| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $43.44B | Enterprise Value | $44.22B |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 6.58× | P/FCF | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 72.22× | EV/EBIT | 460.02× |
| EV/Sales | 6.70× | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | −1.24% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $468.8M | Owner Earnings Yield | 1.08% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 2.49 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 16.43% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | 2.99% | Synthetic credit rating | C |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | 9.38% | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 20.00% |
| WACC | 15.51% | ROIC | — |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — | EVA | — |
FCF sits 215% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM -$0.52 · revenue TTM $6.60B · FCF TTM -$538.2M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Information Technology on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 91st percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 71.1x | 18.6x | 9.6x–33.8x | 91 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | 0.4% | 2.5% | -3.1%–6.0% | 34 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 48 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 50 ↑strong |
| ROE | 0.9% | 4.1% | -14.9%–16.8% | 44 ↓weak |
