Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

XBIO US Equity

Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.Health Care · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1534525 · FY ends Dec 31
$3.36
+0.11 (+3.38%)
USD · as of 2026-08-19 · marketstack

XBIO · 10-K · period ended 2023-12-31

← all XBIO documents
filed 2024-03-21 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1600 of 3,800377k characters rendered

XENETIC BIOSCIENCES, INC. 10-K

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File Number: 001-37937

XENETIC BIOSCIENCES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its

charter)

945 Concord Street

Framingham, Massachusetts01701

(Address of principal executive offices and

zip code)

781-778-7720

(Registrant’s telephone number, including

area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share XBIO The Nasdaq Capital Market

Purchase Warrants XBIOW The Nasdaq Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)

of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark

if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark

if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark

whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during

the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to

such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark

whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation

S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit

such files): Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark

whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an

emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” “smaller

reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth

company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or

revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark

whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal

control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the registered public accounting firm that prepared

or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered

pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing

reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark

whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive- based compensation received by

any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark

whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2): Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market

value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2023, the last business day of

the registrant’s most recently completely second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing price of the registrant’s common stock

on the Nasdaq Capital Market on that date of $3.28, was approximately $5,026,928. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors,

and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that

such officers, directors or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

As of March 15, 2024,

the number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock was 1,540,684.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Information required in response to Part III of

Form 10-K (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) is hereby incorporated by reference to portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement

for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, information statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The registrant

intends to file a definitive proxy statement, information statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities

and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

XENETIC BIOSCIENCES, INC.

2023 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE CONTENTS

PART I 1

Item 1 Business 1

Item 1A Risk Factors 23

Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 52

Item 1C Cybersecurity 52

Item 2 Properties 53

Item 3 Legal Proceedings 53

Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures 53

Item 6 [Reserved] 54

Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 62

Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 63

Item 9A Controls and Procedures 64

Item 9B Other Information 65

Item 9C Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 65

PART III 66

Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 66

Item 11 Executive Compensation 66

Item 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services 66

Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 67

i

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on

Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All statements contained

in this Annual Report other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial

position, our business strategy and plans, future revenues, projected costs, prospects and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking

statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: anticipated effects of geopolitical

events, including the conflicts in the Ukraine and the Middle East and associated sanctions imposed by the United States (“U.S.”)

and other countries in response; our plans to develop our proposed drug candidates; our expectations regarding the nature, timing and

extent of clinical trials and proposed clinical trials; our expectations regarding the timing for proposed submissions of regulatory filings,

including but not limited to, any Investigational New Drug (“IND”) filing or any New Drug Application (“NDA”);

the nature, timing and extent of collaboration arrangements; the expected results pursuant to collaboration arrangements, including the

receipts of future payments that may arise pursuant to collaboration arrangements; the outcome of our plans to obtain regulatory approval

of our drug candidates; the outcome of our plans for the commercialization of our drug candidates; our plans to address certain markets,

engage third party manufacturers, and evaluate additional drug candidates for subsequent commercial development along with the likelihood

and extent of competition to our drug candidates; our plans to advance innovative immune-oncology technologies addressing hard to treat

oncology indications; expectations regarding our Deoxyribonuclease (“DNase”) platform, such as regarding the DNase platform

being in development for the treatment of solid tumors and being aimed at improving outcomes of existing treatments, including immunotherapies,

by targeting neutrophil extracellular traps (“NETs”) and our expectations to prioritize our efforts and resources on this

newly licensed technology; our expectations regarding our PolyXen® platform; and all statements under the heading “Opportunity

to Address Multiple Oncology Indications”.

In some cases, these

statements may be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,”

“expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “seek,”

“approximately,” “intend,” “predict,” “potential,” “projects,” “upcoming”,

“opportunity”, “target” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, we cannot guarantee

future results, the levels of activity, performance or achievements. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties

that may cause our or our industry's results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed

or implied by forward-looking statements.

Some factors that could

cause actual results to differ materially include without limitation:

· uncertainty of the expected financial performance of the Company;

· our ability to implement our business strategy;

· our ability to finance our business;

· our ability to secure and maintain a manufacturer for our technologies;

ii

· the impact of new technologies on our drug candidates and our competition;

· changes in laws or regulations of governmental agencies;

· interruptions or cancellation of existing contracts;

· impact of competitive products and pricing;

· product demand and market acceptance and risks;

· the presence of competitors with greater financial resources;

· our ability to attract and retain key personnel;

· adverse publicity related to our products or the Company itself;

· adverse claims relating to our intellectual property;

· the adoption of new, or changes in, accounting principles;

· other new lines of business that the Company may enter in the future;

These factors are not

necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking

statements in this Annual Report. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on our future results,

including, but not limited to, those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors.” The forward-looking

statements in this Annual Report are made only as of the date of this Annual Report, and we do not undertake any obligation to publicly

update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We intend that all forward-looking statements be

subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

As used in this Annual

Report, unless otherwise indicated, all references herein to “Xenetic,” the “Company,” “we” or “us”

refer to Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Our brand and product

names, including but not limited to, XDNASETM, XCARTTM, OncoHistTM, PolyXen®,

ErepoXenTM and ImuXenTM contained in this Annual Report are trademarks, registered trademarks or service

marks of Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries in the United States of America (“USA” or “U.S.”) and

certain other countries. All other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.

iii

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks. In

addition to the summary below, you should carefully review the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual

Report on Form 10-K. We may be subject to additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial.

These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the principal risks relating

to our business include:

iv

v

vi

PART I

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on

advancing innovative immune-oncology technologies addressing hard to treat cancers. Our proprietary DNase platform is designed to improve

outcomes of existing treatments, including immunotherapies, by targeting NETs, which have been implicated in cancer progression and resistance

to cancer treatments.

The DNase platform is designed to target NETs,

which are weblike structures composed of extracellular chromatin coated with histones and other proteins. NETs are expelled by activated

neutrophils, in response to microbial or pro-inflammatory challenges. However, excessive production or reduced clearance of NETs can lead

to aggravated inflammatory, hypercoagulability and autoimmune pathologies, as well as creation of pro-tumorigenic niches in the case of

cancer growth and metastasis.

We are focused on advancing the development

of our DNase platform toward a first-in-human, multicenter, dose escalation and dose-expansion study of IV rhDNase I in subjects

with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Our systemic DNase program is initially targeting multi-billion-dollar indications

including pancreatic cancer (which includes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (“PDAC”)), colorectal carcinoma

(“CRC”) and other gastrointestinal cancers. These are all cancer indications with significant unmet need, and with

opportunities for substantial improvement of the currently available therapeutic options. PDAC has a low rate of early diagnosis, a

high mortality rate and a poor five-year survival prognosis. Symptoms are usually non-specific and as a result, PDAC is often not

diagnosed until it reaches an advanced stage. Once the disease has metastasized, or spread to other organs, it becomes especially

hard to treat. Each year, about 185,000 individuals globally are diagnosed with this condition; and in 2021, the Surveillance,

Epidemiology and End Results program, or SEER, of the National Cancer Institute estimated that in the United States there would be

approximately 60,000 individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The overall five-year survival rate among pancreatic cancer

patients is 7-8%, which constitutes the highest mortality rate among solid tumor malignancies; among those diagnosed with metastatic

disease, the overall five-year survival rate is only 3%. Recent developments that have improved the survival in many cancer types

have not been effective for pancreatic cancer patients, highlighting the urgent need for the development of newer, more effective

therapeutic options. For those few patients that present with earlier stage PDAC, surgical resection followed by chemotherapy is

possible, but for the majority of PDAC patients which present at diagnosis with advanced disease, chemotherapy is the only option,

and has only very limited benefit. Second-line patients that were diagnosed already with metastatic disease have even fewer

therapeutic options. The only approved regimen for second-line patients is Onivyde® in combination with 5FU and LV. For these

Stage IV at diagnosis patients reaching second-line therapy, median overall survival is only 4.7 months (Macarulla et al, Pancreas

2020 ).

CRC is the second most common cause of cancer

death in the United States after lung cancer. CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females, globally,

according to the World Health Organization GLOBOCAN database. In the United States, CRC is the second most common cause of cancer death

after lung cancer. According to data from the NCI’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (“SEER) Program, it is estimated

that in 2023 approximately 153,000 individuals in the U.S. will be diagnosed with colon cancer, and an estimated 53,000 will die of the

disease. CRC is in decline in older patients (>65 years) but that is offset by a steady increase in CRC diagnoses and deaths in individuals

younger than 55 years of age. Despite continued overall declines, CRC is rapidly shifting to diagnosis at a younger age, at a more advanced

stage, and in the left colon/rectum. If CRC is diagnosed at a localized stage, the 5-year survival rate is 91%. However, if the cancer

has spread to surrounding tissues or organs and/or the regional lymph nodes, the 5-year relative survival rate is 72%. There are numerous

treatment options for earlier stage CRC patients, but as they progress to advanced and metastatic disease (“mCRC”), those

options become limited. Approximately 22% of CRC cases have metastasis at presentation, and 19% will develop metastasis after primary

tumor removal. Unfortunately, if CRC has spread to distant parts of the body, the 5-year relative survival rate is 13%.

All major guidelines recommend patients with mCRC

undergo testing of DNA for high DNA microsatellite instability (MSI-H), a mutation found in approximately 10% of all CRC, and up to 5%

of mCRC. CRC patients that are MSI-H/MMRd (or “mismatch repair deficient”) are candidates for immunotherapy using immune checkpoint

inhibitors (“ICIs”); at present, there are three ICIs approved for MSI-H/MMRd CRC – Keytruda, Opdivo (anti-PD-1 antibodies)

and Yervoy (anti-CTLA-4 antibody). While the ICI response rates in this small subset of CRC are encouraging at around 50%, a significant

number of patients are resistant, or become refractory to ICI therapy. However, the vast majority of mCRC patients (>90%) are microsatellite

stable (“MSS”) and mismatch repair proficient (“MMRp”), where ICIs have not been shown to provide benefit. The

lack of ICI response in this subset is due to poor immunogenicity and immunosuppression. Again, this highlights the urgent need for the

development of newer, more effective therapeutic options.

A substantial amount of scientific literature

has implicated NETs in the context of cancer pathogenesis and resistance to cancer therapies (including chemo, radio, and immunotherapies

such as checkpoint inhibitors and cell therapies). In published reports, elevated levels of NETs have been a biomarker associated with

poor prognosis in patients with a variety of cancers and in particular, in gastrointestinal cancers. In addition, resistance to existing

therapeutic agents can involve the release of immunosuppressive signaling factors from NETs, or physical barriers created by NETs, which

can impede the infiltration, activity, and survival of cytotoxic T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Published pre-clinical models

have demonstrated the effectiveness of systemically administered DNase, alone or in combination with other agents, for the elimination

of NETs and prevention of tumor growth and metastasis. We are currently focused on advancing our systemic DNase program into the clinic

as an adjunctive therapy for pancreatic carcinoma and locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including CRC.

Adoptive transfer of Chimeric Antigen Receptor

(“CAR”) T cells has emerged as one of the most promising advances in cancer immunotherapy. To successfully treat solid tumors,

CAR T cells must be able to infiltrate, persist, and maintain anti-tumor function in a hostile tumor microenvironment that is itself adept

at immunosuppression and conducive to tumor cell survival. Recent approaches to CAR T design include “armored” CAR-T cells,

so named because they can express additional factors to resist immunosuppression or degrade physical components of the tumor’s extracellular

matrix, including NETs. We intend to conduct pre-clinical research with the goal of demonstrating that armoring CAR T cells to secrete

DNase can support depth and durability of response against solid tumor indications. Engineered CAR T cells, designed to recognize cancer-associated

antigens, are capable of sustained and selective killing of tumor cells, with substantial reduction of tumor burden. CAR T therapies have

exhibited remarkable clinical success against hematological malignancies but thus far have failed to demonstrate success in the context

of solid tumors. Published evidence suggests that in addition to immunosuppressive factors, mechanical barriers formed by NETs can impede

T-cell penetration and occlude T-cell contact with tumor cells. The conduct of several CAR T in vivo models has been a primary focus of

our Scripps collaboration.

Our collaboration with Belgian Volition SARL Limited

(“Volition”) is an early exploratory program to evaluate the potential combination of Volition’s Nu.Q® technology

and Xenetic’s DNase-Armored CAR T platform to develop proprietary adoptive cell therapies potentially targeting multiple types of

solid cancers for which current CAR T cell therapies have shown limited or no effect. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement,

Volition will fund a research program and the two parties will share proceeds from commercialization or licensing of any products arising

from the collaboration. Epigenetically modified nucleosomes are present on tumor cell surfaces and within the tumor microenvironment of

multiple types of solid cancers, and thus these nucleosomes may represent generalizable tumor antigens that are not limited to a single

cancer type. Volition’s Nu.Q® technology can specifically recognize and target epigenetically modified nucleosomes, while our

DNase-Armored CAR T platform is designed to enhance the function of CAR T cells within solid tumor microenvironments.

Additionally, we have partnered with biotechnology

and pharmaceutical companies to develop our proprietary drug delivery platform, PolyXen, and receive royalty payments under an exclusive

license arrangement in the field of blood coagulation disorders. PolyXen is an enabling platform technology for protein and peptide drug

delivery. It uses the biological polymer polysialic acid (“PSA”) to prolong the drug's half-life and potentially improve the

stability of therapeutic peptides and proteins. Both the site of attachment and the length of the PSA chain can influence the properties

of the therapeutic by changing the apparent hydrodynamic radius of the molecule, which in turn, can enhance a number of the biological

characteristics of the therapeutic. It can also be used for small molecule drugs.

We incorporate our patented and proprietary technologies

into drug candidates currently under development with biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry collaborators to create what we believe

will be the next-generation biologic drugs with improved pharmacological properties over existing therapeutics. Our drug candidates have

resulted from our research activities or that of our collaborators and are in the development stage. As a result, we continue to commit

a significant amount of our resources to our research and development activities and anticipate continuing to do so for the near future.

To date, none of our drug candidates have received regulatory marketing authorization or approval in the U.S. by the Food and Drug Administration

(“FDA”) nor in any other countries or territories by any applicable agencies. As noted above, we are receiving ongoing royalties

pursuant to a license of our PolyXen technology to an industry partner.

Although we hold a broad patent portfolio, the

focus of our internal efforts in 2023 was on the licensing and advancement of our DNase platform.

We were incorporated under the laws of the State

of Nevada in August 2011. We, directly or indirectly, through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hesperix S.A. (“Hesperix”) and

Xenetic Biosciences (U.K.) Limited (“Xenetic U.K.”), and the wholly-owned subsidiaries of Xenetic UK, Lipoxen Technologies

Limited (“Lipoxen”), Xenetic Bioscience, Incorporated and SymbioTec, GmbH (“SymbioTec”), own various U.S. federal

trademark registrations and applications, along with unregistered trademarks and service marks, including but not limited to XCART, OncoHist,

PolyXen, ErepoXen and ImuXen.

Our Strategy

Our primary focus is aimed at

advancing the systemic DNase program into the clinic as an adjunctive therapy for pancreatic cancer and other locally advanced or

metastatic solid tumors, including CRC. Our goal is to provide solutions in the treatment of solid tumors by improving response and

overcoming resistance to checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and other standard of care treatments. We also intend to pursue

industry collaborations and potential licenses to develop DNase for other uses and indications.

We intend to pursue orphan drug designations and

accelerated approval pathways for relevant oncology indications as appropriate in both the U.S. and Europe. If our orphan oncology drug

candidates are granted orphan drug designation, then we may benefit from certain key advantages of orphan status including certain market

exclusivities.

We intend to advance development of our DNase

platform primarily through the use of contract manufacturing, contract research organizations (“CROs”) and academic institutions

in order to efficiently manage our resources. Continuous pipeline growth and advancement of out-licensed drug candidates is dependent,

in part, on our ability to raise sufficient capital and to advance our existing co-development collaborations and strategic arrangements

as well as enter into new such arrangements.

Business Developments

Volition Collaboration

On August 2, 2022, we announced a research and

development collaboration with Volition to develop NETs-targeted adoptive cell therapies for the treatment of cancer. The collaboration

is an early exploratory program to evaluate the potential combination of Volition’s Nu.Q® technology Test and the

Company’s DNase-Armored CAR T platform to develop proprietary adoptive cell therapies potentially targeting multiple types of solid

cancers. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, Volition will fund a research program and the two parties will share proceeds

from commercialization or licensing of any products arising from the collaboration. On July 10, 2023, we entered into the first Collaborator

Statement of Work as part of this collaboration with Volition.

Scripps Research Institute (“Scripps

Research”)

On March 17, 2023, the Company and Scripps Research,

entered into a Research Funding and Option Agreement (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which we agreed to provide Scripps Research

an aggregate of up to $938,000 to fund research relating to advancing the pre-clinical development of our DNase oncology platform technology.

The research funding is payable by us to Scripps Research on a monthly basis in accordance with a negotiated budget, which provides for

an initial payment of approximately $78,000 on the date of the Agreement and subsequent monthly payments of approximately $78,000 over

a 12-month period. Under the Agreement, we have the option to acquire a worldwide exclusive license to Scripps Research’s rights

in the Technology or Patent Rights (as defined in the Agreement), as well as a non-exclusive, royalty-free, non-transferrable license

to make and use TSRI Technology (as defined in the Agreement) solely for our internal research purposes during the performance of the

research program contemplated by the Agreement.

Unless earlier terminated, the term of the Agreement

continues from the date of the Agreement for fifteen (15) months. The Agreement may be terminated by us with 30 days advance written notice

to Scripps Research beginning six (6) months after the Effective Date (as defined in the Agreement) or by Scripps Research if we fail

to make timely payments due under the Agreement, subject to 30 days’ written notice to cure such nonpayment. The Agreement may further

be terminated by either party in the event of the other party’s uncured failure to perform any obligations under the Agreement or

the bankruptcy of the other party.

University of Virginia (“UVA”)

On December 21, 2023, we entered into a Research

Funding and Material Transfer Agreement, as amended, with UVA (the “UVA Agreement”) to advance the development of our systemic

DNase program. Under the terms of the UVA Agreement, in

addition to advancing our existing intellectual property, we have an option to acquire an exclusive license to any new intellectual property

arising from the DNase research program. Allan Tsung, MD, a member of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board and Chair of

the Department of Surgery at the UVA School of Medicine, will oversee the research conducted under

the UVA Agreement. As a surgical oncologist and scientist, Dr. Tsung is internationally recognized for leading substantial research on

the role of NETs in tumor growth, metastasis, and resistance to existing cancer therapies.

Our Technology and Drug Candidates

The Technologies

We incorporate our patented and proprietary technologies

into a number of drug candidates which are currently under development internally or with our biotechnology and pharmaceutical collaborators,

with the goal of creating what we believe will be the next generation of biologic drugs and therapeutics. While we primarily focus on

researching and developing oncology drugs, we also have ownership and other economic interests in drugs being developed by our collaborators

to treat other conditions.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the focus

of our internal development efforts was on the advancement of our DNase oncology platform. We have not been actively pursuing development

efforts for XCART or PolyXen or any of our other technologies.

· Multiple value-driving milestones expected over the next 12 -24 months;

· DNase-armored CAR T program in early pre-clinical development.

Research, Outside Services and Collaborations

Through partner efforts, we are developing our

pipeline of next-generation bio-therapeutics and novel oncology drugs based on our DNase and PolyXen proprietary technologies. In order

to do this while efficiently managing our overhead, we rely on the services of contract manufacturers, CROs and our strategic collaborations.

We currently do not have in-house research facilities to pursue these initiatives. Accordingly, continuous pipeline growth and advancement

of our technologies and drug candidates is dependent on several important collaborations and strategic arrangements, including our arrangements

with:

Accordingly, in addition to pursuing our development

of the DNase technology, we also have significant interests in drug candidates being developed by our collaborators to treat other conditions.

We may collect some combination of milestone payments and royalties pursuant to these collaborations to the extent that these drugs are

successfully developed and marketed. However, other than royalty payments under a sublicense with Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (together

with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “Takeda”) and potential royalty payments under our collaboration agreement with Pharmsynthez,

we do not anticipate any milestone or royalty payments in the near term, if at all. For further detail, please read the section titled

“Significant Collaborations and Strategic Arrangements” below.

Our Drug Candidate Pipeline

Our product pipeline contains drug candidates

under development internally and with our biotechnology and pharmaceutical collaborators. The following table summarizes key information

regarding our current drug candidates:

ErepoXen

ErepoXen, or polysialylated erythropoietin (“PSA-EPO”),

uses our PolyXen platform technology for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (“CKD”) patients. It is designed

to reduce the dosing frequency by extending the circulating half-life of the therapeutic in the body. We are not pursuing clinical development

of ErepoXen but continue to entertain out-license opportunities for the drug candidate in our licensed territories.

We have collaboration agreements with Pharmsynthez

and Serum Institute to develop and launch ErepoXen in limited markets pursuant to which we will collect royalties if they are successful

in these efforts.

Pharmsynthez received regulatory approval to commence

a Phase II(b)/III human clinical trial of ErepoXen (also known as Epolong) in Russia with patient recruitment completed in 2020. In December

2020, Pharmsynthez reported positive data from this clinical trial and, in February 2021, reported in a press release that it had started

the registration phase of Epolong by filing a registration dossier to obtain approval in Russia. Pharmsynthez had reported in its press

release that it expected that the Russian stage of registration activities would be completed in 2021 and that it would be able to start

production of the product as early as the first quarter of 2022. In the first quarter of 2023, Pharmsynthez informed us that it had received

a response letter indicating certain deficiencies in the dossier and continues to develop a gap mitigation strategy with the intent of

refiling the registration upon correction.

Serum Institute conducted Phase I and Phase II

clinical trials of ErepoXen in ninety-five human subjects. These safety trials, which had no significant drug-related adverse events,

provided us with the data to commence a Phase II, repeat dosing, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for

Pharmaceuticals for Human Use compliant clinical trial for ErepoXen in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa for CKD patients not on

dialysis. We completed three cohorts of this study and then terminated the study.

In addition, Serum Institute finished Phase I/II

clinical trials in India of ErepoXen for in-center-dialysis patients. Serum Institute may seek to leverage Pharmsynthez’s trial

data and potential Russian marketing authorization to request a waiver for a Phase III clinical trial in India, subject to local regulatory

authority approval.

Pipeline Expansion Opportunities

Operating under licenses from us within their

home markets, our collaborators can potentially generate preclinical and clinical data related to our technologies across a wide spectrum

of therapeutic areas. Under these agreements, we retain all rights for major markets and co-own the clinical data. We therefore have the

opportunity to utilize the data in our decision-making process regarding development and commercialization in major markets.

Significant Collaborations and Strategic Arrangements

Takeda

In October 2017, we granted to Takeda the right

to grant a non-exclusive sublicense to certain patents related to our PolyXen technology that were previously exclusively licensed to

Takeda in connection with products related to the treatment of blood and bleeding disorders. Royalty payments of approximately $2.5 million

and $1.7 million were recorded as revenue by us during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and are based on single

digit royalties on net sales of certain covered products.

CLS

On April 26, 2022, we entered into an Exclusive

Sublicense Agreement (the “Sublicense Agreement”) with CLS pursuant to which we received an exclusive license under certain

patent rights and know-how owned or controlled by CLS, to develop and commercialize certain pharmaceutical products and methods incorporating

DNase enzyme for use in the treatment of cancer (the “Sublicensed Products”). Under the terms of the Sublicense Agreement,

we will have sole responsibility to, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to, among other things, research, develop and obtain

marketing approval for the Sublicensed Products in the U.S. and certain European markets, and to commercialize such Sublicensed Products

in the relevant market once marketing approval is obtained.

Concurrent with the Sublicense Agreement, we entered

into an Exclusive License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with CLS, pursuant to which we received an exclusive license

under certain patent rights and know-how owned or controlled by CLS to develop and commercialize certain pharmaceutical products and methods

incorporating DNase in conjunction with CAR T therapies (the “Licensed Products”). Under the terms of the License Agreement,

we will have sole responsibility to, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to, among other things, research, develop and obtain

marketing approval for the Licensed Products in the U.S. and certain European markets, and to commercialize such Licensed Products in

the relevant market once marketing approval is obtained.

Volition

On August 2, 2022, we announced a research and

development collaboration with Volition to develop NETs-targeted adoptive cell therapies for the treatment of cancer and on July 10, 2023

we entered into the first Collaborator Statement of Work with Volition as part of this collaboration. For more information regarding such

collaboration with Volition, refer to the section titled “Business Developments” above.

Catalent

On June 30, 2022, we entered into a Statement

of Work (the “SOW”) with Catalent to outline the general scope of work, timeline, and pricing pursuant to which Catalent will

provide certain services to us to perform current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”) manufacturing of our recombinant protein,

Human DNase I. The parties agreed to enter into a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) that will contain terms and conditions

to govern the project contemplated by the SOW and that will supersede the addendum to the SOW containing Catalent’s standard terms

and conditions. In addition, in the event of any conflict between the project-specific terms and conditions set forth in the SOW and the

MSA, the MSA terms and conditions shall govern. The estimated total cost of the project contemplated by the SOW is expected to be up to

approximately $5 million (exclusive of certain fees and potential alternatives) for the manufacturing services over the course of the

term of the project with each phase of the project invoiced separately in connection with the commencement of such phase.

Scripps Research

On March 17, 2023, the Company and Scripps Research

entered into the Agreement, pursuant to which we have agreed to provide Scripps Research an aggregate of up to $938,000 to fund research

relating to advancing the pre-clinical development of our DNase oncology platform technology. For more information regarding the Agreement,

refer to the section titled “Business Developments” above.

Other Agreements

We have also entered into various research, development,

license and supply agreements with Serum Institute of India (“Serum Institute”), Pharmsynthez and SynBio, a wholly owned subsidiary

of Pharmsynthez. We and our collaborative partners continued to engage in research and development activities with no resultant commercial

products through December 31, 2023. No amounts were recognized as revenue related to the Serum Institute, Pharmsynthez or SynBio agreements

during each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Our Intellectual Property

We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary

technology, inventions and improvements that are commercially important to our business, including seeking, maintaining and defending

patent rights, whether developed internally or licensed from our collaborators or other third parties. Our policy is to seek to protect

our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing patent applications in the U.S. and in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. covering

our proprietary technology, inventions, improvements and product candidates that are important to the development and implementation of

our business. We also rely on trade secrets and know-how relating to our proprietary technology and product candidates, continuing innovation

and in-licensing opportunities to develop, strengthen and maintain our proprietary position in the field of oncology. We also plan to

rely on data exclusivity, market exclusivity and patent term and supplemental patent certificate extensions when available. Our commercial

success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for our technology, inventions

and improvements; to preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets; to obtain and maintain licenses to use intellectual property owned

by third parties; to defend and enforce our proprietary rights, including any patents that we may own in the future; and to operate without

infringing on the valid and enforceable patents and other proprietary rights of third parties.

Our drug candidates are in various stages of development,

each protected by patent and pending patent applications in the U.S. with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and

in certain other developed countries. Our first issued patents began to expire in 2021 with the majority of the existing issued patents

for our PolyXen technology expiring between 2025 and 2030. Our XCART and XDNASE patent families include patent applications that were

recently filed, with those most recently filed having an expiration date of 2042.

Our patent strategy is to file patent applications

on innovations and improvements in those jurisdictions that comprise the major pharmaceutical markets in the world or locations where

a pharmaceutical may be manufactured. These jurisdictions generally include for our key patent portfolios, but are not limited to, the

U.S., U.K., Australia, Japan, Canada, South Korea, China, India, Russia and certain other countries in the European Union (“E.U.”),

though we do not necessarily file a patent application in each of these jurisdictions for every patent family.

As of February 15, 2024, we directly or indirectly

own (e.g. through a license with CLS), through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hesperix and Xenetic U.K., and Xenetic U.K.’s wholly-owned

subsidiaries, Lipoxen, XTI and SymbioTec, more than 170 U.S. and international patents and pending patent applications that cover various

aspects of our technologies. This number includes patents and patent applications that we have acquired or filed covering various aspects

of our XDNASE and XCART platform technology, including all rights throughout the world in and to patents and patent applications related

to “Articles And Methods Directed To Personalized Therapy Of Cancer,” and our PolyXen platform technology covering polysialylation

and advanced polymer conjugate technologies, respectively, as well as our other product candidates. More specifically, our patents and

patent applications cover cancer treatments, method of use, polymer architecture, drug conjugates, formulations, methods of manufacturing

polymers and polymer conjugates along with methods of administering polymer conjugates.

We have received patent protection for certain

therapeutics that use our PolyXen technology linking the specific therapeutic to a PSA. These include, but are not limited to, PSA-EPO,

PSA-insulin and PSA-insulin like protein, a next generation Factor VIII protein product candidate SHP656 (PSA-rFVIII), PSA-DNase I and

PSA-granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PSA-GCSF). Further patents cover methods to prepare proteins that are linked to a PSA as well

as covering PSA linkages. These method patents include those that link a PSA to a protein in a high pH solution as well as patents that

use a process for producing an aldehyde derivative of a sialic acid through the opening and oxidation of a sialic acid unit. For instance,

we have patent protection for a PSA linkage that can be at the N-terminus.

We have received patent protection for the production

of PSA and the removal of endotoxin during the purification process. The removal of endotoxin occurs through the addition of a high pH

solution to the PSA and a process to separate a polydisperse ionically charged polysaccharide, such as PSA, into fractions of different

average molecular weight. This is accomplished through the use of a column and elution buffers with different and constant ionic strength

and pH, resulting in a fractionated polysaccharide that has a molecular weight polydispersity of 1.1 or lower.

We have also received patent protection for our

XDNASE technology, which covers the use of DNase for the treatment of cancer and amelioration of the side effects associated with a cancer

treatment. The DNase can be administered alone or in combination with a cancer therapeutic. This portfolio and that of the XCART portfolio

also provide coverage for the use of certain types of CAR-T cells, with or without the addition of a DNase to treat a cancer. The portfolio

further covers the use of CAR-T cells with or without DNase that are administered with an immune checkpoint inhibitor or modulator to

treat a cancer.

Issued patents can provide protection for varying

periods of time, depending upon the date of filing of the patent application, the date of patent issuance and the legal term of patents

in the countries in which they are obtained. In general, patents issued for applications filed in the U.S. can provide exclusionary rights

for twenty years from the earliest effective filing date. In addition, in certain instances, the term of an issued U.S. patent that covers

or claims an FDA approved product can be extended to recapture a portion of the term effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory

review period, which is called patent term extension in the United States and supplemental patent certificate in Europe and several other

countries. The restoration period cannot be longer than five years, and the total patent term, including the restoration period, must

not exceed fourteen years following FDA approval. The term of patents outside of the U.S. varies in accordance with the laws of the foreign

jurisdiction but is typically also twenty years from the earliest effective filing date. However, the actual protection afforded by a

patent varies on a product-by-product basis, from country-to-country, and depends upon many factors, including the type of patent, the

scope of its coverage, the availability of regulatory-related extensions, the availability of legal remedies in a particular country and

the validity and enforceability of the patent.

In certain situations, where we work with drugs

covered by one or more patents, our ability to develop and commercialize our technologies may be affected by limitations of our access

to these proprietary drugs. Even if we believe we are free to work with a proprietary drug, we cannot guarantee that we will not be accused

of, or be determined to be, infringing on a third party’s rights and be prohibited from working with the drug or found liable for

damages. Any such restriction on access or liability for damages would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations

and financial condition.

The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology

companies, such as ours, are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual issues. There can be no assurance that patents that have

been issued will be held valid and enforceable in a court of law. Even for patents that are held valid and enforceable, the legal process

associated with obtaining such a judgment is time consuming and costly. Additionally, issued patents can be subject to opposition or other

proceedings that can result in the revocation of the patent or maintenance of the patent in amended form (and potentially in a form that

renders the patent without commercially relevant and/or broad coverage). Further, our competitors may be able to circumvent and otherwise

design around our patents. Even if a patent is issued and enforceable, because development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products

can be subject to substantial delays, patents may expire early and provide only a short period of protection, if any, following the commercialization

of products encompassed by our patent(s). We may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the USPTO, which could result

in a loss of the patent and/or substantial cost to us. Further, we understand that if any of our pending patent applications do not issue,

or are deemed invalid following issuance, we may lose valuable IP protection.

U.S. and foreign patent rights and other proprietary

rights exist that are owned by third parties and relate to pharmaceutical compositions and reagents, medical devices and equipment and

methods for preparation, packaging and delivery of pharmaceutical compositions. We cannot predict with any certainty which, if any, of

these rights will be considered relevant to our technology by authorities in the various jurisdictions where such rights exist, nor can

we predict with certainty which, if any, of these rights will or may be asserted against us by third parties. We could incur substantial

costs in defending ourselves and our partners against any such claims. Furthermore, parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive

or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to develop or commercialize some or all of our products in the U.S.

and in other countries and could result in the award of substantial damages. In the event of a claim of infringement, we or our partners

may be required to obtain one or more licenses from third parties. There can be no assurance that we can obtain a license to any technology

that we determine we require on reasonable terms, if at all, or that we could develop or otherwise obtain alternative technology. The

failure to obtain licenses, if required, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, we may not be able to obtain IP licenses related to the development of our drug candidates on a commercially reasonable basis,

if at all.

It is our policy to require our employees and

consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors who receive confidential information from us to

execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that

all confidential information developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us

is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. The agreements provide that all inventions

conceived by an employee shall be our property. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection

or adequate remedies for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.

Manufacturing and Supply

We do not have the capability to manufacture our

own materials necessary to support our drug candidate development programs nor do we intend to acquire such capability as part of our

present business strategy. We currently have agreements in place with Catalent and Serum Institute whereby Catalent and Serum Institute

would produce clinical materials for use in the development of drug candidates involving our DNase and PolyXen technologies, respectively,

including candidates developed by our partners. We do not have any agreements in place to manufacture clinical materials for use in the

development of our XCART technology and would seek a third party manufacturer for our clinical supply needs, if necessary.

Government Regulation

General

Government authorities in the U.S. at the federal,

state and local level, and other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture,

quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, marketing and export and

import of products such as those we are developing. Generally, a new drug must be approved by the FDA through the NDA process and a new

biologic must be licensed by the FDA through the biologics license application (“BLA”) process before it may be legally marketed

in the U.S.

U.S. Regulation

Drug Development Process

In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and in the case of biologics, also under the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”),

and their implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal,

state, local and foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply

with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval may subject

an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications,

withdrawal of an approval, license revocation, a clinical hold, warning letters or untitled letters, product recalls, product seizures,

total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement

or civil or criminal penalties. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us.

The process required by the FDA before a drug or biologic may be marketed

in the U.S. generally involves the following:

· submission to the FDA of an NDA or BLA;

· FDA review and approval of the NDA or BLA.

The drug or biologic manufacturer may also be

subject to post-approval regulatory requirements. Once a pharmaceutical candidate is identified for development, it enters the preclinical

testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies.

An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, to the FDA

as part of the IND. The sponsor will also include a protocol detailing, among other things, the objectives of the first phase of the clinical

trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated, if the first phase lends itself

to an efficacy evaluation. Some preclinical testing may continue even after the IND is submitted. The IND automatically becomes effective

thirty days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the thirty-day time period, places the clinical trial on a clinical hold.

In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. Clinical holds

may also be imposed by the FDA at any time before or during clinical trials due to safety concerns about ongoing or proposed clinical

trials or noncompliance with specific FDA requirements, and the trials may not begin or continue until the FDA notifies the sponsor that

the hold has been lifted.

All clinical trials must be conducted under the

supervision of one or more qualified investigators in accordance with GCP regulations. They must be conducted under protocols detailing

the objectives of the trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria and the safety and effectiveness criteria to

be evaluated. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND, and timely safety reports must be submitted to the FDA if

any serious and unexpected adverse events occur. An institutional review board (“IRB”) at each institution participating in

the clinical trial (or in some cases an independent IRB) must review and approve each protocol before a clinical trial commences at that

institution. As part of its review, the IRB must also approve the information regarding the trial and the consent form that must be provided

to each trial subject or his or her legal representative, monitor the study until completion and otherwise comply with IRB regulations.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases

that may overlap or be combined:

Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as

Phase IV studies, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment

of patients in the intended therapeutic indication. In certain instances, the FDA may mandate the performance of Phase IV clinical trials

as a condition of approval of an NDA or BLA.

The FDA or the sponsor may suspend a clinical

trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.

Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted

in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. In addition,

some clinical trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring

board or committee. Depending on its charter, this group may determine whether a trial may move forward at designated check points based

on access to certain data from the trial.

Concurrent with clinical trials, sponsors must

also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug and finalize a process for manufacturing

the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing

quality batches of the drug candidate and, among other things, the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength,

quality and purity of the final drug. In addition, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted

to demonstrate that the drug candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

While the IND is active and before approval, progress

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2023-12-31, filed 2024-03-21 · accession 0001683168-24-001594

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 23 headings are on that chain and 17 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.