| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $16.11B | Enterprise Value | — |
| P/E (TTM) | 49.04× | PEG (trailing) | 2.50× |
| P/S | 3.80× | P/FCF | 351.77× |
| EV/EBITDA | — | EV/EBIT | — |
| EV/Sales | — | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.28% | Buyback Yield | 0.17% |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $421.0M | Owner Earnings Yield | 2.61% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 1.23 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 10.13% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | WACC | — |
| ROIC | — | EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — |
| EVA | — | ||
FCF sits 89% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM $9.17 · revenue TTM $4.24B · FCF TTM $45.8M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Information Technology on P/E, EV/EBITDA
P/E 66th · EV/EBITDA 80th percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 49.0x | 34.1x | 17.5x–62.7x | 66 ↑rich |
| EV/EBITDA | 40.2x | 19.2x | 10.0x–35.3x | 80 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | 1.3% | 2.4% | -2.9%–6.0% | 40 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | 9.7% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 70 ↑strong |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 69 ↑strong |
| ROE | 17.8% | 4.1% | -14.9%–16.8% | 77 ↑strong |
