CUZ US Equity☆

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Set forth below are the risks we believe investors should consider carefully in evaluating an investment in the securities of Cousins Properties Incorporated.

General Risks of Owning and Operating Real Estate

Our ownership of commercial real estate involves a number of risks, the effects of which could adversely affect our business.

General economic and market risks. In a general economic decline or recessionary climate, our commercial real estate assets may not generate sufficient cash to pay expenses, service debt, or cover operational, improvement, or maintenance costs, and, as a result, our results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected. Factors that may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our properties include, among other things:

•changes in the national, regional, and local economic climate;

•local real estate conditions such as an oversupply of rentable space caused by increased development of new properties, a reduction in demand for rentable space caused by a change in the wants and needs of our tenants, or economic conditions making our locations undesirable;

•the attractiveness of our properties to tenants or buyers;

•competition from other available properties;

•changes in market rental rates and related concessions granted to tenants including, but not limited to, free rent and tenant improvement allowances;

•uninsured losses as a result of casualty events;

•sociopolitical unrest such as political instability, civil unrest, armed hostilities, or political activism resulting in a disruption of day-to-day building operations;

•the need to periodically repair, renovate, and re-lease properties; and

•changes in federal and state income tax laws as they affect real estate companies and real estate investors.

Uncertain economic conditions may adversely impact current tenants in our various markets and, accordingly, could affect their ability to pay rent owed to us pursuant to their leases. In periods of economic uncertainty, tenants are more likely to downsize and/or to declare bankruptcy; and, pursuant to various bankruptcy laws, leases may be rejected and thereby terminated. Furthermore, our ability to sell or lease our properties at favorable rates, or at all, may be negatively impacted by general or local economic conditions.

Our ability to collect rent from tenants may affect our ability to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance, and other operating costs (including real estate taxes). Also, the expense of owning and operating a property is not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as reduced occupancy or other market factors cause a reduction in income from the property. If a property is mortgaged and we are unable to meet the mortgage payments, the lender could foreclose on the mortgage and take

5

Table of Contents

title to the property. In addition, interest rates, financing availability, law changes, and governmental regulations (including those governing usage, zoning, and taxes) may adversely affect our financial condition.

Impairment risks. We regularly review our real estate assets for impairment; and based on these reviews, we may record impairments that have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Negative or uncertain market and economic conditions, as well as market volatility, increase the likelihood of incurring impairment. If we decide to sell a real estate asset rather than holding it for long-term investment or if we reduce our estimates of future cash flows on a real estate asset, the risk of impairment increases. The magnitude and frequency with which these charges occur could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Leasing risk. Our properties were 91.6% leased at December 31, 2021. Our operating revenues are dependent upon entering into leases with, and collecting rents from, our tenants. Tenants whose leases are expiring may want to decrease the space they lease and/or may be unwilling to continue their lease. When leases expire or are terminated, replacement tenants may not be available upon acceptable terms and market rental rates may be lower than the previous contractual rental rates. Also, our tenants may approach us for additional concessions in order to remain open and operating. The granting of these concessions may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows to the extent that they result in reduced rental rates, additional capital improvements, or allowances paid to, or on behalf of, the tenants.

Tenant and market concentration risk. As of December 31, 2021, our top 20 tenants represented 36.9% of our annualized base rental revenues with no single tenant accounting for more than 5.2% of our annualized base rental revenues. The inability of any of our significant tenants to pay rent or a decision by a significant tenant to vacate their premises prior to, or at the conclusion of, their lease term could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations or financial condition if a suitable replacement tenant is not secured in a timely manner.

For the three months ended December 31, 2021, 39.8% of our net operating income for properties owned was derived from the metropolitan Atlanta area, 26.8% was derived from the Austin area, 9.1% was derived from the Charlotte area, 9.0% was derived from the Tampa area, and 7.7% was derived from the Phoenix area. Any adverse economic conditions impacting Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Tampa, or Phoenix could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition.

Uninsured losses and condemnation costs. Accidents, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, terrorism incidents, and other losses at our properties could adversely affect our operating results. Casualties may occur that significantly damage an operating property or property under development, and insurance proceeds may be less than the total loss incurred by us. Although we, or our joint venture partners where applicable, maintain casualty insurance under policies we believe to be adequate and appropriate, including rent loss insurance on operating properties, some types of losses, such as those related to the termination of longer-term leases and other contracts, generally are not insured. Certain types of insurance may not be available or may be available on terms that could result in large uninsured losses, and insurers may not pay a claim as required under a policy. Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. Such losses may not be fully insured. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such projects.

Environmental issues. Federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product released at a property. If determined to be liable, the owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination, or perform such investigation and clean-up itself. Although certain legal protections may be available to prospective purchasers of property, these laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the regulated substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the release of regulated substances at the property, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from regulated substances emanating from that site. We manage this risk through Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and, as necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, which include environmental sampling on properties we acquire or develop.

We are not currently aware of any environmental liabilities at locations that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, financial condition, or results of operations. Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise, however, and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Inquiries about indoor air quality and water quality may necessitate special investigation and, depending on the results, remediation beyond our regular testing and maintenance programs. Indoor air quality and water quality issues can stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contaminants from indoor or outdoor sources, and biological contaminants such as molds,

6

Table of Contents

pollen, viruses, and bacteria. Indoor exposure to chemical or biological contaminants above certain levels can be alleged to be connected to allergic reactions or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. If these conditions were to occur at one of our properties, we may be subject to third-party claims for personal injury or may need to undertake a targeted remediation program, including without limitation, steps to increase indoor ventilation rates and eliminate sources of contaminants. Such remediation programs could be costly, necessitate the temporary relocation of some or all of the property’s tenants, or require rehabilitation of the affected property.

Sustainability strategies. Our sustainability strategy is to develop and maintain durable buildings that are operated in an environmentally and socially responsible manner, encouraging office users to select us for their corporate operations while enhancing the communities in which our buildings are located. Failure to develop and maintain sustainable buildings relative to our peers could adversely impact our ability to lease space at competitive rates and negatively impact our results of operations and portfolio attractiveness.

Climate change risks. The physical effects of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations, and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns or severity, our markets could experience increase in storm intensity (including floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, or ice storms), rising sea-levels, and changes in precipitation, temperature, air quality, and quality and availability of water. Over time, these conditions could result in physical damage to, or declining demand for, our properties or our inability to operate the buildings efficiently or at all. Climate change may also indirectly affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of required resources, including energy, other fuel sources, water, and waste removal services, and increasing the risk and severity of flood and earthquakes at our properties. Should the impact of climate change be severe or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditure by us. For example, various federal, state, and local laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, "green" building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. Such codes could require us to make improvements to our existing properties, increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties, or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. Expenditures required for compliance with such codes may affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Joint venture structure risks. We hold ownership interests in a number of joint ventures with varying structures and may in the future invest in additional real estate through such structures. Our venture partners may have rights to take actions over which we have no control, or the right to withhold approval of actions that we propose, either of which could adversely affect our interests in the related joint ventures, and in some cases, our overall financial condition and results of operations. These structures involve participation by other parties whose interests and rights may not be the same as ours. For example, a venture partner may have economic and/or other business interests or goals that are incompatible with our business interests or goals and that venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our interests. In addition, such venture partners may default on their obligations, including loans secured by property owned by the joint venture that could have an adverse impact on the financial condition and operations of the joint venture. Such defaults may result in our fulfilling the defaulting partners' obligations that may, in some cases, require us to contribute additional capital to the ventures. Furthermore, the success of a project may be dependent upon the expertise, business judgment, diligence, and effectiveness of our venture partners in matters that are outside our control. Thus, the involvement of venture partners could adversely impact the development, operation, ownership, financing, or disposition of the underlying properties.

Title insurance risk. We did not acquire new title insurance policies in connection with the merger with TIER in 2019, instead relying on existing policies benefiting those entities' subsidiaries. We generally do acquire title insurance policies for all developed and acquired properties; however, these policies may be for amounts less than the current or future values of the covered properties. If there were a title defect related to any of these properties, or to any of the properties acquired in connection with the merger with TIER where title insurance policies are ruled unenforceable, we could lose both our capital invested in and our anticipated profits from such property.

Liquidity risk. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and can be difficult to sell and convert to cash quickly. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties, whether in response to any changes in economic or other conditions or in response to a change in strategy, may be limited. In the event we want to sell a property, we may not be able to do so in the desired time period, the sales price of the property may not meet our expectations or requirements, and/or we may be required to record an impairment on the property as a result.

7

Table of Contents

Ground lease risks. As of December 31, 2021, we had interests in nine land parcels in various markets that we lease individually on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2021, we had 2.2 million aggregate square feet of rental space located on these leased parcels, from which we recognized 10.2% of total Net Operating Income ("NOI") in the fourth quarter of 2021. In the future, we may invest in additional properties on some of these parcels or additional parcels subject to ground leases. Many of these ground leases and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject property and restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the property. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the property, impair the property's value, or negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the property. In addition, if we default under the terms of any particular lease, we may lose the ownership rights to the property subject to the lease. Upon expiration of a lease, we may not be able to renegotiate a new lease on favorable terms, if at all. The loss of the ownership rights to these properties or an increase of rental expense could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results.

Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other federal, state, and local regulatory requirements could result in substantial costs.

The Americans with Disabilities Act generally requires that certain buildings, including office buildings, be made accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. If, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely impact our earnings and cash flows, thereby impacting our ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

Our properties are subject to various federal, state, and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire, health, and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or other monetary damages. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Financing Risks

At certain times, interest rates and other market conditions for obtaining capital are unfavorable, and, as a result, we may be unable to raise the capital needed to invest in acquisition or development opportunities, maintain our properties, or otherwise satisfy our commitments on a timely basis, or we may be forced to raise capital at a higher cost or under restrictive terms, which could adversely affect returns on our investments, our cash flows, and results of operations.

We generally finance our acquisition and development projects through one or more of the following: our $1 billion senior unsecured line of credit (the "Credit Facility"), unsecured debt, non-recourse mortgages, construction loans, the sale of assets, joint venture equity, the issuance of common stock, the issuance of preferred stock, and the issuance of units of CPLP. Each of these sources may be constrained from time to time because of market conditions, and the related cost of raising this capital may be unfavorable at any given point in time. These sources of capital, and the risks associated with each, include the following:

•Credit Facility. Terms and conditions available in the marketplace for unsecured credit facilities vary over time. We can provide no assurance that the amount we need from our Credit Facility will be available at any given time, or at all, or that the rates and fees charged by the lenders will be reasonable. We incur interest under our Credit Facility at a variable rate. Variable rate debt creates higher debt service requirements if market interest rates increase, which would adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Our Credit Facility contains customary restrictions, requirements, and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including restrictions on unsecured debt outstanding, restrictions on secured recourse debt outstanding, and requirements to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Our continued ability to borrow under our Credit Facility is subject to compliance with these covenants.

•Unsecured debt. Terms and conditions available in the marketplace for unsecured debt vary over time. The availability of unsecured debt may vary based on the capital markets and capital market activity. Unsecured debt generally contains restrictive covenants that may place limitations on our ability to conduct our business similar to those placed upon us by our Credit Facility.

•Non-recourse mortgages. The availability of non-recourse mortgages is dependent upon various conditions, including the willingness of mortgage lenders to lend at any given point in time. Interest rates and loan-to-value ratios may also be volatile, and we may from time to time elect not to proceed with mortgage financing due to unfavorable terms offered by lenders. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to make the mortgage payments, the lender may foreclose. Further, at the time a mortgage matures, the

8

Table of Contents

property may be worth less than the mortgage amount and, as a result, we may determine not to refinance the mortgage and permit foreclosure, potentially generating defaults on other debt.

•Asset sales. Real estate markets tend to experience market cycles. Because of such cycles, the potential terms and conditions of sales, including prices, may be unfavorable for extended periods of time. In addition, our status as a REIT can limit our ability to sell properties, which may affect our ability to liquidate an investment. As a result, our ability to raise capital through asset sales could be limited. In addition, mortgage financing on an asset may prohibit prepayment and/or impose a prepayment penalty upon the sale of that property, which may decrease the proceeds from a sale or make the sale impractical.

•Construction loans. Construction loans generally relate to specific assets under construction and fund costs above an initial equity amount as negotiated with the lender. Terms and conditions of construction loans vary, but they generally carry a term of two to five years, charge interest at variable rates, require the lender to be satisfied with the nature and amount of construction costs prior to funding, and require the lender to be satisfied with the level of pre-leasing prior to funding. Construction loans can require a portion of the loan to be recourse to us. In addition, construction loans generally require a completion guarantee by the borrower and may require a limited payment guarantee from the Company which may be disproportionate to any guaranty required from a joint venture partner. There may be times when construction loans are not available, or are only available upon unfavorable terms, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to fund development projects or on our ability to achieve the returns we expect.

•Joint ventures. Joint ventures, including partnerships or limited liability companies, tend to be complex arrangements, and there are only a limited number of parties willing to undertake such investment structures. There is no guarantee that we will be able to undertake these ventures at the times we need capital and at favorable terms.

•Common stock. We can also provide no assurance that conditions will be favorable for future issuances of common stock when we need capital. In addition, common stock issuances may have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share and funds from operations per share. The actual amount of dilution, if any, from any future offering of common stock will be based on numerous factors, particularly the use of proceeds and any return generated from these proceeds. The per share trading price of our common stock could decline as a result of the sale of shares of our common stock in the market in connection with an offering or as a result of the perception or expectation that such sales could occur.

•Preferred stock. The availability of preferred stock at favorable terms and conditions is dependent upon a number of factors including the general condition of the economy, the overall interest rate environment, the condition of the capital markets, and the demand for this product by potential holders of the securities. Issuance of preferred stock, if convertible, could be dilutive to earnings per share and have an adverse effect on the trading price of common stock. We can provide no assurance that conditions will be favorable for future issuances of preferred stock when we need the capital, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to fund acquisition and development activities.

•Operating partnership units. The issuance of units of CPLP in connection with property, portfolio, or business acquisitions could be dilutive to our earnings per share and could have an adverse effect on the per share trading price of our common stock.

Any additional indebtedness incurred may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2021, we had $2.2 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could have adverse consequences on our business, such as:

•requiring us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, which would reduce the available cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, development projects, distributions, and other general corporate purposes;

•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital needs, acquisitions, capital expenditures, or other debt service requirements or for other purposes;

•increasing our exposure to floating interest rates;

•limiting our ability to compete with other companies who have less leverage, as we may be less capable of responding to adverse economic and industry conditions;

9

Table of Contents

•restricting us from making strategic acquisitions, developing properties, or capitalizing on business opportunities;

•restricting the way in which we conduct our business due to financial and operating covenants in the agreements governing our existing and future indebtedness;

•exposing us to potential events of default (if not cured or waived) under covenants contained in our debt instruments;

•increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions; and

•limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions in our industry.

The impact of any of these potential adverse consequences could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Covenants contained in our Credit Facility, senior unsecured notes, term loans, and mortgages could restrict our operational flexibility, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our Credit Facility, senior unsecured notes, and our unsecured term loan impose financial and operating restrictions on us. These restrictions may be modified from time to time, but restrictions of this type include limitations on our ability to incur debt, as well as limitations on the amount of our secured debt, unsecured debt, and on the amount of joint venture activity in which we may engage. These covenants may limit our flexibility in making business decisions. If we fail to comply with these covenants, our ability to borrow may be impaired, which could potentially make it more difficult to fund our capital and operating needs. Our failure to comply with such covenants could cause a default, and we may then be required to repay our outstanding debt with capital from other sources. Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us or may be available only on unattractive terms, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the cross default provisions on the Credit Facility, senior unsecured notes, and term loan may affect business decisions on other debt.

Some of our mortgages contain customary negative covenants, including limitations on our ability, without the lender’s prior consent, to further mortgage that specific property, to enter into new leases, to modify existing leases, or to redevelop or sell the property. Compliance with these covenants and requirements could harm our operational flexibility and financial condition.

Our degree of leverage could limit our ability to obtain additional financing or affect the market price of our securities.

Net debt as a percentage of either total asset value or total market capitalization and net debt as a multiple of annualized EBITDAre are often used by analysts to gauge the financial health of equity REITs like us. If our degree of leverage is viewed unfavorably by lenders or potential joint venture partners, it could affect our ability to obtain additional financing. In general, our degree of leverage could also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy. In addition, increases in our net debt to market capitalization ratio, which is in part a function of our stock price, or to other measures of asset value used by financial analysts may have an adverse effect on the market price of common stock.

Planned discontinuation of LIBOR could have an adverse impact on operations.

The London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") has been the subject of regulatory guidance and proposals for reform, and in March 2021, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after June 30, 2023. Changes in, or the planned discontinuation of, LIBOR would cause changes in how interest is calculated on our variable rate debt including our Credit Facility and term loan. Recent proposals for LIBOR reforms may result in the establishment of new methods of calculating LIBOR or the establishment of one or more alternative benchmark rates. Our variable-interest debt instruments, including our Credit Facility and term loan facilities, provide for alternate interest rate calculations if LIBOR is no longer widely available or should the alternative interest rate prove more favorable. There can be no assurances as to what alternative interest rates may be and whether such interest rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"), will be more or less favorable than LIBOR and any other unforeseen impacts of the potential discontinuation of LIBOR.

10

Table of Contents

Real Estate Acquisition and Development Risks

We face risks associated with operating property acquisitions.

Operating property acquisitions contain inherent risks. These risks may include:

•difficulty in leasing vacant space or renewing existing tenants at the acquired property;

•the costs and timing of repositioning or redeveloping acquisitions;

•disproportionate concentrations of earnings in one or more markets;

•the acquisitions may fail to meet internal projections or otherwise fail to perform as expected;

•the acquisitions may be in markets that are unfamiliar to us and could present unforeseen business challenges;

•the timing of acquisitions may not match the timing of dispositions, leading to periods of time where proceeds are not invested as profitably as we desire or where we increase short-term borrowings until sales proceeds become available;

•the inability to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all;

•the inability to successfully integrate the operations, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies, and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions within the anticipated time frames, or at all;

•the inability to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties, retain key employees, or attract highly qualified new employees;

•the possible decline in value of the acquired asset;

•the diversion of our management’s attention away from other business concerns; and

•the exposure to any undisclosed or unknown issues, expenses, or potential liabilities relating to acquisitions.

In addition, we may acquire properties subject to liabilities with no, or limited, recourse against the prior owners or other third parties. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle or contest it, which might not be fully covered by owner's title insurance policies or other insurance policies.

Any of these risks could cause a failure to realize the intended benefits of our acquisitions and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.

We face risks associated with the development of real estate.

Development activities contain certain inherent risks. Although we seek to minimize risks from development through various management controls and procedures, development risks cannot be eliminated. Some of the key factors affecting development of property are as follows:

•Abandoned predevelopment costs. The development process inherently requires that a large number of opportunities be pursued with only a few actually being developed. We may incur significant costs for predevelopment activity for projects that are abandoned, which would directly affect our results of operations. For projects that are abandoned, we must expense certain costs, such as salaries, that would have otherwise been capitalized. We have procedures and controls in place that are intended to minimize this risk, but it is likely that we will incur predevelopment expense on abandoned projects on an ongoing basis.

•Project costs. Construction and leasing of a project involves a variety of costs that cannot always be identified at the beginning of a project. Costs may arise that have not been anticipated or actual costs may exceed estimated costs. These additional costs can be significant and could adversely impact our return on a project and the expected results of operations upon completion of the project. Also, construction costs vary over time based upon many factors, including the cost of labor and building materials. We attempt to mitigate the risk of unanticipated increases in construction costs on our development projects through guaranteed maximum price contracts and pre-ordering of certain materials, but we may be adversely affected by increased construction costs on our current and future projects.

•Construction delays. Real estate development carries the risk that a project could be delayed due to a number of issues that may arise including, but not limited to, weather and other forces of nature, availability of materials, availability of skilled labor, and the financial health of general contractors or sub-contractors. Construction delays could cause adverse financial impacts to us which could include higher interest and other carrying costs than originally budgeted, monetary penalties from tenants pursuant to their leases, and higher construction costs.

11

Table of Contents

Delays could also result in a violation of terms of construction loans that could increase fees, interest, or trigger additional recourse of a construction loan to us.

•Leasing risk. The success of a commercial real estate development project is heavily dependent upon entering into leases with acceptable terms within a predefined lease-up period. Although our policy is generally to achieve certain pre-leasing goals (which vary by market, product type, and circumstances) before committing to a project, it is expected that sometimes not all the space in a project will be leased at the time we commit to the project. If the additional space is not leased on schedule and upon the expected terms and conditions, our returns, future earnings, and results of operations from the project could be adversely impacted. Whether or not tenants are willing to enter into leases on the terms and conditions we project and on the timetable we expect will depend upon a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. These factors may include:

•general business conditions in the local or broader economy or in the prospective tenants’ industries;

•supply and demand conditions for space in the marketplace; and

•level of competition in the marketplace.

•Reputation risks. We have historically developed and managed a significant portion of our real estate portfolio and believe that we have built a positive reputation for quality and service with our lenders, joint venture partners, and tenants. If we developed under-performing properties, suffered sustained losses on our investments, defaulted on a significant level of loans or experienced significant foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure of our properties, our reputation could be damaged. Damage to our reputation could make it more difficult to successfully develop properties in the future and to continue to grow and expand our relationships with our lenders, joint venture partners, and tenants, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

•Governmental approvals. All necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations may not be obtained, may only be obtained subject to onerous conditions, or may not be obtained on a timely basis resulting in possible delays, decreased profitability, and increased management time and attention.

•Competition. We compete for tenants in our Sun Belt markets by highlighting our locations, rental rates, services, amenities, reputation, and the design and condition of our facilities including operational efficiencies and sustainability improvements. As the competition for tenants is intense, we may be required to provide rent abatements, incur charges for tenant improvements and other concessions, or we may not be able to lease vacant space in a timely manner.

•Risks associated with the development of mixed-use properties. We operate, are currently developing, and may in the future develop properties, either alone or through joint ventures, that are known as "mixed-use" developments. This means that in addition to the development of office space, the project may also include space for retail, residential, or other commercial purposes. We do not have as much experience in developing and managing non-office real estate as we do office real estate and, as a result, we may seek to develop the non-office component ourselves, sell the right to that component to a third-party developer, or we may partner with a third party who has more non-office real estate experience. If we do choose to develop other components ourselves, we would be exposed not only to those risks typically associated with the development of commercial real estate generally, but also to specific risks associated with the development and ownership of non-office real estate. In addition, even if we sell the rights to develop the other components or elect to participate in the development through a joint venture, we may be exposed to the risks associated with the failure of the other party to complete the development as expected. These include the risk that the other party would default on its obligations necessitating that we complete the other component ourselves, including potential financing of the project. If we decide not to sell or participate in a joint venture and instead hire a third party manager, we would be dependent on them and their key personnel to provide services to us, and we may not find a suitable replacement if the management agreement is terminated or if key personnel leave or otherwise become unavailable to us.

Federal Income Tax Risks

Any failure to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes could have a material adverse impact on us and our stockholders.

We intend to continue to operate in a manner to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), for

12

Table of Contents

which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. Certain facts and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. In addition, we can provide no assurance that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions will not adversely affect our qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of our REIT status.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income. In this case, we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from operating as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. As a result, we would be subject to federal and state income taxes which could adversely affect our results of operations and distributions to stockholders. Although we currently intend to operate in a manner designed to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax, or other considerations may cause us to revoke the REIT election.

In order to qualify as a REIT, under current law, we generally are required each taxable year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our net taxable income (excluding any net capital gain). To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our other taxable income, we are subject to tax on the undistributed amounts at regular corporate rates. In addition, we are subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax to the extent that distributions paid by us during the calendar year are less than the sum of the following:

•85% of our ordinary income;

•95% of our net capital gain income for that year; and

•100% of our undistributed taxable income (including any net capital gains) from prior years.

We generally intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the 90% distribution requirement to avoid corporate-level tax on undistributed taxable income and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax. Distributions could be made in cash, in stock, or in a combination of cash and stock. Differences in timing between taxable income and cash available for distribution could require us to borrow funds to meet the 90% distribution requirement, to avoid corporate-level tax on undistributed taxable income, and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax.

Certain property transfers may be characterized as prohibited transactions.

From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties. Under the Code, any gains resulting from transfers or dispositions, from other than a taxable REIT subsidiary, that are deemed to be prohibited transactions would be subject to a 100% tax on any gain associated with the transaction. Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets that constitute inventory or other property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Since we acquire properties primarily for investment purposes, we do not believe that our occasional transfers or disposals of property are deemed to be prohibited transactions. However, whether or not a transfer or sale of property qualifies as a prohibited transaction depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") may contend that certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. While we believe that the IRS would not prevail in any such dispute, if the IRS were to argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction, we would be required to pay a tax equal to 100% of any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Recent changes to the U.S. tax laws could have an adverse impact on our business operations, financial condition, and earnings.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of federal and state income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our shares. In particular, the comprehensive tax reform legislation enacted in December 2017 and commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws that have profoundly impacted the taxation of individuals and corporations (including both regular C corporations and corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs). A number of changes that affect noncorporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. Among other changes, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, signed into law on March 27, 2020, makes certain changes to the TCJA. These changes have impacted us and our stockholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. To date, the IRS has issued only limited guidance with respect to certain of the new provisions, and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require further guidance. It is highly likely that technical corrections of legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new law and give proper effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical clarifications or changes needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congress in the near future. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure investors that any such changes will not adversely affect the

13

Table of Contents

taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our properties. Investors are urged to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on ownership of shares and the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals, and their potential effect on ownership of shares.

We may face risks in connection with Section 1031 Exchanges.

When possible, we dispose of and acquire properties in transactions that are intended to qualify as Section 1031 Exchanges. If a transaction's gain that is intended to qualify as a Section 1031 deferral is later determined to be taxable, we may face adverse consequences, and if the laws applicable to such transactions are amended or repealed, we may not be able to dispose of properties on a tax-deferred basis. In such case, our taxable income and earnings and profits would increase. This could increase the dividend income to our stockholders by reducing any return of capital they received. In some circumstances, we may be required to pay additional dividends or, in lieu of that, corporate income tax, possibly including interest and penalties. In addition, if a Section 1031 Exchange were later to be determined to be taxable, we may be required to amend our tax returns for the applicable year in question.

Further, as a result of changes made by the TCJA, Section 1031 Exchanges are only permitted with respect to real property. The changes generally apply to exchanges completed after December 31, 2017, unless the property was disposed of or received in the exchange on or before such date. If a material amount of personal property is associated with the real property that we have disposed of in a Section 1031 Exchange, these provisions will be less beneficial than under prior law.

Disclosure Controls and Internal Control over Financial Reporting Risks

Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting.

The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements, or misrepresentations. While management will continue to review the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives at all times. Deficiencies, including any material weakness, in our internal control over financial reporting which may occur in the future could result in misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of our financial statements, a decline in our stock price, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

General Risks

A pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of a contagious disease, such as the ongoing global pandemic of COVID-19, could adversely affect us.

Public health crises, pandemics, and epidemics, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, have had, and could continue to have, a material adverse effect on global, national, and local economies, as well as on our business and our tenants’ businesses. The potential impact of a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of a contagious disease on our tenants and our properties is difficult to predict or assess. The extent to which the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including the outbreaks in Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Phoenix, Tampa, Dallas, and Nashville and actions taken to contain or slow them, continues to impact our operations and those of our tenants, will depend on future developments. These may include the scope, severity, and duration of the pandemic, and the actions taken to mitigate its impact including the availability and effectiveness of vaccines or other treatments; all of which are highly uncertain and unpredictable, but could be material. The long-term impact of COVID-19 on the U.S. and global economies is uncertain and could result in prolonged world-wide economic downturns and recessions that may lead to corporate bankruptcies among our tenants. Any of these developments and other effects of the ongoing global pandemic of COVID-19 or any other pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of contagious disease, could adversely affect us.

In addition to the general economic impact of a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of a contagious disease, if an outbreak of COVID-19 occurs within the workforce of our tenants or otherwise disrupts their management and other personnel, the business and operating results of our tenants could be negatively impacted. Large-scale “shelter in place”, “stay safe”, or "social distancing" executive orders and health guidance in Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Phoenix, Tampa, Dallas, or Nashville, where we have high concentrations of our lease revenues and/or development activity, have caused many of our tenants, including retailers, restaurants, and our business partners, to stay closed or operate at reduced capacity for an extended period

14

Table of Contents

of time. Although many (but not all) of these restrictions have been gradually lifted, national "social distancing" guidance has remained, and it remains unclear whether an initial surge in the level of business activity is likely to be sustained, especially if the areas in which our properties are located experience a resurgence in COVID-19 cases and/or are subject to the reimposition of previously lifted business restrictions, the imposition of new business restrictions, or the issuance of new or revised local or national health guidance. The negative impact upon our tenants may include an immediate reduction in cash flow available to pay rent under our leases, and although various governmental financial programs may mitigate this, governmental assistance may not be available to all affected tenants or may be significantly delayed or discontinued. In turn, our tenants' inability to pay rent under our leases could adversely affect our own liquidity, and there can be no guarantee that additional liquidity will be readily available or available on favorable terms in the future. Large-scale executive orders and other measures taken to curb the spread of COVID-19 may also negatively impact the ability of our properties and developments to continue to obtain necessary goods and services or provide adequate staffing, which may also adversely affect our operating results and reputation. Any increased costs or lost revenue as a result of tenant financial difficulty, or their need to comply with executive orders or any OSHA regulations, or other health agencies or departments may not be fully recoverable under our leases or adequately covered by insurance, which could impact our profitability. In addition to the potential consequences listed above, these same factors may cause prospective tenants to delay their leasing decisions or to lease less space. Even after the pandemic has ceased to be active, the prevalence of work-from-home policies during the pandemic may alter tenant preferences in the long-term with respect to the demand for leasing office space.

We are dependent upon the services of certain key personnel, including members of the Board of Directors, the loss of any of whom could adversely impact our ability to execute our business.

One of our objectives is to develop and maintain a strong management group at all levels. At any given time, we could lose the services of key executives, members of the Board of Directors, and other employees. None of our Board members, key executives, or other employees are subject to employment contracts. Further, we do not carry key person insurance on any of our executive officers or other key employees. The loss of services of any of these key persons could have an adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to execute our business strategy.

Employee misconduct or misconduct by members of the Board of Directors could adversely impact our ability to execute our business.

Our reputation is critical to maintaining and developing relationships with tenants, vendors, and investors and there is a risk that our employees or members of the Board of Directors could engage, deliberately or recklessly, in misconduct that creates legal exposure for us and adversely impacts our business. Employees or members of the Board becoming subject to allegations of illegal activity, sexual harassment, or racial and gender discrimination, regardless of the outcome, could result in adverse publicity that could harm our reputation and brand. The loss of reputation could impact our ability to develop and manage relationships with tenants, vendors, and investors and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Our restated and amended articles of incorporation contain limitations on ownership of our stock, which may prevent a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Our restated and amended articles of incorporation impose limitations on the ownership of our stock. In general, except for certain individuals who owned stock at the time of adoption of these limitations, and except for persons or organizations that are granted waivers by our Board of Directors, no individual or entity may own more than 3.9% of the value of our outstanding stock. We provide waivers to this limitation on a case by case basis, which could result in increased voting control by a stockholder. The ownership limitation may have the effect of delaying, inhibiting, or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate.

The market prices of shares of our common stock have been, and may continue to be, subject to fluctuation due to many events and factors such as those described in this report including:

•actual or anticipated variations in our operating results, funds from operations, or liquidity;

•the general reputation of real estate as an attractive investment in comparison to other equity securities and/or the reputation of the product types of our assets compared to other sectors of the real estate industry;

•material changes in any significant tenant industry concentration;

•material changes in market concentrations;

•the general stock and bond market conditions, including changes in interest rates or fixed income securities;

•changes in tax laws;

•changes to our dividend policy;

15

Table of Contents

•changes in market valuations of our properties;

•adverse market reaction to the amount of our outstanding debt at any time, the amount of our maturing debt, and our ability to refinance such debt on favorable terms;

•any failure to comply with existing debt covenants;

•any foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure of our properties;

•additions or departures of directors, key executives, and other employees;

•actions by institutional stockholders;

•uncertainties in world financial markets;

•general market and economic conditions; in particular, market and economic conditions of Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Phoenix, Tampa, Dallas, and Nashville; and

•the realization of any of the other risk factors described in this report.

Many of the factors listed above are beyond our control. Those factors may cause market prices of shares of our common stock to decline, regardless of our financial performance, condition, and prospects. The market price of shares of our common stock may fall significantly in the future, and it may be difficult for our stockholders to resell our common stock at prices they find attractive.

If our future operating performance does not meet the projections of our analysts or investors, our stock price could decline.

Securities analysts publish quarterly and annual projections of our financial performance. These projections are developed independently based on their own analyses, and we undertake no obligation to monitor, and take no responsibility for, such projections. Such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and should not be relied upon as being indicative of the performance that we anticipate for any applicable period. Our actual revenues, net income, and funds from operations may differ materially from what is projected by securities analysts. If our actual results do not meet analysts’ guidance, our stock price could decline significantly.

We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions, or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems.

We face risks associated with security breaches or disruptions, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations (including managing our building systems) and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. While, to date, we have not had a significant cyber breach or attack that had a material impact on our business or results of operations, there can be no assurance that our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, and the market price of our common stock. Further, one or more of our tenants could experience a cyber incident which could impact their operations and ability to perform under the terms of their lease with us. While we maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions including deductibles, cover specific aspects of cyber risks, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures and to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

Public attention to environmental, social, and governance matters

Recently, more attention is being directed towards publicly-traded companies regarding environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") matters. Our efforts to improve our ESG profile and practices, including reducing emissions and improve the efficiency of our building operations, may require capital expenditures and may result in short- or long-term increases in our operating costs, all of which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. A failure, or a perceived failure, to respond to investor, customer, employee, or other stakeholder expectations related to ESG concerns, or to comply with regulatory requirements, including a failure, or a perceived failure, to achieve any voluntarily adopted goals or initiatives, could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to

16

Table of Contents

capital, stock price, and customer and employee attraction and retention. In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and other matters have developed rating systems for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to negative investor sentiment, which could have a negative impact on our stock price.

Additionally, while we strive to create and maintain an inclusive culture and a diverse workforce where everyone feels valued and respected, a failure, or a perceived failure, to properly address matters of culture, including inclusivity and diversity matters, could result in a reputational harm or an inability to attract and retain customers or employees.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

17

Table of Contents

Item 2.Properties

The following table sets forth certain information related to operating properties in which we have an ownership interest. Except as noted, all information presented is as of December 31, 2021 ($ in thousands):

Operating Properties (1)

Company's Share

Table continued on next page

18

Table of Contents

Company's Share

Other Properties

College Street Garage - Charlotte (7) NA Consolidated 100% NA NA 0.5% —

(1)Operating properties exclude properties on our development pipeline and properties sold as of and prior to December 31, 2021.

(2)The weighted average economic occupancy of the property over the period for which the property was available for occupancy during the three months ended December 31, 2021.

(3)The Company's share of net operating income for the three months ended December 31, 2021.

(4)The Company's share of property-specific mortgage debt, including premiums and net of unamortized loan costs, as of December 31, 2021.

(5)The Company's share of annualized rent represents the sum of the annualized rent including tenant's share of estimated operating expenses, if applicable, each tenant is paying as of the end of the reporting period. If a tenant is not paying rent due to a free rent concession, annualized rent is calculated based on the annualized contractual rent the tenant will pay in the first period it is required to pay rent. Included in this amount is $17.6 million of annualized base rent for tenants in a free rent period.

(6)Contains two or more buildings that are grouped together for reporting purposes.

(7)Not included in Same Property as of December 31, 2021.

(8)Contains two or more buildings that are grouped together for reporting purposes, some of which are not included in Same Property as of December 31, 2021.

(9)Heights Union is a recently developed property acquired by Cousins on October 1, 2021. The occupancy at December 31, 2021 is 57.6%, and stabilized occupancy of greater than 90% is anticipated to be achieved in the second quarter of 2022.

(10)The square footage of Heights Union has been excluded from the calculation of weighted average occupancy for the fourth quarter and leased at December 31, 2021. See note 9.

Office Lease Expirations

As of December 31, 2021, our leases expire as follows:

19

Table of Contents

Top 20 Office Tenants

As of December 31, 2021, our top 20 office tenants were as follows:

(1) In some cases, the actual tenant may be an affiliate of the entity shown.

20

Table of Contents

Tenant Industry Diversification

As of December 31, 2021, our tenant industry diversification was as follows:

Industry (1) Percentage of Company's Share of Annualized Rent (2)

Technology 23.0 %

Professional Services 15.7 %

Financial 15.0 %

Legal 9.2 %

Energy 7.0 %

Consumer Goods & Services 6.8 %

Health Care 6.1 %

Real Estate 4.5 %

Other 3.6 %

Insurance 3.4 %

Marketing/Media/Creative 2.1 %

Construction/Design 2.1 %

Transportation 1.5 %

Development Pipeline (1)

As of December 31, 2021, information on our projects under development was as follows ($ in thousands):

21

Table of Contents

Land Holdings

As of December 31, 2021, we owned the following land holdings, either directly or indirectly through joint ventures:

715 Ponce Atlanta 50% Unconsolidated 1.0

887 West Peachtree (fka 901 West Peachtree) (1) Atlanta 100% Consolidated 1.6

The Avenue Forsyth-Adjacent Land Atlanta 100% Consolidated 10.4

Domain Point 3 Austin 90% Consolidated 1.7

Domain Central Austin 100% Consolidated 5.6

South End Station Charlotte 100% Consolidated 3.4

303 Tremont Charlotte 100% Consolidated 2.4

Legacy Union 2 & 3 Dallas 95% Consolidated 4.0

Victory Center Dallas 75% Unconsolidated 3.0

Corporate Center 5 & 6 (2) Tampa 100% Consolidated 14.1

(1) Includes a long-term ground lease with future obligation to purchase.

(2) Corporate Center 5 is controlled through a long-term ground lease.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. We record a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable estimate of the loss is a range, we accrue the best estimate within the range. If no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the minimum amount within the range. If an unfavorable outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, we disclose the nature of the litigation and indicate that an estimate of the loss or range of loss cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the estimated loss is material, we disclose the nature and estimate of the possible loss of the litigation. We do not disclose information with respect to litigation where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote or where the estimated loss would not be material. Based on current expectations, such matters, both individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations, business, or financial condition.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

22

Table of Contents

Item X.Information about our Executive Officers

The Executive Officers of the Registrant, as of the date hereof, are as follow:

Name Age Office Held

M. Colin Connolly 45 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Gregg D. Adzema 56 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

J. Kennedy Hicks 38 Executive Vice President, Investments & Managing Director

Richard G. Hickson IV 47 Executive Vice President, Operations

John S. McColl 59 Executive Vice President

Jeffrey D. Symes 56 Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among the Executive Officers or Directors.

Term of Office

The term of office for all officers expires at the annual stockholders’ meeting. The Board retains the power to remove any officer at any time.

Business Experience

Mr. Connolly was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President by the Company's Board of Directors effective January 2019. From July 2017 to December 2018, Mr. Connolly served as President and Chief Operating Officer. From July 2016 to July 2017, Mr. Connolly served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. From December 2015 to July 2016, Mr. Connolly served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. From May 2013 to December 2015, Mr. Connolly served as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer.

Mr. Adzema was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2010.

Ms. Hicks was appointed Executive Vice President of Investments in October 2020. Ms. Hicks joined Cousins in November 2018 as Senior Vice President of Investments. Prior to Cousins, Ms. Hicks worked at Eastdil Secured, a real estate investment banking firm, where she served in a variety of roles from 2010 – 2018, including Managing Director.

Mr. Hickson was appointed Executive Vice President of Operations in October 2018. Mr. Hickson joined Cousins in September 2016 as Senior Vice President responsible for Asset Management.

Mr. McColl was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2011. From February 2010 to December 2011, Mr. McColl served as Executive Vice President-Development, Office Leasing and Asset Management. From May 1997 to February 2010, Mr. McColl served as Senior Vice President.

Ms. Roper was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in February 2017. From October 2012 to February 2017, Ms. Roper served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. From February 2008 to October 2012, Ms. Roper served as Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary.

Mr. Symes joined the Company in February 2020 and was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer effective March 2020. From April 2018 to January 2020, Mr. Symes served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of a private company. From April 2012 to August 2017, Mr. Symes served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (“FelCor”), and he was employed by RLJ Lodging Trust (FelCor’s acquirer) in a transition capacity from September 2017 to March 2018.

23

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters

Market Information and Holders

Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol CUZ). On January 28, 2022, there were 9,655 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Purchases of Equity Securities

There were no purchases of common stock by the Company during the fourth quarter of 2021.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total return of our common stock with the NYSE Composite Index, the FTSE Nareit Equity Index, and the FTSE Nareit Equity Office Index. The graph assumes a $100 investment in each of the indices on December 31, 2016 and the reinvestment of all dividends.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN OF ONE OR MORE COMPANIES, PEER

GROUPS, INDUSTRY INDICES, AND/OR BROAD MARKETS

Fiscal Year Ended

24

Table of Contents

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the selected financial data and the consolidated financial statements and notes.

Overview of 2021 Performance and Company and Industry Trends

Our strategy is to create value for our stockholders through ownership of the premier urban office portfolio in the Sun Belt markets, with a particular focus on Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Phoenix, Tampa, Dallas, and Nashville. This strategy is based on a disciplined approach to capital allocation that includes opportunistic acquisitions, selective development projects, and timely dispositions of non-core assets with a goal of maintaining a portfolio of new and efficient properties with lower capital expenditure requirements. This strategy is also based on a simple, flexible, and low-leveraged balance sheet that allows us to pursue compelling growth opportunities at the most advantageous points in the cycle. To implement this strategy, we utilize our strong local operating platforms within each of our major markets.

During 2021, we completed multiple strategic acquisitions of operating properties and land parcels and entered into two joint ventures. We acquired 725 Ponce, a 372,000 square foot office property in Midtown Atlanta, for a gross price of $300.2 million; Heights Union, a 294,000 square foot office property in Tampa, for a gross price of $144.8 million; and our partners' 50% interest in 300 Colorado, a 369,000 square foot office building in downtown Austin, for a gross price of $162.5 million. We also acquired a 0.7 acre land parcel in Atlanta for a gross price of $10.0 million related to a potential future development in Midtown Atlanta and a 0.2 acre land parcel in Atlanta, adjacent to our 3344, 3348, and 3350 operating properties, for a gross price of $8.0 million that is held in a 95% owned consolidated joint venture. We entered into a 50/50 joint venture to develop Neuhoff, a mixed-use project in Nashville, which will include 448,000 square feet of office and retail space as well as 542 multi-family units, for an estimated investment of $281.3 million at our share. In addition, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture to own 715 Ponce, a land parcel adjacent to 725 Ponce, with an initial contribution of $4.0 million.

During 2021, we completed multiple dispositions of operating properties and interests in joint ventures, using the proceeds to fund the investment activity mentioned above. We sold 816 Congress, a 435,000 square foot office building in downtown Austin, for a gross price of $174.0 million; One South at the Plaza, an 891,000 square foot office property in Charlotte, for a gross price of $271.5 million; Burnett Plaza, a one million square foot office building in Fort Worth, for a gross price of $137.5 million; and a 0.7 acre land parcel in Phoenix, adjacent to our 100 Mill development, to a hotel developer for a gross price of $6.4 million. In addition, we sold our 50% investment in Dimensional Place, a 281,000 square foot office property in Charlotte, for a gross price of $60.8 million. We sold

In 2021, we leased or renewed 2.1 million square feet of office space. The weighted average net effective rent per square foot, representing base rent excluding operating expense reimbursements and leasing costs, for new or renewed non-amenity leases with terms greater than one year, was $25.55 per square foot. Cash-basis net effective rent per square foot increased 15.1% on spaces that had been previously occupied in the past year. Cash-basis net effective rent represents net rent at the end of the term paid by the prior tenant compared to the net rent at the beginning of the term paid by the current tenant. Our same property net operating income for the year decreased 0.5% on a straight-line basis and increased 3.5% on a cash-basis.

On a regular basis we review and, as appropriate, revise our corporate contingency plan, which addresses the steps necessary to respond to an unexpected interruption of business, including the unavailability of our corporate office space. Since March 2020, in accordance with the advice of the CDC due to the threat presented by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, our tenants widely adopted remote working for their office employees, and we increased our janitorial cleaning protocols in our buildings. The rental obligations under our leases have not been materially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic to date, and any requests for rent adjustments are addressed on a case-by-case basis. We also have worked closely with essential vendors, including the contractors and others involved in our development projects, to assess potential impact of appropriate and necessary distancing measures upon our operations and our development delivery timelines. During 2021, many, but not all, of our tenants began to bring employees back to the office at least a few days a week, decreasing the time their teams were working remotely and increasing the physical occupancy at our properties.

Although the impact to our business of the COVID-19 pandemic has not been severe to date, the long-term impact of the pandemic on our tenants or prospective tenants and the world-wide economy is uncertain and will depend on the scope, severity, and duration of the pandemic. A prolonged economic downturn resulting from the pandemic could adversely affect many of our tenants or prospective tenants, which could, in turn, adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

25

Table of Contents

Market Conditions

We believe that the Sun Belt region, and in particular the seven core Sun Belt markets in which we operate, possess some of the most attractive economic and real estate fundamentals in the nation. Our markets are located in states that lead the nation in new job growth and net migration as residents relocate from the Northeast, Midwest, and West Coast to our markets. This migration, when combined with relatively low levels of new supply, has led to steady office absorption and positive rent growth, supporting healthy office fundamentals. We believe that we are well positioned to benefit from, and ultimately outperform in, the current real estate environment.

Our Atlanta portfolio totals 7.9 million square feet, representing 39.8% of our Net Operating Income for the fourth quarter of 2021 and was 89.1% leased at December 31, 2021. Market-wide Class A leasing activity in Atlanta represented 51.3% of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 40.7% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of the total market square footage was 3.0% at December 31, 2021. Atlanta recorded its highest annual total for construction completions in market history, delivering 3.4 million square feet of new product in 2021; of which, 81% has already been leased. We believe our portfolio of operating assets and land holdings for future development, which is well located primarily in the Midtown, Buckhead, and Central Perimeter submarkets, with direct access to mass transit, is well positioned to meet the strong demand in the market.

Our Austin portfolio totals 4.2 million square feet, representing 26.8% of our Net Operating Income for the fourth quarter of 2021 and was 95.5% leased at December 31, 2021. In addition, we have two projects under development in Austin. Domain 9 is a 338,000 square foot project, located in the Domain submarket, and the office portion is 100% leased. 300 Colorado, a 369,000 square foot office property, is located in the central business district and is 88% leased. Market-wide Class A leasing activity in Austin represented 55.8% of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 40.9% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of the total market square footage was 13.1% at December 31, 2021. Our portfolio is predominantly in the central business district and Domain submarket where vacancy is 18.7% and 6.0%, respectively. We believe that our dominant presence in Austin, combined with strong demand for Class A office space, is favorable for our existing portfolio.

Our Charlotte portfolio totals 1.4 million square feet, representing 9.1% of our Net Operating Income for the fourth quarter of 2021 and was 96.3% leased at December 31, 2021. Class A leasing activity in Charlotte represented 47.4% of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 41.5% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of the total market square footage was 8.1% at December 31, 2021. Our portfolio is located in the Uptown and South End submarkets where rent growth has significantly surpassed the national average. The overall market has benefited from Charlotte's strong population growth, which has increased at three times the national rate over the past decade. Strong demand and favorable economics have spurred a high level of new development across the market, specifically in Uptown and South End where approximately 3.0 million square feet is currently under construction.

Our Tampa portfolio totals 2.0 million square feet, representing 9.0% of Net Operating Income for the fourth quarter of 2021 and was 93.1% leased at December 31, 2021. Market-wide Class A leasing activity in Tampa represented 40.9% of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 26.5% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of the total market square footage was 1.0% at December 31, 2021. Metro-wide, the Tampa office market is experiencing low vacancy rates, and the Westshore submarket, where the majority of our portfolio is located, continues to achieve some of the highest rents in the metropolitan area, in part due to its central location and proximity to the Tampa airport.

Our Phoenix portfolio totals 1.3 million square feet, representing 7.7% of our Net Operating Income for the fourth quarter of 2021 and was 92.2% leased at December 31, 2021. We have one project under development in Phoenix - 100 Mill, a 287,000 square foot project, is 81% leased. Market-wide Class A leasing activity in Phoenix represented 38.3% of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 33.6% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of the total market square footage was 2.2% at December 31, 2021. Phoenix has experienced population growth at more than twice the national average, more than two-thirds of which was from new residents from outside the metropolitan area. Our portfolio is located in the Tempe submarket, in close proximity to Arizona State University and its 80,000 students, where Class A office vacancy is 8.6%.

Our Dallas portfolio totals 516,000 square feet, representing 3.0% of Net Operating Income for the fourth quarter of 2021 and was 91.3% leased at December 31, 2021. Market-wide Class A leasing activity in Dallas represented 49.5% of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 44.0% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of the total market square footage was 3.0% at December 31, 2021.

Our Nashville portfolio includes a mixed-used development of 448,000 square feet of commercial space and 542 residential units located in the Germantown submarket. Market-wide Class A leasing activity in Nashville represented 61.1%

26

Table of Contents

of total leasing activity in 2021 while representing only 33.1% of total inventory, and construction as a percentage of total market square footage was 10.2%.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP as outlined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"), and the notes to consolidated financial statements include a summary of the significant accounting policies for the Company. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of certain estimates, a change in which could materially affect revenues, expenses, assets, or liabilities. Some of our accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting policies, which are ones that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows, and ones that also require significant judgment or complex estimation processes. Our critical accounting policies are as follows:

Revenue Recognition

Most of our revenues are derived from operating leases and are reflected as rental property revenues on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Several judgments and estimates are included in the rental property revenue recognition process including the determination of lease term, ownership of tenant improvements, lease modifications, and lease terminations.

Revenues derived from fixed lease payments, which exclude certain rental property revenue such as percentage rent and revenue related to the recovery of certain operating expenses from our tenants, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. We make significant assumptions and judgments in determining the lease term, including the judgments involved as to when a tenant has the right to use an underlying asset and assumptions when the lease provides the tenant with an extension or early termination option.

Most of our leases involve some form of improvements to leased space. We make significant judgments in reviewing various factors to assist in determining whether we or our tenants own the improvements. Those factors include, but are not limited to, whether or not the:

•Lease agreement’s terms obligate the tenant to construct or install specifically-identified assets (i.e., the leasehold improvements);

•Tenant’s failure to make specified improvements is an event of default under which the landlord can require the lessee to make those improvements or otherwise enforce the landlord’s rights to those assets (or a monetary equivalent);

•Tenant is permitted to alter or remove the leasehold improvements without the landlord’s consent or without compensating the landlord for any lost utility or diminution in fair value;

•Tenant is required to provide the landlord with evidence supporting the cost of tenant improvements before the landlord pays the tenant for the tenant improvements;

•Landlord is obligated to fund cost overruns for the construction of leasehold improvements;

•Leasehold improvements are unique to the tenant or could reasonably be used by the lessor to lease to other parties; and

•Economic life of the leasehold improvements is such that a significant residual value of the assets is expected to accrue to the benefit of the landlord at the end of the lease term.

If we determine the improvements are our assets, we capitalize the cost of the improvements and recognize depreciation expense associated with such improvements over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the term of the lease. If the improvements are tenant assets, we defer the cost of improvements funded by us as a lease incentive asset and amortize it as a reduction of rental revenue over the term of the lease. Our determination of whether improvements are our assets or tenant assets also affects when we commence revenue recognition in connection with a lease.

We periodically enter into amendments to our leases. When a lease is amended, we need to determine whether (1) an additional right of use not included in the original lease is being granted as a result of the modification and (2) there is an increase in the lease payments that is commensurate with the standalone price for the additional right of use. If both of those conditions are met, the amendment is accounted for as a separate contract. If both of those conditions are not met, the amendment is accounted for as a lease modification. Most of our lease amendments result in a lease modification of our operating leases which will likely require us to reassess both the lease term and fixed lease payments, including considering any prepaid or accrued lease rentals relating to the original lease as a part of the lease payments for the modified lease.

Termination options in some of our leases allow the customer to terminate the lease prior to the end of the lease term under certain circumstances. Termination options require advance notification from the tenant and payment of a termination fee that reimburses us for a portion of the remaining rent under the original lease term and the undepreciated lease inception

27

Table of Contents

costs such as commissions, tenant improvements and lease incentives. Termination fee income, included in rental property revenue, is recognized on a straight-line basis from the date of the executed termination agreement through lease expiration when the amount of the fee is determinable and collectability of the fee is reasonably assured. This fee income is reduced on a straight-line basis by any accrued straight-line rent receivable related to the lease projected at the date of tenant vacancy.

Real Estate Carrying Value

The carrying values of our real estate assets are subject to several processes that involve a significant use of judgments and estimates. Those processes primarily include (i) purchase price allocations for acquired assets, (ii) depreciation and amortization, and (iii) impairment. The judgments and estimates used in each of these processes have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Purchase Price Allocations for Acquired Assets

We evaluate all real estate acquisitions to determine if the transactions qualify as an acquisition of assets or of a business. In cases where we acquire a pool of properties of varying property types in different markets, we must determine whether the acquisition qualifies as an asset acquisition or an acquisition of a business. For purposes of this review, we separate the assets acquired based on their unique and different risk characteristics, which may be by property type, geographic concentration, or other factors. If we determine that substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar assets, generally 90% of total fair value of assets acquired, we account for the acquisition as an acquisition of assets. If we determine that there is no single or group of assets that make up substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired, we then evaluate whether the acquired set of assets includes an input and substantial process which create an output. If we determine that an input and substantial process creating an output are present, we account for the acquisition as an acquisition of a business. We use considerable judgment in determining whether the acquisition of a pool of assets is an acquisition of assets or of a business. Because acquisition costs are expensed for an acquisition of a business and capitalized for an acquisition of assets, results of operations could be materially different based on our determinations.

For acquisitions that are accounted for as an acquisition of an asset, we record the acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities based on each asset and liability's relative fair value at the acquisition date to the total purchase price plus capitalized acquisition costs. For acquisitions that are accounted for as an acquisition of a business, we record the acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities at fair value at the acquisition date. Fair value is based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize available market information and discount and/or capitalization rates as appropriate. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities for an acquired operating property generally include, but are not limited to: land, buildings, and identified tangible and intangible assets and liabilities associated with in-place leases, including tenant improvements, leasing costs, value of above-market and below-market leases, and value of acquired in-place leases.

The fair value of the above-market or below-market component of an acquired lease is based upon the present value (calculated using a market discount rate) of the difference between the contractual rents to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term and management’s estimate of the rents that would be paid using fair market rental rates and rent escalations at the date of acquisition over the remaining term of the lease. An identifiable intangible asset or liability is recorded if there is an above-market or below-market lease at an acquired property. The amounts recorded for above-market leases are included in other assets on the balance sheets, and the amounts for below-market leases are included in other liabilities on the balance sheets. These amounts are amortized on a straight-line basis as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining term of the applicable leases.

The fair value of acquired in-place leases is derived based on our assessment of lost revenue and costs incurred for the period required to lease the “assumed vacant” property to the occupancy level when purchased. This fair value is based on a variety of considerations including, but not necessarily limited to: (i) the value associated with avoiding the cost of originating the acquired in-place leases; (ii) the value associated with lost revenue related to tenant reimbursable operating costs estimated to be incurred during the assumed lease-up period; and (iii) the value associated with lost rental revenue from existing leases during the assumed lease-up period. Factors considered in performing these analyses include an estimate of the carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, such as real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses, current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases, such as leasing commissions, legal, and other related expenses. The amounts recorded for in-place leases are included in intangible assets on the balance sheets. These amounts are amortized as an increase to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining term of the applicable leases.

28

Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

We also depreciate or amortize operating real estate assets over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation. We use judgment when estimating the useful life of real estate assets and when allocating certain indirect project costs to projects under development, which are amortized over the useful life of the property once it becomes operational. Historical data, comparable properties, and replacement costs are some of the factors considered in determining useful lives and cost allocations.

Impairment

We also review our real estate assets on an asset group basis for impairment. We identify an asset group based on the lowest level of identifiable cash flows and take into consideration such things as shared expenses and amenities. This review includes our operating properties, properties under development, and land holdings.

The first step in this process is for us to determine whether an asset is considered to be held and used or held for sale. In order to be considered a real estate asset held for sale, we must, among other things, have the authority to commit to a plan to sell the asset in its current condition, have commenced the plan to sell the asset, and have determined that it is probable that the asset will sell within one year. If we determine that an asset is held for sale, we record an impairment if the fair value less costs to sell is less than the carrying amount. All real estate assets not meeting the held for sale criteria are considered to be held and used.

In the impairment analysis for assets held and used, we must determine whether there are indicators of impairment. For operating properties, these indicators could include a reduction in our estimated hold period, a significant decline in a property’s leasing percentage, a current period operating loss or negative cash flows combined with a history of losses at the property, a significant decline in lease rates for that property or others in the property’s market, a significant change in the market value of the property, or an adverse change in the financial condition of significant tenants. For land holdings, indicators could include an overall decline in the market value of land in the region, a decline in development activity for the intended use of the land, or other adverse economic and market conditions. For projects under development, indicators could include material budget overruns without a corresponding funding source, significant delays in construction, occupancy, or stabilization schedule, regulatory changes or economic trends that have a significant impact on the market, or an adverse change in the financial condition of a significant future tenant.

If we determine that an asset that is held and used has indicators of impairment, we must determine whether the undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset exceed the carrying amount of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, we reduce the carrying amount of the asset to fair value.

In calculating the undiscounted net cash flows of an asset, we must estimate a number of inputs. We must estimate future rental rates, future capital expenditures, future operating expenses, and market capitalization rates for residual values, among other things. In addition, if there are alternative strategies for the future use of the asset, we assess the probability of each alternative strategy and perform a probability-weighted undiscounted cash flow analysis to assess the recoverability of the asset. We use considerable judgment in determining the alternative strategies and in assessing the probability of each strategy selected.

In determining the fair value of an asset, we exercise judgment on a number of factors. We may determine fair value by using a discounted cash flow calculation or by utilizing comparable market information. We must determine an appropriate discount rate to apply to the cash flows in the discounted cash flow calculation. We use judgment in analyzing comparable market information because no two real estate assets are identical in location and price. The estimates and judgments used in the impairment process are highly subjective and susceptible to frequent change.

In addition to our real estate assets, we review each of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for impairment. As part of this analysis, we first determine whether there are any indicators of impairment at any property held in a joint venture investment. If indicators of impairment are present for any of our investments in joint ventures, we calculate the fair value of the investment. If the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, we determine whether the impairment is temporary or other than temporary. If we assess the impairment to be temporary, we do not record an impairment charge. If we conclude that the impairment is other than temporary, we record an impairment charge. We use considerable judgment in the determination of whether there are indicators of impairment present and in the assumptions, estimations, and inputs used in calculating the fair value of the investment.

29

Table of Contents

Development Cost Capitalization

We are involved in all stages of real estate ownership, including development. Prior to the point at which a project becomes probable of being developed (defined as more likely than not), we expense predevelopment costs. After we determine a project is probable, all subsequently-incurred predevelopment costs, as well as interest and real estate taxes on qualifying assets and certain internal personnel and associated costs directly related to the project under development, are capitalized in accordance with accounting rules. If we abandon development of a project that had earlier been deemed probable, we charge all previously capitalized costs to expense. If this occurs, our predevelopment expenses could rise significantly. The determination of whether a project is probable requires judgment. If we determine that a project is probable, interest, general and administrative, and other expenses could be materially different than if we determine the project is not probable.

During the predevelopment period of a probable project and the period in which a project is under construction, we capitalize all direct and indirect costs associated with planning, developing, and constructing the project. Determination of what costs constitute direct and indirect project costs requires us, in some cases, to exercise judgment. If we determine certain costs to be direct or indirect project costs, amounts recorded in projects under development on the balance sheet and amounts recorded in general and administrative and other expenses on the statements of operations could be materially different than if we determine these costs are not directly or indirectly associated with the project.

Once a certain project is constructed and deemed substantially complete and ready for occupancy, carrying costs, such as real estate taxes, interest, internal personnel costs, and associated costs, are expensed as incurred. Determination of when construction of a project is substantially complete and held available for occupancy requires judgment. We consider projects and/or project phases to be both substantially complete and held for occupancy at the earlier of the date on which the project or phase reached economic occupancy of 90% or one year from cessation of major construction activity. Our judgment of the date the project is substantially complete has a direct impact on our operating expenses and net income for the period.

Results of Operations For The Year Ended December 31, 2021

General

Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2021 have been affected by the various acquisitions, dispositions, and development activities during 2021 as well as the Merger and transactions with Norfolk Southern Railway Company ("NS") in 2019. Net income available to common stockholders for the year ended 2021 and 2020 was $278.6 million and $237.3 million, respectively. We detail below material changes in the components of net income available to common stockholders for the year ended 2021 compared to 2020.

See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations" from our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a comparison of 2020 to 2019 financial results.

Rental Property Revenues and Rental Property Operating Expenses

The following results include the performance of our Same Property portfolios. Our Same Property portfolios include office properties that were stabilized and owned by us for the entirety of each comparable reporting periods presented. A stabilized property is one that has achieved 90% economic occupancy or has been substantially complete and owned by us for one year. Same Property amounts for the 2021 versus 2020 comparison are from properties that were stabilized and owned as of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021.

We use Net Operating Income ("NOI"), a non-GAAP financial measure, to measure the operating performance of our properties. NOI is also widely used by industry analysts and investors to evaluate performance. NOI, which is rental property revenues (excluding termination fees) less rental property operating expenses, excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property's results of operations. Certain items, such as interest expense, while included in net income, do not affect the operating performance of a real estate asset and are often incurred at the corporate level as opposed to the property level. As a result, we use only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level to evaluate a property's performance. Depreciation, amortization, and impairment are also excluded from NOI. Same Property NOI allows analysts, investors, and management to analyze continuing operations and evaluate the growth trend of our portfolio.

30

Table of Contents

Rental property revenues, rental property operating expenses, and NOI changed between the 2021 and 2020 periods as follows ($ in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

Rental Property Revenues

Rental Property Operating Expenses

Net Operating Income

Same Property rental property revenues increased between 2021 and 2020 primarily due to the increased occupancy at Corporate Center and 3344 Peachtree, offset by a decrease in occupancy at 3350 Peachtree. Same property rental property operating expenses increased between 2021 and 2020 primarily due to an Atlanta real estate tax credit received in 2020 and an increase in physical occupancy.

Revenues of Non-Same Property increased between 2021 and 2020 primarily as a result of the stabilization of operations at the recently completed developments at the Domain and 10000 Avalon and the addition of The RailYard in December 2020, 725 Ponce in July 2021, Heights Union in October 2021, and 300 Colorado in December 2021, partially offset by the sale of Hearst Tower in 2020 and the sales of One South at the Plaza, Burnett Plaza, and 816 Congress in 2021.

Fee Income

Fee income decreased $2.7 million (14.6%) between 2021 and 2020 primarily driven by timing of fee income related to the 2019 transactions with NS.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $2.3 million (8.5%) between 2021 and 2020 primarily driven by changes in stock compensation expense related to liability-classified awards, most of which became fully earned as of December 31, 2021.

Interest Expense

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, increased $6.4 million (10.6%) between 2021 and 2020 primarily due to a decrease in interest capitalized in 2021 as a result of the start of preliminary operational activity for projects completing development in the second and third quarters of 2021 and an increase in interest related to the increased borrowings from the amended and restated Term Loan and an increase in our average outstanding balance on our Line of Credit, partially offset by lower interest rates compared to 2020.

31

Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization changed between the 2021 and 2020 periods as follows ($ in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization of Same Property increased between 2021 and 2020 primarily due to the accelerated depreciation of tenant improvements owned by us resulting from an early termination at the Domain.

Depreciation and amortization of Non-Same Property decreased between 2021 and 2020 primarily due to the sales of One South at the Plaza and Burnett Plaza in 2021, partially offset by the recently completed developments at the Domain and 10000 Avalon and the additions of The RailYard in December 2020 and 725 Ponce in July 2021.

Income from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures consisted of the following in 2021 and 2020 ($ in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

Net operating income

Net gain (loss) on sale of investment property (39) (148) 109 74 %

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures $ 6,801 $ 7,947 $ (1,146) (14) %

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures decreased between 2021 and 2020 primarily due to increased interest from the issuance of the Carolina Square $135.7 million non-recourse mortgage note which was used to fund the repayment in full of its $77.5 million construction loan and an increase in depreciation expense from 300 Colorado which began operations in 2021 prior to being consolidated.

Gain on Sales of Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The gain on sales of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily includes the sale of our interest in the Dimensional Place joint venture. The gain on investment property transactions for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily includes the sale of our interests in the Wildwood Associates and Gateway Village joint ventures.

Gain on Investment Property Transactions

The gain on investment property transactions for the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily includes the sales of 816 Congress in December 2021, One South at the Plaza in July 2021, and Burnett Plaza in April 2021, as well as the gain resulting from the consolidation of 300 Colorado in December 2021. The gain on investment property transactions for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily includes the sale of Hearst Tower. The combined sales prices of the 816 Congress, One South at the Plaza, and Burnett Plaza dispositions in 2021 and the Hearst Tower and Woodcrest dispositions in 2020 represented weighted average capitalization rates of 5.4% and 5.1%, respectively. Capitalization rates are calculated by dividing projected annualized NOI by the sales price.

32

Table of Contents

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests includes the outside parties' share of the net income of CPLP as well as that of certain other consolidated entities. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $426,000 (51.0%) between 2021 and 2020 primarily driven by the redemption of 1.7 million limited partnership units in CPLP completed in the first quarter of 2020, partially offset by the increase in net income in 2021.

Funds from Operations

The table below shows Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (“FFO”), a non-GAAP financial measure, and the related reconciliation to net income available to common stockholders for the Company. The Company calculates FFO in accordance with Nareit's definition, which is net income available to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding extraordinary items, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and gains on sale or impairment on depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis.

FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental measure of a REIT’s operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, Nareit created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from GAAP net income. The use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Our management evaluates operating performance in part based on FFO. Additionally, our management uses FFO, along with other measures, to assess performance in connection with evaluating and granting incentive compensation to our officers and other key employees. The reconciliations of net income available to common stockholders to FFO and earnings per share to FFO per share are as follows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands, except per share information):

Year Ended December 31,

Noncontrolling interest related to unitholders 56 25 — 315 297 —

Conversion of stock options — 1 — — 8 —

Conversion of unvested restricted stock units — 199 — — 54 —

Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets:

Partners' share of real estate depreciation (929) — (0.01) (742) — —

Loss (gain) on sale of depreciated properties:

Share of unconsolidated joint ventures 39 — — (450) — —

33

Table of Contents

Net Operating Income

Company management evaluates the performance of its property portfolio in part based on NOI. NOI represents rental property revenues (excluding termination fees) less rental property operating expenses. NOI is not a measure of cash flows or operating results as measured by GAAP, is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs, and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. All companies may not calculate NOI in the same manner. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income as it helps both management and investors understand the core operations of the Company's operating assets. NOI excludes corporate general and administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, impairments, gains/loss on sales of real estate, and other non-operating items.

The following table reconciles net income to NOI for consolidated properties for each period (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

Transaction costs — 428

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures (6,801) (7,947)

Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures (13,083) (45,767)

Gain on investment property transactions (152,547) (90,125)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary short-term and long-term liquidity needs include the following:

•property and land acquisitions;

•expenditures on development projects;

•building improvements, tenant improvements, and leasing costs;

•principal and interest payments on indebtedness;

•general and administrative costs; and

•common stock dividends and distributions to outside unitholders of CPLP.

We may satisfy these needs with one or more of the following:

•cash and cash equivalents on hand;

•net cash from operations;

•proceeds from the sale of assets;

•borrowings under our Credit Facility;

•proceeds from mortgage notes payable;

•proceeds from construction loans;

•proceeds from unsecured loans;

•proceeds from offerings of equity securities; and

•joint venture formations.

Our material cash needs for 2022 include $223.8 million of unfunded tenant improvements and construction obligations and $102.4 million of debt maturities. Those and other 2022 cash needs are expected to be met by a combination of some or all of the sources noted above.

34

Table of Contents

Financial Condition

A key component of our strategy is to maintain a conservative balance sheet with leverage and liquidity that enables us to be positioned for future growth. Our leverage metrics at December 31, 2021, which include net debt to EBITDAre, net debt to undepreciated assets, and net debt to total market capitalization, were among the strongest within our sector of public office REITs. As of December 31, 2021, we had $228.5 million outstanding under our Credit Facility with the ability to borrow an additional $771.5 million. We also had $10.2 million in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on hand at December 31, 2021.

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2021 with respect to our outstanding contractual obligations and commitments (in thousands):

Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years

Contractual Obligations:

Company debt:

Commitments:

(1)Interest on variable rate obligations is based on rates effective as of December 31, 2021.

Credit Facility

Our $1 billion Credit Facility matures on January 3, 2023. The Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require, among other things, the maintenance of an unencumbered interest coverage ratio of at least 1.75x; a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.50x; a secured leverage ratio of no more than 40%; and an overall leverage ratio of no more than 60%. The Credit Facility also contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants, as well as customary events of default. The amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility may be accelerated upon the occurrence of any events of default. We are in compliance with all covenants of the Credit Facility. We expect to negotiate a new credit facility prior to the current maturity date which will have a borrowing capacity that meets or exceeds the current facility and extends the maturity date.

The interest rate applicable to the Credit Facility varies according to our leverage ratio, and may, at our election, be determined based on either (1) the current LIBOR plus a spread of between 1.05% and 1.45%, or (2) the greater of Bank of America's prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, or the one-month LIBOR plus 1.0% (the "Base Rate"), plus a spread of between 0.10% or 0.45%, based on leverage.

At December 31, 2021, the Credit Facility's spread over LIBOR was 1.05%. The amount that we may draw under the Credit Facility is a defined calculation based on the Company's unencumbered assets and other factors. The total available borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was $771.5 million at December 31, 2021.

Term Loan

On June 28, 2021, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the "Term Loan") that amended the former term loan agreement. Under the Term Loan, we have borrowed $350 million that matures on August 30, 2024 with options to, on up to four successive occasions, extend the maturity date for an additional 180 days. The Term Loan has financial covenants consistent with those of the Credit Facility. The interest rate applicable to the Term Loan varies according to our leverage ratio and may, at our election, be determined based on either (1) the Eurodollar Rate Loans plus a spread of between 1.05% and 1.65%, (2) the current LIBOR Daily Floating plus a spread of between 1.05% and 1.65%, or (3) the

35

Table of Contents

interest rate applicable to Base Rate Loans plus a spread of between 0.05% and 0.65%. At December 31, 2021, the Term Loan's spread over LIBOR was 1.05%. We are in compliance with all covenants of the Term Loan.

Unsecured Senior Notes

At December 31, 2021, we had $1 billion in unsecured senior notes outstanding that were issued in five tranches with maturity dates that range from 2025 to 2029. The weighted average fixed interest rates on these notes is 3.91%.

The unsecured senior notes contain financial covenants that are consistent with those of our Credit Facility. The senior notes also contain customary representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants, as well as customary events of default. We are in compliance with all covenants of the unsecured senior notes.

Secured Mortgage Notes

In June 2021, the Company executed a collateral substitution for the mortgage previously secured by the Company's 816 Congress property in Austin. The mortgage is now secured by the Company's Domain 10 property in Austin. All other terms of the note were unchanged.

On February 3, 2020, the Company prepaid in full, without penalty, the $23.0 million Meridian Mark Plaza mortgage note.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $661.5 million outstanding on seven non-recourse mortgage notes. All interest rates on the secured mortgage notes are fixed. Assets with depreciated carrying values of $1.1 billion were pledged as security on these mortgage notes payable.

Joint Venture Commitments and Debt

We have a number of off balance sheet joint ventures with varying structures, as described in note 7 to our consolidated financial statements. The joint ventures in which we have an interest are involved in the ownership and/or development of real estate. A venture will fund capital requirements or operational needs with cash from operations or financing proceeds. If additional capital is deemed necessary, a venture may request a contribution from the partners, and we will evaluate such request. Except as previously discussed, based on the nature of the activities conducted in these ventures, management cannot estimate with any degree of accuracy amounts that we may be required to fund in the short or long-term. However, management does not believe that additional funding of these ventures will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

At December 31, 2021, our unconsolidated joint ventures had aggregate outstanding indebtedness to third parties of $225.6 million. This debt represents mortgage or construction loans, most of which are non-recourse to us. In addition, in certain instances, we provide “non-recourse carve-out guarantees” on these non-recourse loans.

Other Debt Information

Our existing mortgage debt is primarily non-recourse, fixed-rate mortgage notes secured by various real estate assets. We expect to either refinance our non-recourse mortgage loans at maturity or repay the mortgage loans with other capital sources, including our credit facility, unsecured debt, non-recourse mortgages, construction loans, the sale of assets, joint venture equity, the issuance of common stock, the issuance of preferred stock, or the issuance of units of CPLP. Many of our non-recourse mortgages contain covenants which, if not satisfied, could result in acceleration of the maturity of the debt. We expect to either refinance the non-recourse mortgages at maturity or repay the mortgages with proceeds from asset sales, debt, or other capital sources. We are in compliance with all covenants of our existing non-recourse mortgages.

75% of our debt bears interest at a fixed rate. Our variable-interest debt instruments, including our Credit Facility and Term Loan, may use LIBOR, SOFR, or other indexes as allowed as a benchmark for establishing the rate. LIBOR has been the subject of regulatory guidance and proposals for reform and in March 2021, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after June 30, 2023. These reforms may cause LIBOR to no longer be provided or to perform differently than in the past. Recent proposals for LIBOR reforms may result in the establishment of new methods of calculating LIBOR or the establishment of one or more alternative benchmark rates. If LIBOR is no longer widely available, or otherwise at our option, our variable-interest debt instruments, including our Credit Facility and term loan facilities, provide for alternate interest rate calculations as mentioned above.

There can be no assurances as to what alternative interest rates may be and whether such interest rates will be more or less favorable than LIBOR and any other unforeseen impacts of the potential discontinuation of LIBOR. The Company intends to continue monitoring the developments with respect to the planned phasing out of LIBOR after 2022 and work with

36

Table of Contents

its lenders to ensure any transition away from LIBOR will have minimal impact on its financial condition, but can provide no assurances regarding the impact of the discontinuation of LIBOR.

Future Capital Requirements

To meet capital requirements for future investment activities over the long-term, we intend to actively manage our portfolio of properties and strategically sell assets to exit our non-core holdings and reposition our portfolio of income-producing assets. We expect to continue to utilize cash retained from operations as well as third-party sources of capital such as indebtedness to fund future commitments as well as utilize construction facilities for some development assets, if available and under appropriate terms.

We may also generate capital through the issuance of securities that include common or preferred stock, warrants, debt securities, depository shares or the issuance of CPLP limited partnership units.

Our business model also includes raising or recycling capital which can assist in meeting obligations and funding development and acquisition activity. If one or more sources of capital are not available when required, we may be forced to reduce the number of projects we acquire or develop and/or raise capital on potentially unfavorable terms, or we may be unable to raise capital, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Cash Flows

We report and analyze our cash flows based on operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash totaled $10.2 million and $6.1 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Cash Flows" from our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the changes in cash flows between 2020 and 2019 . The following table sets forth the changes in cash flows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, $ Change

The reasons for significant increases and decreases in cash flows between the periods are as follows:

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities increased $38.4 million between the 2021 and 2020 periods primarily due to net cash received from operations at the recently stabilized developments at the Domain and 10000 Avalon and the addition of The RailYard in November 2020, 725 Ponce in July 2021, Heights Union in October 2021, and 300 Colorado in December 2021 partially offset by the sale of Hearst Tower in 2020 and the sales of One South at the Plaza, Burnett Plaza, and 816 Congress in 2021.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities increased $58.6 million between the 2021 and 2020 periods primarily due to cash used in the purchase of 725 Ponce, Heights Union, and our partners interest in 300 Colorado, partially offset by the cash received from the sales of 816 Congress, Burnett Plaza, and One South at the Plaza in 2021.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Cash flows used in financing activities decreased $35.7 million between the 2021 and 2020 periods primarily due to the $250 million repayment of our prior Term Loan and issuance of the $350 million Amended and Restated Term Loan in 2021 offset partially by repayment of the 300 Colorado construction loan assumed in the acquisition.

Capital Expenditures. We incur capital expenditures related to our real estate assets that include the acquisition of properties, the development of new properties, the redevelopment of existing or newly purchased properties, leasing costs for new or replacement tenants, and ongoing property repairs and maintenance.

37

Table of Contents

Capital expenditures for assets we develop or acquire and then hold and operate are included in the property acquisition, development, and tenant asset expenditures line item within investing activities on the statements of cash flows. Components of expenditures included in this line item for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows (in thousands):

Operating properties—building improvements 60,281 139,247

Accrued capital expenditures adjustment (15,367) 25,745

Capital expenditures increased $168.2 million between December 31, 2021 and 2020 primarily due to the acquisitions of 725 Ponce, Heights Union, our partners' interest in 300 Colorado, and the start of development of a new office property at the Domain, partially offset by a decrease in building improvements at operating properties and decrease in land purchases. Tenant improvements and leasing costs, as well as related capitalized personnel costs, are a function of the number and size of executed new leases or renewals of existing leases. The amount of tenant improvements and leasing costs on a per square foot basis for 2021 and 2020 was as follows:

The amounts of tenant improvement and leasing costs on a per square foot basis vary by lease and by market.

Dividends. We paid common dividends of $182.8 million and $176.3 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively. We funded these dividends with cash provided by operating activities. We expect to fund our future quarterly common dividends with cash provided by operating activities, also using proceeds from investment property sales, distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures, and indebtedness, if necessary.

On a quarterly basis, we review the amount of our common dividend in light of current and projected future cash provided by operating activities and also consider the requirements needed to maintain our REIT status. In addition, we have certain covenants under our Credit Facility which could limit the amount of common dividends paid. In general, common dividends of any amount can be paid as long as leverage, as defined in our credit agreements, is less than 60% and we are not in default under our facility. Certain conditions also apply in which we can still pay common dividends if leverage is above that amount. We routinely monitor the status of our common dividend payments in light of the covenants of our credit agreements.

38

Table of Contents

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Our primary exposure to market risk results from our debt, which bears interest at both fixed and variable rates. We attempt to mitigate this risk by limiting our debt exposure in total and our maturities in any one year and weighting more towards fixed-rate debt in our portfolio. The fixed rate debt obligations limit the risk of fluctuating interest rates. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had $1.7 billion of fixed rate debt outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 3.95%.

At December 31, 2021, we had $578.5 million of variable rate debt outstanding, which consisted of the Credit Facility with $228.5 million outstanding at an interest rate of 1.15% and the $350.0 million Term Loan with an interest rate of 1.15%. At December 31, 2020, we had $482.4 million of variable rate debt outstanding, which consisted of the Credit Facility with $232.4 million outstanding at an interest rate of 1.19% and the $250.0 million Term Loan with an interest rate of 1.34%. Based on our average variable rate debt balances in 2021, interest incurred would have increased by $5.3 million in 2021 if these interest rates had been 1% higher.

The information presented above should be read in conjunction with note 10 of notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements and financial statement schedules required under Regulation S-X are filed pursuant to Item 15 of Part IV of this report.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

39

Table of Contents

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management necessarily applied judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding our control objectives.

As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness, design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. In addition, based on such evaluation we have identified no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management, under the supervision of and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. The framework on which the assessment was based is described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, we concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, issued an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, which follows this report of management.

40

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Cousins Properties Incorporated

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Cousins Properties Incorporated and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, of the Company and our report dated February 3, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

February 3, 2022

41

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by Items 401, 405, 406, and 407 of Regulation S-K is presented in Item X in Part I of this report and is included under the captions “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports” in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Registrant’s Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The Company has the Code, which is applicable to its Board of Directors and all of its employees. The Code is publicly available on the “Investor Relations” page of its website site at www.cousins.com. Section 1 of the Code applies to the Company’s senior executive and financial officers and is a “code of ethics” as defined by applicable SEC rules and regulations. If the Company makes any amendments to the Code other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grants any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of the Code to the Company’s senior executive or financial officers, the Company will disclose on its website the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by Items 402 and 407 of Regulation S-K is included under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Registrant’s Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information under the captions “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Registrant’s Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information under the caption “Certain Transactions” and “Director Independence” in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Registrant’s Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information under the caption “Summary of Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Registrant’s Stockholders has fee information for fiscal years 2021 and 2020 and is incorporated herein by reference.

42

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)1. Financial Statements

A.The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant, together with the applicable report of independent registered public accounting firm, are filed as a part of this report:

Page Number

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 34) F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2021 and 2020 F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-9

2.Financial Statement Schedule

The following financial statement schedule for the Registrant is filed as a part of this report:

Page Number

NOTE: Other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is given in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(b)Exhibits

43

Table of Contents

44

Table of Contents

45

Table of Contents

21† Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23† Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

46

Table of Contents

104† Cover Page Interactive Data File.

* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

† Filed herewith.

47

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Cousins Properties Incorporated(Registrant)

BY: /s/ Gregg D. Adzema

Gregg D. Adzema

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature Capacity Date

M. Colin Connolly (Principal Executive Officer)

Gregg D. Adzema (Principal Financial Officer)

Jeffrey D. Symes (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Charles T. Cannada Director February 3, 2022

Charles T. Cannada

/s/ Robert M. Chapman Chairman of the Board and Director February 3, 2022

Robert M. Chapman

/s/ Scott W. Fordham Director February 3, 2022

Scott W. Fordham

/s/ Lillian C. Giornelli Director February 3, 2022

Lillian C. Giornelli

/s/ R. Kent Griffin, Jr. Director February 3, 2022

R. Kent Griffin, Jr.

/s/ Donna W. Hyland Director February 3, 2022

Donna W. Hyland

/s/ Dionne Nelson Director February 3, 2022

Dionne Nelson