ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
The current outbreak of COVID-19, and the resulting volatility it has created, has disrupted our business and we expect that the COVID-19 pandemic, will significantly and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations going forward, and that other potential pandemics or outbreaks, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in the future. Further, the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business continuity issues of an unknown magnitude and duration.
Since being reported in December 2019, COVID-19 has spread globally, including to every state in the United States. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency with respect to COVID-19.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and COVID-19, any mutation thereof, and any future pandemic will continue to have repercussions across regional and global economies and financial markets. The global impact of the outbreak has been rapidly evolving and many countries, including the United States (including the states and cities that comprise the Washington metro region, where we own properties and have development sites), have at times also instituted quarantines, shelter-in-place rules, and restrictions on travel, the types of business that may continue to operate, and/or the types of construction projects that may continue. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic is negatively impacting most industries, both inside and outside the Washington metro region, directly or indirectly. Since the beginning of the pandemic, a number of our commercial tenants have announced temporary closures of their offices or stores and requested rent deferral or rent abatement. In addition, jurisdictions in the Washington metro region have implemented or may implement rent freezes or other similar restrictions. The full extent of the impact on our business is largely uncertain and dependent on a number of factors beyond our control, including a potential increase in the number of cases in the Washington metro region, as a result of this year's flu season or otherwise.
The COVID-19 outbreak has caused and continues to cause severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business continuity issues of an as yet unknown magnitude and duration. COVID-19 has disrupted our business and is expected to continue to have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial performance and condition, operating results and cash flows due to, among other factors:
•a decrease in real estate rental revenue (our primary source of operating cash flow), as a result of temporary rent increase freezes impacting new and renewal rental rates on multifamily properties, longer lease-up periods for both anticipated and unanticipated vacancies, including as a result of a shift from physical to virtual tours, lower revenue recognized as a result of the waiver of late fees and a reduction in parking revenue, as well as our tenants’ ability and willingness to pay rent, increased credit losses, and our ability to continue to collect rents, on a timely basis or at all (for example, 1% of contractual cash rents in our office portfolio, 3% of contractual cash rents in our retail portfolio and 1% of contractual cash rents in our multifamily portfolio were uncollected for the fourth quarter of 2020, as of January 31, 2021);
•a complete or partial closure of one or more of our properties resulting from government or tenant action (as of February 11, 2021, all of our commercial properties are operating on a limited basis pursuant to local government orders, except for essential businesses);
•reductions in demand for commercial space in the Washington metro region and the inability to provide physical tours of either our commercial and multifamily spaces may result in our inability to renew leases, re-lease space as leases expire, or lease vacant space, particularly without concessions, or a decline in rental rates on new leases, particularly at our retail assets;
•the inability of one or more major tenants or a significant number of smaller tenants to pay rent, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more major tenants or a significant number of smaller tenants, due to a downturn in their businesses or a weakening of financial condition related to the pandemic;
•the inability to decrease certain fixed expenses at our properties despite decreased operations at such properties;
12
•the inability of our third-party service providers to adequately perform their property management and/or leasing activities at our properties due to decreased on-site staff or other COVID-19-related challenges;
•difficulty accessing debt and equity capital on attractive terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets or deterioration in credit and financing conditions, which may affect our access to capital and our commercial tenants' ability to fund their business operations and meet their obligations to us;
•the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could negatively impact our future compliance with financial covenants of debt agreements;
•a decline in the market value of real estate in the Washington metro region may result in the carrying value of certain real estate assets exceeding their fair value, which may require us to recognize an impairment to those assets;
•future delays in the supply of products, services or liquidity may negatively impact our ability to complete the development, redevelopment, renovations and lease-up of our properties on schedule or for their original estimated cost;
•loss of cash balances that we periodically invest in a variety of short-term investments in order to preserve principal and maintain a high degree of liquidity while providing current income could result in a lower level of liquidity;
•a general decline in business activity and demand for real estate transactions could adversely affect our ability or desire to grow or change the complexion of our portfolio of properties;
•our insurance may not cover loss of revenue or other expenses resulting from the pandemic and related shelter-in-place rules;
•unanticipated costs and operating expenses and decreased anticipated and actual revenue related to compliance with regulations, such as additional expenses related to staff working remotely, requirements to provide employees with additional mandatory paid time off and increased expenses related to sanitation measures performed at each of our properties, as well as additional expenses incurred to protect the welfare of our employees, such as expanded access to health services;
•the potential for our employees, particularly our key personnel and property management teams, to become sick with COVID-19 which could adversely affect our business;
•the increased vulnerability to cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions while employees are working remotely has the potential to disrupt our operations or cause material harm to our financial condition; and
•complying with REIT requirements during a period of reduced cash flow could cause us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments or borrow funds on unfavorable conditions.
The significance, extent and duration of the impact of COVID-19 remains largely uncertain and dependent on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time, such as a potential increase in cases in the Washington metro region, the continued severity, duration, transmission rate and geographic spread of COVID-19, the extent and effectiveness of the containment measures taken, the timing, effectiveness and availability of vaccines, and the response of the overall economy, the financial markets and the population, particularly in the Washington metro region, once the current containment measures are lifted.
The ongoing volatility of this situation may limit our ability to make predictions as to the ultimate adverse impact of COVID-19 on us. As a result, we cannot provide an estimate of the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business or when, or if, we will be able to resume normal operations. Nevertheless, COVID-19 presents material uncertainty and risk with respect to our business, financial performance and condition, operating results and cash flows.
Risks Related to our Business and Operations
Our performance and value are subject to risks associated with our real estate assets and with the real estate industry, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
Our financial performance and the value of our real estate assets are subject to the risk that our properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures, which could cause our cash flow and ability to make distributions to our shareholders to be adversely affected. The following factors, among others, may adversely affect the cash flow generated by our multifamily and commercial properties:
•declines in the financial condition of our tenants;
•significant job losses in the professional/business services industries or government;
•competition from similar asset class properties;
•local real estate market conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand for multifamily and commercial properties; and
•civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters, terrorist acts or acts of war.
13
Additionally, complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forgo and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amount available for distribution to shareholders. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make, or, in certain cases, maintain ownership of, certain attractive investments.
We may also face potential adverse effects from bankruptcies or insolvencies of major tenants and could face potential difficulties in leasing or re-leasing such tenants' associated space.
Lastly, in addition, a significant economic downturn over a period of time could result in an event or change in circumstances that results in an impairment in the value of our properties. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable over its expected holding period and exceeds its fair value.
Any of these events could affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
We are dependent upon the economic and regulatory climate of the Washington metro region, which may impact our profitability and may limit our ability to meet our financial obligations when due and/or make distributions to our shareholders.
All of the properties in our portfolio are located in the Washington metro region and such concentration may expose us to a greater amount of market dependent risk than if we were geographically diverse. General economic conditions and local real estate conditions in the Washington metro region are dependent upon various industries that are predominant in our area (such as government and professional/business services). A downturn in one or more of these industries may have a particularly strong effect on the economic climate of our region. Additionally, we are susceptible to adverse developments in the Washington, D.C. regulatory environment, such as increases in real estate and other taxes, the costs of complying with governmental regulations or increased regulations and actual or threatened reductions in federal government spending and/or changes to the timing of government spending, as has occurred during federal government shutdowns. In the event of negative economic and/or regulatory changes in our region, we may experience a negative impact to our profitability and may be limited in our ability to meet our financial obligations when due and/or make distributions to our shareholders.
The composition of our portfolio by asset class may change over time, which could expose us to different asset class risks than if our portfolio composition remained static.
We own multifamily and commercial assets, with multifamily and office representing approximately 94% of our net operating income for the year ended December 31, 2020, and approximately 93% of our portfolio based on square footage as of December 31, 2020. If the composition of our portfolio changes, then we would become more exposed to the risks and markets of other asset classes. If we are successful in executing the strategic capital allocation plan, then we will become more exposed to the risks of the multifamily and office markets, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may be adversely affected by any significant reductions in federal government spending or actual or threatened changes to the timing of federal government spending, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
As a REIT focused on the Washington metro region, a significant portion of our properties is occupied by tenants that directly or indirectly serve the U. S. Government as federal contractors or otherwise. A significant reduction in federal government spending, particularly a sudden decrease due to a sequestration process or due to extended uncertainty in the political climate in a way that affects the federal appropriations process by decreasing, delaying or making uncertain the results, stability and timing of federal appropriations, could adversely affect the ability of these tenants to fulfill lease obligations or decrease the likelihood that they will renew their leases with us. Further, economic conditions in the Washington metro region are significantly dependent upon the level of federal government spending in the region as a whole. In the event of an actual or anticipated significant reduction in federal government spending or change in the timing of federal government spending, there could be negative economic changes in our region, which could adversely impact the ability of our tenants to meet their financial obligations under our leases or the likelihood of their lease renewals. As a result, if such a reduction in federal government spending or actual or threatened change to the timing of federal government spending were to occur or be anticipated for an extended period, we could experience an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
14
We face potential difficulties or delays renewing leases or re-leasing space, and as a result, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2020, the percentage of leased square footage of our commercial properties scheduled to expire is as set forth in the lease expiration tables on page 8, with a total of 26% and 27% of our office and retail leases scheduled to expire in the two years following December 31, 2020. Multifamily properties are leased under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less. For each the three years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the multifamily tenant retention rate was 54%, 55%, and 55%, respectively.
Difficulties or delays renewing leases or releasing space, including as a result of our inability to provide physical tours of either our commercial and multifamily spaces as a result of COVID-19, could impact our financial condition and ability to make distributions to our shareholders. We derive substantially all of our income from rent received from tenants. If our tenants decide not to renew their leases, we may face delays or difficulties re-leasing the space. If tenants decide to renew their leases, the terms of renewals, including the cost of required improvement allowances or concessions, may be less favorable to WashREIT than current lease terms. If the rental rates of our properties decrease, our existing tenants do not renew their leases (refer to the list of our ten largest tenants as of December 31, 2020 in "Part I - Item 1. Business", which collectively represented 12% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020) or we do not re-lease a significant portion of our available and soon-to-be-available space, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
Occupancy levels and market rents at our multifamily properties could be negatively affected by competition with other housing alternatives and various political, economic and market conditions, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Our multifamily properties compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including owner occupied single and multifamily homes. Occupancy levels and market rents may be adversely affected by national and local political, economic and market conditions including, without limitation, migration to areas outside of major metropolitan areas like the Washington metro region, where our portfolio is concentrated, new construction and excess inventory of multifamily and owned housing/condominiums, increasing portions of owned housing/condominium stock being converted to rental use, rental housing subsidized by the government, other government programs that favor single family rental housing or owner occupied housing over multifamily rental housing, governmental regulations, slow or negative employment growth and household formation, the availability of low-interest mortgages or the availability of mortgages requiring little or no down payment for single family home buyers, changes in social preferences and the potential for geopolitical instability, all of which are beyond our control. Finally, the federal government’s policies, many of which may encourage home ownership, can increase competition and could possibly limit our ability to raise rents in our markets and therefore lower the value of our properties. Competitive housing in a particular area and increased affordability of owner occupied single and multifamily homes could adversely affect our ability to retain our current residents, attract new ones or increase or maintain rents, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Real estate investments are illiquid, and we may not be able to sell our properties on a timely basis when we determine it is appropriate to do so, which could negatively impact our profitability.
Real estate investments can be difficult to sell and convert to cash quickly, especially if market conditions are not favorable. Such illiquidity could limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio of properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Moreover, the REIT tax laws require that we hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer property sales that otherwise would be in our best interest. Due to these factors, we may be unable to sell a property at an advantageous time or on the terms anticipated which could negatively impact our profitability.
Rent control or rent stabilization legislation and other regulatory restrictions may limit our ability to increase rents and pass through new or increased operating costs to our tenants.
Certain states and municipalities, including Washington, D.C., have adopted laws and regulations imposing restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases or have imposed regulations relating to low- and moderate-income housing. Such laws and regulations limit our ability to charge market rents, increase rents, evict tenants or recover increases in our operating expenses at our residential properties and could make it more difficult for us to dispose of properties in certain circumstances. Similarly, compliance procedures associated with rent control statutes and low- and moderate-income housing regulations could have a negative impact on our operating costs, and any failure to comply with low- and moderate-income housing regulations could
15
result in the loss of certain tax benefits and the forfeiture of rent payments. In addition, such low- and moderate-income housing regulations often require us to rent a certain number of units at below-market rents, which has a negative impact on our ability to increase cash flows from our residential properties subject to such regulations. Furthermore, such regulations may negatively impact our ability to attract higher-paying tenants to such properties. As of December 31, 2020, two of our residential properties were subject to such regulations.
We face risks associated with property development/redevelopment, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
We may, from time to time, engage in development and redevelopment activities, some of which may be significant. Developing or redeveloping properties presents a number of risks for us, including risks relating to necessary permitting, risks relating to development and construction costs and/or permanent financing, risks relating to completing the project on schedule, or at all, and risks related to occupancy rates at the completed property.
Properties developed or acquired for development may generate little or no cash flow from the date of acquisition through the date of completion of development. In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether or not they are ultimately successful, may require a substantial portion of management’s time and attention.
These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken. The materialization of any of the foregoing risks could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
We face risks associated with property acquisitions.
We may acquire properties which would increase our size and could alter our capital structure. In addition, our acquisition activities and results may be exposed to the following risks:
•we may have difficulty finding properties that are consistent with our strategies and that meet our standards;
•we may have difficulty negotiating with new or existing tenants;
•we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms or at all;
•the occupancy levels, lease-up timing and rental rates of acquired properties may not meet our expectations;
•even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, we may be unable to complete that acquisition after making a non-refundable deposit and incurring certain other acquisition-related costs;
•we may be unable to acquire a desired property at all or at the desired purchase price because of competition from other real estate investors, including publicly traded real estate investment trusts, institutional investment funds and private investors;
•the timing of property acquisitions may lag the timing of property dispositions, leading to periods of time where projects' proceeds are not invested as profitably as we desire;
•we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations;
•we may assume liabilities for undisclosed environmental contamination;
•our estimates of capital expenditures required for an acquired property, including the costs of repositioning or redeveloping, may be inaccurate and the acquired properties may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investments; and
•we could experience a decline in value of the acquired assets after acquisition.
We may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without recourse, or with limited recourse with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if liability were asserted against us based upon the acquisition of a property, we may have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow.
We face risks associated with third-party service providers, which could negatively impact our profitability.
We enter into arrangements from time to time by which various service providers conduct day-to-day property management and/or leasing activities at our properties. Currently, all of our multifamily properties are managed by third-party service providers. Failure of such service providers to adequately perform their contracted services could negatively impact our ability to retain tenants or lease vacant space. As a result, any such failure could negatively impact our profitability.
16
Climate change and regulation regarding climate change in the Washington metro region may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, per share market price of our common shares and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders.
Climate change (including rising sea levels, flooding, extreme weather, and changes in precipitation and temperature), may result in physical damage to, a decrease in demand for and/or a decrease in rent from and value of our properties located in the areas affected by these conditions. Additionally, our insurance premiums may increase as a result of the threat of climate change or the effects of climate change may not be covered by our insurance policies.
Changes in federal and state legislation and regulations on climate change could result in utility expenses and/or capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties or other related aspects of our properties in order to comply with such regulations or otherwise adapt to climate change. The District of Columbia, Arlington County, Virginia, Fairfax County, Virginia, and Montgomery County, Maryland, each have made formal public commitments to carbon reduction. To enforce this commitment, the Washington, D.C. City Council passed the DC Clean Energy Omnibus bill. The bill requires that all electricity purchased in the District be renewable by 2032 and sets a building energy performance standard requiring certain buildings to meet certain minimum energy efficiency standards. Under the District of Columbia’s Building Energy Performance Standards, all existing buildings over 50,000 square feet will be required to reach minimum levels of energy efficiency or deliver savings by 2026, with progressively smaller buildings phasing into compliance over the following years. This regulation may require unplanned capital improvements, and increased engagement to manage occupant energy use, which is a large driver of building performance. If our properties cannot meet performance standards, they risk fines for non-compliance, as well as a decrease in demand and a decline in value. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, per share market price of our common shares and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
Some potential losses are not covered by insurance, which could adversely affect our financial condition or cash flow.
We carry insurance coverage on our properties of types and in amounts that we believe are in line with coverage customarily obtained by owners of similar properties. We believe all of our properties are adequately insured. The property insurance that we maintain for our properties has historically been on an “all risk” basis, which is in full force and effect until renewal in March 2021 for our Assembly portfolio and August 2021 for all other properties. There are other types of losses, such as from wars or catastrophic events, for which we cannot obtain insurance at all or at a reasonable cost.
We have an insurance policy that has no terrorism exclusion, except for non-certified nuclear, chemical and biological acts of terrorism. Our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts.
Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. Such losses may not be fully insured. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such projects. Any such uninsured loss could adversely affect our financial condition or cash flow.
In the event of an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insurance limits, we could lose both the revenues generated from the affected property and the capital we have invested in the affected property. Depending on the specific circumstances of the affected property it is possible that we could be liable for any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could adversely affect our business and financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, any material increase in insurance rates or decrease in available coverage in the future could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Actual or threatened terrorist attacks may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.
All of the properties in our portfolio are located in or near Washington, D.C., a metropolitan area that has been and may in the future be the target of actual or threatened terrorism attacks. As a result, some tenants in our market may choose to relocate their businesses to other markets. This could result in an overall decrease in the demand for commercial space in this market generally, which could increase vacancies in our properties or necessitate that we lease our properties on less favorable terms, or both. In addition, future terrorist attacks in or near Washington, D.C. could directly or indirectly damage such properties, both physically and financially, or cause losses that materially exceed our insurance coverage. As a result of the foregoing, our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties could decline materially which would negatively affect our results of operations.
17
Certain federal, state and local laws and regulations may cause us to incur substantial costs or subject us to potential liabilities.
We are subject to certain compliance costs and potential liabilities under various U.S. federal, state and local environmental, health, safety and zoning laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern our and our tenants’ operations including with respect to air emissions, wastewater disposal, and the use, storage and disposal of hazardous and toxic substances and petroleum products, including in storage tanks that power emergency generators. If we fail to comply with such laws, including if we fail to obtain any required permits or licenses, we could face substantial fines or possible revocation of our authority to conduct some of our operations.
In addition, various environmental laws impose liability on a current or former owner or operator of real property for investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products at our currently or formerly owned or leased real property, regardless of whether or not we knew of, or caused, the presence or release of such substances. Liability under these laws may be joint and several, meaning that we could be required to bear 100% of the liability even if other parties are also liable. From time to time, we may be required to remediate such substances or remove, abate or manage asbestos, mold, radon gas, lead or other hazardous conditions at our properties. The presence or release of such toxic or hazardous substances or petroleum products at our currently owned or leased properties could result in limitations on or interruptions to our operations, and releases at our currently or formerly owned or leased properties could result in in third-party claims for bodily injury, property or natural resource damages, or other losses, including liens in favor of the government for costs the government incurs in cleaning up contamination. In addition, we also may be liable for the costs of remediating contamination at off-site waste disposal facilities to which we have arranged for the disposal, or treatment of hazardous substances without regard to whether we complied with environmental laws in doing so. It is our policy to retain independent environmental consultants to conduct Phase I environmental site assessments and asbestos surveys prior to our acquisition of properties. However, there is a risk that these assessments will not identify all potential environmental issues at a given property. Moreover, environmental, health and safety requirements have become increasingly stringent, and our costs may increase as a result. New or revised laws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, such as those related to climate change, could affect the operation of our properties or result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on our properties or adversely affect our ability to sell properties or to use properties as collateral.
We may also incur significant costs complying with other regulations. In addition, failure of our properties to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) could result in injunctive relief, fines, an award of damages to private litigants or mandated capital expenditures to remedy such noncompliance. Any imposition of injunctive relief, fines, damage awards or capital expenditures could adversely impact our business or results of operations. Our properties are subject to various other federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fair housing, rent control and fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with the requirements of the ADA or other federal, state and local regulations, we could be subject to fines, penalties, injunctive action, reputational harm and other business effects which could materially and negatively affect our performance and results of operations.
We face cybersecurity risks which have the potential to disrupt our operations, cause material harm to our financial condition, result in misappropriation of assets, compromise confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and can provide no assurance that the steps we and our service providers take in response to these risks will be effective.
We face cybersecurity risks, such as cyber-attacks, malware, social engineering, phishing schemes or bad actors inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, or another cyber-attack, including by computer hackers, nation-state affiliated actors, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks around the world have increased. These incidents may result in disruption of our operations, material harm to our financial condition, cash flows and the market price of our common shares, misappropriation of assets, compromise or corruption of confidential information collected in the course of conducting our business, liability for stolen information or assets, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, regulatory enforcement, litigation and damage to our stakeholder relationships. These risks require increasing resources from us to analyze and mitigate, and there is no assurance that our efforts will be effective. Additionally, we rely on third-party service providers in our conduct of our business and we can provide no assurance that the security measures of those providers will be effective.
In the normal course of business, we and our service providers collect and retain certain personal information provided by our tenants, employees and vendors. We can provide no assurance that our data security measures will be able to prevent unauthorized access to this personal information. In addition to the risks discussed above related to a breach of confidential information, a breach of personal information may result in regulatory fines and orders, obligations to notify individuals or litigation risks.
18
Risks Related to Financing
We face risks associated with the use of debt, including refinancing risk.
We rely on borrowings under our credit facility, mortgage notes, and debt securities to finance acquisitions and development activities and for general corporate purposes. In the past, the commercial real estate debt markets have experienced significant volatility due to a number of factors, including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the reported significant inventory of unsold mortgage-backed securities in the market. The volatility resulted in investors decreasing the availability of debt financing as well as increasing the cost of debt financing. These conditions, which increase the cost and reduce availability of debt, may continue to worsen in the future. Circumstances could again arise in which we may not be able to obtain debt financing in the future on favorable terms, or at all. If we were unable to borrow under our credit facility or to refinance existing debt financing, our financial condition and results of operations would likely be adversely affected. Similarly, global equity markets have experienced significant price volatility and liquidity disruptions in recent years, and similar circumstances could significantly and negatively impact liquidity in the financial market in the future. Any disruption could negatively impact our ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms or at all.
We anticipate that only a small portion of the principal of our debt will be repaid prior to maturity. Therefore, we are likely to need to refinance a significant portion of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or repaid with proceeds from other sources, such as new equity capital, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay all maturing debt in years when significant “balloon” payments come due. In addition, we may rely on debt to fund a portion of our new investments such as our acquisition and development activity. There is a risk that we may be unable to finance these activities on favorable terms or at all. The materialization of any of the foregoing risks would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our degree of leverage could limit our ability to obtain additional financing, affect the market price of our common shares or debt securities or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.
On February 11, 2021, our total consolidated debt was approximately $1.0 billion. Using the closing share price of $23.53 per share of our common shares on February 11, 2021, multiplied by the number of our common shares, our consolidated debt to total consolidated market capitalization ratio was approximately 34% as of February 11, 2021.
Our degree of leverage could affect our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. Our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by two major rating agencies. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain this rating, and in the event our senior debt is downgraded from its current rating, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and/or difficulty in obtaining additional financing. Our degree of leverage could also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally. There is a risk that changes in our debt to market capitalization ratio, which is in part a function of our share price, or our ratio of indebtedness to other measures of asset value used by financial analysts, may have an adverse effect on the market price of our equity or debt securities.
Additionally, payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our properties, fully implement our capital expenditure, acquisition and redevelopment activities, or meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code.
Failure to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share market price of our common shares and ability to make distributions to our shareholders and agreements we enter into to protect us from rising interest rates expose us to counterparty risk.
We enter into hedging transactions to protect ourselves from the effects of interest rate fluctuations on variable rate debt. Our hedging transactions include entering into agreements such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate exchange contracts. These agreements involve risks, such as the risk that such arrangements would not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes or that a court could rule that such an agreement is not legally enforceable. In addition, interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common shares and ability to make distributions to our shareholders. While such agreements are intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they could also expose us to the risk that the other parties to the agreements would not perform, and that the hedging arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code may limit use of certain hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous or
19
push us to implement those hedges through a TRS, which would increase the cost of our hedging activities. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations. Should we desire to terminate a hedging agreement, there could be significant costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligation under the hedging agreement.
The future of the reference rate used in our existing floating rate debt instruments and hedging arrangements is uncertain, which could hinder our ability to maintain effective hedges and could adversely impact our business operations and financial results.
Our floating-rate debt and certain hedging transactions determine the applicable interest rate or payment amount by reference to a benchmark rate, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), or to another financial metric. Our existing hedging arrangements currently use LIBOR as a reference rate, as calculated for U.S. dollar (“USD-LIBOR”). As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $250.0 million of debt outstanding that was indexed to LIBOR.
In July 2017, the United Kingdom regulator that oversees LIBOR announced its intention to phase out LIBOR rates by the end of 2021, indicating that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. In April 2018, the New York Federal Reserve commenced publishing an alternative reference rate to LIBOR, as calculated for the U.S. dollar (“USD-LIBOR”), the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), proposed by a group of major market participants convened by the U.S. Federal Reserve with participation by SEC Staff and other regulators. In October 2020, after a number of industry consultations, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association published a LIBOR transition protocol.
We can provide no assurance regarding the future of LIBOR, whether our current hedging arrangements will continue to use USD-LIBOR as a reference rate or whether any reliance on such rate will be appropriate. Confusion as to the relevant benchmark reference rate for our hedging instruments could hinder our ability to establish effective hedges.
Despite progress made to date by regulators and industry participants to prepare for the anticipated discontinuation of LIBOR, significant uncertainties still remain. Such uncertainties relate to, for example, whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark rate, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR (various characteristics of SOFR make it uncertain whether it would be viewed by market participants as an appropriate alternative to USD-LIBOR for certain purposes), how any replacement would be implemented across the industry, and the effect any changes in industry views or movement to alternative benchmarks would have on the markets for LIBOR-linked financial instruments.
We can provide no assurance regarding the future of LIBOR and when our current floating rate debt instruments and hedging arrangements will transition from LIBOR as a reference rate to SOFR (in the case of our floating rate debt instruments and hedging arrangements that determine the applicable interest rate or payment amount by reference to LIBOR-USD as a reference rate) or another reference rate. The discontinuation of a benchmark rate or other financial metric, changes in a benchmark rate or other financial metric, or changes in market perceptions of the acceptability of a benchmark rate or other financial metric, including LIBOR, could, among other things result in increased interest payments, changes to our risk exposures, or require renegotiation of previous transactions. In addition, any such discontinuation or changes, whether actual or anticipated, could result in market volatility, adverse tax or accounting effects, increased compliance, legal and operational costs, and risks associated with contract negotiations. In addition, confusion related to the transition from USD-LIBOR to SOFR or another replacement reference rate for our floating debt and hedging instruments could have an uncertain economic effect on these instruments, hinder our ability to establish effective hedges and result in a different economic value over time for these instruments than they otherwise would have had under USD-LIBOR.
Covenants in our debt agreements could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our credit facility and other debt instruments contains customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness. We must maintain certain ratios, including a maximum of total indebtedness to total asset value, a maximum of secured indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum of quarterly adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges, a minimum net operating income from unencumbered properties to unsecured interest expense, a maximum of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value and a minimum of total unencumbered assets to total unsecured indebtedness. Our ability to borrow under our credit facility is subject to compliance with our financial and other covenants.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured credit facility or other debt instruments (including our indenture and our notes purchase agreement) could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. If we fail to comply with the covenants in our unsecured credit facility or other debt instruments, other sources of capital may not be
20
available to us or be available only on unattractive terms. In addition, if we breach covenants in our debt agreements, the lenders can declare a default and, if the debt is secured, take possession of the property securing the defaulted loan.
Any default or cross-default events could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and/or prohibit future borrowings, either of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Our charter and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change in control of WashREIT, even if such a change in control may be in the best interest of our shareholders, and as a result may depress the market price of our common shares.
Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law ("MGCL") may limit a change in control which could prevent holders of our common shares from profiting as a result of such change in control. These provisions include:
•a provision where a corporation is not permitted to engage in any business combination with any “interested stockholder,” defined as any holder or affiliate of any holder of 10% or more of the corporation’s stock, for a period of five years after that holder becomes an “interested stockholder,” and
•a provision where the voting rights of “control shares” acquired in a “control share acquisition,” as defined in the MGCL, may be restricted, such that the “control shares” have no voting rights, except to the extent approved by a vote of holders of two-thirds of the common shares entitled to vote on the matter.
Our bylaws currently provide that the foregoing provision regarding "control share acquisitions" will not apply to WashREIT. However, our board of trustees could, in the future, modify our bylaws such that the foregoing provision regarding "control share acquisitions" would be applicable to WashREIT.
Additionally, Title 8, Subtitle 3 of the MGCL permits our board of trustees, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our declaration of trust or bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us under the circumstances that otherwise could provide our common shareholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price.
The stock ownership limits imposed by the Code for REITs and imposed by our charter may restrict our business combination opportunities that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
The ownership of our shares must be restricted in several ways in order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code. Our charter provides that no person (other than an excepted holder, as defined in our charter) may actually or constructively own more than 9.8% of the aggregate of our outstanding common shares by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, or 9.8% of the aggregate of the equity shares by value.
Our board of trustees has the authority under our charter to reduce these share ownership limits. Our board of trustees may, in its sole discretion, grant exemptions to the share ownership limits, subject to such conditions and the receipt by our board of trustees of certain representations and undertakings to ensure that our REIT qualification is not adversely affected. In addition to 9.8% (or any lower future percentage) share ownership limits, our charter also prohibits any person from (a) beneficially or constructively owning, as determined by applying certain attribution rules of the Code, our equity shares that would result in us being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code (regardless of whether the interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or that would otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT, or (b) transferring equity shares if such transfer would result in our equity shares being owned by fewer than 100 persons.
The share ownership limits contained in our charter are based on the ownership at any time by any “person,” which term includes entities and certain groups. The share ownership limitations in our charter are common in REIT charters and are intended to provide added assurance of compliance with the tax law requirements. However, the share ownership limits on our shares and our enforcement of them might delay, defer, prevent, or otherwise inhibit a transaction or a change in control of WashREIT, including a transaction that might involve a premium price for our common shares or that might otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
21
Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our trustees and officers are limited, which could limit your recourse in the event of actions that you do not believe are in your best interests.
Maryland law provides that a trustee has no liability in that capacity if he or she satisfies his or her duties to us and our shareholders. Under current Maryland law, our trustees and officers will not have any liability to us or our shareholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from:
•actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or
•a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the trustee or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated.
In addition, our charter authorizes and our bylaws require us to indemnify our trustees for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Our bylaws also authorize us to indemnify our officers for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our trustees and officers than might otherwise exist. Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any of our trustees or officers impede the performance of WashREIT, your ability to recover damages from such trustees or officers will be limited with respect to trustees and may be limited with respect to officers. In addition, we will be obligated to advance the defense costs incurred by our trustees and our executive officers, and may, in the discretion of our board of trustees, advance the defense costs incurred by our officers, our employees and other agents, in connection with legal proceedings.
Risks Related to Our Common Shares
We cannot assure you we will continue to pay dividends at current rates and the failure to do so could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.
Cash flows from operations are an important factor in our ability to sustain our dividend at its current rate. If our cash flows from operations were to decline significantly, we may have to borrow on our lines of credit to sustain the dividend rate or reduce our dividend. Our ability to continue to pay dividends on our common shares at their current rate or to increase our common share dividend rate will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, our future financial condition and results of operations and the terms of our debt covenants.
Our board of trustees considers, among other factors, trends in our levels of funds from operations, together with associated recurring capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and incentives, and adjustments to straight-line rents to reflect cash rents received. If some or all of these factors were to trend downward for a sustained period of time, our board of trustees could determine to reduce our dividend rate. If we do not maintain or increase the dividend rate on our common shares in the future, it could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.
Additionally, the market value of our securities can be adversely affected by many factors, including certain factors related to our REIT status.
The market value of our securities can be adversely affected by many factors.
As with any public company, a number of factors may adversely influence the public market price of our common shares. These factors include:
•level of institutional interest in us;
•perceived attractiveness of investment in us, in comparison to other REITs;
•perceived attractiveness of the Washington metro region, particularly if investors have a negative sentiment about the impact of election results on the region's economy;
•attractiveness of securities of REITs in comparison to other asset classes taking into account, among other things, that a substantial portion of REITs’ dividends may be taxed as ordinary income;
•our financial condition and performance;
•the market’s perception of our growth potential and potential future cash dividends;
•investor confidence in the stock and bond markets generally;
•national economic conditions and general stock and bond market conditions;
•government uncertainty, action or regulation;
•increases in market interest rates, which may lead investors to expect a higher annual yield from our distributions in relation to the price of our shares;
22
•uncertainty around and changes in U.S. federal tax laws;
•changes in our credit ratings; and
•any negative change in the level of our dividend or the partial payment thereof in common shares.
Risks Related to our Status as a REIT
The loss of our tax status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our common shares.
We believe that we qualify as a REIT and intend to continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, our charter provides that our board of trustees may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we are qualified as a REIT, or that we will remain qualified as a REIT in the future. This is because qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code which include:
•maintaining ownership of specified minimum levels of real estate-related assets;
•generating specified minimum levels of real estate-related income;
•maintaining certain diversity of ownership requirements with respect to our shares; and
•distributing at least 90% of our "REIT taxable income" (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains) on an annual basis.
Only limited judicial and administrative interpretations of the REIT rules exist. In addition, qualification as a REIT involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we could face serious tax consequences that could substantially reduce our funds available for payment of dividends for each of the years involved because:
•we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate, without any deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income, and possibly increased state and local taxes; and
•unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.
This treatment would reduce net earnings available for investment or distribution to shareholders because of the additional tax liability for the year (or years) involved. To the extent that distributions to shareholders had been made based on the assumption of our qualification as a REIT, we might be required to borrow funds or to liquidate certain of our investments to pay the applicable tax. As a result of these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. If we fail to qualify as a REIT but are eligible for certain relief provisions, then we may retain our status as a REIT but may be required to pay a penalty tax, which could be substantial.
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum tax rate applicable to income from "qualified dividends" payable by non-REIT C corporations to U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates generally is 20% (excluding the 3.8% net investment income tax). Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the maximum 20% reduced rate and are taxed at applicable ordinary income tax rates, except to the extent that certain holding requirements have been met and a REIT's dividends are attributable to dividends received by a REIT from taxable corporations (such as a TRS), to income that was subject to tax at the REIT/corporate level, or to dividends properly designated by the REIT as “capital gain dividends.” For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026, U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of their dividends from REITs (excluding qualified dividend income and capital gains dividends). For those U.S. shareholders in the top marginal tax bracket of 37%, the deduction for REIT dividends yields an effective income tax rate of 29.6% (exclusive of the net investment income tax) on REIT dividends, which is higher than the 20% tax rate on qualified dividend income paid by non-REIT C corporations (although the maximum effective rate applicable to such dividends, after taking into account the 21% U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to non-REIT C corporations is 36.8% (exclusive of the 3.8% net investment income tax)). Although the reduced rates applicable to dividend income from non-REIT C corporations do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, these reduced rates could cause investors who are non-corporate taxpayers to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the shares of non-REIT C corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common shares.
23
The REIT distribution requirements could require us to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions or subject us to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our shareholders, on an annual basis, at least 90% of our "REIT taxable income," determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains. In addition, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate (currently 21%) to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income (including net capital gains) and will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to continue to distribute our net income to our shareholders in a manner intended to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.
In addition, from time to time our taxable income may exceed our net income as determined by GAAP. This may occur, for instance, because realized capital losses are deducted in determining our GAAP net income, but may not be deductible in computing our taxable income. In addition, we may incur nondeductible capital expenditures or be required to make debt or amortization payments. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year and we may incur U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax on that income if we do not distribute such income to shareholders in that year. In that event, we may be required to (i) use cash reserves, (ii) incur debt at rates or times that we regard as unfavorable, (iii) sell assets in adverse market conditions, (iv) distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, or (v) make a taxable distribution of our shares as part of a distribution in which shareholders may elect to receive our shares or (subject to a limit measured as a percentage of the total distribution) cash in order to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income, property or net worth, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. Moreover, if we have net income from "prohibited transactions," that income will be subject to a 100% tax. The need to avoid prohibited transactions could cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that might otherwise be in our best interest to sell. In addition, we could, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax (which could be significant in amount) in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Code to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for the payment of our debt obligations and distributions to shareholders. Our TRSs generally will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income tax on their net taxable income.
There is a risk of changes in the tax law applicable to REITs which may adversely affect our taxation as a REIT and taxation of our shareholders.
The IRS, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review U.S. federal income tax legislation, regulations and other guidance. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect our taxation or taxation of our shareholders. We urge you to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common shares.
ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
24
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
The schedule on the following pages lists our real estate investment portfolio as of December 31, 2020, which consisted of 43 properties and land held for development.
As of December 31, 2020, the percent leased is (i) for commercial properties, the percentage of net rentable area for which fully executed leases exist and may include signed leases for space not yet occupied by the tenant, and (ii) for multifamily properties, the percentage of units leased. Cost information is included in Schedule III to our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Schedule of Properties
Multifamily Properties
______________________________
(1)Leased percentage and ending occupancy calculations are based on units for multifamily buildings.
(2)This development project consists of 401 units with 374 units delivered in 2020.
25
Office Buildings
Retail Centers
______________________________
(3) Percent leased and ending occupancy calculations are based on square feet that includes temporary lease agreements for commercial properties.
(4) This property is subject to a ground lease which expires on October 6, 2070.
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
26
PART II
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market and Shareholder Information: Our shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WRE. As of February 11, 2021, there were 3,225 shareholders of record.
Issuer Repurchases; Unregistered Sales of Securities: A summary of our repurchases of shares of our common stock for the three months ended December 31, 2020 was as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
October 1 - October 31, 2020 — $ — N/A N/A
November 1 - November 30, 2020 — — N/A N/A
______________________________
(1) Represents restricted shares surrendered by employees to WashREIT to satisfy such employees' applicable statutory minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares.
Performance Graph:
The following line graph sets forth, for the period from December 31, 2015, through December 31, 2020, a comparison of the percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock compared to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the MSCI US REIT Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2015, in shares of our common stock and each of the aforementioned indices and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions. There can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below.
This performance graph shall not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
27
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our selected financial data on a historical basis. The following data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
(in thousands, except per share data)
Discontinued operations:
Gain on sale of real estate $ — $ 339,024 $ — $ — $ —
28
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the discussion and analysis of our 2018 financial condition and results of operations compared to 2019, refer to Item 7., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
We provide Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations and financial condition. We organize the MD&A as follows:
•Overview. Discussion of our business outlook, operating results, investment activity, financing activity and capital requirements to provide context for the remainder of MD&A.
Results of Operations. Discussion of our financial results comparing 2020 to 2019.
•Liquidity and Capital Resources. Discussion of our financial condition and analysis of changes in our capital structure and cash flows.
•Funds From Operations. Calculation of NAREIT Funds From Operations (“NAREIT FFO”), a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. Descriptions of accounting policies that reflect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
When evaluating our financial condition and operating performance, we focus on the following financial and non-financial indicators:
•Net operating income (“NOI”), calculated as set forth below under the caption "Results of Operations - Net Operating Income." NOI is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.
•Funds From Operations (“NAREIT FFO”), calculated as set forth below under the caption “Funds from Operations.” NAREIT FFO is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.
•Ending occupancy, calculated as occupied square footage or multifamily units as a percentage of total square footage or multifamily units, respectively, as of the last day of that period.
•Leased percentage, calculated as the percentage of apartments leased for our multifamily properties and percentage of available physical net rentable area leased for our commercial properties.
•Leasing activity, including new leases, renewals and expirations.
For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our properties as “same-store”, “non-same-store” or discontinued operations. Same-store properties include properties that were owned for the entirety of the years being compared, and exclude properties under redevelopment or development and properties acquired, sold or classified as held for sale during the years being compared. We define development properties as those for which we have planned or ongoing major construction activities on existing or acquired land pursuant to an authorized development plan. We consider a property's development activities to be complete when the property is ready for its intended use. The property is categorized as same-store when it has been ready for its intended use for the entirety of the years being compared. We define redevelopment properties as those for which we have planned or ongoing significant development and construction activities on existing or acquired buildings pursuant to an authorized plan, which has an impact on current operating results, occupancy and the ability to lease space with the intended result of a higher economic return on the property. We categorize a redevelopment property as same-store when redevelopment activities have been complete for the majority of each year being compared.
Overview
Outlook
On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared COVID-19, a respiratory illness caused by the novel coronavirus, a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency with respect to COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic caused state and local governments within the Washington metro region to institute quarantines, shelter-in-place rules and restrictions on travel, the types of business that may continue to operate and/or the types of construction projects that may continue. These actions resulted in modifications to our normal operations, including requiring our employees to work remotely with the exception of essential building personnel.
In June 2020, shelter-in-place orders began to phase out in the Washington metro region. We have developed and implemented
29
robust plans for commercial tenants returning to their leased space to reduce the risk of exposure and further spread of the virus at our properties and continue to follow the mandates of public health officials and government agencies. We continue to adhere to occupancy restrictions at our properties where required.
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2020. Beginning late in the first quarter of 2020 and continuing into the second quarter of 2020, many of our retail commercial tenants were closed or were operating at significantly reduced capacity as a result of restrictions on non-essential businesses. The majority of our commercial office tenants have experienced limited disruption to their businesses due to social distancing and lockdown measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Starting in April 2020, we began working with our commercial tenants on a case-by-case basis to the extent they demonstrated hardship as a result of the pandemic and financial ability to work through a satisfactory arrangement on a variety of relief options, generally involving negotiated deferral payment plans or early blend-and-extend renewals. By mid-June, most of our retail tenants had reopened. As of January 31, 2021, we collected 99% and 97% of office and retail cash rent during the fourth quarter of 2020, respectively, excluding the impact of contractual rent deferral agreements. The effects of COVID-19 on our commercial tenants have been reflected in an increase in credit losses of $4.5 million during 2020 compared to 2019. We have $1.0 million of deferred rent outstanding, net of repayments, from each of our office and retail segments. We continue to monitor and communicate with our commercial tenants to assess their needs and ability to pay rent.
At our multifamily properties we temporarily froze rents on full-year lease renewals, waived late fees and offered a payment deferral plan to residents who have been adversely financially impacted by COVID-19. As of January 31, 2021, we collected 99% of multifamily cash rent during the fourth quarter of 2020, excluding rent that has been deferred. Deferred rent outstanding, net of repayments, from our multifamily tenants is less than $0.1 million. The effects of COVID-19 on our multifamily tenants have been reflected in an increase in credit losses of $0.9 million during 2020 compared to 2019. We expect the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic to limit our ability to increase rental rates until the economic disruption of the pandemic subsides.
We had a decline in average occupancy of approximately 150 basis points during the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of 2019, excluding Trove which began lease-up in the first quarter of 2020. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have also impacted our ability to lease up available commercial space as physical touring stopped during shelter-in-place orders and lease decisions have been slower for prospective tenants than in previous years as they re-evaluate re-entry and space plans. New gross leasing square footage declined by 54% and 77% for office and retail space during 2020 compared 2019, respectively. The decline in new gross leasing was due to several factors, including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the execution of some large tenant leases in 2019 and the sale of several office and retail properties during 2019 and 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately 430,000 square feet of vacant commercial space and approximately 276,000 square feet of commercial lease expirations scheduled for 2021. For our multifamily properties, the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have limited our ability to maintain or increase rental rates. We expect this to continue until the economic disruption of the pandemic subsides. To help mitigate the impact on our operating results of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have initiated various operational cost saving initiatives across our portfolio.
We expect the COVID-19 outbreak, including any mutations thereof, will continue to affect our financial condition and results of operations going forward, including but not limited to, real estate rental revenues, credit losses and leasing activity. Given our sole concentration in the Washington metro region, our entire existing portfolio could be impacted for the foreseeable future by quarantines, shelter-in-place rules and various other restrictions imposed or re-imposed in response to a surge in COVID-19 cases. Due to the uncertainty of the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the extent of the financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. For more information, see "Part I - Item 1A. Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
New legislation was enacted during 2020 to provide relief to businesses in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We have evaluated and will continue to evaluate the relief options available or that become available in the future, such as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities Act (“CARES Act”), or other emergency relief initiatives and stimulus packages instituted by the federal government. A number of the available relief options contain restrictions on future business activities, including ability to repurchase shares and pay dividends that require careful evaluation and consideration. We will continue to assess these options and any subsequent legislation or other relief packages, including the accompanying restrictions on our business, as the pandemic continues to evolve. The legislation enacted in 2020 did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
30
Operating Results
Net (loss) income, NOI and NAREIT FFO for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Year Ended December 31,
______________________________
(1) See page 32 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NOI to net income.
(2) See page 44 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NAREIT FFO to net income.
The decrease in net income is primarily due to lower gains on sale of real estate ($414.0 million), lower income from discontinued operations ($16.2 million) and lower NOI ($12.4 million), partially offset by lower depreciation and amortization expense ($16.2 million), lower interest expense ($16.4 million), lower real estate impairment charges ($8.4 million) and lower general and administrative expenses ($2.1 million).
The lower NOI is primarily due to the sales of 1776 G Street ($8.5 million) and Quantico Corporate Center ($1.8 million) in 2019 and John Marshall II ($3.2 million), 1227 25th Street ($0.5 million) and Monument II ($0.4 million) in 2020, lower same-store NOI ($8.4 million) and a net operating loss from Trove ($0.3 million). These were partially offset by income from the multifamily acquisitions ($10.8 million) in 2019. The lower same-store NOI is explained in further detail beginning on page 34 (Results of Operations - 2020 Compared to 2019).
The decrease in NAREIT FFO primarily reflects lower income from discontinued operations, net of depreciation and amortization ($21.1 million) and lower NOI ($12.4 million), partially offset by lower interest expense ($16.4 million) and lower general and administrative expenses ($2.1 million).
Investment and Financing Activity
Significant investment and financing transactions during 2020 included the following:
•The prepayment of the $45.6 million mortgage note secured by Yale West, which was scheduled to mature in 2052. As a result of the transaction, we recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million related to the write-off of an unamortized mortgage premium of $1.4 million, partially offset by a prepayment penalty of $0.9 million.
•The disposition of John Marshall II, a 223,000 square foot office property in Tysons, Virginia, for a contract sales price of $57.0 million. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a loss on sale of real estate of $6.9 million.
•The prepayment of all $250.0 million of our 4.95% Senior Notes originally scheduled to mature in October 2020 without penalty using borrowings from our Revolving Credit Facility.
•The execution of the one-year, $150.0 million 2020 Term Loan, maturing on May 5, 2021 with a one-year extension option. The 2020 Term Loan bears interest at LIBOR + 1.50%, which margin is subject to change based on our credit ratings, with a 0.50% floor for the LIBOR rate. We used the proceeds to repay borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. We subsequently prepaid the 2020 Term Loan on November 30, 2020.
•The entry into a note purchase agreement to issue $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.44% senior unsecured 10-year notes payable (the “Green Bonds”). The closing and full funding of the Green Bonds occurred on December 17, 2020. The proceeds of the sale of the Green Bonds were and will be used to finance or refinance recently completed and future green building and energy efficiency, sustainable water and wastewater management and renewable energy projects (“Eligible Green Projects”).
•The prepayment of the $150.0 million of borrowings outstanding on the 2015 Term Loan.
•In conjunction with the entry into the note purchase agreement to issue the Green Bonds, we terminated four forward interest rate swap arrangements totaling $200.0 million designated as cash flow hedges. At the time of termination, the forward swaps had a liability fair value of $20.4 million, which is amortized as interest expense over the 10-year term of the Green Bonds.
•In conjunction with the prepayment of the 2015 Term Loan, we terminated interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts in the aggregate of $150.0 million. As a result of the termination, the accumulated liability fair value of the interest rate swaps of $0.6 million was reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Loss on interest rate
31
swaps on our consolidated income statements.
As of February 11, 2021, our $700.0 million Revolving Credit Facility has an incremental borrowing capacity of $658.0 million. As of December 31, 2020, the interest rate on the facility was LIBOR plus 1.00% and LIBOR was 0.14% as of that date.
Capital Requirements
We do not have any debt maturities scheduled during 2021. We expect to have additional capital requirements as set forth on page 37 (Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Requirements).
Results of Operations
The discussion that follows is based on our consolidated results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2020. The ability to compare one period to another is significantly affected by acquisitions completed and dispositions made during those years (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Net Operating Income
NOI, defined as real estate rental revenue less real estate expenses, is a non-GAAP measure. NOI is calculated as net income, less non-real estate revenue and the results of discontinued operations (including the gain on sale, if any), plus interest expense, depreciation and amortization, lease origination expenses, general and administrative expenses, real estate impairment and gain or loss on extinguishment of debt. We believe that NOI is useful as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations of trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. As a result of the foregoing, we provide NOI as a supplement to net income, calculated in accordance with GAAP. NOI does not represent net income or income from continuing operations, in either case calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to these measures as an indication of our operating performance. A reconciliation of NOI to net income follows.
32
2020 Compared to 2019
The following tables reconcile NOI to net income and provide the basis for our discussion of our consolidated results of operations and NOI in 2020 compared to 2019. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.
Non-Same-Store
Reconciliation to net income:
Loss on interest rate derivatives (560) — (560) 100.0 %
Loss on extinguishment of debt (34) — (34) 100.0 %
Discontinued operations (4):
Income from properties sold or held for sale — 16,158 (16,158) (100.0) %
Loss on extinguishment of debt — (764) 764 (100.0) %
______________________________
(1)Acquisitions:
2019 Multifamily – Assembly Alexandria, Assembly Manassas, Assembly Dulles, Assembly Leesburg, Assembly Herndon, Assembly Germantown and Assembly Watkins Mill (collectively, the “Assembly Portfolio”) and Cascade at Landmark
(2)Development/redevelopment properties:
Multifamily development property – Trove and land adjacent to Riverside Apartments
(3)Sold (classified as continuing operations):
2020 Office – John Marshall II, Monument II and 1227 25th Street
2019 Office – Quantico Corporate Center and 1776 G Street
(4) Discontinued operations:
2019 Retail – Wheaton Park, Bradlee Shopping Center, Shoppes of Foxchase, Gateway Overlook, Olney Village Center, Frederick County Square, Centre at Hagerstown and Frederick Crossing
Real Estate Rental Revenue
Real estate rental revenue is comprised of (a) minimum base rent, which includes rental revenues recognized on a straight-line basis, (b) revenue from the recovery of operating expenses from our tenants, (c) credit losses on lease related receivables, (d) revenue recognized from lease termination fees and (e) parking and other tenant charges such as percentage rents.
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties for the two years ended December 31, 2020 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Year Ended December 31,
•Multifamily: Decrease primarily due to higher rent abatements ($0.5 million), lower move-in charges ($0.5 million) and higher credit losses ($0.4 million) related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These were partially offset by higher termination
33
fees ($0.3 million), rental rates ($0.2 million) and parking income ($0.1 million).
•Office: Decrease primarily due to lower lease termination fees ($3.7 million), lower parking income ($2.2 million), higher credit losses ($2.1 million) and lower reimbursements ($0.8 million). The lower parking income and higher credit losses are primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Real estate rental revenue from acquisitions increased due to the completion of a full year of operations at the Assembly Portfolio ($14.6 million) and Cascade at Landmark ($3.6 million) which were acquired in 2019.
Real estate rental revenue from sold properties classified as continuing operations decreased due to the sale of 1776 G Street ($13.7 million) during the fourth quarter of 2019, John Marshall II ($5.3 million) during the second quarter of 2020, Quantico Corporate Center ($2.8 million) during the second quarter of 2019, and 1227 25th Street ($0.6 million) and Monument II ($0.6 million) during the fourth quarter of 2020.
Ending occupancy for properties classified as continuing operations for the two years ended December 31, 2020 was as follows:
(1) Ending occupancy includes the addition of the total rentable units at Trove, which began to lease-up in the first quarter of 2020. Excluding Trove, total multifamily ending occupancy was 94.3% and total portfolio ending occupancy was 91.4% as of December 31, 2020.
•Multifamily: Decrease in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to lower ending occupancy at 3801 Connecticut Avenue, The Kenmore, Yale West and The Maxwell, partially offset by higher ending occupancy at Bethesda Hill Apartments.
•Office: Decrease in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to lower ending occupancy at Silverline Center, 2000 M Street, and 1775 Eye Street, partially offset by higher ending occupancy at 1220 19th Street, Fairgate at Ballston and Watergate 600.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we executed new and renewed leases in our office segment as follows:
______________________________
(1) Consist of tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
34
Real Estate Expenses
Real estate expenses as a percentage of revenue for the two years ended December 31, 2020 were 38.4% and 37.4%, respectively.
Real estate expenses from same-store properties for the two years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Year Ended December 31,
•Multifamily: Higher real estate tax ($0.5 million) and insurance ($0.2 million) expenses were offset by lower utilities ($0.3 million), repairs and maintenance ($0.2 million) and administrative ($0.2 million) expenses.
•Office: Decrease primarily due to lower utilities ($1.7 million), contract maintenance ($1.0 million) and administrative ($0.8 million) expenses, partially offset by higher real estate tax ($0.3 million) and insurance ($0.2 million) expenses.
Other Income and Expenses
Depreciation and Amortization: Decrease primarily due to the higher amortization of intangible lease assets at the Assembly Portfolio ($6.6 million) and Cascade at Landmark ($0.3 million) in 2019, lower depreciation and amortization at same-store properties ($5.7 million) and the dispositions of 1776 G Street ($2.7 million) and Quantico Corporate Center ($0.8 million) in 2019 and John Marshall II ($2.8 million) and Monument II ($0.4 million) in 2020. These decreases were partially offset by placing the Trove development ($3.1 million) into service during 2020.
General and administrative expenses: Decrease primarily due to lower short term incentive compensation ($2.0 million) and severance ($1.1 million) expenses in 2020, partially offset by the reversal of a transfer tax liability in 2019 ($0.7 million).
Real estate impairment: The real estate impairment charge of $8.4 million during the first quarter of 2019 reduced the carrying value of Quantico Corporate Center to its estimated fair value (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Loss on sale of real estate: The loss during 2020 is primarily due to losses on the sales of John Marshall II ($6.9 million) and Monument II ($8.6 million), partially offset by a gain on the sale of 1227 25th Street ($1.1 million). The gain during 2019 is due to the sale of 1776 G Street ($61.0 million), partially offset by a loss on the sale of Quantico Corporate Center ($1.0 million).
Loss on extinguishment of debt: During the fourth quarter of 2020, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million related to the prepayments of the $150.0 million 2020 Term Loan originally scheduled to mature in May 2021 and the $150.0 million 2015 Term Loan originally scheduled to mature in March 2021. During the second quarter of 2020, we recognized a loss of $0.2 million related to the prepayment of all $250.0 million of our 4.95% Senior Notes originally scheduled to mature in October 2020. These losses were partially offset by a gain of $0.5 million on the prepayment of the mortgage note secured by Yale West Apartments during the first quarter of 2020.
Loss on interest rate derivatives: In December 2020, in connection with the prepayment of our 2015 Term Loan, we terminated interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts in the aggregate of $150.0 million. As a result of the termination, the accumulated fair value of the interest rate swaps of $0.6 million was reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Loss on interest rate derivatives on our consolidated income statements.
35
Interest Expense: Interest expense by debt type for the two years ended December 31, 2020 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Year Ended December 31,
•Notes payable: Decrease primarily due to prepayment of all $250.0 million of our 4.95% Senior Notes in April 2020 and the execution of a six-month $450.0 million 2019 Term Loan in April 2019 to fund the Assembly Portfolio acquisition that was repaid in the third quarter of 2019, partially offset by the new $150.0 million 2020 Term Loan executed in May 2020 and prepaid in November 2020, and the issuance of the $350.0 million Green Bonds in December 2020.
•Mortgage notes payable: Decrease due to repayment of the mortgage note secured by Yale West Apartments in January 2020.
•Line of credit: Decrease primarily due to a lower weighted average interest rate of 1.5% during 2020, as compared to 3.3% during 2019, partially offset by higher weighted average borrowings of $204.8 million during 2020, as compared to $196.1 million during 2019.
•Capitalized interest: Decrease primarily due to placing into service assets at Trove.
Discontinued operations:
Income from properties sold or held for sale: Decrease primarily due to the sale of the properties classified as discontinued operations during 2019.
Gain on sale of real estate: Decrease due to gains on the sales of the Shopping Center Portfolio ($333.0 million) and Frederick Crossing and Frederick County Square ($9.5 million), partially offset by a loss on the sale of Centre at Hagerstown ($3.5 million) during 2019.
Loss on extinguishment of debt: We recognized a $0.8 million loss on extinguishment of debt during 2019 related to the prepayment of the mortgage note secured by Olney Village Center prior to that property’s disposition as part of the Shopping Center Portfolio.
36
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As the local and global economies have weakened as a result of COVID-19, ensuring adequate liquidity is critical. We believe we have access to adequate resources to meet the needs of our existing operations, mandatory capital expenditures, dividend payments and working capital, to the extent not funded by cash provided by operating activities. However, we expect the COVID-19 pandemic to continue to adversely impact our future operating cash flows. Such adverse impacts include the inability of some of our tenants to pay their rent on time or at all, longer lease-up periods for both anticipated and unanticipated vacancies, temporary rental rate freezes and contractual rent deferral arrangements.
In April 2020, we prepaid without penalty all $250.0 million of our 4.95% Senior Notes due 2020 using borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility.
In April 2020, we executed an amendment to the John Marshall II purchase and sale agreement, decreasing the contract sale price to $57.0 million, and closed on the sale on April 21, 2020.
In May 2020, the Company closed on a one-year unsecured term loan, with a one-year extension option, in a principal amount of $150.0 million. We used the proceeds to repay borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. The term loan was subsequently repaid in full on November 30, 2020.
In September 2020, we entered into a note purchase agreement to issue $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.44% senior unsecured 10-year notes payable. The closing and full funding of the Green Bonds occurred on December 17, 2020.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, we repaid $300.0 million of existing term loans (including the $150.0 million term loan incurred in May 2020) maturing in 2021 and 2022. We have no debt maturing until the fourth quarter of 2022.
Capital Structure
We manage our capital structure to reflect a long-term investment approach, generally seeking to match the cash flow of our assets with a mix of equity and various debt instruments. We expect that our capital structure will allow us to obtain additional capital from diverse sources that could include additional equity offerings of common shares, public and private secured and unsecured debt financings, asset dispositions, operating units and joint venture equity. Our ability to raise funds through the incurrence of debt and issuance of equity securities is dependent on, among other things, general economic conditions including the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, general market conditions for REITs, our operating performance, our debt rating, the current trading price of our common shares and other capital market conditions. We analyze which source of capital we believe to be most advantageous to us at any particular point in time.
As of February 11, 2021, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $25.5 million and availability under our Revolving Credit Facility of $638.0 million.We currently expect that our potential sources of liquidity for acquisitions, development, redevelopment, expansion and renovation of properties, and operating and administrative expenses, may include:
•Cash flow from operations;
•Borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility or other new short-term facilities;
•Issuances of our equity securities and/or common units in operating partnerships;
•Issuances of preferred shares;
•Proceeds from long-term secured or unsecured debt financings, including construction loans and term loans, or the issuance of debt securities;
•Investment from joint venture partners; and
•Net proceeds from the sale of assets.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we significantly reduced our capital requirements as compared to the estimates we disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. We reduced our expected 2020 capital expenditures by approximately $40 million by deferring non-essential building restorations, not incurring certain tenant improvements and leasing costs for speculative leasing, decreasing multifamily renovation capital expenditures, and lowering our anticipated development spending as we did not break ground on the new Riverside development this year.
37
During 2021, we expect that we will have significant capital requirements, which will continue to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the following items:
•Funding dividends and distributions to our shareholders (which we intend to continue to pay at or about current levels);
•Approximately $45.0 - $50.0 million to invest in our existing portfolio of operating assets, including approximately $10.0 - $15.0 million to fund tenant-related capital requirements and leasing commissions;
•Approximately $5.0 - $7.5 million to invest in our development and redevelopment projects; and
•Funding for potential property acquisitions throughout 2021, offset by proceeds from potential property dispositions.
There can be no assurance that our capital requirements will not be materially higher or lower than the above expectations. We currently believe that we will generate sufficient cash flow from operations and potential property sales and have access to the capital resources necessary to fund our requirements in 2021. However, as a result of the uncertainty of the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, general market conditions in the greater Washington metro region, economic conditions affecting the ability to attract and retain tenants, declines in our share price, unfavorable changes in the supply of competing properties, or our properties not performing as expected, we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and property sales or otherwise have access to capital on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain capital from other sources, we may need to alter capital spending to be materially different than what is stated in the prior paragraph. If capital were not available, we may be unable to satisfy the distribution requirement applicable to REITs, make required principal and interest payments, make strategic acquisitions or make necessary and/or routine capital improvements or undertake improvement/redevelopment opportunities with respect to our existing portfolio of operating assets.
Debt Financing
We generally use unsecured or secured, corporate-level debt, including unsecured notes, our Revolving Credit Facility, bank term loans and mortgages, to meet our borrowing needs. Long-term, we generally use fixed rate debt instruments in order to match the returns from our real estate assets. If we issue unsecured debt in the future, we would seek to ladder the maturities of our debt to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk in any particular future year. We also utilize variable rate debt for short-term financing purposes. At times, our mix of variable and fixed rate debt may not suit our needs. At those times, we may use derivative financial instruments including interest rate swaps and caps, forward interest rate options or interest rate options in order to assist us in managing our debt mix. We may either hedge our variable rate debt to give it an effective fixed interest rate or hedge fixed rate debt to give it an effective variable interest rate.
38
As of December 31, 2020, our future debt principal payments are scheduled as follows (in thousands):
Premiums and discounts, net (456) — (456)
Debt issuance costs, net (4,174) — (4,174)
______________________________
(1)WashREIT entered into interest rate swaps to effectively fix a LIBOR plus 110 basis points floating interest rate to a 2.31% all-in fixed interest rate for $150.0 million portion of the term loan. For the remaining $100.0 million portion of the term loan, WashREIT entered into interest rate swaps to effectively fix a LIBOR plus 100 basis points floating interest rate to a 3.71% all-in fixed interest rate. The interest rates are fixed through the term loan maturity of July 2023. The 2018 Term Loan has an all-in fixed interest rate of 2.87%.
(2)Maturity date for credit facility of March 2023 assumes election of option for two additional 6-month periods.
(3)The closing and full funding of the $350.0 million 10-year 3.44% Green Bonds occurred on December 17, 2020. The Green Bonds have an all-in fixed interest rate of 4.09%.
The weighted average maturity for our debt is 5.2 years. If principal amounts due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our cash flow may be insufficient to repay all maturing debt. Prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of a refinancing, such as possible reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans, may result in higher interest rates and increased interest expense or inhibit our ability to finance our obligations.
From time to time, we may seek to repurchase and cancel our outstanding unsecured notes and term loans through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
39
Debt Covenants
Pursuant to the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, 2018 Term Loan and unsecured notes, we are subject to customary operating covenants and maintenance of various financial ratios.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our Revolving Credit Facility, 2018 Term Loan, unsecured notes or other debt instruments could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. This could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and could therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, our ability to draw on our Revolving Credit Facility or incur other unsecured debt in the future could be restricted by the debt covenants.
As of December 31, 2020, we were in compliance with the covenants related to our Revolving Credit Facility, 2018 Term Loan and unsecured notes.
Common Equity
We have authorized for issuance 100.0 million common shares, of which approximately 84.4 million shares were outstanding at December 31, 2020.
On May 4, 2018, we entered into eight separate equity distribution agreements (collectively, the “2018 Equity Distribution Agreements”) with each of Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, Capital One Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Truist Securities, Inc. (f/k/a SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.) relating to the issuance of up to $250.0 million of our common shares from time to time. Issuances of our common shares are made at market prices prevailing at the time of issuance. We may use net proceeds from the issuance of common shares under this program for general business purposes, including, without limitation, working capital, the acquisition, renovation, expansion, improvement, development or redevelopment of income producing properties or the repayment of debt.
Our issuances and net proceeds on the 2018 Equity Distribution Agreements for the three years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31,
We have a dividend reinvestment program, whereby shareholders may use their dividends and optional cash payments to purchase common shares. The common shares sold under this program may either be common shares issued by us or common shares purchased in the open market.
Our issuances and net proceeds on the dividend reinvestment program for the three years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands; except per share data):
Year Ended December 31,
Preferred Equity
Our board of trustees can, at its discretion, authorize the issuance of up to 10.0 million preferred shares. The ability to issue preferred equity provides WashREIT an additional financing tool that may be used to raise capital for future acquisitions or other business purposes. As of December 31, 2020, no preferred shares are issued and outstanding.
40
Capital Commitments
We will require capital for development and redevelopment projects currently underway and in the future. We are currently engaged in development activities for the ground-up development of a multifamily property (Trove) on land adjacent to The Wellington and predevelopment activities for the ground-up development of a multifamily property on land adjacent to Riverside Apartments. As of December 31, 2020, we had no outstanding contractual commitments related to our development and redevelopment projects, and expect to fund approximately $5.0 - $7.5 million of total development and redevelopment spending during 2021.
In addition to our development and redevelopment projects, we anticipate funding several major renovation projects in our portfolios during 2021, as follows (in thousands):
These projects include unit, common area, lobby and pool deck renovations, elevator modernizations, mechanical upgrades, facade restorations and roof replacements at multifamily properties; HVAC replacements, common area renovations and new conference space buildout at office properties; and garage repairs at retail properties. Not all of the anticipated spending had been committed via executed construction contracts at December 31, 2020. We expect to fund these projects using cash generated by our real estate operations, through borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility, or raising additional debt or equity capital in the public market.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2020, certain contractual obligations will require significant capital as follows (in thousands):
Payments due by Period
Total Less than 1year 1-3 years 4-5 years After 5years
______________________________
(1)See notes 5, 6 and 7 of the consolidated financial statements. Amounts include principal, interest and facility fees.
(2)Represents electricity and gas purchase agreements with terms through 2024.
(3)Committed tenant-related capital based on executed leases as of December 31, 2020.
(4)Committed building capital additions based on contracts in place as of December 31, 2020.
We have various standing or renewable contracts with vendors. The majority of these contracts can be canceled with immaterial or no cancellation penalties, with the exception of our elevator maintenance agreements and our electricity and gas purchase agreements, which are included above on the purchase obligations line. Contract terms on leases that can be canceled are generally one year or less. We are currently committed to fund tenant-related capital improvements as described in the table above for executed leases. However, expected leasing levels could require additional tenant-related capital improvements which are not currently committed. We expect that total tenant-related capital improvements, including those already committed, will be approximately $10.0 - $15.0 million in 2021.
41
Historical Cash Flows
Cash flows from operations are an important factor in our ability to sustain our dividend at its current rate. If our cash flows from operations were to decline significantly, we may have to reduce our dividend. Consolidated cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, Variance
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to the sales of the Retail Portfolio and 1776 G Street during 2019 and John Marshall II in 2020 (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). Net cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to the sales of the Retail Portfolio during 2019 (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements) and 2445 M Street in 2018, partially offset by the acquisition of the Assembly Portfolio and Cascade at Landmark during 2019.
Net cash provided by investing activities increased in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to lower development expenditures during 2020. Net cash provided by investing activities increased in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to a higher volume of disposition activity during 2019, partially offset by a higher volume of acquisition activity and higher development expenditures during 2019.
Net cash used in financing activities increased in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to higher repayments of notes payable and term loans, the repayment of the mortgage note and the settlement of interest rate swaps (see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements), partially offset by lower net repayments on the Revolving Credit Facility. Net cash used in financing activities increased in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to higher net repayments on the Revolving Credit Facility, partially offset by lower mortgage note repayments and higher proceeds from equity issuances.
Capital Improvements and Development Costs
Our capital improvement, development and redevelopment costs for the three years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Accretive capital improvements and development costs:
Tenant improvements (including first generation leases) 21,785 28,565 24,914
______________________________
(1) We consider these capital improvements to be accretive to revenue and not necessarily to net income.
Included in the capital improvement and development costs listed above are capitalized interest in the amount of $2.2 million, $3.2 million and $2.1 million for the three years ended December 31, 2020, respectively, and capitalized employee compensation in the amount of $2.0 million, $1.2 million and $2.7 million for the three years ended December 31, 2020, respectively.
42
Accretive Capital Improvements
Acquisition Related Improvements: Acquisition related improvements are capital improvements to properties acquired during the preceding three years which were anticipated at the time we acquired the properties. These types of improvements were made in 2020 to the Assembly Portfolio and Cascade at Landmark.
Expansions and Major Renovations: Expansion projects increase the rentable area of a property, while major renovation projects are improvements sufficient to increase the income otherwise achievable at a property. Expansions and major renovations during 2020 included common area, lobby, unit and facade renovations at Riverside Apartments; retail space renovations at 1775 Eye Street; heating system replacement, roof replacement and unit renovations at The Kenmore; heating system replacement and elevator modernization at The Ashby and roof replacement and unit renovations at 3801 Connecticut Avenue.
Development/Redevelopment: Development costs represent expenditures for ground up development of new operating properties. Redevelopment costs represent expenditures for improvements intended to reposition properties in their markets and increase income than would be otherwise achievable. Development/redevelopment costs in 2020 primarily include development costs for Trove, a multifamily development adjacent to The Wellington and predevelopment costs for a future multifamily development adjacent to Riverside Apartments.
Tenant Improvements: Tenant improvements are costs, such as space build-outs, associated with commercial lease transactions. Our average tenant improvement costs per square foot of space leased during the three years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
The $46.96 decrease in 2020 and the $36.48 increase in 2019 in tenant improvement costs per square foot of office space leased was primarily due to new leases at Watergate 600 and Monument II executed in 2019.
Other Capital Improvements
Other capital improvements, also referred to as recurring capital improvements, are those not included in the above categories. Over time these costs will be recurring in nature to maintain a property's income and value. In our multifamily properties, this category includes improvements made as needed upon vacancy of an apartment. Such improvements totaled $3.6 million in 2020, averaging approximately $1,284 per apartment for the 42% of apartments which turned over relative to our total portfolio of apartment units. In our commercial properties and multifamily properties (aside from improvements related to apartment turnover), improvements include facade repairs, installation of new heating and air conditioning equipment, asphalt replacement, permanent landscaping, new lighting and new finishes. In addition, we incurred repair and maintenance expense of $5.9 million during 2020 to maintain the quality of our buildings.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2020 that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
43
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of WashREIT to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Additional factors include, but are not limited to:
(a)the ultimate duration of the COVID-19 global pandemic, including any mutations thereof, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, the speed of the vaccine rollout, the effectiveness and willingness of people to take COVID-19 vaccines, and the duration of associated immunity and efficacy of the vaccines against emerging variants of COVID-19;
(b)the risks associated with ownership of real estate in general and our real estate assets in particular;
(c)the economic health of the greater Washington metro region;
(d)the risk of failure to enter into and/or complete contemplated acquisitions and dispositions, at all, within the price ranges anticipated and on the terms and timing anticipated;
(e)changes in the composition of our portfolio;
(f)fluctuations in interest rates;
(g)reductions in or actual or threatened changes to the timing of federal government spending;
(h)the risks related to use of third-party providers;
(i)the economic health of our tenants;
(j)shifts away from brick and mortar stores to e-commerce;
(k)the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of securities markets;
(l)compliance with applicable laws, including those concerning the environment and access by persons with disabilities;
(m)the risks related to not having adequate insurance to cover potential losses;
(n)the risks related to our organizational structure and limitations of stock ownership;
(o)changes in the market value of securities;
(p)terrorist attacks or actions and/or cyber-attacks;
(q)failure to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT and the risks of changes in laws affecting REITs; and
(r)other factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors.”
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see the section entitled “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect new information, future events, or otherwise.
Funds From Operations
NAREIT FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for real estate companies. In its 2018 NAREIT FFO White Paper Restatement, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) defines NAREIT FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains (or losses) associated with sales of properties; impairments of depreciable real estate, and real estate depreciation and amortization. We consider NAREIT FFO to be a standard supplemental measure for REITs, and believe it is a useful metric because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of our properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which historically assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have instead historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that NAREIT FFO more accurately provides investors an indication of our ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and fund other needs. Our NAREIT FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs. These other REITs may not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently.
44
The following table provides the calculation of our NAREIT FFO and a reconciliation of NAREIT FFO to net income for the three years ended December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Adjustments:
Discontinued operations:
Depreciation and amortization — 4,926 9,402
Gain on sale of depreciable real estate — (339,024) —
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We base the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We evaluate these estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to estimated useful lives of real estate assets, estimated fair value of acquired leases, cost reimbursement income, bad debts, contingencies and litigation. We base the estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We cannot assure you that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
We believe the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions
We record acquired assets, including physical assets and in-place leases, and assumed liabilities, based on their fair values. We determine the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities in accordance with current GAAP fair value provisions. We determine the fair values of acquired buildings on an “as-if-vacant” basis considering a variety of factors, including the replacement cost of the property, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. We determine the fair value of land acquired based on comparisons to similar properties that have been recently marketed for sale or sold.
The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components: (a) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant and foregone recovery of tenant pass-throughs (referred to as “absorption cost”); (b) the estimated cost of tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “tenant origination cost”); (c) estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “leasing commissions”); (d) the above/at/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place, including consideration of renewal options, to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as “net lease intangible”); and (e) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determined based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the tenant (referred to as “customer relationship value”). We discount the amounts used to calculate net lease intangibles using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. We include tenant origination costs in income producing property on our balance sheet and amortize the tenant origination costs as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset, which is typically the remaining life of the underlying leases. We classify leasing commissions and absorption costs as other assets and amortize leasing commissions and absorption costs as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We classify above market net lease intangible assets as other assets and amortize them on a straight-line basis as a decrease to real estate rental revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. We classify below market net lease intangible liabilities as other liabilities and amortize them on a straight-line basis as an increase to real estate rental revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. If any of the fair value of below market lease intangibles
45
includes fair value associated with a renewal option, such amounts are not amortized until the renewal option is executed. If the renewal option is not executed, the related value is expensed at that time. Should a tenant terminate its lease prior to the expiration date, we accelerate the amortization of the unamortized portion of the tenant origination cost (if it has no future value), leasing commissions, absorption costs and net lease intangible associated with that lease over its new shorter term.
Credit Losses on Lease Related Receivables
Lease related receivables, which include contractual amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants and accrued straight-line rents receivable, are reduced for credit losses. Such amounts are recognized as a reduction to real estate rental revenues. We evaluate the collectability of lease receivables monthly using several factors including a lessee’s creditworthiness. We recognize the credit loss on lease related receivables when, in the opinion of management, collection of substantially all lease payments is not probable. When collectability is determined not probable, any lease income recognized subsequent to recognizing the credit loss is limited to the lesser of the lease income reflected on a straight-line basis or cash collected.
Real Estate Impairment
We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations, development assets or land held for future development, if indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows are based on forward-looking assumptions, including annual and residual cash flows and our estimated holding period for each property. Such assumptions involve a high degree of judgment and could be affected by future economic and market conditions. When determining if a property has indicators of impairment, we evaluate the property's occupancy, our expected holding period for the property, strategic decisions regarding the property's future operations or development and other market factors. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated undiscounted cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair value, calculated in accordance with current GAAP fair value provisions. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell.
U.S. Federal Income Taxes
Generally, and subject to our ongoing qualification as a REIT, no provisions for income taxes are necessary except for taxes on undistributed taxable income and taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Our TRSs are subject to corporate U.S. federal and state income tax on their taxable income at regular statutory rates, or as calculated under the alternative minimum tax, as appropriate. As of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, our TRSs had a deferred tax asset of $1.4 million that was fully reserved. As of December 31, 2019, we had deferred state and local tax liabilities of $0.6 million. These deferred tax liabilities were primarily related to temporary differences in the timing of the recognition of revenue, amortization and depreciation. We did not have deferred state or local tax liabilities as of December 31, 2020.
46
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal material financial market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to refinancing long-term fixed rate obligations, the opportunity cost of fixed rate obligations in a falling interest rate environment and our variable rate line of credit. We primarily enter into debt obligations to support general corporate purposes, including acquisition of real estate properties, capital improvements and working capital needs. We use interest rate swap arrangements to reduce our exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in interest rates.
The table below presents principal, interest and related weighted average fair value interest rates by year of maturity, with respect to debt outstanding on December 31, 2020.
(dollars in thousands)
Unsecured fixed rate debt (1)
Interest rate on debt maturities — % 4.0 % 2.6 % — % — % 4.5 % 3.8 %
Unsecured variable rate debt
Variable interest rate on debt maturities 1.1 % 1.1 %
______________________________
(1) Includes $250.0 million term loan with a floating interest rate. The interest rate on the $250.0 million term loan is effectively fixed by interest rate swap arrangements at 2.9%.
We entered into the interest rate swap arrangements designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to reduce our exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in interest rates. Derivative instruments expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparty under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreement. We believe that we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our ongoing control procedures, we monitor the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, thus minimizing our credit risk concentration.
The following table sets forth information pertaining to interest rate swap contracts in place as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and their respective fair values (dollars in thousands):
Notional Amount Floating Index Rate Fair Value as of:
Fixed Rate Effective Date Expiration Date December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
In September 2020, in conjunction with the entry into the note purchase agreement to issue the Green Bonds, we terminated $200.0 million of four forward interest rate swap arrangements that we had entered into in November 2019 and which were effective as of
47
April 1, 2020, designated as cash flow hedges of the interest rate variability on the issuance of unsecured notes. On October 2, 2020, we paid the $20.4 million liability associated with the termination of the forward swaps.
In December 2020, in connection with the prepayment of our 2015 Term Loan, we terminated two interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts in the aggregate of $150.0 million resulting in a loss on interest rate derivatives of approximately $0.6 million.
48
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2020. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
See the Report of Management in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
See the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
During the three months ended December 31, 2020, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION
Amendment to the Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended
On February 10, 2021, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) approved an amendment to our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended (the “Charter”) to increase the number of common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Shares”), authorized by the Charter from 100,000,000 to 150,000,000, and a corresponding increase in the total number of authorized shares of beneficial interest of the Company from 110,000,000 to 160,000,000 (the “Amendment”). The Company filed the Amendment with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on February 10, 2021, which became effective upon filing. Prior to the filing of the Amendment, the Company had approximately 15.5 million, or less than 16%, of the total number of authorized Common Shares available for future issuance. The Amendment was intended to preserve operational flexibility in the current business environment and ensure the Company has adequate available authorized capacity to take advantage of favorable market conditions and strategic opportunities that may arise, including the ability to access the capital markets, finance the acquisition and development of properties and pursue other opportunities integral to the Company’s growth and success. The foregoing description of the Amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete Amendment, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 3.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to our qualification and taxation as a real estate investment trust, a “REIT,” and the acquisition, holding, and disposition of (i) our common shares, preferred
49
shares and depositary shares (together with common shares and preferred shares, the “shares”) as well as our warrants and rights, and (ii) certain debt securities that we may offer (together with the shares, the “securities”). For purposes of this discussion, references to “our Company,” “we” and “us” mean only Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and not its subsidiaries or affiliates. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), the Treasury Regulations, rulings and other administrative interpretations and practices of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) (including administrative interpretations and practices expressed in private letter rulings, which are binding on the IRS only with respect to the particular taxpayers who requested and received those rulings), and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect, and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. We have not sought and will not seek an advance ruling from the IRS regarding any matter discussed in this section. The summary is also based upon the assumption that we will operate the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities in accordance with their applicable organizational documents. This summary is for general information only, and does not purport to discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to a particular investor in light of its investment or tax circumstances, or to investors subject to special tax rules, including:
•tax-exempt organizations, except to the extent discussed below in “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders” and “Taxation of Holders of Debt Securities-Tax-Exempt Holders of Debt Securities,”
•broker-dealers,
•non-U.S. corporations, non-U.S. partnerships, non-U.S. trusts, non-U.S. estates, or individuals who are not taxed as citizens or residents of the United States, all of which may be referred to collectively as “non-U.S. persons,” except to the extent discussed below in “—Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders” and “—Taxation of Holders of Debt Securities—Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities,”
•trusts and estates,
•regulated investment companies (“RICs”)
•REITs, financial institutions,
•insurance companies,
•subchapter S corporations,
•foreign (non-U.S. governments),
•persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code,
•persons holding the shares as part of a “hedge,” “straddle,” “conversion,” “synthetic security” or other integrated investment,
•persons holding the shares through a partnership or similar pass-through entity,
•persons with a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar,
•persons holding 10% or more (by vote or value) of the beneficial interest in us, except to the extent discussed below,
•persons who do not hold the shares as a “capital asset,” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code,
•corporations subject to the provisions of Section 7874 of the Code,
•U.S. expatriates, or
•persons otherwise subject to special tax treatment under the Code.
50
This summary does not address state, local or non-U.S. tax considerations. This summary also does not consider tax considerations that may be relevant with respect to securities we may issue, or selling security holders may sell, other than our shares and certain debt instruments described below. Each time we or selling security holders sell securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that sale and may add to, modify or update the discussion below, as appropriate.
Each prospective investor is advised to consult his or her tax advisor to determine the impact of his or her personal tax situation on the anticipated tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and sale of our shares, warrants, rights and/or debt securities. This includes the U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax considerations of the ownership and sale of our shares, warrants, rights and/or debt securities, and the potential changes in applicable tax laws.
Taxation of the Company as a REIT
We elected to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with our first taxable year ended December 31, 1960. A REIT generally is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on the “REIT taxable income” (generally, taxable income of the REIT subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain) that it distributes to shareholders, provided that the REIT meets the annual REIT distribution requirement and the other requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. We believe that we are organized and have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code. However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed under the Code, including (through our actual annual (or in some cases quarterly) operating results) requirements relating to income, asset ownership, distribution levels and diversity of share ownership. Given the complex nature of the REIT qualification requirements, the ongoing importance of factual determinations and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be organized or operated in a manner so as to satisfy the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, or that we will meet such requirements in the future. See “—Failure to Qualify as a REIT.”
The sections of the Code that relate to our qualification and taxation as a REIT are highly technical and complex. This discussion sets forth the material aspects of the Code sections that govern the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, relevant rules and Treasury Regulations, and related administrative and judicial interpretations.
Taxation of REITs in General
For each taxable year in which we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our “REIT taxable income” (generally, taxable income subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid and excluding our net capital gain) that is distributed currently to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” at the corporate and shareholder levels that generally results from an investment in a non-REIT C corporation. A non-REIT C corporation is a corporation that generally is required to pay tax at the corporate level. Double taxation means taxation once at the corporate level when income is earned and once again at the shareholder level when the income is distributed. In general, the income that we generate is taxed only at the shareholder level upon a distribution of dividends to our shareholders.
U.S. shareholders generally will be subject to taxation on dividends distributed by us (other than designated capital gain dividends and “qualified dividend income”) at rates applicable to ordinary income, instead of at lower capital gain rates. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026, generally, U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations. Capital gain dividends and qualified dividend income will continue to be subject to a maximum 20% rate.
Any net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT generally do not pass through to our shareholders, subject to special rules for certain items such as the net capital gain that we recognize.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances:
1.We will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed “REIT taxable income,” including any undistributed net capital gain. REIT taxable income is the taxable income of the REIT subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid.
2.If we have (1) net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, or (2) other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, such income will be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate.
51
3.Our net income from “prohibited transactions” will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property.
4.If we fail to satisfy either the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but our failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and we nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because we satisfy specified cure provisions, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the greater of (1) the amount by which we fail the 75% gross income test or (2) the amount by which we fail the 95% gross income test, as the case may be, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.
5.We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required calendar year distribution over the sum of the amounts actually distributed, excess distributions from the preceding tax year and amounts retained for which U.S. federal income tax was paid. The required distribution for each calendar year is equal to the sum of:
•85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year;
•95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year, other than capital gains we elect to retain and pay tax on as described below; and
•any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years.
6.We will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain rental income we receive when a taxable REIT subsidiary provides services to our tenants, on certain expenses deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary on payments made to us and, effective for our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, on income for services rendered to us by a taxable REIT subsidiary, if the arrangements among us, our tenants, and our taxable REIT subsidiaries do not reflect arm’s-length terms.
7.If we acquire any assets from a non-REIT C corporation in a carry-over basis transaction, we would be liable for corporate income tax, at the highest applicable corporate rate, on the “built-in gain” inherent in those assets if we disposed of those assets within five years after they were acquired. To the extent that assets are transferred to us in a carry-over basis transaction by a partnership in which a non-REIT C corporation owns an interest, we will be subject to this tax in proportion to the non-REIT C corporation’s interest in the partnership. Built-in gain is the amount by which an asset’s fair market value exceeds its adjusted tax basis at the time we acquire the asset. The results described in this paragraph assume that the non-REIT C corporation or partnership transferor will not elect, in lieu of this treatment, to be subject to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired by us.
8.We may elect to retain and pay U.S. federal income tax on our net long-term capital gain. In that case, a U.S. shareholder would include its proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain (to the extent that we make a timely designation of such gain to the shareholder) in its income, would be deemed to have paid the tax we paid on such gain, and would be allowed a credit for its proportionate share of the tax deemed to have been paid, and an adjustment would be made to increase the basis of the U.S. shareholder in our common shares.