Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes. For discussion of our consolidated and segment-level results of operations, non-GAAP measures, and liquidity and capital resources for fiscal year 2019, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2020, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2021.
Overview
We are one of the largest casual dining restaurant companies in the world with a portfolio of leading, differentiated restaurant concepts. As of December 26, 2021, we owned and operated 1,169 full-service restaurants and off-premises only kitchens and franchised 329 full-service restaurants and off-premises only kitchens across 47 states, Guam and 17 countries. We have four founder-inspired concepts: Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill and Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar.
Financial Highlights
Our financial highlights for 2021 include the following:
•U.S. combined and Outback Steakhouse comparable restaurant sales of 30.5% and 24.2%, respectively, relative to 2020 and 4.5% and 3.2%, respectively, relative to 2019;
•An increase in Total revenues of 30.0%, as compared to 2020, and a decrease in Total revenues of 0.4%, as compared to 2019;
•Restaurant-level operating margin of 16.5% for 2021, as compared to 9.9% and 14.9% for 2020 and 2019, respectively;
•Decrease in General and administrative expense of $8.7 million and $29.6 million, as compared to 2020 and 2019, respectively;
•Income from operations of $309.0 million in 2021, as compared to Loss from operations of $(175.0) million in 2020 and Income from operations of $191.1 million in 2019; and
•Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders of $2.00 in 2021 as compared to $(1.85) and $1.45 in 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Business Strategies
In 2022, our key business strategies include:
•Enhance the 360-Degree Customer Experience to Drive Sustainable Healthy Sales Growth. We plan to continue to make investments to enhance our core guest experience, increase off-premises dining occasions, remodel and relocate restaurants, invest in digital marketing and data personalization and utilize the Dine Rewards loyalty program and multimedia marketing campaigns to drive sales.
•Drive Long-Term Shareholder Value. We plan to drive long-term shareholder value by reinvesting operational cash flow into our business, improving our credit profile and returning excess cash to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.
•Enrich Engagement Among Stakeholders. We take the responsibility to our people, customers and communities seriously and continue to invest in programs that support the well-being of those engaged with us.
•Accelerate Growth Opportunities. We believe a substantial development opportunity remains for our concepts in the U.S. and internationally through existing geography fill-in and market expansion. We will
33
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
continue to pursue U.S. fill-in opportunities in key states such as Florida and Texas with Outback, and California and Florida with Fleming’s. We will also focus on geographic regions in South America, with strategic expansion in Brazil, and pursue global franchise opportunities.
We intend to fund our business strategies, drive revenue growth and margin improvement, in part by reinvesting savings generated by cost savings and productivity initiatives across our businesses.
Key Financial Performance Indicators
Key measures that we use in evaluating our restaurants and assessing our business include the following:
•Average restaurant unit volumes—average sales (excluding gift card breakage) per restaurant to measure changes in customer traffic, pricing and development of the brand;
•Comparable restaurant sales—year-over-year comparison of the change in sales volumes (excluding gift card breakage) for Company-owned restaurants that are open 18 months or more in order to remove the impact of new restaurant openings in comparing the operations of existing restaurants;
•System-wide sales—total restaurant sales volume for all Company-owned and franchise restaurants, regardless of ownership, to interpret the overall health of our brands;
•Restaurant-level operating margin, Income (loss) from operations, Net income (loss) and Diluted earnings (loss) per share—financial measures utilized to evaluate our operating performance.
Restaurant-level operating margin is widely regarded in the industry as a useful metric to evaluate restaurant-level operating efficiency and performance of ongoing restaurant-level operations, and we use it for these purposes, overall and particularly within our two segments. Our restaurant-level operating margin is expressed as the percentage of our Restaurant sales that Food and beverage costs, Labor and other related expenses and Other restaurant operating expenses (including advertising expenses) represent, in each case as such items are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The following categories of our revenue and operating expenses are not included in restaurant-level operating margin because we do not consider them reflective of operating performance at the restaurant-level within a period:
(i)Franchise and other revenues which are earned primarily from franchise royalties and other non-food and beverage revenue streams, such as rental and sublease income.
(ii)Depreciation and amortization which, although substantially all of which is related to restaurant-level assets, represent historical sunk costs rather than cash outlays for the restaurants.
(iii)General and administrative expense which includes primarily non-restaurant-level costs associated with support of the restaurants and other activities at our corporate offices.
(iv)Asset impairment charges and restaurant closing costs which are not reflective of ongoing restaurant performance in a period.
Restaurant-level operating margin excludes various expenses, as discussed above, that are essential to support the operations of our restaurants and may materially impact our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). As a result, restaurant-level operating margin is not indicative of our consolidated results of operations and is presented exclusively as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, Net income (loss) or Income (loss) from operations. In addition, our presentation of restaurant operating margin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies in our industry; and
34
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
•Adjusted restaurant-level operating margin, Adjusted income (loss) from operations, Adjusted net income (loss) and Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share—non-GAAP financial measures utilized to evaluate our operating performance, which definitions, usefulness and reconciliations are described in more detail in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below.
Selected Operating Data
The table below presents the number of our full-service restaurants in operation as of the periods indicated:
U.S.:
Outback Steakhouse
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
Bonefish Grill
Franchised 7 7
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
Aussie Grill
Company-owned (1) 5 3
International:
Company-owned
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (2) 122 109
Franchised
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea (1) 78 76
System-wide total - Company-owned 1,165 1,154
System-wide total - Franchised 289 298
____________________
(1)Restaurant counts as of December 27, 2020 have been adjusted to exclude off-premises only locations included in the table below.
(2)The restaurant counts for Brazil are reported as of November 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, to correspond with the balance sheet dates of this subsidiary.
(3)International Company-owned Other included two and one Aussie Grill locations as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, respectively. International Franchised Other included three Aussie Grill locations as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020.
35
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
The table below presents the number of our off-premises only kitchens in operation as of the periods indicated:
U.S:
Company-owned 3 2
International:
Company-owned 1 1
Franchised - South Korea 40 19
System-wide total 44 22
____________________
(1)Excludes virtual concepts that operate out of existing restaurants and sports venue locations.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentages of certain items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in relation to Total revenues or Restaurant sales for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
Revenues
Franchise and other revenues 1.5 0.8
Costs and expenses
Food and beverage costs (1) 30.3 31.3
Labor and other related (1) 28.4 32.0
Other restaurant operating (1) 24.8 26.9
Depreciation and amortization 4.0 5.7
General and administrative 6.0 8.0
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings 0.3 2.4
Income (loss) from operations 7.5 (5.5)
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt (0.1) (*)
Other income, net * *
Interest expense, net (1.4) (2.1)
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 6.0 (7.6)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 0.6 (2.6)
Net income (loss) 5.4 (5.0)
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 0.2 (*)
Net income (loss) attributable to Bloomin’ Brands 5.2 % (5.0) %
____________________
(1)As a percentage of Restaurant sales.
*Less than 1/10th of one percent of Total revenues.
36
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
REVENUES
Restaurant Sales
Following is a summary of the change in Restaurant sales for the period indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
(dollars in millions) 2021
Change from:
Comparable restaurant sales (1) 912.7
Restaurant openings (1) 54.4
Restaurant closures (35.3)
Effect of foreign currency translation (15.3)
____________________
(1)Summation of quarterly changes for restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales will not total to annual amounts as the restaurants that meet the definition of a comparable restaurant will differ each period based on when the restaurant opened.
The increase in Restaurant sales in 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to: (i) higher comparable restaurant sales from recovery of in-restaurant dining from the significantly reduced levels in 2020 after the onset of the pandemic and strong retention of off-premises sales and (ii) the opening of 48 new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base. The increase in Restaurant sales was partially offset by the closure of 46 restaurants since December 29, 2019 and the effect of foreign currency translation of the Brazilian Real relative to the U.S. dollar.
Average Restaurant Unit Volumes and Operating Weeks
Following is a summary of the average restaurant unit volumes and operating weeks for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
Average restaurant unit volumes:
U.S.
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar $ 5,208 $ 3,189
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (1) $ 2,286 $ 1,996
Operating weeks:
U.S.
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar 3,321 3,418
International
____________________
(1)Translated at average exchange rates of 5.33 and 4.85 for 2021 and 2020, respectively.
37
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Comparable Restaurant Sales, Traffic and Average Check Per Person Increases (Decreases)
Following is a summary of comparable restaurant sales, traffic and average check per person increases (decreases) for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
Year over year percentage change:
Comparable restaurant sales (stores open 18 months or more):
U.S. (2)
Carrabba’s Italian Grill 10.5 % 32.2 % (16.4) %
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar 13.4 % 60.9 % (29.5) %
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (3) (12.0) % 28.7 % (31.4) %
Traffic:
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse (2.6) % 18.1 % (17.6) %
Carrabba’s Italian Grill 6.4 % 24.6 % (14.6) %
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar 3.8 % 41.7 % (26.7) %
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (3.6) % 23.5 % (21.5) %
Average check per person (4):
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse 5.8 % 6.1 % 0.7 %
Carrabba’s Italian Grill 4.1 % 7.6 % (1.8) %
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar 9.6 % 19.2 % (2.8) %
Combined U.S. 5.1 % 9.8 % (2.3) %
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (8.2) % 5.6 % (9.9) %
____________________
(1)Represents comparable restaurant sales, traffic and average check per person increases (decreases) relative to fiscal year 2019 for improved comparability due to the impact of COVID-19 on fiscal year 2020 restaurant sales.
(2)Relocated restaurants closed more than 60 days are excluded from comparable restaurant sales until at least 18 months after reopening.
(3)Excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency rates. Includes trading day impact from calendar period reporting.
(4)Average check per person includes the impact of menu pricing changes, product mix and discounts.
38
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Franchise and other revenues
FISCAL YEAR
Franchise revenues (1) $ 45.5 $ 21.2
Franchise and other revenues $ 61.3 $ 25.9
____________________
(1)Represents franchise royalties, advertising fees and initial franchise fees. Franchise revenues increased during 2021 primarily due to higher franchise sales as a result of the impact of COVID-19 on 2020 franchise sales.
(2)Includes a $3.1 million benefit in 2021 from the recognition of recoverable Program of Social Integration (“PIS”) and Contribution for the Financing of Social Security (“COFINS”) taxes in connection with favorable court rulings in Brazil regarding the calculation methodology and taxable base. The amount recognized as a result of the favorable court rulings primarily represents refundable PIS and COFINS taxes for prior years, including accrued interest, and will be recovered by offsetting future PIS and COFINS taxes due.
Franchisee Deferred Payment Agreement - On December 27, 2020, we entered into the Resolution Agreement with Out West, who currently franchises approximately 80 Outback Steakhouse restaurants in the western United States, primarily in California. Under the terms of the Resolution Agreement, we agreed to permanently waive all past due royalties and advertising fees for the period of February 24, 2020 to July 26, 2020 and defer, among other items, all past due royalties and advertising fees for the period of July 27, 2020 to November 22, 2020 due to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Out West’s business. See Note 4 - Revenue Recognition of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the Resolution Agreement.
During 2021, Out West franchise revenues recovered, approaching historical levels. Following is a summary of franchise and other revenues and comparable restaurant sales for Out West franchised locations for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
Franchise revenues $ 22.4 $ 4.4
Other revenues 5.3 1.0
Franchise and other revenues (1) $ 27.7 $ 5.4
____________________
(1)Franchise and other revenues during 2020 were significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2021, we collected Out West monthly royalty and advertising fees, and $5.1 million of past due amounts deferred under the Resolution Agreement.
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Food and beverage costs
FISCAL YEAR
% of Restaurant sales 30.3 % 31.3 % (1.0) %
Food and beverage costs decreased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily due to: (i) 0.9% from increases in average check per person, primarily driven by reduced discounting and an increase in menu pricing, (ii) 0.4% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives and (iii) 0.3% from inventory obsolescence and spoilage costs during 2020 associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. These decreases were partially offset by an increase as a percentage of Restaurant sales of 0.6% from commodity inflation.
39
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
In 2022, we anticipate approximately 11.0% to 13.0% commodity inflation, with approximately 70% of our estimated annual food purchases currently covered by fixed contracts and the remainder subject to floating market prices.
Labor and other related expenses
FISCAL YEAR
% of Restaurant sales 28.4 % 32.0 % (3.6) %
Labor and other related expenses include all direct and indirect labor costs incurred in operations, including distribution expense to Restaurant Managing Partners and other field incentive compensation expenses. Labor and other related expenses decreased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily due to 4.1% from leveraging increased restaurant sales and 0.8% from the 2020 impact of net relief pay. These decreases were partially offset by increases as a percentage of Restaurant sales of 0.8% from wage rate increases and 0.4% from higher management bonus.
In 2022, we anticipate high-single digit labor cost inflation.
Other restaurant operating expenses
FISCAL YEAR
% of Restaurant sales 24.8 % 26.9 % (2.1) %
In August 2021, we entered into the Royalty Termination Agreement with the Carrabba’s Founders for $61.9 million in cash. See Note 22 - Commitments and Contingencies for additional details. We recorded Carrabba’s Italian Grill royalty expense of $3.0 million and $3.8 million during fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Other restaurant operating expenses include certain unit-level operating costs such as operating supplies, rent, repairs and maintenance, advertising expenses, utilities, pre-opening costs and other occupancy costs. A substantial portion of these expenses is fixed or indirectly variable. Other restaurant operating expenses decreased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily due to: (i) 3.2% from leveraging increased restaurant sales, (ii) 1.0% from lower advertising expense and (iii) 0.3% from a decrease in off-premises related costs. These decreases were partially offset by increases as a percentage of Restaurant sales of 1.5% from the Carrabba’s Italian Grill royalty termination payment and 0.8% from higher utilities, operating and rent expense.
Depreciation and amortization
FISCAL YEAR
Depreciation and amortization decreased in 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily due to a decreased level of capital expenditures since 2018, as compared to historical levels, and asset impairments during 2020.
40
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
General and administrative
General and administrative expense includes salaries and benefits, management incentive programs, related payroll tax and benefits, other employee-related costs and professional services. Following is a summary of the change in General and administrative expense for the period indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
(dollars in millions) 2021
Change from:
Transformational costs (12.7)
Severance (7.0)
Expected credit losses and contingent lease liabilities (6.9)
Travel and entertainment (2.3)
Employee stock-based compensation 9.7
Incentive compensation 7.6
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
FISCAL YEAR
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings $ 13.7 $ 76.4 $ (62.7)
During 2020, we recognized asset impairment and closure charges of $66.5 million and $3.6 million within the U.S. and international segments, respectively, primarily related to the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19-related pre-tax asset impairments and closure costs include $23.8 million in connection with the closure of 22 U.S. restaurants and from the update of certain cash flow assumptions, including lease renewal considerations. During 2020, we also recognized asset impairment charges related to transformational initiatives of $6.3 million, which were not allocated to our operating segments. See Note 5 - Impairments, Exit Costs and Disposals of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
The impairment and closure charges during 2021 resulted primarily from locations identified for closure or relocation.
Income (loss) from operations
FISCAL YEAR
Income (loss) from operations $ 309.0 $ (175.0)
% of Total revenues 7.5 % (5.5) % 13.0 %
Income from operations during 2021 as compared to Loss from operations during 2020 was primarily due to: (i) higher comparable restaurant sales and franchise revenues, (ii) COVID-19 pandemic related charges and the impact of transformational and restructuring initiatives during 2020, (iii) lower advertising expense, (iv) the 2020 impact of net relief pay, (v) lower depreciation and amortization expense and (vi) the impact of certain cost savings initiatives. These increases were partially offset by: (i) the Carrabba’s Italian Grill royalty termination payment, (ii) higher labor costs and commodity inflation, (iii) an increase in incentive compensation and management bonus and (iv) higher utilities and operating expense.
41
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Interest expense, net
FISCAL YEAR
Interest expense, net $ 57.6 $ 64.4 $ (6.8)
The decrease in Interest expense, net during 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to: (i) lower revolver and term loan borrowings, (ii) the discontinuance of debt discount amortization related to our 2025 Notes resulting from the modified retrospective adoption of a new accounting standard during 2021 and (iii) lower interest rates on our unhedged variable rate debt. These decreases were partially offset by increases in interest expense from our 2029 Notes issued in April 2021 and our 2025 Notes issued in May 2020.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
FISCAL YEAR
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ 26.4 $ (80.7) $ 107.1
Effective income tax rate 10.6 % 33.7 % (23.1) %
The net decrease in the effective income tax rate in 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to the benefit of FICA tax credits on certain employees’ tips reducing the effective income tax rate in 2021 as a result of pre-tax book income as compared to increasing the effective income tax rate in 2020 as a result of pre-tax book loss.
We have a blended federal and state statutory rate of approximately 26%. The effective income tax rate was lower in 2021 and higher in 2020 than the blended federal and state statutory rate primarily due to the benefit of tax credits for FICA taxes on certain employees’ tips.
Segments
We consider our restaurant concepts and international markets as operating segments, which reflects how we manage our business, review operating performance and allocate resources. Resources are allocated and performance is assessed by our Chief Executive Officer, whom we have determined to be our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). We aggregate our operating segments into two reportable segments, U.S. and international. The U.S. segment includes all restaurants operating in the U.S. while restaurants operating outside the U.S. are included in the international segment.
Revenues for both segments include only transactions with customers and exclude intersegment revenues. Excluded from Income (loss) from operations for U.S. and international are certain legal and corporate costs not directly related to the performance of the segments, most stock-based compensation expenses and certain bonus expenses.
During 2020, we recorded $32.4 million of pre-tax charges as a part of transformational initiatives. These costs were primarily recorded within General and administrative expense and Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings and were not allocated to our segments since our CODM does not consider the impact of transformational initiatives when assessing segment performance.
Refer to Note 23 - Segment Reporting of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for reconciliations of segment income (loss) from operations to the consolidated operating results.
42
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
U.S. Segment
FISCAL YEAR
Revenues
Restaurant-level operating margin 17.1 % 9.8 %
Operating income (loss) margin 11.8 % (0.1) %
Restaurant sales
Following is a summary of the change in U.S. segment Restaurant sales for the period indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
(dollars in millions) 2021
Change from:
Comparable restaurant sales (1) 854.9
Restaurant openings (1) 25.2
Restaurant closures (34.7)
____________________
(1)Summation of quarterly changes for restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales will not total to annual amounts as the restaurants that meet the definition of a comparable restaurant will differ each period based on when the restaurant opened.
The increase in U.S. Restaurant sales in 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to: (i) higher comparable restaurant sales from recovery of in-restaurant dining from the significantly reduced levels in 2020 after the onset of the pandemic and strong retention of off-premises sales and (ii) the opening of 15 new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base. These increases were partially offset by the closure of 45 restaurants since December 29, 2019.
Income (loss) from operations
U.S. Income from operations generated during 2021 as compared to Loss from operations during 2020 was primarily due to: (i) higher comparable restaurant sales and franchise revenues, (ii) COVID-19 pandemic related charges during 2020, (iii) the 2020 impact of net relief pay, (iv) lower advertising expense, (v) lower delivery-related costs and (vi) the impact of certain cost savings initiatives. These increases were partially offset by: (i) the Carrabba’s Italian Grill royalty termination payment, (ii) higher labor costs and commodity inflation, (iii) higher utilities and operating expense and (iv) higher management bonus.
43
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
International Segment
FISCAL YEAR
Revenues
Restaurant-level operating margin 12.7 % 8.3 %
Operating income (loss) margin 4.6 % (4.7) %
Restaurant sales
Following is a summary of the change in international segment Restaurant sales for the period indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
(dollars in millions) 2021
Change from:
Comparable restaurant sales (1) 57.8
Restaurant openings (1) 29.2
Effect of foreign currency translation (15.3)
Restaurant closures (0.6)
____________________
(1)Summation of quarterly changes for restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales will not total to annual amounts as the restaurants that meet the definition of a comparable restaurant will differ each period based on when the restaurant opened.
The increase in international Restaurant sales in 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to: (i) higher comparable restaurant sales principally attributable to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fiscal year 2020 international Restaurant sales and (ii) the opening of 33 new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base. These increases were partially offset by the effect of foreign currency translation of the Brazil Real relative to the U.S. dollar.
Income (loss) from operations
International Income from operations generated during 2021 as compared to Loss from operations during 2020 was primarily due to higher restaurant sales due to the reopening of restaurant dining rooms and increases in average check per person. These increases were partially offset by: (i) additional utilities, rent and operating expense, (ii) commodity inflation and (iii) higher labor costs.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to the results provided in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we provide certain non-GAAP measures, which present operating results on an adjusted basis. These are supplemental measures of performance that are not required by or presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the following: (i) system-wide sales, (ii) Adjusted restaurant-level operating margins, (iii) Adjusted income (loss) from operations and the corresponding margins, (iv) Adjusted net income (loss) and (v) Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share.
44
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
We believe that our use of non-GAAP financial measures permits investors to assess the operating performance of our business relative to our performance based on U.S. GAAP results and relative to other companies within the restaurant industry by isolating the effects of certain items that may vary from period to period without correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. However, our inclusion of these adjusted measures should not be construed as an indication that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or infrequent items or that the items for which we have made adjustments are unusual or infrequent or will not recur. We believe that the disclosure of these non-GAAP measures is useful to investors as they form part of the basis for how our management team and our Board evaluate our operating performance, allocate resources and establish employee incentive plans.
These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to replace U.S. GAAP financial measures, and they are not necessarily standardized or comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. We maintain internal guidelines with respect to the types of adjustments we include in our non-GAAP measures. These guidelines endeavor to differentiate between types of gains and expenses that are reflective of our core operations in a period, and those that may vary from period to period without correlation to our core performance in that period. However, implementation of these guidelines necessarily involves the application of judgment, and the treatment of any items not directly addressed by, or changes to, our guidelines will be considered by our disclosure committee. Refer to the reconciliations of non-GAAP measures for descriptions of the actual adjustments made in the current period and the corresponding prior period.
System-Wide Sales - System-wide sales is a non-GAAP financial measure that includes sales of all restaurants operating under our brand names, whether we own them or not. Management uses this information to make decisions about future plans for the development of additional restaurants and new concepts, as well as evaluation of current operations. System-wide sales comprise sales of Company-owned and franchised restaurants. For a summary of sales of Company-owned restaurants, refer to Note 4 - Revenue Recognition of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table provides a summary of sales of franchised restaurants for the periods indicated, which are not included in our consolidated financial results. Franchise sales within this table do not represent our sales and are presented only as an indicator of changes in the restaurant system, which management believes is important information regarding the health of our restaurant concepts and in determining our royalties and/or service fees.
FISCAL YEAR
U.S.
Carrabba’s Italian Grill 44 32
Bonefish Grill 11 8
International
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea 305 253
Total franchise sales (1) $ 917 $ 686
____________________
(1)Franchise sales are not included in Total revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
45
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Restaurant-level operating margin - The following tables reconcile consolidated and segment Income (loss) from operations and the corresponding margins to Restaurant-level operating income and the corresponding margins for the periods indicated:
Consolidated FISCAL YEAR
Operating income (loss) margin 7.5 % (5.5) %
Less:
Plus:
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings 13,737 76,354
Restaurant-level operating margin 16.5 % 9.9 %
U.S. FISCAL YEAR
Operating income (loss) margin 11.8 % (0.1) %
Less:
Plus:
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings 12,368 66,487
Restaurant-level operating margin 17.1 % 9.8 %
International FISCAL YEAR
Operating income (loss) margin 4.6 % (4.7) %
Less:
Plus:
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings 1,100 3,640
Restaurant-level operating income $ 43,927 $ 22,869
Restaurant-level operating margin 12.7 % 8.3 %
46
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Adjusted restaurant-level operating margin - Restaurant-level operating margin is calculated as Restaurant sales after deduction of the main restaurant-level operating costs, which includes Food and beverage costs, Labor and other related and Other restaurant operating expense. Adjusted restaurant-level operating margin is Restaurant-level operating margin adjusted for certain items, as noted below. The following table presents the percentages of certain operating cost financial statement line items in relation to Restaurant sales for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
U.S. GAAP ADJUSTED (1) U.S. GAAP ADJUSTED (1)
Restaurant-level operating margin 16.5 % 18.1 % 9.9 % 10.2 %
_________________
(1)Includes (favorable) unfavorable adjustments recorded in Other restaurant operating expense (unless otherwise noted below) for the following activities, as described in the Adjusted income (loss) from operations, Adjusted net income (loss) and Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share table below for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
Royalty termination expense $ (61.9) $ —
Legal and other matters (2.7) —
COVID-19-related costs (i) — (14.3)
Asset impairments and closing costs — 2.7
_________________
(i)Includes $11.0 million of adjustments recorded in Food and beverage costs.
47
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Adjusted income (loss) from operations, Adjusted net income (loss) and Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share - The following table reconciles Adjusted income (loss) from operations and the corresponding margins, Adjusted net income (loss) and Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share to their respective most comparable U.S. GAAP measures for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
(in thousands, except share and per share data) 2021 2020
Operating income (loss) margin 7.5 % (5.5) %
Adjustments:
Royalty termination expense (1) 61,880 —
Severance and other transformational costs (2) 2,764 32,404
Legal and other matters (3) (372) 178
Asset impairments and closure costs (5) — (2,205)
Total income (loss) from operations adjustments 64,272 124,188
Adjusted income (loss) from operations $ 373,230 $ (50,785)
Adjusted operating income (loss) margin 9.1 % (1.6) %
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders 215,555 (162,211)
Adjustments:
Income (loss) from operations adjustments 64,272 124,188
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt 2,073 —
Amortization of debt discount (7) — 6,275
Adjustment to provision for income taxes (8) (21,222) (32,526)
Redemption of preferred stock in excess of carrying value (9) — 3,496
Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share (11) $ 2.70 $ (0.69)
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (10) 107,803 87,468
Adjusted diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (11) 96,426 87,468
_________________
(1)Payment made to the Carrabba’s Founders in connection with the Royalty Termination Agreement. See Note 22 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details regarding the Royalty Termination Agreement.
(2)Severance, professional fees and other costs incurred as a result of transformational and restructuring activities.
(3)For 2021, includes: (i) a $3.1 million benefit from the recognition of recoverable PIS and COFINS taxes, including accrued interest, within other revenues as a result of favorable court rulings and (ii) an accrual of $2.7 million for Imposto sobre Serviços (“ISS”), a Brazilian municipal service tax, in connection with royalties from our Brazilian subsidiary over the past five years, including related penalties and interest, recorded within Other restaurant operating expense as a result of an unfavorable Brazilian Supreme Court ruling.
(4)Costs incurred in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily consisting of fixed asset and right-of-use asset impairments, restructuring charges, inventory obsolescence and spoilage, contingent lease liabilities and current expected credit losses. See Note 3 - 2020 COVID-19 Charges of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details regarding the impact of certain COVID-19 pandemic-related charges on our financial results.
48
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
(5)Primarily includes a lease termination gain of $2.8 million.
(6)Adjustment for interest expense related to the 2025 Notes weighted for the portion of the period prior to our election under the 2025 Notes indenture to settle the principal portion of our 2025 Notes in cash. The calculation of adjusted diluted earnings per share excludes 2025 Notes interest adjustment.
(7)Amortization of debt discount related to the issuance of the 2025 Notes. See Note 14 - Convertible Senior Notes of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
(8)Income tax effect of the adjustments for the periods presented. Also includes a $4.2 million adjustment during 2021 for the reduction of certain unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken during a prior period.
(9)Consideration paid in excess of the carrying value for the redemption of preferred stock of our Abbraccio concept.
(10)Due to the GAAP net loss, the effect of dilutive securities was excluded from the calculation of GAAP diluted loss per share for 2020.
(11)For fiscal year 2021, adjusted diluted weighted average common shares outstanding was calculated: (i) assuming our February 2021 election to settle the principal portion of the 2025 Notes in cash was in effect for the entire fiscal year and (ii) excluding the dilutive effect of 9,992 shares to be issued upon conversion of the 2025 Notes to satisfy the amount in excess of the principal since our convertible notes hedge offsets the dilutive impact of the shares underlying the 2025 Notes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents
As of December 26, 2021, we had $87.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, of which $26.6 million was held by foreign affiliates. The international jurisdictions in which we have significant cash do not have any known restrictions that would prohibit repatriation.
As of December 26, 2021, we had aggregate accumulated foreign earnings of approximately $28.8 million. This amount consisted primarily of historical earnings from 2017 and prior that were previously taxed in the U.S. under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and post-2017 foreign earnings, which we may repatriate to the U.S. without additional material U.S. federal income tax. These amounts are no longer considered indefinitely reinvested in our foreign subsidiaries. See Note 21 - Income Taxes of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our indefinite reinvestment assertion.
Borrowing Capacity and Debt Service
Credit Facilities - Following is a summary of our outstanding credit facilities as of the dates indicated and principal payments and debt issuance during the periods indicated:
SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FACILITY FORMER CREDIT FACILITY TOTAL CREDIT FACILITIES
(dollars in thousands)
____________________
(1)Subsequent to December 26, 2021, we repaid the remaining $80.0 million balance on our revolving credit facility.
(2)Interest rate for Term loan A represents the weighted average interest rate. Interest rate for the revolving credit facility represents the base rate option elected in anticipation of impending repayment.
49
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
As of December 26, 2021, we had $699.3 million in available unused borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, net of letters of credit of $20.7 million.
2029 Notes - On April 16, 2021, we issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2029. The 2029 Notes mature on April 15, 2029, unless earlier redeemed or purchased by us. The 2029 Notes bear cash interest at an annual rate of 5.125% payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year.
The net proceeds from the 2029 Notes were approximately $294.5 million, after deducting the initial purchaser’s discount and our offering expenses. The net proceeds were used to repay a portion of our outstanding Term loan A and revolving credit facility in conjunction with the refinancing of our Former Credit Facility.
Credit Agreement - On April 16, 2021, we and OSI, as co-borrowers, entered into the Credit Agreement, which provides for senior secured financing of up to $1.0 billion consisting of a $200.0 million Term loan A and an $800.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”). The Senior Secured Credit Facility matures on April 16, 2026 and replaced our prior senior secured financing of up to $1.5 billion (the “Former Credit Facility”).
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility contains mandatory prepayment requirements for Term loan A, including the requirement that we prepay outstanding amounts under these loans with 50% of our annual excess cash flow, as defined in the Credit Agreement, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 25, 2022. The amount of outstanding loans required to be prepaid in accordance with the debt covenants may vary based on our Consolidated Senior Secured Net Leverage Ratio and year end results. Other than the annual required minimum amortization premiums of $10.0 million, we do not anticipate any other payments will be required through December 25, 2022.
See Note 13 - Long-term Debt, Net for additional details regarding the 2029 Notes and Credit Agreement.
As of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, we were in compliance with our debt covenants. We believe that we will remain in compliance with our debt covenants during the next 12 months.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk - In October 2018, we entered into variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with 12 counterparties to hedge a portion of the cash flows of our variable rate debt. The swap agreements have an aggregate notional amount of $550.0 million and mature on November 30, 2022. We pay a weighted average fixed rate of 3.04% on the notional amount and receive payments from the counterparties based on the one-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate. See Note 17 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
In connection with the refinancing of the Former Credit Facility, on April 16, 2021 we terminated our variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with seven counterparties having an aggregate notional amount of $275.0 million for a payment of approximately $13.3 million, including accrued interest. Following these terminations, $13.4 million of unrealized losses related to the terminated swap agreements included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“AOCL”) will be amortized on a straight-line basis to Interest expense, net over the remaining original term of the terminated swaps.
As a result of our anticipated decrease in variable rate debt balances due to significant voluntary debt payments, on December 9, 2021 we terminated our variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with three counterparties having an aggregate notional amount of $150.0 million for a payment of approximately $4.1 million, including accrued interest. Following these terminations, $4.1 million of unrealized losses related to the terminated swap agreements included in AOCL will be amortized to Interest expense, net during 2022.
50
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Use of Cash
Cash flows generated from operating activities and availability under our revolving credit facility are our principal sources of liquidity, which we use for operating expenses, debt payments, share repurchases and dividend payments, development of new restaurants, remodeling or relocating older restaurants and investment in technology.
We believe that our expected liquidity sources are adequate to fund debt service requirements, lease obligations, capital expenditures and working capital obligations during the 12 months following this filing. However, our ability to continue to meet these requirements and obligations will depend on, among other things, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of revenue and cash flow and our ability to manage costs and working capital successfully.
Capital Expenditures - We estimate that our capital expenditures will total approximately $225 million to $240 million in 2022. The amount of actual capital expenditures may be affected by general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors, among other things, including raw material constraints.
Material Cash Requirements - The following table presents current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 26, 2021:
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
LESS THAN 1-3 3-5 MORE THAN
(dollars in thousands) TOTAL 1 YEAR YEARS YEARS 5 YEARS
Long-term debt:
____________________
(1)Amounts represent undiscounted future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases. Includes $1.0 billion related to lease renewal options that are reasonably certain of exercise.
(2)Includes Senior Secured Credit Facility, 2029 Notes, 2025 Notes and finance lease obligations. Amount is not reduced by unamortized debt issuance costs and finance lease interest totaling $14.3 million.
(3)Projected future interest payments on long-term debt are based on interest rates in effect as of December 26, 2021 and assume only scheduled principal payments. Estimated interest expense includes the impact of remaining variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements.
(4)Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. We have purchase obligations with various vendors that consist primarily of inventory, technology, restaurant-level service contracts and advertising.
(5)Includes other long-term liabilities, primarily consisting of deferred compensation obligations, deposits and other accrued obligations. Unrecognized tax benefits are excluded from this table since it is not possible to estimate when these future payments will occur.
Dividends and Share Repurchases - In April 2021, we entered into our Credit Agreement, the terms of which contained certain restrictions on cash dividends and share repurchases until after September 26, 2021 and we were compliant with our financial covenants. We were compliant with our financial covenants as of December 26, 2021 and we believe that we will remain in compliance with our debt covenants during the next 12 months. As such, absent unanticipated circumstances, we do not believe that compliance with our financial covenants will materially limit our ability to pay dividends in the near term and future dividend payments will depend on various other factors considered by our Board as noted below.
51
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
During the first quarter of 2020, we declared and paid dividends of $0.20 per share. We did not pay dividends during 2021. In February 2022, our Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share, payable on March 16, 2022 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2022.
We did not repurchase any shares of our outstanding common stock during 2021. On February 8, 2022, our Board approved the 2022 Share Repurchase Program under which we are authorized to repurchase up to $125.0 million of our outstanding common stock. The 2022 Share Repurchase Program will expire on August 9, 2023.
Following is a summary of our former share repurchase programs as of December 26, 2021 (dollars in thousands):
Total share repurchase programs $ 973,581
The following table presents our dividends and share repurchases for the periods indicated:
(dollars in thousands) DIVIDENDS PAID SHARE REPURCHASES TOTAL
Fiscal year 2021 $ — $ — $ —
Our ability to pay dividends and make share repurchases is dependent on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, continued compliance with the financial covenants in our debt agreements and the existence of surplus, as well as our earnings, financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our Board deems relevant.
Lease Guarantees - We guarantee certain lease agreements primarily related to divested restaurant properties in circumstances where we have assigned our lease interest. In the event of non-payment by the primary lessees, we may be required to satisfy these lease agreements with cash. See Note 22 - Commitments and Contingencies for additional details regarding our lease guarantees.
Deferred Compensation Programs - Certain Restaurant Managing Partners and Chef Partners in the U.S. (“U.S. Partners”) participate in deferred compensation programs that are subject to the rules of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The deferred compensation obligations due under these plans was $15.5 million and $28.1 million as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, respectively. We invest in various corporate-owned life insurance policies, which are held within an irrevocable grantor or rabbi trust account for settlement of our obligations under the deferred compensation plans. The obligation for U.S. Partners’ deferred compensation was fully funded as of December 26, 2021.
52
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Summary of Cash Flows and Financial Condition
Cash Flows -The following table presents a summary of our cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 402,455 $ 138,849
Net cash used in investing activities (104,745) (76,639)
Net cash used in financing activities (317,419) (16,773)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1,642) (2,174)
Operating activities - Net cash provided by operating activities increased during 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily due to a significant improvement in revenues and operating results, partially offset by: (i) cash paid in connection with the Carrabba’s Italian Grill royalty termination, (ii) timing of collections of gift card receivables, (iii) higher inventory purchases, (iv) payment of payroll taxes deferred in 2020 as a result of the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, (v) cash paid to terminate interest rate swap agreements and (vi) timing of operational payments and receipts.
Investing activities - The increase in net cash used in investing activities during 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to higher capital expenditures, partially offset by higher proceeds from the disposal of property, fixtures and equipment.
Financing activities - The increase in net cash used in financing activities during 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to our capital restructuring and debt payments throughout the fiscal year that lowered bank debt and unsecured notes by an aggregate of $297.0 million.
Financial Condition - Following is a summary of our current assets, current liabilities and working capital (deficit) as of the periods indicated:
Working capital (deficit) includes: (i) Unearned revenue primarily from unredeemed gift cards of $398.8 million and $381.6 million as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, respectively, and (ii) current operating lease liabilities of $177.0 million and $176.8 million as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, respectively, with the corresponding operating right-of-use assets recorded as non-current on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have, and in the future may continue to have, negative working capital balances (as is common for many restaurant companies). We operate successfully with negative working capital because cash collected on restaurant sales are typically received before payment is due on our current liabilities, and our inventory turnover rates require relatively low investment in inventories. Additionally, ongoing cash flows from restaurant operations and gift card sales are typically used to service debt obligations and to make capital expenditures.
53
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these accompanying consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if it requires assumptions to be made and changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets - Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation is performed at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows independent of other assets. For long-lived assets deployed at our restaurants, we review for impairment at the individual restaurant level.
When evaluating for impairment, the total future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets are compared to the carrying amount. If the total future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets are less than the carrying amount, this may be an indicator of impairment. An impairment loss is recognized in earnings when the asset’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is generally estimated using a discounted cash flow model. The key estimates and assumptions used in this model are future cash flow estimates, with material changes generally driven by changes in expected use, and the discount rate. These estimates are subjective and our ability to realize future cash flows and asset fair values is affected by factors such as ongoing maintenance and improvement of the assets, changes in economic conditions and changes in our operating performance. Historically, the change in useful lives of our assets as a result of planned closures or the decision not to renew leases has been a key factor in the impairment we have recognized.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets - Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually in the second fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
We may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired. In considering the qualitative approach, we evaluate factors including, but not limited to, macro-economic conditions, market and industry conditions, commodity cost fluctuations, competitive environment, share price performance, results of prior impairment tests, operational stability and the overall financial performance of the reporting units.
If the qualitative assessment is not performed or if we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value, the fair value of the reporting unit is calculated. Fair value of a reporting unit is the price a willing buyer would pay for the reporting unit and is estimated by utilizing a weighted average of the income approach, using a discounted cash flow model, and, when appropriate, the market approach including the guideline public company method and guideline transaction method. The key estimates and assumptions used in these models are future cash flow estimates, which are heavily influenced by revenue growth rates, operating margins and capital expenditures. These estimates are subjective, and our ability to achieve the forecasted cash flows used in our fair value calculations is affected by factors such as the success of strategic initiatives, changes in economic conditions, changes in our operating performance and changes in our business strategies. The fair value of the trade names is determined through a relief from royalty method.
54
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
The carrying value of the reporting unit or trade name is compared to its estimated fair value, with any excess of carrying value over fair value deemed to be an indicator of impairment.
The carrying value of goodwill as of December 26, 2021 was $268.4 million. We performed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of 2021 by utilizing the qualitative approach and determined that there were no events or circumstances to indicate that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units was less than their carrying values.
Sales declines at our restaurants, unplanned increases in commodity or labor costs, deterioration in overall economic conditions and challenges in the restaurant industry may result in future impairment charges. It is possible that changes in circumstances or changes in our judgments, assumptions and estimates could result in an impairment charge of a portion or all of our goodwill or other intangible assets.
Leases - We use judgment to determine the reasonably certain lease term, which in turn, impacts the applicable incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) used to calculate the initial lease liability for each portfolio of leases. Other assumptions used in determining our incremental borrowing rate include our implied credit rating and an estimate of secured borrowing rates based on comparable market data. We determined the present value of the lease liabilities by using a country specific IBR and applying a single rate to the respective portfolio of leases based on term, regardless of the underlying asset type.
The reasonably certain lease term used in the evaluation of existing leases at transition and new leases after adoption of the new lease standard includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option is reasonably certain because failure to exercise such an option would result in an economic penalty. Such an economic penalty would typically result from having to abandon a building or equipment with remaining economic value upon vacating a property.
We use our estimated IBR, which is derived from information available at the lease commencement date, in determining the present value of lease payments. We give consideration to market data as well as publicly available data for instruments with similar characteristics when calculating our IBR.
At the inception of each lease, we evaluate the property and the lease to determine whether the lease is an operating lease or a financing lease. This lease accounting evaluation may require significant judgment in determining the fair value and useful life of the leased property and the appropriate reasonably certain lease term. These judgments may produce materially different amounts of rent expense in a given reporting period than would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used.
Insurance Reserves - We carry insurance programs with specific retention levels or high per-claim deductibles for a significant portion of expected losses under our workers’ compensation, general or liquor liability, health, property and management liability insurance programs. For some programs, we maintain stop-loss coverage to limit the exposure relating to certain risks.
We record a liability for all unresolved claims and for an estimate of incurred but not reported claims at the anticipated cost that falls below our specified retention levels or per-claim deductible amounts. Our liability for insurance claims was $53.5 million and $52.8 million as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, respectively. In establishing our reserves, we consider certain actuarial assumptions and judgments regarding economic conditions, and the frequency and severity of claims. The establishment of the reserves utilizing such estimates and assumptions is in part based on the premise that historical claims experience is indicative of current or future expected activity, which could differ significantly. Reserves recorded for workers’ compensation and general or liquor liability claims are discounted using the average of the one-year and five-year risk-free rate of monetary assets that have comparable maturities.
55
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
If actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 50 basis point change in the discount rate in our insurance claim liabilities as of December 26, 2021, would have affected net earnings by $0.8 million in 2021.
Income Taxes - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates, based on certain judgments regarding enacted tax laws and published guidance, in effect in the years in which we expect those temporary differences to reverse. As of December 26, 2021, tax loss carryforwards and credit carryforwards that do not have a valuation allowance are expected to be recoverable within the applicable statutory expiration periods. We currently expect to utilize general business tax credit carryforwards within a 10-year period. However, our ability to utilize these tax credits could be adversely impacted by, among other items, a future “ownership change” as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. A valuation allowance is established against the deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred taxes may not be realized. Changes in assumptions regarding our level and composition of earnings, tax laws or the deferred tax valuation allowance and the results of tax audits, may materially impact the effective income tax rate.
While we consider all of our tax positions to be fully supportable, our income tax returns, like those of most companies, are periodically audited by U.S. and foreign tax authorities. In determining taxable income, income or loss before taxes is adjusted for differences between local tax laws and generally accepted accounting principles. A tax benefit from an uncertain position is recognized only if it is more likely than not that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. For uncertain tax positions that do not meet this threshold, we recognize a liability. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits requires significant management judgment regarding exposures about our various tax positions. These assumptions and probabilities are reviewed and updated based upon new information. An unfavorable tax settlement could require the use of cash and an increase in the amount of income tax expense we recognize. As of December 26, 2021, we had $18.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest and penalties, that if recognized, would impact our effective income tax rate.
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards
For a description of recently issued Financial Accounting Standards that we adopted in 2021 and, that are applicable to us and likely to have material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but have not yet been adopted, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
56
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in commodity prices, labor inflation and foreign currency exchange rates. During 2021, we substantially reduced our variable rate debt borrowings and terminated a significant portion of our interest rate swap agreements, which significantly reduced our market risk exposure related to interest rate risk.
Commodity Pricing Risk
Many of the ingredients used in the products sold in our restaurants are commodities that are subject to unpredictable price volatility. Although we attempt to minimize the effect of price volatility by negotiating fixed price contracts for the supply of key ingredients, there are no established fixed price markets for certain commodities such as produce and wild fish, and we are subject to prevailing market conditions when purchasing those types of commodities. Other commodities are purchased based upon negotiated price ranges established with vendors with reference to the fluctuating market prices. The related agreements may contain contractual features that limit the price paid by establishing certain price floors and caps. As of December 26, 2021, approximately 70% of our estimated 2022 annual food purchases were covered by fixed contracts, most of which are scheduled to expire during 2022.
During 2021, commodity markets began experiencing elevated levels of inflation across all proteins given strong consumer demand and product shortages due to supply chain disruptions. In addition, higher input costs across labor, fuel, freight and packaging contributed to increases as well. We anticipate commodity inflation to be approximately 11.0% to 13.0% for 2022. Extreme changes in commodity prices or long-term changes could affect our financial results adversely. We expect that in most cases increased commodity prices could be passed through to our customers through increases in menu prices. However, if there is a time lag between the increasing commodity prices and our ability to increase menu prices, or if we believe the commodity price increase to be short in duration and we choose not to pass on the cost increases, our short-term financial results could be negatively affected. Additionally, from time to time, competitive circumstances could limit menu price flexibility, and in those cases, margins would be negatively impacted by increased commodity prices. Currently we do not use financial instruments to hedge our commodity risk.
In addition to the market risks identified above, we are subject to business risk as our U.S. beef supply is highly dependent upon a limited number of vendors. If these vendors were unable to fulfill their obligations under their contracts, we could encounter supply shortages and incur higher costs to secure adequate supplies. See Note 22 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
Labor Inflation
Our restaurant operations are subject to federal and state minimum wage and other laws governing such matters as working conditions, overtime and tip credits. A significant number of our restaurant team members are paid at rates related to the federal and/or state minimum wage and, accordingly, increases in the minimum wage increase our labor costs. To the extent permitted by competition and the economy, we have mitigated increased costs by increasing menu prices and may continue to do so if deemed necessary in future years. Substantial increases in costs and expenses could impact our operating results to the extent such increases cannot be passed through to our guests. We anticipate high-single digit labor cost inflation during 2022.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk for our restaurants operating in foreign countries. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk is primarily related to fluctuations in the Brazilian Real relative to the U.S. dollar. Our operations in other markets consist of Company-owned restaurants on a smaller scale than Brazil. If foreign currency exchange rates depreciate in the countries in which we operate, we may experience declines in our operating results. Currently, we do not use financial instruments to hedge foreign currency exchange rate changes.
57
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
For 2021, 8.8% of our revenue was generated in foreign currencies. A 10% change in average foreign currency rates against the U.S. dollar would have increased or decreased our Total revenues for our foreign entities by $38.9 million. The 10% change would not have had a material effect on Net income.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates, which could affect our consolidated balance sheet, earnings and cash flows. As of December 26, 2021, our interest rate risk was primarily from variable interest rate changes on our Senior Secured Credit Facility. We manage our exposure to market risk through regular operating and financing activities and when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for speculative purposes. To manage the risk of fluctuations in variable interest rate debt, we have interest rate swaps. As of December 26, 2021, we had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $125.0 million that mature on November 30, 2022. See Note 17 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
We utilize valuation models to estimate the effects of changing interest rates. As of December 26, 2021, a potential change from a hypothetical 100 basis point increase/decrease in short-term interest rates would not materially impact the fair value of our interest rate swaps or our annual interest expense.
This market risk discussion contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the discussion based upon general market conditions and changes in U.S. and global financial markets.
58
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PAGE NO.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 60
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 238) 61
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020 64
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows —For Fiscal Years 2021, 2020 and 2019 68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 70
59
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements prepared for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2021 using the criteria described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (“COSO”). Based upon our evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 26, 2021.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2021 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
60
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bloomin’ Brands, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), of changes in stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 26, 2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 26, 2021 and December 27, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 26, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Changes in Accounting Principles
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for convertible instruments and contracts in an entity’s own equity in 2021 and the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
61
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matterarising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to theconsolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidatedfinancial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Insurance Reserves
As described in Notes2 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated discounted insurance reserves balance was $53.5 million as of December 26, 2021. The Company carries insurance programs with specific retention levels or high per-claim deductibles for a significant portion of expected losses under its workers’ compensation, general or liquor liability, health, property and management liability insurance programs. The Company records a liability for all unresolved claims and for an estimate of incurred but not reported claims at the anticipated cost that falls below its specified retention levels or per-claim deductible amounts. In establishing reserves, management considers certain actuarial assumptions and judgments regarding economic conditions and the frequency and severity of claims. Reserves recorded for workers’ compensation and general liability claims are discounted using the average of the one-year and five-year risk-free rate of monetary assets that have comparable maturities.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of insurance reserves is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the estimated reserves, which in turn led to (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating the actuarial assumptions related to economic conditions and the frequency and severity of claims, and (iii) the audit effort included the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of insurance reserves.These procedures alsoincluded, among others (i) evaluating management’s process for developing the insurance reserves, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of management’s actuarial methods used, (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the actuarial assumptions related to economic conditions and the frequency and severity of claims, and (iv) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying
62
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
data used in the valuation. Evaluating the actuarial assumptions related to economic conditions and the frequency and severity of claims involved evaluating whether the assumptions were reasonable considering inflation and the environment, and whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of management’s actuarial methods used in determining the insurance reserves and evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions related to economic conditions.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tampa, Florida