FNRN · Read the filing

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

In addition to factors mentioned elsewhere in this Report, the factors contained below, among others, could cause our financial condition and results of operations to be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our common stock could decline, perhaps significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Changes in U.S. and Foreign Government Policies, Including the Imposition of or Further Increases in Tariffs and Changes to Existing Trade Agreements, Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Bank’s Customers, Which, in Turn, Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In February 2025, the Trump Administration announced that it would be imposing increases in tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. from Canada, Mexico, and China, and, in April 2025, the Administration announced the imposition of increased tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. from other countries. As a consequence, other countries, in retaliation to the U.S.’s tariff measures, announced the imposition of increased levels of tariffs on goods exported to such countries by companies in the U.S. The Trump Administration has announced agreements in principle regarding tariffs with certain significant trading partners of the United States, including (among others) the European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan and South Korea. It remains uncertain whether such agreements in principle will lead to definitive agreements with such trading partners and, if so, on what terms and whether agreements with other trading partners will eventually be consummated. More recently, the U.S. government has introduced new tariffs and tariff-related measures and has indicated that other potential tariff measures and modifications to existing tariffs continue to be under consideration. President Trump imposed many of these tariffs by invoking authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could not invoke the IEEPA to unilaterally set tariffs on imports, thereby invalidating those tariffs implemented using IEEPA. The Trump Administration responded by announcing the imposition of new tariffs under alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs, including an executive order imposing a global surcharge on most imports (initially 10%, with an announcement on February 21, 2026, that the tariff rate would be 15%), effective for 150 days. The tariff environment continues to remain highly dynamic, and the specific tariffs applicable to goods imported into the U.S. continue to evolve, as do import tariffs charged by other countries. These tariffs could be of particular concern to U.S. companies operating in the agricultural sector who export agricultural goods to other countries. The Company’s customers include a number of agricultural businesses, which could be negatively affected.

As a result of these changes to U.S. and foreign government trade policies, there may be changes to existing trade agreements, greater restrictions on free trade generally, the imposition of or significant further increases in tariffs on goods imported into the U.S., and adverse responses by foreign governments to U.S. trade policies, among other possible changes. The extent and duration of any tariffs, and the resulting impact on economic conditions generally and on our customers’ businesses in particular are uncertain and depend on various factors, such as negotiations between the U.S. and other countries, the responses of such countries, and exemptions or exclusions that may be granted. A significant trade disruption or the establishment or further increase of any tariffs, trade protection measures or restrictions could result in lost sales, adversely impacting our banking customers and their businesses, including our agricultural business customers. In addition, international trade disputes, including those related to tariffs, could result in inflationary pressures and/or adversely impact global supply chains, which could increase the costs of doing business for our banking customers. Changes in U.S. social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the countries where our banking customers currently sell products, including agricultural products, and any resulting negative sentiments towards the U.S. and U.S. businesses as a result of such changes, could also have a material adverse effect on our banking customers’ business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If these events negatively affect our banking clients, or general economic conditions nationally, in California, or in the markets we serve, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Negative Developments in the Banking Industry, and any Legislative and/or Bank Regulatory Actions that may Result, Could Adversely Affect our Business Operations, Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

The high-profile bank failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank in 2023, and related negative media attention, generated significant market trading volatility among publicly-traded bank holding companies and, in particular, regional and community banks, such as the Company. These developments negatively impacted customer confidence in the safety and soundness of regional and community banks. Defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial institutions or the financial services industry generally, may lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses of client, creditor and counterparty confidence and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other financial institutions.

While we currently do not anticipate liquidity constraints of the kind that caused these other financial services institutions to fail or require external support, constraints on our liquidity could occur as a result of customers choosing to maintain their deposits with larger financial institutions or to invest in higher yielding short-term fixed income securities, which could materially adversely impact our liquidity, cost of funding, loan funding capacity, net interest margin, capital and results of operations. If we were required to sell a portion of our securities portfolio to address liquidity needs, we may incur losses, including as a result of the negative impact of rising interest rates on the value of our securities portfolio, which could negatively affect our earnings and our capital. While the Company has taken actions which aim to maintain adequate and diversified sources of funding and management believes that its liquidity measures are reasonable in light of the nature of the Bank’s customer base, there can be no assurance that such actions will be sufficient in the event of a sudden liquidity crisis.

These bank failures may also result in potentially adverse changes to laws or regulations governing banks and bank holding companies, enhanced regulatory supervision and examination policies and priorities, and/or the imposition of restrictions through regulatory supervisory or enforcement activities, including higher capital requirements and/or an increase in the Bank’s deposit insurance assessments. The FDIC has proposed that Congress consider, and legislation has been introduced in Congress proposing, various changes in the FDIC insurance program, including possible increases in the deposit insurance limit for certain types of accounts, such as business payment accounts. Although these legislative and regulatory actions cannot be predicted with certainty, any of these potential legislative or regulatory actions could, among other things, subject us to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer, and reduce our profitability, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Economic Conditions in the U.S. May Soften or Become Recessionary with Resultant Adverse Consequences for the U.S. Financial Services Industry and for the Bank

Following the financial crisis of 2008, adverse financial and economic developments impacted U.S. and global economies and financial markets and presented challenges for the banking and financial services industry and for us. These developments included a general recession both globally and in the U.S. accompanied by substantial volatility in the financial markets. In response, various significant economic and monetary stimulus measures were implemented by the U.S. government. The FRB also pursued a highly accommodative monetary policy aimed at keeping interest rates at historically low levels, In January 2022, due to elevated levels of inflation and corresponding pressure to raise interest rates, the FRB began slowing the pace of its bond purchasing and increasing the target range for the federal funds rate over time, before beginning to reduce interest rates in 2024, which reductions continued in 2025. Despite these rate cuts, the FRB has signaled caution in easing monetary policy. At its January 2026 meeting, the FRB, citing continued elevated uncertainty about the economic outlook, low job gains, and inflation that remains somewhat elevated, determined to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 3‐1/2 to 3‐3/4 percent. Monetary policy has contributed to and may continue to result in elevated market interest rates and a flat and/or inverted yield curve. Changes to monetary policy may adversely impact U.S. economic activity and have adverse consequences on our customers’ and our earnings and operations. During his second term, President Trump has regularly pushed for the FRB to cut short-term interest rates, threatened to fire the FRB Chairman, and taken steps to remove another member of the FRB’s governing board, and, in January 2026, the U.S. attorney’s office in the District of Columbia opened a criminal investigation into the FRB Chairman over the central bank’s renovation of its Washington headquarters. These actions have the potential to threaten the independence of the FRB, and the outcome of these actions, and their impact on interest rates, financial markets, borrowing costs and the U.S. economy in general, cannot be predicted at this time. A prolonged federal government shutdown, as well as broader issues surrounding the federal budgeting process and governance, may also contribute to market volatility and disruptions and recessionary risk.

Table of Contents

As noted previously, the Trump Administration recently imposed increased tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. from other countries. As a consequence, other countries, in retaliation to the U.S.’s tariff measures, announced the imposition of increased levels of tariffs on goods exported to such countries by companies in the U.S. More recently, the U.S. government has introduced agreements in principle regarding tariffs with certain trading partners of the United States, new tariffs and tariff-related measures and has indicated that other potential tariff measures and modifications to existing tariffs continue to be under consideration. President Trump imposed many of these tariffs by invoking authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could not invoke the IEEPA to unilaterally set tariffs on imports, thereby invalidating those tariffs implemented using IEEPA. The Trump Administration responded by announcing the imposition of new tariffs under alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs, including an executive order imposing a global surcharge on most imports (initially 10%, with an announcement on February 21, 2026, that the tariff rate would be 15%), effective for 150 days. The tariff environment continues to remain highly dynamic, and the specific tariffs applicable to goods imported into the U.S. continue to evolve, as do import tariffs charged by other countries. See “Changes in U.S. and Foreign Government Policies, Including the Imposition of or Further Increases in Tariffs and Changes to Existing Trade Agreements, Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Bank’s Customers, Which, in Turn, Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” above in these “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. International trade disputes, including those related to tariffs, could result in inflationary pressures and/or adversely impact global supply chains, which could increase the costs of doing business for our banking customers. Political tensions as a result of trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange, and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, which could have resulting material adverse effects on general economic conditions nationally, in California, or in our local markets. Some economists have predicted that the Administration’s steep new tariffs could curtail growth and result in price increases for American consumers, ultimately increasing the likelihood of a U.S. recession. Additionally, financial markets may be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the recent military actions in Iran and the Middle East, escalating military tension between Russia and Ukraine, terrorism and other geopolitical events. Any of these developments could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We, and other financial services companies, are impacted to a significant degree by current economic conditions. If the U.S. economy weakens, our growth and profitability from our lending, deposit and investment operations could be constrained and our asset quality, deposit levels, loan demand and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The U.S. government continues to face significant fiscal and budgetary challenges which, if not resolved, could result in renewed adverse U.S. economic conditions. These challenges may be intensified over time if federal budget deficits were to increase and Congress and the Administration cannot effectively work to address them. The overall level of the federal government's debt, the extensive political disagreements regarding the government's statutory debt limit and the continuing substantial federal budget deficits led to a downgrade from “AAA” to “AA+” of the long-term sovereign credit rating of United States debt by one credit rating agency in 2023. In May 2025, Moody’s lowered the U.S. government’s long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings from “Aaa” to “Aa1”. This downgrade means that all three major credit rating agencies have downgraded the U.S. credit rating below their top rating. This risk could be exacerbated over time.

If substantial federal budget deficits were to continue or increase in the years ahead, further downgrades by the credit rating agencies with respect to the obligations of the U.S. federal government could occur. A prolonged federal government shutdown, as well as broader issues surrounding the federal budgeting process and governance, may further contribute to the possibility of a downgrade of the U.S. sovereign credit rating. Any such further downgrades could increase over time the U.S. federal government’s cost of borrowing, which may worsen its fiscal challenges, as well as generate further upward pressure on interest rates generally in the U.S. which could, in turn, have adverse consequences for borrowers and the level of business activity. The long-term impact of this situation, including the impact on the Bank's investment securities portfolio and other assets, cannot be predicted.

The Bank is Subject to Lending Risks of Loss and Repayment Associated with Commercial Banking Activities

The Bank’s business strategy is to focus on commercial business loans (which includes agricultural loans), construction loans, and commercial and multi-family real estate loans. The principal factors affecting the Bank’s risk of loss in connection with commercial business loans include the borrower’s ability to manage its business affairs and cash flows, general economic conditions, and, with respect to agricultural loans, weather and climate conditions.

For a number of years, California has also experienced severe drought, wildfires or other natural disasters. It can be expected that these events will continue to occur from time to time in the areas served by the Bank, and that the consequences of these natural disasters, including public utility public safety power outages when weather conditions and fire danger warrant, may adversely affect the Bank’s business and that of its commercial loan customers, particularly in the agricultural sector.

Table of Contents

Loans secured by commercial real estate are generally larger and involve a greater degree of credit and transaction risk than residential mortgage (one to four family) loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate properties are often dependent on successful operation or management of the underlying properties, repayment of such loans may be dependent on factors other than the prevailing conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Real estate construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction or development compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the Bank may be confronted with a project which, when completed, has a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan. For additional information, see “The Bank’s Dependence on Real Estate Lending Increases Our Risk of Losses”, below in these “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Although the Bank manages lending risks through its underwriting and credit administration policies, no assurance can be given that such risks will not materialize, in which event, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and business prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Increases in the Allowance for Credit Losses Would Adversely Affect the Bank’s Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Bank’s allowance for credit losses on loans was approximately $14.5 million, or 1.36% of total loans, at December 31, 2025, compared to $15.9 million, or 1.49% of total loans, at December 31, 2024, and 285.7% of total non-performing loans net of guaranteed portions at December 31, 2025, compared to 143.5% of total non-performing loans, net of guaranteed portions at December 31, 2024. No provision for credit losses was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2025, and a reversal of provision for credit losses totaled $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Material future additions to the allowance for estimated losses on loans may be necessary if material adverse changes in economic conditions in our markets were to continue to occur and the performance of the Bank’s loan portfolio were to deteriorate.

Other real estate owned is initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell the property, thereby establishing the new cost basis of other real estate. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent to acquisition, such properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling expenses, determined on an individual asset basis. Any deficiency resulting from the excess of cost over fair value less estimated selling expenses is recognized as a valuation allowance. Any subsequent increase in fair value up to its cost basis is recorded as a reduction of the valuation allowance. The FDIC and the California DFPI, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for credit losses on loans and the carrying value of its assets. Increases in the provisions for estimated losses on loans and foreclosed assets would adversely affect the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Bank’s Dependence on Real Estate Lending Increases Our Risk of Losses

The Bank’s primary lending focus has historically been commercial (including agricultural), construction, and real estate mortgage. At December 31, 2025, loans secured by real estate, including construction loans (residential and other), comprised approximately 84% of the total loans in the Bank’s portfolio. At December 31, 2025, all of the Bank’s real estate mortgage and construction loans and approximately 1% of its commercial loans were secured fully or in part by deeds of trust on underlying real estate. The Company’s dependence on real estate increases the risk of loss in both the Bank’s loan portfolio and its holdings of other real estate owned if economic conditions in Northern California were to deteriorate. Deterioration of the real estate market in Northern California would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The CFPB has adopted various regulations which have impacted, and may continue to impact, our residential mortgage lending business.

Table of Contents

Adverse Economic Factors Affecting Certain Industries the Bank Serves Could Adversely Affect Our Business

The Bank is subject to certain industry-specific economic factors. For example, a portion of the Bank’s total loan portfolio is related to residential and commercial real estate, especially in California. Increases in residential mortgage loan interest rates could have an adverse effect on the Bank’s operations by depressing new mortgage loan originations, which in turn could negatively impact the Bank’s title and escrow deposit levels. Additionally, a downturn in the residential real estate and housing industries in California could have an adverse effect on the Bank’s operations and the quality of its real estate and construction loan portfolio. Although the Bank does not engage in subprime or negative amortization lending, we are not immune to volatility in the real estate market. Real estate valuations are influenced by demand, and demand is driven by economic factors such as employment rates and interest rates. These factors could adversely impact the quality of the Bank’s residential construction, residential mortgage and construction related commercial portfolios in various ways, including by decreasing the value of the collateral for our loans, and thereby negatively affecting the Bank’s overall loan portfolio.

The Bank provides financing to, and receives deposits from, businesses in a number of other industries that may be particularly vulnerable to industry-specific economic factors, including the home building, commercial real estate, retail, agricultural, industrial, and commercial industries. Following the financial crisis of 2008, the home building industry in California was especially adversely impacted by the deterioration in residential real estate markets, which lead the Bank to take additional provisions and charge-offs against credit losses in this portfolio. The recessionary economic and market conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic also significantly affected the commercial and residential real estate markets in the U.S. generally, and in California in particular, decreasing property values, increasing the risk of defaults and reducing the value of real estate collateral. Continued volatility in fuel prices and energy costs and return of drought conditions in California could also adversely affect businesses in several of these industries.

Industry specific risks are beyond the Bank’s control and could adversely affect the Bank’s portfolio of loans, potentially resulting in an increase in non-performing loans or charge-offs and a slowing of growth or reduction in our loan portfolio.

In recent years, wildfires across California and in our market areas resulted in significant damage and destruction of property and equipment. The fire damage resulted in adverse economic impacts to those affected markets and beyond and on the Bank's customers. In addition, the major electric utility company in our region has adopted programs of electrical power shut-offs, often for multiple days, in wide areas of Northern California during periods of high winds and high fire danger. Shut-offs of power by this utility have adversely impacted the business of some of our customers and also have resulted in some of our branches being temporarily closed. It can be expected that these events will continue to occur from time to time in the areas served by the Bank, and that the consequences of these natural disasters, including programs of public utility public safety power outages when weather conditions and fire danger warrant, may adversely affect the Bank’s business and that of its customers. It is also possible that climate change may be increasing the severity or frequency of adverse weather conditions, thus increasing the impact of these types of natural disasters on our business and that of our customers. For additional information, see "Our Operations, Business and Customers Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Physical Effects of Climate Change, as well as Governmental and Societal Responses to Climate Change," below in these "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The long-term impact of these developments on the markets we serve cannot be predicted at this time.

Table of Contents

Several of California’s Largest Home Insurance Providers Have Recently Paused or Severely Limited Their Issuance of New Policies, or Their Renewal of Existing Policies, in the State, Which Could Increase the Bank’s Risk of Loss in its Loan Portfolio

At December 31, 2025, loans secured by real estate comprised approximately 84% of the total loans in the Bank’s portfolio. At December 31, 2025, all of the Bank’s real estate mortgage and construction loans were secured fully or in part by deeds of trust on underlying real estate. Most of the Company’s customers, including its loan customers, are located in the State of California.

Recently, several of California’s largest home insurance providers, including State Farm, Allstate, Farmers, USAA, Travelers, Nationwide and Chubb, have either paused or severely limited their issuance of new policies, or their renewal of existing policies, in the state. Mounting claims from wildfire damages, the increasing cost of building and repairing homes in California, and a steep increase in reinsurance premiums, as well as state insurance regulations that make it difficult for insurers to adjust premiums in response to the evolving risk landscape, have challenged the capacity of insurance companies to sustainably and profitably offer home insurance in California. The result of these actions has been to significantly limit the availability of home insurance in California, where homeowners already face escalating property values and high wildfire, seismic, severe weather and other risks. The catastrophic fires in Southern California in January 2025, with resulting property damage and other claims estimated to be as high as $53.8 billion, are expected to further exacerbate these challenges.

The California Department of Insurance enforces some safeguards to temporarily shield homeowners from the cancellation or non-renewal of home insurance policies in high-risk areas, particularly those prone to wildfires. In addition, the California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan, a state-established risk pool, operates as an insurer of last resort, providing temporary coverage for California homeowners unable to obtain (generally at increased premium cost) such coverage from a traditional insurance carrier; however, enrollment in the FAIR Plan as a percentage of the total number of residential insurance policies in California has steadily increased over the past five years, particularly in counties with the highest wildfire risk, threatening the ongoing stability of the Plan. In late 2023, following the California Governor’s declaration of a State of Emergency regarding property insurance, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California introduced a comprehensive package of executive actions aimed at insurance reform. In December 2024, the California Department of Insurance adopted regulations intended to cause insurance companies to write more policies in wildfire distressed areas of California as a condition for using forward-looking wildfire modeling designed to more accurately assess wildfire risks and to reverse FAIR Plan growth. In October 2025, the California Governor signed legislation to strengthen the FAIR Plan with new financing mechanisms to more quickly pay claims, better oversight, improved policyholder experience, and added coverage for manufactured homes, and the California Insurance Commissioner continues to advance a comprehensive reform package of the FAIR Plan, including temporary expansion of FAIR Plan coverage for certain high-value commercial properties. There can be no assurance that these regulatory actions, or other proposed legislation, will increase insurance availability or stabilize and strengthen California’s insurance market. particularly in light of the catastrophic fires in Southern California in January 2025.

Many homeowners in the State of California have been negatively impacted by the contraction of insurance options in the State and the resulting lack of access to affordable home insurance, which could adversely impact the ability of prospective homebuyers to obtain insurance, and escalating premiums and limited coverage options could result in limiting coverage in the event of loss. If any loss suffered by a loan customer of the Bank is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, this could increase the risk of loss in the Bank’s loan portfolio, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. For additional information, see “The Bank’s Dependence on Real Estate Lending Increases Our Risk of Losses” above in these “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Effects of Changes or Increases in, or Supervisory Enforcement of, Banking or Other Laws and Regulations or Governmental Fiscal or Monetary Policies Could Adversely Affect Us

We are subject to significant federal and state banking regulation and supervision, which is primarily for the benefit and protection of our customers and the Deposit Insurance Fund and not for the benefit of investors in our securities. In the past, our business has been materially affected by these regulations. This will continue and likely intensify in the future. Laws, regulations or policies, including accounting standards and interpretations, currently affecting us may change at any time. Regulatory authorities may also change their interpretation of and intensify their examination of compliance with these statutes and regulations. Therefore, our business may be adversely affected by changes in laws, regulations, policies or interpretations or regulatory approaches to compliance and enforcement, as well as by supervisory action or criminal proceedings taken as a result of noncompliance, which could result in the imposition of significant civil money penalties or fines. Changes in laws and regulations may also increase our expenses by imposing additional supervision, fees, taxes or restrictions on our operations. Compliance with laws and regulations, especially new laws and regulations, increases our operating expenses and may divert management attention from our business operations.

Table of Contents

Following the imposition in 2008 of a federal government conservatorship on the two government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) in the housing finance industry, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association, various proposals have been advanced from time to time to reform the role of the GSEs in the housing finance market. These proposals, among other things, include reducing or eliminating over time the role of the GSEs in guaranteeing mortgages and providing funding for mortgage loans, as well as the implementation of reforms relating to borrowers, lenders, and investors in the mortgage market, including reducing the maximum size of a loan that the GSEs can guarantee, phasing in a minimum down payment requirement for borrowers, improving underwriting standards, and increasing accountability and transparency in the securitization process.

The GSEs remain in federal government conservatorship at this time and proposals for the reform of their role are not being actively pursued in Congress. However, recent developments suggest that the Trump Administration may be exploring plans to sell the government’s stakes in the GSEs through an initial public offering (IPO), and comprehensive GSE reform bills have been introduced in Congress in recent months. GSE reform, if adopted, could well have a substantial impact on the mortgage market and could reduce our income from mortgage originations by increasing mortgage costs or lowering originations. GSE reforms could also reduce real estate prices, which could reduce the value of collateral securing outstanding mortgage loans. This reduction of collateral value could negatively impact the value or perceived collectability of these mortgage loans and may increase our allowance for credit loan losses. Such reforms may also include changes to the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which could adversely affect a significant source of term funding for lending activities by the banking industry, including the Bank. These reforms may also result in higher interest rates on residential mortgage loans, thereby reducing demand, which could have an adverse impact on our residential mortgage lending business.

In July 2013, the FRB and the other U.S. federal banking agencies adopted final rules making significant changes to the U.S. regulatory capital framework for U.S. banking organizations and to conform this framework to the Basel III Global Regulatory Framework for Capital and Liquidity. For additional information, see “Business-Capital Standards” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K.

We maintain systems and procedures designed to comply with applicable laws and regulations. However, some legal/regulatory frameworks provide for the imposition of criminal or civil penalties (which can be substantial) for noncompliance. In some cases, liability may attach even if the noncompliance was inadvertent or unintentional and even if compliance systems and procedures were in place at the time. There may be other negative consequences from a finding of noncompliance, including restrictions on certain activities and damage to our reputation.

Additionally, our business is affected significantly by the fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. federal government and its agencies. We are particularly affected by the policies of the FRB, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the U.S. Under the Dodd-Frank Act and a long-standing policy of the FRB, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength for its subsidiary banks. As a result of that policy, we may be required to commit financial and other resources to our subsidiary bank in circumstances where we might not otherwise do so. Among the instruments of monetary policy available to the FRB are (a) conducting open market operations in U.S. Government securities, (b) changing the discount rates on borrowings by depository institutions and the federal funds rate, and (c) imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates. These methods are used in varying degrees and combinations to directly affect the availability of bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The policies of the FRB can be expected to have a material effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Refer to “Business – Supervision and Regulation of Bank Holding Companies" and "Business – Supervision and Regulation of the Bank” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for discussion of certain existing and proposed laws and regulations that may affect our business.

The Bank is Subject to Interest Rate Risk

The income of the Bank depends to a great extent on “interest rate differentials” and the resulting net interest margins (i.e., the difference between the interest rates earned on the Bank’s interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on the Bank’s interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings). Changes in the relationship between short-term and long-term market interest rates or between different interest rate indices can impact our interest rate differential, possibly resulting in a decrease in our interest income relative to interest expense. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, which are beyond the Bank’s control, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the FRB. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, influence the origination of loans, the purchase of investments and the generation of deposits and affect the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits. In addition, an increase in interest rates could adversely affect clients’ ability to pay the principal or interest on existing loans or reduce their borrowings. This may lead to an increase in our non-performing assets, a decrease in loan originations, or a reduction in the value of and income from our loans, any of which could have a material and negative effect on our operations.

Table of Contents

Fluctuations in market rates and other market disruptions are neither predictable nor controllable and may adversely affect our financial condition and earnings. Since 2022, inflationary pressures have affected many aspects of the U.S. economy, including gasoline and fuel prices, and global and domestic supply-chain issues have also had a disruptive effect on many industries, including the agricultural industry. In January 2022, due to elevated levels of inflation and corresponding pressure to raise interest rates, the FRB announced after several periods of historically low federal funds rates and yields on Treasury notes that it would be slowing the pace of its bond purchasing and increasing the target range for the federal funds rate over time. The FOMC increased the target range 525 basis points from March 2022 through July 2023. The target range remained unchanged through much of 2024 until the FOMC decreased the rate 100 basis points, to a target range of 4.25% to 4.50%, during the last four months of 2024. In 2025, the FOMC implemented three consecutive 25-basis-point interest rate cuts starting in September, lowering the federal funds rate to a range of 3.5% to 3.75% by December 2025. It remains uncertain whether the FOMC will further decrease the target range for the federal funds rate to attain a monetary policy sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to more normalized levels, begin to increase the federal funds rate or leave the rate at its current elevated level for a lengthy period of time. Factors such as inflation, productivity, oil prices, unemployment rates, and global demand play a role in the FOMC's consideration of future rate adjustments. As noted previously, the Trump Administration recently imposed increased tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. from other countries. As a consequence, other countries, in retaliation to the U.S.’s tariff measures, announced the imposition of increased levels of tariffs on goods exported to such countries by companies in the U.S. More recently, the U.S. government has introduced agreements in principle regarding tariffs with certain trading partners of the United States, new tariffs and tariff-related measures and has indicated that other potential tariff measures and modifications to existing tariffs continue to be under consideration. President Trump imposed many of these tariffs by invoking authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could not invoke the IEEPA to unilaterally set tariffs on imports, thereby invalidating those tariffs implemented using IEEPA. The Trump Administration responded by announcing the imposition of new tariffs under alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs, including an executive order imposing a global surcharge on most imports (initially 10%, with an announcement on February 21, 2026, that the tariff rate would be 15%), effective for 150 days. The tariff environment continues to remain highly dynamic, and the specific tariffs applicable to goods imported into the U.S. continue to evolve, as do import tariffs charged by other countries. Such tariffs could result in increased inflationary pressures on the U.S. economy. These developments could adversely affect our banking customers’ businesses, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Economic Conditions in the U.S. May Soften or Become Recessionary with Resultant Adverse Consequences for the U.S. Financial Services Industry and for the Bank,” above in these “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Beginning in 2021, the U.S. Economy Began to Reflect Relatively Rapid Rates of Increase in the Consumer Price Index and Other Economic Indices; a Prolonged Elevated Rate of Inflation Could Present Risks for the U.S. Banking Industry and Our Business.

Beginning in 2021, the U.S. economy exhibited relatively rapid rates of increase in the consumer price index and other economic indices. If the U.S. economy encounters a significant, prolonged rate of inflation, this could pose higher relative risks to the banking industry and our business. Such inflationary periods have historically corresponded with relatively weaker earnings and higher credit losses for banks. In the past, inflationary environments have caused financing conditions to tighten and have increased borrowing costs for some marginal borrowers which, in turn, has impacted bank credit quality and loan growth. Additionally, a sustained period of inflation well above the FRB’s long-term target could prompt broad-based selling of longer-duration, fixed-rate debt, which could have negative implications for equity and real estate markets. Lower interest rates enable less credit-worthy borrowers to more readily meet their debt obligations. Small businesses and leveraged loan borrowers can be challenged in a materially higher-rate environment. Higher interest rates can also present challenges for commercial real estate projects, pressuring valuations and loan-to-value ratios. See “Economic Conditions in the U.S. May Soften or Become Recessionary with Resultant Adverse Consequences for the U.S. Financial Services Industry and for the Bank,” above in these “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, the war between Russia and Ukraine and global reactions thereto have increased U.S. domestic and global energy prices. Oil supply disruptions related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and sanctions and other measures taken by the U.S. or its allies, could lead to higher costs for gas, food and goods in the U.S. and exacerbate the inflationary pressures on the economy. As noted previously, the Trump Administration recently imposed increased tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. from other countries. As a consequence,

Table of Contents

other countries, in retaliation to the U.S.’s tariff measures, announced the imposition of increased levels of tariffs on goods exported to such countries by companies in the U.S. More recently, the U.S. government has introduced agreements in principle regarding tariffs with certain trading partners of the United States, new tariffs and tariff-related measures and has indicated that other potential tariff measures and modifications to existing tariffs continue to be under consideration. President Trump imposed many of these tariffs by invoking authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could not invoke the IEEPA to unilaterally set tariffs on imports, thereby invalidating those tariffs implemented using IEEPA. The Trump Administration responded by announcing the imposition of new tariffs under alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs, including an executive order imposing a global surcharge on most imports (initially 10%, with an announcement on February 21, 2026, that the tariff rate would be 15%), effective for 150 days. The tariff environment continues to remain highly dynamic, and the specific tariffs applicable to goods imported into the U.S. continue to evolve, as do import tariffs charged by other countries. Such tariffs could result in increased inflationary pressures on the U.S. economy. These developments could adversely affect our banking customers’ businesses, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Economic Conditions in the U.S. May Soften or Become Recessionary with Resultant Adverse Consequences for the U.S. Financial Services Industry and for the Bank,” above in these “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Ability to Pay Dividends is Subject to Legal Restrictions

As a bank holding company, our cash flow typically comes from dividends of the Bank. Various statutory and regulatory provisions restrict the amount of dividends the Bank can pay to the Company without regulatory approval. The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends in the future also depends on the Company’s profitability, growth, and capital needs. In addition, California law restricts the ability of the Company to pay dividends. For a number of years, the Company has paid stock dividends, but not cash dividends, to its shareholders. No assurance can be given that the Company will pay any dividends in the future or, if paid, such dividends will not be discontinued. See “Business - Restrictions on Dividends and Other Distributions” above.

Competition Adversely Affects our Profitability

In California generally, and in the Bank’s primary market area specifically, major banks dominate the commercial banking industry. By virtue of their larger capital bases, such institutions have substantially greater lending limits than those of the Bank. Competition is likely to further intensify as a result of the recent and increasing level of consolidation of financial services companies, particularly in our market area resulting from various economic and market conditions. In obtaining deposits and making loans, the Bank competes with these larger commercial banks and other financial institutions, such as savings and loan associations, credit unions and member institutions of the Farm Credit System, which offer many services that traditionally were offered only by banks. Using the financial holding company structure, insurance companies and securities firms may compete more directly with banks and bank holding companies. In addition, the Bank competes with other institutions such as mutual fund companies, brokerage firms, and even retail stores seeking to penetrate the financial services market. Current federal law has also made it easier for out-of-state banks to enter and compete in the states in which we operate. Competition in our principal markets has further intensified as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act which, among other things, permitted out-of-state de novo branching by national banks, state banks and foreign banks from other states. We also experience competition, especially for deposits, from internet-based banking institutions and other non-traditional financial services firms, such as financial technology companies, which do not always have a physical presence in our market footprint and have grown rapidly in recent years. Also, technology and other changes increasingly allow parties to complete financial transactions electronically, and in many cases, without banks. For example, consumers can pay bills and transfer funds over the internet and by telephone without banks. Non-bank financial service providers may have lower overhead costs, are subject to fewer regulatory constraints and continue to expand their offerings of services traditionally provided by financial institutions. Further, the current Trump Administration has taken a number of actions to promote innovation across financial services through a regulatory environment that is favorable to cryptocurrencies, digital assets, open banking initiatives and financial technology companies, which has the potential to further increase competition within the banking industry. In 2025, the OCC announced its conditional approval of five national trust bank charter applications to either newly charter or convert existing institutions into national trust banks that propose to offer digital asset products and services. While national trust banks generally do not take insured deposits or engage in commercial lending, these new non-traditional trust banks offer deposit-like products, although lacking FDIC insurance and core consumer protections, and they are not subject to the same capital, liquidity or supervisory standards as banks. Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (including machine learning and generative artificial intelligence) and quantum computing, have the potential to intensify competition and accelerate disruption in the financial services industry. If consumers do not use banks to complete their financial transactions, we could potentially lose fee income, deposits and income generated from those deposits. During periods of declining interest rates, competitors with lower costs of capital may solicit the Bank’s customers to refinance their loans. Furthermore, during periods of economic slowdown or recession, the Bank’s borrowers may face financial difficulties and be more receptive to offers from the Bank’s competitors to refinance their loans. No assurance can be given that the Bank will be able to compete with these lenders. See “Business – Competition” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Government Regulation and Legislation Could Adversely Affect the Company

The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision, and legislation, which govern almost all aspects of the operations of the Company and the Bank. The business of the Bank is particularly susceptible to being affected by the enactment of federal and state legislation, which may have the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, modifying permissible activities, or enhancing the competitive position of other financial institutions. Such laws are subject to change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund and not for the benefit of shareholders of the Company. Regulatory authorities may also change their interpretation of these laws and regulations. The Company cannot predict what effect any presently contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations would have on the business and prospects of the Company, but it could be material and adverse. See “Business – Supervision and Regulation of the Bank” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K and "The Effects of Changes or Increases in, or Supervisory Enforcement of, Banking or Other Laws and Regulations or Governmental Fiscal or Monetary Policies Could Adversely Affect Us" above in these "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-K.

We maintain systems and procedures designed to comply with applicable laws and regulations. However, some legal/regulatory frameworks provide for the imposition of criminal or civil penalties (which can be substantial) for non-compliance. In some cases, liability may attach even if the non-compliance was inadvertent or unintentional and even if compliance systems and procedures were in place at the time. There may be other negative consequences from a finding of non-compliance, including restrictions on certain activities and damage to the Company’s reputation.

Our Controls and Procedures May Fail or be Circumvented Which Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company's Financial Condition or Results of Operations

The Company maintains controls and procedures to mitigate against risks such as processing system failures and errors, and customer or employee fraud, and maintains insurance coverage for certain of these risks. Any system of controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Events could occur which are not prevented or detected by the Company’s internal controls or are not insured against or are in excess of the Company’s insurance limits. Any failure or circumvention of the Company’s controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in Deposit Insurance Premiums Could Adversely Affect Our Business

As discussed above in Part I under the caption “Business – Premiums for Deposit Insurance,” in September, 2020, the FDIC board of directors voted to adopt a restoration plan for the Deposit Insurance Fund to ensure that the ratio of the fund’s reserves to insured deposits reaches 1.35% within the next 8 years, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. This action was in response to the reserve ratio dropping to 1.30% primarily due to the inflow of more than $1 trillion in estimated insured deposits in the first six month of 2020 resulting mainly from the pandemic, monetary policy actions, direct government assistance and an overall reduction in business spending. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule, applicable to all insured depository institutions to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by two basis points consistent with the Amended Restoration Plan approved by the FDIC on June 21, 2022. The FDIC indicated that it was taking this action in order to restore the DIF reserve ratio to the required statutory minimum of 1.35% by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2028. Under the final rule, the increase in rates began with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023 and will remain in effect unless and until the reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2% in order to support growth in the DIF in progressing toward the FDIC’s long-term goal of a 2% reserve ratio.

On November 16, 2023, the FDIC issued a final rule to implement a special assessment to recover the loss to the DIF associated with protecting uninsured depositors following the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. This special assessment did not apply to the Bank; however, there can be no assurance that the FDIC will not impose special assessments on, or increase annual assessments payable by, the Bank in the future.

Any further increases in the deposit insurance assessments the Bank pays would further increase our costs.

Table of Contents

Negative Public Opinion Could Damage Our Reputation and Adversely Affect Our Earnings

Reputational risk, or the risk to our earnings and capital from negative public opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion can result from the actual or perceived manner in which we conduct our business activities, management of actual or potential conflicts of interest and ethical issues, lending practices, governmental enforcement actions, corporate governance deficiencies, use of social media, cyber-security breaches and our protection of confidential client information, the implementation of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices, or from actions taken by regulators or community organizations in response to such actions. Negative public opinion can adversely affect our ability to keep and attract customers and employees and can expose us to claims and litigation and regulatory action and increased liquidity risk and could have a material adverse effect on the price of our stock.

We May Not Be Able to Hire or Retain Additional Qualified Personnel and Recruiting and Compensation Costs May Increase as a Result of Turnover, Both of Which May Increase Costs and Reduce Profitability and May Adversely Impact Our Ability to Implement Our Business Strategy

Our success depends upon the ability to attract and retain highly motivated, well-qualified personnel. We face significant competition in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. Executive compensation in the financial services sector has been controversial and the subject of regulation. Over time, changing guidance and newly-adopted rules regarding compensation practices could have the effect of making it more difficult for banks to attract and retain skilled personnel.

We May Be Adversely Affected by Unpredictable Catastrophic Events or Terrorist Attacks and Our Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans May Not Adequately Protect Us from Serious Disaster

The occurrence of catastrophic events such as wildfires (including programs of public utility public safety power outages when weather conditions and fire danger warrant), earthquakes, flooding or other large-scale catastrophes and terrorist attacks could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations if a catastrophe rendered both our production data center in Sacramento and our recovery data center in Las Vegas unusable. There can be no assurance that our current disaster recovery plans and capabilities will protect us from serious disaster.

Changes in Accounting Standards Could Materially Impact Our Financial Statements

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, called GAAP. The financial information contained within our consolidated financial statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. Along with other factors, we use historical loss factors to determine the inherent loss that may be present in our loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical loss factors that we use. Other estimates that we use are fair value of our securities, expected useful lives of our depreciable assets, fair value of stock options, calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the value of our mortgage servicing rights. We have not entered into derivative contracts for our customers or for ourselves, which relate to interest rate, credit, equity, commodity, energy, or weather-related indices, other than forward commitments related to our loans held for sale portfolio. From time to time, the FASB and SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements or new interpretations of existing standards emerge as standard industry practice. These changes can be difficult to predict and operationally complex to implement and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retrospectively, resulting in our restating prior period financial statements.

There is a Limited Public Market for the Company’s Common Stock Which May Make It Difficult for Shareholders to Dispose of Their Shares

The Company’s common stock is not listed on any exchange. However, trades may be reported on the OTC Markets under the symbol “FNRN.” The Company is aware that JWTT, Inc., Monroe Financial Partners and Raymond James all currently make a market in the Company’s common stock. Management is aware that there are also private transactions in the Company’s common stock. However, the limited trading market for the Company’s common stock may make it difficult for shareholders to dispose of their shares. Also, the price of the Company’s common stock may be affected by general market price movements as well as developments specifically related to the financial services sector, including interest rate movements, quarterly variations, or changes in financial estimates by securities analysts and a significant reduction in the price of the stock of another participant in the financial services industry.

Table of Contents

Advances and Changes in Technology, and the Company’s Ability to Adapt Its Technology, May Strain Our Available Resources and Could Adversely Impact Our Ability to Compete and the Company’s Business and Operations

Advances and changes in technology can significantly impact the business and operations of the Company. The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological change which regularly involves the introduction of new products and services based on new or enhanced technologies. Examples include cloud computing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, biometric authentication and data protection enhancements, as well as increased online and mobile device interaction with customers and increased demand for providing computer access to Bank accounts and the systems to perform banking transactions electronically. The Company’s merchant processing services require the use of advanced computer hardware and software technology and rapidly changing customer and regulatory requirements. The Company’s ability to compete effectively depends on its ability to continue to adapt its technology on a timely and cost-effective basis to meet these requirements. Our continued success and the maintenance of our competitive position depends, in part, upon our ability to meet the needs of our customers through the application of new technologies. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of new technologies by competitors, including artificial intelligence, could require us to make additional substantial investments to modify or adapt our existing products and services or alter the way we conduct business. These and other capital investments in the Company's business may not produce the growth in earnings anticipated at the time of the expenditure, and we may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. If we fail to maintain or enhance our competitive position with regard to technology, whether because we fail to anticipate customer needs and expectations or because our technological initiatives fail to perform as desired or are not timely implemented, we may lose market share or incur additional expense. Our ability to execute our core operations and to implement technology and other important initiatives may be adversely affected if our resources are insufficient or if we are unable to allocate available resources effectively.

In addition, the Company’s business and operations are susceptible to negative impacts from computer system failures, communication and power disruption, and unethical individuals with the technological ability to cause disruptions or failures of the Company’s data processing systems. Implementation of certain new technologies, such as those related to artificial intelligence, automation and algorithms, also may have unintended consequences, including fraud or cybersecurity risk, due to their limitations, potential manipulation, or our failure to use them effectively.

Information Security Breaches or Other Technological Difficulties Could Adversely Affect the Company

Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, transmission and reporting of personal, confidential and other sensitive information in our computer systems, networks and business applications. Although we take protective measures, our computer systems, as well as the systems of our third-party providers, may be vulnerable to breaches or attacks, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code, operational errors, including clerical or record-keeping errors or those resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems, and other events that could have significant negative consequences to us. Such events could result in interruptions or malfunctions in our or our customers’ operations, interception, misuse or mishandling of personal or confidential information, or processing of unauthorized transactions or loss of funds. These events could result in litigation, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered by our insurance, or result in regulatory consequences or reputational harm, any of which could harm our competitive position, operating results and financial condition. We maintain cyber insurance, but this insurance may not cover all costs associated with cyber incidents or the consequences of personal or confidential information being compromised. These types of incidents can remain undetected for extended periods of time, thereby increasing the associated risks. We may also be required to expend significant resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or exposures arising from cybersecurity risks.

We depend on the continued efficacy of our technical systems, operational infrastructure, relationships with third parties and our employees in our day-to-day and ongoing operations. Our increasing dependence upon automated systems to record and process transactions may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. With regard to the physical infrastructure that supports our operations, we have taken measures to implement backup systems and other safeguards, but our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by any disruption to that infrastructure. Failures in our internal control or operational systems, security breaches or service interruptions could impair our ability to operate our business and result in potential liability to customers, reputational damage and regulatory intervention, any of which could harm our operating results and financial condition.

We may also be subject to disruptions of our operating systems arising from other events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, such as outages related to electrical, internet or telecommunications, natural disasters (such as major seismic events), or unexpected difficulties with the implementation of our technology enhancement and replacement projects, which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. Our business recovery plan may not work as intended or may not prevent significant interruptions of our operations.

Table of Contents

In recent years, it has been reported that several of the larger U.S. banking institutions have been the target of various denial-of-service, ransomware or other cyberattacks (including attempts to inject malicious code and viruses into computer systems) that have, for limited periods, resulted in the disruption of various operations of the targeted banks. These cyber-attacks originate from a variety of sophisticated sources who may be involved with organized crime, linked to terrorist organizations or hostile countries and have extensive resources to disrupt the operations of the Bank or the financial system more generally. The potential for denial-of-service, ransomware and other attacks requires substantial resources to defend and may affect customer satisfaction and behavior. To date we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyberattacks or other information security breaches, but there can be no assurance that we will not suffer such losses or information security breaches in the future. A successful cyber-attack could result in a material disruption of the Bank’s operations, exposure of confidential information and financial loss to the Bank, its clients, customers and counterparties and could lead to significant exposure to litigation and regulatory fines, penalties and other sanctions as well as reputational damage. While we have a variety of cyber-security measures in place, the consequences to our business, if we were to become a target of such attacks, cannot be predicted with any certainty.

In addition, there have been increasing efforts on the part of third parties to breach data security at financial institutions or with respect to financial transactions, including through the use of social engineering schemes such as “phishing.” The ability of our customers to bank remotely, including online and though mobile devices, requires secure transmission of confidential information and increases the risk of data security breaches which would expose us to claims by customers or others and which could adversely affect our reputation and could lead to a material loss.

We, and other banking institutions, are also at risk of increased losses from fraudulent conduct of criminals using increasingly sophisticated techniques which, in some cases, are part of larger criminal organizations which allow them to be more effective. This criminal activity is taking many forms, including information theft, debit/credit card fraud, check fraud, mechanical devices affixed to ATM’s, social engineering, phishing attacks to obtain personal information, or impersonation of customers through falsified or stolen credentials, business email compromise, and other criminal endeavors. We, and other banking institutions are also at risk of fraudulent or criminal activities by employees, contractors, vendors and others with whom we do business. There is also the risk of errors by our employees and others responsible for the systems and controls on which we depend and any resulting failures of these systems and controls could significantly harm the Company, including customer remediation costs, regulatory fines and penalties, litigation or enforcement actions, or limitations on our business activities.

Even if cyber-attacks and similar tactics are not directed specifically at the Bank, such attacks on other large financial institutions could disrupt the overall functioning of the financial system and undermine consumer confidence in banks generally, to the detriment of other financial institutions, including the Bank. A data security breach at a large U.S. retailer resulted in the compromise of data related to credit and debit cards of large numbers of customers requiring many banks, including the Bank, to reissue credit and debit cards for affected customers and reimburse these customers for losses sustained.

We maintain insurance which we believe provides sufficient coverage against these risks at a manageable expense for an institution of our size and scope with similar technological systems. However, we cannot assure that this insurance would be sufficient to cover all financial losses, damages, penalties, including lost revenues, should we experience any one or more of our or a third-party’s systems failing or experiencing attack.

Environmental Hazards Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company’s Business, Financial Condition, and Results of Operations

The Company, in its ordinary course of business, acquires real property securing loans that are in default, and there is a risk that hazardous substances or waste, contaminants or pollutants could exist on such properties. The Company may be required to remove or remediate such substances from the affected properties at its expense, and the cost of such removal or remediation may substantially exceed the value of the affected properties or the loans secured by such properties. Furthermore, the Company may not have adequate remedies against the prior owners or other responsible parties to recover its costs. Finally, the Company may find it difficult or impossible to sell the affected properties either prior to or following any such removal. In addition, the Company may be considered liable for environmental liabilities in connection with its borrowers’ properties, if, among other things, it participates in the management of its borrowers’ operations. The occurrence of such an event could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Company May Not Be Successful in Raising Additional Capital Needed in the Future

If additional capital is needed in the future as a result of losses or growth or our business strategy or regulatory requirements, there is no assurance that our efforts to raise such additional capital will be successful or that shares sold in the future will be sold at prices or on terms equal to or better than the current market price. The inability to raise additional capital when needed or at prices and terms acceptable to us could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategies.

Table of Contents

In the Future, the Company May Be Required to Recognize an Allowance for Credit Losses With Respect to Investment Securities, Which May Adversely Affect our Results of Operations

The Company’s securities portfolio currently includes securities with unrecognized losses. The Company may continue to observe declines in the fair market value of these securities. Management evaluates the need for an allowance for credit losses on the securities portfolio, as required by generally accepted accounting principles. There can be no assurance, however, that future evaluations of the securities portfolio will not require us to recognize losses with respect to these and other holdings, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in the U.S. Tax Laws Have Impacted, and May Impact, Our Business and Results of Operations in a Variety of Ways, Some of Which Are Positive, and Others Which May Be Negative

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), signed into law on December 22, 2017, enacted sweeping changes to the U.S. federal tax laws generally effective January 1, 2018. These changes have impacted our business and results of operations in a variety of ways, some of which are positive and others which are negative. The TCJA reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35%, which resulted in a net reduction in our annual income tax expense and which has also benefited many of our corporate and other small business borrowers. However, our ability to utilize tax credits, such as those arising from low-income housing and alternative energy investments, is constrained by the lower tax rate. Increases in the U.S. corporate tax rate could adversely impact our profitability and that of our business and commercial customers. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted into law, which included certain modifications to U.S. tax law. The Company has evaluated the provisions of this Act and has concluded that they do not have any material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Our Operations, Businesses and Customers Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Physical Effects of Climate Change, as well as Governmental and Societal Responses to Climate Change

There is increasing concern over the risks of climate change and related environmental sustainability matters. The physical effects of climate change include rising average global temperatures, rising sea levels and an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events and natural disasters, including droughts, wildfires, floods, hurricanes and tornados. Most of the Company’s operations and customers are located in California, which could be adversely impacted by severe weather events and the physical effects of climate change. Agriculture is especially dependent on climate, and climate impacts could include shifting average growing conditions, increased climate and weather variability, decreases in available water sources, and more uncertainty in predicting climate and weather conditions, any or all of which could have a particularly adverse impact on our agricultural customers. Elevated temperatures and carbon dioxide levels can have large impacts on appropriate nutrient levels, soil moisture, water availability, working condition, and various other critical performance conditions. Such climate-related impacts could disrupt our operations or the operations of customers or third parties on which we rely, result in market volatility, negatively impact our customers’ ability to pay outstanding loans, damage collateral or result in the deterioration of the value of collateral or insurance shortfalls. Our borrowers may have collateral properties or operations located in areas at risk of wildfires or subject to the risk of drought in California. The properties pledged as collateral on our loan portfolio could also be damaged by wildfires, earthquakes or other natural disasters, and thereby the recoverability of loans could be impaired. A number of factors can affect credit losses, including the extent of damage to the collateral, the extent of damage not covered by insurance, the extent to which unemployment and other economic conditions caused by the natural disaster adversely affect the ability of borrowers to repay their loans, and the cost of collection and foreclosure to us. Additionally, there could be increased insurance premiums and deductibles, or a decrease in the availability of coverage, due to severe losses resulting from wildfires or other climate-related physical hazards. The ultimate outcome on our business of a natural disaster, whether or not caused by climate change, is difficult to predict but these events could reduce the Company’s earnings and cause volatility in the Company’s financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Legislation and regulatory requirements and changes in consumer preferences, including those associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy, could increase expenses of, or otherwise adversely impact, the Company, its businesses or its customers. We and our customers may face cost increases, asset value reductions, operating process changes, reduced availability of insurance, and the like, as a result of governmental actions or societal responses to climate change. New and/or more stringent regulatory requirements relating to climate change or environmental sustainability could materially affect the Company’s results of operations by increasing our compliance costs. Regulatory changes or market shifts to low-carbon products could also impact the creditworthiness of some of our customers or reduce the value of assets securing loans, which may require the Company to adjust our lending portfolios and business strategies.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

ITEM 1C - CYBERSECURITY

Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy

The Company recognizes the security of our banking operations and the confidentiality, security and availability of the information that the Company collects and stores, is critical to protecting our customers, maintaining our reputation and preserving the value of the Company. Cybersecurity risks are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly pervasive across all industries. The Company has implemented a comprehensive cybersecurity risk management program that we believe is reasonably designed to mitigate these risks and protect sensitive customer data, financial transactions and our information systems. Key components of the cybersecurity risk management program include:

The Company engages reputable third-party auditors and security assessors to conduct various independent risk assessments on a regular basis, including cybersecurity program maturity assessments and network and systems testing to identify and address potential vulnerabilities. Following a defense-in-depth strategy, the Company leverages both in-house resources and third-party service providers to implement and maintain processes and controls to manage the identified risks.

Our vendor management program is designed to ensure that our vendors meet current cybersecurity and information security standards. This includes conducting periodic reviews of independent control audits of the security, infrastructure, application standards or controls, and recovery plans of our most critical vendors.

The Company’s cybersecurity risk management program and strategy are designed to ensure the Company’s information and information systems are appropriately protected from a variety of threats, both natural and man-made. Periodic risk assessments are performed to validate control requirements and ensure that the Company’s information is protected at a level commensurate with its sensitivity, value, and criticality. Preventative and detective security controls are employed on all media where information is stored, the systems that process it, and infrastructure components that facilitate its transmission, to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Company information. These controls include, but are not limited to, access control, data encryption, data loss prevention, incident response, security monitoring, third-party risk management, and vulnerability management.

The Company has an incident response program in place that is designed to enable a coordinated response to mitigate the impact of cyber-attacks, recover from the attack and provide for the prompt escalation of certain cybersecurity incidents to management, including for decisions regarding timely reporting of material incidents in accordance with SEC rules.

The Company's cybersecurity risk management program and strategy are regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that they are aligned with the Company's business objectives and are designed to address evolving cybersecurity threats and satisfy regulatory requirements and industry standards.

Table of Contents

Material Effects of Cybersecurity Threats

While cybersecurity risks have the potential to materially affect the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations, the Company does not believe that risks from cybersecurity threats or attacks, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have materially affected the Company, including its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. However, the sophistication of cyber threats continues to increase, and the Company’s cybersecurity risk management and strategy may be insufficient or may not be successful in protecting against all cyber incidents. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, including the use of generative AI to conduct more sophisticated social engineering attacks on us or our clients, further increases the risks in this area, including by making fraud detection more difficult. Accordingly, no matter how well designed or implemented the Company’s controls are, it will not be able to anticipate all cyber security breaches, preventative measures cannot provide absolute security and may not be sufficient in all circumstances or mitigate all potential risks, and the Company may not be able to implement effective preventive measures against cyber security breaches in a timely manner. For more information on how cybersecurity risk may materially affect the Company’s business strategy, results of operations or financial condition, please refer to Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this report.

Governance

Board of Directors Oversight

The Company’s Board of Directors is charged with overseeing the establishment and execution of the Company’s cybersecurity risk management framework and monitoring adherence to related policies required by applicable statutes, regulations and principles of safety and soundness. Consistent with this responsibility, the Board has delegated primary oversight responsibility over the Company’s cybersecurity risk and cybersecurity risk management to the Information Services Steering Committee of the Board of Directors. The Information Services Steering Committee receives regular updates on cybersecurity risks and incidents and the cybersecurity program through direct interaction with the Information Security Officer (“ISO”) and/or the Chief Information Officer (“CIO”). The ISO and/or CIO also provide periodic updates regarding cybersecurity risks and the cybersecurity program to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and to the full Board of Directors. Additionally, awareness and training on cybersecurity topics is provided to the Board on an annual basis.

Management's Role

The ISO and the CIO are responsible for implementing and maintaining the Company’s cybersecurity risk management program. Information Security is led by the ISO, who reports directly to the President/Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s ISO has over 35 years of experience in IT management, information security, and cybersecurity with the Company. The ISO and CIO are responsible for ensuring the protection of electronic and physical information through the identification and management of risk activities. Information security risk is reported by the ISO or the CIO through quarterly metric reporting to the Information Services Steering Committee. This Committee establishes and oversees policies, programs, and other guidance to provide specific expectations for managing the Company’s cybersecurity risk.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2025, the Company and the Bank are engaged in the banking business through 15 offices in five counties in Northern California operating out of three offices in Solano County, five in Yolo County, two in Sacramento County, two in Placer County, two in Glenn County and one in Colusa County. In addition, the Company owns three vacant lots, two in northern Solano County and one in eastern Sacramento County. The lot in eastern Sacramento is listed for sale and is classified as other real estate owned as of December 31, 2025.

As of December 31, 2025, the Bank owns six branch office locations and two administrative facilities and leases 10 facilities. Most of the leases contain multiple renewal options and provisions for rental increases, principally for changes in the cost of living index, property taxes and maintenance.

See Item 1 “Business - General” in this report for more information regarding our properties.

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Neither the Company nor the Bank is a party to any material pending legal proceeding, nor is any of its property the subject of any material pending legal proceeding, except ordinary routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of the Bank’s business and incidental to its business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s or the Bank’s business, financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The following table summarizes the range of reported high and low bid quotations of the Company’s Common Stock for each quarter during the last two fiscal years and is based on information from OTC Markets. The quotations reflect the price that would be received by the seller without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not have represented actual transactions:

QUARTER/YEAR HIGH* LOW*

* Price adjusted for stock dividends in the indicated periods for the 5% stock dividends payable March 25, 2026 and March 25, 2025, as described below.

As of March 1, 2026, there were approximately 1,302 holders of record of the Company’s common stock, no par value.

In the prior two fiscal years and to date, the Company has declared the following stock dividends:

Shareholder Record Date Dividend Percentage Date Payable

The Company does not expect to pay a cash dividend in the foreseeable future. Our ability to declare and pay dividends is affected by certain regulatory restrictions. See “Business – Restrictions on Dividends and Other Distributions” in Part I, Item 1 above.

For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company made the following purchases of its common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2025:

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Table of Contents

ITEM 6 - RESERVED

Table of Contents

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Introduction

This overview highlights selected information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources, and critical accounting estimates, you should carefully read this entire Annual Report on Form 10-K. For a discussion of changes in results of operations comparing the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, for the Company and its subsidiary, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2025.

Our subsidiary, First Northern Bank of Dixon, is a California state-chartered bank that derives most of its revenues from lending and deposit taking in the Sacramento Valley region of Northern California. Interest rates, business conditions and customer confidence all affect our ability to generate revenues. In addition, the regulatory environment and competition can challenge our ability to generate those revenues.

Financial highlights for 2025 include:

The Company reported net income of $21.1 million for 2025, a 5.5% increase compared to net income of $20.0 million for 2024. Net income per common share for 2025 was $1.30, an increase of 8.3% compared to net income per common share of $1.20 for 2024. Net income per common share on a fully diluted basis was $1.27 for 2025, an increase of 6.7% compared to net income per common share on a fully diluted basis of $1.19 for 2024.

Net interest income totaled $67.5 million for 2025, an increase of 4.8% from $64.4 million in 2024, primarily due to increases in yields earned on loans and investment securities, which was partially offset by decreases both in volume and yield earned on due from banks and increases in average rate paid on average interest-bearing transaction deposits and savings and MMDAs. Net interest margin was 3.77% for the year ended 2025 which was a 4.7% or 17 basis point increase from the 3.60% reported for the year ended 2024.

No provision for credit losses was recorded in 2025, compared to a reversal of provision for credit losses of $0.3 million in 2024. No provision for credit losses was recorded in 2025 primarily due to positive trends in gross domestic product and single-family home prices, coupled with an overall decrease in forecasted loss rates and improvements in qualitative risk factors.

Non-interest income totaled $6.1 million in 2025, an increase of 1.3% from $6.0 million in 2024. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in realized losses on sales/calls of available for sale securities and an increase in other income, which was partially offset by decreases in service charges on deposit accounts and debit card income.

Non-interest expenses totaled $46.2 million for 2025, up 7.9% from $42.8 million in 2024. The increase was primarily due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, data processing and legal fees. The increase in salaries and benefits was primarily due to an increase in full-time equivalent employees and increases in contingent compensation and group medical insurance expense. The increase in occupancy and equipment was primarily due to an increase in service contracts related to upgrading and maintaining facilities. The increase in data processing was primarily due to an increase in costs of service contracts.

The Company reported total assets of $1.91 billion and $1.89 billion for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Investments totaled $617.2 million as of December 31, 2025, a 2.6% decrease from $633.9 million as of December 31, 2024. U.S. Treasury securities totaled $87.5 million as of December 31, 2025, down 17.0% from $105.5 million as of December 31, 2024; securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations totaled $85.3 million, down 10.8% from $95.7 million as of December 31, 2024; obligations of state and political subdivisions totaled $75.0 million, up 11.0% from $67.6 million as of December 31, 2024; collateralized mortgage obligations totaled $92.3 million, down 2.8% from $95.0 million as of December 31, 2024; and mortgage-backed securities totaled $277.1 million, up 2.6% from $270.1 million as of December 31, 2024.

Table of Contents

Loans (including loans held-for-sale), net of allowance, totaled $1.050 billion as of December 31, 2025, a 0.4% increase from $1.047 billion as of December 31, 2024. Commercial loans totaled $146.2 million as of December 31, 2025, up 24.0% from $117.9 million as of December 31, 2024; commercial real estate loans were $702.5 million, down 2.9% from $723.6 million as of December 31, 2024; agriculture loans were $93.6 million, up 1.1% from $92.6 million as of December 31, 2024; residential mortgage loans were $100.7 million, down 4.9% from $105.9 million as of December 31, 2024; residential construction loans were $5.8 million, down 14.9% from $6.9 million as of December 31, 2024; and consumer loans totaled $15.5 million, down 1.5% from $15.7 million as of December 31, 2024.

Deposits totaled $1.68 billion as of December 31, 2025, a 1.2% decrease from $1.70 billion as of December 31, 2024.

There were no FHLB advances outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Stockholders' equity increased to $212.0 million as of December 31, 2025, a 20.2% increase from $176.3 million as of December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to 2025 net income of $21.1 million and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of $18.4 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to the allowance for credit losses. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans

The Company believes the allowance for credit losses (ACL) accounting policy is critical because the loan portfolio represents the largest asset on the consolidated balance sheet, and there is significant judgment used in determining the adequacy of the ACL. Management estimates the ACL using relevant information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance. A provision for credit losses is based on the Company’s periodic evaluation of the factors mentioned below, as well as other pertinent factors.

In determining the ACL, accruing loans with similar risk characteristics are generally evaluated collectively. To estimate expected losses the Company generally utilizes historical loss trends and the remaining contractual lives of the loan portfolios to determine estimated credit losses through a reasonable and supportable forecast period. The Company utilized a reasonable and supportable forecast period of approximately four quarters and obtained the forecast data from Moody’s Analytics. Individual loan credit quality indicators, including historical credit losses, have been statistically correlated with various econometrics, including national unemployment rate, national gross domestic product, and single-family home prices. Model forecasts may be adjusted for inherent limitations or biases that have been identified through independent validation and back-testing of model performance to actual realized results. The Company also considered the impact of portfolio concentrations, changes in underwriting practices, imprecision in its economic forecasts, and other risk factors that might influence its loss estimation process. Increases in external risk factors due to more pessimistic business and economic conditions could potentially add $4.6 million based on existing loan balances, if not more, to the ACL. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance accounts is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control, including the performance of our portfolios, the economy and changes in interest rates.

Table of Contents

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Adopted in 2025

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. Among other things, these amendments provide additional transparency into an entity’s income tax disclosures primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. The standard requires that public business entities disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the rate reconciliation and additional information for reconciling items meeting a certain quantitative threshold. The amendments also require that entities disclose on an annual basis: 1) income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal (national), state, and foreign taxes and 2) the income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by individual jurisdictions exceeding 5% of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received). The amendments are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this ASU retrospectively. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. For additional information, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

In March 2024, the FASB issued guidance within ASU 2024-01, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope Application of Profits Interest and Similar Awards. The amendments in the ASU apply to companies that provide employees and non-employees with profits interest and similar awards to align compensation with a company’s operating performance and provide those holders with the opportunity to participate in future profits and/or equity appreciation of the company. The purpose of the ASU is to clarify the application of the scope guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) paragraph 718-10-15-3 in determining if a profit interest award should be accounted for in accordance with Topic 718: Compensation—Stock Compensation. The amendment in ASC paragraph 718-10-15-3 is solely intended to improve the overall clarity and does not change the guidance. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted for both interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. If a company adopts the amendments in an interim period, it should adopt them as of the beginning of the annual period that includes the interim period. The amendments should be applied either (1) retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements or (2) on a prospective basis. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as the Company does not typically provide these types of awards. For additional information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. This ASU requires public companies to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date. ASU 2025-01 amends the effective date of ASU 2024-03 to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption of ASU 2024-03 is permitted. The Company is evaluating the accounting and disclosure requirements of this update and the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans. This ASU expands the population of acquired financial assets accounted for using the gross-up approach. Acquired loans (excluding credit cards) are deemed purchased seasoned loans and accounted for using the gross-up approach upon acquisition if criteria established by the new guidance are met. This change aims to enhance comparability, consistency, and better reflect the economics of acquiring financial assets. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted in an interim or annual reporting period in which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is evaluating the accounting and disclosure requirements of this update and the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements. This ASU enables entities to apply hedge accounting to a greater number of highly effective economic hedges in the following five areas: similar risk assessment for cash flow hedges, hedging forecasted interest payments on choose-your-rate debt instruments, cash flow hedges of nonfinancial forecasted transactions, net written options as hedging instruments, foreign-currency-denominated debt instrument as hedging instrument and hedged item (dual hedge). This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted on any date on or after the issuance of ASU No. 2025-09. The Company is evaluating the accounting and disclosure requirements of this update and the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements. This ASU does not change the fundamental nature of interim reporting or expand or reduce current interim disclosure requirements. The amendments in this ASU: clarify that the guidance in Topic 270 applies to all entities that provide interim financial statements and notes in accordance with GAAP; create a comprehensive list in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 270 of interim disclosures that are required in interim financial statements and notes in accordance with GAAP; incorporate a disclosure principle, which is modeled after previous SEC guidance, that requires entities to disclose events and changes that occur after the end of the most recent fiscal year that have a material impact on the entity; and improve guidance about information included in and the format of interim financial statements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for pubic business entities for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The amendments can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is evaluating the disclosure requirements of this update and the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements. The amendments in this ASU update the FASB ASC for a broad range of Topics arising from technical corrections, unintended application of the ASC, clarifications, and other minor improvements. The amendments in this ASU, which addresses 33 issues, affect a wide variety of Topics in the ASC and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in both interim and annual periods in which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is evaluating the accounting and disclosure requirements of this update and the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

STATISTICAL INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION

The following statistical information and discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II (Item 8) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following tables present information regarding the consolidated average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, the amounts of interest income from average earning assets and the resulting yields, and the amount of interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Average loan balances include non-performing loans. Interest income includes proceeds from loans on non-accrual status only to the extent cash payments have been received and applied as interest income. Tax-exempt income is not shown on a tax equivalent basis.

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity;

Interest Rates and Interest Differential

(Dollars in thousands)

Average Balance Percent Average Balance Percent

ASSETS

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Deposits:

FHLB advances 1,645 0.1 % — — %

Table of Contents

Net Interest Earnings

Average Balances, Yields and Rates

(Dollars in thousands)

Investment Securities:

Table of Contents

Continuation of

Net Interest Earnings

Average Balances, Yields and Rates

(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:

Interest payable and Other Liabilities 15,056 16,542

Net Interest Spread (2) 3.16 % 2.98 %

Table of Contents

Analysis of Changes

in Interest Income and Interest Expense

(Dollars in thousands)

Following is an analysis of changes in interest income and expense (dollars in thousands) for 2025 over 2024. Changes not solely due to interest rate or volume have been allocated proportionately to interest rate and volume.

Volume Interest Rate Change

Investment Securities - Non-taxable 290 136 426

Other Earning Assets 25 (58 ) (33 )

Increase (decrease) in Interest Income (315 ) 3,970 3,655

Deposits:

Interest-Bearing Transaction Deposits 76 338 414

FHLB advances 75 — 75

Increase (decrease) in Interest Expense (19 ) 562 543

Increase (decrease) in Net Interest Income: $ (296 ) $ 3,408 $ 3,112

Table of Contents

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

Composition of Investment Securities

The mix of investment securities held by the Company at December 31 of the previous two fiscal years was as follows (dollars in thousands):

Investment securities available-for-sale (at fair value):

Securities of U.S. Government Agencies and Corporations 85,344 95,684

Obligations of State and Political Subdivisions 75,003 67,591

Maturities of Investment Securities

The following table summarizes the contractual maturity (dollars in thousands) and projected yields of the Company’s investment securities as of December 31, 2025. The yields on tax-exempt securities are shown on a tax equivalent basis. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. In addition, factors such as prepayments and interest rates may affect the yield on carrying value of mortgage related securities.

Period to Maturities

After One But After Five But

Within One Year Within Five Years Within Ten Years

Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield

Investment securities available-for-sale (at fair value):

After Ten Years Total

Amount Yield Amount Yield

Investment securities available-for-sale (at fair value):

U.S. Treasury Securities $ — — $ 87,556 3.45 %

Securities of U.S. Government Agencies and Corporations — — 85,344 2.84 %

Table of Contents

LOAN PORTFOLIO

Composition of Loans

The mix of loans, net of deferred origination fees and costs and allowance for credit losses and excluding loans held-for-sale, at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance Percent Balance Percent

Net deferred origination fees and costs 733 142

As shown in the comparative figures for loan mix during 2025 and 2024, total loans increased primarily as a result of an increase in commercial loans, which was partially offset by decreases in commercial real estate and residential mortgage loans.

Commercial loans are primarily for financing the needs of a diverse group of businesses located in the Bank’s market areas. Commercial real estate loans generally fall into two categories, owner-occupied and non-owner occupied. Real estate construction loans are generally for financing the construction of single-family residential homes for individuals and builders we believe are well-qualified. These loans are secured by real estate and have short maturities. Residential mortgage loans, which are secured by real estate, include owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied properties in the Bank’s market areas. Loans are considered agriculture loans when the primary source of repayment is from the sale of an agricultural or agricultural-related product or service. Such loans are secured and/or unsecured to producers and processors of crops and livestock. The Bank also makes loans to individuals for investment purposes.

Table of Contents

Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates

The following table presents the maturity distribution of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands) (excludes loans held-for-sale). The table also presents the portion of loans that have fixed interest rates or variable interest rates that fluctuate over the life of the loans in accordance with changes in an interest rate index.

Loans with fixed interest rates:

Residential Construction 83 — — — 83

Loans with variable interest rates:

Non-Accrual, Past Due, OREO and Loan Modifications

It is generally the Company’s policy to discontinue interest accruals once a loan is past due for a period of 90 days as to interest or principal payments. When a loan is placed on non-accrual, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected and an appropriate period of performance has been demonstrated.

The following table summarizes the Company’s non-accrual loans by loan category (dollars in thousands), net of guarantees of the State of California and U.S. Government, including its agencies and its government-sponsored agencies, at December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Gross Guaranteed Net Gross Guaranteed Net

Residential construction — — — — — —

Table of Contents

Non-accrual loans amounted to $6,030,000 at December 31, 2025, and were comprised of one commercial loan totaling $139,000, one commercial real estate loan totaling $657,000, four agriculture loans totaling $4,423,000, three residential mortgage loans totaling $174,000 and five consumer loans totaling $637,000. Non-accrual loans amounted to $11,212,000 at December 31, 2024, and were comprised of one commercial loan totaling $139,000, one commercial real estate loan totaling $7,993,000, two agriculture loans totaling $2,236,000, three residential mortgage loans totaling $202,000 and four consumer loans totaling $642,000.

If interest on non-accrual loans had been accrued, such interest income would have approximated $627,000 and $497,000 during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Income actually recognized on nonaccrual loans at payoff approximated $421,000 and $450,000 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

A loan is considered to be collateral dependent when repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral. The ACL on collateral dependent loans is measured using the fair value of the underlying collateral, adjusted for costs to sell when applicable, less the amortized cost basis of the financial asset. It is generally the Company’s policy that if the value of the underlying collateral is determined to be less than the recorded amount of the loan, a charge-off will be taken.

As the following table illustrates, total non-performing assets, which consists of loans on non-accrual status, loans past due 90-days and still accruing and Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO") net of guarantees of the State of California and U.S. Government, including its agencies and its government-sponsored agencies, decreased $4,750,000, or 42.9%, to $6,323,000 from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025. Non-performing assets net of guarantees represented 0.3% and 0.6% of total assets at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Bank’s management believes that the $6,030,000 in non-accrual loans were appropriately reflected at the lower of the carrying value of the loan or the fair value of the underlying collateral at December 31, 2025. However, no assurance can be given that the existing or any additional collateral will be sufficient to secure full recovery of the obligations owed under these loans.

Gross Guaranteed Net Gross Guaranteed Net

(dollars in thousands)

Loans 90 days past due and still accruing — — — — — —

Other real estate owned 1,241 — 1,241 — — —

Non-performing loans (net of guarantees) to total loans 0.5 % 1.0 %

Non-performing assets (net of guarantees) to total assets 0.3 % 0.6 %

The Company had no loans that were 90 days or more past due and still accruing at December 31, 2025.

OREO consists of property that the Company has acquired by deed in lieu of foreclosure or through foreclosure proceedings, and property that the Company does not hold title to but is in actual control of, known as in-substance foreclosure. OREO can also consist of Company owned properties that the Company has determined are no longer intended for use or future development. The estimated fair value of the property is determined prior to transferring the balance to OREO. The balance transferred to OREO is the estimated fair value of the property less estimated cost to sell. Impairment may be deemed necessary to bring the book value of the loan equal to the appraised value. Appraisals or loan officer evaluations are then conducted periodically thereafter charging any additional impairment to the appropriate expense account. The Company had OREO totaling $1,241,000 as of the year ended December 31, 2025. OREO as of December 31, 2025 represented land, transferred from premises and equipment, that the Company determined is no longer intended for future development and is actively marketing it for sale. The Company had no OREO as of December 31, 2024.

Table of Contents

Potential Problem Loans

The Company manages asset quality and credit risk by maintaining diversification in its loan portfolio and through review processes that include analysis of credit requests and ongoing examination of outstanding loans and delinquencies, with particular attention to portfolio dynamics and loan mix. The Company strives to identify loans experiencing difficulty early enough to correct the problems, to record charge-offs promptly based on realistic assessments of collectability and current collateral values and to maintain an adequate allowance for credit losses at all times. Asset quality reviews of loans and other non-performing assets are administered using credit risk rating standards and criteria similar to those employed by state and federal banking regulatory agencies. The federal banking regulatory agencies utilize the following definitions for assets adversely classified for supervisory purposes: “Substandard Assets: a substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.” “Doubtful Assets: An asset classified doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable." OREO and loans rated Substandard and Doubtful are deemed “classified assets.” This category, which includes both performing and non-performing assets, receives an elevated level of attention regarding collection.

Commercial loans, whether secured or unsecured, generally are made to support the short-term operations and other needs of small businesses. These loans are generally secured by the receivables, equipment, and other real property of the business and are susceptible to the related risks described above. Problem commercial loans are generally identified by periodic review of financial information that may include financial statements, tax returns, and payment history of the borrower. Based on this information, the Company may decide to take any of several courses of action, including demand for repayment, requiring the borrower to provide a significant principal payment and/or additional collateral or requiring similar support from guarantors. When repayment becomes unlikely based on the borrower’s income and cash flow, repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral may become necessary. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank-approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, purchase invoices, or other appropriate documentation. Appropriate valuations are obtained at origination of the credit and periodically thereafter (generally every 3-12 months depending on the collateral type and market conditions), once repayment is questionable, and the loan has been deemed classified.

Commercial real estate loans generally fall into two categories, owner-occupied and non-owner occupied. Loans secured by owner occupied real estate are primarily susceptible to changes in the market conditions of the related business. This may be driven by, among other things, industry changes, geographic business changes, changes in the individual financial capacity of the business owner, general economic conditions, and changes in business cycles. These same risks apply to commercial loans whether secured by equipment, receivables, or other personal property or unsecured. Problem commercial real estate loans are generally identified by periodic review of financial information that may include financial statements, tax returns, payment history of the borrower, and site inspections. Based on this information, the Company may decide to take any of several courses of action, including demand for repayment, requiring the borrower to provide a significant principal payment and/or additional collateral or requiring similar support from guarantors. Notwithstanding, when repayment becomes unlikely based on the borrower's income and cash flow, repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral may become necessary. Losses on loans secured by owner-occupied real estate, equipment, or other personal property generally are dictated by the value of underlying collateral at the time of default and liquidation of the collateral. When default is driven by issues related specifically to the business owner, collateral values tend to provide better repayment support and may result in little or no loss. Alternatively, when default is driven by more general economic conditions, underlying collateral generally has devalued more and results in larger losses due to default. Loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate are primarily susceptible to risks associated with swings in occupancy or vacancy and related shifts in lease rates, rental rates or room rates. Most often, these shifts are a result of changes in general economic or market conditions or overbuilding and resultant over-supply of space. Losses are dependent on the value of underlying collateral at the time of default. Values are generally driven by these same factors and influenced by interest rates and required rates of return as well as changes in occupancy costs. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank-approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, sales invoices, or other appropriate means. Appropriate valuations are obtained at origination of the credit and periodically thereafter (generally every 3-12 months depending on the collateral type and market conditions), once repayment is questionable, and the loan has been deemed classified.

Table of Contents

Agricultural loans, whether secured or unsecured, generally are made to producers and processors of crops and livestock. Repayment is primarily from the sale of an agricultural product or service. Agricultural loans are generally secured by inventory, receivables, equipment, and other real property. Agricultural loans primarily are susceptible to changes in market demand for specific commodities. This may be exacerbated by, among other things, industry changes, changes in the individual financial capacity of the business owner, general economic conditions and changes in business cycles, as well as changing weather conditions. Problem agricultural loans are generally identified by periodic review of financial information that may include financial statements, tax returns, crop budgets, payment history, and crop inspections. Based on this information, the Company may decide to take any of several courses of action, including demand for repayment, requiring the borrower to provide a significant principal payment and/or additional collateral or requiring similar support from guarantors. Notwithstanding, when repayment becomes unlikely based on the borrower’s income and cash flow, repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral may become necessary. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank-approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, purchase invoices, or other appropriate documentation. Appropriate valuations are obtained at origination of the credit and periodically thereafter (generally every 3-12 months depending on the collateral type and market conditions), once repayment is questionable, and the loan has been deemed classified.

Residential mortgage loans, which are secured by real estate, are primarily susceptible to four risks: non-payment due to diminished or lost income, over-extension of credit, a lack of borrower’s cash flow to sustain payments, and shortfalls in collateral value. In general, non-payment is due to loss of employment and follows general economic trends in the marketplace, particularly the upward movement in the unemployment rate, loss of collateral value, and demand shifts. Problem residential mortgage loans are generally identified via payment default. Based on this information, the Company may decide to take any of several courses of action, including demand for repayment, requiring the borrower to provide a significant principal payment and/or additional collateral or requiring similar support from guarantors. When repayment becomes unlikely based on the borrower’s income and cash flow, repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral may become necessary. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank-approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, purchase invoices, or other appropriate documentation. Appropriate valuations are obtained at origination of the credit and periodically thereafter (generally every 3-12 months depending on the collateral type and market conditions), once repayment is questionable, and the loan has been deemed classified.

Construction loans, whether owner occupied or non-owner occupied residential development loans, are not only susceptible to the related risks described above but the added risks of construction itself, including cost over-runs, mismanagement of the project, or lack of demand and market changes experienced at time of completion. Again, losses are primarily related to underlying collateral value and changes therein as described above. Problem construction loans are generally identified by periodic review of financial information that may include financial statements, tax returns and payment history of the borrower. Based on this information, the Company may decide to take any of several courses of action, including demand for repayment, requiring the borrower to provide a significant principal payment and/or additional collateral or requiring similar support from guarantors, or repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank-approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, purchase invoices, or other appropriate documentation. Appropriate valuations are obtained at origination of the credit and periodically thereafter (generally every 3-12 months depending on the collateral type and market conditions), once repayment is questionable, and the loan has been deemed classified.

Consumer loans, whether unsecured or secured, are primarily susceptible to four risks: non-payment due to diminished or lost income, over-extension of credit, a lack of borrower’s cash flow to sustain payments, and shortfall in collateral value. In general, non-payment is due to loss of employment and will follow general economic trends in the marketplace, particularly the upward movements in the unemployment rate, loss of collateral value, and demand shifts. Problem consumer loans are generally identified via payment default. Based on this information, the Company may decide to take any of several courses of action, including demand for repayment, requiring the borrower to provide a significant principal payment and/or additional collateral or requiring similar support from guarantors. When repayment becomes unlikely based on the borrower’s income and cash flow, repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral may become necessary. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank-approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, purchase invoices, or other appropriate documentation. Appropriate valuations are obtained at origination of the credit and periodically thereafter (generally every 3-12 months depending on the collateral type and market conditions), once repayment is questionable, and the loan has been deemed classified.

Table of Contents

Once a loan becomes delinquent or repayment becomes questionable, a Company collection officer will address collateral shortfalls with the borrower and attempt to obtain additional collateral or a principal payment. If this is not forthcoming and payment of principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement becomes unlikely, the Company will consider the loan to be individually evaluated and will estimate its probable loss, using the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For collateral dependent loans, the Company will utilize a recent valuation of the underlying collateral less estimated costs of sale, and charge-off the loan down to the estimated net realizable amount. Depending on the length of time until final collection, the Company may periodically revalue the estimated loss and take additional charge-offs or specific reserves as warranted. Revaluations may occur as often as every 3-12 months depending on the underlying collateral and volatility of values. Final charge-offs or recoveries are taken when the collateral is liquidated and the actual loss is confirmed. Unpaid balances on loans after or during collection and liquidation may also be pursued through legal action and attachment of wages or judgment liens on the borrower's other assets.

Excluding the non-performing loans, net of guarantees cited previously, loans totaling $18,259,000 and $11,782,000 were classified as substandard or doubtful loans, representing potential problem loans at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In Management’s opinion, the potential loss related to these problem loans was sufficiently covered by the Bank’s existing loan loss reserve (Allowance for Credit Losses) at December 31, 2025 and 2024. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total loans at December 31, 2025 and 2024 was 1.36% and 1.49%, respectively. The decrease in the ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total loans was primarily due to positive trends in gross domestic product and single-family home prices, coupled with an overall decrease in forecasted loss rates and improvements in qualitative risk factors. Management considered the allowance for credit losses of $14,519,000 to be adequate as a reserve against expected losses as of December 31, 2025.

Table of Contents

Analysis of the Allowance for Credit Losses On Loans

(Dollars in thousands)

Impact of adopting ASC 326 — — 800

Loans Charged-Off:

Commercial Real Estate (26 ) — —

Residential Mortgage (5 ) — (3 )

Residential Construction — — —

Recoveries:

Commercial Real Estate — — —

Agriculture — — 2,567

Residential Mortgage — — —

Residential Construction — — —

Ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average

Loans Outstanding During the Year (0.08 )% (0.09 )% (0.01 )%

Allowance for Credit Losses to Total Loans 1.36 % 1.49 % 1.55 %

Nonaccrual loans to Total Loans 0.57 % 1.06 % 0.37 %

Table of Contents

Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses

The Allowance for Credit Losses has been established as a general component available to absorb expected credit losses throughout the loan portfolio. The following table is an allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses balance on the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Loan Type:

The Bank believes that any breakdown or allocation of the allowance into loan categories lends an appearance of exactness, which does not exist, because the allowance is available for all loans. The allowance breakdown shown above is computed taking actual experience into consideration but should not be interpreted as an indication of the specific amount and allocation of actual charge-offs that may ultimately occur. For additional information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Deposits

The following table sets forth the average amount and the average rate paid on each of the listed deposit categories (dollars in thousands) during the periods specified:

Average Average Average Average Average Average

Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate

Deposit Type:

Approximately 40% of our deposits were uninsured for each of the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Time Deposits include brokered deposits totaling $0 and $9,999,000 as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The brokered deposits purchased are time deposits $250,000 (dollars in thousands) or less that mature within twelve months.

The following table sets forth by time remaining to maturity for the Bank’s time deposits over $250,000 (dollars in thousands) as of December 31, 2025:

Three months or less $ 18,034

Over three months through six months 14,471

Over six months through twelve months 14,924

Over twelve months 6,201

Short-Term Borrowings

The Company had no secured borrowings and no Federal Funds purchased at December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Additional short-term borrowings available to the Company consist of a line of credit and advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") secured under terms of a blanket collateral agreement by a pledge of FHLB stock and all loans held by the Company. At December 31, 2025, the Company had a current collateral borrowing capacity with the FHLB of $390,191,000 and, at such date, also had unsecured formal lines of credit totaling $130,000,000 with correspondent banks.

The Company had no Federal Funds purchased during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Long-Term Borrowings

The Company had no long-term borrowings at December 31, 2025 and 2024. There were no average outstanding balances of long-term borrowings during 2025 and 2024.

Table of Contents

Supplemental Compensation Plans

The Company and the Bank maintain an unfunded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (“Salary Continuation Plan”) and related split dollar plan for a select group of highly compensated employees. Eligibility to participate in the Salary Continuation Plan is limited to a select group of management or highly compensated employees of the Bank that are designated by the Board. Additionally, the Company and the Bank adopted a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) in 2006. The SERP is intended to integrate the various forms of retirement payments offered to executives. At December 31, 2025, the benefit obligation was $4,405,000, of which $4,716,000 was recorded in interest payable and other liabilities and $(311,000) was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2024, the benefit obligation was $4,500,000, of which $4,793,000 was recorded in interest payable and other liabilities and $(293,000) was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company and the Bank maintain an unfunded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (“Directors’ Retirement Plan”) and related split dollar plan for the directors of the Bank. At December 31, 2025, the benefit obligation was $380,000, of which $480,000 was recorded in interest payable and other liabilities and $(100,000) was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2024, the benefit obligation was $397,000, of which $539,000 was recorded in interest payable and other liabilities and $(142,000) was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

For additional information, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

Overview

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $21.1 million, representing an increase of $1.1 million, or 5.5%, compared to net income of $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in net income was primarily attributable to an increase in net interest income of $3.1 million and a decrease in provision for income tax of $1.5 million, which was partially offset by an increase in non-interest expenses of $3.4 million. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to increases in yield on loans and investment securities and a decrease in volume and rate paid on time certificates, which was partially offset by decreases in volume and yield on due from banks and increases in rates paid on interest-bearing transaction deposits and savings and MMDAs. The increase in non-interest expenses was primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment and data processing expenses. The decrease in provision for income tax was due to the execution of a tax planning strategy that involved purchasing investment tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 tied to alternative energy projects. The investment tax credits were acquired at a discount and recognized as a reduction to income tax expense in 2025.

Total assets were $1.91 billion as of December 31, 2025, representing an increase of $19.2 million, or 1.0%, compared to total assets of $1.89 billion as of December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, there was a $26.1 million increase in cash, $3.6 million increase in net loans, $9.9 million increase in interest receivable and other assets, which was partially offset by a $16.6 million decrease in investment securities and a $5.9 million decrease in certificates of deposit. Total deposits decreased $20.9 million, or 1.2%, to $1.68 billion as of December 31, 2025, compared to $1.70 billion at December 31, 2024.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the excess of interest and fees earned on the Bank’s loans, investment securities, federal funds sold and banker’s acceptances over the interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowed funds which are used to fund those assets. Net interest income is primarily affected by the yields and mix of the Bank’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding during the period. The $3,655,000 increase in the Bank's interest and dividend income in 2025 from 2024 was primarily driven by an increase in interest rates on loans and investment securities, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average balance and interest rate on due from banks. The $2,610,000 increase in the Bank's interest income on loans was primarily driven by an increase of $2,444,000 attributable to an increase in interest rates. The $2,204,000 decrease in the Bank’s interest income on due from banks was primarily driven by a decrease of $1,000,000 due to the decreased average due from bank balances outstanding and a decrease of $1,204,000 attributable to a decrease in average interest rates paid on excess reserves at the FRB. The $132,000 decrease in the Bank's interest income on certificates of deposit was driven by a decrease of $147,000 due to the decrease in average certificates of deposit outstanding, which was partially offset by an increase of $15,000 due to the increase in average interest rates paid on certificates of deposit. The $3,414,000 increase in the Bank’s interest income on investment securities was driven by an increase of $2,773,000 due to an increase in interest rates and an increase of $641,000 driven by increased investment securities balances outstanding. The $543,000 increase in the Bank's interest expense on deposits was primarily driven by an increase of $568,000 due to increases in interest rates, which was partially offset by a decrease of $25,000 due to a decrease in average time certificates balances outstanding. See “Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the effects of interest rates and loan/deposit volume on net interest income.

The FRB influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates offered by many financial institutions. Our loan portfolio is significantly affected by changes in the prime interest rate. As of December 31, 2024, the prime rate was 7.50%. The prime rate decreased several times beginning in September 2025, decreasing to 6.75% as of December 31, 2025.

As of December 31, 2024, the target range for the federal funds rate was 4.25% to 4.50%. During 2025 the FRB cut interest rates in each of September, October and December. As of December 31, 2025, the target rate for the federal funds rate was 3.50% to 3.75%. For additional information, see “The Bank is Subject to Interest Rate Risk” and “Beginning in 2021, the U.S. Economy Began to Reflect Relatively Rapid Rates of Increase in the Consumer Price Index and Other Economic Indices; a Prolonged Elevated Rate of Inflation Could Present Risks for the U.S. Banking Industry and Our Business”, in “Risk Factors” (Item 1A) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We are primarily funded by core deposits, with non-interest-bearing demand deposits historically being a significant source of funds. This lower-cost funding base is expected to have a positive impact on our net interest income and net interest margin in a rising interest rate environment.

The nature and impact of future changes in interest rates and monetary policy on the business and earnings of the Company cannot be predicted. For additional information, see “The Effects of Changes or Increases in, or Supervisory Enforcement of, Banking or Other Laws and Regulations or Governmental Fiscal or Monetary Policies Could Adversely Affect Us”, and “The Bank is Subject to Interest Rate Risk” and “Beginning in 2021, the U.S. Economy Began to Reflect Relatively Rapid Rates of Increase in the Consumer Price Index and Other Economic Indices; a Prolonged Elevated Rate of Inflation Could Present Risks for the U.S. Banking Industry and Our Business” in “Risk Factors" (Item 1A) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest income on loans for 2025 was up 4.7% from 2024, increasing from $55,389,000 to $57,999,000. The increase in interest income on loans was primarily due to higher yields earned on newly originated loans and loans repricing at higher rates coupled with a 0.3% increase in average balance of loans.

Interest income on interest-bearing due from banks for 2025 was down 34.0% from 2024, decreasing from $6,477,000 to $4,273,000. The decrease in interest income on interest-bearing due from banks was the result of a 17.0% decrease in average balances of interest-bearing due from banks coupled with a 109 basis point decrease in yield on interest-bearing due from banks.

Interest income on certificates of deposit for 2025 was down 18.2% from 2024, decreasing from $724,000 to $592,000. The decrease in interest income on certificates of deposit was primarily due to a 19.9% decrease in average balances of certificates of deposit, which was partially offset by an 9 basis point increase in yield on certificates of deposit.

Table of Contents

Interest income on investment securities for 2025 was up 22.7% from 2024, increasing from $15,011,000 to $18,425,000. The increase in interest income on investment securities was the result of a 3.9% increase in average investment securities volume coupled with a 46 basis point increase in investment securities yields. The Bank deployed excess liquidity into the investment portfolio over the course of 2025 at higher reinvestment rates. Investment securities yields were 3.00% and 2.54% for 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities for 2025 was up 3.8% from 2024, increasing from $14,292,000 to $14,835,000. The increase in interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities was the result of a 2.4% increase in interest-bearing liabilities coupled with a 2 basis point increase in interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

The mix of deposits for the previous three years was as follows (dollars in thousands):

Average Average Average

Balance Percent Balance Percent Balance Percent

The Bank’s net interest margin (net interest income divided by average earning assets) was 3.77% in 2025 and 3.60% in 2024. The net interest spread (average yield earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities) was 3.16% in 2025 and 2.98% in 2024. The 18 basis point increase in net spread in 2025 over 2024 was due to an overall increase in interest rates on earning assets, which was partially offset by an overall increase in interest rates on deposits.

Provision for Credit Losses

FNRN US Equity

FNRN · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 1C - CYBERSECURITY

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 6 - RESERVED

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

FNRN US Equity☆

FNRN · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 1C - CYBERSECURITY

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 6 - RESERVED

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

FNRN US Equity