HUT · Read the filing

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual business, financial condition, and results of operations could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” See also “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any period in the future.

Business Overview

Hut 8 is an energy infrastructure platform that integrates power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases. We take a power-first, innovation-driven approach to developing, commercializing, and operating the critical infrastructure that underpins the breakthrough technologies of today and tomorrow. As of December 31, 2025, our platform spanned 1,020 megawatts of energy capacity under management across 15 sites in the United States and Canada: five ASIC compute, hosting, and managed services sites in Alberta, New York, and Texas, five cloud and colocation data centers in British Columbia and Ontario, four power generation assets in Ontario, and one non-operational site in Alberta; 330 megawatts of energy under construction at one site in Louisiana; 1,230 megawatts of energy capacity under development across three sites in Texas and Illinois; 1,755 megawatts of energy capacity under exclusivity; and 5,185 megawatts of energy capacity under diligence. Of this capacity, approximately 310 megawatts is associated with the four power generation assets we divested in Q1 2026.

2025 Highlights

Table of Contents

Key Factors Affecting Our Performance

Power constraints

Access to energy is a key factor affecting our ability to meet growing demand for HPC, AI, and ASIC compute and to scale our digital infrastructure platform. Power is the foundation of our operations. We acquire, develop, and manage critical energy assets such as interconnects, powered land, and other electrical infrastructure to address the load demands of energy-intensive applications. As competition for power intensifies, our performance depends on originating, commercializing, and optimizing energy capacity at scale. We believe our experience in power origination, infrastructure design, and load optimization positions us to manage these constraints and support continued growth. Our portfolio currently provides access to competitively priced electrical power in the regions where we operate; however, there is no guarantee that we will be able to procure additional power on similar terms, or at all. Market prices for power, capacity, and ancillary services are unpredictable and tend to fluctuate substantially. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Operations—We are subject to risks associated with our need for significant electrical power” in the Annual Report.

Expansion into AI infrastructure services and other energy-intensive use cases

A key factor affecting our performance is our ability to expand into AI infrastructure services and other energy-intensive use cases. We are leveraging our existing development and operational expertise to develop data centers that support specialized workloads for enterprise and hyperscale customers and other next-generation, energy-intensive use cases. Success in this area depends on various factors, including our ability to develop future sites, secure and retain customers, manage capital efficiently, and compete effectively in emerging technology markets. While this expansion may increase operating and capital costs and expose us to execution and market risks, management believes our experience in power origination, development, and management in large-scale digital infrastructure development position us to capture long-term growth opportunities in the evolving AI sector and other next-generation, energy-intensive use cases.

Table of Contents

Price of Bitcoin

While we are migrating towards less volatile, lower cost-of-capital businesses, such as data centers, our current business remains heavily dependent on the price of Bitcoin, which has historically experienced significant volatility. Our exposure is driven primarily by the Bitcoin held on our consolidated balance sheet, including Bitcoin held directly by us and American Bitcoin in our respective strategic reserves. In addition, our consolidated results reflect American Bitcoin’s activities as a Bitcoin accumulation platform and its strategy of purchasing and holding Bitcoin. Lastly, we generate revenue from Bitcoin rewards that are earned through mining operations at our facilities, the majority of which are conducted through American Bitcoin.

Under ASU 2023-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”), Bitcoin is revalued at fair value at the end of each reporting period, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. As a result, fluctuations in the price of Bitcoin may significantly impact our results of operations.

Bitcoin network difficulty and hashrate

Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in Bitcoin prices, but also by increases in the competition for Bitcoin production, specifically for ASIC compute. This increased competition is described as the network hashrate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires Bitcoin miners like American Bitcoin, to upgrade their equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners. Conversely, a decline in network hashrate results in a decrease in difficulty, increasing mining proceeds and profitability.

Block reward and halving

The current Bitcoin reward for solving a block is 3.125 Bitcoin. The Bitcoin network is programmed such that the Bitcoin block reward is halved every 210,000 blocks mined, or approximately every four years. This reduction in reward spreads out the release of Bitcoin over a long period of time as fewer Bitcoin are mined with each halving event. Bitcoin halving events impact the number of Bitcoin that we mine, including through American Bitcoin which, in turn, may have a potential impact on our results of operations. The last halving event occurred in April 2024, and the next halving event is expected to occur in 2028.

Key Performance Indicators

In addition to our financial results and generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) financial measures, we use certain key performance indicators to evaluate our business, identify trends, and make strategic decisions. Certain Key Performance Indicators for the prior period were reclassified to align with updated definitions.

The following table presents our key performance indicators as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

As of

December 31,

Energy Capacity Under Diligence 5,185 MW 8,599 MW

Energy Capacity Under Exclusivity 1,755 MW 2,768 MW

Energy Capacity Under Development 1,230 MW — MW

Energy Capacity Under Construction 330 MW 205 MW

Energy Capacity Under Management 1,020 MW 815 MW

Table of Contents

Energy Capacity Under Diligence

Energy Capacity Under Diligence represents sites identified for large-load use cases such as AI, HPC, ASIC compute, industrial applications such as next generation manufacturing, and other energy-intensive technologies. At this stage, we assess site potential by engaging with utilities, landowners, power generators, local, state and regulatory bodies, and other stakeholders to evaluate critical factors, including power availability, infrastructure readiness, fiber connectivity, and overall commercial viability. This metric allows management to better understand our potential opportunities, allowing us to remain selective in our investment decisions while positioning us to respond to market demand signals and emerging opportunities. Energy Capacity Under Diligence as of December 31, 2025, was 5,185 MW compared to 8,599 MW as of December 31, 2024. The net decrease reflects both the advancement of certain sites into other development categories and the removal of sites that no longer met our strategic, commercial, infrastructure, or regulatory criteria.

Energy Capacity Under Exclusivity

Energy Capacity Under Exclusivity represents sites where we have secured a clear path to ownership through either: (i) an exclusivity agreement that prevents the sale of designated land and power capacity to another party or (ii) a tendered interconnection agreement, confirming a viable path to securing power and infrastructure for deployment. Management monitors Energy Capacity Under Exclusivity to evaluate potential near-term opportunities prior to making additional investment commitments. Energy Capacity Under Exclusivity as of December 31, 2025 was 1,755 MW compared to 2,768 MW as of December 31, 2024. The net decrease reflects both the advancement of certain sites into other development categories and the removal of sites that no longer met our strategic, commercial, infrastructure, or regulatory criteria.

Energy Capacity Under Development

Energy Capacity Under Development represents sites where we are actively investing in development and commercialization by executing definitive land and/or power agreements, advancing site design and infrastructure buildout, and engaging with prospective customers. This phase is monitored by management as it represents the projects that are closest to commencing construction. Energy Capacity Under Development as of December 31, 2025 was 1,230 MW compared to 0 MW as of December 31, 2024. The growth was driven by an increase of 1,230 MW in capacity advancing from exclusivity to development, including two sites in Texas totaling 1,180 MW, and one site in Illinois of 50 MW.

Energy Capacity Under Construction

Energy Capacity Under Construction represents sites where we have executed a definitive offtake or other commercial agreements and commenced construction activities. This stage includes oversight of contractors, equipment delivery, and commissioning schedules to ensure projects are completed safely, on time, and within budget. Progress at this stage is closely monitored to manage capital deployment and align project delivery with customer timelines and market demand. Energy capacity under construction as of December 31, 2025 was 330 MW related to the River Bend site compared to 205 MW as of December 31, 2024, related to the Vega site which was energized and moved to Energy Capacity Under Management in June 2025.

Energy Capacity Under Management

Energy Capacity Under Management comprises all Power assets: Power Generation, Managed Services, ASIC infrastructure, CPU infrastructure, ASIC Compute, Traditional Cloud, and non-operational sites. Management reviews this metric to assess total energy capacity utilization across our operations to drive an efficient allocation of resources. Energy Capacity Under Management as of December 31, 2025 was 1,020 MW, compared to 815 MW as of December 31, 2024. The increase reflects the energization of our 205 MW Vega site in June 2025. Subsequent to year-end, we completed the sale of four power generation facilities in Ontario totaling 310 MW, which will reduce Energy Capacity Under Management in future periods.

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to our results determined in accordance with GAAP, we rely on Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our business, measure our performance, and make strategic decisions. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss or income, adjusted for impacts of interest expense, income tax benefit or provision, depreciation and amortization, our share of unconsolidated joint venture depreciation and amortization, net of basis adjustments, foreign exchange gain or loss, loss or gain on sale of property and equipment, gain on debt extinguishment, gain on derivatives, gain on other financial liability, gain on warrant liability, gain on bargain purchase, the removal of non-recurring transactions, asset contribution costs, impairment charges, loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes, loss attributable to non-controlling interests, and stock-based compensation expense in the period presented. You are encouraged to evaluate each of these adjustments and the reasons our Board and management team consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis.

Our board of directors and management team use Adjusted EBITDA to assess our financial performance because it allows them to compare our operating performance on a consistent basis across periods by removing the effects of our capital structure (such as varying levels of interest expense and income), asset base (such as depreciation and amortization), and other items (such as non-recurring transactions mentioned above) that impact the comparability of financial results from period to period.

Net (loss) income is the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA. In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in such presentation. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. There can be no assurance that we will not modify the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in the future, and any such modification may be material. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool and you should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of this non-GAAP financial measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility.

For a reconciliation to our most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please see “—Results of Operations” below.

Business Segments

We have four reportable business segments: Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other.

Power

The Power business segment consists of Power Generation and Managed Services.

Power Generation

We generate revenue from our 80.1% interest in a joint venture with Macquarie Group Limited (“Macquarie”), a global financial services and infrastructure investment firm, which provides capacity and energy to the electrical grid through four natural gas power plants in Ontario, Canada (the “Far North JV”). The power generation facilities were acquired in February 2024 and are connected to the IESO, which operates Ontario’s power grid. The power generation assets primarily generate revenue from capacity payments and electricity sales, both of which are variable and depend on several factors, including generation capacity in the market, the supply and demand for electricity, and the prevailing price of natural gas.

In June 2025, all four of the power plants were awarded five-year capacity contracts with IESO. The contracts were awarded to the Far North JV following successful bids submitted into the competitive IESO MT2 capacity auction and will commence on May 1, 2026.

Table of Contents

In November 2025, Hut 8 announced the sale of the Far North JV to TransAlta following the successful optimization and long-term contract wins. The transaction closed on February 2, 2026.

Managed Services

Our Managed Services business provides institutional partners with an end-to-end partnership model for energy infrastructure development, including:

● Project inception: site design, procurement, and construction management;

● Compliance and reporting: finance, accounting, and safety.

Cash flows in our Managed Services business are generated through a fee structure that is typically fixed based on power capacity under management, with reimbursement of passthrough costs. In addition to the fixed fee, under certain agreements, further cash flows may be driven from incentive bonuses and certain energy management services.

As of December 31, 2025, we managed 280 MW of energy capacity under this program at one site in the United States owned by the King Mountain JV.

Starting April 1, 2025, we began operating as the exclusive provider of managed services to American Bitcoin via the execution of a Master Managed Services Agreement (“MSA”). Under the MSA, we provide American Bitcoin with management, oversight, strategy, compliance, operational, and other services for American Bitcoin’s mining operations. These operations are colocated at our facilities and include 205 MW of energy capacity under management currently deployed at our Vega site. The fee structure typically consists of (i) a fixed fee of $1.250/kW-month based on the power capacity of each facility, as well as (ii) designated site level reimbursements. As American Bitcoin is a consolidated subsidiary, all fees under the MSA are eliminated in consolidation.

Digital Infrastructure

Under our ASIC infrastructure business, we enter into contracts to host and operate mining equipment on behalf of third parties within our facilities. These services include the provision, if applicable, and hosting of mining equipment as well as the monitoring, troubleshooting, repair, and maintenance of such equipment. Revenues from ASIC infrastructure services are generated through fees that may be fixed or based on profit-sharing arrangements, often with reimbursement for certain pass-through costs, such as electricity.

During the fourth quarter of 2024, our agreement with Ionic Digital Inc. (“Ionic”) to host approximately 8,500 miners (0.8 EH/s) at our Alpha site was terminated. As a result, we ceased providing ASIC infrastructure services at Alpha and utilized the site solely for self-mining purposes.

Starting April 1, 2025, we began operating as the exclusive provider of ASIC infrastructure services to American Bitcoin via the execution of a Master Colocation Services Agreement (“CSA”). Under the CSA, we provide ASIC infrastructure services for American Bitcoin’s miners at our facilities. The fee structure typically includes (i) a fixed monthly fee that targets a 25% yield on cost of each facility as of the start of the specific service order under the CSA, subject to an annual increase, as well as (ii) infrastructure-related site level reimbursements. As American Bitcoin is a consolidated subsidiary, all fees under the CSA are eliminated in consolidation.

Table of Contents

During 2024, we entered into an ASIC colocation contract with Bitmain Technologies Georgia Limited (“Bitmain”) to host miners at our Vega site. The agreement featured a fixed hosting fee with an option for us to purchase all or a portion of the hosted machines in up to three tranches at a fixed price within six months of energization of the relevant tranches. We completed energization of the miners during June and July 2025. In August 2025, pursuant to our Put Option Agreement with American Bitcoin entered into on March 31, 2025 (the “Put Option Agreement”), we assigned our option to purchase the hosted machines to American Bitcoin. In August 2025, American Bitcoin exercised this option to purchase all of the Bitmain miners hosted at the Vega site, where we then began to provide ASIC infrastructure services to American Bitcoin under the CSA.

Through our Hut 8 Canada business, we provide data center and cloud infrastructure services, including colocation solutions, supported by approximately 3 MW of energy capacity and more than 36,000 square feet of geo-diverse data center space across five locations in Canada. These services support customers operating compute, storage, and network workloads across traditional enterprise, B2B, machine learning, visual effects, and AI. Our CPU infrastructure offering is delivered in Mississauga, Ontario; Vaughan, Ontario; Kelowna, British Columbia; and two locations in Vancouver, British Columbia. The facilities are powered predominately by emission-free energy sources. This segment serves computing needs unrelated to ASIC Compute. These data centers are carrier neutral with network diversity and redundancy from multiple telecommunications providers.

Our CPU infrastructure business is based on a fixed-fee model. Customers pay a fixed recurring monthly fee based on a set amount of resources assigned.

We are expanding our Digital Infrastructure platform to support AI and other high-performance computing workloads through purpose-built data centers, beginning with the development of our River Bend campus in Louisiana.

Compute

Our Compute segment comprises operating businesses that deploy and monetize compute assets across next-generation energy-intensive technology end markets. We generate revenue through the operation of owned compute infrastructure and the provision of compute-based services, with economics driven by hardware utilization, operating efficiency, and market demand. The Compute business segment consists of ASIC Compute, Traditional Cloud, and AI Cloud.

ASIC Compute

The ASIC Compute segment reflects revenue generated primarily by American Bitcoin.

Our ASIC Compute business spanned five sites as of December 31, 2025, which are occupied by American Bitcoin miners and hosted at facilities supported by our ASIC Infrastructure:

Until April 30, 2024, we also had ASIC Compute operations hosted at sites in Kearney, Nebraska and Granbury, Texas. We previously mined Bitcoin at a site in Drumheller, Alberta, which has been non-operational since March 2024 due to lack of profitability driven primarily by elevated energy costs and underlying voltage issues.

Bitcoin rewards are received from mining activity through third-party mining pool operators, which allow miners to combine their processing power, increasing their chances of solving a block and getting paid by the network. We provide computing power to mining pools, which use this computing power to operate nodes and validate blocks on the blockchain. The pools then distribute our pro-rata share of Bitcoin mined to us based on the computing power we contribute.

Table of Contents

During February and March 2025, our mining activity was reduced due to a planned fleet upgrade, which was completed on April 4, 2025. The fleet upgrade resulted in higher efficiency Antminer S21+ miners at our Salt Creek and Medicine Hat sites, which improved ASIC Compute operations.

On March 31, 2025, we launched American Bitcoin. Beginning April 1, 2025, ASIC Compute operations previously reported under our Compute segment remain under this segment but operate generally through our majority-owned subsidiary, American Bitcoin.

On August 5, 2025, pursuant to the Put Option Agreement, we assigned our option to purchase up to approximately 17,280 Bitmain Antminer U3S21EXPH ASIC miners (collectively, the “Bitmain Miners”), representing a total of approximately 14.86 EH/s, to American Bitcoin. American Bitcoin exercised the option on August 5, 2025 and entered into an On-Rack Sales and Purchase Agreement (the “ABTC Bitmain Purchase Agreement”) with Bitmain to purchase the Bitmain Miners in one or more tranches for a total purchase price of up to approximately $320.0 million, not including any applicable tariffs, duties or similar charges.

Concurrently with the execution of the ABTC Bitmain Purchase Agreement, American Bitcoin purchased 16,299 of the Bitmain Miners, representing a total of approximately 14.02 EH/s, for a total purchase price of approximately $314 million, paid through the pledge of Bitcoin at a mutually agreed upon fixed price. Such purchase price was reduced by the application of a deposit and certain expenses of approximately $46.0 million we previously paid to Bitmain. American Bitcoin repaid the $46 million in October 2025, pursuant a pledge of additional Bitcoin to Bitmain at a mutually agreed upon fixed price, where upon Bitmain refunded the $46.0 million comprising of the deposit and certain expenses to us satisfying American Bitcoin’s repayment obligation. In September 2025, American Bitcoin purchased the remaining 981 Bitmain Miners for a total purchase price of $18.9 million, also paid through the pledge of Bitcoin at a mutually agreed upon fixed price. The Bitcoin pledged under the ABTC Bitmain Purchase Agreement has a redemption period of approximately 24 months from each pledge date.

Traditional Cloud

Our Traditional Cloud segment reflects revenue generated by Hut 8 Canada. Traditional Cloud services support both public and private cloud deployments, managed backup, business continuity and disaster recovery services, and high-performance, high-capacity storage solutions at our five HPC locations across Canada. We employ a consumption-based fee structure where customers commit to a baseline level of compute, storage, network, or power usage as defined in their service agreements. Any usage beyond this baseline is typically billed incrementally, so costs are aligned with actual resource consumption and customers are afforded flexibility as their needs evolve.

AI Cloud

Our AI Cloud assets are deployed under our wholly owned subsidiary, Highrise AI, Inc., at a third-party colocation site near Chicago, Illinois. This segment generates recurring revenue through payments made by the provider to us based on fixed infrastructure payments and a revenue share tied to AI Cloud utilization.

Other

Our Other reporting segment includes activities that fall outside the scope of our Power, Digital Infrastructure, and Compute layers.

Equipment Sales and Repairs

We may sell mining equipment when profitable opportunities arise (e.g., if market prices exceed our procurement cost). We may also repair miners for third parties in exchange for a fee, as we have a fully equipped, MicroBT-certified repair center space at our Medicine Hat site.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, Increase

(in USD thousands) 2025 2024 (Decrease)

Revenue:

Cost of revenue – Digital Infrastructure 8,891 15,556 (6,665)

Cost of revenue – Other — 4,584 (4,584)

Operating expenses (income):

Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment 4,593 (634) 5,227

Impairment - other — 4,472 (4,472)

Other income (expense):

Asset contribution costs (22,780) — (22,780)

Gain on debt extinguishment — 5,966 (5,966)

Gain on other financial liability 956 — 956

Gain on warrant liability 384 — 384

Gain on bargain purchase — 3,060 (3,060)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture 8,727 10,359 (1,632)

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation:

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, Increase

(in USD thousands) 2025 2024 (Decrease)

Foreign exchange (gain) loss (3,396) 5,000 (8,396)

Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment 4,593 (634) 5,227

Gain on debt extinguishment — (5,966) 5,966

Gain on other financial liability (956) — (956)

Gain on warrant liability (384) — (384)

Gain on bargain purchase — (3,060) 3,060

Asset contribution costs 22,780 — 22,780

Impairment - other — 4,472 (4,472)

Loss attributable to non-controlling interests 3,410 473 2,937

Revenue

Total revenue was $235.1 million and $162.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, and 2024 respectively, and consisted of Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other.

Power

Power revenue was $23.2 million and $56.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $33.4 million decrease was primarily driven by a $40.8 million decrease in Managed Services revenue due to the $13.5 million in contract termination fees received from MARA Holdings in the prior year period, as well as the termination of the managed services agreement with Ionic in December 2024. This decrease was partially offset by a $7.4 million increase in electricity sales through the Far North JV due to growth in electricity demand during 2025. We also generate intercompany revenue under the MSA between us and American Bitcoin, which is eliminated upon consolidation.

Digital Infrastructure

Digital Infrastructure revenue was $9.6 million and $17.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $7.9 million decrease was primarily driven by (i) a $7.6 million decrease in ASIC infrastructure revenue as a result of the termination of our colocation agreement with Ionic during the fourth quarter of 2024, and (ii) a $0.3 million decrease in CPU infrastructure revenue due to customer churn. We also generate intercompany revenue under the CSA between us and American Bitcoin, which is eliminated upon consolidation.

Table of Contents

Compute

Compute revenue was $202.3 million and $80.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, representing an increase of $121.6 million year over year. This increase was primarily driven by (i) a $115.4 million increase in ASIC Compute revenue, largely attributable to an increase in the average revenue per Bitcoin mined from $60,436 to $103,647 and an increase in Bitcoin mined from 1,184 to 1,803. The increase in Bitcoin mined was primarily due to improved uptime following the fleet upgrade completed in April 2025 at the Salt Creek and Medicine Hat locations and the commencement of ASIC Compute revenue through American Bitcoin mining at the Vega site in August 2025, and (ii) a $7.4 million increase in revenues from our AI Cloud offering, driven by a full year of sales activity in 2025. These increases were partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in Traditional Cloud revenue due to customer churn.

Other

Other revenue was nil and $7.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This decrease was primarily driven by (i) a $7.4 million decrease in equipment sales revenue, and (ii) equipment repair services revenue that was lower by $0.2 million.

Cost of Revenue

Total cost of revenue was $107.8 million and $86.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively, and consisted of Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other.

Power

Power cost of revenue was $20.5 million and $21.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $1.0 million decrease was primarily driven by a $9.2 million decrease in cost of revenue related to the termination of the managed services agreement with Ionic in December 2024. This decrease was partially offset by a $8.2 million increase in cost of revenue related to electricity sales through the Far North JV due to growth in electricity demand during 2025.

Digital Infrastructure

Digital Infrastructure cost of revenue was $8.9 million and $15.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $6.7 million decrease was primarily driven by a $7.5 million decrease in ASIC infrastructure-related costs as a result of the termination of our colocation agreement with Ionic during the fourth quarter of 2024. This decrease was partially offset by a $0.8 million increase in cost of sales related to CPU infrastructure operations, including rent, electricity, and connectivity costs.

Compute

Compute cost of revenue was $78.4 million and $45.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $33.4 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $32.2 million rise in ASIC Compute costs due to higher uptime as a result of the fleet upgrade that was completed in April 2025 at the Salt Creek and Medicine Hat sites, as well as the energization of the Vega site in June 2025, and (ii) a $2.2 million increase in costs related to AI Cloud offerings due to having a full year of activity in 2025. These increases were partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in Traditional Cloud costs due to customer churn.

Other

Other cost of revenue was nil and $4.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $4.6 million decrease was primarily driven by (i) a $4.2 million decrease in equipment sales costs, and (ii) a $0.4 million decrease in costs related to our equipment repair services.

Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense was $101.9 million and $47.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. This $54.1 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $35.5 million increase in depreciation of American Bitcoin’s ASIC miners as a result of the fleet upgrade that was completed in April 2025 at our Salt Creek and Medicine Hat sites, as well as American Bitcoin’s purchase of the Bitmain Miners at the Vega site in August 2025, (ii) an $11.5 million increase in depreciation of our mining infrastructure and related machinery and equipment related to the construction and energization of our Vega site in June 2025, and (iii) a $6.6 million increase in depreciation of our AI GPUs primarily related to a full year of ownership in 2025 compared to only a partial year in 2024.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $122.8 million and $72.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. This $49.9 million uptick in G&A expenses was primarily driven by (i) a $37.0 increase in share based payments, (ii) an $11.2 million growth in salary and benefit expenses due to added headcount to support our growth initiatives, (iii) a $9.5 million increase in transaction costs related to the ABTC Merger, and (iv) a $6.5 million increase in general, marketing, travel, and other expenses in line with the rise in headcount to support our growth initiatives. These increases were partially offset by a $17.8 million decrease in sales tax expenses as we received a $17.8 million sales tax refund in Canada in December 2025 related to sales taxes paid in 2024 and prior periods.

Loss (gain) on digital assets

Loss on digital assets was $220.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, compared to a gain on digital assets of $509.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024. The year-over-year unfavorable variance was primarily driven by a decrease in the price of Bitcoin, which declined from approximately $93,354 as of December 31, 2024 to approximately $87,498 as of December 31, 2025.

Other income (expense)

Other income was $22.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, compared to other expense of $8.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024. This $30.8 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $54.8 million increase in gain on derivatives related to our Bitcoin redemption option and call options, (ii) an $8.4 million increase in foreign exchange gain, (iii) a $1.0 million increase in gain on other financial liability, and (iv) a $0.4 million increase in gain on warrant liability. These gains were partially offset by (i) a $22.8 million increase in asset contributions costs related to the launch of American Bitcoin, (ii) a $6.0 million decrease in gain on debt extinguishment, (iii) a $3.1 million decrease in gain on bargain purchase related to the Far North JV acquisition in the prior period, (iv) a $1.6 million decrease in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture, and (v) a $0.3 million decrease in interest expense due to lower interest rates on our outstanding debt.

Income tax benefit (provision)

Income tax benefit was $51.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, compared to income tax provision of $113.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024. The income tax benefit for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by deferred tax impacts related to unrealized losses on digital assets, compared to an income tax provision for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 that resulted from deferred tax impacts associated with unrealized gains on digital assets.

Loss from discontinued operations

Loss from discontinued operations was nil and $7.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. On March 6, 2024, we announced that we would cease operations at our Drumheller site in Alberta, Canada in connection with restructuring and optimization initiatives designed to strength financial performance. Of the $7.0 million loss related to the closure of our Drumheller site, the impairment of the long-term assets contributed $6.1 million and $3.2 million was from other operational activities. These losses were partially offset by a tax benefit of $2.3 million.

Table of Contents

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, Increase

(in USD thousands) 2024 2023 (Decrease)

Revenue:

Cost of revenue – Digital Infrastructure 15,556 4,321 11,235

Operating (income) expenses:

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment (634) 888 (1,522)

Realized gain on sale of digital assets — (2,376) 2,376

Impairment of digital assets — 1,431 (1,431)

Impairment – other 4,472 — 4,472

Legal settlement — (1,531) 1,531

Other (expense) income:

Foreign exchange gain (loss) (5,000) 1,002 (6,002)

Gain on derivatives 6,780 — 6,780

Gain on bargain purchase 3,060 — 3,060

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture 10,359 12,815 (2,456)

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests 473 — 473

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustments (56,390) 10,761 (67,151)

Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation:

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, Increase

(in USD thousands) 2024 2023 (Decrease)

(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment (634) 888 (1,522)

Gain on derivatives (6,780) — (6,780)

Gain on bargain purchase (3,060) —

Impairment - other 4,472 —

(Income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests 473 — 473

refund. Non-recurring transactions for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 represent approximately $9.6 million related to a sales tax accrual and $2.4 million of transaction costs related to the Business Combination, partially offset by a gain from a legal settlement of $1.5 million.

Revenue

Total revenue was $162.4 million and $96.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively, and consisted of Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other.

Power

Power revenue was $56.6 million and $22.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $33.8 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $13.5 million contract termination fee received from MARA, (ii) a $11.4 million increase in electricity sales through the Far North JV assets, which we acquired in February 2024, and (iii) an $8.9 million increase in Managed Services revenue related to the managed services agreement with Ionic, which was entered into during January 2024 and terminated effective December 2024.

Digital Infrastructure

Digital Infrastructure revenue was $17.5 million and $8.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $9.2 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $5.2 million increase in CPU infrastructure revenue, reflecting a full year of revenue recognition following the Business Combination, and (ii) a $4.0 million increase in cost reimbursements related to the Ionic colocation agreement.

Table of Contents

Compute

Compute revenue was $80.7 million and $64.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $15.8 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $7.3 million increase in ASIC Compute revenue, largely due to an increase in the average revenue per Bitcoin mined from $30,398 to $60,436, partially offset by a decrease in Bitcoin mined, due to an increase in network difficulty and the Halving event (we mined 1,184 Bitcoin during the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 versus 2,138 Bitcoin mined during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023), (ii) a $6.7 million increase in recurring Traditional Cloud revenue, reflecting a full year of Traditional Cloud operations during twelve months ended December 31, 2024 compared to one month of Traditional Cloud operations following the Business Combination, and (iii) a $1.8 million contribution from our AI Cloud offering, which launched in September 2024.

Other

Other revenue was $7.6 million and nil for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This increase was primarily driven by (i) a $7.4 million increase in Equipment Sales revenue, reflecting higher demand for mining-related infrastructure, and (ii) a $0.2 million increase in Equipment Repair service revenue.

Cost of revenue

Total cost of revenue was $86.7 million and $54.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively, and consisted of Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other.

Power

Power cost of revenue was $21.5 million and $7.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $14.2 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $12.8 million increase in cost of revenue related to the Far North JV assets, which were acquired in February 2024, and (ii) a $1.4 million increase in operating costs related to the managed services agreement with Ionic, which was terminated effective December 2024.

Digital Infrastructure

Digital Infrastructure cost of revenue was $15.6 million and $4.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $11.2 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $7.5 million increase in colocation-related costs as a result of eleven months of costs related to the Ionic colocation agreement during 2024 compared to five months of costs during 2023, and (ii) a $3.8 million increase in cost of sales related to CPU infrastructure operations, including rent, electricity, and connectivity costs, reflecting a full year of operations subsequent to the Business Combination.

Compute

Compute cost of revenue was $45.0 million and $42.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $2.4 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $5.5 million increase in Traditional Cloud costs, reflecting a full year of Traditional Cloud operations during twelve months ended December 31, 2024 compared to one month of Traditional Cloud operations during twelve months ended December 31, 2023 following the Business Combination, and (ii) a $1.0 million increase in costs related to our AI Cloud offering, which launched in September 2024. These increases were partially offset by $4.1 million decrease in ASIC Compute costs due to fleet relocation from higher cost hosted to lower cost self-mining sites and the deployment of Reactor, our proprietary energy curtailment software.

Other

Other cost of revenue was $4.6 million and nil for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $4.6 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $4.5 million increase in equipment sales costs as a result of the increased volume of equipment sold, and (ii) $0.1 million in costs related to our equipment repair service.

Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense was $47.8 million and $17.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $30.3 million increase was primarily driven by (i) higher depreciation from assets acquired in the Business Combination as we recognized twelve months of combined company depreciation in 2024 compared to one month of combined company depreciation in 2023, (ii) depreciation related to the Far North JV transaction, which was completed in February 2024, (iii) depreciation as a result of the development of the Salt Creek site, which went live in April 2024, and (iv) depreciation from the newly acquired assets related to our AI Cloud operations.

General and administrative expenses

G&A expenses were $72.9 million and $49.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $23.8 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $10.6 million increase in salary and benefits due to twelve months of combined company expenses in 2024 compared to one month of combined company expenses in 2023 (our number of employees increased from 108 employees as of November 30, 2023, the date of the Business Combination, to 220 employees as of December 31, 2024), (ii) a $7.2 million increase in stock-based compensation due to new restricted stock unit and performance stock unit grants to retain and incentivize our talent, partially offset by no restricted stock award activity in 2024 compared to $8.5 million of restricted stock activity in 2023, (iii) a $3.9 million increase in restructuring expenses related to the Business Combination, and (iv) a $1.9 million increase in costs related to Far North JV acquisition.

Gains on digital assets

Gains on digital assets were $509.3 million and $32.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This increase was due to the increased Bitcoin prices as of December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year period. The price of Bitcoin as of December 31, 2024 was approximately $93,354 compared to $42,288 as of December 31, 2023.

Other expense (income)

Other expense was $8.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 compared to other income of $12.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023. This $21.2 million increase was primarily driven by (i) a $17.7 million decrease in gain on debt extinguishment related to the Anchorage debt-to-equity conversion of $6.0 million in 2024, compared to $23.7 million debt extinguishment related to the NYDIG loan recorded in 2023, (ii) a $3.6 million increase in interest expense due to an increase in the amount of borrowing in 2024 compared to 2023, which comprised of the $150.0 million Coatue note and the additional $15.0 million drawdown from our loan with Coinbase, (iii) a $6.0 million increase in foreign exchange loss due to our net U.S. dollar monetary liability position in our Canadian dollar functional currency subsidiaries and a decline in the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar exchange rate of approximately 8% compared to a 2% increase during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 (the increase noted in the prior period is for the period from the Business Combination to December 31, 2023, reflecting one month of combined company results), and (iv) a $2.0 million decrease in equity in earnings of King Mountain JV due to the impact of the Halving on ASIC Compute revenue. These increases were partially offset by (i) a $7.3 million gain on derivatives due to an increase in the mark-to-market value of our call options and Bitcoin redemption option, and (ii) a $3.1 million gain on bargain purchase related to the Far North JV acquisition driven by the fair value of the net assets acquired being greater than the consideration transferred.

Income tax provision

Our income tax provision was $113.5 million and $0.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This $113.3 million increase was primarily due to $93.0 million in deferred taxes related to the gain on the fair value of our Bitcoin holdings, in addition to higher taxable income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024.

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

Six Months Ended

December 31, Increase

(in USD thousands) 2023 2022 (Decrease)

Revenue:

Cost of revenue – Digital Infrastructure 4,276 400 3,876

Cost of revenue – Other 18 3,112 (3,094)

Operating expenses (income):

Gain on digital assets (32,626) — (32,626)

Loss on sale of property and equipment 443 — 443

Realized gain on sale of digital assets — (2,201) 2,201

Impairment of digital assets — 2,272 (2,272)

Impairment of long-lived assets — 63,574 (63,574)

Other income (expense):

Foreign exchange gain 1,002 — 1,002

Net income (loss) from continuing operations $ 6,131 $ (81,253) $ 87,384

Other comprehensive income:

Foreign currency translation adjustments 10,761 — 10,761

Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation:

Six Months Ended

December 31, Increase

(in USD thousands) 2023 2022 (Decrease)

Foreign exchange gain (1,002) — (1,002)

Losses on sale of property and equipment 443 — 443

Non-recurring transactions (2) 12,044 — 12,044

Impairment of long-lived assets — 63,574

(1) Net of the accretion of fair value differences of depreciable and amortizable assets included inequity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in accordance with ASC 323. See Note 11. Investment in unconsolidated joint venture of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.

Revenue

Total revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $59.9 million and $46.0 million, respectively, consisting of Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other.

Power

Power revenue was $12.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023, consisting of (i) $9.6 million in fees from Managed Services and (ii) $3.0 million in cost reimbursements. Power revenue was $2.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2022, primarily consisting of (i) $1.5 million in managed service fees and (ii) $1.1 million in cost reimbursements. We began our Managed Services offerings for third parties in November 2022; therefore, the six months ended December 31, 2023 reflects a full period of activity related to Managed Services, whereas the comparative period of the six months ended December 31, 2022 reflects less than two months of activity. The six months ended December 31, 2023 also includes revenue from an interim Managed Services agreement with Celsius Mining LLC, which was signed in December 2023.

Digital Infrastructure

Digital Infrastructure revenue was $5.8 million and $14.0 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively. Revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2023 primarily consisted of (i) hosting services revenue from our Alpha site and (ii) one month of recurring CPU infrastructure revenue as a result of the Business Combination. Revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2022 consisted of $14.0 million of hosting services revenue. During six months ended December 31, 2022, one of our hosting customers defaulted on its contract, resulting in contract termination without a refund obligation for prepaid amounts. This resulted in the recognition of $13.1 million in remaining deferred revenue related to this customer.

Table of Contents

Compute

Compute revenue consisted of ASIC Compute revenue of $41.3 million and $25.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. This was primarily driven by (i) an increase in the average price per Bitcoin mined and (ii) one month of combined company activity after the Business Combination. The average revenue per Bitcoin mined was approximately $33,331 as of December 31, 2023 compared to approximately $20,218 as of December 31, 2022. This was partially offset by a decrease of approximately 29 Bitcoin mined, exclusive of our net share of the King Mountain JV, period over period due to increased Bitcoin network difficulty.

Other

Other revenue was $0.1 million and $3.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Other revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2023 consisted of $0.1 million in equipment repair services revenue. Other revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2022 consisted of $3.6 million in equipment sales revenue.

Cost of revenue

Power

Cost of revenue for Power for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were $3.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, primarily consisting of reimbursable payroll and other site operating costs. The increase in costs is primarily attributable to the full six months of activity in the 2023 period compared to only two months of activity related to Managed Services in the 2022 period.

Digital Infrastructure

Cost of revenue for Digital Infrastructure for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were $4.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, primarily driven by an increase in the cost of hosting services, including power costs, at our Alpha site due to an increase in hosted miners at the site.

Compute

Cost of revenue for Compute for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were $26.0 million and $23.2 million, respectively, driven primarily by a 46% increase in electricity utilized, partially offset by a lower average power rate during the period ($61.17 compared to $73.95 for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively).

Other

Cost of revenue for Other for the six months ended December 31, 2023 was less than $0.1 million due to low activity, as there were no equipment sales. Cost of revenue for Other for the six months ended December 31, 2022 was $3.1 million due to the cost of mining equipment sold.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense was $10.6 million and $11.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily driven by the lower net book value of plant and equipment after the recognition of a non-cash impairment charge during the six months ended December 31, 2022 as part of annual impairment testing, partially offset by property and equipment acquired as part of the Business Combination.

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses

G&A expenses were $37.5 million and $10.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase in G&A expenses was driven by (i) a $9.0 million increase in stock-based compensation due to certain stock options granted and restricted stock awards that were accelerated upon the closing of the Business Combination and certain stock options and restricted stock awards that were issued and immediately vested before the closing of the Business Combination, (ii) a $3.7 million increase in salary and benefit costs due to the headcount increasing from 49 to 208 employees as part of the Business Combination and to support the our growth, and (iii) a $9.6 million sales tax provision from a non-recurring state tax accrual related to a facility build out. G&A expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2023 also include one-time transaction costs of $2.4 million primarily related to the Business Combination.

Gains on digital assets

Gains on digital assets were $32.6 million and nil for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase was due to our early adoption of ASU 2023-08 for the six months ended December 31, 2023, which requires us to recognize our digital assets at fair value with changes recognized in net income during the reporting period.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Impairment of long-lived assets, including right-of-use assets, was nil and $63.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. During the six months ended December 31, 2022, adverse changes in the business climate, including decrease in the price of Bitcoin to approximately $16,530 as of December 31, 2022, and the resulting decrease in the market price of miners and mining equipment, indicated that an impairment triggering event had occurred. Testing performed indicated that the estimated fair value of our miners, mining equipment, and other mining operation assets were less than their net carrying value as of December 31, 2022. An impairment charge of approximately $63.6 million was recognized, decreasing the net carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair value.

Other expense

Other expense totaled $4.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 compared to $15.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2022. The decrease of $10.7 million was primarily driven by a $6.7 million increase in equity in earnings of our unconsolidated joint venture and a decrease of $3.0 million in interest expense driven by the NYDIG debt restructuring in February 2023.

Income tax benefit

Our income tax benefit was $0.4 million and $1.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. This $1.4 million decrease was primarily due to lower taxable income for the six months ended December 31, 2023 compared to the prior period.

King Mountain JV

The King Mountain JV is a 50% joint venture with one of the world’s largest renewable energy producers. The King Mountain JV has 280 MW of behind-the-meter self-mining and hosting operations located at a wind farm in McCamey, Texas.

As of December 31, 2025, the King Mountain JV owned approximately 18,000 miners for self-mining (about 1.8EH/s) and hosted approximately 56,562 miners (about 10.2 EH/s) for a single hosting customer at its King Mountain site, which has a total capacity of 280 MW.

Table of Contents

We account for the King Mountain JV using the equity method of accounting, resulting in reporting the King Mountain JV as an unconsolidated joint venture. Additionally, our 50% portion of any distributions from the King Mountain JV are used to pay down the TZRC Secured Promissory Note. See Note 11. Investment in unconsolidated joint venture and Note 15. Loans, notes payable, and other financial liabilities to the consolidated financial statements found elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information on the King Mountain JV and TZRC Secured Promissory Note.

Below are the condensed consolidated income statements for the King Mountain JV for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, and the six months ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

Twelve Months Ended Six Months Ended

December 31, December 31,

Our board of directors and management team also evaluate Adjusted EBITDA for the King Mountain JV, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before depreciation and amortization and interest income. We use Adjusted EBITDA to assess the King Mountain JV’s financial performance because it allows us to compare the operating performance on a consistent basis across periods by removing the effects of the King Mountain JV’s capital structure.

Net income (loss) is the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered as an alternative to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in such presentation. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. There can be no assurance that we will not modify the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in the future, and any such modification may be material. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool and you should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of this non-GAAP financial measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility.

Twelve Months Ended Six Months Ended

December 31, December 31,

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity include our cash and cash equivalents, debt facilities, Bitcoin on our balance sheet, equity sales, and the cash flows generated from operations. We are exploring additional financing structures, including the use of project-level financing, to finance our development initiatives, including infrastructure build outs. Under our lease agreement with Fluidstack, we are required to build and deliver a data center with 245 MW IT capacity in phases with initial delivery targeted for Q2 2027. We have partnered with Jacobs and Vertiv to build the data center at a cost of $9-$11 million per MW.

Table of Contents

Historically, our primary cash needs have been for working capital to support growth initiatives, including infrastructure purchases and development, acquisitions, and equipment financing, including the purchase of additional Bitcoin miners. Going forward, we will continue to prioritize infrastructure development while our ASIC compute operations will mainly be conducted through American Bitcoin, our consolidated subsidiary. In addition to equipment financing for the purchase of additional Bitcoin miners, American Bitcoin’s primary cash needs are to support its Bitcoin accumulation efforts, including at-market purchases of Bitcoin.

In June 2025, we amended our Credit Agreement with Coinbase to, among other things, amend and increase available capacity under the credit facility from $65.0 million to up to $130.0 million. In August 2025, we borrowed the remaining $65.0 million of the available capacity. In December 2025, we further amended the Coinbase Credit Agreement to increase the facility from $130.0 million to $200.0 million and borrowed an additional $70.0 million.

As of December 31, 2025, we had access to $200.0 million from the Two Prime Credit Agreement. We did not draw on this facility during the twelve months ended December 31, 2025.

On August 22, 2025, we established our $1.0 billion 2025 ATM, which replaced our prior $500 million 2024 ATM program that launched on December 4, 2024. As of August 22, 2025, prior to its termination, we had issued and sold shares under the 2024 ATM for gross proceeds of $299.4 million at a weighted average price of $27.83 per share. For reference, our average share price from commencement of the 2024 ATM until August 22, 2025 was $18.61 per share. As of December 31, 2025, we issued and sold 4,020,630 shares under the 2025 ATM for gross proceeds of $183.4 million at a weighted average issuance price of $45.62 per share.

On September 3, 2025, American Bitcoin established a $2.1 billion at-the-market equity program (the “American Bitcoin 2025 ATM”). As of December 31, 2025, American Bitcoin issued and sold 65,485,198 shares of Class A common stock under the American Bitcoin 2025 ATM for gross proceeds of $240.5 million at a weighted average issuance price per share of $3.67.

Our ability to meet our anticipated cash requirements will depend on various factors including our ability to maintain our existing business, enter into new lines of business, provide new offerings, compete with existing and new competitors in existing and new markets and offerings, acquire new businesses or pursue strategic transactions, access public and private capital markets, and respond to global and domestic economic, geopolitical, social conditions and their impact on demand for our offerings.

We believe that cash flows generated from operating activities, Bitcoin held on our consolidated balance sheet, and other financings will be sufficient to meet our anticipated short-term cash requirements. With respect to the construction of our River Bend data center facility, we currently expect to fund our capital expenditures through a combination of cash and Bitcoin on our balance sheet and project-level financing of up to 85% LTC, which is expected to be underwritten by J.P. Morgan, as lead left arranger, and Goldman Sachs, each anticipated to serve as a loan underwriter, subject to the negotiation and execution of definitive transaction agreements and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. On a long-term basis, we plan to rely on access to public and private capital markets for any long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows, cash on hand, Bitcoin on our consolidated balance sheet, and debt and project financing.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:

Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

Cash flows used in operating activities $ (139,226) $ (68,535)

Cash flows used in investing activities (754,207) (188,472)

Cash flows provided by financing activities 856,127 311,946

Table of Contents

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $139.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, resulting from net loss of $248.0 million, offset by adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities of $159.6 million and changes in assets and liabilities of $50.8 million. Net cash used in operating activities was $68.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, resulting from net income of $331.4 million, offset by adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities of $385.5 million and changes in assets and liabilities of $14.4 million.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $754.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, primarily consisting of (i) $405.1 million in Bitcoin purchases by American Bitcoin for its strategic reserve, (ii) $202.9 million in property and equipment purchases primarily related to Vega and River Bend construction, (iii) $162.7 million in deposits for future site land and infrastructure purchases, (iv) $25.0 million in purchases of other digital assets, and (v) $14.0 million in deposits paid to purchase miners and mining equipment. These outflows were partially offset by (i) $46.0 million in cash received from the Bitmain deposit refund, (ii) $5.9 million in proceeds from the sale of property and equipment, and (iii) $3.7 million in proceeds from the sale of digital assets. Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $188.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, primarily consisting of (i)$124.0 million in property and equipment purchases, (ii) $100.7 in Bitcoin purchases for our strategic reserve, and (iii) a $39.6 million deposit for acquiring miners. These inflows were partially offset by $74.5 million in proceeds from the sale of Bitcoin.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $856.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, primarily consisting of (i) $314.4 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock through our 2024 ATM and 2025 ATM, (ii) $237.7 million in net proceeds from the issuance of American Bitcoin’s Class A common stock through the American Bitcoin 2025 ATM, (iii) $205.3 million in net cash proceeds from the issuance and sale of American Bitcoin’s Class A common stock through a Common Stock Purchase Agreement for a private placement with certain accredited investors, and (iv) $135 million in proceeds under the Coinbase Credit Agreement. These inflows were partially offset by $45.6 million in loan repayments. Net cash provided by financing activities was $311.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, primarily consisting of (i) $150.0 million in net proceeds from notes payable from the Coatue note, (ii) $162.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock through our 2024 ATM, and (iii) $22.2 million in net proceeds from covered call options premiums.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, as well as related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and base them on historical experience and other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because these estimates involve judgments about future events and are inherently uncertain, actual results may differ materially from those estimates. Changes in these estimates or assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, and statement of cash flows.

While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2, Basis of Presentation, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report, we believe the following accounting policies and estimates are most critical to understanding and evaluating this management discussion and analysis:

Table of Contents

Digital Assets

Accounting for digital assets requires significant judgment, including classification, measurement, presentation, and the determination of fair value. Digital assets pledged as collateral, including under arrangements with Bitmain, require additional judgment in evaluating the appropriate accounting treatment, including whether such assets remain recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Pledged digital assets remain recognized because we retain ownership and continue to be exposed to changes in market value.

Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees, directors, consultants, and service providers, if any, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock awards, and stock units based upon the estimated grant-date fair value of the awards. For more complex performance awards, including awards with market-based performance conditions, we employ a Monte Carlo simulation valuation method to calculate the fair value of the awards based on the most likely outcome. Under the Monte Carlo simulation, a number of variables and assumptions are used including, but not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the award, the risk-free rate, and dividend yield, if any.

Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

We evaluate the useful lives of our intangible assets to determine if they are finite or indefinite-lived. Reaching a determination on useful life requires significant judgments and assumptions regarding the future effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and evaluated for impairment at least annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Determining useful lives and assessing recoverability require management judgment and the use of estimates, including assumptions regarding future cash flows and economic conditions. Changes in these assumptions could materially affect amortization expense or result in impairment charges in future periods.

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Tariff Risk

Changes in government and economic policies, incentives, trade regulations, or tariffs may have a material impact on equipment that we import. While the final scope, timing, and application of recently announced or proposed changes in U.S. trade policy remain uncertain, increases in tariffs on imported equipment, as well as the potential imposition of retaliatory tariffs by foreign jurisdictions, could materially increase our equipment and infrastructure costs or limit the availability of certain components. Such developments could adversely affect our ability to procure equipment on a timely basis or at cost-effective levels, which in turn may impact project timelines, capital expenditures, and operating margins. We continuously monitor developments in trade policy and may adjust our procurement strategies, sourcing arrangements, or deployment plans in response to such changes; however, there can be no assurance that such actions will fully mitigate the impact of adverse tariff or trade policy developments.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Foreign exchange risk arises from fluctuations in currency exchange rates that impact our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. A portion of our operations is conducted through Hut 8 Canada, and we incur operating expenses, capital expenditures, and other costs denominated primarily in Canadian dollars, while our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. In addition, a significant portion of our Bitcoin holdings are held by our Canadian subsidiary.

Changes in the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar exchange rate may affect the U.S. dollar value of our operating costs, capital expenditures, intercompany balances, and the translation of the financial results and Bitcoin holdings of Hut 8 Canada into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Adverse movements in foreign exchange rates could increase our costs or reduce reported revenues, asset values, and earnings. While we may seek to manage foreign exchange exposure through operational strategies from time to time, we do not currently engage in foreign currency hedging activities and therefore remain exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates.

Market Price Risk of Bitcoin

We hold a significant amount of Bitcoin; therefore, we are exposed to the impact of market price changes in Bitcoin.

As of December 31, 2025, we held 15,679 Bitcoin, comprising 10,278 Bitcoin held by Hut 8 and 5,401 Bitcoin held by American Bitcoin. Based on a fair value of approximately $87,498 per Bitcoin, the aggregate fair value of these holdings as of December 31, 2025 was approximately $1.37 billion. Declines in the fair market value of Bitcoin will impact the cash value that would be realized if we were to sell our Bitcoin for cash, therefore having a negative impact on our liquidity.

Custodian Risk

Our Bitcoin is held with third-party custodians, Coinbase Custody, NYDIG, Anchorage, and BitGo, which we select based on various factors, including their financial strength and industry reputation. Custodian risk refers to the potential loss, theft, or misappropriation of our Bitcoin assets due to operational failures, cybersecurity breaches, or financial difficulties experienced by these third parties. Although we periodically monitor the financial health, insurance coverage, and security measures of our custodians, reliance on such third parties inherently exposes us to risks that we cannot fully mitigate.

Table of Contents

Credit Risk

Credit risk arises from our practice of pledging Bitcoin as collateral in transactions with counterparties. We mitigate this risk by engaging with counterparties that we believe possess strong creditworthiness based on their size, credit quality, and reputation, among other factors. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, we have not incurred any material loss from such transactions. However, there remains a risk that a counterparty could default on its obligations to us, which might result in a material loss. We continually assess the credit risk associated with our counterparties and, if necessary, recognize a loss provision or write-down. Credit risk also arises from us placing our cash and demand deposits in financial institutions. Although we strive to limit our exposure by placing cash and demand deposits with financial institutions with a high credit standing, there can be no assurances that we are able to mitigate our credit risk. In addition, we are exposed to credit risk associated with the creditworthiness of our customers and other counterparties, as non-performance or financial deterioration of these parties could adversely impact cash flows and liquidity.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.

We have one loan that maintains a variable interest rate, the TZRC Secured Promissory Note, which includes a maximum interest rate of 15.25%. As a result, changes in market interest rates could affect our operations over certain periods and may also impact our ability to finance projects. For more information regarding the TZRC Secured Promissory Note, see Note 15. Loans, notes payable, and other financial liabilities to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

We also earn interest income on the cash balances at variable rates. Changes in the short-term interest rates are not expected to have a material impact on the fair value of our cash balances.

We may enter into project-level financing arrangements that include floating rate components, including rates based on a Secured Overnight Financing Rate benchmark. To the extent that we enter into such arrangements, our exposure to interest rate variability could increase. We may seek to manage a portion of this exposure through the use of financial hedging instruments; however, such instruments may not be available on acceptable terms, may not be effective in mitigating interest rate risk, or may introduce additional risks.

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Hut 8 Corp. and Subsidiaries

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 185) 82

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 1232) 86

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 87

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 92

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors

Hut 8 Corp.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Hut 8 Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 25, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Evaluation of audit evidence pertaining to the existence of and rights to digital assets

As discussed in Notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s digital assets are either held in segregated custody accounts for the benefit of the Company, held in segregated custody accounts under the Company’s ownership and pledged as collateral under a borrowing arrangement or held by Bitmain Technologies Delaware Limited (together with its affiliates, Bitmain) for the Bitcoin pledged in connection with the BITMAIN Purchase Agreement for miner purchases from Bitmain (collectively, the digital assets). As of December 31, 2025, the carrying amount of the Company’s digital assets was $1,371.9 million.

Table of Contents

We identified the evaluation of audit evidence pertaining to the existence of and the Company’s rights to the Company’s digital assets as a critical audit matter. A high degree of auditor judgment was involved in determining the nature and extent of the procedures performed and audit evidence obtained to assess the existence of and the Company’s rights to the digital assets.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the existence of and the Company’s rights to the digital assets as of December 31, 2025. We obtained confirmations from the third-party custodians and Bitmain of the Company’s digital assets as of December 31, 2025 and compared the total digital assets confirmed to the Company’s records. We also compared the Company’s record of digital asset holdings and transactions to the records on the public blockchain using a proprietary software audit tool. For digital assets held by Bitmain, we obtained evidence that management had control to the private keys required to access these digital assets by observing the movement of digital assets both prior to and subsequent to year-end using the related private keys. For a selection of on blockchain transfers to third parties, we obtained and assessed evidence that the transaction was appropriately authorized and recorded by the Company. We evaluated the reliability of audit evidence obtained from public blockchain.

Evaluation of the sufficiency of audit evidence over Bitcoin mining revenue

As discussed in Notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded $186.9 million of Bitcoin mining revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company has entered into arrangements with mining pool operators to perform hash computations for the mining pools. In exchange for providing hash computation services, the Company is entitled to noncash consideration in the form of Bitcoin, calculated under payout models determined by the mining pool operators.

We identified the evaluation of the sufficiency of audit evidence over Bitcoin mining revenue as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment, including specialized skills and knowledge, was required to evaluate the nature and extent of procedures performed over the completeness, existence, and accuracy of Bitcoin mining revenue.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We applied auditor judgment to determine the nature and extent of procedures to be performed over the completeness, existence, and accuracy of Bitcoin mining revenue. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the completeness, existence, and accuracy of the Company’s Bitcoin mining revenue as of December 31, 2025. We involved Information Technology (IT) professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in testing certain general IT and automated internal controls over IT systems used for the processing and recording of Bitcoin mining revenue. We obtained confirmations from the third-party mining pool operators of the total mining rewards earned, Bitcoin deposited, and the Bitcoin wallet addresses in which the rewards are deposited for the year ended December 31, 2025, and compared the confirmed information to the Company’s records. For a selection of the Company’s Bitcoin mining revenue, we compared the Company’s record of Bitcoin received from the mining pool operators to the records of the public blockchain using a proprietary software audit tool. We evaluated the reasonableness of the prices utilized by the Company to record Bitcoin received as Bitcoin mining revenue by obtaining independent Bitcoin prices and comparing those to the prices selected by the Company. We performed substantive analytical procedures to determine the completeness, existence, and accuracy of Bitcoin mining revenue recognized by the Company. In addition, we evaluated the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained by assessing the results of procedures performed, including the appropriateness of the nature and extent of such evidence.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.

New York, New York

February 25, 2026

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors

Hut 8 Corp.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Hut 8 Corp. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 25, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Table of Contents

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York

February 25, 2026

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Hut 8 Corp.

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Hut 8 Corp. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and for the six months ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and for the six months ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor from 2023 to 2024.

Montréal, Canada

February 28, 2025

Table of Contents

Hut 8 Corp. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in USD thousands, except share and per share data)

December 31, December 31,

Assets

Current assets

Digital assets – pledged for miner purchase 84,688 92,389

Digital assets receivable 812 —

Income taxes receivable — 1,073

Assets held for sale 38,719 —

Non-current assets

Derivative assets 101,179 —

Digital assets – pledged for miner purchase 242,937 —

Digital assets – pledged as collateral 396,624 331,876

Operating lease right-of-use asset 18,496 20,593

Deposits and prepaid expenses 8,314 7,886

Investment in unconsolidated joint venture 45,158 82,015

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Current liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 44,519 $ 41,786

Miner purchase liability, current portion 100,910 15,096

Operating lease liability, current portion 2,891 2,689

Finance lease liability, current portion — 4,783

Derivative liability — 18,437

HUT US Equity

HUT · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

HUT US Equity☆

HUT · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

HUT US Equity