Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc BNET US Equity

Materials · CIK 875729 · FY ends Jun 30
$0.17
-0.01 (-5.56%)
USD · as of 2026-08-28 · marketstack

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc (OTC: BNET), an SEC filer in Agricultural Chemicals, closed at $0.17, -5.6%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $10M as of 2026-08-27. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.

BNET · 10-K · period ended 2020-06-30

← all BNET documents
filed 2020-09-22 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1,4792,078 of 3,953373k characters rendered

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company maintains its corporate offices at

9 East Park Court, Old Bethpage, New York 11804, the offices of its office manager/bookkeeper, and its main corporate telephone

number is (516) 586-5643.

We are the sole owner of seven United States

patents plus one United States patent for which a Notice of Allowance has been received and one United States patent with revival

pending. Bion also owns one Australian patent, two Canadian patents, one patent from New Zealand and two patents from Mexico and

has one International (PCT) Currently Pending (See Item 1, “Patents” above).

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is currently involved in no

litigation matters.

On September 25, 2014, Pennvest exercised

its right to declare the Pennvest Loan in default and has accelerated the Pennvest Loan and demanded that PA1 pay $8,137,117 (principal,

interest plus late charges) on or before October 24, 2014. PA1 did not make the payment and does not have the resources to

make the payment demanded by Pennvest. During August 2012, the Company provided Pennvest (and the PADEP) with data demonstrating

that the Kreider 1 system met the ‘technology guaranty’ standards which were incorporated in the Pennvest financing

documents and, as a result, the Pennvest Loan is now solely an obligation of PA1. However, the Company’s consolidated

balance sheet as of June 30, 2020 reflects the Pennvest Loan as a liability of $9,585,883 despite the fact that the obligation

(if any) solely an obligation of PA 1.PA1 commenced discussions and negotiations

with Pennvest concerning this matter during 2014 but Pennvest rejected PA1’s most recent formal proposal made during the

fall of 2014. No formal or informal proposals are presently under consideration and only sporadic communication has taken place

regarding the matters involved over the last 5+ years. It is not possible at this date to predict the outcome of such this matter,

but the Company believes that a loan modification agreement (coupled with an agreement regarding a technology update and re-start

of full operations of the Kreider 1 System) may be reached in the context of the future development of the Kreider 2 system if/when

a robust market for nutrient reductions develops in Pennsylvania, of which there is no assurance. PA1 and Bion will continue to

evaluate various options with regard to Kreider 1 over the next six (6) to twelve (12) months.

Litigation has not commenced in this matter

but has been threatened by Pennvest. Such litigation is likely if negotiations do not produce a resolution (although the likelihood

is somewhat reduced by the passage of time).

The Company currently is not involved in any other material litigation.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON

EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

(a) Market Information

Our

common stock is quoted on the Over-The-Counter Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol "BNET." The following

quotations reflect inter dealer prices, without retail mark up, markdown or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, High Low High Low

(b) Holders

The number of holders of record of our

common stock at September 1, 2020 was approximately 1,000. Many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions

on behalf of stockholders, so we are unable to estimate the number of stockholders represented by these record holders.

The transfer agent for our common stock

is Equiniti, 3200 Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.

(c) Dividends

We have never paid any cash dividends on

our common stock. Our board of directors does not intend to declare any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but instead intends

to retain earnings, if any, for use in our business operations. The payment of dividends, if any, in the future is within the discretion

of the board of directors and will depend on our future earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial condition, and

other relevant factors.

During each of fiscal year 2020 and 2019

the Company paid an aggregate dividend of $0 and $0, respectively, on shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred

Stock which were outstanding during the year. A dividend of $2,000 was accrued on Series B Preferred Stock during each of the 2020

and 2019 fiscal years.

(d) Securities Authorized for

Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

In June 2006 the Company adopted its 2006 Consolidated

Incentive Plan, as amended ("Plan"), which terminated all prior plans and merged them into the Plan. The Plan was

ratified by the Company's shareholders in October 2006 (and has been amended multiple times since initial ratification).

Under the Plan, Directors may grant Shares, Options, Stand Alone Stock Appreciation Rights ("SAR's"), shares of Restricted

Stock, shares of Phantom Stock and Stock Bonuses and other items with respect to a number of Common Shares that in the aggregate

does not exceed 36,000,000 shares. The maximum number of Common Shares for which Incentive Awards, including Incentive Stock Options,

may be granted to any one Participant shall not exceed 2,000,000 shares in any one calendar year; and the total of all cash payments

to any one participant pursuant to the Plan in any calendar year shall not exceed $1,500,000. As of August 31, 2020, 9,511,600

options have been granted and are outstanding under the Plan (as amended), including all options granted under prior merged plans,

and options granted from July 1, 2020 through September 1, 2020, all of which options are vested as of September 1, 2020. As

of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2020, the Company had no outstanding contingent Stock Bonuses.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes share and exercise

price information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2020:

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — — —

(e) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company

sold 3,168,001 shares of its unregistered common stock (not including 29,000 shares issued to entities for services and 143,316

shares issued upon conversion of debt). During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company sold 18,000 units at

$0.50 per unit and received gross proceeds of $9,000 and net proceeds of $8,100; each unit consisting of one share

of the Company’s restricted common stock and one half warrant to purchase half a share of the Company’s restricted

common stock at $0.75 until December 31, 2020. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company also sold 2,000,001

units at $0.50 per unit, and received gross proceeds of $1,000,000 and net proceeds of $910,500 with each unit consisting of one

share of the Company’s restricted common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s restricted common

stock at $0.75 per share until December 31, 2020. In addition, the Company also sold 1,150,000 units at $0.50 per unit and

received gross proceeds of $575,000 and net proceeds of $517,500 with each unit consisting of one share of the Company’s

restricted common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s restricted common stock at $0.75 until December

31, 2021. During the year ended June 30, 2020, Mark Smith elected to convert a loan payable, accrued

expenses and interest of $15,000, $52,830 and $3,828 respectively, into an aggregate 143,316 units at $0.50 per unit, pursuant

to the 2006 Consolidated Incentive Plan with each unit consisting of one share of the common stock and one warrant to purchase

one share of the Company’s stock for $0.75 per share until December 31, 2024.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company

sold 1,793,606 shares of its unregistered common stock (not including the issuance of 18,162 shares to an employee pursuant to

its 2006 Consolidated Incentive Plan, 116,000 shares issued to entities for services and 200,000 shares issued upon conversion

of debt). During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company sold 1,793,606 unregistered shares at $0.50 per share and received gross

proceeds of $896,801 and net proceeds of $832,921 including units consisting of one share of the Company’s restricted common

stock and one warrant to purchase half of a share of the Company’s restricted common stock at $0.75 per share with expiry

dates ranging from June 30, 2019 through December 31, 2020. The Company also issued 1,028 shares of common stock as commissions.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

N/A

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Included in ITEM 8 are the audited Consolidated

Financial Statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 ("Financial Statements").

Statements made in this Form 10-K that are

not historical or current facts, which represent the Company's expectations or beliefs including, but not limited to, statements

concerning the Company's operations, performance, financial condition, business strategies, and other information, involve substantial

risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results of operations, most of which are beyond the Company's control, could differ

materially. These statements often can be identified by the use of terms such as "may," "will," "expect,"

"believe," anticipate," "estimate," or "continue" or the negative thereof. We wish to caution

readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Any forward-looking

statements represent management's best judgment as to what may occur in the future. However, forward looking statements are subject

to risks, uncertainties and important factors beyond our control that could cause actual results and events to differ materially

from historical results of operations and events and those presently anticipated or projected.

These factors include adverse economic conditions,

entry of new and stronger competitors, inadequate capital, unexpected costs, failure (or delay) to gain product or regulatory approvals

in the United States (or particular states) or foreign countries, loss (permanently or for any extended period of time) of the

services of members of the Company’s small core management team (all of whom are age 70 or older) and failure to capitalize

upon access to new markets. Additional risks and uncertainties that may affect forward looking statements about Bion's business

and prospects include the possibility that markets for nutrient reduction credits (discussed below) and/or other ways to monetize

nutrient reductions will be slow to develop (or not develop at all), the existing default by PA1 on its loan secured by the Kreider

1 system, the possibility that a competitor will develop a more comprehensive or less expensive environmental solution, delays

in market awareness of Bion and our Systems, uncertainties and costs related to research and development efforts to update and

improve Bion’s technologies and applications thereof, and/or delays in Bion's development of Projects and failure of marketing

strategies, each of which could have both immediate and long term material adverse effects by placing us behind our competitors

and requiring expenditures of our limited resources.

THESE RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND FACTORS BEYOND

OUR CONTROL ARE MAGNIFIED DURING THE CURRENT UNCERTAIN PERIOD RELATED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE UNIQUE ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL,

GOVERNMENTAL AND HEALTH-RELATED CONDITIONS IN WHICH THE COMPANY, THE ENTIRE COUNTRY AND THE ENTIRE WORLD NOW RESIDE. TO DATE

THE COMPANY HAS EXPERIENCED DIRECT IMPACTS IN VARIOUS AREAS INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION: I) GOVERNMENT-ORDERED SHUTDOWNS

WHICH HAVE SLOWED THE COMPANY’S RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND OTHER INITIATIVES, II) SHIFTED FOCUS OF STATE AND FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT WHICH IS LIKELY TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE COMPANY’S LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES IN PENNSYLVANIA AND WASHINGTON DC,

III) STRAINS AND UNCERTAINTIES IN BOTH THE EQUITY AND DEBT MARKETS HAVE MADE DISCUSSION AND PLANNING OF FUNDING OF THE COMPANY

AND ITS INITIATIVES AND PROJECTS WITH INVESTMENT BANKERS, BANKS AND POTENTIAL STRATEGIC PARTNERS MORE TENUOUS, IV) STRAINS AND

UNCERTAINTIES IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR AND MARKETS HAVE MADE DISCUSSION AND PLANNING OF FUNDING OF THE COMPANY AND ITS INITIATIVES

AND PROJECTS MORE DIFFICULT AS FUTURE INDUSTRY CONDITIONS ARE NOW MORE DIFFICULT TO ASSESS/PREDICT, V) DUE TO THE AGE AND HEALTH

OF OUR CORE MANAGEMENT TEAM, ALL OF WHOM ARE AGE 70 OR OLDER AND HAVE HAD ONE OR MORE EXISTING HEALTH ISSUES, THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

PLACES THE COMPANY AT GREATER RISK THAN WAS PREVIOUSLY THE CASE (TO A HIGHER DEGREE THAN WOULD BE THE CASE IF THE COMPANY HAD A

LARGER, DEEPER AND/OR YOUNGER CORE MANAGEMENT TEAM), AND VI) THERE ALMOST CERTAINLY WILL BE OTHER UNANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES FOR

THE COMPANY AS A RESULT OF THE CURRENT PANDEMIC EMERGENCY AND ITS AFTERMATH.

Bion disclaims any obligation subsequently

to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the

occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

The following discussion and analysis should

be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed with this

Report.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc.'s ("Bion,"

"Company," "We," "Us," or "Our") patented and proprietary technology provides comprehensive

environmental solutions to one of the greatest water air and water quality problems in the U.S. today: pollution from large-scale

livestock production facilities (also known as “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations” or ”CAFOs").

Application of our technology and technology platform can simultaneously remediate environmental problems and improve operational/resource

efficiencies by recovering value high-value co-products from the CAFOs’ waste stream that has traditionally been wasted or

underutilized, including renewable energy, nutrients (including ammonia nitrogen and phosphorus) and water. From 2016 to present,

the Company has focused a large portion of its activities on developing, testing and demonstrating the 3rd generation of its technology

and technology platform (“3G Tech”) with emphasis on increasing the efficiency of production of valuable by-products

of its waste treatment including ammonia nitrogen in the form of organic ammonium bicarbonate products. The Company’s initial

ammonium bicarbonate liquid product completed its Organic Materials Review Institute (“OMRI”) application and review

process with approval during May 2020. (See discussion at “Organic Fertilizer products” in Item 1 above.)

The Company believes that, in addition to providing

superior environmental remediation, its 3G Tech will create the opportunity for large scale production of sustainable and/or organic

branded livestock products that will command premium pricing (in part due to ongoing monitoring and third party verification of

environmental performance to provide meaningful assurances to both consumers and regulators). As co-products, our 3G Tech will

produce valuable organic fertilizer products which can be: a) utilized in the production of organic grains for use as feed in support

of joint venture Projects (“JVs”) raising organic livestock, and/or b) marketed to the growing organic fertilizer market.

Our 3G Tech patented technology was developed to be part of a comprehensive technology platform that could generate multiple present

and projected future revenue streams to offset the costs of technology adoption. Bion’s technology platform includes onsite

monitoring and data collection as well as independent 3rd party verified lab data confirming the environmental reduction

impacts. The third party verified data regarding the environmental impact reductions will also be used to qualify the final consumer

products (livestock protein—including meat, eggs and dairy products) for a US Department of Agriculture (“USDA”)

“Environmentally Sustainable” brand.

The $200 billion U.S. livestock industry is

under intense scrutiny for its environmental and public health impacts – its ‘environmental sustainability’--

at the same time it is struggling with declining revenues and margins (derived in part from clinging to its historic practices

and resulting impacts). Its failure to respond to consumer concerns ranging from food safety to its ‘socialized’ environmental

impacts have provided impetus for plant-based alternatives such as Beyond Meat and Impossible Burger providing “sustainable”

alternatives to this growing consumer segment of the market. The plant-based threat to the livestock industry market (primarily

beef and pork) has succeeded in focusing the large scale livestock production facilities (also known as “Concentrated Animal

Feeding Operations” or “CAFOs") on how to meet the plant-based market challenge by addressing the consumer sustainability

issues. The adoption of livestock waste treatment technology by industry segments is largely dependent upon adoption generating

sufficient revenues to offset the capital and operating costs associated with technology adoption.

We believe that Bion’s 3G Tech platform,

coupled with common-sense policy changes to U.S. clean water strategy that are already underway, will combine to provide a pathway

to true economic and environmental sustainability with ‘win-win’ benefits for at least a premium sector of the livestock

industry, the environment, and the consumer.

Bion’s business model and technology

can open up the opportunity for JVs (in various contractual forms) between the Company and large livestock/food/fertilizer industry

participants, based upon the supplemental cash flow generated by implementation our 3G Tech business model (described and discussed

below) which will support the costs of technology implementation (including related debt). We anticipate this will result in long

term value for Bion. Long term, Bion anticipates that the sustainable branding opportunity may expand to represent the single largest

contributor to the economic opportunity provided by Bion.

During 2018, the Company had its first patent

issued on its 3G Tech and has continued its work to expand its patent coverage for our 3G Tech. In August 2020, the Company received

a Notice of Allowance on its third patent which significantly expands the breadth and depth of the Company’s 3G Tech coverage.

(See “Patents” below). The 3G Tech platform has been designed to maximize the value of co-products produced during

the waste treatment/recovery processes, including pipeline-quality renewable natural gas and organic commercial fertilizer products.

All processes will be verifiable by third-parties (including regulatory authorities, certifying boards and consumers) to comply

with environmental regulations and trading programs and meet the requirements for: a) renewable energy credits, b) organic certification

of the fertilizer coproducts and c) the USDA PVP ‘Environmentally Sustainable’ branding program (See discussion at

Item 1 above and below herein.) Bion anticipates moving forward with the development process of its initial commercial installations

of its 3G technology during the 2021 (current) and 2022 fiscal years.

In parallel, Bion has worked (which work continues)

to advance public policy initiatives that will potentially create markets (in Pennsylvania and other states) that will utilize

taxpayer funding for the purchase of verified pollution reductions from agriculture (“credits”) by the state (or others)

through a competitively-bid procurement programs. Such credits can then be used as a ‘qualified offset’ by an individual

state (or municipality) to meet its federal clean water mandates at significantly lower cost to the taxpayer. Competitive procurement

of verified credits is now supported by US EPA, the Chesapeake Bay Commission, national livestock interests, and other key stakeholders.

Legislation in Pennsylvania to establish the first such state competitive procurement program passed the Pennsylvania Senate by

a bi-partisan majority during March 2019. However, the Covid-19 pandemic and related financial/budgetary crises have subsequently

slowed progress for this and other policy initiatives and, as a result, it is not currently possible to project the timeline for

this and other similar initiatives (see discuss at Item 1 above and below herein).

The livestock industry is under tremendous

pressure ( from regulatory agencies, a wide range of advocacy groups, institutional investors and the industry’s own consumers)

to adopt sustainable practices. Environmental cleanup is inevitable - policies are already changing. Bion’s 3G technology

was developed for implementation on large scale livestock production facilities, where scale drives lower treatment costs and efficient

production of co-products. We believe that scale, coupled with Bion’s verifiable treatment technology platform, will create

a transformational opportunity to integrate clean production practices at (or close to) the point of production—the source

from which most of the industry’s environmental impacts are initiated. Bion intends to assist the forward-looking segment

of the livestock industry in actually bringing animal protein production in line with Twenty-first Century consumer demands for

sustainability.

Bion’s 3G Tech and technology platform

are designed to capture four revenue streams under one umbrella and provide the basis for joint ventures between the Company and

larger livestock producers seeking to produce environmental/sustainable product lines. The revenue streams are: a) renewable energy

and associated greenhouse gas credits (including US Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and/or Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits)(the

value and availability of which will vary based on livestock type, geographical locations, and state regulatory programs), b) verified

nutrient reductions (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus) that can be used as qualified offsets to the federal Chesapeake Bay mandate

and US EPA TMDL (‘total maximum daily limit’) requirements (the value of which will vary based on livestock type, geographical

locations, and state regulatory programs), c) co-products consisting of high value fertilizer for use in organic food production

for human consumption and/or to grow feed for use by livestock in Projects, and d) an environmentally sustainable USDA certification

that will be incorporated into a “brand” that can address the consumer concerns regarding food safety and sustainability

(based on incorporation of all of the third party verified data for greenhouse gas reductions, nutrient reductions and fertilizer

products into a digital register). The Company believes that the “branding” opportunity will offer large scale livestock

producer / processor / distributors of livestock products the opportunity to differentiate and identify their products in the marketplace

and, thereby creates the opportunity to achieve “premium pricing” by addressing consumer concerns related to safety

and sustainability in a manner similar to the premiums achieved by organic producers.

Operational results from the initial commercial

system (Kreider 1 utilizing our 2G Tech) confirmed the ability of Bion’s technologies to meet nutrient reduction goals at

commercial scale for an extended period of operation. Bion’s 3G Tech platform (and the new variations under development)

center on its patented and proprietary processes that separate and aggregate the various assets in the CAFO waste stream so they

become benign, stable and/or transportable. Bion systems can: a) remove up to 95% of the nutrients (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus)

in the effluent, b) reduce greenhouse gases by 90% (or more) including elimination of virtually all ammonia emissions, c) while

materially reducing pathogens, antibiotics and hormones in the livestock waste stream. Our core technology and its primary CAFO

applications were now proven in the Kreider 1 commercial operations. It has been accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency

(“EPA”) and other regulatory agencies and it is protected by Bion’s portfolio of U.S. and international patents

(both issued and applied for).

Currently, our research and development

activities are underway to improve, update and commercialization of our 3G Tech systems (which is ready to be implemented) during

the current fiscal year to meet the needs of JVs in various geographic and climate areas with nutrient release constraints and

to increase the recovery and generation of valuable co-products while adding the capability to treat dry (poultry) waste streams

in addition to wet manure streams at lower capital costs and operating costs

Bion business activity is focused on using

applications of its 3G Tech for utilization in JVs and Projects (including Integrated Projects) in which the Company will participate

as developer, technology provider and direct participant. Currently our efforts and funds are being expended on pre-development

activities related to: 1) the Kreider 2 poultry JV and 2) Midwest sustainable/organic grain-finished beef JV (see discussion at

Item 1 above and below herein).

KREIDER 1 (HISTORY AND STATUS)

During 2008 the Company commenced actively

pursuing the opportunity presented by environmental retrofit and remediation of the waste streams of existing CAFOs which effort

has met with very limited success to date. The first commercial activity in this area is represented by our agreement with Kreider

Farms (“KF”), pursuant to which the Kreider 1 system to treat KF's dairy waste streams to reduce nutrient releases

to the environment while generating marketable nutrient credits and renewable energy was designed, constructed and entered full-scale

operation during 2011. On January 26, 2009 the Board of the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority (“Pennvest”)

approved a $7.75 million loan to Bion PA 1, LLC (“PA1”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, for the initial

Kreider Farms project (“Kreider 1 System”). After substantial unanticipated delays, on August 12, 2010 PA1 received

a permit for construction of the Kreider 1 System based our 2G Tech (which the Company is no longer implementing). Construction

activities commenced during November 2010. The closing/settlement of the Pennvest Loan took place on November 3, 2010. PA1 finished

the construction of the Kreider 1 System and entered a period of system ‘operational shakedown’ during May 2011. The

Kreider 1 System reached full, stabilized operation by the end of the 2012 fiscal year. During 2011 the PADEP re-certified the

nutrient credits for this project. The PADEP issued final permits for the Kreider 1 System (including the credit verification plan)

on August 1, 2012 on which date the Company deemed that the Kreider 1 System was ‘placed in service’. As a result,

PA1 commenced generating nutrient reduction credits for potential sale while continuing to utilize the Kreider 1 System to test

improvements and add-ons. However, to date liquidity in the Pennsylvania nutrient credit market has failed to develop significant

breadth and depth, which limited liquidity/depth has negatively impacted Bion’s business plans and has resulted in insurmountable

challenges to monetizing the nutrient reductions created by PA1’s existing Kreider 1 project and Bion’s other proposed

projects. These difficulties have prevented PA1 from generating any material revenues from the Kreider 1 project to date and raise

significant questions as to when, if ever, PA1 will be able to generate such revenues from the Kreider 1 System which has now been

inactive for several years. PA1 had sporadic discussions/negotiations with Pennvest related to forbearance and/or re-structuring

its obligations pursuant to the Pennvest Loan for more than five years. In the context of such discussions/negotiations, PA1 elected

not to make interest payments to Pennvest on the Pennvest Loan since January 2013. Additionally, the Company has not made any principal

payments, which were to begin in fiscal 2013, and, therefore, the Company has classified the Pennvest Loan as a current liability

as of June 30, 2020. Due to the failure of the Pennsylvania nutrient reduction credit market to develop, the Company determined

that the carrying amount of the property and equipment related to the Kreider 1 project exceeded its estimated future undiscounted

cash flows based on certain assumptions regarding timing, level and probability of revenues from sales of nutrient reduction credits

and, therefore, PA1 and the Company recorded impairments related to the value of the Kreider 1 assets of $1,750,000 and $2,000,000

at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. During the 2016 fiscal year, PA1 and the Company recorded an impairment of $1,684,562

to the value of the Kreider 1 assets which reduced the value on the Company’s books to zero ($0). This impairment reflects

management’s judgment that the salvage value of the Kreider 1 assets roughly equals PA1’s contractual obligations related

to the Kreider 1 System, including expenses related to decommissioning of the Kreider 1 System.

On September 25, 2014, Pennvest exercised

its right to declare the Pennvest Loan in default and accelerated the Pennvest Loan and demanded that PA1 pay $8,137,117 (principal,

interest plus late charges) on or before October 24, 2014. PA1 did not make the payment and does not have the resources to make

the payments demanded by Pennvest. PA1 commenced discussions and negotiations with Pennvest concerning this matter but Pennvest

rejected PA1’s proposal made during the fall of 2014. As of the date of this report, no formal proposals are currently under

consideration and only sporadic communication has taken place regarding the matters involved over the last 5 years. It is not possible

at this date to predict the outcome of this matter, but the Company believes that a loan modification agreement (coupled with an

agreement regarding an update and re-start of full operations of KF1) may be reached in the context of development of the Kreider

2 Project (see discussion at Item 1 above and below herein) in the future if/when a robust market for nutrient reductions develops

in Pennsylvania, of which there is no assurance. PA1 and Bion will continue to evaluate various options with regard to Kreider

1 over the next 6-12 months.

The economics (potential revenues, profitability

and continued operation) of the Kreider 1 System were based almost entirely on the long-term sale of nutrient (nitrogen and/or

phosphorus) reduction credits to meet the requirements of the Chesapeake Bay environmental clean-up. See below for further discussion.

During August

2012, the Company provided Pennvest (and the PADEP) with data demonstrating that the Kreider 1 System met the ‘technology

guaranty’ standards which were incorporated in the Pennvest financing documents and, as a result, the Pennvest Loan has been

(and is now) solely an obligation of PA1 since that date. However, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of

June 30, 2020 reflects the Pennvest Loan as a liability of $9,585,883 despite the fact that the obligation (if any) solely an obligation

of PA 1.

PA1 is currently maintaining some equipment

at the Kreider 1 System pending its potential inclusion within the Kreider 2 Project discussed below.

3G TECH KREIDER 2 POULTRY PROJECT

Bion continues

its pre-development work related to a waste treatment/renewable energy production facility to treat the waste from KF’s

approximately 6+ million chickens (planned to expand to approximately 9-10 million) (and potentially other poultry operations

and/or other waste streams) ('Kreider Renewable Energy Facility' or ‘ Kreider 2 Project’). On May 5, 2016, the Company

executed a stand-alone joint venture agreement with Kreider Farms covering all matters related to development and operation of

Kreider 2 system to treat the waste streams from Kreider’s poultry facilities in Bion PA2 LLC (“PA2”). During

May 2011 the PADEP certified a smaller version of the Kreider 2 Project (utilizing our 3G Tech) for 559,457 nutrient credits under

the old EPA’s Chesapeake Bay model. The Company has been in ongoing discussions with the PADEP regarding the appropriate

credit calculation methodology for large-scale technology-based nutrient reduction installations such as the KF2 Project utilizing

our 3G Tech platform. Based on these discussions and the size of the Kreider 2 Project, we anticipate that when designs are finalized,

the Kreider 2 Project will be re-certified for a far larger number of credits (management’s current estimates are between

2-4 million (or more) nutrient reduction credits for treatment of the waste stream from Kreider’s poultry pursuant to the

Company’s subsequent amended application during the current fiscal year pursuant to the amended EPA Chesapeake Bay model

and agreements between the EPA and PA. Note that this Project may be expanded in the future to treat wastes from other local and

regional CAFOs (poultry and/or dairy---including the Kreider Dairy) and/or additional Kreider poultry expansion (some of which

may not qualify for nutrient reduction credits). A review process to clarify certain issues related to credit calculation and

verification commenced during 2014 based on Bion’s 2G Tech but has been placed on hold while certain matters are resolved

between the EPA and Pennsylvania and pending development of a robust market for nutrient reductions in Pennsylvania. The Company

anticipates it will submit an amended or new application based on our 3G Technology. Site specific design and engineering work

for this facility, which will probably be one of the first full-scale commercial projects to utilize Bion’s 3G Tech, have

not commenced, and the Company does not yet have financing in place for the Kreider 2 Project. This opportunity is being pursued

through PA2. If there are positive developments related to the market for nutrient reductions in Pennsylvania, of which there

is no assurance, the Company intends to pursue development, design and construction of the Kreider 2 Project with a goal of achieving

operational status for its initial modules during the coming calendar year, and hopes to enter into agreements related to sales

of the nutrient reduction credits for future delivery (under long term contracts) in the future. The economics (potential revenues

and profitability) of the Kreider 2 Project, despite its use of Bion’s 3G Tech for increased recovery of marketable by-products,

are based in material part the long-term sale of nutrient (nitrogen and/or phosphorus) reduction credits to meet the requirements

of the Chesapeake Bay environmental clean-up. However, liquidity in the Pennsylvania nutrient credit market has not yet developed

significant breadth and depth, which lack of liquidity has negatively impacted Bion’s business plans and will most likely

delay PA2’s Kreider 2 Project and other proposed projects in Pennsylvania.

Note that while Bion believes that the Kreider

2 Project and/or subsequent Bion Projects in PA and the Chesapeake Bay Watershed will eventually generate revenue from the sale

of: a) nutrient reductions (credits or in other form), b) renewable energy (and related credits), c) sales of fertilizer products,

and/or d) potentially, in time, credits for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, plus e) license fees related to a ‘sustainable

brand’, the Covid-19 pandemic has delayed legislative efforts needed to commence its development. We believe that the potential

market is very large, but it is not possible to predict the exact timing and/or magnitude of these potential markets at this time.

MIDWEST SUSTAINABLE/ORGANIC GRAIN-FINISHED

BEEF JV OPPORTUNITY

Bion believes there is a potentially large opportunity

to develop JVs to produce sustainable/organic grain-finished beef in the Midwest and is actively involved in early pre-development

work and discussions regarding pursuit of this opportunity.

We are moving forward with preliminary

pre-development work on a JV to build a state of the art beef cattle operation in the Midwest U.S. The project would produce corn-fed

USDA-certified organic- and/or sustainable-branded beef. Organic beef would be finished on organic corn (vs grass fed), produced

using the ammonium bicarbonate fertilizer captured from the cattle’s waste. We believe Bion’s unique ability to produce

fertilizer for growing of a supply of low-cost organic corn, and the resulting opportunity to produce organic beef, will dramatically

differentiate us from potential competitors. This organic opportunity is dependent on successfully establishing Bion’s fertilizer

products as acceptable for use in organic grain production. We intend to develop JVs with organic farmers which use Bion’s

organic ammonium bicarbonate fertilizers to support organic grain production. This grain can be fed (in the finishing stage) to

livestock to raise organic beef (and beef products) that will meet consumer demand with respect to sustainability and safety and

provide the tenderness and taste American consumers have come to expect from premium American beef. Such a product is largely

unavailable in the market today (See discussion at Item 1 above).

PUBLIC POLICY INITIATIVES

A substantial portion of our activities involve

public policy initiatives (by the Company and other stakeholders) to encourage the establishment of appropriate public policies

and regulations (at federal, regional, state and local levels) to facilitate cost effective environmental clean-up and, thereby,

support our business activities. Bion has been joined by National Milk Producers Federation, Land O’Lakes, JBS and other

national livestock interests to support changes to our nation’s clean water strategy that will allow states to acquire low-cost

nutrient reductions through a competitive procurement process, in a similar manner to how government entities now acquire

many other goods and services on behalf of the taxpayer. As developing markets for nutrient reductions become fully-established,

Bion anticipates a robust business opportunity to retrofit existing CAFOs and develop Projects, based primarily on the sale of

nutrient credits that provide cost-effective alternatives to today’s high-cost and failing clean water strategy.

To date the market for long-term nutrient

reduction credits in Pennsylvania (‘PA’) has been very slow to develop and the Company’s activities have been

negatively affected by such lack of development. However, Bion is confident that once these markets are established, the credits

it produces will be competitive in the credit trading markets, based on its cost to remove nitrogen from the livestock waste stream,

compared to the cost to remove nitrogen through various other treatment activities.

Several independent studies have calculated

the average cost to remove nitrogen through various sector practices. Reports prepared for the PA Senate (2008), Chesapeake Bay

Commission (2012) and PA legislature (2013; described below), as well as the Maryland Chesapeake Bay Financing Strategy Report

(2015), demonstrate that the cost to remove nitrogen (per pound on average) from agriculture is $44 to $54, municipal wastewater:

$28 to $43, and storm water: $386 to $633. Pursuant to the PA legislative Report, by replacing sector allocation (for all sectors)

with competitive bidding, up to 80 percent savings could be achieved in PA’s Chesapeake Bay compliance costs ($1.5 billion

annually) by 2025. If the legislative study had focused on the cost differentials of competitive bidding compared only with storm

water, the relative savings would be substantially greater.

Since these studies were completed, most of

the larger (Tier 1) municipal wastewater treatment plants in PA have been upgraded, at a cost of approximately $2.5 billion (vs

initial 2004 PA DEP cost estimates of $376 million). US EPA is now focused on PA’s storm water allocation (3.5 million pounds

(per last published data)) and has this sector on ‘backstop level actions’, the highest level of EPA-oversight and

the final step before sanctions. In the same 2004 PA DEP cost estimate that led to the more than a $2 billion underestimate/miscalculation

in municipal wastewater plant upgrade costs, the estimate for storm water cost was $5.6 billion. In April 2017, US EPA sent a Letter

of Expectation to PA DEP, expressing the agency’s support for the use of nutrient credit trading and competitive bidding

to engage the private-sector to lower costs. The letter specifically encouraged the use of credit trading to offset the state’s

looming storm water obligations.

The Company believes that: i) the April 2015

release of a report from the Pennsylvania Auditor General titled “Special Report on the Importance of Meeting Pennsylvania’s

Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Reduction Targets” which highlighted the economic consequences of EPA-imposed sanctions if the state

fails to meet the 2017 TMDL targets, as well as the need to support using low-cost solutions and technologies as alternatives to

higher-cost public infrastructure projects, where possible, and ii) Senate Bill 575 (introduced in April 2019 as successor to prior

SB 799 (which was passed by PA Senate during January 2018 but was not voted on in the House)) which, if adopted, will establish

a program that will allow the Pennsylvania’s tax- and rate-payers to meet significant portions of their EPA-mandated Chesapeake

Bay pollution reductions at significantly lower cost by purchasing verified reductions (by competitive bidding) from all sources,

including those that Bion can produce through livestock waste treatment, represent visible evidence of progress being made on these

matters in Pennsylvania. SB 575 was passed by the PA Senate in 2019 and introduced in the PA House which is scheduled to be taken

up the bill during its current session which is now underway. Such legislation (which has bi-partisan support), if passed and signed

into law (of which there is no assurance), will potentially enable Bion (and others) to compete for public funding on an equal

basis with subsidized agricultural ‘best management practices’ and public works and storm water authorities. Note,

however, that there is opposition to SB 575 (as was the case for SB 799 and its predecessors) from threatened stakeholders committed

to the existing status quo approaches--- a significant portion of which was focused on attacking (in often inaccurate and/or vilifying

ways) Bion in/through social media and internet articles, blogs, press releases, twitter posts and re-tweets, rather than engaging

the substantive issues. Further note that the current COVID-19 crisis has shifted government, legislative and budget focuses in

PA in manners which may delay our efforts. If legislation similar to SB 575 is passed (on a stand-alone basis or as part of a larger

piece of legislation) and implemented (in a form which maintains its core provisions), Bion expects that the policies and strategies

being developed in PA will not only benefit the Company’s existing and proposed PA projects, but will also subsequently provide

the basis for a larger Chesapeake Bay watershed strategy and, thereafter, a national clean water strategy.

THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC HAS FURTHER INCREASED

UNCERTAINTIES RE SB 575 AND ALL POLICY INITIATIVES. SEE FURTHER DISCUSSION IN ITEM 1 ABOVE.

The Company believes that Pennsylvania is ‘ground

zero’ in the long-standing clean water battle between agriculture and the further regulation of agriculture relative to nutrient

impacts. The ability of Bion and other technology providers to achieve verified reductions from agricultural non-point sources

can resolve the current stalemate and enable implementation of constructive solutions that benefit all stakeholders, providing

a mechanism that ensures that taxpayer funds will be used to achieve the most beneficial result at the lowest cost, regardless

of source. All sources, point and non-point, rural and urban, will be able to compete for tax payer-funded nitrogen reductions

in a fair and transparent process; and since payment from the tax and rate payers would now be performance-based, these providers

will be held financially accountable.

We believe that the overwhelming environmental,

economic, quality of life and public health benefits to all stakeholders in the watershed, both within and outside of Pennsylvania,

make the case for adoption of the strategies outlined in the Report less an issue of ‘if’, but of ‘when and

how’. The adoption of a competitive procurement program will have significant positive impact on technology providers that

can deliver verified nitrogen reductions such as Bion, by allocating existing tax- and rate-payer clean water funding to low cost

solutions based upon a voluntary and transparent procurement process. The Company believes that implementation of a competitively-bid

nutrient reduction program to achieve the goals for the Chesapeake Bay watershed can also provide a working policy model and platform

for other states to adopt that will enhance their efforts to comply with both current and future requirements for local and federal

estuarine watersheds, including the Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico, the Great Lakes Basin and other nutrient-impaired watersheds.

(Note, however, that current COVID-19 crisis has shifted government, legislative and budget focuses in manners which may delay

the fruition of our efforts.)

The Company currently anticipates that either

a Midwest Sustainable/Organic Grain-Fed Beef JV or the Kreider 2 poultry JV in PA will be its initial full-scale 3G Project. Bion

hopes to commence development of its initial s by optioning land and beginning the site-specific design and permitting processes

during the current fiscal year, but further delays are possible. It is not possible at this time to firmly predict where the initial

Project will be developed or the order in which Projects will be developed. All potential Projects are in very early discussion

and pre-development stages and may never progress to actual development or may be developed after other Projects not yet under

active consideration.

Bion also hopes to be able to move forward

on multiple JVs/Projects through 2021-2024 to create a pipeline of Projects. Management has a 5-year development target (through

calendar year 2026) of approximately 3-8 or more JVs/Projects pursuant to joint ventures (or similar agreements). Management hopes

to have identified and begun development work related to 3-5 Projects over the next 2 years. At the end of the 5-year period, Bion

projects that 3-5 or more of these JVs/Projects will be in full operation in 3 or more states (and possibly one or more foreign

countries), and the balance would be in various stages ranging from partial operation to early development stage. It is possible

that one or more Projects will be developed in joint ventures specifically targeted to meet the growing animal protein demand outside

of the United States (including without limitation Asia, Europe and/or the Middle East). No JVs/Projects (including Integrated

Projects) have been developed to date.

The Company’s audited financial statements

for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has

incurred net losses of approximately $4,553,000 and $2,659,000 during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The

Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and

for the year ended June 30, 2020 includes a “going concern” explanatory paragraph which means that there are factors

that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. At June 30, 2020, the Company had

a working capital deficit and a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $10,474,000 and $15,130,000, respectively. Management’s

plans with respect to these matters are described in this section and in our consolidated financial statements (and notes thereto),

and this material does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. However, there is no

guarantee that we will be able to raise sufficient funds or further capital for the operations planned in the near future.

COVID-19 PANDEMIC RELATED MATTERS:

The Company faces risks and uncertainties

and factors beyond our control that are magnified during the current Covid-19 pandemic and the unique economic, financial, governmental

and health-related conditions in which the Company, the country and the entire world now reside. To date the Company has experienced

direct impacts in various areas including but without limitation: i) government ordered shutdowns which have slowed the Company’s

research and development projects and other initiatives, ii) shifted focus of state and federal governments which is likely to

negatively impact the Company’s legislative initiatives in Pennsylvania and Washington D. C., iii) strains and uncertainties

in both the equity and debt markets which have made discussion and planning of funding of the Company and its initiatives and projects

with investment bankers, banks and potential strategic partners more tenuous, iv) strains and uncertainties in the agricultural

sector and markets have made discussion and planning more difficult as future industry conditions are now more difficult to assess

and predict, v) due to the age and health of our core management team, all of whom are age 70 or older and have had one or more

existing health issues, the Covid-19 pandemic places the Company at greater risk than was previously the case (to a higher degree

than would be the case if the Company had a larger, deeper and/or younger core management team), and vi) there almost certainly

will be other unanticipated consequences for the Company as a result of the current pandemic emergency and its aftermath.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Revenue Recognition

The Company currently does not generate

revenue and if and when the Company begins to generate revenue the Company will comply with the provisions of Accounting Standards

Codification (“ASC”) 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”.

Stock-based compensation

The Company follows the provisions of ASC

718, which generally requires that share-based compensation transactions be accounted and recognized in the statement of income

based upon their grant date fair values.

Derivative Financial Instruments:

Pursuant to ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives

and Hedging” (“Topic 815”), the Company reviews all financial instruments for the existence of features which

may require fair value accounting and a related mark-to-market adjustment at each reporting period end. Once determined, the Company

assesses these instruments as derivative liabilities. The fair value of these instruments is adjusted to reflect the fair value

at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment

to fair value of derivatives.

Warrants:

The Company has issued warrants to purchase

common shares of the Company. Warrants are valued using a fair value based method, whereby the fair value of the warrant is determined

at the warrant issue date using a market-based option valuation model based on factors including an evaluation of the Company’s

value as of the date of the issuance, consideration of the Company’s limited liquid resources and business prospects, the

market price of the Company’s stock in its mostly inactive public market and the historical valuations and purchases of the

Company’s warrants. When warrants are issued in combination with debt or equity securities, the warrants are valued and accounted

for based on the relative fair value of the warrants in relation to the total value assigned to the debt or equity securities and

warrants combined.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07

“Compensation – Stock Compensation – Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting” to simplify

the accounting for share based payments granted to nonemployees and was adopted by the Company effective July 1, 2019. Under this

guidance, payments to nonemployees is aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. The adoption

of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements as previously issued share-based payments

to nonemployees had already reached a measurement date.

YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 COMPARED

TO THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2019

Revenue

Total revenues were nil for both the

years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

General and Administrative

Total general and administrative expenses

were $3,090,000 and $1,725,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

General and administrative expenses, excluding

stock-based compensation charges of $1,931,000 and $536,000, were $1,159,000 and $1,189,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and

2019, respectively, representing a $30,000 decrease. Salaries and related payroll tax expenses were $266,000 and $254,000 for the

year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Consulting costs were $458,000 and $446,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020

and 2019, respectively, as there were no significant changes in the Company’s use of consultants. Insurance related expenses

were $93,000 and $86,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, representing a $7,000 increase due to renewal of insurance

coverage and higher premium costs. Investor relations related expenses were $72,000 and $145,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020

and 2019, respectively, a $73,000 decrease due to the fact the pandemic curtailed investor conferences and related travel during

the latter part of the year ended June 30, 2020. Accounting and tax related costs were $105,000 and $87,000 for the years ended

June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, with the increase being attributed to tax preparation fees.

General and administrative stock-based

employee compensation for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 consists of the following:

General and administrative:

Change in fair value from modification of option terms $ 511,000 $ 211,000

Change in fair value from modification of warrant terms 1,065,000 118,000

Stock-based compensation charges were $1,931,000

and $536,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Compensation expense relating to the change in fair value

from the modification of option terms was $511,000 and $211,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, as the

Company granted a reduction in certain exercise prices and an extension of certain option expiration dates for 7,121,600 and 1,025,000

options during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. During the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company

extended expiration dates of warrants for certain employees and consultants which resulted in the recognition of $1,065,000 and

$118,000, respectively, in non-cash compensation. The fair value of stock options expensed for the years ended June 30, 2020 and

2019 was $355,000 and $207,000, respectively. The Company granted 2,210,000 and 655,000 fully vested options during the years ended

June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Depreciation

Total depreciation expense was $1,248 and

$1,314 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Research and Development

Total research and development expenses

were $1,124,000 and $520,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Research and development expenses, excluding

stock-based compensation expenses of $646,000 and $85,000 were $478,000 and $435,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019,

respectively. Salaries and related payroll tax expenses were $80,000 for both the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Consulting costs were $218,000 and $230,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, while expenses related to

the development of a new pilot program for its anaerobic digestate process were $112,000 and $51,000, respectively for the years

ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Research and development stock-based employee

compensation for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 consists of the following:

Research and development:

Change in fair value from modification of option terms $ 115,000 $ 11,000

Change in fair value from modification of warrant terms 457,000 45,000

Stock-based compensation expenses were

$646,000 and $85,000 and for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The compensation expense of $115,000 and $11,000

for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively was for the change in fair value from modification of options terms is

due to a research and development employee and consultant having certain option exercise prices reduced during those periods. During

the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company extended expiration dates of warrants for certain research and development

employees and consultants which resulted in the recognition of $457,000 and $45,000, respectively, in non-cash compensation. The

Company expensed $74,000 and $29,000 for the fair value of stock options that vested during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

The Company granted 2,210,000 and 655,000 options during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, that were fully

vested within that time period and a portion of the stock compensation was allocated to research and development.

Loss from Operations

As a result of the factors described above,

the loss from operations was $4,215,000 and $2,246,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Other (Income) Expense

Other (income) expense was $338,000 and

$413,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Interest expense related the Pennvest Loan was $247,000 and

$239,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, while interest expense related to deferred compensation and

convertible notes was $182,000 and $147,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, with the increase being attributable

to overall higher deferred compensation and note balances. Additionally, interest expense of $36,000 and $25,000 was recorded during

the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, due to the modification of warrant expiry dates for warrants held by investors.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company recognized other income of $122,000 due to the extinguishment of liabilities due

to the legal release of certain accounts payable and $6,000 due to the grant of an Economic Impact Disaster Loan.

Net Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling

Interest

The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling

interest was $8,000 and $5,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Net Loss Attributable to Bion’s

Common Stockholders

As a result of the factors described above,

the net loss attributable to Bion’s stockholders was $4,546,000 and $2,654,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019,

respectively, and the net loss per basic common share was $0.16 and $0.10 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's consolidated financial statements

for the year ended June 30, 2020 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and

the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Report of our Independent Registered Public

Accounting Firm on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020 includes a "going

concern" explanatory paragraph which means that the auditors stated that conditions exist that raise substantial doubt about

the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Operating Activities

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had cash

of approximately $561,000. During the year ended June 30, 2020, net cash used in operating activities was $966,000, primarily consisting

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2020-06-30, filed 2020-09-22 · accession 0001079973-20-000805

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 20 headings are on that chain and 2 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.