Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-27 | 2025-11-26 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability, if any, from all pending legal proceedings and claims would not materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on its assessment of the design and related testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that, as of September 27, 2025, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of September 27, 2025. | ||||||
| 2024-09-28 | 2024-12-27 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability, if any, from all pending legal proceedings and claims would not materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on its assessment of the design and related testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that, as of September 28, 2024, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of September 28, 2024. | ||||||
| 2023-09-30 | 2023-11-29 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability, if any, from all pending legal proceedings and claims would not materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on its assessment of the design and related testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2023, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2023. | ||||||
| 2022-09-24 | 2022-11-23 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability, if any, from all pending legal proceedings and claims would not materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on its assessment of the design and related testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting management has concluded that, as of September 24, 2022, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level as of September 24, 2022. | ||||||
| 2021-09-25 | 2021-11-24 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability, if any, from all pending legal proceedings and claims would not materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on its assessment of the design and related testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting management has concluded that, as of September 25, 2021, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level as of September 25, 2021. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.