Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

ARCT US Equity

Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc.Health Care · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1768224 · FY ends Dec 31
$10.28
+2.07 (+25.21%)
USD · as of 2026-08-19 · marketstack

ARCT · 10-K · period ended 2023-12-31

← all ARCT documents
filed 2024-03-14 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1548 of 1,646404k characters rendered

10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

or

Commission File Number 001-38942

ARCTURUS THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(858) 900-2660

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class TradingSymbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share ARCT The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☐ No☒

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☒

Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes☒No☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes☐No☒

The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market on June 30, 2023 was $692.4million.

As of March 4, 2024, the registrant had26,915,243 shares of voting common stock outstanding.

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Page

PART I

Item 1. Business 4

Item 1A. Risk Factors 45

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 78

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 78

Item 2. Properties 79

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 79

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 79

PART II

Item 6. Reserved 81

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 90

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 90

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 90

Item 9B. Other Information 94

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 94

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 96

Item 11. Executive Compensation 96

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 96

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 97

i

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, or this Annual Report, and the documents incorporated by reference herein may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth below under Part I, Item 1.A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. These statements, which represent our current expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, may contain words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other words indicating future results, though not all forward-looking statements necessarily contain these identifying words. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:

our compliance, and ability to remain in compliance, with the requirements of our collaboration agreements, including our collaboration with Seqirus Inc. (“CSL Seqirus”);

the anticipated benefits and success of our collaboration agreement with CSL Seqirus related to the licensure of our STARR® mRNA technology and LUNAR® lipid-mediated delivery, including our timely receipt of upfront and potential royalty and other payments thereunder;

the continued development activities of the LUNAR-COV19 and LUNAR-FLU programs under our collaboration with CSL Seqirus;

the status, success and benefits of our arrangements with private and governmental entities, some of which are subject to termination for convenience by our counterparties;

our compliance, and ability to remain in compliance, with the stringent requirements of our current and potential government contracts, including our arrangements with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, a division of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense;

the initiation, design, cost, timing, progress, enrollment and results of, and our expected ability to undertake certain activities and accomplish certain goals with respect to, our research and development activities, preclinical studies and clinical trials, including those related to ARCT-810 and ARCT-032;

the potential safety, immunogenicity, efficacy or regulatory approval of any of our COVID-19 vaccine candidates as a booster or primary vaccination series;

the potential effects and benefits of our technologies and product candidates on their own and in comparison to technologies, drugs or courses of treatment currently available or that may be developed by competitors;

the likelihood that preclinical or clinical data will be predictive of future clinical results or efficacy or safety of a product candidate;

the anticipated timing of enrollment, duration, milestones and announcements of results of clinical trials, and the submission of applications to conduct clinical trials;

the likelihood that clinical data will be sufficient for regulatory approval or completed in time to submit an application for regulatory approval within a particular timeframe;

the likelihood or timing of any regulatory approval, and the likelihood that the marketing approval of ARCT-154 in Japan will be predictive of any future marketing approvals in other countries or for other versions of our LUNAR-COV19 or other product candidates;

the potential administration regimen or dosage, or ability to administer multiple doses of, any of our product candidates;

our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our product candidates, and any related restrictions, limitations, and/or warnings in the label of an approved product candidate;

our plans to research, develop and commercialize our product candidates;

1

our ability to successfully commercialize, and our expectations regarding future therapeutic and commercial potential with respect to, our product candidates;

the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates;

the success of competing therapies that are or may become available;

the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets and address unmet medical needs;

our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product candidates;

interactions with regulatory authorities in the United States and foreign countries;

our ability to attract and retain experienced and seasoned scientific and management professionals;

the performance of our third-party suppliers and manufacturers, including our ability to scale-up manufacturing levels as necessary;

our strategic alliance partners’ election to pursue development and commercialization of any programs or product candidates that are subject to our collaboration and license agreements with such partners;

our ability to attract collaborators with relevant development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;

future activities to be undertaken by our strategic alliance partners, collaborators and other third parties;

our ability to develop sales and marketing capabilities, whether alone or with potential future collaborators;

our ability to avoid, settle or be victorious at costly litigation with shareholders, former executives or others, should these situations arise;

our ability to obtain and deploy funding for our operations and to efficiently use our financial and other resources;

our ability to continue as a going concern; and

the accuracy of our estimates regarding future expenses, future revenues, cash flows, capital requirements need for additional financing, and possible sources of revenue.

These statements are only current predictions and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. In addition, historic results of scientific research, preclinical and clinical trials do not guarantee that future research or trials will suggest the same conclusions, nor that historic results referred to herein will be interpreted the same in light of additional research, preclinical and clinical trial results. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in our other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Although we currently believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements.

References to Arcturus

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, references to the “Company,” “Arcturus,” “we,” “our” and “us” mean Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries from and after the effective time of the Redomiciliation (as defined below in Part I, Item 1. "Business" - "Available Information") and, prior to that time, to our predecessor, Arcturus Therapeutics Ltd.

2

Trademarks and Tradenames

The Arcturus logo and other trademarks of Arcturus appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of Arcturus. All other trademarks, service marks and trade names in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this report may appear without the ® or TM symbols.

Market Data and Forecasts

Unless otherwise indicated, information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K concerning economic conditions, our industry, and our markets, including our general expectations and competitive position, market opportunity and market size, is based on a variety of sources, including information from independent industry analysts and publications, as well as our own estimates and research.

Our estimates are derived from industry and general publications, studies and surveys conducted by third-parties, as well as data from our own internal research. These publications, studies and surveys generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information, and we have not independently verified industry data from such third-party sources. While we believe our internal research is reliable and that our internal estimates are reasonable, such research has not been verified by any independent source and our internal estimates are based on our good faith beliefs as of the respective dates of such estimates.

3

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

We are a global messenger RNA medicines company focused on the development of infectious disease vaccines and therapeutics for liver and respiratory rare diseases. In addition to our messenger RNA (“mRNA”) platform, our proprietary lipid nanoparticle (“LNP”) delivery system, LUNAR®, may enable multiple nucleic acid medicines. Our proprietary self-amplifying mRNA technology (Self-Transcribing and Replicating RNA, or STARR®, technology) may provide longer-lasting RNA and sustained protein expression at lower dose levels as compared to conventional mRNA.

We are leveraging our proprietary LUNAR platform and our nucleic acid technologies to develop and advance a pipeline of mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics for infectious diseases and rare genetic disorders with significant unmet medical needs. We continue to expand this platform by adding new innovative delivery solutions that allow us to expand our efforts. Our proprietary LUNAR technology is intended to address the major hurdles in RNA drug development, namely the effective and safe delivery of RNA therapeutics to disease-relevant target tissues. We believe the versatility of our platform to target multiple tissues, its compatibility with various nucleic acid therapeutics, and our expertise in developing scalable manufacturing processes can allow us to deliver on the next generation of nucleic acid medicines.

In June 2020, we initiated our first clinical study, a Phase 1 study for our mRNA-based therapeutic candidate for ornithine transcarbamylase (“OTC”) deficiency. We launched our COVID-19 vaccine program in March 2020, and in November 2023, our self-amplifying mRNA vaccine against COVID-19, ARCT-154, received marketing approval in Japan. In November 2022, we entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the “CSL Collaboration Agreement”) with Seqirus, Inc. (“CSL Seqirus”), a part of CSL Limited and one of the world’s leading influenza vaccine providers, for the global exclusive rights to research, develop, manufacture and commercialize self-amplifying mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, influenza and three other respiratory infectious diseases and global non-exclusive rights to pandemic pathogens. The CSL Collaboration Agreement became effective on December 8, 2022. The collaboration (“CSL Collaboration”) combines CSL Seqirus’ established global vaccine commercial and manufacturing infrastructure with Arcturus’ manufacturing expertise and innovative STARR self-amplifying mRNA and LUNAR delivery platform technologies.

Our vaccines franchise, led by a self-amplifying mRNA-based COVID-19 program under license to CSL Seqirus, made significant strides in 2023, highlighted by the marketing authorization approval in Japan of ARCT-154. The approval is the world’s first for a self-amplifying RNA (sa-mRNA) COVID-19 Vaccine. In August 2023, we successfully completed the 12-month safety follow-up of the pivotal Phase 1/2/3 study in Vietnam of ARCT-154 that completed dosing in April 2022 of over 19,000 participants. In February 2023, Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. (“Meiji”), a Japanese leader in the area of infectious diseases, completed dosing of a Phase 3 clinical trial of ARCT-154 in Japan to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of ARCT-154, and to assess the non-inferiority of ARCT-154 to a licensed mRNA vaccine, administered as a booster. Meiji conducted the study under its exclusive partnership with CSL Seqirus for the distribution of ARCT-154 in Japan. The study enrolled 828 adult participants, with half in the ARCT-154 group and half in a comparator group (Comirnaty®, Pfizer-BioNTech). The results of this study demonstrated that a booster dose of ARCT-154 elicited a numerically higher immune response (meeting the non-inferiority criteria) against the original Wuhan-Hu-1 virus strain and a superior immune response against Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant of SARS-CoV-2 virus compared to a booster dose of the conventional mRNA vaccine Comirnaty®. These Phase 3 study results were used to support the approval of ARCT-154 in Japan for primary immunization and as a booster dose.

Within the framework of the CSL Collaboration, we continue the development of the COVID-19 vaccine to establish a differentiated platform and address routine recommendations for periodic vaccine composition updates in a timely manner. In 2023, we, along with our partner CSL Seqirus, developed a bivalent version of the self-amplifying mRNA vaccine (Bivalent ARCT-2301), including the Wuhan-Hu1 strain and Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant. The clinical study with this vaccine candidate was initiated in September 2023 in Japan. The immunogenicity and safety of Bivalent ARCT-2301 are being compared with those of the bivalent composition of the licensed conventional mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

4

The LUNAR-FLU program, also under the CSL Collaboration, has made significant progress as well. In 2023, we generated a comprehensive non-clinical data package to support a Phase 1 clinical trial with a novel seasonal influenza mRNA vaccine candidate and received all necessary approvals to initiate the Phase 1 study in Australia. We initiated dosing in this study in January 2024 with the intention of assessing the dose response of the investigational vaccine and comparing the safety and immunogenicity with the licensed standard of care. Overall, 132 healthy individuals (84 young adults and 48 older adults) are planned to be recruited in this Phase 1 clinical study. In August 2023, we entered into an amendment to the CSL Collaboration Agreement, pursuant to which CSL Seqirus made a $17.5 million milestone payment related to a development milestone for the LUNAR-FLU program.

We continue to advance our rare disease pipeline and collaborations. In our ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency program, the Phase 1b single ascending dose study conducted in the United States of ARCT-810 (LUNAR-OTC) in adults with OTC deficiency completed enrollment and dosing of all four cohorts (N=16 subjects). The trial assessed safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of ARCT-810, as well as various exploratory biomarkers of drug activity. The final database lock occurred in December 2023. A Phase 2 multiple-dose study of ARCT-810 in OTC-deficient adolescents and adults initiated dosing in December 2022 and plans to enroll approximately 24 participants in two dose cohorts. The study is being conducted in the UK and several countries in the European Union. ARCT-810 received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (the “EMA”) for treatment of OTC deficiency. ARCT-810 was also granted Fast Track Designation in May 2023 and Rare Pediatric Disease Designation in June 2023.

Our mRNA therapeutic candidate for cystic fibrosis, ARCT-032 (LUNAR-CF), successfully achieved the recruitment target and administration in a First-in-Human study in New Zealand, a Phase 1 single ascending dosing study with 32 healthy participants (eight subjects in each of four dose cohorts). In August 2023 we received regulatory approval for a protocol amendment to transition to a Phase 1b clinical study of ARCT-032 in up to eight adults with CF, with each participant receiving two administrations of ARCT-032. Dosing began in patients with CF in November 2023 and enrollment is ongoing. The FDA granted Rare Pediatric Disease Designation for ARCT-032 in October 2023. ARCT-032 was granted Orphan Drug Designation by the FDA in November 2023 and Orphan Medicinal Product Designation by the EMA in February 2024.

We also continued to improve our platform technologies and to advance our early-stage research activities and manufacturing process development and operations. We continue to conduct exploratory platform development activities, including the evaluation of genome editing, and new targeting approaches, where our LUNAR and STARR platforms could potentially be useful for identification and development of additional products for our portfolio. Also, with our sourcing partners, we manufactured cGMP batches (current good manufacturing practices) yielding significant quantities of clinical trial materials for global studies of our candidates, including ARCT-810 (LUNAR-OTC), ARCT-032, (LUNAR-CF), ARCT-154 (LUNAR-COV19) and ARCT-2301 (Bivalent LUNAR-COV19).

Nucleic Acid Medicines and an Introduction to Arcturus’ Platform Technologies

Nucleic Acid Medicines

Nucleic acid medicines have the potential to treat diseases caused by genetic mutations, including diseases that cannot be treated by conventional drugs, such as small molecules and biologics. Some of these medicines function by providing the means for producing a deficient yet vital protein in vivo. Within a cell, DNA carries the blueprint, in the form of genes, from which all proteins necessary for life are encoded. Each gene’s code is transcribed into a nucleic acid molecule called mRNA, which informs the cell’s own machinery how to organize amino acid building blocks to make one or more proteins needed for normal biological function.

Nucleic acid therapeutics represent a significant advancement in targeted medicines and several of these therapeutics are being developed by public and private companies. The general objectives of these therapies include:

to introduce a gene product (e.g., mRNA, CRISPR, gene therapy) that encodes for a functional protein to replace an absent or defective protein;

to restore a functional protein by correcting its encoding mRNA sequence;

to reduce the amount of a target protein in a patient by binding to and destroying the associated target mRNA (antisense and small interfering RNA (“siRNA”)); and

5

to introduce proteins from viruses or malfunctioning proteins obtained from certain cancers to train the immune system to recognize these proteins and clear these viruses or cancer cells (nucleic acid vaccines).

Brief Introduction to our LUNAR® and STARR® Technology Platforms

LUNAR®

A key challenge for nucleic acid medicines is the safe and effective delivery of the nucleic acid molecule. We have developed a novel lipid-mediated delivery system called LUNAR. LUNAR is a multi-component drug delivery system that incorporates a mixture of novel biodegradable lipids. Lipids are molecules that contain hydrocarbons and make up the building blocks of the structure and function of living cells. Examples of lipids include fats, oils, waxes, certain hormones, and most of the cell membrane that is not made up of protein. LUNAR is designed to address technical challenges facing the delivery of nucleic acid medicines into cells. We continue to expand our library of proprietary lipids, termed ATX, with over 250 to date. Our preclinical studies have shown that formulations can be customized for the indication and target cell type of interest, and we have also demonstrated that our proprietary formulation process is scalable and reproducible. Our LUNAR platform is described in more detail below.

STARR®

Our STARR technology is our proprietary self-amplifying mRNA (or sa-mRNA) technology platform. When combined with a delivery system, such as our lipid-mediated delivery system LUNAR, the STARR technology has the potential to generate a protective immune response or drive therapeutic protein expression to prevent against or treat a variety of diseases. Self-amplifying RNA-based prophylactic vaccines developed with STARR may trigger rapid and prolonged antigen expression within host cells affording individuals protective immunity against infectious pathogens. We have clinically shown that the combination of LUNAR and STARR technology can result in lower dose requirements with superior immune response and sustained protein expression compared to non-self-amplifying RNA-based vaccines, which may enable production of greater volumes of vaccine doses more quickly.

Development Programs

Our Internal Programs Pipeline

Vaccines in Development

According to the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, over 50,000 people die each year due to vaccine-preventable diseases and related complications in the United States alone. Influenza and pneumonia cases approach this number of deaths each year and more than one million individuals in the United States have died of COVID since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). The Department of Health and Human Services estimated that 330,000 lives were saved in the United States due to COVID-19 vaccination in 2021 alone. Outbreaks of new infectious diseases, and the rise of variants to existing viruses, create demand for new and novel approaches to producing vaccines in a more cost effective and quicker manner.

6

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the efficacy, safety, and rapidity in which nucleic acid medicines can be used to vaccinate vulnerable populations, and our vaccine program has continued to progress. In 2020, we initiated the development of our first self-amplifying mRNA vaccine candidate to protect against COVID-19. In December 2022 we entered into the CSL Collaboration Agreement, which combines CSL Seqirus’ established global vaccine commercial and manufacturing infrastructure with Arcturus’ manufacturing expertise and innovative STARR self-amplifying mRNA vaccine and LUNAR delivery platform technologies. For a more comprehensive discussion of the CSL Collaboration Agreement, please see Item 1 “Business” – “Revenue and Collaboration Arrangements and Other Material Agreements” – “CSL Seqirus.” In a Phase 3 clinical study in Japan that completed dosing in February 2023, ARCT-154, administered as a booster dose, achieved a numerically higher immune response (meeting the non-inferiority criteria) against the original Wuhan-Hu-1 virus strain, and a superior immune response against Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant of SARS-CoV-2 virus compared to a booster dose of the conventional mRNA vaccine Comirnaty®. In November 2023, ARCT-154 was approved for primary immunization and as a booster dose in Japan. This approval marks the world’s first approval for a self-amplifying RNA (sa-mRNA) COVID-19 Vaccine. In collaboration with CSL, and CSL's partner Meiji, we continue to generate clinical data to support using the self-amplifying vaccine platform for seasonal updates of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Our influenza vaccine franchise continued to expand, with the initiation of the Phase 1 clinical trial in January 2024 for the seasonal influenza candidate vaccine under our collaboration with CSL and our continued efforts under our pandemic influenza vaccine program with BARDA.

Development Program

COVID-19

Coronaviruses are a family of viruses that can lead to respiratory illness. Three viruses in this family have emerged in the past twenty years: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV), and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the pandemic, there have been surges of infections as protective health measures have waxed and waned. Uncontrolled viral spread has led to approximately half a billion cases worldwide and the selection of viral variants that are more contagious, pathogenic, or both. Since late 2021, infections have been dominated by subvariants of the Omicron strain, which continue to displace previous circulating strains by evading immunity and spreading more efficiently, resulting in an increased risk of breakthrough infection among the vaccinated. Despite the expeditious Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) and rollout of vaccines in many countries, vaccine efficacy rates vary widely to currently circulating variants. The current recommendations include seasonal vaccination of risk populations against COVID-19, using vaccine compositions, including the new emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants.

As the world pivots from a pandemic to an endemic response to SARS-CoV-2 infections, primary and booster vaccines that induce robust and durable immunity against current and emerging variants of concern (“VOCs”) can help to reduce the infection and disease burden for both the public and the health care systems globally. As such, through the CSL collaboration, we are developing the next generation of mRNA vaccines, which have demonstrated encouraging immunogenicity data, including neutralizing antibody responses against various variants of concern, including Omicron, boosting pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Our initial COVID-19 vaccine candidate, ARCT-021, developed in conjunction with Duke-NUS Medical School, is based on our STARR (self-amplifying mRNA) technology platform and demonstrated antibody and cell-mediated immunogenicity and an excellent safety profile through Phase 2 clinical trials. This vaccine was designed to promote immune responses to the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the critical part of the virus that allows infection to occur.

Our next-generation COVID-19 vaccine candidate, ARCT-154, is also based on our STARR (self-amplifying mRNA) technology platform and our LUNAR platform. Additional changes were implemented for new generation vaccine candidates to further improve the immunogenicity and tolerability profile and increase vaccine efficacy. These changes include codon optimization for replicon and spike protein, additional mutations for stabilization of spike protein in pre-fusion confirmation, and changes in the manufacturing process to improve the impurity profile and reduce the amount of double-stranded RNA.

Marketing Authorization Approval of ARCT-154 in Japan

7

In November 2023, ARCT-154 received marketing authorization approval from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for use as a primary immunization and booster in Japan. The approval was based on positive clinical data from several ARCT-154 studies, including the pivotal 19,000 subject efficacy, safety and immunogenicity study performed in Vietnam as well as the pivotal Phase 3 booster study in Japan.

Marketing Authorization Application for ARCT-154 in Europe

CSL Seqirus and Arcturus submitted a European Medicines Agency (EMA) marketing authorization application for ARCT-154 for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 18 years of age and older. The application was accepted by EMA for review and the review procedure started on August 17, 2023.

Pivotal Phase 1/2/3 Study in Vietnam

During 2021, we entered into a collaboration with Vinbiocare Biotechnology Joint Stock Company (“Vinbiocare”), a member company of the Vingroup Joint Stock Company (Vingroup) group of companies. As part of a collaboration with Vinbiocare, ARCT-154, our investigational next-generation, self-amplifying mRNA-based vaccine for COVID-19, was advanced into a Phase 1/2/3 study in Vietnam, funded and sponsored by Vinbiocare (the “Vinbiocare Study”). The trial is randomized, observer-blinded, placebo, and active-controlled and is intended to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of ARCT-154. The Phase 3 arm of the Phase 1/2/3 study was initiated in September 2021. The study enrolled over 19,000 adult subjects in Vietnam, including individuals with medical conditions, putting them at higher risk of severe complications of COVID-19. The Phase 3b placebo-controlled efficacy portion of the study enrolled over 16,000 participants.

In February 2022, Vinbiocare provided safety and immunogenicity data from the placebo-controlled Phase 1/2/3a portions of the study with approximately 1,000 participants. In April 2022, Vinbiocare shared results from the vaccine safety and efficacy analysis of Phase 3b participants. The primary efficacy endpoint in the placebo-controlled Phase 3b portion of the study was met. Analysis of the data demonstrated that two 5-mcg doses of ARCT-154 administered 28 days apart resulted in vaccine efficacy of 56.6% (95% CI; 48.7% - 63.3%) for protection against COVID-19 overall and 93.3% (95% CI; 80.5% - 98.9%) against severe COVID-19. Nine COVID-19-related deaths were reported in the placebo group and one in the ARCT-154 vaccinated group. The single death in the ARCT-154 vaccination arm occurred in an older age group participant who was also at increased risk of severe COVID-19. During the window when COVID-19 cases in the study were routinely collected, the prevalent SARS-CoV-2 strain associated with COVID-19 infections in Vietnam was Delta.

In the Phase 3b study population comprising 8,059 ARCT-154 recipients and 8,041 placebo recipients, and although local solicited AEs were reported more frequently by ARCT-154 recipients than placebo recipients (52.3% versus 15.3%) after Dose 1 or 2, the majority of solicited local AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. Solicited local AEs of severe intensity were infrequent in ARCT-154 recipients (0.6%) and mainly consisted of injection site pain and tenderness. Also, systemic solicited AEs were reported by ARCT-154 recipients more frequently than the placebo recipients (60.5% versus 40.8%), and most solicited systemic AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. Solicited systemic AEs of severe intensity were reported by 2.7% of ARCT-154 recipients. No Grade 4 solicited AE was reported in the study.

Local and systemic AEs were less frequent after the second dose than after the first dose of ARCT-154 and generally resolved within three days. In the entire Phase 3b population and throughout the study, SAEs considered related to the study vaccine were infrequent and reported by 10 ARCT-154 recipients and five placebo recipients from Day 1 to Day 92, and 1 ARCT-154 recipient who had formerly received two placebo doses, from Day 92 to the end of the study.

The administration of the third dose (early booster dose) of the ARCT-154 vaccine approximately two months after the primary vaccination series was not associated with any safety concerns.

No clinically meaningful differences in the safety profile were observed when comparing different subgroups in terms of age/risk groups, sex, or site/region.

No signs of disease enhancement (VAERD) were observed during the study period, judging by the reduction in the severity of the COVID-19 cases observed after one or two doses of the ARCT-154 vaccine. No case of myocarditis or pericarditis was reported.

8

Two doses of ARCT-154 were immunogenic in the adult study population without previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection in terms of the induction of neutralizing and IgG-binding antibodies specific to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, two doses of ARCT-154 induced cross-neutralization responses to Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta/B.1.617.2 variants of concern when measured by the ACE2 surrogate virus neutralization assay.

Figure: ACE2 surrogate neutralization panel, showing geometric mean concentrations of neutralizing antibody responses (with 95% confidence intervals) obtained for participants across a range of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Data from participants with verified COVID-19 were left out of the analysis.

The administration of the third dose of ARCT-154 (early booster after 2-dose primary series) was associated with a further increase in immune responses to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and Delta and Omicron BA.1 variants of concern.

In August 2023, we submitted the primary manuscript with efficacy, immunogenicity and safety results of the pivotal Phase 1/2/3 clinical study of ARCT-154 in Vietnam. The preprint of this article is available on https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3329097/v1. The peer review of the manuscript is ongoing by Nature Communications.

Pivotal Phase 3 Non-Inferiority Study of ARCT-154 in Japan

Meiji is sponsoring a randomized, multicenter, Phase 3, observer-blind, active-controlled comparative study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of ARCT-154 and to evaluate the non-inferiority of ARCT-154 over COMIRNATY (Monovalent, Original strain). The study targeted a total of 780 adult participants, with half in the ARCT-154 group and half in a comparator group, and completed enrollment with 828 participants in February 2023.

Subjects were eligible if they had received three doses of approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines with the last dose as COMIRNATY at least three months prior to screening.

The immunogenicity of ARCT-154 was non-inferior to COMIRNATY against the SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan strain), thus meeting the primary objective of the study. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of ARCT-154 was superior to COMIRNATY against SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron BA.4/5 strain).

9

Figure: (A) Geometric mean titers (GMT) of surrogate neutralizing antibodies at Days 1 (baseline) and 29, and geometric mean-fold rises (GMFR) in titers from Day 1 to Day 29; B) GMT Ratio; C) seroresponse rates (SRR) at Day 29; D) SRR Difference - Study ARCT-154-J01. Note: GMT – Geometric Mean Titer; SRR – seroresponse rate. All values are from the Per Protocol Subset 1 (PPS-1) and are shown with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. Solid circles (●) represent the Wuhan variant, and open circles (○) represent the Omicron BA.4/5 variant. Vertical dashed lines represent the threshold for achieving the non-inferiority comparison of ARCT-154 to Comirnaty.

In addition, the immunogenicity results of ARCT-154 compared to COMIRNATY were not affected by age, sex, time since the last vaccination, antibody titer against SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan and Omicron BA.4/5 strains) before administration of the study vaccine, and brands of the vaccines administered in the past.

Six months after vaccination, GMTs and SRRs of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan and Omicron BA.4/5 strains) remained higher in ARCT-154 recipients than in COMIRNATY recipients.

10

Figure: Geometric mean titers (with 95% CI bars) of surrogate neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 (panel A) and Omicron BA.4/5 (panel B) strains up to six months after vaccination with one booster dose of either ARCT-154 or BNT162b2. Geometric mean titer ratios (95% CI) for ARCT-154/ BNT162b2 are shown for Days 29, 91 and 181, and geometric mean-fold rises over baseline (GMFR) with 95% CI are shown for each group at Days 29, 91 and 181.

No safety concerns were raised from the study. No deaths or ARCT-154-related SAEs were reported. The proportions of subjects with the solicited local AEs of injection-site swelling, induration, and erythema were lower after administration of ARCT-154 than after administration of COMIRNATY, and the proportion of subjects with solicited systemic AEs was similar in both study arms. The proportion of subjects with Grade 3 or higher solicited AEs was low in both study arms.

11

Figure: Rates of solicited local reactions and systemic adverse events in the two study groups with severity.

In summary, the pivotal Phase 3 Non-Inferiority Study of ARCT-154 in Japan met all primary and secondary immunogenicity endpoints, including a secondary pre-defined superiority assessment over Comirnaty (Omicron BA.4/5 strain). Overall, the safety and immunogenicity results of the study support the favorable benefit/risk profile of the ARCT-154 vaccine when administered as a booster dose in adult individuals who previously received other mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

On July 13, 2023, an article reporting the study results titled “Booster dose of self-amplifying SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccine vs. mRNA vaccine: a Phase 3 comparison of ARCT-154 with Comirnaty” was posted on medRxiv.org at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.13.23292597v1.

In December 2023, Lancet Infectious Diseases published results of the study showing that a booster dose of ARCT-154, a novel, self-amplifying messenger RNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine, elicited a numerically higher immune

12

response (meeting the non-inferiority criteria) against the original Wuhan-Hu-1 virus strain, and a superior immune response against Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant of SARS-CoV-2 virus compared to a booster dose of the conventional mRNA vaccine Comirnaty®. ARCT-154 results were achieved with one-sixth the dose of Comirnaty® (5 μg vs 30 μg).

In January 2024, Arcturus and Meiji submitted the article ‘Persistence of immune responses of a self-amplifying RNA COVID-19 vaccine (ARCT-154) versus BNT162b2’ to Lancet Infectious Disease, with a 6-month follow-up results from this study. These additional data demonstrate the extended persistence of neutralizing antibodies after ARCT-154 compared with conventional mRNA vaccine in the clinical setting, indicating longer-lasting immunity and implying a longer duration of protection by ARCT-154 (Figure above). The manuscript was published on February 1, 2024 (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(24)00060-4/fulltext).

Phase 1/2 Study in United States, Singapore, and South Africa

In January 2022, we announced immunogenicity data for participants of a Phase 1/2 study being conducted in the United States and Singapore. Results from the arms where participants were dosed with five mcg of ARCT-154 as a booster after at least five months of being vaccinated with two doses of Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) showed encouraging increases in levels of neutralizing antibody activity against D614G and several variants of concern (VoCs) and variants of interest (VoIs).

On August 7, 2023, we announced that Phase 1/2 clinical trial data demonstrated one-year durability of immune response following ARCT-154 booster vaccine administration as measured using validated microneutralization (MNT) assays. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in neutralizing antibodies remained greater than 10-fold above baseline for one year across a panel of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including ancestral strain with the D614G mutation, Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.4/5), for participants receiving ARCT-154 booster. The results of this study were presented as a poster at the 9th Influenza Conference of the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI) in Valencia, Spain.

Figure: Geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants (versus pre-booster levels) after ARCT-154 booster vaccination measured by validated pseudovirus microneutralization assays (N=12). Error bars represent the 95% CI. Participants who received any COVID-19 vaccines or had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during the follow-up period were excluded from immunogenicity analysis at sampling times after the event.

Phase 3 Study of Bivalent Version of COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate in Japan

On September 29, 2023, Meiji initiated an additional Phase 3 clinical study with a bivalent version of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate (ancestral strain, ARCT-154 and Omicron BA.4/5) to further support immunogenicity and safety data for our self-amplifying mRNA platform, which may facilitate the timely release of future seasonal

13

updates of our COVID-19 vaccine against evolving variants of concern. The study enrolled 930 healthy adults and individuals with comorbidities, who previously received three to five doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, including the last booster at least three months prior to recruitment. The study will compare the investigational vaccine, ARCT-2301 and COMIRNATY (ancestral strain and BA.4/5), to evaluate safety and immunogenicity between observer-blind groups. Preliminary results of his study are expected by the end of Q1 2024. The results of this study of the bivalent version of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate are not required for approval of ARCT-154 in Japan but will facilitate the timely release of future seasonal updates of the COVID-19 vaccine without the need for additional clinical data.

Figure: Geometric mean titers (GMT) of surrogate neutralizing antibodies at Days 1 (baseline) and 29, and geometric mean-fold rises (GMFR) in titers from Day 1 to Day 29; B) GMT Ratio; C) seroresponse rates (SRR) at Day 29; D) SRR Difference – Study ARCT-2301-J01. Note: GMT – Geometric Mean Titer; SRR – seroresponse rate. All values are from the Per Protocol Subset 1 (PPS-1) and are shown with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. Solid circles (●) represent the Wuhan variant, open circles (○) represent the Omicron BA.4/5 variant, and open squares (☐) represent the Omicron XBB.1.5 variant. Vertical lines represent the threshold for achieving the non-inferiority and superiority comparisons of ARCT-154 to Comirnaty.

Bivalent ARCT-2301, when administered intramuscularly as a booster dose in subjects who had received three to five doses of authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines at least three months before the recruitment, demonstrated immunological superiority over the comparator vaccine (Comirnaty® bivalent: Wuhan strain/Omicron strain BA.4/5), as measured by GMT ratios and seroresponse rates differences for both vaccine strains (prototype Wuhan strain and Omicron BA.4/65 variant). In addition, ARCT-2301 induced a higher immune response against the epidemiologically dominant Omicron XBB.1.5 variant.

14

COVID-19 Vaccine Platform Stability Data

Current data regarding the product format, stability and cold chain characteristics of our lyophilized self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine compares favorably to existing smaller non-self-amplifying COVID-19 vaccine stability requirements. The lyophilized powder of ARCT-154 demonstrated room temperature stability for four days (25°C; 60% RH), refrigerator stability for five months (2-8°C), and long-term stability for 24 months (-25°C to -15°C). The vaccine stability data are supportive for shipping at 2-8°C. Notably, the vaccine remains stable in the event of temperature cycling.

Development Program

LUNAR-qsFLU (Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza)

Influenza is estimated to cause one billion infections globally every year and hundreds of thousands of deaths, especially in the elderly and individuals with underlying medical conditions. In many regions, influenza is seasonal, with infections peaking during November through April in the Northern Hemisphere and May through September in the Southern Hemisphere. Year-round surveillance by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) in collaboration with various national health agencies informs WHO recommendations on the strains of influenza most likely to spread during the upcoming influenza season. National health agencies (such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)) then make the final decision of which strains should be covered by vaccines licensed in their country.

Our LUNAR-qsFLU (qs; quadrivalent seasonal) program, now exclusively licensed to CSL Seqirus, has the objective of producing a safe and effective seasonal influenza vaccine candidate with significant advantages over the traditional egg-based inactivated quadrivalent vaccine. Inaccurate predictions of circulating influenza strains as well as mutations due to adaptation in egg-grown vaccines can substantially reduce efficacy on a year-to-year basis. We believe the ability of mRNA platforms to nimbly adapt to new viral strains should help improve efficacy. In addition, we do not expect mRNA vaccines to face the challenge from mutations common to egg-grown vaccines.

Increasing evidence supports that immunity against neuraminidase (NA), the second most abundant influenza surface protein, along with hemagglutinin (HA) specific immunity protects against influenza disease (Krammer et al, mBIO, 2018). While most currently licensed vaccines contain some neuraminidase, the amount is not standardized, and currently licensed vaccines do not induce robust anti-neuraminidase immune responses. LUNAR-qsFLU, targets both the HA and NA, and may have a protective benefit over current vaccines during seasons even when vaccine strains are not well matched to circulating strains (Sandbulte et al, PNAS, 2011).

LUNAR-qsFLU has been designed to take advantage of our expertise in both LUNAR lipid delivery systems and our STARR self-amplifying mRNA technology. This platform has been shown to deliver effective protection against COVID-19 and has been optimized to elicit robust immunogenicity with acceptable reactogenicity at a lower dose than conventional mRNA vaccines with the aspiration of creating a highly effective influenza vaccine for use in general and high-risk populations. Working with CSL Seqirus, we have generated a comprehensive non-clinical data package to support the initiation of the Phase 1 clinical trial with a novel influenza mRNA vaccine candidate. A Phase 1 dose-finding safety and immunogenicity study was initiated in January 2024 in Australia and is ongoing.

In non-clinical studies, the immunogenicity of ARCT-2138 was compared with those of three licensed influenza vaccines in naïve mice.

Naïve BALB/c mice were vaccinated once with 2 μg of ARCT-2138 or one-fifth of the human dose for comparator vaccines. All vaccines contained antigens from the FDA recommended strains for the 2022/2023 influenza season for cell or egg-based vaccines. Smaller doses than the full adult dose of the comparator vaccines was given due to limitation in the injection volume in the hind legs of mice (50μl per leg, total 100μl). ARCT-2138 was dosed at 2 μg which is a five times lower dose than was tested in humans (10 μg) based on clinical dose escalation studies performed with ARCT-021.

The most significant differences in HAI titers were observed between ARCT-2138 and cell-based and recombinant influenza vaccines. While a significant increase in HAI titers was observed for H1N1 and B Victoria antigens at day 56 for ARCT-2138 compared to the adjuvanted influenza vaccine, no difference was observed between these vaccine groups for H3N2 antigen, and the immune response for B Yamagata antigen was lower after ARCT-2138. Neurominidase antibody responses were assessed at days 42 and 70. As with HAI titers, ARCT-2138 elicited significant higher antibody titers for all four vaccine strains and at all time points analyzed when compared

15

to titers from mice immunized with cell-based and recombinant influenza vaccines. ARCT-2138 neuraminidase antibody response were slightly, but significantly, higher for all vaccine strains except B Yamagata compared to mice immunized with adjuvanted influenza vaccines.

Altogether, the animal study data indicates that ARCT-2138 elicited higher antibody titers in mice than licensed cell-based and recombinant influenza vaccines and moderately higher titers for most antigens compared to an adjuvanted influenza vaccine.

Figure: HAI and NI Titers after Vaccination with ARCT-2138 and Licensed Comparator Vaccines. Naïve BALB/c mice were vaccinated once with ARCT-2138 (2 μg) or once with one of three licensed vaccines (1/5 human dose) and assessed for HAI and NI titers for each of the antigens from the FDA recommended strains for the 2022/2023 Northern Hemisphere influenza season. Antigens used to determine inhibition titers were from cell-based vaccine strains only. ARCT-2138 showed similar or superior responses to (A) all four HAs and (B) all four NAs present in the licensed comparator. Geometric mean with geometric SD shown. Significance determined by 2-way ANOVA multiple comparisons test comparing ARCT-2138 to licensed vaccines at each time point (****=p<0.0001; ***=p<0.001; **=p<0.01; *=p≤0.05; no asterisks=not significant).

Development Program

LUNAR-pandFLU (Influenza)

Our LUNAR-pandFLU program continues to progress under the award from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) that we obtained in 2022. The program includes all non-clinical, manufacturing, and regulatory support to advance a vaccine to protect against disease caused by H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza. Non-clinical safety and pharmacology studies are ongoing, and a pre-IND meeting was granted. Enrollment for a Phase 1 clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ARCT-2304 (LUNAR-pandFLU candidate vaccine) is expected to begin before the end of 2024. For a more comprehensive discussion of the funding award, please see Item 1 “Business” – “Revenue and Collaboration Arrangements and Other Material Agreements” – “BARDA.”

16

Rare Disease Program

Medicines in Development

The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 (the “Orphan Drug Act”) defines a rare disease as a disease affecting fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. According to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), there are approximately 10,000 such diseases that, together, affect nearly 30 million people in the United States. The European Union (the “EU”) defines a rare disease as having a prevalence of fewer than five in 10,000 people. Collectively, these disorders affect between 6% and 7% of the population in the developed world.

There is a pressing need for new medicines for rare diseases as few of the 10,000 known rare diseases have approved treatments. Biopharmaceutical industry researchers are making great progress in the fight against some rare diseases as innovative science has opened new opportunities. More than 770 medicines have been approved by the FDA since the enactment of the Orphan Drug Act and more than 800 medicines are currently in clinical development. Despite recent progress, there is more work to be done to overcome the scientific, operational and financial challenges that arise.

We believe our technology should provide an excellent platform to address genetically inherited rare diseases. Specifically, we are focusing on developing medicines to treat people with rare respiratory and liver diseases who currently have limited or no treatment options.

Rare Disease Program – ARCT-810 (LUNAR-OTC)

The LUNAR-OTC development program addresses ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency, a rare, life-threatening, genetic disease caused by mutations in the OTC gene that lead to dysfunctional or deficient OTC.

OTC deficiency is the most common of the urea cycle disorders, a group of inherited metabolic disorders that are associated with reduced ability to eliminate ammonia from the body. There are over 5,000 people with OTC deficiency in the United States and the prevalence is approximately one in 14,000 to one in 77,000 people worldwide. Ammonia is a toxic waste product produced from the breakdown of protein. OTC is a critical enzyme in the urea cycle, which takes place in liver cells and converts ammonia to harmless urea which is eliminated by the kidneys. In patients with OTC deficiency, ammonia accumulates in the blood and is toxic to the brain and liver. Symptoms of high ammonia levels include vomiting, headaches, coma and death. OTC deficiency can cause developmental problems, seizures and death in newborn babies. As an X-linked disorder, OTC deficiency tends to be more severe in males, though female carriers are often affected. Patients with less severe symptoms may present later in life, as adults. Currently no cure exists for OTC deficiency apart from liver transplant; however, this treatment comes with significant risks and complications such as organ rejection, and transplant recipients must take immunosuppressant drugs for the rest of their lives. Current standard of care for OTC deficiency is a low-protein diet, dietary supplements, and ammonia scavengers to try to prevent accumulation of ammonia. Life-threatening episodes of high ammonia levels can still occur, requiring treatment with dialysis or hemofiltration. These treatments do not address the underlying cause of disease and there remains a high unmet need for an effective treatment.

Our LUNAR-OTC development candidate, ARCT-810, uses our LUNAR platform to deliver normal OTC mRNA into liver cells which then produce normal functioning OTC with possible disease-modifying effects. Our LUNAR-OTC approach has the potential to treat the underlying defect that causes the debilitating symptoms of OTC deficiency, rather than mitigating symptoms by sequestering ammonia. We have retained worldwide development and commercialization rights to ARCT-810.

LUNAR-OTC has received orphan drug designation from the FDA and the EMA for treatment of OTC deficiency. ARCT-810 was also successfully granted Fast Track Designation in May 2023 and Rare Pediatric Disease Designation (RPDD) in June 2023. Fast Track Designation is designated to facilitate development and expedite review of new therapeutics intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions that demonstrate the potential to address important unmet medical needs. Rare Pediatric Disease Designation is designed to recognize rare pediatric diseases in which the serious or life-threatening manifestations primarily affect patients from birth to 18 years of age. Due to such designation, if ARCT-810 achieves approval for a pediatric indication in the original

17

rare pediatric disease product application in the United States, Arcturus (or the sponsor of ARCT-810) is eligible to receive a voucher for priority review of a subsequent marketing application for a different product.

Preclinical data in OTC-deficient murine models have demonstrated that dosing of LUNAR-OTC results in robust OTC protein expression and activity, thereby improving ureagenesis, reducing plasma ammonia, and increasing survival.

The Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, dose-escalation study of ARCT-810 in healthy volunteers, completed in November 2020, demonstrated favorable safety, tolerability and PK profiles.

A Phase 1b study in stable OTC-deficient adults completed dosing in the United States in August 2023. The trial is designed to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of ARCT-810, as well as exploratory biomarkers of drug activity. The Phase 1b study is a single ascending dose, placebo-controlled study that enrolled 16 adults with mild OTCD. ARCT-810 was generally safe and well tolerated. A Phase 2 multiple-dose study of ARCT-810 in OTC-deficient adolescents and adults initiated dosing in December 2022 and plans to enroll approximately 24 participants in two dose cohorts. The study is being conducted in the UK and several other countries in the European Union.

Rare Disease Program - LUNAR-CF (Cystic Fibrosis)

The LUNAR-CF program addresses cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease, a progressive disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. ARCT-032, our lead development candidate for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, uses our LUNAR platform to deliver a codon-optimized CFTR mRNA into airway epithelial cells. This allows airway cells to produce functional human CFTR protein using native translational machinery and protein trafficking pathways which could result in the treatment of the underlying defect that causes CF lung disease, regardless of the specific mutation. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (the “CFF”) has partnered with us to support development of this therapy. ARCT-032 represents the first LUNAR-based mRNA therapeutic delivered by the inhaled route, offering direct delivery to the affected airways to restore functional CFTR.

There are close to 40,000 children and adults living with cystic fibrosis in the United States (and an estimated 105,000 people have been diagnosed with CF across 94 countries), and CF can affect people of every racial and ethnic group. Approximately 800 people are newly diagnosed with CF each year in the United States. CF is caused by one of more than 2,000 known mutations in the CFTR gene. These mutations have been grouped into several different classes based on the mechanism by which they cause reduction in the production and/or function of the CFTR protein. When CFTR is absent or defective, the airway surfaces become dehydrated and coated with a layer of thick mucus that clogs the airways, causing difficulty breathing and often resulting in chronic infections, exaggerated inflammation, structural airway damage, and other serious complications in the lungs. CF is a multi-system disease that may also affect the pancreas, intestines, liver, sinuses, reproductive tract and sweat glands. The median predicted survival of CF patients born between 2018-2022 in the United States is approximately 56 years, and the cause of most of the mortality and morbidity is due to the lung disease.

Current non-curative therapies for CF lung disease are directed towards disease severity and to prevent the progression of the disease. These treatments include aerosolized mucolytics, antibiotics, and airway clearance techniques that are time-consuming and represent a significant treatment burden for people with CF. Many CF patients ultimately suffer from a critical decline in lung function and require lung transplants.

The FDA has approved several CFTR modulator therapies (Kalydeco®, Orkambi®, Symdeko®, and Trikafta®) that assist certain classes of abnormal CFTR protein to reach the cell membrane and/or increase functional ion channel activity. The CFTR modulators, while effective in many patients, are mutation-specific and therefore are not effective in all persons with CF. Other treatments are required to target Class I mutations (no CFTR produced; approximately 10% of CF cases worldwide), and people who are intolerant or have poor response to CFTR modulator therapies. We are initially focusing ARCT-032 on these groups of patients, as they currently have the highest unmet need for CF therapies.

We made significant progress on the LUNAR-CF program in 2023. Following on our activities of 2022, which included reproducible demonstration of restoration of CFTR function in human bronchial epithelial cell cultures from CF donors and the completion of the first-in-human enabling GLP toxicology studies, in 2023 we

18

initiated and successfully achieved the recruitment target in a Phase 1 single ascending dose study of ARCT-032 (LUNAR-CF), our mRNA therapeutic candidate for CF, in 32 healthy participants (eight subjects in each of four dose cohorts). In August 2023 we received regulatory approval of a protocol amendment to transition to a Phase 1b clinical study of ARCT-032 in up to eight adults with CF, with each participant receiving two administrations of ARCT-032. We initiated Phase 1b enrollment in October 2023.

ARCT-032 was granted Orphan Drug Designation by the FDA in November 2023 and Orphan Medicinal Product Designation by the EMA in February 2024. The FDA granted Rare Pediatric Disease Designation for ARCT-032 in October 2023. The Rare Pediatric Disease Designation is designed to recognize rare pediatric diseases in which the serious or life-threatening manifestations primarily affect patients from birth to 18 years of age. With this designation, if ARCT-032 achieves approval for a pediatric indication in the original rare pediatric disease product application in the United States, Arcturus (or the sponsor of ARCT-032) is eligible to receive a voucher for priority review of a subsequent marketing application for a different product.

An extensive portfolio of nonclinical studies supported the advancement of ARCT-032 to the clinic. Our comprehensive data set showcasing the potential for ARCT-032 as a disease-modifying treatment has been presented at the major CF conferences in North America and Europe. For example, we recently presented data at the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference in November 2023 that demonstrated that a single dose of ARCT-032, administered in the airways of CF ferrets by microsprayer, effectively doubled the mucociliary transport rate in vivo.

In vitro proof of concept of ARCT-032 was obtained using HBE cells cultured in an air-liquid interface system, a model system that has been shown to be highly correlated with clinical trial results with CFTR modulator drugs. HBE cells cultured in this manner undergo extensive differentiation, resulting in an in vitro model that is representative of the in vivo airway epithelium. The cells exhibit a pseudostratified morphology and are comprised of a heterogeneous cell population, including ionocytes, ciliated, basal, and secretory cells. Work performed at University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) demonstrated that ARCT-032 (LUNAR-CFTR) treatment resulted in significantly higher chloride activity when compared to negative control (LUNAR-TdTomato). More importantly, after treatment with ARCT-032, cultures derived from patients with CF with the F508del mutation (F508del+/+) demonstrated that the chloride current had been restored, i.e., the chloride efflux was similar to HBE cells from people without CF (WT) that were used as a positive control (figure below). Additionally, western blot analysis of protein in the HBE cells showed higher levels of mature CFTR protein (C-band) in ARCT-032 treated cells when compared to non-CF donor control cells.

Functional Measurement of Chloride Activity and Western Blot Protein Expression Analysis in Human CF F508del+/+ Cells Transduced With ARCT-032

Isc = short-circuit current; WT = wild type (healthy subjects).

Left: A significant increase in chloride activity was observed in cultured cells from CF donors (F508del) treated

19

with LUNAR-CFTR (ARCT-032) compared to those treated with LUNAR-TdTomato (negative control). ARCT-032 restored the levels of chloride efflux to the wild-type range observed for healthy human donors.

** p<0.001 (unpaired t-test)

Right: Western blot demonstrates robust mature (C-band) CFTR protein expression specific to ARCT-032 treated CF cells (F508del+/+) comparable to WT cells, and not present in the LUNAR buffer or TdTomato controls.

The use of F508del HBEs allowed us to compare the activity of ARCT-032 with Vertex Pharmaceutical’s Trikafta (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor), a highly effective CFTR modulator combination approved for patients with F508del and other CFTR mutations.

Figure 1: Chloride conductance was measured in presence or absence of a chloride gradient in ALI-cultured F508 HBE cells (solid bars) or WT HBEs (textured bars) 24 hours following a single treatment with ARCT-032 (blue circles), LUNAR-TdT (red circles) or Trikafta (green circles). The measurements were performed in three separate studies at different times.

ALI-cultured HBE cell monolayers derived from either three different CF patients carrying the F508del mutation or from an equal number of healthy donors carrying the WT CFTR. The cells were transfected with a single, 20 μg dose of ARCT-032 or LUNAR-TdT, a formulation carrying TdTomato encoding mRNA that was used as a negative control. When the HBE monolayer was tested for transepithelial chloride currents in presence of a chloride gradient, a single 20 μg treatment with ARCT-032 resulted in significantly increased chloride conductance compared to the LUNAR-TdT control at 24 hours post-treatment (Figure 1). Importantly, ARCT-032-restored chloride efflux in F508del HBEs matched the chloride efflux observed in wild type HBEs from non-CF donors. In absence of a chloride gradient, ARCT-032 driven chloride currents were lower than those with a chloride gradient but matched the activity of Trikafta tested alongside (Figure 1). Our results from the UAB studies without chloride gradients are comparable to those previously obtained at CF Foundation Therapeutics under similar experimental conditions.

Next, ARCT-032 activity was evaluated in CF HBEs carrying the nonsense mutations (G542X/R1162X) which are associated with a severe CF phenotype due to the complete absence of CFTR expression (CFTR null). CF patients harboring these and other nonsense mutations are not eligible to be treated with the approved CF modulators such as Trikafta and are a primary target population of patients for ARCT-032 treatment. We demonstrated that a single 20 μg treatment with ARCT-032 resulted in a significantly higher CFTR-mediated chloride conductance compared to the LUNAR-TdT used as a negative control (Figure 2). These observations highlight the potential applicability of ARCT-032 treatment in CF patients non-responsive to currently approved CF modulators.

20

Figure 2: Chloride conductance measured in G542X/R1162X nonsense mutation carrying HBEs or WT HBEs at 24 hours following a single treatment with ARCT-032 (blue circles) or LUNAR-TdT (red circles) or buffer (black circles).

Additional preliminary results have indicated that a single 20 μg treatment with ARCT-032 could impart substantial CFTR activity in F508del HBEs for at least three days while the activity is still detectable at five days from the treatment (Figure 3A). This highlights the efficacy of transfection and the stability of translated CFTR protein. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that treatment of F508 HBEs with multiple smaller doses (3 μg and 5 μg) of ARCT-032 can achieve CFTR activity comparable to a larger single dose (20 μg) (Figure 3B). Together, these results have demonstrated the ability of ARCT-032 to generate a functional and stable CFTR protein in a dose and treatment amenable manner.

Figure 3: A) Time-course study in F508del HBEs carried out in presence of a chloride gradient following a single treatment with ARCT-032 indicated substantial CFTR activity for three days and detectable activity for at least five days. B) Under no chloride gradient conditions, treatment of F508del HBEs with multiple smaller doses (3μg or 5μg) of ARCT-032 achieved CFTR function comparable to a single larger dose (20μg).

As mentioned, earlier work has shown successful transduction of airway epithelial cells with LUNAR-mRNA in multiple species of healthy animals. We recently achieved similar success in a CF animal model. In collaboration with the University of Iowa and supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, a double transgenic ferret model of CF was used to assess transduction of bronchial epithelial cells in diseased ferrets. Ferrets with the G551D mutation maintained on VX-770 (ivacaftor) developed a CF phenotype including thick mucus in the lungs upon withdrawal from VX-770 treatment. LUNAR-Cre was administered to the airways by microsprayer, and the Cre recombinase mRNA-transduced cells switched off TdTomato expression (shown in red) and expressed EGFP (cells in green). This demonstrated the ability of LUNAR-Cre to penetrate the mucus layer and transduce the target pulmonary epithelial cells in CF-diseased ferrets.

21

Penetration of LUNAR-mRNA Through Mucus

Figure 4: Photomicrographs of the pulmonary epithelium of G551D CFTR/Rosa transgenic ferrets following microsprayer administration of LUNAR Cre. The ferrets express TdTomato protein (red) by default; introduction of Cre recombinase mRNA (via LUNAR-Cre) results in Cre protein expression and excision of TdTomato enabling expression of EGFP (green). The panel on the left shows transduction with LUNAR-Cre of pulmonary epithelial cells lining the trachea, as evidenced by the conversion of TdTomato expression in red to EGFP expression in green. The panel on the right illustrates the ability of LUNAR-Cre LNPs to penetrate the mucus (outlined by a blue box) in a smaller bronchiole and transduce the underlying epithelial cells. The red-fluorescing cells are not transduced by LUNAR-Cre. Sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue).

Further experiments with G551D CFTR-transgenic ferrets demonstrated in vivo proof of concept of ARCT-032 (LUNAR-CFTR) in this model system. The G551D ferrets are initially maintained on VX-770 treatment and develop typical findings of CF lung disease upon withdrawal of the drug. This enables the evaluation of therapeutic interventions. Following withdrawal of VX-770, the ferrets were treated with either ARCT-032 or LUNAR-TdTomato (negative control) administered by a microsprayer. Mucociliary clearance was assessed by PET/CT scan while maintained on VX-770, a few weeks after VX-770 withdrawal, and 24 hours following dosing. As shown in figure below, after a single administration of ARCT-03 the mucociliary clearance in CF ferrets 2 (green line) was about twice that of the ‘VX-770 Off’ baseline (black line), and comparable to or greater than that for ‘VX-770 On’ (turquoise line).

LUNARhCFTR = ARCT-032; LUNARdT = LUNAR-TdTomato; MCC = mucociliary clearance; VX-770 = ivacaftor.

22

Note: x-axis represents time in minutes.

Figure 5: After VX-770 washout, G551D CFTR ferrets were treated as shown and PET/CT scanned. MCC was assessed post first dose.

Discovery Program

Discovery Program – Phenylketonuria (PKU)

Phenylketonurea (PKU) is an inherited metabolic disease characterized by the buildup of the amino acid phenylalanine (Phe) in the body due to the lack or deficient activity of the enzyme responsible for its metabolism, phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH). In PKU patients, high levels of phenylalanine affect normal nervous system function and can lead to brain disfunction and intellectual disability. Globally, approximately 1:10,000 newborns carry mutations in the PAH gene responsible for the PKU disease. Dietary restriction (low protein diet) has been the main therapeutic treatment to control Phe levels and, although successful, outcomes are not always optimal, and patients often have difficulty adhering to restrictions. There are only two approved treatments for PKU: Palynziq®, which requires injections that may lead to an immune response against Palynziq® as it is an enzyme derived from bacteria, and the synthetic PAH co-factor, BH4, Kuvan®, which only helps a subpopulation of PKU patients.

The LUNAR PKU program attempts to address the unmet needs of PKU patients by delivering mRNA encoding the PAH protein formulated in LUNAR lipid nanoparticles to the PAH-deficient liver, restoring PAH function and reducing blood Phe to healthy levels. In a PKU mouse model, we have shown that we can deliver a functional human PAH mRNA to the liver and reduce Phe to safe levels (Phe < 0.3 mM). Presently, the program is aiming to increase the duration of the efficacy after a single dose treatment to reduce the frequency of dosing and improve the effectiveness of the therapy. Proof of concept studies in PKU mice show that engineering of PAH mRNA and protein lead to a significant increase in the duration of the efficacy, longer than six (6) days, as compared to the original, first-generation PAH mRNA (~24-48 hours). Additional in vivo efficacy and tolerability studies are underway to finalize a candidate drug product composed of the optimized PAH mRNA and LUNAR formulations.

LUNAR PAH mRNA reduces phenylalanine plasma levels in a PKU mouse model after a single dose.

23

Discovery Programs – Vaccine Programs (Lyme Disease and Gonorrhea)

Based on the clinical and regulatory validation of LUNAR and STARR technologies provided by the approval of ARCT-154, our next-generation vaccine for COVID-19, we have initiated new vaccine discovery programs for Lyme disease and gonorrhea. The new discovery programs rely on the evidence of superior immunogenicity, durability, and breadth of immune response compared to conventional mRNA vaccines, as observed in the COVID-19 program.

Lyme disease is a bacterial infection and is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States. Infection can spread to joints, the heart and the nervous system. Gonorrhea is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) that can infect the mucous membranes of the reproductive tract. It is the second most commonly reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the United States. We selected these diseases based on high unmet medical needs, good understanding of the path forward in vaccine target selection, and demonstration of proof of concept, as well as platform advantages that may be translated in a favorable vaccine product.

Enabling Technologies

Enabling Technologies – LUNAR-Genome Editing

Genome editing therapies are based on the ability to modify a specific DNA sequence in the human genome. All genome editing molecular tools can be programmed to target a DNA sequence of interest. Although the diversity of programmable gene editing tools is increasing, all of them are based on a DNA binding component (either a protein or, as in the case of CRISPR-clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, an RNA sequence) plus a DNA modifier component (a protein that can either make double strand breaks on the DNA (nuclease), single strand breaks (nickase), or make chemical modification in the DNA (base editors)). One of the main roadblocks to applying genome editing as a therapy to treat human disease is the delivery of the genome editing tool components into the cells, either ex-vivo or in vivo, applying them directly into the human body and targeting the right organ.

The LUNAR-Genome editing program aims to leverage the ability of our LUNAR-mRNA technology to deliver any type of genome editing tools into target cells. Some of the genome editing tools are based on protein components working in pairs (TALEN-Transcriptional Activator-Like Effector Nuclease, ZFN-Zinc Finger Nuclease) or as a single protein (meganuclease), while other tools could have a combination of RNA and protein component (CRISPR). We have delivered mRNAs coding for TALEN proteins encapsulated in our LUNAR formulations acting on different targets, and also CRISPR Cas9 mRNA to edit the targeted DNA sequence.

To test the efficacy of the different genome editing strategies as a proof of concept, we utilized target genes that encode proteins that are well known, that are involved in diseases and can be detected in the plasma, which facilitated the readout of the experiments. For evaluation of the LUNAR TALEN mRNA strategy, we designed TALEN pairs targeting either the mouse Pcsk9 gene or the human LPA gene which are involved in lipid metabolism and are associated with cardiovascular disease.

PCSK9

The Pcsk9 gene is expressed only in the liver, and the PCSK9 protein is secreted into the blood circulation. PCSK9 binds and downregulates the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors (LDLR) present in the hepatocytes cell membrane, therefore reduction of PCSK9 protein levels increases LDLR (defined below) levels and its availability to take and reduce LDL-Cholesterol from the blood (Figure below. Top). A single intravenous dose of LUNAR-TALEN PCSK9 mRNA encapsulated LUNAR LNPs into wildtype mice led to insertions and deletions in the PCSK9 genomic DNA sequence which resulted in the inactivation of the PCSK9 gene and, consequently, a reduction of PCSK9 protein levels in the mouse plasma of the treated mice (Figure below. Bottom Left). Examination of the targeted PCSK9 DNA sequence extracted from different organs did not show any DNA modifications except for the liver, which is explained by the liver specificity of this LUNAR formulation (Figure below. Bottom Right).

24

Figure: Top: PCSK9 involvement in LDL-Cholesterol metabolism. PCSK inhibits LDL-Receptor activity and increases LDL-Cholesterol in circulation. Elimination of PCSK9 protein after editing the Pcsk9 target gene Bottom Left: LUNAR-PCSK9 TALEN mRNA dosing of mice at time Day 0 reduces levels of PCSK9 in circulation. Bottom Right: Genome editing evaluation by sequencing shows INDEL (insertion/deletions) only in DNA extracted from the liver but not from other tissues.

Lp(a)

Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Numerous epidemiological studies have shown an association between higher circulating Lp(a) concentrations and an increased risk of atherosclerotic and aortic calcification cardiovascular disease. Lipid-lowering drugs do not effectively reduce Lp(a) levels that are mainly regulated by the genomic structure of the apo(a) gene named LPA. LPA is expressed only in the liver and natural homozygous loss of this gene in humans has not been associated with adverse phenotypes, which makes LPA a candidate for genome editing therapies. We designed and tested our LUNAR-TALEN-LPA technology in primary human hepatocytes and in a transgenic mouse model containing the human LPA gene. Like the PCSK9 model, either one or two intravenous doses of LUNAR-TALEN-LPA mRNA encapsulated LUNAR LNPs led to a significant reduction of Lp(a) levels in serum that correlated with the reduction of LPA mRNA expression and the presence of gene editing in the LPA target sequence.

LUNAR-TALEN-LPA mRNA reduces human Lp(a) plasma levels and hepatic mRNA levels in a human Lp(a) transgenic mouse model after either one or two doses.

25

Enabling Technologies - CRISPR/Cas9

Our efforts in CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering are focused on generating proof-of-concept for our platform technology. To test the ability to deliver CRISPR/Cas9 complexes to the liver, we used a single guide RNA known to target the mouse TTR gene and an mRNA encoding the Cas9 nuclease, both encapsulated in a proprietary LUNAR LNP (LUNAR-Cas9-TTR). The transthyretin (TTR) protein is expressed only in the liver and is secreted into the blood. In humans, mutations in the TTR gene can cause transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), which is a progressive and fatal disorder resulting from the deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in different tissues of the body, predominantly the nervous system and the heart, resulting in organ failure. Reduction of TTR production by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing has been shown to halt disease progression (Fig. 2 Top). LUNAR-Cas9-TTR formulations were injected intravenously into wild-type mice. After a single dose, there was a significant reduction in the amount of TTR protein detected in the mouse serum at the doses tested (Fig.2, Bottom left). This reduction of TTR protein correlated with the deletions detected in the targeted TTR genomic DNA extracted from the liver of the LUNAR-Cas9-TTR treated mice (Fig.2, Bottom right). Further, when our constructs were compared to a competitor’s results, using a similar Cas9 mRNA and TTR-targeting sgRNA, a significantly greater amount of gene editing was observed using the Arcturus mRNA and lipid nanoparticles. Demonstration of efficacy of the LUNAR mRNA platform with different genome editing technologies and targets will enable future discovery efforts toward the identification of new potential therapies.

26

Figure: Top: TTR protein containing mutations aggregates and deposits forming amyloid fibers in different organs causing cardiomyopathies or neuropathies. Left: TTR levels in the serum were reduced in mice treated with LUNAR-Cas9-TTR. Right: Quantitation of genome editing by DNA sequencing analysis showed a significant amount of INDELs (insertion/deletions) in the livers of mice treated with LUNAR-Cas9-TTR.

Enabling Technologies – Cancer vaccines

Our LUNAR Cancer vaccine discovery efforts are aimed at developing an immunotherapy against a tumor via activated T-cells. We contemplate that the vaccine would encode an antigen(s) that would be specifically presented by (or associated with) a tumor, such that the vaccination would elicit T cell responses that recognize and attack the tumor. We have applied our learnings from our more-advanced LUNAR-COVID-19 vaccine program to establish both STARR (self-amplifying) and conventional mRNA platforms for immuno-oncology therapy.

In a preclinical study, our proof of concept (POC) vaccine encoding AH1 antigen of gp70 protein which is highly expressed on the surface of mouse colorectal carcinoma cell line CT26 has demonstrated clear effectiveness in a syngeneic mouse model of a colorectal CT26 cell line. With intramuscular administration of the STARR vaccine (two doses of 10 ug), treated with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), anti-PD1/PDL1 antibody, led to a substantial reduction of tumor growth in comparison to the CPI treatment by itself (Panel A). Moreover, the same level of efficacy was achieved with a single administration of a 0.2 ug dose of the STARR vaccine.

27

With various LUNAR formulations, conventional mRNA vaccine expressing the AH1 antigen also demonstrated a robust T cell response (Panel B) and reduction of tumor growth with anti-PD1/PDL1 treatment in the syngeneic mouse model. We believe that these POC results from the two platforms hints for the possible applicability to various types of cancer with flexibility in dosing regimens.

Our current effort focuses on the selection of neoantigens, and other common tumor-specific antigens encoded in the cancer vaccines. Common tumor antigens can be shared among patients, and therefore target broader patient populations, whereas a neoantigen vaccine would be a personalized vaccine specific for an individual patient. Additional advancements of the LUNAR Cancer Vaccine program include the improvement of antigen cassette designs, STARR RNA elements, and immune modulator molecules, all of which can significantly enhance T cell responses.

Figure: Antitumor activity and T cell response by Arcturus cancer vaccines. A. STARR vaccine expressing a tumor antigen led to a significant reduction of the tumor growth rate of a colorectal cancer cell line, CT26. B. T responses elicited by conventional mRNA cancer vaccine by various LUNAR formulations.

Enabling Technologies – Immuno-oncology

Cell-based therapies for hematologic malignancies using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have made significant advances in the past decade. The success of CAR-T cells in immuno-oncology has led to a growing number of therapies utilizing other immune cell types engineered to express a variety of immunomodulatory molecules. Yet, despite their promise, extensive challenges still exist with this therapeutic approach. Some of the issues include toxicity, potential for insertional mutagenesis of the CAR construct, T cell malignancies, and an ex vivo manufacturing process that is complex, time consuming and costly. We believe that our LUNAR-I/O approach has the potential to ameliorate some of these issues. For example:

1.

RNA-driven CAR expression in lymphocytes or immune cell types would be transient and therefore expected to have a lower side effect profile;

2.

There is no integration into the germline DNA allowing for co-delivery of multiple therapeutic molecules without the risk of insertional mutagenesis; and

3.

Generation of CAR-expressing cells by a process that is quicker and cheaper, particularly when targeting specific immune cell subtypes in vivo.

The goal of the LUNAR-I/O program is to leverage the inherent advantages of both RNA and LUNAR technology to maximize clinical effectiveness of CAR-expressing cells. To this end, initial experiments have demonstrated that our proprietary LUNAR lipid nanoparticles can transfect > 90% of both primary human CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes in vitro. Our current efforts are focused on targeting T lymphocytes in vivo with either CAR-mRNA or CAR-STARR (self-amplifying RNA) constructs in combination with other immunostimulatory molecules.

28

Platform Technology Overview

Our LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery technology includes a diverse, growing library of over 300 proprietary lipids that we are rationally designing to be versatile, while maximizing efficacy and improving tolerability of a diverse selection of nucleic acids, refining the LNPs to target specific cell types, and determining the most favorable routes of administration. A key feature of our LUNAR lipids is their biodegradability, decreasing the undesired effects caused by lipid accumulation that are associated with tolerability issues present in other lipid-mediated RNA medicine delivery platforms. Our team continues to advance our LUNAR lipid formulated nucleic acid platform in a scalable and highly reproducible manner, reducing the costs of goods for the therapies in our pipeline.

In addition to our LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery technology, we believe we have created innovative, proprietary advancements in producing mRNA medicines, including improvements that increase purity, scalability, efficiency in production times, and adaptability to different mRNA modification strategies. We strive to use these proprietary innovations to benefit each mRNA medicine in our pipeline.

We continue to invest in our LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery of mRNA (encoding CRISPR-Cas9, TALEN, zinc finger proteins, and meganucleases), siRNA, DNA, microRNA, and antisense oligonucleotide technology platforms to improve their efficacy and safety profile, further expanding their applications. This investment has led to key innovations ensuring that our LUNAR formulated drug product candidates have optimal characteristics for therapeutic use, which we believe sets us apart from other nucleic acid therapeutics and lipid-mediated delivery platforms. As such, we consider ourselves a leader in the research and development of systemically administered mRNA therapeutics.

Key Attributes of Our LUNAR Lipid-Mediated Delivery Technology

We have designed our LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery platform to address major challenges with nucleic acid medicine delivery, including transfection efficiency, adverse immune reactions and liver damage.

LUNAR formulations are a multi-component, lipid-mediated drug delivery system that utilizes our proprietary lipids, called ATX lipids. Each of our ATX lipids contain an ionizable head group and a biodegradable lipid backbone. The head group is a key chemical component of the ATX lipid, making it pH-sensitive and providing it distinct advantages as a component of our LUNAR lipid formulation. At acidic pH, ATX lipids are positively charged, facilitating interaction with the negatively charged nucleic acid, thereby enabling LUNAR particle formation. At physiological pH (e.g., pH 7.4),the ATX lipids within the LUNAR formulations are neutrally charged, reducing the toxicity often seen with permanently positively-charged lipid-mediated delivery technology. Upon uptake into a cell by endocytosis (a process that forms a cellular structure called an endosome around the LUNAR formulated nucleic acid therapeutic), the head group again becomes positively charged, disrupting the endosome and the LUNAR particle, resulting in release of the nucleic acid therapeutic into the cell where is it translated to produce a therapeutic protein.

The disruption of the LUNAR particle also releases the components of the formulation into the cell, where the ATX lipid is degraded by enzymes in the cell allowing for the lipids to be cleared from the cell. We designed the ATX lipid to be rapidly biodegradable by engineering chemical structural components, called esters, into the ATX backbone that are sensitive to cellular enzymes, called esterases. This degradation prevents ATX lipids from accumulating inside the cell and causing toxicity.

29

Biodegradable, highly optimized for each cell type

LUNAR-platform development

The development of our LUNAR platform is focused on continuous innovation and advancement in the following areas:

Design and incorporate novel ATX lipids and formulations to enrich our library of proprietary ATX lipids for target cell/tissue specificity, improved tolerability and translatability to larger species;

Develop and improvise manufacturing processes for LUNAR formulations to ensure RNA encapsulation across compositions and scales;

Develop stabilization strategies (e.g. lyophilized presentation) for LUNAR formulations to mitigate frozen storage; and

Continually assess and improvise LUNAR screening funnel to enable rigorous selection of ATX lipids for various programs.

Through the above efforts, our versatile LUNAR platform continues to drive internal and partner programs.

ATX Lipid Design and In Vivo Screening Process

As mentioned above, we have generated a growing library of more than 300 proprietary ATX lipids. ATX lipids are rationally designed to fit their respective applications and vary depending on the target cell type and route of administration. We perform extensive formulation screening for each nucleic acid therapeutic candidate to determine the optimal ATX lipid and LUNAR composition for the particular nucleic acid therapeutic candidate, the desired route of administration, and target cell type.

The design of ATX lipids is an iterative process based on in vivo protein expression and tolerability results from previous ATX lipid candidates. New ATX lipids are chemically synthesized and used to package both siRNAs for inhibiting target protein expression and mRNAs expressing a secreted protein. The ATX lipid formulated RNAs must meet specific chemical and biophysical acceptance criteria before being tested for biological activity. RNA formulations meeting all acceptance criteria are first screened for protein expression in mice. Active candidates are then tested for tolerability and preliminary tissue clearance rates following administration. Active candidates are further verified by evaluating protein expression in non-human primates. Active ATX lipid candidates demonstrating high levels of protein expression and equivalent or improved tissue clearance rates are then assigned to a specific disease target for development of therapeutic applications. The following results are from an in vivo mRNA expression study which identified three new highly active LUNAR lipids with regard to protein expression in non-human primates compared to the positive control.

30

31

In the top two figures, mice were injected intravenously with 4 different LUNAR lipid formulations containing mRNA expressing human erythropoietin (EPO). The LUNAR lipids that were screened were LUNAR96, LUNAR97, LUNAR98 and LUNAR2 at 0.1 mg/kg 0.3 mg/kg RNA doses. LUNAR lipid 2 formulation is a positive control to which expression from the other formulations is compared. Mice were bled 24 hours after injection and assayed for EPO, a secreted protein. The figure below the mouse human EPO expression figure shows the clearance of the LUNAR lipids from the liver 48 hours after administration of 0.1mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg RNA doses. LUNAR 96, 97 and 98 yielded much higher expression levels of EPO than LUNAR 2, the positive control for both doses tested. The mouse liver clearance figure shows that the residual amount of LUNAR96 and LUNAR98 were below the limit of detection and the residual amount of LUNAR97 was at least 10-fold less than the remaining amount of LUNAR2 at the 0.1 mg/kg RNA dose and at least two-fold less than the residual amount of LUNAR2 at the higher RNA dose. LUNAR96 and LUNAR98 formulations were tested for EPO expression in non-human primates at a single dose and assayed for secreted EPO in the blood 24 hours after IV administration. Both LUNAR96 and LUNAR98 yielded significantly higher expression levels than the positive control, LUNAR2 further confirming the superior performance of the new LUNAR formulations. Hence, this lipid screen identified 3 LUNAR lipids that yielded greater RNA expression in mice and 2 LUNAR lipids in NHPs, and were rapidly cleared from the liver within 48 hours after administration.

Lung Targeting

Aerosol capabilities have been developed for the Cystic Fibrosis program using our proprietary lipid nanoparticle delivery platform, LUNAR. Characterization and optimization of the aerosolized LUNAR formulations in targeting airway epithelium have been achieved in rodent (mice, rat) and nonrodent models (ferret, NHP) as depicted in the image using a reporter mRNA encapsulated in LUNAR. We expect that the validation attained for the inhaled LUNAR platform in the Cystic Fibrosis program will serve as a translatable approach to support other respiratory approaches where targeting airway epithelium is needed.

LUNAR delivery to airways epithelium demonstrated in vivo across species (rodents, ferrets, NHPs)

Liver Targeting

As proof of concept for augmenting LUNAR liver-targeting capabilities, we are developing LUNAR formulations containing a propriety hepatocyte targeting agent. Traditional lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery to hepatocytes occurs via uptake by the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). We evaluated this targeting agent in an LDLR-deficient mouse model and found that only the LUNAR formulations with this targeting agent were able to deliver mRNA to the hepatocytes compared to LUNAR formulations that did not contain the targeting agent. Based on these promising data, we are expanding these platform development efforts.

32

LUNAR Safety (i.v. administration)

LUNAR-CF - ARCT-032 Nonclinical Safety Profile

Arcturus has instituted a robust ATX lipid screening paradigm to ensure that we identify formulations with suitable properties for the intended drug’s target product profile, whether is it a protein replacement therapy, a gene editing treatment, or a vaccine. Drug product safety is a key feature in that profile. A recent example of the outcome of these efforts is the nonclinical safety profile we obtained with ARCT-032 that has enabled the first-in-human trials.

Our Proprietary mRNA and Protein Design Technology

The mRNA programs in our pipeline benefit from our in-house expertise in protein and mRNA design, which helps us address many of the known challenges that face the viability of mRNA therapeutics today. We have identified several design elements of mRNA compounds that provide improved translation (the process of making protein based on the instructions/codes in the mRNA) of our mRNA therapeutics, including untranslated regions derived from species that have not previously been combined with human mRNA sequences. This platform technology is applicable to many different human mRNA sequences that we are currently investigating in our discovery efforts. We are able to engineer human protein sequences to increase the half-life of the proteins produced by our mRNA therapies and can more efficiently direct specific types of proteins to certain cellular structures of interest. These innovations are broadly applicable to several programs that are part of our mRNA discovery efforts.

In addition to these platform technologies, we have developed a proprietary tool to aid our team in the efficient design and development of new mRNA drug candidates. Our mRNA Design Suite is a cloud-based software suite with a collection of proprietary bioinformatic algorithms aimed at achieving highly improved potency of a drug substance through optimization of mRNA sequences. The algorithms were developed in house through the integration of experimentally validated optimization processes. Through multi-layered in silico quality control pipelines, mRNA Design Suite promptly generates high-quality and error-free sequences accompanied by various statistics. Additionally, mRNA Design Suite seamlessly interacts with our plasmid/mRNA production database to accelerate the process from mRNA design to gene synthesis, cloning, and mRNA production.

Our STARR® mRNA Technology

In addition to our LUNAR lipids technology, our platform technologies include our distinct and proprietary self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) platform, termed STARR. The STARR platform includes proprietary algorithms that inform the design and optimization of saRNA to enhance expression of the applicable antigen while minimizing structures that might inhibit expression. The replicase, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, is encoded upstream of the antigen of interest and functions to amplify transcripts and increase the duration of antigen expression compared to non-self-amplifying (conventional) mRNA. The enhanced expression leads to higher immunogenicity at lower doses than conventional mRNA vaccines in preclinical studies (Figure below).

33

The above results show the luciferase expression from an optimized saRNA, STARR Technology (Green), a non-optimized saRNA (Blue) and the conventional RNA (Purple). The STARR Technology yields at least a 30-fold greater expression level than conventional RNA. The STARR Technology also produces a longer duration of expression compared to the conventional RNA and also the non-optimized self-amplifying RNA.

We believe the combination of LUNAR and STARR technology can provide lower dose requirements by generating a superior immune response and sustained protein expression as compared to non-self-amplifying RNA-based vaccines. We believe this LUNAR/STARR technology will enable us to simplify and increase the speed of vaccine production.

Supply and Manufacturing

Our supply and manufacturing strategies are focused on addressing the following considerations:

1.

multiple pre-clinical & clinical pipeline candidates;

2.

late-stage clinical and commercial scale COVID vaccine products; and

3.

regional and global product demand.

We have built a global manufacturing footprint with our partners, including Aldevron, Catalent, Recipharm, Polymun and ARCALIS. With such collaborations, we have established an Integrated Global Supply Chain Network with our primary and secondary sourcing contract development & manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) based in the United States, EU and Asia for producing critical raw materials, drug substance, and packaged finished product.

To date, we have manufactured and supplied gram quantities of drug substance, and scaled-up and validated our finished drug products (COVID Vaccine) through our CDMOs for clinical studies, and commercial readiness. We continue to dedicate, resources to advance our sophisticated manufacturing know-how, including formulation of lipid nanoparticles, which improves manufacturing efficiency and capacity. As the market for COVID vaccines shifts from multi-dose vial formats to lower and single-dose vial formats, we continue, with our collaborator CSL Seqirus, to evaluate and advance manufacturing process and capabilities and technology transfers, and prepare for commercialization of COVID vaccines.

34

Global Manufacturing Footprint

For the near future, we expect to continue to rely on third-party CDMOs for the supply of drug substance and finished drug product for our current product candidates, including to support the launch of our first commercial product.

Our CDMOs are compliant with CGMPs, and other rules and regulations prescribed by foreign regulatory authorities. We believe we have established sufficient manufacturing capacity through our CDMOs to meet our current internal research, development, and potential commercial needs, as well as our obligations under existing agreements with our partners. Additionally, we continue to evaluate relationships with additional suppliers to increase overall capacity and diversify our supply chain.

Revenue and Collaboration Arrangements and Other Material Agreements

In addition to our internal programs, we have a number of strategic alliances where we collaborate with other parties on discovery, development, manufacturing or other efforts based on our LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery system and our proprietary mRNA and protein design technologies. Among other collaboration arrangements,

we have a collaboration with CSL Seqirus for vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), influenza and three other respiratory infectious diseases;

we have received funding from the CFF to support our LUNAR-CF development program;

we are partnering with Ultragenyx to develop mRNA therapeutic candidates for rare disease targets; and

we have a contract with BARDA to support the development of a low-dose pandemic influenza candidate based on our proprietary self-amplifying messenger RNA-based vaccine platform.

CSL Seqirus

In November 2022, we entered into the CSL Collaboration Agreement with CSL Seqirus for the global exclusive rights to research, develop, manufacture and commercialize self-amplifying mRNA vaccines. The CSL Collaboration Agreement became effective on December 8, 2022, following clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act.

Under the CSL Collaboration Agreement, CSL Seqirus receives global exclusive rights to our technology for vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), influenza and three other respiratory infectious diseases. Specifically, the collaboration agreement grants CSL Seqirus a license to our STARR mRNA technology and LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery, as well as mRNA drug substance and drug product manufacturing expertise. CSL has also been

35

granted global non-exclusive rights in the field of pandemic preparedness (i.e., pathogens identified as priority diseases by the WHO), with the right to convert to an exclusive license.

The CSL Collaboration Agreement sets forth how the parties will collaborate to research and develop vaccine candidates. In the COVID-19 field, we undertake activities for certain regulatory filings for our leading self-amplifying mRNA vaccine candidate in COVID-19, ARCT-154, in the United States and Europe and for research and development activities of a next-generation COVID vaccine candidate. CSL Seqirus leads and is responsible for all other research and development in COVID-19, influenza and the other fields.

We received an up-front payment of $200.0 million, with the potential to receive development milestones totaling more than $1.3 billion if all products are registered in the licensed fields. We also are entitled to potentially receive up to $3.0 billion in commercial milestones based on “net sales” of vaccines in the various fields. In addition, we are entitled to receive a 40% share of net profits from COVID-19 vaccine sales and up to low double-digit royalties of annual net sales for vaccines against influenza, pandemic preparedness and three additional respiratory infectious diseases. Entitlement to all such payments is subject to the strict conditions, requirements, royalty reduction provisions and other limitations set forth in the CSL Collaboration Agreement.

Either party may terminate the CSL Collaboration Agreement on a field-by-field basis for material breach by the other party, following notice and opportunity to cure. CSL Seqirus may also terminate the collaboration agreement in its entirety or on a field-by-field basis for any reason or no reason whatsoever, with certain limitations. The CSL Collaboration Agreement may also be terminated by CSL Seqirus for safety reasons, clinical data nonviability, commercial nonviability and other specified reasons.

The CSL Collaboration Agreement allows us to fulfill our obligations under the award from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) relating to rapid pandemic influenza response, announced by Arcturus in August 2022.

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Agreement

On May 16, 2017, pursuant to a Development Program Letter Agreement (as amended, the “CFF Agreement”) with the CFF, CFF agreed to award us funding for a development program to identify lead CFTR mRNA sequences and LUNAR formulations, demonstrate tolerability of LUNAR CFTR mRNA, and demonstrate translatability of aerosolized LUNAR. The award includes a grant of rights to CFF know-how to assist us to research, develop, commercialize, make or otherwise exploit a product. If the award results in a successful commercialized product, we will pay CFF (i) royalties on sales of the product up to a maximum of a single-digit multiple of the total award amount actually paid to us by CFF, and (ii) thereafter, a single-digit percentage of annual net sales. Further, in the event of a license, sale or other transfer of the product or our development program technology (including a change of control transaction), we will pay CFF a percentage of such license, sale or transfer payments actually received by us or our shareholders (subject to a royalty cap). On August 1, 2019, we entered into an amendment to the CFF Agreement. Pursuant to the amendment, (i) CFF will increase the amount it will award to advance LUNAR-CF, (ii) we will provide a certain amount of matching funds for remaining budgeted costs, and (iii) the related disbursement schedule from CFF to us was modified such that (a) a disbursement was made upon execution of the amendment, (b) an agreed upon amount will be disbursed to us within thirty days of the first day of each of January, April, July and October 2020, and (c) the last payment will be disbursed upon us invoicing CFF to meet good manufacturing practices and submitting an IND application. In January 2022, the parties signed an additional amendment for CFF to fund the development of a CF ferret model for application in the development of ARCT-032, our LUNAR-CF candidate.

On September 25, 2023, we entered into an additional amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the CFF Agreement, pursuant to which we and CFF agreed to: (a) increase the Amount of Award (as defined in the CFF Agreement and applicable amendment) from CFF to advance LUNAR-CF by up to $9 million (for a total to date of up to approximately $25 million), and required Arcturus to provide $15 million in matching funds for remaining budgeted costs; (b) modify the existing rates and caps on royalties due to CFF under the CFF Agreement, including the addition of an option for Arcturus to reduce the royalty rate through a one-time payment; (c) modify the calculation of payments from Arcturus to CFF in the event of certain dispositions or licensing of cystic fibrosis or other pulmonary assets or of a change of control of Arcturus; and (d) make corresponding changes to exhibits, definitions and other provisions of the CFF Agreement.

Ultragenyx

36

On October 26, 2015, we entered into a Research Collaboration and License Agreement with Ultragenyx, which was later amended in 2017, 2018 and during the second quarter of 2019 (as amended, the “Ultragenyx Agreement”). Ultragenyx initially selected two development targets, including Glycogen Storage Disease Type III, and the parties initially agreed to a list of eight additional reserved rare disease targets which Ultragenyx has an exclusive option to select for collaborative development. Under the Ultragenyx Agreement, we granted Ultragenyx exclusivity (i) with respect to development targets, to the development and commercialization of products containing nucleic acid technology, and (ii) with respect to reserved targets, the development and commercialization of any product containing nucleic acid products or utilizing LUNAR lipid-mediated delivery technology.

On June 18, 2019, we expanded our collaboration with Ultragenyx and entered into a third amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to the Ultragenyx Agreement. Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the total number of targets was increased from 10 to 12, and we granted Ultragenyx exclusivity to development targets for four years at no additional cost. In connection with the Third Amendment, Ultragenyx purchased shares of our common stock and made a one-time upfront payment. Ultragenyx also received a two-year option to purchase additional shares of our common stock which they exercised in May of 2020.

On December 1, 2021, Ultragenyx announced that the first patient had been dosed in its Phase 1/2 study of UX053, an investigational messenger RNA therapy in development under the collaboration for the treatment of Glycogen Storage Disease Type III, and thus the first milestone under the collaboration agreement had been met. Ultragenyx completed dosing in the single ascending dose, or SAD, stage of the Phase 1/2 study of UX053 with no safety issues observed. In May 2023, Ultragenyx announced that it terminated the Phase 1/2 study for UX053 due to reasons unrelated to safety concerns. On June 18, 2023, the exclusivity period for reserved targets expired. Prior to this expiration, Ultragenyx exercised its option with respect to some of its reserved targets thereby converting them to development targets under the agreement.

BARDA

In August 2022, we entered into a cost reimbursement contract with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to support the development of a low-dose pandemic influenza candidate based on our proprietary self-amplifying messenger RNA-based vaccine platform.

The contract is to support our non-clinical and pre-clinical development, early-stage clinical development through Phase 1, and associated drug product manufacturing, regulatory and quality-assurance activities over a period of three years. The contract provides for reimbursement by BARDA of Arcturus’ permitted costs incorporated into the contract, up to $63.2 million. The contract does not include the purchase of any pandemic influenza vaccine that eventually may be developed. The contract is terminable by BARDA at any time under specified circumstances, including for convenience.

This contract is part of BARDA’s ongoing efforts to bolster pandemic preparedness and response capabilities by investing in innovative medical counter-measures that can help prevent the medical consequences that result from outbreaks caused by pandemic influenza and emerging infectious diseases.

CureVac

On January 1, 2018, we entered into a Development and Option Agreement with CureVac, which was amended on May 3, 2018, restated on September 28, 2018 and amended on July 24, 2019 (as amended and restated, the “Development and Option Agreement”). Under the terms of the Development and Option Agreement, CureVac and Arcturus agreed to conduct joint preclinical development programs and we granted CureVac a license to develop and commercialize certain products incorporating certain of our technology (the “Arcturus LMD Technology”) and CureVac technology. CureVac did not exercise its option to extend the term prior to its expiration, and the Development and Option Agreement expired as of July 24, 2023.

ARCALIS Joint Venture

On August 14, 2023, we announced that ARCALIS Inc. (ARCALIS), our manufacturing joint venture in Japan to support the production of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics, had been awarded up to $115 million in two separate grants from the Japanese government. We anticipate that these grants will be used to fund the construction

37

of a factory and the purchase of capital equipment to support current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) production of mRNA drug substance and mRNA drug product operations.

On October 4, 2023, we announced that ARCALIS was selected by the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry to receive additional financial support to construct a DNA template manufacturing facility along with new state-of-the-art equipment. DNA plasmid generated at this facility would be used as key starting material in the manufacture of mRNA drug substance at ARCALIS’ neighboring mRNA drug substance facility, which was completed in July 2023. To date, approximately $165 million has been awarded to ARCALIS by the Japanese government, subject to certain terms and conditions, to build mRNA Drug Substance, mRNA Drug Product manufacturing capabilities and to construct a DNA template manufacturing facility.

Intellectual Property

Our business success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our proprietary technologies, inventions and know-how, and on our ability to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We strive to protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets, licensing agreements, invention assignment agreements and confidentiality agreements with employees, advisors, consultants and contractors.

We rely on continuing technological innovation to strengthen our proprietary position in the field of nucleic acid medicines. Therefore, we plan to continue to file patent applications in jurisdictions around the world as we discover and develop novel nucleic acid technology platforms and novel nucleic acid therapeutic candidates. We cannot guarantee that future applications will be issued.

Our Patent Portfolio

As of February 26, 2024, we own over 438 patents and pending patent applications including 46 granted U.S. patents, 41 pending U.S. patent applications, six pending international applications under Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”), 157 granted foreign patents and 188 pending foreign patent applications. The claims of these patents and pending applications include compositions of matter, methods of use, manufacturing process and drug product formulations. These claims cover the use of our core platform technologies including the use of LUNAR and lipid components to deliver nucleic acids, the use of UNA oligomers for therapeutics and reagents, the use of LNA oligomers for therapeutics, specific nucleic acid modalities for treating disease, as well as our proprietary technology regarding the design, manufacture, and purification of nucleic acids for use in therapy. Claims also cover the composition of matter, formulation, and use of our therapeutic candidates to prevent and/or treat target diseases including OTC deficiency, CF and COVID-19. If issued, our patents are expected to expire between 2028 and 2044, without taking into account any possible patent term extensions.

Our patent portfolio includes the following patents and pending patent applications for LUNAR, UNA and the use of LNA in certain RNA medicines:

LUNAR® – As of February 26, 2024, we own 20 U.S. patents, 12 U.S. pending patent applications, one international patent application (“PCT”), 56 foreign granted patents, and 91 foreign pending patent applications covering the composition of matter, manufacture of lipid nanoparticles (including lyophilization), and use of our LUNAR technology for nucleic acid delivery and drug delivery.

UNA, tRNA, mRNA and LNA – As of February 26, 2024, we own 25 U.S. patents, 23 U.S. pending patent applications, three PCT applications, 83 granted foreign patents and 58 foreign pending patent applications covering methods and uses of LNA, UNA oligomer and mRNA therapeutics, tRNA constructs, and compositions of UNA oligomers or mRNA to treat specific target diseases.

STARR® – In 2019, we began to develop our STARR platform which combines our proprietary LUNAR delivery systems with technologies that enable self-transcribing and self-amplifying RNA. As noted above, our robust LUNAR portfolio of over 168 patents and patent applications, provides protection for delivery vehicles that can enable specific and effective delivery of STARR drug substances. Our portfolio has expanded, and as of February 26, 2024 own two pending U.S. nonprovisional patent applications, 21 pending foreign applications. Our first granted U.S. patent for our STARR platform is U.S. 11,759,515 (issued September, 19, 2023). This portfolio is generally directed

38

to specially designed RNA constructs, specific nucleotide and amino acid sequences, and lipid formulations comprising the same under the STARR technology. We anticipate that further patents will be filed as we continue to innovate with respect to our STARR platform and that current applications covering these developments in our STARR platform, if granted, will last until 2044, not including any patent term extensions.

Patent Terms

The term of individual patents depends on the countries in which they are obtained. The patent term is 20 years from the earliest effective date of filing a non-provisional patent application in most of the countries in which we file.

Under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act), U.S. patent holders can apply for a patent term extension to compensate for the patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. Patent extension is only available for patents covering FDA-approved drugs. The extension can be up to five years beyond the original expiration date of the patent and cannot extend a patent term for longer than 14 years from the date of product approval. Only one patent extension is granted per approved drug. Similar provisions may be available in foreign jurisdictions including Europe. We intend to apply for patent term extensions where possible.

Trade Secrets

We have developed valuable trade secrets to protect our product candidates and proprietary processes, including trade secrets related to the design and optimization of nucleic acids, the design and optimization of lipid compositions for delivery of nucleic acids, manufacturing and formulation processes, and analytical techniques.

Certain Risks to Intellectual Property

Our commercial success also depends in part on our non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third parties. For a more comprehensive discussion of the risks related to our intellectual property, please see Item 1A “Risk Factors” – “Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions.

Our success depends in part on our ability to:

preserve trade secrets;

prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights; and

operate our business without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties, both in the United States and internationally.

We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and other contractors. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our employees, consultants, scientific advisors or other contractors use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

Product Approval and Government Regulation

Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing and export and import of products such as those we are developing. Any product candidate that

39

we develop must be authorized or approved by the FDA before it may be legally marketed in the United States and by the appropriate foreign regulatory agency before it may be legally marketed in foreign countries.

U.S. Drug Development Process

In the United States, the development, manufacturing, and marketing of human drugs and vaccines are subject to extensive regulation. The FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and implementing regulations, and biological products, including vaccines, under provisions of the FDCA and the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”). Drugs and vaccines are also subject to other federal, state and local statutes and regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial civil or criminal sanctions. FDA sanctions could include refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an approval, clinical hold, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, debarment, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us. The process required by the FDA before a drug or biological product may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

completion of nonclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation and stability studies according to good laboratory practices (“GLP”) or other applicable regulations;

submission to the FDA of an application for an IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;

performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials according to the FDA’s regulations commonly referred to as current good clinical practices (“GCPs”) to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug for its intended use;

submission to the FDA of a new drug application (“NDA”) or biologics license application (“BLA”) for a new drug or biologics;

satisfactory completion of FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the drug is produced to ensure compliance with the FDA’s current good manufacturing practice standards (“cGMP”), to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug’s identity, strength, quality and purity;

potential FDA audit of the nonclinical and clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the NDA or BLA; and

FDA review and approval of the NDA or BLA.

The lengthy process of seeking required approvals and the continuing need for compliance with applicable statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial resources and approvals are inherently uncertain.

Before testing any compounds with potential therapeutic value in humans, the drug candidate enters the preclinical study stage. Preclinical tests, also referred to as nonclinical studies, include discovery and target identification, in vitro testing to assess biological activity, mechanism of action, and potential toxicity, as well as animal studies to assess the potential safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacological activity of the drug candidate. The conduct of the animal studies must comply with federal regulations and requirements including GLP. The sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and a proposed clinical protocol, to the FDA as part of the IND. The IND automatically becomes effective thirty days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA imposes a clinical hold within that 30-day time period. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before

40

the clinical trial can begin. The FDA may also impose clinical holds on a drug candidate at any time before or during clinical trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance. Accordingly, we cannot be sure that submission of an IND will result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that suspend or terminate such trial.

Clinical trials involve the administration of the drug candidate to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of qualified investigators, generally physicians not employed by or under the trial sponsor’s direct control. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria, and the parameters to be used to monitor subject safety. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s regulations comprising the good clinical practices requirements. Further, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) at or servicing each institution at which the clinical trial will be conducted. An IRB is charged with protecting the welfare and rights of trial participants and considers such items as whether the risks to individuals participating in the clinical trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB also approves the form and content of the informed consent that must be signed by each clinical trial subject or his or her legal representative and provides oversight for the clinical trial until completed.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

Phase 1. The drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. In the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, especially when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing may be conducted in patients;

Phase 2. The drug is evaluated in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance, optimal dosage and dosing schedule; and

Phase 3. Clinical trials are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. These clinical trials are intended to establish the overall risk/benefit ratio of the product and provide an adequate basis for product labeling. Generally, a well-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial is required by the FDA for approval of an NDA or BLA.

Post-approval clinical trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These clinical trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication.

Annual progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted to the FDA and written IND safety reports must be promptly submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events or any finding from tests in laboratory animals that suggests a significant risk for human subjects. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA or the sponsor or its data safety monitoring board may suspend a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.

Concurrently with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the drug candidate and, among other things, must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final drug. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the drug candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

41

U.S. review and approval processes

The results of product development, nonclinical studies and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on the chemistry of the drug, proposed labeling and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA or BLA requesting approval to market the product. The submission of an NDA or BLA is subject to the payment of substantial user fees; a waiver of such fees may be obtained under certain limited circumstances.

In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”), an NDA or BLA or supplement to an NDA or BLA must contain data to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may grant deferrals for submission of data or full or partial waivers. Unless otherwise required by regulation, PREA does not apply to any drug for an indication for which orphan designation has been granted.

The FDA reviews all NDAs or BLAs submitted to determine if they are substantially complete before it accepts them for filing. If the FDA determines that an NDA or BLA is incomplete or is found to be non-navigable, the filing may be refused and must be re-submitted for consideration. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the NDA or BLA. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”), the FDA has 10 months from acceptance of filing in which to complete its initial review of a standard NDA or BLA and respond to the applicant, and six months from acceptance of filing for a priority NDA or BLA. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA goal dates. The review process and the PDUFA goal date may be extended by three months or longer if the FDA requests or the NDA or BLA sponsor otherwise provides additional information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission before the PDUFA goal date.

After the NDA or BLA submission is accepted for filing, the FDA reviews the NDA or BLA to determine, among other things, whether the proposed product is safe and effective for its intended use, and whether the product is being manufactured in accordance with cGMP to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity. The FDA may refer applications for novel drug or biological products or drug or biological products which present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions. During the drug approval process, the FDA also will determine whether a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) is necessary to assure the safe use of the drug. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor of the NDA or BLA must submit a proposed REMS; the FDA will not approve the NDA or BLA without a REMS, if required.

Before approving an NDA or BLA, the FDA will inspect the facilities at which the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve the product unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. The FDA requires vaccine manufacturers to submit data supporting the demonstration of consistency between manufacturing batches, or lots. The FDA works together with vaccine manufacturers to develop a lot release protocol, the tests conducted on each lot of vaccine post-approval. Additionally, before approving an NDA or BLA, the FDA will typically inspect the sponsor and one or more clinical sites to assure that the clinical trials were conducted in compliance with IND study requirements. If the FDA determines that the application, manufacturing process or manufacturing facilities are not acceptable it will outline the deficiencies in the submission and often will request additional testing or information.

The NDA or BLA review and approval process is lengthy and difficult and the FDA may refuse to approve an NDA or BLA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical data or other data and information. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA or BLA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive and the FDA may interpret data differently than we interpret the same data. The FDA will issue a complete response letter if the agency decides not to approve the NDA or BLA. The complete response letter usually describes all of the specific deficiencies in the NDA or BLA identified by the FDA. The deficiencies identified may be minor, for example, requiring labeling changes, or major, for example, requiring additional clinical trials. Additionally, the complete response letter may include recommended actions that the applicant might take to place the application in a

42

condition for approval. If a complete response letter is issued, the applicant may either submit new information, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter, or withdraw the application.

If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may require post marketing clinical trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, which are designed to further assess a product’s safety and effectiveness and may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized.

Post-approval requirements

Any drug or biological products for which we or our strategic alliance partners receive FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information, product sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements, which include, among others, standards for direct-to-consumer advertising, promoting drugs for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the drug’s approved labeling (known as “off-label use”), industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, and promotional activities involving the internet. Failure to comply with FDA requirements can have negative consequences, including adverse publicity, enforcement letters from the FDA, mandated corrective advertising or communications with doctors, and civil or criminal penalties. Although physicians may prescribe legally available drugs for off-label uses, manufacturers may not market or promote such off-label uses.

Following approval, the FDA continues to monitor vaccine quality through real-time monitoring of lots by requiring manufacturers to submit certain information for each vaccine lot. Vaccine manufacturers may only distribute a lot following release by the FDA. Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance. Discovery of problems with a product after approval may result in restrictions on a product, manufacturer, or holder of an approved NDA or BLA, including withdrawal of the product from the market. In addition, changes to the manufacturing process require notice to or prior approval from the FDA before being implemented and other types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications and additional labeling claims, are also subject to further FDA review and approval.

Regulation in Europe and Other Regions

In addition to regulations in the United States, we and our strategic alliance partners are subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things, clinical trials and any commercial sales and distribution of our products.

Whether or not we or our collaborators obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. Certain countries outside of the United States have a similar process that requires the submission of a clinical trial application much like the IND prior to the commencement of human clinical trials. Once the CTA is approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, clinical trial development may proceed.

To obtain regulatory approval of an investigational drug or biological product under EU regulatory systems, we or our strategic alliance partners must submit a marketing authorization application. The application in the EU is similar to that required in the United States, with the exception of, among other things, region/country-specific document requirements.

For other countries outside of the EU, such as countries in Eastern Europe, Latin America or Asia, the requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country. In all cases, again, the clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCPs and the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. The

43

regulatory approval of marketing authorization application of an investigational drug or biological product is similar to that required in the United States, with the exception of, among other things, country-specific document requirements.

Competition

Our Business in General

We believe that our scientific knowledge and expertise in nucleic acid-based therapies provide us with competitive advantages over the various companies and other entities that are attempting to develop similar treatments. However, we face competition at the technology platform and therapeutic indication levels from both large and small biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies and public and private research institutions. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Our recent collaboration with CSL, a global leader in vaccines, will allow us to compete better commercially on the world stage within the COVID and influenza markets.

Our success will be based in part upon our ability to identify, develop and manage a portfolio of product candidates that are safer and more effective than competing products in the treatment of our targeted patients. The commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products we may develop in our respective areas.

We are aware of several other companies that are working to develop nucleic acid medicines, including gene therapy, gene editing, mRNA (including saRNA), siRNA, and antisense therapeutics. Many of these companies, such as Genevant Sciences and Acuitas Therapeutics, are also developing nucleic acid delivery platforms which compete with LUNAR technology.

Below we have included what we believe to be the competitive landscape for certain of the medicines that we currently have in development.

Vaccine Franchise

LUNAR-COV19 Vaccines (ARCT-154)

Our vaccine franchise is based on our self-amplifying and self-replicating STARR technology platform and our lipid nanoparticle delivery platform called LUNAR. This franchise has advanced into late-stage clinical development including ARCT-154 in two Phase 3 clinical studies. We have partnered our COVID-19 vaccine franchise with CSL Seqirus. We consider the following companies with approved or late-stage clinical development vaccines as some of our competitors or future competitors to our partnered COVID-19 vaccine franchise: Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novavax, and HDT Bio. Dozens of other companies are continuing to develop COVID-19 vaccines. However, the majority of these companies use conventional mRNA (not self-amplifying) and egg-based vaccine technology as the basis for their COVID-19 vaccines.

LUNAR-FLU Vaccine

We have partnered our influenza vaccine franchise with CSL Seqirus. We consider the following companies as some of the competitors or future competitors to our partnered LUNAR-Flu vaccine franchise: Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, and Sanofi. The flu industry is rapidly shifting to utilizing mRNA-based platforms in addition to traditional (egg-based) technologies.

Liver Franchise ARCT-810 (LUNAR-OTC)

Our liver franchise has advanced into mid-stage clinical development with ARCT-810 in Phase 2 clinical development. Potential competitors include, but are not limited to, Ultragenyx which is advancing a gene therapy

44

program for OTC in clinical development, and Moderna which has a therapeutic candidate in pre-clinical development.

Lung Franchise: ARCT-032 (LUNAR-CF)

The lead candidate of our lung franchise is ARCT-032, which is an mRNA therapeutic candidate for cystic fibrosis based on our proprietary drug substance mRNA technology platform and our LUNAR lipid nanoparticle delivery platform.

We are aware of product candidates of the following companies that we consider as competitors or future competitors to ARCT-032: Moderna/Vertex, Eloxx Pharmaceuticals, Recode, 4DMT, Spirovant, SalioGen and Splisense.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 180 employees, all of which were full-time. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Available Information

The Company was founded in 2013 as Arcturus Therapeutics, Inc., and we have maintained our principal executive offices in San Diego, California since that time. In November 2017, Alcobra Ltd., an Israeli limited company, merged with our company, changed its name to Arcturus Therapeutics Ltd. (“Arcturus Israel”), and commenced trading on Nasdaq under the symbol “ARCT.” On June 17, 2019, we redomiciled to the United States (the “Redomiciliation”) and changed our name to Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc.

Our Internet address is www.arcturusrx.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and proxy statements, and all amendments thereto, are available free of charge on our Internet website. These reports are posted on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC electronically through the SEC website (www.sec.gov). The information contained on the SEC’s website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered to be part thereof.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In conducting our business, we face many risks that may interfere with our business objectives. Some of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, we are subject to various risks resulting from inherent unknowns and uncertainties in the drug development process, as well as changing economic, political, industry, regulatory, business and financial conditions. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.

You should carefully consider the following factors and other information in this Annual Report before you decide to invest in our common stock. If any of the negative events referred to below occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. In any such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risk Factor Summary

The following is a summary of certain important factors that may make an investment in our company speculative or risky. You should carefully consider the fuller risk factor disclosure set forth in this Annual Report, in addition to the other information herein, including the section of this report titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2023-12-31, filed 2024-03-14 · accession 0000950170-24-031156

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 23 headings are on that chain and 17 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.