10-K
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-39988
Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
900 Chesapeake DriveRedwood City, CA 94063
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 665-9295
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class TradingSymbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value BOLT The Nasdaq Capital Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the consolidated financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued consolidated financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ☐ NO ☒
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing sales price for such stock on June 28, 2024, as reported by The Nasdaq Capital Market, was approximately $21.9 million. The calculation of the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting stock excludes certain shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by current executive officers, directors and stockholders that the Registrant has concluded are affiliates of the Registrant. Exclusion of such shares should not be construed to indicate that any such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the Registrant or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the Registrant.
Table of Contents
As of March 19, 2025, the Registrant had 38,339,697 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Designated portions of the Proxy Statement relating to registrant’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2024, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
PART I
Item 1. Business 3
Item 1A. Risk Factors 25
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 69
Item 1C. Cybersecurity 69
Item 2. Properties 71
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 71
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 71
PART II
Item 6. Reserved 72
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 86
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 87
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 117
Item 9B. Other Information 118
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 118
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 119
Item 11. Executive Compensation 119
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 119
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules 120
Signatures
i
Table of Contents
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding:
•
our expectations regarding the success of our development and commercialization strategy and our product candidates;
•
our expectations regarding the operation of our product candidates, collaborations and related benefits;
•
our beliefs regarding our industry;
•
our beliefs regarding the success, cost and timing of our product candidate development and collaboration activities and current and future clinical trials and studies;
•
our beliefs regarding the potential markets for our product candidates, collaborations and our and our collaborators’ ability to serve those markets;
•
our ability to attract and retain key personnel;
•
any impact of pandemics, or responses to the pandemics on our business, collaborations, clinical trials or personnel;
•
our ability to obtain funding for our operations, including funding necessary to complete further development and any commercialization of our product candidates; and
•
regulatory developments in the United States (the “U.S.”) and foreign countries, with respect to our product candidates.
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance and achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should,” “will,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors". The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.
We have common law trademark rights in the unregistered marks “Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.,” “Boltbody,” and the Bolt Biotherapeutics logo in certain jurisdictions. Solely for convenience, trademarks and tradenames referred to in this Annual Report appear without the ® and TM symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights, to these trademarks and tradenames.
1
Table of Contents
RISK FACTOR SUMMARY
Below is a summary of material factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. Importantly, this summary does not address all the risks and uncertainties that we face. Additional discussion of the risks and uncertainties summarized in this risk factor summary, as well as other risks and uncertainties that we face, can be found under “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.
•
We have a limited operating history and have incurred significant losses since inception, and we anticipate that we may continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
•
We will need substantial funding to pursue our business objectives. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on terms favorable to us, we could be forced to delay, reduce or terminate our product development, other operations or commercialization efforts.
•
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.
•
If none of our product candidates, including those in our collaborations, obtain regulatory approval and are successfully commercialized in one or more indications, or we or our collaboration partners experience significant delays in doing so, we may never generate any product revenue or become profitable.
•
Our discovery and development of product candidates based on our BoltbodyTM ISAC (immune-stimulating antibody conjugate) approach, as well as the BDC-3042 program based on dectin-2 agonism, are unproven, which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of product candidate development, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value, or if competing technological approaches will limit the commercial value of our product candidates or render our platform obsolete.
•
We have never commercialized a product candidate and we may lack the necessary expertise, personnel and resources to successfully commercialize on our own or together with collaborators, any of our products that receive regulatory approval.
•
We do not have our own manufacturing capabilities and rely on third parties to produce clinical and commercial supplies of BDC-3042, BDC-4182 and our other current and future product candidates.
•
Enacted and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our product candidates and affect the prices we may charge for such product candidates.
•
If we are unable to obtain, maintain and protect sufficient patent and other intellectual property rights for our product candidates and technology, or if the scope of patent and other intellectual property rights obtained is not sufficiently broad, we may not be able to compete effectively in our market.
•
Our business, operations and clinical development plans and timelines and supply chain could be adversely affected by macroeconomic uncertainties, including pandemics, labor shortages, inflation and monetary supply shifts, and potential disruptions from major geopolitical conflicts, on the manufacturing, clinical trial and other business activities performed by us or by third parties with whom we conduct business, including our contract development and manufacturing organizations, or CDMOs, contract research organizations, or CROs, shippers and others.
•
The trading price of the shares of our common stock may be volatile, and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
•
We might not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss carryforwards.
2
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business.
Overview
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer. Our pipeline candidates are built on our deep expertise in myeloid biology and cancer drug development. Our product candidates use pattern recognition receptors in the innate immune system to help the body recognize tumor cells for a productive anti-cancer response. Our proprietary BoltbodyTM ISAC platform technology combines tumor-targeting antibodies with immune-stimulating linker-payloads. We believe this approach has the potential to create products that work with a patient’s own immune system, resulting in anti-cancer efficacy with good tolerability. Having explored more than one thousand distinct linker-payloads and multiple tumor targets, we know the importance of both the linker-payload and the antibody and have developed a library of linker-payloads for use in our own development programs and in our collaborations. We believe that ISACs have the potential to transform the cancer treatment landscape in a way similar to what we’ve seen with antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs. Many antibodies that target tumor antigens could be made into ISACs, providing us with future opportunities.
Our first Boltbody ISAC program was trastuzumab imbotolimod, or BDC-1001, targeting a tumor antigen known as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) that is common in many cancers. BDC-1001 demonstrated that the ISAC approach can safely deliver antitumor activity. However, we determined that our first-generation ISAC technology was not efficacious enough to be a commercially viable treatment option for patients in this market. As a result, in May 2024 we discontinued development of BDC-1001 as part of a strategic pipeline prioritization and restructuring plan in order to focus on BDC-3042 and our next-generation Boltbody ISAC program BDC-4182.
We are working on several Boltbody ISAC programs, both on our own and through our collaborations. BDC-4182 is a Boltbody ISAC targeting claudin 18.2 and we anticipate initiating a clinical trial in the second quarter of this year. Our collaborations broaden our pipeline and help us continue to advance our Boltbody ISAC platform technology while benefiting from our collaboration partners’ resources and expertise. Our Genmab collaboration recently advanced the first program into development, and we continue research on additional programs. Our Toray collaboration continues work on an ISAC targeting Caprin-1, a novel cancer target discovered by Toray. We are also working on proprietary Boltbody ISAC programs targeting CEA and PD-L1 and will be seeking partners for those programs.
BDC-3042, our dectin-2 agonist antibody program, leverages our myeloid biology expertise to target tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). We have completed enrollment of our dose escalation study without any dose-limiting toxicities and will be reporting results from the Phase 1 study in the second quarter of 2025.
Our Pipeline
We are leveraging our myeloid biology expertise to build a robust pipeline of immuno-oncology product candidates, including multiple Boltbody ISACs and a unique agonist antibody that targets tumor-associated macrophages. In addition to these programs, we are exploring various well-known targets that have been traditionally difficult to drug and where our myeloid expertise and the Boltbody ISAC approach may unlock the potential of these promising antigens as viable cancer targets. We currently hold exclusive worldwide rights to all of our proprietary development programs.
3
Table of Contents
BDC-3042 is an agonist antibody targeting dectin-2, an innate immune receptor found on the surface of macrophages. dectin-2 is selectively expressed in TAMs across a broad range of tumor types, including non-small cell lung, head and neck, ovarian, triple-negative breast cancer, and melanoma, among others. Most of these TAMs seem to be immunosuppressive, and agonism of dectin-2 converts them to an immunostimulatory phenotype, inducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production, enhanced phagocytosis, and antigen processing and presentation. A dectin-2 agonist antibody has the potential to convert these immunosuppressive TAMs into tumor-destructive macrophages that elicit productive anti-tumor immune responses. Anti-PD-1 therapies have been shown to upregulate the expression of dectin-2 in tumors, which provides an interesting rationale for exploring this combination. In October 2023, we dosed the first patient with BDC-3042 in the Phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with a broad range of solid tumors. We have completed enrollment of our dose escalation study without any dose-limiting toxicities and we expect to be reporting results from the Phase 1 study in the second quarter of 2025.
BDC-4182 utilizes our next-generation BoltbodyTM ISAC technology platform and targets claudin 18.2, which is overexpressed in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other tumor types. Selection of BDC-4182 as our clinical candidate was supported by preclinical experiments demonstrating potent anti-tumor activity in multiple preclinical models, safety and tolerability in non-human primates, and enhanced preclinical efficacy compared to cytotoxic ADCs in murine tumor models. Data on our claudin 18.2 Boltbody ISAC program were presented at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer’s (SITC) Annual Meetings in both November of 2024 and 2023. We expect to initiate our first in human clinical trial with BDC-4182 in the second quarter 2025. We secured exclusive worldwide rights to BDC-4182 following the restructuring of the Innovent collaboration in March 2024. Innovent and its affiliates are eligible to receive commercial and sales milestone payments as well as royalties on global net sales.
We have two additional ISAC programs utilizing our next-generation Boltbody ISAC technology platform in preclinical development. One is a Boltbody ISAC targeting carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 5, or CEA. CEA is a well-known tumor antigen expressed in various solid tumors including, colorectal, non-small cell lung, pancreatic, and breast. CEA is upregulated on the cell surface of these cancers. CEA allows us to target these cancers, some of which are immunologically “cold.” In our preclinical studies, we have observed promising in vitro and in vivo activity with notable anti-tumor activity, including complete tumor regression and immunological memory.
Our final Boltbody ISAC program targets PD-L1. Patients with tumors that are nonresponsive or become refractory to immune checkpoint blockade have few treatment options. PD-L1 is an immune checkpoint protein that can be expressed on cancer, including cancers such as lung, colorectal, and breast, and on immune cells. Expression of PD-L1 on these cells engages the PD-1 checkpoint and results in the inhibition of a productive anti-tumor immune response. More specifically, T cell-mediated immune responses are significantly dampened since the expression of PD-L1 on the cancer cells engages with the PD-1 on the cell surface of T cells and acts like a brake on the immune system. Inhibition of the PD-L1/PD-1 axis has shown potent anti-tumor immune responses in numerous types of cancers; however, a substantial number of cancer patients’ tumors are non-responsive or become refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We believe that a PD-L1 Boltbody ISAC has the potential to overcome the limitations of current anti-PD-L1 therapies.
Our Corporate History and Team
Our company was founded in 2015 to develop and commercialize pioneering work from the Engleman Laboratory at Stanford University. We have assembled a highly qualified management team with broad experience in myeloid biology and drug development to execute our mission. Our scientific founders and management team collectively have extensive experience in immunology, oncology drug development, and patient care. We are industry veterans with prior experience at companies such as Astellas, Immunomedics, Jazz, Maxygen, Seagen, Roche / Genentech, and others.
Strategy
Our goal is to become a leading immuno-oncology company, leveraging our myeloid biology expertise and proprietary Boltbody ISAC approach to discover, develop, and commercialize transformative treatments to address key unmet medical needs in cancer. The key components of our strategy are to:
•
Leverage our Boltbody ISAC approach and myeloid expertise to develop our pipeline of immune-activating therapies. Our expertise in myeloid biology and immuno-oncology has led us to research various tumor antigens across solid tumors where significant unmet medical needs remain. Our expertise in medicinal chemistry and antibody engineering and our ability to modulate TLR-agonist linker-payloads allow us to optimize the therapeutic profile of our product candidates for any target tumor antigens as part of our research and development efforts to produce durable anti-tumor responses. We believe that our approach is applicable
4
Table of Contents
to a broad spectrum of tumor-associated antigens expressed on cancers, including cancers that are refractory to existing therapies.
•
Develop BDC-3042, our agonist antibody targeting dectin-2. dectin-2 represents an attractive target found in a broad range of solid tumors. BDC-3042 targets macrophages in the tumor microenvironment to initiate robust innate and adaptive immune responses. We believe that this differentiated approach could improve the lives of patients by producing durable anti-tumor responses. In October 2023, we dosed the first patient with BDC-3042 in the Phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with a broad range of solid tumors and we expect to announce results in the second quarter of 2025.
•
Develop our next-generation BDC-4182, for the treatment of patients with gastric cancer. We are in the final stages of preparing for the first clinical trial of BDC-4182, expected to start in the second quarter of 2025. BDC-4182 is the only claudin 18.2-targeting ISAC in development. Based on our preclinical studies, we believe BDC-4182 has the potential to outperform cytotoxic ADCs. We are conducting a first-in-human dose escalation and expansion study with the normal Phase 1 goals of demonstrating safety and selecting a dose, as well as with the goal of demonstrating anti-tumor activity.
•
Selectively enter into collaborations to expand and enhance our proprietary Boltbody ISAC approach and myeloid expertise and increase the impact of our product candidates. In order to advance treatment options for patients, we may selectively collaborate with other companies with complementary technology or resources that could maximize the value of our product candidates and expand our pipeline. Such collaborations may provide us with novel technologies, targets, agents or approaches that complement our myeloid expertise and innovative Boltbody ISAC approach to improve the lives of patients with cancer. Collaborations can also provide significant funding for our research activities. Our collaborations with Genmab and Toray are examples of this approach.
•
Continue to invest modestly in our Boltbody ISAC platform to provide future product candidates for our pipeline. This is exemplified by our work on the CEA ISAC and the PD-L1 ISAC programs.
•
In October 2024, we successfully established a wholly-owned subsidiary in Australia, Bolt Biotherapeutics Australia PTY LTD, to expand our global footprint and better serve our research and development programs in the region. This strategic move enhances our ability to deliver localized solutions and it aligns with Australia's tax regime, which provides certain eligible companies with tax benefits for research and development activities.
Collaboration Agreements
Joint Development and License Agreement with Toray Industries
In March 2019, we entered into a Joint Development and License Agreement, or the Toray Agreement, with Toray, to develop and commercialize a Boltbody ISAC containing a proprietary antibody owned by Toray targeting Caprin-1. Under the Toray Agreement, we exchanged co-exclusive (with each other) licenses to certain patents and know-how covering our respective technologies. Each party is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct development and regulatory activities assigned to it under a development plan. Toray will be solely responsible for both parties’ development costs up to the conclusion of the first Phase 1 clinical trial and Toray is entitled to reimbursement for 50% of such development costs from our share of revenues collected from the sale or licensing of collaboration products. After the conclusion of the first Phase 1 clinical trial, the parties will share equally all costs of development activities necessary for obtaining regulatory approval of collaboration products in the indications in the territories covered under the agreement, unless either party elects to opt out of its co-funding obligations or reduce them by half, which election can be on a region-by-region basis.
Oncology Research and Development Collaboration with Genmab A/S
In May 2021, we entered into a License and Collaboration Agreement, or the Genmab Agreement, with Genmab. Together, the companies will evaluate Genmab antibodies and bispecific antibody technologies in combination with our Boltbody ISAC technology platform, with the goal of discovering and developing next-generation bispecific ISACs for the treatment of cancer. Under this research collaboration, the companies will evaluate multiple bispecific ISAC concepts to identify up to three clinical candidates for development. Genmab will fund the research, along with the preclinical and clinical development of these candidates through initial clinical proof of concept. Under the Genmab Agreement, we received an upfront payment of $10.0 million and an equity investment of $15.0 million under a separate stock purchase agreement. Under the Genmab Agreement, we will be compensated for research and development
5
Table of Contents
services at the agreed upon full-time employee rate and third-party costs through initial clinical proof of concept of the therapeutic candidates, after which both parties can exercise their respective program opt-in rights. With respect to each candidate for which a party has exercised its program opt-in rights and has exclusive global rights, the other party is eligible to receive potential development and sales-based milestone payments and tiered royalties. Bolt is eligible to receive total potential milestone payments of up to $285.0 million per therapeutic candidate exclusively developed and commercialized by Genmab, along with tiered royalties.
Oncology Research and Development Collaboration with Innovent Biologics, Inc.
In August 2021, we entered into a License and Collaboration Agreement, or the Innovent Agreement, with Innovent. Together, the companies will leverage Innovent’s proprietary therapeutic antibody portfolio and antibody discovery capability against undisclosed oncology targets in combination with our Boltbody ISAC technology and myeloid biology expertise to create up to three new candidates for cancer treatments. Innovent will fund the initial research, along with the preclinical and clinical development of these candidates through initial clinical proof of concept. Under the Innovent Agreement, we received an upfront payment of $5.0 million. Under the Innovent Agreement, we will be compensated for research and development services at the agreed upon full-time employee rate and third-party costs through initial clinical proof of concept of the therapeutic candidates, after which both parties can exercise their respective license rights. The Innovent Agreement includes license options exercisable by each party to exclusively develop, manufacture and commercialize each candidate in a specific territory. With respect to each candidate for which a party has exercised its license option, the other party is eligible to receive a license option exercise fee, potential development and sales-based milestone payments and tiered royalties. In March 2024, we entered into an amended and restated agreement with Innovent that provides Bolt with worldwide rights to two ISAC programs, including BDC-4182 targeting claudin 18.2. Bolt will be assuming all future development costs for the two ISAC programs, and Innovent is eligible to receive commercial and sales milestones as well as royalties on global net sales.
License Agreements
License Agreements with Stanford University
In May 2015, we entered into a license agreement, or the Stanford Agreement, as amended, with The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, or Stanford. The Stanford Agreement provides us an exclusive license to certain patents related to our proprietary Boltbody ISAC technology, to develop, manufacture, and commercialize licensed products incorporating such technology. Stanford retained the right under the Stanford Agreement, on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates, and all other non-profit research institutions, to practice the licensed patents for any non-profit purpose, including sponsored research and collaborations, but excluding delivery of paid or reimbursed healthcare. However, Stanford retained the right to practice the licensed patents for the delivery of its own paid or reimbursed healthcare.
The technology claimed by some of the patents licensed under the Stanford Agreement was developed using U.S. government funding and the license is therefore subject to a nonexclusive license held by the U.S. government, certain requirements that licensed products be manufactured in the United States (unless waived according to U.S. government process) and U.S. government march-in rights. For more information on risks related to technology developed using government funding see “Risk Factors–Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”
Under the Stanford Agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize licensed products and we are also required to achieve certain development and/or regulatory milestones by certain dates, which can be extended a limited number of times upon the payment of a nominal fee. The Stanford Agreement continue until terminated. We may terminate the Stanford Agreement at any time for any reason by providing at least 30 days’ written notice to Stanford. Stanford may terminate the Stanford Agreement if we breach certain provisions of such Stanford Agreement, including the payment and development and/or regulatory milestone obligations, and fail to remedy such breach within 60 days after written notice of such breach by Stanford.
Effective May 10, 2023, the Company terminated a separate license agreement with Stanford entered into in June 2018, after determining it was no longer necessary. The termination did not result in any payments due to Stanford.
6
Table of Contents
Manufacturing
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. We rely on third-party contract development and manufacturing organizations, or CDMOs, for production and testing of our clinical material, including the linker-payloads and antibodies used to make our Boltbody ISACs, and we expect to continue to do so to meet our toxicology, clinical, and commercial activities. We believe there are multiple sources for all of the materials required for the manufacture of our product candidates.
Competition
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, fierce competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary drugs and defense of intellectual property. We face potential competition from many sources, including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, public and private research institutions, and governmental agencies. Any drug candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing treatments and new treatments that are in development and may become available in the future.
To our knowledge, BDC-3042 is the only agonist antibody targeting dectin-2 in development and does not currently have any direct competition. The expression profile of dectin-2 and the safety profile that has been observed to date in dose escalation with BDC-3042 suggests that this agent could be combined with standard of care and/or other agents. In addition, dectin-2 appears to be upregulated in many different tumor types and, similar to checkpoint therapy, could have applicability to a wide range of indications with a potential market opportunity that exceeds $10 billion. There are numerous myeloid-directed therapies on the market or in development, including but not limited to those targeting CD40, CD47, Clever-1, dectin-1, LAIR1, LILRBs/ILTs, and SIRP-alpha.
To our knowledge, BDC-4182 is the only ISAC targeting claudin18.2. There are numerous claudin 18.2 targeting agents in development that utilize different therapeutic approaches, including monoclonal antibodies such as zolbetuximab, ASKB-589, FG-M108, TST001, ADCs such as ATG-022, AZD0901/CMG901, EO-3021, IBI-343, LM-302, bispecific antibodies such as ASP2138, AZD5863, givastomig, IBI-389, QLS31905 and cell therapies or CAR-Ts such as CT041, IBI-345, TAC101-CLDN18.2, Clever-1, dectin-1, LAIR1, LILRBs/ILTs, and SIRP-alpha.
Companies developing ISACs or TLR agonists could also be long-term competitors for our Boltbody ISAC platform technology. To the best of our knowledge, the only other ISAC in active clinical development is Mersana Therapeutics’ XMT-2056, a HER2-targeting antibody conjugated to a STING agonist. Turning to systemically administered TLR agonists, Eikon Therapeutics is developing EIK1001, a TLR 7/8 agonist. EIK1001 is in a Phase 3 study in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in melanoma and a Phase 2 study in combination with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer. In preclinical studies, Boltbody ISACs have demonstrated greater effectiveness with differentiated biology compared to unconjugated TLR or STING agonists.
Many of our potential competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical, and clinical development, obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing approved drugs than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites, and enrolling subjects for our clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Our success is contingent in part upon the successful development and commercialization of our pipeline candidates and proving them to be more effective or safer than competing products in our target indications. We could see a reduction or elimination of our commercial opportunity if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any drug that we may develop. Our competitors also may be more successful than us in obtaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or other regulatory approvals for their drugs more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our pipeline candidates, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market.
Intellectual Property
Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to obtain, maintain and protect intellectual property and other
7
Table of Contents
proprietary rights for our current and future product candidates, and our Boltbody ISAC approach through a variety of methods, including seeking and maintaining patents intended to cover our Boltbody ISAC approach, our products and compositions, their methods of use and processes for their manufacture and any other inventions that are commercially important to the development of our business, novel discoveries, product development technologies and know-how, to operate without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property and proprietary rights of others and to prevent others from infringing, misappropriating or violating our intellectual property and proprietary rights. We also rely on trademarks, trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation and confidential information to develop and maintain our proprietary position.
Regardless of the coverage we seek under our existing patent applications, there is always a risk that an alteration to the product or process may provide sufficient basis for a competitor to avoid infringement claims. In addition, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before a patent is issued and courts can reinterpret patent scope after issuance. Moreover, many jurisdictions, including the United States, permit third parties to challenge issued patents in administrative proceedings, which may result in further narrowing or even cancellation of patent claims. Furthermore, we cannot provide any assurance that any patents will be issued from our pending or any future applications or that any current or future issued patents will adequately protect our intellectual property. For this and other risks related to our proprietary technology, inventions, improvements, Boltbody ISAC approach and product candidates, please see the section entitled “Risk Factors–Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”
As of December 31, 2024, we have 2 issued U.S. patents, 1 issued European patent, and 1 issued Japanese patent that are solely owned by us and 4 issued U.S. patents and 5 issued foreign (Australian, Chinese, European, Japanese, and Korean) patents that we co-own with Stanford and for which Stanford has exclusively licensed its rights to us under the 2015 Stanford Agreement. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, we own or co-own with Stanford, for which Stanford has exclusively licensed its rights to us under the 2015 Stanford Agreement, approximately 202 pending patent applications in various countries (23 of which are pending in the U.S., and 7 of which are Patent Cooperation Treaty ("PCT") applications that have yet to enter the national phase in the U.S.).
More particularly, we have 1 issued U.S. patent, 1 pending U.S. nonprovisional patent application, 1 pending PCT application that has yet to enter the national phase in one or more countries, and 24 pending foreign patent applications, which we solely own, directed to BDC-3042, our novel agonistic antibody targeting an immune-activating receptor expressed on TAMs known as Dectin-2 (CLEC6A). The issued patent and the pending U.S. and foreign patent applications, if issued, are expected to expire between 2041 and 2044, excluding any extension of patent term that may be available. We also have 3 pending U.S. nonprovisional patent applications, 40 pending foreign patent applications, and 2 pending U.S. provisional patent applications, which we solely own, directed to BDC-4182, our next-generation Boltbody ISAC clinical candidate targeting claudin 18.2. The pending U.S. and foreign patent applications, if issued, are expected to expire between 2040 and 2045, excluding any extension of patent term that may be available.
In addition, we have 5 issued U.S. patents, 7 issued foreign patents, and 131 pending patent applications directed to ISAC technology other than BDC-3042 and BDC-4182, including 4 issued U.S. patents and 5 issued foreign patents covering our previous lead product candidate trastuzumab imbotolimod and the use thereof, which we co-own with Stanford and have exclusively licensed under the 2015 Stanford Agreement. Of these 131 pending patent applications, 1 is a U.S. provisional patent application, 6 are PCT applications that have yet to enter the national phase in one or more countries, 16 are U.S. nonprovisional patent applications, and 108 are foreign patent applications. The issued patents and the pending U.S. and foreign patent applications, if issued, are expected to expire between 2035 and 2045 excluding any extension of patent term that may be available.
The patents and patent applications licensed from Stanford are subject to retained rights by Stanford to allow academic and non-profit research institutions to practice the licensed technology and patents for non-commercial purposes. For more information regarding our license agreement with Stanford, please see “—License Agreements.”
Some of our pending patent applications in the United States are provisional patent applications. Provisional patent applications are not eligible to become issued patents until, among other things, we file a non-provisional patent application within 12 months of filing of one or more of our related provisional patent applications. If we do not timely file any non-provisional patent applications, we may lose our priority date with respect to our provisional patent applications and any patent protection on the inventions disclosed in our provisional patent applications. While we intend to timely file non-provisional patent applications relating to our provisional patent applications, we cannot predict whether any such patent applications will result in the issuance of patents that provide us with any competitive
8
Table of Contents
advantage.
The terms of individual issued patents extend for varying periods depending on the date of filing of the patent applications or the dates of patent issuance and the legal term of patents in the countries in which they are obtained. Generally, utility patents issued for applications filed in the United States are granted a term of 20 years from the earliest effective filing date of a non-provisional patent application, assuming the patent has not been terminally disclaimed over a commonly owned patent or a patent naming a common inventor, or over a patent not commonly owned but that was disqualified as prior art as the result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. The life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is therefore limited and once our issued patents have expired, we may face competition, including from other competing technologies. In addition, in certain instances, the term of a U.S. patent can be extended to recapture a portion of the delay by the USPTO in issuing the patent as well as a portion of the term effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory review period. However, as to the FDA component, the restoration period cannot be longer than five years, the total patent term including the restoration period must not exceed 14 years following FDA approval, only one patent applicable to each regulatory review period may be extended and only those claims covering the approved drug or a method for using it may be extended. We may not receive an extension if we fail to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, fail to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements.
Moreover, the length of the extension could be less than we request. There can be no assurance that we will benefit from any patent term extension or favorable adjustment to the term of any of our patents. The duration of foreign patents varies in accordance with provisions of applicable local law, but typically is also 20 years from the earliest effective filing date. The actual protection afforded by a patent may vary on a product-by-product basis and from country to country and can depend upon many factors, including the type of patent, the scope of its coverage, the availability of regulatory-related extensions, the availability of legal remedies in a particular country and the validity and enforceability of the patent. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.
Furthermore, we rely upon trade secrets and know-how, confidential information, unpatented technologies, continuing technological innovation and other proprietary information to develop, protect and maintain our competitive position and aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not presently consider appropriate for, patent protection and prevent competitors from reverse engineering or copying our technologies. However, the foregoing rights, technologies and information are difficult to protect. We seek to protect them by, in part, using confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants and any potential commercial partners and collaborators and invention assignment agreements with our employees. We also have implemented or intend to implement confidentiality agreements or invention assignment agreements with our selected consultants and any potential commercial partners. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the invention assignment agreements, to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed through a relationship with a third party. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. There can be no assurance that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other intellectual property or proprietary information. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our commercial partners, collaborators, employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
Our commercial success will also depend in part on not infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual or proprietary rights of third parties. The issuance of third-party patents could require us to alter our development or commercial strategies, change our products or processes, obtain licenses to additional third-party patents or other intellectual property or cease certain activities. Our breach of any license agreements or failure to obtain a license to proprietary rights that we may require to develop or commercialize our future products may have an adverse impact on us. Given that patent applications in the United States and certain other jurisdictions are maintained in secrecy for 18 months or potentially longer and the publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature often lags actual discoveries, we cannot be certain of the patent protection being sought by third parties and/or the priority of inventions covered by such patent applications. Moreover, we may have to participate in interference, revocation, derivation, re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, or opposition proceedings brought by third parties or declared by the USPTO or an equivalent foreign body. See “Risk Factors–Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property” for additional information regarding these and other risks related to our intellectual property portfolio and their potential effect on us.
9
Table of Contents
Government Regulation
Government authorities in the United States at the federal, state, and local level and in other countries and jurisdictions, including the European Union, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing, and export and import of drug and biological products, such as our investigational medicines and any future investigational medicines. Generally, before a new drug or biologic can be marketed, considerable data demonstrating its quality, safety and efficacy must be obtained, organized into a format specific for each regulatory authority, submitted for review and approved by the regulatory authority.
Regulatory Approval in the United States and European Union
In the United States, pharmaceutical products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, the Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, and other federal and state statutes and regulations. These regulations govern, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, storage, recordkeeping, approval, labeling, promotion and marketing, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, sampling, and import and export of pharmaceutical products, including biological products such as our Boltbody ISAC product candidates. Our Boltbody ISACs and monoclonal antibodies are subject to approval for marketing via a Biologics License Application, or BLA. Failure to comply with applicable U.S. requirements may subject a company to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as clinical hold, FDA refusal to approve pending BLAs, warning or untitled letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties, and criminal prosecution.
Our investigational medicines and any future investigational medicines must be approved by the FDA before they may be legally marketed in the United States. The process generally involves the following:
•
completion of extensive preclinical laboratory and animal studies in accordance with applicable regulations, including studies conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice, or GLP, requirements;
•
submission to the FDA of an IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
•
approval by an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, or independent ethics committee at each clinical trial site before each clinical trial may be commenced;
•
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with applicable IND regulations, Good Clinical Practice, or GCP, requirements and other clinical trial-related regulations to establish the safety and efficacy of the investigational product for each proposed indication;
•
submission to the FDA of a BLA and payment of any user fees for FDA review of the BLA;
•
a determination by the FDA within 60 days of its receipt of a BLA to accept the filing for review;
•
satisfactory completion of one or more FDA pre-approval inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the biologic, or components thereof, will be produced to assess compliance with cGMP requirements to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the biologic’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
•
satisfactory completion of any potential FDA audits of the clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the BLA to assure compliance with GCP and integrity of the clinical data;
•
FDA review and approval of the BLA, including consideration of the views of any FDA advisory committee; and
•
compliance with any post-approval requirements, including Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, where applicable, and post-approval studies required by the FDA as a condition of approval.
The process in the European Union and other countries or jurisdictions with developed regulatory regimes is broadly comparable.
10
Table of Contents
Preclinical Studies
Before testing any biological product candidates in humans, the product candidate must undergo rigorous preclinical testing. Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry and formulation, as well as in vitro and animal studies to assess the potential for adverse events and in some cases to establish a rationale for therapeutic use. The conduct of preclinical studies is subject to federal regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations for safety/toxicology studies. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and plans for clinical studies, among other things, to the FDA as part of an IND. An IND is a request for authorization from the FDA to administer an investigational product to humans and must become effective before human clinical trials may begin. Some long-term preclinical testing may continue after the IND is submitted. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the trial on clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result, submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence.
Clinical Trials
The clinical stage of development involves the administration of the investigational product to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of qualified investigators, generally physicians not employed by or under the trial sponsor’s control. Clinical trials must be conducted: (i) in compliance with federal regulations; (ii) in compliance with GCP, an international standard meant to protect the rights and health of patients and to define the roles of clinical trial sponsors, administrators and monitors; as well as (iii) under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated in the trial. Each protocol involving testing on U.S. patients and subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Furthermore, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) for each institution at which the clinical trial will be conducted to ensure that the risks to individuals participating in the clinical trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB also approves the informed consent form that must be provided to each clinical trial subject or his or her legal representative and must monitor the clinical trial until completed.
There also are requirements governing the reporting of ongoing clinical trials and completed clinical trial results to public registries. Information about certain clinical trials, including clinical trial results, must be submitted within specific timeframes for publication on the www.clinicaltrials.gov website. Information related to the product, patient population, phase of investigation, clinical trial sites, and investigators and other aspects of the clinical trial is then made public as part of the registration. Disclosure of the results of these clinical trials can be delayed in certain circumstances for up to two years after the date of completion of the trial.
A sponsor who wishes to conduct a clinical trial outside of the United States may, but need not, obtain FDA authorization to conduct the clinical trial under an IND. If a foreign clinical trial is not conducted under an IND, the sponsor may still submit data from the clinical trial to the FDA in support of a BLA. The FDA will accept a well-designed and well-conducted foreign clinical trial not conducted under an IND if the clinical trial was conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and reflected the makeup of the United States population, and the FDA is able to validate the data through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary.
Clinical trials are generally conducted in three sequential phases, known as Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3:
•
Phase 1 clinical trials generally involve a small number of healthy volunteers or subjects with the target disease, usually studying an escalating single dose or multiple doses of the product candidate. The primary purpose of Phase 1 trials is to assess the metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacologic action, side effect tolerability, safety of the product candidate, determine the dosing regimen(s) for subsequent investigations, and, if possible, early evidence of effectiveness.
•
Phase 2 clinical trials generally involve studies in subjects with the target disease to evaluate effectiveness for a specific indication or indications. At the same time, safety and further pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information is collected and possible adverse effects and safety risks are identified.
•
Phase 3 clinical trials generally involve a large number of patients at multiple sites and are designed to provide the data necessary to demonstrate clinical efficacy of the product for its intended use, its safety in use and to establish the overall benefit/risk relationship of the product and provide an adequate basis for product
11
Table of Contents
labeling. In most cases, the FDA requires two adequate and well-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of a product.
These phases may overlap or be combined. For example, a Phase 1/2 clinical trial may contain both a dose-escalation stage and a dose-expansion stage, the latter of which may confirm tolerability at the recommended dose for expansion in future clinical trials (as in traditional Phase 1 clinical trials) and provide insight into the anti-tumor effects of the investigational therapy in selected subpopulation(s).
Typically, during the development of oncology therapies, subjects enrolled in Phase 1 clinical trials are cancer patients and, as a result, considerably more information on clinical activity may be collected during such trials than during Phase 1 clinical trials for non-oncology therapies. A single Phase 3 or Phase 2 trial with other confirmatory evidence may be sufficient to provide substantial evidence of effectiveness (generally subject to the requirement of additional post-approval studies).
Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 and other types of clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA, the IRB, or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including non-compliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or if the drug or biologic has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. Additionally, some clinical trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board or committee. This group provides recommendations as to whether a trial may move forward at designated checkpoints based on access to certain data from the trial.
Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies, and must develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug or biologic, as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product and, among other things, companies must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the investigational medicines do not undergo unacceptable deterioration over their shelf life.
In 2014, Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014 was adopted. The new Regulation is directly applicable in all EU Member States (without national implementation) and entered into application on January 31, 2022. The new Regulation seeks to simplify and streamline the approval of clinical trials in the EU. Pursuant to the Regulation, the sponsor shall submit a single Clinical Trial Application (CTA) via the EMA's Clinical Trials Information System, or CTIS, which will cover all regulatory and ethics assessments from the member states concerned.
Any submissions made from January 31, 2023, onwards must be made through CTIS and all trials authorized pursuant to the Directive that are still ongoing on January 31, 2025, must have their details registered on CTIS. In both cases trials registered on CTIS must comply with the Regulation. Once the CTA is approved in accordance with a member state's requirements, clinical trial development may proceed. Approval and monitoring of clinical trials in the EU is, as it was under the Directive, the responsibility of individual member states, but compared to the position prior to the applicability of the Clinical Trials Regulation there is likely to be more collaboration, information-sharing, and decision-making between member states. The new Regulation also aims to streamline and simplify the rules on safety reporting and introduces enhanced transparency requirements, such as mandatory submission of a summary of the clinical trial results to a new EU Database. Clinical trials must be carried out in accordance with GCP.
Review Process
Following completion of the clinical trials, the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials are submitted to the FDA as part of a BLA, along with proposed labeling, chemistry, and manufacturing information to ensure product quality and other relevant data. To support marketing approval, the data submitted must be sufficient in quality and quantity to establish the safety and efficacy of the investigational product to the satisfaction of the FDA. FDA approval of a BLA must be obtained before a biologic or drug may be marketed in the United States.
The cost of preparing and submitting a BLA is substantial. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, each
12
Table of Contents
BLA must be accompanied by a substantial user fee. The FDA adjusts the PDUFA user fees on an annual basis. Fee waivers or reductions are available in certain circumstances, including a waiver of the application fee for the first application filed by a small business. Additionally, no user fees are assessed on BLAs for products designated as orphan drugs, unless the product also includes a non-orphan indication. The applicant under an approved BLA is also subject to an annual program fee.
The FDA reviews all submitted BLAs before it accepts them for filing and may request additional information. The FDA must make a decision on accepting a BLA for filing within 60 days of receipt, and such decision could include a refusal to file by the FDA. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the BLA. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under PDUFA, the FDA has 10 months, from the filing date, in which to complete its initial review of an original BLA for a new molecular entity and respond to the applicant, and six months from the filing date of an original BLA designated for priority review. The review process for both standard and priority review may be extended by the FDA for three additional months to consider certain late-submitted information, or information intended to clarify information already provided in the submission. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA goal dates for standard and priority BLAs, and the review process can be extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification.
Before approving a BLA, the FDA will conduct a pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facilities for the new product to determine whether they comply with cGMP requirements. The FDA will not approve the product unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications.
The FDA also may audit data from clinical trials to ensure compliance with GCP requirements and the integrity of the data supporting safety and efficacy. Additionally, the FDA may refer applications for novel products or products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions, if any. The FDA is not bound by recommendations of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations when making decisions on approval. The FDA likely will reanalyze the clinical trial data, which could result in extensive discussions between the FDA and the applicant during the review process.
After the FDA evaluates a BLA, it will issue either an approval letter or a Complete Response Letter, or CRL. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the biologic with specific prescribing information for specific indications. A CRL indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete, and the application will not be approved in its present form. A CRL generally outlines the deficiencies in the BLA and may require additional clinical data, additional pivotal clinical trial(s) and/or other significant and time-consuming requirements related to clinical trials, preclinical studies, or manufacturing for the FDA to reconsider the application. If a CRL is issued, the applicant may either resubmit the BLA, addressing all deficiencies identified in the letter, or withdraw the application or request an opportunity for a hearing. The FDA has committed to reviewing such resubmissions in two or six months, depending on the type of information included. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may decide that the BLA does not satisfy the criteria for approval.
As a condition of BLA approval, the FDA may require a REMS to help ensure that the benefits of the biologic outweigh the potential risks to patients. A REMS can include medication guides, communication plans for healthcare professionals, and elements to assure a product’s safe use, or ETASU. An ETASU can include, but is not limited to, special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing the product, dispensing the product only under certain circumstances, special monitoring and the use of patient-specific registries. The requirement for a REMS can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. Moreover, the FDA may require substantial post-approval testing and surveillance to monitor the product’s safety or efficacy.
An application for authorization to market a product in the European Union, or one or more member states, proceeds under one of four procedures: a centralized authorization procedure, a mutual recognition procedure, a decentralized procedure or a national procedure. Since our products, by virtue of being antibody-based biologics, fall under the centralized procedure, only this procedure will be described here. A successful application under the centralized authorization procedure results in a marketing authorization from the European Commission, which is automatically valid in all European Union member states. The other European Economic Area member states (namely Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) are also obligated to recognize the European Commission decision. The EMA and the European Commission administer the centralized authorization procedure.
13
Table of Contents
Under the centralized authorization procedure, the CHMP serves as the scientific committee that renders opinions about the safety, efficacy and quality of human products on behalf of the EMA. The CHMP is composed of experts nominated by each member state’s national drug authority, with one of them appointed to act as Rapporteur for the coordination of the evaluation with the possible assistance of a further member of the CHMP acting as a Co-Rapporteur. After approval, the Rapporteur(s) continue to monitor the product throughout its life cycle. The CHMP is required to issue an opinion within 210 days of receipt of a valid application, though the clock is stopped to ask the applicant for clarification of anything contained within the application or further supporting data. The process is complex and involves extensive consultation with the regulatory authorities of member states and a number of experts. Once the procedure is completed, a European Public Assessment Report is produced. If the CHMP concludes that the quality, safety and efficacy of the medicinal product is sufficiently proven, it adopts a positive opinion. The CHMP’s opinion is sent to the European Commission, which uses the opinion as the basis for its decision whether to grant a marketing authorization. If the opinion is negative, information is given as to the grounds on which this conclusion was reached. After approval, the Rapporteur(s) continue to monitor the product throughout its life cycle.
Orphan Drug Designation
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug or biological product intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more than 200,000 individuals in the United States but for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making the product for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product in the United States.
Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting a BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation on its own does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process.
If a product that has orphan designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same product for the same indication for seven years from the date of such approval, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan exclusivity by means of greater effectiveness, greater safety, or providing a major contribution to patient care, or in instances of drug supply issues. Competitors, however, may receive approval of either a different product for the same indication or the same product for a different indication. In the latter case, because healthcare professionals are free to prescribe products for off-label uses, based on their independent medical judgment, the competitor’s product could be used for the orphan indication despite another product’s orphan exclusivity.
FDA's determination of whether two antibody–drug conjugates, or ADCs, are the same product for purposes of orphan drug exclusivity is based on a determination of sameness of the monoclonal antibody element and the functional element of the conjugated molecule. Two ADCs are deemed to be the same product if the complementarity determining region sequences of the antibody and the functional element of the conjugated molecule are the same. A difference in either of those two elements can result in a determination that the molecules are different.
Regulation (EC) 141/2000 states that a drug shall be designated as an orphan drug in the European Union if its sponsor can establish (i) that it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition affecting not more than five in 10,000 persons in the European Union when the application is made, or that it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the European Union and that without incentives it is unlikely that the marketing of the drug in the European Union would generate sufficient return to justify the necessary investment; and (ii) that there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question that has been authorized in the European Union or, if such method exists, the drug will be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. Regulation (EC) 847/2000 sets out criteria for the designation of orphan drugs. An application for designation as an orphan product can be made any time prior to the filing of an application for approval to market the product. Marketing authorization for an orphan drug leads to a 10-year period of orphan market exclusivity, during which the EMA and European Union Member States shall not accept another marketing authorization application for the same indication for a similar medicinal product. This period of orphan market exclusivity can be reduced to six years if it no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation by the end of the fifth year or extended to 12 years with an agreed Pediatric Investigation Plan, or PIP.
14
Table of Contents
Expedited Development and Review Programs
The FDA is authorized to designate certain products for expedited review if they are intended to address an unmet medical need in the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition.
Fast Track designation may be granted for products that are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition for which there is no effective treatment, and preclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition. Fast Track designation applies to both the product and the specific indication for which it is being studied. The sponsor of a new biologic candidate can request the FDA to designate the candidate for a specific indication for Fast Track status concurrent with, or after, the submission of the IND for the candidate. The FDA must determine if the biologic candidate qualifies for Fast Track designation within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s request. For Fast Track products, sponsors may have greater interactions with the FDA and the FDA may initiate review of sections of a Fast Track product’s BLA before the application is complete. This “rolling review” is available if the FDA determines, after preliminary evaluation of clinical data submitted by the sponsor, that a Fast Track product may be effective. The sponsor must also provide, and the FDA must approve, a schedule for the submission of the remaining information and the sponsor must pay applicable user fees. Any product submitted to the FDA for marketing, including under a Fast Track program, may be eligible for other types of FDA programs intended to expedite development and review, such as priority review and accelerated approval.
Breakthrough therapy designation may be granted for products that are intended, alone or in combination with one or more other products, to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate substantial improvement over currently approved therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. Under the breakthrough therapy program, the sponsor of a new biologic candidate may request that the FDA designate the candidate for a specific indication as a breakthrough therapy concurrent with, or after, the submission of the IND for the biologic candidate. The FDA must determine if the biological product qualifies for breakthrough therapy designation within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s request. The FDA may take certain actions with respect to breakthrough therapies, including holding meetings with the sponsor throughout the development process, providing timely advice to the product sponsor regarding development and approval, involving more senior staff in the review process, assigning a cross-disciplinary project lead for the review team, and taking other steps to design the clinical studies in an efficient manner.
Priority review may be granted for products that are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety and effectiveness compared to available therapies. The FDA will attempt to direct additional resources to the evaluation of an application designated for priority review in an effort to facilitate the review.
Accelerated approval may be granted for products that are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and that generally provide a meaningful therapeutic advantage to patients over existing treatments. A product eligible for accelerated approval may be approved on the basis of either a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. In clinical trials, a surrogate endpoint is a measurement of laboratory or clinical signs of a disease or condition that substitutes for a direct measurement of how a patient feels, functions, or survives. The accelerated approval pathway is most often used in settings in which the course of a disease is long, and an extended period of time is required to measure the intended clinical benefit of a product, even if the effect on the surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint occurs rapidly. Thus, accelerated approval has been used extensively in the development and approval of products for treatment of a variety of cancers in which the goal of therapy is generally to improve survival or decrease morbidity and the duration of the typical disease course requires lengthy and sometimes large studies to demonstrate a clinical or survival benefit. The accelerated approval pathway is contingent on a sponsor’s agreement to conduct additional post-approval confirmatory studies to verify and describe the product’s clinical benefit. These confirmatory trials must be completed with due diligence and, in some cases, the FDA may require that the trial be designed, initiated and/or fully enrolled prior to approval. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or to confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, would allow the FDA to withdraw the product from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for product candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or the time period for FDA review or approval may not be shortened. Furthermore, Fast Track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, priority review and accelerated approval do not change the
15
Table of Contents
standards for approval but may expedite the development or approval process.
Similar conditional approval and accelerated assessment processes exist in the European Union for medicine that would fulfill an unmet medical need or therapeutic innovation. We believe that some of the disease indications in which our product candidates are currently being or may be developed in the future qualify for this provision, and we will take advantage of this provision as appropriate.
Additional Controls for Biologics
To help reduce the increased risk of the introduction of adventitious agents, the PHSA emphasizes the importance of manufacturing controls for products whose attributes cannot be precisely defined. The PHSA also provides authority to the FDA to immediately suspend licenses in situations where there exists a danger to public health, to prepare or procure products in the event of shortages and critical public health needs, and to authorize the creation and enforcement of regulations to prevent the introduction or spread of communicable diseases in the United States and between states.
After a BLA is approved, the product may also be subject to official lot release as a condition of approval. As part of the manufacturing process, the manufacturer is required to perform certain tests on each product lot before it is released for distribution. If the product is subject to official release by the FDA, the manufacturer submits samples of each product lot to the FDA together with a release protocol showing a summary of the history of manufacture of the lot and the results of all the manufacturer’s tests performed on the lot. The FDA may also perform certain confirmatory tests on lots of some products, such as viral vaccines, before releasing the lots for distribution by the manufacturer. In addition, the FDA conducts laboratory research related to the regulatory standards on the safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness of biological products. As with drugs, after approval of biologics, manufacturers must address any safety issues that arise, are subject to recalls or a halt in manufacturing, and are subject to periodic inspection after approval.
Pediatric Information
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, BLAs or supplements to BLAs must contain data to assess the safety and effectiveness of the biological product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the biological product is safe and effective. The FDA may grant full or partial waivers, or deferrals, for submission of data. Unless otherwise required by regulation, PREA generally does not apply to any biological product for an indication for which orphan designation has been granted. However, beginning in 2020, PREA will apply to BLAs for orphan-designated biologics if the biologic is a molecularly targeted cancer product intended for the treatment of an adult cancer and is directed at a molecular target that FDA has determined is substantially relevant to the growth or progression of a pediatric cancer.
The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, or the BPCA, provides a six-month extension of any exclusivity–patent or non-patent–for a biologic if certain conditions are met. Conditions for exclusivity include the FDA’s determination that information relating to the use of a new biologic in the pediatric population may produce health benefits in that population, FDA making a written request for pediatric studies, and the applicant agreeing to perform, and reporting on, the requested studies within the statutory timeframe. Applications under the BPCA are treated as priority applications, with all the benefits that designation confers.
While there is no direct equivalent to the separate route for biologics, broadly equivalent requirements and controls similarly apply to the submission of pediatric testing and marketing authorization applications to the European Medicines Agency in the European Union and, post-approval, to the holding of such marketing authorizations, including conditionality.
Post-Approval Requirements
Once a BLA is approved, a product will be subject to certain post-approval requirements. For instance, the FDA tightly regulates the post-approval marketing and promotion of biologics, including standards and regulations for direct-to-consumer advertising, off-label promotion, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities and promotional activities, involving the Internet. Biologics may be marketed only for the approved indications and in a manner consistent with the provisions of the approved labeling.
16
Table of Contents
Adverse event reporting and submission of periodic safety summary reports is required following FDA approval of a BLA. The FDA also may require post-marketing testing, known as Phase 4 testing, REMS, and surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved product, or the FDA may place conditions on an approval that could restrict the distribution or use of the product. In addition, quality control, biological product manufacture, packaging and labeling procedures must continue to conform to cGMP after approval. Biologic manufacturers and certain of their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies. The FDA is authorized to conduct periodic unannounced inspections at any establishment where a biologic product is manufactured to assess cGMP compliance. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas of production and quality-control to maintain compliance with cGMP.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information, imposition of post-market studies or clinical studies to assess new safety risks or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. Potential consequences include, among other things:
•
restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, suspension of the approval, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls;
•
fines, warnings or other enforcement-related letters or holds on post-approval clinical studies;
•
refusal of the FDA to approve pending BLAs or supplements to approved BLAs, or suspension or revocation of product license approvals;
•
product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or
•
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
Broadly equivalent requirements, controls and sanctions similarly apply to supply, QA, manufacture, labeling, advertising, pharmacovigilance, and tracing of medicinal products as imposed by European Union laws and enforced by European Union national regulatory authorities.
U.S. Patent Term Restoration and Marketing Exclusivity
Depending upon the timing, duration, and specifics of FDA approval of our product candidates, some of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Hatch Waxman Amendments. The Hatch Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. Patent term extension, however, cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term extension period is generally one half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of a BLA, plus the time between the submission date of a BLA and the approval of that application, except that the review period is reduced by any time during which the applicant failed to exercise due diligence. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for such an extension, only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent. The USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. In the future, we or our licensors may apply for patent term extension for our owned or licensed patents to add patent life beyond their current expiration date, depending on the expected length of the clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of the relevant BLA. However, an extension might not be granted because of, for example, our or our licensors’ failure to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failure to apply within applicable deadlines, failure to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or any other failure to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than requested. There is no guarantee that the applicable authorities, including the FDA in the United States, will agree with our assessment of whether any extensions should be granted, and if granted, the length of such extensions.
17
Table of Contents
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or the BPCIA, created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown to be biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Biosimilarity, which requires that the biological product be highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and that there be no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency, can be shown through analytical studies, animal studies and a clinical trial or trials. Interchangeability requires that a biological product be biosimilar to the reference product and that the product can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product in any given patient and, for products administered multiple times to an individual, that the product and the reference product may be alternated or switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biological product without such alternation or switch.
A reference biological product is granted 12 years of data exclusivity from the time of first licensure of the product and the FDA will not accept an application for a biosimilar or interchangeable product based on the reference biological product until four years after the date of first licensure of the reference product. “First licensure” typically means the initial date the product at issue was licensed in the United States. Date of first licensure does not include the date of licensure of (and a new period of exclusivity is not available for) a biological product if the licensure is for a supplement for the biological product or for a subsequent application by the same sponsor or manufacturer of the biological product (or licensor, predecessor in interest or other related entity) for a change (not including a modification to the structure of the biological product) that results in a new indication, route of administration, dosing schedule, dosage form, delivery system, delivery device or strength, or for a modification to the structure of the biological product that does not result in a change in safety, purity or potency.
Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom
On June 23, 2016, the electorate in the United Kingdom voted in favor of Brexit and the United Kingdom officially withdrew from the European Union on January 31, 2020. Great Britain is no longer covered by the European Union’s procedures for the grant of marketing authorizations (Northern Ireland is covered by the centralized authorization procedure and can be covered under the decentralized or mutual recognition procedures). A separate marketing authorization will be required to market drugs in Great Britain. Various national procedures are now available to place a drug on the market in the United Kingdom, Great Britain, or Northern Ireland, with the main national procedure having a maximum timeframe of 150 days (excluding time taken to provide any further information or data required). The data exclusivity periods in the United Kingdom are currently in line with those in the European Union, but the Trade and Cooperation Agreement provides that the periods for both data and market exclusivity are to be determined by domestic law, and so there could be divergence in the future.
Gaining orphan drug designation in Great Britain following Brexit is based on the prevalence of the condition in Great Britain (rather than in the European Union). It is therefore possible that conditions that are currently designated as orphan conditions in Great Britain will no longer be and that conditions that are not currently designated as orphan conditions in the European Union will be designated as such in Great Britain. Unlike in the European Union, applications for orphan drug designation in Great Britain are reviewed in parallel with the corresponding marketing authorization application.
The regulatory framework in place in the United Kingdom in relation to clinical trials is derived from the European Union's Clinical Trials Directive, as implemented into United Kingdom law. The Clinical Trials Regulation does not apply in Great Britain. It is uncertain as to what extent the United Kingdom will seek to align its regulations with the Clinical Trials Regulation, and there are already added administrative burdens as a result of Brexit for trials that take place both in the United Kingdom and the European Union, for example United Kingdom sponsored trials that also have sites in the European Union now need to have a legal representative in the European Union.
International Regulation
In addition to regulations in the United States and Europe, a variety of foreign regulations govern clinical trials, commercial sales, privacy and security of health information, and distribution of product candidates. The approval process varies from country to country and the time to approval may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA or European Commission approval.
18
Table of Contents
Other U.S. Healthcare Laws and Regulations and Legislative Reform
U.S. Healthcare and Privacy Laws and Regulations
Healthcare providers and third-party payors will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our operations, including any arrangements with healthcare providers, third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws that may affect the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we would market, sell, and distribute our products. The U.S. healthcare laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:
•
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits any person or entity from, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of an item or service reimbursable, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
•
Federal civil and criminal false claims laws, such as the Federal False Claims Act, which can be enforced by private citizens through civil qui tam actions, and civil monetary penalty laws prohibit individuals or entities from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false, fictitious or fraudulent claims for payment of federal funds, and knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government.
•
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, among other things, imposes criminal liability for executing or attempting to execute a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement to a healthcare benefits program.
•
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, which impose obligations with respect to individually identifiable health information upon covered entities (including health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers), their respective business associates and their covered subcontractors that perform services for them that involve individually identifiable health information.
•
Federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers.
•
The federal transparency requirements under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, created under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care Education and Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, which requires, among other things, certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies reimbursed under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to payments and other transfers of value provided to physicians, (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals and physician ownership and investment interests.
•
State and foreign laws that are analogous to each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may impose similar or more prohibitive restrictions, and may apply to items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers.
•
State laws that require pharmaceutical companies to implement compliance programs, comply with certain compliance guidelines, or to track and report payments and other remuneration provided to healthcare providers; state laws that require the reporting of marketing expenditures or drug pricing,; state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; state laws that prohibit various marketing-related activities; and other federal, state laws that govern the privacy and security of health information.
19
Table of Contents
If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other current or future healthcare laws that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting and oversight obligations, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Although effective compliance programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws, these risks cannot be entirely eliminated. In addition, if any physicians or healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to significant criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.
Legislative Reform
We operate in a highly regulated industry, and new laws, regulations and judicial decisions, or new interpretations of existing laws, regulations, and decisions, related to healthcare availability, the method of delivery and payment for healthcare products and services could negatively affect our business, financial condition, and prospects. There is significant interest in promoting healthcare reforms, and it is likely that federal and state legislatures within the United States and the governments of other countries will continue to consider changes to existing healthcare legislation. For example, the U.S. and state governments continue to propose and pass legislation designed to reduce the cost of healthcare. In 2010, the ACA was enacted which included changes to the coverage and reimbursement of drug products under government healthcare programs.
While there have been executive judicial and congressional challenges to the ACA, several bills affecting the implementation of certain taxes under the ACA have been signed into law. For example, in 2017, the U.S. Congress enacted the Tax Act, which eliminated the tax-based, shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.” On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Further, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or IRA, into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the "donut hole" under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial and congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how such challenges and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the ACA.
In addition, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the United States federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs. In 2011, the U.S. Congress enacted the Budget Control Act, which included provisions intended to reduce the federal deficit. The Budget Control Act resulted in the imposition of 2% reductions in Medicare payments to providers beginning in 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect until 2032 unless additional congressional action is taken. In 2012, the U.S. Congress enacted the American Taxpayer Relief Act, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
20
Table of Contents
Furthermore, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products. This has resulted in several congressional inquiries and proposed legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. At the federal level, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue to advance these principles. Further, the IRA, among other things (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 29, 2023, HHS announced the list of the first ten drugs that will be subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare drug price negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. In response to the Biden administration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing by the CMS Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the future. Further, on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework. Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future.
Environmental, Health and Safety Laws and Regulations
We and our third-party contractors are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the use, generation, manufacture, distribution, storage, handling, treatment, remediation and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Hazardous chemicals, including flammable and biological materials, are involved in certain aspects of our business, and we cannot eliminate the risk of injury or contamination from the use, generation, manufacture, distribution, storage, handling, treatment or disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our product candidates use PBDs, which are highly potent cytotoxins that require special handling by our and our contractors' staff. In the event of contamination, injury, or failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, fines and penalties associated with such liability could exceed our assets and resources. Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent. We may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.
Pharmaceutical Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement
The availability and extent of coverage and adequate reimbursement by governmental and private third-party payors are essential for most patients to be able to afford expensive medical treatments. In both domestic and foreign markets, sales of our product candidates will depend substantially on the extent to which the costs of our product candidates will be covered by third-party payors, such as government health programs, commercial insurance, and managed healthcare organizations. These third-party payors decide which products will be covered and establish reimbursement levels for those products.
Coverage and reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payor’s determination that use of a product is:
•
a covered benefit under its health plan;
•
safe, effective and medically necessary;
21
Table of Contents
•
appropriate for the specific patient;
•
cost-effective; and
•
neither experimental nor investigational.
Obtaining coverage approval and reimbursement for a product from a government or other third-party payor is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products to the payor. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to coverage and reimbursement at a satisfactory level. If coverage and adequate reimbursement of our future products, if any, are unavailable or limited in scope or amount, such as may result where alternative or generic treatments are available, we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability. Adverse coverage and reimbursement limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in our product candidates, even if such product candidates obtain regulatory approval.
There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. There is no uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement in the United States and, coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by the CMS, which decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare. Private payors often, but not always, follow the CMS’ decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement. It is difficult to predict what third-party payors will decide with respect to coverage and reimbursement for fundamentally novel products such as ours, as there is no body of established practices and precedents for these new products. Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage and adequate reimbursement for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and adequate reimbursement for that product. We may need to conduct expensive pharmaco-economic studies to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of our product candidates. There can be no assurance that our product candidates will be considered medically necessary or cost-effective. In addition to third-party payors, professional organizations and patient advocacy groups such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology can influence decisions about reimbursement for new medicines by determining standards for care. Therefore, it is possible that any of our product candidates, even if approved, may not be covered by third-party payors or the reimbursement limit may be so restrictive that we cannot commercialize the product candidates profitably.
Reimbursement agencies in Europe may be more restrictive than payors in the United States. For example, a number of cancer products have been approved for reimbursement in the United States but not in certain European countries. In Europe, decisions about pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country. In certain countries, new products may be marketed after agreement on reimbursement price has been reached. Such pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after receipt of marketing approval for a product. Political, economic, and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained. Other countries require additional health technology assessments that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies. In addition, the European Union provides options for its member states to restrict the range of products reimbursed by their national health insurance systems to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. With pricing and reimbursement decisions taking place at the member state level, member states may approve a specific price for a product, adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the product on the market or monitor and control prescription volumes and issue guidance to physicians to limit prescriptions. Reference pricing used by various European Union member states and parallel distribution, or arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states, can further reduce prices. Furthermore, many countries in the European Union have increased the number of discounts required on pharmaceutical products. These efforts could continue as countries attempt to manage healthcare expenditures, especially in light of severe fiscal and debt crises experienced by many countries in the European Union. There can be no assurance that any country with reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our products, if approved in those countries. Accordingly, reimbursement for any products in Europe may be lower, compared to the United States and may be insufficient to generate commercially reasonable revenues and profits.
22
Table of Contents
The containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of foreign and domestic governments as well as private third-party payors. The pricing of drugs has been a focus in this effort. Governments and private third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications, which could affect our ability to sell our product candidates profitably. We also expect to experience pricing pressures due to the trend towards managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations, and additional legislative changes. These and other cost-control initiatives could cause us to decrease the price we might establish for products, which could result in lower-than-anticipated product revenues. In addition, the publication of discounts by third-party payors or authorities may lead to further pressure on the prices or reimbursement levels within the country of publication and other countries. If pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels or if coverage and adequate reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, our revenues, and the potential profitability of our product candidates in those countries would be negatively affected.
Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2024, we had 52 employees, all of whom were full-time. Depending on the nature of their job, employees may have the flexibility to work remotely or out of our Redwood City office, laboratory and vivarium space. None of our employees are represented by labor unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good and we have not experienced any work stoppages.
We recognize that attracting, motivating, and retaining talent at all levels is vital to our continued success. Our employees are a significant asset, and we aim to create an equitable, inclusive, diverse, and empowering environment in which our employees can grow and advance their careers. Our overall goal is to develop, expand and retain our workforce in support of our current pipeline and future business objectives. Our human resources objectives include identifying, recruiting, retaining, motivating, and integrating our existing and future employees. By focusing on employee retention and engagement, we also improve our ability to support our clinical trials, our pipeline, our platform technologies, business, and operations, and protect the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our efforts to recruit and retain a diverse and passionate workforce include providing competitive compensation and benefits packages and ensuring we listen to our employees.
We value innovation, passion, data-driven decision making, persistence and honesty. We are building an environment where our employees can thrive and be inspired to make exceptional contributions towards the advancement of novel and more effective therapies for cancer patients. We also seek and support a diverse population of employees, and value the contributions of all without regard to age, race, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation. We recognize the value of our employees’ unique backgrounds and breadth of experience in building a strong and sustainable company.
The principal purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and motivate our employees and directors through grants of stock-based compensation awards and payments of cash-based performance bonus awards. These incentives are intended to encourage employees to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve objectives, thus contributing to our stockholder value. We also offer the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to all employees where they can purchase shares of our common stock at a discounted price. We are committed to providing a competitive and comprehensive benefits package to our employees. Our benefits package is designed to support our employees and their family’s health and well-being. Our benefits include, medical, dental and vision, as well as dependent care, mental health, and other wellness benefits.
We value career development for all employees, and we provide reimbursement and time for employees to attend professional development courses ranging from technical training, competency-based workshops, and leadership development programs. Direct managers also take an active role in identifying individualized development plans to assist their employees in realizing their full potential and creating opportunities for promotions and added responsibilities that enhance the engagement and retention of our workforce. We are committed to maintaining and increasing our investment in our workforce as we grow, including improvements in the way we hire, develop, motivate, and retain employees.
23
Table of Contents
Corporate History
We were incorporated under the laws of Delaware under the name Bolt Therapeutics, Inc. as a private company in January 2015. We changed our name to Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc. in July 2015. Our principal executive offices are located at 900 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, California 94063 and our telephone number is (650) 665-9295. Our corporate website address is www.boltbio.com. We make available, free of charge on our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such reports with the SEC. Alternatively, you may access these reports at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, and the inclusion of our website address is an inactive textual reference only.
24
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business involves significant risks, some of which are described below. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. If any of the following risks actually occur, it could harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition and future prospects. In such event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. This report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors that are described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital
We have a limited operating history and have incurred significant losses since inception, and we anticipate that we may continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
Biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. We are an immuno-oncology company with a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects. With the exception of BDC-3042, all of our other development programs are in preclinical development or drug discovery stage. We commenced operations in 2015, and to date, we have focused primarily on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, developing our proprietary Boltbody ISAC approach, identifying product candidates, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, establishing collaborations, and conducting research, preclinical studies and clinical trials. Our approach to the discovery and development of product candidates based on our Boltbody ISAC approach is unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any product candidates that succeed in clinical development or products of commercial value. For example, we discontinued development of our first Boltbody ISAC program because we determined that it was not efficacious enough to be a commercially viable treatment option for patients. As an organization, we have not yet completed any clinical trials, obtained regulatory approvals, manufactured a commercial-scale product (or arranged for a third party to do so on our behalf), or conducted sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions made about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products.
Since inception in 2015, we have not generated any product revenue and have incurred significant operating losses. Our net losses were $63.1 million and $69.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $427.4 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. It could be at least several years, if ever, before we have product revenue from a commercialized drug. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:
•
continue to advance our research and preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates;
•
expand and initiate further clinical trials for our product candidates;
•
seek to identify additional product candidates;
•
seek marketing approvals for our product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials, if any;
•
establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any products for which we may obtain marketing approval;
•
maintain, expand, protect and enforce our intellectual property portfolio and obtain licenses to third-party intellectual property;
•
attract, hire and retain additional administrative, clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel;
•
enter into third-party relationships for clinical trials, manufacturing and supply; and
•
incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses in operating our business, including the additional costs associated with operating as a public company.
25
Table of Contents
In addition, because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical products and development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses and when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. Our expenses could increase and profitability could be further delayed if we decide to or are required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities such as the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or the U.K. Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, to perform studies or trials in addition to those currently expected, or if there are any delays in the development or completion of any planned or future preclinical studies or clinical trials of our current and future product candidates. Even if we complete the development and regulatory processes described above, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with launching and commercializing our current and future product candidates.
Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company also could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
We will need substantial funding to pursue our business objectives. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on terms favorable to us, we could be forced to delay, reduce or terminate our product development and other operations.
Identifying and developing potential product candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain regulatory approval and begin selling any approved products. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we conduct our ongoing and planned preclinical studies, initiate additional clinical trials for our product candidates and seek regulatory approval for our current product candidates and any future product candidates we may develop. Our expenses could increase beyond our current expectations if the FDA requires us to perform clinical trials and other studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or terminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.
We have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception, with an accumulated deficit of $427.4 million and anticipate continuing to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. Under our current plan, which includes income from collaboration arrangements, we believe our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $70.2 million as of December 31, 2024 may be sufficient to fund our operations through mid-2026. However, due to the significant uncertainty in our plans, including the achievement of our collaboration income, we have concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.
Similarly, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2024, describing the existence of substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
•
the scope, rate of progress, results and costs of drug discovery, preclinical development, laboratory testing and clinical trials for our product candidates;
•
the number and development requirements of product candidates that we may pursue, and other indications for our current product candidates that we may pursue;
•
the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;
•
the scope and costs of manufacturing development and commercial manufacturing activities;
•
the cost associated with commercializing any approved product candidates;
•
the cost and timing of developing our ability to establish sales and marketing capabilities, if any;
•
the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining, enforcing and protecting our intellectual property rights, defending intellectual property-related claims and obtaining licenses to third-party intellectual property;
26
Table of Contents
•
the timing and amount of milestone and royalty payments we are required to make under our license agreements;
•
our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all; and
•
the extent to which we acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies and associated intellectual property.
We will require additional capital to complete our planned clinical development programs for our current product candidates to obtain regulatory approval. Any additional capital raising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our current and future product candidates, if approved.
In addition, we cannot guarantee that future financing will be available on a timely basis, in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Moreover, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders and the issuance of additional securities by us, whether equity or debt, or the market perception that such issuances are likely to occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis on acceptable terms, we may be required to delay, reduce or terminate one or more of our research and development programs or the commercialization of any product candidates that may be approved. This could harm our business and could potentially cause us to cease operations. Considering all of these factors, we believe that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a going concern.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.
If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to third parties to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
We might not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards.
As of December 31, 2024, we had federal and state net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards of $234.9 million and $324.0 million, respectively. The federal NOL carryforwards generated prior to 2018 and state NOL carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire beginning in 2035. We have federal NOL aggregating $230.5 million that are not subject to expiration. The NOL carryforwards subject to expiration could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, as modified by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, federal NOL carryforwards incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and in future taxable years may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal NOL carryforwards in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020 is limited. There is variation in how states will respond to the Tax Act and CARES Act. In addition, for state income tax purposes, there may be periods during which the use of NOL carryforwards are suspended or otherwise limited, such as recent California legislation limiting the usability of NOL carryforwards for tax years beginning in 2020 and before 2022.
Separately, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code, and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income or taxes may be limited. The completion of our initial public offering, together with private placements and other transactions that have
27
Table of Contents
occurred since our inception, may trigger such an ownership change pursuant to Section 382. We have performed a Section 382 study as of September 30, 2024 and expect approximately $2.8 million of federal research and development credits and $51.0 million of California NOL carryforwards to expire unused due to Section 382 limitations.
We may experience ownership changes as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control. If an ownership change occurs and our ability to use our NOL carryforwards is materially limited, it would harm our future operating results by effectively increasing our future tax obligations.
Risks Related to the Development of Our Product Candidates
If none of our product candidates, including those in our collaborations, obtain regulatory approval and are successfully commercialized in one or more indications, or we or our collaboration partners experience significant delays in doing so, we may never generate any product revenue or become profitable.
We have invested most of our efforts in developing our Boltbody ISAC approach, identifying potential product candidates and conducting preclinical studies. In May 2024, we announced the discontinuation of the development of our previous lead product candidate, trastuzumab imbotolimod because we determined that it was not efficacious enough to be a commercially viable treatment option for patients. We do not have any products that have received regulatory approval and may never be able to develop marketable product candidates. We are very early in our product candidate development efforts and BDC-3042 is in the early stages of clinical development. We expect that a substantial portion of our efforts and expenses over the next several years will be devoted to the development of BDC-3042, BDC-4182, and our collaborations. We cannot be certain that any of our other product candidates will receive regulatory approval or will be successfully commercialized even if they receive regulatory approval. The research, testing, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, approval, sale, marketing and distribution of our product candidates are, and will remain, subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and similar foreign regulatory authorities. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate, we must demonstrate through preclinical studies and clinical trials that the product candidate is safe and effective for use in each target indication. Drug development is a long, expensive and uncertain process, and delay or failure can occur at any stage of any of our clinical trials. Failure to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates will prevent us from commercializing and marketing our product candidates, or receiving royalty payments from our collaborators. The success of our product candidates will depend on several additional factors, including:
•
completing clinical trials that demonstrate their safety and efficacy;
•
successful initiation of clinical trials;
•
successful patient enrollment in, and completion, of clinical trials;
•
the ability to successfully develop, in-license or otherwise acquire additional targeting agents for our Boltbody ISACs;
•
receiving marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;
•
obtaining, maintaining, protecting and enforcing patent, trade secret and other intellectual property rights and regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates;
•
completing any post-marketing studies required by applicable regulatory authorities;
•
making and maintaining arrangements with third-party manufacturers, or establishing manufacturing capabilities, for both clinical and commercial supplies of our product candidates;
•
establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities and successfully launching commercial sales of our products, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;
•
the prevalence and severity of adverse events experienced with our product candidates;
•
acceptance of our product candidates by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;
•
a continued acceptable safety profile following approval;
•
obtaining and maintaining healthcare coverage and adequate reimbursement for our product candidates;
•
competing effectively with other cancer therapies, including with respect to the sales and marketing of our product candidates, if approved; and
28
Table of Contents
•
obtaining licenses to any third-party intellectual property we deem necessary or desirable.
Many of these factors are beyond our control, including the time needed to adequately complete clinical testing, the regulatory submission process, potential threats to our intellectual property rights and changes in the competitive landscape. It is possible that none of our product candidates will ever obtain regulatory approval, even if we expend substantial time and resources seeking such approval. If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully complete clinical trials, obtain regulatory approval or, if approved, commercialize our product candidates, which would materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In addition, the clinical trial requirements of the FDA, the EMA, the MHRA and other regulatory agencies and the criteria these regulators may use to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use and market of the potential products. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as ours can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known or extensively studied pharmaceutical or other product candidates.
Our discovery and development of product candidates based on our Boltbody ISAC (immune-stimulating antibody conjugate) approach, as well as the BDC-3042 program based on dectin-2 agonism, are unproven, which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of product candidate development, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value, or if competing technological approaches will limit the commercial value of our product candidates or render our platform obsolete.
The success of our business depends primarily upon our ability to identify, develop and commercialize products based on our proprietary Boltbody ISAC approach, which leverages a novel and unproven approach. Our BDC-3042 program relies on agonizing dectin-2 to reprogram TAMs and is also a novel and unproven approach. BDC-3042 is in clinical development and we have not yet completed any clinical trials for any product candidate or obtained marketing approval thereafter. Our research methodology and novel approach to immunotherapy may be unsuccessful in identifying additional product candidates, and any product candidates based on our technology may be shown to have harmful side effects or may have other characteristics that may necessitate additional clinical testing, or make the product candidates unmarketable or unlikely to receive marketing approval. For example, in August 2022, we announced the discontinuation of development of BDC-2034 due to off-target toxicity related to the targeting antibody. Additionally, in May 2024, we announced the discontinuation of development of our previous lead product candidate, trastuzumab imbotolimod because we determined that it was not efficacious enough to be a commercially viable treatment option for patients. Further, because all of our product candidates and development programs are based on our technology approach, adverse developments with respect to one of our programs may have a significant adverse impact on the actual or perceived likelihood of success and value of our other programs.
In addition, the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to maintain a competitive position with our Boltbody ISAC approach. If we fail to stay at the forefront of technological change in utilizing our Boltbody ISAC approach to create and develop product candidates, we may be unable to compete effectively. Our competitors may render our Boltbody ISAC approach obsolete, or limit the commercial value of our product candidates, by advances in existing technological approaches (for example, using different antibody drug conjugate, or ADC, technologies than we use) or the development of new or different approaches, potentially eliminating the advantages in our drug discovery process that we believe we derive from our research approach and proprietary technologies. By contrast, adverse developments with respect to other companies that attempt to use a similar approach to our approach may adversely impact the actual or perceived value of our Boltbody ISAC approach and potential of our product candidates.
We have concentrated our product research and development efforts on our novel therapeutic approach of using myeloid biology to fight cancer, and our future success depends on the successful development of our product candidates. There can be no assurance that any development problems we experience in the future related to our novel therapy will not cause significant delays or unanticipated costs, or that such development problems can be efficiently solved. We may also experience delays in developing a sustainable, reproducible and scalable manufacturing process or transferring that process to commercial partners, which may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our product candidates on a timely or profitable basis, if at all.
If any of these events occur, we may be forced to abandon our development efforts for a program or programs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and could potentially cause us to cease operations.
29
Table of Contents
We are currently developing, and in the future may develop, product candidates in combination with other therapies and that may expose us to additional risks.
We may develop future product candidates for use in combination with one or more currently approved cancer therapies. Even if any product candidate we develop was to receive marketing approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, we would continue to be subject to the risks that the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with our product candidate or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. Combination therapies are commonly used for the treatment of cancer, and we would be subject to similar risks if we develop any of our product candidates for use in combination with other drugs or for indications other than cancer. This could result in our own products being removed from the market or being less successful commercially.
We may also evaluate future product candidates in combination with one or more other cancer therapies that have not yet been approved for marketing by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities. We will not be able to market and sell any product candidate we develop in combination with any such unapproved cancer therapies that do not ultimately obtain marketing approval.
If the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities do not approve these other drugs or revoke their approval of, or if safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues arise with, the drugs we choose to evaluate in combination with any product candidate we develop, we may be unable to obtain approval of or market any product candidate we develop.
We may seek accelerated approval for some or all of our product candidates from the FDA, however, the FDA may disagree and may require completion of additional clinical trials before considering a Biologics License Application, or BLA, for review.
We may seek accelerated approval for some or all of our product candidates. Under the FDA’s accelerated approval program, the FDA may approve a drug or biologic for a serious or life-threatening illness that provides meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. For drugs and biologics granted accelerated approval, confirmatory trials are required to confirm safety and clinical benefit and convert the application to full approval. These confirmatory trials must be completed with due diligence. Moreover, the FDA may withdraw approval of an application approved under the accelerated approval pathway if, for example:
•
the trial or trials required to verify the predicted clinical benefit of our product candidates fail to verify such benefit or do not demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit, including as to the duration of their effectiveness, to justify the risks associated with the product;
•
other evidence demonstrates that the product is not shown to be safe or effective under the conditions of use;
•
we fail to conduct any required post-approval trial with due diligence; or
•
we disseminate false or misleading promotional materials relating to the relevant product.
Clinical trials are very expensive, time-consuming and difficult to design and implement, and involve uncertain outcomes. Furthermore, results of earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials may not be predictive of results of future preclinical studies or clinical trials.
The risk of failure for our product candidates is high. It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will prove effective or safe in humans or will receive regulatory approval. To obtain the requisite regulatory approvals to market and sell any of our product candidates, we must demonstrate through extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective in humans for use in each target indication. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and the outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. For example, in August 2022, we announced the discontinuation of development of BDC-2034 due to off-target toxicity related to the targeting antibody. Additionally, in May 2024, we announced the discontinuation of development of our previous lead product candidate, trastuzumab imbotolimod because we determined that it was not efficacious enough to be a commercially viable treatment option for patients.
30
Table of Contents