Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

EOSE US Equity

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.Information Technology · Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies · CIK 1805077 · FY ends Dec 31
$3.81
+0.35 (+10.12%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

EOSE · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

← all EOSE documents
filed 2025-03-04 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 4551,054 of 1,820388k characters rendered

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. Factors that could cause such differences are discussed in “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.”

Overview

The Company offers an innovative ZnythTM technology battery energy storage system ("BESS") designed to provide the operating flexibility to manage increased grid complexity and price volatility resulting from an overall increase in renewable energy generation and a congested grid coming from an increase in electricity demand growth. The Company’s BESS is a validated chemistry with accessible non-precious earth components in a durable design that is intended to deliver results in even the most extreme temperatures and conditions. The system is designed to be safe, flexible, scalable, sustainable and manufactured in the United States, using raw materials primarily sourced in the United States. We believe the Company’s Z3TM battery module is the core of its innovative systems. The Z3 battery module is the only US designed and manufactured battery module that today provide utilities, independent power producers, renewables developers, and C&I customers with an alternative to lithium-ion and lead-acid monopolar batteries for critical 3- to 12-hour discharge duration applications. We believe the Z3 battery will transform how utility, industrial, and commercial customers store power.

In addition to its BESS, the Company currently offers: (a) a BMS which provides a remote asset monitoring capability and service to track the performance and health of the Company’s BESS and to proactively identify future system performance issues through predictive analytics; (b) project management services to ensure the process of implementing the Company’s BESS are coordinated in conjunction with the customer’s overall project plans; (c) commissioning services that ensure the customer’s installation of the BESS meets the performance expected by the customer; and (d) long-term maintenance plans to maintain optimal operating performance of the Company’s systems.

The Company’s growth strategy contemplates increasing sales of battery energy storage systems and related software and services through a direct sales team and sales channel partners. The Company’s current and target customers include utilities, project developers, independent power producers and commercial and industrial companies.

Business Trends

As an SEC-registered and Nasdaq-listed company, we are required to implement procedures and processes to address public company regulatory requirements and customary practices and have, and will continue to, hire additional personnel in this context. We have incurred additional annual expenses as a public company for, among other things, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, director fees, internal and external accounting, legal, administrative resources, including increased personnel costs, and audit and other professional service fees.

Inflation and cost factors - During 2024, the effects of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes in 2022 and in the first half of 2023 had an impact on reducing inflation back towards normal levels. This eased many investor concerns and worked to stabilize the cost of purchasing supplies and raw materials for the Company.

DOE Loan Facility

On November 26, 2024, the Company entered into the DOE Loan Facility. The DOE Loan Facility is a key step in advancing the Company's Project American Made Zinc Energy ("AMAZE") and is expected to fund the expansion of Eos’ manufacturing capacity to 8 GWh by 2027 to meet the growing demand for longer duration battery energy storage systems. The DOE Loan Facility provides for up to $303.5 million in funding, including capitalized interest.

36

The DOE Loan Facility provides for a multi draw term loan facility under a series of at least two and, if the Company elects, up to four tranches of the loan (each, a “Tranche”), subject to the achievement of certain funding conditions, with each Tranche corresponding to the production, maintenance and development, and operation of a given production line to be funded using the proceeds of such Tranche and the principal amount of each Tranche consisting of a maximum principal amount designated for such Tranche in the DOE Loan Facility. Each Tranche provides the Company funding for 80% of the Eligible Project Costs (as defined in the DOE Loan Facility) associated with the corresponding production line, with the Company responsible for funding the remaining 20% of the Eligible Project Costs.

Through December 31, 2024, the Company has received funding under the DOE Loan Facility for an aggregate amount of $68.3 million, at an interest rate of 4.791% for eligible project costs incurred through December 6, 2024. These costs are a portion of Tranche 1 of the DOE Loan Facility. Tranche 1 provides up to $102.0 million for eligible costs in connection with the design, construction, installation, startup and shakedown of a battery automation line and related tools, with a projected annual production capacity of approximately 1.25 GWh ("Line 1").

Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”)

On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 into law. The IRA has significant economic incentives for both energy storage customers and manufacturers for projects placed in service after December 31, 2022.One of the most important features of the IRA is that it offers a 10-year term tax credit, whereas historically similar industrial credits have been shorter in duration. Customers placing new energy storage facilities in service, which include our Gen 2.3 and Z3TM BESS, could qualify for an investment tax credit (“ITC”). The IRA also offers an extra ten percent credit if the project is in an “energy community” and another ten percent credit if the project satisfies domestic content requirements. The ten percent bonus for domestic content could represent a strategic advantage for the Company resulting from the Company’s near-sourcing and Made in America strategy, and we believe that projects utilizing Eos batteries qualify for the bonus.

Production Tax Credits under Internal Revenue Code 45X (“PTC”) can be claimed on battery components manufactured in the U.S. and sold to U.S. or foreign customers. These tax credits available to manufacturers include a credit for ten percent of the cost incurred to make electrode active materials in addition to credits of $35 per kWh of capacity of battery cells and $10 per kWh of capacity of battery modules. These credits are cumulative, meaning that companies will be able to claim each of the available tax credits based on the battery components produced and sold through 2029, after which the PTC will begin to gradually phase down through 2032. In April 2024, the IRS issued final regulations related to applicable tax credit transferability and direct pay provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. The Company has reviewed these regulations and believes they do not have a material impact on the financial statements.

Company Highlights

•In January 2024, the Company entered into a supply agreement with TETRA Technologies, Inc (“TETRA”) that further expanded this partnership. TETRA is a leading global energy services and solutions company. This supply agreement designates TETRA as the preferred strategic supplier of electrolyte products for the Company’s Eos Z3TM long duration energy storage cube.

•In February 2024, the Company entered into a multiyear pricing agreement with SHPP US LLC, a Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”) affiliate, to supply conductive composite thermoplastic for the Eos Z3TM battery module. The Company and SABIC have worked collaboratively to develop a solution using one of SABIC’s new resin materials to replace the titanium used in prior Eos battery iterations.

•In February 2024, the Company achieved “Power On” status of all motion systems on its first state-of-the-art manufacturing line. Reaching this milestone is a significant step in achieving the state-of-the-art manufacturing line being installed and commissioned in the Company’s Turtle Creek facility.

•In April 2024, the Company and Pine Gate Renewables signed an agreement to expand its existing relationship. The new Master Supply Agreement (“MSA”) is for 500 MWh of energy storage systems to be delivered over the next five years.

37

•In May 2024, the Company successfully completed its Factory Acceptance Testing on State of the Art (“SotA”) manufacturing line.

•In June 2024, the Company announced a strategic investment of up to $315.5 million from an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management LP (“Cerberus”), to support the Company’s growth plans.

•In June 2024, the Company recognized a gain on debt extinguishment of $68.5 million from the payoff of the Senior Secured Term Loan.

•In June 2024, the Company completed the installation of the first state of the art line in its Turtle Creek facility and began commercial production of batteries off the new line to be delivered to customer sites.

•In June 2024, the Company announced that Nick Robinson, Senior Managing Director on the Supply Chain and Strategic Opportunities team of Cerberus, joined the Company’s Board of Directors.

•In July 2024, the Company and Indian Energy announced an agreement to expand its existing relationship. The expanded agreement with Indian Energy added 25 MWh of storage to the existing 35 MWh order for an overall project size of 60 MWh.

•In July 2024, the Company regained compliance with the minimum continued listing criteria set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) as of July 9, 2024, based on the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock being at or above $1.00 per share for the 10 consecutive business days from June 24, 2024 to July 8, 2024. The Company's stock price has performed well above the minimum listing throughout the remainder of 2024 and closed at $4.86 at December 31, 2024.

•In July 2024, the Company announced that Gregory Nixon, Head of Strategic Investments for Cerberus, joined the Company’s Board of Directors.

•In August 2024, the Company successfully achieved all four of the first performance milestones previously agreed upon between Eos and Cerberus as part of Cerberus’s strategic investment in the Company. Achieving these specific performance milestones allowed the Company to draw an additional $30 million on the Delayed Draw Term Loan from Cerberus to fund ongoing operations and production expansion to meet the growing demand for long duration energy storage solutions.

•In October 2024, the Company successfully achieved all four of the performance milestones for the October Draw previously agreed upon between Eos and Cerberus as part of Cerberus’s strategic investment in the Company. Achieving these specific performance milestones allowed the Company to draw an additional $65.0 million on the Delayed Draw Term Loan from Cerberus.

•In November 2024, the Company announced a new customer agreement with City Utilities (CU) to provide 216 MWh of energy storage for two project sites in Missouri.

•In November 2024, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Wabash (NYSE: WNC), a world-class provider of advanced engineering and operational solutions for the transportation, logistics, and distribution industries. The proposed partnership would accelerate Eos’ ability to deliver large-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) through Wabash’s manufacturing and supply chain expertise and national distribution network.

•In November 2024, the Company entered into the DOE Loan Facility which provides an aggregate principal amount of up to $277.5 million and an aggregate capitalized interest of up to $26.0 million. Through December 31, 2024, the Company has drawn down an aggregate of $68.3 million of principal under the DOE Loan Facility, at an interest rate of 4.791%, for eligible project costs that the Company has incurred or is expected to incur through December 6, 2024. These costs are a portion of Tranche 1 of the DOE Loan Facility, which are related to Line 1.

•In December 2024, the Company announced a 400 MWh standalone storage order with International Electric Power (“IEP”). This marks the second agreement and third project with IEP, a leading developer in the energy space deploying multiple technologies, and builds on Eos’ successful prior delivery of its battery systems to a Texas-based IEP project earlier this year.

38

•In December 2024, the Company and FlexGen Power Systems (“FlexGen”) announced they have signed a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) to develop and introduce America’s first fully-integrated, domestic BESS solution to the market by combining Eos’ Z3TM batteries with the FlexGen HybridOSTM Energy Management System (EMS). The agreement is mutually beneficial as it complements each company’s opportunity pipeline and advances their commitment to commercializing safe and reliable, U.S. manufactured, BESS solutions to customers.

•In December 2024, the Company announced its search for a new manufacturing facility in addition to the Mon Valley Works expansion under Project AMAZE. This expansion is part of the Company’s broader strategy to scale up its operations to meet the rapidly growing demand for renewable energy solutions and to further its commitment to American manufacturing and energy independence.

•In December 2024, the Company announced that David Urban, Managing Director at BGR Group and Of Counsel at Torridon Law PLLC, joined the Company’s Board of Directors.

•The Company conducted a Section 382 ownership shift analysis through December 31, 2024. Based on the analysis, the Company expects to be able to utilize approximately $741.2 million of Federal Net Operating Loss Carryforwards, with the majority being available for use by December 31, 2029. The remaining balance will become available over time.

•In January 2025, the Company successfully achieved all operational milestones that guarantees final $40.5 million under the $210.5 million Delayed Draw Term Loan to further solidify its position as a leader in American energy storage systems. Successfully meeting these performance milestones will enable the Company to fuel its ongoing operations, U.S. production expansion, and the creation of an American energy storage powerhouse, without the need to raise additional capital via debt or additional equity offerings.

•With the Delayed Draw Term Loan fully funded, combined with DOE loan facility's first disbursement in December 2024, Eos has a strong foundation and sufficient capital to continue implementing Project AMAZE. The Company is executing its strategy to scale production into strong customer demand for long duration energy storage. Cash from customer projects now play an important role in funding working capital and our American-made system can play a critical role in America achieving energy independence. The $210.5 million Delayed Draw Term Loan ("DDTL") is now fully funded, driven by the Company consistently achieving key operational milestones related to the Company’s state-of-the-art manufacturing line, raw materials cost-out, Z3 technology performance improvement and orders backlog cash conversion. The Company surpassed its January raw materials cost-out target by 6% while delivering manufacturing cycle times below 10 seconds to further demonstrate continued operational efficiency and progress.

39

Results of Operations

Revenue

For the Years Ended December 31,

($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change % Change

The Company generates revenues from the delivery of its BESS and service-related solutions. The Company expects revenues to increase as it scales production to meet customer demand.

Revenue slightly decreased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, due to reduced production and deliveries due to the installation of the Company’s new manufacturing line.

Cost of goods sold

For the Years Ended December 31,

($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change % Change

Cost of goods sold primarily consists of direct costs relating to labor, material and overhead directly tied to product assembly, procurement and construction (“EPC”), project delivery, commissioning and start-up test procedures. Indirect costs included in cost of goods sold are manufacturing overhead such as equipment maintenance, environmental health and safety, quality and production control procurement, transportation, logistics, depreciation and facility-related costs. As a nascent technology with a new manufacturing process that is early in its product lifecycle, the Company still faces significant costs associated with production start-up, commissioning of various components, modules and subsystems and other related costs. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized $3.8 million reduction of cost of goods sold related to the IRA PTC. The Company expects its cost of goods sold to exceed revenues in the near term as it continues to scale production and prepares battery energy storage systems delivered to customers to go-live.

Cost of goods sold increased by $9.1 million, or 10% from $89.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $98.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in cost of goods sold from 2023 to 2024 was primarily due to an increase in project commissioning costs on previously delivered projects, revaluations of inventory balances, along with the underutilization and absorption of labor and overhead associated with implementing the new line.

Research and development expenses

For the Years Ended December 31,

($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change % Change

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related costs, materials, third-party services, depreciation and amortization of intangible assets.

Research and development costs increased by $4.1 million or 22% from $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, to $22.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in research and development costs was driven by higher spending on materials and supplies related to the implementation of the automated line, as well as an increase in payroll and personnel costs.

40

Selling, general and administrative expenses

For the Years Ended December 31,

($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change % Change

Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of payroll and personnel-related, outside professional services, facilities, depreciation, travel, marketing, and public company costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $6.4 million or 12%, from $53.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $60.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily driven by higher consulting fees and payroll, partially offset by decrease in legal fees.

Loss from write-down on property, plant and equipment

For the Years Ended December 31,

Loss from write-down on property, plant and equipment $ 9,133 $ 7,159

The Company incurred losses of $9.1 million and $7.2 million from write-downs of property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The 2023 write-downs were mainly due to replacement of equipment, outsourcing of certain production processes and the shift in production from the Gen 2.3 battery system to the Z3TM battery system. The 2024 write-downs were primarily related to design changes from the Z3TM-Phase 1 to Z3TM-Phase 2 production in which the Phase 1 production assets could not be utilized or repurposed for Phase 2 production. Additionally, the 2024 amount contains costs for disposal of equipment and tooling that was used for manufacturing of the Gen 2.3 battery, but cannot be repurposed for the Eos Z3 battery production.

Interest expense, net

For the Years Ended December 31,

Interest expense, net includes expenses for accrued interest, amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts.

Interest expense, net decreased by $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. This was mainly due to lower interest expense recognized from the Senior Secured Term Loan due to the loan's extinguishment in June 2024. See Note 13, Borrowings for detail of interest expense recognized for the Senior Secured Term Loan.

Interest expense - related parties

For the Years Ended December 31,

2021 Convertible Note Payable interest and amortization $ (14,299) $ (12,393)

AFG Convertible Note interest and amortization (6,114) (4,631)

AFG Convertible Note loss on issuance — (2,873)

Yorkville Promissory Notes loss on issuance — (17,569)

Capitalized interest from construction in progress assets 914 —

Interest expense, related parties $ (19,499) $ (37,466)

41

See Note 13, Borrowings for further discussion.

Change in fair value of debt - related party

The change in the fair value of debt - related party of $33.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, related to the Delayed Draw Term Loan. The primary factors contributing to the fair value change was the extension of the maturity date and timing of future cash flows of the DDTL netting with a debt yield reduction which decreased from 47.5% to 30.0% during the year ended December 31, 2024. The change in fair value applicable to the debt yield reduction is included in Change in fair value of debt - credit risk in Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the change in fair value of warrants was composed of the items below:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2024

($ in thousands) Change in Fair Value

IPO warrants $ (214)

Change in fair value of warrants $ (171,226)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023

($ in thousands) Loss on issuance Change in Fair Value Net (Loss) Gain

IPO warrants $ — $ 23 $ 23

Change in fair value of derivatives - related parties

For the Years Ended December 31,

Change in fair value of warrants - related parties (365,456) —

Change in fair value of derivatives - related parties $ (405,388) $ 9,983

The change in the fair value of embedded derivatives - related parties, was due to our convertible debt (See Note 13, Borrowings) and the change in fair value of warrants - related parties was due to changes in fair value of our SPA Warrant and contingent warrants (See Note 14, Warrants Liability).

42

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

For the Years Ended December 31,

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment $ 68,478 $ (3,510)

The Company recognized a gain on debt extinguishment of $68.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from the payoff of the Senior Secured Term Loan.

The Company recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from the issuance of common stock upon Yorkville's redemption of their convertible promissory notes.

Other expense

For the Years Ended December 31,

Other expense of $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 primarily included loss from derecognition of loan commitment assets during 2024 from the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction. See Note 3, Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, for more information.

Other expense of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 included equity issuance costs from the April, May, and December 2023 equity and warrant issuances.

Income tax expense

For the Years Ended December 31,

Income tax expense $ 21 $ 31

Income tax expense of approximately $0.02 million and $0.03 million was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The taxes are attributable to taxable earnings from the Company’s foreign operations which were insignificant for all periods presented.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity and Going Concern

As a growth company in the early commercialization stage of its lifecycle, Eos is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties associated with the development of an enterprise. In this regard, substantially all of the Company’s efforts to date have been devoted to the development and manufacturing of battery energy storage systems and complementary products and services, recruitment of management and technical staff, deployment of capital to expand the Company’s operations to meet customer demand and raising capital to fund the Company’s development. However, as a result of these efforts, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception and expects to continue to incur such losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future until such time that the Company can reach a scale of profitability to sustain its operations.

In order to execute its development strategy, the Company has historically relied on outside capital through the issuance of equity, debt and borrowings under financing arrangements (collectively “outside capital”) to fund its cost structure. While the Company believes its recent entry into new credit facilities as discussed below has significantly improved its capital position and provides a path to sustainable operations and profitability, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to achieve such profitability or do so in a manner that does not require additional outside capital. Moreover, while the Company has historically been successful in raising outside capital, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to continue to obtain outside capital in the future or do so on terms that are acceptable to the Company.

43

As disclosed in Note 3, Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, on June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a financing transaction with CCM Denali Debt Holdings, LP, an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management LP (herein after referred to as “Cerberus”, “Denali”, “Lender”, “Holder”). As a result of this transaction, Cerberus agreed to provide a $210.5 million secured multi-draw facility to be made in four installments (the “Delayed Draw Term Loan”) as well as a $105.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”), to be made available beginning June 21, 2026, at Cerberus’ sole discretion and only if the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully funded. As of the issuance date, the Delayed Draw Term Loan was fully funded. As part of the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, Cerberus received warrants and preferred stock resulting in a 33% ownership position in the Company as of the issuance date. This ownership percentage represents $644.8 million in market capitalization based on the February 27, 2025 closing share price of the Company’s common stock.

As disclosed in Note 13, Borrowings, on November 26, 2024, the Company successfully closed on the DOE Loan Facility, which provides the Company with up to $303.5 million in funding, including capitalized interest, subject to the achievement of certain funding conditions. The DOE Loan Facility provides for a multi draw term loan facility under a series of at least two and, if the Company elects, up to four tranches, subject to the achievement of certain conditions, with each tranche corresponding to the production, maintenance and development, and operation of a given production line to be funded using the proceeds of such tranche. The DOE Loan Facility specifies the maximum amount subject to each tranche (Tranche 1: $102.0 million; Tranche 2: $117.3 million; Tranche 3: $71.8 million; and Tranche 4: $12.3 million), and any amounts which are not withdrawn under a specified tranche cannot be allocated to another tranche. Through December 31, 2024, the Company had drawn down $68.3 million under Tranche 1.

As of the date the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements were issued (the “issuance date”), management evaluated the significance of the following negative financial conditions in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification 205-40, Going Concern:

•Since its inception, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash from operations in order to fund its development. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company incurred a net loss of $685.9 million. Adjustments to reconcile the net loss to cash used in operations are primarily from non-cash items on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The non-cash items totaled $549.2 million. The Company incurred negative cash flows from operations of $153.9 million and had an accumulated deficit of $1,561.7 million as of December 31, 2024.

•As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $74.3 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents available to fund the Company’s operations, and working capital of $114.9 million, which includes loan commitment assets of $21.7 million classified as current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

•On June 21, 2024, upon closing of the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, Cerberus funded the Company $$75.0 million of the initial draw, and the Company received $71.3 million, net of the 5.0% original issue discount. On August 29, 2024, Cerberus funded the Company $30.0 million (“August Draw”), and the Company received $28.5 million, net of the 5.0% original issue discount. On November 1, 2024, Cerberus funded the Company $65.0 million related to the October 31, 2024 tranche (“October Draw” or “October Tranche”), and the Company received $61.8 million, which is net of the 5.0% original issue discount. On January 24, 2025, Cerberus funded the Company the final $40.5 million related to the January 31, 2025 tranche (“January 2025 Draw”). Subsequent to the January 2025 Draw, the Delayed Draw Term Loan has been fully funded.

•Through December 31, 2024, under the DOE Loan Facility, the Company drew down $68.3 million for the eligible project cost that the Company had incurred through December 6, 2024. These costs are a portion of Tranche 1 of the DOE Loan Facility. Tranche 1 provides up to $102.0 million for eligible costs in connection with the design, construction, installation, startup and shakedown of a battery automation line and related tools. In the event the Company does not achieve certain funding conditions and the DOE chooses not to continue funding, the Company would need to seek alternative sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

44

•The Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction and the DOE Loan Facility contain certain quarterly financial covenants, which include (a) Minimum Liquidity, (b) Minimum Consolidated EBITDA, and (c) Minimum Consolidated Revenue (collectively, the “financial covenants”). As of the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024, the only financial covenant in effect was Minimum Liquidity. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with this covenant, as well as all non-financial covenants and expects to remain in compliance with the Minimum Liquidity covenant over the next twelve month beyond the issuance date. The Minimum Consolidated EBITDA and Minimum Consolidated Revenue financial covenants are effective starting fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, the Company expects that it may be unable to remain in compliance with the Minimum Consolidated EBITDA and Minimum Consolidated Revenue financial covenant beginning December 31, 2025, absent the Company’s ability to secure a waiver or amend the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction and the DOE Loan Facility. In the event the Company is unable to comply with the financial and non-financial covenants as of December 31, 2025, and the Company is unable to secure a waiver, Cerberus and DOE may, at their discretion, enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company and/or exercise any and all of their existing rights and remedies, which may include, among other things, asserting their rights in the Company’s assets securing the loans. Moreover, the Company’s other lenders may exercise similar rights and remedies under the cross-default provisions of their respective borrowing agreements with the Company.

•In the event the Company’s ongoing efforts to raise additional outside capital are unsuccessful, the Company will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due over the next twelve month beyond the issuance date. In such an event, management will be required to seek other strategic alternatives, which may include, among others, a significant curtailment in the Company’s operations, a sale of certain of the Company’s assets, a sale of the entire Company to strategic or financial investors and/or allowing the Company to become insolvent.

These uncertainties raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates that the Company will be able to realize assets and settle liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Financing Arrangements

The Company has historically relied on outside capital to fund its cost structure and expects this reliance to continue for the foreseeable future until the Company reaches profitability through its planned revenue generating activities. During 2024, the Company closed on the following capital transactions:

•Under the ATM offering program, for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company sold 16,627,523 shares raising proceeds of $14.1 million, net of fees paid to Cowen, at an average selling price of $0.87 per share.

•The Company secured a strategic investment of up to $315.5 million from Cerberus. The investment by Cerberus is structured as a $210.5 million Delayed Draw Term Loan to be made in four installments. On June 21, 2024 the first installment of $75.0 million was funded, on August 29, 2024, the second draw of $30.0 million was funded, on October 31, 2024 the third draw of $65.0 million was funded, and on January 24, 2025, the final draw of $40.5 million was funded. As part of the strategic investment, a $105.0 million Revolving Facility can be made available to the Company at the Lenders’ sole discretion and only if the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully funded.

45

•On November 26, 2024, the Company entered into the DOE Loan Facility which provides for an aggregate principal amount of up to $277.5 million of borrowings and an aggregate capitalized interest of up to $26.0 million. Through December 31, 2024, the Company has drawn down $68.3 million under the DOE Loan Facility, at an interest rate of 4.791% for eligible project costs that the Company has incurred through December 6, 2024. These costs are a portion of Tranche 1 of the DOE Loan Facility, which are related to Line 1. Additional draws under the DOE Loan Facility are subject to our achievement of certain funding conditions, with each Tranche corresponding to the production, maintenance and development, and operation of a given production line to be funded using the proceeds of such Tranche and the principal amount of each Tranche consisting of a maximum principal amount designated for such Tranche in the DOE Loan Facility. Each Tranche provides the Company funding for 80% of the Eligible Project Costs (as defined in the DOE Loan Facility) associated with the corresponding production line, with the Company responsible for funding the remaining 20% of the Project Costs.

See Note 13, Borrowings, and Note 20, Shareholders' Equity for all of the Company’s outstanding debt and equity transactions.

Capital Expenditures

Although the Company expects capital expenditures and working capital requirements to increase as it seeks to execute its growth strategy, total capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 were $33.2 million and $29.3 million, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures in 2024 was primarily driven by costs incurred for Phase 2 production of the Z3TM battery system. See Note 7, Property, Plant and Equipment for further discussion.

Discussion and Analysis of Cash Flows

The Company relies heavily on private placement of convertible notes, term loans, equipment financing and issuance of common stock and warrants. Our short-term working capital needs are primarily related to funding of debt interest payments, repayment of debt principal, product manufacturing, research and development, and general corporate expenses. The Company’s long-term working capital needs are primarily related to repayment of long-term debt obligations and capital expenses for capacity expansion and maintenance, equipment upgrades and repair of equipment.

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods presented.

For the Years Ended December 31,

Net cash used in operating activities $ (153,936) $ (145,018)

Net cash used in investing activities (33,186) (29,461)

Cash flows from operating activities:

Cash flows used in operating activities primarily comprise of costs related to research and development, manufacturing of products, project commissioning and other general and administrative activities.

Net cash used in operating activities of $153.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily driven by a net loss of $685.9 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $549.2 million. Non-cash items primarily related to stock compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, non-cash interest expense, gain on debt extinguishment, loss from the write-down of property, plant and equipment, and changes in fair value of debt, warrants and derivatives. The net cash outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $17.2 million was primarily driven by an increase in inventory of $20.5 million, decrease in accrued expenses of $14.7 million, and increase in contract assets of $5.7 million, partially offset by an increase in contract liabilities of $19.7 million.

46

Net cash used in operating activities of $145.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 was primarily driven by a net loss of $229.5 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $94.2 million. Non-cash items included stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, non-cash interest expense, changes in fair value of warrants and derivatives, and loss from the write-down of property, plant and equipment. The net cash outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $9.7 million was primarily driven by decrease in accounts payable of $11.5 million, increase in contract assets of $6.3 million, increase in other receivables of $7.5 million, and increase in grant receivables of $3.0 million, partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses of $19.3 million.

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 were primarily composed of payments made for purchases of property, plant and equipment of $33.2 million.

Net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 were primarily composed of payments made for purchases of property, plant and equipment of $29.3 million, which included costs incurred for development and construction of a fully automated manufacturing line for the Z3TM battery.

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $205.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This was primarily due to the proceeds received from the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction of $160.3 million, DOE Loan of $66.6 million, and issuance of common stock of $14.1 million. The proceeds were partially offset by payoff of the Senior Secured Term Loan of $19.9 million, debt issuance costs related to the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction and DOE Loan of $18.1million, payments on the equipment financing facility of $3.3 million and share repurchases from employees for tax withholding of $1.2 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $227.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This was primarily from the issuance of common stock and warrants in the amount of $192.2 million, as well net proceeds received from the issuance of Yorkville Convertible Promissory Notes and AFG Convertible Notes, totaling $48.1 million. The proceeds were partially offset by equity issuance costs of $5.0 million, debt issuance costs related to the Yorkville Convertible Promissory Notes, AFG Convertible Notes and Senior Secured Term Loan of $4.2 million, payments on the equipment financing facility of $2.9 million and share repurchases from employees for tax withholding purposes of $0.6 million.

Contractual Obligations

The Company has certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts. As of December 31, 2024, this is comprised of the following:

•Future lease payments, including interest, under non-cancellable operating and financing leases of $4.2 million. The leases expire at various dates prior to 2028. See Note 15, Leases to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

•In accordance with the Insurer Letter Agreement, the Company shall pay to the Atlas Insurers $4.0 million on June 30, 2025, subject to the absence of certain events of default under the Credit Agreement.

•Principal and Interest payments related to the following debt obligations. See Note 13, Borrowings to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

47

Future Debt Payments

Equipment financing facility - due April 2025 and April 2026 2,596

(1)As of December 31, 2024, the Company is obligated to repay future contractual interest payments for these borrowings in-kind.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we make assumptions, judgments, and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We regularly reevaluate our assumptions, judgments, and estimates.

Critical accounting estimates are those estimates that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Warranty Liability

The Company generally provides a standard warranty for a period of two years. We also provide extended warranties and performance guarantees, which are identified as separate performance obligations in the Company's contracts with customers. We accrue warranty reserves at the time of recording the sale. Warranty reserves include management’s best estimate of the projected costs to repair or to replace any items under warranty, which is based on various factors including actual claim data to date, results of lab testing, factory quality data, and field monitoring. Due to limited claim experience since commercialization of our product, and the potential for variability in these underlying factors, the difference between our estimated costs and our actual costs could be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. If actual product failure rates or the frequency or severity of reported claims differ from our estimates, we may be required to revise our estimated warranty liability. We will also update actual warranty experience to determine warranty reserves as such experience becomes available. We review our reserves at least quarterly, seeking to ensure that our accruals are adequate in meeting expected future warranty obligations, and we will adjust our estimates as needed. Initial warranty data can be limited at the early stage in the commercialization of our products and, the adjustments that we record may be material. Thus, it is likely that as we sell additional BESS, we will acquire additional information on the projected costs to repair or replace items under warranty and may need to make additional adjustments (See Note 10, Accrued Expenses to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report).

Warrants Liability

The Company estimated the fair value of the April 2023 warrants, the May 2023 warrants, and the December 2023 warrants using the Black-Scholes model at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates inputs such as the stock price of the Company, exercise price, risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, and time to expiration. The expected volatility involves unobservable inputs classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The sensitivity of the fair value calculation to this assumption could create materially different results under different conditions or using different assumptions. See Note 16, Fair Value Measurement to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

48

Convertible Notes and Embedded Derivatives

The Company estimated the fair value of the embedded conversion features in the 2021 Convertible Notes and the AFG Convertible Notes using a binomial lattice model at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates inputs such as the stock price of the Company, dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, the effective debt yield and expected volatility. The effective debt yield and volatility involve unobservable inputs classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The sensitivity of the fair value calculation to these methods, assumptions, and estimates included could create materially different results under different conditions or using different assumptions. See Note 16, Fair Value Measurements to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Instruments issued under the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction (see Note 16, Fair Value Measurement)

The fair value of the Delayed Draw Term Loan was estimated using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method, based on the contractual cash flows discounted at an effective debt yield. The fair value of the loan commitment asset was estimated using the discounted cash flow model, based on the contractual cash flows discounted at the effective debt yield and considering the probability of achieving certain milestones. The fair value for the SPA Warrant is estimated based on its intrinsic value, using the Eos common stock closing price adjusted by a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”), less the exercise price of $0.01 for the SPA Warrant. A DLOM was applied considering the underlying shares of the SPA Warrants are unregistered. The fair value of the Contingent Warrants is estimated based on the underlying Eos common stock closing price adjusted by a DLOM using a Black-Scholes model, considering the probability of achieving certain milestones. A DLOM was applied considering the underlying shares of the Contingent Warrants are unregistered. The fair values for all these instruments are designated as level 3 measurements as they rely on significant unobservable inputs. The significant unobservable inputs for each of these instruments are detailed in Note 16, Fair Value Measurement), which include debt yield, DLOM, and milestones achievement expectations. The sensitivity of the fair value calculation to debt yield, DLOM, and milestones achievement expectations could create materially different results under different conditions or using different assumptions.

49

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk arises from the general funding needs of the Company's activities and in the management of the Company's assets and liabilities. Our exposure to liquidity risk is dependent on our ability to raise funds to meet our obligations and sustain operations. We manage liquidity risk by continuously monitoring our actual and forecasted working capital requirements to ensure there is capital to meet short-term, long-term obligations, including our financial covenants under the DOE Loan Facility and Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction (see Note 13, Borrowings to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report). As disclosed in Note 1, Overview to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, there is a substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. In order to execute its development strategy, the Company has historically relied on outside capital to fund its cost structure and expects to continue to rely on outside capital for the foreseeable future. While the Company believes it will eventually reach a scale of profitability to sustain its operations, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to achieve such profitability or do so in a manner that does not require its continued reliance on outside capital. Moreover, while the Company has historically been successful in raising outside capital, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to continue to obtain outside capital in the future or do so on terms that are acceptable to the Company.

Equity Price Risk

Equity price risk arises from security price volatility. The Company is subject to this risk due to the warrants issued, since they are measured at fair value. See Note 16, Fair Value Measurement for warrant valuations and fair values, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

50

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

Index to Financial Statements

PAGE

Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 34) 52

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 56

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 62 to 110

51

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows, for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and may be unable to remain in compliance with financial covenants required by borrowing arrangements absent the Company’s ability to secure additional outside capital or obtain a waiver, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

52

Convertible Notes Payable and Warrants Liability -Refer to Notes 13, 14 and 16 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company’s 2021 Convertible Notes and AFG Convertible Notes (collectively “the Convertible Notes”) contain embedded conversion features that are required to be bifurcated from the Convertible Notes and measured at fair value at each reporting period. The Company estimates the fair value of the embedded conversion features using a binomial lattice model at the inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates inputs such as the stock price of the Company, dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, the effective debt yield, and expected volatility. The effective debt yield and the expected volatility involve unobservable inputs.

The Company’s April 2023 Transaction, May 2023 Transaction, and the December 2023 Public Offering include warrants that are required to be measured at fair value at each reporting period. The Company estimates the fair value of the warrants using a Black-Scholes model at the inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates inputs such as the stock price of the Company, exercise price, risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, and time to expiration. The expected volatility involves unobservable inputs.

Unlike the fair value of financial instruments that are readily observable and therefore more easily independently corroborated, the valuation of the embedded conversion features and warrants is inherently subjective and involves the use of complex modeling tools. Auditing the fair value of the embedded conversion features and warrants requires a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the valuation of the (1) embedded conversion features in the Convertible Notes and (2) warrants included the following, among others:

•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of management’s valuation methodology and the significant assumptions used in determining the fair value of the embedded conversion features and warrants by:

◦Testing the source information underlying the fair value of the embedded conversion features and the warrants and the mathematical accuracy of the calculations.

◦Developing an independent estimate of the inputs and compared those to the inputs used in the fair value of the embedded conversion features and warrants.

•We evaluated the competency and objectivity of management’s expert engaged by the Company to perform the valuation of the embedded conversion features and warrants.

Financial Instruments Associated with the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction - Refer to Notes 3, 13, 14 and 16 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

On June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a (1) credit and guaranty agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with CCM Denali Debt Holdings, LP, and (2) Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with CCM Denali Equity Holdings, LP (collectively, CCM Denali Debt Holdings, LP and CCM Denali Equity Holdings, LP referred to as “Cerberus”) (collectively, the Credit Agreement and the SPA referred to as “Cerberus Agreements”).

In conjunction with the Cerberus Agreements, the Company also entered into a payoff letter agreement with ACP Post Oak Credit I LLC and other Atlas Lenders to settle all outstanding obligations under the Atlas Credit Agreement, which were deemed paid and satisfied in full.

53

Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, Cerberus agreed to provide a (1) $210.5 million secured multi-draw facility to be made in four installments (the “Delayed Draw Term Loan”) upon the achievement of certain performance milestones on dates specified in the Credit Agreement, and (2) $105.0 million revolving credit facility, to be made available beginning June 21, 2026, at Cerberus’ sole discretion and only if the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully funded.

Under the terms of the SPA, the Company issued the following (1) a warrant to purchase 43,276,194 shares of Common Stock (the “SPA Warrant”), (2) 59 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and (3) upon the achievement of performance milestones on dates specified in the Credit Agreement, the Company issued at the option of Cerberus, preferred stock or warrants on common stock, up to an aggregate of 33.0% ownership limitation on a fully diluted basis at such time the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully drawn (the “Contingent Warrants”). The Contingent Warrants were settled in Preferred Stock upon the successful funding of the Delayed Draw Term Loan on dates specified in the Credit Agreement.

Auditing the accounting for the instruments issued under the Cerberus Agreements, and the settlement of the obligations under the Atlas Credit Agreement, requires a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve professionals in our firm with expertise in financial instruments.

The Credit Agreement contains loan commitment assets, which are required to be measured at fair value upon inception (June 21, 2024), with no subsequent remeasurement. The Company estimates the fair value of the loan commitment asset using the discounted cash flow model, based on the contractual cash flows discounted at the effective debt yield and considering the probability of achieving certain milestones. The milestone achievement expectations and the effective debt yield involve unobservable inputs.

The Company estimates the fair value of the debt issued under the Delayed Draw Term Loan at inception and on subsequent valuation dates using a discounted cash flow method, based on the contractual cash flows discounted at the effective debt yield. The effective debt yield involves unobservable inputs.

The Company estimates the fair value for the SPA warrant issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement at inception and on subsequent valuation dates based on its intrinsic value, using the Company’s common stock closing price adjusted by a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”), less the exercise price. The DLOM involves unobservable inputs.

The Company estimates the fair value of the Contingent Warrants issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement at inception and on subsequent valuation dates based on the Company’s common stock closing price adjusted by a DLOM using Black-Scholes option pricing model, considering the probability of achieving certain milestones. The milestone achievement expectations, the expected volatility, and the DLOM involve unobservable inputs.

Unlike the fair value of financial instruments that are readily observable and therefore more easily independently corroborated, the valuation of the financial instruments associated with the Cerberus Agreements is inherently subjective and involves the use of complex modeling tools. Auditing the fair value of the financial instruments associated with the Cerberus Agreements requires a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the (1) accounting of the instruments issued under the Cerberus Agreements, and the settlement of the obligations under the Atlas Credit Agreement, and (2) valuation of the financial instruments associated with the Cerberus Agreements included the following, among others:

•With the assistance of professionals in our firm with expertise in financial instruments, we evaluated the appropriateness of management’s accounting conclusions related to (1) the financial instruments issued under the Cerberus Agreements, and (2) the settlement of the obligations under the Atlas Credit Agreement.

•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of management’s valuation methodology and the significant assumptions used in determining the fair value of the financial instruments issued under the Cerberus Agreements by:

54

◦Testing the source information underlying the fair value of the financial instruments issued under the Cerberus Agreements and the mathematical accuracy of the calculations.

◦Developing an independent estimate of the inputs and compared those to the inputs used in the fair value of the financial instruments issued under the Cerberus Agreements.

•We evaluated the competency and objectivity of management’s expert engaged by the Company to perform the accounting and valuation of the financial instruments associated with the Cerberus Agreements, and the settlement of the obligations under the Atlas Credit Agreement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, NY

March 4, 2025

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.

55

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

December 31,

ASSETS

Current assets:

Loan commitment assets - related party 21,731 —

Other receivables — 7,500

Operating lease right-of-use asset, net 2,909 4,033

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Operating lease liability, current 1,879 1,496

Other current liabilities 288 100

Long-term liabilities:

Contract liabilities, long-term 4,310 3,540

Warrants liability - related party 266,630 —

56

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

December 31,

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 17)

SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK (NOTE 3) - related party 488,696 —

SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Accumulated other comprehensive loss - related party (43,490) —

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (6) 7

Total liabilities, preferred stock and shareholders' deficit $ 260,318 $ 186,492

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

57

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

For the Years Ended December 31,

Operating expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses 60,047 53,650

Loss from write-down of property, plant and equipment 9,133 7,159

Other (expense) income

Interest expense – related parties (19,499) (37,466)

Change in fair value of debt - related party 33,823 —

Change in fair value of derivatives - related parties (405,388) 9,983

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 68,478 (3,510)

Income tax expense 21 31

Net loss attributable to shareholders $ (685,870) $ (229,506)

Accretion of Preferred Stock - related party (278,330) —

Net loss attributable to common shareholders $ (964,200) $ (229,506)

Other comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common shareholders

Change in fair value of debt - credit risk - related party (43,490) —

Foreign currency translation adjustment (13) 1

Comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders $ (1,007,703) $ (229,505)

Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common shareholders

Weighted average shares of common stock

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

58

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Shares Amount

Release of restricted stock units 1,707,292 — — — — —

Foreign currency translation adjustment — — — 1 — 1

Release of restricted stock units 2,052,963 — — — — —

Accretion of Preferred Stock - related party — — (278,330) — — (278,330)

Foreign currency translation adjustment — — — (13) — (13)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

59

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

December 31,

Cash flows from operating activities

Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities

Depreciation and amortization 7,899 9,751

Loss from write-down of property, plant and equipment 9,133 7,159

Amortization of right-of-use assets 1,233 1,023

Non-cash interest expense - related parties 19,499 36,903

(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment (68,478) 3,510

Change in fair value of debt - related party (33,823) —

Change in fair value of derivatives - related parties 405,388 (9,983)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Operating lease liabilities (1,448) (1,130)

Cash flows from investing activities

Purchases of intangible assets (34) (138)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment (33,152) (29,323)

Net cash used in investing activities (33,186) (29,461)

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds received from DOE Loan, net of fees paid to lender 66,614 —

Payment of debt issuance costs - related party (12,238) (1,116)

Payoff of Senior Secured Term Loan (19,946) —

Payment of debt issuance costs (5,905) (3,046)

Principal payments on finance lease obligations (99) (96)

60

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

December 31,

Repayment of equipment financing facility (3,326) (2,867)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock 14,089 92,916

Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants — 99,251

Payment of equity issuance costs — (5,003)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options 56 462

Proceeds from exercise of warrants 7,492 —

Effect of foreign exchange on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (17) 5

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 18,695 53,444

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year 84,667 31,223

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year $ 103,362 $ 84,667

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

Fixed assets acquired with finance lease — 125

Accrued and unpaid debt issuance costs 3,278 —

Accrued and unpaid capital expenditures 1,298 548

Accretion of preferred stock - related party 278,330 —

Issuance of common stock upon settlement of Yorkville Convertible Notes — 51,023

Supplemental disclosures

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

61

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Overview

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Eos”) designs, develops, manufactures, and markets innovative energy storage solutions for utility-scale, microgrid, and commercial & industrial (“C&I”) applications. Eos developed a broad range of intellectual property with multiple patents covering unique battery chemistry, mechanical product design, energy block configuration and a software operating system (Battery Management System). The Company has only one operating and reportable segment. See Note 22, Segment Reporting, for further discussion.

Liquidity and Going Concern

As a growth company in the early commercialization stage of its lifecycle, Eos is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties associated with the development of an enterprise. In this regard, substantially all of the Company’s efforts to date have been devoted to the development and manufacturing of battery energy storage systems and complementary products and services, recruitment of management and technical staff, deployment of capital to expand the Company’s operations to meet customer demand and raising capital to fund the Company’s development. However, as a result of these efforts, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception and expects to continue to incur such losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future until such time that the Company can reach a scale of profitability to sustain its operations.

In order to execute its development strategy, the Company has historically relied on outside capital through the issuance of equity, debt and borrowings under financing arrangements (collectively “outside capital”) to fund its cost structure. While the Company believes its recent entry into new credit facilities as discussed below has significantly improved its capital position and provides a path to sustainable operations and profitability, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to achieve such profitability or do so in a manner that does not require additional outside capital. Moreover, while the Company has historically been successful in raising outside capital, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to continue to obtain outside capital in the future or do so on terms that are acceptable to the Company.

As disclosed in Note 3, Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, on June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a financing transaction with CCM Denali Debt Holdings, LP, an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management LP (herein after referred to as “Cerberus”, “Denali”, “Lender”, “Holder”). As a result of this transaction, Cerberus agreed to provide a $210,500 secured multi-draw facility to be made in four installments (the “Delayed Draw Term Loan”) as well as a $105,000 revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”), to be made available beginning June 21, 2026, at Cerberus’ sole discretion and only if the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully funded. As of the issuance date, the Delayed Draw Term Loan was fully funded. As part of the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, Cerberus received warrants and preferred stock resulting in a 33% ownership position in the Company as of the issuance date. This ownership percentage represents $644,823 in market capitalization based on the February 27, 2025 closing share price of the Company’s common stock.

As disclosed in Note 13, Borrowings, on November 26, 2024, the Company successfully closed on the DOE Loan Facility, which provides the Company with up to $303,450 in funding, including capitalized interest, subject to the achievement of certain funding conditions. The DOE Loan Facility provides for a multi draw term loan facility under a series of at least two and, if the Company elects, up to four tranches, subject to the achievement of certain conditions, with each tranche corresponding to the production, maintenance and development, and operation of a given production line to be funded using the proceeds of such tranche. The DOE Loan Facility specifies the maximum amount subject to each tranche (Tranche 1: $101,979; Tranche 2: $117,326; Tranche 3: $71,836; and Tranche 4: $12,309), and any amounts which are not withdrawn under a specified tranche cannot be allocated to another tranche. Through December 31, 2024, the Company had drawn down $68,279 under Tranche 1.

As of the date the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements were issued (the “issuance date”), management evaluated the significance of the following negative financial conditions in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification 205-40, Going Concern:

62

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Overview (cont.)

•Since its inception, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash from operations in order to fund its development. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company incurred a net loss of $685,870. Adjustments to reconcile the net loss to cash used in operations are primarily from non-cash items on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The non-cash items totaled $549,174. The Company incurred negative cash flows from operations of $153,936 and had an accumulated deficit of $1,561,716 as of December 31, 2024.

•As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $74,292 of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents available to fund the Company’s operations, and working capital of $114,937, which includes loan commitment assets of $21,731 classified as current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

•On June 21, 2024, upon closing of the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, Cerberus funded the Company $75,000 of the initial draw, and the Company received $71,250, net of the 5.0% original issue discount. On August 29, 2024, Cerberus funded the Company $30,000 (“August Draw”), and the Company received $28,500, net of the 5.0% original issue discount. On November 1, 2024, Cerberus funded the Company $65,000 related to the October 31, 2024 tranche (“October Draw” or “October Tranche”), and the Company received $61,750, which is net of the 5.0% original issue discount. On January 24, 2025, Cerberus funded the Company the final $40,500 related to the January 31, 2025 tranche (“January 2025 Draw”). Subsequent to the January 2025 Draw, the Delayed Draw Term Loan has been fully funded.

•Through December 31, 2024, under the DOE Loan Facility, the Company drew down $68,279 for the eligible project cost that the Company had incurred through December 6, 2024. These costs are a portion of Tranche 1 of the DOE Loan Facility. Tranche 1 provides up to $101,979 for eligible costs in connection with the design, construction, installation, startup and shakedown of a battery automation line and related tools. In the event the Company does not achieve certain funding conditions and the DOE chooses not to continue funding, the Company would need to seek alternative sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

•The Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction and the DOE Loan Facility contain certain quarterly financial covenants, which include (a) Minimum Liquidity, (b) Minimum Consolidated EBITDA, and (c) Minimum Consolidated Revenue (collectively, the “financial covenants”). As of the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024, the only financial covenant in effect was Minimum Liquidity. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with this covenant, as well as all non-financial covenants and expects to remain in compliance with the Minimum Liquidity covenant over the next twelve month beyond the issuance date. The Minimum Consolidated EBITDA and Minimum Consolidated Revenue financial covenants are effective starting fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, the Company expects that it may be unable to remain in compliance with the Minimum Consolidated EBITDA and Minimum Consolidated Revenue financial covenant beginning December 31, 2025, absent the Company’s ability to secure a waiver or amend the Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction and the DOE Loan Facility. In the event the Company is unable to comply with the financial and non-financial covenants as of December 31, 2025, and the Company is unable to secure a waiver, Cerberus and DOE may, at their discretion, enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company and/or exercise any and all of their existing rights and remedies, which may include, among other things, asserting their rights in the Company’s assets securing the loans. Moreover, the Company’s other lenders may exercise similar rights and remedies under the cross-default provisions of their respective borrowing agreements with the Company.

•In the event the Company’s ongoing efforts to raise additional outside capital are unsuccessful, the Company will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due over the next twelve month beyond the issuance date. In such an event, management will be required to seek other strategic alternatives, which may include, among others, a significant curtailment in the Company’s operations, a sale of certain of the Company’s assets, a sale of the entire Company to strategic or financial investors and/or allowing the Company to become insolvent.

63

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Overview (cont.)

These uncertainties raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates that the Company will be able to realize assets and settle liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The Company follows accounting standards established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) to ensure consistent reporting of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. References to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) in these notes are to the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”) and related updates (“ASU”). The financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification of Prior Year Presentation

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. In the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Gross profit (loss) has been introduced, reflecting Total revenue less Cost of goods sold. This addition does not impact the reported Net loss.

Foreign Currency

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries use the local currency of their respective countries as their functional currency. The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The operating results of foreign operations are translated at weighted average exchange rates. The related translation gains or losses are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ deficit in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, which were insignificant for years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, are included as other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Allowance for Expected Credit Losses

The Company evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers. If the collection of any specific receivable is doubtful, an allowance is recorded in the allowance for expected credit losses. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the allowances for expected credit loss related to Accounts Receivable was $40 and $26, respectively. The Company also has an immaterial allowance related to its Notes Receivable, net, which is included in Other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

64

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Embedded derivatives

Some of our debt and preferred stock financings contain embedded features, such as conversion features and redemption features. The Company evaluates each agreement to determine whether the embedded feature requires bifurcation from the host instrument, in which case would require to be accounted for as a derivative liability. The Company uses valuation models to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivatives. The change in fair value of the embedded derivatives is presented separately on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Earnings (loss) Per Share

In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Preferred Series B is a participating security that does not have the obligation to share in the losses of the Company. Therefore, the more dilutive of the “if-converted” and “two-class” method must be applied when calculating EPS for the common shares. Management has elected to recognize changes in the redemption value of the Series B Preferred Stock. At each balance sheet date, the redemption value of the Series B Preferred Stock will be calculated, and if the redemption value is greater than the carrying value, the carrying value will be accreted to the redemption value. The accretion is recorded as a deemed dividend, which, in the absence of Retained earnings, reduces additional paid in capital and earnings available to common shareholders in computing basic and diluted EPS. Other potentially dilutive common shares and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating EPS on a diluted basis. See Note 21, Earnings Per Share for further information.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, notes receivable, contract assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, warrants, notes payable — related party, contract liabilities, and long-term debt.

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, contract assets, contract liabilities and accounts payable are considered to be representative of their fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Goodwill

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment each year using a qualitative or quantitative process that is performed at least annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate a likely reduction in the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

65

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Prior to performing a quantitative evaluation, an assessment of qualitative factors may be performed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying value. If it is determined that it is unlikely that the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the Company is not required to complete the quantitative goodwill impairment evaluation. If it is determined that the carrying value may exceed fair value when considering qualitative factors, a quantitative goodwill impairment evaluation is performed. When performing the quantitative evaluation, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference will be recorded.

The Company completed the annual goodwill impairment test as of November 30, 2024, using a qualitative assessment for the reporting unit. The Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than the carrying amount, and a quantitative goodwill impairment test was not necessary. As a result of the annual assessment, there were no impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. An assessment is performed to determine whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of any long-lived asset impairment is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which a long-lived assets impairment is determined by management.

Income Taxes and Deferred Taxes

The Company complies with the accounting and reporting requirements of FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes ("ASC 740"). Income taxes are computed under the asset and liability method reflecting both current and deferred taxes, which reflect the tax impact of all events included in the financial statements. The balance sheet approach (i) reflects a current tax liability or asset recognized for estimated taxes payable or refundable on tax returns for the current and prior years, (ii) reflects a deferred tax liability or asset recognized for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards, (iii) measures current and deferred tax liabilities and assets using the enacted tax rate of which the effects of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated, and (iv) reduces deferred tax assets, if necessary, by the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets only to the extent that management concludes these assets are more-likely-than-not to be realized. Significant judgement is required in assessing and estimating the more-likely-than-not tax consequences of the events included in the financial statements. Management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as income tax expense. The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process in which (i) management determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on the technical merits of the position and (ii) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.

Intangible Assets, net

Intangible assets are stated at their historical cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives.

Inventory

66

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company records inventory when it takes delivery and title to the product according to the terms of each supply contract.

The Company evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. A valuation allowance is recorded for inventories that management considers excess or obsolete. Management considers forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, competitiveness of product offerings, market conditions and product life cycles when determining excess and obsolescence and net realizable value adjustments. Once inventory is written down and a new cost basis is established, it is not written back up if demand increases.

Leases

The Company accounts for its leases under ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASC 842”). Under ASC 842, the right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The discount rate used to calculate the present value represents our collateralized incremental borrowing rate and is calculated based on the treasury yield curve that is commensurate with the term of each lease, and a spread representative of our borrowing costs. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Leases may be classified as either operating leases or finance leases. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are excluded from the scope of ROU assets and liabilities, as allowed by ASC 842.

The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components. The Company has elected the practical expedient to account for non-lease components as part of the lease component for all asset classes. The majority of the Company's lease agreements are real estate leases.

Property, Plant and Equipment, net

Equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the life of the lease. Maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred. Expenditures which significantly improve or extend the life of an asset are capitalized.

Construction in Progress

Included in property, plant, and equipment is construction in progress. Costs related to the design, development, and construction of large capital projects are accumulated in construction in progress until the project is complete. A construction project is considered substantially complete upon the cessation of construction and development activities. Once the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the asset's estimated useful life. A portion of construction in progress also includes capitalized interest. Interest costs incurred during construction of large capital projects are capitalized as construction in progress until the underlying asset is ready for its intended use, at which point the interest costs are amortized as depreciation expense over the life of the underlying asset. Interest is capitalized using a weighted average effective interest rate applicable to borrowings outstanding during the period to which it is applied.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred, which include materials, supplies, salaries, benefits and other costs related to research, development and testing of products.

67

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is earned from the sales, installation, and commissioning of BESS, the terms of which are dictated by supply agreements the Company enters into with its customers. Revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods and/or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised goods and/or services to the customer. As most contracts contain multiple goods or services delivered to the customer at different times, the transaction price is allocated to each good or service based on the relative standalone selling price and revenue is recognized when or as the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company uses either the expected cost-plus margin approach or adjusted market assessment approach to estimate the standalone selling prices of its goods and services.

Product Revenue

Product revenue is comprised of revenue from the BESS, along with other products, including marshalling cabinets, spare parts, transformers and inverters. It is recognized when control transfers, as determined by the specific terms outlined in each contract. If not specifically defined in the contract, the timing around the transfer of control is based on the shipping terms, which vary by contract, but are generally either Delivered-at-Place ("DAP") Destination or Exworks. Many of the Company’s contracts with customers contain some component of variable consideration. The Company estimates variable consideration, such as refunds, penalties including liquidated damages, and the customer’s right to return, using the expected value method, and adjusts transaction price for its estimate of variable consideration. We update our estimates of variable consideration and adjust the transaction price accordingly by recording an adjustment to net revenue and refund liability with respect to variable consideration such as penalties, refunds, and credits to customers. The Company has concluded that its estimation of variable consideration results in an adjustment to the transaction price such that it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur in the future.

Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold. Sales tax collected from customers are recorded on a net basis and therefore, not included in revenue. Sales tax is recorded as a liability (payable) until remitted to governmental authorities.

Service Revenue

Service revenue includes commissioning, installation and engineering, procurement and construction revenue. As the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Company’s performance, these performance obligations are satisfied over time. The Company uses an input method to measure progress towards satisfaction. If at any time management determines that in the case of a particular contract total costs will exceed total contract revenue, a provision for the entire anticipated contract loss is recorded at that time.

Warranty related revenue

In addition to a standard two-year limited warranty against defects, the Company offers customers the option to purchase an extended warranty, a maintenance and monitoring service and/or a performance guarantee. As the standard two-year limited warranty is classified as an assurance-type warranty, based on criteria set forth in ASC 606, it is not accounted for as a separate performance obligation. The extended warranty, maintenance and monitoring service warranty and performance guarantee, however, represent distinct services and are accounted for as separate performance obligations based on a time-lapsed measure of progress resulting in a ratable recognition of revenue over the respective performance period. For these performance obligations, at any time if management determines that in the case of a particular warranty that total costs will exceed total warranty revenue, a provision for the entire anticipated warranty loss is recorded at that time and included in warranty liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

68

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities

The Company recognizes contract assets for certain contracts in which revenue recognition performance obligations have been satisfied, however invoicing to the customer has not yet occurred. Contract liabilities primarily relate to consideration received from customers in advance of the Company’s satisfying performance obligations under contractual arrangements. Contract balances are reported in a net contract asset or liability position on a contract-by-contract basis at the end of each reporting period. Payment terms are generally aligned with meeting various contractual milestones, beginning with purchase order execution and extending through manufacturing release, ready to ship, delivery and commissioning.

Practical Expedients and Exemptions

As permitted by ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), the Company elected to use certain practical expedients.

•The Company treats costs associated with obtaining new contracts as expenses when incurred if the amortization period of the asset recognized by the Company is one year or less.

•The Company has elected to exclude sales and other similar taxes from the transaction price.

•If shipping and handling activities are performed after a customer obtains control of the good, the Company has elected to account for shipping and handling as activities to fulfil the promise to transfer the good. All elections are consistently applied to similar transactions.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company's stock-based compensation expense consists of:

•Stock options.

•Restricted stock units awards ("RSU").

•Performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSU”).

•Performance-based milestone awards ("Milestone PRSU").

Stock-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. For stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value. For RSUs and Milestone PRSUs, the Company uses the Company's stock price on date of grant to estimate fair value. For PRSUs, the fair value is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation in an option pricing framework.

The Company recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the award vesting period. Stock options generally have a term of five to ten years and vest over periods ranging from three months to two years. RSUs generally vest over periods from one to three years. PRSUs generally vest over two to three years. For PRSUs and Milestone PRSUs, stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis based on management’s estimation of achievement of performance conditions (see Note 18, Stock Based Compensation for further discussion). The Company recognizes forfeitures as incurred.

Warranty liability

Warranty obligations are incurred in connection with the sale of the Company’s products. Costs to provide for warranty obligations are estimated and recorded as a liability at the time of recording the sale. Warranty reserves include management’s best estimate of the projected costs to repair or to replace any items under warranty, which is based on various factors, including the use of actual claim data to date, results of lab testing, factory quality data, and field monitoring.

Series A and B Preferred Stock

As discussed in Note 3, Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction, the Company issued shares of (1) Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock (collectively "Series A Preferred Stock") in June 2024 and August 2024, respectively, which were subsequently converted into shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Series B-2

69

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Preferred Stock, respectively, in September 2024, and (2) Series B-3 Preferred Stock in November 2024 (collectively, with the Series B-1 Preferred Stock, Series B-2 Preferred Stock and Series B-3 Preferred Stock, the “Series B Preferred Stock” and together with Series A Preferred Stock, “the Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock is redeemable based upon the passage of time and therefore meets the criteria to be classified within temporary equity. Management has elected to recognize changes in the redemption value pursuant to ASC 480-10-S99-3A-15(b). As a result, the Company will remeasure the Preferred Stock to the maximum redemption value at each reporting date but will never be adjusted below its initial carrying value. Adjustments are reflected in Additional paid in capital on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Production Tax Credits under Internal Revenue Code 45X (“PTC”)

Since the PTC is a refundable credit (i.e., a credit with a direct-pay option available), the PTC is outside the scope of ASC 740. Therefore, the Company accounts for the PTC under a government grant model. GAAP does not address the accounting for government grants received by a business entity that are outside the scope of ASC 740. The Company’s accounting policy is to analogize to IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, under IFRS Accounting Standards. Under IAS 20, once it is reasonably assured that the entity will comply with the conditions of the grant, the grant money is recognized on a systematic basis over the periods in which the entity recognizes the related expenses or losses for which the grant money is intended to compensate. The Company recognizes grants once it is probable that both of the following conditions will be met: (1) the Company is eligible to receive the grant and (2) the Company is able to comply with the relevant conditions of the grant. The PTC is a non-monetary asset since the Company’s intention is to sell the tax credit to a third-party and is recorded at the value that is expected to be received from the sale in Grant Receivable, net on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and is subsequently recognized in Cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss when the inventory is sold. In the event the PTC is sold, upon the receipt of the cash payments, the Company will record offsets to Grant Receivable, net. Differences in the recorded value of the PTC and the sale price will be recognized as an adjustment to cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Fair Value Option

The Company has elected the option under ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments ("ASC 825"), to measure the Delayed Draw Term Loan, including all tranches of fundings received in 2024 (see Note 3, Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction) at fair value. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable unless a new election date occurs. When the fair value option is elected for an instrument, unrealized gains and losses for such instrument is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss at each subsequent reporting date. Upfront costs and fees related to items for which the fair value option is elected shall be recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred. These amounts are included in Other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The gains or losses attributable to changes in instrument-specific risk are included in Change in fair value of debt – credit risk in Accumulated other comprehensive Loss.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, Disclosure Agreements - Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. This amendment will impact various disclosure areas, including the statement of cash flows, accounting changes and error corrections, earnings per share, debt, equity, derivatives, and transfers of financial assets. The amendments in this ASU 2023-06 will be effective on the date the related disclosures are removed from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K by the SEC, and will no longer be effective if the SEC has not removed the applicable disclosure requirement by June 30, 2027. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact this amendment could have on its disclosures.

70

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”), which requires an entity, even one with only one reportable segment, to disclose significant segment expenses and other segment items on an annual and interim basis, and provide in interim periods all disclosures about a reportable segment’s profit or loss and assets that are currently required annually. Additionally, it requires an entity to disclose the title and position of the chief operating decision maker. ASU 2023-07 does not change how an entity identifies its operating segments, aggregates them or applies the quantitative thresholds to determine its reportable segments. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. Entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2023-07 retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 as of December 31, 2024. See Note 22, Segment Reporting for further discussion.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires additional disclosures related to the effective tax rate reconciliation and taxes paid. The amendment is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2024, and the Company does not anticipate a material change in the financial statements and related disclosure.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The amendments in this update require disaggregation of certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, though early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact this amendment could have on its financial statements and disclosures.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20): Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments. The amendments in this update clarify the requirements for determining whether certain settlements of convertible debt instruments should be accounted for as induced conversions rather than as debt extinguishments. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, including interim periods within those fiscal years, though early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact this amendment could have on its financial statements and disclosures.

There were no other accounting standards or updates during the year ended December 31, 2024 that had a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction

Credit and Guaranty Agreement (“Credit Agreement”)

Delayed Draw Term Loan

On June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a credit and guaranty agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with CCM Denali Debt Holdings, LP, an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management LP (herein after referred to as “Cerberus”, “Denali”, “Lender”, “Holder”). As a result of this transaction, Cerberus agreed to provide a $210,500 secured multi-draw facility to be made in four installments (“tranches”, and collectively, the (“Delayed Draw Term Loan” or “DDTL”) as well as a $105,000 revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”), to be made available at the Lenders’ sole discretion and only if the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully funded. On June 21, 2024, the initial $75,000 installment was funded (the “Initial Draw”). On August 29, 2024, the full amount of the August tranche of $30,000 was funded. On October 31, 2024, the full amount of the October tranche of $65,000 was funded. The loan commitment asset of $21,731on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 related to the January 31 tranche. Subsequently the January 31, 2025 tranche for the full $40,500 was funded, completing the scheduled fundings under the Delayed Draw Term Loan. See Note 23, Subsequent Events for further discussion.

71

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction (cont.)

On November 26, 2024, the Company amended the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement Amendment”), by and among the Company, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries as guarantors party thereto and the Lender, pursuant to which among other things, the applicability of the Consolidated Revenue and EBITDA financial covenants were deferred until December 31, 2025 and certain provisions were amended to conform with comparable provisions in the DOE Loan Facility. See Note 13, Borrowings, for further discussion.

Securities Purchase Agreement

On June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with CCM Denali Equity Holdings, LP (the “Purchaser”).

SPA Warrant

Under the SPA, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 43,276,194 shares of common stock representing a collective ownership of 19.9% (the “SPA Warrant”) of our outstanding shares of (inclusive of Series A-1 Preferred Stock – see below) common stock prior to the issuance. The SPA Warrant has a ten-year term and an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The SPA Warrant includes anti-dilutive rights, subject to certain excluded issuances, in the event any shares of common stock, options, warrants, convertible securities or other equity or equity equivalent securities payable in common stock are issued at a price per share of less than the fair market value (as defined in the Warrant) of a share of common stock on the issuance date of the Warrant, subject to adjustment. Until the Company received stockholder approval on September 10, 2024, the Company could not issue additional shares of common stock exceeding 19.99% of shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of the Initial Draw (such percentage, as may be adjusted in accordance with the terms of the Warrant, the “Conversion Cap”) upon exercise of the Warrant, and would have been required to issue, at the option of the Lender, Series A Preferred Stock or additional warrants on common stock upon a draw under the Delayed Draw Term Loan. Following shareholder approval received, the Conversion Cap increased to 49.9% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the applicable measurement date; and the holder of the Warrant has the option to amend the Conversion Cap to any percentage less than 49.9%.

The SPA Warrant is exercisable at the holder’s discretion for cash or on a cashless basis. The SPA Warrant is subject to automatic cashless exercise on the expiration date if the fair market value of one share is greater than the exercise price then in effect. Upon an acceleration under the Credit Agreement, the Company may be required to purchase the SPA Warrant from the holder at an amount equal to the closing sale price of underlying common stock less the SPA Warrant exercise price at the request of the holder. The SPA Warrant meets the criteria for liability classification under ASC 480 and is recognized at fair value with changes in fair value included in Change in fair value of derivatives - related parties in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Contingent Warrants

Upon the achievement of performance milestones on dates specified in the Credit Agreement, the Company received additional funds and issued at the option of the Lender, Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock, if prior to shareholder approval or Series B Preferred Stock if after shareholder approval) or warrants on common stock (collectively “Contingent Warrants”) under the SPA in an amount equal to the applicable percentage, up to an aggregate of 33.0% ownership limitation on a fully diluted basis at such time the Delayed Draw Term Loan is fully drawn. The applicable percentage is subject to increase by up to 8.0% to up to 41.0% on a fully diluted basis to the extent that milestones are not met on the final measurement date on April 30, 2025, in which case additional Contingent Warrants would be issuable. The Contingent Warrants meet the criteria for liability classification under ASC 480. As such, the Contingent Warrants are included in Warrants liability - related party on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of December 31, 2024. The change in fair value of the Contingent warrants is included in Change in fair value of derivatives - related parties on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. See Note 14, Warrants Liability, for further discussion of the SPA Warrant and Contingent Warrants.

72

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction (cont.)

Series A-1 Preferred Stock

On June 21, 2024, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware the Certificate of Designation of Series A-1 Non-Voting Non-Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A-1 Certificate of Designation” and the shares issuable thereunder, the “Series A-1 Preferred Stock”) and issued 59 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock to satisfy the terms of the Credit Agreement. Under the terms of the Series A-1 Certificate of Designation, each share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock had an original issue price of $455,822.59 (the “A-1 Original Issue Price”) and a liquidation value, payable with the common stock, as if such shares were convertible into an aggregate of 31,940,063 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment. The Series A-1 Preferred Stock was non-voting and non-convertible into common stock. Holders of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock were entitled to receive dividends or distributions on each share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock equal to dividends or distributions actually paid on each share of common stock, multiplied by the number of shares of common stock represented by the Series A-1 Preferred Stock Liquidation Value (as defined in the Series A-1 Certificate of Designation).

The 59 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock issued to Cerberus converted into shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock once stockholder approval was obtained on September 10, 2024. See Series B Preferred Stock discussion below.

Series A-2 Preferred Stock

On August 29, 2024, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware the Series A-2 Certificate of Designation (the “Series A-2 Certificate of Designation”) and the shares issuable thereunder, the “Series A-2 Preferred Stock”).

Under the terms of the Series A-2 Certificate of Designation, each share of Series A-2 Preferred Stock had an original issue price of $9,555,515.30 (the “A-2 Original Issue Price”) and a liquidation value, payable pari passu with the common stock, as if such share was convertible into an aggregate of 28,806,463 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment. The Series A-2 Preferred Stock was non-voting and non-convertible into common stock. Holders of the Series A-2 Preferred Stock were entitled to receive dividends or distributions on each share of Series A-2 Preferred Stock equal to dividends or distributions actually paid on each share of common stock, multiplied by the number of shares of common stock represented by the Series A-2 Preferred Stock Liquidation Value (as defined in the Series A-2 Certificate of Designation). The Series A-2 Preferred Stock terms were substantially identical to the Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

On August 29, 2024, in connection with the August Draw, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement between the Company and Cerberus, the applicable percentage increased by 4.9%, and as a result the Company issued to Cerberus 7 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock.

On September 12, 2024, the 7 shares of Series A-2 Preferred issued to Cerberus converted into shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock once stockholder approval was obtained. See Series B Preferred Stock discussion below.

Series B Preferred Stock

On September 11, 2024, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware the Certificate of Designation of Series B-1 Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-1 Certificate of Designation” and the shares issuable thereunder, the “Series B-1 Preferred Stock”) and the Certificate of Designation of Series B-2 Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-2 Certificate of Designation” and the shares issuable thereunder, the “Series B-2 Preferred Stock”).

On November 1, 2024, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware the Certificate of Designation of Series B-3 Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-3 Certificate of Designation” and the shares issuable thereunder, the “Series B-3 Preferred Stock”).

Each Series B Preferred Stock has a par value of $.0001 per share. The table below summarizes the Company’s outstanding Series B Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2024.

73

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction (cont.)

Conversion rights: The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion ratio of 1.0 million shares of common stock per share of Series B Preferred Stock (“Conversion Ratio”). The Conversion Ratio is subject to antidilution protection that is triggered if the Company issues equity for a price per share that is less than the conversion price then in effect, subject to certain exceptions.

Dividends: Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends or distributions on each share of Series B Preferred Stock equal to dividends or distributions actually paid on each share of common stock on an as-converted basis.

Appointment of Directors: At all times when the holders of the Preferred Stock beneficially own at least 10%, 15% or 30% of the capital stock of the Company, the Preferred Stock shareholders, exclusively and voting together as a separate class, will have the right to appoint a maximum of 1, 2 or 3 Directors to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), respectively. At all times when the holders of the Preferred Stock beneficially own at least 40% of the capital stock of the Company, the Preferred Stock shareholders, exclusively and voting together as a separate class, will have the right to nominate and designate a fourth director, who shall be designated by the Board or the nominating committee of the Board to a class of common directors and thereafter stand for election as a common director on the Board. The Preferred Stock shareholders will have the right to nominate a 4th director to the Board only if such appointment does not result in a change of control under any Company governing documents or violate any applicable laws, including requirements of the SEC and Nasdaq, and any such fourth director appointment shall be subject to and conditioned upon compliance by the holders of the Preferred Stock with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, including the submission of any required filings and the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting periods.

Preemptive rights: The Series B Certificates of Designation contain customary preemptive rights that permit the Holders of Series B Preferred Stock to participate in certain future equity offerings by the Company.

Rights to distributions upon liquidation of the Company: In the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive distribution of any of the assets or surplus funds of the Company pro rata with the holders of the common stock and any other holders of the preferred stock of the Company issued pursuant to the SPA and the Credit Agreement (the “Investor Preferred Stock”), including the Series B Preferred Stock, in an amount equal to such amount per share as would have been payable had all shares of Series B Preferred Stock been converted to common stock.

Protective provisions: The Company is prohibited from taking certain actions that could adversely affect the rights of the Preferred Stock without the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock until the later of (i) such time when the holders of Investor Preferred Stock shall no longer beneficially own at least 5% of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation and (ii) June 21, 2029, in the case of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock, August 29, 2029, in the case of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock, or November 1, 2029 in the case of the Series B-3 Preferred Stock.

74

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Credit and Securities Purchase Transaction (cont.)

Redemption Rights: At any time after June 21, 2029, in the case of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock, August 29, 2029, in the case of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock, or November 1, 2029 in the case of the Series B-3 Preferred Stock, the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock held by any holder become redeemable for cash at the redemption price. The redemption price will be an amount per share equal to the greater of (i) the B-1 Original Issue Price, the B-2 Original Issue Price, or the B-3 Original Issue Price, as applicable, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, up to and including the date of redemption and (ii) the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the applicable Series B Preferred Stock multiplied by the average of the closing sale price of the common stock for the five (5) business days immediately prior to the date of redemption plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, up to and including the date of redemption.

As of December 31, 2024, all then outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock were classified as mezzanine equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at its redemption value because it is probable of becoming redeemable. The Company recorded accretion of the Series B Preferred Stock, which reduces additional paid-in capital, on the Statements of Shareholders' Deficit.

Atlas Payoff Letter and Insurer Letter Agreement

On June 21, 2024 (the “Atlas Facility Termination Date”), the Company entered into a payoff letter agreement (the “Atlas Payoff Letter”), by and among the Company, ACP Post Oak Credit I LLC (“Atlas”) and the Atlas Lenders (as defined below) relating to the Company’s Senior Secured Term Loan (see Note 13, Borrowings), dated as of July 29, 2022 (the “Atlas Credit Agreement”), by and among the Company and Atlas, as lender, administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively with Atlas, the “Atlas Lenders”). Pursuant to the Atlas Payoff Letter, as of the Atlas Facility Termination Date, all outstanding obligations under the Atlas Credit Agreement and the related facility documents were deemed paid and satisfied in full and all security interests and other liens granted to or held by the Atlas Lenders were terminated and released. Under the Atlas Payoff Letter, the Company agreed to pay to the Atlas Lenders on the Atlas Facility Termination Date (a) approximately $11,900 (which was released from the interest escrow account maintained pursuant to the Atlas Credit Agreement, and (b) $8,000. Atlas also agreed, in lieu of amounts due from the Company, to receive a $1,000 participation in the Credit Agreement, as negotiated between Atlas and the Lender. The Company has no obligation under the participation agreement between Atlas and the Lender. The payoff of the Senior Secured Term Loan resulted in a restructuring gain. These amounts are included in Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. See Note 13, Borrowings, for further discussion.

In connection with the termination of the Atlas Credit Agreement, the Company entered into an insurer letter agreement, dated as of June 21, 2024 (the “Insurer Letter Agreement”), with the insurance companies that issued insurance policies to certain Atlas Lenders in connection with the Atlas Credit Agreement (the “Atlas Insurers”) pursuant to which the Company and the Atlas Insurers agreed that the Company will pay to the Atlas Insurers, subject to the terms and conditions of the Insurer Letter Agreement, $3,000 on December 31, 2024, and on June 30, 2025, subject to the absence of certain events of default under the Credit Agreement, an additional $4,000. The Company paid $3,000 in December 2024, and the remaining $4,000 is included in Accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

4. Revenue Recognition

The Company's revenues comprised of the following:

For the Years Ended December 31,

75

Table of Contents

EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

4. Revenue Recognition (cont.)

For the year ended December 31, 2024, we had two customers who accounted for 50.6% and 33.2% of the total revenue, as the Company focused on the transition to the new manufacturing line. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we had two customers who accounted for 49.9% and 45.2% of the total revenue.

Contract assets and Contract liabilities

The following table provides information about contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers. Contract assets, current, Contract liabilities, current and Contract liabilities, long-term are included separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and contract assets expected to be recognized in greater than twelve months are included under Other assets, net.

December 31,

Contract assets increased by $5,737 during the year ended December 31, 2024 due to recognition of revenues for which invoicing has not yet occurred.

The following table provides information about changes in Contract liabilities:

For the Years Ended December 31,

Contract liabilities, beginning of the period $ 6,610 $ 4,806

Amounts in beginning balance recognized in revenue (2,795) (3,525)

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2024-12-31, filed 2025-03-04 · accession 0001805077-25-000015

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 23 headings are on that chain and 16 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.