ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our future business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such cases, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
RISKS RELATED TO ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Our business may be adversely affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally. We operate primarily in the Wisconsin and Minnesota markets. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are significantly impacted by changes in the economic conditions in those areas. In addition, our business is susceptible to broader economic trends within the United States economy. Economic conditions have a significant impact on the demand for our products and services, as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of our deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions caused by inflation, recession, tariffs, unemployment, changes in securities markets, changes in housing market prices, geopolitical uncertainties, natural disasters, pandemics and election outcomes or other factors could impact economic conditions and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions intended to prevent and mitigate its spread, challenges related to vaccination rollout and new variants of the virus has and is expected to continue to (and the future outbreak of other highly infectious or contagious diseases likely would)significantly and negatively impact financial markets and economic conditions in our markets, the United States and globally. As a result, consumer confidence and consumer credit factors have been, and may be further, negatively impacted. Consequently, our business, financial condition and results of operations have been and could be further significantly and adversely affected. See also “The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to continue to cause adverse economic conditions and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and our results of operations and other aspects of our business.”
Deterioration in the markets for residential real estate, including secondary residential mortgage loan markets, could reduce our net income and profitability. During the severe recession that lasted from 2007 to 2009, softened residential housing markets, increased delinquency and default rates, and volatile and constrained secondary credit markets negatively impacted the mortgage industry. Our financial results were adversely affected by these effects including changes in real estate values, primarily in Wisconsin and Minnesota, and our net income declined as a result. Decreases in real estate values adversely affected the value of property used as collateral for loans as well as investments in our portfolio. Continued slow growth in the economy since 2009 resulted in increased competition and lower rates, which has negatively impacted our net income and profits.
The foregoing changes could affect our ability to originate loans and deposits, the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities and the average maturity of our securities portfolio. An increase in the level of interest rates may also adversely affect the ability of certain of our borrowers to repay their obligations. If interest rates paid on deposits or other borrowings were to increase at a faster rate than the interest rates earned on loans and investments, our net income would be adversely affected.
The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to continue to cause adverse economic conditions and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and our results of operations and other aspects of our business.
We are closely monitoring developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic to assess its impact on our business. While still evolving, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant economic and financial turmoil both in the U.S. and around the world, and has fueled concerns that it may lead to a global recession. These conditions are expected to continue and worsen in the near term. At this time, it is not possible to estimate how long it will take to halt the spread of the virus or the long term
12
effects that the COVID-19 pandemic could have on our business. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or prospects will depend on future developments which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions taken to contain or address its impact.
While we have implemented risk management and contingency plans and taken preventive measures and other precautions, no predictions of specific scenarios can be made with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic and such measures may not adequately predict the impact on our business from such events. Currently, many of our employees have been working remotely for an extended period of time. An extended period of remote work arrangements could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk, including but not limited to cybersecurity risks, and impair our ability to manage our business.
Increased economic uncertainty and increased unemployment resulting from the economic impacts of the spread of COVID-19 may also adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, or could substantially weaken the value of collateral securing those loans. In addition, any resulting downward pressure on real estate values could increase the potential for problem loans and thus have a direct impact on our consolidated results of operations.
We participate as an approved lender pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program, which was established under the congressionally-approved Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) and is administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”).The Paycheck Protection Program gives small businesses and self-employed individuals guaranteed loans and loan forgiveness to stay in business during the COVID-19 pandemic, subject to certain requirements. As an SBA-approved lender, we secured more than $139 million in authorized funding for our customers under the Paycheck Protection Program. As a result of factors including the fact that the Paycheck Protection Program is a new program that was created urgently in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, lenders and customers have experienced, and may experience further, challenges in the administration and debt forgiveness process.
While governmental and non-governmental organizations are engaging in efforts to combat the spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health issues, these measures may not be effective.We also cannot predict how legal and regulatory responses to concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health issues will impact our business.Such events or conditions could result in regulation or restrictions affecting the conduct of our business in the future.
Acts or threats of terrorism and political or military actions by the United States or other governments could adversely affect general economic industry conditions. Geopolitical conditions may affect our earnings. Acts or threats of terrorism and political actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to terrorism, or similar activity, could adversely affect general or industry conditions and, as a result, our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS
We are subject to interest rate risk. Through our banking subsidiary, the Bank, our profitability depends in large part on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned from interest earning assets, such as loans and mortgage-backed securities, and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Our net interest income will be adversely affected if market interest rates change such that the interest we pay on deposits and borrowings increase faster than the interest earned on loans and investments. As a result of the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, interest rates in the United States have been reduced, and may be even further reduced. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time due to many factors that are beyond our control, including but not limited to: general economic conditions and government policy decisions, especially policies of the Federal Reserve Bank. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk. In particular, reduced interest rates negatively impact our results of operations. See also “The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to continue to cause adverse economic conditions and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and our results of operations and other aspects of our business.”
We are subject to lending risk. There are inherent risks associated with our lending activities. These risks include the impact of changes in interest rates and changes in the economic conditions in the markets we serve, as well as those across the United States. An increase in interest rates or weakening economic conditions (such as high levels of unemployment), including weakening economic conditions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, has and could further adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, or could substantially weaken the value of collateral securing those loans. As of December 31, 2020, the Bank had $61.0 million of loan modifications remaining due to pandemic-related borrower requests. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” for discussion of COVID-19 qualitative factors, and related provision for loan losses. Downward pressure on real estate values could increase the potential for problem loans and thus have a direct impact on our consolidated results of operations. See also “The COVID-19 pandemic pandemic is expected to continue to cause adverse economic conditions and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and our results of operations and other aspects of our business.”
13
We are subject to higher lending risks with respect to our commercial and agricultural banking activities which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our loans include commercial and agricultural loans, which include loans secured by real estate as well as loans secured by personal property. Commercial real estate lending, including agricultural loans, typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. Agricultural operating loans carry significant risks as they may involve larger balances concentrated with a single borrower or group of related borrowers. In addition, repayment of such loans depends on the successful operation or management of the farm property securing the loan for which an operating loan is utilized. Farming operations may be affected by factors outside of the borrower’s control, including adverse weather conditions, such as drought, hail or floods that can severely limit crop yields and declines in market prices for agricultural products. Although the Bank manages lending risks through its underwriting and credit administration policies, no assurance can be given that such risks will not materialize, in which event, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business prospects could be materially adversely affected.
Our allowance for loan losses may be insufficient. To address risks inherent in our loan portfolio, we maintain an allowance for loan losses that represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that exist within our loan portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of various factors, including specific credit risks, historical loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions, and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make estimates of significant credit risks, which may undergo material changes. In evaluating our impaired loans, we assess repayment expectations and determine collateral values based on all information that is available to us. However, we must often make subjective decisions based on our assumption about the creditworthiness of the borrowers and the values of collateral securing these loans.
Deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in our allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically examine our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the allowance or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different from those of our management.
If charge-offs in future periods exceed our allowance for loan losses, we will need to take additional loan loss provisions to increase our allowance for loan losses. Any additional loan loss provision will reduce our net income or increase our net loss, which could have a direct material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in the fair value or ratings downgrades of our securities may reduce our stockholders’ equity, net earnings, or regulatory capital ratios. At December 31, 2020, $144.2 million of our securities, were classified as available for sale and $43.6 million were classified as held to maturity. The estimated fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio may increase or decrease depending on market conditions. Our available for sale securities portfolio is comprised of fixed-rate, and to a lesser extent, floating rate securities. We increase or decrease stockholders’ equity by the amount of the change in unrealized gain or loss (the difference between the estimated fair value and amortized cost) of our available for sale securities portfolio, net of the related tax benefit or provision, under the category of accumulated other comprehensive income/loss. Therefore, a decline in the estimated fair value of this portfolio will result in a decline in our reported stockholders’ equity, as well as our book value per common share and tangible book value per common share. This decrease will occur even though the securities are not sold. In the case of debt securities, if these securities are never sold, the decrease may be recovered over the life of the securities.
We conduct a periodic review and evaluation of our securities portfolio to determine if the decline in the fair value of any security below its cost basis is other-than-temporary. Factors which we consider in our analysis include, but are not limited to, the severity and duration of the decline in fair value of the security, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, whether the decline appears to be related to issuer conditions or general market or industry conditions, our intent and ability to retain the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value and the likelihood of any near-term fair value recovery. We generally view changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary, which is consistent with our experience. If we deem such decline to be other-than-temporary related to credit losses, the security is written down to a new cost basis and the resulting loss is charged to earnings as a component of non-interest income in the period in which the decline in value occurs.
We have, in the past, recorded other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges, principally arising from investments in non-agency mortgage-backed securities. We do not currently hold any non-agency mortgage-backed securities. We continue to monitor our securities portfolio as part of our ongoing OTTI evaluation process. No assurance can be given that we will not need to recognize OTTI charges related to securities in the future. Future OTTI charges would cause decreases to both Tier 1 and Risk-based capital levels which may expose the Company and/or the Bank to additional regulatory restrictions.
14
The capital that we are required to maintain for regulatory purposes is impacted by, among other factors, the securities ratings on our portfolio. Therefore, ratings downgrades on our securities may also have a material adverse effect on our risk-based regulatory capital levels.
Competition may affect our results. We face strong competition in originating loans, in seeking deposits and in offering other banking services. We compete with commercial banks, trust companies, mortgage banking firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and brokerage and investment banking firms. Our market area is also served by commercial banks and savings associations that are substantially larger than us in terms of deposits and loans and have greater human and financial resources. This competitive climate can make it difficult to establish, maintain and retain relationships with new and existing customers and can lower the rate we are able to charge on loans, increase the rates we must offer on deposits, and affect our charges for other services. Those factors can, in turn, adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
We are a community bank and our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect our performance.
We are a community bank, and our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. A key component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets to expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our market area and contiguous areas. As such, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers and caring about our customers and associates. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions of our employees, by our inability to conduct our operations in a manner that is appealing to current or prospective customers, or otherwise, our business and, therefore, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.
We may not have sufficient pre-tax net income in future periods to fully realize the benefits of our net deferred tax assets. Assessing the need for, or the sufficiency of, a valuation allowance requires management to evaluate all available evidence. Based on future pre-tax net income projections and the planned execution of existing tax planning strategies, we believe that it is more likely than not that we will fully realize the benefits of our net deferred tax assets. However, our current assessment is based on assumptions and judgments that may or may not reflect actual future results. If a valuation allowance becomes necessary, it could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Maintaining or increasing our market share may depend on lowering prices and market acceptance of new products and services. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards and customer demands. We face increasing pressure to provide products and services at lower prices, which can reduce our net interest margin and revenues from our fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet and mobile banking services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services. Also, these and other capital investments in our business may not produce expected growth in earnings anticipated at the time of the expenditure. We may not be successful in introducing new products and services, achieving market acceptance of our products and services, or developing and maintaining loyal customers, which in turn, could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
Customers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could result in a loss of income to us. Technology and other changes are allowing customers to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks at one or both ends of the transaction. For example, customers can now pay bills and transfer funds directly without going through a bank. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as disintermediation, could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits.
We could experience an unexpected inability to obtain needed liquidity. Liquidity measures the ability to meet current and future cash flow needs as they become due. The liquidity of a financial institution reflects its ability to meet loan requests, to accommodate possible outflows in deposits, and to take advantage of interest rate market opportunities. The ability of a financial institution to meet its current financial obligations is a function of its balance sheet structure, its ability to liquidate assets and its access to alternative sources of funds. We seek to ensure our funding needs are met by maintaining an appropriate level of liquidity through asset/liability management. If we become unable to obtain funds when needed, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and, in turn, our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, it could limit our ability to take advantage of what we believe to be good market opportunities for expanding our loan portfolio.
Our growth strategy includes selectively acquiring businesses through acquisitions of other banks, and our ability to consummate these acquisitions on economically advantageous terms acceptable to us in the future is unknown. Our growth strategy includes acquisitions of other banks that serve customers or markets we find desirable, including our recent acquisitions of Community Bank of Northern Wisconsin (“CBN”), WFC, United Bank and F&M. The market for acquisitions remains highly competitive, and we may be unable to find satisfactory acquisition candidates in the future that fit our acquisition and growth strategy. This competition could increase prices for potential acquisitions that we believe are attractive. Any such acquisitions could be funded through cash from operations, the issuance of equity and/or the incurrence of additional
15
indebtedness, which amount may be material, or a combination thereof. Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and stockholders’ equity per share of our common stock. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals. If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals. To the extent that we are unable to find suitable acquisition candidates, an important component of our growth strategy may be lost.
Acquisition and expansion activities may disrupt our business, dilute existing stockholders and adversely affect our operating results. We acquired F&M in July 2019, United Bank in October 2018, WFC in August 2017 and CBN in May 2016. We intend to continue to evaluate potential acquisitions and expansion opportunities inthe normal course of our business. Although the integration of F&M, United Bank, WFC and CBN have been successfully completed, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately or profitably manage the ongoing integration of any such future acquisitions. Acquiring other banks or financial service companies, as well as othergeographic and product expansion activities, involve various risks including:
•risks of unknown or contingent liabilities;
•unanticipated costs and delays;
•risks that acquired new businesses do not perform consistent with our growth and profitability expectations;
•risks of entering new markets or product areas where we have limited experience;
•risks that growth will strain our infrastructure, staff, internal controls and management, which may require additional personnel, time and expenditures;
•exposure to potential asset quality issues with acquired institutions;
•difficulties, expenses and delays of integrating the operations and personnel of acquired institutions, and start-up delays and costs of other expansion activities;
•potential disruptions to our business;
•possible loss of key employees and customers of acquired institutions;
•potential short-term decreases in profitability; and
•diversion of our management’s time and attention from our existing operations and business.
Our failure to execute our acquisition strategy could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.
Future growth, operating results or regulatory requirements may require us to raise additional capital but that capital may not be available. We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. To the extent our future operating results erode capital or we elect to expand through loan growth or acquisition, we may be required to raise additional capital.
Our ability to raise capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets, which are outside of our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot be assured of our ability to raise capital when needed or on favorable terms. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed or if we are subject to material unfavorable terms for such capital, we may be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on our growth and business. These actions could negatively impact our ability to operate or further expand our operations and may result in increases in operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Our internal controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented. Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well-designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any (a) failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures, (b) failure to adequately address any internal control deficiencies, or (c) failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations. See Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” for further discussion of our internal controls.
We may not be able to attract or retain key people. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain key people. We depend on the talents and leadership of our executive team, including Stephen M. Bianchi, our Chief Executive Officer, and James S. Broucek, our Chief Financial Officer. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by us can be intense, and we may not be able to hire people or retain them. Although Mr. Bianchi and Mr. Broucek are under employment agreements expiring in 2022, unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could have a
16
material adverse impact on our business because of their skills, knowledge of our local markets, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
We continually encounter technological change. The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology driven by new or modified products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on network and information systems and other technologies, and, as a result, we are subject to various Cybersecurity risks. Cybersecurity refers to the combination of technologies, processes and procedures established to protect information technology systems and data from unauthorized access, attack, or damage. Our business involves the storage and transmission of customers’ personal information. While we have internal policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of a failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, as well as contracts and service agreements with applicable outside vendors, we cannot be assured that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do, that they will be addressed adequately. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information, whether through a breach of our computer systems or otherwise, could severely harm our business. Although we have implemented measures to prevent security breaches, cyber incidents and other security threats, our facilities and systems, and those of third party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human error, or other similar events that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, the storage and transmission of such data is regulated at the federal and state level. Privacy information security laws and regulation changes, and compliance therewith, may result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations or experience a data security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, whether by us or our vendors, our reputation could be damaged, possibly resulting in lost future business, and we could be subject to fines, penalties, administrative orders and other legal risks as a result of a breach or non-compliance.
Our ability to pay dividends depends primarily on dividends from our banking subsidiary, the Bank, which is subject to regulatory and other limitations. We are a bank holding company and our operations are conducted primarily by our banking subsidiary, the Bank. Since we receive substantially all of our revenue from dividends from the Bank, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock depends on our receipt of dividends from the Bank.
The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to certain restrictions on its ability to pay dividends under applicable banking laws and regulations. Federal bank regulators are authorized to determine under certain circumstances relating to the financial condition of a bank holding company or a bank that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice and to prohibit payment thereof. In particular, federal bank regulators have stated that paying dividends that deplete a banking organization’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice and that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In addition, in the current financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged payment ratios that are at maximum allowable levels unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.
The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to us is also subject to its profitability, financial condition, capital expenditures and other cash flow requirements. The Bank may not be able to generate adequate cash flow to pay us dividends in the future. The Company’s ability to pay dividends is also subject to the terms of its Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated August 27, 2020 and Business Note Agreement dated August 1, 2018, each of which prohibits the Company from declaring or paying dividends while an event of default has occurred and is continuing under each respective agreement. The Company has pledged 100% of Bank stock as collateral for the loan and credit facilities provided for by the Business Note Agreement.The inability to receive dividends from the Bank could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Furthermore, holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive the dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and our Board of Directors could reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future. This could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our shares of common stock are thinly traded and our stock price may be more volatile. Because our common stock is thinly traded, its market price may fluctuate significantly more than the stock market in general or the stock prices of similar companies, which are exchanged, listed or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market. We believe there are 10,356,276 shares of our common stock held by nonaffiliates as of March 8, 2021. Thus, our common stock will be less liquid than the stock of
17
companies with broader public ownership, and as a result, the trading prices for our shares of common stock may be more volatile. Among other things, trading of a relatively small volume of our common stock may have a greater impact on the trading price of our stock than would be the case if our public float were larger.
REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE RISKS
A new accounting standard may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has adopted a new accounting standard referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, which will require financial institutions to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans, and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for loan losses. The FASB extended the effective date of CECL from January 2021 to January 2023 for smaller reporting companies such as the Company. Once effective, this will change the current method of providing allowances for loan losses that are probable, which may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, and to greatly increase the types of data we will need to collect and review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.Banking regulators expect the new accounting standard will increase the allowance for loan losses.Any change in the allowance for loan losses at the time of adoption will be an adjustment to retained earnings and would change the Bank’s capital levels. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or expenses incurred to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment, and are subject to changes, which could increase our cost structure or have other negative impacts on our operations. The banking industry is extensively regulated at the federal and state levels. Insured depository institutions and their holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision by financial regulatory authorities covering all aspects of their organization, management and operations. We are also subject to regulation by the SEC. Our compliance with these regulations, including compliance with regulatory commitments, is costly. Regulation includes, among other things, capital and reserve requirements, permissible investments and lines of business, mergers and acquisitions, restrictions on transactions with insiders and affiliates, anti-money laundering regulations, dividend limitations, community reinvestment requirements, limitations on products and services offered, loan limits, geographical limits, and consumer credit regulations. The system of supervision and regulation applicable to us establishes a comprehensive framework for our operations and is intended primarily for the protection of the Deposit Insurance Fund, our depositors and the public, rather than our stockholders. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations or policies could result in sanction by regulatory agencies, civil monetary penalties, and/or damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any change in government regulation could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company or a bank, that a person or group may acquire, without the prior approval of banking regulators. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act and the regulations thereunder, a person or group must give advance notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of any bank holding company, such as the Company, and the OCC before acquiring control of any national bank, such as the Bank. Under the BHCA and Federal Reserve guidance thereunder, a person or group will be presumed to control a bank holding company if they acquire a certain percentage of the bank holding company or if one or more other control factors are present. On January 31, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board approved the issuance of a final rule (which became effective October 1, 2020) that clarified and codified the Federal Reserve’s standards for determining whether one company has control over another. The final rule established four categories of tiered presumptions of noncontrol that are based on the percentage of voting shares held by the investor (less than 5%, 5-9.9%, 10-14.9% and 15-24.9%) and the presence of other indicia of control. As the percentage of ownership increases, fewer indicia of control are permitted without falling outside of the presumption of noncontrol. These indicia of control include nonvoting equity ownership, director representation, management interlocks, business relationship and restrictive contractual covenants. Under the final rule, investors can hold up to 24.9% of the voting securities and up to 33% of the total equity of a company without necessarily having a controlling influence. The overall effect of the BHCA is to make it more difficult to acquire a bank holding company and a bank by tender offer or similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, shareholders of the Company may be less likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender offers or similar efforts to acquire control of other non-bank companies. Investors should be aware of these requirements when acquiring shares of our stock.
We have become subject to more stringent capital requirements, which may adversely impact our return on equity, require us to raise additional capital, or limit our ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares.
The Basel III Rules, which became effective for us on January 1, 2015, included new minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios and refined the definition of what constitutes “capital” for calculating these ratios. The new minimum capital requirements are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from prior rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The
18
Basel III Rules also established a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5%.The 2.5% capital conservation buffer was phased in incrementally over time, and became effective for us on January 1, 2019, resulting in the following minimum capital plus capital conservation buffer ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 8.5%; and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. An institution is subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. The application of more stringent capital requirements could, among other things, result in lower returns on equity, and result in regulatory actions if we are unable to comply with such requirements. Furthermore, the imposition of liquidity requirements in connection with the implementation of the Basel III Rules could result in our having to lengthen the term of our funding sources, change our business models or increase our holdings of liquid assets. Specifically, the Bank’s ability to pay dividends will be limited if it does not have the capital conservation buffer required by the new capital rules, which may further limit the Company’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
We are subject to increases in FDIC insurance premiums and special assessments by the FDIC, which will adversely affect our earnings. We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. For example, during 2008 and 2009, higher levels of bank failures dramatically increased resolution costs of the FDIC and depleted the Deposit Insurance Fund. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, in part, permanently raised the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000 per customer (up from $100,000). These programs placed additional stress on the Deposit Insurance Fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the Deposit Insurance Fund, the FDIC increased assessment rates of the insured institutions.If additional bank or financial institution failures increase, or if the cost of resolving prior failures exceeds expectations, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the current levels. Any future increases or required prepayments of FDIC insurance premiums may adversely impact our earnings and financial condition.
Our reporting obligations as a public company are costly. Reporting requirements of a public company change depending on the reporting classification in which the Company falls as of the end of its second quarter of each fiscal year. The Company is currently a “smaller reporting company” which allows us to provide certain simplified and scaled disclosures in our filings. We will remain a smaller reporting company for so long as the market value of the Company’s common stock held by non-affiliates as of the end of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter is less than $250 million, or as of the same period the Company’s annual revenues are less than $100 million and its public float is less than $700 million. Historically, we have been categorized as a smaller reporting company and an “accelerated filer” and, thus, subject to the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that an independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. On March 12, 2020, the SEC adopted amendments to the accelerated filer definitions in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the new definitions, a smaller reporting company with less than $100 million in revenue that previously met the definition of an accelerated filer, like the Company, will now be considered a “non-accelerated” filer and will not be required to obtain an attestation of their internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will not be required to comply with the shorter SEC filing deadlines that apply to accelerated filers. As such, the Company is not subject to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. However, if the Company’s revenues increase above $100 million, we would again become subject to the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, making the public reporting process more costly.
Changes in federal or state tax laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our business, financial condition and results of operations are impacted by tax policy implemented at the federal and state level. The Tax Act was enacted in December 2017. Among other things, the Tax Act reduces the corporate federal income tax rate for the Company from 34 percent to 24.5 percent for 2018, and 21 percent for 2019 and 2020, which would result in changes in the valuation of deferred tax asset and liabilities, and includes a number of provisions that will have an impact on the banking industry, borrowers and the market for single-family residential real estate. We revalued our net deferred tax assets to account for the future impact of the lower corporate tax rates. The recent changes in the tax laws may have an adverse effect on the market for, and valuation of, residential properties, and on the demand for such loans in the future, and could make it harder for borrowers to make their loan payments. In addition, these recent changes may also have a disproportionate effect on taxpayers in states with high residential home prices and high state and local taxes. If home ownership becomes less attractive, demand for mortgage loans could decrease. The value of the properties securing loans in our loan portfolio may be adversely impacted as a result of the changing economics of home ownership, which could reduce our profitability and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We cannot predict whether any other tax legislation will be enacted in the future or whether any such changes to existing federal or state tax law would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We continue to evaluate the impact the Tax Act and other enacted tax reform may have on our business, financial conduction and results of operations.
We are subject to changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines. Our financial performance is impacted by accounting principles, policies and guidelines. Some of these policies require the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Some of our accounting policies are critical because they require
19
management to make subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. If such estimates or assumptions underlying our financial statements are incorrect, we may experience material losses.
From time to time, the FASB and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes are beyond our control, can be difficult to predict and could materially impact how we report our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in these standards are continuously occurring, and given recent economic conditions, more drastic changes may occur. The implementation of such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
20
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company leases its main administrative offices located at 2174 EastRidge Center, Eau Claire, WI 54701. At December 31, 2020, the Bank had a total of 25 full-service branch offices located in the Wisconsin cities of Altoona, Barron, Eau Claire, Ellsworth, Ettrick, Ladysmith, Lake Hallie, Mondovi, Osseo, Rice Lake (2), Spooner, Strum and
Tomah (2); and the Minnesota cities of Albert Lea, Blue Earth, Fairmont, Faribault, Mankato, Oakdale, Red Wing, St. James, St. Peter and Wells. Of these, the Bank owns 20 and leases the remaining 5 branch offices. Management believes that our current facilities are adequate to meet our present and immediately foreseeable needs. For more information on our properties and equipment, see Note 6, Office Properties and Equipment of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. For more information on our leases, see Note 8, Leases of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, the Company and/or the Bank occasionally become involved in various legal proceedings. While the outcome of any such proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty, in our opinion, any liability from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Historically, trading in shares of our common stock has been limited. Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “CZWI”.
We had approximately 626 stockholders of record at March 8, 2021. The number of stockholders does not separately reflect persons or entities that hold their stock in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms. We believe that the number of beneficial owners of our common stock on that date was substantially greater.
Dividends
The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends when and as declared by our Board of Directors and approved by our regulators. During the continuance of an event of default under its Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement entered into with certain accredited purchasers in August 2020, the Company would be restricted from declaring or paying any dividends on its capital stock. In determining the payment of cash dividends, our Board of Directors considers our earnings, capital and debt servicing requirements, the financial ratio guidelines of our regulators, our financial condition and other relevant factors.
The Company’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock is dependent on the dividend payments it receives from the Bank, since the Company receives substantially all of its revenue in the form of dividends from the Bank. Future dividends are not guaranteed and will depend on the Company’s ability to pay them. For more information on dividends, see Note 11, Capital Matters of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
21
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On November 30, 2020, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program. Under this program the Company may repurchase up to approximately 5% of the outstanding shares of its common stock as of November 30, 2020, or 557,728 shares, from time to time. The table below shows information about our repurchases of our common stock during the period beginning on November 30, 2020 (the date on which the plan was adopted) and ending on December 31, 2020.
22
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FIVE YEAR SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth selected historical financial and other data of the Company for the years and at the dates indicated. The information at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 is derived in part from, and should be read together with, the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the Company that appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information at December 31, 2018, September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017 and for the three month transition period ended December 31, 2018, and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is derived in part from audited financial statements that do not appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information below is qualified in its entirety by the detailed information included elsewhere herein and should be read along with Item 7., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8., “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” included in this Form 10-K. See discussion of the Company’s acquisitions in Item 1., “Business”, in Item 7., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and in Note 2. “Acquisition” in the consolidated financial statements.
Selected Results of Operations Data:
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 42,505 39,988 9,090
Per Share Data: (1)
Net income per share (basic) (1) $ 1.14 $ 0.85 $ 0.12
Net income per share (diluted) (1) $ 1.14 $ 0.85 $ 0.12
Cash dividends per common share $ 0.21 $ 0.20 $ —
Book value per share at end of period $ 14.52 $ 13.36 $ 12.62
Tangible book value per share at end of period $ 11.18 $ 9.89 $ 9.03
23
FIVE YEAR SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED)
As of, or for the
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Performance Ratios:
Return on average total shareholders’ equity 8.29 % 6.59 % 3.65 %
Net interest spread (2)
Average loan-to-average deposit ratio 98.97 % 98.55 % 94.99 %
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans (5) 0.92 % 1.71 % 0.82 %
Allowance for loan losses to:
Total loans (net of unearned income) 1.38 % 0.88 % 0.77 %
Net charge-offs to average loans 0.08 % 0.08 % 0.04 %
Non-performing assets to total assets (5) 0.70 % 1.41 % 0.83 %
Capital Ratios:
Shareholders’ equity to assets (6) 9.74 % 9.83 % 10.73 %
Tier 1 capital (leverage ratio) (7) 9.9 % 10.4 % 9.7 %
24
FIVE YEAR SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED)
Years ended September 30, (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Results of Operations Data:
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 29,003 21,949
Net (loss) gain on sale of available for sale securities (17) 111
Income before provision for income taxes 6,609 3,822
Per Share Data: (1)
Net income per share (basic) (1) $ 0.72 $ 0.47
Net income per share (diluted) (1) $ 0.58 $ 0.46
Cash dividends per common share $ 0.20 $ 0.16
Book value per share at end of period $ 12.45 $ 12.48
Tangible book value per share at end of period $ 11.05 $ 9.78
25
FIVE YEAR SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED)
As of, and for the
Years ended September 30, (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Other FHLB borrowings $ — $ —
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets 0.45 % 0.34 %
Return on average total shareholders’ equity 4.35 % 3.76 %
Net interest margin (2) 3.42 % 3.31 %
Net interest spread (2)
Average during period 3.27 % 3.19 %
Net overhead ratio (3) 2.35 % 2.48 %
Average loan-to-average deposit ratio 99.52 % 100.87 %
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans (5) 1.10 % 1.10 %
Allowance for loan losses to:
Total loans (net of unearned income) 0.89 % 0.81 %
Net charge-offs to average loans 0.07 % 0.07 %
Non-performing assets to total assets (5) 1.14 % 1.49 %
Capital Ratios:
Shareholders’ equity to assets (6) 13.93 % 7.81 %
Average equity to average assets (6) 10.32 % 9.09 %
Tier 1 capital (leverage ratio) (7) 9.2 % 9.2 %
Total risk-based capital (7) 13.1 % 13.2 %
26
(1)Earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.
(2)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets, and net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest bearing liabilities.
(3)Net overhead ratio represents the difference between non-interest expense and non-interest income, divided by average assets.
(4)Efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense, divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
(5)Non-performing loans are either 90+ days past due or nonaccrual. Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans plus other real estate owned plus other collateral owned.
(6)Company ratios
(7)Bank regulatory ratios
27
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
The following discussion sets forth management’s discussion and analysis of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, and our financial position as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes, the selected financial data and the statistical information presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete understanding of the following discussion and analysis. Unless otherwise noted, years refer to the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
The following is a brief summary of some of the significant factors that affected our operating results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. In 2020, net interest income was favorably impacted by the following: (1) higher accretion of discounts associated with paydown of purchased credit impaired loans, (2) income realized from the origination of the Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program (“SBA PPP”) loans, (3) lower deposit costs due to the lower 2020 interest rate environment, (4) an additional six months of net interest income on the F&M acquisition, partially offset by (5) lower interest income on loans, securities and cash and cash equivalents due to the lower interest rate environment and (6) a partial year of interest expense on the Company’s issuance of subordinated debt in August 2020. The Company recorded higher provision for loan losses in 2020 largely due to organic loan growth along with qualitative factor increases to reflect uncertainty in current general economic conditions. In 2020’s lower interest rate environment, the Company realized higher mortgage loans originated for sale, which increased gain on sale and income recorded in loan servicing income from the capitalization of mortgage servicing rights, partially offset by higher mortgage servicing rights impairment and an increase in variable compensation tied to mortgage loan production. On July 1, 2019, we closed on the F&M acquisition. As a result, fiscal 2019 was positively impacted by six months of F&M income, which was more than offset by merger charges. Total related merger and acquisition charges were $3.9 million in fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2019 operating results were positively impacted by the net gain on sale of the Michigan branch totaling $2.3 million. Fiscal 2019 also included $0.4 million of professional fees related to the change in our fiscal year end.
When comparing, year over year results, changes in net interest income, provision for loan losses, non-interest income and non-interest expense are primarily due to the items discussed above. See the remainder of this section for a more thorough discussion. Unless otherwise stated, all monetary amounts in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, other than share, per share and capital ratio amounts, are stated in thousands.
On July 1, 2019, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition (the “Acquisition”) of F. & M. Bancorp. of Tomah Inc. (“F&M”), which enhanced the composition of commercial and agricultural loans and increased our market presence in Wisconsin. In connection with the acquisition, the Company merged F&M with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving the merger. See Note 2, “Acquisition” for additional information.
We reported net income of $12.73 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, compared to net income of $9.46 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Diluted earnings per share were $1.14 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 compared to $0.85 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Return on average assets for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 was 0.80%, compared to 0.68% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. The return on average equity was 8.29% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 6.59% for the comparable period in 2019.
28
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. Some of these estimates are more critical than others. Below is a discussion of our critical accounting estimates.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable and inherent losses in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the estimated probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan loss, we consider the types of loans and the amount of loans in our loan portfolio, historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors determined by management. We follow all applicable regulatory guidance, including the “Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses,” issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC). We believe that the Bank’s Allowance for Loan Losses Policy conforms to all applicable regulatory requirements. However, based on periodic examinations by regulators, the amount of the allowance for loan losses recorded during a particular period may be adjusted.
Our determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on (1) specific allowances for specifically identified and evaluated impaired loans and their corresponding estimated loss based on likelihood of default, payment history and net realizable value of underlying collateral. Specific allocations for collateral dependent loans are based on fair value of the underlying collateral relative to the unpaid principal balance of individually impaired loans. For loans that are not collateral dependent, the specific allocation is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate through the repayment period; and (2) a general allowance on loans not specifically identified in (1) above, based on historical loss ratios, which are adjusted for qualitative and general economic factors. We continue to refine our allowance for loan losses methodology, with an increased emphasis on historical performance adjusted for applicable economic and qualitative factors.
Assessing the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective as it requires making material estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans, any of which estimates may be susceptible to significant change. In our opinion, the allowance, when taken as a whole, reflects estimated probable loan losses in our loan portfolio
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.” The Company records the excess of the cost of acquired entities over the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, as goodwill. The Company amortizes acquired intangible assets with definite useful economic lives over their useful economic lives utilizing the straight-line method. On a periodic basis, management assesses whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the intangible assets may be impaired. The Company does not amortize goodwill, but reviews goodwill for impairment at a reporting unit level on an annual basis, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may be impaired. A reporting unit is defined as any distinct, separately identifiable component of the Company’s one operating segment for which complete, discrete financial information is available and reviewed regularly by the segment’s management. The Company has one reporting unit as of December 31, 2020 which is related to its banking activities. The impairment testing process is conducted by assigning net assets and goodwill to the Company’s reporting unit. An initial qualitative evaluation is made to assess the likelihood of impairment and determine whether further quantitative testing to calculate the fair value is necessary. When the qualitative evaluation indicates that impairment is more likely than not, quantitative testing is required whereby the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit is calculated and compared to the recorded book value, “step one.” If the calculated fair value of the Company’s reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and “step two” is not considered necessary. If the carrying value of the company’s reporting unit exceeds its calculated fair value, the impairment test continues (“step two”) by comparing the carrying value of the Company’s reporting unit’s goodwill to the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.
In March 2020, the Company determined that a quarterly review of goodwill impairment should be performed, and this review was performed in each quarter of 2020. These quarterly reviews determined that goodwill was not impaired at any 2020 quarter-end, or as of December 31, 2020.
29
Fair Value Measurements and Valuation Methodologies.
We apply various valuation methodologies to assets and liabilities which often involve a significant degree of judgment, particularly when liquid markets do not exist for the particular items being valued. Quoted market prices are referred to when estimating fair values for certain assets, such as most investment securities. However, for those items for which an observable liquid market does not exist, management utilizes significant estimates and assumptions to value such items. Examples of these items include loans, deposits, borrowings, goodwill, core deposit intangible assets, other assets and liabilities obtained or assumed in business combinations, and certain other financial instruments. These valuations require the use of various assumptions, including, among others, discount rates, rates of return on assets, repayment rates, cash flows, default rates, and liquidation values. The use of different assumptions could produce significantly different results, which could have material positive or negative effects on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or disclosures of fair value information.
In addition to valuation, the Company must assess whether there are any declines in value below the carrying value of assets that should be considered other than temporary or otherwise require an adjustment in carrying value and recognition of a loss in the consolidated statement of income. Examples include but are not limited to; loans, investment securities, goodwill, core deposit intangible assets and deferred tax assets, among others. Specific assumptions, estimates and judgments utilized by management are discussed in detail herein in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and in notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14 and 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes.
Amounts provided for income tax expenses are based on income reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently payable under tax laws. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which arise principally from temporary differences between the amounts reported in the financial statements and the tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, are included in the amounts provided for income taxes. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and tax planning strategies which will create taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and if necessary, tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
The assessment of tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretations, and judgments concerning certain accounting pronouncements and application of specific provisions of Federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of Federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be material to our consolidated results of our operations and reported earnings. We believe that the deferred tax assets and liabilities are adequate and properly recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2020, management does not believe a valuation allowance related to the realizability of its deferred tax assets is necessary.
Business Combinations.
Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method of accounting. As of acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are measured at fair value and recognized separately from goodwill. Results of operations of the acquired entities are included in the consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. The calculation of intangible assets, including core deposit intangibles, and the fair value of loans are based on significant judgments. Core deposit intangibles are calculated using a discounted cash flow model, based on various factors including, among others, discount rate, attrition rate, interest rate and cost of alternative funds.
Loans acquired in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their acquisition-date fair value with no carryover of related allowance for credit losses. Any allowance for loan loss on these pools reflects only losses incurred after the acquisition (meaning the present value of all cash flows expected at acquisition that ultimately are not to be collected). Determining the fair value of the acquired loans involves estimating the cash flows expected to be collected from both principal and interest on acquired loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest. Management considers a number of factors in evaluating the acquisition-date fair value, including, among others, the remaining life of the loans, delinquency status, estimated prepayments, internal risk ratings, estimated value of underlying collateral and interest rate environment.
30
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Twelve months ended December 31, 2020 vs. Twelve months ended December 31, 2019
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the difference between the dollar amount of interest earned on interest bearing assets and the dollar amount of interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. The interest income and expense of financial institutions are significantly affected by general economic conditions, competition, policies of regulatory authorities and other factors.
Interest rate spread and net interest margin are used to measure and explain changes in net interest income. Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield on interest earning assets and the rate paid for interest bearing liabilities that fund those assets. Net interest margin is expressed as the percentage of net interest income to average interest earning assets. Net interest margin exceeds interest rate spread because non-interest bearing sources of funds (“net free funds”), principally demand deposits and stockholders’ equity, also support interest earning assets. The narrative below discusses net interest income, interest rate spread, and net interest margin.
Net interest income was $50.3 million for 2020 compared to $43.5 million for 2019. The increase in average balances is largely the reason for the increase in net interest income, due to both a full year of F&M balances and SBA PPP loan origination growth, with originated loan growth muted by acquired loan shrinkage. The net interest margin for 2020 was 3.40% compared to 3.37% for 2019. This increase in the net interest margin percentage was due to the following factors: (1) increase in accretion of discounts associated with paydown of purchased credit impaired loans; (2)income realized from the origination of the SBA PPP loans; (3) lower deposit costs due to the lower 2020 interest rate environment; (4) an additional six months of net interest income on the F&M acquisition. These increases were partially offset by: (1) lower interest income on loans, securities and cash and equivalents due to the lower interest rate environment and (2) a partial year of interest expense on the Company’s issuance of subordinated debt in August 2020. Accretion on purchased credit impaired loans recognized due to loan payoffs or significant reductions in loan balances was $2.7 million in 2020, which was an increase of $2.3 million from accretion recognized in 2019 or $0.4 million. In 2020, the SBA PPP program was initiated, and the Bank recognized $2.1 million of accretion of the net origination fees and contractual interest income of $0.973 million. Remaining deferred SBA PPP fees were approximately $3 million at December 31, 2020. Interest expense on liabilities decreased $2.6 million in 2020 due to the lower interest rate environment and actions taken by the Bank to reduce interest rates paid. The Bank has approximately $207 million of certificates of deposit maturing in 2021, at a blended interest cost of approximately 1.38%. These favorable items were offset by the negative impacts of a lower interest rate environment resulting in lower yields on loans, investments and cash and cash equivalents.
Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows interest income from average interest earning assets, expressed in dollars and yields, and interest expense on average interest bearing liabilities, expressed in dollars and rates. Also presented is the weighted average yield on interest earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis, rates paid on interest bearing liabilities and the resultant spread at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Non-accruing loans average balances are included in the table with the loans carrying a zero yield.
31
Twelve months ended December 31, 2020 Twelve months ended December 31, 2019
Average interest earning assets:
Average interest bearing liabilities:
Interest rate spread 3.20 % 3.13 %
Net interest margin (1) 3.40 % 3.37 %
(1) Fully taxable equivalent (FTE). The average yield on tax exempt securities is computed on a tax equivalent basis using a tax rate of 21% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The FTE adjustment to net interest income included in the rate calculations totaled $1 thousand and $120 thousand for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
32
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the components of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities that are presented in the preceding table. For each category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to: (1) changes in volume, which are changes in the average outstanding balances multiplied by the prior period rate (i.e. holding the initial rate constant); and (2) changes in rate, which are changes in average interest rates multiplied by the prior period volume (i.e. holding the initial balance constant).
Twelve months ended December 31, 2020 v. 2019 Increase (decrease) due to
Volume (1) Rate (1) TotalIncrease /(Decrease)
Interest income:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 354 $ (864) $ (510)
Interest-bearing deposits (47) 6 (41)
Interest expense:
FHLB Advances and other borrowings 814 (1,278) (464)
(1)the change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship to the dollar amounts of the change in each.
Provision for Loan Losses. We determine our provision for loan losses (“provision”, or “PLL”) to provide an adequate allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) to reflect probable and inherent credit losses in our loan portfolio.
We recorded provisions for loan losses of $7.8 million for 2020 compared to $3.5 million for 2019. In 2020, the provision allocated for originated loan growth was approximately $1.2 million compared to approximately $2.0 million for 2019. In 2020, approximately $1.2 million of provision was related to charge-offs and changes in specific reserves compared to $1.4 million in 2019. The remaining increase in provision related to qualitative factor increases to reflect uncertainty in current general economic conditions and a modest increase in unallocated ALL. There was no provision on approximately $5.5 million lines of credit drawn in late December and subsequently repaid on January 4, 2021.
Management believes that the provision taken for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively is adequate in view of the present condition of the Bank’s loan portfolio and the sufficiency of collateral supporting non-performing loans. We are continually monitoring non-performing loan relationships and will make provisions, as necessary, if the facts and circumstances change. In addition, a decline in the quality of our loan portfolio as a result of general economic conditions, factors affecting particular borrowers or our market areas, or other factors could all affect the adequacy of our ALL. If there are significant charge-offs against the ALL, or we otherwise determine that the ALL is inadequate, we will need to record an additional PLL in the future. See Note 1, “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Allowance for Loan Losses” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” to this Form 10-K, for further analysis of the provision for loan losses.
33
Non-Interest Income. The following table reflects the various components of non-interest income for 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Twelve months ended December 31, Change from prior year
Non-interest Income:
Net gains on investment securities 110 271 (59.41)%
Net gain on sale of branch — 2,295 N/M
Net gain on sale of acquired business lines 432 — N/M
Settlement proceeds 131 — N/M
N/M means not meaningful
The higher level of non-interest income primarily relates to the full-year impact of F&M on 2020 non-interest income since F&M’s, July 1, 2019 acquisition, unless noted below.
Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $536 thousand due to the impact of higher average balances in retail checking accounts.
Loan servicing income increased largely due to increased capitalized mortgage servicing rights due to higher mortgage loan origination sold volumes.
The increase in gain on sale of loans in 2020 is due to higher mortgage loan origination and sale volumes.
Net gains on investment securities reflects the 2020 sale of higher premium mortgage-backed securities and the 2019 municipal bond sale discussed in more detail in the balance sheet analysis section.
The Company sold the Rochester Hills, Michigan branch in the second quarter of 2019 for a $2.3 million gain, recorded in the gain on sale of branch line item above. In addition to the merger activity increases in other non-interest income, we recorded the receipt of a one-time payment of approximately $0.2 million on a loan charged-off prior to the Company’s acquisition.
The net gain on sale of acquired business lines reflects the sale of Wells Insurance Agency in June 2020 at a net gain of $252 thousand and the Bank’s acquired wealth management business partner exercising their contractual call, which originated prior to the acquisition, resulting in the sale of the Bank’s right to receive income from the wealth management business.
The Company recognized $131 thousand of non-interest income related to a cash receipt related to a private mortgage-backed security claim. The cash received represents a supplement to the proceeds received in fiscal 2015 from the private mortgage-backed security, previously owned by the Bank and sold in 2011.
34
Non-Interest Expense. The following table reflects the various components of non-interest expense for 2020 and 2019.
Twelve months ended December 31, % Change From prior year
Non-interest Expense:
Advertising, marketing and public relations 967 1,214 (20.35)%
Non-interest expense (annualized) / Average assets 2.74 % 3.05 %
The higher level of non-interest expense primarily relates to the full-year impact of F&M on 2020 non-interest expense since F&M’s, July 1, 2019 acquisition, unless noted below.
Compensation expense increased in 2020 primarily due to the impact of the F&M acquisition and higher variable mortgage production compensation related to higher mortgage loan origination activity, partially offset by lower compensation from the reduction in Bank personnel throughout 2020.
Data processing increases were due to higher loan balances and larger deposit balances.
Mortgage servicing rights expense increased in 2020 from impairment charges of $1.755 million in 2020 compared to $259 thousand in 2019. This increase is due to the impact of higher actual and forecasted prepayment rates. The remaining increase is due to higher amortization based on the current interest rate environment and a modestly larger servicing book.
Advertising, marketing and public relations decreased in 2020 reflecting the Company’s 2019 branding campaign for recently merged bank operations. Overall decreases were partially offset by higher contributions made to the communities in the Bank’s branch footprint to support community needs, due to increased economic pressures faced in 2020.
The FDIC premium assessment increased in 2020, as 2019 reflected the FDIC application of the Small Bank Assessment Credits.
Professional fees decreased in 2020 largely due to a reduction in merger expenses of $0.5 million.
Other non-interest expense decreased in 2020 due to lower merger and branch closure costs in 2020 of $165 thousand, a decrease of $3.1 million from 2019.
Income Taxes. Income tax provision was $4.6 million in 2020 compared to $2.8 million for 2019. Tax expense in 2019 was favorably impacted by a Department of Treasury ruling in the fourth quarter of 2019 related to the continued non-taxable nature of certain acquired bank owned life insurance. This resulted in a $0.3 million reduction in tax expense related to certain United Bank acquired bank owned life insurance contracts due to the elimination of previously established deferred tax liability on these contracts. The tax rate rose approximately 1% due to the impact of the 2019 sale of municipal securities.
Income tax expense recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations involves interpretation and application of certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes and is, therefore, considered a critical accounting policy. We undergo examination by various taxing authorities. Such taxing authorities may require that changes in the amount of tax expense or the amount of the valuation allowance be recognized when their interpretations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.
35
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Total assets increased $117.8 million to $1.65 billion at December 31, 2020 from $1.53 billion at December 31, 2019. This growth was primarily due to strong deposit growth, which funded the net loan portfolio growth from SBA PPP loans and increase in the Bank’s liquidity position.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased from $55.8 million at December 31, 2019 to $119.4 million at December 31, 2020. This increase was due to strong deposit growth, which exceeded loan and security growth.
Investment Securities. We manage our securities portfolio to provide liquidity, in an effort to improve interest rate risk, and enhance income. Our investment portfolio is comprised of securities available for sale (AFS) and securities held to maturity (HTM).
Securities AFS (recorded at fair value), which represent the majority of our investment portfolio, decreased to $144.2 million at December 31, 2020 compared with $180.1 million at December 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to the increased principal repayment and runoff in mortgage-backed certificates, along with a $10.7 million sale of higher premium MBS.
Additionally, during 2019, we sold the vast majority of our obligations of state and local government agency (municipal) portfolio. The proceeds from the sale, along with the growth in available for sale securities balances, were largely reinvested in mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities and investments in trust preferred securities, resulting in their respective increases. The trust preferred securities reprice based on LIBOR plus a spread, and current issuers of these securities are bank holding companies with assets of $50 billion or more.
In 2020, the Bank purchased additional trust preferred securities with similar characteristics as those purchased in 2019.
In 2020, the Bank purchased $45 million of HTM securities, consisting largely of U.S agency mortgage-backed securities which offset the decrease in the AFS portfolio and resulted in a modest growth of the net balance of the AFS and HTM portfolios.
The amortized cost and market values of our investment securities by asset categories as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
Available for sale securities AmortizedCost FairValue
U.S. government agency obligations $ 33,048 $ 33,365
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 140 140
U.S. government agency obligations $ 52,020 $ 51,805
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 281 281
36
Held to maturity securities AmortizedCost FairValue
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 600 $ 602
Total held to maturity securities $ 43,551 $ 43,784
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 300 $ 302
Total held to maturity securities $ 2,851 $ 2,957
The amortized cost and fair values of our investment securities by maturity, as of December 31, 2020 were as follows:
Available for sale securities AmortizedCost EstimatedFair Value
Due in one year or less $ — $ —
Due after one year through five years 3,833 4,095
Due after five years through ten years 44,405 44,880
Held to maturity securities AmortizedCost EstimatedFair Value
Due in one year or less $ — $ —
Due after one year through five years 200 200
Due after five years through ten years 400 402
Total securities with contractual maturities 600 602
Total held to maturity securities $ 43,551 $ 43,784
The amortized cost and fair values of our investment securities by maturity, as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:
Available for sale securities AmortizedCost EstimatedFair Value
Due in one year or less $ 141 $ 141
Due after one year through five years 5,900 5,959
Due after five years through ten years 43,269 43,180
Held to maturity securities AmortizedCost EstimatedFair Value
Due in one year or less $ 300 $ 302
Total securities with contractual maturities 300 302
Total held to maturity securities $ 2,851 $ 2,957
37
The following tables show the fair value and gross unrealized losses of securities with unrealized losses, as of the dates indicated below, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Mortgage-backed securities — — — — — —
Total held to maturity securities $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Unrealized losses reflected in the preceding tables have not been included in results of operations because the unrealized loss was not deemed other-than-temporary. Management has determined that more likely than not, the Company neither intends to sell, nor will it be required to sell each debt security before its anticipated recovery, and therefore recovery of cost will occur.
38
The composition of our investment securities portfolio by credit rating as of the periods indicated below was as follows:
December 31, December 31,
Available for sale securities AmortizedCost FairValue AmortizedCost FairValue
Below investment grade — — — —
December 31, December 31,
Held to maturity securities AmortizedCost FairValue AmortizedCost FairValue
AAA — — — —
BBB — — — —
Below investment grade — — — —
At December 31, 2020, the Bank has pledged certain of its U.S. Government Agency securities with a carrying value of $0.6 million and mortgage-backed securities with a carrying value of $3.0 million as collateral against specific municipal deposits. At December 31, 2020, the Bank has pledged certain of its U.S. Government Agency securities with a carrying value of $1.2 million as collateral against a borrowing line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. However, at December 31, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding on this Federal Reserve Bank line of credit. At December 31, 2020, the Bank also has mortgage-backed securities with a carrying value of $0.5 million pledged as collateral to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Bank sold approximately $10.8 million of fixed rate mortgage-backed certificates with a net realized gain of $156 thousand, which is included in net gains on investment securities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the Bank sold $35.4 million of mortgage-backed securities and obligations of state and political subdivisions with a net realized gain of $142 thousand.
Loans. Total loans outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs, increased to $1.24 billion at December 31, 2020 from $1.18 billion at December 31, 2019.
Gross loans were increased by the net origination of $123.7 million of SBA PPP loans. Reductions in the acquired loan portfolio, including purchase credit impaired loans reductions of $20.3 million, exceeded growth in the Bank’s originated loan portfolio. The reductions in the purchase credit impaired loans also resulted in lower non-performing and substandard loans. In 2020, approximately $5.5 million of the loan growth was due to draws on lines of credit on December 31, 2020, with the proceeds deposited into the customer’s money market account at the Bank, and withdrawn to repay the lines on January 4, 2021. The same customers executed similar transactions at the end of 2019, with the dollar amount being approximately $12.7 million.
39
The following table reflects the composition, or mix, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
Amount Percent Amount Percent
Real Estate Loans:
Commercial/agricultural real estate:
Residential mortgage:
C&I/Agricultural operating and Consumer installment loans:
C&I/Agricultural operating:
Consumer Installment:
Unamortized discount on acquired loans (5,063) (0.4) % (9,491) (0.8) %
Our loan portfolio is diversified by types of borrowers and industry groups within the market areas that we serve. Significant loan concentrations are considered to exist for a financial entity when the amounts of loans to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. As illustrated above, at December 31, 2020, the largest loan concentration we identified was commercial real estate loans which comprised 41% of our total loan portfolio. Approximately 76% of our total gross loans are secured by real estate.
40
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 respectively the fixed and adjustable-rate loans in our loan portfolio:
Amount Percent Amount Percent
Fixed rate loans:
Real estate loans:
Non-real estate loans:
Adjustable-rate loans:
Real estate loans:
Non-real estate loans:
Consumer installment 66 — % 126 — %
Unamortized discount on acquired loans (5,063) (0.5) % (9,491) (0.9) %
41
Loan amounts, their contractual maturities and weighted average interest rates at December 31, 2020 are shown below. SBA PPP loans of $123.7 million at an interest rate of 1% are included in the one year to five-year amounts in the C&I/agricultural operating segment.
Real estate Non-real estate
(1)Includes loans having no stated maturity and overdraft loans.
Loan amounts, their contractual maturities and interest rates at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
Real estate Non-real estate
(1)Includes loans having no stated maturity and overdraft loans.
We believe that the critical factors in the overall management of credit or loan quality are sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans and commitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, recording an adequate allowance to provide for incurred loan losses, and reasonable non-accrual and charge-off policies.
Risk Management and the Allowance for Loan Losses. . The loan portfolio is our primary asset subject to credit risk. To address this credit risk, we maintain an ALL for probable and inherent credit losses through periodic charges to our earnings. These charges are shown in our accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations as Provision for Loan Losses. See “Statement of Operations Analysis - Provision for Loan Losses” above. We attempt to control, monitor and minimize credit risk through the use of prudent lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers prior to lending and ongoing and timely review of payment performance. Asset quality administration, including early identification of loans performing in a substandard manner, as well as timely and active resolution of problems, further enhances management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses. Any losses that occur and that are charged off against the ALL are periodically reviewed with specific efforts focused on achieving maximum recovery of both principal and interest on the affected loan.
At least quarterly, we review the adequacy of the ALL. Based on an estimate computed pursuant to the requirements of ASC 450-10, “Accounting for Contingencies” and ASC 310-10, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, the analysis of the ALL consists of three components: (i) specific credit allocation established for expected losses relating to specific impaired loans for which the recorded investment in the loan exceeds its fair value; (ii) general portfolio allocation based on historical loan loss experience for significant loan categories; and (iii) general portfolio allocation based on qualitative factors such as economic conditions and other relevant factors specific to the markets in which we operate. We currently segregate loans into pools based on common risk characteristics for purposes of determining the ALL. The additional segmentation of the portfolio is intended to provide a more effective basis for the determination of qualitative factors affecting
42
our ALL. In addition, management continually evaluates our ALL methodology to assess whether modifications in our methodology are appropriate in light of underwriting practices, market conditions, identifiable trends, regulatory pronouncements or other factors.
Changes in the ALL by loan portfolio segment for the periods presented were as follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Purchased credit impaired loans — — — — — —
Other acquired loans:
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Recoveries — — — 84 — 84
Purchased credit impaired loans — — — — — —
Other acquired loans:
Total Allowance on other acquired loans $ 526 $ 27 $ 163 $ 53 $ — $ 769
The specific credit allocation for the ALL is based on a regular analysis of all originated loans that are considered impaired. In compliance with ASC 310-10, the fair value of the loan is determined based on either the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the market price of the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral less the expected cost of sale for such collateral. At December 31, 2020, the Company had identified impaired loans of $43.4 million, consisting of $18.5 million of TDR loans, the carrying amount of purchased credit impaired loans of $16.9 million and $8.0 million of substandard non-TDR loans. The $43.4 million total of impaired
43
loans includes $11.7 million of performing TDR loans. At December 31, 2019, the Company had identified impaired loans of $63.2 million, consisting of $12.6 million TDR loans, the carrying amount of purchased credit impaired loans of $32 million and $18.6 million of substandard non-TDR loans. The $63.2 million total of impaired loans includes $5.4 million of performing TDR loans.
At December 31, 2020, the allowance for loan losses was $ 17.0 million or 1.38% of total loans compared to $10.3 million or 0.88% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2019. This level was based on our analysis of the loan portfolio risk at each of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, as discussed above. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was primarily due to the impact the change in Q-Factor related to qualitative factor increases to reflect uncertainty in current general economic conditions. To a lesser extent, the provision for growth in the originated loan portfolio contributed to the increase in the amount of allowance for loan losses. The percentage of allowance for loan losses was also helped by a decrease in gross acquired loans. The percentage of gross acquired loans to gross loans, excluding SBA PPP loans, decreased to 25% at December 31, 2020 compared to 36% at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2020, the Bank had $286.2 million in gross acquired loans, which were recorded at fair market value at acquisition. The Bank had $424.7 million in gross acquired loans at December 31, 2019, which were recorded at fair market value at acquisition.
Allowance for Loan Losses to Loans, net of SBA PPP Loans
ALL to loans net of SBA PPP loans and deferred fees 1.53 % 1.35 % 1.16 % 0.88 %
All of the nine factors identified in the FFIEC’s Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses are taken into account in determining the ALL. The impact of the factors in general categories are subject to change; thus, the allocations are management’s estimate of the loan loss categories in which the probable and inherent loss has occurred as of the date of our assessment. Of the nine factors, we believe the following have the greatest impact on our customers’ ability to repay loans and our ability to recover potential losses through collateral sales: (1) lending policies and procedures; (2) economic and business conditions; and (3) the value of the underlying collateral. As loan balances and estimated losses in a particular loan type decrease or increase and as the factors and resulting allocations are monitored by management, changes in the risk profile of the various parts of the loan portfolio may be reflected in the allocated allowance. The general component of our ALL covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for these and other qualitative factors. In addition, management continues to refine the ALL estimation process as new information becomes available. These refinements could also cause increases or decreases in the ALL. The unallocated portion of the ALL is intended to account for imprecision in the estimation process or relevant current information that may not have been considered in the process.
Loans 30-89 days or more past due increased $6.7 million at December 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019, largely related to increases in commercial real estate and construction and land development loans 30-59 days delinquent. Nonaccrual loans decreased from $19.1 million to $10.7 million at December 31, 2020, primarily due to significant decreases in nonaccrual acquired loans, specifically in acquired commercial/agricultural real estate loans. While agricultural loans make up approximately 8% of the Bank’s loan portfolio, nonaccrual loans secured by agricultural collateral account for 65% or $7.0 million of the Bank’s nonaccrual loans, largely due to loans acquired in bank acquisitions. We believe our credit and underwriting policies continue to support more effective lending decisions by the Bank, which increases the likelihood of maintaining loan quality going forward. Refer to the “Risk Management and the Allowance for Loan Losses” section below for more information related to non-performing loans.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, loan charge-offs were $1.318 million compared to $0.911 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, largely due to an increase in commercial and industrial loans.
Certain external factors may result in higher future losses but are not readily determinable at this time, including, but not limited to: unemployment rates, increased taxes and continuing increased regulatory expectations with respect to ALL levels. As a result, our analysis may show a need to increase our ALL as a percentage of total loans and nonperforming loans for the near future. Loans charged-off are subject to periodic review and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest and related expenses on the loans charged off.
44
COVID-19 Loan Modifications. In response to COVID-19, our banking regulator issued an Interagency Statement encouraging financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual obligations due to COVID-19. Additionally, Section 4013 of the CARES Act provides that a qualified loan modification is exempt by law from classification as a TDR as defined by GAAP, from the period beginning March 1, 2020 until the earlier of December 31, 2020 or the date that is 60 days after the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 outbreak declared by the President of the United States under the National Emergencies Act is terminated. Section 541 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 extends this relief to the earlier of January 1, 2022 or 60 days after the national emergency termination date. The Interagency Statement was subsequently revised in April 2020 to clarify the interaction of the original guidance with Section 4013 of the CARES Act. In accordance with this guidance, the Bank instituted a plan to offer modifications to impacted borrowers. The Bank continues to work with borrowers as the pandemic persists and is requiring additional support in exchange for additional modifications beyond the original term. As of December 31, 2020, the Bank’s COVID-19 related modifications under Section 4013 of the CARES Act, totaled $61 million, or 5% of gross loans versus $126.7 million, or 10% of gross loans at September 30, 2020, and $197.3 million, or 15% of gross loans at June 30, 2020. At December 31, 2020, hotel industry sector loans represented $51.6 million of the approved deferrals. The Bank has approximately $2.4 million of total payment deferrals expiring in the first quarter of 2021.
Nonperforming Loans, Potential Problem Loans and Foreclosed Properties. We employ early identification of non-accrual and problem loans in order to minimize the risk of loss. Non-performing loans are defined as either 90 days or more past due or non-accrual. The accrual of interest income is discontinued according to the following schedules:
•Commercial/agricultural real estate loans, past due 90 days or more;
•Commercial and industrial/agricultural operating loans past due 90 days or more;
•Closed ended consumer installment loans past due 120 days or more; and
•Residential mortgage and open ended consumer installment loans past due 180 days or more.
When interest accruals are discontinued, interest credited to income is reversed. If collection is in doubt, cash receipts on non-accrual loans are used to reduce principal rather than recorded as interest income. Restructuring a loan typically involves the granting of some concession to the borrower involving a loan modification, such as modifying the payment schedule or making interest rate changes. Restructured loans may involve loans that have had a charge-off taken against the loan to reduce the carrying amount of the loan to fair market value as determined pursuant to ASC 310-10. Restructured loans that comply with the restructured terms are considered performing loans.
45
The following table identifies the various components of non-performing assets and other balance sheet information as of the dates indicated below and changes in the ALL for the periods then ended:
Nonperforming assets:
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial real estate $ 827 $ 5,705
Commercial and industrial (“C&I”) 357 1,850
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more 586 1,104
Other collateral owned 41 31
Total nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) $ 11,530 $ 21,620
Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) $ 18,477 $ 12,594
Loans charged off:
Commercial/Agricultural real estate — (381)
C&I/Agricultural operating (1,091) —
Residential mortgage (78) (239)
Consumer installment (149) (291)
Total loans charged off (1,318) (911)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial/Agricultural real estate 150 3
C&I/Agricultural operating 44 1
Residential mortgage 20 5
Consumer installment 77 93
Total recoveries of loans previously charged off: 291 102
Net loans charged off (“NCOs”) (1,027) (809)
Additions to ALL via provision for loan losses charged to operations 7,750 3,525
Ratios:
NCOs (annualized) to average loans 0.08 % 0.08 %
ALL to total loans 1.38 % 0.88 %
NPLs to total loans 0.92 % 1.71 %
NPAs to total assets 0.70 % 1.41 %
46
The following table shows the detail of non-performing assets by originated and acquired portfolios.
Nonperforming Originated and Acquired Assets
Nonperforming assets:
Originated nonperforming assets:
Acquired nonperforming assets:
Other collateral owned — — — 3
Ratios:
Non-performing assets include non-performing loans, other real estate owned and other collateral owned. Our non-performing assets were $11.5 million, or 0.70% of total assets, at December 31, 2020 compared to $21.6 million, or 1.41% of total assets, at December 31, 2019. The decrease was largely due to reductions in acquired nonperforming loans.
Nonaccrual Loans Roll forward
Quarter Ended
Acquired nonaccrual loans — — — — —
47
The table below shows the quarterly totals of accruing troubled debt restructurings since December 31, 2019. The increase in troubled debt restructuring in 2020 was largely due to one commercial real estate and one C&I loan to one borrower that have collateral positions such that no impaired reserves were required on these loans.
Troubled Debt Restructurings in Accrual Status
Troubled debt restructurings: Accrual Status
The table below shows the quarter-end totals of special mention, substandard and the total of these, known as criticized loans. The decrease in criticized loans in 2020 was largely due to decreases in acquired nonperforming and other substandard loans.
Acquired loans represent much of the reduction in non-performing loans and classified loans. The table below shows the changes in the Bank’s non-accretable difference on purchased credit impaired loans. The Bank has transferred the non-accretable difference on purchased credit impaired loans to accretable discount as collateral coverage improved sufficiently, due to a combination of principal paydowns and/or improving collateral positions. This transferred non-accretable difference to accretable discount is accreted over the remaining maturity of the loan or until payoff, whichever is shorter.
Non-accretable difference:
Quarter Ended
Mortgage Servicing Rights. The Company continues to sell loans to investors in the secondary market and generally retains the rights to service mortgage loans sold to others. MSR assets are initially measured at fair value by a third party; assessed at least quarterly for impairment; carried at the lower of the initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or estimated fair value. MSR assets are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, with the amortization recorded in non-interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The valuation of MSRs and related amortization thereon are based on numerous factors, assumptions and judgments, such as those for: changes
48
in the mix of loans, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and default rates. Changes in these factors, assumptions and judgments may have a material effect on the valuation and amortization of MSRs. Although management believes that the assumptions used to evaluate the MSRs for impairment are reasonable, future adjustment may be necessary if future economic conditions differ substantially from the economic assumptions used to determine the value of MSRs.
The fair market value of the Company’s MSR asset decreased to $3.3 million at December 31, 2020 from $4.3 million at December 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to $1.8 million of impairment recorded in 2020 on the MSR impairment for a total impairment of $2.0 million at December 31, 2020, increased amortization, and was partially offset by additions from originations. The unpaid balances of one- to four-family residential real estate loans serviced for others as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were $553.7 million and $524.7 million, respectively. The fair market value of the Company’s MSR asset as a percentage of its servicing portfolio at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was 0.59% and 0.82%, respectively.
Intangible Assets. We have intangible assets of $5.5 million at December 31, 2020 compared to $7.6 million at December 31, 2019. The intangible assets are comprised of core deposit intangible assets arising from various acquisitions from 2016 through 2019 and, until its sale in June 2020, the premium on the Wells Insurance Agency customer relationships. In 2020, Wells Insurance Agency was sold, and the related intangible related to customer relationships of $0.5 million was eliminated and reflected in the net gain on sale of the agency. Amortization of these intangibles was $1.6 million in 2020.
Deposits. Deposits are our largest source of funds. Total deposits increased to $1.30 billion at December 31, 2020 from $1.20 billion at December 31, 2019. The increase in deposits, largely attributable to the growth in non-maturity deposits, allowed the Company to reduce reliance on higher cost brokered and institutional deposits. The brokered and institutional deposits decreased to $2.8 million at December 31, 2020 from $54.4 million at December 31, 2019. In addition, retail certificates of deposits decreased by $35.6 million as the Company chose not to match higher rates offered by local retail certificate of deposit competitors. Non-maturity deposit growth included the impact of December 31, 2020 draws on lines of credit of $5.5 million deposited in the customers money market accounts, which were withdrawn on January 4, 2021 and repaid the draw on lines of credit. This is compared to $12.7 million of December 31, 2019 draws on lines of credit, taken on December 31, 2019, with the proceeds deposited into the customer’s money market accounts and subsequently repaid on January 2, 2020.
The following is a summary of deposits by type at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively:
Brokered deposits included above: $ 2,516 $ 50,377
49
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and other borrowings. A summary of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and other borrowings at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 is as follows:
December 31,
Stated Maturity Amount Range of Stated Rates Amount Range of Stated Rates
Unamortized discount on acquired notes (32) (59)
Other borrowings:
Unamortized debt issuance costs (528) (296)
(1) The FHLB advances bear fixed rates, require interest-only monthly payments, and are collateralized by a blanket lien on pre-qualifying first mortgages, home equity lines, multi-family loans and certain other loans which had a pledged balance of $723,862 and $792,909 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. At December 31, 2020, the Bank’s available and unused portion under the FHLB borrowing arrangement was approximately $118,391 compared to $203,935 as of December 31, 2019. This decrease was largely due to a change in the classification of the Bank based on asset size, which resulted in several asset classes no longer qualifying for collateral.
(2) Maximum month-end borrowed amounts outstanding under this borrowing agreement were $162,530 and $151,530, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
(3) The weighted-average interest rates on FHLB borrowings, with maturities less than twelve months, outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were 0.50% and 1.74%, respectively.
(4) Five of the FHLB notes with remaining balances totaling $8,530, were acquired as a result of the F&M acquisition. These notes mature on various dates through 2024 with a weighted average rate of 2.05% and weighted average maturity of 13 months.
(5) FHLB term notes totaling $55,000, with various maturity dates in 2029 and 2030, can be called or replaced by the FHLB on a quarterly basis, beginning approximately three months after the initial advance.
(6) Senior notes, entered into by the Company in June 2019 consist of the following:
(a) A term note which was subsequently refinanced in October 2020, requiring quarterly interest-only payments through June 2022, and quarterly principal and interest payments thereafter. The only change terms were a reduction in the floor rate. Interest is variable, based on US Prime rate with a floor rate of 3.25%.
(b) A $5,000 line of credit, maturing in August 2021, that remains undrawn upon.
50
(7) Subordinated notes resulted from the following:
(a) The Company’s private sale in August 2017, which bears a fixed interest rate of 6.75% for five years. In August 2022, they convert to a three-month LIBOR plus 4.90% rate, and the interest rate will reset quarterly thereafter. Interest-only payments are due quarterly.
(b) The Company’s Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement entered into with certain purchasers in August 2020, which bears a fixed interest rate of 6.00% for five years. In September 2025, the fixed interest rate will be reset quarterly to equal the three-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 591 basis points. Interest-only payments are due semi-annually each year during the fixed interest period and quarterly during the floating interest period.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and other borrowings
We utilize advances and other borrowings, as necessary, to supplement core deposits to meet our funding and liquidity needs and we evaluate all options for funding securities.
FHLB advances decreased to $123.5 million at December 31, 2020 from $131.0 million at December 31, 2019. During 2020, the Bank replaced short-term advances with new longer-term advances. The Bank entered into $45 million of advances with maturities between 2023 and 2025 with average interest rates of 1.44%. Additionally, in 2020 we entered into $12.5 million of advances with a ten-year maturity, callable quarterly by the FHLB with interest rates ranging from 0.52% to 0.86%. This increased the advances callable quarterly by the FHLB to $55 million with maturities in 2029 and 2030.
At December 31, 2020, the Bank had $123.7 million of borrowing capacity under the Federal Reserve SBA PPP Liquidity Facility, which the Federal Reserve established in 2020.
Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity was $160.6 million at December 31, 2020 compared to $150.6 million at December 31, 2019. In December 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a 5% stock buyback program or approximately 557,000 share buyback authorization. The Company previously had a stock buyback program in existence at January 1, 2020 which was suspended in March 2020 and terminated in July of 2020. The Company’s net income of $12.7 million was partially offset by the payment in February 2020 of a shareholder annual dividend of $0.21 per share and the 2020 repurchase of approximately 253,400 shares at a weighted average price of $11.13 per share.
Under the December 2020 stock buyback program, the Company purchased approximately 98,000 shares in December 2020, and is authorized to repurchase up to approximately 459,000 additional shares.
Liquidity and Asset / Liability Management. Liquidity management refers to our ability to ensure cash is available in a timely manner to meet loan demand, depositors’ needs, and meet other financial obligations as they become due without undue cost, risk or disruption to normal operating activities. We manage and monitor our short-term and long-term liquidity positions and needs through a regular review of maturity profiles, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts to minimize funding risk. A key metric we monitor is our liquidity ratio, calculated as cash and investments with maturities less than one-year divided by deposits with maturities less than or equal to one-year. At December 31, 2020, our liquidity ratio increased to 16.53 percent from 11.16 percent at December 31, 2019.
Our primary sources of funds are: deposits; amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans; other short-term investments; and funds provided from operations. We use our sources of funds primarily to meet ongoing commitments, to pay maturing certificates of deposit and savings withdrawals, and to fund loan commitments. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and maturing short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Although $206.7 million of our $313.2 million (66%) CD portfolio will mature within the next 12 months, we have historically retained a majority of our maturing CD’s. However, due to strategic pricing decisions regarding rate matching and branch closures, our retention rate decreased in 2020 and may remain at this lower level in 2021 based on management’s current pricing strategy, which reflects the Bank’s current strong liquidity position. Through new deposit product offerings to our branch and commercial customers, we are currently attempting to strengthen customer relationships to attract additional non-rate sensitive deposits. Based on interest rates on scheduled maturities and lower current market interest rates, this should also improve our cost of funds.
We maintain access to additional sources of funds including FHLB borrowings and lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank, and our correspondent banks. We utilize FHLB borrowings to leverage our capital base, to provide funds for our lending and investment activities, and to manage our interest rate risk. Our borrowing arrangement with the FHLB calls for pledging certain qualified real estate, commercial and industrial loans, and borrowing up to 75% of the value of those loans, not to exceed 35% of the Bank’s total assets. Currently, we have approximately $118.4 million available to borrow under this
51
arrangement, supported by loan collateral as of December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2020, the Bank had $123.7 million of borrowing capacity under the Federal Reserve SAB PPP Liquidity Facility. We also maintain lines of credit of $1.2 million with the Federal Reserve Bank and $15.0 million of uncommitted federal funds purchased lines with correspondent banks as part of our contingency funding plan. In addition, the Company maintains a $5.0 million revolving line of credit which is available as needed for general liquidity purposes. While the Bank does not have formal brokered certificate lines of credit with counter parties at December 31, 2020, we believe that the Bank could access this market, which provides an additional potential source of liquidity. See Note 10, “Federal Home Loan Bank and Other Borrowings” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” which are included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K, for further detail.
In reviewing the adequacy of our liquidity, we review and evaluate historical financial information, including information regarding general economic conditions, current ratios, management goals and the resources available to meet our anticipated liquidity needs. Management believes that our liquidity is adequate, and to management’s knowledge, there are no known events or uncertainties that will result or are likely to reasonably result in a material increase or decrease in our liquidity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments, issued to meet customer financial needs. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they become payable. These instruments include unused commitments for lines of credit, overdraft protection lines of credit and home equity lines of credit, as well as commitments to extend credit. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had approximately $247.3 million in unused commitments, compared to approximately $243.6 million in unused commitments as of December 31, 2019. See Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies”; “Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” which are included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K, for further detail.
Capital Resources. As of the dates indicated below, our Tier 1 and Risk-based capital levels exceeded levels necessary to be considered “Well Capitalized” under Prompt Corrective Action provisions for the Bank.
Below are the amounts and ratios for our capital levels as of the dates noted below for the Bank.
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
At December 31, 2020, the Bank was categorized as “Well Capitalized” under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, as determined by the OCC, our primary regulator.
52
Below are the amounts and ratios for our capital levels as of the dates noted below for the Company.
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
53
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
The following is selected financial data summarizing the results of operations for each quarter as of the periods indicated below:
Year ended December 31, 2020:
Dividends paid $ 0.21 $ — $ — $ —
Year ended December 31, 2019:
Dividends paid $ 0.20 $ — $ — $ —
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time and are not predictable or controllable. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. Like other financial institutions, our interest income and interest expense are affected by general economic conditions and policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.
How We Measure Our Risk of Interest Rate Changes. As part of our attempt to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we monitor our interest rate risk through several means including through the use of third party reporting software. In monitoring interest rate risk we continually analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their payment streams and interest rates, the timing of their maturities, and their sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates.
In order to manage the potential for adverse effects of material and prolonged increases in interest rates on our results of operations, we adopted asset and liability management policies to better align the maturities and re-pricing terms of our interest
54
earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. These policies are implemented by our Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The ALCO is comprised of members of the Bank’s senior management and a member from the Board of Directors. The ALCO establishes guidelines for and monitors the volume and mix of our assets and funding sources, taking into account relative costs and spreads, interest rate sensitivity and liquidity needs. The Committee’s objectives are to manage assets and funding sources to produce results that are consistent with liquidity, cash flow, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability goals for the Bank. The ALCO meets on a regularly scheduled basis to review, among other things, economic conditions and interest rate outlook, current and projected liquidity needs and capital position, anticipated changes in the volume and mix of assets and liabilities and interest rate risk exposure limits versus current projections pursuant to net present value of portfolio equity analysis. At each meeting, the Committee recommends strategy changes, as appropriate, based on this review. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and reporting on the effects of the policy implementations and strategies to the Bank’s Board of Directors on a regularly scheduled basis.
In order to manage our assets and liabilities and achieve desired levels of liquidity, credit quality, cash flow, interest rate risk, profitability and capital targets, we have focused our strategies on:
•originating shorter-term secured commercial, agriculture and consumer loan maturities, which could include balloon mortgage loans;
•originating variable rate commercial and agriculture loans and adjustable-rate commercial and agriculture loans;
•the sale of a vast majority of longer-term fixed-rate residential loans in the secondary market with retained servicing;
•managing our funding needs by utilizing core deposits, brokered certificates of deposits and borrowings as appropriate, with borrowing used to extend terms and lock in fixed interest rates;
•reducing non-interest expense and managing our efficiency ratio by implementing technologies to enhance customer service and increase employee productivity; and
•realigning supervision and control of our branch network by modifying their configuration, staffing, locations and reporting structure to focus resources on our most productive markets.
At times, depending on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the ALCO may determine to increase the Bank’s interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain or improve its net interest margin.
55
The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, an analysis of our interest rate risk as measured by the estimated changes in Economic Value of Equity (EVE) resulting from an immediate and permanent shift in the yield curve (up 300 basis points and down 100 basis points). As of December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, due to the current level of interest rates, EVE estimates for decreases in interest rates greater than 100 basis points are not meaningful. The increase in changes in economic value of equity as a percentage of equity is due to the growth in non-maturity deposits, and the net reduction in longer-term fixed rate loans.
Percent Change in Economic Value of Equity (EVE)
(1)Assumes an immediate and parallel shift in the yield curve at all maturities.
Our overall interest rate sensitivity is demonstrated by net interest income shock analysis which measures the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of change in our net interest income over the next 12 months in the event of an immediate and parallel shift in the yield curve (up 300 basis points and down 100 basis points). The table below presents our projected change in net interest income for the various rate shock levels at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The growth in percent change in net interest income in the various rate shock environments is due to the growth in assumed variable-rate Federal Reserve overnight balances and variable-rate loan assets.
Percent Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
(1)Assumes an immediate and parallel shift in the yield curve at all maturities.
Note: The table above may not be indicative of future results.
The assumptions used to measure and assess interest rate risk include interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay (runoff) rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above should market conditions vary from the assumptions used in preparing the analysis. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
56
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
57
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 8, 2021 expressed an unmodified opinion.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and
58
we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Loan Losses
As discussed in Notes 1 and 4 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company has a gross loan portfolio of $1.2 billion and related allowance for loan losses of $17.0 million as of December 31, 2020. The Company’s allowance for loan losses is a material and complex estimate requiring significant management’s judgment in the evaluation of the credit quality and the estimation of inherent losses within the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses includes a general reserve which is determined based on the results of a quantitative and a qualitative analysis of all loans not measured for impairment at the reporting date.
The Company’s general reserves cover non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss rates and qualitative loss factors for each portfolio. In calculating the allowance for loan losses, the Company considers relevant credit quality indicators for each loan segment, and estimates losses for each loan type based upon their nature and risk profile. This process requires significant management judgment in the review of the loan portfolio and assignment of risk ratings based upon the characteristics of loans. In addition, estimation of losses inherent within the portfolio requires significant management judgment, particularly where the Company has not incurred sufficient historical losses and has utilized industry data in forming its estimate.
Auditing these complex judgments and assumptions involves especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
•Testing the effectiveness of controls over the evaluation of the general reserve qualitative adjustments. Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls relating to management’s timely identification of problem loans, appropriate application of loan rating policy, consistency of application of accounting policies and appropriateness of assumptions used in the allowance for loan losses calculation.
•Evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions and reasonableness, accuracy, and completeness of data used by management in forming the loss factors by performing retrospective review of historic loan loss experience and analyzing historical data used in developing the assumptions.
•Evaluating the appropriateness of inputs and factors that the Company used in forming the qualitative loss factors and assessing whether such inputs and factors were relevant, reliable, and reasonable for the purpose used.
•Testing the mathematical accuracy and computation of the allowance for loan losses.
•Evaluated the period to period consistency with which qualitative loss factors are determined and applied. Evaluate the qualitative adjustments year over year for directional consistency and testing the reasonableness, including the qualitative adjustments attributed to the estimated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s loan portfolio.
Goodwill Impairment Evaluation
As described in Notes 1 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $31,498,000 at December 31, 2020, which is allocated to the Company’s single reporting unit. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually, or more frequently whenever events or circumstances occur that indicate that it is more-likely-than-not that an impairment loss has occurred. Management performed a quantitative assessment of goodwill for the Company’s single reporting unit utilizing estimates of selected market information (market approach). The calculation of the goodwill impairment involves significant estimates and subjective assumptions which require a high degree of management judgment. This judgment includes the identification of relevant market and transactions with comparable entities.
We identified the goodwill impairment assessment of the Company as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for this determination was the degree of auditor judgment in performing procedures to evaluate the appropriateness of the methodology used by management, including consideration of the significant assumptions and inputs, which includes relevant market and transactions with comparable entities.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
59
•Testing the operating effectiveness of controls over management’s goodwill impairment test including controls addressing:
◦Management’s review of the reasonableness and accuracy of the Company’s market and transactions with comparable entities.
◦Management’s review of the accuracy of estimates used to determine implied fair value.
•Substantively testing management’s estimate, including evaluating their judgements and assumptions, for estimating fair value of the Company which included:
◦Evaluation of key financial data for accuracy, including corroborating the reasonableness and accuracy of the market and transactions with comparable entities.
◦Utilization of firm employed valuation specialist to evaluate appropriateness of valuation methodologies and overall reasonableness of implied fair value.
/s/ Eide Bailly, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
Denver, Colorado
March 8, 2021
60
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flow for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
The consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Baker Tilly US, LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor from 2010 to 2019.
Baker Tilly US, LLP (formerly known as Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP)
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 10, 2020
61
CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
Assets
Other interest bearing deposits 3,752 4,744
Securities held to maturity "HTM" 43,551 2,851
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value 200 246
Mortgage servicing rights, net 3,252 4,282
Foreclosed and repossessed assets, net 197 1,460
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Stockholders’ Equity:
Unearned deferred compensation (550) (462)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 1,490 (471)
See accompanying notes to audited consolidated financial statements.
62
CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
For the year ended December 31, 2020 For the year ended December 31, 2019
Interest and dividend income:
Interest expense:
Interest on FHLB and FRB borrowed funds 1,814 2,721
Interest on other borrowed funds 2,458 2,015
Net interest income before provision for loan losses 50,255 43,513