Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-28 | 2025-09-17 | in the notes | effective | effective | remediated (prior year) | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to certain lawsuits or claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, although an adverse resolution against the Company in a fiscal quarter or year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in a particular quarter or year. For further details on claims, see Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of June 28, 2025, the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective based on that criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of June 28, 2025, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on that criteria. Item 9A · material weakness · Remediation Update As of June 29, 2024, the Company had identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting that were remediated during the fiscal year ended June 28, 2025 as discussed further below. | ||||||
| 2024-06-29 | 2024-10-15 | in the notes | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to certain lawsuits or claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, although an adverse resolution against the Company in a fiscal quarter or year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in a particular quarter or year. For further details on claims, see Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 29, 2024 due to the material weaknesses described below. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of June 29, 2024, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as a result of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting discussed below. | ||||||
| 2023-07-01 | 2023-09-26 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to certain lawsuits or claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, although an adverse resolution against the Company in a fiscal quarter or year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in a particular quarter or year. For further details on claims, see Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of July 1, 2023, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on that criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of July 1, 2023, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on that criteria. | ||||||
| 2022-07-02 | 2022-09-14 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to certain lawsuits or claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, although an adverse resolution against the Company in a fiscal quarter or year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in a particular quarter or year. For further details on claims, see Footnote “Commitments and Contingencies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of July 2, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on that criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of July 2, 2022, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on that criteria. | ||||||
| 2021-07-03 | 2021-09-16 | described here | effective | effective | remediated (prior year) | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to certain lawsuits or claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow, although an adverse resolution against the Company in a fiscal quarter or year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in a particular quarter or year. Refer to Commitments and Contingencies footnote for further details on claims in the fiscal year. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of July 3, 2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on that criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on our assessment, we believe that as of July 3, 2021, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on that criteria. Item 9A · material weakness · As a result, we previously disclosed a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2020 and April 3, 2021, in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for such periods. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.