints are frequency and severity of AEs through 90 days. Exploratory endpoints include measurements of neurological impairment and function, changes from baseline.

We are actively working on expanding our existing and establishing new collaborations with SCI patient engagement and advocacy organizations, to enhance awareness of SCI and elevate the patient’s voice in the treatment development process.

Preclinical and Research Cell Transplant Programs

Auditory Neurons

Our auditory neurons program, ANP1 was established in 2022 with the goal of advancing auditory neuron transplant therapy as a treatment option for hearing loss conditions. The initial focus of this program is on the treatment of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders ("ANSD"), a group of conditions characterized by the loss of auditory neuron function where the sound is not transmitted properly from the cochlea (inner ear) to the brain. Based on our proprietary technology platform, we have developed a unique differentiation process for generating auditory neuron progenitor (“ANP”) cells. In February 2023, we entered into a collaboration with the University of Michigan and Yehoash Raphael, Ph.D., The R. Jamison and Betty Williams Professor of Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Lab Director at the University of Michigan Kresge Hearing Research Institute, where preclinical testing of ANP1 has been ongoing. Initial preclinical results have been positive, with a demonstrated ability to deliver ANP cells into specific target areas utilizing standard surgical tools as well as to establish initial engraftment into certain anatomical destinations and survival after transplantation. ANP cells were confirmed to retain the expression of neuronal-specific markers post-transplantation and additionally demonstrated the ability to migrate. These results support the advancement of ANP1 into its new phase of preclinical development, the evaluation of the long-term engraftment of ANP cells and their functional assessment in hearing loss.

Photoreceptors

Our photoreceptor program, PNC1, is focused on a process of directing the differentiation of human pluripotent cells into clinical-grade transplantable photoreceptor precursors/cells and to show their further differentiation, integration, and function after transplantation into the subretinal space of animal models of photoreceptor degeneration. Photoreceptor degeneration is the hallmark of a variety of retinal diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (“RP”). Currently, the only approved treatments for RP are gene therapies which treat specific genetic defects that lead to RP. Our PNC1 program is aimed to replace damaged photoreceptors regardless of the cause of degeneration.

Additional Research Programs

RND1

RND1is a cell transplant candidate based on a novel hypoimmune iPSC cell line. RND1 is being developed in collaboration with our gene editing partner Factor Biosciences for the treatment of an undisclosed condition. We believe the hypoimmune iPSC cell line in development can provide a source of pluripotent cells for multiple product candidates in CNS diseases.

In February 2023, we entered into an option and license agreement with Factor (as assigned from Eterna) to develop engineered hypoimmune iPSC line that we will evaluate for differentiation into cell transplant product candidates for CNS diseases and certain indications, including RND1. We believe this collaboration allows us to leverage our expertise by capitalizing our directed cell differentiation and manufacturing capabilities with externally-sourced ex vivo gene editing technology. This is reflective of a portion of our corporate strategy which aims to capitalize on our process development capabilities by combining them with cell engineering and editing technologies to produce novel cell therapies with potentially superior product profiles compared to currently marketed therapies, if any.

In September 2023, we announced the initiation of certain development activities to generate a novel iPSC line under our agreement with Factor and our selection of specific gene edits for the initial product candidate to be developed by Factor. The edits include: the targeted deletion of the B2M gene, designed to reduce the immunogenicity of product candidates derived from the lines by inhibiting rejection by CD8+ T cells; the targeted insertion of the HLA-E gene, designed to overexpress HLA-E and prevent the allogeneic NK cell response; and a third undisclosed edit intended to confer clinical differentiation and a competitive advantage in the applicable indications. We expect that these edits may expand the edited cell lines’ overall utility, including for non-immune privileged or non-human leukocyte antigen ("HLA") matched indications and may further differentiate the cell line from others currently in use by competitors.

Collaborations

To accelerate the discovery and advancement of transplanting specific cell types into the body, we have entered into, and intend to seek additional opportunities to form, collaborations with a diverse group of strategic partners. We have entered into collaborations with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, government agencies, academic laboratories, and research institutes with resources and expertise in diverse areas in an effort to advance our discovery and development platforms and will continue to evaluate such collaborations.

Roche Collaboration Agreement

On December 17, 2021, Lineage entered into the Roche Agreement, pursuant to which Lineage granted to Roche exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize RPE cell therapies, including its proprietary cell therapy known as OpRegen, for the treatment of ocular disorders, including advanced dry AMD with GA.

Under the terms of the Roche Agreement, Roche assumed responsibility for further clinical development and commercialization of OpRegen and Lineage is responsible for completing activities related to the ongoing clinical study Phase 1/2a open-label, dose-escalation clinical safety and efficacy study in patients with advanced dry AMD with GA, for which enrollment is complete, and performing certain manufacturing and process development activities.

Roche paid Lineage a $50.0 million upfront payment (which was received in January 2022) and Lineage is eligible to receive up to an additional $620.0 million in developmental, regulatory and commercialization milestone payments. Lineage is also eligible for tiered double-digit percentage royalties on net sales of OpRegen. All milestone payments, and royalty payments, due under the Roche Agreement are subject to the existence of certain intellectual property rights that cover OpRegen at the time such payments would otherwise become due, and the royalties on net sales of OpRegen are subject to financial offsets based on the existence of competing products.

Unless earlier terminated by either party, the Roche Agreement will expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis upon the expiration of all of Roche’s payment obligations under the Roche Agreement. Roche may

terminate the Roche Agreement in its entirety, or on a product-by-product or country-by-country basis, at any time with advanced written notice. Either party may terminate the Roche Agreement in its entirety with written notice for the other party’s material breach if such party fails to cure the breach. Either party also may terminate the Roche Agreement in its entirety upon certain insolvency events involving the other party.

Based on the intercompany relationship between Lineage and CCN, Lineage is responsible for payment to the IIA (as defined below) approximately 24.1% of the upfront payment and of any future payments Lineage receives under the Roche Agreement, up to an aggregate cap on all payments to IIA, such cap growing over time via interest accrual until paid in full. As of December 31, 2024, the aggregate cap amount was $95.4 million. In addition, pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated License Agreement, dated June 15, 2017, CCN, and Hadasit Medical Research and Development Ltd. (“Hadasit”), as amended, and a letter agreement entered into between CCN and Hadasit on December 17, 2021, Lineage is responsible for payment to Hadasit (i) a maximum of 21.5% of the upfront payment (subject to certain reductions) and of any milestone payments Lineage receives from Roche under the Roche Agreement, and (ii) up to 50% of all royalty payments (subject to a maximum payment of 5% of net sales of products) Lineage receives from Roche under the Roche Agreement. In accordance with the foregoing obligations, from the $50.0 million upfront payment Lineage received from Roche in January 2022, Lineage paid $12.1 million to the IIA and $8.9 million to Hadasit. See “Grants from Government Entities,” below, and Note 13 (Commitments and Contingencies) to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information related to our obligations to the IIA and Hadasit.

In May 2024 we established a new Services Agreement with Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, to support ongoing development of OpRegen. Under this new agreement, Lineage agreed to provide additional clinical, technical, training and manufacturing services that further support the ongoing advancement and optimization of the OpRegen program. These additional services will be primarily funded by Genentech and include: (i) activities to support the ongoing Phase 1/2a study and currently-enrolling Phase 2a study; and (ii) additional technical training and materials related to Lineage’s cell therapy technology platform to support commercial manufacturing strategies.

Grants from Government Entities

Grants from the Israeli Innovation Authority

Under the Israeli Encouragement of Research, Development and Industrial Initiative Technology Law, 5744-1984, as amended, and related regulations (collectively, the “Innovation Law”), research and development programs which meet specified criteria and are approved by the Israel Innovation Authority (the “IIA”) are eligible for grants of up to 50% of the project’s expenditure, as determined by the research committee, in exchange for the payment of royalties from the revenues generated from the sale of product candidates and related services developed, in whole or in part pursuant to, or as a result of, a research and development program funded by the IIA. The royalties are generally at a range of 3.0% to 5.0% of revenues until the entire IIA grant is repaid, together with an annual interest generally tied to an interest rate index.

Under the Innovation Law, the manufacture of product candidates developed with government grants is required to be performed in Israel. The transfer of manufacturing activity outside Israel may be subject to the prior approval of the IIA, and if approved, may increase the royalties payable to the IIA, in certain cases substantially. The amount of the increase in the royalties payable depends on the percentage of manufacturing activity that occurs outside Israel.

The know-how developed within the framework of the Innovation Law plan may not be transferred to third parties outside Israel without the prior approval of a governmental committee chartered under the Innovation Law. The IIA approval to transfer know-how created, in whole or in part, in connection with an IIA-funded project to a third party outside Israel where the transferring company remains an operating Israeli entity is subject to payment of a redemption fee to the IIA calculated according to a formula provided under the Innovation Law that is based, in general, on the ratio between the aggregate IIA grants to the company’s aggregate investments in the project that was funded by these IIA grants, multiplied by the transaction consideration. The transfer of such know-how to a party outside Israel where the transferring company ceases to exist as an Israeli entity is subject to a redemption fee. The redemption fee in case of transfer of know-how to a party outside Israel is generally based on the ratio between the aggregate IIA grants received by the transferring company and the transferring company’s aggregate research and development expenses, multiplied by the transaction consideration. The maximum amount payable to the IIA in case

of transfer of know-how outside Israel will not exceed six times the value of the grants received plus interest. In the event that the grant recipient ceases to be an Israeli corporation such payment shall not exceed six times the value of the grants received plus interest, with a possibility to reduce such payment to up to three times the value of the grants received plus interest if the research and development activity remains in Israel for a period of three years after payment to the IIA.

The restrictions under the Innovation Law, including restrictions on the sale, transfer or licensing to a non-Israeli entity of know-how developed as part of the programs under which the grants were given, continue to apply even after the repayment of royalties in full by the grant recipient.

Part of CCN’s research and development efforts have been financed, partially, through grants that it has received from the IIA and when we acquired our holdings in CCN, we undertook in writing, vis-à-vis the IIA, to comply with, and to ensure the compliance by CCN with, the Innovation Law. We therefore must comply with the requirements of the Innovation Law and related regulations. To date, through a series of separate grants beginning in 2007, CCN received a total of $15.4 million from the IIA to support the OpRegen program. See Note 13 (Commitments and Contingencies) to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information.

Grants from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

The clinical development of OPC1 has been supported by $14.3 million of funding from CIRM, a state agency established to fund stem cell research and development of new stem cell-based treatments. The terms of our grant award from CIRM require royalty payments to the California State General Fund based on net commercial revenue from the sale of any product, drug or service arising from CIRM-funded research as follows: 0.1% per $1.0 million of funds granted for the earlier of 10 years or nine times the award amount that has been paid. In addition, a 1% royalty will be owed on net commercial revenue in excess of $500 million per year until the last to expire patent covering a CIRM-funded invention, if any, contributed towards the commercialization of the product.

In February 2024, we applied for clinical program funding from CIRM to support the DOSED clinical study. Later in February 2024, CIRM’s governing board determined to postpone acceptance of clinical funding applications submitted after January 31, 2024, in response to an unprecedented influx of applications and resulting review and budgetary issues. CIRM has announced that they anticipate opportunities for clinical funding to be re-opened in Spring 2025 and at that time we would plan to submit our grant applicant in support of our DOSED clinical study as part of that clinical funding program. However, no assurances can be given as to when CIRM will accept new clinical program funding applications or, if it does, that CIRM will accept our application for review or that it will award us any additional funding for the OPC1 program. See the risk factor titled, “We have relied on grant funding from CIRM to support clinical development of OPC1 and we may not be able to obtain additional CIRM funding, which could negatively impact our ability to advance clinical development of OPC1, as well as our operating results and financial condition. In addition, our profits from the sale of products resulting from CIRM-funded development, if any, will be reduced by amounts that we are required to pay CIRM,” in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this report.

Other Programs

We may elect to enter into collaborations for additional product candidates currently in development and which cover a range of therapeutic areas. Generally, these product candidates are based on the same pluripotent platform technology and would employ a similar guided cell differentiation and transplant approach as our current clinical-stage products.

Intellectual Property

We seek to protect and rely on our proprietary cell-based therapy platform technologies and associated development and manufacturing capabilities and derived product candidates with intellectual property through a variety of measures, including seeking and maintaining patents intended to cover our products and compositions, their methods of use and processes for their manufacture, our platform technologies and any other inventions that are commercially important to the development of our business and, when appropriate, trade secret protection. We have sought, and intend to continue to seek, appropriate patent protection for important and strategic components of our proprietary technologies by filing patent applications in the United States and internationally. We may also file

additional patent applications, when appropriate, to cover improvements on our manufacturing processes, clinical products, clinical product candidates, and related technologies. From time to time, we assess our patents and pending applications covering our products and product candidates. If we determine that any patents or patent applications no longer provide adequate or necessary protection, we may transfer or abandon such patents and patent applications to avoid incurring unnecessary costs.

To further protect our proprietary confidential information, know-how, and trade secrets, we require confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, vendors, collaborators and similar third parties. For example, we require our employees and consultants to execute confidentiality and invention assignment agreements upon accepting employment or entering into other relationships with us. We also implement internal policies and procedures to ensure protection of our proprietary confidential information including know-how and trade secrets through, for example, limited and restricted confidential access to this information.

There are no assurances that any of our intellectual property rights will guarantee complete or adequate protection or market exclusivity for our products and product candidates. We also enter into collaborative and other similar contractual arrangements with third parties, such as license agreements, to in-license and/or out-license intellectual property rights. Our financial success will be dependent, in part, on our ability to obtain rights to commercially valuable patents and other intellectual property, to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights and to operate without knowingly infringing any intellectual property rights of others.

We own or license, directly or through our subsidiaries, patent families that include several hundred U.S. and international patents and patent applications. We cannot be certain that issued patents will be enforceable or provide adequate protection or that pending applications will result in issued patents.

OpRegen®

We solely own and have rights to U.S. and international issued patents and pending patent applications relating to OpRegen, including those in-licensed from Hadasit. Our solely owned pending patent applications include those relating to a cryopreserved thaw-and-inject formulation which, if issued, will have estimated patent expiration dates in 2038. The issued patents and pending patent applications, if issued, have expiration dates ranging from 2028 to 2042. Pursuant to the Roche Agreement, we have licensed these patent rights to Roche to further develop and commercialize RPE cell therapies, including OpRegen (see “—Collaborations—Roche Collaboration Agreement” above).

OPC1

We own numerous U.S. and international issued patents and pending patent applications that are relevant to neural cells, such as oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, that are directed to the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells, including human embryonic stem (“hES”) cells, into various neural cell types, as well as various culture and purification methods. These issued patents and pending patent applications include nine patent families directed to improved methods of producing oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, oligodendrocyte progenitor cell compositions, and methods of treatment of spinal cord injury using oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. These patent families include four U.S. patents directed to methods for producing oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, composition of oligogendrocyte progenitor cells and methods of treatment of spinal cord injury using oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. The estimated patent expiration dates of these nine patent families range from 2036 to 2046. The commercial success of OPC1 depends, in part, upon our ability to exclude competition for this product with the existing patent portfolio and new patent applications that may be filed, regulatory exclusivity, undisclosed know-how and/or trade secrets, or a combination of these exclusivity barriers to entry.

Auditory Neurons

We have ten pending patent applications for our ANP1 program which include two pending U.S. provisional patent applications and a pending U.S. utility patent application, six pending international patent applications and a PCT patent application. The pending U.S. utility application and the pending international applications if issued would have estimated patent expiration dates in 2043. It is anticipated that the pending provisional patent application will be converted to a PCT patent application in 2026. It is anticipated that the pending PCT patent application will be converted to a U.S. utility patent application and one or more international patent applications in 2026 and, if issued, would have estimated patent expiration dates in 2045.

Photoreceptors

We have rights to two patent families for our PNC1 program. These patent families include issued U.S. and international patents and pending patent applications. One of these patent families is owned by us and includes U.S. and international pending patent applications and issued patents with estimated patent expiration dates in 2036. The other patent family is jointly owned by us and Hadasit resulting from the collaborative efforts of Hadasit and CCN pursuant to the photoreceptor development program under the Second Amended and Restated License Agreement between Hadasit and CCN. This jointly owned patent family includes a pending U.S. utility patent applications and six international patent applications and, if issued, would have estimated patent expiration dates in 2043. We removed the photoreceptor development program from the scope of that license agreement in April 2024, and the pending U.S and international patent applications will continue to be jointly owned by us and Hadasit.

General Risks Related to Obtaining and Enforcing Patent Protection

Because patent applications are confidential until a patent application is published or a patent is issued, we may not know if our competitors have filed patent applications for technology covered by our pending applications or if we were the first to invent or first to file an application directed toward the technology that is the subject of our patent applications. Competitors may have filed patent applications or received patents and may obtain additional patents or other proprietary rights that block or compete with our products. In addition, if competitors file patent applications covering our technology, we may have to participate in interference/derivation proceedings or litigation to determine the right to a patent. Litigation and interference/derivation proceedings are unpredictable and expensive, such that, even if we are ultimately successful, our results of operations may be adversely affected by such events. Accordingly, there is a risk that any patent applications that we file and any patents that we hold or later obtain could be challenged by third parties and be declared invalid in view of third-party patent applications and/or patents or through other proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office such as post-grant reviews, reexaminations, and inter partes’ reviews or oppositions and other comparable proceedings in foreign jurisdictions. Litigation, interferences, oppositions, inter partes’ reviews or other proceedings are, have been and may in the future be necessary in some instances to determine the validity and scope of certain of our proprietary rights, and in other instances to determine the validity, scope or non-infringement of certain patent rights claimed by third parties to be pertinent to the manufacture, use or sale of our products. We may also face challenges to our patent and regulatory protections covering our products by third parties, including manufacturers of generics and biosimilars that may choose to launch or attempt to launch their products before the expiration of our patent or regulatory exclusivity. Litigation, interference, oppositions, inter partes’ reviews, administrative challenges or other similar types of proceedings are unpredictable and may be protracted, expensive and distracting to management. The outcome of such proceedings could adversely affect the validity and scope of our patent or other proprietary rights, hinder our ability to manufacture and market our products, require us to seek a license for the infringed product or technology or result in the assessment of significant monetary damages against us that may exceed any amounts that we may accrue on our financial statements as a reserve for contingent liabilities. An adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or a failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing or selling our products. Furthermore, payments under any licenses that we are able to obtain would reduce our profits derived from the covered products and services.

The enforcement of patent rights often requires litigation against third-party infringers, and such litigation can be costly to pursue. Even if we succeed in having new patents issued or in defending any challenge to issued patents, there is no assurance that our patents will be comprehensive enough to provide us with meaningful patent protection against our competitors.

Employees

As of December 31, 2024, we had 77 employees, of which 24 were employed by Lineage and 53 were employed by CCN and work in Israel. Of the 77 employees, 70 were employed on a full-time basis and seven were employed on a part-time basis. Nine employees hold Ph.D. degrees in one or more fields of science or doctorates in medicine. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing of pluripotent-derived products is complex and requires the use of innovative technologies to handle living cells. Manufacturing these products requires facilities specifically designed for and validated for this purpose and specific quality assurance and quality control procedures are necessary. Currently, all of our cGMP manufacturing processes, including cell banking, staff training, and product manufacturing for our cell therapy product candidates, are conducted at our internally-controlled facility at CCN. The facility, which includes process development laboratories and a cGMP manufacturing facility, is designed and equipped to enable simultaneous cGMP processes and to produce a range of cell therapy products for human use in clinical trials as well as at a scale suitable for commercial launch.

Our process development and manufacturing are designed to address the complexity of manufacturing cell-based therapies with a specific focus on the reproducibility and scale of the manufacturing process. To this end each of our manufacturing processes contains predefined steps that are controlled by a specific set of control tests that allow us to follow up the progression of production according to the manufacturing plan. We implement a variety of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional culture conditions to address the specific requirements of our pre-defined differentiation processes of the pluripotent cell into a functional cell product.

We obtain key materials required for the manufacture of our cell therapy product candidates from third-party manufacturers and suppliers, which include, in some instances, sole source manufacturers and suppliers. We do not currently have long-term commitments or supply agreements in place to obtain certain key materials used in the manufacture of our cell therapy product candidates.

Licensed Technology and Product Development Agreements

Lineage has obtained the right to use various technologies that we believe have great potential in our product development efforts, and that may be useful to other companies that are engaged in the research and development of products for human therapeutic and diagnostic use.

Second Amended and Restated License Agreement

In June 2017, CCN entered into a Second Amended and Restated License Agreement (the “Hadasit License Agreement”) with Hadasit, pursuant to which Hadasit granted CCN an exclusive, worldwide, royalty bearing license (with the right to grant sublicenses) in its intellectual property portfolio of materials and technology related to human stem cell derived (i) photoreceptor cells and (ii) retinal pigment epithelial cells (collectively, the “Licensed IP”), to use, commercialize and exploit any part thereof, in any manner whatsoever in the fields of the development and exploitation of (i) human stem cell derived photoreceptor cells, solely for use in cell therapy for the diagnosis, amelioration, prevention and treatment of eye disorders (the "Photoreceptor Field"), and (ii) human stem cell derived retinal pigment epithelial cells, solely for use in cell therapy for the diagnosis, amelioration, prevention and treatment of eye disorders. The development and exploitation of human stem cell derived photoreceptor cells (“PR Development Program”) is governed by a Research Agreement (“PR Research Agreement”) made part of and attached to the Hadasit License Agreement.

As consideration for the Licensed IP, CCN paid a one time lump sum payment and will pay a royalty in the low single digits of net sales from sales of Licensed IP by any invoicing entity, and a low double digit percent of sublicensing receipts. In addition, CCN pays Hadasit an annual minimal non-refundable royalty.

CCN further agreed to pay Hadasit non-refundable milestone payments upon the recruitment of the first patient for the first Phase IIB clinical trial, upon the enrollment of the first patient in the first Phase III clinical trials, upon delivery of the report for the first Phase III clinical trials, upon the receipt of an NDA or marketing approval in the European Union (“EU”), whichever is the first to occur, and upon the first commercial sale in the United States or EU, whichever is the first to occur.

The Hadasit License Agreement was amended on November 30, 2017 (“First Amendment”) to update the original list of patent applications and issued patents for Licensed IP, and provide for reimbursement of certain costs associated with a patent not originally listed in the Hadasit License Agreement to CCN. The Hadasit License

Agreement was amended on December 1, 2019 to replace PR Research Agreement with a new PR Research Agreement (“New PR Research Agreement”) which included provisions with respect to the ownership of research results and intellectual property. The Hadasit License Agreement was further amended on December 17, 2021 by a letter agreement pursuant to which CCN is obligated to pay a maximum of 21.5% of any milestone payments Lineage receives under the Roche Agreement (subject to certain reductions, including for costs related to Lineage’s performance obligations under the Roche Agreement) and up to 50% of all royalty payments (subject to a maximum payment of 5% of net sales of products), Lineage receives under the Roche Agreement. We removed the Photoreceptor Field from the scope of the Hadasit License Agreement, in April 2024.

The Hadasit License Agreement terminates upon the expiration of CCN’s obligation to pay royalties for all licensed products, unless earlier terminated. In addition, the Hadasit License Agreement may be terminated by (i) Hadasit if, among other reasons, CCN fails to continue the clinical development of the Licensed IP or fails to take actions to commercialize or sell the Licensed IP over any consecutive 12 month period, and (ii) by either party for (a) a material breach which remains uncured following a cure period, or (b) the granting of a winding-up order in respect of the other party, or upon an order being granted against the other party for the appointment of a receiver or a liquidator in respect of a substantial portion of such other party’s assets. The Hadasit License Agreement also contains mutual confidentiality obligations of CCN and Hadasit, and indemnification obligations of CCN.

WARF Agreements

We have rights to certain U.S. and international issued patents, pending patent applications, and stem cell lines with the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (“WARF”) under a Commercial License and Option Agreement entered into between Lineage and WARF in January 2008 (the “2008 WARF Agreement”) and a Non-Exclusive License Agreement entered into between Asterias and WARF in October 2013 (the “2013 WARF Agreement”).

Under the 2008 WARF Agreement and the 2013 WARF Agreement, we have a worldwide non-exclusive license under certain WARF patents and WARF-owned primate (including human) stem cell lines for use in internal research, and to make, use and sell products that are used as research tools and products that are discovered or developed through our internal research using such patents and stem cell lines. We paid upfront license fees and have agreed to additional payments upon the attainment of specified clinical development milestones, royalties on sales of commercialized products, and, subject to certain exclusions, a percentage of any payments that we may receive from any sublicenses that we may grant to use the licensed patents or stem cell lines.

The 2008 WARF Agreement will expire on the date of the last to expire licensed patent and the 2013 WARF Agreement will continue with respect to licensed cell lines unless terminated by a party. We may terminate either or both of the 2008 and 2013 WARF Agreements at any time with prior written notice, and WARF may terminate the WARF Agreements only upon our breach. We have agreed to indemnify WARF and certain other designated affiliated entities from liability arising out of or relating to the death or injury of any person or damage to property due to the sale, marketing, use or manufacture of products that are covered by the licensed patents, licensed stem cell lines or inventions or materials developed or derived from the licensed patents or stem cell lines.

Government Regulation

Government authorities at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries, extensively regulate among other things, the development, testing, manufacture, quality, approval, safety, efficacy, distribution, labeling, packaging, storage, record keeping, monitoring, reporting, marketing, import/export and promotion of drugs, biologics, and medical devices. Authorities also heavily regulate many of these activities for human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (“HCT/Ps”).

FDA and Foreign Regulation of Therapeutic Products

The FDA and foreign regulatory authorities will regulate our proposed products as drugs, biologics or medical devices, depending upon such factors as the use to which the product will be put, the chemical composition, and the interaction of the product with the human body. In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs, biologics and medical devices, among other products, under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), the Public Health Service

Act (“PHSA”), and implementing regulations. Under this regulatory structure, establishments that manufacture HCT/Ps are subject to many regulations, including, but not limited to, registration and listing requirements and current good tissue practices. Certain proposed cell therapy products will be reviewed by the FDA staff in its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Office of Therapeutic Products.

Our human drug and biologic products will be subject to rigorous FDA review and approval procedures before they may be marketed in the United States. After testing in animals to evaluate the potential efficacy and safety of the product candidate, an IND submission must be made to the FDA to obtain authorization for human testing. Extensive clinical testing, which is generally done in three phases, must then be undertaken to demonstrate substantial evidence of safety and efficacy of each product in humans. Each clinical trial is conducted under the auspices of an independent Institutional Review Board (“IRB”). The IRB will consider, among other things, ethical factors, the safety of human subjects, and the possible liability of the institution.

Phase 1 clinical trials are conducted in a small number of healthy volunteers or volunteers with the target disease or condition to assess safety and dosage, and to identify adverse effects. Phase 2 clinical trials are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with the target disease or condition in order to determine preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and expanded evidence of safety. In some cases, an initial trial is conducted in diseased patients to assess both preliminary safety and preliminary efficacy, in which case it is referred to as a Phase 1/2 clinical trial. Phase 3 clinical trials are large-scale, multicenter, comparative trials and are conducted with patients afflicted with the target disease or condition in order to monitor adverse effects and provide enough data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety required by the FDA. The FDA closely monitors the progress of each of the three phases of clinical testing and may, at its discretion, re-evaluate, alter, suspend or terminate the clinical trial based upon the data which have been accumulated to that point and FDA's assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the intended patient population. The clinical trial sponsor is required to report adverse events to the FDA and IRB in accordance with FDA laws and regulations. Monitoring of all aspects of the trial to minimize risks is a continuing process.

No action can be taken to market any therapeutic product in the U.S. until a New Drug Application (“NDA”) or Biologics License Application (“BLA”), as applicable, has been approved by the FDA. Submission of the application is not a guarantee that the FDA will find it complete and accept it for filing. If an application is accepted for filing, following the FDA’s review of safety and efficacy data compiled from clinical trials, the FDA may grant marketing approval, or deny the application by way of a complete response letter if it determines that the application does not provide an adequate basis for approval. FDA regulations also restrict the export of therapeutic products for clinical use prior to FDA approval. Before approving an NDA or BLA, the FDA will inspect the facilities at which the product is manufactured or perform an establishment file review of the site. The FDA will not approve the product unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with the requirements of current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”) and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications including good tissue practices (“GTPs”) to the extent applicable. FDA's cGMP regulations detail minimum requirements for the methods, facilities, and controls used in manufacturing, processing, and packing of a drug product. FDA's GTP regulations and guidance documents govern the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture of HCT/Ps. The primary intent of the GTP requirements is to ensure that cell and tissue-based products are manufactured in a manner designed to prevent the introduction, transmission and spread of communicable disease. FDA regulations also require when applicable, evaluation of donors through screening and testing. To maintain compliance with cGMPs, GTPs, and good clinical practices ("GCPs"), an applicant must incur significant expenditure of time, money and effort in areas including, but not limited to, training, record keeping, production, and quality control.

To date, although there are clinical trials of pluripotent stem cell-derived therapeutic products ongoing, we do not believe that the FDA has granted marketing approval to any pluripotent stem cell-based therapeutic products, and it is possible that the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies may subject our product candidates to additional or more stringent review than drugs or biologics derived from other technologies.

The FDA offers several programs to expedite development of products that treat serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefits to patients over existing treatments. A drug is eligible for designation as a Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (“RMAT”) if: the drug is a regenerative medicine therapy, which is defined as a cell therapy, therapeutic tissue engineering product, human cell and tissue product or any combination product using such therapies or products, except for those regulated solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and part 1271 of Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations;; the drug is intended to treat,

modify, reverse or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition; and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug has the potential to address unmet medical needs for such disease or condition.

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug or biologic intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or, if it affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States, there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available a drug or biologic for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States for that drug or biologic. Orphan drug designation is a separate process from seeking an NDA or BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the generic identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. The orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review or approval process.

If a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product may be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full NDA or BLA, to market the same drug biologic for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent FDA from approving a different drug or biologic for the same disease or condition, or the same drug or biologic for a different disease or condition. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the NDA or BLA application fee. A designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.

Combination Products

Combination products are defined by the FDA to include products comprised of two or more regulated components or parts such as a biologic and a device. Combination products may be reviewed in a single application or in separate applications for the constituent parts. When regulated independently, drugs, biologics and devices each have their own regulatory requirements. However, the regulatory requirements for a combination product comprised of a biologic administered with a delivery device can be more complex because, in addition to the individual regulatory requirements for each component, additional combination product regulatory requirements may apply. The Office of Combination Products at the FDA coordinates the review of such products and determines the primary mode of action of a combination product. The definition and regulatory requirements for combination products may differ significantly among countries in which we may seek approval of our product candidates.

FDA Regulation of Manufacturing

The FDA regulates the manufacturing process of pharmaceutical products, HCT/Ps, and medical devices, requiring that they be produced in compliance with cGMP and GTP. See “Manufacturing", above. The FDA regulates and inspects equipment, facilities, laboratories and processes used in the manufacturing and testing of products prior to providing approval to market products. If, after receiving approval from the FDA, a material change is made to manufacturing equipment or to the location or manufacturing process, additional regulatory review may be required. The FDA also conducts regular, periodic visits to re-inspect the equipment, facilities, laboratories and processes of manufacturers following an initial approval. If, as a result of a post-approval inspection, the FDA determines that equipment, facilities, laboratories or processes do not comply with applicable FDA regulations and conditions of product approval, the FDA may seek civil, criminal or administrative sanctions and/or remedies against the manufacturer, including, but not limited to, suspension of manufacturing operations. Issues pertaining to manufacturing equipment, facilities or processes may also delay the approval of new products undergoing FDA review.

FDA Regulation of Advertising and Product Promotion

The FDA also regulates the content of advertisements used to market pharmaceutical and biologic products. Claims made in advertisements concerning the safety and efficacy of a product, or any advantages of a product over

another product, must be supported by clinical data filed as part of an NDA, a BLA, or an amendment to an NDA or a BLA, and must be consistent with the FDA-approved labeling and dosage information for that product. Additionally, the FDCA prohibits manufacturers of pharmaceutical and/or biologic products from making any claims, implicit or explicit, that are "false or misleading in any particular".

Pharmaceutical and biologic products may be promoted only for the approved indications in accordance with the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label may be subject to significant liability. However, physicians may, in their independent medical judgment, prescribe legally available products for off-label uses. The FDA does not regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments but the FDA does restrict manufacturer’s communications on the subject of off-label use of their products.

Foreign Regulation

Sales of pharmaceutical products outside the U.S. are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. Even if FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product by comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries must be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing the product in those countries. The time required to obtain such approval may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval.

Federal Funding and State Regulations

Effective July 7, 2009, the National Institute of Health ("NIH") adopted guidelines on the use of hES cells in federally funded research. The central focus of the guidelines is to assure that hES cells used in federally funded research are derived from human embryos that were created for reproductive purposes, are no longer needed for this purpose, and are voluntarily donated for research purposes with the informed written consent of the donors. hES cells that were not derived in compliance with the guidelines are not eligible for use in federally funded research.

The State of California has adopted legislation and regulations that require institutions that conduct stem cell research to notify, and in certain cases obtain approval from, a Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (“SCRO Committee”) before conducting the research. Under certain California regulations, all hES cell lines used in our research must be acceptably derived. California regulations further require certain records to be maintained with respect to stem cell research and the materials used. Lineage programs that involve the use of stem cells have been reviewed by a SCRO Committee to confirm compliance with federal and state guidelines.

The hES cell lines that we use are all on the NIH registry of lines that have been reviewed and meet standards for federal funding grants. All of our research programs utilize stem cells from established and well-characterized cell lines and which are capable of self-renewal and expansion through normal cellular division (mitosis). Our research programs do not require new tissue or cells from donors of any kind.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and Other Health Information Privacy and Security Laws

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), and their respective implementing regulations impose obligations on “covered entities,” including certain healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their respective “business associates” that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, and their subcontractors that use, disclose, access, or otherwise process individually identifiable protected health information, with respect to protecting the privacy, security, and transmission of protected health information. HIPAA also regulates standardization of data content, codes and formats used in healthcare transactions and standardization of identifiers for covered health plans and providers. Penalties for violations of HIPAA regulations include civil and criminal penalties. Additionally, HITECH created four new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in U.S. federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, certain state and foreign laws also govern the privacy and security of health information in

some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Privacy and Data Security Laws

In the ordinary course of our business, we may collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, and share (collectively, processing) personal data and other sensitive information, including data we collect about trial participants in connection with clinical trials. Accordingly, we are, or may become, subject to numerous data privacy and security requirements related to data privacy, security, and protection under federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations, guidance, and industry standards, many of which place restrictions on the Company's ability to transfer, access and use personal data across its business. Compliance with such requirements increases the cost and complexity of doing business and non-compliance may result in, among other penalties and sanctions, substantial monetary fines. The landscape of data privacy laws is evolving, with increasingly stringent regulatory frameworks related to personal data processing, which increase compliance obligations and exposure for noncompliance. In some jurisdictions violations may subject us to fines. For example, under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“EU GDPR”), government regulators may impose temporary or definitive bans on data processing, as well as fines of up to 20 million euros or 4% of a company’s annual global revenue, whichever is greater. Further, some laws allow individuals to initiate litigation related to processing of their personal data.

The laws to which we may be subject include privacy-specific laws at a state level such as the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”). Other countries in which we operate also have general privacy obligations, including Israel’s Protection of Privacy Law 5741-1981, the EU GDPR, and the UK’s similar privacy law (“UK GDPR”). These non-US laws apply to processing of personal data of residents, and may apply to some of our activities. Some of our uses of personal information may be subject to specific privacy laws, such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act or the CAN-SPAM Act. Obligations under these privacy laws may include data minimization, notification, consent, contractual provisions with third parties, restrictions on transfers from one country to another (such as restrictions under EU GDPR and UK GDPR of transfers of personal data to the US unless certain provisions have been met), and record keeping obligations. We are also subject to a complex patchwork of data security and breach notification laws, which exist at a state level in the US (in addition to obligations under HIPAA, discussed above), and also in laws outside of the US, such as GDPR and UK GDPR. Obligations under these laws may include notification in the event of a data breach; limiting personal data processing to only what is necessary for specified, explicit, and legitimate purposes; implementing and maintaining technical and organizational safeguards for personal data. In addition to privacy and data security specific legislation, there are also enforcements brought under unfair and deceptive trade practice laws, such as Section V of the FTC Act. Regulators often issue guidance to assist companies, which guidance is frequently updated, and these guidance are relied on by enforcement bodies and courts.

There is a growing trend towards required public disclosure of clinical trial data in the EU which adds to the complexity of obligations relating to processing health data from clinical trials. Failing to comply with these obligations could lead to government enforcement actions and significant penalties against the Company, harm to its reputation, and adversely impact its business and operating results. The uncertainty regarding the interplay between different regulatory frameworks further adds to the complexity that the Company faces with regard to data protection regulation. In addition, Israel’s Protection of Privacy Law 5741-1981 and the regulations promulgated thereunder impose certain obligations with respect to the manner personal data is processed, and government regulators may issue fines or sanctions for non-compliance.

In certain circumstances we may transfer personal information of EU individuals to the US. Often we rely on standard contractual clauses. These have been questioned by privacy advocates, which scrutiny has grown under the new US presidential administration, and their sufficiency be subject to legal review. In addition, Switzerland and the UK similarly restrict personal data transfers outside of those jurisdictions to countries, such as the United States, that do not provide an adequate level of personal data protection, and certain countries outside Europe (e.g., Israel) have also passed or are considering laws requiring local data residency or otherwise impeding the transfer of personal data across borders.

In addition, business practices in the healthcare industry have come under increased scrutiny, particularly in the U.S., by government agencies (e.g., the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the U.S. Department of

Health and Human Services (“HHS”)) and state attorneys general, which continue to stress the intersection of health and privacy as a compliance and enforcement priority. Resulting investigations and prosecutions carry the risk of significant civil and criminal penalties. Of note is the increased enforcement activity by data protection authorities in various jurisdictions, particularly in the EU, where significant fines have been levied on companies for data breaches, violations of privacy requirements, and unlawful cross-border data transfers. In the U.S., the FTC has stepped up enforcement of data privacy with several significant settlements (including settlements concerning the downstream sharing of personal information and use and disclosure of personal health data) and there have been a material increase in class-action lawsuits linked to the collection and use of biometric data and use of tracking technologies.

Federal and State Fraud and Abuse Laws

A variety of federal and state laws prohibit fraud and abuse. These laws are interpreted broadly and enforced aggressively by various state and federal agencies, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), the Department of Justice, the Office of Inspector General for the HHS, and various state agencies. In addition, the Medicare and Medicaid programs increasingly use a variety of contractors to review claims data and to identify improper payments as well as fraud and abuse. These contractors include Recovery Audit Contractors, Medicaid Integrity Contractors and Zone Program Integrity Contractors. In addition, CMS conducts Comprehensive Error Rate Testing audits, the purpose of which is to detect improper Medicare payments. Any overpayments identified must be repaid unless a favorable decision is obtained on appeal. In some cases, these overpayments can be used as the basis for an extrapolation, by which the error rate is applied to a larger universe of claims, and which can result in even higher repayments.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, receiving, or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce or in return for either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing, recommending, or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program. The definition of “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including gifts, discounts, credit arrangements, payments of cash, ownership interests and providing anything at less than its fair market value. Recognizing that the federal Anti- Kickback Statute is broad and may prohibit certain common activities within the healthcare industry, the Office of Inspector General for HHS has issued a series of statutory exceptions and regulatory “safe harbors.” However, these exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly and require strict compliance in order to offer protection from prosecution under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Although payment and business practices that meet the requirements of a safe harbor are not treated as offenses under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit within a specific safe harbor does not necessarily mean that the transaction or arrangement is illegal or that prosecution under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute will be pursued. However, conduct and business arrangements that do not fully satisfy all requirements of an applicable safe harbor may result in increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities and would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of their facts and circumstances. Additionally, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “ACA”) codified case law that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act.

The federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which can be enforced by private citizens on behalf of the government, through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, and civil monetary penalty laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent. Pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for alleged off-label promotion of drugs, purportedly concealing price concessions in the pricing information submitted to the government for government price reporting purposes, and allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal healthcare programs for the product. As a result of a modification made by the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, a claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S. government. In addition, manufacturers can be held liable under the federal False Claims Act even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims.

HIPAA also created new federal crimes, including healthcare fraud and false statements relating to healthcare matters. The healthcare fraud statute prohibits knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare

benefit program, including private third-party payers. The false statements statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation.

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to CMS information related to payments or other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, and chiropractors), certain other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.

Many states have laws similar to the federal laws described above and the state laws may be broader in scope and may apply regardless of payor, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws that may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third party payors, including private insurers, or that apply regardless of payor, state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, state and local laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures, state laws that require the reporting of information related to drug pricing, and state and local laws requiring the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives.

Additionally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) prohibits U.S. corporations and their representatives from offering, promising, authorizing or making payments to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain or retain business abroad. The scope of the FCPA includes interactions with certain healthcare professionals in many countries. Other countries have enacted similar anti-corruption laws and/or regulations.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above, or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, including sanctions, damages, disgorgement, monetary fines, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, imprisonment, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

Coverage and Reimbursement

Patients generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse part or all of the costs associated with medical products. Accordingly, market acceptance of medical products can depend on the extent to which third-party coverage and reimbursement is available from government health administration authorities, private healthcare insurers and other healthcare funding organizations. No uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement exists in the United States, and coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor. Decisions regarding whether to cover any of our product candidates, if approved, the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided are made on a plan-by-plan basis. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates, but also have their own methods and approval process apart from Medicare determinations. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our product candidates to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. Pharmaceutical companies may be required to provide specified rebates or discounts on the products it sells to certain government funded programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and those rebates or discounts have increased over time. The ACA increased many of these mandatory discounts and rebates required and imposed a new branded prescription pharmaceutical manufacturers and importers fee payable each year by certain pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers.

Outside of the United States, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, the EU

provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product, or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. Historically, products launched in the EU do not follow price structures of the United States and generally tend to be significantly lower.

Healthcare Reform

The United States and some foreign jurisdictions are considering or have enacted a number of reform proposals to change the healthcare system. There is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by federal and state legislative initiatives, including those designed to limit the pricing, coverage, and reimbursement of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products, especially under government-funded healthcare programs, and increased governmental control of drug pricing.

In March 2010, the ACA was signed into law, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers in the United States, and significantly affected the pharmaceutical industry. The ACA contains a number of provisions of particular import to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including, but not limited to, those governing enrollment in federal healthcare programs, a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal healthcare programs. Since its enactment, there have been judicial, Congressional, and executive branch challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, legislation enacted in 2017, informally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”), among other things, removes penalties for not complying with ACA’s individual mandate to carry health insurance. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the individual mandate was repealed by Congress. Thus, the ACA will remain in effect in its current form. In January 2025, the new U.S. presidential administration issued Executive Order 14148, which revoked Executed Order 14009 issued by the prior U.S. presidential administration in January 2021, which had initiated a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding how federal government policy and budget decisions will unfold with respect to healthcare reform under the new U.S. presidential administration. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted. On August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 was signed into law, which includes reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect through 2031, except for a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, unless additional Congressional action is taken. Under current legislation, the actual reduction in Medicare payments will vary from 1% in 2022 to up to 3% in the final fiscal year of this sequester. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. Further, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, beginning January 1, 2024. Congress is considering additional health reform measures.

Moreover, there has recently been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. For example, on July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that attempted to implement several of the administration’s proposals. As a result, the FDA concurrently released a final rule and guidance in September 2020 providing pathways for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020, the HHS finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection

for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Medicare Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a new safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. The implementation of the rule was delayed until 2032 by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. On November 20, 2020, CMS issued an interim final rule implementing President Trump’s Most Favored Nation executive order, which would tie Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered drugs to the lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries. The Most Favored Nation regulations mandate participation by identified Medicare Part B providers and will apply in all U.S. states and territories for a seven-year period beginning January 1, 2021, and ending December 31, 2027. As a result of litigation challenging the Most Favored Nation model, on December 27, 2021 CMS published a final rule that rescinds the Most Favored Nation model interim final rule. Further, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order that included multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to President Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform. The plan sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles and considerable uncertainty exists regarding how federal government policy and budget decisions will unfold with respect to drug pricing under the new U.S. presidential administration.

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law by President Biden. The new legislation has implications for Medicare Part D, which is a program available to individuals who are entitled to Medicare Part A or enrolled in Medicare Part B to give them the option of paying a monthly premium for outpatient prescription drug coverage. Among other things, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 requires manufacturers of certain drugs to engage in price negotiations with Medicare (beginning in 2026), with prices that can be negotiated subject to a cap; imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation (first due in 2023); and replaces the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new discounting program (beginning in 2025). The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 permits the Secretary of the HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years.

At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

Major Sources of Revenues

The following table shows our major sources of revenues, as a percentage of total revenues, that were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

Year ended December 31,

Collaboration revenues 85.8 % 84.8 %

Royalties, license and other revenues 14.2 % 15.2 %

Our collaboration revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are related primarily to the $50.0 million upfront payment from Roche under the Roche Agreement. Our royalties, license and other revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 represent cash flows generated under patent families that Asterias acquired from Geron and the Services Agreement with Genentech. See Note 3 (Revenue) and Note 13 (Commitments and Contingencies) to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information.

None of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023 were generated outside of the United States.

Marketing

We do not have established marketing, sales or distribution infrastructure or capabilities. In order to commercialize any of our product candidates if approved for commercial sale, we must either establish a sales and marketing organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution and compliance capabilities or collaborate with third-parties that have sales and marketing experience. As we move our product candidates through development toward regulatory approval, we intend to evaluate options for each product candidate’s commercialization strategy. These options include building our own sales force and other commercial infrastructure, entering into strategic marketing collaborations with third parties, out-licensing the product to other pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, and combinations of these strategies.

Competition

The cell therapy industry is characterized by rapid innovation, intense and dynamic competition with a strong emphasis on proprietary products. While we believe that our technology, manufacturing capabilities, scientific knowledge, and experience in the field of cell therapy provide us with competitive advantages, we face potential competition from many different sources, including major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with substantially greater financial and other resources than we have, academic institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions, as well as standard-of-care treatments, new products undergoing development and combinations of existing and new therapies. Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies, including combinations thereof, that may become available in the future.

As mentioned above, some of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have, such as larger research and development staff and well-established marketing and salesforces, or may operate in jurisdictions with lower standards of evidence to bring products to market. For example, we are aware that some of our competitors, including Abbvie, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bayer AG, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Santen Pharmaceuticals, Sana Biotechnology Inc., jCyte, Inc., Astellas Pharma Inc., and Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc., may be conducting clinical trials for therapies that could compete with our cell therapy programs.

Corporate Information

Lineage was incorporated on November 30, 1990 in the State of California. Our common shares trade on the NYSE American and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the symbol “LCTX.” Our principal executive offices are at 2173 Salk Avenue, Suite 200, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA, and our phone number at that address is (442) 287-8990. Our website address is www.lineagecell.com. The information on, or that can be accessed through our website, is not part of this report. We routinely use our website as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. We also make available, free of charge through our website, our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider all the risk factors described below, as well as the other information in this report, when evaluating our business and before deciding whether to purchase, hold or sell our common shares. Each of these risk factors, as well as additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial, could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or growth prospects, as well as adversely affect the market price of our common shares, in which case you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business Operations and Capital Requirements

We are dependent on our third-party collaboration with Roche to develop and commercialize OpRegen. If Roche is not successful in developing and commercializing OpRegen and/or Roche terminates the collaboration, we will lose a significant source of potential revenue.

We currently have a collaboration and license agreement with Roche, pursuant to which we license to Roche rights to develop and commercialize our retinal pigment epithelium cell therapies, including OpRegen (the “Licensed Products”), for the treatment of ocular disorders, including age-related macular degeneration with geographic atrophy. Roche is obligated to pay us milestone payments upon the achievement of specified developmental, regulatory and commercialization milestones. In addition, Roche is obligated to pay us royalties upon sales of the Licensed Products, if any. All regulatory and commercial milestone payments and royalty payments are subject to the existence of certain intellectual property rights that cover OpRegen at the time such payments would otherwise become due, and the royalties on net sales of OpRegen are subject to financial offsets based on the existence of competing products.

We are exposed to numerous risks associated with the Roche agreement, including Roche having sole control over the clinical development and commercialization of any Licensed Products developed under the agreement. The Roche agreement also prevents us from developing or commercializing retinal pigment epithelium cell therapies for the treatment of ocular disorders on our own or with any third party. Our collaboration with Roche involves risks that are different from the risks associated with independently advancing product candidates, including that Roche may have or develop economic or business interests that are inconsistent with ours; take actions contrary to our requests or objectives; take actions that reduce our return on investment for this collaboration; or take actions that harm our reputation.

Roche’s degree of control of the collaboration, clinical development and commercialization efforts may impact the payment amounts that we receive under the Roche agreement. For example, Roche may suspend development of OpRegen or other product candidates covered by the Roche agreement or decide not to pursue commercialization of OpRegen or such other product candidates at all, or it may agree to pay royalties to third parties or adopt a pricing model that reduces the amount of royalties we might otherwise expect. For example, in 2024, Roche announced that it decided to halt the development of some of its programs on the basis that such programs did not provide sufficient grounds for Roche to continue investing in the candidate.

We are expecting Roche to develop and commercialize the Licensed Products, and if Roche is not able to develop and commercialize the Licensed Products, determines not to continue to pursue development and commercialization of the Licensed Products, or determines to terminate the collaboration at any time in its sole discretion, which it has the right to do, we will not receive any future milestone or royalty payments under the agreement which would harm our business, business prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Even if Roche develops and commercializes the Licensed Products, Roche may not do so on the timelines we expect and the Licensed Products may not be commercially successful, each of which could harm our business, business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Roche may determine not to pursue development and commercialization and/or to terminate the collaboration, in its sole discretion, for many reasons, including:

•

delays in development, manufacture or clinical supply of OpRegen (see the risk factor titled, “The manufacture of our cell therapy product candidates is complex, highly regulated and subject to a multitude of risks. We have limited experience manufacturing our product candidates on a clinical scale and no experience manufacturing on a commercial scale. Any failure to manufacture our product candidates in sufficient quantities in accordance with applicable quality standards and regulatory requirements and at acceptable costs, may result in significant

clinical development delays or impair our ability, or that of a strategic collaborator, to obtain approval for or commercialize our product candidates,” below);

•

Roche may conclude that clinical supply of OpRegen does not meet its internal standards;

•

Roche may believe that data generated in clinical trials for OpRegen may be negative, inconclusive, or do not otherwise demonstrate adequate safety, efficacy or clinical benefit to warrant further development or commercialization;

•

Roche may conclude that the commercial landscape in GA secondary to AMD has significantly changed with the FDA’s approval in 2023 of Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Syfovre® (pegcetacoplan injection) and Iveric bio, Inc.’s IZERVAYTM (avacincaptad pegol intravitreal solution);

•

Roche may not dedicate the resources necessary to carry OpRegen through clinical development, regulatory approval, or commercialization;

•

Roche may conclude that the commercial potential of OpRegen does not meet its internal thresholds or yield a timely return on its investment in OpRegen;

•

Roche may choose not to develop and commercialize OpRegen in certain, or any, markets or for one or more indications, if at all;

•

Roche may change the focus of its development or commercialization efforts or prioritize other programs and, accordingly, reduce the efforts and resources allocated to OpRegen;

•

Roche may be unable to obtain regulatory clearances or approvals to continue clinical development or commercialization of OpRegen in a timely manner, or at all;

•

the failure to develop a formulation and/or manufacturing process for OpRegen that Roche believes is commercially viable in a timely manner, or at all; or

•

the loss or impairment of intellectual property rights related to OpRegen.

If Roche terminates the collaboration:

•

we would no longer have the right to receive any milestone payments or royalties thereunder;

•

further development of OpRegen, if any, would be significantly delayed or terminated;

•

we would bear all risks and costs related to any further clinical development, manufacturing, regulatory approval and commercialization OpRegen, if any;

•

we might determine that the commercial potential of OpRegen does not warrant further development of OpRegen;

•

we would need to raise additional capital if we were to choose to pursue OpRegen development on our own, or we would need to establish alternative collaborations with third parties, which might not be possible in a timely manner, or at all;

•

if we were to choose to pursue OpRegen development independently, we would need to work collaboratively with Roche to transfer the OpRegen program back to us, and such a transfer might take significant amounts of time, would be resource intensive and costly, and might not be feasible; and

•

it may adversely affect the interest of other third parties in pursuing strategic collaborations relating to our product candidates, including OpRegen, or technology or the terms of any such potential collaboration.

Any loss or termination of rights under the collaboration will cause us to lose a significant source of potential revenue and could significantly delay or result in the discontinuation of development of OpRegen or significantly diminish the commercial potential of OpRegen, which would have a material and adverse effect on our company, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market price of our common shares to decline.

In addition, we are required under the Roche agreement to transfer certain manufacturing process know-how to Roche to facilitate manufacture of OpRegen and other potential Licensed Products for clinical trials and

commercialization. Transferring manufacturing testing and processes and know-how is complex and involves review and incorporation of both documented and undocumented processes that may have evolved over time. We have never completed such transfer and we can give no assurances that we will be successful in doing so. In addition, transferring production to different facilities may require utilization of new or different processes to meet the specific requirements of a given facility. We and Roche will need to conduct significant development work to transfer these processes. In addition, we may be required to demonstrate the comparability of the cells generated by Roche with cells previously produced and used in testing. Any failure or delay in the successful transfer of manufacturing process know-how to Roche or the inability of Roche to manufacture comparable cells could halt or delay the continued development of OpRegen and other potential Licensed Products.

We have incurred operating losses since inception, and we do not know if or when we will attain profitability.

LCTX US Equity

LCTX · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

LCTX US Equity☆

LCTX · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

LCTX US Equity