SPZCO vs QuiverQuant
Both sites track what Congress discloses. The split is the executive branch: on 2026-08-22 we checked QuiverQuant for OGE, Form 278-T and executive-branch disclosure vocabulary and found none in visible text. SPZCO publishes 187 officials' filings as filed.
| SPZCO | QuiverQuant · 2026-08-22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Executive-branch disclosures | 187 officials, 12,448 reported transactions, 36,680 holdings rows — OGE Forms 278-T and 278e, each linked to its filing. | neither auditable competitor carries OGE / Form 278-T / executive-branch disclosure vocabulary anywhere in visible text |
| Congressional trades | One page per member, plus the ranking of which companies the record names most. | their /congresstrading/stock/AAPL links 1,131 trade pages |
| Rows in the HTML | Our Trump page ships its transaction table in the served HTML. | Their Trump page renders zero trade rows server-side |
| Breadth | 6,789 company pages and 12,947 13F filer pages. | Page-class breadth (16k stock + 11k insider pages, ~80 tools, per-ticker congress pages) + backlinks |
| Structured data | JSON-LD on the data hubs, and every page self-canonical. | Zero JSON-LD, missing canonicals |
What QuiverQuant does better
- Their moat is breadth + authority, not craft. Breadth and inbound links are theirs today. Ours is a young domain and we say so.
- QQ publishes Ro Khanna trade pages (verified live). So the congressional paper-filer set is not ours alone, and we do not say it is.
Executive-branch disclosures → · Congressional trades → · SPZCO vs Unusual Whales →
Everything above about quiverquant.com is what we read on its public pages on 2026-08-22. Sites change; we re-check before we re-state.