Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

CEA Industries Inc. BNC US Equity

Consumer Staples · CIK 1482541 · FY ends Apr 30
$3.01
+0.00 (+0.00%)
USD · as of 2026-08-28 · marketstack

CEA Industries Inc. (Nasdaq: BNC), an SEC filer in Agricultural Services, closed at $3.01, +0.0%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $124M as of 2026-08-27, a return on equity of -29.3%, a net margin of -112.2% and 3-year sales growth of -41.0%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.

BNC · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

← all BNC documents
filed 2025-03-27 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1600 of 3,783301k characters rendered

UNITED

STATES

SECURITIES

AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,

D.C. 20549

FORM

10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR

THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2024

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR

THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____ TO _______

Commission

File Number: 001-41266

CEA

INDUSTRIES INC.

(Exact

name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(303)993-5271

(Registrant’s

telephone number, including area code)

Securities

registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.00001 par value CEAD Nasdaq Capital Markets

Warrants to purchase common stock CEADW Nasdaq Capital Markets

Securities

registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate

by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒.

Indicate

by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No

☒.

Indicate

by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the

preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such

filing requirements for the last 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule

405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant

was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting

company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated

filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ☐ Accelerated Filer ☐

Non-accelerated Filer ☒ Smaller Reporting Company ☒

Emerging Growth Company ☐

If

an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying

with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

If

securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant

included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate

by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation

received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒.

The

aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day

of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $5,171,944 based upon a closing price of $6.71

reported for such date on the Nasdaq Capital Markets.

As

of March 27, 2025, the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant was 802,346.

DOCUMENTS

INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

CEA

Industries Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K

For

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024

Table

of Contents

Page

Part I

Item 1. Business 4

Item 1A. Risk Factors 9

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 24

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 24

Item 2. Properties 25

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 25

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 25

Part II

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 27

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 37

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 37

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 37

Item 9B. Other Information 38

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 39

Item 11. Executive Compensation 47

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 53

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 55

Signatures 57

In

this Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer

to CEA Industries Inc. and, where appropriate, its wholly-owned subsidiary.

Hemp

and marijuana are technically both part of the “Cannabis sativa L.” plant. “Hemp” is a term used to classify

varieties of cannabis that contain 0.3% or less tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) content (by dry weight), the principal psychoactive

constituent of cannabis. Hemp and its derivatives were federally legalized in the United States as part the Agricultural Act of 2018.

“Marijuana” is a term used to classify varieties of cannabis that contain more than 0.3% THC (by dry weight). Marijuana is

not federally legal in the United States. Many states, however, have taken action to make marijuana legal for all purposes, made it available

for medical uses, decriminalized it, or a combination thereof. We currently provide nearly all of our products and services to customers

that cultivate marijuana. In this Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated, “cannabis” refers to “marijuana.”

Although

our customers do, we neither grow, manufacture, distribute nor sell cannabis (marijuana) and hemp or any of their related products.

CAUTIONARY

STATEMENT

This

Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”

in Item 7, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are

not historical facts but are based on current management expectations that involve substantial risks, uncertainties, and other factors,

some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed

in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance.

We generally identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,”

“expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,”

“projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential”

or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. All statements, other than statements of historical

fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, any projections of revenue, gross

profit, earnings or loss, tax provisions, cash flows or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies or objectives

of management for future operations; any statements regarding current or future macroeconomic or industry-specific trends or events and

the impact of those trends and events on us or our financial performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, legal claims

or tax disputes; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

These

forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that could cause our

actual results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, performance, prospects, opportunities, achievements or industry results,

as well as those of the markets we serve or intend to serve, to differ materially from those expressed in, or suggested by, these forward-looking

statements. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions regarding our present and future business strategies and the environment

in which we operate. Important factors that could cause those differences include, but are not limited to:

● our overall financial condition;

● regulatory, legislative and judicial developments;

● competitive pressures in our current and future businesses;

● our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;

● future revenue being lower than expected;

● our intention not to pay dividends: and

These

factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read with the other cautionary statements in this report.

Although

we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove

to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. In light of these

and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this annual report on Form 10-K should not be

regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described

or identified in “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking

statements, which apply only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by the federal securities laws, we

undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or

otherwise, to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements

and projections contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of

the Securities Act.

Non-GAAP

Financial Measures

To

supplement our financial results on U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) basis, we use non-GAAP measures

including net bookings, backlog, as well as adjusted net income (loss) which reflects adjustments for certain non-cash expenses such

as stock-based compensation, certain debt-related items and depreciation expense. We believe these non-GAAP measures are helpful in understanding

our past performance and are intended to aid in evaluating our potential future results. The presentation of these non-GAAP measures

should be considered in addition to our GAAP results and are not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial

information prepared or presented in accordance with GAAP. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way to

view aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting

our business. For purposes of this Annual Report, (i) “adjusted net income (loss)” and “adjusted operating income (loss)”

mean GAAP net income (loss) and operating income (loss), respectively, after adjustment for non-cash equity compensation expense, debt-related

items and depreciation expense, and (ii) “net bookings” means new sales contracts executed during the quarter for which we

received an initial deposit, net of any adjustments including cancellations and change orders during the quarter.

Our

backlog, remaining performance obligations and net bookings may not be indicative of future operating results, and our customers may

attempt to renegotiate or terminate their contracts for a number of reasons, including delays in or inability to obtain project financing

or licensing or abandonment of the project entirely. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that contracts included in the backlog or

remaining performance obligations will actually generate revenues or when the actual revenues will be generated.

PART

I

Item

1. Business

Overview

CEA

Industries, through our subsidiary, Surna Cultivation Technologies LLC, has been focused on selling environmental control and other technologies

and services to the Controlled Environment Agriculture (“CEA”) industry. The CEA industry aims to optimize

the use of horticultural resources such as water, energy, space, capital, and labor, to create an agriculture business that is more efficient

and more productive than those that use traditional farming methods. Typically, the CEA industry has been focused on indoor agriculture

and vertical farming.

Headquartered

in Colorado, we aim to provide customers with a variety of value-added technology solutions that help improve their overall crop quality

and yield, optimize energy and water efficiency, and satisfy the evolving state and local codes, permitting and regulatory requirements.

We offer our customers a variety of service and product offerings that include: (i) air handling equipment and systems, (ii) air sanitation

products, (iii) LED lighting, and (iv) benching and racking solutions for indoor cultivation.

CEA

growers currently face a challenging business environment that includes high energy costs, water usage and conservation issues, continuously

evolving waste removal regulations, inflationary pressures, and labor shortages. In addition to these issues, our cannabis growing customers

face increasingly rigorous quality standards and declining cannabis prices in a growing industry whose standards are constantly evolving.

The part of the CEA industry focused on food related crops is also facing disruption from evolving market demand, competition, and reorganization,

including the lack of growth capital and several noteworthy bankruptcies.

Recent

Developments – Acquisition of Fat Panda

We

have entered into an acquisition agreement to acquire a group of Manitoba corporations that own all the assets used in the business of

Fat Panda Ltd. (“Fat Panda”). Fat Panda is engaged in the manufacture, distribution and retail sale of e-cigarettes, vape

devices and e-liquids and related products through multiple retail locations in the provinces of Manitoba, Ontario, and Saskatchewan,

Canada, as well as through its online e-commerce site.

Fat

Panda, we believe, is central Canada’s largest retailer and manufacturer of e-cigarettes, vape devices and e-liquids, with a market

share exceeding 50% in the region. Fat Panda operates 33 retail locations, including 29 Fat Panda stores and four Electric Fog vape outlets.

Fat Panda also serves a wide range of customers through its online e-commerce platform. Its retail footprint is complemented by a comprehensive

portfolio of products, including its own line of premium e-liquids manufactured in-house, along with a robust portfolio of trademarks

and intellectual property.

The

acquisition will include all the assets of Fat Panda, including among other things, the leases for the retail outlets, intellectual property,

inventory, government licenses and permits, franchise agreements, manufacturing facilities and supply agreements, which are necessary

for the ongoing manufacturing and retail operations of Fat Panda. The acquisition will continue the employment of the current management

and of the production and retail staff, for the uninterrupted, continuous operations of the business. The sellers will enter into non-competition

agreements at closing. Certain of the senior management persons will enter into employment agreements for their continued employment

after the closing of the acquisition.

The

purchase price is CAD$18,000,000 (approximately, US$12,600,000), payable in cash, securities and seller loans. The Company also expects

to borrow part of the cash portion of the purchase price, in an amount yet to be determined, which will be secured by the assets of Fat

Panda. The purchase price includes an initial cash payment of CAD$13,900,000, issuance of 39,000 shares of the common stock of the Company

with an agreed aggregate value of CAD$700,000 (approximately CAD$18.00 per share), and issuance of notes to the sellers in the aggregate

principal amount of CAD$2,060,000, and release of a CAD$100,000 due diligence deposit. The Company is also agreeing to pay certain financial

statement audit expenses of the selling parties. Of the notes to be issued by Fat Panda to the selling parties, one of the notes in the

principal amount of CAD$1,030,000, is convertible into the common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of USD$19.00 per share. At

closing the following will occur: first, a portion of the cash purchase price in the amount of CAD$1,375,000 will be held in a joint

escrow account for 120 days after closing as a working capital adjustment escrow; second, the sum of CAD$1,240,000, will be paid into

escrow for possible indemnity claims to be held for 18 months; and third, the purchase price will be reduced by CAD$112,500 and the sum

of CAD$112,500 will be paid into escrow to be held for 18 months, both in relation to employee obligation claims under Canadian employment

law.

Completion

of the acquisition is subject to a number of conditions, which include the preparation and delivery of the Fat Panda companies audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, satisfaction of the financial

condition of Fat Panda, completion of due diligence by the Company, receipt of all necessary government approvals and licenses, and

continuation and reformation of the various retail location leases. Completion is also subject to the Company obtaining financing

for a portion of the cash purchase price. The acquisition agreement also provides for the selling persons to make representations

and warranties and undertake certain covenants about many aspects of the business of Fat Panda that shall be true and correct and

performed at or prior to closing. The representations, warranties and covenants are those that are typical in relation to the

acquisition of an operating business. The Company has also made certain representations, warranties and covenants, the principal one

of which is to obtain financing for a part of the purchase price, which if not obtained will permit the Company to terminate the

purchase agreement.

The

Company anticipates that it will complete the acquisition in the first half of fiscal year 2025.

Shares

of our common stock and warrants currently are traded on the Nasdaq Capital Markets under the ticker symbols “CEAD” and “CEADW”,

respectively.

Our

Current CEA Services and Equipment Solutions

Our

goal is to develop relationships with our prospects and customers that will afford us the opportunity to provide comprehensive services

and equipment for the complete lifecycle of indoor agriculture facilities. This lifecycle includes designing and engineering the facility,

providing the many required infrastructure technologies, advising on and ensuring proper installation of the technologies, providing

training and start-up support, and ultimately providing preventative and other ongoing services for ensuring proper maintenance and operations.

We

provide a comprehensive range of service solutions that include facility design and budgeting, equipment selection and specification,

equipment installation advisory, and preventative maintenance services. In addition, we provide our customers with product offerings

that include both proprietary products and value-added reseller (“VAR”) products.

Our

CEA Customers and Prospects

We

aim to provide our services and products to customers who are building, upgrading, or expanding an indoor cultivation facility for any

crop. Our customers vary based on the size of the facility, type of crop being cultivated, and extent of construction or retrofitting

of the facility.

Most

of our customers are new entrants to the CEA industry and have no other cultivation facilities. Some customers have one or more facilities

which we classify as MFOs (multi-facility operators). We currently do not have projects with the largest, publicly traded firms (typically

referred to as “MSOs,” or Multi-State Operators).

Competition

in the CEA Market

Our

environmental control systems and our related engineering and design services compete with various national and local Mechanical, Electrical

& Plumbing (MEP) engineering firms. We also compete with national and local HVACD contractors and traditional HVACD equipment suppliers

who resell, design, and implement climate control systems for commercial and industrial facilities, but most of whom do not have the

specific knowledge that we have about the complexities and challenges of CEA facilities. We have positioned ourselves to differ from

these competitors by providing a broad range of engineering and design services and environmental control systems, across most major

HVACD solutions, including chilled water systems, custom air handling units, split systems, and packaged roof-top units. Each is tailored

specifically for managing the distinct challenges involved in CEA facilities. We believe our industry-specific applications and experience

in the CEA market allow us to deliver the right solution to our cultivation customers. Unlike many of our competitors, our solutions

are designed specifically for cultivators to provide tight temperature and humidity control, reduce bio-security risks, reduce energy

requirements, and minimize maintenance complexity, costs and downtime. However, we are seeing more competitors enter the CEA market,

focused on emulating the same types of crop-specific climate control systems and engineering services that we offer. We believe this

increased competition may adversely impact our ability to obtain new facility projects from both MFOs and independent smaller growers

and could require us to accept lower gross margins on our projects.

Intellectual

Property

In

our business operations, we generally rely on a combination of patent and trademark rights, licenses, trade secrets, and laws that protect

intellectual property, confidential procedures, and contractual restrictions with our employees and others to establish and protect our

intellectual property rights. While we have several issued patents, we do not believe that these issued patents currently provide us

with a meaningful competitive advantage. We have registered trademarks around our core Surna brand in the United States and select foreign

jurisdictions, as well as the Surna logo and the combined Surna logo and name in the United States. Our Surna trademark is also registered

in the European Union and Canada. We also recently secured trademark registration for our proprietary SCA platform, SentryIQ, in the

United States and Canada. Subject to ongoing use and renewal, trademark protection is potentially perpetual. We actively protect our

inventions, new technologies, and product developments by maintaining trade secrets and, in limited circumstances, filing for patent

protection.

Employees

We

currently have 6 active full-time employees. We review our staffing needs in light of our contract obligations and attempt to size and

skill match our employees as required. However, we may engage, and have in the past utilized, the services of consultants, independent

contractors, and other non-employee professionals. Additional employees may be hired in the future depending on need, available resources,

and our achieved growth.

The

Company has experienced a decline in activity, as indicated in its 2024 sales and its current backlog. This decline is due to many factors,

including (i) recent challenges in the cannabis market, (ii) continued supply chain-related delays and cancellations that have affected

many of its vendors and partners, and (iii) a broader slowdown in the macroeconomic environment.

US

Government Regulation in Relation to Cannabis

While

we do not generate any revenue from the direct sale of cannabis products, we have historically, and continue to, offer our services and

engineering solutions to indoor cultivators that are engaged in various aspects of the cannabis industry. Cannabis is a Schedule I controlled

substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those states in which specific uses of marijuana have been legalized, such as medical

marijuana or for adult recreational purpose, its use remains a violation of federal laws.

A

Schedule I controlled substance is defined as a substance that has no currently accepted medical use in the United States, a lack of

safety for use under medical supervision and a high potential for abuse. The Department of Justice defines Schedule I controlled substances

as “the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence.” If

the federal government decides to enforce the Controlled Substances Act with respect to cannabis, persons that are charged with distributing,

possessing with intent to distribute, or growing cannabis could be subject to fines and terms of imprisonment, the maximum being life

imprisonment and a $50 million fine. Any change in the federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant

financial damage to us. While we do not intend to harvest, manufacture, distribute or sell cannabis or cannabis products, we may be irreparably

harmed by a change in the enforcement of cannabis laws by the federal or state governments.

In

the past, the Obama administration took the position that it was not an efficient use of resources to direct federal law enforcement

agencies to prosecute those lawfully abiding by state-designated laws allowing the use and distribution of medical marijuana. The Trump

administration revised this policy but made no major changes in enforcement through Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions rescinding the

Cole Memorandum. Although President Biden stood for decriminalization and descheduling during his campaign, his administration has not

formulated an explicit policy on cannabis. The Biden administration has implemented pardons for past federal cannabis possession convictions

and encouraged governors to do the same. Also, in May 2021 the Drug Enforcement Administration approved licensed facilities to grow cannabis

for the purpose of medical research, and on December 2, 2022, President Biden signed the Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion

Act. This act is “the first standalone marijuana-related bill approved by both chambers of the United States Congress” and

allows medical marijuana research. The act requires the Drug Enforcement Administration to register researchers and suppliers of cannabis

for medical research in a timely manner, who will then be able to legally manufacture, distribute, dispense and possess the substance.

It also creates a mechanism for FDA approval of drugs derived from the cannabis plant and “protects doctors who may now discuss

the harms and benefits of using cannabis and cannabis derivatives.” It also requires the Department of Health and Human Services

to investigate the medical utility of cannabis and barriers that exist to conducting research and requires the U.S. Attorney General

to conduct an annual review to ensure that cannabis is being adequately produced for research purposes. In January 2023, the FDA stated

that given the growing cannabidiol (CBD) products market, it had convened a high-level internal working group to explore potential regulatory

pathways for CBD products and is prepared to find a new regulatory pathway for CBD to balance individuals’ desire for access to

CBD products with the regulatory oversight needed to manage risks.

Currently,

there is much legislation being considered to reform cannabis products and use. The proposed laws cover a wide spectrum from complete

federal legalization to specific industry nuances. In September 2023, the MORE Act was introduced that would provide full federal legalization

through descheduling with a particular focus on equity provisions, including expungement for certain cannabis offenses and a community

reinvestment program. The MORE Act has not passed through committee. There are two proposed federal bills that would remove cannabis

from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) entirely and task the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with regulation of cannabis products.

One of these bills, The States Reform Act, adopts a dual federal-state regulatory model, like the regulation of alcohol. Another bill,

the Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States (STATES) 2.0 Act, would permit states to to maintain the prohibition

of cannabis, but interstate commerce in state-law-compliant cannabis would be legalized, so non-legal states would not be able to prohibit

shipments to and from legal states from crossing through their borders. Finally, only one piece of legislation took the rescheduling

approach to cannabis legalization in 2023. The Marijuana 1-to-3 Act of 2023, opens new tab would simply direct the Attorney General to

transfer cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III of the CSA without clarifying or addressing any other provisions of federal law. However,

that was not the only piece of rescheduling-related legislation introduced last year.

Lawmakers

continued to offer various solutions for providing financial relief for cannabis businesses and legal protections for ancillary businesses

in 2023. The most well-known of these bills is the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation (SAFER) Banking Act, which would provide safe

harbor for financial institutions and other ancillary businesses that work with cannabis industry clients, thus increasing the industry’s

access to traditional financial services like loans and deposit accounts. Similar to SAFER but with a narrower scope, the Clarifying

Law Around Insurance of Marijuana (CLAIM) Act would provide a specific safe harbor for insurance companies that serve the cannabis industry.

As for financial support, the Small Business Tax Equity Act of 2023, would exempt cannabis sales conducted in compliance with state law

from the prohibition of 26 U.S.C. § 280E, thereby allowing businesses to deduct normal business expenses from their taxes.

During

2023, there have been a myriad of additional bills introduced that govern the expungement and/or sealing of criminal records for non-violent

cannabis offenses, legalizing hem and CBD products and adding FDA regulation for these products, facilitating research on cannabis, access

for veterans to medical cannabis, and restoring eligibility for federal employment and the right of medical cannabis patient to purchase

and possess firearms.

Notwithstanding

the actions of the Biden administration, it should be expected that the Department of Justice will continue at this time to enforce the

Controlled Substances Act with respect to cannabis under established principles in setting their law enforcement priorities to prevent:

● the distribution of cannabis products, such as marijuana, to minors;

● the growing of cannabis on public lands; and

● cannabis possession or use on federal property.

Since

the use of marijuana is illegal under federal law, most federally chartered banks will not accept deposit funds from businesses involved

with marijuana. Consequently, businesses involved in the marijuana industry generally bank with state-chartered banks and credit unions

to provide banking to the industry.

In

2014, Congress passed a spending bill containing a provision (the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment and sometimes referred to as the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer

Amendment) blocking federal funds and resources allocated under the federal appropriations bills from being used to “prevent such

States from implementing their own State medical marijuana laws.” The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment, however, did not codify

any federal protections for medical marijuana patients and producers operating within state law. The Justice Department maintains that

it can still prosecute violations of the federal cannabis laws and continue cases already in the courts. The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment

must be re-enacted every year, and it is continued through March 8, 2024. However, state laws do not supersede the prohibitions set forth

in the federal drug laws.

In

order to participate in either the medical or the adult use aspects of the cannabis industry, all businesses and employees must obtain

licenses from the state and, for businesses, local jurisdictions as well. As an example, Colorado issues four types of business licenses

including cultivation, manufacturing, dispensing, and testing. In addition, all owners and employees must obtain an occupational license

to be permitted to own or work in a facility. All applicants for licenses undergo a background investigation, including a criminal record

check for all owners and employees.

Colorado

has also enacted stringent regulations governing the facilities and operations of cannabis businesses that are involved with the plant

and its products. All facilities are required to be licensed by the state and local authorities and are subject to comprehensive security

and surveillance requirements. In addition, each facility is subject to extensive regulations that govern its businesses practices, which

includes mandatory seed-to-sale tracking and reporting, health and sanitary standards, packaging and labeling requirements, and product

testing for potency and contaminants.

Laws

and regulations affecting the medical marijuana industry are constantly changing, which could detrimentally affect our proposed operations.

Local, state and federal medical marijuana laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could

require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter our business plan. In addition, violations of these laws, or

allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. It is also possible

that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our business. We cannot predict the nature of any future

laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative

policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on our business.

Item

1A. Risk Factors

Investing

in our securities involves significant risks. Certain factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,

and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, in addition to other information

contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks and uncertainties

described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe

are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks actually occur,

our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event,

the trading price of our securities could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Summary

Of Risk Factors Relating to our Current CEA Operations

Our

CEA business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks discussed at length in the section below titled

“Risk Factors.” These risks include, among others, the following:

● We rely on a limited number of customers and suppliers.

Risk

Factors

Risks

Relating to Our Current CEA Business

Our

revenues have been limited, and we will need to obtain financing for any substantive growth, and possibly our continued operations, which

may not be available to us.

Historically,

we have raised equity and debt capital to support our operations. We raised approximately $22 million from a public offering completed

in February 2022. As of December 31, 2024, we had working capital of approximately $9,064,000 and our cash balance was approximately

$9,453,000.

We

expect to need additional funds in the longer term, from time to time, to complete aspects of the overall development of our business

plan, such as in connection with the acquisition of Fat Panda and other strategic assets. We also anticipate needing additional funds

for ongoing operating expenses. The precise amount and timing of our funding needs cannot be determined accurately at this time, and

will depend on a number of factors, including demand for our products and services, the success of our product development efforts, the

timing of receipts for customer payments, the management of working capital, and the continuation of normal payment terms and conditions

for our purchase of goods and services. The continuation of normal payment terms and conditions with our customers and suppliers, including

our ability to obtain advance payments from our customers, significantly impacts our ability to fund our ongoing operations.

Any

future equity offering will result in dilution to our shareholders; obtaining borrowed capital may not be possible for us.

To

the extent that we raise equity and equity linked securities in any future offerings, our existing shareholders will experience a dilution

in the voting power and ownership of their common stock, and our earnings per share, if any, would be impacted. Any borrowings made to

finance acquisitions and operations, could make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our operating results, a downturn in economic conditions,

or increases in interest rates on borrowings that are subject to interest rate fluctuations. The amount and timing of additional financing

needs will vary principally depending on the timing of new product launches, investments and/or acquisitions, and the amount of cash

flow from our operations. If our resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to issue additional equity

or debt securities or obtain a credit facility.

There

is no assurance that we will be able to convert our backlog related to our CEA operations into revenue or make a profit.

While

we continue our CEA business, we may be unable to convert the full contract value of our backlog in a timely manner, or at all. We inconsistently

convert our backlog into revenue on a quarter-to-quarter basis. The performance of our obligations under a sales contract, and the timing

of our revenue recognition, is dependent upon our customers’ ability to secure funding and real estate, obtain a license and then

build their cultivation facility so they can use our services and take possession of the equipment we provide. Our sales contracts currently

are not time specific as to when our customers are required to take delivery of our services and equipment. More recently, we determined

that some of our new construction facility projects are becoming larger and more complex and, as a result, delays were more likely due

to licensing and permitting, lack of, or delay in, funding, staged facility construction, and/or the shifting priorities of certain customers

with multiple facility projects in progress at one time. Even if we obtain more customers, or increase the average size of our projects,

there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate a profit. Because we are a small company with limited capital, limited products

and services, and limited marketing activities, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to operate profitably. If we cannot

operate profitably, we may have to suspend or cease operations.

We

may extend credit to our CEA customers in the future and, if we are unable to collect these accounts receivable, our future profitability

could be adversely impacted.

Historically,

we had little exposure to the collection risk on accounts receivable since we typically received payments from our customers in advance

of our performance of services or delivery of equipment. However, in certain situations, especially as we expand our products and services

offering for a customer’s entire facility lifecycle, we may extend credit to our customers, in which case we are at risk for the

collection of account receivables. Accordingly, we will be at greater risk for the collection of account receivables. Any customer credit

arrangements are negotiated and may not protect us if a customer develops operational difficulty or incurs operating losses which could

lead to a bankruptcy. In these cases, we may lose most of the outstanding balance due. In addition, we are typically not able to insure

our accounts receivables. The risk is that we derive our revenue and profits from selling products and services to the emerging cannabis

industry. The failure of our customers to pay the full amounts due to us could negatively affect future profitability.

Because

we currently do not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our financial

results or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of our common stock may, therefore, be adversely impacted.

Our

reporting obligations as a public company place significant requirements on our management, operational and financial resources, and

systems, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Annually, we are required to prepare a management report on our management’s

assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that our internal control

over financial reporting is currently not effective. In the event that our status with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)

changes to that of an accelerated filer from a smaller reporting company, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required

to attest to and report on our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Under

such circumstances, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent

registered public accounting firm may still decline to attest to our management’s assessment, or may issue a report that is qualified,

if it is not satisfied with our controls, or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it

interprets the relevant requirements differently from us.

We

have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and, if we do not remediate the material weakness

or are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timeliness

of our financial reporting may be adversely affected.

The

Company did not maintain effective controls over certain aspects of the financial reporting process because: (i) we lack a sufficient

complement of personnel with a level of accounting expertise and an adequate supervisory review structure that is commensurate with our

financial reporting requirements, (ii) there is inadequate segregation of duties due to the limitation on the number of our accounting

personnel, and (iii) we have insufficient controls and processes in place to adequately verify the accuracy and completeness of spreadsheets

that we use for a variety of purposes including revenue, taxes, stock-based compensation and other areas, and place significant reliance

on, for our financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial

reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements

will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. If we are unable to achieve effective internal control over financial reporting,

or if our independent registered public accounting firm determines we continue to have a material weakness in our internal control over

financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of

our shares could decline, and our reputation may be damaged.

The

inability to effectively manage our operational reorganization could harm our business and materially and adversely affect our operating

results and financial condition.

If

there is any growth in or reorganization of our business and operations, including integrating any acquired business and assets, it is

likely to place a strain on our management and administrative resources, infrastructure and systems. We expect that in those instances

we will need to further refine and expand our business development capabilities, our systems and processes and our access to financing

sources. We also will need to hire, train, supervise, and manage employees. These processes are time consuming and expensive, will increase

management responsibilities and will divert management attention. We cannot assure that we will be able to:

● execute on our business plan and strategy;

● expand our products effectively or efficiently or in a timely manner;

● allocate our human resources optimally;

● meet our capital needs;

● identify and hire qualified employees or retain valued employees; or

Our

inability or failure to manage our company effectively could harm our business and materially and adversely affect our operating results

and financial condition.

Our

operating results may fluctuate significantly based on customer acceptance of our services and products, industry uncertainty, project

financing concerns, and regulatory requirements. As a result, period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are unlikely

to provide a good indication of our future performance.

Management

expects that, under typical operating conditions, we will experience substantial variations in our revenues and operating results from

quarter to quarter. This variance may change with fundamental changes in our operations, such as the planned acquisition of Fat Panda.

In

our CEA operations, we have been experiencing a decline in revenues, which has also affected our operating results. Our revenue recognition

in our CEA operations is dependent upon shipment of the equipment portions of our sales contracts, which, in many cases, may be delayed

while our customers complete permitting, prepare their facilities for equipment installation or obtain project financing. Uncertainty

in the CEA industry, project financing concerns, and the licensing and qualification of our prospective customers, which are out of our

control, make it difficult for us to predict when we will recognize revenue. If customers are unable to obtain licensing, permitting

or financing, our sales and revenue will decline, resulting in a reduction in our operating income or possible increase in losses.

To

date, the majority of our revenues have been generated from clients that operate in the legal cannabis industry in the United States

and Canada.

We

provide the overwhelming majority of our facility engineering design and equipment integration and solutions to facilities in the legal

cannabis industry. While we are hopeful that the proportion of non-cannabis revenues might increase over time, decreases in demand from

the legal cannabis industry will have a material adverse effect on our revenues and the success of our business operations.

The

cannabis industry has been an emerging industry over the last several years, and cannabis has only been legalized in some states and

remains illegal in other states and under U.S. federal law, making it difficult to accurately forecast the demand for our engineering

and product solutions in this specific industry. Losing clients from the cannabis industry may have a material adverse effect on our

revenues and the success of our business.

The

cannabis industry is still developing in the United States. While the majority of U.S. states now have legal cannabis, it remains illegal

under U.S. federal law, making it difficult to accurately predict and forecast the demand for our engineering and product solutions.

If the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) did take action against the cannabis industry, we believe those of our clients

operating in the legal cannabis industry would be lost to us.

In

our operations, we rely heavily upon the various U.S. federal governmental memos issued in the past, including the memorandum issued

by the DOJ on October 19, 2009, known as the “Ogden Memorandum”, the memorandum issued by the DOJ on August 29, 2013, known

as the “Cole Memorandum” and other guidance, in the attempt to keep our operations acceptable to those state and federal

entities that regulate, enforce, or choose to defer enforcement of certain current regulations regarding cannabis. By doing this, we

seek to avoid the many possible consequences of providing grow equipment to the cannabis industry as our customers continue to comply

with their state and local jurisdictional laws, rules and regulations and the interpretations of relevant authorities.

The

legal cannabis industry is not yet well or fully developed, and many aspects of this industry’s development and evolution cannot

be accurately predicted. Therefore, the loss of any of our current clients or our inability to capture new client contracts will have

a material adverse effect on our business. While we have attempted to identify our business risks in the legal cannabis industry, you

should carefully consider that there are other risks that cannot be foreseen or are not described in this report, which could materially

and adversely affect our business and financial performance.

There

is heightened scrutiny by Canadian regulatory authorities related to the cannabis industry.

Our

existing and future operations may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by those regulators and other authorities in Canada that

oversee the cannabis industry. As a result, we may become subject to direct and indirect interaction with public officials in one or

both the United States and Canada. No assurance can be provided that any heightened scrutiny will not in turn lead to the imposition

of restrictions on our ability to operate in Canada, in addition to those described herein.

If

we do not successfully have additional products and services, or if those products and services are not successfully commercialized,

we could lose revenue opportunities.

Our

future success depends, in part, on our ability to expand our product and service offerings in our current operational sector or otherwise

expand or change our operations. The processes of identifying and commercializing products are complex and uncertain, and if we fail

to accurately predict customers’ changing needs and emerging technological or other trends, then our business could be harmed.

We have already and may have to continue to commit significant resources to commercializing products before knowing whether our investments

will result in products the market will accept. We may be unable to differentiate our products from those of our competitors, and our

products may not be accepted by the market. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify additional product opportunities,

develop and bring products to market in a timely manner, or achieve market acceptance of our products or that products and technologies

developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or non-competitive. Furthermore, we may not execute successfully

on commercializing those products because of errors in product planning or timing, technical hurdles that we fail to overcome in a timely

fashion, or a lack of appropriate resources. This could result in competitors providing those solutions before we do and a reduction

in revenue and earnings.

Our

future success depends on our ability to grow and expand our customer base. Our failure to achieve such growth or expansion could materially

harm our business.

Our

success depends on us achieving greater and broader acceptance of our products and services in our current and proposed business operations.

This will require us to expand our commercial customer base and win larger contracts. There can be no assurance that customers will purchase

our services or products or that we will continue to expand our customer base. If we are unable to effectively market or expand our product

and service offerings, we will be unable to grow and expand our business or implement our business strategy. This could materially impair

our ability to increase sales and revenue, and materially and adversely affect our margins, which could harm our business and cause our

stock price to decline.

Our

suppliers in our CEA operations could fail to fulfil our orders for parts used to assemble our products, which would disrupt our business,

increase our costs, harm our reputation, and potentially cause us to lose our market.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2024-12-31, filed 2025-03-27 · accession 0001641172-25-000913

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 16 headings are on that chain and 0 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.