| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | DKK 88.5M | Enterprise Value | DKK 97.1M |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 1.68× | P/FCF | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 304.48× | EV/EBIT | — |
| EV/Sales | 1.84× | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | −5.19% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | -DKK 3.2M | Owner Earnings Yield | −3.60% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 0.15 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 4.73% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | WACC | — |
| ROIC | −8.43% | EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — |
| EVA | — | ||
FCF sits 44% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Flows latest annual · EPS TTM -DKK 0.12 · revenue TTM DKK 52.8M · FCF TTM -DKK 4.6M (in DKK)
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Information Technology on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 98th percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 304.5x | 19.2x | 10.0x–35.3x | 98 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | -5.2% | 2.4% | -2.9%–6.0% | 23 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 35 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 38 ↓weak |
| ROE | -21.6% | 4.1% | -14.9%–16.8% | 22 ↓weak |
