ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on the beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in the sections titled “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
We are a robust AI-driven data management platform that solves complex data challenges for large institutions operating in dynamic and mission-critical environments with rapidly increasing volumes of data being ingested from a similarly rapidly growing number of data sources.
We solve these challenges by structuring “dark” or unstructured data at the edge, the location at which the data is generated and collected, and leveraging purpose-built AI models. Unstructured, or “dark” data, which is typically categorized as qualitative data, cannot be processed and analyzed via conventional data tools and methods. Conversely, structured data, typically categorized as quantitative data, is highly organized and easily decipherable by machine learning algorithms.
Structuring and then analyzing data using AI models at the edge, versus transmitting the data from the edge back to a central processing location for structuring and analysis, enables real-time decision making and data-driven operational efficiency.
We specialize in ingesting all available metadata from edge-based sensors used by government and law enforcement agencies around the world, including surveillance cameras (video), audio, telemetry, acoustic, seismic, and autonomous devices, along with large commercial corporations with fundamentally similar capabilities and requirements.
Data generated by these edge-based sensors, including video, can then be run through our trained AI models to detect objects present within the video frame. Once an object is detected, for example an automobile, additional identifying characteristics of the object can be extracted from the image including the license plate characters and the make, model, and color of the automobile. This process of analyzing, logging and categorizing ingested data is referred to as “structuring” the data.
Airship AI’s software allows customers to view structured data both in real-time as well as to conduct searches on the structured data at a later point in time. Real-time structured data use includes, for example, alarms on a specific license plate or a specific make, model or color of automobile. Non-real-time structured data use includes, for example, searching a database of video data that has been previously ingested and stored to find instances of a particular license plate being visible, along with other logged vehicle characteristics such as make, model and color of an automobile.
Additional edge deployed AI models enable similar object detection and recognition of common and custom trained objects, such as an aircraft, boat, person, animal, bag, or weapon. Airship AI’s models provide similar data points for these object types allowing analysts the ability to be notified in real-time of the detection of a specified object and similarly search for historically detected objects. Examples include detecting aircrafts and boats along with their respective tail numbers and hull registration numbers.
Our AI modelling process starts with pre-trained AI models from our technology ecosystem partners which we then customize using proprietary datasets tailored towards our customers’ unique workflow requirements. Where customers have pre-existing AI models or engines, we integrate those models or engines into our edge platform allowing customers to leverage proprietary models within the Airship AI software ecosystem.
Our primary offerings include Outpost AI, Acropolis, and Airship Command. Our offerings allow customers to manage their data across the full data lifecycle, when and where they need it, using a highly secure permissioned based architecture.
Table of Contents
Recent Developments
Expansion into Robotics and Autonomous Systems
We are pursuing the extension of our edge AI platform to support robotic and autonomous system deployments and expect to conduct pilot programs during 2026. We believe the integration of advanced computer vision, sensor fusion, and real-time edge analytics with mobile and semi-autonomous platforms represents a natural extension of our existing software capabilities.
Our robotics-related initiatives are focused on enabling our AI software to operate on, and integrate with, ground-based or mobile robotic platforms for applications such as security, inspection, monitoring, and situational awareness. These platforms are expected to leverage our existing AI models, including object detection, behavior analysis, and anomaly detection, deployed at the edge to support real-time decision-making in dynamic environments.
During 2026, we plan to conduct limited pilot deployments with selected customers and partners to evaluate technical performance, operational integration, and market demand. These pilot programs are not expected to generate material revenue. Any future commercialization of robotics-enabled offerings would be expected to complement our existing software-centric business model. There can be no assurance that these pilot efforts will result in commercially viable products or services.
Backlog and Pipeline
We also began to see movement during the fourth quarter of 2025 and into the first quarter of 2026 on several large projects in the federal and commercial marketplace, including several notable awards:
Our backlog as of December 31, 2025 was $3.3 million.
Our total validated pipeline as of December 31, 2025 was $173.4 million, consisting of single and multi-year opportunities for AI-driven edge, video, and sensor and data management platform across our customer verticals. Our pipeline includes opportunities at varying stages of progression with expected award timeframes over the next 18-24 months.
Warrant Exercise
On October 8, 2025, we entered into a warrant exercise inducement offer letter with the holder of existing common stock warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 2,162,162 shares of common stock to exercise such warrants at the existing exercise price of $4.50 per share, in exchange for our agreement to issue new common stock warrants to purchase 2,702,702 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $6.20. The aggregate gross proceeds received from the exercise of the existing warrants were approximately $9,729,729, before deducting financial advisory fees. We intend to use the net proceeds from the exercise of the existing warrants for working capital and general corporate purposes.
The shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the existing warrants are registered for issuance pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-284462), which was declared effective by the SEC on January 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
In consideration for the immediate exercise of the existing warrants for cash, the holder received the inducement warrants to purchase 2,702,702 shares of common stock in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The inducement warrants have an exercise price of $6.20 per share, are immediately exercisable and will be exercisable for five and one-half years from the date of issuance.
The inducement warrants and the shares of common stock underlying the inducement warrants offered in the private placement have not been registered under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws. Accordingly, the securities may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and such applicable state securities laws. As part of the transaction, we have filed a resale registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC to register the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the inducement warrants, which registration statement went effective on November 16, 2025.
Key Performance Indicators
Historically, a majority of our product revenue has consisted primarily of a bundled hardware and software product and to date we have sold or licensed a minimal amount of standalone software. In the future, we expect to see more delivery of our products using a cloud-based software solution which will allow us to create additional subscription revenue.
We have historically evaluated our business solely based on revenue generated from customers and we have not tracked any other customer-related metrics. As we grow and increase our product offerings and customer base, we intend to modify and develop more advanced performance indicators. We believe the following key performance indicators apply to us in the future:
Table of Contents
Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance
We believe the following factors and trends may cause previously reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results or future financial conditions:
Segment Reporting
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, Topic 280, Segment Reporting, requires that an enterprise report selected information about reportable segments in its financial reports issued to its stockholders. Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and that is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President are the Company’s CODM. The CODM monitors the revenue and expense components of the various products and services we offer, but operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporation-wide basis in comparison to a business plan which is developed each year. Accordingly, all operations are considered by management to be one operating segment and one reportable segment as contained in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss to the consolidated financial statements. The CODM uses consolidated net income (loss) as its required measure of segment profit/loss, as such measure is determined in accordance with the measurement principles most consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Other income (expense):
Loss from change in fair value of convertible debt - (142 ) 142 100.0 %
Provision for income taxes - - - -
Net Revenues — Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased $7,729,000 to $15,321,000 as compared to $23,050,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024 included purchase orders from various federal government agency customers totaling over $16 million, which we primarily shipped in the year ended December 31, 2024.
On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order creating an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, to reform federal government processes and reduce expenditures. Pressures on and uncertainty surrounding the U.S. federal government’s budget, and potential changes in budgetary priorities and spending levels, could adversely affect staffing levels and the funding for government projects. Disruptions in how the government agencies operate due to these policies may materially affect our business and resulted in a decline in revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Cost of Net Revenues — Cost of net revenues primarily consists of product costs and post customer support. For the year ended December 31, 2025, cost of sales decreased $4,899,000 to $7,624,000 as compared to $12,523,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was due to lower sales, offset by product mix with decreased equipment purchases during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
Research and Development Expenses — Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $271,000 to $3,076,000 as compared to $2,805,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was due to increased expenses for product development in the United States and Taiwan.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses — Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $610,000 to $11,837,000 as compared to $11,227,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase is primarily due to an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $267,000 and other personnel costs.
Other Income (Expense) — Other income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $36,537,000 as compared to other expense of $53,960,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2025 consisted of (i) gain from change in fair value of earnout liability of $15,402,000; (ii) gain from change in fair value of warrant liability of $20,853,000; and (iii) interest income of $282,000. The income from change in fair value of various financial instruments was primarily the result of a decrease in our stock price.
Other expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 consisted of (i) loss from change in fair value of earnout liability of $18,171,000; (ii) loss from change in fair value of warrant liability of $33,513,000; (iii) loss from change in fair value of convertible debt of $142,000; (iv) loss on note conversion of $1,145,000; (v) interest expense of $1,003,000; and offset by (vi) other income of $14,000. The loss from change in fair value of various financial instruments was primarily the result of an increase in the stock price.
Net Income (Loss) — Net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $29,321,000 as compared to a net loss of $57,465,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The net income primarily related to noncash items of $34,247,000. Noncash items included (i) gain from change in warrant liability of $20,853,000; (ii) gain from change in earnout liability of $15,402,000; and offset by (iii) stock based compensation of $1,630,000; and (iv) net amortization of operating lease right of use asset of $378,000.
The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily related to noncash items of $55,766,000. Noncash items included (i) depreciation of $2,000; (ii) stock based compensation of $1,363,000; (iii) net amortization of operating lease right of use asset of $223,000; (iv) issuance of common stock for services of $199,000; (v) noncash interest expense of $1,008,000; (vi) loss from change in warrant liability of $33,513,000; (vii) loss from change in earnout liability of $18,171,000; (viii) loss from change in fair value of convertible note of $142,000; and (ix) loss on note conversions of $1,145,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources as of December 31, 2025 and 2024
Liquidity is our ability to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are funds generated by operations, levels of accounts receivable and accounts payable and capital expenditures. We have incurred losses from operations in the past few years and had an accumulated deficit of $45.6 million as of December 31, 2025.
On October 8, 2025, we entered into warrant exercise inducement offer letter with the holder of existing common stock warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 2,162,162 shares of common stock to exercise such warrants at the existing exercise price of $4.50 per share, in exchange for our agreement to issue new common stock warrants to purchase 2,702,702 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $6.20. The aggregate gross proceeds received from the exercise of the existing warrants were approximately $9,729,729, before deducting financial advisory fees. We intend to use the net proceeds from the exercise of the existing warrants for working capital and general corporate purposes.
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $8,005,000. This amount was primarily related to (i) net income of $29,321,000; offset by (ii) net working capital changes of $3,080,000 (including a $2,444,000 increase in deferred revenues); and (iii) noncash items of $34,247,000. Noncash items included (iv) gain from change in warrant liability of $20,853,000; (v) gain from change in earnout liability of $15,402,000; and offset by (vi) stock based compensation of $1,630,000; and (vii) net amortization of operating lease right of use asset of $378,000.
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $6,504,000. This amount was primarily related to (i) net loss of $57,465,000; and (ii) net working capital reductions of $4,804,000 (including a $2,780,000 reduction in deferred revenues); offset by (iii) noncash items of $55,766,000. Noncash items included (iv) depreciation of $2,000; (v) stock based compensation of $1,363,000; (vi) net amortization of operating lease right of use asset of $223,000; (vii) issuance of common stock for services of $199,000; (viii) noncash interest expense of $1,008,000; (ix) loss from change in warrant liability of $33,513,000; (x) loss from change in earnout liability of $18,171,000; (xi) loss from change in fair value of convertible note of $142,000; and (xii) loss on note conversions of $1,145,000.
Table of Contents
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $8,347,000 and consisted of (i) net proceeds from exercise of warrants of $9,498,000; (ii) proceeds from stock option exercises of $149,000; and offset by (iii) repayment of advances by founders of $1,300,000.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $14,785,000 and consisted of (i) net proceeds from offering of $7,290,000; (ii) net proceeds from exercise of warrants of $7,705,000; and (iii) proceeds from stock option exercises of $240,000; and (iv) offset by repayment of advances by founders of $450,000.
Debt Financing Arrangements
On June 22, 2023, we entered into a senior secured convertible promissory note with Platinum Capital Partners Inc. (“Platinum”) and received $2,000,000. On June 22, 2024, we entered into an extension agreement with Platinum to extend the maturity date of the $2,000,000 senior secured convertible promissory note to June 22, 2025. In consideration for entering into the extension agreement, we issued to Platinum 232,360 shares of common stock in payment of all interest and extension fees through June 22, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, the Platinum convertible note was fully converted to equity. We issued 879,051 shares of common stock related to the conversion.
On October 3, 2023, we issued senior secured convertible promissory notes for $600,000 to two private investors. At the option of the holders, the notes were convertible into cash, common stock or a combination of cash and stock. On March 5, 2024, the two private investors converted the notes with a face value of $600,000 and interest into 169,204 shares of our common stock valued at $835,610. On September 13, 2024, we issued an additional 86,198 shares of our common stock related to the conversion of notes at $2.65 per share.
We recognized a loss on debt conversion of $1,144,676 during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments [MAKE CHANGES TO SAME DISCLOSURE THAT APPEARS ON PAGE 36]
On July 13, 2023, we entered into a lease in Redmond, WA for 15,567 square feet of office and warehouse space which started on October 1, 2023. The monthly payment is $25,000 per month. The lease expires October 31, 2027 and the monthly payment increases 3% on July 31, 2024 and each year thereafter. There is a one three year option to extend the lease based on the fair market rate on October 31, 2027. We do not believe that is reasonably certain that the lease will be extended.
On February 1, 2025, we entered into an office lease in Mooresville, North Carolina. We lease 5,240 square feet and the net monthly payment is $9,105. The lease expires January 31, 2028 and the monthly payment increases 3% on February 1, 2026 and each year thereafter. There is no option to extend the lease.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as that term is defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K) that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates due to risks and uncertainties, including uncertainty in the current economic environment. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and our actual results, our future consolidated financial statements will be affected.
We believe that the significant accounting policies described in “Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our audited consolidated financial statements are accurate and complete.
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates due to risks and uncertainties, including uncertainty in the current economic environment. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and our actual results, our future consolidated financial statements will be affected.
We believe that the significant accounting policies described in “Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our audited consolidated financial statements are accurate and complete. The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, and judgments that have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Revenue Recognition
The majority of our contracts with our customers include various combinations of our products and post contract support (“PCS”) services. Our products and PCS offerings have significant standalone functionalities and capabilities. Accordingly, the products are distinct from our PCS services as customers can benefit from the products without the PCS services and such PCS services are separately identifiable within the contracts. We account for multiple agreements with a single customer as a single contract if the contractual terms and/or substance of those agreements indicate that they may be so closely related that they are, in effect, parts of a single contract. The amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for delivering on the contract is allocated to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.
We establish the standalone selling price using the prices charged for a deliverable when sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, we estimate the standalone selling price based on our pricing model and offering type (products or PCS services). As our business offerings evolve over time, we may be required to modify our estimated standalone selling prices, and as a result the timing and classification of our revenue could be affected.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. In addition, deferred tax assets are recorded for all future benefits including, but not limited to, net operating losses, research and development credit carryforwards, and basis differences with certain assets and liabilities.
Significant judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. In the event that we change our determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to the provision or benefit for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.
We recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. We do not believe that we currently have any material uncertain tax positions and no reserves are currently required given our deferred tax asset has a 100% valuation allowance.
Table of Contents
Stock Based Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options, warrants, SARs, unvested earnout shares and other equity-based compensation using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation and Monte Carlo valuation models for estimating fair value of such equity instruments. The fair value of such equity instruments is determined at the date of grant and such value is recognized as an expense over the service period of the recipient. The Black-Scholes-Merton and Monte Carlo pricing model uses various inputs and assumptions, including the estimated fair value of the common stock, stock volatility, risk free interest rate over the expected term of the instrument, estimated life of the award, and forfeiture rates of such awards. All of these estimates impact stock based compensation which is a non-cash expense. Changes in the assumptions used in the calculation would impact the recorded stock based compensation. The fair value of the equity instrument is usually calculated at issuance and is not required to be remeasured in the future. Management uses third party experts to assist with certain elements of the fair value calculation and it constantly adjusts the variables used in estimating the fair value of equity instruments issued as compensation.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This topic also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires classification based on observable and unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
We recorded our earnout liability (unvested earnout shares) and public and private placement warrants, remeasured on a recurring basis The recorded value of other financial assets and liabilities, which consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are based upon the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.
We classify as liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net- cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For further information on recent accounting pronouncements, see “Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our audited consolidated financial statements included herein.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements begins on page F-1 of this report and is included herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
There is no information to report pursuant to Item 304(b) of Regulation S-K.
Table of Contents
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of our company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of our company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of our company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 308(b), this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their cost.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2025, there were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting, which were identified in connection with our management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to have a material effect on our internal control over financial reporting.
Table of Contents
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
We have no information to disclose that was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025 but was not reported.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
Not applicable.
Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information about our current directors and executive officers:
Name Age Position
Victor Huang 56 Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director
Derek Xu 69 Chief Operating Officer and Director
Paul Allen 56 President
Mark E. Scott 72 Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Peeyush Ranjan 51 Director
Louis Lebedin 68 Director
Amit Mital 56 Director
Background and Business Experience:
Victor Huang joined Airship as its first employee in October 2004. Mr. Huang has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since December 2023. He has served as Airship’s Chief Executive Officer since April 2007, a member of its Board of Directors since March 2005 and as its Chairman of the Board beginning in January 2012. From June 1996 to September 2004, Mr. Huang was an independent trader and investor. From January 1992 to June 1996, Mr. Huang worked at Smith Barney as a financial consultant. Mr. Huang attended University of Washington where he studied business administration. Mr. Huang is our co-founder and was appointed as a director due to the perspective and experience he brings as an investor, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and one of our largest stockholders.
Derek Xu is a co-founder of Airship. Mr. Xu has served as our Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and a member of the Board since December 2023. He has served as Airship’s Chief Operating Officer since March 2022 and as a member of its Board of Directors since the incorporation of Airship in 2003. Mr. Xu previously served as Airship’s Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Xu also previously served as Airship’s Chief Technology Officer from April 2007 to December 2023. Prior to 2003, Mr. Xu co-founded and sold his Web service company that provided eCommerce solutions for small businesses. Before that, Mr. Xu worked in leadership positions at various tech companies where he helped develop and launch several Web based products for financial institutions. Mr. Xu holds a Ph.D. degree in Geophysics from University of Washington. Mr. Xu is our co-founder and was appointed as a director due to the perspective and experience he brings as an investor, director, Chief Operating Officer and one of our largest stockholders.
Paul Allen has served as our President since December 2023. He has served as Airship’s President since 2019. Mr. Allen joined Airship as the Director of Business Development in 2015 and was promoted to Vice President of Sales in 2017 before being promoted to President in 2019. Prior to joining Airship, Mr. Allen was partner at a boutique firm in Northern Virginia, providing technical goods and services to the U.S. Government and Department of Defense, which he left following a successful private acquisition. Mr. Allen previously spent 14 years with IBM, leaving as a Business Unit Executive in their partner channel organization to pursue a career in direct support of the U.S. Government and Department of Defense. Mr. Allen retired from the U.S. Army 1st Special Forces Command in 2021 with over 28 years of service, the majority of which he spent in the U.S. Army Special Forces as a Green Beret, retiring as the 3rd Battalion 20th Special Forces Group (National Guard) Senior Warrant Officer at the rank of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CW3). Mr. Allen holds a bachelor’s degree in Strategic Studies & Defense Analysis from Norwich University.
Mark E. Scott has served as our Chief Financial Officer since March 1, 2024. He served as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Airship AI since November 2021 and served as a consultant from February 2021 to November 2021. Mr. Scott has served as a consultant and Chief Financial Officer for Valterra Partners LLC, a private equity firm, from 2017 to 2024. Mr. Scott also served as a consultant and Chief Financial Officer of Valuto, Inc., a bitcoin kiosk company, from January 2021 to November 2021. Mr. Scott has operated a wholly owned consulting firm where he advises companies on financial matters. Mr. Scott has significant financial, SEC and merger and acquisition experience in public and private microcap companies. Mr. Scott is a certified public accountant and received a Bachelor of Arts in Accounting from the University of Washington.
Table of Contents
Peeyush Ranjan has served as a member of the Board since December 2023. From 2017 to March 2025 and from 2006-2015, Mr. Ranjan has served as VP, Director or Manager of Engineering at Google, a technology services firm. From 2015 to 2016, he was CTO of Flipkart, an e-commerce services company based in India, and a VP of Engineering at Airbnb. Previously, he was part of engineering teams at Consera Technologies, Hewlett Packard, Infospace, Inc. and Microsoft. He holds a B.Tech. degree in Computer Science from IIT Kharagpur, an M.S. in Computer Science from Purdue University and an M.B.A. in Technology Management from University of Washington. Mr. Ranjan was appointed as a director based on his extensive technology experience.
Louis Lebedin has served as a member of the Board since December 2023. Mr. Lebedin has over 25 years of banking experience with a proven track record of building and leading a world class business. From 2017 to 2019, Mr. Lebedin served as an advisor to Unio Capital LLC, an asset management firm, responsible for product development. From 2006 to 2012, Mr. Lebedin was global head of JP Morgan’s prime brokerage business, a leading provider of clearing and financing services for equity and fixed income hedge funds. He was responsible for defining and executing the strategy for the business, to expand its market share while continuing to meet the evolving needs of its hedge fund clients. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Lebedin served on JP Morgan Clearing Corp.’s Operations Committee and the Equities Division’s Executive Committee. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Lebedin was the chief operating officer and chief financial officer of Bear Stearns’s Global Clearing Services division. Mr. Lebedin joined the Clearance Division in 1988 assuming the role of controller before being promoted to chief financial officer in 1996. From 1980 to 1987, he worked at Coopers & Lybrand, rising to the level of audit manager specializing in financial services. Mr. Lebedin holds a B.S. in accounting from Syracuse University, and he earned his CPA license in 1982. Mr. Lebedin was appointed as a director based on his extensive banking and business experience.
Amit Mital has served as a member of the Board since December 2023. Mr. Mital has over two decades of experience in the tech field and currently serves as CEO and founder of Kernel Labs, which focuses on machine learning, virtual reality and cybersecurity, a position he also held from 2018 to 2021. From 2021 to 2022, Mr. Mital was on the National Security Council (NSC) as the senior director for cybersecurity strategy and policy and also served in the White House as a special assistant to the President. Before Kernel Labs, Mr. Mital was chief technology officer at Symantec Corporation, where he oversaw technology strategy for the cybersecurity company from 2013-2015. While at Kernel Labs, Mr. Mital was also co-founder and chairman of the blockchain-based distributed identification platform Trusted Key, which was later acquired by Workday. Mr. Mital’s longest-tenured job came at Microsoft, where he worked as a corporate vice president for 20 years, and as a general manager concurrently for seven years. Mr. Mital holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering from Dartmouth College. Mr. Mital was appointed as a director based on his executive leadership experience in the technology industry and his senior leadership experience in the United States government, as well as being a cybersecurity industry veteran.
Term of Office
Our directors currently have terms which will end at our next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified, subject to their prior death, resignation or removal. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our officers or directors.
Table of Contents
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
To the best of our knowledge, except as described below, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The Company’s business and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board. The Board consists of five directors, including three independent directors, namely Amit Mital, Peeyush Ranjan and Louis Lebedin. A director is not required to hold any shares in the Company to qualify as a director.
The Board has extensive involvement in the oversight of risk management related to the Company and its business and will accomplish this oversight through the regular reporting to the Board by the audit committee. The audit committee represents the Board by periodically reviewing the Company’s accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of its financial statements, the surveillance of administrative and financial controls and its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Through its regular meetings with management, including the finance, legal, internal audit and information technology functions, the audit committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of the Company’s business and summarize for the Board all areas of risk and the appropriate mitigating factors. In addition, the Board receives periodic detailed operating performance reviews from management.
Board Meetings and Committees
During our last fiscal year, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of Board meetings and (ii) the total number of meetings of the committees on which the director served.
Table of Contents
Independent Directors
Nasdaq rules generally require that independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, the Company has determined that Peeyush Ranjan, Louis Lebedin, and Amit Mital, representing three of the Company’s five directors, are “independent” as defined in the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC rules.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee, which have the responsibilities and authority necessary to comply with applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules. The Board may from time to time establish other committees.
The Company’s chief executive officer and other executive officers will regularly report to the non-executive directors and the audit, the compensation and the nominating and corporate governance committees to ensure effective and efficient oversight of the Company’s activities and to assist in proper risk management and the ongoing evaluation of management controls. We believe that the leadership structure of the Board will provide appropriate risk oversight of the Company’s activities.
Audit Committee
Amit Mital, Peeyush Ranjan and Louis Lebedin serve as members of the audit committee of the Company (the “Audit Committee”), with Mr. Mital serving as the chairperson. Each of the members of the Audit Committee satisfies all independence requirements under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. Our Board has determined that Louis Lebedin possesses accounting or related financial management experience that qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq.
The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is generally responsible for, among other things:
Compensation Committee
Louis Lebedin, Peeyush Ranjan and Amit Mital serve as members of the compensation committee of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”), with Mr. Lebedin serving as the chairperson. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee satisfies the independence requirements under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq.
Table of Contents
The Compensation Committee is generally responsible for overseeing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the salaries and other compensation of our Executive Officers and general employees and providing assistance and recommendations with respect to our compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee is generally responsible for, among other things:
· reviewing and approving the compensation of all other Executive Officers;
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Peeyush Ranjan, Amit Mital and Victor Huang serve as members of the nominating and governance committee of the Company (the “Nominating and Governance Committee”), with Mr. Ranjan serving as the chairperson.
The Nominating and Governance Committee is generally responsible for identifying and proposing new potential director nominees to the Board for consideration and for reviewing our corporate governance policies. The Nominating and Governance Committee is generally responsible for, among other things:
Table of Contents
Code of Ethics
We have adopted code of business conduct that applies to all of its directors, officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our code of business conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Please note that our Internet website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. The Company will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of its code of ethics on its Internet website.
Insider Trading Policy
We have adopted an insider trading policy and procedures governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of its securities by directors, officers and employees, or the Company itself, that are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and any listing standards applicable to the Company.
Communication with our Board of Directors
Our stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with our Board of Directors by sending written communication in an envelope addressed to “Board of Directors” in care of the Secretary, 8210 154th Avenue NE, Suite 120, Redmond WA 98052.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders are required under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Copies of these reports must also be furnished to us.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports received by us, and on written representations by our officers and directors regarding their compliance with the applicable reporting requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, we believe that, with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, all such reports were filed timely.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Airship AI,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” in this section are to the business and operations of Airship AI prior to the merger and the business and operations of the Company as directly or indirectly affected by Airship AI by virtue of the Company’s ownership of the business of Airship AI following the merger.
This section discusses the material components of the executive compensation program for (i) the individual who served as our principal executive officer during fiscal years 2025 and 2024; and (ii) our next two most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 during fiscal years 2025 and 2024 and were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2025 or 2024. We refer to these individuals as our “named executive officers.”
Table of Contents
This discussion may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt following the merger may differ materially from the currently planned programs summarized in this discussion. As an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we are not required to include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and have elected to comply with the scaled disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies.
Summary Compensation Table - Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Non-Equity
Incentive
Stock Plan Option Other
Salary Bonus Awards Compensation Awards Compensation Total
Name and Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards as of the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock underlying outstanding equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Option Awards
Number of Number of
Securities Securities
Underlying Underlying
Unexercised Unexercised Option
Options Options Exercise Option
Exercisable Unexerciseable Price Expiration
Name (#) (#) ($) Date
Stock Option Exercises as of the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following table summarizes the stock option exercises for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2025:
Option Awards Stock Awards
Number of Shares Value Realized Number of Shares Value Realized
Acquired on Exercise on Exercise Acquired on Vesting on Vesting
Name (#) ($) (#) ($)
Victor Huang - $ - - $ -
Derek Xu - $ - - $ -
Paul Allen - $ - - $ -
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the stock option exercises for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2024:
Executive Compensation Arrangements
Other than the annual compensation, bonus and equity incentive awards described above and below, the Company has no other executive compensation, change in control or similar agreements or arrangements.
On March 1, 2024, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mark E. Scott, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, which provides for a base salary of $250,000 annually. Mr. Scott is also eligible to participate in annual performance-based bonus programs established by the Board or Compensation Committee, subject to the achievement of applicable performance criteria established by the Board or Compensation Committee, which shall be determined in good faith by the Board or Compensation Committee. Mr. Scott was also granted options to purchase up to Twenty Five Thousand (25,000) shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to $1.49, which options vested in full on the date of issuance.
On March 4, 2025, we entered into an employment agreement with Paul Allen to serve as our President, which provides for a base salary of $350,000. The term of the employment agreement is for a period of three years, which will be automatically extended for additional one-year periods unless either party gives the other party written notice of such party’s decision not to renew the term at least 90 days prior to the end of the initial three-year term or any renewal term. Mr. Allen is also eligible to participate in annual performance-based bonus programs established from time to time by the Board, subject to the achievement by Mr. Allen and the Company of the applicable performance criteria set forth in the employment agreement and established for Mr. Allen by the Board. The employment agreement is terminable by either party at any time. In the event of termination by us without cause or by Mr. Allen for good reason, as those terms are defined in the employment agreement, he is entitled to three months’ severance. In connection with entering into the employment agreement, Mr. Allen was granted ten-year options under our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock, which options vest immediately, at an exercise price equal to $3.27, being the fair market value on the date of grant. Mr. Allen was also granted ten-year options under the Plan to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock, which options vest quarterly over four years, at an exercise price equal to $3.27, being the fair market value on the date of grant.
Table of Contents
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Mr. Huang and Mr. Xu have stock option grants with a grant date fair value of $216,649 that vest with a change in control.
We have the following potential payments upon termination or change in control with Mark E. Scott:
Early Not For Good Change in
Executive For Cause or Normal Cause Control Disability
Payments Upon Termination Retirement Termination Termination or Death
Compensation:
Base salary (1) $ - $ - $ 83,333 $ - $ -
Performance-based incentive
compensation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Stock options $ - $ - $ - $ 323,491 $ -
Benefits and Perquisites:
Health and welfare benefits $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Accrued vacation pay $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
We have the following potential payments upon termination or change in control with Paul Allen:
Early Not For Good Change in
Executive For Cause or Normal Cause Control Disability
Payments Upon Termination Retirement Termination Termination or Death
Compensation:
Base salary (1) $ - $ - $ 116,667 $ - $ -
Performance-based incentive
compensation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Stock options $ - $ - $ - $ 534,041 $ -
Benefits and Perquisites:
Health and welfare benefits $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Accrued vacation pay $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
Related to the Share Exchange Agreement with Super Simple AI, Inc., on February 17, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2022 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the “SAR Plan”) to issue a maximum of 1,500,000 stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), which was later adjusted to 2,637,150 SARs after the merger.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were 1,758,000 SARs outstanding with a base value of $0.12 and January 2028 expiration. There were no SAR grants during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Table of Contents
Payment of Appreciation Amount
The appreciation distribution in respect to a SAR may be paid in cash, in common stock of the Company, in any combination of the two or in any other form of consideration, as determined by the Board and contained in the stock appreciation rights agreement evidencing such SAR.
Amendment and Termination
Our board of directors may terminate or amend the SAR Plan at any time, but no such action shall adversely affect rights under any outstanding award without the holder’s consent.
Upon consummation of the merger, each SAR granted under the SAR Plan that was outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger converted into a stock appreciation right denominated in shares of common stock (each, a “Converted SAR”). Each Converted SAR will continue to have and be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such SAR immediately prior to the effective time, except that (i) each Converted SAR will cover that number of shares of common stock equal to (A) the product of (1) the number of shares of common stock subject to such SAR immediately prior to the effective time and (2) the conversion ratio and (B) a number of earnout shares in accordance with, and subject to, the contingencies set forth in the Merger Agreement, and (ii) the per share base value for each share of common stock covered by the Converted SAR will be equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the base value per share of common stock of such SAR immediately prior to the effective time by (B) the conversion ratio.
2023 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan
On December 4, 2023, the Company adopted the Airship AI Holdings, Inc. 2023 Equity Incentive Plan, which plan was approved by stockholders at the extraordinary general meeting held on December 19, 2023 in connection with the merger. On October 15, 2025, the Company adopted the Airship AI Holdings, Inc. 2023 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), which increased the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted thereunder by 2,000,000 shares. The Equity Incentive Plan was approved by our stockholders at our annual meeting held on December 11, 2025. This section summarizes certain principal features of the Equity Incentive Plan.
The Equity Incentive Plan is a comprehensive incentive compensation plan under which the Company can grant equity-based and other incentive awards to its officers, employees, directors, consultants and advisers. The purpose of the Equity Incentive Plan is to help the Company attract, motivate and retain such persons with awards under the Equity Incentive Plan and thereby enhance shareholder value.
Administration. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Board, which consists of three members of the Board, each of whom is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act and “independent” for purposes of any applicable listing requirements. If a member of the compensation committee is eligible to receive an award under the Equity Incentive Plan, such compensation committee member shall have no authority under the plan with respect to his or her own award. Among other things, the compensation committee has complete discretion, subject to the express limits of the Equity Incentive Plan, to determine the directors, employees and nonemployee consultants to be granted an award, the type of award to be granted the terms and conditions of the award, the form of payment to be made and/or the number of shares of common stock subject to each award, the exercise price of each option and base price of each stock appreciation right (“SAR”), the term of each award, the vesting schedule for an award, whether to accelerate vesting, the value of the common stock underlying the award, and the required withholding, if any. The compensation committee may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding award, provided that the participant’s consent to such action is required if the action would impair the participant’s rights or entitlements with respect to that award. The compensation committee is also authorized to construe the award agreements, and may prescribe rules relating to the Equity Incentive Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the compensation committee does not have any authority to grant or modify an award under the Equity Incentive Plan with terms or conditions that would cause the grant, vesting or exercise thereof to be considered nonqualified “deferred compensation” subject to Code Section 409A, unless such award is structured to be exempt from or comply with all requirements of Code Section 409A.
Grant of Awards; Shares Available for Awards. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of stock options, SARs, performance share awards, performance unit awards, distribution equivalent right awards, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and unrestricted stock awards to non-employee directors, officers, employees and nonemployee consultants of the Company or its affiliates. The aggregate number of shares of common stock initially reserved and available for grant and issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan is 7,068,009. Such aggregate number of shares of stock will automatically increase on January 1 of each year for a period of ten years commencing on January 1, 2026 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2035, in an amount equal to 2.0% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding year; provided, however, that the Board may act prior to January 1 of a given year to provide that the increase for such year will be a lesser number of shares of common stock. No more than 7,068,009 shares of common stock in the aggregate may be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan in connection with incentive stock options. Shares shall be deemed to have been issued under the Equity Incentive Plan solely to the extent actually issued and delivered pursuant to an award. If any award granted under the Equity Incentive Plan expires, is cancelled, or terminates unexercised or is forfeited, the number of shares subject thereto is again available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan, other than any shares tendered or withheld in order to exercise or satisfy withholding obligation in respect of any award. The Equity Incentive Plan shall continue in effect, unless sooner terminated, until the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date on which it is adopted by the Board.
Table of Contents
It is expected that all of our employees, consultants, advisors and service providers and all of our non-executive officer directors will be eligible to participate in the Equity Incentive Plan. Future new hires and additional non-employee directors and/or consultants would be eligible to participate in the Equity Incentive Plan as well. The number of stock options and/or shares of restricted stock to be granted to executives and directors cannot be determined at this time as the grant of stock options and/or shares of restricted stock is dependent upon various factors such as hiring requirements and job performance.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Limit. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for a limit on non-employee director compensation. The maximum number of shares of stock that may be subject to an award granted under the Equity Incentive Plan during any single fiscal year to any non-employee director, when taken together with any cash fees paid to such non-employee director during such year in respect of his or her service as a non-employee director (including service as a member or chair of any committee of the board), shall not exceed $250,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such award based on the fair market value on the date of grant of such award for financial reporting purposes).
Stock Options. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of either “incentive stock options” (“ISOs”), which are intended to meet the requirements for special federal income tax treatment under Section 422 of the Code, or “nonqualified stock options” (“NQSOs”). Stock options may be granted on such terms and conditions as the compensation committee may determine, which shall be specified in the option agreement; provided, however, that the per share exercise price under a stock option may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant and the term of the stock option may not exceed 10 years (110% of such value and five years in the case of an ISO granted to an employee who owns (or is deemed to own) more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of our company or a parent or subsidiary of our company). ISOs may only be granted to employees. In addition, the aggregate fair market value of common stock covered by one or more ISOs (determined at the time of grant), which are exercisable for the first time by an employee during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. Any excess is treated as a NQSO.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A SAR entitles the participant, upon exercise, to receive an amount, in cash or stock or a combination thereof, equal to the increase in the fair market value of the underlying common stock between the date of grant and the date of exercise. The compensation committee shall set forth in the applicable SAR award agreement the terms and conditions of the SAR, including the base value for the SAR (which shall not be less than the fair market value of a share on the date of grant), the number of shares subject to the SAR and the period during which the SAR may be exercised and any other special rules and/or requirements which the compensation committee imposes on the SAR. No SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of grant. SARs may be granted in tandem with, or independently of, stock options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan. A SAR granted in tandem with a stock option (i) is exercisable only at such times, and to the extent, that the related stock option is exercisable in accordance with the procedure for exercise of the related stock option; (ii) terminates upon termination or exercise of the related stock option (likewise, the common stock option granted in tandem with a SAR terminates upon exercise of the SAR); (iii) is transferable only with the related stock option; and (iv) if the related stock option is an ISO, may be exercised only when the value of the stock subject to the stock option exceeds the exercise price of the stock option. A SAR that is not granted in tandem with a stock option is exercisable at such times as the compensation committee may specify.
Performance Shares and Performance Unit Awards. Performance share and performance unit awards entitle the participant to receive cash or shares of common stock upon the attainment of specified performance goals. In the case of performance units, the right to acquire the units is denominated in cash values. The compensation committee shall set forth in the applicable award agreement the performance goals and objectives and the period of time to which such goals and objectives shall apply. If such goals and objectives are achieved, such distribution of shares, or payment in cash, as the case may be, shall be made no later than by the fifteenth (15th) day of the third (3rd) calendar month next following the end of the company’s fiscal year to which such performance goals and objectives relate, unless otherwise structured to comply with Code Section 409A.
Table of Contents
Distribution Equivalent Right Awards. A distribution equivalent right award entitles the participant to receive bookkeeping credits, cash payments and/or common stock distributions equal in amount to the distributions that would have been made to the participant had the participant held a specified number of shares of common stock during the period the participant held the distribution equivalent right. A distribution equivalent right may be awarded as a component of another award (but not an option or SAR award) under the Equity Incentive Plan, where, if so awarded, such distribution equivalent right will expire or be forfeited by the participant under the same conditions as under such other award. The compensation committee shall set forth in the applicable distribution equivalent rights award agreement the terms and conditions, if any, including whether the holder is to receive credits currently in cash, is to have such credits reinvested (at fair market value determined as of the date of reinvestment) in additional shares of common stock, or is to be entitled to choose among such alternatives.
Restricted Stock Awards. A restricted stock award is a grant or sale of common stock to the holder, subject to such restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions, if any, as the compensation committee or the board of directors may impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), in such instalments or otherwise, as the compensation committee or the board of directors may determine at the date of grant or purchase or thereafter. If provided for under the restricted stock award agreement, a participant who is granted or has purchased restricted stock shall have all of the rights of a shareholder, including the right to vote the restricted stock and the right to receive dividends thereon (subject to any mandatory reinvestment or other requirement imposed by the compensation committee or the board of directors or in the award agreement). During the restricted period applicable to the restricted stock, subject to certain exceptions, the restricted stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged, exchanged, hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of by the participant.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. A restricted stock unit award provides for a grant of shares or a cash payment to be made to the holder upon the satisfaction of predetermined individual service-related vesting requirements, based on the number of units awarded to the holder. The compensation committee shall set forth in the applicable restricted stock unit award agreement the individual service-based vesting requirements which the holder would be required to satisfy before the holder would become entitled to payment and the number of units awarded to the holder. The holder of a restricted stock unit shall be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock, or one share of common stock, as determined in the sole discretion of the compensation committee and as set forth in the restricted stock unit award agreement, for each restricted stock unit subject to such restricted stock unit award, if and to the extent the holder satisfies the applicable vesting requirements. Such payment or distribution shall be made no later than by the fifteenth (15th ) day of the third (3rd) calendar month next following the end of the calendar year in which the restricted stock unit first becomes vested, unless otherwise structured to comply with Code Section 409A. A restricted stock unit shall not constitute an equity interest in the company and shall not entitle the holder to voting rights, dividends or any other rights associated with ownership of shares prior to the time the holder shall receive a distribution of shares.
Unrestricted Stock Awards. An unrestricted stock award is a grant or sale of shares of common stock to the employees, non-employee directors or non-employee consultants that are not subject to transfer, forfeiture or other restrictions, in consideration for past services rendered to the company or an affiliate or for other valid consideration.
Adjustment to Shares. Subject to any required action by shareholders of the company, the number of shares of common stock covered by each outstanding award shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares resulting from a subdivision or consolidation of shares, including, but not limited to, a stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, continuation or reclassification, or the payment of a stock dividend (but only on the stock) or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares effected without receipt of consideration by the company.
Change-in-Control Provisions. The compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, at the time an award is granted or at any time prior to, coincident with or after the time of a change in control, cause any award either (i) to be cancelled in consideration of a payment in cash or other consideration in amount per share equal to the excess, if any, of the price or implied price per share of common stock in the change in control over the per share exercise, base or purchase price of such award, which may be paid immediately or over the vesting schedule of the award; (ii) to be assumed, or new rights substituted therefore, by the surviving corporation or a parent or subsidiary of such surviving corporation following such change in control; (iii) accelerate any time periods, or waive any other conditions, relating to the vesting, exercise, payment or distribution of an award so that any award to a holder whose employment has been terminated as a result of a change in control may be vested, exercised, paid or distributed in full on or before a date fixed by the compensation committee; (iv) to be purchased from a holder whose employment has been terminated as a result of a change of control, upon the holder’s request, for an amount of cash equal to the amount that could have been obtained upon the exercise, payment or distribution of such rights had such award been currently exercisable or payable; or (v) terminate any then outstanding award or make any other adjustment to the awards then outstanding as the compensation committee deems necessary or appropriate to reflect such transaction or change. The number of shares subject to any award shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Table of Contents
Transferability. No award may be assigned, transferred, sold, exchanged, encumbered, pledged or otherwise hypothecated or disposed of by a holder except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or by gift to any immediate family member of the holder, subject to compliance with applicable laws.
Amendment and Termination. The compensation committee may adopt, amend and rescind rules relating to the administration of the Equity Incentive Plan, and amend, suspend or terminate the Equity Incentive Plan, but no such amendment or termination will be made that materially and adversely impairs the rights of any participant with respect to any award received thereby under the Equity Incentive Plan without the participant’s consent, other than amendments that are necessary to permit the granting of awards in compliance with applicable laws. In addition, no amendment that results (directly or indirectly ) in the reduction of the exercise price of an option or SAR or that otherwise requires shareholder approval under applicable law will be made without shareholder approval.
Director Compensation
We primarily use monthly fees and stock option grants to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. This compensation reflected the financial condition of the Company. In setting director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the skill-level required by our members of the Board. During the year ended December 31, 2025, Victor Huang and Derek Xu did not receive any compensation for their services as directors. The compensation disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” above represents the total compensation for Mr. Huang and Mr. Xu.
Our independent non-employee directors are compensated in cash and stock option grants. The non-employee directors receive $100,000 of compensation in cash and stock option grants after appointment at the annual shareholder meetings. The stock option grants generally vest quarterly over four years.
Our non-employee directors received the following compensation during the year ended December 31, 2025:
Non-Equity Non-Qualified
Fees Earned Incentive Deferred
or Paid in Plan Compensation Other
Cash Stock Option Compensation Earnings Compensation
Name $ Awards Awards (1) ($) $ ($) Total
Table of Contents
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2025 regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by:
● each of our current executive officers and directors; and
● all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group.
Percentage of beneficial ownership of common stock is based on 34,368,162 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2025.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to, or the power to receive the economic benefit of ownership of, the securities. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days are included, including through the exercise of any option or other right or the conversion of any other security. However, these shares are not included in the computation of the percentage ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of shares beneficially owned by them.
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Name of Beneficial Owner (1) Shares %
Directors and Named Executive Officers-
Armistice Capital Master Fund LLC (9) 2,702,702 7.3 %
_________
* Less than 1%
Table of Contents
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information about the securities authorized for issuance under our incentive plans as of December 31, 2025:
(a) (b) (c)
Number of securities
remaining available
Number of securities Weighted-average for future issuance
to be issued upon exercise price of under equity compensation
exercise of outstanding outstanding options, plan (excluding securities
Equity compensation plan
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders - - -
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth certain information about the securities authorized for issuance under our incentive plans for SARS as of December 31, 2025:
(a) (b) (c)
Number of securities
remaining available
Number of securities Weighted-average for future issuance
to be issued upon exercise price of under equity compensation
exercise of outstanding outstanding options, plan (excluding securities
Equity compensation plan
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders - - -
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Advances due to Founders
As of January 1, 2024, advances due to founders totaled $1,750,000. During 2024, Mr. Huang and Mr. Xu advanced Airship AI $2,100,000 and were repaid $2,550,000, with $1,300,000 recorded as advances from founders as of December 31, 2024. During 2025, Mr. Huang and Mr. Xu were repaid $650,000 each, with $0 recorded as advances from founders as of December 31, 2025.
Master Loan Agreement with Victor Huang
On September 27, 2024, we entered into a master loan agreement with Mr. Huang, whereby he may provide additional funding of up to $1,500,000 under certain terms and conditions. The agreement provides for interest of 6%. We agreed to pay interest for the 2024 advances of $11,913 and issued warrants to purchase up to 220,000 shares of common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.36 per share, are exercisable immediately upon issuance and will expire in five years following the date of issuance. The $284,478 fair value of the warrant is recorded in permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets and was fully expensed on the date of grant. There are no outstanding advances under the master loan agreement as of December 31, 2024. The master loan agreement was terminated September 2, 2025.
Indemnification
The Company’s charter and bylaws provide that the Company will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers.
Policies and Procedures for Related Persons Transactions
Pursuant to its Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee will have the responsibility to review related party transactions. A “related person transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which the post-combination company or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, the amount of which involved exceeds $120,000 (or, for so long as we remain a “smaller reporting company” the lesser of (i) $120,000 and (ii) 1% of our average total assets of the two completed fiscal years), and in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A “related person” means:
Table of Contents
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy and procedures for audit, audit-related and tax services that can be performed by the independent auditors without specific authorization from the Audit Committee subject to certain restrictions. The policy sets out the specific services pre-approved by the Audit Committee and the applicable limitations, while ensuring the independence of the independent auditors to audit our financial statements is not impaired. The pre-approval policy does not include a delegation to management of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities under the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditors.
Service Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee engaged BPM LLP to perform an annual audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The following is the breakdown of aggregate fees paid for the last two fiscal years. Another tax firm prepares our tax returns.
Year Ended Year Ended
Tax fees - -
-”Audit Fees” are fees paid for professional services for the audit and quarterly reviews of our financial statements.
- “Tax Fees” are fees primarily for tax compliance in connection with filing US income tax returns.
“All other fees” related to the reviews of Registration Statements on Form S-1 and S-4.
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) List of Documents Filed as a Part of This Report:
The Company’s financial statements, as indicated by the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth below, begin on page F-1. Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 207) F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets F-2
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss F-3
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-6
(2) Index to Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto, or because it is not required.
(3) Index to Exhibits:
See exhibits listed under Part (b) below.
Table of Contents
(b) Exhibits:
Exhibit No. Description
Table of Contents
23.1* Consent of BPM LLP, Independent Registered Accounting Firm.
101.SCH* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
* Filed herewith
+ Indicates a management or compensatory plan.
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Airship AI Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Airship AI Holdings, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ BPM LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
Santa Rosa, California
February 16, 2026
Table of Contents
AIRSHIP AI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
OTHER ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Operating lease liability, net of current portion 425,109 638,525
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9)
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (10,879 ) (3,470 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
AIRSHIP AI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Year Ended Year Ended
NET REVENUES:
COST OF NET REVENUES:
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) :
Loss from change in fair value of convertible debt - (141,636 )
Loss on note conversion - (1,144,676 )
Provision for income taxes - -
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Foreign currency (loss) income, net (7,409 ) 9,338
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
AIRSHIP AI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OFCHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Common Additional Other Total
Common Stock Paid in Accumulated Comprehensive Stockholders'
Stock $ Capital Deficit (Loss) Gain Deficit
Foreign currency translation gain - - - - 9,338 9,338
Foreign currency translation loss - - - - (7,409 ) (7,409 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
AIRSHIP AI HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended Year Ended
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Depreciation and amortization - 1,861
Amortization of operating lease right of use asset 378,448 222,780
Issuance of common stock for services - 198,500
Noncash interest expense - 1,008,419
Loss from change in fair value of convertible note - 141,636
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Payroll and income tax receivable - 7,230
Accounts payable - trade and accrued expenses 366,649 (2,294,698 )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock and warrants for offering, net - 7,290,000
Repayment of advances from founders (1,300,000 ) -
Advances from founders - (450,000 )
Effect from exchange rate on cash (7,409 ) 9,338
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid $ - $ 11,913
Taxes paid $ - $ 2,410
Noncash investing and financing
Issuance of common stock for debt interest payment $ - $ 1,008,442
Issuance of common stock for debt conversion $ - $ 4,114,831
Issuance of common stock for earnout shares $ 5,282,125 $ -
Recognition of operating right-of-use asset $ 304,339 $ -
Recognition of operating lease liability $ 304,339 $ -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
AIRSHIP AI HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization
Airship AI Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Airship”) is a holding company incorporated in Delaware that executes business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Airship AI, Inc. (“Airship AI”). Prior to the formation of Super Simple AI, Inc. in 2022, the Company operated as Airship AI, Inc. (formerly known as JDL Digital Systems, Inc.). On March 7, 2023, Super Simple AI, Inc. changed its name to Airship AI Holdings, Inc. Super Simple AI, Inc. was formed in January 2022 through a share exchange with JDL Digital Systems, Inc. JDL Digital Systems, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington on June 30, 2003.
On December 21, 2023, the Company completed the merger (the “Merger”) contemplated by the merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) dated as of June 27, 2023 and amended on September 22, 2023, by and among BYTE Acquisition Corp. (“BYTS”), BYTE Merger Sub, Inc., a Washington corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of BYTS (“Merger Sub”), and Airship AI.
Effective December 21, 2023, Merger Sub merged with and into Airship AI with Airship AI as the surviving corporation. Thus, Airship AI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In connection with the Merger, Airship AI changed its name from “Airship AI Holdings, Inc.” to “Airship AI, Inc.”
Fair Value Transactions in Connection with Merger
As a result of the Merger, the Company entered into the following transactions that were measured at fair value and vary quarterly with the share price and other items. Any change is non-cash and is recorded as a gain or loss in other income (expense). See Note 13– Fair Value Measurements for more information.
Liability as of Liability as of
Business
The Company is a robust AI-driven data management platform that solves complex data challenges for large institutions operating in dynamic and mission-critical environments with rapidly increasing volumes of data being ingested from a similarly rapidly growing number of data sources.
The Company solves these challenges by structuring “dark” or unstructured data at the edge, the location at which the data is generated and collected, and leveraging purpose-built AI models. Unstructured, or “dark” data, which is typically categorized as qualitative data, cannot be processed and analyzed via conventional data tools and methods. Conversely, structured data, typically categorized as quantitative data, is highly organized and easily decipherable by machine learning algorithms.
Structuring and then analyzing data using AI models at the edge, versus transmitting the data from the edge back to a central processing location for structuring and analysis, enables real-time decision making and data-driven operational efficiency.
The Company specializes in ingesting all available metadata from edge-based sensors used by government and law enforcement agencies around the world, including surveillance cameras (video), audio, telemetry, acoustic, seismic, and autonomous devices, along with large commercial corporations with fundamentally similar capabilities and requirements.
Table of Contents
Data generated by these edge-based sensors, including video, can then be run through the Company’s trained AI models to detect objects present within the video frame. Once an object is detected, for example an automobile, additional identifying characteristics of the object can be extracted from the image including the license plate characters and the make, model, and color of the automobile. This process of analyzing, logging and categorizing ingested data is referred to as “structuring” the data.
Airship AI’s software allows customers to view structured data both in real-time as well as to conduct searches on the structured data at a later point in time. Real-time structured data use includes, for example, alarms on a specific license plate or a specific make, model or color of automobile. Non-real-time structured data use includes, for example, searching a database of video data that has been previously ingested and stored to find instances of a particular license plate being visible, along with other logged vehicle characteristics such as make, model and color of an automobile.
Additional edge deployed AI models enable similar object detection and recognition of common and custom trained objects, such as an aircraft, boat, person, animal, bag, or weapon. Airship AI’s models provide similar data points for these object types allowing analysts the ability to be notified in real-time of the detection of a specified object and similarly search for historically detected objects. Examples include detecting aircrafts and boats along with their respective tail numbers and hull registration numbers.
The Company’s AI modelling process starts with pre-trained AI models from its technology ecosystem partners which the Company then customizes using proprietary datasets tailored towards its customers’ unique workflow requirements. Where customers have pre-existing AI models or engines, the Company integrates those models or engines into its edge platform allowing customers to leverage proprietary models within the Airship AI software ecosystem.
The Company’s primary offerings include Outpost AI, Acropolis, and Airship Command. Its offerings allow customers to manage their data across the full data lifecycle, when and where they need it, using a highly secure permissioned based architecture.
The Company employed sixty three employees as of December 31, 2025. The employees are headquartered in Redmond, WA and are supported by a growing team at its Customer Center of Excellence located in Charlotte, NC. The Company employed eight research and development personnel in Taiwan as of December 31, 2025.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
Functional Currency
The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar. The Company’s functional currency for U.S. operations is the U.S. Dollar. The operations of Zeppelin Worldwide, Inc. and its subsidiary, Zeppelin Taiwan, Ltd. (together “Zeppelin”) use the Taiwan Dollar as its functional currency. At each period end, Zeppelin’s balance sheet is translated into U.S. Dollars based upon the period end exchange rate, while their statements of operations and comprehensive loss and statements of cash flows are translated into U.S. Dollars based upon an average exchange rate during the period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company classifies highly liquid temporary investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased as cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions. Balances at US banks are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant risk for cash on deposit.
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue
The Company primarily generates revenue from sales of systems and products and the related post contract support to customers. The Company’s primary systems and products include Outpost AI, Acropolis and Airship Command. To date, the majority of the Company’s product revenue that has been recognized consists primarily of a bundled offering of hardware and software which delivers on premise solutions to its customers. Separate limited software subscription services have been delivered to customers including those customers that are able to operate in a cloud-based environment. The transaction price recognized as revenue represents the amount the Company expects to be entitled to and is primarily comprised of product revenue, net of returns and variable consideration, including sales incentives provided to customers. Payment is typically due within 30 to 90 calendar days of the invoice date.
The Company recognizes revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by following a five-step process: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price, and (5) recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation, as further described below. The Company generally provides a warranty to its customers for its software products and services. In the event that there is a failure of warranties in such agreements, the Company is generally obligated to correct the product or service to conform to the warranty provision as set forth in the applicable agreement, or, if the Company is unable to do so, the customer is entitled to seek a refund of the purchase price of the product and service (generally prorated over the contract term). For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company did not incur any significant warranty expenses and as such a warranty reserve was not considered necessary as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Product Revenue
Product revenue is derived primarily from sales of the Company’s system offerings, Outpost AI, Acropolis and Airship Command. The Company recognizes product revenue at a point in time when title transfers, when the products are shipped, or when control of the system is transferred to the customer, which usually is upon delivery of the system and when contractual performance obligations have been satisfied.
Post Contract Support Revenue
Post Contract Support (“PCS”) revenue is derived primarily from the Company’s support and software maintenance agreements (“SMA”). The Company’s PCS includes the right to receive, on a when and if available basis, future unspecified firmware upgrades and features as well as bug fixes, and email and telephone support. The Company allocates a portion of the transaction price to the PCS performance obligation based on a cost-plus methodology and recognizes the associated revenue on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the support period. The Company’s support contracts are typically one to five years with an average of four years, payment is due within 30 to 90 calendars days of the invoice date and may include options to renew. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized revenue of $2,461,217 and $339,947, respectively, related to one-year support contracts. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized revenue of $2,638,539 and $3,994,070 respectively, related to multi-year support contracts.
Other Services
The Company earns other service revenues from installation services, training and licensing which are short-term in nature and revenue for these services are recognized at the time of performance when the service is provided. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized revenue of $86,031 and $0, respectively, related to other services.
Table of Contents
Contracts with Multiple Performance Obligations
The Company’s contracts with customers often contain multiple performance obligations that can include three separate obligations: (i) a hardware component (which may be bundled with hardware accessories) and the embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware component delivered at the time of sale; (ii) the right to the Company’s downloadable free application and software solutions, and (iii) the right for the customer to receive post contract support (“PCS”) after the initial sale. The Company’s products and PCS offerings have significant standalone functionalities and capabilities. Accordingly, the products are distinct from the Company’s PCS services as customers can benefit from the products without the PCS services and such PCS services are separately identifiable within the contracts. The Company accounts for multiple agreements with a single customer as a single contract if the contractual terms and/or substance of those agreements indicate that they may be so closely related that they are, in effect, parts of a single contract. The amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for delivering on the contract is allocated to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.
The Company establishes the standalone selling price using the prices charged for a deliverable when sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the standalone selling price based on its pricing model and offering type (products or PCS services).
The Company has elected the practical expedient to not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component as the Company’s standard payment terms are less than one year.
The Company sells its products primarily through a direct sales force. The Company considers revenue to be earned when all of the following criteria are met:
☐ Promised performance obligations are identified,
☐ The transaction price is allocated to multiple performance obligations, and
☐ The Company has satisfied the performance obligations to the customer.
Transfer of control is evidenced upon passage of title and risk of loss to the customer unless the Company is required to provide additional services.
The Company’s short-term and long-term deferred revenue balances totaled $4,668,105 and $3,966,407 as of December 31, 2025. The Company’s short-term and long-term deferred revenue balances totaled $3,238,483 and $2,951,850 as of December 31, 2024. Of the deferred revenue balance of $6,190,333 and $8,970,780 as of January 1, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized approximately $3,238,483 and $4,008,654 during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Provision for Credit Losses
The Company generally sells its products to large governmental entities and large corporations in the United States. Accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amounts and are non-interest bearing.
The Company determined estimates of uncollectible accounts receivable based primarily on actual historical bad debt and sales return trends, customers financial condition and general economic conditions. Under the application of Accounting Standards Codification 326, the Company’s historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses, as well as current economic and business conditions, and anticipated future economic events that may impact collectability. In developing its expected credit loss estimate, the Company evaluated the appropriate grouping of financial assets based upon its evaluation of risk characteristics, including consideration of the types of products and services sold. Account balances are written off against the allowance for expected credit losses after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
Table of Contents
Occasionally certain long-standing customers, who routinely place large orders, will have unusually large receivables balances relative to the total gross receivables. Management monitors the payments for these large balances closely and very often requires payment of existing invoices before shipping new sales orders. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company did not have a reserve for credit losses as all accounts receivable are considered collectible. Accounts receivable balances as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and January 1, 2024 were $6,462,675, $1,226,757 and $1,648,904, respectively.
Concentration of Credit and Sales Risk
The Company sells its product to commercial and government customers under agreements that are normally paid within 30 days of contract completion.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company had revenue from ninety two customers and four customers represented 87% of total revenue. The primary reason for the high level of customer concentration for the year ended December 31, 2025 was due to reliance on these four customers for the year ended December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2025, three customers represent approximately 84% of outstanding account receivables. Due to the nature of the customers and timely payment history, customer concentration and credit risk in account receivables is estimated to be minimal.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had revenue from seventy-four customers and one customer represented 57% of total revenue, although such a high level of customer concentration is not typical. The primary reason for the high level of customer concentration for the year ended December 31, 2024 was due to one large order received in late 2023 which was fulfilled in the year ended December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, four customers represent approximately 92% of outstanding account receivables. Due to the nature and concentration of the customers and timely payment history, credit risk in account receivables is estimated to be minimal.
Inventory
The Company’s purchase of inventory, primarily computer servers, is undertaken to match purchase orders received from customers. Upon receipt of inventory, the Company generally configures the servers and loads proprietary software onto the servers before shipping out. The Company holds inventory for a short period of time and as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, it had no inventory in stock. Inventory value is primarily material costs and is valued at the lower of cost (first in, first out method) or net realizable value.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment annually or when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets under certain circumstances are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any future service potential to the Company are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value (less the projected cost associated with selling the asset). To the extent carrying values exceed fair values, an impairment loss is recognized in operating results. The Company recorded impairment losses of $0 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist of the cost of employees, consultants and contractors who design, engineer and develop new products and processes as well as materials, supplies and facilities used in producing prototypes.
The Company’s current research and development efforts are primarily focused on improving the Company’s products. The Company is also actively involved in identifying new applications. The Company’s current internal team along with outside consultants has considerable experience working with the application of the Company’s technologies and their applications. The Company engages third party experts as required to supplement the Company’s internal team. The Company believes that continued development of new and enhanced technologies is essential to the Company’s future success. The Company incurred research and development expenses of $3,076,466 and $2,804,894 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, on development activities.
Table of Contents
Software Development Costs
Costs incurred in the development of software programs for the Company’s products are charged to operations as incurred until technological feasibility of the software has been established. Generally, technological feasibility is established when the software module performs its primary functions described in its original specifications, contains features required for it to be usable in a production environment, is completely documented and the related hardware portion of the product is complete. After technological feasibility is established, any additional costs are capitalized. Capitalization of software costs ceases when the software is substantially complete and is ready for its intended use. No software development costs have been capitalized as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Cost of Net Revenues
Cost of net revenues for products includes components and freight. Cost of net revenues for post contract support and other services includes primarily the cost of personnel and personnel-related expenses to conduct implementations and ongoing client support.
Advertising
Advertising costs are charged to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred. Advertising and marketing costs for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $360,982 and $182,346, respectively.
Shipping and Handling of Products
Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling of products are included in net revenues. Costs incurred related to shipping and handling of products are included in cost of revenues.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This topic also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires classification based on observable and unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level2 — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company initially recorded its senior secured convertible promissory notes, earnout liability (unvested earnout shares), and the warrants that were issued with the notes at fair value, remeasured on a recurring basis and considered them as Level 3 instruments. The public and private warrants were considered Level 1 and 2 instruments, respectively. The senior secured convertible promissory notes were converted to equity during the year ended December 31, 2024. The recorded value of other financial assets and liabilities, which consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are based upon the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.
The Company classifies as liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net- cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).
Table of Contents
Derivative Liabilities and Earnout Liabilities
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including issued share purchase warrants and earnout shares to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. The Company classifies as liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net- cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).
At the Merger closing, the Company assumed 515,000 private placement warrants and 16,184,612 public warrants. As of December 31, 2025, there were 515,000 private placement warrants and 16,145,008 public warrants outstanding.
Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company evaluated the warrants and concluded that they did not meet the criteria to be classified within the stockholders’ deficit. Accordingly, the Company recognizes the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The initial estimated fair value of the warrants was measured using a Monte Carlo simulation. The subsequent estimated fair value of the public warrants is based on the listed price in an active market for such warrants while the fair value of the private placement warrants continues to be measured using a Monte Carlo simulation with the key inputs being directly or indirectly observable public warrants listed price.
At the closing of the Merger, the Airship AI securityholders that hold shares of common stock of Airship AI, Airship AI options, Airship AI earnout warrants or Airship AI SARs had the contingent right to receive up to 5.0 million additional shares of common stock, subject to certain contingencies. These earnout shares have been categorized into two components: (i) the vested shares that are associated with stockholders with vested equity at the closing of the Merger that will be earned upon achievement of the earnout milestones and (ii) the unvested shares associated with stockholders with unvested equity at the closing of the Merger that will be earned over the remaining service period with the Company on their unvested equity shares and upon achievement of the earnout milestones.
The earnout shares associated with vested shares are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815-40, as the events that determine the number of earnout shares required to be released or issued, as the case may be, include events that were not solely indexed to the fair value of common stock of the Company. The earnout shares were measured at the Merger closing and subsequently measured at each reporting date until settled or when they met the criteria for equity classification. Accordingly, the Company recognizes the earnout shares as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The earnout shares were valued using a Monte Carlo analysis.
At the closing of the Merger, the earnout shares associated with unvested underlying shares were considered to be equity instruments and valued at approximately $2,675,000. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company stock-based compensation expense for the vesting of earnout shares was $535,044. As of December 31, 2025, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested earnout shares totaled $1,605,136. The weighted average period over which this remaining compensation cost is expected to be recognized is 3 years.
Derivative warrant and earnout shares liabilities are classified as non-current liabilities as their liquidation is not reasonably expected to require the use of significant current assets or require the creation of current liabilities.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has share-based compensation plans under which employees, consultants, suppliers and directors may be granted restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, unvested earnout shares and warrants to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value at the time of grant. Stock-based compensation cost is measured by the Company at the grant date and the fair value of the award is recognized as an expense, over the requisite service period which is generally the vesting period. The Company adjusts stock-based compensation for changes to the estimate of expected equity award forfeitures based on actual forfeiture experience. The effect of adjusting the forfeiture rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company’s ability to realize deferred tax assets depends upon future taxable income, as well as the limitations discussed below. For financial reporting purposes, a deferred tax asset must be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized prior to expiration. The Company considers historical and future taxable income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, taxable income in prior carryback years, and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the need for valuation.
Comprehensive (Loss) Gain
Comprehensive (loss) gain is defined as the change in equity of a business during a period from non-owner sources. There was other comprehensive loss of $7,409 and gain of $9,338 related to foreign exchange translation for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Going Concern Assessment
The Company applies Accounting Standards Codification 205-40 (“ASC 205-40”), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued to provide guidance on determining when and how reporting companies must disclose going concern uncertainties in their consolidated financial statements. ASC 205-40 requires management to perform assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the entity’s consolidated financial statements (or within one year after the date on which the consolidated financial statements are available to be issued, when applicable). Further, a company must provide certain disclosures if there is “substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern” and management plans to alleviate the going concern. In February 2026, the Company analyzed its cash requirements and operations at least through February 2027 and has determined that, based upon the Company’s current available cash and operations, the Company has no substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Use of Estimates
In preparing these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements relate to the calculation of revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, valuation of common stock, valuation of senior secured convertible notes, warrant liability, earnout share liabilities, accruals for potential liabilities including income taxes, valuation of deferred tax assets and valuation assumptions related to share-based compensation.
Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic income (loss) per share is based upon the net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 divided by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted net income per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares (representing the dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and stock appreciation rights) outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Common stock equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2024 are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share given the Company incurred a loss and they are anti-dilutive. See Note 14—Earnings per share.
Table of Contents
Reportable Segments
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, Topic 280, Segment Reporting, requires that an enterprise report selected information about reportable segments in its financial reports issued to its stockholders. Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and that is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President are the Company’s CODM. The CODM monitors the revenue and expense components of the various products and services the Company offers, but operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporation-wide basis in comparison to a business plan which is developed each year. Accordingly, all operations are considered by the CODM to be one operating segment and one reportable segment as contained in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) to the consolidated financial statements. The CODM uses consolidated net income (loss) as its required measure of segment profit/loss, as such measure is determined in accordance with the measurement principles most consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures” (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 requires public entities, on an annual basis, to provide: a tabular rate reconciliation (using both percentages and reporting currency amounts) of (1) the reported income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations, to (2) the product of the income (or loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and the applicable statutory federal (national) income tax rate of the jurisdiction (country) of domicile using specific categories, and separate disclosure for any reconciling items within certain categories that are equal to or greater than a specified quantitative threshold. For each annual period presented, ASU 2023-09 also requires all reporting entities to disclose the year-to-date amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal (national), state, and foreign. It also requires additional disaggregated information on income taxes paid (net of refunds received) to an individual jurisdiction equal to or greater than 5% of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received). ASU 2023-09 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. ASU 2023-09 is to be applied on a prospective basis with the option to apply the standard retrospectively. The Company adopted this standard and disclosed the impact from this standard in Note 10 – Income Taxes.
All other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.
Recent Legislation
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law in the United States. Key provisions of the OBBBA include permanent extension of once-temporary provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, along with the introduction of other significant changes that may impact the Company. The legislation has multiple effective dates, with certain provisions effective in the Company’s fiscal year 2025 and others implemented through the Company’s fiscal year 2028. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the OBBBA and has included the impact of changes in the law that were effective during its fiscal year 2025 in the results of its consolidated financial statements
3. Advances due to Founders
As of January 1, 2024, advances due to founders totaled $1,750,000. During 2024, Mr. Huang and Mr. Xu advanced Airship AI $2,100,000 and were repaid $2,550,000, with $1,300,000 recorded as advances from founders as of December 31, 2024. During 2025, Mr. Huang and Mr. Xu were repaid $650,000 each, with $0 recorded as advances from founders as of December 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
4. Revenues
Disaggregation of Revenue
The Company’s net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of approximately $10.1 million and $18.7 million, respectively, of hardware and software bundled systems for which revenue is transferred at a point in time. The Company’s remaining net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 of approximately $5.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, relates to PCS revenue and other services which are transferred over time. Within each product category, contract terms, conditions and economic factors affecting the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flow are substantially similar.
Contract Balances
A receivable is recognized in the period the Company delivers goods or provides services or when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. The Company usually does not record contract assets because the Company has an unconditional right to payment upon satisfaction of the performance obligation, and therefore, a receivable is more commonly recorded than a contract asset. Receivables are generally paid within thirty days and there is no financing element to the customer contracts. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there are no unbilled receivable balances.
The Company’s short-term and long-term deferred revenue balances totaled $4,668,105 and $3,966,407 as of December 31, 2025. The Company’s short-term and long-term deferred revenue balances totaled $3,238,483 and $2,951,850 as of December 31, 2024. Of the deferred revenue balance of $6,190,333 and $8,970,780 as of January 1, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized approximately $3,238,483 and $4,008,654 during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Remaining Performance Obligations
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately $8.6 million of remaining performance obligations, which were comprised of deferred service contracts not yet delivered. The Company expects to recognize approximately 54% of its remaining performance obligations as revenue in fiscal 2026 and the remaining 46% in fiscal 2027 and years thereafter.
Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract
The Company does not pay any material variable compensation to obtain a customer contract. Additionally, the majority of the Company’s cost of fulfillment as a seller of products is classified as inventory and then cost of revenue when the product is sold. Other costs of contract fulfillment such as software maintenance are expensed in the period incurred and align with when the revenue is amortized.
5. Notes Payable and Convertible Notes Payable
On June 22, 2023, the Company issued a $2,000,000 senior secured convertible promissory note to Platinum Capital Partners, Inc. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company issued 879,051 shares of common stock related to the conversion of $2,000,000 of the senior secured convertible promissory note.
On October 3, 2023, the Company issued senior secured convertible promissory notes for $600,000 to two private investors. At the option of the holders, the notes were convertible into cash, common stock or a combination of cash and stock. On March 5, 2024, the two private investors converted the notes with a face value of $600,000 and interest into 169,204 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $835,610. On September 13, 2024, the Company issued an additional 86,198 shares of common stock related to the conversion of notes at $2.65 per share.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded an unrealized loss due to the increase in the fair value of the convertible notes payable totaling $141,636 and a loss of $1,144,676 for the conversion of these convertible notes.
Table of Contents
6. Stockholders’ Deficit
Authorized and Outstanding Stock
The Company is a Delaware company and its affairs are governed by its certificate of incorporation, its bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law and the common law of the State of Delaware. The Company’s charter authorizes the issuance of 205,000,000 shares, consisting of 200,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were 34,368,162 and 30,588,413 shares of common stock outstanding, respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2025
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company had the following issuances of equity securities:
As of September 30, 2024, the Company determined the First Operating Performance Milestone of the earnout shares was achieved resulting in the vesting of 1,250,000 shares, of which 1,160,906 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to applicable personnel on January 7, 2025.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, investors exercised public warrants for 13,502 shares of the Company’s common stock at $4.50 per share, and the Company received proceeds of $60,759.
On October 8, 2025, the Company entered into warrant exercise inducement offer letter with the holder of its existing common stock warrants and issued 2,162,162 shares of its common stock to exercise its existing warrants at the existing exercise price of $4.50 per share, in exchange for our agreement to issue new common stock warrants to purchase 2,702,702 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $6.20. The aggregate gross proceeds from the exercise of the existing warrants were approximately $9,729,729, before deducting financial advisory fees of $231,593.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 443,179 shares of common stock and received $149,288 upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted average exercise price of $0.34 per share.
Year Ended December 31, 2024
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had the following sales of equity securities:
On March 5, 2024, a private investor converted a senior secured convertible promissory note for $250,000 and interest into 70,502 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On March 5, 2024, a private investor converted a senior secured convertible promissory note for $350,000 and interest into 98,702 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On March 21, 2024, the Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock for services performed as of December 31, 2023 to MZHCI, LLC related to an investor relations consulting agreement.
On May 16, 2024, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to Pamria LLC for consulting and investor relations services.