Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

authID Inc. AUID US Equity

Information Technology · CIK 1534154 · FY ends Dec 31
$0.49
-0.01 (-1.97%)
USD · as of 2026-08-28 · marketstack

authID Inc. (Nasdaq: AUID), an SEC filer in Services-Prepackaged Software, closed at $0.49, -2.0%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $8M, a return on equity of -178.1%, a net margin of -878.8% and 3-year sales growth of 57.0%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.

AUID · 10-K · period ended 2020-12-31

← all AUID documents
filed 2021-03-08 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 5531,152 of 3,229269k characters rendered

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have a history of losses and we may not be able to achieve

profitability going forward.

We have an accumulated

deficit of approximately $98.2 million as of December 31, 2020 and incurred an operating loss of approximately $9.0 million for

the year ended December 31, 2020. We have had net losses in most of our quarters since our inception. We expect that we will continue

to incur net losses in 2021. We may incur losses in the future for a number of reasons, including the other risks described in

this report, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown events. Accordingly,

we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Our management is developing plans and executing certain programs to alleviate

the negative trends and conditions described above, however there is no guarantee that such plans will be successfully implemented.

Our ability to curtail our operating losses or generate a profit may be further impacted by the fact that our business plan is

largely unproven. There is no assurance that even if we successfully implement our business plan, that we will be able to curtail

our losses. If we incur significant additional operating losses, our stock price may decline, perhaps significantly and the Company

will need to raise substantial additional capital in order to be able to continue to operate, which will dilute the existing stockholders

and such dilution may be significant. Additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all.

We have yet to achieve positive cash flow and, given our

projected funding needs, our ability to generate positive cash flow is uncertain.

We have had negative

cash flow from operating activities of approximately $4.7 million and approximately $6.0 million for the years ended December 31,

2020 and 2019, respectively. We anticipate that we will continue to have negative cash flows from operating activities for the

foreseeable future as we expect to incur increased research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative

expenses. Our business will require significant amounts of working capital to support our growth, particularly as we seek to introduce

our new offered products. An inability to generate positive cash flow from operations may adversely affect our ability to raise

needed capital for our business on reasonable terms, if at all. It may also diminish supplier or customer willingness to enter

into transactions with us, and have other adverse effects that may impact our long-term viability. There can be no assurance we

will achieve positive cash flows in the foreseeable future.

11

We need access to additional

financing, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we cannot access additional financing when we need

it and on acceptable terms, our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results and ability to continue as a going

concern will be adversely affected.

Our growth-oriented

business plan to offer products to our customers will require continued capital investment. Our research and development activities

will also require continued investment. We raised approximately $8.2 million and $3.3 million and in 2020 and 2019, respectively,

through equity and debt financing at varying terms. In order to implement and grow our operations through December 31, 2022, achieve

an expected annual revenue stream from our products and repay our outstanding convertible debt obligations ($7.6 million) in February

2022 we expect that we will need to raise between $14 and $16 million dollars. See Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements

for additional information with respect to conversion options or the respective convertible noteholders. There is no guarantee

that our current business plan will not change, and as a result of such change, we will need additional capital to implement such

business plan. Further, assuming we achieve our expected growth plan, of which there is no guarantee, we will need additional capital

to implement growth beyond our current business plan.

Our limited operating history makes

it difficult for us to evaluate our future business prospects and make decisions based on those estimates of our future performance.

We have been an emerging

growth company since beginning operations. We have a limited operating history and have generated limited revenue. As we look to

further expand our existing products it is difficult, if not impossible, to forecast our future results based upon our historical

data. Because of the uncertainties related to our lack of historical operations, we may be hindered in our ability to anticipate

and timely adapt to increases or decreases in revenues or expenses. If we make poor budgetary decisions as a result of unreliable

historical data, we could be less profitable or incur losses, which may result in a decline in our stock price.

There can be no assurance that we will

successfully commercialize our products that are currently in development or that our existing products will sustain market acceptance.

There is no assurance

that we will ever successfully commercialize our platform and related solutions that are under development or that we will experience

market reception for our products in development or increased market reception for our existing products. Although our acquisitions

have generated revenue, there is no guarantee that we will be able to successfully implement our new products utilizing the acquired

technology, products, and customer base. There is no assurance that our existing products or solutions will achieve market acceptance

or that our new products or solutions will achieve market acceptance. Further, there can be no guarantee that we will not lose

business to our existing or potential new competitors.

We depend upon key personnel and need

additional personnel.

Our success depends

on the continuing services of Philip Kumnick, CEO, Philip Broenniman, COO, as well as certain other members of the current management

team. Our executive team are incentivized by stock compensation grants that align the interests of investors with the executive

team and certain executives have employment retention agreements. The loss of key management, engineering employees or third-party

contractors could have a material and adverse effect on our business operations. Additionally, the success of our operations will

largely depend upon our ability to successfully attract and maintain competent and qualified key management personnel. As with

any company with limited resources, there can be no guarantee that we will be able to attract such individuals or that the presence

of such individuals will necessarily translate into profitability for our company. If we are successful in attracting and retaining

such individuals, it is likely that our payroll costs and related expenses will increase significantly and that there will be additional

dilution to existing stockholders as a result of equity incentives that may need to be issued to such management personnel. Our

inability to attract and retain key personnel may materially and adversely affect our business operations. Any failure by our management

to effectively anticipate, implement, and manage personnel required to sustain our growth would have a material adverse effect

on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

12

The market for our products is characterized

by changing technology, requirements, standards and products, and we may be adversely affected if we do not respond promptly and

effectively to these changes.

The market for our

payment processing and identity management products is characterized by evolving technologies, changing industry standards, changing

political and regulatory environments, frequent new product introductions and rapid changes in customer requirements. The introduction

of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices can render existing products obsolete

and unmarketable. Our future success will depend on our ability to enhance our existing products and to develop and introduce,

on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and product features that keep pace with technological developments and emerging

industry standards and address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers. In the future:

If we are unable to

respond promptly and effectively to changing technologies and market requirements, we will be unable to compete effectively in

the future.

There can be no assurance

that we will successfully identify new product opportunities and develop and bring new products to market in a timely manner, or

that the products and technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.

The failure of our new product development efforts could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations

and future growth.

13

If our technology and solutions cease

to be adopted and used by government and public and private organizations, we may lose some of our existing customers and our operations

will be negatively affected.

Our ability to grow

depends significantly on whether governmental and public and private organizations adopt our technology and solutions as part of

their new standards and whether we will be able to leverage our expertise in governmental solutions into commercial solutions.

If these organizations do not adopt our technology, we may not be able to penetrate some of the new markets we are targeting, or

we may lose some of our existing customer base.

In order for us to

achieve our growth objectives, our identity management technologies and solutions must be adapted to and adopted in a variety of

areas including, among others, physical access control, computer access control, biometric fingerprint matching and identity card

issuance and verification. Further, our payment processing technologies and solutions will need to be adopted by financial institutions,

merchants and consumers.

We cannot accurately

predict the future growth rate, if any, or the ultimate size of these markets. The growth of the market for our products and services

depends on a number of factors such as the cost, performance and reliability of our products and services compared to the products

and services of our competitors, customer perception of the benefits of our products and solutions, public perception of the intrusiveness

of these solutions and the manner in which organizations use the information collected, customer satisfaction with our products

and services and marketing efforts and publicity for our products and services. Our products and services may not adequately address

market requirements and may not gain wide market acceptance. If our solutions or our products and services do not gain wide market

acceptance, our business and our financial results will suffer.

We have sought in the past and will

seek in the future to enter into contracts with governments, as well as state and local governmental agencies and municipalities,

which subjects us to certain risks associated with such types of contracts.

Most contracts with

governments or with state or local agencies or municipalities, or Governmental Contracts, are awarded through a competitive bidding

process, and some of the business that we expect to seek in the future will likely be subject to a competitive bidding process.

Competitive bidding presents a number of risks, including:

14

We may not be afforded

the opportunity in the future to bid on contracts that are held by other companies and are scheduled to expire, if the governments,

or the applicable state or local agency or municipality determines to extend the existing contract. If we are unable to win particular

contracts that are awarded through the competitive bidding process, we may not be able to operate in the market for the products

and services that are provided under those contracts for a number of years. If we are unable to win new contract awards or retain

those contracts, if any, that we are awarded over any extended period, our business, prospects, financial condition and results

of operations will be adversely affected.

In addition, Governmental

Contracts subject us to risks associated with public budgetary restrictions and uncertainties, actual contracts that are less than

awarded contract amounts, the requirement for posting a performance bond and the related cost and cancellation at any time at the

option of the governmental agency. Any failure to comply with the terms of any Governmental Contracts could result in substantial

civil and criminal fines and penalties, as well as suspension from future contracts for a significant period of time, any of which

could adversely affect our business by requiring us to pay significant fines and penalties or prevent us from earning revenues

from Governmental Contracts during the suspension period. Cancellation of any one of our major Governmental Contracts could have

a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Governments may be

in a position to obtain greater rights with respect to our intellectual property than we would grant to other entities. Governmental

agencies also have the power, based on financial difficulties or investigations of their contractors, to deem contractors unsuitable

for new contract awards. Because we will engage in the government contracting business, we will be subject to additional regulatory

and legal compliance requirements, as well as audits, and may be subject to investigation, by governmental entities. Compliance

with such additional regulatory requirements are likely to result in additional operational costs in performing such Governmental

Contracts which may impact our profitability. Failure to comply with the terms of any Governmental Contract could result in substantial

civil and criminal fines and penalties, as well as suspension from future contracts for a significant period of time, any of which

could adversely affect our business by requiring us to pay the fines and penalties and prohibiting us from earning revenues from

Governmental Contracts during the suspension period.

Furthermore, governmental

programs can experience delays or cancellation of funding and suspension of appropriations for example as occurred with the recent

partial United States government, which can be unpredictable; this may make it difficult to forecast our revenues on a quarter-by-quarter

basis.

We rely in part on third-party software

to develop and provide our solutions.

We rely in part on

software licensed from third parties to develop and offer some of our solutions. Any loss of the right to use any such software

or other intellectual property required for the development and maintenance of our solutions, or any defects or other issues with

such software could result in problems or delays in the provision of our solutions until equivalent technology is either developed

by us, or, if available from others, is identified, obtained, and integrated, which could harm our business.

In addition, the recent

emergence of a coronavirus disease (COVID - 19) could impact any or all of the third party providers and suppliers on whom we rely.

While the full impact of this disease and worldwide reaction to it are largely unknown, any disruption of

such providers and suppliers caused by this disease could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,

results of operations, and cash flows.

We have historically depended upon a

small number of large system sales ranging from $100,000 to $2,000,000 and we may fail to achieve one or more large system sales

in the future, or fail to successfully transition to new products generating recurring revenues.

Historically, we have

derived a substantial portion of our revenues from a small number of sales of large, relatively expensive systems, typically ranging

in price from $100,000 to $2,000,000. If we fail to receive orders for these large systems in a given sales cycle on a consistent

basis, our business could be significantly harmed. We are trying to reduce such dependence by developing a range of products and

solutions, which are in a lower price range and intended to generate recurring revenue from a large number of customers. The Company

has invested heavily in developing and launching such products but there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful and

that a satisfactory return on such investment will be achieved. Further, our quarterly results are difficult to predict because

we cannot predict in which quarter, if any, large system sales will occur in a given year, nor when (if at all), or at what rate

the ramp in sales of new products will occur. As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations

are not a good indication of our future performance. In some future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations

of securities analysts and investors, in which case the market price of our Common Stock may decrease significantly.

15

Our efforts to expand our international operations are subject

to a number of risks, any of which could adversely reduce our future international sales and increase our losses.

Most of our revenues

to date are attributable to sales and business operations in jurisdictions other than the United States. Our international operations

could be subject to a number of risks, any of which could adversely affect our future international sales and operating results,

including:

● trade restrictions;

● export duties and tariffs;

● export regulations or restrictions including sanctions;

● uncertain political, regulatory and economic developments;

● labor and social unrest;

● inability to protect our intellectual property rights;

● highly aggressive competitors;

● currency issues, including currency exchange risk;

● difficulties in staffing, managing and supporting foreign operations;

● longer payment cycles; and

● increased collection risks;

● impact of the Coronavirus;

Negative developments

in any of these areas in one or more countries could result in a reduction in demand for our products, the cancellation or delay

of orders already placed, difficulty in collecting receivables, and a higher cost of doing business, any of which could adversely

affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We are exposed to risks in operating

in foreign markets, which may make operating in those markets difficult and thereby force us to curtail our business operations.

In conducting our business

in foreign countries, we are subject to political, economic, legal, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating

in other countries. Risks inherent to operating in other countries range from difficulties in settling transactions in emerging

markets to possible nationalization, expropriation, price controls and other restrictive governmental actions. We also face the

risk that exchange controls or similar restrictions imposed by foreign governmental authorities may restrict our ability to convert

local currency received or held by us in their countries into U.S. dollars or other currencies, or to take those dollars or other

currencies out of those countries.

It is possible that

countries in which we do or intend to do business, or companies and their principals become subject to sanctions under U.S. law.

This would prevent us from doing business with those countries or with those entities or individuals. The Company could be exposed

to fines and penalties in the event of breach any applicable sanctions legislation or orders. In addition, the Company might be

required to suspend or terminate existing contracts in order to comply with such sanctions legislation or orders, which would adversely

impact our future revenues and cashflows.

16

Additionally, we are

subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and other laws in the United States and elsewhere that prohibit

improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties for the purpose of obtaining

or retaining business. We have operations in and deal with governments and officials in foreign countries. Our activities in these

countries create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees, contractors or customers that

could be in violation of various laws, including the FCPA, even though these parties are not always subject to our control. We

have implemented safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees, consultants and customers. However, our existing safeguards

and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and our employees, contractors or customers may engage in conduct

for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA or similar laws may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions

and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Breaches of network or information technology

security, natural disasters or terrorist attacks could have an adverse effect on our business.

Cyber-attacks or other

breaches of network or information technology (IT) security, natural disasters, terrorist acts or acts of war may cause equipment

failures or disrupt our systems and operations. We may be subject to attempts to breach the security of our networks and IT infrastructure

through cyber-attack, malware, computer viruses and other means of unauthorized access. While we maintain insurance coverage for

some of these events, the potential liabilities associated with these events could exceed the insurance coverage we maintain. A

failure to protect the privacy of customer and employee confidential data against breaches of network or IT security could result

in damage to our reputation. To date, we have not been subject to cyber-attacks or other cyber incidents that we are aware of which,

individually or in the aggregate, resulted in a material impact to our operations or financial condition.

For us to further penetrate

the marketplace, the marketplace must be confident that we provide effective security protection for national and other secured

identification documents and cards and other personally identifiable information or protected personal information, or PII. Although

we are not aware that we have experienced any act of sabotage or unauthorized access by a third party of our software or technology

to date, if an actual or perceived breach of security occurs in our internal systems or those of our customers, regardless of whether

we caused the breach, it could adversely affect the market’s perception of our products and services. This could cause us

to lose customers, resellers, alliance partners or other business partners, thereby causing our revenues to decline. If we or our

customers were to experience a breach of our internal systems, our business could be severely harmed by adversely affecting the

market’s perception of our products and services.

Most recently, we have

considered the impacts of coronavirus disease (COVID - 19) on our overall operations. The full impact of this disease and the worldwide

reaction to it are still developing rapidly at this time, and the widespread growth in infections, or travel restrictions, quarantines

or site closures imposed as a result of the disease, is among other things, impacting the ability of our employees, sub-contractors,

or our customers employees and sub-contractors to attend places of work, to meet with potential customers, or undertake implementations

at our customer’s locations. In addition, the disease could lead to disruptions in our supply chain, causing shortages or

unavailability of software updates, or necessary equipment. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business,

financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

17

Interruptions, delays in service or

defects in our systems could impair the delivery of our services and harm our business.

We depend on the efficient

and uninterrupted operation of our computer network systems, software, telecommunications networks, and processing centers, as

well as the systems and services of third parties, in order to provide services to our customers. Almost all of our network systems

are hosted “in the cloud” by internationally recognized third party service providers such as Amazon Web Services and

Microsoft Azure. Our systems and data centers are vulnerable to damage or interruption from, among other things, fire, natural

disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist acts, war, unauthorized entry, human error, and computer viruses or

other defects. They may also be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and similar misconduct. We have security,

backup and recovery systems in place, and we are in the process of implementing business continuity plans that will be designed

to ensure our systems will not be inoperable. However, there is still a risk that a system outage or data loss may occur which

would not only damage our reputation but could also require the payment of penalties or damages to our clients if our systems do

not meet certain operating standards. Despite precautions taken at these facilities, the occurrence of a natural disaster or an

act of sabotage or terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice or other unanticipated problems at these

facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our service. Our property and business interruption insurance may not be applicable

or adequate to compensate us for all losses or failures that may occur.

Any damage to, failure

of, or defects, bugs or errors in our systems or those of third parties, errors or delays in the processing of payment or other

transactions, telecommunications failures or other difficulties could result in loss of revenue, loss of customers, loss of customer

and consumer data, harm to our business or reputation, exposure to fraud losses or other liabilities, negative publicity, additional

operating and development costs, and diversion of technical and other resources.

Third parties could obtain access to

our proprietary information or could independently develop similar technologies.

Despite the precautions

we take, third parties may copy or obtain and use our technologies, ideas, know-how and other proprietary information without authorization

or may independently develop technologies similar or superior to our technologies. In addition, the confidentiality and non-competition

agreements between us and most of our employees, distributors and clients may not provide meaningful protection of our proprietary

technologies or other intellectual property in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure. If we are not able to successfully

defend our industrial or intellectual property rights, we may lose rights to technologies that we need to develop our business,

which may cause us to lose potential revenues, or we may be required to pay significant license fees for the use of such technologies.

To date, we have relied primarily on a combination of patents, trade secret and copyright laws, as well as nondisclosure and other

contractual restrictions on copying, reverse engineering and distribution to protect our proprietary technology.

Our current patents

and any patents that we may register in the future may provide only limited protection for our technology and may not be sufficient

to provide competitive advantages to us. For example, competitors could be successful in challenging any issued patents or, alternatively,

could develop similar or more advantageous technologies on their own or design around our patents. Any inability to protect intellectual

property rights in our technology could enable third parties to compete more effectively with us.

In addition, the laws

of certain foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

Our means of protecting our intellectual property rights in the United States or any other country in which we operate may not

be adequate to fully protect our intellectual property rights.

Third parties may assert that we are

infringing their intellectual property rights; IP litigation could require us to incur substantial costs even when our efforts

are successful.

We may face intellectual

property litigation, which could be costly, harm our reputation, limit our ability to sell our products, force us to modify our

products or obtain appropriate licenses, and divert the attention of management and technical personnel. Our products employ technology

that may infringe on the proprietary rights of others, and, as a result, we could become liable for significant damages and suffer

other harm to our business.

18

We have not been subject

to material intellectual property litigation to date. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce any patents we have

or may obtain and/or any other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope

of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity, and we may not prevail in any such

future litigation. Litigation, whether or not determined in our favor or settled, could be costly, could harm our reputation and

could divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel from normal business operations. In addition,

adverse determinations in litigation could result in the loss of our proprietary rights, subject us to significant liabilities,

require us to seek licenses from third parties, prevent us from licensing our technology or selling or manufacturing our products,

or require us to expend significant resources to modify our products or attempt to develop non-infringing technology, any of which

could seriously harm our business.

Our products may contain

technology provided to us by third parties. Because we did not develop such technology ourselves, we may have little or no ability

to determine in advance whether such technology infringes the intellectual property rights of any other party. Our suppliers and

licensors may not be required to indemnify us in the event that a claim of infringement is asserted against us, or they may be

required to indemnify us only with respect to intellectual property infringement claims in certain jurisdictions, and/or only up

to a maximum amount, above which we would be responsible for any further costs or damages. In addition, we have indemnification

obligations to certain parties with respect to any infringement of third-party patents and intellectual property rights by our

products. If litigation were to be filed against these parties in connection with our technology, we would be required to defend

and indemnify such parties.

Our officers and directors beneficially

own a significant portion of our common stock and, as a result, can exercise control over stockholder and corporate actions.

Our officers and directors

of the Company currently beneficially own approximately 11.1% of our outstanding common stock, and 19.3% on a fully diluted basis

assuming the exercise of both vested and unvested options as well as warrants and the conversion of convertible debt. As such,

they have a significant influence over most matters requiring approval by stockholders, including the election of directors and

approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, our directors hold approximately 61% of the secured debt issued by

the Company, which is convertible into common stock. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing

a change in control, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the market price of the Company’s common stock

or prevent stockholders from realizing a premium over the market price for their Shares.

We face competition. Some of our competitors

have greater financial or other resources, longer operating histories and greater name recognition than we do and one or more of

these competitors could use their greater resources and/or name recognition to gain market share at our expense or could make it

very difficult for us to establish market share.

The Company has created

an Identity as a Service (IDaaS) platform allowing it to onboard customers who wish to deploy Ipsidy’s services and solutions

in order to know with biometric certainty who is engaging with them. Ipsidy’s solutions include the ability to verify the

identity of a user, via remote identity proofing, then provide physical and digital access, as well as transaction and device authentication,

all digitally signed by the user using their identity. The Company’s platform utilizes commodity, consumer grade tablets

for customer deployment with users engaging the platform via a web-browser or a corresponding Android or iOS smartphone app.

The Company also offers

certain payment processing solutions and smart card products manufacturing and printing. The industry sectors in which these products

compete are characterized by rapid change and new entrants. The Company will need to consistently develop and improve its products

in order to remain competitive.

In reviewing the competitors

that exist for the Company’s current and planned products and platform services relating to biometric identity solutions,

the Company considers a number of factors. Ipsidy’s platform approach offers an IDaaS approach which seeks to combine a number

of different elements into a single platform. Ipsidy believes that its full stack platform is exceptional in that it provides a

combination of SaaS based identity verification and identification services which cover both physical and digital identity access

use cases. The competitive landscape includes several companies that mainly address only one or other area, with some addressing

multiple areas independently. However, it is believed that some companies are attempting to create combined identity offerings,

similar to Ipsidy’s.

19

In looking at our competition,

the Company does not consider providers who do not offer a consumer application solution for smartphones, such as the Ipsidy App.

Neither do we consider competitors, which are major conglomerates with vertically integrated cybersecurity companies, due to the

vast array of services which they offer. Furthermore, some of the competitors which do offer solutions for both digital and physical

use cases, are major legacy providers offering hardware heavy solutions principally for governmental users. These include IDEMIA,

Gemalto and Supercom. This is in contrast to Ipsidy’s approach which is based on offering apps and browser-based solutions

which are usable on mobile devices with minimal hardware requirements. Furthermore, our identity solutions are designed to address

the requirements of private, commercial and governmental uses for enrolled users.

To further analyze

the competitive landscape, the market must be segmented into authentication solution vendors and biometric identification &

verification solution providers. Major competitors offering solutions in both areas include IDEMIA, Gemalto, ID.ME, HID Global,

and Yoti. Major competitors offering only authentication, include Twillio/Authy, HYPR, Datacard, Duo, Daon, and Trusona. Companies

offering only biometric identification & verification include NEC, Imageware, Element, and Veridium.

The Ipsidy IDaaS platform

is based on a patent-pending methodology, which combines digital signature authentication and biometric identity verification into

a single out-of-band transaction. This provides functionality for our customers to have real-time control over their electronic

transactions and every-day events through a mobile application, with a detailed audit trail created for each event, containing

the digitally signed transaction details and biometric identity of the user. This patent-pending approach of combining transaction

details and identity into a single, digitally signed message could allow the Ipsidy platform to be a complimentary solution to

many of its competitors and hence differentiate itself in the market.

Companies that focused

on offerings for ID proofing, include Jumio, Mitek and Acuant. Companies that provide a single solution may be seeking to combine

with authentication and biometric verification technology providers to expand their ID proofing solutions’ capabilities.

The Ipsidy platform now offers its own identity proofing service for use in digital onboarding solutions, in conjunction with our

biometric authentication and verification solutions.

Another aspect of the

competitive landscape for platform service arises from market demand for SaaS based identity services that are both high assurance

and low friction. This combination is the ideal balance that Ipsidy and its competitors are trying to achieve. Companies that are

believed to be competing with Ipsidy with their offerings today are Callsign, Gemalto, Danal (acquired by Boku in 2018), Datacard/Entrust,

and IDEMIA (Formerly Morpho and Obertur). In addition, Ipsidy offers its customers the flexibility to adapt its solutions to their

specific use cases for either high assurance or to decrease friction.

With respect to SaaS

based services for physical identity access management, the competitive landscape for Ipsidy also includes companies such as HID

Global, NEC, and IDEMIA. All of these companies offer a broad range of solutions from complete biometric access control systems

to complex biometric e-gate and passenger flow management solutions. Ipsidy’s offering focuses on the SaaS based biometric

identity solutions portion of this market, using mobile apps but also offers API integration with hardware suppliers to create

competitive solutions.

There are new entrants

into each of these markets continually. Each competitor may have a different offering or approach to solve similar problems, which

overlap with those of the Company. Some competitors also include manufacturers who provide systems, or platform solutions to third

party operators and, therefore, do not directly compete with the Company, which operates its own systems.

The Cards Plus business

faces competition both locally in South Africa and internationally. China has become a source of imports of card products at highly

competitive pricing and some local suppliers are reliant on Chinese card manufacturers. Local competitors include Card Technology

Services, Easy Card and Open Gate, Cardz Group and XH Smart Technology (Africa). That said, we believe that we are the only significant

manufacturer in South Africa using digital print technology.

20

The payment processing

industry has many competitors who provide gateway services, closed loop end-to-end solutions, payment processing, peer-to-peer

payments and bill payments. As these types of services are usually supplied by regional or country specific companies, the following

summary of this competitive landscape, is focused on those countries or regions the Company is actively pursuing business in today.

In Colombia and elsewhere in Latin America where the Company is focused, major competitors include PayU, Credibanco, Redeban, Mercado

Pago, Nequi, and QPagos. Some of these companies may on the other hand be potential customers for our identify transaction platform

and biometric authentication services. Companies in this region that also compete in those sectors include Veritran, Certicamaras,

Olimpia IT, Evertec-Processa and Indra.

The resources available

to our competitors to develop new products and introduce them into the marketplace exceed the resources currently available to

us. As a result, our competitors may be able to compete more aggressively and sustain that competition over a longer period of

time that we can. This intense competitive environment may require us to make changes in our products, pricing, licensing, services,

distribution, or marketing to develop a market position. Each of these competitors has the potential to capture market share in

our target markets which could have an adverse effect on our position in our industry and on our business and operating results.

Government regulation could negatively impact the business.

We do not have or require

any approval from government authorities or agencies in order to operate our regular business and operations. However, data protection

legislation in various countries in which the Company does business (including Columbia and the United Kingdom) may require it

to register its databases with governmental authorities in those countries and to comply with additional disclosure and consent

requirements with regard to the collection, storage and use of personal information of individuals resident in those countries.

To the extent that our business is based on Governmental Contracts, the relevant government authorities will need to approve us

as a supplier and the terms of those contracts. However, it is possible that any proposed expansion to our business and operations

in the future would require government approvals. Due to the security applications and biometric technology associated with our

products and platforms the activities and operations of our company are or could become subject to license restrictions and other

regulations, such as (without limitation) export controls and other security regulation by government agencies. Expansion of our

activities in payment processing may in due course require government licensing in different jurisdictions and may subject us to

additional regulation and oversight. Aspects of payment processing and related financial services are already subject to legislation

and regulations in various jurisdictions. As indicated, “We are exposed to risks in operating in foreign markets” above,

the imposition of sanctions on particular countries, entities or individuals would prevent us from doing business with such countries,

entities or individuals. If our existing and proposed products become subject to licensing, export control and other regulations,

we may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted or amended laws and regulations or penalties for

any failure to comply. Our operations could be adversely affected, directly or indirectly, by existing or future laws and regulations

(and amendments thereto) relating to our business or industry.

Some states in the

United States have adopted legislation governing the collection, use of, and storage of biometric information and other states

are considering such legislation. Specifically, several states are considering adopting a Biometric Information Privacy Act, or

BIPA modelled on the Illinois statute, which governs the collection, processing, storage and distribution of biometric information

such as facial biometric templates and fingerprints. Several of these new statutes give individuals rights of action to sue violators,

which have resulted in a number of class action lawsuits. The widespread adoption of such legislation could result in restrictions

on our current or proposed business activities or we may incur increased costs to comply with such regulations. In addition, a

new privacy law took effect in California at the beginning of 2020, and in Maine in July 2020, and other states are considering

additional regulations. These regulations could have a significant impact on our businesses.

Our common stock is thinly traded, so

you may be unable to sell at or near asking prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire

to liquidate your shares.

Currently, our common

stock is quoted on the OTC and future trading volume may be limited by the fact that many major institutional investment funds,

including mutual funds, as well as individual investors follow a policy of not investing in OTC stocks and certain major brokerage

firms restrict their brokers from recommending OTC stocks because they are considered speculative, volatile and thinly traded.

The OTC market is an inter-dealer market much less regulated than the major exchanges and our common stock is subject to abuses,

volatility and shorting. Thus, there is currently no broadly followed and established trading market for our common stock. An established

trading market may never develop or, if developed, be maintained. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility

and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders. Absence of an active trading market reduces the liquidity of the shares traded

there.

21

Our stock is considered a penny stock

and any investment in our stock will be considered a high-risk investment and subject to restrictions on marketability.

The trading price of

our common stock is below $5.00 per share. If the price of the common stock is below such level, trading in our common stock would

be subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These rules

require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trades generally involving any non-NASDAQ equity security

that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Such rules require the delivery, before any

penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith, and impose

various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited

investors (generally institutions). For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must determine the suitability of the penny

stock for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transactions before sale. The additional burdens

imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock,

which could impact the liquidity of our common stock.

Our business is subject to changing

regulations regarding corporate governance, disclosure controls, internal control over financial reporting and other compliance

areas that will increase both our costs and the risk of noncompliance. If we fail to comply with these regulations, we could face

difficulties in preparing and filing timely and accurate financial reports.

We are subject to the

reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the

Dodd-Frank Act. Maintaining compliance with these rules and regulations, particularly after we cease to be an emerging growth company,

will increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, will make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and

costly and may also place increased strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley

Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and at the time we cease to be

an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, we will be required to provide attestation that we maintain effective

disclosure controls and procedures by our registered public accounting firm. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls,

or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to

meet our reporting obligations. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control also could adversely affect the

results of periodic management evaluations regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are

required to include in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the annual auditor

attestation reports regarding effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting that we will be required to include

in our periodic reports filed with the SEC upon our ceasing to be an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, unless,

under the JOBS Act, we meet certain criteria that would require such reports to be included prior to then, under Section 404(b)

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also

cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on

the trading price of shares of our common stock.

In order to maintain

the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting going forward, we will

need to expend significant resources and provide significant management oversight. There is a substantial effort involved in continuing

to implement appropriate processes, document our system of internal control over relevant processes, assess their design, remediate

any deficiencies identified and test their operation. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business

concerns, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. These efforts will also involve substantial

accounting-related costs. We may experience difficulty in meeting these reporting requirements in a timely manner.

22

If we are unable to

maintain key controls currently in place or that we implement in the future and pending such implementation, or if any difficulties

are encountered in their implementation or improvement, (1) our management might not be able to certify, and our independent registered

public accounting firm might not be able to report on, the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, which would

cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, (2) misstatements in our financial statements may occur that may not be prevented

or detected on a timely basis and (3) we may be deemed to have significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, any of which could

adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Implementing any appropriate

changes to our internal controls may require specific compliance training of our directors, officers and employees, entail substantial

costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, and take a significant period of time to complete. Such changes may not,

however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent

inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially impair

our ability to operate our business. In the event that we are not able to demonstrate compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act in a timely manner, our internal controls are perceived as inadequate or that we are unable to produce timely or accurate financial

statements, our stock price could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory

authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

We are an “emerging growth company”

and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” will make

our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging

growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we expect to take advantage of certain exemptions and relief from various

reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.” In particular,

while we are an “emerging growth company” (1) we will not be required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements

of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (2) we will be exempt from any rules that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board requiring mandatory audit firm rotations or a supplement to the auditor’s report on financial statements,

(3) we will be subject to reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements

and (4) we will not be required to hold nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation or stockholder approval of any golden

parachute payments not previously approved.

In addition, we are

eligible to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies until those standards apply

to private companies, and as a result, we may not comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which

adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. The Company has adopted and will be adopting all standards

as they have become effective for public companies.

We also take advantage

of reduced disclosure requirements, including regarding executive compensation. If we remain an “emerging growth company”

in the future, we may take advantage of other exemptions, including the exemptions from the advisory vote requirements and executive

compensation disclosures under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act, and the exemption from the provisions

of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may remain an “emerging growth company” until (1) the market value

of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30, in which case we would cease to be an

“emerging growth company” as of the following December 31, (2) our gross revenue exceeds $1 billion in any fiscal year,

(3) we issue more than $1 billion in nonconvertible notes in any three-year period or (4) the last day of the fiscal year following

the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement.

The exact implications

of the JOBS Act are still subject to interpretations and guidance by the SEC and other regulatory agencies, and we cannot assure

that we will be able to take advantage of all of the benefits of the JOBS Act. In addition, investors may find our common stock

less attractive if we rely on the exemptions and relief granted by the JOBS Act. If some investors find our common stock less attractive

as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may decline and/or become more

volatile.

23

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The Company’s

headquarters are located in Long Beach, New York where the Company currently leases office space. The facilities in Long Beach,

New York are owned by Bridgeworks LLC, a company providing office facilities to emerging companies principally owned by Mr. Beck

and his family, the former CEO and Board Member. The arrangement with Bridgeworks LLC allows the Company to use certain office

services for a fixed, monthly fee of $2,500 reduced from $5,000 in September 2020. The arrangement with Bridgeworks LLC is terminable

upon 30 days’ notice.

The Company leased

an office in Plantation, Florida for $2,600 per month plus a share of building expenses. The lease expired in July 2020

and we did not renew the lease.

In October 2018, the

Company subleased an office in Alpharetta, Georgia for approximately $3,800 per month. The sub-lease expired on March 31, 2020

and we did not renew the lease.

MultiPay S.A.S. leases

space in Bogotá, Colombia. In April 2017, MultiPay S.A.S. entered into a lease beginning April 22, 2017 for two years. The

rent is approximately $9,000 per month with an inflation adjustment after one year. The lease was extended through April 21, 2021.

The Company intends to enter into a new lease within Bogota, Colombia with a smaller footprint and lower expense.

Cards Plus leases its

office and production facility in a suburb of Johannesburg, South Africa. The location consists of approximately 39,500 square

feet. The current lease is through June 30, 2022 at an approximate rent of $8,000 per month.

We believe our facilities

are in good operating condition and that our facilities are adequate for present and near term uses.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time the

Company is a party to various legal or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. While any litigation

contains an element of uncertainty, we have no reason to believe that the outcome of such proceedings will have a material adverse

effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

24

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s

Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

The high and low

per share closing sales prices of the Company’s stock on the OTCQB (ticker symbol: IDTY) for each quarter for the years ended

December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

Quarter Ended High Low

Holders of our Common Stock

As of February 28,

2021, there were approximately 255 stockholders of record of our common stock. This number does not include shares held by brokerage

clearing houses, depositories or others in unregistered form. The stock transfer agent for our securities is Computershare Shareholder

Services, PO Box 505000, Louisville, Kentucky 40233.

Dividends

The Company has never

declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock. The Company currently intends to retain future earnings, if any, to finance

the expansion of its business. As a result, the Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2020-12-31, filed 2021-03-08 · accession 0001213900-21-013989

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 18 headings are on that chain and 14 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.