AROC · Read the filing

Archrock, Inc_December 31, 2025

Table of Contents

four

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(MARK ONE)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file no. 001-33666

Archrock, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

9807 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas77024

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(281) 836-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share AROC New York Stock Exchange

NYSE Texas

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2025: $4,265,752,484.

Number of shares of the common stock of the registrant outstanding as of February 18, 2026: 174,945,882 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2026 Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2025, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Glossary 3

Forward-Looking Statements 6

Part I

Item 1. Business 7

Item 1A. Risk Factors 20

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 37

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 37

Item 2. Properties 40

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 40

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 40

Part II

Item 6. [Reserved] 42

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 55

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 56

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 56

Item 9B. Other Information 58

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 58

Item 11. Executive Compensation 58

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 59

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 59

Signatures 66

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY

The following terms and abbreviations appearing in the text of this report, including the Financial Statements, have the meanings indicated below.

Form 10–K Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2025

AI Artificial intelligence

AMNAX Alerian Midstream Energy Index

AMZ Alerian MLP Index

ASU Accounting Standards Update

Bcf/d Billion cubic feet per day

BoLM U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management

C|CISO Certified Chief Information Security Officer

CAA Clean Air Act

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

CISSP Certified Information Systems Security Professional

Code Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended

CODM Chief operating decision maker

ColdStream ColdStream Energy Holdings, LLC

CWA Clean Water Act

DOE Department of Energy

DSDP Directors’ Stock and Deferral Plan

EBITDA Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

ECOTEC Ecotec International Holdings, LLC

EIA U.S. Energy Information Administration

EIA Outlook February 2026 EIA Short Term Outlook

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

ERP Enterprise Resource Planning

ESG Environmental, Social and Governance

ESPP Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board

FGC Holdco FGC Holdco LLC, a subsidiary of ColdStream

Table of Contents

Flowco Flowco Holdings Inc.

GAAP Accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.

GHG Greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane and water vapor for example)

Hilcorp Hilcorp Energy Company

Ionada Ionada PLC

IRS Internal Revenue Service

IT Information Technology

LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate

LNG Liquefied natural gas

MMb/d Million barrels per day

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NOL Net operating loss

NSPS New Source Performance Standards

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act

OTC Over–the–counter, as related to aftermarket services parts and components

ppb Parts per billion

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

ROU Right–of–use, as related to operating leases

S&P 500 S&P 500 Composite Stock Price Index

Table of Contents

SAFE Simple agreement for future equity

SEC U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Securities Act Securities Act of 1933, as amended

SG&A Selling, general and administrative

SOFR Secured Overnight Financing Rate

TOPS Total Operations and Production Services, LLC

UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

U.S. United States of America

VIE Variable interest entity

VOC Volatile organic compounds

WACC Weighted average cost of capital

Table of Contents

FORWARD–LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Exchange Act, including, without limitation, statements regarding our business growth strategy and projected costs; future financial position; the sufficiency of available cash flows to fund continuing operations and pay dividends; the expected amount of our capital expenditures; anticipated cost savings; future revenue, adjusted gross margin and other financial or operational measures related to our business; the future value of our equipment; and plans and objectives of our management for our future operations. You can identify many of these statements by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “will continue” or similar words or the negative thereof.

Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this Form 10-K. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. Known material factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10–K. These risk factors include, but are not limited to, risks related to macroeconomic conditions, including an increase in inflation and trade tensions; pandemics and other public health crises; ongoing international conflicts and tensions; risks related to our operations; competitive pressures; risks of acquisitions or mergers to reduce our ability to make distributions to our common stockholders; inability to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms; inability to achieve the expected benefits of the NGCS Acquisition and difficulties integrating NGCS; risks related to our sustainability initiatives; uncertainty to pay dividends in the future; risks related to a substantial amount of debt and our debt agreements; inability to access the capital and credit markets or borrow on affordable terms to obtain additional capital; inability to fund purchases of additional compression equipment; vulnerability to interest rate increases and fluctuations; erosion of the financial condition of our customers; risks related to the loss of our most significant customers; uncertainty of the renewals for our contract operations service agreements; risks related to losing management or operational personnel; dependence on particular suppliers and vulnerability to product shortages and price increases; information technology and cybersecurity risks; tax-related risks; legal and regulatory risks, including climate-related and environmental, social and governance risks.

All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K are based on information available to us on the date of this Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

We are an energy infrastructure company with a primary focus on midstream natural gas compression and a commitment to helping our customers produce, compress and transport natural gas in a safe and environmentally responsible way. We are a premier provider of natural gas compression services, in terms of total compression fleet horsepower, to customers in the energy industry throughout the U.S., and a leading supplier of aftermarket services to customers that own compression equipment in the U.S. Our business supports a must–run service that is essential to the production, processing, transportation and storage of natural gas.

We operate in two business segments:

Natural Gas Compression Industry Overview

Natural gas compression is a mechanical process whereby the pressure of a given volume of natural gas is increased to a desired higher pressure for transportation from one point to another. It is essential to the production and transportation of natural gas. Compression is also critical to minimizing flaring and reducing the waste of natural gas and natural gas liquids that results from insufficient gathering and processing capacity.

Compression is typically required throughout the natural gas production and transportation cycle, including at the wellhead, throughout gathering and distribution systems, into and out of processing and storage facilities and along intrastate and interstate pipelines. Our service offerings focus primarily on midstream applications, with 60% of our operating fleet being used in the gathering and processing cycle stages. The remaining 40% of our operating fleet is used in gas lift applications.

Wellhead and Gathering Systems. Natural gas compression is used to transport natural gas from the wellhead through the gathering system. At some point during the life of natural gas wells, reservoir pressures typically fall below the line pressure of the natural gas gathering or pipeline system used to transport the natural gas to market. At that point, natural gas no longer naturally flows into the pipeline. Compression equipment is applied in both field and gathering systems to boost the pressure levels of the natural gas flowing from the well, allowing it to be transported to market. Changes in pressure levels in natural gas fields require periodic changes to the size and/or type of on–site compression equipment. Compression equipment is also used to increase the efficiency of a low–capacity natural gas field by providing a central compression point from which the natural gas can be produced and injected into a pipeline for transmission to facilities for further processing.

Processing Applications. Compressors may be used in combination with natural gas production and processing equipment to process natural gas into other marketable energy sources. In addition, compression services are used for compression applications in refineries and petrochemical plants. Processing applications typically utilize multiple large horsepower compressors.

Gas Lift Applications. Compression is used to reinject natural gas into producing oil wells to help lift liquids to the surface, which is known as natural gas lift. These applications utilize low– to mid–range horsepower compression equipment located at or near the wellhead or large horsepower compression equipment of over 1,000 horsepower for a centralized gas lift system servicing multiple wells.

Table of Contents

Many oil and natural gas producers, transporters and processors outsource their compression services due to the benefits and flexibility of contract compression. Changing well and pipeline pressures and conditions over the life of a well often require producers to reconfigure or replace their compression packages to optimize the well production or gathering system efficiency.

We believe outsourcing compression operations to compression service providers such as us offers customers:

We believe the U.S. natural gas compression services industry continues to have growth potential over time due to, among other things, increased natural gas production in the U.S. from unconventional sources, the aging of producing natural gas fields that will require more compression to continue producing the same volume of natural gas due to lower pressures and the rise in gas-to-oil ratios for maturing wells and expected increased demand for natural gas in the U.S. for power generation of AI data centers, industrial uses and exports, including liquefied natural gas exports and exports of natural gas via pipeline to Mexico.

Contract Operations Overview

Compression Services

We provide comprehensive contract operations services including the personnel, equipment, tools, materials and supplies to meet our customers’ natural gas compression needs. Based on the operating specifications at the customer location and each customer’s unique needs, these services include designing, sourcing, owning, installing, operating, servicing, repairing and maintaining the equipment. We work closely with our customers’ field service personnel so that compression services can be adjusted to efficiently match changing characteristics of the reservoir and the natural gas produced and may repackage or reconfigure our existing fleet to adapt to our customers’ compression needs.

During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, we generated 85%, 85% and 82%, respectively, of our total revenue from contract operations.

Compression Fleet

The compressors that we own and use to provide contract operations services are predominantly large horsepower, which we define as greater than 1,000 horsepower per unit, and consist primarily of reciprocating compressors driven by natural gas–powered or electric motor drive engines. Our fleet is largely standardized around major components and key suppliers, which minimizes our fleet operating costs and maintenance capital requirements, reduces inventory costs, facilitates low–cost compressor resizing and improves technical proficiency in our maintenance and overhaul operations, which in turn allows us to achieve higher uptime while maintaining lower operating costs.

Table of Contents

All of our compressors are designed to automatically shut down if operating conditions deviate from a pre–determined range and substantially all are also equipped with telematic devices that enable us to remotely monitor the units. We maintain field service locations from which we service and overhaul our fleet. Our equipment undergoes routine and preventive maintenance in accordance with our established maintenance schedules, standards and procedures, which we update as technology changes and as our operations group develops new techniques and procedures to better service our equipment. In our experience, these maintenance practices maximize equipment life and unit availability, minimize emissions and avoidable downtime while reducing the overall maintenance expenditures over the equipment life. As of December 31, 2025, the average age of our operating fleet was 10 years.

The following table summarizes the size of our natural gas compression fleet as of December 31, 2025:

Aggregate

Number Horsepower % of

of Units (in thousands) Horsepower

General Terms of our Contract Operations Service Agreements

We typically enter into a master service agreement with each customer that sets forth the general terms and conditions of our services, and then enter into a separate supplemental service agreement for each distinct site at which we provide contract operations services. The following describes select material terms common to our standard contract operations service agreements.

Term and Termination. Our customers typically contract for our contract operations services on a site–by–site basis that is generally reduced if we fail to operate in accordance with the contract requirements. Following the initial minimum term, which generally ranges from 12 to 36 months, or generally up to 60 months for the largest horsepower units in our fleet, contract operations services generally continue on a month–to–month basis until terminated by either party with 30 days’ advance notice.

Fees and Expenses. Our customers pay a fixed monthly fee for our contract operations services, which generally is based on the amount of horsepower associated with a specific application. In certain circumstances, such as limited or disrupted natural gas flows, our customers may be provided a reduced monthly fee. We are typically responsible for the costs and expenses associated with our compression equipment except for fuel gas or electricity, which is provided by our customers.

Service Standards and Specifications. We provide contract operations services according to the particular specifications of each job, as set forth in the applicable contract. These are typically turn–key service contracts under which we supply all services and support and use our compression equipment to provide the contract operations services necessary for a particular application. In certain circumstances, if the availability of our services does not meet certain percentages specified in our contracts, our customers are generally entitled, upon request, to specified credits against our service fees.

Title and Risk of Loss. We own and retain title to or have an exclusive possessory interest in all compression equipment used to provide contract operations services and we generally bear risk of loss for such equipment to the extent the loss is not caused by gas conditions, our customers’ acts or omissions or the failure or collapse of the customer’s over–water job site upon which we provide the contract operations services.

Table of Contents

Insurance. Typically, both we and our customers are required to carry general liability, workers’ compensation, employer’s liability, automobile and excess liability insurance. Our insurance coverage includes property damage, general liability and commercial automobile liability and other coverage we believe is appropriate. Additionally, we are substantially self-insured for workers’ compensation and employee group health claims in view of the relatively high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance arrangements for these risks. We are also self-insured for property damage to our offshore assets.

Aftermarket Services Overview

Our aftermarket services business sells parts and components and provides operations, major and routine maintenance, overhaul and reconfiguration services to customers who own compression equipment. We believe that we are particularly well–qualified to provide these services because our highly experienced operating personnel have access to the full range of our compression services and facilities. In addition, our aftermarket services business provides opportunities to cross–sell our contract operations services. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, we generated 15%, 15% and 18%, respectively, of our total revenue from aftermarket services.

Competitive Strengths

We believe we have the following key competitive strengths:

Superior safety performance. We believe our collective safety performance is pivotal to the success of our business and is of primary importance to our customers. We have a strong safety culture and a proven ability to safely manage our business in a variety of commodity and economic environments. Our safety–centric culture has consistently produced industry–leading safety performance for many years, including a 2025 total recordable incident rate of 0.22.

Large horsepower. As of December 31, 2025, we have the largest fleet of large horsepower equipment among all outsourced compression service providers in the U.S. In addition, 74% of our fleet, as measured by operating horsepower, was comprised of units that exceed 1,000 horsepower per unit. We believe the trends driving demand for large horsepower units will continue. These trends include (i) high levels of associated gas production from shale wells, which are generally produced at a lower initial pressure than dry gas wells, (ii) pad drilling, which brings multiple wells to a single well site with larger volumes of gas, (iii) increasing well lateral lengths, which increase natural gas flow through gas gathering systems, and (iv) high probability drilling programs that allow for efficient infrastructure planning.

Excellent customer service. We operate in a relationship–driven, service–intensive industry and therefore need to provide superior customer service. We believe that our regionally–based network, local presence, experience and in–depth knowledge of our customers’ operating needs and growth plans enable us to respond to our customers’ needs and meet their evolving demands on a timely basis. In addition, we focus on achieving a high level of reliability for the services we provide in order to maximize uptime and our customers’ production levels. Our sales efforts concentrate on demonstrating our commitment to enhancing our customers’ cash flows through superior customer service and after–market support.

Large and stable customer base. We have strong relationships with a deep base of midstream companies and natural gas and crude oil producers. Our contract operations revenue base is sourced from approximately 300 customers operating throughout all major U.S. natural gas and crude oil producing regions.

Fee–based cash flows. We charge a fixed monthly fee for our contract operations services and a reduced monthly fee during periods of limited or disrupted natural gas flows. Our compression packages, on average, operate at a customer location for approximately six years. We believe this fee structure and the longevity of our operations reduces volatility and enhances the stability and predictability of our cash flows.

Table of Contents

Diversified geographic footprint. We operate in substantially all major natural gas and crude oil producing regions in the U.S. We have a meaningful presence in associated gas plays, including the Permian and Eagle Ford shales, which, combined, account for approximately three-fourths of our operating horsepower. Increased size and geographic density offer compression services providers operating and cost advantages. As the number of compression locations and size of the compression fleet increases, the number of required sales, administrative and maintenance personnel increases at a lesser rate, resulting in operational efficiencies and potential cost advantages. Additionally, broad geographic scope allows compression service providers to more efficiently provide services to all customers, particularly those with compression applications in remote locations. Our large fleet and numerous operating locations throughout the U.S., combined with our ability to efficiently move equipment among producing regions, mean that we are not dependent on production activity in any particular region. We believe our size, geographic scope and broad customer base give us more flexibility in meeting our customers’ needs than many of our competitors and provide us with improved operating expertise and business development opportunities.

Long operating history. We have a long, sustained history of operating in the compression industry and a robust database of fleet financial and operating metrics that provides an advantage compared to our younger competitors. We have extensive experience working with our customers to meet their evolving needs.

Financial resilience and flexibility. We have historically shown and are committed to maintaining capital discipline and financial strength, which is critical in a cyclical industry and business such as ours. Maintaining ample liquidity and a prudent balance sheet supports our ability to continue to deliver on our long–term strategies and positions us to take advantage of future growth opportunities as they arise.

Technology Deployment. We are focused on harnessing technology across all aspects of our business to drive operational efficiencies and enhance our value proposition to our customers. This includes the automation of workflows, integration of digital and mobile tools for our field service technicians, expanded remote monitoring capabilities of our compression fleet and emissions solutions. We believe these efforts, among other things, will help us achieve increased asset uptime, improve the efficiency of our field service technicians, improve our supply chain and inventory management and reduce our emissions and carbon footprint, thereby improving our profitability as discussed further below in “Business Strategies.”

Business Strategies

We intend to continue to capitalize on our competitive strengths to meet our customers’ needs through the following key strategies:

Capitalize on the long–term fundamentals for the U.S. natural gas compression industry. We believe our ability to efficiently meet our customers’ evolving compression needs, our long–standing customer relationships and our large compression fleet will enable us to capitalize on what we believe are favorable long–term fundamentals for the U.S. natural gas compression industry. These fundamentals include significant natural gas resources in the U.S., increased unconventional oil and natural gas production, decreasing natural reservoir pressures, rising gas-to-oil ratios for maturing wells and expected increased natural gas demand in the U.S. from the growth of liquefied natural gas exports, exports of natural gas via pipeline to Mexico, power generation of AI data centers and industrial uses.

Improve profitability. We utilize technology in all aspects of our business to drive operational efficiencies and enhance our value proposition to our customers. Our investments have focused on implementing cloud-based solutions to replace legacy systems, the automation of workflows, integration of digital and mobile tools for our field service technicians and expanded remote monitoring capabilities of our compression fleet. Implementing telematics and advanced data analysis across our fleet has enabled us to respond more quickly and optimally to downtime events, minimize prolonged troubleshooting, prevent unnecessary unit touches and stops, which are the primary cause of wear and tear of the equipment, and, ultimately, predict failures before they occur. We expect this will increase the number of units a field service technician can oversee and reduce vehicle miles traveled and fuel consumption, thereby also reducing emissions.

Table of Contents

In addition, our primary focus is on large horsepower equipment as we aim to continue to capitalize on the trends that have been driving, and that we believe will continue to drive the demand for these units. As part of this strategy, we sold approximately 325,000 and 175,000 of horsepower units during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Of the units sold during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, approximately 85% and 75%, respectively, were small horsepower units.

Optimize our business to generate attractive returns. We plan to continue to invest in strategically growing our business both organically and through third–party acquisitions. We see opportunities to grow our contract operations business over the long term by putting idle units back to work and profitably adding new horsepower in key growth areas. In addition, because a large amount of compression equipment is owned by natural gas and crude oil producers, processors, gatherers, transporters and storage providers, we believe there will be additional opportunities for our aftermarket services business to provide services and parts to support the operation of this equipment.

Oil and Natural Gas Industry Cyclicality and Volatility

Demand for our products and services is correlated to natural gas and crude oil production. Fluctuations in energy prices can affect the levels of expenditures by our customers, production volumes and ultimately, demand for our products and services; however, we believe our contract operations business is typically less impacted by commodity prices for the following reasons:

• fee–based contracts minimize our direct commodity price exposure;

Seasonal Fluctuations

Our results of operations have not historically reflected any material seasonal tendencies and we do not believe that seasonal fluctuations will have a material impact on us in the foreseeable future.

Sales and Marketing

Our marketing and client service functions are coordinated and performed by our sales and field service personnel. Salespeople, application engineers and field service personnel qualify, analyze and scope new compression applications as well as regularly visit our customers to ensure customer satisfaction, determine customer needs as to services currently being provided and ascertain potential future compression services requirements. This ongoing communication allows us to respond swiftly to customer requests.

Table of Contents

Customers

Our customer base consists primarily of companies engaged in all aspects of the oil and natural gas industry, including large integrated and independent oil and natural gas processors, gatherers and transporters. We have entered into preferred vendor arrangements with some of our customers that give us preferential consideration for their compression needs. In exchange, we provide these customers with enhanced product availability, product support and favorable pricing. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, our five most significant customers collectively accounted for 35%, 35% and 33%, respectively, of our contract operations and aftermarket services revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2025, no customers accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenue and as of December 31, 2025, two customers accounted for approximately 30% of our consolidated trade accounts receivable, primarily related to our contract operations segment.

Suppliers

We have pricing agreements in place with all of our primary suppliers of compression equipment, parts and services, and work closely with these key suppliers on value engineering, to lower total lifecycle cost and improve equipment reliability. Though we rely on these suppliers to a significant degree, we believe alternative sources for compression equipment, parts and services are generally available.

Competition

The natural gas compression services business is highly competitive with low barriers to entry. Overall, we experience considerable competition from companies that may be able to more quickly adapt to changing technology within our industry and changes in economic conditions as a whole, more readily take advantage of acquisitions and other opportunities and adopt more aggressive pricing policies. We believe we are competitive with respect to price, equipment availability, customer service, flexibility in meeting customer needs, technical expertise and quality and reliability of our compression packages and related services. See “Competitive Strengths” above for further discussion.

Governmental Regulation

Environmental Regulation

Our operations are subject to stringent and complex U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to protection of the environment and to occupational safety and health. Compliance with these environmental laws and regulations may expose us to significant costs and liabilities and cause us to incur significant capital expenditures in our operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of investigatory and remedial obligations and the issuance of injunctions delaying or prohibiting operations. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and that continued compliance with currently applicable requirements would not have a material adverse effect on us. However, the trend in environmental regulation has been to place more restrictions on activities that may affect the environment, and thus, any changes in these laws and regulations that result in more stringent and costly waste handling, storage, transport, disposal, emission or remediation requirements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Table of Contents

The primary U.S. federal environmental laws to which our operations are subject include the CAA and regulations thereunder, which regulate air emissions; the CWA and regulations thereunder, which regulate the discharge of pollutants in industrial wastewater and storm water runoff; the RCRA and regulations thereunder, which regulate the management and disposal of hazardous and non–hazardous solid wastes; and the CERCLA and regulations thereunder, known more commonly as “Superfund,” which impose liability for the remediation of releases of hazardous substances in the environment. We are also subject to regulation under the OSHA and regulations thereunder, which regulate the protection of the safety and health of workers. Analogous state and local laws and regulations may also apply. We also acknowledge the potential for policy shifts that could impact our operations. In January 2025, the current administration issued a series of executive orders and memoranda signaling a shift in environmental and energy policy in the U.S., including the revocation of approximately 80 former administration-era executive orders related to public health, the environment, climate change and climate-related financial risks. The current administration also declared a “national energy emergency,” directing agencies to expedite conventional energy projects. While the extent of the current administration’s changes to the environmental regulatory landscape in the U.S. is unknown at this time, it is possible that additional changes in the future could impact our results of operation and those of our customers.

Air Emissions

The CAA and analogous state laws and their implementing regulations regulate emissions of air pollutants from various sources, including natural gas compressors, and also impose various monitoring and reporting requirements. Such laws and regulations may require a facility to obtain pre–approval for the construction or modification of certain projects or facilities expected to produce air emissions or result in the increase of existing air emissions, obtain and strictly comply with air permits containing various emissions and operational limitations, or utilize specific emission control technologies to limit emissions. Our standard contract operations agreement typically provides that the customer will assume permitting responsibilities and certain environmental risks related to site operations.

New Source Performance Standards. In June 2016, the EPA issued final regulations under the CAA amending the NSPS for the oil and natural gas source category and applying to sources of emissions of methane and VOC from certain processes, activities and equipment that is constructed, modified or reconstructed after September 18, 2015. Specifically, the regulation imposed both methane and VOC standards for several emission sources not previously covered by the NSPS, such as fugitive emissions from compressor stations and pneumatic pumps and methane standards for certain emission sources that are already regulated for VOC, such as equipment leaks at natural gas processing plants. The amendments also established methane standards for a subset of equipment that the NSPS regulates, including reciprocating compressors and pneumatic controllers, and extend the VOC standards to the remaining unregulated equipment.

In March 2024, the EPA published even more stringent rules with respect to methane and VOC for new and existing sources, via NSPS Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc, with the OOOOb rules for sources constructed, modified, or reconstructed after December 6, 2022, which became effective on May 7, 2024. The OOOOc rules for existing sources give the States a two-year deadline to develop and submit to EPA plans for addressing emissions from those sources. However, EPA issued a direct interim final rule in July 2025 and a final rule in December 2025 that pushed the substantive deadlines in OOOOb and OOOOc back to January 2027. EPA has also been working on a proposed rule to roll back significant portions of the OOOOb and OOOOc, which rule proposal is in interagency review at the White House Office of Management and Budget and is expected for publication soon.

In April 2024, BoLM published a separate final rule, known as the “Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation” rule, to address methane emissions from oil and gas activities on public lands, which became effective on June 10, 2024. The rule is currently stayed pending litigation in North Dakota, Texas, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah. Among the newly adopted methane requirements that may impact our operations are broader applicability to compression equipment relative to the existing rules, increased work practices and inspection requirements and mandates for certain new zero–emissions equipment. Notably, however, in November 2025, BoLM announced that it will not enforce requirements of the rule that carried a December 10, 2025 deadline until December 10, 2026.

Both the EPA rules and the BoLM rules are subject to ongoing judicial challenges.

Table of Contents

Meanwhile, several states — including, most notably, New Mexico and Colorado — have continued to develop their own more stringent methane rules that will or are anticipated to impose additional requirements on the industry. For example, Colorado’s Air Quality Control Commission adopted the “Midstream Rule” on December 20, 2024, to address GHG emissions from midstream oil and gas operations, including from natural gas compressor stations. Under the Midstream Rule, midstream facilities were required to begin taking steps to reduce GHG emissions from combustion fuel equipment by February 14, 2025, and are required to meet certain GHG emissions limits by the end of 2030. The Midstream Rule is subject to ongoing judicial challenges.

We do not believe that these rules will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet definitively predict the impact of any revision of the current rules or issuance of new rules, which impact could be material.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards. In October 2015, the EPA issued a new NAAQS ozone standard of 70 ppb, which is a tightening from the 75-ppb standard set in 2008. This new standard became effective on December 28, 2015, and the EPA completed designating attainment/non–attainment regions under the revised ozone standard in 2018. In November 2016, the EPA proposed an implementation rule for the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard, but the agency has yet to issue a final implementation rule. State implementation of the revised NAAQS could result in stricter permitting requirements, delay or prohibit our customers’ ability to obtain such permits and result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, the costs of which could be significant. By law, the EPA must review each NAAQS every five years. In December 2018 and again in December 2020, the EPA announced that it was retaining without revision the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard. In June 2021, the EPA commenced a process for reconsidering the December 2020 decision. In August 2023, the EPA announced a new review of the ozone NAAQS and most recently released reports on December 23, 2024, related to its review. We do not believe continued implementation of the NAAQS ozone standard will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet predict the impact, if any, of any new Federal Implementation Plan involving new NAAQS standards.

General. New environmental regulations and proposals similar to these, when finalized, and any other new regulations requiring the installation of more sophisticated pollution control equipment or the adoption of other environmental protection measures, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Notably, opposition to energy development and infrastructure projects has led to regulatory and judicial challenges to new facilities, including compression facilities, in many states. While we have not directly faced any such challenges to the facilities at which we provide contract operations and know of no pending or threatened efforts targeting those facilities, expanded opposition to energy infrastructure, including facilities at which we provide contract operations or in the future might otherwise have an opportunity to provide contract operations, could potentially give rise to material impacts in the future.

Climate Change

Climate change legislation andregulatoryinitiatives may arise from avarietyofsources, includinginternational, national, regional and state levelsofgovernment and associatedadministrative bodies, seeking to restrict or regulate emissions of GHGssuchascarbondioxideandmethane.

Congress and various federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies have previously considered legislationto restrict or regulate emissions of GHG. Energy legislation and other initiatives continue to be proposed that may be relevant to GHGemissionsissues.For example, the SEC adopted rules in March 2024 that would have mandated extensive disclosure for certain public companies of climate-related data, risks and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and greenhouse gas emissions. The SEC quickly stayed those rules in April 2024, however, and in March 2025 voted not to defend the rules against ongoing legal challenges. Those legal challenges remain in abeyance pending an SEC decision on whether to rescind, repeal, or modify the rules but, in the meantime, the SEC climate rules remain suspended and without effect.

Table of Contents

laws.Althoughmostofthestate–levelinitiativeshavetodatebeenfocusedonlargesourcesofGHG emissions, suchaselectricpowerplants,itispossiblethatsmallersourcessuchasournaturalgas–powered compressors couldbecomesubjecttoGHG–relatedregulation.Dependingontheparticularprogram,wecouldberequiredtocontrol emissionsortopurchaseandsurrenderallowancesforGHG emissionsresultingfromouroperations. Our customers or other business partners may require us to provide additional climate-related information if they are also subject to these or additional climate-related disclosure laws or regulations. These actions could result in increased (i) costs to operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) capital expenditures to install new emission controls on our facilities, and (iii) costs to administer and manage any potential GHG emissions regulations or carbon trading or tax programs. Such climate-related disclosure requirements could result in increased compliance costs, and possible litigation and reputational risks if such disclosures are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or do not otherwise meet the expectations of our stakeholders. Moreover, such requirements may not always be uniform across jurisdictions, which may result in increased complexity and cost for compliance. In addition, we may take voluntary steps to mitigate any impact our operations might have on climate change. As a result, we may experience increases in energy, transportation and raw material costs, capital expenditures or insurance premiums; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will have the desired effects.

The $1 trillionlegislative infrastructure package passed by Congress in November 2021 included a number of climate-focused spending initiatives targeted at climate resilience, enhanced response and preparation for extreme weather events, and clean energy and transportation investments. Significant additional legislative action by Congress also occurred in August 2022 with the Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by the former administration, which provided $391 billion in funding for research and development and incentives for low-carbon energy production methods, carbon capture, and other programs directed at encouraging de-carbonization and addressing climate change. The IRA also amended the Clean Air Act to include a Methane Emissions and Waste Reduction Incentive Program for petroleum and natural gas systems. This program required the EPA to impose a “waste emissions charge” on certain natural gas and oil sources that were already required to report under EPA’s GHG Reporting Program. In November 2024, the EPA released its final rule to implement the methane emissions fee with an effective date in January 2025, which is expected to apply to reporting year 2024 emissions. Twenty-three states have filed a lawsuit challenging the rule, and the change in U.S. presidential administration provides additional uncertainty as to the rule’s future. While the current administration issued an executive order pausing the disbursement of funds appropriated through the IRA and rolling back these environmental policies implemented during the former administration, with legislative action culminating in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which eliminated most of the Inflation Reduction Act’s incentives and delayed the commencement of the methane waste emissions charge on oil and gas sources by a decade to 2034. Notably, Congress eliminated EPA’s regulations in support of the waste emissions charge using the Congressional Review Act effective on March 14, 2025 and, as of September 12, 2025, EPA has proposed to suspend the GHG Reporting Program for oil and gas sources until 2034 and to eliminate such reporting for all other sources. U.S. climate leaders have vowed to continue pressing for climate progress although major new climate legislation seems unlikely in the immediate future. Such legislation, regulations, and initiatives, as well as uncertainty regarding the future success of such regulations and initiatives in reducing demand for oil and gas, could indirectly affect our business and our results of operations by reducing demand for our services.

Separately, the EPA has promulgated regulations controlling GHG emissions under its existing CAA authority. The EPA has adopted rules requiring many facilities, including petroleum and natural gas systems, to inventory and report their GHG emissions. As noted above, in September 2025, EPA proposed to suspend those requirements until 2034. In 2025, we did not operate any facilities that were subject to these reporting obligations. In addition, the EPA rules provide air permitting requirements for certain large sources of GHG emissions. The requirement for large sources of GHG emissions to obtain and comply with permits will affect some of our and our customers’ largest new or modified facilities going forward but is not expected to cause us to incur material costs. As noted above, the EPA has previously undertaken efforts to regulate emissions of methane, considered a GHG, in the oil and gas sector, and could develop additional, more stringent rules at some point in the future.

Table of Contents

“social cost of nitrous oxide” and “social cost of methane,” which are “the monetized damages associated with incremental increases in greenhouse gas emissions,” including “changes in net agricultural productivity, human health, property damage from increased flood risk, and the value of ecosystem services.” In early 2025, however, the new administration disbanded the Working Group and withdrew all of its published guidance, ordering EPA to review whether and how to use the social cost of carbon in federal permitting and regulatory decisions and directing the agencies in the meantime to follow OMB regulatory analysis guidance from 2003 that is virtually silent on climate. The current administration also released a series of executive orders impacting the energy sector, ranging from declaring a national emergency due to the U.S.’s inadequate energy supply, infrastructure, and prices, to halting wind energy leasing and promoting fossil fuel exploration. These executive orders are already reshaping the current direction of the U.S. climate agenda and have led to rulemaking actions by EPA that are beginning to undo U.S. climate regulation, including a February 12, 2026 final rule overturning the 2009 CAA endangerment finding respecting GHGs and all federal GHG emissions standards for vehicles and engines. At this time, we cannot determine how the current administration will continue to proceed and cannot accurately predict the ensuing impact of climate-related policy shifts on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

At the international level, the U.S. joined the international community at the 21st COP of the UNFCCC in Paris, France, which resulted in the “Paris Agreement,” which intended for signatory countries to nationally determine their contributions and set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. While the Paris Agreement did not impose direct requirements on emitters, national plans to meet its pledge resulted in new regulatory requirements. After withdrawing from the Paris Agreement in November 2020, the U.S. re-entered the Paris Agreement in April 2021 along with a new “nationally determined contribution” that the U.S. would achieve GHG emissions reductions of at least 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2030. In November 2021, at COP26 in Glasgow, the U.S. and European Union jointly announced the launch of the “Global Methane Pledge,” by which signatory countries aim to cut global methane pollution at least 30% by 2030 relative to 2020 levels, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. The December 2023 COP28 meeting in Dubai reaffirmed commitments to the Paris Agreement and concluded that the world should move away from fossil fuel energy in a just, orderly, and equitable manner and aim to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, while recognizing a transitional role for fossil fuels. In November 2024, at COP29 in Azerbaijan, countries agreed on the final building blocks that set out how carbon markets will operate under the Paris Agreement, among other outcomes that further indicate the global push to mitigate climate change. However, the current administration issued an executive order in January 2025 that initiated the process to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and from any commitments made under the UNFCCC. COP30 took place in Brazil in November 2025 with no official participation or representatives attending from the U.S. In January 2026, the U.S. officially withdrew from the Paris Agreement. Just as we cannot fully anticipate the impact of the methane rules discussed above, we also cannot predict whether the withdrawal from or potential future re-entry into the Paris Agreement or other international pledges will result in any particular new federal regulatory requirements or whether such requirements will cause us to incur material costs. Nevertheless, several states and geographic regions in the U.S. have adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs, including cap and trade regimes and commitments that contribute to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Increasingly, parties have sought to bring suit against various natural gas and oil companies alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately disclose those impacts. Any such litigation targeting our customers could negatively impact their operations and, in turn, decrease demand for our operations, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

In sum, any legislation, regulatory programs or social pressures related to climate change could increase our costs and require substantial capital, compliance, operating and maintenance costs, reduce demand for our services and reduce our access to financial markets. Current, as well as potential future, laws and regulations that limit GHG emissions or that otherwise promote the use of renewable energy over fossil fuel energy sources could increase the cost of our services and, thereby, further reduce demand and adversely affect our sales volumes, revenues and margins.

Table of Contents

Water Discharges

The CWA and analogous state laws and their implementing regulations impose restrictions and strict controls with respect to the discharge of pollutants into state waters or waters of the U.S. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. In addition, the CWA regulates storm water discharges associated with industrial activities depending on a facility’s primary standard industrial classification. Four of our facilities have applied for and obtained industrial wastewater discharge permits and/or have sought coverage under local wastewater ordinances. U.S. federal laws also require development and implementation of spill prevention, controls and countermeasure plans where petroleum storage quantities exceed certain thresholds, including appropriate containment berms and similar structures to help prevent the contamination of navigable waters in the event of a petroleum hydrocarbon tank spill, rupture or leak at such facilities. The definition of “waters of the U.S.” and, relatedly, the scope of CWA jurisdiction, have been the subject of notable rulemaking efforts and judicial challenges over several decades, which may continue. In May 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court announced a decision that sharply narrowed that definition to relatively permanent bodies of water connected to traditional navigable waters and wetlands with a continuous surface connection to other jurisdictional waters, thereby invalidating protections for many other historically regulated wetlands and waters. The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued a final rule effective September 8, 2023 to implement the terms of that decision. As a result of prior litigation, that amended rule has gone into effect in only part of the country, and new legislation with respect to the amended rule is ongoing. In November 2025, EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers released a proposed rule that would again redefine “waters of the United States” to be consistent with the most recent Supreme Court decision, further clarifying and narrowing CWA jurisdiction over wetlands and other waters.

Waste Management and Disposal

RCRA and analogous state laws and their implementing regulations govern the generation, transportation, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous and non–hazardous solid wastes. During the course of our operations, we generate wastes (including, but not limited to, used oil, antifreeze, used oil filters, sludges, paints, solvents and abrasive blasting materials) in quantities regulated under RCRA. The EPA and various state agencies have limited the approved methods of disposal for these types of wastes. CERCLA and analogous state laws and their implementing regulations impose strict, and under certain conditions, joint and several liability without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct on classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include current and past owners and operators of the facility or disposal site where the release occurred and any company that transported, disposed of, or arranged for the transport or disposal of the hazardous substances released at the site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. In addition, where contamination may be present, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury, property damage and recovery of response costs allegedly caused by hazardous substances or other pollutants released into the environment. Additionally, emerging contaminants, like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances such as perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid compounds, have become subject to CERCLA regulation in addition to existing federal and state chemicals regulation, and polyfluoroalkyl substances have recently been regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act. Other emerging contaminants could also become subject to regulation under CERCLA, Toxic Substances Control Act or comparable state laws. We cannot provide any assurance that the costs and liabilities associated with the future imposition of such remedial or regulatory compliance obligations upon us would not have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position.

Table of Contents

We currently own or lease, and in the past have owned or leased, a number of properties that have been used in support of our operations for a number of years. Although we have utilized operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time, hydrocarbons, hazardous substances, or other regulated wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties owned or leased by us or on or under other locations where such materials have been taken for disposal by companies subcontracted by us. In addition, many of these properties have been previously owned or operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or release of hydrocarbons, hazardous substances or other regulated wastes was not under our control. These properties and the materials released or disposed thereon may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to remove or remediate historical property contamination, or to perform certain operations to prevent future contamination. At certain of such sites, we are currently working with the prior owners who have undertaken to monitor and clean up contamination that occurred prior to our acquisition of these sites. We are not currently under any order requiring that we undertake or pay for any cleanup activities. However, we cannot provide any assurance that we will not receive any such order in the future.

Occupational Safety and Health

We are subject to the requirements of the OSHA and comparable state statutes. These laws and the implementing regulations strictly govern the protection of the safety and health of employees. The OSHA’s hazard communication standard, the EPA’s community right–to–know regulations under Title III of CERCLA and similar state statutes require that we organize and/or disclose information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2025, we employed approximately 1,350 employees in 12 states and conducted business in 41 states. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

We consider our employees to be our greatest asset and believe that our success depends on our ability to attract, develop and retain our employees. We operate on a merit-based approach, and we support the hiring of employees from a range of backgrounds.

We support pay equity and believe we offer competitive and comprehensive compensation benefits packages that include bonuses, an employee stock purchase plan, a 401(k) plan with employer contribution, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts with employer contribution, paid time off (including 16 hours per year as paid time to volunteer), family leave, an employee assistance program and tuition assistance, among many others.

We believe in the ultimate goal of serving as the best corporate citizen possible and are dedicated to inspiring and empowering our employees to operate continuously according to our core values of safety, service, integrity, respect and pride. To that end, the Governance and Sustainability Committee of our Board of Directors provides oversight of our policies, practices and programs regarding the fair and equitable promotion of employees within our company and the health and safety of our employees and communities.

Learning and Talent Development

We invest significant resources to develop the talent needed to provide our industry–leading natural gas compression services. We work closely with suppliers to develop training programs for our field service technicians. Our field service technicians are supported by a dedicated training team and collectively completed over 44,000 hours of operational and technical training during 2025. Generally, new hire field employees enter a program whereby they are assigned an experienced mentor, for an average of six months, under whose direct supervision they apply their classroom learning in the real world setting.

In addition, we offer a number of non–technical, targeted skills–based and career–enhancing training programs, including technical orientation for non–technical employees, supervisor coaching, performance management and conflict resolution. Our talent development programs provide employees with the resources they need to help achieve their career goals, build management skills and lead their organizations.

Table of Contents

Safety, Health and Wellness

The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well–being of our people and so we are committed to the safety, health and wellness of our employees.

Safety is a core value of our company, and safety performance is a key measure of success that has been included in our short–term incentive program for approximately 20 years. We actively promote the highest standards of safety behavior and environmental awareness and strive to meet or exceed all applicable local and national regulations. “Stop the Job” is an adopted edict that establishes the obligation of and provides the authority to all employees to stop any task or operation where they perceive that a risk to people, the environment or assets is not properly controlled. We believe that all incidents are preventable and that through proper training, planning and hazard recognition, we can achieve a workplace with zero incidents. To this end, we created the TARGET ZERO program that includes over 90 safety and environmental procedures, and their necessary tools, equipment and training, which are designed to foster a mindset that integrates safety into every work process. Through this program, we have achieved excellent safety performance, with a total recordable incident rate of 0.22 in 2025. While no incidents are acceptable, the incidents we experienced were extremely minor in nature and resulted in no lost time. It will be our continuous goal that we achieve a rate of zero in all future periods.

We also provide our employees and their families with access to a variety of flexible and convenient health and wellness programs that support the maintenance or improvement of our employees’ physical and mental health and encourage engagement in healthy behaviors, including our employee–led RockFIT program that develops and sponsors corporate health and fitness challenges throughout the year.

Building Employee and Community Connections

We consider ourselves a member of every community in which we operate and believe that building connections between our employees, their families and our communities creates a more meaningful and enjoyable workplace. Our employees give generously and are passionate towards many causes, for which they receive 16 hours per year of paid time off to volunteer. Our employee–led Archrock Cares program brings together employees across functions and backgrounds to break down traditional corporate barriers and form strong bonds through the pursuit of shared interests and volunteering and giving opportunities across the country.

Available Information

Our annual reports on Form 10–K, quarterly reports on Form 10–Q, current reports on Form 8–K and any amendments to those reports are available free of charge on our website, www.archrock.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Form 10–K or any of our other securities filings. Paper copies of our filings are also available, without charge, from Archrock, Inc., 9807 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77024, Attention: Investor Relations. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers who file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website address is www.sec.gov.

Additionally, we make available free of charge on our website:

• our Code of Business Conduct;

• our Corporate Governance Principles; and

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As described in “Forward–Looking Statements,” this Form 10–K contains forward–looking statements regarding us, our business and our industry. The risk factors described below, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in the forward–looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be negatively impacted.

Table of Contents

Industry and General Economic Risks

Macroeconomic conditions, including an increase in inflation and trade tensions, could have adverse effects on our results of operations.

Uncertainty on future inflation trends and fluctuations in interest rates have created further uncertainty for the economy and for our customers. Elevated inflation will increase our labor costs and the costs of parts, lube oil and other materials used in our operations. An increase in inflation rates could negatively affect our profitability and cash flows, due to higher wages, higher operating costs, higher financing costs, and/or higher supplier prices. We may be unable to pass along such higher costs to our customers. In addition, inflation may adversely affect customers’ financing costs, cash flows, and profitability, which could adversely impact their operations and our ability to collect receivables.

Additionally, trade tensions or restrictions on free trade, including the tariffs that have been imposed and proposed by the current administration, could exacerbate these effects. Any widespread imposition of new or increased tariffs and trade restrictions could increase the cost of imported materials and products, such as steel, which accordingly could increase costs of our products, disrupt our supply chain, cause adverse financial impacts due to volatility in foreign exchange rates and interest rates, increase inflationary pressures on raw materials and energy, and negatively impact our profit margins. New or increased tariffs could also negatively affect U.S. national or regional economies, which could affect the demand for our products.

Pandemics and other public health crises may negatively affect demand for our services, and may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Pandemics or other public health crises could significantly impact public health, economic growth, supply chains and markets. The extent to which our operating and financial results may be affected by future pandemics or other public health crises will depend on various factors and consequences beyond our control, such as the duration and scope of such pandemic or public health crisis, additional actions by businesses and governments in response to the pandemic and the speed and effectiveness of responses to combat any such pandemic or public health crisis. Any future pandemic or public health crisis may materially adversely affect our operating and financial results in a manner that is not currently known to us or that we do not currently consider to present significant risks to our operations.

Ongoing International Conflicts and Tensions

The conflict in Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war, other geopolitical conflicts, and related price volatility and geopolitical instability could negatively impact our business.

In late February 2022, Russia launched significant military action against Ukraine, and in October 2023, Israel launched a military response against Hamas in Gaza. These ongoing conflicts and other geopolitical conflicts, such as the developments in Venezuela, have caused, and could intensify, volatility in oil and natural gas prices, and the extent and duration of these military actions, sanctions and resulting market disruptions could be significant and could potentially have a substantial negative impact on the global economy and/or our business for an unknown period of time. Any such volatility and disruptions may also magnify the impact of other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.

Table of Contents

Business and Operational Risks

Our operations entail inherent risks that may result in substantial liability. We do not insure against all potential losses and could be seriously harmed by unexpected liabilities.

Our operations entail inherent risks, including equipment defects, malfunctions and failures and natural disasters, which could result in uncontrollable flows of natural gas or well fluids, fires and explosions. These risks may expose us, as an equipment operator, to liability for personal injury, wrongful death, property damage, pollution and other environmental damage. The insurance we carry against many of these risks may not be adequate to cover our claims or losses. Our insurance coverage includes property damage, general liability and commercial automobile liability and other coverage we believe is appropriate. Additionally, we are substantially self-insured for workers’ compensation and employee group health claims in view of the relatively high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance arrangements for these risks. We are also self -insured for property damage to our offshore assets. Further, insurance covering the risks we expect to face or in the amounts we desire may not be available in the future or, if available, the premiums may not be commercially justifiable. If we were to incur substantial liability and such damages were not covered by insurance or were in excess of policy limits, or if we were to incur liability at a time when we are not able to obtain liability insurance, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

We face significant competitive pressures that may cause us to lose market share and negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our business is highly competitive, and there are low barriers to entry. Our competitors may be able to more quickly adapt to technological changes within our industry and changes in economic and market conditions as a whole, more readily take advantage of acquisitions and other opportunities and adopt more aggressive pricing policies. Our ability to renew or replace existing contract operations service agreements with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain current revenue and cash flows could be adversely affected by the activities of our competitors. If our competitors substantially increase the resources they devote to the development and marketing of competitive products, equipment or services or substantially decrease the price at which they offer their products, equipment or services, we may not be able to compete effectively.

In addition, we could face significant competition from new entrants into the compression services business and heightened competition from consolidation of our competitors. Some of our existing competitors or new entrants may expand or fabricate new compressors that would create additional competition for the services we provide to our customers. Certain of these competitors may have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us, and may be in a better competitive position. In addition, our customers may purchase and operate their own compression fleets in lieu of using our natural gas compression services. In recent years, consolidation in the oil and gas industry has led to combinations of our customers, who have leveraged their size and purchasing power to pursue economies of scale and pricing concessions, which could lead to decreased demand for our products and services. We also may not be able to take advantage of certain opportunities or make certain investments because of our debt levels and our other obligations. Any of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Any acquisitions we complete, including the NGCS Acquisition, are subject to substantial risks that could reduce our ability to make distributions to our common stockholders.

Even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will increase the amount of cash available for distribution to our common stockholders, these acquisitions, including the NGCS Acquisition, may nevertheless result in a decrease in the amount of cash available for distribution to our common stockholders. Any acquisition, including the NGCS Acquisition, involves potential risks, including, among other things:

• our inability to obtain satisfactory title to the assets we acquire; and

Table of Contents

If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, our future growth could be limited.

Our ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make accretive acquisitions. If we are unable to make accretive acquisitions either because we are (i) unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with them, (ii) unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms or (iii) outbid by competitors, then our future growth and ability to maintain dividends could be limited. Furthermore, even if we make acquisitions that we believe will be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless result in a decrease in the cash generated from operations.

Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:

• an inability to successfully integrate the businesses we acquire;

• the assumption of unknown liabilities;

• limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller;

• the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

• unforeseen operating difficulties; and

• customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.

If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly and we will not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information that we will consider in determining the application of our future funds and other resources. In addition, competition from other buyers could reduce our acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay a higher price than we might otherwise pay.

We may not be able to achieve the expected benefits of the NGCS Acquisition. We may also encounter significant difficulties in integrating NGCS.

We may not be able to achieve the expected benefits of the NGCS Acquisition. There can be no assurance that the NGCS Acquisition will be beneficial to us. We may not be able to integrate the assets acquired in the NGCS Acquisition without increases in costs or other difficulties. The integration of a business is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. As a result, we will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating our business practices and operations with the business practices and operations of NGCS. The integration process may disrupt our business and, if implemented ineffectively, would restrict the full realization of the anticipated benefits from the NGCS Acquisition. The failure to meet the challenges involved in integrating NGCS and to realize the anticipated benefits of the NGCS Acquisition could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects, as well as the market price of our common stock. The challenges of integrating the operations of acquired businesses include, among others:

• the financial condition of our customers;

• our ability to implement certain business and financial objectives, such as:

• winning profitable new business;

• growing our asset base and enhancing asset utilization;

Table of Contents

• integrating acquired businesses;

• generating sufficient cash;

• accessing the capital markets at an acceptable cost;

• liability related to the use of our services;

• our level of indebtedness and ability to fund our business.

Many of these factors are outside of our control, and any one of them could result in increased costs and liabilities, decreases in the amount of expected revenue and earnings, and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of the acquired business.

The market price of our common stock may decline as a result of the NGCS Acquisition if, among other things, the integration of the properties acquired in the NGCS Acquisition is unsuccessful or transaction costs related to the NGCS Acquisition are greater than expected. The market price of our common stock may decline if we do not achieve the perceived benefits of the NGCS Acquisition as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by us or by securities market participants or if the effect of the NGCS Acquisition on our business, results of operations or financial condition or prospects is not consistent with our expectations or those of securities market participants.

Our sustainability initiatives, including emissions reduction and our public statements and disclosures regarding the same, expose us to numerous risks.

We have developed, and we will continue to develop objectives related to sustainability matters. Statements related to these objectives are made using various underlying assumptions and reflect our current intentions, and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved or achieved within the projected timeframe. Our efforts to research, establish, accomplish, and accurately report on these objectives expose us to numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. Our ability to achieve any objective is subject to numerous factors and conditions, many of which are outside of our control, including the availability of alternative energy sources in the jurisdictions in which we operate, the capacity of electrical grids to support traditional and alternative energy sources, and the broader economic and legal circumstances affecting energy and electricity locally. We cannot predict the ultimate impact of achieving our objectives, or the various implementation aspects, on our financial condition and results of operations.

There can be no assurance that we will pay dividends in the future.

We cannot provide assurance that we will, at any time in the future, again generate sufficient surplus cash that would be available for distribution to the holders of our common stock as a dividend or that our Board of Directors would determine to use any of our net profits to pay a dividend.

Future dividends may be affected by, among other factors:

• our debt service requirements and other liabilities;

• restrictions contained in our Debt Agreements;

• the rates we charge for our services;

• the level of demand for our services;

• the creditworthiness of our customers;

• our level of operating expenses; and

• changes in U.S. federal, state and local income tax laws or corporate laws.

Table of Contents

We cannot provide assurance that we will declare or pay dividends in any particular amount or at all in the future. A decision not to pay dividends or a reduction in our dividend payments in the future could have a negative effect on our stock price.

Financial Risks

We have a substantial amount of debt that could limit our ability to fund future growth and operations and increase our exposure to risk during adverse economic conditions.

As of December 31, 2025, we had $2.4 billion in outstanding debt obligations, net of unamortized debt premiums and unamortized deferred financing costs, outstanding under our Credit Facility and senior notes. Many factors, including factors beyond our control, may affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness. These factors include those discussed elsewhere in these Risk Factors.

Our substantial debt level and associated commitments could have important consequences to our liquidity, particularly to the extent our borrowing capacity becomes covenant restricted. For example, these commitments could:

• make it more difficult for us to satisfy contractual obligations;

• limit our ability to incur indebtedness in the future.

Covenants in our Debt Agreements may impair our ability to operate our business.

Our Debt Agreements contain various covenants with which we or certain of our subsidiaries must comply, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the use of proceeds from borrowings, limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness, investments, acquisitions, making loans, liens on assets, repurchasing equity, making dividends, transactions with affiliates, mergers, consolidations, dispositions of assets and other provisions customary in similar types of agreements. The Debt Agreements also contain various covenants requiring mandatory prepayments from the net cash proceeds of certain asset transfers.

Our Credit Facility is also subject to financial covenants, including the following ratios, as defined in the corresponding agreement:

EBITDA to Interest Expense 2.5 to 1.0

Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA 3.0 to 1.0

Total Debt to EBITDA (1) 5.25 to 1.0

If we were to anticipate non-compliance with these financial ratios, we may take actions to maintain compliance with them. These actions include reductions in our general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures or the payment of cash dividends. Any of these measures may reduce the amount of cash available for payment of dividends and the funding of our business requirements, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operations, cash flows or the price of our common stock.

Table of Contents

The breach of any of the covenants under the Debt Agreements could result in a default under the Debt Agreements, which could cause indebtedness under the Debt Agreements to become due and payable. If the repayment obligations under the Debt Agreements were to be accelerated, we may not be able to repay the debt or refinance the debt on acceptable terms and our financial position would be materially adversely affected. A material adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, financial condition, business or operations that, taken as a whole, impacts our ability to perform the obligations under the Debt Agreements could lead to a default under those agreements. Further, a default under one or more of the Debt Agreements would trigger cross-default provisions under the other Debt Agreements, which would accelerate our obligation to repay the indebtedness under those agreements.

As of December 31, 2025, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Debt Agreements, excluding the 2034 Notes, which were issued in January 2026 and not subject to covenant compliance as of December 31, 2025. See Note 15 (“Long-Term Debt”) for further details.

We may be unable to access the capital and credit markets or borrow on affordable terms to obtain additional capital that we may require.

Historically, we have financed acquisitions, operating expenditures and capital expenditures with a combination of cash provided by operating and financing activities. However, to the extent we are unable to finance our operating expenditures, capital expenditures, scheduled interest and debt repayments and any future dividends with net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the Credit Facility, we may require additional capital. Periods of instability in the capital and credit markets (both generally and in the oil and gas industry in particular) could limit our ability to access these markets to raise debt or equity capital on affordable terms or to obtain additional financing. Among other things, our lenders may seek to increase interest rates, enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt at maturity at favorable terms or at all and may reduce or cease to provide funding to us. Additionally, extended lead times for newly fabricated equipment can increase near-term capital needs and create timing inconsistency between funding availability and capital expenditures. If we are unable to access the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or if we are not successful in raising capital within the time period required or at all, we may not be able to grow or maintain our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our inability to fund purchases of additional compression equipment could adversely impact our financial results.

We may not be able to maintain or increase our asset and customer base unless we have access to sufficient capital to purchase additional compression equipment. Cash flow from our operations and availability under our Credit Facility may not provide us with sufficient cash to fund our capital expenditure requirements, including any funding requirements related to acquisitions. Our ability to grow our asset and customer base could be impacted by limits on our ability to access additional capital.

We may be vulnerable to fluctuations in interest rates due to our variable rate debt obligations.

Borrowings under our Credit Facility are subject to variable interest rates. Changes in economic conditions outside of our control could result in fluctuations in interest rates, and higher interest rates will thereby increase our interest expense and reduce the funds available for capital investment, operations or other purposes. In addition, a substantial portion of our cash flow must be used to service our debt obligations. Any increase in our interest expense could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows, including our ability to pay dividends in the future.

Our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement changed the referenced rate from LIBOR to SOFR so that borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at, based on our election, either a base rate or SOFR, plus an applicable margin. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains SOFR benchmark replacement provisions. At this time, there can be no assurance as to whether any alternative benchmark or resulting interest rates may be more or less favorable than SOFR.

Table of Contents

Customer and Contract Risks

The erosion of the financial condition of our customers could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Many of our customers finance their exploration and production activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of equity. During times when the oil or natural gas markets weaken, our customers are more likely to experience a downturn in their financial condition. Additionally, some of our midstream customers may provide their gathering, transportation and related services to a limited number of companies in the oil and gas production business. A reduction in borrowing bases under reserve-based credit facilities, the lack of availability of debt or equity financing or other factors that negatively impact our customers’ financial condition could result in a reduction in our customers’ spending for our products and services, which may result in their cancellation of contracts, the cancellation or delay of scheduled maintenance of their existing natural gas compression equipment, their determination not to enter into new natural gas compression service contracts or their determination to cancel or delay orders for our services. Furthermore, the loss by our midstream customers of their key customers could reduce demand for their services and result in a deterioration of their financial condition, which would in turn decrease their demand for our services. Any such action by our customers would reduce demand for our services. Reduced demand for our services could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, in the event of the financial failure of a customer, we could experience a loss on all or a portion of our outstanding accounts receivable associated with that customer.

The loss of any of our most significant customers would result in a decline in our revenue and cash available to pay dividends to our common stockholders.

Our five most significant customers collectively accounted for 35%, 35% and 33% of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our services are provided to these customers pursuant to contract operations service agreements, which generally have an initial term of 12 to 36 months, or generally up to 60 months for the largest horsepower units in our fleet, and continue thereafter until terminated by either party with 30 days’ advance notice. The loss of all or even a portion of the services we provide to these customers, as a result of competition or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Many of our contract operations service agreements have short initial terms and are cancelable on short notice after the initial term, and we cannot be sure that such contracts will be extended or renewed after the end of the initial contractual term. Any such non-renewals, or renewals at reduced rates or the loss of contracts with any significant customer could adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The length of our contract operations service agreements with customers varies based on operating conditions and customer needs. Our initial contract terms typically are not long enough to enable us to recoup the cost of the equipment we utilize to provide contract operations services, and these contracts are typically cancelable on short notice after the initial term. We cannot be sure that a substantial number of these contracts will be extended or renewed by our customers or that any of our customers will continue to contract with us. The inability to negotiate extensions or renew a substantial portion of our contract operations services contracts, the renewal of such contracts at reduced rates, the inability to contract for additional services with our customers or the loss of all or a significant portion of our services contracts with any significant customer could lead to a reduction in revenue and net income and could require us to record asset impairments. Moreover, we have limited ability to increase prices during our initial contract terms. As a result, we are unable to pass increases in the prices of the equipment, materials and services we utilize to provide contract operations services, as a result of inflation, tariffs, or otherwise, onto our customers, which could result in a reduction in net income. This could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Table of Contents

Labor and Supply Chain Risks

Our ability to manage and grow our business effectively may be adversely affected if we lose management or operational personnel.

We believe that our ability to hire, train and retain qualified personnel will continue to be challenging and important. The supply of experienced operational and field personnel, in particular, decreases as other energy companies’ needs for the same personnel increase. Our ability to grow and to continue our current level of service to our customers will be adversely impacted if we are unable to successfully hire, train and retain these important personnel. In addition, the cost of labor has increased and may continue to increase in the future with increases in demand, which could require us to incur additional costs and negatively impact our results of operations.

We depend on particular suppliers and are vulnerable to product shortages and price increases. With respect to our suppliers of newly–fabricated compression equipment specifically, we occasionally experience long lead times, and therefore may at times make purchases in anticipation of future business. If we are unable to purchase compression equipment or other integral equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers, we may be unable to retain existing customers or compete for new customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Some equipment, materials and services used in our business are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on these suppliers involves several risks, including price increases (as a result of inflation, tariffs or otherwise), inferior quality and a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of such equipment, materials and services in a timely manner. Additionally, we occasionally experience long lead times from our suppliers of newly–fabricated compression equipment and may at times make purchases in anticipation of future business. We do not have long–term contracts with some of these suppliers, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these suppliers could have a negative impact on our results of operations and could damage our customer relationships.

If we are unable to purchase compression equipment, in particular, on a timely basis to meet the demands of our customers, our existing customers may terminate their contractual relationships with us, or we may not be able to compete for business from new or existing customers, which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, supply chain bottlenecks could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary materials, parts or lube oil used in our operations or increase the costs of such items. A significant increase in the price of such equipment, materials and services, as a result of inflation, tariffs or other factors, could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Information Technology and Cybersecurity Risks

We may not realize the intended benefits of our process and technology transformation project, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We utilize technology in all aspects of our business to drive operational efficiencies and enhance our value proposition to our customers. Our investments have focused on implementing cloud-based solutions to replace legacy systems, the automation of workflows, integration of digital and mobile tools for our field service technicians and expanded remote monitoring capabilities of our compression fleet. The implementation of the process and technology transformation project has required significant capital and other resources from which we may not realize the benefits we expect to realize. Any such difficulties could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Cyber-attacks or terrorism could affect our business, results of operations and our reputation.

We rely on our information technology systems and data for critical operations. We own and manage some of these technology systems, but also rely on the systems provided by a host of third-party service providers, vendors, and business partners. We and certain of our third-party providers collect, maintain and process data about customers, employees, business partners and others, including personally identifiable information, as well as proprietary information belonging to our business, such as trade secrets. We are subject to numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks and threats, including cyber-attacks, computer viruses and terrorism that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of critical technology systems or information and may disrupt our operations and harm our operating results. Our industry requires the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. Any integration of AI in our or relevant third parties’ operations, products or services is expected to pose new and/or unknown cybersecurity risks and challenges. In addition, we have acquired and may continue to acquire companies with cybersecurity vulnerabilities and/or unsophisticated security measures, which exposes us to significant cybersecurity, operational, and financial risks.

Despite our implementation of security measures, our technology systems and data are vulnerable to material compromises, disruption and failures due to social engineering/phishing, malware (including ransomware), malfeasance by insiders, human or technological error, hacking, viruses, and as a result of bugs, misconfigurations or exploited vulnerabilities in software or hardware, acts of war or terrorism and other causes. Given the complexity of our technology systems, which includes operational technology deployed in the field, we are unable to comprehensively identify, patch or mitigate against all security vulnerabilities. In addition, a successful cyberattack against a critical third party could materially impact our operations and financial results, and because we cannot control the scope or effectiveness of the security measures deployed by our third-party suppliers and service providers, such as cloud services that support our internal and customer-facing operations, successful cyberattacks that disrupt or result in unauthorized access to third-party technology systems can materially impact our operations and financial results. We and certain of our third-party providers have experienced cyberattacks and other incidents, and we expect such attacks and incidents to occur in the future. While to date no incidents have had any material operational or financial impact, we cannot guarantee that material incidents will not occur in the future.

Cyberattacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools, including generative and other AI, that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future attacks or incidents, or avoid a material adverse impact to our systems or information. There also can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. If our information technology systems were to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we may be unable to fulfill critical business functions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The nature of our industry and assets makes us a target for terrorist activities designed to disrupt our ability to service our customers. Increased cybersecurity regulations and an escalating cyber terrorist threat environment are expected to require additional investments in security that we cannot currently predict. We are also subject to evolving cybersecurity and data privacy laws and regulations that are increasingly complex. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant legal liability, regulatory investigations and penalties, or harm to our reputation in the marketplace. The implementation of security requirements and measures and the maintenance of insurance, to the extent available, addressing such activities could significantly increase costs. We cannot guarantee that any costs and liabilities incurred in relation to an attack or incident, such as lost business, penalties or damages, will be covered by our existing insurance policies or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all. These types of events could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, these types of events could require significant management attention and resources and could adversely affect our reputation among customers and the public.

Table of Contents

Tax-related Risks

Tax legislation and administrative initiatives or challenges to our tax positions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We operate or are registered in locations throughout the U.S. and Canada and, as a result, we are subject to the tax laws and regulations of U.S. federal, state and local and Canadian governments. We have investments in unconsolidated affiliates that operate in the U.S. and international locations. From time to time, various legislative or administrative initiatives may be proposed that could adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance that our tax provision or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these initiatives. In addition, U.S. federal, state and local, and international tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can be no assurance that our tax positions will not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would be successful in any such challenge.

Our ability to use NOLs and interest expense limitation carryovers to offset future income may be limited.

Our ability to use any NOLs and interest expense limitation carryovers generated by us could be substantially limited if we were to experience an “ownership change” as defined under Section 382 of the Code. In general, an “ownership change” would occur if our “5-percent stockholders,” as defined under Section 382 of the Code, including certain groups of persons treated as “5-percent stockholders,” collectively increased their ownership in us by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. An ownership change can occur as a result of a public offering of our common stock, as well as through secondary market purchases of our common stock and certain types of reorganization transactions. We have experienced ownership changes, which may result in an annual limitation on the use of our pre–ownership change NOLs (and certain other losses and/or credits) equal to the equity value of our stock immediately before the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate for the month in which the ownership change occurred. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the IRS proposed regulations that would prevent us from using unrealized built-in gains to increase this limitation. If these regulations were finalized and we experienced an ownership change our ability to use our NOLs (and certain other losses and/or credits) may be limited. Such a limitation could, for any given year, have the effect of increasing the amount of our U.S. federal and state income tax liability, which would negatively impact the amount of after–tax cash available for distribution to our stockholders and our financial condition.

Legal and Regulatory Risks

From time to time, we are subject to various claims, tax audits, litigation and other proceedings that could ultimately be resolved against us and require material future cash payments or charges, which could impair our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The size, nature and complexity of our business make us susceptible to various claims, tax audits, litigation and binding arbitration proceedings. We are currently, and may in the future become, subject to various claims, which, if not resolved within amounts we have accrued, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, including our ability to pay dividends. Similarly, any claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively impact our reputation among our customers and the public and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. See Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-K and Note 16 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to our Financial Statements for additional information regarding certain legal proceedings to which we are a party.

Table of Contents

New regulations, proposed regulations and proposed modifications to existing regulations under the CAA, if implemented, could result in increased compliance costs.

In June 2016, the EPA issued final regulations under the CAA amending the NSPS for the oil and natural gas source category and applying to sources of emissions of methane and VOC from certain processes, activities and equipment that is constructed, modified or reconstructed after September 18, 2015. Specifically, the regulation imposed both methane and VOC standards for several emission sources not previously covered by the NSPS, such as fugitive emissions from compressor stations and pneumatic pumps and methane standards for certain emission sources that are already regulated for VOC, such as equipment leaks at natural gas processing plants. The amendments also established methane standards for a subset of equipment that the NSPS regulates, including reciprocating compressors and pneumatic controllers, and extend the VOC standards to the remaining unregulated equipment.

In April 2024, BoLM published a separate final rule, known as the “Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation” rule, to address methane emissions from oil and gas activities on public lands, which became effective on June 10, 2024. The rule is currently stayed pending litigation in North Dakota, Texas, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah. Among the newly adopted methane requirements that may impact our operations are broader applicability to compression equipment relative to the existing rules, increased work practices and inspection requirements and mandates for certain new zero-emissions equipment. Notably, however, in November 2025, BoLM announced that it will not enforce requirements of the rule that carried a December 10, 2025 deadline until December 10, 2026.

Both the EPA rules and the BoLM rules are subject to ongoing judicial challenges.

Table of Contents

In October 2015, the EPA issued a new NAAQS ozone standard of 70 ppb, which is a tightening from the 75-ppb standard set in 2008. This new standard became effective on December 28, 2015, and the EPA completed designating attainment/non–attainment regions under the revised ozone standard in 2018. In November 2016, the EPA proposed an implementation rule for the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard, but the agency has yet to issue a final implementation rule. State implementation of the revised NAAQS could result in stricter permitting requirements, delay or prohibit our customers’ ability to obtain such permits and result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, the costs of which could be significant. By law, the EPA must review each NAAQS every five years. In December 2018 and again in December 2020, the EPA announced that it was retaining without revision the 2015 NAAQS ozone standard. In June 2021, the EPA commenced a process for reconsidering the December 2020 decision. In August 2023, the EPA announced a new review of the ozone NAAQS and most recently released reports on December 23, 2024, related to its review. We do not believe continued implementation of the NAAQS ozone standard will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but we cannot yet predict the impact, if any, of any new Federal Implementation Plan involving new NAAQS standards.

New environmental regulations and proposals similar to these, when finalized, and any other new regulations requiring the installation of more sophisticated pollution control equipment or the adoption of other environmental protection measures, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Notably, opposition to energy development and infrastructure projects has led to regulatory and judicial challenges to new facilities, including compression facilities, in many states. While we have not directly faced any such challenges to the facilities at which we provide contract operations and know of no pending or threatened efforts targeting those facilities, expanded opposition to energy infrastructure, including facilities at which we provide contract operations or in the future might otherwise have an opportunity to provide contract operations, could potentially give rise to material impacts in the future.

We are subject to a variety of governmental regulations; failure to comply with these regulations may result in administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures and changes in these regulations could increase our costs or liabilities.

We are subject to a variety of U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, including relating to the environment, health and safety, labor and employment and taxation. We have investments in unconsolidated affiliates that are subject to U.S. and international regulations. Many of these laws and regulations are complex, change frequently, are becoming increasingly stringent, and the cost of compliance with these requirements can be expected to increase over time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including assessment of monetary penalties, imposition of remedial requirements and issuance of injunctions as to future compliance. From time to time, as part of our operations, including newly acquired or potential future contract operations, we may be subject to compliance audits by regulatory authorities in the various states in which we operate.

Environmental laws and regulations may, in certain circumstances, impose strict liability for environmental contamination, which may render us liable for remediation costs, natural resource damages and other damages as a result of our conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or the conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior owners or operators or other third parties. In addition, where contamination may be present, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury, property damage and recovery of response costs. Remediation costs and other damages arising as a result of environmental laws and regulations, and costs associated with new information, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations could be substantial and could negatively impact our financial condition, profitability and results of operations. Moreover, failure to comply with these environmental laws and regulations may result in the imposition of administrative, civil and criminal penalties and the issuance of injunctions delaying or prohibiting operations.

Table of Contents

We may need to apply for or amend facility permits or licenses from time to time with respect to storm water or wastewater discharges, waste handling, or air emissions relating to manufacturing activities or equipment operations, which subjects us to new or revised permitting conditions that may be onerous or costly to comply with. In addition, certain of our customer service arrangements may require us to operate, on behalf of a specific customer, petroleum storage units such as underground tanks or pipelines and other regulated units, all of which may impose additional compliance and permitting obligations. Any failure to obtain or delay in obtaining required permits, licenses and other governmental approvals by our customers could result in production delays and thereby indirectly materially and adversely impact our operations and business.

We conduct operations at numerous facilities in a wide variety of locations across the continental U.S. The operations at many of these facilities require environmental permits or other authorizations. Additionally, natural gas compressors at many of our customers’ facilities require individual air permits or general authorizations to operate under various air regulatory programs established by rule or regulation. These permits and authorizations frequently contain numerous compliance requirements, including monitoring and reporting obligations and operational restrictions, such as emission limits. Given the large number of facilities in which we operate, and the numerous environmental permits and other authorizations that are applicable to our operations, we may occasionally identify or be notified of violations of certain requirements existing in various permits or other authorizations. Occasionally, we have been assessed penalties for non–compliance, and we could be subject to such penalties in the future. We have not been subject to any penalties to date that have materially and adversely impacted or are expected to materially and adversely impact our operations or business.

We routinely deal with oil, natural gas and other petroleum products. Hydrocarbons or other hazardous substances or wastes may have been disposed or released on, under or from properties used by us to provide contract operations services or inactive compression storage or on or under other locations where such substances or wastes have been taken for disposal. These properties may be subject to investigatory, remediation and monitoring requirements under environmental laws and regulations, and such requirements may vary.

The modification or interpretation of existing environmental laws or regulations, the more vigorous enforcement of existing environmental laws or regulations, or the adoption of new environmental laws or regulations may also negatively impact oil and natural gas exploration and production, gathering and pipeline companies, including our customers, which in turn could have a negative impact on us.

Climate change legislation, regulatory initiatives and stakeholder pressures could result in increased compliance costs, financial risks and potential reduction in demand for our services.

Congress and various federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies have previously considered legislationto restrict or regulate emissions of GHG. Energy legislation and other initiatives continue to be proposed that may be relevant to GHGemissionsissues.For example, the SEC adopted rules in March 2024 that would have mandated extensive disclosure for certain public companies of climate-related data, risks and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and greenhouse gas emissions. The SEC stayed those rules in April 2024, however, and in March 2025 voted not to defend the rules against ongoing legal challenges. Those legal challenges remain in abeyance pending an SEC decision on whether to rescind, repeal, or modify the rules but, in the meantime, the SEC climate rules remain suspended and without effect.

Table of Contents

Almost half of thestates,eitherindividuallyorthroughmulti–stateregionalinitiatives,havebegunto addressGHG emissions, primarilythroughtheplanneddevelopment ofemissioninventoriesorregionalGHG capandtradeprograms. Various states, such as California, Colorado and New York have passed or proposed similar climate change disclosure laws.Althoughmostofthestate–levelinitiativeshavetodatebeenfocusedonlargesourcesofGHG emissions, suchaselectricpowerplants,itispossiblethatsmallersourcessuchasournaturalgas–powered compressors couldbecomesubjecttoGHG–relatedregulation.Dependingontheparticularprogram,wecouldberequiredtocontrol emissionsortopurchaseandsurrenderallowancesforGHG emissionsresultingfromouroperations. Our customers or other business partners may require us to provide additional climate-related information if they are also subject to these or additional climate-related disclosure laws or regulations. These actions could result in increased (i) costs to operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) capital expenditures to install new emission controls on our facilities, and (iii) costs to administer and manage any potential GHG emissions regulations or carbon trading or tax programs. Such climate-related disclosure requirements could result in increased compliance costs, and possible litigation and reputational risks if such disclosures are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or do not otherwise meet the expectations of our stakeholders. Moreover, such requirements may not always be uniform across jurisdictions, which may result in increased complexity and cost for compliance. In addition, we may take voluntary steps to mitigate any impact our operations might have on climate change. As a result, we may experience increases in energy, transportation and raw material costs, capital expenditures or insurance premiums; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will have the desired effects.

The $1 trillionlegislative infrastructure package passed by Congress in November 2021 included a number of climate-focused spending initiatives targeted at climate resilience, enhanced response and preparation for extreme weather events, and clean energy and transportation investments. Significant additional legislative action by Congress also occurred in August 2022 with the Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by the former administration, which provided $391 billion in funding for research and development and incentives for low-carbon energy production methods, carbon capture, and other programs directed at encouraging de-carbonization and addressing climate change. The IRA also amended the Clean Air Act to include a Methane Emissions and Waste Reduction Incentive Program for petroleum and natural gas systems. This program required the EPA to impose a “waste emissions charge” on certain natural gas and oil sources that were already required to report under EPA’s GHG Reporting Program. In November 2024, the EPA released its final rule to implement the methane emissions fee with an effective date in January 2025, which was expected to apply to reporting year 2024 emissions. Twenty-three states have filed a lawsuit challenging the rule, and the change in U.S. presidential administration provides additional uncertainty as to the rule’s future. While the current administration issued an executive order pausing the disbursement of all unspent funds appropriated through the IRA and rolling back these environmental policies implemented during the former administration, with legislative action culminating in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which eliminated most of the Inflation Reduction Act’s incentives and delayed the commencement of the methane waste emissions charge on oil and gas sources by a decade to 2034. Notably, Congress eliminated EPA’s regulations in support of the waste emissions charge using the Congressional Review Act effective on March 14, 2025 and, as of September 12, 2025, EPA has proposed to suspend the GHG Reporting Program for oil and gas sources until 2034 and to eliminate such reporting for all other sources. U.S. climate leaders have vowed to continue pressing for climate progress although major new climate legislation seems unlikely in the immediate future. Such legislation, regulations, and initiatives, as well as uncertainty regarding the future success of such regulations and initiatives in reducing demand for oil and gas, could indirectly affect our business and our results of operations by reducing demand for our services.

Table of Contents

In an executive order issued in January 2021, the former administration asked the heads of all executive departments and agencies to review and take action to address any federal regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies and any similar agency actions promulgated during the prior administration that may be inconsistent with or present obstacles to the administration’s stated goals of protecting public health and the environment, and conserving national monuments and refuges. The executive order also established an Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, which is called on to, among other things, capture the full costs of GHG emissions, including the “social cost of carbon,” “social cost of nitrous oxide” and “social cost of methane,” which are “the monetized damages associated with incremental increases in greenhouse gas emissions,” including “changes in net agricultural productivity, human health, property damage from increased flood risk, and the value of ecosystem services.” In early 2025, however, the new administration disbanded the Working Group and withdrew all of its published guidance, ordering EPA to review whether and how to use the social cost of carbon in federal permitting and regulatory decisions and directing the agencies in the meantime to follow OMB regulatory analysis guidance from 2003 that is virtually silent on climate. The current administration also released a series of executive orders impacting the energy sector, ranging from declaring a national emergency due to the U.S.’s inadequate energy supply, infrastructure, and prices, to halting wind energy leasing and promoting fossil fuel exploration. These executive orders are already reshaping the current direction of the U.S. climate agenda and have led to rulemaking actions by EPA that are beginning to undo U.S. climate regulation, including a February 12, 2026 final rule overturning the 2009 CAA endangerment finding respecting GHGs and all federal GHG emissions standards for vehicles and engines. At this time, we cannot determine how the current administration will continue to proceed and cannot accurately predict the ensuing impact of climate-related policy shifts on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Table of Contents

A climate–related decrease in demand for oil and natural gas could negatively affect our business.

Supply and demand for oil and natural gas is dependent upon a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others, the potential adoption of new government regulations, including those related to fuel conservation measures and climate change regulations, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices. For example, legislative, regulatory or executive actions intended to reduce emissions of GHG could increase the cost of consuming crude oil and natural gas, thereby potentially causing a reduction in the demand for such products. A broader transition to alternative fuels or energy sources, whether resulting from potential new government regulation, carbon taxes or consumer preferences could result in decreased demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. In addition, increased focus of our customers on reducing emissions from, or the use of, combustion engines in compression could increase demand for electric compressors or require us to make modifications to our existing natural gas-powered units. Any decrease in demand for these products could consequently reduce demand for our services and could have a negative effect on our business.

Also, recent activism directed at shifting funding away from companies with fossil fuel energy-related assets could result in a reduction of funding for the energy sector overall. Numerous climate lawsuits have been filed against the world’s largest oil, gas, and coal producing corporations, with the number of cases filed against fossil fuel companies each year nearly tripling since the Paris Agreement was reached in 2015. Such actions could adversely impact our business by distracting management and other personnel from their primary responsibilities, require us to incur increased costs, and/or result in reputational harm. Moreover, any such litigation targeting our customers could negatively impact their operations and, in turn, decrease demand for our services. Such shareholder activism in relation to environmental, social and governance matters could have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain external financing as well as negatively affect the cost of, and terms for, financing to fund capital expenditures or other aspects of our business. Attention to climate change and other ESG risks has also resulted in governmental investigations and public and private litigation, which could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of weather events that could result in severe personal injury, property and environmental damage, which could curtail our or our customers’ operations and otherwise materially adversely affect our cash flows.

Some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHG in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant weather–related effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, hurricanes, blizzards, floods and other climatic events, in addition to more chronic changes such as shifting temperature, precipitation, and other meteorological patterns. If any of those effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our assets and operations, including, but not limited to, damages to our or our customers’ facilities and assets from powerful wind or rising waters. We may experience increased insurance costs, or difficulty obtaining adequate insurance coverage, for our assets in areas subject to more frequent severe weather. We may not be able to recoup these increased costs through the rates we charge our customers. Extreme weather events could cause damage to property or facilities that could exceed our insurance coverage, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Such impacts may be proportionately more severe given the geographical concentration of our operations. These disruptions could further result in evacuation of personnel, curtailment of services, interruption of the transportation of products and materials, and loss of productivity.

Another possible consequence of climate change is increased volatility in seasonal temperatures. The market for natural gas and natural gas liquids is generally impacted by periods of colder weather and warmer weather, so any changes in climate could affect the market for those fuels, and thus demand for our services. Increased energy use due to weather changes may require us to invest in additional equipment to serve increased demand. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may negatively affect our financial condition through decreased revenues. Despite the use of the term “global warming” as a shorthand for climate change, some studies indicate that climate change could cause some areas to experience temperatures substantially colder than their historical averages. As a result, it is difficult to predict how the market for our services could be affected by increased temperature volatility.

Table of Contents

Environmental, social and governance scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders may impose additional costs or additional risks.

In recent years, attention has been given to corporate activities related to ESG matters. A number of advocacy groups, both domestically and internationally, have campaigned for governmental and private action to promote change at public companies related to ESG matters, including demands for action related to climate change, promoting the use of substitutes to fossil fuel products and encouraging the divestment of companies in the fossil fuel industry. Various members of the investment community, including investment advisors, sovereign wealth funds, public pension funds, universities, and other groups, have begun promoting the divestment of fossil fuel equities as well as pressuring lenders and other financial services companies and their regulators, such as the Federal Reserve, to limit or curtail activities with fossil fuel companies. These efforts could have a material adverse effect on the price of our securities and our ability to access equity capital markets. Members of the investment community have also begun to screen companies like ours for sustainability performance, including practices related to GHGs and climate change, and through the use of ESG ratings or otherwise, before investing in our securities. As a result, we could experience additional costs or financial penalties, delayed or cancelled projects, and/or reduced production and reduced demand, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, cash flows, and financial condition. If we do not adapt to or comply with expectations and standards on ESG matters, as they continue to evolve, or if we are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, we may suffer from reputational damage, and our business, financial condition and/or stock price could be materially and adversely affected.

Our operations, projects and growth opportunities require us to have strong relationships with various key stakeholders, including our shareholders, employees, suppliers, customers, local communities and others. We may face pressures from stakeholders, many of whom may be concerned by climate change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices, reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability while at the same time remaining a successfully operating public company. If we do not successfully manage expectations across these varied stakeholder interests, it could erode our stakeholder trust and thereby affect our brand and reputation. The lack of an established single approach to identifying, measuring, and reporting on many ESG matters may further create uncertainty and ambiguities. Failure to realize or timely achieve progress on such aspirational goals, targets, cost estimates, and other expectations or assumptions may adversely impact us. Unfavorable ESG ratings could also lead to further increased negative sentiment towards us, our customers, and our industry, negatively impacting us and our access to and costs of capital. Such erosion of confidence could negatively impact our business through decreased demand and growth opportunities, delays in projects, increased legal action and regulatory oversight, adverse press coverage and other adverse public statements, difficulty hiring and retaining top talent, difficulty obtaining necessary approvals and permits from governments and regulatory agencies on a timely basis and on acceptable terms, and difficulty securing investors and access to capital. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Information Technology and Cybersecurity Risks

We utilize technology in all aspects of our business to drive operational efficiencies and enhance our value proposition to our customers. Our investments have focused on implementing cloud-based solutions to replace legacy systems, the automation of workflows, integration of digital and mobile tools for our field service technicians and expanded remote monitoring capabilities of our compression fleet. We face certain ongoing risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors – Information Technology and Cybersecurity Risks” of this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Cybersecurity Incidents

We have not experienced a material cybersecurity incident and although we are subject to ongoing and evolving cybersecurity threats, we have not identified risks from known cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any prior cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.

Risk Management and Strategy

Overall Process

Our cybersecurity risk management program is designed to monitor, detect, prevent and respond to cybersecurity threats to our critical systems, information, services and IT environment. Our internal IT team has committed resources to review and enhance our cybersecurity risk management program, work with internal and third-party experts to determine and implement appropriate controls, partner with our compliance team to provide employee training and awareness, stay abreast of emerging potential threats and best practices, and to respond to cybersecurity incidents. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information.

In executing and assessing our program, we reference National Standards that emphasize identifying and managing risks, protecting critical assets, detecting potential threats, and responding to and recovering from incidents. This helps guide our ongoing efforts to safeguard information systems, maintain business continuity, and reduce cyber risk across the enterprise. This does not imply that we meet any particular technical standards, specifications, or requirements, only that we use the National Standards as a guide to help us identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks relevant to our business.

Enterprise Risk Management Process Integration

Our cybersecurity risk management program is integrated into our overall enterprise risk management program, and shares common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes that apply to other legal, compliance, strategic, operational, and financial risk areas. This provides cross-functional visibility, as well as executive leadership oversight, to address and mitigate associated risks.

Our IT policy communicates internal guidelines for our IT infrastructure and services, baseline controls that help safeguard the security of our operating environment, and reporting and escalation protocols. Our IT security training program is designed to help our employees recognize and report suspicious activity. The program includes annual cybersecurity training for employees and executive leadership, phishing simulations, and other security exercises for employees. Cybersecurity awareness and education is further emphasized through a company-wide education campaign during National Cybersecurity Awareness Month.

Independent Third-Party Assessment

As part of our cybersecurity strategy, we engage third-party firms to perform assessments, including detailed penetration testing, to identify potential vulnerabilities and evaluate the effectiveness of our security controls. In addition, we maintain a Business Continuity and Incident Response Plan, which is validated through tabletop exercises to support our readiness to respond to cybersecurity events.

Table of Contents

Third-Party Risk Oversight

Based on our analysis of each third-party provider’s criticality to our operations and respective risk profile, our oversight processes may include, among other things, pre-engagement risk assessments through security questionnaire responses and open-source intelligence gathering, negotiated contractual provisions where possible and post-engagement monitoring of external security indicators, through a third-party solution that tracks changes to vendor cybersecurity risk scores and identifies new cybersecurity risks. Executive leadership is kept updated on significant changes to a critical vendor’s cybersecurity risk score. These visibility, insights, and processes help us to manage vendor risks.

Risk Management with Respect to Information Technology and Cybersecurity

Our Board of Directors has an active role, as a whole and through its subcommittees, in oversight of our risks and is assisted by management in the exercise of these responsibilities.Our Board of Directors delegates oversight to specific subcommittees and is informed quarterly through committee reports. The Audit Committee reports to the Board of Directors regarding its activities, including those related to cybersecurity, as the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our cybersecurity risk management program. Various Audit Committee members have first-hand or supervisory experience over cybersecurity, and our Audit Committee chair is certified in the National Association of Corporate Directors Cyber Risk Oversight Program.

Our Vice President of IT is a member of our senior IT management team and is primarily responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats. Our Vice President of IT has primary responsibility for our overall cybersecurity risk management program, including supervising both our internal cybersecurity personnel and external cybersecurity consultants. Our Vice President of IT has over 25 years of experience primarily focused on managing large scale, complex programs and projects as well as managing application development teams in a global environment. Our senior manager in charge of IT security has more than a decade of experience in cybersecurity risk management, including CISSP and C|CISO certifications.

AROC US Equity

AROC · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

AROC US Equity☆

AROC · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

AROC US Equity