| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $143.5M | Enterprise Value | $139.2M |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 1.19× | P/FCF | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.45× | EV/EBIT | 1265.08× |
| EV/Sales | 1.15× | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | −2.50% | Buyback Yield | 0.00% |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $5.2M | Owner Earnings Yield | 3.65% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 1.53 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 11.66% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | Synthetic credit rating | D |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | 4.43% | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 23.00% |
| WACC | — | ROIC | −3.07% |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — | EVA | — |
FCF sits 168% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM -$0.21 · revenue TTM $121.1M · FCF TTM -$3.6M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Information Technology on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 84th percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 44.5x | 18.6x | 9.6x–33.8x | 84 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | 4.0% | 2.5% | -3.1%–6.0% | 63 ↑strong |
| Net Margin | -2.2% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 42 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 41 ↓weak |
| ROE | -2.5% | 4.1% | -14.9%–16.8% | 38 ↓weak |
