CNNE US Equity☆

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks, some of which are inherent in our industry and others of which are more specific to our own businesses. In addition to the other information set forth in this Annual Report and other filings we have made and make in the future with the SEC, you should carefully consider the following risk factors and uncertainties, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations in future periods. However, other factors not discussed below or elsewhere in this Annual Report could also adversely affect our businesses, results of operations and financial condition. Therefore, the risk factors below should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that we may face.

Risks Relating to our External Management Structure and Our Manager

The Management Service Agreement was negotiated between related parties and the terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it were negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.

Because our Manager is owned by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Mr. Foley, and in the past was also owned by certain of our directors and executive officers, the Management Services Agreement was developed by related parties, although our independent directors reviewed and approved the Management Services Agreement. The terms of the Management Services Agreement, including fees payable, may not reflect the terms we may have received if it was negotiated with an unrelated third party. In addition, particularly as a result of our relationship with the present and past principal owners of the Manager, who are or were certain directors and members of our management team, our independent directors may determine that it is in the best interests of our shareholders not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the Management Services Agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with our Manager.

Our executive officers and directors may allocate some of their time to other businesses, thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations.

While the members of our management team devote a substantial amount of their time to the affairs of the Company, our executive officers, directors, Manager and other members of our management team may engage in other business activities. This may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our management and the operations of other businesses. Their other business endeavors may involve related or unrelated parties. Conflicts of interest that arise over the allocation of time may not always be resolved in our favor and may materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Conflicts of interest could arise in connection with certain of our directors’ and executive officers’ discharge of fiduciary duties to our shareholders.

Certain of our directors and executive officers are or were members of the Manager. Such persons, by virtue of their positions with us, have fiduciary duties to us and our shareholders. The duties of such persons as directors or executive officers to us and our shareholders may conflict with the interests of such persons in their capacities as members or employees of the Manager.

Our Manager and members of our management team may engage in activities that compete with us or our businesses.

While the members of our management team intend to devote a substantial majority of their time to the affairs of the Company, and while our Manager currently does not manage any other businesses that are in lines of business similar to our businesses, neither our management team nor our Manager is expressly prohibited from investing in or managing other entities, including those that are in the same or similar line of business as our businesses, or required to present any particular acquisition or business opportunity to the Company. In this regard, the Management Services Agreement and the obligation thereunder to provide management services to us will not create a mutually exclusive relationship between our Manager, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other.

Our Manager can resign on 180 days’ notice, subject to a limited extension, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as the market price of our shares.

Our Manager has the right, under the Management Services Agreement, to resign at any time on 180 days’ written notice, whether we have found a replacement or not, subject to the Company’s right to extend such period by an additional 180 days or until a replacement manager has been in place for 30 days, if no replacement manager has been found by the 150th day following the Manager’s notice of resignation. If our Manager resigns, we may not be able to contract with a new manager or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 180 days (subject to possible extension), or at all, in which case our operations are likely to experience a disruption; our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected; and the market price of our shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our internal management, acquisition activities and supervision of our businesses is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single

10

Table of Contents

institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by our Manager. Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with our businesses may result in additional costs and time delays that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.

Risks Relating to the Restaurant Group

The Restaurant Group companies face significant competition for customers, real estate and employees and competitive pressure to adapt to changes in conditions driving customer demand. The Restaurant Group companies' inability to compete effectively may affect guest counts, sales and profit margins, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with a substantial number of restaurant operators that compete directly and indirectly with the Restaurant Group companies with respect to price, service, ambiance, brand, customer service, dining experience, location, food quality and variety and value perception of menu items and there are other well established competitors with substantially greater financial and other resources than the Restaurant Group companies. Some of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors advertise on national television, which may provide customers with greater awareness and name recognition than our Restaurant Group companies can achieve through their advertising efforts. There is also active competition for management personnel and attractive suitable real estate sites. Consumer tastes and perceptions, nutritional and dietary trends, guest count patterns and the type, number and location of competing restaurants often affect the restaurant business, and our Restaurant Group companies' competitors may react more efficiently and effectively to those conditions. For instance, prevailing health or dietary preferences or perceptions of our Restaurant Group companies' products may cause consumers to avoid certain menu items or products our Restaurant Group companies offer in favor of foods that are perceived as more healthy, and such choices by consumers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our Restaurant Group companies face growing competition from the supermarket industry, with the improvement of their "convenient meals" in the deli and prepared food sections, from quick service and fast casual restaurants and online food delivery services as a result of food and beverage offerings by those food providers. As our Restaurant Group companies' competitors expand operations in markets where our restaurant businesses operate or expect to operate, we expect competition to intensify. If our Restaurant Group companies are unable to continue to compete effectively, their guest counts, sales and profit margins could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increased commodity, energy and other costs could decrease our Restaurant Group companies' profit margins or cause the Restaurant Group companies to limit or otherwise modify their menus, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The cost, availability and quality of ingredients restaurant operations use to prepare their food is subject to a range of factors, many of which are beyond their control. A significant component of our restaurant businesses' costs will be related to food commodities, including beef, pork, chicken, seafood, poultry, dairy products, oils, produce, fruit, flour and other related costs such as energy and transportation over which we may have little control, that can be subject to significant price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate conditions, industry demand, changes in international commodity markets and other factors. If there is a substantial increase in prices for these commodities, our Restaurant Group companies' results of operations may be negatively affected. In addition, the Restaurant Group companies' restaurants are dependent upon frequent deliveries of perishable food products that meet certain specifications. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of perishable food products caused by unanticipated demand, problems in production or distribution, disease or food-borne illnesses, inclement weather or other conditions could adversely affect the availability, quality, and cost of ingredients, which would likely lower revenues, damage the Restaurant Group companies' reputation or otherwise harm our business.

Negative customer experiences or negative publicity surrounding our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or other restaurants could adversely affect sales in one or more of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants and make our concepts less valuable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we believe our Restaurant Group companies' success depends significantly on their ability to provide exceptional food quality, outstanding service and an excellent overall dining experience, adverse publicity, whether or not accurate, relating to food quality, public health concerns, illness, safety, injury or government or industry findings concerning our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants, restaurants operated by other food service providers or others across the food industry supply chain could affect our Restaurant Group companies more than it would other restaurants that compete primarily on price or other factors. If customers perceive or experience a reduction in the food quality, service or ambiance at our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or in any way believe our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants have failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, the value and popularity of one or more of our Restaurant Group companies' concepts could suffer. Further, because our restaurant businesses rely heavily on "word-of-mouth," as opposed to more conventional mediums of

11

Table of Contents

advertisement, to establish concept recognition, our restaurant businesses may be more adversely affected by negative customer experiences than other dining establishments, including those of our restaurant businesses' competitors.

Our restaurant businesses could suffer due to reduced demand for our restaurant businesses' brands or specific menu offerings if our restaurant businesses are the subject of negative publicity or litigation regarding allegations of food-related contaminations or illnesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Food safety is a top priority, and our Restaurant Group companies dedicate substantial resources to ensuring that their customers enjoy safe, quality food products. Food-related contaminations and illnesses may be caused by a variety of food-borne pathogens, such as E. coli or salmonella, which are frequently carried on unwashed fruits and vegetables, from a variety of illnesses transmitted by restaurant workers, such as hepatitis A, which may not be diagnosed prior to being infectious, and from contamination of food by foreign substances. Contamination and food borne illness incidents could also be caused at the point of source or by food suppliers and distributors. As a result, we cannot control all of the potential sources of contamination or illness that can be contained in or transmitted from our Restaurant Group companies' food. Regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illnesses or other food safety issues including food tampering or contamination, at one of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants could adversely affect the reputation of our Restaurant Group companies' brands and have a negative impact on their sales. Even instances of food-borne illness, food tampering or food contamination occurring solely at restaurants of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors or at one of our Restaurant Group companies' suppliers could result in negative publicity about the food service industry generally and adversely impact our Restaurant Group companies' sales.

If any person becomes injured or ill, or alleges becoming injured or ill, as a result of eating our Restaurant Group companies' food, our Restaurant Group companies may temporarily close some restaurants, which would decrease their revenues, and our restaurant businesses may be liable for damages or be subject to governmental regulatory action, either of which could have long-lasting, negative effects on our restaurant businesses' reputation, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether our restaurant businesses are found liable. The occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs and lower margins.

The success of the Restaurant Group depends, in part, on its intellectual property, which we may be unable to protect.

We regard our Restaurant Group's service marks, including "O'Charley's," "Ninety Nine" and other service marks and trademarks as important factors in the marketing of our restaurants. We have also obtained trademarks for several of our brands' menu items and for various advertising slogans. Our policy is to pursue registration of our marks whenever possible and to oppose vigorously any infringement of our marks.

Risks Relating to Dun & Bradstreet

D&B faces significant competition for its solutions, which may increase as D&B expands its business.

D&B faces significant competition for its solutions. D&B competes on the basis of differentiated solutions, datasets, analytics capabilities, ease of integration with its clients’ technology, stability of services, client relationships, innovation and price. D&B's global and regional competitors vary in size, financial and technical capability, and in the scope of the products and services they offer. Some of D&B's competitors may be better positioned to develop, promote and sell their products and services. Larger competitors may benefit from greater cost efficiencies and may be able to win business simply based on pricing. D&B's competitors may also be able to respond to opportunities before it does, by taking advantage of new technologies, changes in client requirements or market trends. In addition, D&B faces competition from non-traditional and free data sources.

Many of D&B's competitors have extensive client relationships, including relationships with D&B's current and potential clients. New competitors, or alliances among competitors, may emerge and gain significant market share. Existing or new competitors may develop products and services that are superior to D&B's solutions or that achieve greater acceptance than D&B's solutions. If D&B is unable to respond to changes in client requirements as quickly and effectively as its competition, D&B's ability to expand its business and sell its solutions may be adversely affected.

Additionally, D&B's competitors often sell services at lower prices than it does, individually or as part of integrated suites of several related services. This may cause D&B's clients to purchase from its competitors rather than from D&B, which could result in reduced prices for certain solutions or the loss of clients. Price reductions by D&B's competitors could also negatively impact its operating margins or harm its ability to obtain new long-term contracts or renewals of existing contracts on favorable terms. Additionally, some of D&B's clients may develop their own solutions that replace the solutions they currently purchase from D&B or look to new technologies, which could result in lower revenue.

12

Table of Contents

We believe that D&B's D-U-N-S Number and D&B's ability to link its data together with this unique identifier provides it with a strategic advantage by allowing for a global, end-to-end assessment of businesses throughout the world. However, some of D&B's competitors and clients utilize their own unique identifiers, and clients have and may continue to adopt alternative standards to D&B's D-U-N-S Number and stop using D&B's solutions. In addition, public and commercial sources of free or relatively inexpensive business information have become increasingly available and this trend is expected to continue. To the extent the availability of free or relatively inexpensive business information increases, the demand for some of D&B's solutions may decrease. If more clients adopt alternative standards to the D-U-N-S Number or look to these other sources of data, it could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition and results of operations.

D&B also expect that there will be significant competition as it expands its business, and it may not be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors. If it is unable to compete successfully, it could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

A failure in the integrity of D&B's data, models, or the systems upon which it relies could harm its brand and result in a loss of sales and an increase in legal claims.

The reliability of D&B's solutions is dependent upon the integrity of the data in its global datastores as well as its models, including scores and other analytics. D&B utilizes single source providers in certain countries to support the needs of its clients globally and relies on members of its world-wide network to provide local data in certain countries. A failure in the integrity of D&B's datastores, or an inability to ensure that its usage of data is consistent with any terms or restrictions on such use, whether inadvertently or through the actions of a third party, could harm D&B by exposing it to client or third-party claims or by causing a loss of client confidence in its solutions. For example, D&B licenses data from third parties for inclusion in the data solutions that it sells to its clients, and while D&B has guidelines and quality control requirements in place, it does not have absolute control over such third parties’ data collection and compliance practices. D&B may experience an increase in risks to the integrity of its datastores as it acquires content through the acquisition of companies with existing databases that may not be of the same quality or integrity as D&B's existing datastores.

In addition, there are continuous improvements in computer hardware, network operating systems, programming tools, programming languages, operating systems, data matching, data filtering and other database technologies and the use of the internet as well as emergence of new technologies. These improvements, as well as changes in client preferences or regulatory requirements or transitions to non-traditional or free data sources or new technologies, may require D&B to make changes in the technology it uses to gather and process its data and deliver its solutions. Further, D&B relies on third-party technology contractors that have extensive knowledge of its systems and database technologies. The loss of these third-party contractors could negatively affect D&B's ability to maintain and improve its systems. D&B's success will depend, in part, upon its ability to:

•internally develop and implement new and competitive technologies;

•use leading third-party technologies and contractors effectively;

•respond to changing client needs and regulatory requirements, including being able to bring new solutions to the market quickly; and

•transition clients and data sources successfully to new interfaces or other technologies.

D&B may not successfully implement new technologies, cause clients or data suppliers to implement compatible technologies or adapt its technology to evolving client, regulatory and competitive requirements. If D&B fails to respond, or fails to cause its clients or data suppliers to respond, to changes in technology, regulatory requirements or client preferences, the demand for D&B's solutions, the delivery of D&B's solutions or D&B's market reputation could be adversely affected. Additionally, D&B's failure to implement important updates or the loss of key third-party technology consultants could affect its ability to successfully meet the timeline for it to generate cost savings resulting from its investments in improved technology. Failure to achieve any of these objectives would impede D&B's ability to deliver strong financial results.

Although D&B is continually evolving the systems upon which it relies to sustain delivery of its solutions, meet client demands and support the development of new solutions and technologies, certain of D&B's existing infrastructure is comprised of complex legacy technology that requires time and investment to upgrade without disruption to its business. D&B has in the past been subject to client and third-party complaints and lawsuits regarding its data, which have occasionally been resolved by the payment of monetary damages. D&B has also licensed, and it may license in the future, proprietary rights to third parties. While D&B attempts to ensure that the quality of its brand is maintained by the third parties to whom it grants such licenses and by clients, they may take actions that could materially adversely affect the value of D&B's proprietary rights or reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition and results of operations.

13

Table of Contents

D&B could lose its access to data sources or ability to transfer data across the data sources in markets it operates, which could prevent D&B from providing its solutions.

D&B's solutions depend extensively upon continued access to and receipt of data from external sources, including data received from clients, strategic partners and various government and public records repositories. In some cases, D&B competes with its data providers. D&B's data providers could stop providing data, restrict the scope of data to which they have access, provide untimely data or increase the costs for their data for a variety of reasons, including changing regulatory requirements, judicial decisions, a perception that its systems are unsecure as a result of data security incidents, budgetary constraints, a desire to generate additional revenue or for regulatory or competitive reasons. European regulators and the European Commission have adopted prescriptive measures for assessing and demonstrating that all cross-border data transfers comply with the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Case 311/18 Data Protection Commission v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems ("Schrems II"), and China adopted its own restrictions on cross-border data transfers under its new DSL and PIPL data compliance laws. Additional supplemental measures in China requiring prior authorization for certain data transfers as well as regulatory enforcement decisions and opinions have been adopted pursuant to these laws. In 2024, the U.S. adopted its own version of data export controls under Executive Order 14117 and associated regulation promulgated thereunder as well as the Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act. Other countries have adopted or may adopt similar measures restricting or placing additional regulatory burdens on cross-border data transfers. As a result of these developments and related regulatory decisions, D&B has become and may become subject to further increased restrictions or mandates on the collection, disclosure or use or transfer of such data, in particular if such data is not collected by D&B's providers in a way that allows it to legally use the data or cannot be transferred out of the country where it has been collected. D&B may not be successful in maintaining its relationships with these external data source providers or be able to continue to obtain data from them on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, D&B may not be able to obtain data from alternative sources if its current sources become unavailable. If D&B were to lose access to this external data or if its access or use were restricted or were to become less economical or desirable, D&B's ability to provide solutions could be negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, due to data transfer restrictions, existing and prospective D&B clients may be reluctant to acquire or use data that is subject to these restrictions, and it may be limited in its ability to provide solutions to customers across markets, which may impede D&B's growth.

D&B is subject to various and a rapidly increasing number of governmental regulations, laws and orders, including a 20-year consent order with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), compliance with which may cause D&B to incur significant expenses or reduce the availability or effectiveness of its solutions, and the failure to comply with which could subject D&B to civil or criminal penalties or other liabilities.

D&B is subject to an increasing number of government regulations affecting the collection, processing, and sale of its data-driven solutions, such as the FTC Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 ("CCPA"), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act ("CPRA"), existing and expected rules and regulations in various U.S. states governing the collection, processing and protection of data, privacy rights, data security breach notification and related matters, the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") and certain credit information laws and permits as well as constitutional requirements in the European Union, the Cyber Security Law, DSL, and PIPL, and new AI regulations in the U.S., EU, and China new data export laws and regulations. See "Business—Regulatory Matters" for a description of select regulatory regimes to which D&B is subject.

These laws and regulations, which generally are designed to protect information relating to individuals and small businesses, the data rights of individuals, national security, and to prevent the unauthorized collection, access to and use of personal or confidential information available in the marketplace and prohibit certain deceptive and unfair acts, are complex and have tended to become more stringent over time, but have begun to accelerate in their adoption and applicability to its business. Further, new laws and regulations are likely to be enacted and existing laws and regulations may change or be interpreted and applied differently over time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and it is possible they will be interpreted and applied in ways that will materially and adversely affect D&B's business. New and amended data protection, privacy, credit, data security, artificial intelligence, economic sanctions, export control and ESG legislation that may impact Dun & Bradstreet has also been proposed both in the U.S. and internationally. D&B incurs significant expenses in their effort to ensure compliance with these laws, and those expenses may increase as new laws or regulations are enacted or the interpretation and application of existing laws and regulations change.

On September 21, 2021, D&B agreed to enter into an Agreement Containing Consent Order (the "FTC Consent Order") subject to acceptance by the FTC, the approval of which was finalized on April 6, 2023. The FTC Consent Order requires that D&B undertake specific compliance practices, recordkeeping, monitoring and reporting during its term, which ends on April 6, 2042. D&B's compliance with the FTC Consent Order may cause them to incur significant expenses or to reduce the availability or effectiveness of their solutions. Failure to comply with the FTC Consent Order could subject D&B to civil or criminal penalties or other liabilities.

As required by the Consent Order, D&B has provided regular reporting to the FTC regarding its compliance with the Consent Order and timely complied with and responded to all FTC requests for information. In November 2024, the FTC sent

14

Table of Contents

D&B notice regarding alleged violations of the Consent Order and a potential FTC enforcement action. D&B is discussing a potential resolution of the matter with the FTC.

On March 17, 2023, D&B, along with four other industry peers, were served by the FTC with an Order under Section 6(b) of the FTC Act (the "6(b) Order"), which authorizes the FTC to conduct wide-ranging studies that do not have a specific law enforcement purpose, in connection with the FTC’s inquiry into the small business credit reporting industry. Certain requirements of the 6(b) Order relate to subject matter similar to the scope of the FTC Consent Order. The FTC’s 6(b) inquiry is expected to examine various aspects of the collection, processing, and quality of information concerning small businesses for purposes of business credit reports and other business risk solutions, as well as the marketing and commercial practices related to such solutions, and various related matters. At this time, it is unclear what action, if any, the FTC may take with respect to its findings from its inquiry. It is possible that the FTC’s findings could result in FTC rule making or other action that may impact D&B's business.

Some new U.S. state laws are intended to provide consumers (including sole proprietors) with greater transparency and control over their personal data as well as to provide additional obligations and duties for businesses. These laws place requirements on a broad scope of data sales and processing, which are likely to affect D&B's business. Additionally, the duties and obligations for data handling, time sensitive privacy rights management, assessments, contracts, and similar requirements are expected to create more operational burdens on D&B's business. D&B anticipates that additional state and/or federal legislation in the U.S. relating to these matters will be enacted in the future and that our operations will need to continue to evolve to accommodate unique considerations across jurisdictions.

The following legal and regulatory developments also could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition or results of operations:

•changes in cultural and consumer attitudes in favor of further restrictions on information collection use and transfer, which may lead to regulations that prevent full utilization of our solutions and impair D&B's ability to transfer data across borders;

•failure of data suppliers, third-party processors, or clients to comply with laws or regulations, where mutual compliance is required or where D&B's ability to comply is dependent on the compliance of those parties;

•failure of D&B's solutions to comply with current laws and regulations or the requirements of the FTC Consent Order; and

•failure to adapt D&B's solutions to changes in the regulatory environment in an efficient, cost-effective manner. This would include the failure to modify existing solutions, or new solutions created internally or acquired through mergers, to comply with existing or evolving legal requirements.

Changes in applicable legislation or regulations that restrict or dictate how D&B collects, maintains, combines and disseminates information could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition or results of operations. In the future, D&B may be subject to significant additional expense to ensure continued compliance with applicable laws and regulations and to investigate, defend or remedy actual or alleged violations. Moreover, D&B's compliance with privacy and other data laws and regulations and D&B's reputation depend in part on its clients’ and business partners’ adherence to such laws and regulations and their use of D&B's solutions in ways consistent with client expectations and regulatory requirements. Businesses today are under intense scrutiny to comply with an ever-expanding and evolving set of data regulatory requirements, which can vary by geography and industry served. As such, performing adequate diligence on clients and suppliers can be cumbersome and dampen the pace of their business expansion or leave a business exposed to fines and penalties. Further, certain of the laws and regulations governing D&B's business are subject to interpretation by judges, juries and administrative entities, creating substantial uncertainty for its business. D&B cannot predict what effect the interpretation of existing or new laws or regulations may have on its business.

Risks Relating to Alight

Alight faces significant competition and its failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of its business.

Alight's competitors may have greater resources, larger customer bases, greater name recognition, stronger presence in certain geographies and more established relationships with their customers and suppliers than it has. In addition, new competitors, alliances among competitors or mergers of competitors could result in Alight's competitors gaining significant market share and some of Alight's competitors may have or may develop a lower cost structure, adopt more aggressive pricing policies or provide services that gain greater market acceptance than the services that Alight offers or develops. Large and well-capitalized competitors may be able to respond to the need for technological changes (including the implementation of AI and Machine Learning ("ML")) and innovate faster, or price their services more aggressively. They may also compete for skilled professionals, finance acquisitions, fund internal growth and compete for market share more effectively than Alight does. If

15

Table of Contents

Alight is unable to compete successfully, it could lose market share and clients to competitors, which could materially adversely affect its results of operations. To respond to increased competition and pricing pressure, Alight may have to lower the cost of its solutions or decrease the level of service provided to clients, which could have an adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Alight relies on complex information technology systems and networks to operate its business. Any significant system or network disruption could expose Alight to legal liability, impair its reputation or have a negative impact on its operations, sales and operating results and could expose Alight to litigation and negatively impact our relationships with clients.

Alight relies on the efficient, uninterrupted and secure operation of complex information technology systems, and networks and data centers, some of which are within its business and some of which are outsourced to third-party providers, including cloud infrastructure service providers such as Amazon Web Services ("AWS") and Microsoft Azure Cloud. Alight does not have control over the operations of such third parties. Alight also may decide to employ additional offsite data centers in the future to accommodate growth. Problems faced by Alight's data center locations, with the telecommunications network providers with whom Alight or such providers contract, or with the systems by which Alight's telecommunications providers allocate capacity among their clients, including Alight, could adversely affect the availability and processing of Alight's solutions and related services and the experience of Alight's clients. If Alight's data centers are unable to keep up with its growing needs for capacity, this could have an adverse effect on Alight's business and cause it to incur additional expense. In addition, any financial difficulties faced by Alight's third-party data center’s operator or any of the service providers with whom Alight or such providers contract may have negative effects on Alight's business, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict. These facilities are vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, cyber security attacks (including "ransomware" and phishing attacks), terrorist attacks, power losses, telecommunications failures and similar events. The risk of cyber-attacks could be exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, or other hostile actions taken by nation-states and terrorist organizations. While Alight has adopted, and continues to enhance, business continuity and disaster recovery plans and strategies, there is no guarantee that such plans and strategies will be effective, which could interrupt the functionality of our information technology systems or those of third parties. The occurrence of a natural disaster (or other extreme weather as a result of climate change) or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems could result in lengthy interruptions in Alight's services and solutions. The facilities also could be subject to break-ins, computer viruses, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and other misconduct. Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in connection with these third-party technologies and information services, or Alight's own systems, could negatively impact Alight's relationships with customers and adversely affect its business and could expose it to third-party liabilities. Any errors, defects, disruptions or other performance problems with our information technology systems including any changes in service levels at Alight's third-party data center could adversely affect its reputation and may damage its clients’ stored files or result in lengthy interruptions in its services. Interruptions in Alight's services might reduce its revenues, subject it to potential liability or other expenses or adversely affect its renewal rates.

In relation to Alight's third-party data centers, while Alight owns, controls and has access to its servers and all of the components of its network that are located in these centers, Alight does not control the operation of these facilities. The operators of Alight's third-party data center facilities have no obligation to renew their agreements with Alight on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If Alight is unable to renew these agreements on commercially reasonable terms, or if the data center operators are acquired, Alight may be required to transfer its servers and other infrastructure to new data center facilities, and Alight may incur costs and experience service interruption in doing so.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations including changes in such laws and regulations, their application and their interpretation, could have an adverse effect on Alight's business.

Alight's business is subject to extensive legal and regulatory oversight throughout the world including a variety of laws, rules, and regulations addressing, among other things, licensing, data privacy and protection, wage and hour standards, employment and labor relations, occupational health and safety, environmental matters, anti-competition, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, language requirements, economic sanctions, currency, reserves and government contracting. This legal and regulatory oversight could reduce Alights profitability or limit its growth by increasing the costs of legal and regulatory compliance; by limiting or restricting the products or services it sells, the markets it enters, the methods by which it sells its services, the prices it can charge for our services, and the form of compensation it can accept from its clients and third parties; or by subjecting its business to the possibility of legal and regulatory actions or proceedings.

The global nature of Alight's operations increases the complexity and cost of compliance with laws and regulations, including training and employee expenses, adding to its cost of doing business. In addition, many of these laws and regulations may have differing or conflicting legal standards across jurisdictions, increasing further the complexity and cost of compliance. In emerging markets and other jurisdictions with less developed legal systems, local laws and regulations may not be established with sufficiently clear and reliable guidance to provide us adequate assurance that Alight is operating its business in a compliant manner with all required licenses or that our rights are otherwise protected.

16

Table of Contents

In addition, certain laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar laws in other jurisdictions in which Alight operates, could impact its operations outside of the legislating country by imposing requirements for the conduct of overseas operations, and in a number of cases, requiring compliance by foreign subsidiaries. Alight is also subject to economic and trade sanctions programs, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), which prohibit or restrict transactions or dealings with specified countries, their governments, and in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially designated.

Alight's employees, consultants or agents may still take actions in violation of its policies for which it may be ultimately responsible, or its policies and procedures may be inadequate or may be determined to be inadequate by regulators. Any violations of applicable anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions or anti-money laundering laws or regulations could limit certain of Alight's business activities until they are satisfactorily remediated and could result in civil and criminal penalties, including fines that could damage its reputation and have a materially adverse effect on its results of operation or financial condition. In addition to the complexity of the laws and regulations themselves, the development of new laws and regulations, changes in application or interpretation of laws and regulations and Alight's continued operational changes and development into new jurisdictions and new service offerings also increases Alight's legal and regulatory compliance complexity as well as the type of governmental oversight to which it may be subject. These changes in laws and regulations could mandate significant and costly changes to the way Alight implements its services and solutions or could impose additional licensure requirements or costs to Alight's operations and services, or limit its ability to mitigate risk. In addition, new regulatory or industry developments could create an increase in competition that could adversely affect Alight. These potential developments include:

•changes in regulations relating to health and welfare plans including potential challenges or changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, expansion of government-sponsored coverage through Medicare or the creation of a single payer system;

•changes in regulations relating to defined contribution and defined benefit plans, including pension reform that could decrease the attractiveness of certain of our retirement products and services to retirement plan sponsors and administrators or have an unfavorable effect on Alight's ability to earn revenues from these products and services;

•changes in regulations relating to payroll processing and payments or withholding taxes or other required deductions;

•additional requirements respecting data privacy and data usage in jurisdictions in which Alight operates that may increase its costs of compliance and potentially reduce the manner in which data can be used by Alight to develop or further its product offerings;

•changes in regulations relating to fiduciary rules;

•changes in federal or state regulations relating to marketing and sale of Medicare plans, Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans;

•changes to regulations of producers, brokers, agents or third-party administrators such as the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, that may alter operational costs, the manner in which Alight markets or is compensated for certain services or other aspects of Alight's business; and

•additional regulations or revisions to existing regulations promulgated by other regulatory bodies in jurisdictions in which Alight operates.

For example, there have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the federal and state levels directed at addressing the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. Although Alight cannot predict the ultimate content or timing of any healthcare reform legislation, potential changes resulting from any amendment, repeal or replacement of these programs, including any reduction in the future availability of healthcare insurance benefits, could adversely affect Alight's business and future results of operations. Further, the federal government from time to time considers pension reform legislation, which could negatively impact Alight's sales of defined benefit or defined contribution plan products and services and cause sponsors to discontinue existing plans for which Alight provides administrative or other services. Certain tax-favored savings initiatives that have been proposed could hinder sales and persistency of Alight's products and services that support employment-based retirement plans.

Alight's services are also the subject of ever-evolving government regulation, either because the services provided to or business conducted by Alight's clients are regulated directly or because third parties upon whom Alight relies on to provide services to its clients are regulated, thereby indirectly impacting the manner in which Alight provides services to those clients. Changes in laws, government regulations or the way those regulations are interpreted in the jurisdictions in which Alight operates could affect the viability, value, use or delivery of benefits and HR programs, including changes in regulations relating to health and welfare plans (such as medical), defined contribution plans (such as 401(k)), defined benefit plans (such as retirement or pensions) or payroll delivery, may adversely affect the demand for, or profitability of, Alight's services.

17

Table of Contents

In addition, as Alight, and the third parties upon whom Alight relies, implement and expand direct-to-consumer sales and marketing solutions, Alight is subject to various federal and state laws and regulations that prescribe when and how Alight may market to consumers (including, without limitation, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the "TCPA") and other telemarketing laws and the Medicare Communications and Marketing Guidelines issued by the Center for Medicare Services of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service). The TCPA provides for private rights of action and potential statutory damages for each violation and additional penalties for each willful violation. Alight has in the past and may in the future become subject to claims that it has violated the TCPA and/or other telemarketing laws. Changes to these laws could negatively affect Alight's ability to market directly to consumers or increase Alight's costs or liabilities.

Issues relating to the use of new and evolving technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, in Alight's offerings may result in reputational harm and liability.

A quickly evolving social, legal and regulatory environment may cause Alight to incur increased operational and compliance costs, including increased research and development costs, or divert resources from other development efforts, to address potential issues related to usage of AI and ML. Alight is increasingly building AI and ML into many of its offerings including in its generative AI-enhanced Search and Chat function for Alight Worklife as well as its intelligent document processing tools. As with many cutting-edge innovations, AI and ML present new risks and challenges, and existing laws and regulations may apply to Alight in new ways, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict. The risks and challenges presented by AI and ML could undermine public confidence in AI and ML, which could slow its adoption and affect Alight's business. Alight incorporates AI and ML into its offerings for use cases that could potentially impact civil, privacy, or employment benefit rights. Failure to adequately address issues that may arise with such use cases could negatively affect the adoption of Alight's solutions and subject it to reputational harm, regulatory action, or legal liability, which may harm its financial condition and operating results. Potential government regulation related to AI, including relating to ethics and social responsibility, may also increase the burden and cost of compliance and research and development. Employees, customers, or customers’ employees who are dissatisfied with Alight's public statements, policies, practices, or solutions related to the development and use of AI and ML may express opinions that could introduce reputational or business harm, or legal liability.

Risks Relating to Black Knight Football

BKFC is dependent on the performance and popularity of its football clubs.

Black Knight Football's revenue is driven by the performance and popularity of its football clubs. BKFC's football clubs earn most of their revenue from media rights distributions from their domestic leagues which vary significantly depending on the level at which each club competes in their domestic league systems. For example, AFCB competes in the Premier League, the top league in the English football system. Relegation from the Premier League to lower tiers of the English Football League system would result in a significant decrease in the media rights revenue earned by AFCB. Relegation from the Premier League or a general decline in the success of AFCB, particularly in consecutive seasons, may also negatively affect AFCB's ability to attract or retain talented players and coaching staff, as well as supporters, sponsors and other commercial partners, which would have a material adverse effect on Black Knight Football's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

BKFC's business is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain key personnel, including players.

Black Knight Football is highly dependent on members of the management, coaching staff and players of its clubs. Competition for talented players and staff is, and will continue to be, intense. BKFC's ability to attract and retain the highest quality players and coaching staff for its clubs is critical to the on field success of its clubs and, consequently, to its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. A downturn in the performance of BKFC's clubs could adversely affect its clubs ability to attract and retain coaches and players. While Black Knight Football and its clubs enter into employment contracts with its key personnel, including players and coaches, with the aim of securing their services for the term of the contract, the retention of their services for the full term of the contract cannot be guaranteed due to possible contract disputes or approaches by other clubs. Black Knight Football's failure to attract and retain key personnel for each of its clubs could have a negative impact on its ability to effectively manage and grow its business.

Negotiation, pricing and terms of key media contracts are outside of Black Knight Football's control and those contracts may change in the future or expose it to certain risks.

A significant majority of the revenue of BKFC and its clubs is generated from the domestic and international media rights for domestic league matches. Contracts for these media rights and certain other revenue for those competitions are negotiated collectively by the domestic leagues in which BKFC's football clubs compete. BKFC and its clubs are generally not a party to the contracts negotiated by the domestic leagues. Further, BKFC and its clubs do not participate in and therefore do not have any direct influence on the outcome of contract negotiations. Although an agreement has been reached for the sale of Premier League domestic broadcasting rights in the UK through the end of the 2028/2029 football season, future agreements may not maintain the current level of broadcasting revenues. Furthermore, a change in credit quality at one of the media broadcasters for the domestic leagues in which BKFC's clubs compete could increase the risk that such counterparty is unable or unwilling to

18

Table of Contents

pay amounts owed to the domestic league and ultimately, BKFC's clubs. The failure of a major television broadcaster for the domestic league competitions to pay outstanding amounts owed to its respective league could have a material adverse effect on BKFC's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

The markets in which Black Knight Football operates are highly competitive and increased competition could adversely affect Black Knight Football's results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

Black Knight Football faces competition from other football clubs in England and Europe. In the domestic leagues in which BKFC's clubs operate, investment from wealthy team owners has led to teams with deep financial backing that are able to acquire top players and coaching staff, which could continue to result in increased competition for, and cost of, key personnel. As European football and particularly the Premier League continues to grow in popularity, the interest of wealthy potential owners may increase, leading to additional clubs substantially improving their financial position. Despite the pervasive adoption of financial monitoring rules on clubs in European domestic leagues and club competitions, European and Premier League football clubs are spending substantial resources on transfer fees and player salaries. Competition from top European football leagues, including the Premier League, has led to higher salaries for football players as well as increased competition on the field. The increase in competition could result in BKFC's football clubs finishing lower in their domestic leagues or being relegated to lower tiers of their domestic league systems, which could have a material adverse effect on Black Knight Football's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Risks Relating to the Company's Structure

We may become subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940.

We do not believe that we are subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "40 Act"). We primarily acquire interests in operating companies and are engaged in actively managing and operating a core group of those companies, which we are committed to supporting for the long-term. Our officers, the Manager and employees devote their activities to these businesses. Based on these factors, we believe that we are not an investment company under the 40 Act, including by virtue of the exception from the definition of “investment company” Section 3(b)(1) of the 40 Act, and we intend to continue to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company. If, at any time, we become or are determined to be primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, we could become subject to regulation under the 40 Act. In these circumstances, after giving effect to any applicable grace periods, we may be required to register as an investment company, which could result in significant registration and compliance costs, could require changes to our corporate governance structure and financial reporting, and could restrict our activities going forward. In addition, if we were to become subject to the 40 Act, any violation of the 40 Act could subject us to material adverse consequences, including potentially significant regulatory penalties and the possibility that certain of our contracts would be deemed unenforceable.

Certain executive officers and members of our Board of Directors have or will have interests and positions that could present potential conflicts.

Certain executive officers and members of our Board serve on the boards of directors of other entities or are employed by other entities, including but not limited to D&B, Trasimene, Alight, System1, BKFC, CSI, Minden Mill and Watkins.

As a result of the foregoing, there may be circumstances where certain executive officers and directors may be subject to conflicts of interest with respect to, among other things: (i) our ongoing relationships with D&B, Trasimene, Alight, System1, BKFC, CSI, Minden Mill or Watkins; (ii) business opportunities arising for any of us; and (iii) conflicts of time with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting us. For example, from time to time, we may enter into transactions with such other entities and/or their respective subsidiaries or other affiliates. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to our company or any of our respective subsidiaries or affiliates as would be the case where there is no potential conflict of interest.

We have in place a code of business conduct and ethics prescribing procedures for managing conflicts of interest and our Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and our related persons transaction committee are responsible for the review, approval or ratification of any potential conflicts of interest transactions. Additionally, we expect that interested directors will abstain from decisions with respect to conflicts of interest as a matter of practice. Our related person transaction committee and related person transaction policy governs all transactions with directors (and director nominees), executive officers, immediate family members of directors and executive officers, shareholders that own greater than 5% of any class of the Company's voting securities, our Manager, and generally any entity in which a director or officer of the Company controls. All transactions or series of transactions exceeding $120,000 with such persons or entities must be reviewed and approved by the related person transaction committee. The related person transaction committee consists of two independent directors and if a member of such committee is involved in a transaction under review, they are required to recuse themself from the review under our related person transaction policy. However, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective, that we will be able to resolve all potential conflicts or that the resolution of any such conflicts will be no less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated third party.

19

Table of Contents

Refer to Note O - Related Party Transactions to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our related party relationships and transactions with our Manager and entities affiliated with certain members of our Board.

An inability of our material unconsolidated affiliates to maintain effective financial reporting processes may adversely impact our ability to report our results of operations or financial condition accurately and timely.

The accuracy and timeliness of the Company's financial reporting is dependent on the timely financial reporting and effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting of our material investments in unconsolidated affiliates. Material deficiencies in the internal controls over financial reporting or other matters impacting the ability of our unconsolidated affiliates to accurately and timely report their standalone results of operations and financial condition or meet related debt covenants, if any, may cause us to be unable to report the financial information of the Company on a timely basis or reduce the value of the Company's related investment. Furthermore, restatements to prior period financial information reported by our material unconsolidated affiliates could require the Company to similarly restate its prior period financial information. If the Company is unable to timely and accurately report its financial information it could subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including potential sanctions by the SEC or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There also could be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements. This could materially adversely affect us and lead to a decline in the price of the Company's common stock.

General Risk Factors

The loss of key personnel could impair our operating abilities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success will substantially depend on our ability to attract and retain key members of our senior management team and officers. If we lose one or more of these key employees, our operating results and in turn the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we may enter into employment agreements with our officers, there can be no assurance that the entire term of any employment agreement will be served or that any employment agreement will be renewed upon expiration.

Data security and integrity are critically important to the businesses we own and manage, and cybersecurity incidents, including cyberattacks, breaches of security, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential information, business disruption, or the perception that confidential information is not secure, could result in a material loss of business, regulatory enforcement, substantial legal liability and/or significant harm to their reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Improper access to, misappropriation, destruction or disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary data could result in significant harm to our reputation or the reputation of any of the businesses we own.

For example, D&B collects, stores and transmits a large amount of confidential company information on hundreds of millions of businesses, including financial information and personal information, as well as certain consumer information and credit information. D&B operates in an environment of significant risk of cybersecurity incidents resulting from unintentional events or deliberate attacks by third parties or insiders, which may involve exploiting highly obscure security vulnerabilities or sophisticated attack methods.

With respect to Alight, one of its significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of its employees’ and clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the confidential information about clients’ employees’ compensation, health and benefits information and other personally identifiable information. With respect to our Restaurant Group companies, they rely heavily on information technology systems across their operations and corporate functions, including for order and delivery from suppliers and distributors, point-of-sale processing in their restaurants, management of their supply chains, payment of obligations, collection of cash, data warehousing or support analytics, finance or accounting systems, labor optimization tools, gift cards, online business and various other processes and transactions, including the storage of employee and customer information.

The businesses we own and manage have experienced and we expect will continue to experience numerous attempts to access their computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets on a daily basis. The security and protection of their data is a top priority for them. Such businesses devote significant resources to maintain and regularly upgrade the wide array of physical, technical and contractual safeguards that they employ to provide security around the collection, storage, use, access and delivery of information they possess. These businesses have implemented various measures to manage their risks related to system and network security and disruptions, but an actual or perceived security breach, a failure to make adequate disclosures to the public or law enforcement agencies following any such event or a significant and extended disruption in the functioning of its information technology systems could damage a subsidiary company’s reputation and cause it to lose clients, adversely impact its operations, sales and operating results and require it to incur significant expense to address and remediate or otherwise resolve such issues.

20

Table of Contents

Although our businesses have not incurred material losses or liabilities to date as a result of any breaches, unauthorized disclosure, loss or corruption of their data or inability of their clients to access their systems, such events could result in intellectual property or other confidential information being lost or stolen, including client, employee or business data, disrupt their operations, subject them to substantial regulatory and legal proceedings and potential liability and fines, result in a material loss of business and/or significantly harm their reputation. If they are unable to efficiently manage the vulnerability of their systems and effectively maintain and upgrade their system safeguards, they may incur unexpected costs and certain of their systems may become more vulnerable to unauthorized access.

Furthermore, if we are unable to similarly and effectively maintain and upgrade our corporate system safeguards, data and confidential information we may have access to from time to time about the businesses we own and manage may also become more vulnerable to unauthorized access. We utilize a third party to manage the Company's corporate IT network and related resources and we actively collaborate with the third party to monitor risks and recent threats to our IT environment, develop protocols for responding to cybersecurity incidents, and train employees on common techniques used in cyber attacks. Our failure to adequately monitor our key third-party IT service provider could result in the failure of all or a portion of our IT resources and impact the operations of our business. Furthermore, loss of our third-party IT service provider could result in increased cost associated with acquiring new internal IT resources and developing internal IT processes.

Due to concerns about data security and integrity, a growing number of legislative and regulatory bodies have adopted breach notification and other requirements in the event that information subject to such laws is accessed by unauthorized persons and additional regulations regarding the use, access, accuracy and security of such data are possible. For example, in the United States, D&B is subject to laws that provide for at least 50 disparate notification regimes. D&B is also subject to various laws in regulations in the other global markets it operates including Europe and Asia. Complying with such numerous and complex regulations in the event of unauthorized access would be expensive and difficult, and failure to comply with these regulations could subject D&B to regulatory scrutiny and additional liability. In many jurisdictions, including North America and the European Union, Alight is subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of this information including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended ("HIPAA") and the HIPAA regulations governing, among other things, the privacy, security and electronic transmission of individually identifiable protected health information, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the European Union General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"). California also enacted legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 ("CCPA") and the related California Privacy Rights Act ("CPRA"), that afford California residents expanded privacy protections and a private right of action for security breaches affecting their personal information. Virginia and Colorado have similarly enacted comprehensive privacy laws, the Consumer Data Protection Act and Colorado Privacy Act, respectively, both laws of which emulate the CCPA and CPRA in many respects. The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act took effect on January 1, 2023, and the Colorado Privacy Act took effect on July 1, 2023. We anticipate federal and state regulators to continue to consider and enact regulatory oversight initiatives and legislation related to privacy and cybersecurity. These and other similar laws and regulations are frequently changing and are becoming increasingly complex and sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which Alight provides services both in terms of substance and in terms of enforceability. This makes compliance challenging and expensive. Alight’s failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation in the marketplace. Further, regulatory initiatives in the area of data protection are more frequently including provisions allowing authorities to impose substantial fines and penalties, and therefore, failure to comply could also have a significant financial impact.

If Cannae or its businesses are unable to protect their computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets it could have a material adverse effect on the value of our businesses, and ultimately, our financial condition and results of operations.

The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with new acquisitions may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with acquisitions of ownership interests and we may not realize the anticipated benefits from past or potential future acquisitions, strategic transactions, investments, or our business model.

Before making acquisitions, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisers, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of business and transaction. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an acquisition, we rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the transaction and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation that we carry out with respect to any opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts (including fraud) that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the acquisition being successful. As a result, we may not realize the benefits from our acquisitions that we anticipated at the time of our diligence and initial consummation of transactions.

21

Table of Contents

Our management may seek growth through acquisitions in lines of business that will not necessarily be limited to our current areas of focus or geographic areas. This expansion of our business subjects us to associated risks, such as the diversion of management's attention and lack of experience in operating such businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may make acquisitions in lines of business that are not directly tied to or synergistic with our current subsidiary companies. Accordingly, we may in the future acquire businesses in industries or geographic areas with which management is less familiar than we are with our current businesses.

The acquisition and integration of any business we may acquire involves a number of risks and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures in assimilating or integrating the businesses, technologies, products, personnel or operations of the acquired business. Furthermore, acquisitions may: (1) involve our entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience; (2) involve difficulties in retaining the customers of the acquired business; (3) involve difficulties and expense associated with regulatory requirements, competition controls or investigations; (4) result in a delay or reduction of sales for both us and the business we acquire; and (5) disrupt our ongoing business, divert our resources and require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our current business.

To complete future acquisitions, we may determine that it is necessary to use a substantial amount of our cash or engage in equity or debt financing. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital-raising activities and other financial and operational matters that make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital in the future and to pursue other business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all, which could limit our ability to engage in acquisitions. Moreover, we can make no assurances that the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, such as operating improvements or anticipated cost savings, would be realized or that we would not be exposed to unexpected liabilities in connection with any acquisition.

Further, an acquisition may negatively affect our operating results because it may require us to incur charges and substantial debt or other liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation and amortization of deferred compensation charges, may require the amortization, write-down or impairment of amounts related to deferred compensation, goodwill and other intangible assets, may include substantial contingent consideration payments or other compensation that reduces our earnings during the quarter in which it is incurred, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset acquisition costs.

We may often pursue opportunities that involve business, regulatory, legal or other complexities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As an element of our strategy, we may pursue unusually complex opportunities. This could often take the form of substantial business, regulatory or legal complexity. Our tolerance for complexity may present risks, and as such, transactions can be more difficult, expensive and time-consuming to finance and execute; it may be more difficult to manage or realize value from the assets acquired in such transactions; and such transactions may sometimes entail a higher level of regulatory scrutiny or a greater risk of contingent liabilities. Any of these risks could harm our performance.

We and the businesses we own and manage, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, are involved in legal proceedings and may experience unfavorable outcomes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We and the businesses we own and manage, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, are involved in pending and threatened litigation matters, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. We and such companies are also subject to compliance with extensive government laws and regulations related to employment practices and policies. We may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to their satisfaction, and these matters may involve claims for substantial amounts of money or for other relief that might necessitate changes to their business or operations. The defense of these actions may be both time consuming and expensive and their outcomes cannot be predicted with certainty. Determining reserves for pending litigation is a complex, fact-intensive process that requires significant legal judgment. It is possible that unfavorable outcomes in one or more such proceedings could result in substantial payments that could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows in a particular period or on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The lack of liquidity in certain of our ownership interests may adversely affect our business.

We invest, and will continue to invest, in companies whose securities are not publicly traded and whose securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of ownership interests with these characteristics may make it difficult for us to sell these positions when desired. In addition, if we

22

Table of Contents

are required or otherwise choose to liquidate all or a portion of our assets quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these ownership interests. Our businesses are often subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there is usually no established trading market for such ownership interests. Because certain of our businesses are illiquid, we may be unable to dispose of them timely or we may be unable to do so at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.

Our Articles of Incorporation and Nevada law may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our Company or changes in our management, which could have the result of depressing the trading price of our common stock.

Certain anti-takeover provisions of Nevada law could have the effect of delaying or preventing a third-party from acquiring us, even if the acquisition arguably could benefit our stockholders.

Nevada’s "combinations with interested stockholders" statutes (NRS 78.411 through 78.444, inclusive) prohibit specified types of business "combinations" between certain Nevada corporations and any person deemed to be an "interested stockholder" for two years after such person first becomes an "interested stockholder" unless the corporation’s board of directors approves the combination (or the transaction by which such person becomes an "interested stockholder") in advance, or unless the combination is approved by the board of directors and sixty percent of the corporation’s voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder, its affiliates and associates. Further, in the absence of prior approval certain restrictions may apply even after such two-year period. However, these statutes do not apply to any combination of a corporation and an interested stockholder after the expiration of four years after the person first became an interested stockholder. For purposes of these statutes, an “interested stockholder” is any person who is (1) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, or (2) an affiliate or associate of the corporation and at any time within the two previous years was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the corporation. The definition of the term "combination" is sufficiently broad to cover most significant transactions between a corporation and an "interested stockholder."

Nevada law also provides that directors may resist a change or potential change in control if the directors determine that the change is opposed to, or not in the best interests of, the corporation. The existence of the foregoing provisions and other potential anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your common stock in an acquisition.

Our consolidated financial statements include estimates made by management and actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management include fair value measurements and accounting for income taxes. Actual results could differ from estimates. See Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion.

We record many of our ownership interests using the equity method of accounting, through which we record our proportionate share of their net earnings or loss in our consolidated financial statements. Equity-method investments are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If we determine that there are indicators that the book value of any of our equity-method investments are not recoverable, we are required to estimate the fair value of the ownership interest. Determining the fair value of our non-public businesses is subjective and involves the use of estimates. If we determine the fair value of any of our ownership interests is less than its recorded book value, we may be required to record an impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. See further discussion of our policies and process for monitoring impairment in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report under the header Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.

The global operations of certain of our ownership interests including D&B, Alight and BKFC may subject us to risks that could negatively affect our business.

These risks, which can vary substantially by country, include political, financial or social instability or conditions, geopolitical events, corruption, social unrest, natural disasters, military conflicts and terrorism, as well as exposure to the macroeconomic environment in such markets (including consumer preferences and spending, unemployment levels, wage and commodity inflation and foreign exchange rate fluctuations), the regulatory environment (including the risks of operating in markets in which there are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforceability of legal requirements and the enforceability of contract rights and intellectual property rights), and income and non-income based tax rates and laws. Adverse changes in any of these factors may materially adversely impact the businesses and value of our ownership interests in D&B, Alight and BKFC.

23

Table of Contents

Changing rules, public disclosure regulations and stakeholder expectations on environmental, social and corporate governance related matters create a variety of risks for our business.

In addition to the changing rules and regulations related to environmental, social and governance matters imposed by governmental and self-regulatory organizations such as the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, a variety of third-party organizations, institutional investors and customers evaluate the performance of companies on ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. These changing rules, regulations and stakeholder expectations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and increased management time and attention spent complying with or meeting such regulations and expectations. Reduced access to or increased cost of capital may occur as financial institutions and investors increase or change expectations related to ESG matters.

Developing and acting on initiatives within the scope of ESG, and collecting, measuring and reporting ESG-related information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming and is subject to evolving reporting standards. We may also communicate certain initiatives and goals, regarding environmental matters, diversity, social investments and other ESG-related matters, in our SEC filings or in other public disclosures. These initiatives and goals within the scope of ESG could be difficult and expensive to implement, the technologies needed to implement them may not be cost effective and may not advance at a sufficient pace, and we could be criticized for the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the disclosure. If our ESG-related data, processes and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to our goals, including our previously announced commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, within the scope of ESG on a timely basis, or at all, our reputation, business, financial performance and growth could be adversely affected.

In addition, in recent years "anti-ESG" sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states and Congress having proposed or enacted "anti-ESG" policies, legislation, or initiatives or issued related legal opinions, and the President having recently issued an executive order opposing diversity equity and inclusion ("DEI") initiatives in the private sector. Such anti-ESG and anti-DEI-related policies, legislation, initiatives, litigation, legal opinions, and scrutiny could result in additional compliance obligations, investigations and enforcement actions, or reputational harm.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

At Cannae, the board of directors oversees management’s process for identifying and mitigating risks, including cybersecurity risks. Senior leadership, including our Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO"), works diligently to identify, assess and manage material risks through our Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") program. As part of that program, we conduct risk assessments to identify and assess our material business, operational and environmental risks and works with our management team to develop strategies and plans to mitigate and manage those risks, including cybersecurity risks related to the use of third-party service providers.

Our ERM program is overseen by a group of highly-qualified individuals and is tailored to the unique structure of our business. As a holding company with a small group of highly qualified employees, we are well positioned to maintain operations in the event of a disaster or a material disruption to our information technology ("IT") infrastructure and networks. Our CISO has extensive information technology, cybersecurity and program management experience as do many of the employees in the information security group for our third-party provider. Our CISO, as well as others in our third-party provider's information security group, hold certifications such as the Certified Information System Security Professional certification. Each of our various businesses separately maintains business continuity functions that adhere to the unique requirements of their business.

On an ongoing basis, management assesses the cybersecurity risks of Cannae and aligns its procedures and its audit plan with the identified and addressable risks. The underlying controls of the cyber risk management program are based on the recognized standards as outlined in the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") Cybersecurity Framework. We utilize a third party to manage our IT network and processes and our ERM personnel work directly with the provider on all aspects of the Company's IT infrastructure and cybersecurity risks. Risks are evaluated over various timeframes; however, the focus of management’s risk assessment is on risks to the long-term solvency and sustainability of the ongoing operations of Cannae. Risks with the potential for an adverse impact to the Company in the near term are prioritized to the extent they present a material risk to the financial viability of the Company.

We apply a comprehensive approach to the mitigation of identified security risks, including monitoring our third-party IT service provider and management of our unconsolidated affiliates. As a holding company with relatively low volumes of personnel and third-party data, we have established policies, procedures and controls, including those related to privacy, information security and cybersecurity, and we employ a broad and diversified set of IT risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques tailored to the unique nature of our business, including threat and vulnerability management, security monitoring,

24

Table of Contents

identity and access management, phishing awareness, risk oversight, third-party risk management, disaster recovery and business continuity management.

In the event of a cybersecurity incident, we have established protocols for management's response to incidents and we regularly test those protocols with appropriate management personnel. Such protocols include an incident response playbook with the assessment of cybersecurity risks and procedures and hierarchies for escalating and reporting incidents to executive management, the board of directors, investors, government agencies and the general public.

The employees at our consolidated companies are the strongest assets in protecting information and mitigating risk. We monitor the security practices of our employees, including training programs that focus on applicable privacy, security, legal, and regulatory requirements that provide ongoing enhancement of their respective security and risk cultures. Our employees participate in an annual Information Security Training.

The Board administers its risk oversight function directly and through committees and our Board has a strong focus on cybersecurity. Our approaches to cybersecurity and privacy are overseen by the audit committee. At each regular meeting of the audit committee of our Board, management provides reports relating to existing and emerging risk at our companies, including, as appropriate, cyber and data security risks, and any security incidents. At least annually (or more frequently in the event of material changes to the Company) the update to the audit committee includes a summary of management’s complete reassessment of the Company’s risk and control environment identified through our ERM program. Our audit committee chairman reports on these discussions to our Board on a quarterly basis.

See Item 1A Risk Factors for discussion of material risks faced by the Company, including risks related to cybersecurity and IT.

Item 2. Properties

Our corporate headquarters are located in Las Vegas, Nevada in owned facilities.

Restaurant Group. The Restaurant Group's headquarters are currently located in Nashville, Tennessee with another office location in Woburn, Massachusetts. All of our restaurants are leased from third parties, and are located in 20 states throughout the U.S. Substantially all of our Restaurant Group's revenues are generated in those states.

Corporate and Other. We own an 1,800 acre ranch-style luxury resort and residential community in Bend/Powell Butte, Oregon.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

For a description of our legal proceedings see discussion under Legal and Regulatory Contingencies in Note M - Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

25

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company's common stock trades on The New York Stock Exchange under the "CNNE" trading symbol.

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a graph comparing cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock against the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and against the cumulative total return of a peer group index consisting of certain companies against which we compete for the period ending December 31, 2024. We updated our peer group for the period ending December 31, 2024 from the group used for the period ending December 31, 2023 to include peers that better align with the size and now internally-managed operating structure of the Company. The peer group comparison has been weighted based on their stock market capitalization. The graph tracks the performance of a of $100.00 investment, with reinvestment of all dividends (if any), from December 31, 2019 through December 31, 2024.

26

Table of Contents

______________________________

(1) Represents the peer group used for the year ended December 31, 2023 and consists of the following companies: Apollo Global Management Inc., Compass Diversified Holdings, FS KKR Capital Corp, Golub Capital BDC, Inc., New Mountain Finance Corporation and Prospect Capital Corporation.

(2) Represents the peer group used for the year ended December 31, 2024 and consists of the following companies: Main Street Capital, Compass Diversified Holdings, StepStone Group, Hercules Capital, Federated Hermes, Capital Southwest, Artisan Partners Asset Management, Trinity Capital, Hamilton Lane, Bridge Investment Group and GCM Grosvenor.

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

On January 31, 2024, the last reported sale price of our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange was $19.76 per share. We had approximately 5,943 shareholders of record.

Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be included in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

On August 3, 2022, our Board authorized a three-year stock repurchase program, (the "2022 Repurchase Program"), under which we may repurchase up to an additional 10.0 million shares of our common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices or in privately negotiated transactions through August 3, 2025. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we repurchased 300,000 shares of CNNE common stock for approximately $5.6 million in the aggregate, or an average of $18.80 per share, pursuant to the 2022 Repurchase Program.

On October 29, 2023, our Board authorized a new stock repurchase program, (the "2023 Repurchase Program"), under which the Company may repurchase up to 10.0 million shares of its common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices or in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time. The 2023 Repurchase Program does not supersede or impact the repurchase capacity under the 2022 Repurchase Program. We have not made any repurchases of our common stock under the 2023 Repurchase Program.

On April 1, 2024, we completed the Tender Offer through a procedure commonly referred to as a "modified Dutch auction" to purchase 9,672,540 shares of our CNNE common stock for approximately $223.5 million, or an average of $23.11 per share, inclusive of transaction fees. Refer to Item 7 Part II of this Annual Report under the header Other Developments for further discussion of the Tender Offer.

As of December 31, 2024, the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2022 Repurchase Program and the 2023 Repurchase Program is 12,295,463.

Item 6. Reserved

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

For a description of our business, including descriptions of segments and recent business trends, see the discussion under Business in Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

Recent Developments

Dayforce

In the year ended December 31, 2024, we sold the remaining 4.0 million shares of common stock of Dayforce for gross proceeds of $264.0 million. As of December 31, 2024, we no longer have any holdings of Dayforce.

Refer to Note B - Investments and Note C - Fair Value Measurements for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in Dayforce and other equity securities.

Dun & Bradstreet

On February 8, 2024, April 30, 2024, July 24, 2024, and October 22, 2024, the board of directors of D&B declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.05 per share of D&B common stock. In the year ended December 31, 2024, we received $14.3 million of cash dividends from D&B which are recorded as a reduction to the basis of our recorded asset for D&B.

27

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2024, we owned 69.0 million shares of D&B, which represented approximately 15.6% of its outstanding common stock.

See Note B - Investments for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in D&B and other equity method investments.

Paysafe

In January 2024, we purchased 1.6 million shares of common stock of Paysafe for $23.4 million. In November 2024, we sold 0.9 million shares of common stock of Paysafe for $16.0 million which we expect will generate tax savings for the Company.

As of December 31, 2024, we owned 2.5 million shares of Paysafe which represented approximately 4.1% of the outstanding common equity of Paysafe.

See Note B - Investments and Note C - Fair Value Measurements for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in Paysafe and other equity securities.

Alight

On December 3, 2024, we completed the sale of 12.0 million shares of common stock of Alight for aggregate proceeds of $89.0 million.

As of December 31, 2024, we owned 40.5 million shares of Alight, which represented approximately 7.6% of its outstanding common stock.

See Note B - Investments for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in Alight and other equity method investments.

JANA

On February 21, 2024, we issued 1.85 million shares of common stock of the Company from the Company’s treasury and paid $18.3 million in cash, in the aggregate, to certain partners of JANA in exchange for a 19.99% equity interest in JANA. The transaction is valued at $55.5 million based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on February 21, 2024. Cannae also committed to invest $50 million into JANA funds (the "JANA Fund Commitment"). JANA Partners is an investment manager founded in 2001. We account for our ownership interest in JANA as an unconsolidated affiliate using the equity method of accounting and record our ratable share of JANA's net income or loss on a three-month lag. On December 27, 2024, the Company invested $20.0 million into a JANA fund as part of the JANA Fund Commitment. We account for our investment in the JANA fund as an equity security without a readily determinable fair value.

See Note B - Investments for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in JANA and other equity method investments and our accounting for the JANA fund and other equity securities without a readily determinable fair value.

Watkins Holdings

On October 17, 2024, the Company invested approximately $80.0 million for a 52.8% ownership interest in Watkins Holdings, LLC ("Watkins Holdings"), a partnership with KDSA Investment Partners ("KDSA") and Mark Jacobs (the "Watkins Acquisition"). Watkins Holdings concurrently completed the acquisition of The Watkins Company ("Watkins"), a leading producer of high-quality flavoring products. Watkins was founded in 1868 and has grown to be a leading domestic producer of spices, seasonings and extracts. The former majority owner of Watkins, Mark Jacobs, rolled a significant equity stake into Watkins Holdings. We account for our ownership interest in Watkins as an unconsolidated affiliate using the equity method of accounting and record our ratable share of Watkins's net income or loss on a three-month lag.

See Note B - Investments for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in Watkins Holdings and other equity method investments.

Black Knight Football

In the year ended December 31, 2024, we invested $36.8 million in BKFC and as of December 31, 2024, we held a 47.2% ownership interest.

See Note B - Investments for further discussion of our accounting for our ownership interest in BKFC and other equity method investments.

Other Developments

On February 21, 2024, we announced a tender offer to purchase up to $200 million of shares of our common stock at a purchase price of not less than $20.75 per share and not greater than $23.75 per share (the "Tender Offer"). We conducted the Tender Offer through a procedure commonly referred to as a "modified Dutch auction." This procedure allows shareholders to select the price within a price range specified by us at which the shareholders are willing to sell their shares.

28

Table of Contents

On April 1, 2024, the Tender Offer expired and the Company accepted for purchase an aggregate of 9,672,540 shares of its common stock that were properly tendered and not properly withdrawn at or below a purchase price of $22.95 per share for an aggregate cost of $222.0 million, excluding fees and expenses. Included in the 9,672,540 shares of Cannae common stock we accepted for purchase in the Tender Offer are 957,943 shares that Cannae elected to purchase pursuant to its right to purchase up to an additional 2% of its outstanding common stock.

On February 26, 2024, the Company, Cannae LLC and Trasimene entered into a Third Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement (the "Third Amended MSA"). The Third Amended MSA amends the management services agreement primarily to (i) provide for a termination of the agreement by the Company effective June 30, 2027, (ii) reduce the management fee to a fixed amount of $7.6 million annually effective beginning July 2, 2024 and (iii) provide for payment of the termination fee under the agreement of $20 million to be paid by the Company to Trasimene in installments of $6.7 million annually over the 3-year period ended July 1, 2026. The Third Amended MSA has a termination date of June 30, 2027 unless earlier terminated by the Company or Trasimene.

The following dividends were declared by our Board in 2024:

Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date Dividends Per Share

Subsequent to December 31, 2024, the Board declared cash dividends of $0.12 per share, payable on March 31, 2025, to Cannae common shareholders of record as of March 17, 2025.

Related Party Transactions

Our financial statements for all years presented reflect transactions with our Manager and certain members of our Board. See Note O - Related Party Transactions to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note A - Basis of Financial Statements to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for discussion of all our significant accounting policies.

The accounting policies and estimates described below are those we consider critical in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures with respect to contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates - applicability of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 323. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are recorded using the equity method of accounting. If an investor does not possess a controlling financial interest over an investee but has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee’s operating and financial policies, the investor must account for such an investment under the equity method of accounting. For investments in common stock or in-substance common stock of an investee, which an investor does not control, the general but rebuttable presumption exists that an ownership of greater than 20% of the outstanding common stock of an investee indicates the investor has significant influence. For investments in partnerships and similar entities for which an investor does not control, equity method of accounting for the investment is generally required unless the investor's interest is so minor that the investor has virtually no influence.

In the ordinary course of our business, we make investments in companies that provide us with varying degrees of control and influence over the underlying investees through our level of ownership of the outstanding equity of the investee, participation in management of the investee, participation on the board of directors of the investee, and/or legal agreements with other investors with control implications. As a result, our analysis of the appropriate accounting for our various ownership interests often requires judgment regarding the level of control, significant influence or lack thereof the Company has over each investee. If we are required to account for certain of our ownership interests in which we have concluded the Company has significant influence resulting in the application of the equity method of accounting at fair value, the impact of such change could significantly impact the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of December 31, 2024, we held less than 20% of the outstanding common equity of Dun & Bradstreet but continue to account for our ownership interest under the equity method because (i) we continue to exert significant influence through, and in connection with, our 15.6% ownership and (ii) certain of our senior management and directors serve on Dun & Bradstreet's

29

Table of Contents

board of directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Chairman of our Board, Bill Foley, who is also the chairman of D&B's board of directors.

As of December 31, 2024, the book value of our investment in D&B accounted for under the equity method of accounting is $691.9 million. Based on quoted market prices, the aggregate fair market value of our ownership of Dun & Bradstreet common stock was $860.3 million as of December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2024, we held less than 20% of the outstanding common equity of Alight but we account for our ownership under the equity method because we exert significant influence: (i) through, and in connection with, our 7.6% ownership, (ii) because certain of our senior management and directors serve on Alight's board of directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Chairman of our Board, Bill Foley, who is also the chairman of Alight's board of directors, and (iii) because we are party to an agreement with Alight pursuant to which we have the ability to appoint or be consulted on the election of certain of the directors of Alight.

As of December 31, 2024, the book value of our investment in Alight accounted for under the equity method of accounting is $374.0 million. Based on quoted market prices, the aggregate fair market value of our ownership of Alight common stock was approximately $280.1 million as of December 31, 2024.

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates - impairment monitoring. On an ongoing basis, management monitors the Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates to determine whether there are indications that the fair value of an investment may be other-than-temporarily below our recorded book value of the investment. Factors considered when determining whether a decline in the fair value of an investment is other-than-temporary include, but are not limited to: the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than book value, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the investee for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

As of June 30, 2024, the aggregate fair market value of our ownership of Sightline equity prior to recording impairment was $154.7 million. Based on a valuation using a hybrid discounted cash flow and market comparison approach and adjusted for the risk of a capital shortfall at the business, the aggregate fair market value of our ownership of Sightline equity was approximately $13.7 million as of June 30, 2024 and management determined the decrease in value of our investment in Sightline was other-than-temporary. The fair value measurement is considered a level 3 fair value measure. The primary inputs in the valuation were the forecasted results of operations of Sightline, the discount rate used in the discounted cash flow analysis and the adjustment for the risk of a capital shortfall. The primary significant unobservable input used was the 35% discount rate used in the discounted cash flow analysis and the 50% adjustment for the risk of capital shortfall. As of December 31, 2024, management determined that the remaining investment in Sightline was impaired as a result of the implied valuation of Sightline it would require for it to raise equity funding. Due to the quantum of the decrease in the fair market value of our ownership interest subsequent to our acquisition, declines in the forecasted results of operations and liquidity of Sightline, and the uncertainty of the ability of Sightline to raise new capital, management determined the decrease in value of our investment in Sightline was other-than-temporary. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment of $149.5 million which is included in Recognized (losses) gains, net, on our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of our ownership interest in Alight based on quoted market prices was $280.1 million and the book value of our recorded asset for Alight was $374.0 million. While the fair value of our interest in Alight is below our book value, the fair value was above book value during the second quarter and there are no other indicators that our interest is other-than-temporarily impaired. Alight has consistently produced positive results from operations and cash flows, has reduced its debt, and initiated a dividend in 2024. There are no indications that the book value of our interest will not be recoverable at this time. Due to these factors, we consider the decline in value to be temporary as of December 31, 2024. Though we do not currently believe our interest in Alight is other-than-temporarily impaired, because the fair value is currently below the book value of our interest in Alight, sustained declines in fair value of the interest, deterioration in Alight's actual or forecasted results of operations or adverse changes in the US macroeconomic environment could result in an impairment charge in future periods to record our asset at fair value.

Accounting for Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The impact of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred taxes, if any, is applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period enacted.

As of December 31, 2024, we had a net deferred tax asset of $73.9 million, which is primarily attributable to temporary differences for our investments held through partnerships. In the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded an additional valuation allowance of $47.7 million on the Company's federal net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and certain deferred taxes related to our consolidated partnerships. In 2024, we determined it was uncertain whether we would be able to use the Company's available federal NOL carryforwards and certain other deferred taxes. One of the factors used in assessing the need

30

Table of Contents

for a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is whether a company is in a three-year cumulative book loss position and for the three years ended December 31, 2024, the Company was in a cumulative book loss position. The Company is relying on deferred tax liabilities, and the ability to carry back capital losses, as sources of income to facilitate the recovery of its remaining deferred tax assets. The Company’s prospective investment strategy, fluctuations in the fair market value of its ownership interests prior to any dispositions and other factors may influence the timing of reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities and their ultimate impact on taxable income or loss, which could have an effect on the recoverability of deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2024, the Company has a federal valuation allowance of $47.7 million representing a full valuation allowance on its federal NOL carryforwards and certain other deferred taxes where it is not more likely than not that the tax benefit will be realized. Additionally, the Company has a state valuation allowance of $5.1 million representing certain state NOLs where it is not more likely than not that the tax benefit of certain state NOLs will be realized before the NOLs in those certain states expire. At this time, we consider it more likely than not that we will have sufficient taxable income and available excess capital gain from prior year periods that will allow us to realize our other deferred tax assets. The Company will continue to monitor the recoverability of deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and may need to record an additional valuation allowance on its net deferred tax asset in future periods.

Refer to Note L - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our accounting for income taxes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280). The guidance improves reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. In addition, the amendments in this ASU enhance interim disclosure requirements, clarify circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple segment measures of profit or loss, provide new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable segment, and contain other disclosure requirements. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. For public business entities, the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. We have adopted this ASU which resulted in additional disclosures in our consolidated financial statements.

Refer to Note E - Segment Information to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our segment reporting.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which requires consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The guidance is to be applied on a prospective basis, though retrospective application is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this authoritative guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which requires public business entities to disaggregate specific expenses in a tabular presentation. This includes purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and other relevant expense captions on the face of the income statement. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance is to be applied on a prospective basis, though retrospective application is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this authoritative guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Certain Factors Affecting Comparability

Year ended December 31, 2024. On March 20, 2024, Alight entered into a definitive agreement to sell its professional services segment and its payroll and human capital management outsourcing businesses (the "Payroll & Professional Services Business"). The transaction closed on July 12, 2024. Beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2024, Alight began accounting for the assets and liabilities of the disposed businesses as held for sale and its operating results as discontinued operations. Accordingly, Alight's results presented for the periods ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 have been retrospectively revised to reflect the Payroll & Professional Services Business as held for sale and discontinued operations.

Year ended December 31, 2023. In the year ended December 31, 2023, the Restaurant Group undertook a project to renegotiate or terminate leases and close O'Charley's stores with unfavorable store-level cash flow profiles. Through this process they closed 77 O'Charley's stores in the year ended December 31, 2023.

31

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Consolidated Results of Operations

Net earnings. The following table presents certain financial data for the years indicated:

Year ended December 31,

(In millions)

Revenues:

Operating expenses:

Other operating expenses, including asset impairments 93.3 142.9 153.0

Other income (expense):

Interest, investment and other income 4.6 13.6 2.5

Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates (46.6) (194.0) (183.9)

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (5.5) (10.7) (1.5)

Revenues

Total revenue decreased $117.5 million in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by a decrease in revenue in the Restaurant Group segment. Total revenue in 2023 decreased $92.1 million compared to 2022, primarily driven by a decrease in revenue in the Restaurant Group segment.

The change in revenues from our segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.

Expenses

Our operating expenses consist primarily of cost of restaurant revenue, personnel costs, depreciation and amortization, and other operating expenses.

Cost of restaurant revenue includes cost of food and beverage, primarily the costs of beef, groceries, produce, seafood, poultry and alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, net of vendor discounts and rebates, payroll and related costs and expenses directly relating to restaurant level activities, and restaurant operating costs including occupancy and other operating expenses at the restaurant level.

Personnel costs include base salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation and bonuses paid to employees, and are one of our most significant operating expenses. Personnel costs that are directly attributable to the restaurant-level operations of the Restaurant Group are included in Cost of restaurant revenue.

Depreciation and amortization expense consists of our depreciation related to investments in property and equipment as well as amortization of intangible assets.

Other operating expenses include management fees, carried interest fees, professional fees, advertising costs, travel expenses and impairments of operating assets.

32

Table of Contents

The change in expenses from our segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.

Income tax benefit was $0.4 million, $77.0 million, and $89.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was 0.2%, 37.2%, and 26.8%, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate in all periods is primarily attributable to the varying impact of earnings or losses from unconsolidated affiliates on our consolidated pretax earnings or losses. The fluctuation in income tax benefit as a percentage of loss before income taxes is attributable to our estimate of ultimate income tax liability or benefit and changes in the characteristics of net earnings or loss year to year, such as the weighting of operating income versus investment income. The change in our effective tax rate in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to the recording of a valuation allowance in the current period of $47.7 million on our federal net operating loss carryforwards and certain deferred taxes within our consolidated partnerships, the impact to the rate of equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates relative to pre-tax loss and the impairment recorded to our investment in Sightline.

For a detailed breakout of our effective tax rate and further discussion on changes in our taxes, see Note L - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates for the periods indicated consisted of the following:

Year ended December 31,

(In millions)

Dun & Bradstreet (1) $ (13.7) $ (17.1) $ (8.8)

_____________________________________

(1) Equity in losses for D&B includes $8.6 million of loss for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, related to amortization of Cannae's basis difference between the book value of its ownership interest and ratable portion of the underlying equity in net assets of D&B.

(2) Equity in losses for Sightline includes $2.9 million and $7.3 million of loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, related to amortization of Cannae's basis difference between the book value of its ownership interest and ratable portion of the underlying equity in net assets of Sightline.

(3) The amount for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 includes the Company's equity in losses of Paysafe which was no longer accounted for under the equity method of accounting beginning December 31, 2023.

Net Loss

Net loss attributable to Cannae decreased $8.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 2023. Total net loss attributable to Cannae decreased $114.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 2022.

The change in net loss is attributable to the factors discussed above and net loss from the segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.

33

Table of Contents

Segment Results of Operations

Restaurant Group

The following table presents the results from operations of our Restaurant Group segment:

Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Revenues:

Operating expenses:

Other operating expenses, including asset impairments 26.5 75.9 36.5

Other income (expense):

Interest expense (5.7) (6.1) (4.2)

Total revenues for the Restaurant Group segment decreased $116.4 million, or 21.7%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. The decrease was primarily attributable to approximately $100.3 million of incremental revenue included in the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with 99 Restaurants and O'Charley's stores that were closed prior to December 31, 2024 and a decline in comparable store sales.

Total revenues for the Restaurant Group segment decreased $94.6 million, or 15.0%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 2022. The decrease was primarily attributable to approximately $79.6 million of incremental revenue included in the year ended December 31, 2022 associated with stores that were closed prior to December 31, 2023 and a decline in comparable store sales.

Comparable Store Sales. One method we use in evaluating the performance of our restaurants is to compare sales results for restaurants period over period. A new restaurant is included in our comparable store sales figures starting in the first period following the restaurant's first seventy-eight weeks of operations. Changes in comparable store sales reflect changes in sales for the comparable store group of restaurants over a specified period of time. This measure highlights the performance of existing restaurants, as the impact of new restaurant openings is excluded. Comparable store sales for our 99 Restaurants brand changed (2.2)%, (2.1)%, and 7.5% in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, from the prior fiscal years. The decrease in 2024 is primarily attributable to a decrease in guest counts, partially offset by an increase in the average amount spent by customers each visit. The decrease in 2023 is primarily attributable to a decrease in guest counts, partially offset by an increase in the average amount spent by customers each visit. Comparable store sales for our O'Charley's brand changed (8.5)%, (3.4)% and (5.8)% in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, from the prior fiscal years. The decrease in 2024 is primarily attributable to a decrease in guest counts, partially offset by an increase in the average amount spent by customers each visit. The decrease in 2023 is primarily attributable to a decrease in guest counts, partially offset by an increase in the average amount spent by customers each visit.

Cost of restaurant revenue decreased $103.7 million, or 21.8%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. Cost of restaurant revenue decreased $96.5 million, or 16.9%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 2022. Cost of restaurant revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenue was approximately 88.5%, 88.6%, and 90.6% in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The change in cost of restaurant revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenue in 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to an easing of inflation in the cost of labor, food and supplies relative to customary increases in menu pricing.

Other operating expenses decreased by $49.4 million, or 65.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023. Other operating expenses increased by $39.4 million, or 107.9%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 2022. The change in both periods is primarily attributable to $36.8 million of impairment recorded to the Restaurant Group's property and equipment, lease assets and other intangible assets in the year ended December 31, 2023.

34

Table of Contents

Recognized gains, net, decreased $17.4 million, or 48.3%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2023 and increased $28.2 million, or 361.5%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 2022. The changes in both periods is primarily attributable to $30.2 million of gains recorded upon derecognition of O'Charley's lease liabilities associated with stores closed in 2023 and upon conversion of certain stores from a failed sale lease back in previous years to operating leases in 2023. The change in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023 was partially offset by a gain of $12.5 million recorded in 2024 related to the termination of the lease for the Restaurant Group's corporate headquarters.

Dun & Bradstreet

As of December 31, 2024, we owned approximately 15.6% of the outstanding common stock of Dun & Bradstreet. We account for our ownership interest in D&B under the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours.

Summarized financial information for Dun & Bradstreet for the relevant dates and time periods included in Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented below.

Year ended December 31,

(In millions)

Less: net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest 4.1 3.3 6.4

Net loss attributable to Dun & Bradstreet (28.6) (47.0) (2.3)

Details relating to the results of operations of Dun & Bradstreet (NYSE: "DNB") can be found in its periodic reports filed with the SEC.

Alight

As of December 31, 2024, we owned approximately 7.6% of the outstanding common stock of Alight. We account for our ownership of Alight under the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours.

Summarized financial information for Alight for the relevant dates and time periods included in Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented below.

Year ended December 31,

(In millions)

Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations (19.0) (45.0) 68.0

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (2.0) (17.0) (10.0)

Details relating to the results of operations of Alight (NYSE: "ALIT") can be found in its periodic reports filed with the SEC.

Black Knight Football

As of December 31, 2024, we owned approximately 47.2% of the ownership interest of BKFC. We account for our ownership of BKFC under the equity method of accounting and report our equity in the earnings or loss of BKFC on a three-month lag; therefore, its results do not consolidate into ours. Accordingly, our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 includes our equity in BKFC’s losses for the year ended September 30, 2024 and for the period from December 13, 2022 (the date we acquired our initial interest in BKFC) through September 30, 2023, respectively.

Summarized financial information for BKFC for the relevant dates and time periods included in Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is presented below.

35

Table of Contents

(In millions)

(Losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (7.1) (5.3)

Net loss attributable to BKFC (122.6) (103.8)

Black Knight Football's total revenue is primarily attributable to Premier League media rights, matchday and sponsorship revenue earned by AFCB. Total revenues for Black Knight Football increased $62.1 million, or 41.7%, in the year ended September 30, 2024, compared to the period from December 13, 2022 through September 30, 2023. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to the 2023 period including nine and a half months rather than twelve and an increase in matchday and sponsorship revenue.

Personnel costs were $185.7 million and $112.1 million in the year ended September 30, 2024 and the period from December 13, 2022 to September 30, 2023, respectively, an increase of $73.6 million, or 65.7%. The increase was attributable to the acquisition of new players at AFC Bournemouth and the 2023 period including nine and a half months rather than twelve.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $114.0 million and $99.8 million, respectively, in the year ended September 30, 2024 and the period from December 13, 2022 to September 20, 2023, respectively, an increase of $14.2 million, or 14%. The increase was attributable to inclusion of a full year of expense in the 2024 period.

Other income increased $16.4 million in the year ended September 30, 2024 compared to the corresponding period from December 13, 2022 to September 20, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to increased gain on sale of players by AFCB, partially offset by a non-cash impairment charge of $12.0 million to BKFC's investment in FC Lorient resulting from the club's relegation to Ligue 2.

Corporate and Other

The Corporate and Other segment consists of our share in the operations of certain controlled businesses and other equity investments, activity of the corporate holding company and certain intercompany eliminations and taxes.

The following table presents the results from operations of our Corporate and Other segment:

Year ended December 31,

(In millions)

Revenues:

Operating expenses:

Depreciation and amortization 2.8 2.0 2.3

Other income (expense):

Interest, investment and other income 4.6 13.6 2.5

Personnel costs in our corporate and other segment increased $29.3 million, or 101.4%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023, and decreased $6.4 million, or 18.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022. The increase in 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily attributable to increased non-cash stock-based compensation granted in 2024. The decrease in 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily driven by a decrease in investment success bonuses paid related to our sales of shares of Dayforce.

36

Table of Contents

Other operating expenses decreased $49.5 million, or 42.5%, in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022. The decrease is primarily attributable to $49.3 million of carried interest expense attributable to our sale of Optimal Blue in 2022, of which $31.8 million was paid in D&B stock.

Interest, investment and other income decreased $9.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 2023 and increased $11.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022. The change in both periods was primarily attributable to the change in interest income on our cash and short term investments resulting from changes in our cash balance and market interest rates.

Recognized losses, net in our Corporate and Other segment consists of the following:

Year ended December 31,

(In millions)

Dayforce fair value adjustments $ (4.5) $ 28.3 $ (374.1)

Sightline impairment (149.5) (70.2) —

Paysafe fair value adjustments 12.3 — (236.0)

Alight loss on sale (22.5) — —

QOMPLX impairment — (9.0) (32.8)

Dun & Bradstreet (loss) gain on partial sales (6.0) — 19.3

Optimal Blue gain on sale — — 313.0

AmeriLife fair value adjustment (1) — — 67.3

AmeriLife gain on partial sales — — 176.4

Other fair value adjustments, net 15.3 — (23.5)

_____________________________________

(1) Represents the gain recorded upon the revaluation of our investment to fair value on November 15, 2022.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Requirements.Our current cash requirements include our corporate operating expenses and funding needs of our Restaurant Group. There are no restrictions on our retained earnings regarding our ability to pay dividends to stockholders. The declaration of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Additional uses of cash flow may include payment of dividends on our common stock, stock repurchases, acquisitions, additional investment in current investees, and debt repayments.

As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $131.5 million, of which $113.2 million was cash held by the corporate holding company, $6.2 million of short term investments, and $49.0 of immediate capacity under our existing holding company credit facilities with the ability to add an additional $500 million of borrowing capacity by amending our 2020 Margin Facility. As of December 31, 2024, we were committed under letters of credit totaling $6.2 million issued primarily in connection with casualty insurance programs for our Restaurant Group employees.

We continually assess our capital allocation strategy, including decisions relating to repurchasing our stock, paying dividends, reducing debt, and/or conserving cash. We believe that all anticipated cash requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds, cash dividends or distributions from subsidiaries and holdings, cash generated from short-term investments, potential sales of non-strategic assets, and borrowings on existing credit facilities. Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are monitored regularly to ensure that we can meet our cash requirements. We forecast the Company's liquidity needs and periodically review the short-term and long-term projected sources and uses of funds, as well as the asset, liability, investment and cash flow assumptions underlying such forecasts. As part of such forecasting, we actively manage the impact of rising interest rates on both our idle cash and our outstanding debt.

The Company believes the holding company's balances of cash, cash equivalents, short term investments, marketable equity securities, cash generated by its investments and capacity under its credit agreements, will be sufficient to satisfy its cash requirements over the next 12 months and beyond.

37

Table of Contents

We are focused on evaluating our assets and investments as potential vehicles for creating liquidity. Our intent is to use that liquidity for general corporate purposes, including, funding future investments, other strategic initiatives and/or conserving cash.

Operating Cash Flows. Our cash flows used in operations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $90.1 million, $87.8 million and $205.1 million, respectively. The increase in cash used in operations of $2.3 million from 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to lower tax payments and lower cash expenses incurred with our Manager. The decrease in cash used in operations of $117.3 million from 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to decreased tax payments and no carried interest expense incurred with our Manager in 2023.

Investing Cash Flows. Our cash flows provided by investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $298.3 million, $53.1 million and $521.2 million, respectively. The increase in cash provided by investing activities of $245.2 million from 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to proceeds from sales of Dayforce, D&B and Alight in 2024, partially offset by an increase in purchases of new investments. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities of $468.1 million from 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to primarily attributable to higher proceeds from sales of Dayforce, AmeriLife, Optimal Blue, D&B and CorroHealth in the 2022 period compared to lower proceeds from sales of Dayforce in 2023 period, partially offset by increased proceeds from distributions from unconsolidated affiliates in the 2023 period and the investment in System1 in the 2022 period. See our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for a detailed breakout of cash flows from purchases and sales of investments.

Capital Expenditures. Total capital expenditures for property and equipment and other intangible assets were $7.0 million, $10.0 million and $14.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Capital expenditures in all years primarily consisted of purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements in our Restaurant Group segment and property improvements at our real estate operations.

Financing Cash Flows. Our cash flows used in financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $182.9 million, $106.8 million and $154.2 million, respectively. The increase in cash used in financing activities of $76.1 million from 2024 compared to 2023 is primarily attributable to the Tender Offer, partial repayment of the FNF Revolver and dividends paid in 2024. The decrease in cash used in financing activities of $47.4 million from 2023 compared to 2022 is primarily attributable to a reduction in treasury stock repurchases in 2023 compared to 2022 and lower proceeds from debt, net of repayments.

Financing Arrangements. For a description of our financing arrangements see Note K - Notes Payable to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

Contractual Obligations. Our long-term contractual obligations generally include our credit agreements and debt facilities, lease payments and financing obligations on certain of our premises and equipment, purchase obligations of the Restaurant Group and payments to our Manager.

See Note G - Leases to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our leasing arrangements.

On February 26, 2024, the Company, Cannae LLC and Trasimene entered into a Third Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement (the "Third Amended MSA"). The Third Amended MSA amends the management services agreement primarily to (i) provide for a termination of the agreement by the Company effective June 30, 2027, (ii) reduce the management fee to a fixed amount of $7.6 million annually effective beginning July 2, 2024 and (iii) provide for payment of the termination fee under the agreement of $20 million to be paid by the Company to Trasimene in installments of $6.7 million annually over the three-year period ended July 1, 2026. The Third Amended MSA has a termination date of June 30, 2027 unless earlier terminated by the Company or Trasimene.

Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Restaurant Group has unconditional purchase obligations with various vendors, primarily related to food and beverage obligations with fixed commitments in regard to the time period of the contract and the quantities purchased with annual price adjustments that can fluctuate. Future purchase obligations are estimated by assuming historical purchase activity over the remaining, non-cancellable terms of the various agreements. For agreements with minimum purchase obligations, at least the minimum amounts we are legally required to purchase are included. These agreements do not include fixed delivery terms. We used both historical and projected volume and pricing as of December 31, 2024 to determine the amount of the obligations.

Restaurant Group financing obligations include its agreements to lease certain O'Charley's restaurant locations that are accounted for as failed sale and leaseback transactions.

38

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2024, our required annual payments relating to these contractual obligations were as follows:

(In millions)

Unconditional purchase obligations $ 46.9 $ 7.2 $ 4.0 $ 2.1 $ — $ — $ 60.2

Restaurant Group financing obligations 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 — 1.3

Capital Stock Transactions.For information on our 2022 Repurchase Program, 2023 Repurchase Program and the Tender Offer, see discussion under the header Purchases of Equity Securitiesby the Issuer included in Item 5 of Part II of this Annual Report.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Equity Price Risk

We are exposed to market price fluctuations associated with the Company's equity securities holdings. Equity price risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in equity prices. At December 31, 2024, we held $56.2 million in equity securities which are recorded at fair value. The carrying values of equity securities subject to equity price risks are directly derived from quoted market prices. See Note C - Fair Value Measurements to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our fair value measurements for equity securities. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. Furthermore, amounts realized in the sale of a particular security may be affected by the relative quantity of the security being sold.

For purposes of this Annual Report, we perform a sensitivity analysis to determine the book effects that market risk exposures may have on the fair values of our equity securities. At December 31, 2024, a 20% increase (decrease) in market prices, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our equity securities of $11.2 million.

See discussion of our accounting for interests in unconsolidated affiliates under the header Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Item 7 of this Annual Report for further discussion of the potential impact of the Company's monitoring of impairment of its interests in unconsolidated affiliates, including those with fair values based on quoted market prices.

Commodity Price Risk

In our Restaurant Group segment, we are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices, these fluctuations can materially impact the food and beverage costs incurred in our Restaurant Group segment. While our Restaurant Group companies have taken steps to qualify multiple suppliers who meet our standards as suppliers for our restaurants and have entered into agreements with suppliers for some of the commodities used in our restaurant operations, there can be no assurance that future supplies and costs for such commodities will not fluctuate due to weather and other market conditions outside of our control. Consequently, such commodities can be subject to unforeseen supply and cost fluctuations. Dairy costs can also fluctuate due to government regulation. Because we typically set our menu prices in advance of our food product prices, our menu prices cannot immediately incorporate changing costs of food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our guests through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. We do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices at this time.

39

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Page Number

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 51

40

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Cannae Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting