Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

Study Comparing Tarlatamab and Durvalumab Versus Durvalumab Alone in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Following Platinum, Etoposide and Durvalumab

← catalyst calendar

NCT06211036 · readout in 320 d

Sponsored by Amgen (industry) · AMGN — their whole pipeline →.

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Active, not recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Design
Randomized · None · Treatment
Enrollment
563actual
Sites
219
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria +26

Every value on this page is a field the sponsor filed with ClinicalTrials.gov, reproduced. Dates are their own estimates, revised as a study runs, unless the registry marks them actual. sources →

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, retrieved 2026-08-19

Dates

each axis at the precision it was filed, with the registry's own basis
DateFiledBasisWhat it is
Start2024-06-05actualWhen the study began enrolling
Primary completion2027-07-05estimatedThe date the last participant is measured for the primary outcome — the readout window
Study completion2028-09-30estimatedThe whole study's end, after follow-up
First posted2024-01-18actualWhen this record first appeared on the registry
Results postedWhen the sponsor posted results to the registry
Record updated2025-12-17actualThe sponsor's own last edit to this record — every projection above is as current as this date

What it studies

Conditions

  • Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer
  • Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Interventions

  • Drug: Tarlatamab — also filed as AMG 757
  • Drug: Durvalumab

Primary outcome

what the primary-completion date above is the date OF
OS
measured Up to approximately 3 years

Publications

Linked on the registry record. A “linked by the registry” entry is NLM's own automated PubMed match, not a claim by the sponsor that the paper reports this study.

Permalink · AMGN's whole pipeline · Catalyst calendar · Every registered study · What changed