ICHR US Equity☆

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are many factors that affect our business and the results of operations, some of which are beyond our control. The following is a description of some important factors that may cause the actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected or desired.

Risk Factor Summary

The following is a summary of some important risk factors that could adversely affect our business, operations, and financial results.

Economic and Strategic Risks

•Our business depends significantly on expenditures by manufacturers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry.

•We rely on a very small number of OEM customers for a significant portion of our sales.

•Our customers exert a significant amount of negotiating leverage over us.

•The industries in which we participate are highly competitive and rapidly evolving.

•We are exposed to risks associated with weakness in the global economy and geopolitical instability.

•If we do not keep pace with developments in the industries we serve and with technological innovation generally, our products and services may not be competitive.

•We must design, develop, and introduce new products that are accepted by OEMs in order to retain our existing customers and obtain new customers.

•Acquisitions may present integration challenges, and the goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets, and other long-term assets recorded in connection with such acquisitions may become impaired.

•We are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Business and Operational Risks

•The manufacturing of our products is highly complex.

•Defects in our products could damage our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our products, and result in potentially costly litigation.

•We may incur unexpected warranty and performance guarantee claims.

•Our dependence on a limited number of suppliers may harm our production output and increase our costs.

11

Table of Contents

•We may face supply chain disruptions, manufacturing interruptions or delays.

•We are subject to order and shipment uncertainties.

•Our customers generally require that they qualify our engineering, documentation, manufacturing and quality control procedures.

•We may be subject to interruptions, failures, or cybersecurity breaches in our information technology systems.

•Certain of our customers require that we consult with them in connection with specified fundamental changes in our business.

•Our business is largely dependent on the know-how of our employees, and we generally do not have an intellectual property position that is protected by patents.

•Our business will suffer if we are unable to attract, hire, integrate, and retain key personnel and other necessary employees, particularly in the highly competitive technology labor market, or if we experience labor disruptions at our facilities.

•The technology labor market is very competitive, and labor disruptions could materially adversely affect our business.

•Our business is subject to the risks of catastrophic events.

•We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders.

Legal and Regulatory Risks

•Our business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws, rules, policies, and other obligations regarding privacy, data protection, and other matters.

•Third parties have claimed and may in the future claim we are infringing their intellectual property.

•From time to time, we may become involved in other litigation and regulatory proceedings.

•As a global company, we are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.

•Changes in U.S. or international trade policy, tariffs, and import/export regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business.

•We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations.

•If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls and procedures, it may cause investors to lose confidence in our financial reporting.

•Changes in tax laws, tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources Risks

•We have a substantial amount of indebtedness and are subject to restrictive covenants.

•We are subject to interest rate risk associated with variable rates on our outstanding indebtedness.

Ordinary Share Ownership Risks

•Our quarterly sales and operating results fluctuate significantly from period to period, and the price of our ordinary shares may fluctuate substantially.

•Our articles of association contain anti-takeover provisions that could adversely affect the rights of our shareholders.

•The issuance of preferred shares could adversely affect holders of ordinary shares.

•Our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests under the laws of the Cayman Islands compared to the laws of the U.S.

•If a U.S. person is treated as owning at least 10% of our shares, such person may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

12

Table of Contents

Economic and Strategic Risks

Our business depends significantly on expenditures by manufacturers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry, which, in turn, is dependent upon the semiconductor device industry. When that industry experiences cyclical downturns, demand for our products and services generally decreases, resulting in decreased sales. We may also be forced to reduce our prices during cyclical downturns without being able to proportionally reduce costs.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations depend significantly on expenditures by manufacturers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. In turn, the semiconductor capital equipment industry depends upon the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductor devices. The semiconductor device industry is subject to cyclical and volatile fluctuations in supply and demand and in the past has experienced significant downturns, including in the fourth quarter of 2022, which often occur in connection with declines in general economic conditions, and which have resulted in significant volatility in the semiconductor capital equipment industry and resulted in weakened customer demand. The semiconductor device industry has also experienced recurring periods of over-supply of products that have had a severe negative effect on the demand for capital equipment used to manufacture such products. Even as the industry recovers from periods of downturns, inventory digestion at our customers and the relative spending levels within our primary served markets, in particular lower spending levels for deposition and etch equipment, may result in decreased demand from our customers, such as in 2023 and early 2024. Our revenue exposure to specific end markets and technology nodes may amplify cyclicality, and downturns with respect to the demand for certain of our products may disproportionately impact our results even when other products are experiencing growth. We anticipate that we will continue to experience significant fluctuations in customer orders for our products and services as a result of such fluctuations and cycles, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with prevailing market conditions, effectively manage our supply chain and motivate and retain employees, particularly during periods of decreasing demand for our products. We may be forced to reduce our prices during periods of decreasing demand. During the third quarter of 2025, we initiated the Consolidation Restructuring Plan to better align our footprint with the demand environment. While we operate under a low fixed cost model, we may not be able to proportionally reduce all of our costs if we are required to reduce our prices. The cyclical and volatile nature of the semiconductor device industry and the absence of long-term fixed or minimum volume contracts make any effort to project a material reduction in future sales volume difficult. If we overbuild inventory in a period of decreased demand, or we expand our operations and workforce too rapidly, or procure excessive resources in anticipation of increased demand for our products, and that demand does not materialize at the pace at which we expect, or declines, our operating results may be adversely affected as a result of underutilization of capacity, charges related to excess or obsolete inventory, asset impairment or inventory write-downs, increased operating expenses or reduced margins. Further, any future capacity expansion by us or our competitors could also lead to overcapacity and oversaturation in our target markets, which could lead to price erosion that could adversely impact our operating results.

13

Table of Contents

We rely on a very small number of OEM customers for a significant portion of our sales. Any adverse change in our relationships with these customers could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The semiconductor capital equipment industry is highly concentrated and has experienced significant consolidation in recent years. As a result, a relatively small number of OEM customers have historically accounted for a significant portion of our sales, and we expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable future. For 2025, two customers with individual sales over 10%, Lam Research and Applied Materials, accounted for a combined 76% of total sales, and we expect that our sales will continue to be concentrated among a very small number of customers. We do not have any long-term contracts that require customers to place orders with us in fixed or minimum volumes. Accordingly, the success of our business depends on the success of our customers and those customers and other OEMs continuing to outsource the manufacturing of critical subsystems and process solutions to us. Because of the small number of OEMs in the markets we serve, a number of which are already our customers, it is difficult to replace lost sales resulting from the loss of, or the reduction, cancellation or delay in purchase orders by, any one of these customers, whether due to a reduction in the amount of outsourcing they do, their giving orders to our competitors, an adverse change to their business or financial condition, their acquisition by an OEM who is not a customer or with whom we do less business, or otherwise. We have in the past lost business from customers for a number of these reasons. If we are unable to replace sales from customers who reduce the volume of products and services they purchase from us or terminate their relationship with us entirely, such events could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to lessen the adverse effect of any loss of, or reduction in sales to, an existing customer through the rapid addition of one or more new customers is limited because onboarding a new customer is a time-consuming process as our customers generally require that they qualify our engineering, documentation, manufacturing and quality control procedures. Consequently, the risk that our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected by the loss of, or any reduction in orders by, any of our significant customers is increased. Moreover, if we lost our existing status as a qualified supplier to any of our customers, such customer could cancel its orders from us or otherwise terminate its relationship with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, if one or more of the largest OEMs were to decide to single- or sole-source all or a significant portion of manufacturing and assembly work to a single equipment manufacturer, such a development would heighten the risks discussed above.

Our customers exert a significant amount of negotiating leverage over us, which requires us to accept lower prices and gross margins or take on increased liability risk in order to retain or expand our market share with them.

By virtue of our largest customers’ size and the significant portion of our sales that is derived from them, as well as the competitive landscape, our customers exert significant influence and pricing pressure in the negotiation of our commercial arrangements and the conduct of our business with them. Our customers often require price reductions and quality or delivery commitments as conditions to their purchasing from us, which have, among other things, resulted in reduced gross margins in order for us to maintain or expand our market share. Our customers’ negotiating leverage also can result in customer arrangements that contain significant liability risk to us. For example, some of our customers require that we provide them indemnification against certain liabilities in our arrangements with them, including claims of losses by their customers caused by our products. Pursuant to certain of these arrangements, we indemnify, hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party for third party claims in connection with our breach of the agreement, our negligence or willful misconduct in connection with the agreement, or any trade secret, copyright, patent or other intellectual property infringement claim with respect to our products. Any increase in our customers’ negotiating leverage may expose us to increased liability risk in our arrangements with them, which, if realized, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new products often carry lower gross margins than existing products for several quarters following their introduction. If we are unable to retain and expand our business with our customers on favorable terms, or if we are unable to achieve gross margins on new products that are similar to or more favorable than the gross margins we have historically achieved, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

14

Table of Contents

The industries in which we participate are highly competitive and rapidly evolving, and if we are unable to compete effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We face intense competition from other suppliers of gas or chemical delivery subsystems, as well as the internal manufacturing groups of OEMs. Increased competition has in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in price reductions, reduced gross margins or loss of market share, any of which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are subject to significant pricing pressure as we attempt to maintain and increase market share with our existing customers. Our competitors may offer reduced prices or introduce new products or services for the markets currently served by our products and services. These products may have better performance, lower prices and achieve broader market acceptance than our products. OEMs also typically own the design rights to their products. Further, if our competitors obtain proprietary rights to these designs such that we are unable to obtain the designs necessary to manufacture products for our OEM customers, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Certain of our competitors may have or may develop greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their products and services, and reduce prices to increase market share. In addition to organic growth by our competitors, there may be merger and acquisition activity among our competitors and potential competitors that may provide our competitors and potential competitors with an advantage over us by enabling them to expand their product offerings and service capabilities to meet a broader range of customer needs. The introduction of new technologies and new market entrants may also increase competitive pressures.

Additionally, from time to time, governments around the world may provide incentives or make other investments that could benefit and give competitive advantages to our competitors. For example, in August 2022, the U.S. government enacted the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 to provide financial incentives to the U.S. semiconductor industry. Government incentives, including any that may be offered in connection with the CHIPS Act, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all and to the extent that the current administration modifies or repeals the CHIPS Act the availability of any such incentives may be even less certain. If our competitors can benefit from such government incentives and we cannot, it could strengthen our competitors’ relative position and have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are exposed to risks associated with weakness in the global economy and geopolitical instability.

Continuing uncertainty regarding the global economy and geopolitical instability continues to pose challenges to our business. Geopolitical instability, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the conflict in the Middle East, actual and potential shifts in U.S. (including as a result of the 2024 U.S. presidential and congressional elections) and foreign trade, economic and other policies, and rising trade tensions between the U.S. and China, as well as other global events, have significantly increased macroeconomic uncertainty at a global level. The current macroeconomic environment is characterized by high inflation, supply chain challenges, shortages of skilled labor and higher labor costs, high interest rates, foreign currency exchange volatility, volatility in the global capital markets, and uncertainty in debt markets, which exacerbates negative trends in business and consumer spending and causes certain of our customers to push out, cancel or refrain from placing orders for products or services, which may reduce sales, reduce our backlog, increase our inventory and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. While inflation has slowed from its peak in 2022 and the U.S. Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate in 2024 and 2025, the rate continues to be elevated and there can be no assurances that the rate will continue to decrease or that it will not be increased in 2026 or beyond. Further, difficulties in obtaining capital, uncertain market conditions or reduced profitability may also cause some customers to scale back operations, exit businesses, merge with other manufacturers, or file for bankruptcy protection and potentially cease operations, leading to customers’ reduced research and development funding or capital expenditures and, in turn, lower orders from our customers or additional slow moving or obsolete inventory or bad debt expense for us. These conditions may also similarly affect our key suppliers, which could impair their ability to deliver parts and result in delays for our products or require us to procure products from higher-cost suppliers, or if no additional suppliers exist, to reconfigure the design and manufacture of our products, and we may be unable to fulfill some customer orders. Any of these conditions or events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

15

Table of Contents

If we do not keep pace with developments in the industries we serve and with technological innovation generally, our products and services may not be competitive.

Rapid technological innovation in the markets we serve requires us to anticipate and respond quickly to evolving customer requirements and could render our current product offerings, services and technologies obsolete. In particular, the design and manufacturing of semiconductors is constantly evolving and becoming more complex in order to achieve greater power, performance and efficiency with smaller devices. Capital equipment manufacturers need to keep pace with these changes by refining their existing products and developing new products.

We believe that our future success will depend upon our ability to design, engineer and manufacture products that meet the changing needs of our current and potential customers, including potentially through the incorporation or use of software or artificial intelligence technology, which as a novel business model could expose us to new risks. This requires that we successfully anticipate and respond to technological changes in design, engineering and manufacturing processes in a cost-effective and timely manner. If we are unable to integrate new technical specifications into competitive product designs, develop the technical capabilities necessary to manufacture new products or make necessary modifications or enhancements to existing products, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The timely development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process which requires that we:

•design innovative and performance-enhancing features that differentiate our products from those of our competitors;

•identify emerging technological trends in the industries we serve, including new standards for our products;

•accurately identify and design new products to meet market needs;

•collaborate with OEMs to design and develop products on a timely and cost-effective basis;

•ramp-up production of new products, especially new subsystems, in a timely manner and with acceptable yields;

•manage our costs of product development and the costs of producing the products that we sell;

•successfully manage development production cycles; and

•respond quickly and effectively to technological changes or product announcements by others.

If we are unsuccessful in keeping pace with technological developments for the reasons above or other reasons, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We must design, develop, and introduce new products that are accepted by OEMs in order to retain our existing customers and obtain new customers.

While we continue to invest in research and development initiatives for new products, the introduction of new products is inherently risky because it is difficult to foresee the adoption of new standards, coordinate our technical personnel and strategic relationships and win acceptance of new products by OEMs. Further, we cannot ensure that we will be able to successfully introduce, market and cost-effectively manufacture new products, or that we will be able to develop new or enhanced products and processes that satisfy customer needs. In addition, new capital equipment typically has a lifespan of five to ten years, and OEMs frequently specify which systems, subsystems, components and instruments are to be used in their equipment. Once a specific system, subsystem, component or instrument is incorporated into a piece of capital equipment, it will often continue to be purchased for that piece of equipment on an exclusive basis for 18 to 24 months before the OEM generates enough sales volume to consider adding alternative suppliers. Accordingly, it is important that our products are designed into the new systems introduced by the OEMs. If any of the new products we develop are not launched or successful in the market, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

16

Table of Contents

Acquisitions may present integration challenges, and if the goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets, and other long-term assets recorded in connection with such acquisitions become impaired, we would be required to record impairment charges, which may be significant.

We have acquired strategic businesses in the past and if we find appropriate opportunities in the future, we may acquire businesses, products or technologies that we believe are strategic. The process of integrating an acquired business, product or technology may produce unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, fail to result in expected synergies or other benefits or absorb significant attention of our management that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development of our business. Our ability to realize anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other strategic initiatives may also be affected by the incurrence of additional indebtedness in connection with financing; regulatory challenges; our ability to retain key employees and customers of the acquired company; our ability to successfully integrate personnel from the acquired company; our ability to establish, integrate or combine operations and systems; or our ability to retain the customers of an acquired business. In addition, we may record a portion of the assets we acquire as goodwill, other indefinite-lived intangible assets or finite-lived intangible assets. We review goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient future earnings and cash flows. Changes in estimates, circumstances or conditions, resulting from both internal and external factors, could have a significant impact on our fair valuation determination, which could then have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which could cause operating results and reported financial results to vary significantly from period to period.

The vast majority of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Many of the costs and expenses associated with our Singapore, Malaysian, Korean, U.K., Mexico and European Union operations are paid in Singapore dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Korean won, British pounds, Mexican pesos or euros, respectively, and we expect our exposure to these currencies to increase as we increase our operations in those jurisdictions. As a result, our risk exposure from transactions denominated in non-U.S. currencies is primarily related to the Singapore dollar, Malaysian ringgit, Korean won, British pound, Mexican peso and euro. In addition, because the majority of our sales are denominated in the U.S. dollar, if one or more of our competitors sells to our customers in a different currency than the U.S. dollar, we are subject to the risk that the competitors’ products will be relatively less expensive than our products due to exchange rate effects. We have not historically established transaction-based hedging programs. Foreign currency exchange risks inherent in doing business in foreign countries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Business and Operational Risks

The manufacturing of our products is highly complex, and if we are not able to manage our manufacturing and procurement process effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

The manufacturing of our products is a highly complex process that involves the integration of multiple components and requires effective management of our supply chain while meeting our customers’ design-to-delivery cycle time requirements. Through the course of the manufacturing process, our customers may modify design and system configurations in response to changes in their own customers’ requirements. In order to rapidly respond to these modifications and deliver our products to our customers in a timely manner, we must effectively manage our manufacturing and procurement process. If we fail to manage this process effectively, we risk losing customers and damaging our reputation. We may also be subject to liability under our agreements with our customers if we or our suppliers fail to re-configure manufacturing processes or components in response to these modifications. In addition, the acquisition of inventory in excess of demand, or that does not meet customer specifications, causes us to incur excess or obsolete inventory charges. We have from time to time experienced bottlenecks and production difficulties that have caused delivery delays and quality control problems. These risks are even greater as we seek to expand our business into new subsystems. In addition, certain of our suppliers have been, and may in the future be, forced out of business as a result of the economic environment. In such cases, we may be required to procure products from higher-cost suppliers or, if no additional suppliers exist, reconfigure the design and manufacture of our products. This could materially limit our growth, adversely impact our ability to win future business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

17

Table of Contents

Defects in our products could damage our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our products, and result in potentially costly litigation.

A number of factors, including design flaws, material and component failures, contamination in the manufacturing environment, impurities in the materials used and unknown sensitivities to process conditions, such as temperature and humidity, as well as equipment failures, may cause our products to contain undetected errors or defects. Errors, defects or other problems with our products may:

•cause delays in product introductions and shipments;

•result in increased costs and diversion of development resources;

•cause us to incur increased charges due to unusable inventory;

•require design modifications;

•result in liability for the unintended release of hazardous materials;

•result in product warranty liability;

•create claims for rework, replacement or damages under our contracts with customers, as well as indemnification claims from customers;

•decrease market acceptance of, or customer satisfaction with, our products, which could result in decreased sales and increased product returns;

•result in the loss of existing customers or impair our ability to attract new customers; or

•result in lower yields for semiconductor manufacturers.

If any of our products contain defects or have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our reputation may be damaged and customers may be reluctant to buy our products. We may also face a higher rate of product defects as we increase our production levels in periods of significant growth. In addition, we may not find defects or failures in our products until after they are installed in a manufacturer’s fabrication facility. We may have to invest significant capital and other resources to correct these problems. Our customers also might seek to recover from us any losses resulting from defects or failures in our products. In addition, hazardous materials flow through and are controlled by certain of our products and an unintended release of these materials could result in serious injury or death. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or pay significant damages.

We may incur unexpected warranty and performance guarantee claims that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In connection with our products and services, we provide various product warranties, performance guarantees and indemnification rights. Warranty or other performance guarantee or indemnification claims against us could cause us to incur significant expense to repair or replace defective products or indemnify the affected customer for losses. In addition, quality issues have various other ramifications, including delays in the recognition of sales, loss of sales, loss of future sales opportunities, increased costs associated with repairing or replacing products, and a negative impact on our reputation, all of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our dependence on a limited number of suppliers may harm our production output and increase our costs, and may prevent us from delivering acceptable products on a timely basis.

Our ability to meet our customers’ demand for our products depends upon obtaining adequate supplies of quality components and other raw materials on a timely basis. In addition, our customers often specify components from particular suppliers that we must incorporate into our products. We also use consignment and just-in-time stocking programs, which means we carry very little inventory of components or other raw materials, and we rely on our suppliers to deliver necessary components and raw materials in a timely manner. However, our suppliers are under no obligation to continue to provide us with components or other raw materials. As a result, the loss of or failure to perform by any of our key suppliers could materially adversely affect our ability to deliver products on a timely basis. In addition, if a supplier is unable to provide the volume of components we require on a timely basis and at acceptable prices and quality, we would have to identify and qualify replacements from alternative sources of supply, and the process of qualifying new suppliers for complex components is lengthy and could delay our production. We may also experience difficulty in obtaining sufficient supplies of components and raw materials in times of significant growth in our business. If we are unable to procure sufficient quantities of components or raw materials from suppliers, our customers may elect to delay or cancel existing orders or not place future orders, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

18

Table of Contents

Supply chain disruptions, manufacturing interruptions or delays, or the failure to accurately forecast customer demand could affect our ability to meet customer demand, lead to higher costs, or result in excess or obsolete inventory.

Our business depends on our timely supply of equipment, services and related products to meet the changing requirements of our customers, which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts, materials and services from suppliers and contract manufacturers. Shortages of parts, materials and services needed to manufacture our products, as well as delays in and unpredictability of shipments due to transportation interruptions, have adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, our manufacturing operations and our ability to meet customer demand. Ongoing supply chain constraints may continue to increase costs of logistics and parts for our products and may cause us to pass on increased costs to our customers, which may lead to reduced demand for our products and materially and adversely impact our operating results. Supply chain disruptions have caused and may continue to cause delays in our equipment production and delivery schedules, which could have an adverse impact on our operating and financial results.

We may experience supply chain disruptions, significant interruptions of our manufacturing operations, delays in our ability to deliver or install products or services, increased costs, customer order cancellations or reduced demand for our products as a result of:

•global trade issues and changes in and uncertainties with respect to trade and export regulations, trade policies and sanctions, tariffs (including uncertainty around increased, new, or retaliatory tariffs and trade restrictions resulting from the current presidential administration), international trade disputes and new and unchanging regulations for exports of certain technologies to China, where a portion of our supply chain is located, and any retaliatory measures, that adversely impact us or our suppliers;

•the failure or inability to accurately forecast demand and obtain quality parts on a cost-effective basis;

•volatility in the availability and cost of parts, commodities, energy and shipping related to our products, including increased costs due to high inflation or interest rates or other market conditions;

•difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export licenses and approvals;

•shipment delays due to transportation interruptions or capacity constraints;

•a worldwide shortage of manufacturing components as a result of sharp increases in demand for semiconductor products in general;

•cybersecurity incidents or information technology or infrastructure failures, including those of a third-party supplier or service provider; and

•natural disasters, the impacts of climate change or other events beyond our control (such as earthquakes, utility interruptions, tsunamis, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, storms or extreme weather conditions, fires, regional economic downturns, regional or global health epidemics, geopolitical turmoil, increased trade restrictions between the U.S. and China and other countries, social unrest, political instability, terrorism or acts of war) in locations where we or our customers or suppliers have manufacturing, research, engineering, or other operations.

If we need to rapidly increase our business and manufacturing capacity to meet increases in demand or expedited shipment schedules, this may strain our manufacturing and supply chain operations and negatively impact our working capital.

19

Table of Contents

We are subject to order and shipment uncertainties, and any significant reductions, cancellations or delays in customer orders could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our sales are difficult to forecast because we generally do not have a material backlog of unfilled orders and because of the short timeframe within which we are often required to manufacture and deliver products to our customers. Most of our sales for a particular quarter depend on customer orders placed during that quarter or shortly before it commences. Our contracts generally do not require our customers to commit to minimum purchase volumes. While most of our customers provide periodic rolling forecasts for product orders, those forecasts do not become binding until a formal purchase order is submitted, which generally occurs only a short time prior to shipment. As a result of the foregoing and the cyclicality and volatility of the industries we serve, it is difficult to predict future orders with precision and we may incur unexpected or additional costs to align our business operations with changes in demand. Occasionally, we order component inventory and build products in advance of the receipt of actual customer orders. Customers may cancel order forecasts, change production quantities from forecasted volumes, change product specifications or delay production for reasons beyond our control. Furthermore, reductions, cancellations or delays in customer order forecasts may occur from time to time without penalty to, or compensation from, the customer. Reductions, cancellations or delays in forecasted orders could cause us to hold inventory longer than anticipated, which could reduce our gross profit, restrict our ability to fund our operations, and result in unanticipated reductions or delays in sales. If we do not obtain orders as we anticipate, we could have excess components for a specific product or finished goods inventory that we would not be able to sell to another customer, likely resulting in inventory write-offs or selling inventory at lower margins, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to interruptions, failures, or cybersecurity breaches in our information technology systems.

We rely on our information technology systems to process transactions, summarize our operating results and manage our business. Our information technology systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cyber-attack or other security breaches, catastrophic events, such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, severe weather, acts of war or terrorism, and usage errors by our employees. If our information technology systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our operations.

We may be the target of attempted cyber-attacks, computer viruses, malicious code, phishing attacks, denial of service attacks and other information security threats. In addition, artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being used by malicious actors to identify vulnerabilities, automate reconnaissance, generate sophisticated phishing and social engineering attacks, develop polymorphic malware that evades traditional detection methods, and implement coordinated cyber-attacks at scale and speed that exceed human-directed attacks. As AI capabilities continue to advance, the sophistication, scale, and frequency of AI-enhanced cyber-attacks are expected to increase significantly, potentially outpacing our ability to defend against such threats using conventional cybersecurity measures. Our cybersecurity defenses may require substantial ongoing investment in AI-powered security tools, threat intelligence, and skilled security personnel to address the evolving AI threat landscape.

20

Table of Contents

To date, cyber-attacks have not had a material impact on our financial condition, results or business; however, our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information technology systems may not be effective and security breaches or disruptions could result in material financial or other losses in the future, especially if we are not able to predict the probability and the severity of these attacks. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats, the current global economic and political environment, our prominent size and scale, the outsourcing of some of our business operations to foreign jurisdictions, the ongoing shortage of qualified cyber-security professionals, and the interconnectivity and interdependence of third parties to our systems. The occurrence of a cyber-attack, breach, unauthorized access, misuse, computer virus or other malicious code or other cyber-security event could jeopardize or result in the unauthorized disclosure, gathering, monitoring, misuse, corruption, loss or destruction of confidential and other information that belongs to us, our customers, our counterparties, third-party service providers or borrowers that is processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks. The occurrence of such an event could also result in damage to our software, computers or systems, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our customers’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations. This could result in significant losses, loss of customers and business opportunities, reputational damage, litigation, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. While we have purchased cyber-security insurance, there can be no assurance that the coverage will be sufficient to cover all financial losses. Moreover, as cyber-security events increase in frequency and magnitude, we may be unable to obtain cyber-security insurance in amounts and on terms we view as appropriate for our operations.

The reliability and capacity of our information technology systems is critical to our operations and the implementation of our growth initiatives. Any material disruption in our information technology systems, or delays or difficulties in implementing or integrating new systems or enhancing current systems, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our customers' adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies for semiconductor manufacturing process optimization and equipment control may create new technical requirements, interoperability challenges, and competitive risks.

Semiconductor equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers are increasingly adopting artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies for process optimization, predictive maintenance, equipment control, yield enhancement, and fab automation. These AI/ML capabilities may become standard customer requirements for capital equipment and subsystems, requiring real-time data integration, edge computing capabilities, sophisticated sensors and instrumentation, and software interfaces that enable AI-driven process control and optimization.

If we are unable to develop and integrate AI/ML capabilities into our gas and chemical delivery subsystems at the pace required by our OEM customers and their end customers, we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to suppliers who offer AI-enabled products. Developing AI/ML capabilities may require significant investments in software engineering, data science, sensor technologies, and computing infrastructure, and we may lack the internal expertise or resources to develop such capabilities as rapidly as the market demands. We may also face technical challenges in integrating AI/ML capabilities with our existing product architectures, or in ensuring interoperability with our OEM customers' AI platforms and industry-standard protocols.

Additionally, AI-enabled equipment and subsystems may create new data privacy, data security, and intellectual property issues, as process data, recipes, and performance information may be collected, transmitted, and analyzed by AI systems, potentially creating risks of data breaches, unauthorized access to confidential information, or disputes over ownership of AI-generated insights. Customer requirements for AI capabilities may also increase product complexity, development costs, and time-to-market for new products, and may require ongoing software updates, maintenance, and support that create new service obligations and cost structures.

Our failure to keep pace with customer AI adoption could result in loss of market share, reduced pricing power, or exclusion from next-generation equipment platforms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

21

Table of Contents

Certain of our customers require that we consult with them in connection with specified fundamental changes in our business and that we address any concerns or requests such customer may have in connection with a fundamental change.

Certain of our key customers require that we consult with them in connection with specified fundamental changes in our business, including, among other things:

•entering into any new line of business;

•amending or modifying our organizational documents;

•selling all or substantially all of our assets, or merging or amalgamating with a third party;

•incurring borrowings in excess of a specific amount;

•making senior management changes; and

•entering into any joint venture arrangement.

These customers do not have contractual approval or veto rights with respect to any fundamental changes in our business. However, our failure to consult with such customers or to satisfactorily respond to their requests in connection with any such fundamental change could potentially constitute a breach of contract or otherwise be detrimental to our relationships with such customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is largely dependent on the know-how of our employees, and we generally do not have an intellectual property position that is protected by patents.

We believe that the success of our business depends in part on our proprietary technology, information, processes and know-how and on our ability to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. We rely on a combination of trade secrets and contractual confidentiality provisions and, to a much lesser extent, patents, copyrights and trademarks to protect our proprietary rights. Accordingly, our intellectual property position is more vulnerable than it would be if it were protected primarily by patents. We cannot ensure that we have adequately protected or will be able to adequately protect our technology, that our competitors will not be able to utilize our existing technology or develop similar technology independently, that the claims allowed with respect to any patents held by us will be broad enough to protect our technology or that foreign intellectual property laws will adequately protect our intellectual property rights. If we fail to protect our proprietary rights successfully, our competitive position could suffer. Any future litigation to enforce patents issued to us, to protect trade secrets or know-how possessed by us or to defend ourselves or to indemnify others against claimed infringement of the intellectual property rights of others could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business will suffer if we are unable to attract, hire, integrate and retain key personnel and other necessary employees, particularly in the highly competitive technology labor market, or if we experience labor disruptions at our facilities.

Our business will suffer if we are unable to attract, employ and retain highly skilled personnel as our future success depends in part on the continued service of our key executive officers, as well as our research, engineering, sales and manufacturing personnel, most of whom are not subject to employment or non-competition agreements. Competition for qualified personnel in the technology industry is particularly intense, and we operate in geographic locations in which labor markets are competitive. Our management team has significant industry experience, substantial institutional knowledge of our business and operations and deep customer relationships, and therefore would be difficult to replace. In addition, our business is dependent to a significant degree on the expertise and relationships which only a limited number of engineers possess. Many of these engineers often work at our customers’ sites and serve as an extension of our customers’ product design teams. The loss of any of our key executive officers or key engineers and other personnel, including our engineers working at our customers’ sites, or the failure to attract additional personnel as needed, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could lead to higher labor costs, the use of less-qualified personnel and the loss of customers. We initiated labor cost reduction initiatives in the second quarter of 2025, continuing through the fourth quarter of 2025, which may adversely affect us as a result of decreased employee morale, the loss of institutional knowledge held by departing employees and the allocation of resources to reorganize and reassign job roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, we do not maintain key person life insurance with respect to any of our employees. In addition, if any of our key executive officers or other key employees were to join a competitor or form a competing company, we could lose customers, suppliers, know-how and key personnel.

22

Table of Contents

As of December 26, 2025, we had approximately 1,891 full time employees and 557 contract/temporary employees worldwide. None of our employees are unionized, but in various countries, local law requires our participation in works councils. While we have not experienced any material work stoppages at any of our facilities, any stoppage or slowdown could cause material interruptions in manufacturing, and we cannot ensure that alternate qualified personnel would be available on a timely basis, or at all. As a result, labor disruptions at any of our facilities could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to the risks of severe weather, earthquakes, fire, power outages, floods, and other catastrophic events, including weather events resulting from climate change, and to interruption by man-made disruptions, such as terrorism.

Our facilities could be subject to a catastrophic loss caused by natural disasters, including severe weather, fires, earthquakes or other events, including a terrorist attack, a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of a disease. Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gasses in the Earth’s atmosphere and climate change may produce significant physical effects on weather conditions, such as increased frequency and severity of droughts, storms, floods, extreme temperatures, and other climatic events. While we maintain disaster recovery plans, they might not adequately protect us. These events, including terrorist attacks, pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks of a disease, hurricanes, fires, floods and ice and snow storms, could result in damage to and closure of our or our customers’ facilities or the infrastructure on which such facilities rely. Additionally, it could delay production and shipments, reduce sales, result in large expenses to repair or replace the facility, and we may experience extended power outages at our facilities. Disruption in supply resulting from natural disasters or other causalities or catastrophic events may result in certain of our suppliers being unable to deliver sufficient quantities of components or raw materials at all or in a timely manner, which could cause disruptions in our operations or disruptions in our customers’ operations. Although we carry business interruption insurance policies and typically have provisions in our contracts that protect us in certain events, our coverage might not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur. To the extent that natural disasters or other calamities or causalities should result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, or the delay in the manufacture or shipment of our products, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

Government subsidy programs for semiconductor manufacturing may create artificial and unsustainable demand patterns for capital equipment, and subsidy conditions may create competitive distortions or impose indirect obligations on us.

Governments in the United States, European Union, Japan, South Korea, China, and other countries have enacted substantial subsidy and incentive programs to encourage domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity. These programs, including the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act, the EU Chips Act, and similar initiatives, provide grants, tax incentives, loan guarantees, and other financial support to semiconductor manufacturers who build or expand fabrication facilities in specific jurisdictions.

Government subsidy programs may create demand volatility and distortions in the semiconductor capital equipment market:

•Subsidized fabrication facility construction may create a near-term surge in capital equipment demand as multiple subsidized projects proceed simultaneously, followed by a sharp decline in demand once subsidy-driven projects are completed, creating boom-bust cycles that are more severe than normal industry cyclicality;

•Subsidized facilities may not be economically sustainable without ongoing government support, and may operate at low utilization rates or may be curtailed if subsidies are reduced or eliminated, resulting in lower ongoing demand for spare parts, upgrades, or capacity expansions;

•Government subsidy priorities may favor certain types of semiconductor manufacturing (e.g., mature node manufacturing for automotive or industrial applications versus leading-edge logic manufacturing), creating uneven demand across equipment categories and potentially reducing demand for equipment types where we have strong positions;

•Subsidized competitors in foreign markets may gain market share due to government support, while we may not have access to equivalent subsidies, creating competitive disadvantages; and

•Political changes or budget constraints may result in subsidy programs being reduced, delayed, or eliminated, causing sudden changes in expected demand.

Additionally, semiconductor manufacturers who receive government subsidies may be subject to various conditions and restrictions that could indirectly affect us:

23

Table of Contents

•"Buy national" or domestic content requirements that encourage or require subsidized manufacturers to source equipment and subsystems from domestic suppliers, potentially disadvantaging us if we do not have manufacturing presence in the subsidy jurisdiction or if our products do not meet domestic content thresholds;

•Restrictions on subsidized manufacturers' ability to expand manufacturing capacity in certain countries, which may limit end-market demand for equipment in regions where we have sales or manufacturing presence;

•Labor, environmental, or social requirements imposed on subsidy recipients that may flow down through the supply chain to us as indirect requirements or customer expectations; and

•Transparency and reporting requirements that may require subsidized customers to disclose information about their supply chains, potentially affecting our confidential commercial information or competitive position.

We have limited visibility into how government subsidy programs will ultimately affect equipment demand patterns, customer behavior, or competitive dynamics. Our inability to accurately forecast subsidy-driven demand could result in capacity mismatches, inventory imbalances, or missed market opportunities. Subsidy-driven market distortions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders.

Based on the current and anticipated valuation of our assets and the composition of our income and assets, we do not expect to be considered a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the foreseeable future. However, we must make a separate determination for each taxable year as to whether we are a PFIC after the close of each taxable year and we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for our 2025 taxable year or any future taxable year. Under current law, a non-U.S. corporation will be considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets, generally based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets during a taxable year, is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. PFIC status depends on the composition of our assets and income and the value of our assets, including, among others, a pro rata portion of the income and assets of each subsidiary in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least 25% by value of the subsidiary's equity interests, from time to time. Because we currently hold and expect to continue to hold a substantial amount of cash or cash equivalents, and because the calculation of the value of our assets may be based in part on the value of our ordinary shares, which may fluctuate considerably given that market prices of technology companies historically often have been volatile, we may be a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder held ordinary shares, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply for such U.S. holder.

24

Table of Contents

Legal and Regulatory Risks

Our business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws, rules, policies, and other obligations regarding privacy, data protection, and other matters.

We are subject to federal, state, and international laws relating to the collection, use, retention, security, and transfer of customer, employee, and business partner personally identifiable information, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) and similar effective or proposed state legislation in the U.S. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between one company and its subsidiaries, and among the subsidiaries and other parties with which we have commercial relations. The introduction of new products or expansion of our activities in certain jurisdictions may subject us to additional laws and regulations. Foreign data protection, privacy, and other laws and regulations, including GDPR, can be more restrictive than those in the U.S. These U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations, including GDPR, which can be enforced by private parties or government entities, are constantly evolving and can be subject to significant change. In addition, the application and interpretation of these laws and regulations, including GDPR, are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate, and may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices. These existing and proposed laws and regulations can be costly to comply with and can delay or impede the development of new products, result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, require significant management time and attention, and subject us to inquiries or investigations, claims or other remedies, including fines, which may be significant, or demands that we modify or cease existing business practices.

A failure by us, our suppliers, or other parties with whom we do business to comply with posted privacy policies or with other federal, state, or international privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations, including GDPR and CCPA, could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Third parties have claimed and may in the future claim we are infringing their intellectual property, which could subject us to litigation or licensing expenses, and we may be prevented from selling our products if any such claims prove successful.

We have received claims, and may in the future, that our products, processes or technologies infringe the patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. Any litigation regarding our patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert our management and key personnel from our business operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The complexity of the technology involved in our products, the uncertainty of intellectual property litigation, and the uncertainty of the intellectual property rights of others that may be applicable to our products increase these risks. Claims of intellectual property infringement may also require us to enter into costly license agreements which we may not be able to obtain on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We also may be subject to significant damages or injunctions against the development, manufacture and sale of certain of our products if any such claims prove successful. We rely on design specifications and other intellectual property of our customers in the manufacture of products for such customers. While our customer agreements generally provide for indemnification of us by a customer if we are subjected to litigation for third-party claims of infringement of such customer’s intellectual property, such indemnification provisions may not be sufficient to fully protect us from such claims, or our customers may breach such indemnification obligations to us, which could result in costly litigation to defend against such claims or enforce our contractual rights to such indemnification.

25

Table of Contents

From time to time, we may become involved in other litigation and regulatory proceedings, which could require significant attention from our management and result in significant expense to us and disruptions in our business.

We may in the future be named as a defendant from time to time in other lawsuits and regulatory actions relating to our business, such as commercial contract claims, employment claims and tax examinations, some of which may claim significant damages or cause us reputational harm. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceeding. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations or limit our ability to engage in certain of our business activities. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceeding, such proceedings are often expensive, time-consuming and disruptive to normal business operations and require significant attention from our management. As a result, any such lawsuits or proceedings could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a global company, we are subject to the risks of doing business internationally, including periodic foreign economic downturns and political instability, which may adversely affect our sales and cost of doing business in those regions of the world.

Foreign economic downturns have adversely affected our business and results of operations in the past and could adversely affect our business and results of operations in the future. In addition, other factors relating to the operation of our business outside of the U.S. may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future, including:

•the imposition of governmental controls or changes in government regulations, including tax regulations;

•difficulties in enforcing our intellectual property rights;

•difficulties in developing relationships with local suppliers;

•difficulties in attracting new international customers;

•difficulties in complying with foreign and international laws and treaties;

•restrictions on the export of technology, including those based on positions taken by governmental agencies regarding possible national, commercial or security issues posed by the development, sale or export of certain products and technologies;

•compliance with U.S. and international laws involving international operations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, export control laws and export license requirements;

•difficulties in achieving headcount reductions due to unionized labor and works councils;

•restrictions on transfers of funds and assets between jurisdictions;

•geopolitical instability;

•change in currency controls; and

•trade restrictions and changes in taxes and tariffs.

In the future, we may seek to expand our presence in certain foreign markets or enter emerging markets. Evaluating or entering an emerging market may require considerable management time, as well as start-up expenses for market development before any significant sales and earnings are generated. Operations in new foreign markets may achieve low margins or may be unprofitable, and expansion in existing markets may be affected by local political, economic and market conditions. As we continue to operate our business globally, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and the other risks noted above. The impact of any one or more of these factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

26

Table of Contents

Changes in U.S. or international trade policy, tariffs, and import/export regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our international operations and transactions depend upon favorable trade relations between the U.S. and the foreign countries in which our customers and suppliers have operations. Changes in U.S. or international social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories or countries where we currently sell our products or conduct our business, as well as any negative sentiment toward the U.S. as a result of such changes, could adversely affect our business. Legislators in the U.S. may institute or propose changes to trade policies that include the negotiation or termination of trade agreements, the imposition of higher tariffs on imports into the U.S., economic sanctions on individuals, corporations or countries, and other government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries where we conduct our business. It may be time-consuming and expensive for us to alter our business operations in order to adapt to or comply with any such changes, and we may face competition from companies that exist in a more favorable legal or regulatory environment than we do who are able to sell products for certain applications to certain customers that we are prohibited from selling to under applicable export controls.

As a result of recent trade policy changes in the U.S., there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade and a resulting impact on our operations, sales and financial condition. For example, the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS") has issued multiple rules in the last several years (the "BIS Rules") that restrict the export of advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing items when provided for use in certain semiconductor manufacturing activities in China, which have impacted and may continue to impact our sales and operations. We have had some delays in export activity as we analyze available emergency authorizations and assess the new licensing requirements for our business. While we have applied and received licenses from the BIS for our products, we recognize that the BIS could revise or expand the BIS Rules in response to public comments and the BIS may issue guidance clarifying the scope of the BIS Rules. Such revisions, expansions or guidance could change the impact of the BIS Rules on our business and require us to apply for additional licenses. If the BIS denies our license applications or there are delays in issuing licenses, we may have to cease or delay exports, which would cause a reduction in revenue. Furthermore, to the extent any of our customers or counterparties are designated on the Entity List or Unverified List maintained by the BIS, to which BIS may continue to add customers, we could suffer additional disruptions to sales and operations.

More broadly, if customers do not view us as a reliable supplier because we cannot obtain the necessary licenses, we may lose business opportunities to competitors. In particular, competitors outside the U.S. whose products are not subject to the BIS Rules may replace us if we cannot obtain licenses in a timely manner. In the longer term, if our supply is less reliable due to the BIS Rules, Chinese entities that currently purchase our products may begin to develop their own products instead. China's investments in technology development and manufacturing capability in support of its stated policy of reducing its dependence on foreign semiconductor manufacturers and other technology companies has likely already resulted, and we expect will continue to result, in reduced demand for our products in China and other key markets as well as reduced supply of critical materials for our products. To the extent that the BIS or other relevant regulators impose additional export restrictions that apply to our business, it will have an adverse impact on our revenues and operations as well.

This represents a structural, long-term threat to our revenue rather than merely a cyclical or regulatory compliance issue. Chinese government-backed initiatives to achieve semiconductor self-sufficiency, including substantial state subsidies for domestic equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers, may erode our market position in China over a multi-year period even if current export control regulations are not further tightened. We may experience permanent loss of market share in China as Chinese customers increasingly source equipment and subsystems from domestic suppliers, and we may be unable to offset such losses with growth in other geographic markets due to limited semiconductor manufacturing capacity outside of Asia.

In addition, geopolitical changes in China-Taiwan relations could disrupt the operations of companies in China or Taiwan that are suppliers to, or third-party partners of, the Company, our customers and our customers’ other suppliers. Disruption of certain critical operations in China or Taiwan would adversely affect our ability to manufacture certain products and would likely have substantial negative effects on the entire semiconductor industry.

27

Table of Contents

Tariffs and other changes in U.S. trade policy could trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries, and certain foreign governments have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on certain U.S. goods. For example, further U.S. government escalation of restrictions related to China and increased restrictions on Chinese exports, such as those tariffs contemplated by the current U.S. administration on goods originating from China, may lead to regulatory retaliation by the Chinese government and possibly further escalate geopolitical tensions, and any such scenarios may adversely impact our business. Such changes have the potential to adversely impact the U.S. economy or certain sectors thereof, our industry and the global demand for our products. We may not succeed in developing and implementing policies and strategies to counter the foregoing factors effectively in each location where we do business and the foregoing factors may cause a reduction in our sales, profitability or cash flows, or cause an increase in our liabilities.

U.S. export control regulations apply to "deemed exports" of controlled technology to foreign nationals, and the complexity of re-export controls across our international operations may limit our ability to hire qualified personnel and may create compliance challenges.

U.S. export control regulations apply not only to the physical export of products and technology from the United States, but also to "deemed exports," which occur when controlled technology or source code is released to a foreign national within the United States. A foreign national is any person who is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Deemed export rules mean that providing access to controlled technical data, software, or technology to foreign national employees, contractors, or visitors in the United States may require an export license, depending on the person's nationality and the classification of the technology.

Our business depends on our ability to hire and retain highly skilled engineers, many of whom may be foreign nationals, including individuals from China, Taiwan, and other countries that are subject to heightened export control scrutiny. Deemed export restrictions may limit our ability to:

•Recruit and hire qualified engineering talent, particularly in competitive labor markets where foreign nationals represent a significant portion of available candidates;

•Assign foreign national employees to work on projects involving controlled technologies, potentially creating inefficiencies in resource allocation and project staffing;

•Provide foreign national employees with access to technical information, training, or collaborative work environments necessary for effective performance of their duties;

•Utilize foreign national employees in customer-facing roles where exposure to customer proprietary information or controlled technologies may occur; and

•Compete for talent against companies that are not subject to deemed export restrictions or that have more permissive licensing arrangements.

Compliance with deemed export regulations requires careful tracking of employee nationalities, technology classifications, and license authorizations, and violations can result in significant civil and criminal penalties. We may be required to implement costly administrative controls, facility access restrictions, and information barriers to ensure deemed export compliance, and such measures may negatively impact operational efficiency, employee morale, and our culture of collaboration and innovation.

In addition, our international operations create re-export control complexity. Products, software, and technology that are manufactured, developed, or stored outside the United States but that incorporate U.S.-origin controlled content or that are produced using U.S.-origin technology may be subject to U.S. re-export controls. This means that transfers of items or technology among our foreign subsidiaries, from our foreign subsidiaries to customers or suppliers, or within the operations of our foreign subsidiaries may require U.S. export licenses or may be subject to U.S. export restrictions, even though such transfers do not physically touch the United States.

Tracking U.S.-origin controlled content across complex, multi-jurisdictional supply chains and manufacturing operations is administratively burdensome and creates risk of inadvertent violations. Re-export control requirements may limit our flexibility to optimize our global supply chain, to transfer manufacturing or engineering resources among facilities, or to respond quickly to customer requirements. Foreign governments may also object to the application of U.S. export controls to activities occurring outside U.S. territory, potentially creating conflicting legal obligations.

Our failure to comply with deemed export or re-export control regulations could result in loss of export privileges, significant fines and penalties, reputational damage, and criminal liability for responsible individuals, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

28

Table of Contents

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations, including laws and regulations addressing climate change, which could require us to incur environmental liabilities, increase our manufacturing and related compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our business.

We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment or addressing climate change. These environmental laws and regulations include those relating to the use, storage, handling, discharge, emission, disposal and reporting of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous materials (such as regulations imposed on the use or sale of polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS") or PFAS-containing products) used in our manufacturing processes. These materials may have been or could be released into the environment at properties currently or previously owned or operated by us, at other locations during the transport of materials or at properties to which we send substances for treatment or disposal. In addition, we may not be aware of all environmental laws or regulations that could subject us to liability in the U.S. or internationally. If we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws and regulations or become non-compliant with permits required at some of our facilities, we could be held financially responsible and incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims. We could also be required to alter or discontinue our product design, manufacturing and operations in certain jurisdictions and incur substantial expense in order to comply. In addition, our operations may be interrupted or restricted by the phase-out or ban of certain substances, materials or processes, which may impact the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in manufacturing our products.

Concern over climate change may continue to result in new or increased legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of climate change. Increased costs of energy or compliance with emissions standards due to legal or regulatory requirements related to climate change may cause disruptions in or increased costs associated with manufacturing our products.

Evolving environmental, social and governance disclosure requirements and stakeholder expectations may increase our compliance costs, expose us to reputational and litigation risks, and affect our ability to attract customers, investors, and employees.

We are subject to increasing requirements and expectations regarding environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") matters from regulators, investors, customers, employees, and other stakeholders. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has proposed rules that would require public companies to provide detailed disclosures regarding climate-related risks, greenhouse gas emissions (including Scope 1, Scope 2, and in some cases Scope 3 emissions), climate-related financial impacts, and oversight and governance of climate-related risks. Although the SEC's proposed climate disclosure rules have faced legal and regulatory challenges and their final form and timing remain uncertain, we may ultimately be required to comply with such rules or with similar disclosure requirements adopted by the SEC or other regulators.

In addition, international ESG disclosure frameworks are creating compliance obligations for companies operating globally. The European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ("CSRD") requires detailed sustainability reporting covering environmental, social, employee, human rights, anti-corruption, and diversity matters, with requirements that extend to non-EU companies with significant EU operations or revenue. Other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Singapore, and various other countries where we operate or sell products, have adopted or are considering mandatory ESG disclosure regimes. These various frameworks are not fully harmonized, creating complexity and potential inconsistency in reporting obligations across jurisdictions.

Compliance with evolving ESG disclosure requirements may require us to:

•Implement new systems, processes, and internal controls to measure, track, and report ESG metrics, including greenhouse gas emissions across our operations and supply chain;

•Engage third-party consultants, auditors, or verification services to validate ESG data and disclosures;

•Dedicate significant management time and attention to ESG strategy, governance, and reporting;

•Make costly changes to operations, supply chain, or business practices to improve ESG performance or to meet stakeholder expectations;

•Disclose information that we have historically treated as confidential or that may be competitively sensitive; and

•Subject our ESG disclosures to the same liability standards as financial disclosures, creating potential for securities litigation or regulatory enforcement if disclosures are deemed inaccurate or misleading.

29

Table of Contents

Beyond regulatory compliance, our customers, particularly large OEMs and semiconductor manufacturers, are increasingly requiring their suppliers to meet specific ESG criteria as a condition of doing business. Customer requirements may include carbon neutrality commitments, renewable energy usage targets, supply chain transparency and due diligence regarding conflict minerals and human rights, diversity and inclusion metrics, and adherence to specific ESG standards or certifications. Our failure to meet customer ESG requirements could result in disqualification from bids, loss of business, or reduced competitiveness, particularly as ESG performance becomes a more prominent factor in OEM supplier selection processes.

Similarly, investors are increasingly incorporating ESG factors into investment decisions and may penalize companies with unfavorable ESG profiles through lower valuations, reduced access to capital, or higher cost of capital. Employees and prospective employees, particularly in competitive technology labor markets, may consider our ESG commitments and performance in making employment decisions, and our failure to meet employee expectations on ESG matters could affect our ability to attract and retain talent.

We may also face litigation or reputational risks related to our ESG disclosures or performance. "Greenwashing" litigation, in which companies are accused of making misleading or unsubstantiated environmental claims, has increased in recent years. Activist shareholders, non-governmental organizations, or other parties may publicly criticize our ESG performance or disclosures, potentially causing reputational harm. ESG-related litigation or controversies could be costly to defend, could divert management attention, and could damage our reputation with customers, investors, and other stakeholders.

The evolving and sometimes conflicting nature of ESG disclosure requirements and stakeholder expectations makes it difficult to predict the ultimate costs and operational impacts of ESG compliance. Our ESG-related investments and commitments may not be sufficient to meet future regulatory requirements or stakeholder expectations, and may not generate commensurate benefits in terms of customer retention, investor support, or competitive advantage. ESG compliance costs and related business impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, prevent fraud, or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and may lead to a decline in our share price.

As a publicly traded company, we are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Section 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and to provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, our ability to record, process, and report financial information accurately and to prepare financial statements within required time periods could be adversely affected, which could subject us to litigation, investigations, or penalties; negatively affect our liquidity, our access to capital markets, perceptions of our creditworthiness, our ability to complete acquisitions, our ability to maintain compliance with covenants under our debt instruments or derivative arrangements regarding the timely filing of periodic reports, or investor confidence in our financial reporting, any of which may divert management resources or cause our stock price to decline.

Changes in tax laws, tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

As a global company, we are subject to taxation in the U.S. and various other countries. Significant judgment is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities. Our future annual and quarterly tax rates could be affected by numerous factors, including changes in applicable tax laws, the amount and composition of pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates or valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. We have significant operations in the U.S. and our holding company structure includes entities organized in the Cayman Islands, Netherlands, Singapore and Scotland. As a result, changes in applicable tax laws in these jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

30

Table of Contents

We are also subject to regular examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, and from time to time we initiate amendments to previously filed tax returns. We regularly assess the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations and amendments to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes, which requires estimates and judgments. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, we cannot ensure that the tax authorities will agree with such estimates. We may have to engage in litigation to achieve the results reflected in the estimates, which may be time-consuming and expensive. We cannot ensure that we will be successful or that any final determination will not be materially different from the treatment reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The U.S. enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) in August 2022, which, among other provisions, creates a new corporate alternative minimum tax ("CAMT") of at least 15% for certain large corporations that have at least an average of $1 billion in adjusted financial statement income over a consecutive three-year period effective in tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. The IRA also includes a 1% excise tax on new corporate stock repurchases beginning in 2023. We do not expect to meet the CAMT threshold in the near term nor expect the IRA to have a material impact on our financial statements. On January 21, 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order to immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated under the IRA. The pause applies to specific programs or activities related to climate change mitigation. While this executive order is not expected to materially adversely affect our operations, there can be no assurance that our customers, counterparties and suppliers will not be negatively impacted. In addition, it is possible that the U.S. Congress could advance other tax legislation proposals in the future that could have a material impact on our financial statements.

In October 2021, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) issued model rules for a new global minimum tax framework, commonly referred to as “Pillar Two,” which includes the introduction of a 15% global minimum tax. Certain jurisdictions in which we operate have adopted rules locally consistent with the Pillar Two framework, including Singapore, a jurisdiction in which we earn significant profit and were granted a tax holiday expiring in 2026. Additionally, prior decisions by tax authorities regarding corporate tax treatments and positions could change, resulting in a change in tax policies or prior tax rulings. While we are still evaluating the impact of Pillar Two, these rules and/or changes to prior tax treatments and positions may materially and adversely impact our provision for income taxes, net income, and cash flows.

Evolving artificial intelligence regulations may restrict our use of AI technologies, impose compliance costs, create liability risks, and affect our competitiveness.

Governments and regulatory authorities worldwide are developing legal and regulatory frameworks specifically addressing artificial intelligence technologies. The European Union has adopted the AI Act, which classifies AI systems into risk categories and imposes requirements for high-risk AI systems including conformity assessments, risk management systems, data governance, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, and robustness. The U.S. federal government has issued Executive Orders on AI that direct agencies to develop AI regulations and policies, and various U.S. states have proposed or enacted AI-specific legislation. Other countries where we operate or sell products, have adopted or are developing AI regulatory frameworks.

AI regulations may impose various requirements and restrictions on our development, deployment, and use of AI technologies, including:

•Prohibitions or restrictions on certain AI applications deemed to be high-risk or unacceptable risk;

•Mandatory impact assessments, testing, validation, and certification of AI systems before deployment;

•Requirements for transparency and explainability of AI decision-making, which may be technically difficult to achieve for certain types of AI models;

•Human oversight and intervention requirements that may limit the efficiency benefits of AI automation;

•Data governance requirements that restrict the types of data that can be used to train or operate AI systems;

•Liability frameworks that impose strict liability or expanded liability for harms caused by AI systems; and

•Varying and potentially inconsistent requirements across different jurisdictions, creating compliance complexity for our global operations.

Compliance with AI regulations may require us to implement costly governance structures, conduct extensive documentation and testing, modify or limit our use of AI technologies, or forego certain AI applications altogether. We may face situations where AI use cases that are permissible in some jurisdictions are prohibited

31

Table of Contents

or heavily restricted in others, forcing us to maintain multiple versions of products or processes or to limit AI deployment to the most restrictive common denominator.

AI regulations may also create competitive dynamics that favor certain companies or technologies. Large technology companies with greater resources may be better positioned to absorb AI compliance costs, while smaller companies or new entrants may face barriers to AI adoption. Alternatively, if our competitors are subject to less stringent AI regulations in their home jurisdictions, they may be able to develop and deploy AI capabilities more rapidly or at lower cost than we can.

The rapid pace of AI technology evolution and the nascent state of AI regulation create significant uncertainty regarding future compliance obligations. Regulatory frameworks adopted today may become outdated as AI technology advances, potentially leading to frequent regulatory changes that require ongoing adaptation. Our AI-related investments and product development decisions may be adversely affected by regulatory uncertainty, and we may make investments in AI capabilities that are later restricted or prohibited by regulation.

Violations of AI regulations could result in significant fines and penalties, prohibition on AI system deployment, requirements to withdraw products from the market, reputational damage, and potential criminal liability for responsible individuals. AI-related regulatory enforcement or compliance failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources Risks

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which could adversely affect us, including by decreasing our business flexibility. The agreement that governs our indebtedness contains covenants that could impact our ability to perform certain transactions without obtaining pre-approval from our lenders.

As of December 26, 2025, we had total principal outstanding of $125.0 million under our term loan facility and no outstanding balance under our revolving credit facility (collectively “credit facilities”). We may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our credit facilities contain certain restrictive covenants and conditions, including limitations on our ability to, among other things:

•incur additional indebtedness or contingent obligations;

•create or incur liens, negative pledges or guarantees;

•make investments;

•make loans;

•sell or otherwise dispose of assets;

•merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of our assets;

•make certain payments on indebtedness;

•pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments;

•enter into certain agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries;

•enter into transactions with affiliates;

•change the nature of our business; and

•amend the terms of our organizational documents.

As a result of these covenants, we may be restricted in our ability to pursue new business opportunities or strategies or to respond quickly to changes in the industries that we serve. A violation of any of these covenants would be deemed an event of default under our credit facilities. In such event, upon the election of the lenders, the loan commitments under our credit facilities would terminate and the principal amount of the loans and accrued interest then outstanding would be due and payable immediately. A default may also result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In the event our lenders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we cannot ensure that we and our subsidiaries would have sufficient funds to repay such indebtedness or be able to obtain replacement financing on a timely basis or at all. These events could force us into bankruptcy or liquidation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also may need to negotiate changes to the covenants in the agreements governing our credit facilities in the future if there are material changes in our business, financial condition or results of operations, but we cannot ensure that we will be able to do so on terms favorable to us or at all.

32

Table of Contents

Furthermore, our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our indebtedness, including under our credit facilities, depends on our financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and other factors beyond our control. We may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to fund our day-to-day operations or to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and, as a result, the lenders under our credit facilities could terminate their commitments to loan money, or foreclose against the assets securing such borrowings, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation, in each case, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The interest expense associated with our indebtedness is subject to variable rates, and increased debt service costs as a result of higher interest rates could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Borrowings under our credit facilities are generally subject to variable interest rates, which fluctuate depending on macroeconomic factors, and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service costs on these borrowings would also increase, even if the amount borrowed remains the same, and would require us to use more of our available cash to service our indebtedness, resulting in decreased net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to enter into swap agreements or other hedging arrangements in the future if we desire to do so, or that any future hedging arrangements will offset increases in interest rates.

Ordinary Share Ownership Risks

Our quarterly sales and operating results fluctuate significantly from period to period, and this may cause volatility in our share price.

Our quarterly sales and operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the future for a variety of reasons, including the following:

•demand for and market acceptance of our products as a result of the cyclical nature of the industries we serve or otherwise, often resulting in reduced sales during industry downturns and increased sales during periods of industry recovery or growth;

•overall economic conditions;

•changes in the timing and size of orders by our customers;

•strategic decisions by our customers to terminate their outsourcing relationship with us or give market share to our competitors;

•consolidation by our customers;

•cancellations and postponements of previously placed orders;

•pricing pressure from either our competitors or our customers, resulting in the reduction of our product prices or loss of market share;

•disruptions or delays in the manufacturing of our products or in the supply of components or raw materials that are incorporated into or used to manufacture our products, thereby causing us to delay the shipment of products;

•decreased margins for several or more quarters following the introduction of new products, especially as we introduce new subsystems or other products or services;

•changes in design-to-delivery cycle times;

•inability to reduce our costs quickly in step with reductions in our prices or in response to decreased demand for our products;

•changes in our mix of products sold;

•write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory;

•increased fixed overhead;

•one-time expenses or charges; and

•announcements by our competitors of new products, services or technological innovations, which may, among other things, render our products less competitive.

33

Table of Contents

As a result of the foregoing, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our sales and results of operations may not be meaningful and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance. Changes in the timing or terms of a small number of transactions could disproportionately affect our results of operations in any particular quarter. Moreover, our results of operations in one or more future quarters may fail to meet our guidance or the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, we would expect to experience an immediate and significant decline in the trading price of our ordinary shares.

Further, if the market for stocks in our industry or industries related to our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our ordinary shares could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our share price to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.

Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contains anti-takeover provisions that could adversely affect the rights of our shareholders.

Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contains provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of the Company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions, including, among other things:

•provisions that authorize our Board of Directors, without action by our shareholders, to issue additional ordinary shares and preferred shares with preferential rights determined by our Board of Directors;

•provisions that permit only a majority of our Board of Directors or the chairman of our Board of Directors to call shareholder meetings and therefore do not permit shareholders to call shareholder meetings; and

•provisions that impose advance notice requirements, grant the Board of Directors the right to decline to register any transfer of shares, and ownership thresholds, and other requirements and limitations on the ability of shareholders to propose matters for consideration at shareholder meetings.

These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of the Company in a tender offer or similar transaction.

The issuance of preferred shares could adversely affect holders of ordinary shares.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue preferred shares without any action on the part of holders of our ordinary shares. Our Board of Directors also has the power, without shareholder approval, to set the terms of any such preferred shares that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over our ordinary shares with respect to dividends or if we liquidate, dissolve or wind up our business and other terms. If we issue preferred shares in the future that have preference over our ordinary shares with respect to the payment of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if we issue preferred shares with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our ordinary shares, the rights of holders of our ordinary shares or the price of our ordinary shares could be adversely affected.

Our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests as a shareholder, as Cayman Islands law provides substantially less protection when compared to the laws of the U.S.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and by the Companies Law (2013 Revision) and common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take legal action against our directors and us, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the U.S. In particular, the Cayman Islands have a less exhaustive body of securities laws as compared to the U.S. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action before the U.S. federal courts.

34

Table of Contents

Furthermore, since we are a Cayman Islands company with a portion our assets located outside of the U.S., it may be difficult or impossible for shareholders to bring an action against us in the U.S. in the event that shareholders believe that their rights have been infringed under U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if shareholders are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands may render shareholders unable to enforce a judgment against our assets. There is no statutory recognition in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the U.S..

As a result of all of the above, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests through actions against us or our officers, directors or major shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the U.S..

If a U.S. person is treated as owning at least 10% of our shares, such person may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

If a U.S. person is treated as owning (directly, indirectly, or constructively) at least 10% of the value or voting power of our shares, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). Because our group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, in certain circumstances we could be treated as a controlled foreign corporation or certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as controlled foreign corporations (regardless of whether we are or are not treated as a controlled foreign corporation).

A U.S. shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to annually report and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, whether or not we make any distributions. An individual that is a U.S. shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a U.S. shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. A failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject a U.S. shareholder to significant monetary penalties and may prevent starting of the statute of limitations with respect to such shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due. We do not intend to monitor whether we are or any of our current or future non-U.S. subsidiaries is treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether any investor is treated as a U.S. shareholder with respect to us or any of our controlled foreign corporation subsidiaries. In addition, we cannot provide assurances that we will furnish to any U.S. shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations.

A U.S. investor should consult its tax advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to an investment in our shares in its particular circumstances.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

Risk Management and Strategy

Our cybersecurity program is designed from a risk- and compliance-based approach to achieve system-wide resilience and protection across our operations. We regularly assess risks from cybersecurity threats and monitor our information systems for potential vulnerabilities. We model our cybersecurity program after the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework to deliver clear and proactive processes, multi-layered defenses, and relevant technologies that are designed to control, audit, monitor, and protect access to sensitive information. Our cybersecurity program includes physical, administrative, and technical safeguards, and we maintain plans and procedures the objective of which is to help us prevent, detect and timely and effectively respond to, and as necessary, recover from, cybersecurity incidents. Through our cybersecurity risk management program, we have established operational processes to address issues including monitoring and patching of vulnerabilities, regularly updating our information systems, and evaluating new countermeasures made to defend against an evolving landscape of threats. This process is overseen by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

35

Table of Contents

In addition, we periodically engage third-party consultants and providers to assist us in assessing, testing, enhancing and monitoring our cybersecurity risk management programs and responding to any incidents.These third parties work in conjunction with our information security team in an effort to continuously improve our cyber risk posture. Examples of third-party actions include the engagement of a security operations center for real-time monitoring and response to incidents, independent audits, risk assessments and security certifications. We have established processes to help identify and manage cybersecurity risks associated with the use of these third-party consultants and providers, which include the completion of due diligence before engaging with a third-party and assessments and reviews throughout the relationship.

We believe cybersecurity awareness is important in helping prevent cyber threats. To that end, we provide monthly cybersecurity awareness training and regular phishing awareness exercises to our tech-enabled employees. We monitor and assess the success rate of employees reporting phishing scams, and the results inform the development of our security trainings, systems and programs. Additionally, role-based security training is provided to employees in certain higher-risk positions (including those who handle sensitive information, technology or funds), which is tailored to the heightened cybersecurity risks they face.

We have experienced, and may in the future experience, whether directly or through our third-party service providers or other channels, cybersecurity incidents. While prior incidents have not had a material impact on us, future incidents could have a material impact on our business, operations and reputation. Although our processes are designed to help prevent, detect, respond to and mitigate the impact of such incidents, there is no guarantee that they will be sufficient to prevent or mitigate the risk of a cyberattack or the potentially serious reputational, operational, legal or financial impacts that may result. Refer to “Item 1A. – Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, “We may be subject to interruptions or failures in our information technology systems,” for additional discussion on our cybersecurity related risks.

Cybersecurity Governance

Cybersecurity is an important part of our risk management and strategy activities and an area of focus for our Board of Directors and management. Our Board of Directors has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of our cybersecurity and information security policies and our internal controls regarding cybersecurity and information security. Our Audit Committee receives regular reports from members of our senior management and other personnel that include assessments and potential mitigation of the risks and exposures to cybersecurity incidents.

Our cybersecurity risk management and strategy activities are overseen by executive management, made up of the IT Steering Committee and Chief Information Officer.Our Chief Information Officer has over 25 years of experience in information technology and security as well as extensive experience working in and leading our information systems and technology function. The IT Steering Committee and Chief Information Officer receive regular updates on cybersecurity matters, results of mitigation efforts and cybersecurity incident response and remediation through the management of, and participation in, the cybersecurity risk management and strategy activities described above, and report to the Audit Committee quarterly on any appropriate items.

36

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices are located at 3185 Laurelview Ct., Fremont, California 94538. As of December 26, 2025, our principal manufacturing and administrative facilities, including our executive offices, are comprised of approximately 1,038,600 square feet. All of our facilities are leased, which allows for flexibility as business conditions and geographic demand change. The table below sets forth the approximate square footage of each of our facilities.

Location ApproximateSquareFootage

We do not anticipate difficulty in either retaining occupancy of any of our facilities through lease renewals prior to expiration or through month-to-month occupancy or replacing them with equivalent facilities. We believe that our existing facilities and equipment are well maintained, in good operating condition, and are adequate to meet our currently anticipated requirements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We may be subject to various legal claims and proceedings involving claims incidental to our business, including employment-related claims. We are presently not a party to any material litigation or regulatory proceeding and are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or regulatory proceeding against us which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information and Holders of Record

Our ordinary shares are listed for trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ICHR.”

As of February 13, 2026, there were 2 holders of record of our ordinary shares. This number does not include shareholders for whom shares are held in “nominee” or “street” name or in our treasury account.

Dividends

We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares for the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions (including those under our credit facilities and any potential indebtedness we may incur in the future), restrictions imposed by applicable law, tax considerations, and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

37

Table of Contents

Stock Performance Graph

The information included under the heading Item 5. – Stock Performance Graph is “furnished” and not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be “soliciting material” subject to Regulation 14A or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Exchange Act regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

The Stock Price Performance Graph set forth below plots the cumulative total shareholder return on a quarterly basis of our ordinary shares from December 25, 2020 through December 26, 2025, with the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Composite Index and the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 25, 2020 in the ordinary shares of Ichor Holdings, Ltd., in the Nasdaq Composite Index, and in the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index and assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any.

The stock price performance shown on the graph above is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Information used in the graph was obtained from the Nasdaq Stock Market, a source believed to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

None.

ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

38

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon our current plans, expectations and beliefs that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in the section entitled Item 1A. – Risk Factors. For a comparison of our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for 2024 to 2023, refer to Part II, Item 7. in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10‐K, which was filed with the SEC on February 21, 2025.

Overview

We are a leader in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of critical fluid delivery subsystems and components primarily for semiconductor capital equipment, as well as other industries such as defense/aerospace and medical. Our product offerings include gas and chemical delivery subsystems, collectively known as fluid delivery subsystems, which are key elements of the process tools used in the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. Our gas delivery subsystems deliver, monitor and control precise quantities of the specialized gases used in semiconductor manufacturing processes such as etch and deposition. Our chemical delivery subsystems precisely blend and dispense the reactive liquid chemistries used in semiconductor manufacturing processes such as chemical-mechanical planarization, electroplating, and cleaning. We also provide precision-machined components, weldments, e‐beam and laser welded components, precision vacuum and hydrogen brazing and surface treatment technologies, and other proprietary products.

Fluid delivery subsystems ensure accurate measurement and uniform delivery of specialty gases and chemicals at critical steps in the semiconductor manufacturing processes. Any malfunction or material degradation in fluid delivery reduces yields and increases the likelihood of manufacturing defects in these processes. Most OEMs outsource all or a portion of the design, engineering, and manufacturing of their gas delivery subsystems to a few specialized suppliers, including us. Additionally, many OEMs are outsourcing the design, engineering, and manufacturing of their chemical delivery subsystems due to the increased fluid expertise required to manufacture these subsystems. Outsourcing these subsystems allows OEMs to leverage their suppliers’ highly specialized engineering, design, and production skills while focusing their internal resources on their own value-added processes. Outsourcing enables OEMs to reduce their costs and development time, as well as provide growth opportunities for specialized subsystems suppliers like us.

We have a global footprint with production facilities in California, Minnesota, Oregon, Texas, Singapore, Malaysia, and Mexico.

39

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes key financial information for the periods indicated. Amounts are presented in accordance with GAAP unless explicitly identified as being a non-GAAP metric. For a description of our non-GAAP metrics and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP metrics, please refer to Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Non-GAAP Financial Results within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Year Ended

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Gross margin, non-GAAP 12.2 % 12.7 %

Operating margin (4.1) % (0.9) %

Operating margin, non-GAAP 2.2 % 2.2 %

Diluted EPS, non-GAAP $ 0.23 $ 0.18

Key Factors Affecting Our Business

Investment in Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment

The design and manufacturing of semiconductor devices is constantly evolving and becoming more complex in order to achieve greater performance and efficiency. To keep pace with these changes, OEMs need to refine their existing products and invest in developing new products. In addition, semiconductor device manufacturers will continue to invest in new wafer fabrication equipment to expand their production capacity and to support new manufacturing processes.

Outsourcing of Subsystems by Semiconductor OEMs

Faced with increasing manufacturing complexities, more complex subsystems, shorter product lead times, shorter industry spend cycles, and significant capital requirements, outsourcing of subsystems and components by OEMs has continued to grow. In the past two decades, OEMs have outsourced most of their gas delivery systems to suppliers such as us. OEMs have also started to outsource their chemical delivery systems in recent years. Our results will be affected by the degree to which outsourcing of these fluid delivery systems by OEMs continues to grow.

Cyclicality of Semiconductor Capital Equipment Industry

Our business is subject to the cyclicality of the capital expenditures of the semiconductor industry, which drives cyclicality in the semiconductor capital equipment industry in which we operate. In 2025, we derived over 90% of our sales from the semiconductor capital equipment industry. Demand for semiconductor capital equipment can fluctuate significantly based on changes in regulatory intervention and general economic conditions, including consumer spending, increased tariffs and trade restrictions, demand for semiconductor products, pricing, and other factors. In the past, these fluctuations have resulted in significant variations in the levels of spending within the semiconductor capital equipment industry, and as a result, our results of operations. The cyclicality of the semiconductor industry will continue to impact our results of operations in the future.

40

Table of Contents

Customer Concentration

The number of capital equipment manufacturers for the semiconductor device industry is significantly consolidated, resulting in a small number of large manufacturers. Our customers are a significant component of this consolidation, resulting in our sales being concentrated in a few customers. For 2025, two customers with individual sales over 10%, Lam Research and Applied Materials, accounted for a combined 76% of total sales. Our customers often require reduced prices or other pricing, quality, or delivery commitments as a condition to their purchasing from us or increasing their purchase volume, which can, among other things, result in reduced gross margins in order to maintain or expand our market share. Although we do not have any long-term contracts that require customers to place certain order quantities with us, Lam Research and Applied Materials have been our customers for over 20 years.

Macroeconomic Conditions

The semiconductor capital equipment industry is inherently cyclical. Overall semiconductor equipment spending in 2025 increased compared to 2024 levels, characterized by healthy demand in our primary markets of etch and deposition. During fiscal year 2025, our revenue grew 11.6% to $947.7 million, driven by sustained demand from our primary customers, including Lam Research and Applied Materials. To better align our global operations with evolving customer demand and drive operational efficiencies, we initiated a geographic footprint rationalization and restructuring plan in 2025. As part of this realignment, we began transitioning certain manufacturing activities and relocating machining assets to our expanded high-volume facilities, while concurrently consolidating our footprint through the closure of our facilities in Scotland and Korea. During fiscal year 2025, we incurred restructuring, exit, severance, and related asset impairment charges of approximately $35 million in connection with these activities.

While we continue to benefit from the broader growth and cyclical recovery in the semiconductor equipment industry, our operations and financial results remain subject to significant risks and uncertainties within the global trade and regulatory landscape. Specifically, the global trade environment remains complex. The outcome of ongoing negotiations between the United States and other countries regarding "reciprocal tariffs" and national security-based trade measures remains uncertain and could materially affect our material costs, product pricing, and overall demand. To date, although we have experienced modest increases in the costs of certain materials, tariffs have not had a material adverse impact on our overall demand or cost structure. Additionally, our operations in Mexico currently benefit from exemptions under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement; however, we cannot provide any assurance that these exclusions and exemptions will remain in place indefinitely, particularly as the USMCA undergoes its scheduled joint review in July 2026. Any new, expanded, or reciprocal tariffs could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations in the future. The U.S. government also continues to expand and refine export controls and similar regulations aimed at restricting access to advanced semiconductor technology, particularly in China. These controls, which require specific export licenses for many of our customers' products, create ongoing market uncertainty, could reduce demand for our equipment, and may disrupt our global supply chain.

While challenging macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions may persist in the near and intermediate term, we remain confident in our belief that the long-term demand for semiconductors, semiconductor capital equipment, and our products will continue to grow, driven by an increasing need for expanded semiconductor productive capacity and advanced manufacturing process technologies.

Components of Our Results of Operations

The following discussion sets forth certain components of our statements of operations as well as significant factors impacting those items.

Net sales

We generate sales primarily from the design, manufacture, and sale of subsystems and components for semiconductor capital equipment. Sales are recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Sales are recognized at a point-in-time, upon "delivery," as such term is defined within the contract, which is generally at the time of shipment, as that is when control of the promised good has transferred.

41

Table of Contents

Cost of sales, gross profit, and gross margin

Cost of sales consists primarily of purchased materials, direct labor, indirect labor, factory overhead cost, and depreciation expense for our manufacturing facilities and equipment. Our business has a variable cost structure, with fixed costs comprising a smaller percentage of cost of sales compared to variable costs. Our existing global manufacturing plant capacity is scalable, and we are able to adjust to increased customer demand for our products without significant additional capital investment. We operate our business in this manner to avoid having excessive fixed costs during a cyclical downturn, while retaining flexibility to expand our production volumes during periods of growth. However, during a cyclical downturn, fixed costs become a larger percentage of cost of sales, which could result in a decrease to gross margin. Additionally, since the gross margin on each of our products can differ, our overall gross margin as a percentage of our sales can change based on the mix of products we sell in any period.

Operating expenses

Our operating expenses primarily include research and development and sales, general, and administrative expenses. Personnel costs are the most significant component of operating expenses and consist of salaries, benefits, bonuses, and share-based compensation. Operating expenses also include overhead costs for facilities, IT, and depreciation. In addition, our operating expenses include amortization expense of acquired intangible assets.

Research and development – Research and development expense consists primarily of activities related to product design and other development activities, new component testing and evaluation, and test equipment and fixture development. We expect research and development expense will continue to increase in absolute dollars due to continued development of our own intellectual property and product offerings for existing and new customer markets and increases in our customers’ demand for new product designs.

Selling, general, and administrative – Selling expense consists primarily of salaries and commissions paid to our sales and sales support employees and other costs related to the sales of our products. General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries, professional fees, and overhead associated with our administrative staff. We expect selling expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to invest in expanding our markets and as we expand our international operations. We expect general and administrative expenses to also increase in absolute dollars as our business grows, due to an increase in employee-related costs, regulatory compliance, and accounting-related expenses.

Amortization of intangibles – Amortization of intangible assets is related to our finite-lived intangible assets and is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the asset.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net of interest income on our cash deposits, consists of interest on our outstanding debt under our credit facilities, including amortization of debt issuance costs, and any other indebtedness we may incur in the future. Borrowings under our credit facilities are generally subject to variable interest rates, which fluctuate depending on macroeconomic factors and can result in increased interest expense in periods of rising interest rates.

Other expense, net

The functional currency of our international operations is the U.S. dollar. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency generate foreign exchange gains and losses that are included in other expense, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Substantially all of our sales contracts, and most of our agreements with third-party suppliers, provide for pricing and payment in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, these transactions are not subject to material exchange rate fluctuations.

42

Table of Contents

Income tax expense

Income tax expense consists primarily of taxes on our taxable income related to our domestic and foreign operations, offset by the benefit of our tax holiday in Singapore, which expires in 2026. In 2025, the tax benefit resulting from our Singapore tax holiday, compared to the Singapore statutory tax rate, was approximately $3.4 million. During 2025, we maintained a valuation allowance against our U.S. state and federal deferred tax assets; therefore, we are not recording income tax benefits related to our U.S. GAAP losses. Income tax is also impacted by certain withholding taxes, Pillar 2 top-up taxes, stock option and restricted share unit (“RSU”) activity, and credit generation.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and our actual results, our future financial statements will be affected.

The critical accounting policies requiring estimates, assumptions, and judgments that we believe have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The majority of our inventories are valued on a standard cost basis, which approximates actual costs on a first-in, first-out basis. The remainder of our inventories are valued on an average cost basis, which approximates actual costs on a first-in, first-out basis. Quarterly, we assess the value of our inventory and periodically write it down for excess quantities or obsolescence to its estimated net realizable value. This assessment is based on estimated future consumption compared to inventory quantities on-hand. The estimate for future consumption is based on how assumptions of historical consumption, recency of purchases, backlog, and other factors indicate future consumption. Once the value of inventory is adjusted, the original cost of our inventory, less the write-down, represents its new cost basis. During 2025, 2024, and 2023, we wrote down inventory determined to be excessive or obsolete by $3.6 million, $8.6 million, and $9.8 million, respectively. We believe the accounting estimate related to excess and obsolete inventory is a critical accounting estimate because it requires us to make assumptions about future inventory consumption and recoverability of cost, which can be uncertain. Changes in these estimates can have a material impact on our financial statements.

43

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods presented. The period-to-period comparison of results is not necessarily indicative of results for future periods.

Year Ended

(in thousands)

Operating expenses:

Amortization of intangible assets 8,311 8,572

The following table sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of our total net sales for the periods presented.

Year Ended

Operating expenses:

Research and development 2.4 2.7

Selling, general, and administrative 10.1 9.3

Amortization of intangible assets 0.9 1.0

Total operating expenses 13.4 13.1

Operating loss (4.1) (0.9)

Interest expense, net 0.7 1.1

Other expense, net 0.2 0.1

Loss before income taxes (5.0) (2.1)

Income tax expense 0.6 0.3

44

Table of Contents

Net sales

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

The increase in net sales from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to increased customer demand stemming from increased spending within the semiconductor capital equipment industry. Further detail is provided above under the section entitled "Key Factors Affecting Our Business".

Gross margin

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

The decrease in gross margin from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to increased restructuring, country exit, and reduction-in-force related costs; increased supplies and tooling, employee, and occupancy costs; and unfavorable sales mix, partially offset by lower excess and obsolete inventory expense.

Research and development

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

Research and development expenses remained approximately unchanged from 2024 to 2025.

Selling, general, and administrative

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to increased non-recurring restructuring, country exit, and reduction-in-force related costs of $9.4 million, increased employee-related costs of $2.8 million, increased legal and professional consulting costs of $1.3 million, increased outside service provider costs of $1.0 million, increased costs associated with software and IT services of $0.8 million, and increased share-based compensation of $1.7 million, partially offset by reduced transaction-related costs associated with our acquisitions pipeline of $0.8 million.

45

Table of Contents

Amortization of intangible assets

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

Amortization of intangibles assets $ 8,311 $ 8,572 $ (261) (3.0) %

The decrease in amortization expense from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Interest expense, net

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

Weighted average borrowing rate 6.16 % 7.31 % -115 bps

The decrease in interest expense, net from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to decreases in the weighted average amounts borrowed and decreases in our weighted average borrowing rate. The reduction in our weighted average borrowings outstanding was primarily due to paying off our revolving credit facility in the first quarter of 2024. The decrease in our weighted average borrowing rate was due to lower average Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") rates (-93bps), the variable component of our borrowing rate, and lower applicable margin (-22bps), the fixed component of our borrowing rate, as a result of lower average leverage ratios in 2025.

Other expense, net

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

The change in other expense, net from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to debt issuance and modification costs connected to amending our credit agreement.

Income tax expense

Year Ended Change

(dollars in thousands)

The increase in income tax expense from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to the impact of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD") Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules ("Pillar Two") on our Singapore operations, resulting in an increased tax accrual of $2.0 million. Because we have a valuation allowance recorded against our U.S. state and federal deferred income taxes, we did not record tax benefits from our U.S. taxable losses during 2025.

46

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Results

Management uses certain non-GAAP metrics to evaluate our operating and financial results. We believe the presentation of non-GAAP results is useful to investors for analyzing business trends and comparing performance to prior periods, along with enhancing investors’ ability to view our results from management’s perspective. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis. Non-GAAP gross profit, operating income, and net income (loss) are defined as: gross profit, operating income (loss), or net income (loss), respectively, excluding (1) amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation expense, and discrete or infrequent charges and gains that are outside of normal business operations, including transaction-related costs, contract and legal settlement gains and losses, facility shutdown costs, inventory impairment charges, and severance costs associated with reduction-in-force programs, to the extent they are present in gross profit, operating income (loss), and net income (loss), respectively; and (2) with respect to non-GAAP net income (loss), the tax impacts associated with these non-GAAP adjustments, as well as non-recurring discrete tax items, including deferred tax asset valuation allowance charges. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis; the related income tax effects, including current and deferred income tax expense, are included in the adjustment line under the heading "Tax adjustments related to non-GAAP adjustments". Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share ("EPS") is defined as non-GAAP net income divided by weighted average diluted ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Non-GAAP gross margin and non-GAAP operating margin are defined as non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP operating income, respectively, divided by net sales.

Non-GAAP results have limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for our results reported under GAAP. Other companies may calculate non-GAAP results differently or may use other measures to evaluate their performance, both of which could reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP results as a tool for comparison.

Because of these limitations, you should consider non-GAAP results alongside other financial performance measures and results presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, in evaluating non-GAAP results, you should be aware that in the future we will incur expenses such as those that are the subject of adjustments in deriving non-GAAP results and you should not infer from our presentation of non-GAAP results that our future results will not be affected by these expenses or other discrete or infrequent charges and gains that are outside of normal business operations.

The following table presents our unaudited non‐GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin and a reconciliation from gross profit, the most comparable GAAP measure, for the periods indicated:

Year Ended

(dollars in thousands)

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Restructuring plan costs (1) 20,711 —

Facility shutdown costs (2) 2,760 —

U.S. GAAP gross margin 9.3 % 12.2 %

Non-GAAP gross margin 12.2 % 12.7 %

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; and (ii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.9 million.

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory write-off charges of $1.7 million; and (ii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.1 million.

(3)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs (other than severance costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations, as described above).

47

Table of Contents

The following table presents our unaudited non‐GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin and a reconciliation from operating loss, the most comparable GAAP measure, for the periods indicated:

Year Ended

(dollars in thousands)

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Restructuring plan costs (1) 26,644 —

Amortization of intangible assets 8,311 8,572

Facility shutdown costs (2) 6,726 —

Transaction-related costs (4) — 785

U.S. GAAP operating margin (4.1) % (0.9) %

Non-GAAP operating margin 2.2 % 2.2 %

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; (ii) fixed asset charges of $3.1 million; (iii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.7 million; (iv) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $1.2 million; and (v) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $0.9 million.

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.8 million; (ii) inventory write-off charges of $1.7 million; (iii) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $1.3 million; (iv) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $1.3 million; and (v) accelerated depreciation charges of $0.6 million.

(3)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs (other than severance costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations, as described above).

(4)Represents transaction-related costs incurred in connection with our acquisitions pipeline.

48

Table of Contents

The following table presents our unaudited non‐GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted EPS and a reconciliation from net income (loss), the most comparable GAAP measure, for the periods indicated. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis; the related income tax effects, including current and deferred income tax expense, are included in the adjustment line under the heading "Tax adjustments related to non-GAAP adjustments."

Year Ended

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Restructuring plan costs (1) 26,644 —

Amortization of intangible assets 8,311 8,572

Facility shutdown costs (2) 6,726 —

Transaction-related costs (4) — 785

Loss on extinguishment of debt (5) 667 —

Tax adjustments related to non-GAAP adjustments (6) 129 175

Tax expense (benefit) from valuation allowance (7) 83 —

U.S. GAAP diluted EPS $ (1.54) $ (0.64)

Non-GAAP diluted EPS $ 0.23 $ 0.18

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; (ii) fixed asset charges of $3.1 million; (iii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.7 million; (iv) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $1.2 million; and (v) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $0.9 million.

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.8 million; (ii) inventory write-off charges of $1.7 million; (iii) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $1.3 million; (iv) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $1.3 million; and (v) accelerated depreciation charges of $0.6 million.

(3)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs (other than severance costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations, as described above).

(4)Represents transaction-related costs incurred in connection with our acquisitions pipeline.

(5)In September 2025, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, which includes a group of financial institutions as direct lenders underlying the agreement. Under the debt modification literature codified in ASC 470, a portion of the refinance was treated as an extinguishment. Accordingly, $0.2 million of existing capitalized deferred issuance costs were written off as a loss on extinguishment of debt and $0.5 million of third-party and lender fees were expensed as incurred.