Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. ASTI US Equity

Information Technology · CIK 1350102 · FY ends Dec 31
$2.92
-0.19 (-6.11%)
USD · as of 2026-08-28 · marketstack

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: ASTI), an SEC filer in Semiconductors & Related Devices, closed at $2.92, -6.1%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $31M as of 2026-08-27, a return on equity of -233.2%, a net margin of -10202.5% and 3-year sales growth of -60.3%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.

ASTI · 10-K · period ended 2022-12-31

← all ASTI documents
filed 2023-03-10 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 397996 of 1,171247k characters rendered

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the notes to those financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or our future financial performance. As a result of many factors, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a company formed to commercialize flexible PV modules using our proprietary technology. For the year ended December 31, 2022 we generated $1,222,786 of total revenue, of which, product sales accounted for $694,286 and milestone and engineering revenue accounted for $528,500. As of December 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $447,537,493.

Significant Trends, Uncertainties and Challenges

We believe the significant trends, uncertainties and challenges that directly or indirectly affect our financial performance and results of operations include:

Our ability to generate customer acceptance of and demand for our products;

Successful ramping up of commercial production on the equipment installed;

The substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to our history of operating losses;

Our products are successfully and timely certified for use in our target markets;

Successful operating of production tools to achieve the efficiencies, throughput and yield necessary to reach our cost targets;

The products we design are saleable at a price sufficient to generate profits;

Our ability to raise sufficient capital to enable us to reach a level of sales sufficient to achieve profitability on terms favorable to us;

Effective management of the planned ramp up of our domestic and international operations;

Our ability to successfully develop and maintain strategic relationships with key partners, including OEMs, system integrators, and distributors, who deal directly with end users in our target markets;

Our ability to maintain the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market;

Our ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;

Our ability to achieve projected operational performance and cost metrics;

Our ability to enter into commercially viable licensing, joint venture, or other commercial arrangements;

Availability of raw materials; and

COVID-19 and the uncertainty around the continued duration and effect of the worldwide pandemic.

Basis of Presentation: The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these

20

estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the understanding of our financial results:

Significant Accounting Policies

Inventories: All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined using the weighted average method. Inventory balances are frequently evaluated to ensure they do not exceed net realizable value. The computation for net realizable value takes into account many factors, including expected demand, product life cycle and development plans, module efficiency, quality issues, obsolescence and others. Management's judgment is required to determine reserves for obsolete or excess inventory. If actual demand and market conditions are less favorable than those estimated by management, additional inventory write downs may be required.

Impairment of Long-lived assets: We analyze our long-lived assets (property, plant and equipment) and definitive-lived intangible assets (patents) for impairment, both individually and as a group, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Events that might cause impairment would include significant current period operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset or group of assets combined with a history of such losses, significant changes in the manner of use of assets and significant negative industry or economic trends. An undiscounted cash flow analysis is calculated to determine if an impairment exists. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related loss is calculated using the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the assets.

Convertible Debt: The Company evaluates its convertible debt instruments to determine if there is an embedded derivative or other feature that requires bifurcation from the host contract. Please refer to Note 12 for further discussion on each convertible debt.

Derivatives: The Company evaluates its financial instruments under FASB ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" to determine whether the instruments contain an embedded derivative. When an embedded derivative is present, the instrument is evaluated for a fair value adjustment upon issuance and at the end of every period. Any adjustments to fair value are treated as gains and losses in fair values of derivatives and are recorded on the Statement of Operations. Please refer to Note 10 for further discussion on embedded derivatives.

Revenue Recognition:

Product revenue. We recognize revenue for the sale of PV modules and other equipment sales at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products to the customer, which typically occurs upon shipment or delivery depending on the terms of the underlying contracts. For module and other equipment sales contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract based on relative standalone selling prices, or estimates of such prices, and recognize the related revenue as control of each individual product is transferred to the customer.

Milestone and engineering revenue. Each milestone and engineering arrangement is a separate performance obligation. The transaction price is estimated using the most likely amount method and revenue is recognized as the performance obligation is satisfied through achieving manufacturing or cost targets and engineering targets.

Government contract revenue. Revenue from government research and development contracts is generated under terms that are cost plus fee or firm fixed price. We generally recognize this revenue over time using cost-based input methods, which recognize revenue and gross profit as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred compared to the total estimated costs of the contract. In applying cost-based input methods of revenue recognition, we use the actual costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs to determine our progress towards contract completion and to calculate the corresponding amount of revenue to recognize.

Cost based input methods of revenue recognition are considered a faithful depiction of our efforts to satisfy long-term government research and development contracts and therefore reflect the performance obligations under such contracts. Costs incurred that do not contribute to satisfying our performance obligations are excluded from our input methods of revenue recognition as the amounts are not reflective of our transferring control under the contract. Costs incurred towards contract completion may include direct costs plus allowable indirect costs and an allocable portion of the fixed fee. If actual and estimated costs to complete a contract indicate a loss, provision is made currently for the loss anticipated on the contract.

Share-Based Compensation: The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees, officers, directors, and consultants based on estimated fair values. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis, over the

21

requisite service period in the Company’s Statements of Operations. Share-based compensation is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, as necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company estimates the fair value of its restricted stock awards as its stock price on the grant date.

Research, Development and Manufacturing Operations Costs: Research, development and manufacturing operations expenses include: 1) technology development costs, which include expenses incurred in researching new technology, improving existing technology and performing federal government research and development contracts, 2) product development costs, which include expenses incurred in developing new products and lowering product design costs, and 3) pre-production and production costs, which include engineering efforts to improve production processes, material yields and equipment utilization, and manufacturing efforts to produce saleable product. Research, development and manufacturing operations costs are expensed as incurred, with the exception of costs related to inventoried raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods, which are expensed as Cost of revenue as products are sold.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging Contracts in Entity s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity s Own Equity. ASU 2020-06 will simplify the accounting for convertible instruments by reducing the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. Limiting the accounting models results in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract as compared with current GAAP. Convertible instruments that continue to be subject to separation models are (1) those with embedded conversion features that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, that meet the definition of a derivative, and that do not qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting and (2) convertible debt instruments issued with substantial premiums for which the premiums are recorded as paid-in capital. ASU 2020-06 also amends the guidance for the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity to reduce form-over-substance-based accounting conclusions. ASU 2020-06 will be effective for public companies that are smaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statement presentation.

Other new pronouncements issued but not effective as of December 31, 2022 are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

22

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Years EndedDecember 31, 2022and2021

Year Ended December 31,

Revenues

Costs and Expenses

Other Income/(Expense)

Income/(Loss) on Equity Method Investment (27,361 ) - (27,361 )

Revenues. Our revenues increased by $615,003, or 101%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in sales is due primarily to Milestone and engineering revenue from TubeSolar in the current period.

Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues is comprised primarily of repair and maintenance, direct labor and overhead expenses. Our cost of revenues increased by $109,045, or 6% for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in cost of revenues is mainly due to the increase in materials and freight, and labor costs as a result of increased production during the current year. This is partially offset by lower repair and maintenance costs in the current period. Management believes our factory is currently significantly under-utilized, and a substantial increase in revenue would result in marginal increases to direct labor and overhead included in the cost of revenues.

Research, development and manufacturing operations. Research, development and manufacturing operations costs include costs incurred for product development, pre-production and production activities in our manufacturing facility. Research, development and manufacturing operations costs also include costs related to technology development. Research, development and manufacturing operations costs increased by $1,835,602 or 44%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in cost is due primarily to increased operations in the current year as compared to the Company’s restart status in the prior year.

Selling,general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1,438,580, or 44%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in costs is due primarily to an increased level of operations in the current period as compared to the Company’s restart status in the prior period. Additionally, the Company incurred a one-time termination expense of approximately $500,000 and $157,000 recognized with the departure of our former CEO and CFO, respectively, in the current period.

Share-based compensation. Share-based compensation expense increased by $5,478,734 or 100%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the same period in 2021. The increase is due primarily to the employment agreements between the Company and its new CEO and CFO and the restricted stock units grants made pursuant to such employment agreements.

23

Other Income. Other income decreased by $5,462,052 or 196%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the same period in 2021. The decline is due primarily to a gain from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities recognized in the prior period and not repeated in the current period and because the Company recognized the remaining discount on convertible debt of approximately $2 million as interest expense upon conversion of these notes in the current period.

Net Income/(Loss). Our Net Loss was $19,754,705 for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to Net Loss of $6,000,003 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $13,754,702. The increase is due to the reasons described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has continued limited PV production at its manufacturing facility. The Company does not expect that sales revenue and cash flows will be sufficient to support operations and cash requirements until it has fully implemented its product strategy. During the year ended December 31, 2022 the Company used $10,506,575 in cash for operations.

Additional projected product revenues are not anticipated to result in a positive cash flow position for the year 2023 overall and, as of December 31, 2022, the Company has working capital of $7,470,521. Although the Company has working capital, additional financing will be required for the Company to reach a level of sufficient sales to achieve profitability.

The Company continues to accelerate sales and marketing efforts related to its specialty PV application strategies through expansion of its sales and distribution channels. The Company continues activities to secure additional financing through strategic or financial investors, but there is no assurance the Company will be able to raise additional capital on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company's revenues do not increase rapidly, and/or additional financing is not obtained, the Company will be required to significantly curtail operations to reduce costs and/or sell assets. Such actions would likely have an adverse impact on the Company's future operations.

As a result of the Company’s recurring losses from operations, and the need for additional financing to fund its operating and capital requirements, there is uncertainty regarding the Company’s ability to maintain liquidity sufficient to operate its business effectively, which raises substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Statements of Cash Flows Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

For the year ended December 31, 2022, our cash used in operations was $10,506,575 compared to $9,404,443 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $1,102,132. The increase is primarily the result of scaling up operations during the current year as compared to the Company’s restart status during 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2022, cash used in investing activities was $265,472 compared to cash used in investing activities of $301,522 for the year ended December 31, 2021. This change was primarily the result of a decrease purchase of equipment partially offset by a contribution to Ascent Germany. During the year ended December 31, 2022, cash used in operations of $10,506,575 were primarily funded through $18,500,000 in proceeds from issuances of debt and common stock.

Off Balance Sheet Transactions

As of December 31, 2022, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We hold no significant funds and have no future obligations denominated in foreign currencies as of December 31, 2022.

Although our reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar, we may conduct business and incur costs in the local currencies of other countries in which we may operate, make sales and buy materials. As a result, we are subject to currency translation risk. Further, changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. Dollar could affect our future net sales and cost of sales and could result in exchange losses.

24

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risks for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash equivalents and investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, our cash equivalents consisted only of operating accounts held with financial institutions. From time to time, we hold restricted funds, money market funds, investments in U.S. government securities and high-quality corporate securities. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal and provide liquidity on demand, while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. The direct risk to us associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited to our investment portfolio, and we do not believe a change in interest rates will have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Financial Statements and Supplementary Data required by this item are included in Part IV, Item 15(a)(1) and are presented beginning on Page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management conducted an evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2022. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

provide reasonable assurance transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Under the supervision of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded our internal control over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2022. Our management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee.

25

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no other changes in internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

26

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Our executive officers, continuing directors and director nominees, their ages and positions with us as of March 10, 2023, are as follows:

Name Age Position

Jeffrey Max 65 President and Chief Executive Officer

Paul Warley 61 Chief Financial Officer

David Peterson 53 Chairman of the Board, Director

Forrest Reynolds 52 Director

Louis Berezovsky 57 Director

Michael French 45 Director

Jeffrey Max has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies Inc. since September 21, 2022. Mr. Max is a seasoned technology CEO, investor and entrepreneur with more than three decades of experience in scaling technology organizations. From 2019 to 2022, Mr. Max was Chairman and CEO of Agile Space Industries, Inc., an in-space propulsion solutions provider, specializing in additively manufactured hypergolic chemical systems. During Mr. Max’s tenure, Agile expanded into design and manufacturing, securing contracts to supply thrusters for multiple NASA lunar lander missions. Under Mr. Max’s leadership, Agile grew from a team of 6 to over 60, and acquired Tronix3D, a contract based additive manufacturer specializing in 3D printing of exotic metal alloys. Since 2018, Mr. Max has been Senior Advisor at The Liiv Group, an investment firm headquartered in New York City with portfolio companies providing media production, marketing and advertising services. Since 2016, Mr. Max has been Managing Partner of La Plata Capital Partners LLC, a privately owned investment company. From 2016 to 2019, Mr. Max was CEO of Rezolve, Inc., a mobile commerce and mobile engagement firm. From 2014 to 2016, he was President of Powa Technologies, Inc., a mobile commerce and e-commerce firm. From 2003 to 2014, Mr. Max was CEO of Venda, Inc., an ecommerce software as a service company. Mr. Max is a director of Orbital Assembly Corporation, an aviation and aerospace component manufacturer. We believe Mr. Max is well-qualified to serve as our CEO due to his business experience.

Paul Warley has been Chief Financial Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies Inc. since December 12, 2022. Mr. Warley has significant experience in corporate turnarounds, restructuring, cross-border trade and capital advisory work. From 2015 to 2022, Mr. Warley was president of Warley & Company LLC, a strategic advisory firm providing executive management, capital advisory and M&A services to middle-market companies in the service, construction, technology, oil & gas, clean energy, food, retail and green-building sectors. While at Warley & Company, from 2018 to 2019 Mr Warley was engaged as Chief Executive Officer and CFO of 360Imaging, a provider of products and services for implant surgery and digital dentistry. From 2011 to 2015, Mr. Warley served clients in the alternative energy industry as a managing director and additionally was Chief Compliance Officer with Deloitte Corporate Finance. From 1997 to 2011, Mr Warley was Managing Director and Region Manager for GE Capital. From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Warley was with Bank of America and Bankers Trust as a Senior Vice President. Mr. Warley holds the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Series 7, 24 and 63 licenses. He earned his B.S. degree in Business Administration from The Citadel (The Military College of South Carolina) and served in the U.S. Army, attaining the rank of Captain. While at Warley & Company LLC, Mr. Warley provided corporate finance consulting services to BD1 Investment Holding LLC, the Company’s largest stockholder. We believe Mr. Warley is well-qualified to serve as our CFO due to his business experience.

David Peterson has served on our Board since December 2020. Mr. Peterson has over 25 years of business management experience, including 9 years as a private equity investor, 6 years as a manager at an engineering consulting firm, and over 20 years of board experience. From April 2015 to present, Mr. Peterson has worked for EPD Consultants, Inc., a privately held engineering firm headquartered in Carson, California, where he serves as Senior Project Manager. From 2010 to 2015, Mr. Peterson was President and Co-Founder of Great Circle Industries, Inc., a water recycling company in southern California. His past experience includes being a board member at AIR-serv, LLC, a tire inflation vending machine manufacturer, where Mr. Peterson managed the acquisition process, including obtaining expansion of the company's credit facility, as that company completed 10 acquisitions and grew from $10 million of EBITDA to $20 million of EBITDA in the year prior to its sale for $151 million to WindPoint Partners. Mr. Peterson has an MBA degree from the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California, and a B.A. from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Mr. Peterson is currently the Manager of Crowdex Investment, LLC, a significant equity investor in the Company. Mr. Peterson and Michael J. Gilbreth (our former

27

CFO) are cousins. We believe Mr. Peterson is well-qualified to serve as a director due to his extensive management and board experience.

Forrest Reynolds has over 28 years of business and management experience and is currently the Managing Partner of CalTex Capital, LLC, a privately held investment firm, as well as a Managing Director of The Vortex Group Family Office, LLC, a private family office, both of which are based in Texas. Previously, Mr. Reynolds served as the Chief Restructuring Officer for Centaur Gaming, LLC, a gaming development company located in Indianapolis, Indiana. In this capacity, Mr. Reynolds managed a $1.0 billion Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization for the company. Prior to that, Mr. Reynolds worked in the investment banking industry for over 14 years holding various positions with several multinational investment banks including Credit Suisse, BT Alex Brown (later Deutsche Bank) and UBS. Mr. Reynolds sits on the board of several private companies and is actively involved with several charitable organizations. Mr. Reynolds graduated from The University of Texas at Austin where he received a B.B.A. in Finance and a B.A. in Economics. We believe Mr. Reynolds is well-qualified to serve as a director due to his knowledge and business experience.

Louis Berezovsky joined Eagle Infrastructure Services in July 2013 and leads the Finance and Accounting, M&A, Human Resources, Legal and IT functions. He has more than 30 years of experience in senior financial management positions across a variety of industries including 25 years of working in private equity sponsored portfolio companies. His accomplishments include the completion more than 60 acquisitions as well as multiple recapitalizations and successful sale processes. Prior to joining Eagle, Mr. Berzovsky previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ABRA Auto Body and Glass, Chief Financial Officer of ConvergeOne, and Chief Financial Officer of AIR-serv.

After receiving his B.S. in Accounting from the University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management, he began his career at a Minneapolis based CPA firm. He is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA). He has also served as a member of the Board of Directors and as the Chairman of the Finance Committee for the Better Business Bureau of Minnesota and North Dakota since 2012. We believe Mr. Berezovsky is well-qualified to serve as a director due to his knowledge and business experience.

Michael French is currently Vice President of Space Systems for the Aerospace Industries Association. From February 2018 to July 2019, Mr. French was Senior Vice President, Commercial Space at Bryce Space and Technology, a privately held management consulting and market analysis firm. From April 2017 to February 2018, Mr. French was Principal at Port City Strategies, a privately held space industry consulting firm. From August 2011 to January 2017, Mr. French was Chief of Staff and Deputy Chief of Staff at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”). Mr. French has also held positions in the Executive Office of the President, The White House and as an attorney at Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, and Hampton LLP. Mr. French also serves on the Federal Aviation Administration’s Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee. Mr. French received a B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley in 1999 and J.D. from Harvard Law School in 2002. Mr. French brings significant aerospace industry leadership experience and market insight, with a particular focus on industry-government partnerships and investments across developing space technologies. We believe Mr. French is well-qualified to serve as a director due to his knowledge and business experience.

28

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock to report their initial ownership of the common stock and other equity securities and any changes in that ownership in reports that must be filed with the SEC. The SEC has designated specific deadlines for these reports, and we must identify in our Annual Report on Form 10-K those persons who did not file these reports when due.

Based solely on a review of reports furnished to us, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe all directors, executive officers, and 10% owners timely filed all reports regarding transactions in our securities required to be filed in 2021 or 2022 by Section 16(a) under the Exchange Act, except that (i) Michael French filed a late Form 3 in 2022, and (ii) each of Jeffrey Max, Crowdex Investment, LLC, BD 1 Investment Holding, LLC, and TubeSolar AG filed one late Form 4 in 2022.

29

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Overview

Our Bylaws provide that the size of our Board of Directors is to be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors, but shall consist of at least two and no more than nine members. Our Board of Directors currently consists of four members. The Board has determined that the following directors are “independent” as required by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market and by our corporate governance guidelines: Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Berezovsky and Mr. French.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Board of Directors will be divided into three classes. Our Class 1 directors are Forrest Reynolds and Louis Berezovsky. Our Class 2 director is Michael French. Our Class 3 director is David Peterson.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Our current Chief Executive Officer, Jeffry Max, is not a member of our Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our Board does not have a formal policy regarding separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles, and the Board may in the future decide to implement such a policy if it deems it in the best interests of us and our stockholders.

Our corporate governance guidelines provide that unless the board chair is an independent director, the board shall appoint a Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director chairs the executive sessions of the independent directors, coordinates the activities of the other independent directors and performs such other duties as deemed necessary by the board from time to time. Because our Chairman is not independent, the board has appointed Louis Berezovsky to serve as our Lead Independent Director.

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. To do this, the Chairman of the Board meets regularly with management to discuss strategy and the risks we face. In addition, the Audit Committee regularly monitors our enterprise risk, including financial risks, through reports from management. Senior management attends the Board meetings and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board on risk management and any other matters. The Chairman of the Board and independent members of the Board work together to provide strong, independent oversight of our management and affairs through the Board’s standing committees and, when necessary, executive sessions of the independent directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Each committee operates pursuant to a charter. The charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee can be found on our website www.ascentsolar.com.

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal systems of accounting and financial controls,relationships with independent auditors, and audits of financial statements. Specific responsibilities include the following:

selecting, hiring and terminating our independent auditors;

evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent auditors;

approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors;

reviewing the design, implementation, adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and critical accounting policies;

reviewing and monitoring the enterprise risk management process;

overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to financial statements or accounting matters;

30

reviewing, with management and our independent auditors, any earnings announcements and other public announcements regarding our results of operations; and

preparing the report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.

Our Audit Committee is comprised of Mr. Berezovsky, Mr. French and Mr. Reynolds. Mr. Berezovsky serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent under the rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market, and that Mr. Berezovsky qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee assists our Board in determining the development plans and compensation of our officers,directors and employees. Specific responsibilities include the following:

approving the compensation and benefits of our executive officers;

reviewing the performance objectives and actual performance of our officers; and

administering our stock option and other equity compensation plans.

The Compensation Committee reviews all components of compensation including base salary, bonus, equity compensation, benefits and other perquisites. In addition to reviewing competitive market values, the Compensation Committee also examines the total compensation mix, pay-for-performance relationship and how all elements, in the aggregate, comprise the executives’ total compensation package. The CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee from time to time regarding the appropriate mix and level of compensation for other officers. Those recommendations consider the objectives of our compensation philosophy and the range of compensation programs authorized by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may determine director compensation by reviewing peer group data. Although the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain outside third parties, it does not currently utilize any outside consultants. The Compensation Committee may delegate certain of its responsibilities, as it deems appropriate, to other committees or officers.

Our Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr. Berezovsky, Mr. French and Mr. Reynolds. Mr. Reynolds serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

Our Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent under the rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market.

Nominating and Governance Committee. Our Nominating and Governance Committee assists our Board by identifying and recommending individualsqualified to become members of our Board, reviewing correspondence from our stockholders, and establishing, evaluating and overseeing our corporate governance guidelines. Specific responsibilities include the following:

evaluating the composition, size and governance of our Board and its committees and making recommendations regarding future planning and the appointment of directors to our committees;

establishing a policy for considering stockholder nominees for election to our Board; and

evaluating and recommending candidates for election to our Board.

Our Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised of Mr. Berezovsky, Mr. French and Mr. Reynolds. Mr. French serves as Chairman of our Nominating and Governance Committee. Our Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent under the rules of Nasdaq Capital Market.

When considering potential director candidates for nomination or election, the following characteristics are considered in accordance with our Nominating and Governance Committee Charter:

high standard of personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;

training, experience and ability at making and overseeing policy in business, government and/or education sectors;

willingness and ability to keep an open mind when considering matters affecting interests of us and our constituents;

31

willingness and ability to devote the time and effort required to effectively fulfill the duties and responsibilities related to the Board and its committees;

willingness and ability to serve on the Board for multiple terms, if nominated and elected, to enable development of a deeper understanding of our business affairs;

willingness not to engage in activities or interests that may create a conflict of interest with a director’s responsibilities and duties to us and our constituents; and

willingness to act in the best interests of us and our constituents, and objectively assess Board, committee and management performances.

In addition, in order to maintain an effective mix of skills and backgrounds among the members of our Board, the following characteristics also may be considered when filling vacancies or identifying candidates:

diversity (e.g., age, geography, professional, other);

professional experience;

industry knowledge (e.g., relevant industry or trade association participation);

skills and expertise (e.g., accounting or financial);

leadership qualities;

public company board and committee experience;

non-business-related activities and experience (e.g., academic, civic, public interest);

continuity (including succession planning);

size of the Board;

number and type of committees, and committee sizes; and

legal and other applicable requirements and recommendations, and other corporate governance-related guidance regarding Board and committee composition.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders who follow the nomination procedures in our bylaws. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, as noted above, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe that it is essential that Board members represent diverse viewpoints.

Number of Meetings

The Board held a total of 12 meetings in 2022. Our Audit Committee held five meetings, our Compensation Committee held three meetings, and our Nominating and Governance Committee held two meetings in 2022. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the Board committees on which he served.

Board Member Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding director attendance at annual stockholder meetings, directors are encouraged to attend these annual meetings absent extenuating circumstances. We did not hold our annual meeting during 2022 or 2021.

Stockholder Nominations

In accordance with our Bylaws, a stockholder wishing to nominate a director for election at an annual or special meeting of stockholders must timely submit a written proposal of nomination to us at our executive offices. To be timely, a written proposal of nomination for an annual meeting of stockholders must be received at least 90 calendar days but no more than 120 calendar days before the first anniversary of the date on which we held our annual meeting of stockholders in the immediately preceding year; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed more than 30 calendar days from the anniversary of the annual meeting of stockholders in the immediately preceding year, the written

32

proposal must be received: (i) at least 90 calendar days but no more than 120 calendar days prior to the date of the annual meeting; or (ii) no more than 10 days after the date we first publicly announce the date of the annual meeting. A written proposal of nomination for a special meeting of stockholders must be received no earlier than 120 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting nor any later than the later of: (i) 90 calendar days prior to the date of the special meeting; and (ii) 10 days after the date we first publicly announce the date of the special meeting.

Each written proposal for a nominee must contain: (i) the name, age, business address and telephone number, and residence address and telephone number of the nominee; (ii) the current principal occupation or employment of each nominee, and the principal occupation or employment of each nominee for the prior ten (10) years; (iii) a complete list of companies, whether publicly traded or privately held, on which the nominee serves (or, during any of the prior ten (10) years, has served) as a member of the board of directors; (iv) the number of shares of our common stock that are owned of record and beneficially by each nominee; (v) a statement whether the nominee, if elected, intends to tender, promptly following such person’s failure to receive the required vote for election or reelection at the next meeting at which the nominee would face election or reelection, an irrevocable resignation effective upon acceptance of such resignation by the Board; (vi) a completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement relating to voting agreements or commitments to which the nominee is a party; (vii) other information concerning the nominee that would be required in a proxy statement soliciting the nominee’s election; and (viii) information about, and representations from, the stockholder making the nomination.

A stockholder interested in submitting a nominee for election to the Board of Directors should refer to our Bylaws for additional requirements. Upon receipt of a written proposal of nomination meeting these requirements, the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board will evaluate the nominee in accordance with its charter and the characteristics listed above.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the current members of our compensation committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of ours. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

Director Compensation

Currently, each of our non-executive directors, consisting of Mr. Berezovsky, Mr. French and Mr. Reynolds, receive an annual retainer of $55,000 in cash. Additionally, in 2022, Mr. Berezovsky, Mr. French and Mr. Reynolds were granted a one time cash fee of $20,000, $20,000, and $25,000, respectively. There are currently no equity grants for service on the board of directors. We do not provide any perquisites to directors but will reimburse all directors for expenses incurred in physically attending meetings or performing their duties as directors.

The following Director Compensation Table summarizes the compensation of each of our non-employee directors for services rendered to us during the year ended December 31, 2022:

33

2022 Director Compensation Table

Felix Mantke (2), (3), (4) - - - - -

David Peterson (3) - - - - -

Victor Lee (2), (3) - - - - -

(1)

None.

(2)

In September 2022, at the request of the majority stockholders of the Company, Victor Lee, Amit Kumar, Kim Huntley and Will Clarke resigned from the Company’s board of directors and Forrest Reynolds, Louis Berezovsky, Michael French, and Felix Mantke were appointed as new directors. The resignations of these four directors were not the result of any dispute or disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the operations, policies or practices of the Company.

(3)

Non-independent directors do not receive compensation for their board service.

(4)

In December, 2022, Felix Mantke resigned from the Company’s board of directors. His resignation was not the result of any dispute or disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the operations, policies or practices of the Company.

In addition to the fees listed above, we reimburse the directors for travel expenses submitted to us related to their attendance at meetings of the Board or its committees. The directors did not receive any other compensation or personal benefits.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and other senior finance and accounting staff. The code is designed to, among other things, deter wrongdoing and to promote the honest and ethical conduct of our officers and employees. The text of our code of ethics can be found on our Internet website at www.ascentsolar.com. If we effect an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of ethics, we intend to satisfy our disclosure requirements by posting a description of such amendment or waiver on that Internet website or via a current report on Form 8-K.

Communication with the Board of Directors

Stockholders may communicate with the Board by sending correspondence to our Chairman, c/o the Corporate Secretary, at our corporate address on the cover of this Form 10-K. It is our practice to forward all such correspondence to our Chairman, who is responsible for determining whether to relay the correspondence to the other members of the Board.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

We have opted to comply with the executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to “smaller reporting companies,” as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Act.

34

This section provides an overview of the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each individual who served as our principal executive officer during 2022, and up to two of our next most highly compensated executive officers in respect of their service to our Company for 2022. Our named executive officers, or the Named Executive Officers, for the year ended December 31, 2022, are:

Jeffrey Max, our current CEO;

Victor Lee, our former CEO;

Paul Warley, our current CFO; and

Michael J. Gilbreth, our former CFO

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for services rendered in all capacities to us during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

35

Summary Compensation Table

(1)

Mr. Max joined the Company in September 2022. Mr. Max's employment agreement provides an annual base salary of $850,000 of which, $500,000 was initially deferred and accrued interest at an annual rate of 4% until the Company raised a minimum $10 million of new capital. Upon completion of the capital raise, Mr. Max received his deferred compensation, including approximately $800 of interest resulting in salary of approximately $227,400. Mr. Max was also granted an inducement grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for an aggregate of 3,534,591 shares of Ascent’s common stock valued at approximately $18,980,000 on grant date. 20% of the RSUs are fully vested upon grant. The remaining 80% of the RSUs vests in equal monthly increments over the next thirty-six months.

(2)

The Company also paid $20,200 to Mr. Max's attorneys for fees incurred in connection with the drafting, negotiation and execution of his employment agreement and approximately $1,300 as a car allowance.

(3)

Mr. Lee’s employment agreement provided for a minimum annual salary of $300,000, which salary was increased to $330,000 in 2016. Due to liquidity constraints, Mr. Lee agreed to limit his salary for 2022 and 2021 to the amounts shown in the salary column of the summary compensation table above.

(4)

Reflects a $50,000 moving bonus paid to Mr. Lee.

(5)

Mr. Lee resigned as CEO in September 2022. Mr. Lee's separation agreement effective in September 2022, provided cash separation benefits of approximately $591,700.

(6)

In April 2021, the Compensation Committee approved a special bonus to Mr. Lee of $100,000, and in December 2021, the Compensation Committee approved an additional bonus to Mr. Lee of $100,000 resulting in total 2021 bonuses of $200,000 and paid in 2021.

(7)

Mr. Warley joined the Company in December 2022. Mr. Warley's employment agreement provides an annual base salary of $305,000, which increased to $350,000 in December 2022, after the Company raised a minimum $10 million of new capital. Mr. Warley was also granted an inducement grant of 700,000 RSUs for an aggregate of 700,000 shares of Ascent’s common stock valued at approximately $2,086,000 on grant date. 20% of the RSUs are fully vested upon grant. The remaining 80% of the RSUs vests in equal monthly increments over the next thirty-six months.

(8)

Mr. Gilbreth joined the Company on October 5, 2020 and his employment agreement provided an annual salary of $165,000. Mr. Gilbreth resigned as CFO in December 2022.

(9)

In May 2022, the Compensation Committee approved and paid a bonus to Mr. Gilbreth of $24,800.

36

(10)

In connection with his resignation, Mr. Gilbreth's separation agreement effective in December 2022, provided cash separation benefits of approximately $157,300.

(11)

In December 2021, the Compensation Committee approved and paid a bonus to Mr. Gilbreth of $74,250.

Executive Employment Agreements

Jeff Max

On September 21, 2022, we entered into a three year employment agreement with Mr. Max. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Max will receive an annual base salary of $850,000. A $500,000 portion of the base salary is initially deferred and bears interest at an annual rate of 4%. Once the Company raises a minimum $10 million of new capital, then (i) the deferred salary and accrued interest thereon will be paid in a lump sum and (ii) the Company will begin paying Mr. Max the full $850,000 base salary amount. Mr. Max will also be eligible for an annual incentive bonus of up to 100% of his base salary if agreed bonus targets are achieved. The bonus performance objectives may include corporate, business unit or division, financial, strategic, individual or other objectives established with respect to that particular fiscal year by the Company in consultation with Mr. Max. Mr. Max was also granted an inducement grant of RSUs for an aggregate of 3,534,591 shares of Ascent’s common stock. 20% of the RSUs are fully vested upon grant. The remaining 80% of the RSUs shall vest in equal monthly increments over the next thirty-six months. Any outstanding and unvested RSUs will accelerate and fully vest upon the earlier of (i) a change of control and (ii) the termination of Mr. Max’s employment for any reason other than (x) by the Company for cause or (y) by Mr. Max without good reason. Additionally, Mr. Max is reimbursed for his Medicare premiums paid and receives a $4,800 annual car allowance and is eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefit plans and programs.

Under Mr. Max's Employment Agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Max without cause or Mr. Max terminates his employment for good reason or a change in control, Mr. Max will be entitled to receive (i) 12 months of base salary, (ii) any incentive bonus amounts that have been earned but not yet paid, and (iii) 12 months of continued reimbursement for medical coverage under Medicare. In addition, all RSUs and other equity awards will be immediately vested and settled. The employment agreement also includes customary non-competition, non-solicitation and non-interference provisions that Mr. Max must comply with for a period of 6 months, 12 months and 12 months, respectively, after termination of his employment with the Company.

Victor Lee

On April 4, 2014, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lee. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Lee will receive an annual base salary of $300,000, subject to annual adjustments as determined by our board. Mr. Lee will also be eligible for an annual bonus of up to 100% of his base salary as determined at the sole discretion of our board or compensation committee. Under this agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Lee without cause, then subject to his execution of a release of claims, (i) Mr. Lee is entitled to receive twelve months of base salary from the date of termination, and (ii) the initial stock option grant that Mr. Lee received upon commencing employment will remain exercisable for a year following the termination date. The initial stock option grant is currently fully vested, but Mr. Lee was historically entitled to an additional year of vesting under such initial stock option grant upon termination without cause prior to the full vesting of the option. In addition, the employment agreement provides that Mr. Lee is eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefit plans and programs. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Lee is subject to a two year non-compete and non-solicit following termination of employment.

On September 21, 2022, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Lee. Under the separation agreement, Mr. Lee is entitled to the following separation benefits: (i) the Company will continue to pay to Mr. Lee his current base salary for the next 12 months; (ii) the Company will pay Mr. Lee’s $200,000 declared but unpaid cash bonus in two installments; and (iii) the Company shall pay COBRA premiums at the Company’s current contribution level for the next 12 months. Separation benefits are included in All Other Comp in the Compensation Table.

Paul Warley

On December 12, 2022, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Warley. The employment agreement provides for a term through December 31, 2025, subject to earlier termination by the Company and Mr. Warley as provided in the Employment Agreement and provides Mr. Warley an annual base salary of $305,000, which increases to $350,000 once the Company raises a minimum $10 million of new capital. Mr. Warley will also be eligible for an annual incentive bonus of up to 75% of his Base Salary if the agreed bonus targets are achieved and a moving allowance of up to $30,000 if he relocates his primary residence to Colorado. Additionally, the Company granted Mr. Warley an inducement grant of RSUs for an aggregate of 700,000 shares of Ascent’s common stock. 20% of the RSUs are fully vested upon grant. The remaining 80% of the RSUs

37

shall vest in equal monthly increments over the next thirty-six months. Any outstanding and unvested RSUs will accelerate and fully vest upon the earlier of (i) a change of control and (ii) the termination of Mr. Warley’s employment for any reason other than (x) by the Company for cause or (y) by Mr. Warley without good reason. Mr. Warley is also eligible to participate in the Company’s standard benefit plans and programs.

Under the employment agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Warley without cause or Mr. Warley terminates his employment for good reason or a change in control, Mr. Warley will be entitled to receive half of his Base Salary amount then in effect during the period from (i) the termination date through (ii) the end of the term of the Employment Agreement. In addition, all RSUs and other equity awards will be immediately vested and settled. The employment agreement also includes customary non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that Mr. Warley must comply with for a period of 12 months after termination of his employment with the Company.

Michael J. Gilbreth

On October 5, 2020, the Company appointed Michael J. Gilbreth to serve as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The Company hired Mr. Gilbreth pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement and a standard and customary confidentiality, non-competition, and no-solicitation agreement. The offer letter provides for at-will employment with an annual base salary of $165,000, and an annual bonus opportunity of up to 60% of base salary. An annual minimum bonus of 25% of base salary is guaranteed, and the additional 35% is discretionary.

On December 11, 2022, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Gilbreth. Under the separation agreement Mr. Gilbreth is entitled to the following separation benefits: (a) payment of ten (10) weeks’ salary equal to $35,577, 50% of which is payable on the first payroll period after effective date of the separation agreement, and the remaining 50% of which is payable on the next payroll period; and (b) payment of a bonus, which equals 60% of Mr. Gilbreth’s current salary, or $111,000, one-third (1/3) of which ($37,000) shall be payable with the December 28, 2022 payroll date, another one-third (1/3) of which ($37,000) shall be payable beginning the first payroll period after January 31, 2023, and the remaining one-third (1/3) of which ($37,000) shall be payable on the first payroll period after the filing by the Company of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2022. Separation benefits are included in All Other Comp in the Compensation Table.

The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding equity awards granted to the named executive officer as of December 31, 2022.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2022

Option Awards Stock Awards

Michael J. Gilbreth - - - - - -

(1)

In September 2022, Mr. Max was granted an inducement grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for an aggregate of 3,534,591 shares of Ascent’s common stock. 20% of the RSUs are fully vested upon grant. The remaining 80% of the RSUs vests in equal monthly increments over the next thirty-six months.

38

(2)

In December 2022, Mr. Warley was granted an inducement grant of for an aggregate of 700,000 shares of Ascent’s common stock. 20% of the RSUs are fully vested upon grant. The remaining 80% of the RSUs vests in equal monthly increments over the next thirty-six months.

(3)

After giving effect to the January 2022 reverse stock split, each of Mr. Lee’s outstanding stock options (i) is exercisable for fewer than one share, and (ii) has a per share exercise price in excess of $6,000,000.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table shows information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by our current directors, our Named Executive Officers, and our greater than 5% beneficial owners as of March 10, 2023.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power and all shares issuable upon exercise of options or the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of March 10, 2023 (or May 14, 2023). For purposes of calculating the percentage of our common stock beneficially owned, the number of shares of our common stock includes 36,928,917 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 10, 2023.

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned.

39

The address for each director or Named Executive Officer is c/o Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., 12300 Grant Street, Thornton, Colorado 80241.

Name of Beneficial Owner No. of SharesBeneficiallyOwned Percentage

5% Stockholders:

Named Executive Officers and Directors:

Victor Lee (5) - *

Michael J. Gilbreth - *

Forrest Reynolds - *

Louis Berezovsky - *

Michael French - *

Felix Mantke - *

David Peterson (7) - *

* Less than 1.0%

(1)

The address of Crowdex Investment, LLC ("Crowdex") is 1675 South State Street, Suite B, Kent County, Delaware 19901. Bernd Förtsch is the 100% direct and indirect beneficial owner of Crowdex.

(2)

The address of BD 1 Investment Holdings, LLC (“BD1”) is 1675 South State Street, Suite B, Kent County, Delaware 19901. Johannes Kuhn and Ute Kuhn are the indirect beneficial owners of BD1.

(3)

The address for TubeSolar AG (“TubeSolar”) is Berliner Allee 65, D – 86153 Augsburg, Germany. Bernd Förtsch directly and indirectly owns a controlling interest in TubeSolar. Mr. Förtsch disclaims beneficial ownership over any of the securities owned by TubeSolar.

(4)

Mr. Max’s beneficial ownership includes 1,256,743 RSUs which would be vested by May 14, 2023. Does not include 2,277,848 RSUs which would not be vested by May 14, 2023.

(5)

Mr. Warley’s beneficial ownership includes 217,778 RSUs which would be vested by May 14, 2023. Does not include 482,222 RSUs which would not be vested by May 14, 2023.

(6)

Mr. Peterson is the manager of Crowdex. Mr. Peterson disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities owned by Crowdex.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

None. The Company does not have any currently effective equity incentive plans with securities authorized for future issuance. The executive equity grants made to Mr. Max and Mr. Warley in 2022 were made outside of a stockholder approved plan, in reliance upon the “inducement grant” exception provided for in the Nasdaq listing rules.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Relationship with Crowdex and TubeSolar

Crowdex and TubeSolar are both directly and indirectly beneficially owned and controlled by Bernd Förtsch.

On September 22, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (“Series 1A SPA”) with Crowdex for the private placement of the Company’s newly designated Series 1A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series 1A Preferred Stock”). We sold

40

2,000 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock to Crowdex in exchange for $2,000,000 of gross proceeds at an initial closing under the Series 1A SPA on September 22, 2020.

In November 2020, Crowdex converted 1,200 shares of outstanding Series 1A Preferred Stock into 2,400,000 shares of Common Stock.

On November 27, 2020, we issued to Crowdex a $500,000 unsecured convertible promissory note in a private placement and received $500,000 of gross proceeds from the offering. On December 31, 2020, we sold 500 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock to Crowdex in exchange for the cancellation of the note issued on November 27, 2020. There were no additional cash proceeds from this closing.

Crowdex acquired a $250,000 aggregate principal amount convertible promissory note of the Company from the original noteholder, Penumbra Solar, Inc., in September 2020. On December 9, 2021, Crowdex converted the note, together with accrued interest, into 545,041 shares of common stock.

On January 4, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with TubeSolar. Pursuant to this securities purchase agreement, the Company sold 2,500 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock to TubeSolar and received $2,500,000 of gross proceeds on January 5, 2021. On July 19, 2021, we issued TubeSolar 120,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion by TubeSolar of 60 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock. On September 3, 2021, we issued TubeSolar 80,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion by TubeSolar of 40 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock.

On September 15, 2021, we entered into the JDA with TubeSolar to pursue the APV market. We also jointly established the JV. See “Item 1 Business” for additional detail.

On February 1, 2022:

Crowdex converted their remaining 1,300 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock into 2,600,000 shares of common stock;

TubeSolar converted their remaining 2,400 shares of Series 1A Preferred Stock into 4,800,000 shares of common stock.

Relationship with BD1

On December 18, 2020, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement (“BD1 Exchange Agreement”) with BD1. BD1 had previously acquired all of the Company’s existing outstanding unsecured notes (other than notes held by Global Ichiban and Crowdex) from the original note holders. Pursuant to the terms of the BD1 Exchange Agreement, BD1 agreed to surrender and exchange all of its outstanding promissory notes with principal balances of approximately $10.4 million (including accrued interest and default penalties). In exchange and without the payment of any additional consideration, the Company issued to BD1 two unsecured convertible promissory notes with principal amounts of $10,340,000 (the “First Exchange Note”) and $160,000 (the “Second Exchange Note”). On August 16, 2021, BD1 sold and assigned a portion of the First Exchange Note equal to $600,000 in principal amount to Nanyang Investment Management Pte Ltd (“Nanyang”) on behalf of a client account for a purchase price of $600,000, and on January 21, 2022, further sold and assigned a portion of the First Exchange Note equal to $1,000,000 in principal amount to Nanyang on behalf of a client account for a purchase price of $1,000,000. On January 3, 2022, BD1 sold and assigned a portion of the First Exchange Note equal to $1,000,000 in principal amount to Fleur Capital Pte Ltd (“Fleur”) on behalf of a client account for a purchase price of $1,000,000. The Company has issued to BD1 an unsecured convertible promissory note with principal amount of $7,740,000 replacing the First Exchange Note (the “Replacement Note” and, together with the Second Exchange Note, the “BD1 Exchange Notes”).

On August 2, 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with BD1 for the private placement of an aggregate of 133,334 shares of our common stock at a fixed price of $75 (as adjusted for the reverse stock split) per share in two tranches of 66,667 shares in exchange for $10,000,000 of aggregate gross proceeds. On September 2, 2021, we closed on the first tranche and, on November 5, 2021, we closed on the second tranche, receiving aggregate gross proceeds of $10,000,000.

On February 1, 2022, BD1 converted its $7,900,000 aggregate outstanding principal amount of BD1 Exchange Notes into 15,800,000 shares of common stock.

Johannes Kuhn is the indirect beneficial owner of BD1.

41

Policies and Procedures with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons

The Board recognizes that related person transactions can present a heightened risk of potential or actual conflicts of interest. Accordingly, our Audit Committee charter requires that all such transactions will be reviewed and subject to approval by members of our Audit Committee, which will have access, at our expense, to our or independent legal counsel. Future transactions with our officers, directors or greater than five percent stockholders will be on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from independent third parties.

Director Independence

Our Board of Directors has determined that three out of our four directors are independent directors, as defined under the applicable rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing standards. The independent directors are Messrs. Berezovsky, French and Reynolds.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS

Fees for audit and related services by our accounting firm, Haynie & Company, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:

All other fees - -

Audit fees for Haynie & Company for fiscal year 2022 and 2021 represents aggregate fees for the 2022 and 2021 annual audit and quarterly reviews of the financial statements. Audit-related services consisted primarily of audit of employee benefit plan and work performed in connection with our registration statements.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee will pre-approve all audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditors before the accountant is engaged to render these services. The Audit Committee may consult with management in the decision making process, but may not delegate this authority to management. The Audit Committee may delegate its authority to pre-approve services to one or more committee members, provided that the designees present the pre-approvals to the full committee at the next committee meeting. All audit and non-audit services performed by our independent accountants have been pre-approved by our Audit Committee to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us.

42

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1)

Financial Statements—See Index to Financial Statements at Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules—Supplemental schedules are not provided because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is given in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)

Exhibits: See Item 15(b) below.

(b)

Exhibits: The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits on this Form 10-K are filed or incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference.

43

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Set forth below is a list of exhibits that are being filed or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Exhibit No. Description

44

23.1* Consent of Haynie & Company

45

101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

* Filed herewith

† Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

46

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 10th day of March, 2023.

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By: /S/ JEFFREY MAX

Jeffrey MaxPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature Capacities Date

Jeffrey Max

Chief Financial Officer

/S/ PAUL WARLEY (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) March 10, 2023

Paul Warley

/S/ DAVID PETERSON Chairman of the Board of Directors March 10, 2023

David Peterson

/S/ LOUIS BEREZOVSKY Director March 10, 2023

Louis Berezovsky

/S/ MICHAEL FRENCH Director March 10, 2023

Michael French

/S/ FORREST REYNOLDS Director March 10, 2023

Forrest Reynolds

47

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

Index to Financial Statements

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 457) F-1

Balance Sheets F-3

Statements of Operations F-4

Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) F-5

Statements of Cash Flows F-6

Notes to Financial Statements F-7

48

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company has continued limited photovoltaic production at its manufacturing facility which has led to continued operating losses and the Company does not expect that sales revenue and operating cash flows will be sufficient to support operations. The Company also has a working capital deficit and is dependent on outside financing to fund its operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 4. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

F-1

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Complex Financing Transactions

Description of the Matter:

The Company's financing transactions include debt conversion features that require analysis to determine if there is an embedded derivative, if derivative accounting is required and if the conversion feature should be bifurcated. The Company also issued warrants that require evaluation to determine if they are accounted for as a liability or equity and the calculations to estimate the fair value for the allocation of proceeds. The financing transactions are discussed in Note 12 and Note 15 to the financial statements.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit:

We reviewed the underlying agreements, evaluated management’s analysis, and compared that to applicable accounting guidance. We also tested the inputs used for the allocation of proceeds.

Revenue Recognition

Description of the Matter:

The Company's long-term contract with a customer includes non-recurring milestone and engineering payments upon completion of certain tasks. Management analyzed the underlying performance obligations to determine if the revenue should be recognized over time or at a point in time. Revenue recognition is discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit:

We reviewed the underlying agreement, evaluated management’s revenue recognition analysis, and tested certain revenue transactions to ensure the performance obligation was met prior to recognizing revenue.

/s/ Haynie & Company

Haynie & Company

Salt Lake City, Utah

March 10, 2023

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

F-2

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, December 31,

ASSETS

Current Assets:

Other Assets:

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities:

Long-Term Liabilities:

Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)

Stockholders’ Deficit:

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (16,024 ) -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Years Ended

December 31,

Revenues

Milestone and engineering 528,500 -

Costs and Expenses

Share-based compensation 5,478,734 -

Other Income/(Expense)

Income/(Loss) on Equity Method Investment (27,361 ) -

Net Income/(Loss) Per Share (Basic) $ (0.66 ) $ (1.54 )

Net Income/(Loss) Per Share (Diluted) $ (0.66 ) $ (1.54 )

Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)

Foreign currency translation gain/(loss) (16,024 ) -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Loss (Deficit)

Loss on Extinguishment of Liabilities - - - - - - 1,686,079 - - 1,686,079

Proceeds from private placement: -

Foreign Currency Translation Loss - - - - - - - - (16,024 ) (16,024 )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended

December 31,

Operating Activities:

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:

Share-based compensation 5,478,734 —

Loss on equity method investment 27,361 —

Warranty reserve — 7,082

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Prepaid expenses and other current assets (686,359 ) (301,161 )

Investing Activities:

Purchase of property, plant and equipment (169,357 ) (280,317 )

Contributions to equity method investment (83,559 ) (21,205 )

Patent activity costs (12,556 ) —

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (265,472 ) (301,522 )

Financing Activities:

Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt and warrants 13,500,000 —

Financing issuance cost (2,206,695 ) —

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 5,961,760 167,725

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

Cash paid for interest $ — $ —

Non-Cash Transactions:

Series 1A preferred stock conversion $ 740 $ 100,000

Extinguishment of note payable $ — $ 193,200

Purchase of equipment not yet paid at end of the year $ 159,119 $ —

Conversion of bridge loan into common stock and warrants $ 1,000,000 $ —

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (“Ascent” or the "Company") was incorporated on October 18, 2005 from the separation by ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (“ITN”) of its Advanced Photovoltaic Division and all of that division’s key personnel, core technologies, and certain trade secrets and royalty free licenses to use in connection with the manufacturing, developing marketing, and commercializing Copper-Indium-Gallium-diSelenide (“CIGS”) photovoltaic (“PV”) products. ITN, a private company incorporated in 1994, is an incubator dedicated to the development of thin film, PV, battery, fuel cell and nano technologies. Through its work on research and development contracts for private and governmental entities, ITN developed proprietary processing and manufacturing know how applicable to PV products generally, and CIGS PV products in particular. ITN formed Ascent to commercialize its investment in CIGS PV technologies.

The Company focus is on integrating its PV products into scalable and high value markets such as agrivoltaics, aerospace, satellites, near earth orbiting vehicles, and fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicles (“UAV”). The value proposition of Ascent’s proprietary solar technology not only aligns with the needs of customers in these industries, but also overcomes many of the obstacles other solar technologies face in these unique markets. Ascent has the capability to design and develop finished products for end users in these areas as well as collaborate with strategic partners to design and develop custom integrated solutions for products like fixed-wing UAVs. Ascent sees significant overlap of the needs of end users across some of these industries and can achieve economies of scale in sourcing, development, and production in commercializing products for these customers.

On January 28, 2022 , the Company effected a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) at a ratio of one-for-five thousand (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on January 31, 2022. Stockholders also received one whole share of Common Stock in lieu of a fractional share and no fractional shares were issued. All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

Following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock were decreased from approximately 23.74 billion pre-split shares to 4.81 million post-split shares. In connection with the Reverse Stock Split effectiveness, the number of authorized shares of the Company's Common Stock were decreased from 30 billion to 500 million shares.

Although the Company is focused on various markets for its product, the Chief Executive Officer makes significant operating decisions and assesses the performance of the Company as a single business segment. Accordingly, the Company has one reportable segment.

F-7

NOTE 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying financial statements have been derived from the accounting records of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of operations for the years then ended.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Cash Equivalents: The Company classifies all short-term investments in interest bearing bank accounts and highly liquid debt securities purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash balances which may exceed federally insured limits. The Company does not believe this results in significant credit risk.

Inventories: All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined using the weighted average method. Inventory balances are frequently evaluated to ensure they do not exceed net realizable value. The computation for net realizable value takes into account many factors, including expected demand, product life cycle and development plans, module efficiency, quality issues, obsolescence and others. Management's judgment is required to determine reserves for obsolete or excess inventory. As of December 31, 2022, and 2021, the Company had inventory reserve balances of $338,348 and $395,943, respectively. If actual demand and market conditions are less favorable than those estimated by management, additional inventory write downs may be required.

Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are recorded at the original cost to the Company. Assets are being depreciated over estimated useful lives of three to 10 years using the straight-line method, as presented in the table below, commencing when the asset is placed in service. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the remainder of the lease term or the life of the improvements. Upon retirement or disposal, the cost of the asset disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in income. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Useful Lives

in Years

Manufacturing machinery and equipment 5 - 10

Furniture, fixtures, computer hardware/software 3 - 7

Leasehold improvements life of lease

Patents: At such time as the Company is awarded patents, patent costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the legal life on the patents, or over their estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter. As of December 31, 2022, and 2021, the Company had net patent costs of $79,983 and $86,595, respectively. Of these amounts $25,847 and $45,015 represent costs net of amortization incurred for awarded patents, and the remaining $54,136 and $41,580 represents costs incurred for patent in process applications as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company capitalized $12,556 and $0 in patent costs, respectively, as it worked to secure design rights and trademarks for newly developed products. Amortization expense was $19,168 and $37,891 for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company concluded that certain expired patents were not curable and certain patents in process would not be granted. As such, during the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company wrote off the remaining book value of these assets and recorded a charge of $297,702 in Other income/(expense) in the Statement of Operations.

As of December 31, 2022, future amortization of patents is expected as follows:

F-8

Impairment of Long-lived Assets: The Company analyzes its long-lived assets (property, plant and equipment) and definitive-lived intangible assets (patents) for impairment, both individually and as a group, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Events that might cause impairment would include significant current period operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset or group of assets combined with a history of such losses, significant changes in the manner of use of assets and significant negative industry or economic trends. An undiscounted cash flow analysis is calculated to determine if impairment exists. If impairment is determined to exist, any related loss is calculated using the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the assets. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company did not incur impairments of its manufacturing facilities and equipment.

Equity Method Investment: The Company accounts for its investments in stock of other entities over which the Company has significant influence, but not control, using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company increases its investment for contributions made and records its proportionate share of net earnings, declared dividends and partnership distributions based on the most recently available financial statements of the investee. The Company re-evaluates the classification at each balance sheet date and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is a change in the Company’s ability to exercise significant influence. The Company evaluates its equity method investments for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is an other-than-temporary decline in the value of the investment. Declines in fair value that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are charged to Other income (expense), net.

Related Party Payables: The Company accounts for fees due to board members in the related party payables account on the Balance Sheets.

Convertible Notes: The Company issues, from time to time, convertible notes. Refer to Note 12 for further information.

Convertible Preferred Stock: The Company evaluates its preferred stock instruments under FASB ASC 480, "Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity" to determine the classification, and thereby the accounting treatment, of the instruments. Refer to Notes 13 and 14 for further discussion on the classification of each instrument.

Derivatives: The Company evaluates its financial instruments under FASB ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" to determine whether the instruments contain an embedded derivative. When an embedded derivative is present, the instrument is evaluated for a fair value adjustment upon issuance and at the end of every reporting period. Any adjustments to fair value are treated as gains and losses in fair values of derivatives and are recorded in the Statements of Operations. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion on embedded derivatives.

Product Warranties: The Company provides a limited warranty to the original purchaser of products against defective materials and workmanship. The Company also guarantees that standalone modules and PV integrated consumer electronics will achieve and maintain the stated conversion efficiency rating for certain products. Warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms, historical experience and analysis of peer company product returns. The Company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and makes adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims, or as new information becomes available.

Leases: The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at the inception of the contract. The Company accounts for non-lease components, such as certain taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, separate from the lease arrangement. Operating lease liabilities, which represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease, and corresponding Operating lease right-of-use assets, which represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, are recognized at the commencement date of the lease based on the present value of fixed future payments over the lease term. The Company utilizes the lease term for which it is reasonably certain to use the underlying asset, including consideration of options to extend or terminate the lease. Incentives received from landlords are recorded as a reduction to the lease right-of-use assets. The Company does not recognize lease right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities for leases with initial terms of 12 months or less.

The Company calculates the present value of future payments using the discount rate implicit in the lease, if available, or its incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. In determining the Company's operating lease right of use assets and operating lease liabilities, the Company applied these incremental borrowing rates to the minimum lease payments within the lease agreement.

Revenue Recognition:

Product revenue. The Company recognizes revenue for the sale of PV modules and other equipment sales at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products to the customer, which typically occurs upon shipment or delivery depending on the terms of the underlying contracts. For module and other equipment sales contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract

F-9

based on relative standalone selling prices, or estimates of such prices, and recognize the related revenue as control of each individual product is transferred to the customer.

During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized product revenue of $694,286 and $607,783, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, one customer’s revenue individually represented 82% and 83%, respectively, of the Company’s product total revenue.

Milestone and engineering revenue. Each milestone and engineering arrangement is a separate performance obligation. The transaction price is estimated using the most likely amount method and revenue is recognized as the performance obligation is satisfied through achieving manufacturing, costs or engineering targets. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized total milestone revenue of $528,500. The Company did not have Milestone and engineering revenue during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Government contracts revenue. Revenue from government research and development contracts is generated under terms that are cost plus fee or firm fixed price. The Company generally recognizes this revenue over time using cost-based input methods, which recognize revenue and gross profit as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred compared to the total estimated costs of the contract. In applying cost-based input methods of revenue recognition, we use the actual costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs to determine our progress towards contract completion and to calculate the corresponding amount of revenue to recognize.

Cost based input methods of revenue recognition are considered a faithful depiction of our efforts to satisfy long-term government research and development contracts and therefore reflect the performance obligations under such contracts. Costs incurred that do not contribute to satisfying the Company's performance obligations are excluded from our input methods of revenue recognition as the amounts are not reflective of transferring control under the contract. Costs incurred towards contract completion may include direct costs plus allowable indirect costs and an allocable portion of the fixed fee. If actual and estimated costs to complete a contract indicate a loss, provision is made currently for the loss anticipated on the contract.

No government contract revenue was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

As a practical expedient, the Company elects to exclude disclosures related to certain unsatisfied performance obligations. These performance obligations include the milestone performance obligations which are wholly unsatisfied as of December 31, 2022.

Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount as the result of transactions with customers. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company estimates the collectability of accounts receivable using analysis of historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. Reserves are established on an account-by-account basis and are written off against the allowance in the period in which the Company determines that is it probable that the receivable will not be recovered.

The Company bills the government under cost-based research and development contracts at provisional billing rates which permit the recovery of indirect costs. These rates are subject to audit on an annual basis by the government agencies’ cognizant audit agency. The cost audit may result in the negotiation and determination of the final indirect cost rates. In the opinion of management, re-determination of any cost-based contracts will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had an accounts receivable, net balance of $1,769 and $49,250,respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $26,000 and $26,000, respectively.

The payment terms and conditions in customer contracts vary. Customers required to prepay are represented by deferred revenues, included in Accrued Liabilities on the Balance Sheets, until the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied. Invoiced customers are typically required to pay within 30 days of invoicing. Deferred revenue was as follows:

F-10

Recognized as revenue (307,500 )

Recognized as revenue (239,313 )

Shipping and Handling Costs: The Company classifies shipping and handling costs for products shipped to customers as a component of “Cost of revenues” on the Company’s Statements of Operations. Customer payments of shipping and handling costs are recorded as a component of Revenues.

Share-Based Compensation: The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees, officers, directors, and consultants based on estimated fair values. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis, over the requisite service period in the Company’s Statements of Operations. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, as necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company estimates the fair value of its restricted stock awards as its stock price on the grant date.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2022-12-31, filed 2023-03-10 · accession 0000950170-23-007284

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 22 headings are on that chain and 16 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.