ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis provides information about our business, the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources of HF Foods Group Inc. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors. and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above for further explanation.
Recent Developments
CFO Transition
On October 15, 2025 (the “Separation Date”), Cindy Yao, departed from the Company as its Chief Financial Officer. In connection with Ms. Yao’s departure, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with Ms. Yao effective November 6, 2025.
Effective October 15, 2025, Paul McGarry, who previously served as the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Controller was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer. Effective January 27, 2026, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. McGarry to serve as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.
Opening of a State-of-the-Art Distribution Warehouse in Powder Springs, GA
On December 18, 2025, the Company officially opened its newest 182,000 square foot distribution center located outside Atlanta, in Powder Springs, Georgia. This brand-new facility includes warehouse, freezer, cooler, and office space and provides significant opportunities for expanding our existing operations in Atlanta and the surrounding cities and states. The Company plans to incorporate automated material handling and warehouse management technologies at the facility to support operating efficiency. The new distribution center will continue to service over 1,000 customers from HF Food’s previous Atlanta location and is now open to deliver more business throughout Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The distribution center is located at 4795 Innovative Highway, Powder Springs, GA 30127, and currently employs over 50 individuals with plans to expand operations throughout 2026.
Business Overview
HF Foods is a leading marketer and distributor of fresh produce, frozen and dry food, and non-food products to Asian restaurants and other foodservice customers throughout the United States.
We operate a national distribution platform comprised of sixteen distribution centers and four cross-docks, supported by a fleet of over 400 vehicles, which collectively spans 46 states and covers approximately 95% of the contiguous United States. We serve approximately 15,000 customer locations through a high-frequency, service-oriented distribution model designed to meet the operational needs of independent restaurants, including timely delivery and consistent product availability.
We believe we are differentiated by our deep cultural and language understanding of the Asian restaurant community, long-standing relationships with growers and suppliers, and specialized sourcing capabilities across North America, South America, and Asia. These strengths are reinforced by nearly 1,000 employees and a centralized outsourced call center in China, which supports order taking and customer service in customers’ primary language and enables coordinated marketing and promotional campaigns.
Our product portfolio is supported by long-term partnerships with both domestic and international suppliers, which we believe enhances our ability to provide a broad and differentiated assortment at competitive prices. Our supplier relationships and market knowledge strengthen our purchasing and negotiating position and support continuity of supply, including improving our ability to manage potential supply chain disruptions, reduce stockouts, obtain pricing concessions, and maintain reliable delivery schedules. While Asian restaurants remain our core customer base, we intend to selectively broaden our customer reach into other ethnic and specialty foodservice segments over time as we execute our long-term growth strategy.
24
How to Assess HF Foods’ Performance
In assessing our performance, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures, including principal growth in net revenue, gross profit, distribution, selling and administrative expenses, as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. The key measures that we use to evaluate the performance of our business are set forth below:
Net Revenue
Net revenue is equal to gross sales minus sales returns, sales incentives that we offer to our customers, such as rebates and discounts that are offsets to gross sales; and certain other adjustments. Our net revenue is driven by changes in number of customers and average customer order amount, product inflation that is reflected in the pricing of our products and mix of products sold.
Gross Profit
Gross profit is equal to net revenue minus cost of revenue. Cost of revenue primarily includes inventory costs (net of supplier consideration), inbound freight, tariffs, customs clearance fees and other miscellaneous expenses. Cost of revenue generally changes as we incur higher or lower costs from suppliers and as the customer and product mix changes.
Distribution, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, stock-based compensation and benefits for employees and contract laborers, trucking and fuel expenses, utilities, maintenance and repair expenses, insurance expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses, selling and marketing expenses, professional fees and other operating expenses.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Discussion of our results includes certain non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, that we believe provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our financial performance with other companies in the same industry, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors. We present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in order to provide supplemental information that we consider relevant for the readers of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, and such information is not meant to replace or supersede GAAP measures.
Management uses EBITDA to measure operating performance, defined as net income before interest expense, interest income, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. In addition, management uses Adjusted EBITDA, defined as net income before interest expense, interest income, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude certain unusual, non-cash, or non-recurring expenses. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from non-recurring expenses, and other non-cash charges and is more reflective of other factors that affect our operating performance.
The definition of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be the same as similarly titled measures used by other companies in the industry. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not defined under GAAP and are subject to important limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of HF Foods’ results as reported under GAAP. For example, Adjusted EBITDA:
•excludes certain tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available;
•does not reflect any cash capital expenditure requirements for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future;
•does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and
•does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements, necessary to service our debt.
For additional information on EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, see the section entitled “EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA” below.
Financial Review
Highlights for 2025 included:
25
•Net revenue: Net revenue was $1,228.3 million in 2025, compared to $1,201.7 million in 2024, an increase of $26.6 million, or 2.2%. The increase was primarily attributable to volume growth and improved pricing in Seafood and Meat & Poultry and volume growth in Commodity, partially offset by volume decreases within other categories.
•Gross profit: Gross profit was $207.6 million in 2025 compared to $205.2 million in 2024, an increase of $2.4 million, or 1.2%. The increase was primarily attributable to volume growth and improved pricing in Seafood and Meat and Poultry and volume growth in Commodity, partially offset by volume decreases in other categories. Gross profit margin of 16.9% for 2025 decreased from 17.1% in the prior year due to a shift in sales mix from Asian Specialty with higher margin to Meat and Poultry and Commodity with lower margins.
•Distribution, selling and administrative expenses: Distribution, selling and administrative expenses increased by $3.7 million, or 1.9%, in 2025 compared to 2024, mainly due to increases in depreciation expense of $2.3 million, occupancy expenses of $1.4 million, auto & truck expense of $1.4 million and insurance costs of $1.2 million partially offset by a reduction in professional fees of $2.8 million. Distribution, selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively consistent at 16.4% in 2025 compared to 16.5% in 2024.
•Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc.: Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc. was $38.8 million in 2025 compared to net loss of $48.5 million in 2024. The improvement of $9.7 million was primarily driven by an increase in income tax benefit of $7.9 million, due to the result of current year goodwill impairment charges, as well as an improvement in loss from operations of $6.1 million compared to 2024 which was offset by one time gain from the termination of a lease guarantee liability of $5.5 million within other income in the prior year and an increase in fair value of interest rate swap expense year over year of $3.6 million.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2025 to Year Ended December 31, 2024
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
Year Ended December 31,
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts 1,870 (1,693) 3,563
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (468) 409 (877)
26
The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated results of operations expressed as a percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses 16.4 % 16.5 %
Goodwill impairment charges 3.2 % 3.9 %
Loss from operations (2.7) % (3.3) %
Interest expense 0.9 % 0.9 %
Other expense (income), net (0.1) % 0.2 %
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts 0.2 % (0.1) %
Lease guarantee income — % (0.5) %
Loss before income taxes (3.7) % (3.8) %
Income tax expense (benefit) (0.5) % 0.2 %
Net loss and comprehensive loss (3.2) % (4.0) %
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests — % — %
Net Revenue
Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $26.6 million, or 2.2%, compared to the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to volume growth and improved pricing in Seafood and Meat & Poultry and volume growth in Commodity, partially offset by volume decreases within other categories.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $207.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $205.2 million in the same period in 2024, an increase of $2.4 million, or 1.2%. The gross profit increase was attributable to increased net revenue partially offset by increased costs. Gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased slightly to 16.9% compared to 17.1% in the same period in 2024.
Distribution, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses of $201.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $3.7 million, or 1.9%, in 2025 compared to $198.0 million in 2024, mainly due to increases in depreciation expense of $2.3 million, occupancy expenses of $1.4 million, auto & truck expense of $1.4 million and insurance costs of $1.2 million partially offset by a reduction in professional fees of $2.8 million. Distribution, selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively consistent at 16.4% in 2025 compared to 16.5% in 2024.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased slightly to $11.47 million, compared to $11.43 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.04 million or 0.4%. The increase was driven by an increase in our average daily line of credit balance of $1.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in our average daily JPMorgan Chase mortgage-secured term loan balance of $5.1 million combined with a slightly lower interest-rate environment. Average floating interest rates on our floating-rate debt for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by approximately 0.9% on the line of credit and 0.9% on the JPMorgan Chase mortgage-secured term loan, compared to 2024. Our average daily line of credit balance was $56.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, up from $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, while our average daily JPMorgan Chase mortgage-secured term loan balance decreased to $98.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $103.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
27
Income tax benefit was $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to an income tax expense of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The $7.9 million increase in income tax benefit was primarily driven by lower nondeductible goodwill impairment charges in 2025, as well as the impact of the SEC settlement recognized in 2024.
Net Loss Attributable to HF Foods Group, Inc.
Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc. was $38.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to a net loss of $48.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The $9.7 million improvement in net loss was primarily attributable to a $7.9 million favorable change in income taxes, a $6.1 million improvement in loss from operations due to a lower goodwill impairment charge in 2025 compared to 2024. These favorable variances were partially offset by the absence of the $5.5 million non-recurring gain recognized in the prior year from the termination of a lease guarantee liability, which was recorded in other income, and by a $3.6 million unfavorable year-over-year change in the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap. Following the 2025 impairment, the Company has no remaining goodwill.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
The following table reconciles EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure:
Year Ended December 31,
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts 1,870 (1,693) 3,563
Executive transition and organizational redesign (3) 2,964 2,929 35
_________________
(1) Represents costs associated with the launch and continued implementation of strategic projects including supply chain management improvements and technology infrastructure initiatives.
(2) Includes legal and consulting costs related to various corporate projects and other strategic initiatives.
(3) Includes severance and related expenses for the Company’s transition of executive officers and organizational redesign.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2025, we had cash of approximately $8.6 million, checks issued not presented for payment of $1.7 million and access to approximately $61.2 million in additional funds through our $125.0 million line of credit, subject to a borrowing base calculation. We have funded working capital and other capital requirements primarily by cash flow from operations and bank loans. Cash is required to pay purchase costs for inventory, salaries, fuel and trucking expenses, selling expenses, rental expenses, income taxes, other operating expenses and to service debts.
We believe that our cash flow generated from operations is sufficient to meet our normal working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. However, our ability to repay our current obligations will depend on the future realization of our current assets. Management has considered the historical experience, the economy, the trends in the foodservice distribution industry to determine the expected collectability of accounts receivable and the realization of inventories as of December 31, 2025.
We are party to an amortizing interest rate swap contract with JPMorgan Chase for an initial notional amount of $120.0 million, expiring in March 2028, as a means to partially hedge our existing floating rate loans exposure. Pursuant to the agreement, we will pay the swap counterparty a fixed rate of 4.11% in exchange for floating payments based on CME Term SOFR.
28
Management believes we have sufficient access to funds to meet our working capital requirements and debt obligations in the next twelve months. However, there are a number of factors that could potentially arise which might result in shortfalls in anticipated cash flow, such as the demand for our products, economic conditions, competitive pricing in the foodservice distribution industry, and our bank and suppliers being able to provide continued support. If the future cash flow from operations and other capital resources is insufficient to fund our liquidity needs, we may have to resort to reducing or delaying our expected capital investment plans, liquidating assets, obtaining additional debt or equity capital, or refinancing all or a portion of our debt.
As of December 31, 2025, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements that currently have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, changes in financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
The following table summarizes cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Year Ended December 31,
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (5,826) $ (765) $ (5,061)
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities consists primarily of net loss adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization, goodwill impairment charges, changes in deferred income taxes and others, and includes the effect of working capital changes. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $2.8 million primarily due to an increase in non-cash expense add-backs and increases in accounts payable balances, offset by the timing of working capital outlays mainly for inventory purchases and increases in our accounts receivable balances.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $7.8 million primarily due to increased capital project spend in the year ended December 31, 2025.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities remained relatively consistent at $10.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily due to the higher overall net proceeds from line of credit activity, offset by overall lower interest rates as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These principles require management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, cash flow and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates include, but are not limited to, inventory reserves, impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, and the purchase price allocation and fair value of assets and liabilities acquired with respect to business combinations. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and the actual results, future financial statements will be affected.
We believe that among our significant accounting policies, which are described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity. Accordingly, we believe these are the most critical to fully understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, as of December 31, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. We have concluded we are one reporting unit for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment.
We review the carrying value of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable and annually for goodwill as required by ASC Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. Factors that may
29
be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill may not be recoverable, include a sustained decline in stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates and slower growth rates in our industry. This guidance provides the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If, based on a review of qualitative factors, it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a quantitative analysis. If the quantitative analysis indicates the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we measure any goodwill impairment losses as the amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
As of September 30, 2024, the Company concluded that a triggering event occurred due to a sustained decline in the Company’s stock price since December 31, 2023, which required interim testing for goodwill impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Accordingly, the Company performed a quantitative assessment as of September 30, 2024. The fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value by approximately 1%, and therefore we concluded no impairment existed as of that date.
As a result of continued declines in the level of stock price, the Company performed a quantitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2024. The results of the testing as of December 31, 2024, concluded that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit fell short of carrying value, and therefore impairment existed as of that date. A goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2024.
As a result of declines in the stock price during the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company performed a quantitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2025. The results of the testing at December 31, 2025, resulted in the conclusion that the estimated fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit was less than its carrying value, and its goodwill was impaired. A goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2025 of $38.8 million.
For the impairment tests conducted in 2025 and 2024, we used a combination of an income approach or a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model and market approaches, such as public company comparable analysis and comparable acquisitions analysis to determine fair value of the reporting unit. The income approach and market approaches were weighted equally to estimate fair value. The income approach requires detailed forecasts of cash flows, including significant assumptions such as revenue growth rates, gross profit margins, distribution, selling and administrative expenses, among other assumptions, and an estimate of weighted-average cost of capital which we believe approximate the assumptions from a market participant’s perspective. The market approaches are primarily impacted by an enterprise value multiple of EBITDA. These estimates incorporate many uncertain factors which could be impacted by changes in market conditions, interest rates, growth rate, tax rates, costs, customer behavior, regulatory environment and other macroeconomic changes. In addition, we considered the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit by assessing the implied enterprise value control premium based on our market capitalization and also considered the lack of liquidity in the Company’s common stock. The Company’s common stock is fairly thinly traded, with a higher level of internal stockholders than its peers, and no major analyst coverage. As a result, the implied value from the traded stock price is based on limited investment public interest. Our market capitalization is calculated using the number of common shares outstanding and common stock publicly traded price. We determined that the implied control premiums used in each analysis were reasonable which corroborates our fair value estimates. We categorize the fair value determination as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.
See Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Assumptions used in impairment testing are made at a point in time and require significant judgment; therefore, they are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances present at each impairment test date. Additionally, these assumptions are generally interdependent and do not change in isolation.
Following the impairment test conducted as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s goodwill was fully impaired.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
We assess our long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Factors which may indicate potential impairment include a significant underperformance related to the historical or projected future operating results or a significant negative industry or economic trend. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying amounts to future undiscounted cash flows which the assets or asset groups are expected to generate. If property and equipment and intangible assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value. The testing for impairment of long-lived assets occurs prior to any testing related to goodwill. The Company assessed whether the carrying amounts of the Company’s long-lived assets were impaired and determined no events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
30
No impairment of long-lived assets was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2025 or 2024.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our debt exposes us to risk of fluctuations in interest rates. Floating rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes us to short-term changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes us to changes in market interest rates reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at higher rates. We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired proportion of fixed and floating rate debts and may employ interest rate swaps as a tool from time to time to achieve that position. To manage our interest rate risk exposure, we entered into four interest rate swap contracts to hedge the floating rate term loans. See Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
As of December 31, 2025, our aggregate floating rate debt’s outstanding principal balance without hedging was $57.9 million, or 35.7% of total debt, consisting primarily of our revolving line of credit (see Note 9 - Long-Term Debt to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our floating rate debt interest is based on the floating 1-month SOFR plus a predetermined credit adjustment rate plus the bank spread. The remaining 64.3% of our debt is on a fixed rate or a floating rate with hedging. In a hypothetical scenario, a 1% change in the applicable rate would cause the interest expense on our floating rate debt to change by approximately $0.6 million per year.
Fuel Price Risk
We are also exposed to risks relating to fluctuations in the price and availability of diesel fuel. We require significant quantities of diesel fuel for our vehicle fleet, and the inbound delivery of the products we sell is also dependent upon shipment by diesel-fueled vehicles. Additionally, elevated fuel costs can negatively impact consumer confidence and discretionary spending and thus reduce the frequency and amount spent by consumers for food-away-from-home purchases. We currently are able to obtain adequate supplies of diesel fuel, and average prices for 2025 decreased in comparison to average prices in 2024, decreasing 2.6% on average. However, it is impossible to predict the future availability or price of diesel fuel. The price and supply of diesel fuel fluctuates based on external factors not within our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, regional production patterns, weather conditions and environmental concerns. Increases in the cost of diesel fuel could increase our cost of goods sold and operating costs to deliver products to our customers.
We do not actively hedge the price fluctuation of diesel fuel in general. Instead, we seek to minimize fuel cost risk through delivery route optimization and fleet utilization improvement.
31
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Consolidated Financial Statements 35
Consolidated Balance Sheets 35
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss 36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 37
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 39
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 40
Note 1 - Organization and Description of Business 40
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 40
Note 3 - Revenue 47
Note 4 - Balance Sheet Components 47
Note 5 - Fair Value Measurements 49
Note 6 - Leases 50
Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets 53
Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments 54
Note 9 - Long-Term Debt 55
Note 10 - Shareholders’ Equity 56
Note 11 - Earnings (Loss) Per Share 57
Note 12 - Income Taxes 58
Note 13 - Related Party Transactions 61
Note 14 - Stock-Based Compensation 63
Note 15 - Employee Benefit Plan 64
Note 16 - Segment Information 65
Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies 66
Note 18 - Subsequent Events 67
32
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
HF Foods Group Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HF Foods Group Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 16, 2026, expressed an adverse opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Consolidated Financial Statements - Impact of Material Weaknesses on Substantive Audit
As disclosed in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, the Company identified material weaknesses as of December 31, 2025. These material weaknesses included ineffective entity-level controls over control activities and monitoring, and ineffective controls over financial reporting including controls over the recording of revenue and accounts receivable, the review of journal entries, the accounting for new leases, and the impairment analysis of long-lived assets, including the review of underlying data and assumptions for completeness and accuracy.
The completeness and accuracy of the consolidated financial statements, including the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, is dependent on, in part, the Company’s ability to (i) design and maintain effective entity-level controls and (ii) design and maintain effective controls over financial reporting.
We identified a critical audit matter over the existence and accuracy of (i) revenues and accounts receivable, and (ii) journal entries. Designing the appropriate procedures and evaluating audit evidence to ensure the existence and accuracy of (i) revenue and accounts receivable, and (ii) journal entries, required especially challenging and subjective auditor judgment due to the increased extent of audit effort due to the large volume of transactions.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
33
•Performing incremental procedures over the existence and accuracy of revenue and accounts receivable by increasing the sample sizes to perform audit procedures.
•Expanding the scope of our journal entry testing, to select additional types of journal entries.
/s/ BDO USA, P.C.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
Troy, Michigan
March 16, 2026
34
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Accounts receivable - related parties 546 239
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 9,725 11,507
Assets held for sale 2,768 —
Trademarks, trade names and other intangibles, net 25,440 24,911
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Checks issued not presented for payment $ 1,674 $ 5,687
Accounts payable - related parties 384 52
Current portion of long-term debt, net 6,683 5,410
Current portion of obligations under finance leases 6,425 3,797
Current portion of obligations under operating leases 4,334 4,177
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 14,994 18,001
Obligations under finance leases, non-current 25,279 19,929
Obligations under operating leases, non-current 22,990 10,125
Other long-term liabilities 1,662 728
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 17)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO HF FOODS GROUP INC. 202,051 239,291
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 541,529 $ 549,991
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
35
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
Net revenue - related parties 4,489 3,741
Cost of revenue - related parties 3,990 3,447
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses 201,762 198,026
Other (income) expense, net (1,057) 2,818
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts 1,870 (1,693)
Lease guarantee income — (5,548)
Income tax (benefit) expense (5,970) 1,965
Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests (468) 409
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC $ (0.73) $ (0.92)
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED $ (0.73) $ (0.92)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
36
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense 28,382 26,677
Gain from disposal of property and equipment (115) (12)
Credit for expected credit losses (357) (103)
Deferred tax (benefit) expense (5,584) 364
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts 1,870 (1,693)
Lease guarantee income — (5,548)
Other non-cash (income) expense (280) 1,169
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - related parties (307) 10
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,782 (1,362)
Checks issued not presented for payment (4,013) 1,193
Accounts payable - related parties 332 (345)
Operating lease liabilities (4,207) (4,040)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (3,007) 714
Net cash provided by operating activities 25,480 22,636
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment (18,918) (12,547)
Purchase of intangible assets (1,661) —
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 206 48
Contribution to equity method investee — (49)
Net cash used in investing activities (20,373) (12,548)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments for tax withholding related to vested stock awards (156) (175)
Proceeds from issuance of debt 4,200 —
Repayment of long-term debt (6,856) (5,470)
Payment of debt financing costs (213) —
Repayment of obligations under finance leases (6,291) (3,574)
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests — (500)
Net cash used in financing activities (10,933) (10,853)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
37
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow data:
Cash paid for income taxes 358 2,506
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Property acquired in exchange for finance leases 14,269 14,322
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests — 772
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
38
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(In thousands, except share data)
Shares Amount Shares Amount
Distribution to shareholders — — — — — — — (500) (500)
Dissolution of noncontrolling interests — — — — (772) — (772) 772 —
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
39
HF Foods Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Organization and Description of Business
Organization and General
HF Foods Group Inc., headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, operating through our subsidiaries (collectively “HF Foods” or the “Company”) is a marketer and distributor of fresh produce, frozen and dry food, and non-food products to Asian restaurants, as well as other foodservice customers, throughout the United States. With multiple distribution centers located throughout the nation, HF Foods supplies Asian cuisine through its relationships with growers and suppliers of food products in North America, South America and Asia. The Company’s business consists of one operating segment, which is also its one reportable segment: HF Foods, which operates solely in the United States, offers specialty restaurant foods and supplies to its customers.
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For consolidated entities where we own or are exposed to less than 100% of the economics, the Company records net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss equal to the percentage of the economic or ownership interest retained in such entity by the respective noncontrolling party.
Variable Interest Entities
GAAP provides guidance on the identification of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and financial reporting for an entity over which control is achieved through means other than voting interests. The Company evaluates each of its interests in an entity to determine whether or not the investee is a VIE and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of such VIE. In determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company considers if the Company (1) has power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive the economic benefits of the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE. If deemed the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the VIE.
Effective April 30, 2024, the Company assumed the lease for which AnHeart, Inc. (“AnHeart”) was a lessee and the Company was a guarantor, and as such, it discontinued recognizing AnHeart as a VIE for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company was not the primary beneficiary and therefore did not consolidate AnHeart. See Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies for additional information on AnHeart.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company had no VIEs.
Noncontrolling Interests
GAAP requires that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and affiliates be reported in the equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the amounts attributable to the net income (loss) of those noncontrolling interests are reported separately in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, noncontrolling interest equity consisted of the following:
Uses of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during each reporting period.
40
Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, inventory reserves, impairment of long-lived assets, and impairment of goodwill.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements not yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The guidance requires additional disclosure of certain amounts included in the expense captions presented on the Statement of Operations as well as disclosures about selling expenses. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis, with the option for retrospective application, for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. This standard amends ASC 326-20 to provide a practical expedient related to the estimation of expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets that arise from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. The guidance is effective on a prospective basis for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025 and interim periods in those annual periods. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This standard is intended to improve the operability and application of guidance related to capitalized software development costs. The guidance becomes effective on a prospective basis, with the option for modified prospective or retrospective application, for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim periods in those annual periods. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270). This new standard clarifies interim reporting guidance, develops a list of disclosures required by other Topics and intends to enhance consistency in interim reporting across entities. The standard allows for early adoption and becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s interim financial statement disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements. This update addresses a broad range of topics including technical corrections, unintended applications of the codifications, clarifications of certain items, and other minor improvements. The ASU is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires public entities to disclose specific categories in its annual effective tax rate reconciliation and disaggregated information about significant reconciling items by jurisdiction and by nature. This guidance also requires entities to disclose their income tax payments (net of refunds) to international, federal, and state and local jurisdictions. This standard is effective for the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025. See Note 12 - Income Taxes in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further detail.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or shorter as cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company had no cash equivalents.
Checks issued not presented for payment represent accounts at banks with an aggregate excess of the amount of outstanding checks over the cash balances and are presented in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The net changes to checks issued not presented for payment are presented in the operating section of the statement of cash flows.
Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business and are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Receivables are presented net of the allowance for expected credit losses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable and determines the appropriate allowance for expected credit losses based on a combination of factors. The Company maintains an allowance for expected credit losses based on historic collection trends, write-offs and the aging of receivables. The Company uses specific criteria to
41
determine uncollectible receivables to be written off, including, bankruptcy filings, the referral of customer accounts to outside parties for collection, and the length that accounts remain past due.
Inventories
The Company’s inventories, consisting mainly of food and other foodservice-related products, are considered finished goods. Inventory costs, including the purchase price of the product and freight charges to deliver it to the Company’s warehouses, are net of certain cash consideration received from vendors, primarily in the form of rebates. The Company adjusts its inventory balance for slow-moving, excess and obsolete inventories to the net recoverable value of such goods based upon inventory category, inventory age, specifically identified items, and overall economic conditions. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Following are the estimated useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment:
Estimated Useful Lives
Automobiles 3 to 7 years
Buildings and improvements 7 to 39 years
Furniture and fixtures 4 to 10 years
Machinery and equipment 3 to 10 years
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of those leasehold improvements or the remaining lease term.
Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred, whereas the cost of renewals and betterment that extends the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized as additions to the related assets. Retirements, sales and disposals of assets are recorded by removing the cost and accumulated depreciation from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts with any resulting gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income loss in distribution, selling and administrative expenses.
Software Costs
In accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software, the Company capitalizes certain computer software licenses and software implementation costs related to developing or obtaining computer software for internal use. Subsequent additions, modifications or upgrades to internal-use software are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to perform a task that it previously did not perform. Internal use software is amortized on a straight-line basis over a three to five year period. Capitalized costs include direct acquisitions as well as software and software development acquired under capitalized leases and internal labor where appropriate. Capitalized software purchases and related development costs, net of accumulated amortization, were $3.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2024, and are included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually, as of December 31, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired.
The Company’s policy is to test goodwill for impairment annually on the last day of the fourth quarter, or more frequently if certain triggering events or circumstances indicate it could be impaired. Potential impairment indicators include (but are not limited to) macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, other relevant entity-specific events, specific events affecting the reporting unit, or sustained decrease in share price. The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If, based on a review of qualitative factors, it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, or at management’s discretion, the Company performs a quantitative analysis. If the quantitative analysis indicates the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company measures any goodwill impairment losses as the amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company has one reporting unit for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment. See Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires the application of judgment and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions including, projections of future cash flows, which include forecasted revenue, discount rate, and other factors
42
which can be affected by changes in business climate, economic conditions, the competitive environment and other factors. The Company also considers the use of market approaches, such as the comparable public company analysis and comparable acquisitions analysis, to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company bases these fair value estimates on assumptions management believes to be reasonable but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. A change in underlying assumptions would cause a change in the results of the tests and, as such, could cause fair value to be less than the carrying amount and result in an impairment of goodwill in the future. Additionally, if actual results are not consistent with the estimates and assumptions or if there are significant changes to the Company’s planned strategy, it may cause the fair value of the reporting unit to be less than its carrying amount and result in an impairment of goodwill in the future. The Company corroborates the reasonableness of the total fair value of the reporting unit by assessing the implied control premium based on the Company’s market capitalization. The Company’s market capitalization is calculated using the relevant shares outstanding and stock price of the Company’s publicly traded shares. In the event of a goodwill impairment, the Company would be required to record an impairment, which would impact earnings and reduce the carrying amounts of goodwill on the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $38.8 million and $46.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s goodwill is fully impaired.
Intangible Assets, net
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company determines the appropriate useful life of its intangible assets by measuring the expected cash flows of acquired assets. The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are as follows:
Estimated Useful Lives
Non-competition agreements 3 years
Trademarks and trade names 10 years
Customer relationships 10 to 20 years
Inventory management system 7 years
Long-term Investments
The Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities consist of an equity investment and an investment without readily determinable fair value.
The Company follows ASC Topic 321 (“ASC 321”), Investments – Equity Securities, using the measurement alternative to measure investments in investees that do not have readily determinable fair value and over which the Company does not have significant influence at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer, if any. The Company makes a qualitative assessment of whether the investment is impaired at each reporting date. If a qualitative assessment indicates that the investment is impaired, the Company has to estimate the investment’s fair value in accordance with the principles of ASC Topic 820 (“ASC 820”), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. If the fair value is less than the investment’s carrying value, the entity has to recognize an impairment loss in earnings equal to the difference between the carrying value and fair value.
Investments in entities in which the Company can exercise significant influence but does not own a majority equity interest or control are accounted for using the equity method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 323 (“ASC 323”), Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures. Under the equity method, the Company initially records its investment at cost, which is included in the equity method investment on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company subsequently adjusts the carrying amount of the investment to recognize the Company’s proportionate share of each equity investee’s net income or loss into earnings after the date of investment. The Company evaluates the equity method investments for impairment under ASC 323. An impairment loss on the equity method investments is recognized in earnings when the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary.
The Company did not record any impairment loss on its long-term investments during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
43
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company assesses its long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Factors which may indicate potential impairment include a significant underperformance related to the historical or projected future operating results or a significant negative industry or economic trend. Recoverability of an asset or asset group is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If property and equipment, and intangible assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. The testing for impairment of long-lived assets occurs prior to any testing related to goodwill. The Company assessed whether the carrying amounts of the Company’s long-lived assets were impaired and determined no events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
The Company did not record any impairment loss on its long-lived assets during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Insurance and Claim Costs
The Company maintains workers compensation and general liability insurance with licensed insurance carriers. Beginning in April 2020, the Company is self-insured for auto claims less than $100,000 per claim. Insurance and claims expense represent premiums the Company paid and the accruals made for claims within the Company’s self-insured retention amounts. A liability is recognized for the estimated cost of all self-insured claims including an estimate of incurred but not reported claims based on historical experience and for claims expected to exceed the Company’s policy limits.
The Company establishes reserves for anticipated losses and expenses related to auto liability claims. The reserves consist of specific reserves for all known claims and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported, and losses arising from known claims ultimately settling in excess of insurance coverage using loss development factors based upon industry data and past experience. In determining the liability, the Company specifically reviews all known claims and records a liability based upon the Company’s best estimate of the amount to be paid. In making the estimate, the Company considers the amount and validity of the claim, as well as the Company’s past experience with similar claims. In establishing the reserve for claims incurred but not reported, the Company considers its past claims history, including the length of time it takes for claims to be reported to the Company. These reserves are periodically reviewed and adjusted to reflect the Company’s experience and updated information relating to specific claims. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company has recorded a self-insurance liability of $2.0 million and $1.7 million respectively, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products when control of each product passes to the customer and the customer accepts the goods, which occurs at delivery. The majority of customer orders are fulfilled within a day and customer payment terms are typically thirty days or less from invoice date. Our 100% satisfaction guarantee permits our customers to reject part of the order or the entire order within twenty-four hours of receipt without any penalty. Sales taxes invoiced to customers and remitted to government authorities are excluded from net sales.
The Company follows ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company recognizes revenue that represents the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in such exchange. This requires the Company to identify contractual performance obligations and determine whether revenue should be recognized at a point in time or over time, based on when control of goods and services transfer to a customer. The Company’s contracts contain performance obligations which are satisfied when customers have physical possession of each product. The Company’s revenue streams are recognized at a specific point in time.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue primarily includes inventory costs (net of vendor consideration, primarily in the form of rebates), inbound freight, customs clearance fees, tariffs and other miscellaneous expenses.
Distribution, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for employees and contract laborers, trucking and fuel expenses for deliveries, utilities, maintenance and repair expenses, insurance expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses, selling and marketing expenses, professional fees and other operating expenses.
Shipping and Handling Costs
44
Shipping and handling costs, which include costs related to the selection of products and their delivery to customers, are included in distribution, selling and administrative expenses. Shipping and handling costs were$67.6 million and $69.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and includes estimates for labor associated with shipping and handling activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, the Company determines deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities by using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. See Note 12 - Income Taxes for additional information.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law on July 4, 2025. The OBBBA includes a broad range of tax reform provisions, such as the permanent extension of certain expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, modifications to the international tax framework and the restoration of favorable tax treatment for certain business provisions. The legislation has multiple effective dates, with certain provisions effective in 2025 and others implemented through 2027. The Company adopted the tax provisions in the current period when the provisions were signed into law.
Leases
The Company accounts for leases following ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”). The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception and also considers classification of leases as operating or finance. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, current portion of obligations under operating leases, and obligations under operating leases, non-current on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property and equipment, net, current portion of obligations under finance leases, and obligations under finance leases, non-current on the consolidated balance sheets.
Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and initial direct costs incurred and excludes lease incentives. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable rent payments related to both operating and finance leases are expensed as incurred. The Company's variable lease payments primarily consist of real estate, maintenance and usage charges.
The Company has elected to exclude short-term leases from the recognition requirements of ASC 842. A lease is short-term if, at the commencement date, it has a term of less than or equal to one year. Lease expense related to short-term leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has also elected to combine lease and non-lease components when measuring lease liabilities for vehicle and equipment leases.
Derivative Financial Instruments
In accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Company has not designated its interest rate swap (“IRS”) contracts as hedges for accounting treatment. Pursuant to GAAP, income or loss from fair value changes for derivatives that are not designated as hedges by management are reflected as income or loss on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Net amounts received or paid under the interest rate swap contracts are recognized as an increase or decrease to interest expense when such amounts are incurred. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty.
45
Concentrations and Credit Risk
The Company had no customers that comprised more than 10% of consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2025 or 2024, respectively. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had no customers that comprised more than 10% of consolidated accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and derived from revenue earned from customers, and thereby exposed to credit risk. The risk is mitigated by the Company’s large customer base and ongoing assessments of its customers’ creditworthiness and outstanding balances.
The Company maintains cash balances with banks which at times exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Segment Reporting
ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments on a basis consistent with the Company’s internal organizational structure as well as information about geographical areas, business segments and major customers in financial statements for details on the Company’s business segments. The Company uses the “management approach” in determining reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Company’s operating decision makers for making operational decisions and assessing performance as the source for determining the Company’s reportable segments. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is its chief executive officer, who reviews operating results and makes resource allocations on a consolidated basis and thus the Company has concluded it has one operating and reportable segment. See Note 16 - Segment Information in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further detail.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) annually. Stock-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the stock awards at the grant date and is recognized, net of forfeitures, over the requisite service period. See Note 14 - Stock-Based Compensation to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding stock-based compensation.
46
Note 3 - Revenue
The following table presents the Company’s net revenue disaggregated by principal product categories:
Year Ended December 31,
Note 4 - Balance Sheet Components
Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following:
Less: allowance for expected credit losses (1,199) (1,557)
The beginning balance of accounts receivable as of January 1, 2024 was $49.6 million.
Movement of allowance for expected credit losses was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Credit for expected credit losses (357) (103)
Bad debt write-offs (1) (459)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 9,725 $ 11,507
Assets held for sale consisted of the following:
Buildings $ 2,034 $ —
Assets held for sale $ 2,768 $ —
In 2025, the Company approved a plan to sell land and a building it owned in Utah. The Company engaged a firm to market the location for sale and solicited multiple offers on the property. On October 17, 2025, the Company executed a sale agreement for
47
the assets and subsequently determined that the assets met the accounting requirements to be classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2025. The Company closed on the sale of the land and building on February 12, 2026. For additional information regarding the sale see Note 18 - Subsequent Events.
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
_________________
(1) The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment related to finance leases was $50.0 million and $21.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025 and $36.1 million and $14.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2024. The total future minimum lease payments under all finance leases as of December 31, 2025 is $43.7 million.
(2) Included in construction in progress at December 31, 2024 was $4.0 million related to the Inventory Management System prior to it being placed in service in 2025. When the Company placed the Inventory Management System in service in 2025, it reclassified the amount out of construction in progress to Intangible Assets.
Depreciation expense was $12.7 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Long-term investments consisted of the following:
Pt. Tamron Akuatik Produk Industri (“Tamron”) 12.0% 1,800 1,800
Total long-term investments $ 2,144 $ 2,350
The investment in Tamron is accounted for using the measurement alternative under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 321 Investments—Equity Securities, which is measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments, if any. The investment in Asahi is accounted for under the equity method due to the fact that the Company has significant influence but does not exercise control over this investee. The Company determined there was no impairment for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 for these investments.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following:
Accrued professional fees 300 553
Accrued interest and fees 862 938
Total accrued expenses and other liabilities $ 14,994 $ 18,001
48
Note 5 - Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
(In thousands)
Assets:
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps $ — $ 1,607 $ — $ 1,607 $ — $ — $ — $ —
The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurement which clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
•Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.
•Level 2 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
•Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about what assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.
Any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy will be recognized at the end of the reporting period in which the transfer occurs. There were no transfers between fair value levels in any of the periods presented herein.
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, checks issued not presented for payment and accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate their fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.
See Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information regarding the Company’s interest rate swaps.
49
Carrying Value and Estimated Fair Value of Outstanding Debt - The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s outstanding debt as described in Note 9 - Long-Term Debt, including the current portion, as of the dates indicated:
Fair Value Measurements
(In thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Carrying Value
Fixed rate debt:
Bank of America $ — $ — $ 48 $ 51
Other financial institutions — 2,474 — 2,784
Variable rate debt:
Fixed rate debt:
Bank of America $ — $ — $ 104 $ 113
Variable rate debt:
The carrying value of the variable rate debt approximates its fair value because of the variability of interest rates associated with these instruments. For the Company’s fixed rate debt, the fair values were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
See Note 9 - Long-Term Debt for additional information regarding the Company’s debt.
Nonrecurring Fair Values
The Company measures fair value of certain assets on a nonrecurring basis when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.
As further disclosed in Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets, we performed a quantitative goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The results of testing as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 concluded that the estimated fair value of our one reporting unit fell short of carrying value, and therefore impairment existed as of those dates. Goodwill impairment charges of $38.8 million and $46.3 million were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The calculation of the fair value of our reporting unit was determined using Level 3 fair value measurements due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.
There were no assets carried at nonrecurring fair value other than goodwill at December 31, 2025 or 2024.
Note 6 - Leases
The Company leases office space, warehouses and vacant land that is currently being developed under non-cancelable operating leases, with terms typically ranging from one to thirty years, as well as operating and finance leases for vehicles and delivery trucks, forklifts and computer equipment with various expiration dates through 2051. The Company determines whether an arrangement is or includes an embedded lease at contract inception.
Operating and finance lease assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date and initially measured based on the present value of lease payments over the defined lease term. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company also recognizes finance lease assets and finance lease liabilities at inception, with lease expense recognized as interest expense and amortization of the lease payment. Variable lease costs were insignificant in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
50
Operating Leases
The components of operating lease expense were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Weighted average remaining lease term (months) 122 58
Weighted average discount rate 6.7% 5.4%
Supplemental cash flow information related to operating leases was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 5,986 $ 4,623
Finance Leases
The components of finance lease expense were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Finance leases cost:
Amortization of ROU assets $ 7,000 $ 4,249
Interest on lease liabilities 1,874 1,284
Total finance leases cost $ 8,874 $ 5,533
Supplemental cash flow information related to finance leases was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Operating cash flows from finance leases $ 1,817 $ 1,205
Supplemental balance sheet information related to finance leases was as follows:
Weighted average remaining lease term (months) 113 143
Weighted average discount rate 5.9 % 5.9 %
51
Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:
(In thousands) Operating Leases Finance Leases
Year Ended December 31,
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had additional leases for vehicles that had not yet commenced which total $0.8 million in future minimum lease payments and were excluded from the table above. These vehicle leases are expected to commence during the year ended December 31, 2026 with lease terms of 7 to 8 years.
AnHeart Lease Arrangements
The Company was previously the guarantor of leases for properties located at 273 Fifth Avenue and 275 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, New York. In connection with these arrangements, the Company previously determined that AnHeart, Inc. (“AnHeart”) was a variable interest entity (“VIE”); however, because the Company was not the primary beneficiary, AnHeart was not consolidated.
Effective January 21, 2021, the Company assumed the lease for 273 Fifth Avenue and became responsible for the related tenant obligations thereunder, including rent and required property improvements. The lease term expires in January 2051. In March 2024, the Company commenced the required construction of a multi-use facility at the property. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had incurred approximately $7.3 million of construction costs, and the project was placed in service in September 2025 following receipt of the certificate of occupancy. The lease agreement permits subletting of the premises, and as of December 31, 2025, the Company had entered into sub-lease arrangements for portions of the property.
Following AnHeart’s default under the 275 Fifth Avenue lease in 2022, the Company performed under its guaranty and recognized a lease guarantee liability. Effective April 30, 2024, the Company assumed the lease for portions of the 275 Fifth Avenue property. Upon assumption of the lease, the Company determined that AnHeart was no longer a VIE with respect to this arrangement. The remaining lease guarantee liability of $5.4 million was reversed, and an operating lease right-of-use asset and lease liability of approximately $4.9 million were recognized on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company recognized a $5.4 million gain in other expense (income), net during 2024 for the reversal of the lease guarantee liability. The lease term expires on April 30, 2034, includes options to renew for up to two additional five-year terms, and provides for initial monthly rent of approximately $45,000, subject to annual increases. Certain legal matters relating to the 273 Fifth Avenue and 275 Fifth Avenue lease arrangements are described in Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies.
52
Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are presented below:
(In thousands) Amount
Goodwill impairment charges (46,303)
Goodwill impairment charges (38,815)
Balance at December 31, 2025 $ —
Accumulated impairment for goodwill is $423.3 million as of December 31, 2025 and $384.5 million as of December 31, 2024. Prior to the goodwill impairment charge in the current year, the accumulated impairment resulted from impairment charges taken during the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2020.
There is only one reporting unit at December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually, as of December 31, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated goodwill might be impaired.
As of September 30, 2024, the Company concluded that a triggering event occurred due to a sustained decline in the Company’s stock price since December 31, 2023, which required interim testing for goodwill impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Accordingly, the Company performed a quantitative assessment as of September 30, 2024. The fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value, and therefore the Company concluded no impairment was required to be recorded during the period ended September 30, 2024.
As a result of continued declines in the level of stock price, the Company performed a quantitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2024. The results of the testing as of December 31, 2024, concluded that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit fell short of carrying value, and therefore impairment existed as of that date. A goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the year ended December 31, 2024.
As a result of declines in the stock price during the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company performed a quantitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2025. The results of the testing at December 31, 2025, resulted in the conclusion that the estimated fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit was less than its carrying value, and its goodwill was impaired. A goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the year ended December 31, 2025 of $38.8 million.
For the impairment tests conducted in 2025 and 2024, the Company used a combination of an income approach or a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model and market approaches, such as public company comparable analysis and comparable acquisitions analysis to determine fair value of the reporting unit. The income approach and market approaches were weighted equally to estimate fair value. The income approach requires detailed forecasts of cash flows, including assumptions such as revenue growth rates, gross profit margins, distribution, selling and administrative expenses, among other assumptions, and an estimate of weighted-average cost of capital which the Company believes approximate the assumptions from a market participant’s perspective. The market approaches are primarily impacted by an enterprise value multiple of EBITDA. These estimates incorporate many uncertain factors which could be impacted by changes in market conditions, interest rates, growth rate, tax rates, costs, customer behavior, regulatory environment and other macroeconomic changes. In addition, the Company considered the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit by assessing the implied enterprise value control premium based on the Company’s market capitalization. The Company determined that the implied control premiums used in each analysis were reasonable which corroborates the Company’s fair value estimates. The Company categorized the fair value determination as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.
Assumptions used in impairment testing are made at a point in time and require significant judgment; therefore, they are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances present at each impairment test date. Additionally, these assumptions are generally interdependent and do not change in isolation.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s goodwill was fully impaired.
53
Intangible Assets
In connection with the Sealand acquisition in 2022, the Company acquired $14.7 million of intangible assets, primarily representing trademarks and trade names of $4.4 million, customer relationships of $8.9 million and non-compete agreements of $1.4 million. The useful lives of trademarks and trade names are ten years, customer relationships are ten years and non-compete agreements are three years.
In connection with the Great Wall Group acquisition in 2021, HF Foods acquired $30.1 million of intangible assets, primarily representing a non-competition agreement, trademarks and trade names and customer relationships, which have an estimated amortization period of approximately three years, ten years, and ten years, respectively.
In connection with the acquisition of B&R Global in 2019, HF Foods acquired $188.5 million of intangible assets, primarily representing trademarks and trade names and customer relationships which have an estimated amortization period of ten and twenty years, respectively.
The Company evaluated possible triggering events that would indicate its long-lived assets are impaired. No impairment was recorded against intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $15.7 million and $16.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is presented below:
(In thousands) Amount
Year ending December 31,
Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes interest rate swaps (“IRS”) for the sole purpose of mitigating interest rate fluctuation risk associated with floating rate debt instruments (as defined in Note 9 - Long-Term Debt). The Company does not use any other derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
On August 20, 2019, HF Foods entered into two IRS contracts with East West Bank (the “EWB IRS”) for initial notional amounts of $1.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively. On April 20, 2023, the Company amended the corresponding mortgage term loans, which pegged the two mortgage term loans to 1-month Term SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) + 2.29% per annum for
54
the remaining duration of the term loans. The amended EWB IRS contracts fixed the two term loans at 4.23% per annum until maturity in September 2029.
On December 19, 2019, HF Foods entered into an IRS contract with Bank of America (the “BOA IRS”) for an initial notional amount of $2.7 million in conjunction with a newly contracted mortgage term loan of corresponding amount. On December 19, 2021, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to Loan Agreement, which pegged the mortgage term loan to Term SOFR + 2.50%. The BOA IRS was modified accordingly to fix the SOFR based loan to approximately 4.50%. The term loan and corresponding BOA IRS contract mature in December 2029.
On March 15, 2023, the Company entered into an amortizing IRS contract with JPMorgan Chase for an initial notional amount of $120.0 million, effective from March 1, 2023 and expiring in March 2028, as a means to partially hedge its existing floating rate loans exposure. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will pay the swap counterparty a fixed rate of 4.11% in exchange for floating payments based on Term SOFR.
The Company evaluated the aforementioned IRS contracts currently in place and did not designate those as cash flow hedges. Hence, the fair value changes of these IRS contracts are accounted for and recognized as a change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company determined that the fair values of the IRS contracts were $0.2 million in an asset position and $1.6 million in a liability position. As of December 31, 2024, the fair values of the IRS contracts were $0.5 million in an asset position and none in a liability position. The Company includes these in other long-term assets and other long-term liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.
Note 9 - Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 is summarized as follows:
($ in thousands)
Less: debt issuance costs (173) (215)
_______________
(a)Loan balance consists of real estate term loan and equipment term loan, collateralized by one real property and specific equipment. The real estate term loan is pegged to TERM SOFR + 2.50%.
(b)Real estate term loans with East West Bank are collateralized by three real properties. Balloon payments of $1.9 million and $2.9 million are due at maturity in 2027 and 2029, respectively.
(c)Real estate term loan with a principal balance of $96.2 million as of December 31, 2025 and $101.3 million as of December 31, 2024 is secured by assets held by the Company and has a maturity date of January 2030.
The terms of the various loan agreements related to long-term bank borrowings require the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, a fixed charge coverage ratio and effective tangible net worth. As of December 31, 2025, the Company was in compliance with its covenants.
On March 31, 2022, the Company amended the JPM Credit Agreement, defined below, extending the Real Estate Term Loan for five years. The amendment provided for an increase in the Real Estate Term Loan from $69.0 million to $115.0 million with a 1-month SOFR plus a credit adjustment of 0.10% plus 1.875% per annum.
55
The future maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2025 are as follows:
(In thousands) Amount
Year ending December 31,
Thereafter —
Credit Facility
On November 4, 2019, the Company entered into a credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase (the “JPM Credit Agreement”). The JPM Credit Agreement provided for a $100.0 million asset-secured revolving credit facility maturing on November 4, 2022, with an option to renew at the bank’s discretion. On January 17, 2020, the Company and certain of the wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates of the Company as borrowers, and certain material subsidiaries of the Company as guarantors, entered into the Second Amended Credit Agreement. On December 30, 2021, the Company entered into the Consent, Waiver, Joinder and Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase, as Administrative Agent, and certain lender parties thereto, including Comerica Bank. The Second Amended Credit Agreement, as amended, provided for (i) a $125.0 million asset-secured revolving credit facility maturing on November 4, 2022 (the “Revolving Facility”), (ii) mortgage-secured term loan of $75.6 million, (the “Term Loan”), and (iii) amendment in the referenced interest rate from 1-month LIBOR to 1-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a credit adjustment of 0.10% (difference between LIBOR and SOFR plus 1.375% per annum).
The existing revolving credit facility balance under the Second Amended Credit Agreement, was rolled over to the Revolving Facility on December 30, 2021. On the same day, the Company utilized an additional $33.3 million drawdown from the Revolving Facility to fund the Great Wall Group acquisition. The Second Amended Credit Agreement, as amended, contains certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, a fixed charge coverage ratio.
On March 31, 2022, the Company entered into the Third Amended Credit Agreement extending the Revolving Facility for five years, with a maturity date of March 31, 2027. The Third Amended Credit Agreement provides for a $100.0 million asset-secured revolving credit facility with a one-month SOFR plus a credit adjustment of 0.10% plus 1.375% per annum. On February 6, 2024, the Company amended the Third Amended Credit Agreement to (i) remove a cap on permitted indebtedness in respect of capital lease obligations, subject to certain enumerated conditions; (ii) create a reserve on the borrowing base, which will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis once the Company has made expenditures in excess of such amount relating to the development and construction of certain real property, and which amounts shall be excluded from certain financial covenants under the Third Amended Credit Agreement and; (iii) remove certain sublease income from various financial covenants. On July 15, 2024, the Company again amended the Third Amended Credit Agreement to (i) increase the issuing bank sublimit to $10.0 million and; (ii) modify the due date for a borrowing base certificate based on availability under the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2025, the Company was in compliance with its covenants. The outstanding principal balance on the line of credit as of December 31, 2025 was $55.8 million and outstanding letters of credit amounted to $8.0 million leaving access to approximately $61.2 million in additional funds through our $125.0 million line of credit, subject to a borrowing base calculation.
On February 12, 2025, the Company amended certain terms and conditions of the Third Amended Credit Agreement, by, among other things, (i) increasing the Revolving Commitment (as defined in the Credit Agreement) from $100.0 million to $125.0 million, (ii) joining three new subsidiaries of the Company to the Credit Agreement, each as a “Borrower” thereunder, (iii) joining Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to the credit agreement as a “Lender” thereunder, (iv) amending certain affirmative covenants commensurate with the increase in the Revolving Facility, and (v) amending certain restrictions regarding incurring obligations under real property leases and equipment financings in the ordinary course of business.
Note 10 - Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock
The Company had 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, with a par value of $0.0001 per share as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
On September 25, 2025, the Company entered into an At-the-Market (ATM) Sales Agreement with D.A. Davidson & Co. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC, pursuant to which the Company may sell, from time to time, at its discretion, shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, having an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million, subject to
56
the terms of the sales agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company did not sell any Shares under the offering.
Preferred Stock
The Company had authorized 100,000 shares of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share and 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
The Company had no preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2025 or 2024.
Note 11 - Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The Company computes earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC Topic 260 (“ASC 260”), Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires companies with complex capital structures to present basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as net income (loss) divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS, but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., convertible securities, options, warrants and restricted stock) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS. There were 918,880 and 1,325,443 potential common shares related to performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock units that were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, because their effect could have been anti-dilutive. There were 1,279,680 and 1,482,062 potential common shares related to performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock units that were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, because their effect could have been anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except share and per share data) 2025 2024
Numerator:
Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc. $ (38,843) $ (48,511)
Denominator:
Effect of dilutive securities — —
Loss per common share:
57
Note 12 - Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 consists of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
Current:
Current income taxes (benefit) (386) 1,601
Deferred income taxes (benefit):
Deferred income taxes (benefit): (5,584) 364
Total income tax expense (benefit) $ (5,970) $ 1,965
Cash paid for income taxes (net of refunds received) by jurisdiction after the prospective adoption of ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 is as follows:
Year ended December 31,
State
Colorado 31
Illinois 30
North Carolina 26
Virginia 73
All other states (individually less than 5% of total) 35
Total income taxes paid, net of refunds $ 358
The Company’s effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were 13.2% and (4.3)%, respectively. The determination of the Company’s overall effective income tax rate requires the use of estimates.
The effective income tax rate reflects the income earned and taxed in U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions based on enacted tax law, permanent differences between book and tax items, tax credits and the Company’s change in relative income in each jurisdiction. Changes in tax laws and rates may affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities and the Company’s effective income tax rate in the future. The Company has immaterial operations outside the U.S., as such, no foreign income tax was recorded.
The provision for income taxes differed from the amount obtained by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to income before income taxes. The reconciliations of the statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate reflecting the prospective adoption of ASU 2023-09 are as follows:
58
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands) Amount Percent
Federal statutory tax rate (21%) $ (9,509) 21.0 %
State and local income tax, net of federal income tax effect (1) (1,089) 2.4
Changes in valuation allowance — —
Nontaxable or Nondeductible items
Executive compensation limit 113 (0.2)
Meals and Entertainment 42 (0.1)
Other nontaxable or nondeductible items 32 (0.1)
Changes in unrecognized tax benefits — —
Other adjustments (83) 0.2
Total income tax benefit $ (5,970) 13.2 %
_______________
(1) State taxes in CA made up the majority (greater than 50 percent) of the tax effect in this category
The reconciliation from the statutory U.S. federal tax rate to our effective income tax rate prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-09 is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
Year EndedDecember 31,
Federal statutory tax rate (21%) 21.0 %
State statutory tax rate (1.1) %
U.S permanent differences (0.3) %
Noncontrolling interests 0.2 %
Officers’ compensation (0.4) %
Rate change (1.2) %