| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | ₩80.98T | Enterprise Value | ₩80.47T |
| P/E (TTM) | 119.21× | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 7.16× | P/FCF | 271.77× |
| EV/EBITDA | — | EV/EBIT | 88.11× |
| EV/Sales | 7.11× | EV/FCF | 270.06× |
| FCF Yield | 0.37% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings Yield | — | Shareholder Yield | — |
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 2.24 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 15.22% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | 2.85% | WACC | 14.89% |
| ROIC | 8.48% | EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | −6.41% |
| EVA | -₩595.43B | ||
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM ₩9345.00 · revenue TTM ₩11.31T · FCF TTM ₩297.98B (in KRW)
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Information Technology on P/E
P/E 90th percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 119.2x | 32.8x | 17.9x–61.7x | 90 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | 0.4% | 2.5% | -3.1%–6.0% | 34 ↓weak |
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.2%–1.8% | 27 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | 6.2% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 63 ↑strong |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 66 ↑strong |
| ROE | 7.7% | 4.1% | -14.9%–16.8% | 57 ↑strong |
