Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

A Global Study Comparing Pulsed Field Ablation With Electrographic Flow Mapping Versus Posterior Wall Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

← catalyst calendar

NCT07187115 · readout ≤ 712 d

Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation (industry) · BSX — their whole pipeline →.

Phase
Not applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Design
Randomized · None · Treatment
Enrollment
699estimated
Sites
15
Countries
Belgium, Hong Kong, Spain +1

Every value on this page is a field the sponsor filed with ClinicalTrials.gov, reproduced. Dates are their own estimates, revised as a study runs, unless the registry marks them actual. sources →

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, retrieved 2026-08-19

Dates

each axis at the precision it was filed, with the registry's own basis
DateFiledBasisWhat it is
Start2025-11-07actualWhen the study began enrolling
Primary completionJul 2028estimatedThe date the last participant is measured for the primary outcome — the readout window
Study completionDec 2030estimatedThe whole study's end, after follow-up
First posted2025-09-22actualWhen this record first appeared on the registry
Results postedWhen the sponsor posted results to the registry
Record updated2026-07-29actualThe sponsor's own last edit to this record — every projection above is as current as this date

What it studies

Conditions

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
  • Persistant Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

  • Device: FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation System
  • Device: OptiMap System (non-ablative) — also filed as Ablamap System
  • Device: FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) System and Opal HDx Mapping System

Primary outcomes

what the primary-completion date above is the date OF
Primary Safety Endpoint
measured 60 Days
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
measured 365 Days

Permalink · BSX's whole pipeline · Catalyst calendar · Every registered study · What changed