Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

A Study to Assess How Well the Study Medicine IPN60340 Works in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax, Compared to Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax, in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Cannot Receive Intensive Chemotherapy

← catalyst calendar

NCT07623187 · readout in 1,746 d

Sponsored by Ipsen (industry) · IPN.PA — their whole pipeline →.

Phase
Phase 2/3
Status
Not yet recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Design
Randomized · Quadruple · Treatment
Enrollment
450estimated

Every value on this page is a field the sponsor filed with ClinicalTrials.gov, reproduced. Dates are their own estimates, revised as a study runs, unless the registry marks them actual. sources →

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, retrieved 2026-08-19

Dates

each axis at the precision it was filed, with the registry's own basis
DateFiledBasisWhat it is
Start2026-11-01estimatedWhen the study began enrolling
Primary completion2031-05-31estimatedThe date the last participant is measured for the primary outcome — the readout window
Study completion2032-05-31estimatedThe whole study's end, after follow-up
First posted2026-06-03actualWhen this record first appeared on the registry
Results postedWhen the sponsor posted results to the registry
Record updated2026-06-03actualThe sponsor's own last edit to this record — every projection above is as current as this date

What it studies

Conditions

  • Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)
  • Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Interventions

  • Biological: IPN60340 + azacitidine + venetoclax — also filed as ICT01
  • Drug: Placebo + azacitidine + venetoclax — also filed as NaCl

Primary outcome

what the primary-completion date above is the date OF
(Phase 2b and Phase 3) Percentage of participants with Complete Remission (CR)
measured From randomization to end of Cycle 6 (approximately 6 months)

Permalink · IPN.PA's whole pipeline · Catalyst calendar · Every registered study · What changed