Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Therapy in Japanese Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Complete Remission

← catalyst calendar

NCT05197426 · results posted

Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb (industry) · BMY — their whole pipeline →.

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Active, not recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Design
Randomized · Quadruple · Treatment
Enrollment
19actual
Sites
31
Countries
Japan, United States

Every value on this page is a field the sponsor filed with ClinicalTrials.gov, reproduced. Dates are their own estimates, revised as a study runs, unless the registry marks them actual. sources →

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, retrieved 2026-08-19

Dates

each axis at the precision it was filed, with the registry's own basis
DateFiledBasisWhat it is
Start2022-01-17actualWhen the study began enrolling
Primary completion2025-01-27actualThe date the last participant is measured for the primary outcome — the readout window
Study completion2026-04-30estimatedThe whole study's end, after follow-up
First posted2022-01-19actualWhen this record first appeared on the registry
Results posted2026-02-11actualWhen the sponsor posted results to the registry
Record updated2026-02-11actualThe sponsor's own last edit to this record — every projection above is as current as this date

What it studies

Condition

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Interventions

  • Drug: Oral Azacitidine — also filed as CC-486, BMS-986345, Onureg
  • Other: Placebo

Primary outcome

what the primary-completion date above is the date OF
Recurrence Free Survival (RFS)
measured Approximately 17.7 months

Posted documents

hosted by the registry — we link, never re-serve
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Planposted 2023-06-27 · 6.1 MB · Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Permalink · BMY's whole pipeline · Catalyst calendar · Every registered study · What changed