| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $3.29B | Enterprise Value | $3.86B |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 4.35× | P/FCF | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 55.87× | EV/EBIT | — |
| EV/Sales | 5.10× | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | −3.09% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | -$22.5M | Owner Earnings Yield | −0.68% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 0.80 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 7.98% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | WACC | — |
| ROIC | −0.96% | EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — |
| EVA | — | ||
FCF sits 353% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM -$0.37 · revenue TTM $757.3M · FCF TTM -$101.8M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Communication Services on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 95th percentile in the Communication Services pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 267 Communication Services names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 63.3x | 9.8x | 6.7x–19.3x | 95 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | -2.1% | 5.1% | -2.6%–11.0% | 26 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | -3.2% | 1.9% | -12.4%–11.9% | 34 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 4.4% | -9.4%–14.2% | 33 ↓weak |
| ROE | -4.5% | 5.0% | -10.4%–15.3% | 29 ↓weak |
