Item 1A. Risk Factors
In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks, some of which are inherent in our industry and others of which are more specific to our own businesses. In addition to the other information set forth in this Annual Report and other filings we have made and make in the future with the SEC, you should carefully consider the following risk factors and uncertainties, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations in future periods. However, other factors not discussed below or elsewhere in this Annual Report could also adversely affect our businesses, results of operations and financial condition. Therefore, the risk factors below should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that we may face.
7
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to our Management Structure and Our Manager
The Management Service Agreement was negotiated between related parties and the terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it were negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.
Because the Manager is owned by our Vice Chairman, Mr. Foley, and in the past was also owned by certain of our directors and executive officers, the MSA and MSA Termination Agreement were developed by related parties, although our independent directors reviewed and approved both agreements. The terms of the MSA and MSA Termination Agreement, including fees payable, may not reflect the terms we may have received if it was negotiated with an unrelated third party. In addition, particularly as a result of our relationship with the present and past principal owners of the Manager, who are or were certain directors and members of our management team, our independent directors may determine that it is in the best interests of our shareholders not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the MSA and MSA Termination Agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with our directors and executive officers.
Our executive officers and directors may allocate some of their time to other businesses, thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
While the members of our management team devote a substantial amount of their time to the affairs of the Company, our executive officers, directors, Manager and other members of our management team may engage in other business activities. This may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our management and the operations of other businesses. Their other business endeavors may involve related or unrelated parties. Conflicts of interest that arise over the allocation of time may not always be resolved in our favor and may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Conflicts of interest could arise in connection with certain of our directors’ and executive officers’ discharge of fiduciary duties to our shareholders.
Certain of our directors and executive officers are or were members of the Manager and are or were directors and executive officers of other companies. Such persons, by virtue of their positions with us, have fiduciary duties to us and our shareholders. The duties of such persons as directors or executive officers to us and our shareholders may conflict with the interests of such persons in their capacities as members or employees of the Manager.
Members of our management team may engage in activities that compete with us or our businesses.
While the members of our management team intend to devote a substantial majority of their time to the affairs of the Company, our management team is not expressly prohibited from investing in or managing other entities, including those that are in the same or similar line of business as our businesses, or required to present any particular acquisition or business opportunity to the Company.
Risks Relating to the Restaurant Group
The Restaurant Group companies face significant competition for customers, real estate and employees and competitive pressure to adapt to changes in conditions driving customer demand. The Restaurant Group companies' inability to compete effectively may affect guest counts, sales and profit margins, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with a substantial number of restaurant operators that compete directly and indirectly with the Restaurant Group companies with respect to price, service, ambiance, brand, customer service, dining experience, location, food quality and variety and value perception of menu items and there are other well established competitors with substantially greater financial and other resources than the Restaurant Group companies. Some of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors advertise on national platforms, which may provide customers with greater awareness and name recognition than our Restaurant Group companies can achieve through their advertising efforts. There is also active competition for management personnel and attractive suitable real estate sites. Consumer tastes and perceptions, nutritional and dietary trends, guest count patterns and the type, number and location of competing restaurants often affect the restaurant business, and our Restaurant Group companies' competitors may react more efficiently and effectively to those conditions. For instance, prevailing health or dietary preferences or perceptions of our Restaurant Group companies' products may cause consumers to avoid certain menu items or products our Restaurant Group companies offer in favor of foods that are perceived as more healthy, and such choices by consumers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our Restaurant Group companies face growing competition from the supermarket industry, with the improvement of their "convenient meals" in the deli and prepared food sections, from quick service and fast casual restaurants and online food delivery services as a result of food and beverage offerings by those food providers. As our Restaurant Group companies' competitors expand operations in markets where our restaurant businesses operate or expect to operate, we expect competition to intensify. If our Restaurant Group companies are unable to continue to compete effectively,
8
Table of Contents
their guest counts, sales and profit margins could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Increased commodity, energy and other costs could decrease our Restaurant Group companies' profit margins or cause the Restaurant Group companies to limit or otherwise modify their menus, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cost, availability and quality of ingredients restaurant operations use to prepare their food is subject to a range of factors, many of which are beyond their control. A significant component of our restaurant businesses' costs will be related to food commodities, including beef, pork, chicken, seafood, poultry, dairy products, oils, produce, fruit, flour and other related costs such as energy and transportation over which we may have little control, that can be subject to significant price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate conditions, industry demand, changes in international commodity markets and other factors. If there is a substantial increase in prices for these commodities, our Restaurant Group companies' results of operations may be negatively affected. In addition, the Restaurant Group companies' restaurants are dependent upon frequent deliveries of perishable food products that meet certain specifications. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of perishable food products caused by unanticipated demand, problems in production or distribution, disease or food-borne illnesses, inclement weather or other conditions could adversely affect the availability, quality, and cost of ingredients, which would likely lower revenues, damage the Restaurant Group companies' reputation or otherwise harm our business.
Negative customer experiences or negative publicity surrounding our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or other restaurants could adversely affect sales in one or more of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants and make our concepts less valuable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because we believe our Restaurant Group companies' success depends significantly on their ability to provide exceptional food quality, outstanding service and an excellent overall dining experience, adverse publicity, whether or not accurate, relating to food quality, public health concerns, illness, safety, injury or government or industry findings concerning our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants, restaurants operated by other food service providers or others across the food industry supply chain could affect our Restaurant Group companies more than it would other restaurants that compete primarily on price or other factors. If customers perceive or experience a reduction in the food quality, service or ambiance at our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or in any way believe our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants have failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, the value and popularity of one or more of our Restaurant Group companies' concepts could suffer. Further, because our restaurant businesses rely heavily on "word-of-mouth," as opposed to more conventional mediums of advertisement, to establish concept recognition, our restaurant businesses may be more adversely affected by negative customer experiences than other dining establishments, including those of our restaurant businesses' competitors.
Our restaurant businesses could suffer due to reduced demand for our restaurant businesses' brands or specific menu offerings if our restaurant businesses are the subject of negative publicity or litigation regarding allegations of food-related contaminations or illnesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Food safety is a top priority, and our Restaurant Group companies dedicate substantial resources to ensuring that their customers enjoy safe, quality food products. Food-related contaminations and illnesses may be caused by a variety of food-borne pathogens, such as E. coli or salmonella, which are frequently carried on unwashed fruits and vegetables, from a variety of illnesses transmitted by restaurant workers, such as hepatitis A, which may not be diagnosed prior to being infectious, and from contamination of food by foreign substances. Contamination and food borne illness incidents could also be caused at the point of source or by food suppliers and distributors. As a result, we cannot control all of the potential sources of contamination or illness that can be contained in or transmitted from our Restaurant Group companies' food. Regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illnesses or other food safety issues including food tampering or contamination, at one of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants could adversely affect the reputation of our Restaurant Group companies' brands and have a negative impact on their sales. Even instances of food-borne illness, food tampering or food contamination occurring solely at restaurants of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors or at one of our Restaurant Group companies' suppliers could result in negative publicity about the food service industry generally and adversely impact our Restaurant Group companies' sales.
If any person becomes injured or ill, or alleges becoming injured or ill, as a result of eating our Restaurant Group companies' food, our Restaurant Group companies may temporarily close some restaurants, which would decrease their revenues, and our restaurant businesses may be liable for damages or be subject to governmental regulatory action, either of which could have long-lasting, negative effects on our restaurant businesses' reputation, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether our restaurant businesses are found liable. The occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs and lower margins.
9
Table of Contents
The success of the Restaurant Group depends, in part, on its intellectual property, which we may be unable to protect.
We regard our Restaurant Group's service marks, including "O'Charley's," "Ninety Nine" and other service marks and trademarks as important factors in the marketing of our restaurants. We have also obtained trademarks for several of our brands' menu items and for various advertising slogans. Our policy is to pursue registration of our marks whenever possible and to oppose vigorously any infringement of our marks.
Risks Relating to Alight
Alight faces significant competition and its failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of its business.
Alight's competitors may have greater resources, larger customer bases, greater name recognition, stronger presence in certain geographies and more established relationships with their customers and suppliers than it has. In addition, new competitors, alliances among competitors or mergers of competitors could result in Alight's competitors gaining significant market share and some of Alight's competitors may have or may develop a lower cost structure, adopt more aggressive pricing policies or provide services that gain greater market acceptance than the services that Alight offers or develops. Large and well-capitalized competitors may be able to respond to the need for technological changes (including the implementation of AI and Machine Learning ("ML")) and innovate faster, or price their services more aggressively. They may also compete for skilled professionals, finance acquisitions, fund internal growth and compete for market share more effectively than Alight does. If Alight is unable to compete successfully, it could lose market share and clients to competitors, which could materially adversely affect its results of operations. To respond to increased competition and pricing pressure, Alight may have to lower the cost of its solutions or decrease the level of service provided to clients, which could have an adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Alight relies on complex information technology systems and networks to operate its business. Any significant system or network disruption could expose Alight to legal liability, impair its reputation or have a negative impact on its operations, sales and operating results and could expose Alight to litigation and negatively impact our relationships with clients.
Alight relies on the efficient, uninterrupted and secure operation of complex information technology systems, and networks and data centers, some of which are within its business and some of which are outsourced to third-party providers, including cloud infrastructure service providers such as Amazon Web Services ("AWS") and Microsoft Azure Cloud. Alight does not have control over the operations of such third parties. Alight also may decide to employ additional offsite data centers in the future to accommodate growth. Problems faced by Alight's data center locations, with the telecommunications network providers with whom Alight or such providers contract, or with the systems by which Alight's telecommunications providers allocate capacity among their clients, including Alight, could adversely affect the availability and processing of Alight's solutions and related services and the experience of Alight's clients. If Alight's data centers are unable to keep up with its growing needs for capacity, this could have an adverse effect on Alight's business and cause it to incur additional expense. In addition, any financial difficulties faced by Alight's third-party data center’s operator or any of the service providers with whom Alight or such providers contract may have negative effects on Alight's business, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict. These facilities are vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, cyber security attacks (including "ransomware" and phishing attacks), terrorist attacks, power losses, telecommunications failures and similar events. The risk of cyberattacks could be exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, or other hostile actions taken by nation-states and terrorist organizations. While Alight has adopted, and continues to enhance, business continuity and disaster recovery plans and strategies, there is no guarantee that such plans and strategies will be effective, which could interrupt the functionality of our information technology systems or those of third parties. The occurrence of a natural disaster (or other extreme weather as a result of climate change or otherwise) or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems could result in lengthy interruptions in Alight's services and solutions. The facilities also could be subject to break-ins, computer viruses, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and other misconduct. Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in connection with these third-party technologies and information services, or Alight's own systems, could negatively impact Alight's relationships with customers and adversely affect its business and could expose it to third-party liabilities. Any errors, defects, disruptions or other performance problems with our information technology systems including any changes in service levels at Alight's third-party data center could adversely affect its reputation and may damage its clients’ stored files or result in lengthy interruptions in its services. Interruptions in Alight's services might reduce its revenues, subject it to potential liability or other expenses or adversely affect its renewal rates.
In relation to Alight's third-party data centers, while Alight owns, controls and has access to its servers and all of the components of its network that are located in these centers, Alight does not control the operation of these facilities. The operators of Alight's third-party data center facilities have no obligation to renew their agreements with Alight on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If Alight is unable to renew these agreements on commercially reasonable terms, or if the data center
10
Table of Contents
operators are acquired, Alight may be required to transfer its servers and other infrastructure to new data center facilities, and Alight may incur costs and experience service interruption in doing so.
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations including changes in such laws and regulations, their application and their interpretation, could have an adverse effect on Alight's business.
Alight's business is subject to extensive legal and regulatory oversight throughout the world including a variety of laws, rules, and regulations addressing, among other things, licensing, data privacy and protection, wage and hour standards, employment and labor relations, occupational health and safety, environmental matters, anti-competition, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, language requirements, economic sanctions, currency, reserves and government contracting. This legal and regulatory oversight could reduce Alights profitability or limit its growth by increasing the costs of legal and regulatory compliance; by limiting or restricting the products or services it sells, the markets it enters, the methods by which it sells its services, the prices it can charge for our services, and the form of compensation it can accept from its clients and third parties; or by subjecting its business to the possibility of legal and regulatory actions or proceedings.
The global nature of Alight's operations increases the complexity and cost of compliance with laws and regulations, including training and employee expenses, adding to its cost of doing business. In addition, many of these laws and regulations may have differing or conflicting legal standards across jurisdictions, increasing further the complexity and cost of compliance. In emerging markets and other jurisdictions with less developed legal systems, local laws and regulations may not be established with sufficiently clear and reliable guidance to provide us adequate assurance that Alight is operating its business in a compliant manner with all required licenses or that our rights are otherwise protected.
In addition, certain laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar laws in other jurisdictions in which Alight operates, could impact its operations outside of the legislating country by imposing requirements for the conduct of overseas operations, and in a number of cases, requiring compliance by foreign subsidiaries. Alight is also subject to economic and trade sanctions programs, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), which prohibit or restrict transactions or dealings with specified countries, their governments, and in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially designated.
Alight's employees, consultants or agents may still take actions in violation of its policies for which it may be ultimately responsible, or its policies and procedures may be inadequate or may be determined to be inadequate by regulators. Any violations of applicable anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions or anti-money laundering laws or regulations could limit certain of Alight's business activities until they are satisfactorily remediated and could result in civil and criminal penalties, including fines that could damage its reputation and have a materially adverse effect on its results of operation or financial condition. In addition to the complexity of the laws and regulations themselves, the development of new laws and regulations, changes in application or interpretation of laws and regulations and Alight's continued operational changes and development into new jurisdictions and new service offerings also increases Alight's legal and regulatory compliance complexity as well as the type of governmental oversight to which it may be subject. These changes in laws and regulations could mandate significant and costly changes to the way Alight implements its services and solutions or could impose additional licensure requirements or costs to Alight's operations and services, or limit its ability to mitigate risk. In addition, new regulatory or industry developments could create an increase in competition that could adversely affect Alight. These potential developments include:
•changes in regulations relating to health and welfare plans including potential challenges or changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, expansion of government-sponsored coverage through Medicare or the creation of a single payer system, or changes to the employee tax exclusion and/or employer deduction for employer-provided healthcare benefits;
•changes in regulations relating to defined contribution and defined benefit plans, and Individual Retirement Accounts ("IRAs"), including retirement plan and pension reform that could decrease the attractiveness of certain of our retirement products and services to retirement plan sponsors and administrators or have an unfavorable effect on Alight's ability to earn revenues from these products and services;
•changes in regulations relating to payroll processing and payments or withholding taxes or other required deductions;
•additional requirements respecting data privacy and data usage in jurisdictions in which Alight operates that may increase its costs of compliance and potentially reduce the manner in which data can be used by Alight to develop or further its product offerings;
•changes in regulations relating to fiduciary rules;
•changes in federal or state regulations relating to marketing and sale of Medicare plans, Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans;
11
Table of Contents
•changes to regulations of producers, brokers, agents or third-party administrators such as the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, that may alter operational costs, the manner in which Alight markets or is compensated for certain services or other aspects of Alight's business;
•changes to, or new, federal, state or provincial regulations relating to leave of absence programs or short-term or long-term disability plans, which could create more difficult and complex delivery requirements for Alight's business leading to increased operational costs or increased enforcement and litigation for potential violations, including greater penalties for administrative errors; and
•additional regulations or revisions to existing regulations promulgated by other regulatory bodies in jurisdictions in which Alight operates.
For example, there have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the federal and state levels directed at addressing the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. Although Alight cannot predict the ultimate content or timing of any healthcare reform legislation, potential changes resulting from any amendment, repeal or replacement of these programs, including any reduction in the future availability of healthcare insurance benefits, could adversely affect Alight's business and future results of operations. Further, the federal government from time to time considers pension reform legislation, which could negatively impact Alight's sales of defined benefit or defined contribution plan products and services and cause sponsors to discontinue existing plans for which Alight provides administrative or other services. Certain tax-favored savings initiatives that have been proposed could hinder sales and persistency of Alight's products and services that support employment-based retirement plans.
Alight's services are also the subject of ever-evolving government regulation, either because the services provided to or business conducted by Alight's clients are regulated directly or because third parties upon whom Alight relies on to provide services to its clients are regulated, thereby indirectly impacting the manner in which Alight provides services to those clients. Changes in laws, government regulations or the way those regulations are interpreted in the jurisdictions in which Alight operates could affect the viability, value, use or delivery of benefits and HR programs, including changes in regulations relating to health and welfare plans (such as medical), defined contribution plans (such as 401(k)), defined benefit plans (such as retirement or pensions) or payroll delivery, may adversely affect the demand for, or profitability of, Alight's services.
In addition, as Alight, and the third parties upon whom Alight relies, implement and expand direct-to-consumer sales and marketing solutions, Alight is subject to various federal and state laws and regulations that prescribe when and how Alight may market to consumers (including, without limitation, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the "TCPA") and other telemarketing laws and the Medicare Communications and Marketing Guidelines issued by the Center for Medicare Services of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service). The TCPA provides for private rights of action and potential statutory damages for each violation and additional penalties for each willful violation. Alight has in the past and may in the future become subject to claims that it has violated the TCPA and/or other telemarketing laws. Changes to these laws could negatively affect Alight's ability to market directly to consumers or increase Alight's costs or liabilities.
Issues relating to the use of new and evolving technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, in Alight's offerings may result in reputational harm and liability.
A quickly evolving social, legal and regulatory environment may cause Alight to incur increased operational and compliance costs, including increased research and development costs, or divert resources from other development efforts, to address potential issues related to usage of AI and ML. Alight is increasingly building AI and ML into many of its offerings including in its generative AI-enhanced Search and Chat function for Alight Worklife as well as its intelligent document processing tools. As with many cutting-edge innovations, AI and ML present new risks and challenges, and existing laws and regulations may apply to Alight in new ways, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict. The risks and challenges presented by AI and ML could undermine public confidence in AI and ML, which could slow its adoption and affect Alight's business. Alight incorporates AI and ML into its offerings for use cases that could potentially impact civil, privacy, or employment benefit rights. Failure to adequately address issues that may arise with such use cases could negatively affect the adoption of Alight's solutions and subject it to reputational harm, regulatory action, or legal liability, which may harm its financial condition and operating results. Potential government regulation related to AI, including relating to ethics and social responsibility, may also increase the burden and cost of compliance and research and development. Employees, customers, or customers’ employees who are dissatisfied with Alight's public statements, policies, practices, or solutions related to the development and use of AI and ML may express opinions that could introduce reputational or business harm, or legal liability.
Risks Relating to Black Knight Football
BKFC is dependent on the performance and popularity of its football clubs.
Black Knight Football's revenue is driven by the performance and popularity of its football clubs. BKFC's football clubs earn most of their revenue from media rights distributions from their domestic leagues which vary significantly depending on the level at which each club competes in their domestic league systems. For example, AFCB competes in the Premier League,
12
Table of Contents
the top league in the English football system. Relegation from the Premier League to lower tiers of the English Football League system would result in a significant decrease in the media rights revenue earned by AFCB. Relegation from the Premier League or a general decline in the success of AFCB, particularly in consecutive seasons, may also negatively affect AFCB's ability to attract or retain talented players and coaching staff, as well as supporters, sponsors and other commercial partners, which would have a material adverse effect on Black Knight Football's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
BKFC's business is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain key personnel, including players.
Black Knight Football is highly dependent on members of the management, coaching staff and players of its clubs. Competition for talented players and staff is, and will continue to be, intense. BKFC's ability to attract and retain the highest quality players and coaching staff for its clubs is critical to the on field success of its clubs and, consequently, to its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. A downturn in the performance of BKFC's clubs could adversely affect its clubs ability to attract and retain coaches and players. While Black Knight Football and its clubs enter into employment contracts with its key personnel, including players and coaches, with the aim of securing their services for the term of the contract, the retention of their services for the full term of the contract cannot be guaranteed due to possible contract disputes or approaches by other clubs. Black Knight Football's failure to attract and retain key personnel for each of its clubs could have a negative impact on its ability to effectively manage and grow its business.
Negotiation, pricing and terms of key media contracts are outside of Black Knight Football's control and those contracts may change in the future or expose it to certain risks.
A significant majority of the revenue of BKFC and its clubs is generated from the domestic and international media rights for domestic league matches. Contracts for these media rights and certain other revenue for those competitions are negotiated collectively by the domestic leagues in which BKFC's football clubs compete. BKFC and its clubs are generally not a party to the contracts negotiated by the domestic leagues. Further, BKFC and its clubs do not participate in and therefore do not have any direct influence on the outcome of contract negotiations. Although an agreement has been reached for the sale of Premier League domestic broadcasting rights in the UK through the end of the 2028/29 football season, future agreements may not maintain the current level of broadcasting revenues. Furthermore, a change in credit quality at one of the media broadcasters for the domestic leagues in which BKFC's clubs compete could increase the risk that such counterparty is unable or unwilling to pay amounts owed to the domestic league and ultimately, BKFC's clubs. The failure of a major media broadcaster for the domestic league competitions to pay outstanding amounts owed to its respective league could have a material adverse effect on BKFC's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
The markets in which Black Knight Football operates are highly competitive and increased competition could adversely affect Black Knight Football's results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
Black Knight Football faces competition from other football clubs in England and Europe. In the domestic leagues in which BKFC's clubs operate, investment from wealthy team owners has led to teams with deep financial backing that are able to acquire top players and coaching staff, which could continue to result in increased competition for, and cost of, key personnel. As European football and particularly the Premier League continues to grow in popularity, the interest of wealthy potential owners may increase, leading to additional clubs substantially improving their financial position. Despite the pervasive adoption of financial monitoring rules on clubs in European domestic leagues and club competitions, European and Premier League football clubs are spending substantial resources on transfer fees and player salaries. Competition from top European football leagues, including the Premier League, has led to higher salaries for football players as well as increased competition on the field. The increase in competition could result in BKFC's football clubs finishing lower in their domestic leagues or being relegated to lower tiers of their domestic league systems, which could have a material adverse effect on Black Knight Football's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Risks Relating to JANA
Changes in the value levels of equity, debt, real assets, commodities, foreign exchange or other asset markets, including from the impact of global trade policies and tariffs, may cause investments, revenue and earnings to decline.
JANA’s investment management revenue is primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of investments and, in some cases, performance fees which are normally expressed as a percentage of returns to the client. Numerous factors, including price movements in the equity, debt or currency markets, or movements in the price of real assets, commodities, digital assets or other alternative investments in which JANA invests on behalf of its clients, including from the impact of global fiscal, monetary and trade policies, could cause the value of investments, or JANA's returns on investments, to decrease. These risks may also be heightened by market volatility, illiquid market conditions or other market disruptions. The occurrence of any of the above events may cause JANA’s investments, revenue and earnings to decline.
13
Table of Contents
Poor investment performance could lead to the loss of clients and may cause AUM, revenue and earnings to decline.
The Company’s management believes that investment performance is one of the most important factors for the growth and retention of investments. Poor investment performance relative to applicable portfolio benchmarks, aggregate fee levels or competitors may cause investments, revenue and earnings to decline as a result of:
•Client withdrawals in favor of better performing products offered by competitors.
•Client shifts to products that charge lower fees.
•The diminishing ability to attract additional funds from existing and new clients
•Reduced, minimal or no performance fees.
Regulatory reforms in the US could expose JANA to increasing regulatory scrutiny, as well as regulatory uncertainty.
In recent years, a number of regulatory reforms have been proposed or fully or partially implemented in the US, and the level of regulatory scrutiny to which JANA is subject has increased and could increase further in the future. JANA, as well as its clients, vendors and distributors, have expended resources and altered certain of their business or operating activities to prepare for, address and meet the requirements that such regulatory reforms impose. New or proposed changes to laws, regulations, policies, initiatives and other government actions may be difficult to anticipate, which provides additional uncertainty and may heighten the Company’s risks related to such actions. Regulatory reforms in the US could require JANA to alter its future business or operating activities, which could be time-consuming and costly, increase regulatory compliance costs, result in litigation, impede the Company’s growth and cause its investments, revenue and earnings to decline. Regulatory reform may also impact JANA’s clients, which could cause them to change their investment strategies or allocations in manners that may be adverse to JANA.
Risks Relating to the Company's Structure
We may become subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940.
We do not believe that we are subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "40 Act"). We primarily acquire interests in operating companies and are engaged in actively managing and operating a core group of those companies, which we are committed to supporting for the long-term. Our officers, the Manager and employees devote their activities to these businesses. Based on these factors, we believe that we are not an investment company under the 40 Act, including by virtue of the exception from the definition of “investment company” in Section 3(b)(1) of the 40 Act, and we intend to continue to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company. If, at any time, we become or are determined to be primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, we could become subject to regulation under the 40 Act. In these circumstances, after giving effect to any applicable grace periods, we may be required to register as an investment company, which could result in significant registration and compliance costs, could require changes to our corporate governance structure and financial reporting, and could restrict our activities going forward. In addition, if we were to become subject to the 40 Act, any violation of the 40 Act could subject us to material adverse consequences, including potentially significant regulatory penalties and the possibility that certain of our contracts would be deemed unenforceable.
Certain executive officers and members of our Board of Directors have or will have interests and positions that could present potential conflicts.
Certain executive officers and members of our Board serve on the boards of directors of other entities or are employed by other entities, including but not limited to Alight, BKFC, JANA, CSI, Minden Mill and Watkins.
As a result of the foregoing, there may be circumstances where certain executive officers and directors may be subject to conflicts of interest with respect to, among other things: (i) our ongoing relationships with Alight, BKFC, JANA, CSI, Minden Mill or Watkins; (ii) business opportunities arising for any of us; and (iii) conflicts of time with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting us. For example, from time to time, we may enter into transactions with such other entities and/or their respective subsidiaries or other affiliates. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to our company or any of our respective subsidiaries or affiliates as would be the case where there is no potential conflict of interest.
We have in place a code of business conduct and ethics prescribing procedures for managing conflicts of interest and our Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and our related persons transaction committee are responsible for the review, approval or ratification of any potential conflicts of interest transactions. Additionally, we expect that interested directors will abstain from decisions with respect to conflicts of interest as a matter of practice. Our related person transaction committee and related person transaction policy governs all transactions with directors (and director nominees), executive officers, immediate family members of directors and executive officers, shareholders that own greater than 5% of any class of the Company's voting securities, our Manager, and generally any entity in which a director or officer of the Company controls. All transactions or
14
Table of Contents
series of transactions exceeding $120,000 with such persons or entities must be reviewed and approved by the related person transaction committee. The related person transaction committee consists of two independent directors and if a member of such committee is involved in a transaction under review, they are required to recuse themself from the review under our related person transaction policy. However, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective, that we will be able to resolve all potential conflicts or that the resolution of any such conflicts will be no less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated third party.
Refer to Note O - Related Party Transactions to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our related party relationships and transactions with our Manager and entities affiliated with certain members of our Board.
An inability of our material unconsolidated affiliates to maintain effective financial reporting processes may adversely impact our ability to report our results of operations or financial condition accurately and timely.
The accuracy and timeliness of the Company's financial reporting is dependent on the timely financial reporting and effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting of our material investments in unconsolidated affiliates. Material deficiencies in the internal controls over financial reporting or other matters impacting the ability of our unconsolidated affiliates to accurately and timely report their standalone results of operations and financial condition or meet related debt covenants, if any, may cause us to be unable to report the financial information of the Company on a timely basis or reduce the value of the Company's related investment. Furthermore, restatements to prior period financial information reported by our material unconsolidated affiliates could require the Company to similarly restate its prior period financial information. If the Company is unable to timely and accurately report its financial information it could subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including potential sanctions by the SEC or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There also could be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements. This could materially adversely affect us and lead to a decline in the price of the Company's common stock.
General Risk Factors
The loss of key personnel or directors could impair our operating abilities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments in operating companies, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success will substantially depend on our ability to attract and retain key members of our senior management team, officers and directors. If we lose one or more of these key employees or directors, our operating results and in turn the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we may enter into employment or director agreements with our officers or directors, there can be no assurance that the entire term of any such agreement will be served or that any such agreement will be renewed upon expiration.
Data security and integrity are critically important to the businesses we own and manage, and cybersecurity incidents, including cyberattacks, breaches of security, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential information, business disruption, or the perception that confidential information is not secure, could result in a material loss of business, regulatory enforcement, substantial legal liability and/or significant harm to their reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Improper access to, misappropriation, destruction or disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary data could result in significant harm to our reputation or the reputation of any of the businesses we own.
With respect to Alight, one of its significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of its employees’ and clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the confidential information about clients’ employees’ compensation, health and benefits information and other personally identifiable information. With respect to our Restaurant Group companies, they rely heavily on information technology systems across their operations and corporate functions, including for order and delivery from suppliers and distributors, point-of-sale processing in their restaurants, management of their supply chains, payment of obligations, collection of cash, data warehousing or support analytics, finance or accounting systems, labor optimization tools, gift cards, online business and various other processes and transactions, including the storage of employee and customer information.
The businesses we own and manage have experienced and we expect will continue to experience numerous attempts to access their computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets on a daily basis. The security and protection of their data is a top priority for them. Such businesses devote significant resources to maintain and regularly upgrade the wide array of physical, technical and contractual safeguards that they employ to provide security around the collection, storage, use, access and delivery of information they possess. These businesses have implemented various measures to manage their risks related to system and network security and disruptions, but an actual or perceived security breach, a failure to make adequate disclosures to the public or law enforcement agencies following any such event or a significant and extended disruption in the functioning of its information technology systems could damage a subsidiary company’s reputation
15
Table of Contents
and cause it to lose clients, adversely impact its operations, sales and operating results and require it to incur significant expense to address and remediate or otherwise resolve such issues.
Although our businesses have not incurred material losses or liabilities to date as a result of any breaches, unauthorized disclosure, loss or corruption of their data or inability of their clients to access their systems, such events could result in intellectual property or other confidential information being lost or stolen, including client, employee or business data, disrupt their operations, subject them to substantial regulatory and legal proceedings and potential liability and fines, result in a material loss of business and/or significantly harm their reputation. If they are unable to efficiently manage the vulnerability of their systems and effectively maintain and upgrade their system safeguards, they may incur unexpected costs and certain of their systems may become more vulnerable to unauthorized access.
Furthermore, if we are unable to similarly and effectively maintain and upgrade our corporate system safeguards, data and confidential information we may have access to from time to time about the businesses we own and manage may also become more vulnerable to unauthorized access. We utilize a third party to manage the Company's corporate IT network and related resources and we actively collaborate with the third party to monitor risks and recent threats to our IT environment, develop protocols for responding to cybersecurity incidents, and train employees on common techniques used in cyberattacks. Our failure to adequately monitor our key third-party IT service provider could result in the failure of all or a portion of our IT resources and impact the operations of our business. Furthermore, loss of our third-party IT service provider could result in increased costs associated with acquiring new internal IT resources and developing internal IT processes.
In many jurisdictions, including North America and the European Union, Alight is subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of this information including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended ("HIPAA") and the HIPAA regulations governing, among other things, the privacy, security and electronic transmission of individually identifiable protected health information, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the European Union General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"). California also enacted legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 ("CCPA") and the related California Privacy Rights Act ("CPRA"), that afford California residents expanded privacy protections and a private right of action for security breaches affecting their personal information. Virginia and Colorado have similarly enacted comprehensive privacy laws, the Consumer Data Protection Act and Colorado Privacy Act, respectively, both laws of which emulate the CCPA and CPRA in many respects. The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act took effect on January 1, 2023, and the Colorado Privacy Act took effect on July 1, 2023. We anticipate federal and state regulators to continue to consider and enact regulatory oversight initiatives and legislation related to privacy and cybersecurity. These and other similar laws and regulations are frequently changing and are becoming increasingly complex and sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which Alight provides services both in terms of substance and in terms of enforceability. This makes compliance challenging and expensive. Alight’s failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation in the marketplace. Further, regulatory initiatives in the area of data protection are more frequently including provisions allowing authorities to impose substantial fines and penalties, and therefore, failure to comply could also have a significant financial impact.
If Cannae or its businesses are unable to protect their computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets it could have a material adverse effect on the value of our businesses, and ultimately, our financial condition and results of operations.
The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with new acquisitions may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with acquisitions of ownership interests, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits from past or potential future acquisitions, strategic transactions, investments, or our business model.
Before making acquisitions, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisers, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of business and transaction. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an acquisition, we rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the transaction and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation that we carry out with respect to any opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts (including fraud) that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the acquisition being successful. As a result, we may not realize the benefits from our acquisitions that we anticipated at the time of our diligence and initial consummation of transactions.
16
Table of Contents
Our management may seek growth through acquisitions in lines of business that will not necessarily be limited to our current areas of focus or geographic areas. This expansion of our business subjects us to associated risks, such as the diversion of management's attention and lack of experience in operating such businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may make acquisitions in lines of business that are not directly tied to or synergistic with our current subsidiary companies. Accordingly, we may in the future acquire businesses in industries or geographic areas with which management is less familiar than we are with our current businesses.
The acquisition and integration of any business we may acquire involves a number of risks and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures in assimilating or integrating the businesses, technologies, products, personnel or operations of the acquired business. Furthermore, acquisitions may: (1) involve our entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience; (2) involve difficulties in retaining the customers of the acquired business; (3) involve difficulties and expense associated with regulatory requirements, competition controls or investigations; (4) result in a delay or reduction of sales for both us and the business we acquire; and (5) disrupt our ongoing business, divert our resources and require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our current business.
To complete future acquisitions, we may determine that it is necessary to use a substantial amount of our cash or engage in equity or debt financing. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital-raising activities and other financial and operational matters that make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital in the future and to pursue other business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all, which could limit our ability to engage in acquisitions. Moreover, we can make no assurances that the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, such as operating improvements or anticipated cost savings, would be realized or that we would not be exposed to unexpected liabilities in connection with any acquisition.
Further, an acquisition may negatively affect our operating results because it may require us to incur charges and substantial debt or other liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation and amortization of deferred compensation charges, may require the amortization, write-down or impairment of amounts related to deferred compensation, goodwill and other intangible assets, may include substantial contingent consideration payments or other compensation that reduces our earnings during the quarter in which it is incurred, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset acquisition costs.
We currently have, and may continue to pursue, investments in businesses that involve or may involve business, regulatory, structural, legal, or other complexities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We have investments in businesses that have complex structures. This could take the form of substantial business, regulatory, structural, or legal complexity. These investments have or may have structures that could limit our ability to manage, control, or timely realize value from the assets acquired. As an element of our strategy, we may continue to pursue opportunities that have these complexities, and these transactions can be more difficult, expensive, and time-consuming to finance and execute. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our performance.
We and the businesses we own and manage, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, are involved in legal proceedings and may experience unfavorable outcomes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We and the businesses we own and manage, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, are involved in pending and threatened litigation matters, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. We and such companies are also subject to compliance with extensive government laws and regulations related to employment practices and policies. We may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to their satisfaction, and these matters may involve claims for substantial amounts of money or for other relief that might necessitate changes to their business or operations. The defense of these actions may be both time consuming and expensive and their outcomes cannot be predicted with certainty. Determining reserves for pending litigation is a complex, fact-intensive process that requires significant legal judgment. It is possible that unfavorable outcomes in one or more such proceedings could result in substantial payments that could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows in a particular period or on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The lack of liquidity in certain of our ownership interests may adversely affect our business.
We invest, and will continue to invest, in companies whose securities are not publicly traded and whose securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of
17
Table of Contents
ownership interests with these characteristics may make it difficult for us to sell these positions when desired. In addition, if we are required or otherwise choose to liquidate all or a portion of our assets quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these ownership interests. Our businesses are often subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there is usually no established trading market for such ownership interests. Because certain of our businesses are illiquid, we may be unable to dispose of them timely or we may be unable to do so at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.
Our Articles of Incorporation and Nevada law may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our Company or changes in our management, which could have the result of depressing the trading price of our common stock.
Certain anti-takeover provisions of Nevada law could have the effect of delaying or preventing a third-party from acquiring us, even if the acquisition arguably could benefit our stockholders.
Nevada’s "combinations with interested stockholders" statutes (NRS 78.411 through 78.444, inclusive) prohibit specified types of business "combinations" between certain Nevada corporations and any person deemed to be an "interested stockholder" for two years after such person first becomes an "interested stockholder" unless the corporation’s board of directors approves the combination (or the transaction by which such person becomes an "interested stockholder") in advance, or unless the combination is approved by the board of directors and sixty percent of the corporation’s voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder, its affiliates and associates. Further, in the absence of prior approval certain restrictions may apply even after such two-year period. However, these statutes do not apply to any combination of a corporation and an interested stockholder after the expiration of four years after the person first became an interested stockholder. For purposes of these statutes, an “interested stockholder” is any person who is (1) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, or (2) an affiliate or associate of the corporation and at any time within the two previous years was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the corporation. The definition of the term "combination" is sufficiently broad to cover most significant transactions between a corporation and an "interested stockholder."
Nevada law also provides that directors may resist a change or potential change in control if the directors determine that the change is opposed to, or not in the best interests of, the corporation. The existence of the foregoing provisions and other potential anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your common stock in an acquisition.
Our consolidated financial statements include estimates made by management and actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management include fair value measurements and accounting for income taxes. Actual results could differ from estimates. See Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion.
We record many of our ownership interests using the equity method of accounting, through which we record our proportionate share of their net earnings or loss in our consolidated financial statements. Equity-method investments are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If we determine that there are indicators that the book value of any of our equity-method investments are not recoverable, we are required to estimate the fair value of the ownership interest. Determining the fair value of our non-public businesses is subjective and involves the use of estimates. If we determine the fair value of any of our ownership interests is less than its recorded book value, we may be required to record an impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. See further discussion of our policies and process for monitoring impairment in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report under the header Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
The global operations of some of our ownership interests, including Alight and BKFC, may subject us to risks that could negatively affect our business.
These risks, which can vary substantially by country, include political, financial or social instability or conditions, geopolitical events, corruption, social unrest, natural disasters, military conflicts and terrorism, as well as exposure to the macroeconomic environment in such markets (including consumer preferences and spending, unemployment levels, wage and commodity inflation and foreign exchange rate fluctuations), the regulatory environment (including the risks of operating in markets in which there are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforceability of legal requirements and the enforceability of contract rights and intellectual property rights), and income and non-income based tax rates and laws. Adverse changes in any of these factors may materially adversely impact the businesses and value of our ownership interests in D&B, Alight and BKFC.
18
Table of Contents
Changing rules, public disclosure regulations and stakeholder expectations on environmental, social and corporate governance related matters create a variety of risks for our business.
In addition to the changing rules and regulations related to environmental, social and governance matters imposed by governmental and self-regulatory organizations such as the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, a variety of third-party organizations, institutional investors and customers evaluate the performance of companies on ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. These changing rules, regulations and stakeholder expectations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and increased management time and attention spent complying with or meeting such regulations and expectations. Reduced access to or increased cost of capital may occur as financial institutions and investors increase or change expectations related to ESG matters.
Developing and acting on initiatives within the scope of ESG, and collecting, measuring and reporting ESG-related information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming and is subject to evolving reporting standards. We may also communicate certain initiatives and goals regarding environmental matters, diversity, social investments and other ESG-related matters, in our SEC filings or in other public disclosures. These initiatives and goals within the scope of ESG could be difficult and expensive to implement, the technologies needed to implement them may not be cost effective and may not advance at a sufficient pace, and we could be criticized for the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the disclosure. If our ESG-related data, processes and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to our goals, including our previously announced commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, within the scope of ESG on a timely basis, or at all, our reputation, business, financial performance and growth could be adversely affected.
In addition, in recent years "anti-ESG" sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states and Congress having proposed or enacted "anti-ESG" policies, legislation, or initiatives or issued related legal opinions, and the President having recently issued an executive order opposing diversity equity and inclusion ("DEI") initiatives in the private sector. Such anti-ESG and anti-DEI-related policies, legislation, initiatives, litigation, legal opinions, and scrutiny could result in additional compliance obligations, investigations and enforcement actions, or reputational harm.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
At Cannae, the board of directors oversees management’s process for identifying and mitigating risks, including cybersecurity risks. Senior leadership, including our Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO"), works diligently to identify, assess and manage material risks through our Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") program. As part of that program, we conduct risk assessments to identify and assess our material business, operational and environmental risks and works with our management team to develop strategies and plans to mitigate and manage those risks, including cybersecurity risks related to the use of third-party service providers.
Our ERM program is overseen by a group of highly qualified individuals and is tailored to the unique structure of our business. As a holding company with a small group of highly qualified employees, we are well positioned to maintain operations in the event of a disaster or a material disruption to our information technology ("IT") infrastructure and networks. Our CISO has extensive information technology, cybersecurity and program management experience as do many of the employees in the information security group for our third-party provider. Our CISO, as well as others in our third-party provider's information security group, hold certifications such as the Certified Information System Security Professional certification. Each of our various businesses separately maintains business continuity functions that adhere to the unique requirements of their business.
On an ongoing basis, management assesses the cybersecurity risks of Cannae and aligns its procedures and its audit plan with the identified and addressable risks. The underlying controls of the cyber risk management program are based on the recognized standards as outlined in the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") Cybersecurity Framework. We utilize a third party to manage our IT network and processes and our ERM personnel work directly with the provider on all aspects of the Company's IT infrastructure and cybersecurity risks. Risks are evaluated over various timeframes; however, the focus of management’s risk assessment is on risks to the long-term solvency and sustainability of the ongoing operations of Cannae. Risks with the potential for an adverse impact to the Company in the near term are prioritized to the extent they present a material risk to the financial viability of the Company.
We apply a comprehensive approach to the mitigation of identified security risks, including monitoring our third-party IT service provider and management of our unconsolidated affiliates. As a holding company with relatively low volumes of personnel and third-party data, we have established policies, procedures and controls, including those related to privacy, information security and cybersecurity, and we employ a broad and diversified set of IT risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques tailored to the unique nature of our business, including threat and vulnerability management, security monitoring,
19
Table of Contents
identity and access management, phishing awareness, risk oversight, third-party risk management, disaster recovery and business continuity management.
In the event of a cybersecurity incident, we have established protocols for management's response to incidents and we regularly test those protocols with appropriate management personnel. Such protocols include an incident response playbook with the assessment of cybersecurity risks and procedures and hierarchies for escalating and reporting incidents to executive management, the board of directors, investors, government agencies and the general public.
The employees at our consolidated companies are the strongest assets in protecting information and mitigating risk. We monitor the security practices of our employees, including training programs that focus on applicable privacy, security, legal, and regulatory requirements that provide ongoing enhancement of their respective security and risk cultures. Our employees participate in an annual Information Security Training.
The Board administers its risk oversight function directly and through committees and our Board has a strong focus on cybersecurity. Our approaches to cybersecurity and privacy are overseen by the audit committee. At each regular meeting of the audit committee of our Board, management provides reports relating to existing and emerging risks at our companies, including, as appropriate, cyber and data security risks, and any security incidents. At least annually (or more frequently in the event of material changes to the Company) the update to the audit committee includes a summary of management’s complete reassessment of the Company’s risk and control environment identified through our ERM program. Our audit committee chairman reports on these discussions to our Board on a quarterly basis.
See Item 1A Risk Factors for discussion of material risks faced by the Company, including risks related to cybersecurity and IT.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located in Las Vegas, Nevada in leased facilities.
Restaurant Group. The Restaurant Group's headquarters are currently located in Nashville, Tennessee with another office location in Woburn, Massachusetts. All of our restaurants are leased from third parties and are located in 20 states throughout the U.S. Substantially all of our Restaurant Group's revenues are generated in those states.
Corporate and Other. We own an 1,800-acre ranch-style luxury resort and residential community in Bend/Powell Butte, Oregon.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For a description of our legal proceedings see discussion under Legal Contingencies in Note M - Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
20
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company's common stock trades on The New York Stock Exchange under the "CNNE" trading symbol.
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock against the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and against the cumulative total return of a peer group index consisting of certain companies against which we compete for the period ending December 31, 2025. The peer group comparison has been weighted based on their stock market capitalization. The graph tracks the performance of a $100.00 investment, with reinvestment of all dividends (if any), from December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2025.
______________________________
(1) Represents the peer group used for the year ended December 31, 2025 and consists of the following companies: Main Street Capital, Compass Diversified Holdings, StepStone Group, Hercules Capital, Federated Hermes, Capital Southwest, Artisan Partners Asset Management, Trinity Capital, Hamilton Lane and GCM Grosvenor.
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
21
Table of Contents
On January 30, 2026, the last reported sale price of our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange was $14.41 per share. We had approximately 6,004 shareholders of record.
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be included in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On August 3, 2022, our Board authorized a three-year stock repurchase program, (the "2022 Repurchase Program"), under which the Company may repurchase up to 10.0 million shares of its common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices or in privately negotiated transactions through August 3, 2025. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 2,295,463 shares of CNNE common stock for approximately $42.1 million in the aggregate, or an average of $18.33 per share, pursuant to the 2022 Repurchase Program. As of December 31, 2025, there are no shares available for repurchase under the 2022 Repurchase Program as the 2022 Repurchase Program was completed with all authorized shares being repurchased.
On October 29, 2023, our Board authorized a stock repurchase program, (the "2023 Repurchase Program"), under which the Company may repurchase up to 10.0 million shares of its common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices or in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time. The 2023 Repurchase Program does not supersede or impact the repurchase capacity under the 2022 Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 10,000,000 shares of CNNE common stock for approximately $195.2 million in the aggregate, or an average of $19.52 per share, pursuant to the 2023 Repurchase Program. As of December 31, 2025, there are no shares available for repurchase under the 2023 Repurchase Program as the 2023 Repurchase Program was completed with all authorized shares being repurchased.
On March 24, 2025, our Board authorized a new stock repurchase program (the "2025 Repurchase Program"), under which the Company may repurchase up to 10.0 million shares of its common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices or in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time. The 2025 Repurchase Program does not supersede or impact the repurchase capacity under the prior authorizations. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 4,700,913 shares of CNNE common stock for approximately $80.6 million in the aggregate, or an average of $17.14 per share, pursuant to the 2025 Repurchase Program. From January 1, 2026 through January 16, 2026, we repurchased an additional 385,000 shares of CNNE common stock for approximately $6.2 million in the aggregate, or an average of $16.15 per share, pursuant to the 2025 Repurchase Program. Since the original commencement of the 2025 Repurchase Program through market close on January 16, 2026, we have repurchased a total of 5,085,913 shares of Cannae common stock for approximately $86.8 million in the aggregate, or an average of $17.06 per share. As of January 16, 2026, the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2025 Repurchase Program is 4,914,087.
The following table summarizes repurchases of equity securities by Cannae during the quarter ending December 31, 2025:
______________________________
(1) On October 29, 2023, our Board of Directors approved the 2023 Repurchase Program, under which we may purchase up to 10.0 million shares of our CNNE common stock.
(2) On March 24, 2025, our Board approved the 2025 Repurchase Program, under which we may purchase up to 10.0 million shares of our CNNE common stock.
(3) As of the last day of the applicable month.
Item 6. Reserved
22
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
For a description of our business, including descriptions of segments and recent business trends, see the discussion under Business in Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Recent Developments
Dun & Bradstreet
On March 24, 2025, Dun & Bradstreet ("D&B") entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. (the "D&B Sale"). Under the terms of the agreement, D&B shareholders received $9.15 in cash for each share of common stock they own upon closing of the D&B Sale.
In conjunction with the D&B Sale, Cannae entered into a Voting and Support Agreement with Dun & Bradstreet pursuant to which Cannae agreed to vote the 69,048,691 shares of D&B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for which the Company was then the beneficial owner (the "Owned Shares") in favor of the D&B Sale. Pursuant to the Voting and Support Agreement, the Company also agreed not to take certain actions, including (i) tendering any Owned Shares into any tender or exchange offer, (ii) transferring any Owned Shares (subject to certain exceptions), (iii) granting any proxies or powers of attorney or (iv) taking any action that would make any representation or warranty by the Company contained in the Voting and Support Agreement untrue or incorrect in any material respect or have the effect of preventing or disabling the Company from performing its obligations under the Voting and Support Agreement in any material respect. Under the Voting and Support Agreement, the Company was permitted to sell up to 10.0 million of the Owned Shares prior to completion of the D&B Sale or termination of the merger agreement entered into by D&B related to the D&B Sale in accordance with its terms.
As a result of the D&B Sale, we present our investment in Dun & Bradstreet as a discontinued operation in our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025 and all prior periods have been recast to reflect our investment in D&B as a discontinued operation and held for sale. See Note Q - Discontinued Operations for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in D&B.
During the second quarter, we sold 10.0 million shares of common stock of D&B, and Cannae received proceeds of $89.5 million. On August 26, 2025, the D&B Sale closed, and Cannae completed the disposition of its remaining ownership interests in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. for aggregate proceeds of $540.3 million in cash in exchange for our remaining 59,048,691 shares of common stock (the "D&B Disposition"). Following the consummation of the D&B Disposition and as of December 31, 2025, Cannae no longer has any ownership interest in D&B.
JANA
On May 12, 2025, Cannae entered into an agreement to acquire an additional 30% ownership interest in JANA Partners (the "JANA Investment") in exchange for an upfront payment of $67.5 million and potential further payments aggregating to $26.0 million if JANA Partners achieves certain assets under management thresholds (the "JANA Contingent Consideration"). The transaction closed on September 2, 2025 and as of December 31, 2025, the Company has a 50.0% total ownership interest in JANA Partners.
On September 2, 2025, Cannae invested an additional $30.0 million into the JANA Fund. We previously accounted for our investment in the JANA Fund as an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. Due to our incremental investment in the JANA Fund and JANA Partners, as of September 30, 2025, we began accounting for our ownership interest in the JANA Fund as an unconsolidated affiliate using the equity method of accounting and record our ratable share of the JANA Fund's net income or loss on a three-month lag.
Black Knight Football
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we invested $50.0 million in BKFC and as of December 31, 2025, we held a 44.7% ownership interest. In January 2026, BKFC purchased the remaining 60% equity interest in FC Lorient ("FCL") for total consideration of $70.3 million including cash of $40.7 million and stock of BKFC of $29.6 million and as a result of this transaction we now hold a 42.7% ownership interest in BKFC.
Paysafe
In November 2025, we sold approximately 2.5 million shares of common stock of Paysafe for $16.5 million which will generate expected tax savings for the Company as the sale resulted in an $87.3 million tax loss which the Company will use to offset capital gains realized in 2025 and to carry back the excess losses to utilize against excess capital gains realized in prior years. As of December 31, 2025, Cannae no longer has any ownership interest in the common stock of Paysafe.
Other Developments
In January 2025, WineDirect, Inc. completed the spin-off of its fulfillment division as WineDirect Fulfillment, LLC
23
Table of Contents
("Fulfillment") and sold its E-commerce division (the "WD Transaction"). As a result of the WD Transaction, we received $20.4 million in proceeds including $13.6 million of cash and a 21.6% ownership interest in Fulfillment valued at $6.8 million. We recorded a new investment in Fulfillment of $6.8 million in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and a $15.0 million gain which is included in Recognized gains, net on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2025.
On May 12, 2025, Cannae, Cannae LLC and the Manager (Cannae, Cannae LLC and the Manager collectively, the "Parties"), entered into that certain Management Services Agreement Termination Agreement (the "MSA Termination Agreement"). As previously disclosed, on February 26, 2024, the Parties entered into that certain Third Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement among the Parties (the "MSA"), which provided for a termination of the MSA by the Company effective June 30, 2027, unless terminated earlier by the Company. The MSA Termination Agreement terminated the MSA in its entirety as of May 12, 2025 without any further obligations or liabilities other than certain obligations relating to the continued indemnification and limitation on liability and the remaining obligations of the Company and/or Cannae LLC, as applicable, to pay the Manager: (i) an amount of $0.6 million in each month from May to December 2025, representing each of the unpaid monthly Management Fees (as defined in the MSA) that would have been due to the Manager through December 31, 2025; (ii) on January 1, 2026, $11.4 million, representing the aggregate remaining unpaid monthly Management Fees that would have been due to the Manager from January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027; (iii) on July 1, 2025, $6.7 million, representing the second installment of the unpaid Termination Fees (as defined in the MSA) that would have been due to the Manager on such date; and (iv) on July 1, 2026, $6.6 million, representing the final installment of the unpaid Termination Fees (as defined in the MSA) that would have been due to the Manager on July 1, 2026.
On May 12, 2025, Mr. Foley transitioned from his roles as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company and now serves as the Board's non-executive Vice Chairman pursuant to a director services agreement (the "DSA"). Doug Ammerman was appointed as Chairman of the Board and Ryan R. Caswell, the Company’s former President, now serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, also effective as of May 12, 2025. In connection with the change in Mr. Foley's employment and as described in Mr. Foley’s original employment agreement, Mr. Foley received a lump-sum payment of $17.2 million, and all of Mr. Foley’s outstanding but unvested equity awards were accelerated in the second quarter of 2025.
The following dividends were declared by our Board in 2025:
Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date Dividends Per Share
Subsequent to December 31, 2025, the Board declared cash dividends of $0.15 per share, payable on March 31, 2026, to Cannae common shareholders of record as of March 17, 2026.
Related Party Transactions
Our financial statements for all years presented reflect transactions with our Manager and certain members of our Board. See Note O - Related Party Transactions to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note A - Basis of Financial Statements to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for discussion of all our significant accounting policies.
The accounting policies and estimates described below are those we consider critical in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures with respect to contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates - applicability of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 323. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are recorded using the equity method of accounting. If an investor does not possess a controlling financial interest over an investee but has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee’s operating and financial policies, the investor must account for such an investment under the equity method of accounting. For investments in common stock or in-substance common stock of an investee, which
24
Table of Contents
an investor does not control, the general but rebuttable presumption exists that an ownership of greater than 20% of the outstanding common stock of an investee indicates the investor has significant influence. For investments in partnerships and similar entities for which an investor does not control, equity method of accounting for the investment is generally required unless the investor's interest is so minor that the investor has virtually no influence.
In the ordinary course of our business, we make investments in companies that provide us with varying degrees of control and influence over the underlying investees through our level of ownership of the outstanding equity of the investee, participation in management of the investee, participation on the board of directors of the investee, and/or legal agreements with other investors with control implications. As a result, our analysis of the appropriate accounting for our various ownership interests often requires judgment regarding the level of control, significant influence or lack thereof the Company has over each investee. If we are required to account for certain of our ownership interests in which we have concluded the Company has significant influence resulting in the application of the equity method of accounting at fair value, the impact of such change could significantly impact the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2025, we held less than 20% of the outstanding common equity of Alight but we account for our ownership under the equity method because we exert significant influence: (i) through, and in connection with, our 7.7% ownership, (ii) because certain of our directors serve on Alight's board of directors, and (iii) because we are party to an agreement with Alight pursuant to which we have the ability to appoint or be consulted on the election of certain of the directors of Alight.
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates - impairment monitoring. On an ongoing basis, management monitors the Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates to determine whether there are indications that the fair value of an investment may be other than temporarily below our recorded book value of the investment. Factors considered when determining whether a decline in the fair value of an investment is other-than-temporary include, but are not limited to: the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than book value, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the investee for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
As of June 30, 2025, the book value of our investment in Alight accounted for under the equity method of accounting was $288.2 million, prior to any impairment. Based on the closing stock price of Alight common shares as of June 30, 2025, the fair value of our investment in Alight was $229.1 million. The fair value measurement is considered a level 1 fair value measure. Due to the quantum of the decrease in the fair market value of our ownership interest subsequent to our acquisition paired with the fact that the fair value has been below our book value for an extended period of time, exceeding one year, management determined the decrease in value of our investment in Alight was other-than-temporary as of June 30, 2025. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment in our investment of Alight of $59.1 million which is included in Recognized (losses) gains, net, on our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2025.
As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of our ownership interest in Alight based on quoted market prices was $78.9 million and the book value of our recorded asset for Alight was $73.8 million. Although our interest in Alight is not impaired as of December 31 ,2025 because the fair value is above the book value of our interest in Alight, sustained declines in fair value of the interest, deterioration in Alight's actual or forecasted results of operations or adverse changes in the US macroeconomic environment could result in an impairment charge in future periods to record our asset at fair value.
Accounting for Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The impact of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred taxes, if any, is applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period enacted.
As of December 31, 2025, we had a net deferred tax asset of $0.6 million, which is primarily attributable to temporary differences for certain state income taxes. In the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded an additional valuation allowance of $108.8 million which was primarily attributable to the Company's remaining federal tax assets. In 2025, we recognized tax losses through sales of all or a portion of our interests in D&B, Paysafe, System1, Inc. ("System1") and Sightline Payment Holdings, LLC ("Sightline"), which increased our tax receivable as of December 31, 2025 as we expect to carry such losses back to prior year returns with excess capital gains. Following these transactions, we determined it was uncertain whether we would be able to use the Company's remaining deferred tax assets primarily attributable to temporary book-tax differences on our unconsolidated affiliates and equity securities. One of the factors used in assessing the need for a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is whether a company is in a three-year cumulative book loss position and for the three years ended December 31, 2025, the Company was in a cumulative book loss position. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has a federal valuation allowance of $155.3 million representing a full valuation allowance on our federal deferred taxes where it is not more likely than not that the tax benefit will be realized. Additionally, the Company has a state valuation allowance of
25
Table of Contents
$6.3 million representing certain state NOLs where it is not more likely than not that the tax benefit of certain state NOLs will be realized before the NOLs in those certain states expire.
Refer to Note L - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our accounting for income taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which requires consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The guidance is to be applied on a prospective basis, though retrospective application is permitted. We have adopted this ASU which resulted in additional disclosures in our consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note L - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our income tax disclosures.
In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which requires public business entities to disaggregate specific expenses in a tabular presentation. This includes purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and other relevant expense captions on the face of the income statement. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance is to be applied on a prospective basis, though retrospective application is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this authoritative guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Certain Factors Affecting Comparability
Year ended December 31, 2025. On March 24, 2025, D&B entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. (the "D&B Sale"). As a result of the D&B Sale, we present our investment in Dun & Bradstreet as a discontinued operation in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025 and all prior periods have been recast to reflect our investment in D&B as a discontinued operation and held for sale.
Year ended December 31, 2024. On March 20, 2024, Alight entered into a definitive agreement to sell its professional services segment and its payroll and human capital management outsourcing businesses (the "Payroll & Professional Services Business"). The transaction closed on July 12, 2024. Beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2024, Alight began accounting for the assets and liabilities of the disposed businesses as held for sale and its operating results as discontinued operations. Accordingly, Alight's results presented for the periods ended December 31, 2023 have been retrospectively revised to reflect the Payroll & Professional Services Business as held for sale and discontinued operations.
Year ended December 31, 2023. In the year ended December 31, 2023, the Restaurant Group undertook a project to renegotiate or terminate leases and close O'Charley's stores with unfavorable store-level cash flow profiles. Through this process they closed 77 O'Charley's stores in the year ended December 31, 2023.
26
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations
Net earnings. The following table presents certain financial data for the years indicated:
Year ended December 31,
(In millions)
Revenues:
Operating expenses:
Other operating expenses, including asset impairments 99.5 93.3 142.9
Other income (expense):
Interest, investment and other income 10.1 4.6 13.6
Income tax expense (benefit) 13.0 3.3 (71.5)
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates (223.5) (32.9) (176.9)
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (97.9) (22.3) (18.3)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (11.7) (5.5) (10.7)
The following is a discussion of the material fluctuations in our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 and the year December 31, 2024 compared to 2023. The material changes in revenues, expenses and pre-tax loss for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 are discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
Revenues
Restaurant sales including food and beverage sales, are net of applicable state and local sales taxes and discounts, and are recognized at a point in time as services are performed and goods are provided.
Other operating revenue consists of income generated by our resort operations, which includes sales of real estate, lodging rentals, food and beverage sales, and other income from various resort services offered. Revenue is recognized at a point in time upon closing of the sale of real estate or once goods and services have been provided and billed to the customer.
Total revenue decreased $28.9 million in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by a decrease in revenue in the Restaurant Group segment. Total revenue in 2024 decreased $117.5 million compared to 2023, primarily driven by a decrease in revenue in the Restaurant Group segment.
The change in revenues from our segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
27
Table of Contents
Expenses
Our operating expenses consist primarily of cost of restaurant revenue, personnel costs, depreciation and amortization, and other operating expenses.
Cost of restaurant revenue includes cost of food and beverage, primarily the costs of beef, groceries, produce, seafood, poultry and alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, net of vendor discounts and rebates, payroll and related costs and expenses directly relating to restaurant level activities, and restaurant operating costs including occupancy and other operating expenses at the restaurant level.
Personnel costs include base salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation and bonuses paid to employees, and are one of our most significant operating expenses. Personnel costs that are directly attributable to the restaurant-level operations of the Restaurant Group are included in Cost of restaurant revenue.
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of our depreciation related to investments in property and equipment as well as amortization of intangible assets.
Other operating expenses include management fees, carried interest fees, professional fees, advertising costs, travel expenses and impairments of operating assets.
The change in expenses from our segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) was $13.0 million, $3.3 million, and $(71.5) million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was (6.8)%, (1.3)%, and 35.7%, respectively. The fluctuation in income tax benefit as a percentage of loss before income taxes is attributable to our estimate of ultimate income tax liability or benefit and changes in the characteristics of net earnings or loss year to year, such as the weighting of operating income versus investment income and the varying impact of equity in earnings or loss of unconsolidated affiliates on pre-tax income or loss. The change in our effective tax rate in the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 is primarily attributable to the recognition of tax losses of $281.1 million that will be carried back to 2022 to refund excess capital gains, offset by the recording of additional valuation allowance in the amount of $108.8 million on the deferred tax assets related to our investments and our federal net operating losses. The change in our effective tax rate in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to the recording of a valuation allowance in 2024 of $47.7 million on our federal net operating loss carryforwards and certain deferred taxes within our consolidated partnerships, the impact to the rate of equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates relative to pre-tax loss and the impairment recorded to our investment in Sightline.
For a detailed breakout of our effective tax rate and further discussion on changes in our taxes, see Note L - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Affiliates
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates for the periods indicated consisted of the following:
Year ended December 31,
(In millions)
Watkins (4.3) — —
_____________________________________
(1) The amount for the year ended December 31, 2023 include the Company's equity in losses of Paysafe which was no longer accounted for under the equity method of accounting beginning December 31, 2023.
The change in net income or loss from our unconsolidated affiliates that are reportable segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
28
Table of Contents
Net Loss
Net loss attributable to Cannae increased $208.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to 2024. Total net loss attributable to Cannae decreased $8.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 2023.
The change in net loss is attributable to the factors discussed above and net loss from the segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
Segment Results of Operations
Restaurant Group
The following table presents the results from operations of our Restaurant Group segment:
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
Revenues:
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization 9.7 10.5 17.0
Other operating expenses, including asset impairments 34.1 26.5 75.9
Other income (expense):
Interest expense (6.4) (5.7) (6.1)
Recognized (loss) gains, net (0.2) 18.6 36.0
Total other (expense) income (6.6) 12.9 29.9
Revenues
Total revenues for the Restaurant Group segment decreased $29.1 million, or 6.9%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 from 2024. The decrease was partially attributable to approximately $12.6 million of incremental revenue included in the year ended December 31, 2024 associated with stores that were closed prior to December 31, 2025 and an overall decline in comparable store sales.
Total revenues for the Restaurant Group segment decreased $116.4 million, or 21.7%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. The decrease was primarily attributable to approximately $100.3 million of incremental revenue included in the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with stores that were closed prior to December 31, 2024 and a decline in comparable store sales.
Comparable Store Sales. One method we use in evaluating the performance of our restaurants is to compare sales results for restaurants period over period. A new restaurant is included in our comparable store sales figures starting in the first period following the restaurant's first seventy-eight weeks of operations. Changes in comparable store sales reflect changes in sales for the comparable store group of restaurants over a specified period of time. This measure highlights the performance of existing restaurants, as the impact of new restaurant openings is excluded. Comparable store sales for our 99 Restaurants brand changed (0.6)%, (2.2)%, and (2.1)% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, from the prior fiscal years. The change is primarily attributable to a decrease in guest counts of 2.9%, 7.3% and 8.8% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, partially offset by an increase in the average amount spent by customers each visit of 2.4%, 5.6% and 7.4% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Comparable store sales for our O'Charley's brand changed (13.4)%, (8.5)% and (3.4)% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, from the prior fiscal years. The change is primarily attributable to a decrease in guest counts of 17.4%, 9.9% and 7.3% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, offset or partially offset by an increase in the average amount spent by customers each visit of 4.8%, 1.6% and 4.2% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
29
Table of Contents
Cost of Restaurant Revenue
Cost of restaurant revenue decreased $13.2 million, or 3.6%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 from 2024. Cost of restaurant revenue decreased $103.7 million, or 21.8%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. Cost of restaurant revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenue was approximately 91.7%, 88.5%, and 88.6% in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in cost of restaurant revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenue in 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily attributable to an increase in the cost of meats and poultry at 99 Restaurants of 0.7 percentage points and 0.7 percentage points , respectively, and an increase in the cost of labor and meats at O'Charley's of 2.6 percentage points and 0.8 percentage points, respectively. The decrease in cost of restaurant revenue in 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to the closure of 77 O'Charley's stores during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses increased by $7.6 million, or 28.7%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 from 2024. Other operating expenses decreased by $49.4 million, or 65.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. The increase in the year ended December 31, 2025 from 2024 is primarily attributable to a $12.2 million increase in non-cash impairments to property, plant and equipment and lease assets primarily associated with O'Charley's, partially offset by a reduction in back office costs at the Restaurant Group's headquarters. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023 is primarily attributable to $36.8 million of impairment recorded to the Restaurant Group's property and equipment, lease assets and other intangible assets in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Recognized (Loss) Gains, Net
Recognized (loss) gains, net, decreased $18.8 million, or 101.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 from 2024 and decreased $17.4 million, or 48.3%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. The decrease in the year ended December 31, 2025 from 2024 is primarily attributable to a gain of $12.5 million recorded in 2024 related to the termination of the lease for the Restaurant Group's corporate headquarters. The decrease in December 31, 2024 from 2023 is primarily attributable to $30.2 million of gains recorded upon derecognition of O'Charley's lease liabilities associated with stores closed in 2023 and upon conversion of certain stores from a failed sale lease back in previous years to operating leases in 2023. The change in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023 was partially offset by the gain of $12.5 million recorded in 2024 related to the termination of the lease for the Restaurant Group's corporate headquarters.
Alight
As of December 31, 2025, we owned approximately 7.7% of the outstanding common stock of Alight. We account for our ownership of Alight under the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours.
Summarized financial information for Alight for the relevant dates and time periods included in Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented below.
Year ended December 31,
(In millions)
Goodwill impairment 3,124.0 — —
Net loss from discontinued operations (21.0) (19.0) (45.0)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (2.0) (2.0) (17.0)
Details relating to the results of operations of Alight (NYSE: "ALIT") can be found in its periodic reports filed with the SEC.
Black Knight Football
As of December 31, 2025, we owned approximately 44.7% of the ownership interest of BKFC. We account for our ownership of BKFC under the equity method of accounting and report our equity in the earnings or loss of BKFC on a three-month lag; therefore, its results do not consolidate into ours. Accordingly, our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 includes our equity in BKFC’s losses for the year ended September 30, 2024, September 30, 2023, and for the
30
Table of Contents
period from December 13, 2022 (the date we acquired our initial interest in BKFC) through September 30, 2023, respectively.
Summarized financial information for BKFC for the relevant dates and time periods included in Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented below.
(In millions)
Losses of unconsolidated affiliates (5.6) (7.1) (5.3)
Black Knight Football's total revenue is primarily attributable to Premier League media rights, matchday and sponsorship revenue earned by AFCB.
Revenues
Total revenues for Black Knight Football increased $56.0 million, or 26.5%, in the twelve months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the corresponding period in 2024. The change in revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in league and sponsorship revenue of $37.3 million, or 20.4%, due to AFCB's higher placement in the Premier League table along with an increase of $9.8 million, or 80.4% as a result of players out on loan during the year.
Total revenues for Black Knight Football increased $62.1 million, or 41.7%, in the year ended September 30, 2024, compared to the period from December 13, 2022 through September 30, 2023. The change in revenue was primarily attributable to the 2023 period which consisted of nine and a half months rather than twelve and an increase in Premier League and sponsorship revenue due to AFCB's higher placement in the table.
Operating Loss
Operating loss decreased $15.0 million, or 12.0%, in the year ended September 30, 2025, compared to the corresponding period in 2024. The change was primarily attributable to the increase in revenue as noted above, partially offset by increased personnel costs, namely player compensation of $16.1 million, or 12.5% for the year ended September 30, 2025.
Operating loss increased $31.6 million, or 33.7%, in the year ended September 30, 2024, compared to the period from December 13, 2022 through September 30, 2023. The change in operating loss was primarily attributable to the 2023 period which included nine and a half months rather than twelve.
Net Loss Attributable to BKFC
Net loss attributable to BKFC decreased $106.1 million, or 86.5%, in the year ended September 30, 2025, compared to the corresponding period in 2024. The change was primarily attributable to the factors noted above, as well as an increase in income from player trading of approximately $84.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2025 compared to the corresponding periods in 2024.
Net loss attributable to BKFC increased $18.8 million, or 18.1%, in the year ended September 30, 2024, compared to the period from December 13, 2022 through September 30, 2023. The change in net loss attributable to BKFC was primarily attributable to the 2023 period which consisted of nine and a half months rather than twelve.
JANA
As of December 31, 2025, we own approximately 50.0% of the ownership interest of JANA. We account for our ownership of JANA under the equity method of accounting, and therefore its results do not consolidate into ours. We report our equity in the earnings or loss of JANA on a three-month lag, and accordingly, our net earnings (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2025 includes our equity in JANA’s earnings for the twelve months ended September 30, 2025, and our net earnings (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes our equity in JANA's earnings for the period from February 21, 2024 through September 30, 2024, respectively.
Summarized statement of operation information for JANA for the relevant dates and time periods included in Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented below.
31
Table of Contents
(In millions)
JANA's total revenue is primarily attributable to management fees earned from managing investment funds and performance fees earned which are calculated based on investment performance and various factors, including relative benchmarks, hurdles and preferred returns.
The changes in revenue and operating income for the twelve months ended September 30, 2025 relative to the period from February 21, 2024 through September 30, 2024 are not comparable due to the difference in the time periods.
Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment consists of our share in the operations of certain controlled businesses and other equity investments, activity of the corporate holding company and certain intercompany eliminations and taxes.
The following table presents the results from operations of our Corporate and Other segment:
Year ended December 31,
(In millions)
Revenues:
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization 2.2 2.8 2.0
Other income (expense):
Interest, investment and other income 10.1 4.6 13.6
Personnel costs in our corporate and other segment decreased $1.0 million, or 1.7%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024, and increased $29.3 million, or 101.4%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023. The increase in 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily attributable to increased non-cash stock-based compensation granted in 2024.
Other operating expenses in our corporate and other segment decreased $1.4 million, or 2.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $5.1 million decrease in expenses incurred with our Manager and decrease in legal fees related to 2024 transactions, partially offset by a $5.4 million increase in professional fees primarily attributable to increased costs associated with our 2025 proxy statement.
32
Table of Contents
Recognized losses, net in our Corporate and Other segment consists of the following:
Year ended December 31,
(In millions)
Alight impairment $ (59.1) $ — $ —
Paysafe fair value adjustments (25.6) 12.3 —
WD Transaction 16.8 — —
Put Right fair value adjustments (15.0) — —
System1 gain on sale 10.0 — —
Alight loss on sale — (22.5) —
Sightline impairment — (149.5) (70.2)
Dayforce fair value adjustments — (4.5) 28.3
System1 impairment — — (63.9)
QOMPLX impairment — — (9.0)
Other fair value adjustments, net (4.0) 15.3 —
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements.Our current cash requirements include our corporate operating expenses and funding needs of our Restaurant Group. There are no restrictions on our retained earnings regarding our ability to pay dividends to stockholders. The declaration of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Additional uses of cash flow may include payment of dividends on our common stock, stock repurchases, acquisitions, additional investment in current investees, and debt repayments.
As of December 31, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $182.0 million, of which $168.8 million was cash held by the corporate holding company and $50.0 million of notional capacity under the 2020 Margin Facility, or approximately $25.4 million of borrowing capacity based on collateral value. As of February 20, 2026, there was no borrowing capacity based on collateral value. As of December 31, 2025, we were committed under letters of credit totaling $6.4 million issued primarily in connection with casualty insurance programs for our Restaurant Group employees.
We continually assess our capital allocation strategy, including decisions relating to repurchasing our stock, paying dividends, reducing debt, and/or conserving cash. We believe that all anticipated cash requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds, cash dividends or distributions from subsidiaries and holdings, cash generated from short-term investments, potential sales of non-strategic assets, and borrowings on existing credit facilities. Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are monitored regularly to ensure that we can meet our cash requirements. We forecast the Company's liquidity needs and periodically review the short-term and long-term projected sources and uses of funds, as well as the asset, liability, investment and cash flow assumptions underlying such forecasts. As part of such forecasting, we actively manage the impact of rising interest rates on both our idle cash and our outstanding debt.
The Company believes the holding company's balances of cash, cash equivalents, marketable equity securities, cash generated by its investments and capacity under its credit agreements, will be sufficient to satisfy its cash requirements over the next 12 months and beyond.
We are focused on evaluating our assets and investments as potential vehicles for creating liquidity. Our intent is to use that liquidity for general corporate purposes, including funding future investments, other strategic initiatives and/or conserving cash.
The Company is actively engaged in managing and operating a core group of operating companies. The Company accounts for many of its material holdings on an unconsolidated basis and therefore, a material portion of the cash inflow the Company generates is reported in cash flows from investing activities pursuant to GAAP. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Company expects to continue to generate a material portion of its cash inflow from activities classified as investing activities under GAAP and does not expect to generate positive operating cash flows. The cash requirements of the Company typically come from the investing activities, as presented for the past three years as we receive distributions from unconsolidated affiliates and sell our investment in these various operating companies.
Operating Cash Flows. Our cash flows used in operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were $18.1 million, $90.1 million and $87.8 million, respectively. The decrease in cash used in operations of $72.0 million from
33
Table of Contents
2025 compared to 2024 is primarily attributable to a $29.3 million increase in tax refunds in 2025, a $20.6 million increase in distributions from unconsolidated affiliates and other customary changes in working capital including a higher proportion of corporate operating expenses accrued as of December 31, 2025. The net change in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities related to operating cash flows in the year ended December 31, 2025 changed by $26.3 million from the year ended December 31, 2024. See Footnote P for additional information on cash paid for income taxes, Footnote J for additional information on accounts payable and other accrued liabilities and discussion of operating expenses at our Corporate and Other segment under Results of Operations above.
The increase in cash used in operations of $2.3 million from 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to customary fluctuations in working capital, partially offset by lower net cash tax payments and lower cash expenses incurred with our Manager. The net change in income taxes in our consolidated statement of cash flows in the year ended December 31, 2024 changed by $78.0 million from the year ended December 31, 2023. The change is primarily attributable to non-cash changes in the Company's deferred tax assets and income taxes receivable. Management fees and carried interest paid to our Manager are lower in the year ended December 31, 2024 due to the MSA signed in February 2024, which changed to a fixed payment and significantly lowered management fees and eliminated carried interest fees. See Footnote P to our consolidated financial statements for further information on cash paid for income taxes and Footnote O for further information on expenses incurred with our Manager.
Investing Cash Flows. Our cash flows provided by investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were $518.1 million, $298.3 million and $53.1 million, respectively. The increase in cash provided by investing activities of $219.8 million from 2025 compared to 2024 is primarily attributable to increased proceeds from sales of our investments, partially offset by a decrease in purchases of new investments. In 2025, we sold our interests in D&B for proceeds of $629.8 million which was partially offset by the purchase of $161.8 million in other investments. See Footnote A for further discussion on the D&B Disposition and our investments in BKFC, JANA and Jana Funds in 2025. In 2024, we sold investments in Dayforce, D&B and Alight for $454.0 million, partially offset by purchases of new investments of $201.7 million.
The increase in cash provided by investing activities of $245.2 million from 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to proceeds from sales of Dayforce, D&B and Alight in 2024, partially offset by an increase in purchases of new investments, primarily in BKFC. See our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for a detailed breakout of cash flows from purchases and sales of investments.
Capital Expenditures. Total capital expenditures for property and equipment and other intangible assets were $10.4 million, $7.0 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Capital expenditures in all years primarily consisted of purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements in our Restaurant Group segment and property improvements at our real estate operations.
Financing Cash Flows. Our cash flows used in financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were $449.5 million, $182.9 million and $106.8 million, respectively. The increase in cash used in financing activities of $266.6 million from 2025 compared to 2024 is primarily attributable to the increased repurchases of treasury stock and repayment of the Margin Loan in 2025. The increase in cash used in financing activities of $76.1 million from 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to the increased repurchases of treasury stock, partial repayment of the FNF Revolver and dividends paid in 2024 compared to 2023.
Financing Arrangements. For a description of our financing arrangements see Note K - Notes Payable to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Contractual Obligations. Our long-term contractual obligations generally include our credit agreements and debt facilities, lease payment obligations on certain of our premises and equipment, purchase obligations of the Restaurant Group and payments to our Manager.
See Note G - Leases to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our leasing arrangements.
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Restaurant Group has unconditional purchase obligations with various vendors, primarily related to food and beverage obligations with fixed commitments in regard to the time period of the contract and the quantities purchased with annual price adjustments that can fluctuate. Future purchase obligations are estimated by assuming historical purchase activity over the remaining, non-cancellable terms of the various agreements. For agreements with minimum purchase obligations, at least the minimum amounts we are legally required to purchase are included. These agreements do not include fixed delivery terms. We used both historical and projected volume and pricing as of December 31, 2025 to determine the amount of the obligations.
34
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2025, our required annual payments relating to these contractual obligations were as follows:
(In millions)
Unconditional purchase obligations $ 54.9 $ 8.4 $ 3.0 $ 0.3 $ — $ — $ 66.6
Fees payable to Manager 16.9 — — — — — 16.9
Capital Stock Transactions.For information on our 2022 Repurchase Program, 2023 Repurchase Program and the Tender Offer, see discussion under the header Purchases of Equity Securitiesby the Issuer included in Item 5 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to market price fluctuations associated with the Company's equity securities holdings. Equity price risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in equity prices. At December 31, 2025, we held $1.4 million in equity securities which are recorded at fair value. The carrying values of equity securities subject to equity price risks are directly derived from quoted market prices. See Note C - Fair Value Measurements to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our fair value measurements for equity securities. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. Furthermore, amounts realized in the sale of a particular security may be affected by the relative quantity of the security being sold.
For purposes of this Annual Report, we perform a sensitivity analysis to determine the book effects that market risk exposures may have on the fair values of our equity securities. At December 31, 2025, a 20% increase (decrease) in market prices, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our equity securities of $0.3 million.
See discussion of our accounting for interests in unconsolidated affiliates under the header Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Item 7 of this Annual Report for further discussion of the potential impact of the Company's monitoring of impairment of its interests in unconsolidated affiliates, including those with fair values based on quoted market prices.
Commodity Price Risk
In our Restaurant Group segment, we are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef, poultry, seafood, produce and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef, poultry, seafood, produce and other food product prices, these fluctuations can materially impact the food and beverage costs incurred in our Restaurant Group segment. While our Restaurant Group companies have taken steps to qualify multiple suppliers who meet our standards as suppliers for our restaurants and have entered into agreements with suppliers for some of the commodities used in our restaurant operations, there can be no assurance that future supplies and costs for such commodities will not fluctuate due to weather and other market conditions outside of our control. Consequently, such commodities can be subject to unforeseen supply and cost fluctuations. Dairy costs can also fluctuate due to government regulation. Because we typically set our menu prices in advance of our food product prices, our menu prices cannot immediately incorporate changing costs of food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our guests through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. We do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef, poultry, seafood, produce and other food product prices at this time.
35
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page Number
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 42
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 47
36
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Cannae Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described in the following paragraphs on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment.
The Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the determination of impairment charges for Right of Use ("ROU") and Fixed Assets held at the Restaurant Group. Specifically, the Company lacked appropriately designed and operating controls to ensure that impairment analyses, when performed, were evaluated in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. This control deficiency could result in a material misstatement of impairment expense and the carrying value of ROU and Fixed Assets that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and therefore constitutes a material weakness.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. The material weakness identified above was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2025 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 2, 2026, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
37
Table of Contents
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Newport Beach, California
March 2, 2026
38
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Cannae Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive earnings, equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of Ernst & Young LLP, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"), and our report dated March 2, 2026 expressed an adverse opinion.
We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of Alight, Inc. ("Alight"), the Company’s investment which is accounted for by the use of the equity method. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include its equity investment in Alight of $73.8 million as of December 31, 2025 and its equity in losses of Alight of $236.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Those financial statements were audited by Ernst & Young LLP, whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Alight, is based solely on the report of Ernst & Young LLP.
Basis for opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit and the report of Ernst & Young LLP provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical audit matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Accounting for Equity Method Investments
As described further in Note B to the financial statements, the Company holds multiple equity method investments that are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 323, Investments — Equity Method and Joint Ventures. The Company’s equity method investments include diverse investee business models, varying ownership percentages and differing levels of influence over each investee. We determined the evaluation of the applicability of the equity method of accounting to these investments to be a critical audit matter.
39
Table of Contents
The principal considerations for our determination that the evaluation of the applicability of the equity method of accounting to these investments is a critical audit matter are that the Company’s ownership percentages in certain investees vary from small minority interests to majority ownership interests. These differing ownership percentages, when coupled with the evaluation of the Company’s level of influence over each investee required complex auditor judgement in evaluating the appropriateness of management’s conclusion of the applicability of the equity method of accounting.
Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of the applicability of the equity method of accounting to these investments included the following, among others:
•For select equity method investments, we consulted with our national office resources and assessed management’s evaluation of the applicability of the equity method of accounting to the investee which included consideration of ownership interests and the Company’s influence over each investee.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.
Newport Beach, California
March 2, 2026
40
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Cannae Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive earnings, equity, and cash flows, for each of the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (“Dun & Bradstreet”) or Alight, Inc. (“Alight”), the Company’s investments in which are accounted for by use of the equity method. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include its equity investment in Dun & Bradstreet of $691.9 million as of December 31, 2024 and its equity in losses of Dun & Bradstreet of $13.7 million and $17.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include its equity investment in Alight of $374.0 million as of December 31, 2024 and its equity in losses of Alight of $15.5 million and $35.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 respectively. The financial statements of Dun & Bradstreet and Alight were audited by KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, respectively, whose reports have been furnished to us. We have applied auditing procedures to the adjustments to reflect the Company’s equity investment and equity earnings in Dun & Bradstreet and Alight, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 27, 2025 (March 2, 2026 as to Note E and Note Q)
We began serving as the Company’s auditor in 2017. In 2025, we became the predecessor auditor.
41
Table of Contents
CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 182.0 $ 131.5
Short-term investments — 6.2
Income taxes receivable 60.6 35.7
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates 643.5 764.9
Equity securities, without a readily determinable fair value 147.3 159.9
Equity securities, at fair value 1.4 56.2
Property and equipment, net 49.0 61.8
Other intangible assets, net 13.2 15.1
Deferred tax assets 0.6 73.9
Other non-current assets 27.1 18.9
Non-current assets of discontinued operations - see Note Q — 691.9
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, current $ 91.9 $ 54.8
Lease liabilities, current 15.4 14.5
Notes payable, current 6.3 61.0
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long-term 12.8 12.5
Commitments and contingencies - see Note M
Equity:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 6.5 (19.2)
Noncontrolling interests (32.9) (21.2)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
42
Table of Contents
CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share data)
Revenues:
Operating expenses:
Other operating expenses, including asset impairments 99.5 93.3 142.9
Other income (expense):
Interest, investment and other income 10.1 4.6 13.6
Income tax expense (benefit) 13.0 3.3 (71.5)