EDSA US Equity☆

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Certain factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and the related notes, before deciding to invest in our common shares. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business. In addition, many of the following risk factors could be exacerbated by any worsening of the global business and economic environment. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Business

We are a late-stage biopharmaceutical company with no products approved for commercial sale, and we have incurred significant losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur losses and may never generate profits from operations or maintain profitability.

Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. At September 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $44.04 million. We have historically financed operations primarily through issuances of common shares, the exercise of common share purchase warrants, convertible preferred shares, convertible loans, government grants and tax incentives. We have devoted substantially all of our efforts to research and development, including clinical trials, and have not completed the development of any of our drug candidates.

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of, and seek marketing approvals for our product candidates, prepare for and begin the commercialization of any approved products, and add infrastructure and personnel to support our product development efforts and operations as a public company in the United States and Canada. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year.

Based on our current plans, we do not expect to generate significant revenue unless and until we or a current or potential future licensee obtains marketing approval for, and commercializes, one or more of our product candidates, which may require several years. Neither we nor a licensee may ever succeed in obtaining marketing approval for, or commercializing our product candidates and, even if marketing approval is obtained, we may never generate revenues that are significant enough to generate profits from operations.

We will need substantial additional funding to finance our operations through regulatory approval of one or more of our product candidates. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

We expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially in the future, particularly for any drug candidates beyond Phase 2 clinical development or if we expand the number of drug candidates in clinical studies. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates that are not then subject to licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements with third parties, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

We depend heavily on the success of our drug product candidates. If we are unable to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize one or more of these experimental treatments, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

Our ability to generate product revenues, which may not occur for multiple years, if at all, will depend heavily on the successful development and commercialization of our drug product candidates. The success of our product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including the following:

· our timing to obtain applicable regulatory approvals;

Table of Contents

· successful completion of clinical development;

· the availability of raw materials to produce our product candidates;

· establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;

· effectively competing with other therapies; and

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates, which would materially harm our business. Many of these factors are beyond our control. Accordingly, we may never be able to generate revenues through the license or sale of any of our product candidates.

Deterioration in general economic conditions in the United States, Canada and globally, including the effect of prolonged periods of inflation on our suppliers, third-party service providers and potential partners, could harm our business and results of operations.

Our business and results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in national or global economic conditions. These conditions include but are not limited to inflation, rising interest rates, availability of capital markets, energy availability and costs, the negative impacts caused by pandemics and public health crises, negative impacts resulting from the military conflict between Russia and the Ukraine, and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions. Impacts of such conditions could be passed on to our business in the form of higher costs for labor and materials, higher investigator fees, possible reductions in pharmaceutical industry-wide spending on research and development and acquisitions and higher costs of capital.

Public health threats could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

Public health threats, such as the novel coronavirus (Covid-19), influenza and other highly communicable diseases or viruses could adversely impact our operations and disrupt our ongoing or planned research and development activities. We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any potential future business shutdowns or disruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including the suppliers, clinical trial sites, regulators and other third parties with whom we conduct business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and negatively impacted.

Our limited operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

Our primarily operating entity, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc., was formed in July 2015. To date, our operations have been limited to organization and staffing, developing and securing our technology, entering into licensing arrangements, raising capital and undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete development of any product candidate, obtain marketing approval, manufacture a commercial-scale product, or arrange for a third-party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Assuming we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we will need to transition from a company with a research and development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications and delays and may not be successful in such a transition. Any predictions made about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

Table of Contents

We expect to expand our capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

We expect to experience growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of drug development, regulatory affairs, finance and administration and, potentially, sales and marketing. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. We may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The physical expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

We are highly dependent on Dr. Pardeep Nijhawan, our Chief Executive Officer and Secretary; and Michael Brooks, our President; as well as other principal members of our management and scientific teams. Although we have employment agreements with each of our executive officers, these agreements do not prevent our executives from terminating their employment with the company at any time. The unplanned loss of the services of any of these persons could materially impact the achievement of our research, development, financial and commercialization objectives. Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel will also be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain these personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies for similar personnel. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may have commitments with other entities that may limit their availability to us.

We are exposed to risks related to currency exchange rates.

We conduct a significant portion of our operations outside of the United States. Because our financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, changes in currency exchange rates have had and could have in the future a significant effect on our operating results when our operating results are translated into U.S. dollars.

We are subject to anti-corruption laws, as well as export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws, privacy laws and other laws governing our operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, it could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where we do business and may do business in the future. We are also subject to other laws and regulations governing our international operations, including regulations administered by the government of the United States and authorities in the European Union, including applicable export control regulations, economic sanctions on countries and persons, customs requirements and currency exchange regulations. There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance with all applicable anti- corruption laws. If we are not in compliance, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the FCPA, other anti- corruption laws or trade control laws by U.S. or other authorities could also have an adverse impact on our reputation, our business, results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, compliance with global privacy and data security requirements could result in additional costs and liabilities to us or inhibit our ability to collect and process data globally, and our failure to comply with data protection laws and regulations could lead to government enforcement actions, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

Our employees, principal investigators, consultants and commercial partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading, which could cause significant liability for us and harm our reputation.

We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other misconduct by our employees, principal investigators, consultants and collaborators, including intentional failures to comply with FDA or Office of Inspector General regulations or similar regulations of comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities, provide accurate information to the FDA or comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities, comply with manufacturing standards we have established, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and similar laws and regulations established and enforced by comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. Misconduct by these parties could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws, standards or regulations. Such actions could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

Table of Contents

We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cyber security incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our computer systems and those of third parties with which we contract are vulnerable to damage, including damage from cyber attacks, ransomware attacks, computer viruses, unauthorized access, human error and technological errors, natural disasters and telecommunication and electrical failures. System failures, accidents or security breaches could cause interruptions in our operations, and could result in a material disruption of our clinical and commercialization activities and business operations, in addition to possibly requiring substantial expenditures of resources to remedy. The loss of clinical trial data could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our product research, development and commercialization efforts could be delayed.

Risks Related to Clinical Development, Regulatory Approval and Commercialization

If clinical trials of our product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA, Health Canada (HC) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA), or do not otherwise produce favorable results, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization our product candidates.

In connection with obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any drug candidate, we must complete preclinical development and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical trials are expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and are uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials. In particular, the small number of subjects and patients in early clinical trials of our product candidates may make the results of these clinical trials less predictive of the outcome of later clinical trials. The design of a clinical trial can determine whether our results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced or completed. There is no assurance that we will be able to design and execute a clinical trial to support marketing approval. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. Pre-clinical studies or clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional pre-clinical studies or clinical trials, or to discontinue clinical trials altogether. Ultimately, we may be unable to complete the development and commercialization of any of our product candidates.

Interim results, top-line, initial data may not accurately reflect the complete results of a particular study or trial.

We may publicly disclose interim, top-line or initial data from time to time that is based on a preliminary analysis of then- available efficacy and safety data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimates, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully evaluate all data. Interim, top-line and initial data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. In addition, the information we may publicly disclose regarding a particular preclinical or clinical study is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular drug, drug candidate or our business. If the interim, top-line or initial data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed or delayed, which could harm our business, financial condition, operating results or prospects.

Table of Contents

If clinical trials for our product candidates are prolonged or delayed, we may incur additional costs, and may not be able to commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis or at all.

We cannot predict whether we will encounter problems with any of our ongoing or planned clinical trials that will cause us or any regulatory authority to delay or suspend those clinical trials. A number of events, including any of the following, could delay the completion of our ongoing and planned clinical trials and negatively impact our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and to market and sell, a particular product candidate:

· delays in establishing the appropriate dosage levels;

· product candidates may not have the desired effects; and

· the lack of adequate funding to continue clinical trials.

Additionally, changes in standard of care or regulatory requirements and guidance may occur and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Such amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs for re-examination, which may impact the cost, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial. Such changes may also require us to reassess the viability of the program in question.

We do not know whether our clinical trials will begin or continue as planned, will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Delays in clinical trials will result in increased development costs for our product candidates. In addition, if we experience delays in completion of, or if we terminate, any of our clinical trials, the commercial prospects for our product candidates may be affected and our ability to generate product revenues will be delayed. Furthermore, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate.

The clinical trial designs, endpoints and outcomes that will be required to obtain marketing approval for our drug candidates are uncertain. We may never receive marketing approval for our drug candidates.

To our knowledge, there are currently no FDA-approved drug treatment options specifically approved for many of the disease indications we are targeting with our drug candidates. Accordingly, there may not be well-established development paths and outcomes. The FDA, Health Canada or any other regulatory authority may determine that the designs or endpoints of any trial that we conduct, or that the outcome shown on any particular endpoint in any trial that we conduct, are not sufficient to establish a clinically meaningful benefit for our drug candidates, or otherwise, to support approval, even if the primary endpoint(s) of the trial is met with statistical significance. If this occurs, our business could be materially harmed. Moreover, if the regulatory authorities require us to conduct additional clinical trials beyond the ones that we currently contemplate, our finances and results from operations will be adversely impacted. If our clinical studies meet their respective primary endpoints, we plan to seek marketing approval. We cannot predict whether each of these regulatory agencies will agree that our study data and information will be sufficient to meet the requirements for filing a marketing application or the standards for approval. If the regulatory agencies determine that more data and information are needed, it could delay and/or negatively impact our ability to obtain regulatory approval to market and sell a particular product candidate.

Table of Contents

If the commercial opportunity in chronic ACD or ARDS is smaller than we anticipate, our future revenue from EB01 or EB05, as applicable, will be adversely affected and our business will suffer.

It is critical to our ability to grow and become profitable that we successfully identify patients with chronic ACD or ARDS. Our estimates of the number of people who have these conditions as well as the subset who have the potential to benefit from treatment with EB01 or EB05, are based on a variety of sources, including third-party estimates and analyses in the scientific literature, and may prove to be incorrect. Further, new information may emerge that changes our estimate of the prevalence of these diseases or the number of patient candidates for these drug candidates. The effort to identify patients for our other potential target indications is at an early stage, and we cannot accurately predict the number of patients for whom treatment might be possible. Additionally, the potentially addressable patient population for our drug candidates may be limited or may not be amenable to treatment with our drug candidates, and new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or access. If the commercial opportunity for these conditions is smaller than we anticipate, our future financial performance may be adversely impacted.

While we have chosen to test our product candidates in specific clinical indications based in part on our understanding of their mechanisms of action, our understanding may be incorrect or incomplete and, therefore, our product candidates may not be effective against the diseases tested in our clinical trials.

Our rationale for selecting the particular therapeutic indications for each of our product candidates is based in part on our understanding of the mechanism of action of these product candidates. However, our understanding of the product candidates’ mechanism of action may be incomplete or incorrect, or the mechanism may not be clinically relevant to the diseases treated. In such cases, our product candidates may prove to be ineffective in the clinical trials for treating those diseases, and adverse clinical trial results would likely negatively impact our business and results from operations.

A successful sPLA2 or anti-TLR4 drug has not been developed to date and we can provide no assurances that we will be successful or that there will be no adverse side effects.

Our sPLA2 and anti-TLR4 product candidates employ novel mechanisms of action. To our knowledge no drug companies have successfully commercialized an sPLA2 inhibitor or an anti-TLR4 antibody and as a result the efficacy and long-term side effects are not known. There is no guarantee that we will successfully develop and/or commercialize an sPLA2 inhibitor or anti-TLR4 therapy, and/or that our product candidates will have no adverse side effects.

Even if one of our product candidates receives marketing approval, it may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

If any product candidate receives marketing approval, the approved product may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If an approved product does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues or any profits from operations. Our ability to negotiate, secure and maintain third-party coverage and reimbursement for our product candidates may be affected by political, economic and regulatory developments in the United States, Canada, the European Union and other jurisdictions. Governments continue to impose cost containment measures, and third-party payors are increasingly challenging prices charged for medicines and examining their cost effectiveness, in addition to their safety and efficacy. These and other similar developments could significantly limit the degree of market acceptance of any of our future product candidates that receive marketing approval.

Table of Contents

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and any of our other current or future product candidates, we may not be successful in commercializing the applicable product candidate if it receives marketing approval.

We do not have a sales or marketing infrastructure and have no experience as a company in the sale or marketing of pharmaceutical products. To achieve commercial success for any approved product, we must either develop a sales and marketing organization or outsource these functions to third parties. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel. If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales and marketing services, our product revenues or the profitability of these product revenues to us could be lower than if we were to market and sell any products that we develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are acceptable to us. We likely will have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products to treat our target indications or markets before or more successfully than we do.

The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition with respect to our current product candidates and any products we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. Competitors may also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise than we do. Our commercial opportunities could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are more effective, safer, have fewer or less severe side effects, are approved for broader indications or patient populations, or are more convenient or less expensive than any products that we develop and commercialize. Our competitors may also obtain marketing approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our products, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. If approved, our product candidates will compete for a share of the existing market with numerous other products being used to treat ACD, ARDS, or any other indications for which we may receive government approval.

Even if we are able to commercialize one of our product candidates, the product may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement practices or healthcare reform initiatives, which would harm our business.

The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing, coverage and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from country to country. Current and future legislation may significantly change the approval requirements in ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted and, in some markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, and negatively impact the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidates obtain marketing approval.

Our ability to commercialize EB01, EB05 or any other product candidate successfully also will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Government authorities and other third- party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement rates from both government-funded and private payors for any approved products that we develop could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercially sell any products that we may develop. The amount of insurance that we currently hold may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We will need to increase our insurance coverage when and if we begin conducting more expansive clinical development of our product candidates, and we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise.

Table of Contents

We will be dependent on third parties for manufacturing, including optimization, technology transfers and scaling up of clinical scale quantities of all of our product candidates.

We have no direct experience in manufacturing any of our product candidates, and currently lack the resources or capability to manufacture any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale. As a result, we will be dependent on third parties for manufacturing, including optimization, technology transfers and scaling up of clinical scale quantities of all our product candidates. We believe that this strategy will enable us to direct operational and financial resources to the development of our product candidates rather than diverting resources to establishing manufacturing infrastructure; however our use of third parties to manufacture our product candidates may increase the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

We do not currently have any agreements with third-party manufacturers for the long-term clinical or commercial supply of any of our product candidates and may in the future be unable to scale-up and/or conclude agreements for commercial supply with commercial third-party manufacturers on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we are able to establish and maintain arrangements with third-party manufacturers, they may encounter difficulties in achieving volume production, laboratory testing, quality control or quality assurance or suffer shortages of qualified personnel, any of which could result in our inability to manufacture sufficient quantities to meet clinical timelines for a particular product candidate, to obtain marketing approval for the product candidate or to commercialize the product candidate. We may compete with other companies for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us.

If the third parties that we contract to manufacture product for our preclinical tests and clinical trials cease to continue to do so for any reason or if we elect to change suppliers, we likely would experience delays in advancing these clinical trials while we identify and qualify replacement suppliers and we may be unable to obtain replacement suppliers on terms that are favorable to us. In addition, if we are not able to obtain adequate supplies of our product candidates or the drug substances used to manufacture them, it will be more difficult for us to develop our product candidates and compete effectively. Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to develop product candidates and commercialize any products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.

The manufacturing of our monoclonal antibody candidates is complex and subject to a multitude of risks. These manufacturing risks could substantially increase our costs and limit supply of these drug candidates for clinical development, and commercialization.

The manufacture of our monoclonal antibody candidates requires processing steps that are more complex than those required for most small molecule drugs. As a result of the complexities in manufacturing biologics, the cost to manufacture biologics in general, and our cell product candidates in particular, is generally higher than traditional small molecule chemical compounds, and the manufacturing processes are less reliable and are more difficult to reproduce. Although we are working with third parties to develop reproducible and commercially viable manufacturing processes for our product candidates, doing so is a difficult and uncertain task, and there are risks associated with scaling to the level required for advanced clinical trials or commercialization, including, among others, cost overruns, potential problems with process scale-out, process reproducibility, stability issues, lot consistency, and timely availability of reagents or raw materials.

We may make changes as we continue to evolve the manufacturing processes for our product candidates for advanced clinical trials and commercialization, and we cannot be sure that even minor changes in these processes will not cause our product candidates to perform differently and affect the results of our ongoing clinical trials, future clinical trials, or the performance of the product once commercialized. In some circumstances, changes in manufacturing operations, including to our protocols, processes, materials or facilities used, may require us to perform additional preclinical or comparability studies, or to collect additional clinical data from patients prior to undertaking additional clinical studies or filing for regulatory approval for a product candidate. These requirements may lead to delays in our clinical development and commercialization plans for our product candidates, and may increase our development costs substantially.

Table of Contents

We may also decide to transfer certain manufacturing process know-how and certain intermediates to other contract manufacturing organizations. Transferring manufacturing testing and processes and know-how is complex and involves review and incorporation of both documented and undocumented processes that may have evolved over time. We and any CMOs or third parties that we engage for manufacturing our product candidates will need to conduct significant development work to transfer these processes and manufacture each of our product candidates for clinical trials and commercialization. In addition, we may be required to demonstrate the comparability of material generated by any CMO or third parties that we engage for manufacturing our product candidates with material previously produced and used in testing. The inability to manufacture comparable drug product by us or our CMO could delay the continued development of our product candidates.

We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such clinical trials.

We do not independently conduct clinical trials for our product candidates. We rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions, drug distributers and clinical investigators, to perform this function. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us at any time. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it would delay our product development activities. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates. Our product development costs will increase if we experience delays in testing or obtaining marketing approvals. Our reliance on these third parties for clinical development activities reduces our control over these activities but does not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials complies with standards, commonly referred to as Good Clinical Practice, and is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial.

If we are not able to establish additional collaborations, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans.

We may decide to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of our product candidates. Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document and we face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of a product candidate, reduce or delay our development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay our potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we would likely need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.

Even if we complete the necessary clinical trials, the marketing approval process is expensive, time consuming and uncertain. If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required marketing approvals, we will not be able to commercialize our product candidates, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.

Our product candidates and the activities associated with their development and commercialization, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution, are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA, Health Canada and by comparable authorities in other countries. Failure to obtain marketing approval for a product candidate will prevent us from commercializing the product candidate. We have not received approval to market EB01, EB05 or any other Edesa product candidate from regulatory authorities in any jurisdiction.

Table of Contents

We have only limited experience in filing and supporting the applications necessary to obtain marketing approvals for product candidates and expect to rely on third-party consultants to assist us in this process. Securing marketing approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and effectiveness. Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities may determine that EB01, EB05 or any of our other product candidates is not effective, is only moderately effective or has undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities, safety profiles or other characteristics that preclude us from obtaining marketing approval or that prevent or limit commercial use. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical studies, clinical trials or other trials. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. Any marketing approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render the approved product not commercially viable. If we experience delays in obtaining approval or if we fail to obtain approval of our product candidates, the commercial prospects for our product candidates may be harmed and our ability to generate revenues will be materially impaired.

Even if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, the terms of approvals and ongoing regulation of our products may limit how we manufacture and market our products, and compliance with such requirements may involve substantial resources, which could materially impair our ability to generate revenue.

Even if marketing approval of a product candidate is granted, an approved product and our manufacturer and marketer are subject to ongoing review and extensive regulation, including the possible requirement to implement a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy or to conduct costly post- marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. We must also comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Promotional communications with respect to prescription drugs are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the information in the product’s approved labeling. Thus, we will not be able to promote any products we develop for indications or uses for which they are not approved. In addition, manufacturers of approved products and those manufacturers’ facilities are required to ensure that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP, which include requirements relating to quality control, quality assurance and documentation. Accordingly, assuming we receive marketing approval for one or more of our product candidates, we and our contract manufacturers will continue to expend time, money and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production, product surveillance and quality control. If we are not able to comply with post-approval regulatory requirements, we could have the marketing approvals for our products withdrawn by regulatory authorities and our ability to market any future products could be limited, which could adversely affect our ability to achieve or sustain profitability. Thus, the cost of compliance with post-approval regulations may have a negative effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We may not qualify for or ultimately benefit from various expedited regulatory review programs or designations.

If we believe we meet eligibility requirements, we intend to apply for various regulatory incentives in the United States, such as breakthrough therapy designation, fast track designation, accelerated approval and priority review, where available, that provide for expedited review and/or other benefits, and we may also seek similar designations elsewhere in the world. Often, regulatory agencies have broad discretion in determining whether or not product candidates qualify for such regulatory incentives and benefits and we cannot guarantee we would be successful in obtaining beneficial regulatory designations by FDA or other regulatory agencies. Even if approved, expedited designations may not result in faster development processes, reviews or approvals compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may later decide that any of our development programs no longer meet the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened. If we are not able to obtain or maintain such designations for EB05 or other product candidates, it could delay and/or negatively impact our ability to obtain regulatory approval.

The FDA has broad discretion regarding Emergency Use Authorizations for Covid-19 medical products, and such authorizations are only valid during the Covid-19 public health emergency.

While, in most cases, a therapeutic must be approved by FDA before the product may be sold, when a public health emergency is declared, subject to certain conditions, FDA may authorize the emergency use of an unapproved medical product under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). In the event that our Phase 2/3 clinical study of EB05 is successful, and if we believe we meet eligibility requirements, we intend to submit an application with the FDA for EUA. FDA does not have review deadlines with respect to such submissions and, therefore, the timing of any potential approval of an EUA submission would be uncertain. We would not be able to guarantee that the FDA would review our data in a timely manner, or that the FDA would accept the data when reviewed. The FDA may decide that our data are insufficient for an EUA and require additional studies and refuse to approve our application. In addition, even if granted, the FDA may revoke an EUA where it is determined that the underlying health emergency no longer exists or warrants such authorization. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining an EUA, or if any granted EUA is revoked after a short period of time, it could have a material adverse effect on our future business, financial condition and operating results.

Table of Contents

Use of social media platforms presents new risks.

We believe that our potential patient population is active on social media. Social media practices in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are evolving, which creates uncertainty and risk of noncompliance with regulations applicable to our business. For example, patients may use social media platforms to comment on the effectiveness of, or adverse experiences with, a product candidate, which could result in reporting obligations. In addition, there is a risk of inappropriate disclosure of sensitive information or negative or inaccurate posts or comments about us or our product candidates on any social networking website. In addition, our employees or third parties with whom we contract, such as our CROs or CMOs, may knowingly or inadvertently make use of social media in a manner that may give rise to liability, lead to the loss of trade secrets or other intellectual property or result in public exposure of personal information of our employees, clinical trial patients, customers and others or information regarding our product candidates or clinical trials. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition and could adversely affect the price of our common shares.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

We are dependent on license relationships with third parties for our key drug development programs.

In 2016, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem to obtain exclusive rights to certain know-how, patents and data relating to a pharmaceutical product. We are using the exclusive rights to develop the product for therapeutic, prophylactic and diagnostic uses in topical dermal applications and anorectal applications, including for the development of EB01 to treat ACD and EB02 to treat HD. In 2021, we also entered into a license agreement with the inventor of the same pharmaceutical product to acquire global rights for all fields of use beyond those named under the 2016 license agreement with Yissum. If we default or fail to perform any of the terms, covenants, provisions or our obligations under the License Agreement, Yissum has the option to terminate the License Agreement, subject to advance notice to cure such default. Any termination of this license agreement would have a materially adverse impact on our business and results from operations.

In April 2020, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with NovImmune SA to obtain exclusive rights throughout the world to certain know-how, patents and data relating to the monoclonal antibodies targeting TLR4 and CXCL10. We are using these rights to develop EB05 as a potential treatment for ARDS and other disease indications. If we default or fail to perform any of the terms, covenants, provisions or our obligations under the License Agreement, including milestone payments, NovImmune has the option to terminate the License Agreement, subject to advance notice to cure such default. Any termination of this license agreement would have a materially adverse impact on our business and results from operations.

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our licensed technology and products, or if the scope of the patent protection is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our licensed technology and products may be adversely affected.

Our success will partially depend on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and other countries with respect to our proprietary technology and products. We intend to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States, in Europe and in certain additional jurisdictions related to our novel technologies and product candidates that are important to our business. This process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, if we license technology or product candidates from third parties in the future, these license agreements may not permit us to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain or enforce the patents, covering the licensed technology or product candidates.

Table of Contents

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has been the subject of much litigation. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of any patents issued to us will likely be highly uncertain. Patent applications that we file may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may also diminish the value of patents issued to us, narrow the scope of our patent protection or make enforcement more difficult or uncertain.

We may become involved in lawsuits or other enforcement proceedings to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming and potentially unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file claims, which can be expensive and time consuming to prosecute. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their intellectual property or that our patent and other intellectual property rights are invalid or unenforceable, including for antitrust reasons. As a result, in a patent infringement proceeding, a court or administrative body may decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, or may construe the patent’s claims narrowly and so refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the competitor technology in question. Even if we are successful in a patent infringement action, the unsuccessful party may subsequently raise antitrust issues and bring a follow-on action thereon. Antitrust issues may also provide a bar to settlement or constrain the permissible settlement terms.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties. There is considerable intellectual property litigation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and we may become party to, or threatened with, future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology. The risks of being involved in such litigation and office proceedings may also increase as our product candidates approach commercialization, and as our business gains greater visibility operating as a publicly traded company in the United States. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing or future intellectual property rights and to restrict our freedom to operate. Third parties may also seek injunctive relief against us, whereby they would attempt to prevent us from practicing our technologies altogether pending outcome of any litigation against us. We may not be aware of all such intellectual property rights potentially relating to our product candidates prior to their assertion against us. If we are found to infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could incur substantial monetary damages. A finding of infringement could also prevent us from commercializing our product candidates, lose market exclusivity, require substantial license payments, or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business.

Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and could distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.

Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses and likely would distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments that could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our securities. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development, sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Accordingly, costs and lost management time, as well as uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Table of Contents

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

We partially rely on trade secrets and know-how, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary and confidential information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect these trade secrets, in part, by entering into nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them. However, we cannot guarantee that we have executed these agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or that the agreements we have executed will provide adequate protection. Any party with whom we have executed such an agreement may breach that agreement and disclose our proprietary or confidential information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets, particularly unpatented know-how, were to be obtained or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.

Risks Related to Owning Our Securities

The price of our common shares may continue to be volatile.

Market prices for securities of early-stage pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other life sciences companies have historically been particularly volatile, and the market price of our common shares has been subject to significant fluctuations. This volatility can be exacerbated by low trading volume. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of our shares to fluctuate include:

· sales or potential sales of substantial amounts of our common shares;

· developments concerning our product manufacturers;

· governmental regulation and legislation;

· actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our product candidates;

· actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results of operations;

· regional or worldwide recession;

· changes in accounting principles; and

· the loss of any of our key scientific or management personnel.

Moreover, the stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of individual companies. These broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect the trading price of our common shares. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, shareholders have often instituted class action securities litigation. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could significantly harm our profitability and reputation.

Table of Contents

If we fail to meet all applicable Nasdaq Capital Market requirements and Nasdaq determines to delist our common shares, the delisting could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common shares and the market price of our common shares could decrease and our ability to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted.

Our common shares are listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing requirements, and if we are unable to maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements, including the $1.00 Minimum Bid Price Requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), our securities may be delisted from Nasdaq, which could reduce the liquidity of our common shares materially and result in a corresponding material reduction in the price of our common shares. In addition, delisting could harm our ability to raise capital through alternative financing sources on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may result in the potential loss of confidence by investors, employees, suppliers and business development opportunities. Such a delisting likely would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common shares when you wish to do so. Further, if we were to be delisted from Nasdaq, our common shares may no longer be recognized as a “covered security” and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities. Thus, delisting from Nasdaq could adversely affect our ability to raise additional financing through the public or private sale of equity securities, would significantly impact the ability of investors to trade our securities and would negatively impact the value and liquidity of our common shares.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our investors, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements, grants and debt financings. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that the we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a holder of our common shares. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends or other distributions. If we raise additional funds through licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research and development programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future, and consequently, any gains from an investment in our common shares will likely depend on appreciation in the price of our common shares.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common shares and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to holders of our common shares in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors must rely on sales of their common shares and warrants after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments. There is no guarantee that our common shares will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which the shareholders have purchased their shares.

A sale of a substantial number of our common shares in the public market could cause the market price of our common shares to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

The price of our common shares could decline as a result of sales of a large number of our common shares or the perception that these sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

In addition, in the future, we may issue additional common shares, warrants or other equity or debt securities convertible into common shares in connection with a financing, acquisition, litigation settlement, employee arrangements or otherwise. Any such issuance could result in substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and could cause the price of our common shares to decline.

Table of Contents

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common shares, the price of our common shares could decline.

The trading market for our common shares relies in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. We do not control these analysts. The price of our common shares could decline if one or more equity analysts downgrade our common shares or if analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business.

Our Articles allow for our board of directors to create new series of preferred shares without further approval by the shareholders, which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common shares.

As previously approved by our shareholders, our board of directors has the authority to authorize up to an unlimited number of a new series of our preferred shares and to fix and determine the special rights and restrictions of that series without further shareholder approval, subject to the terms set out in the Articles and unless otherwise required by the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). As a result, our board of directors could authorize the creation of a series of our preferred shares that would grant to holders of the preferred shares a right to our assets upon liquidation before a distribution to the holders of our common shares. In addition, our board of directors could authorize the creation of a new series of our preferred shares that is convertible into our common shares, which could result in dilution to existing shareholders.

Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 could have a material adverse effect on our share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC require an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are currently exempt from the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404(b). If we lose this eligibility, we will incur increased personnel and audit fees in connection with the additional audit requirements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC. If we cannot in the future favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence in the reliability of our financial reports may be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our share price.

The ownership of our common shares is highly concentrated, which may prevent you and other shareholders from influencing significant corporate decisions and may result in conflicts of interest that could cause our common shares price to decline.

The ownership of our common shares is highly concentrated among insiders and affiliates. Accordingly, these shareholders will have substantial influence over the outcome of corporate actions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the company’s assets or any other significant corporate transaction. These shareholders may also delay or prevent a change of control of the company, even if such a change of control would benefit the other shareholders of the company. The significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common shares due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.

We may be deemed a passive foreign investment company, and as a result, U.S. shareholders may be subject to special taxation rules that restrict capital gains treatment, unless the shareholders make a timely tax election to treat the company as a qualified electing fund.

A special set of U.S. federal income tax rules applies to a foreign corporation that is deemed a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Based on our audited financial statements, income tax returns, and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we likely will not be classified as a PFIC in the September 30, 2022 taxable year. There can be no assurance, however, that we will not be considered to be a PFIC for any particular year in the future because PFIC status is factual in nature, depends upon factors not wholly within our control, generally cannot be determined until the close of the taxable year in question, and is determined annually. If we are deemed to be a PFIC during the current or any future taxable year, U.S. shareholders would be subject to special taxation rules related to gain on sale or disposition of our shares and excess distributions unless they make a timely election to treat our shares as a qualified electing fund (QEF election). A QEF election cannot be made unless we provide U.S. shareholders the information and computations needed to report income and gains pursuant to a QEF election. Without a QEF election, U.S. shareholders may not be able to use capital gains tax treatment and may be subject to potentially adverse tax consequences. Given the complexities of the PFIC and QEF election rules, U.S. shareholders may need to incur the time and expense of consulting a tax adviser about these rules.

Table of Contents

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES.

We currently lease approximately 2,800 square feet of office space in Markham, Ontario, from a related company under a lease that expires in December 2022, with an option to renew for another two-year term. We anticipate extending the lease through December 2024.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may be involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including contract disputes, employment matters and intellectual property disputes. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings or claims outside the ordinary course of business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common shares trade on The Nasdaq Capital Market in the United States under the symbol “EDSA”.

Holders

As of December 14, 2022, we had 19,353,351 common shares outstanding, with 44 shareholders of record. The number of record shareholders was determined from the records of our stock transfer agent and does not reflect persons or entities that hold their shares in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

See Part III, Item 12 “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” of this report.

Dividends

We have not declared any dividends on our common shares since our incorporation and do not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future. Our present policy is to retain future earnings, if any, for use in our operations and the expansion of our business.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

None.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences Applicable to Holders in the United States

The following summary of the material Canadian federal income tax consequences is stated in general terms and is not intended to be legal or tax advice to any particular shareholder. Management urges holders to consult their own tax advisor with respect to the income tax consequences applicable to them based on their own particular circumstances.

This summary is applicable only to holders who are resident in the United States for income tax purposes, have never been resident in Canada for income tax purposes, deal at arm’s length with the company, hold their Common Shares as capital property and who will not use or hold the Common Shares in carrying on business in Canada. This summary does not discuss any non-Canadian income or other tax consequences of acquiring, holding or disposing of Common Shares.

This summary is based upon the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations thereunder (collectively, the Tax Act or ITA) and the Canada-United States Tax Convention (1980) as amended (the Tax Convention) at the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the current administrative practices of the Canada Revenue Agency. This summary does not take into account provincial income tax consequences. The comments in this summary that are based on the Tax Convention are applicable to U.S. Holders only if they qualify for benefits under the Tax Convention.

Table of Contents

Dividends

A Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax (Part XIII Tax) equal to 25%, or such lower rates as may be available under an applicable tax treaty, of the gross amount of any dividend paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited to the Holder on the Common Shares. For example, under the Tax Convention, where dividends on the Common Shares are considered to be paid to a Holder that is the beneficial owner of the dividends and is a resident of the United States for the purposes of, and is entitled to all the benefits of, the Tax Convention, the applicable rate of Canadian withholding tax is generally reduced to 15%. The company will be required to withhold the applicable amount of Part XIII Tax from each dividend so paid and remit the withheld amount directly to the Receiver General for Canada for the account of the Holder. We have not declared any dividends on our common shares since our incorporation and do not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future.

Disposition of Common Shares

A Holder who is a resident of the United States and realizes a capital gain on a disposition of Common Shares will generally be exempt from Canadian income tax on that capital gain, unless the shares are taxable Canadian property.

Provided the Common Shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” (as defined in the Tax Act) (which currently includes the Nasdaq Capital Market) at the time of disposition, the Common Shares will generally not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Holder at that time, unless any of the following conditions are met: (a) at the time of disposition more than 50% of the fair market value of the Common Shares is derived directly or indirectly from real property situated in Canada, which generally includes certain Canadian natural resource properties; (b) the Common Shares formed part of the business property of a permanent establishment that the Holder has or had in Canada within the 12 months preceding disposition; or (c) the Holder is an individual who (i) was a resident of Canada at any time within the ten years immediately preceding the disposition, and for a total of 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years, preceding the disposition, (ii) owned the Common Shares when the individual ceased to be resident in Canada, and (iii) the Common Shares were not subject to a deemed disposition on the Holder’s departure from Canada. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Common Share may otherwise be deemed to be taxable Canadian property to a Holder for purposes of the Tax Act in particular circumstances.

Inclusion in Taxable Income

A Holder who is subject to Canadian income tax in respect of a capital gain realized on a disposition of Common Shares must include one half of the capital gain (“taxable capital gain”) in computing the Holder’s taxable income earned in Canada. The Holder may, subject to certain limitations, deduct one half of any capital loss (“allowable capital loss”) arising on a disposition of taxable Canadian property from taxable capital gains realized in the year of disposition in respect of taxable Canadian property and, to the extent not so deductible, from such taxable capital gains of any of the three preceding years or any subsequent year. Subject to certain exceptions, a non-resident person who disposes of taxable Canadian property must notify the Canada Revenue Agency either before or after the disposition (within ten days of the disposition).

Item 6. RESERVED.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of many important factors, including those set forth in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors.” Please see “Forward-Looking Statements and Other Matters” in Part I above. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward- looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Overview

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc. and Edesa Biotech USA, Inc.

Our operations have been funded primarily through issuances of common shares, exercises of common share purchase warrants, convertible preferred shares, convertible loans, government grants and tax incentives. We have devoted substantially all of our efforts to research and development, including clinical trials, and have not completed the development of any of our drug candidates. We believe our cash and cash equivalents on hand, including net proceeds from equity offering completed subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, and reimbursements of eligible research and development expenses under our contribution agreement with the Canadian government are sufficient to support the Company’s operations for at least the next 12 months.

As a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, we expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of, and seek marketing approvals for our product candidates, prepare for and begin the commercialization of any approved products, and add infrastructure and personnel to support our product development efforts and operations as a public company in the United States and Canada. To fund operations, we may seek additional financing through the sale of equity, government grants, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential future licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements with third parties or other strategic transactions.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021

Our total operating expenses decreased by $5.31 million to $18.37 million for the year ended September 30, 2022 compared to $23.68 million for the prior year:

Total other income decreased by $9.52 million to $0.82 million for the year ended September 30, 2022 compared to $10.34 million for the prior year primarily due to a decrease in grant income associated with the completion of clinical study activities under our federal reimbursement grant with the Canadian government’s Strategic Innovation Fund.

For the year ended September 30, 2022, our net loss was $17.55 million, or $1.05 per common share, compared to a net loss of $13.34 million, or $1.10 per common share, for the year ended September 30, 2021.

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures primarily consist of computer and office equipment. There were no significant capital expenditures for the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a clinical-stage company we have not generated significant revenue, and we expect to incur operating losses as we continue our efforts to acquire, develop, seek regulatory approval for and commercialize product candidates and execute on our strategic initiatives. Our operations have historically been funded through issuances of common shares, exercises of common share purchase warrants, convertible preferred shares, convertible loans, government grants and tax incentives. For the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, we reported net losses of $17.55 million and $13.34 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

In March 2022, we completed a registered direct offering of 1,540,000 common shares, no par value, and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,199,727 common shares. In a concurrent private placement, we issued common share purchase warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 2,739,727 common shares. After deducting the placement agent fees and offering expenses, net proceeds to the Company were approximately $9.01 million.

In November 2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement with RBC Capital Markets, LLC (RBCCM), as sales agent, which was subsequently terminated in March 2022. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, as amended, the Company could offer and sell, from time to time, common shares through an at-the-market offering program for up to $15.4 million in gross cash proceeds. During the term of the agreement, we sold a total of 626,884 common shares. After deducting commissions and direct costs, net proceeds totaled approximately $2.62 million.

Under our contribution agreement with the Canadian government’s Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF), we are eligible to receive cash reimbursements up to C$14.05 million (approximately $11 million USD) in the aggregate for certain research and development expenses related to our EB05 clinical development program. For the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, we recorded grant income of $0.78 million and $10.34 million respectively.

At September 30, 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $7.09 million, working capital of $6.95 million, shareholders’ equity of $9.39 million and an accumulated deficit of $44.04 million.

Subsequent to the fiscal year end, on November 2, 2022, we completed a private placement of units consisting of 2,691,337 common shares, 12-month warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,345,665 common shares and 3-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,345,665 common shares. The gross proceeds from this offering are approximately $3.0 million, before offering expenses.

We plan to finance company operations over the course of the next twelve months with cash and cash equivalents on hand, including net proceeds from equity offering completed subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, and reimbursements of eligible research and development expenses under our contribution agreement with the Canadian government. Management has flexibility to adjust this timeline by making changes to planned expenditures related to, among other factors, the size and timing of clinical trial expenditures and manufacturing campaigns, staffing levels, and the acquisition or in-licensing of new product candidates. To help fund our operations and meet our obligations in the future, we plan to seek additional financing through the sale of equity, government grants, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential future licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements with third parties or other strategic transactions. There is no assurance that adequate funding will be available to us or, if available, that such funding will be available on terms that we or our shareholders view as favorable. Market volatility, inflation, interest rates, government policies and concerns related to the war in Ukraine and the Covid-19 pandemic may have a significant impact on the availability of funding sources and the terms at which any funding may be available.

Research and Development

Our primary business is the development of innovative therapeutics for inflammatory and immune-related diseases with clear unmet medical needs. We focus our resources on research and development activities, including the conduct of clinical studies and product development, and expense such costs as they are incurred. Our research and development expenses have primarily consisted of employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, taxes, travel, and share-based compensation expense for personnel in research and development functions; expenses related to process development and production of product candidates paid to contract manufacturing organizations, including the cost of acquiring, developing, and manufacturing research material; costs associated with clinical activities, including expenses for contract research organizations; and clinical trials and activities related to regulatory filings for our product candidates, including regulatory consultants.

Research and development expenses, which have historically varied based on the level of activity in our clinical programs, are significantly influenced by study initiation expenses and patient recruitment rates, and as a result are expected to continue to fluctuate, sometimes substantially. Our research and development costs were $13.34 million and $17.95 million for the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to decreased milestone payments, external research expenses related to our ongoing clinical studies and investigational drug product manufacturing expenses, which were partially offset by increased personnel expenses.

Table of Contents

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is primarily related to fluctuations between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. We have balances in Canadian dollars which are subject to foreign currency fluctuations relating to the impact of translating to U.S. dollars for financial statements presentation. We also periodically exchange U.S. dollars for Canadian dollars since most operating expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. The fluctuation of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar will have an impact upon our profitability and may also affect the value of our assets and the amount of shareholders’ equity. We have not entered into any agreements or purchased any instruments to hedge possible currency risks. At September 30, 2022, we had assets denominated in Canadian dollars of approximately C$7.1 million and the U.S. dollar exchange rate as at this date was equal to 1.3742 Canadian dollars. Based on the exposure at September 30, 2022, a 10% annual change in the Canadian/U.S. exchange rate would impact our net loss and other comprehensive loss by $0.52 million.

Concentration of Credit Risk

We are potentially subject to financial instrument concentration of credit risk through our cash and cash equivalents, and accounts and other receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents in money market mutual funds of U.S. government securities or financial institutions believed to be credit worthy and perform periodic evaluations of their relative credit standing.

Accounts and other receivable include Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) refunds receivable from the Canada Revenue Agency and reimbursements receivable from the Canadian government’s Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF). We assess the collectability of our accounts receivable through a review of our current aging and payment terms, as well as an analysis of our historical collection rate, general economic conditions and credit status of the government agencies. As of September 30, 2022 and 2021, all outstanding accounts and other receivable were deemed to be fully collectible, and therefore, no allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded.

Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements, which are indexed under Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require that the management make certain assumptions and estimates and, in connection therewith, adopt certain accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Of those policies, we believe that the policies discussed below may involve a higher degree of judgment or may otherwise be more relevant to our financial condition and results of operations.

Accounts and other receivable

Accounts and other receivable include Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) refunds receivable and reimbursements receivable from the Canadian government’s Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF). As of September 30, 2022, all outstanding accounts, grants and HST refunds receivable were deemed to be fully collectible, and therefore, no allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded.

Table of Contents

Intangible assets

Intangible assets represent the exclusive world-wide rights to know-how, patents and data relating to certain monoclonal antibodies (the Constructs), including sublicensing rights, acquired by entering into a license agreement with a pharmaceutical development company. Unless earlier terminated, the term of the license agreement will remain in effect for 25 years from the date of first commercial sale of licensed products containing the Constructs. Subsequently, the license agreement will automatically renew for five-year periods unless either party terminates the agreement in accordance with its terms. We recognize intangible assets at their historical cost, amortized on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives, which is 25 years, and subject to impairment review at the end of each reporting period.

Right-of-Use assets

We recognize operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets and operating lease liabilities on the balance sheet for operating leases with terms longer than 12 months. We follow the ongoing practical expedient not to recognize operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for short-term leases. The ROU assets are initially measured at cost and amortized using the straight-line method through the end of the lease term. The lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using our incremental borrowing rate.

Share-based compensation

We measure the cost of equity-settled transactions by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted if the fair value of the goods or services received by the Company cannot be reliably estimated.

We grant options to buy common shares of the Company to our directors, officers, employees and consultants, and grant other equity-based instruments such as warrants to non- employees. The fair value of share-based compensation is measured on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and is recognized over the vesting period for employees or the service period for non-employees, net of forfeitures as they occur. The provisions of our share-based compensation plans do not require the Company to settle any options by transferring cash or other assets, and therefore we classify the awards as equity. The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of subjective assumptions, including price volatility of the underlying common shares, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, and expected life of the option.

Translation of foreign currency transactions

Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of our wholly owned Canadian subsidiary is measured using the Canadian dollar as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the Canadian operation have been translated at year-end exchange rates and related revenue and expenses have been translated at average exchange rates for the year. Accumulated gains and losses resulting from the translation of the financial statements of the Canadian operation are included as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of shareholders' equity.

For other transactions denominated in currencies other than our functional currency, the monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end rates. Revenue and expenses are translated at rates of exchange prevailing on the transaction dates. Non-monetary balance sheet and related income statement accounts are remeasured into U.S. dollar using historical exchange rates. All of the exchange gains or losses resulting from these other transactions are recognized in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are contained in Note 3 to the financial statements, which are indexed under Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company and are not required to provide disclosure under this item.

Table of Contents

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The financial statements and related financial information required to be filed hereunder are indexed under Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that material information related to our Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, by others within those entities on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2022. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2022, were effective.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for designing, establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to provide reasonable assurance that the financial information prepared by us for external purposes is reliable and has been recorded, processed and reported in an accurate and timely manner in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities. The Audit Committee fulfills its role of ensuring the integrity of the reported information through its review of the interim and annual financial statements. Management reviewed the results of their assessment with our Audit Committee.

Management has used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)” to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2022.

Attestation Report of Our Registered Public Accounting Firm

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report from our independent registered public accounting firm. We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, and are subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. We are not required to have the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting audited by our external auditors.

Table of Contents

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended September 30, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

Item 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Directors

Our directors and their ages as of the date of this filing are set forth below.

Name Age Position(s) Held Director Since

Lorin Johnson, PhD (2) 70 Director June 7, 2019

Sean MacDonald (1)(3) 46 Chairman of the Board of Directors June 7, 2019

Frank Oakes (3) 72 Director April 9, 2010

Carlo Sistilli, CPA, CMA (1) 66 Director June 7, 2019

(1) Member of Audit Committee.

(2) Member of Compensation Committee.

(3) Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

Biographies and Qualifications

The biographies of our directors and certain information regarding each director’s experience, attributes, skills and/or qualifications that led to the conclusion that the director should be serving as a director of our Company are as follows:

Jennifer M. Chao has over 25 years of experience in the biotech and life sciences industries focused primarily on finance and corporate strategy. She is Managing Partner of CoreStrategies Management, LLC, a company she founded in 2008. She currently serves on the Board of Directors of Endo International plc. (Nasdaq: ENDP) and is a member of Endo’s Audit Committee and Compliance Committee. Prior to joining Endo, Ms. Chao served as a Director (since 2015) and as Board Chair (since October 2019) of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. until its acquisition by Endo in December 2020. She also served as Chair of BioSpecifics’ Compensation Committee and as a member of its Audit Committee, Strategy Committee, Intellectual Property Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, since March 2022, she has been a Board Director of Cardiol Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq: CRDL) and serves as Chair of Cardiol’s Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. Additionally, from 2004 to 2008, Ms. Chao was Managing Director and Senior Lead Biotechnology Securities Analyst at Deutsche Bank. Prior to that, Ms. Chao served as Managing Director and Senior Lead Biotechnology Analyst at RBC Capital Markets and Vice President, Senior Biotechnology Analyst at Leerink Swann & Co. Ms. Chao was a research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, as a recipient of the BioMedical Research Career Award, and received her B.A. in Politics and Greek Classics from New York University. Ms. Chao’s qualifications to serve on the board of directors include her extensive experience in the life science industry, corporate strategy and U.S. capital markets.

Table of Contents

Lorin Johnson, PhD is a seasoned pharmaceutical entrepreneur and innovator with more than 30 years of experience in building companies. He has been a member of our board of directors since June 2019, having previously served as a director of the company’s principal operating subsidiary, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc., from its founding in January 2015 to January 2016. Dr. Johnson is currently the Chief Scientist of Glycyx Pharma Ventures Ltd., a biopharma investment and development company he founded in March 2016. Prior to Glycyx, Dr. Johnson cofounded Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company, and held senior leadership positions prior to its acquisition by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. in April 2015. Earlier in his career, Dr. Johnson served as Director of Scientific Operations and Chief Scientist at Scios, Inc. (formerly California Biotechnology, Inc). In addition to Edesa, he currently serves on the board of 9Meters Biopharma, Inc. (Nasdaq: NMTR), and is a member of 9Meters’ Audit Committee, Compensation Committee (chair) and Nominating and Governance Committee. He also serves on the boards of Glycyx MOR, Inc., Intact Therapeutics, Inc., Kinisi Therapeutics, Ltd. and NeVAP, Inc. Dr. Johnson has also held academic positions at Stanford University School of Medicine where he served as an Assistant Professor of Pathology and at the University of California, San Francisco. He is the coauthor of 76 journal articles and book chapters and is the coinventor on 23 issued patents. Dr. Johnson holds a PhD from the University of Southern California and was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of California, San Francisco. Dr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the board of directors include his knowledge of our business and his significant experience in the pharmaceutical industry.

Sean MacDonald has chaired our Board since June 2019, having previously served as a director of the company’s principal operating subsidiary, Edesa Biotech Research Inc., since September 2017. In his career, he has led and closed multiple licensing transactions, financings, acquisitions and divestments, and corporate strategy for several pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Mr. MacDonald is currently an advisor to venture capital groups and biotechnology companies, including Finchley Healthcare Ventures and Dark Canyon Laboratories, a position he has held since April 2022. From August 2021 to April 2022, he was the Chief Business Officer of iOnctura SA, a Swiss clinical-stage oncology company. From April 2019 to August 2021, he was the Head of Business Development for Cosmo Pharmaceuticals NV, a European gastroenterology focused pharmaceutical company; and from October 2018 to August 2021 he was the chief executive of Corbin Therapeutics, a Montreal-based biotech company focused on treating neuroinflammation. Mr. MacDonald held various operational and executive leadership roles from October 2012 to October 2018 at Pharmascience Inc., one of Canada’s largest pharmaceutical companies, including Vice President of Business Development and Corporate Development. He received his BSc in Molecular Biology and MBA from the University of Ottawa. Mr. MacDonald’s qualifications to serve on the board of directors include his extensive operational experience and background in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry.

Pardeep Nijhawan, MD, FRCPC, AGAF has served as our Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Secretary and a member of our board of directors since June 2019, having previously founded and led the company’s principal operating subsidiary, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc., since January 2015. Dr. Nijhawan is a seasoned pharmaceutical entrepreneur with more than 20 years of experience in cross-functional leadership roles in finance, marketing, corporate strategy and business development. In 2002 Dr. Nijhawan founded Medical Futures Inc., and served as its CEO. He sold Medical Futures to Tribute Pharmaceuticals in 2015. In 2014, he founded Exzell Pharma, a specialty Canadian-based pharmaceutical organization that markets and commercializes approved products. He sold Exzell Pharma to BioLab Pharma in 2022. Dr. Nijhawan also founded Digestive Health Clinic in 2000 and led it to become one of Canada’s largest provider of private endoscopy services. He continues to serve on the Board of Digestive Health Clinic. Since January 2021, he has served on the advisory board of Private Debt Partners, a Canadian alternative asset management firm. Dr. Nijhawan received his MD from the University of Ottawa and completed his internship at Yale University, and his internal medicine residency and fellowship at the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Nijhawan’s qualifications to serve on the board of directors include his extensive executive leadership and experience in the life sciences industry and his knowledge of our business as its chief executive.

Frank Oakes has more than 40 years of executive leadership experience. He has been a director of the company since April 2010 and served as the Chairman of the Board until June 2019. From 1999 to 2019, he also served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the company’s legacy operating subsidiary, which he founded. Prior to founding Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc., he was the Chief Executive Officer of The Abalone Farm, Inc., where he led the company through the research and development, capitalization, and commercialization phases of development to become the largest abalone producer in the United States at the time. Mr. Oakes has consulted and lectured around the world. He received his BS degree from California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo and is a graduate of the Los Angeles Regional Technology Alliance University’s management program. Mr. Oakes qualifications to serve on the board of directors include his extensive operational experience building companies and management teams and leading a U.S. and Canadian publicly listed life science company.

Paul Pay is an executive with over 40 years of experience in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry. He has been a member of our board of directors since June 2019, having previously served as a director of the company’s principal operating subsidiary, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc., since its founding in January 2015. From November 2002 to May 2021, he led all business development activity at Norgine. He is currently Senior Advisor, Corporate & Business Development at Norgine reporting to the Chairman. Prior to joining Norgine, Mr. Pay held senior management positions at large, specialty and early-stage pharmaceutical companies, and cofounded a university spin-out company. His commercial roles have included sales, marketing, market research, licensing, business development, public relations, intellectual property and product development. He is a past Director of Exzell Pharma, a specialty pharmaceutical company; of Arc Medical Design, a medical device development company and of Norgine Ltd., an affiliate of Norgine and of Merus Labs International, a Norgine wholly owned subsidiary. Mr. Pay received a BSC (Hons) from the University of Leeds. Mr. Pay’s qualifications to serve on the board of directors include his extensive experience in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry and his knowledge of Edesa’s business.

Table of Contents

Carlo Sistilli, CPA, CMA Mr. Sistilli has more than 35 years of financial experience and has held a variety of executive positions in accounting and finance during his career. He has been a member of our board of directors since June 2019, having previously served as a board observer of the company’s principal operating subsidiary, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc., since September 2017. Mr. Sistilli has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Arista Homes since March 2003 to present. Prior to Arista, Mr. Sistilli was a founder and served as CFO and a board member of an Internet start-up company in the automotive sector, and played a key role in taking the company public on the Alberta Ventures Exchange. Earlier in his career, Mr. Sistilli was the Controller and a member of the senior management team of a major regional trust company, which Mr. Sistilli helped sell to Manulife Financial. Since January 2021, he has served on the board of directors and audit committee of Aleafia Health Inc. In addition to his professional career, Mr. Sistilli is an officer and a member of the board of directors of Mother of Mercy Centre. Mr. Sistilli holds a Bachelor of Arts from York University, with a major in economics, Certified Management Accountant Designation and a Chartered Professional Accountant Designation. Mr. Sistilli’s qualifications to serve on the board of directors include his knowledge of Edesa’s business and his background in accounting and finance.

Executive Officers

Set forth below is certain information with respect to the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers as of the date of this filing. Biographical information pertaining to Dr. Nijhawan, who is a director and an executive officer, may be found in the above section entitled “Directors.” The executive officers serve at the pleasure of our Board of Directors.

Name Age Position(s) Held Date of Appointment

Kathi Niffenegger, CPA 65 Chief Financial Officer November 1, 2013

Michael Brooks, PhD 44 President June 7, 2019

Kathi Niffenegger, CPA has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2013. She also previously served as the company’s Corporate Secretary from 2013 to June 2019. Ms. Niffenegger has more than 30 years of experience in accounting and finance in a range of industries, and has led audits of manufacturing, pharmaceutical and governmental grant clients. She has also developed specialized expertise in cost accounting systems and internal controls. Prior to joining the company, she held positions of increasing responsibility in the audit division of Glenn Burdette CPAs and served most recently as technical partner. Earlier in her career, she was the Chief Financial Officer of Martin Aviation. Ms. Niffenegger holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration, Accounting from California State University, Long Beach. She is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and holds the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA) designation.

Michael Brooks, PhD was appointed President of Edesa in June 2019, having served as Vice President of Corporate Development and Strategy for the company’s principal operating subsidiary, Edesa Biotech Research, Inc., since January 2015. Prior to joining Edesa, Dr. Brooks held positions of increasing responsibility at Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc from 2010 to 2015 and served most recently as the company’s Director of Business Development. Prior to joining Cipher, Dr. Brooks was a Postdoctoral fellow at the University of Toronto. Dr. Brooks holds a Hons B.Sc. degree in Microbiology and a PhD in Molecular Genetics from the University of Toronto. Dr. Brooks received his MBA degree from the Rotman School of Management where he was a Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) Science-to-Business Scholar.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our common shares file reports with the SEC on their initial beneficial ownership of our common shares and any subsequent changes. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of such reports filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the Company’s year ended September 30, 2022, during such period, each of our directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our common shares filed on a timely basis all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act except for: one report on Form 4 reporting one share option grant that was inadvertently filed late by each of Dr. Johnson, Mr. MacDonald, Dr. Nijhawan, Mr. Oakes, Mr. Pay, Mr. Sistilli, Dr. Brooks and Ms. Niffenegger; and one report on Form 4 reporting one transaction that was inadvertently filed late by Dr. Brooks.

Table of Contents

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on the Investor Relations section of our website at edesabiotech.com/investors/governance, in the Corporate Governance section, under the Governance Documents section. We intend to satisfy the SEC’s disclosure requirements regarding amendments to, or waivers of, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on our website. Copies of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct may be obtained, free of charge, by writing to our Corporate Secretary, Edesa Biotech, Inc., 100 Spy Court, Markham, ON Canada L3R 5H6.

Information about our Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that each director who serves on these committees is “independent,” as that term is defined by the listing rules of Nasdaq and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board of Directors has adopted written charters for its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of these charters are available on our website at www.edesabiotech.com/investors/governance.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is composed of Jennifer Chao, Sean MacDonald and Carlo Sistilli (chair). The purpose of the Audit Committee is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. In that regard, the Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring: (a) the integrity of our financial statements; (b) our independent auditor’s qualifications, independence, and performance; (c) the performance of our system of internal controls, financial reporting, and disclosure controls; and (d) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. To fulfill this obligation and perform its duties, the Audit Committee maintains effective working relationships with the Board, management, and our independent auditor.

Carlo Sistilli is the Chair of our Audit Committee and has extensive financial experience. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from York University, with a major in economics, Certified Management Accountant Designation and a Chartered Professional Accountant Designation. He has held a variety of executive positions in accounting and finance during the past 35 years. The Board has determined that Mr. Sistilli is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is composed of Jennifer Chao, Lorin Johnson and Paul Pay (chair). The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board’s oversight relating to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our other Named Executive Officers. It has responsibility for evaluating, and recommending to the independent members of the Board for approval, our compensation plans, policies and programs as such plans, policies and programs affect executive officers.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of Jennifer Chao (chair), Frank Oakes and Sean MacDonald. The purpose of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to identify individuals qualified to become Board members; recommend to the Board individuals to serve as directors; advise the Board with respect to Board composition, procedures and committees; lead the Board in its annual review of the Board and management’s performance; develop, recommend to the Board and annually review a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company; and oversee any related matters required by the federal securities laws.

Table of Contents

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Executive Compensation

Our named executive officers for the year ended September 30, 2022 were Pardeep Nijhawan, MD, Director, Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary; Kathi Niffenegger, CPA, Chief Financial Officer; and Michael Brooks, PhD, President.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the named executive officers for the years ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021.

Table of Contents

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. The employment agreements provide for the annual base salary for each named executive officer, which amounts are subject to annual review by and at the sole discretion of our board of directors or its designee. Each named executive officer is also eligible to earn an annual cash performance bonus, which is based on our attainment of financial or other operating criteria established by our board of directors or its designee, as determined by our board of directors or its designee.

Employment Agreement with Pardeep Nijhawan effective as of June 7, 2019 and amended March 19, 2021 and April 12, 2022

On June 14, 2019 but effective as of June 7, 2019, we entered into an employment agreement with Pardeep Nijhawan. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Dr. Nijhawan will serve as our Chief Executive Officer for an indefinite term until Dr. Nijhawan’s employment is terminated in accordance with the agreement. As compensation for his services to us, Dr. Nijhawan received a base salary of $300,000 per year and is eligible to receive a target annual bonus of 40% of his base salary, subject to achieving corporate and personal targets to be determined by us. The base salary increased to $320,000 per year effective January 1, 2021 and $331,200 effective March 24, 2022. Dr. Nijhawan also receives an automobile allowance of $2,700 per month and is eligible to participate in our group insured benefits program, as may be in effect from time-to-time for our employees generally, and executive employees specifically. Dr. Nijhawan is eligible for future share and/or option grants, as determined by our Compensation Committee, commensurate with Dr. Nijhawan’s position and any business milestones which may be established by the Compensation Committee and subject to availability of shares and/or options for grant under our Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.

If Dr. Nijhawan’s employment with us is terminated for “Cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), subject to applicable law, our only obligation shall be to provide Dr. Nijhawan with his base salary and vacation pay earned through the date of termination and all of Dr. Nijhawan’s vested or non-vested stock options which have not been exercised by Dr. Nijhawan as of the date of termination will be automatically extinguished. If Dr. Nijhawan is terminated by us without “Cause”, our only obligation shall be to provide Dr. Nijhawan with (i) a lump sum payment equal to Dr. Nijhawan’s then current base salary for twenty-four months (the “Severance Period”), (ii) a lump sum payment of the annual bonus to which Dr. Nijhawan is entitled for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination, if such bonus has not already been paid, (iii) a lump sum payment equal to Dr. Nijhawan’s annual bonus entitlement, prorated over Dr. Nijhawan’s length of service in the fiscal year in which his employment is terminated, calculated in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement, (iv) payment of Dr. Nijhawan’s annual bonus entitlement during the full Severance Period, calculated in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement, (v) continuation of Dr. Nijhawan’s benefits and car allowance and any other benefit required to be maintained by law in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement and (vi) subject to applicable law, all stock options granted to Dr. Nijhawan shall be exercisable in accordance with the terms of the applicable stock option plan. Dr. Nijhawan may resign from his employment at any time by providing us with a minimum of sixty days advance notice, in writing. Dr. Nijhawan’s notice may be waived by us, subject only to providing Dr. Nijhawan with payment of his base salary and continuation of benefits until the end of the notice period. If Dr. Nijhawan resigns from his employment, subject to applicable law, (i) all non-vested stock options and all vested stock options held by Dr. Nijhawan which have not been exercised by Dr. Nijhawan as of the date of termination shall be automatically extinguished and (ii) Dr. Nijhawan shall not be entitled to any bonus or pro rata bonus payment not already paid on or before the date of termination.

During the term of Dr. Nijhawan’s employment with us and for twelve months following the cessation of Dr. Nijhawan’s employment with us, Dr. Nijhawan is prohibited from competing with our business in North America. In addition, for twenty-four months following the cessation of Dr. Nijhawan’s employment with us, Dr. Nijhawan is prohibited from soliciting customers or prospective customers for any purpose competitive with our business, encouraging any customer to cease doing business with us and soliciting the employment or engagement of certain of our employees.

Table of Contents

Employment Agreement with Michael Brooks effective as of June 7, 2019 and amended March 19, 2021 and April 12, 2022

On June 14, 2019 but effective as of June 7, 2019, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael Brooks, PhD. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Dr. Brooks will serve as our President for an indefinite term until Dr. Brooks’ employment is terminated in accordance with the agreement. As compensation for his services to us, Dr. Brooks received a base salary of $275,000 per year and is eligible to receive a target annual bonus of 40% of his base salary, subject to achieving corporate and personal targets to be determined by us. The base salary increased to $300,000 per year effective January 1, 2021 and $310,500 effective March 24, 2022. Dr. Brooks also receives an automobile allowance of $2,000 per month and is eligible to participate in our group insured benefits program, as may be in effect from time-to-time for our employees generally, and executive employees specifically. Dr. Brooks is eligible for future share and/or option grants, as determined by our Compensation Committee, commensurate with Dr. Brooks’ position and any business milestones which may be established by the Compensation Committee and subject to availability of shares and/or options for grant under our Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.

If Dr. Brooks’ employment with us is terminated for “Cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), subject to applicable law, our only obligation shall be to provide Dr. Brooks with his base salary and vacation pay earned through the date of termination and all of Dr. Brooks’ vested or non-vested stock options which have not been exercised by Dr. Brooks as of the date of termination will be automatically extinguished. If Dr. Brooks is terminated by us without “Cause”, our only obligation shall be to provide Dr. Brooks with (i) a lump sum payment equal to Dr. Brooks’ then current base salary for twelve months plus one additional month for every completed year of service since September 2015, not to exceed an aggregate of twenty-four months (the “Severance Period”), (ii) a lump sum payment of the annual bonus to which Dr. Brooks is entitled for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination, if such bonus has not already been paid, (iii) a lump sum payment equal to Dr. Brooks’ annual bonus entitlement, prorated over Dr. Brooks’ length of service in the fiscal year in which his employment is terminated, calculated in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement, (iv) payment of Dr. Brooks’ annual bonus entitlement during the full Severance Period, calculated in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement, (v) continuation of Dr. Brooks’ benefits and car allowance and any other benefit required to be maintained by law in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement and (vi) subject to applicable law, all stock options granted to Dr. Brooks shall be exercisable in accordance with the terms of the applicable stock option plan. If Dr. Brooks’ employment is terminated or “constructively terminated” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) by us without “Cause” upon or within a twelve month period following a Change of Control (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), Dr. Brooks shall be entitled to the payments and benefits provided as described in clauses (ii) to (vi) above, plus a change of control payment equal to twenty-four months of the his then current base salary. Dr. Brooks may resign from his employment at any time by providing us with a minimum of sixty days advance notice, in writing. Dr. Brooks’ notice may be waived by us, subject only to providing Dr. Brooks with payment of his base salary and continuation of benefits until the end of the notice period. If Dr. Brooks resigns from his employment, subject to applicable law, (i) all non-vested stock options and all vested stock options held by Dr. Brooks which have not been exercised by Dr. Brooks as of the date of termination shall be automatically extinguished and (ii) Dr. Brooks shall not be entitled to any bonus or pro rata bonus payment not already paid on or before the date of termination.

During the term of Dr. Brooks’ employment with us and for twelve months following the cessation of Dr. Brooks' employment with us, Dr. Brooks is prohibited from competing with our business in North America. In addition, for twenty-four months following the cessation of Dr. Brooks' employment with us, Dr. Brooks is prohibited from soliciting customers or prospective customers for any purpose competitive with our business, encouraging any customer to cease doing business with us and soliciting the employment or engagement of certain of our employees.

Employment Agreement with Kathi Niffenegger effective as of December 1, 2020 and amended March 19, 2021 and April 12, 2022

On December 1, 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Niffenegger that superseded prior employment agreements. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Ms. Niffenegger will continue to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Both Ms. Niffenegger and we have the right to terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause. As compensation for her services to us, Ms. Niffenegger received a base salary of $275,000 per year retroactive to June 1, 2020, is eligible to receive a discretionary bonus in an amount up to 40% of her base salary based on her performance and the company’s performance and such other employee benefits as are generally provided to similarly situated employees of the company. The base salary increased to $290,000 per year effective January 1, 2021 and $300,150 per year effective March 24, 2022. Ms. Niffenegger is eligible for future share and/or option grants in accordance with our executive compensation policy as in effect from time to time as determined by the independent members of our Board of Directors subject to availability of shares and/or options for grant under our Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.

Table of Contents

If Ms. Niffenegger’s employment with us is terminated for “Cause” (as defined in the employment agreement) or if Ms. Niffenegger resigns from her employment at any time, our only obligation is to provide Ms. Niffenegger with: (i) her accrued salary and accrued unused vacation pay through and including her last day of employment (the “Separation Date”); (ii) reimbursement of any reimbursable expenses properly incurred through and including the Separation Date; and (iii) any benefit required under applicable law. If Ms. Niffenegger is terminated by us without “Cause”, our only obligations are (a) to provide Ms. Niffenegger with the same payments and benefits as would be provided if we had terminated her employment for Cause; and (b) subject to Ms. Niffenegger’s execution of a release in our favor, Ms. Niffenegger will also be paid, as severance (the “Severance Amount”), (i) a lump sum payment equal to twelve months of Ms. Niffenegger’s then current base salary, plus one additional month of base salary for every completed year of service since June 2019, not to exceed an aggregate of twenty-four months, (ii) a lump sum payment of any discretionary bonus for the prior calendar year already determined by our Board of Directors, but not yet paid; and (iii) a lump sum payment equal to Ms. Niffenegger’s potential discretionary bonus for the calendar year in which the Separation Date occurs, prorated over Ms. Niffenegger’s length of service in the calendar year in which her employment is terminated, calculated in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement. If Ms. Niffenegger’s employment is terminated or “constructively terminated” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) by us without “Cause” upon or within a twelve month period following a Change of Control (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), Ms. Niffenegger shall be entitled to the Severance Amount described above, except that the portion of the Severance Payment established by (b)(i) shall be equal to twenty four months of Ms. Niffenegger’s base salary.

The Agreement provides that during the term of Ms. Niffenegger’s employment with us and for a period of one year thereafter, Ms. Niffenegger is prohibited from soliciting for employment certain of our employees. The Agreement also provides that both during and after Ms. Niffenegger’s employment with us, she is prohibited from (i) making use of our trade secrets to solicit on behalf of Ms. Niffenegger or any other person business from any of our customers and (ii) inducing or attempting to induce any person to sever any existing contractual relationship they have with us.

Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2022

Option Awards

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards Narrative Disclosure

Equity Incentive Compensation Plan

We adopted an Equity Incentive Compensation Plan in 2019 (the 2019 Plan) which amended and restated our 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2017 Plan). Under the 2019 Plan, we are authorized to grant options, restricted shares and restricted share units (RSUs) to any of our officers, directors, employees, and consultants and those of our subsidiaries and other designated affiliates. The number of shares available for issuance under the 2019 Plan is 2,625,951, including shares available for the exercise of outstanding options under the 2017 Plan. The purpose of the 2019 Plan is to advance the interests of the Company by encouraging equity participation through the acquisition of common shares of the Company. The 2019 Plan is to be administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, except to the extent (and subject to the limitations set forth in the 2019 Plan) the Board elects to administer the 2019 Plan, in which case the 2019 Plan shall be administered by only those members of the Board who are “independent” members of the Board. The administrator of the 2019 Plan has the power to, among other things:

• allot common shares for issuance in connection with the exercise of options;

• grant options, restricted shares or restricted share units;

• amend, suspend, terminate or discontinue the plan; and

• delegate all or a portion of its administrative powers as it may determine to one or more committees.

Options to purchase 2,203,699 common shares at prices ranging from C$2.16 and $3.16 to $304.08 are outstanding at September 30, 2022. No restricted shares or restricted share units have been granted as of September 30, 2022.

Options granted during the year ended September 30, 2022 to directors, officers and employees under the 2019 Plan totaled 500,083 options to purchase common shares at exercise prices ranging from $2.94 to $3.71. Options granted during the year ended September 30, 2021 to directors, officers and employees under the 2019 Plan totaled 1,145,000 options to purchase common shares at exercise prices ranging from $5.25 to $7.44.

Options Vesting Policy

Vesting requirements for option awards are determined by the independent members of the Board of Directors. Options granted by the Company during the year ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 generally had monthly vesting for directors in equal proportions over 12 months beginning on the grant date, monthly vesting for officers and current employees in equal proportions over 36 months beginning on the grant date and monthly vesting for new employees in equal proportions over 36 months beginning on the monthly anniversary of the grant date following 90 days of employment.

Table of Contents

Retirement Benefits

Executive officers and employees of our California subsidiary are eligible to receive the company’s non-elective contribution of 3% of eligible compensation under a 401(k) plan to provide retirement benefits. Any company contributions we made to the plan for our named executive officers are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.

Other than the funds contributed under our 401(k) plan, no other funds were set aside or accrued by us during the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for our named executive officers.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation of our non-employee directors for the year ended September 30, 2022.

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2022

The following table summarizes the equity awards made to our directors that were outstanding at September 30, 2022.

Name Outstanding Options (#)

Carlo Sistilli, CPA, CMA 62,389

Narrative to Director Compensation Table

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

The board adopted a compensation policy effective June 7, 2019 and amended it effective March 24 2022. As compensation for their services on the board of directors, each non-executive board member received annual remuneration as noted below and prorated during the effective periods. The Chief Executive Officer does not receive any additional compensation for his services on the board of directors.

Prorated during the period October 1, 2020 through March 23, 2022, each non-executive director received annual base remuneration of $30,000 and the Chairman of the Board received annual remuneration of $50,000, inclusive of compensation for his services on committees of the board of directors. Each member of the Company’s Audit Committee received annual remuneration of $5,000, and the Chair of the Audit Committee received $10,000 annually for his services. Each member of the Company’s Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received annual remuneration of $3,500 for each committee on which they serve, and the Chairs of each of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received $7,500 annually for their services.

Prorated during the period March 24, 2022 through September 30, 2022, each non-executive director received annual base remuneration of $35,000 and the Chairman of the Board received annual remuneration of $65,000, inclusive of compensation for his services on committees of the board of directors. Each member of the Company’s Audit Committee received annual remuneration of $7,500, and the Chair of the Audit Committee received $15,000 annually for his services. Each member of the Company’s Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received annual remuneration of $4,500 for each committee on which they serve, and the Chairs of each of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received $9,000 annually for their services.

Table of Contents

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information as of September 30, 2022 about our common shares that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, which consists of our 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan in effect at September 30, 2022:

(a) (b) (c)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A N/A N/A

Warrants and other equity held by directors, officers and employees outside of the compensation plans are not included in the table above.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following tables sets forth certain information as of December 14, 2022, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by: (1) all of our directors; (2) our named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table; (3) all of directors and executive officers as a group; and (4) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC, based on a review of filings with the SEC and information known to us. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all common shares that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.

Common shares subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of December 14, 2022 are deemed outstanding for computing the share ownership and percentage of the person holding such options and warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. The percentage ownership of our common shares of each person or entity named in the following table is based on 19,353,351 common shares outstanding as of December 14, 2022.

Table of Contents

Directors and Officers

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) Beneficial Ownership Beneficially Owned

Lorin Johnson, PhD 77,136 (3 ) *

Carlo Sistilli, CPA, CMA 63,438 (8 ) *

* Percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed one percent.

Table of Contents

Shareholders Known by Us to Own 5% or More of Our Common Shares

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership Beneficially Owned

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Related Party Transactions

Lease Agreement

In January 2017, Edesa Research entered into a lease agreement with a company related to Pardeep Nijhawan, our Chief Executive Officer, for office space that serves as our principal executive office. The current lease has an original expiration date of December 2022 with the option to extend the lease for an additional two years. We anticipate extending the lease through December 2024. Monthly rents during the term ranged from C$8,320 to C$9,020 plus HST. Rents of approximately $81,000 were incurred during each of the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021. Rents of approximately $22,000 were payable at September 30, 2022. No rent was payable at September 30, 2021.

Director Independence

In evaluating the independence of our Board members and the composition of the committees of our Board of Directors, the Board of Directors utilizes the definition of “independence” as that term is defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Using this standard, the Board of Directors has determined that Jennifer Chao, Lorin Johnson, Sean MacDonald, Frank Oakes, Paul Pay and Carlo Sistilli are “independent directors.” This means that our Board of Directors is composed of a majority of independent directors as required by the rules of Nasdaq.

Table of Contents

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The following table shows the aggregate fees billed for audit and other services provided for the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 rendered by MNP LLP.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Type of Service Year Ended2022 Year Ended2021

Audit Fees

Audit fees consisted of fees incurred for professional services rendered for audits and interim reviews of the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 and include procedures related to registrations and offerings.

Tax Fees

Tax fees consisted of fees incurred for professional services rendered for tax compliance related to tax returns during the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of our auditors. It has established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee also has the authority and the funding to engage independent counsel and other outside advisors.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to an amount or range of estimated fees. All proposed engagements of the auditor for audit and permitted non-audit services are submitted to the Audit Committee for approval prior to the beginning of any such services. Our auditors are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021.

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report:

(1) Financial Statements

The list of consolidated financial statements and notes required by this Item 15 (a) (1) is set forth in the “Index to Financial Statements” on page F-1 of this Annual Report.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index below are filed as part of this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. Description

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

23.1 Consent of MNP LLP (filed herewith).

24.1 Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document