Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

TNGX US Equity

Tango Therapeutics, Inc.Health Care · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1819133 · FY ends Dec 31
$25.20
-0.24 (-0.94%)
USD · as of 2026-08-19 · marketstack

TNGX · 10-K · period ended 2021-12-31

← all TNGX documents
filed 2022-03-28 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1,0381,601 of 2,078679k characters rendered

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results could differ materially from the results described in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section to “Tango,” “we,” “us,” “our” and other similar terms refer to our wholly-owned subsidiary Tango Therapeutics Sub, Inc. and its subsidiary prior to the closing of the business combination with BCTG Acquisition Corp. and to Tango Therapeutics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Business Combination.

Overview

We are a precision oncology company leveraging our state-of-the-art target discovery platform to identify novel targets and develop new drugs directed at tumor suppressor gene loss in defined patient populations with high unmet medical need. Tumor suppressor gene loss remains a largely untouched target space specifically because these genetic events cannot be directly targeted. Empowered by recent advances in CRISPR technology, we are now able to employ a unique functional genomics approach and apply the principles of synthetic lethality to target the loss of specific tumor suppressor genes at scale. We believe this will result in establishing a sustainable pipeline designed to deliver meaningfully clinical benefit to patients. Our novel small molecules are designed to be selectively active in cancer cells with specific tumor suppressor gene loss, killing those cancer cells while being relatively inert in normal cells. We also are extending this target space beyond the classic, cell-autonomous effects of tumor suppressor gene loss to include the discovery of novel targets that reverse the effects of tumor suppressor gene loss that prevent the immune system from recognizing and killing cancer cells (immune evasion). We believe this approach will provide the ability to deliver the deep, sustained target inhibition necessary for prolonged tumor regression and meaningful clinical benefit as a result of the unique ability of synthetic lethal targeting to spare normal cells.

Our lead program, TNG908, a protein arginine methyl transferase 5, or PRMT5, inhibitor is synthetic lethal with MTAP deletion, is being developed as a treatment for cancers with MTAP deletions. MTAP deletions occur in 10% to 15% of all human cancers. In preclinical studies, TNG908 demonstrated 15-fold greater potency in cells with MTAP deletions than those without and showed strong regressions in multiple cancer types. In the first quarter of 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the Investigational New Drug (IND) application for the Phase 1/2 clinical trial and granted Fast Track designation to TNG908. We plan to initiate a Phase 1/2 clinical trial in the second quarter of 2022. Our Target 3 program, an undisclosed synthetic lethal target, reverses the immune evasion effect of serine-threonine kinase 11 (STK11) loss-of-function mutations. In animal models, the combination of Target 3 with a PD1 inhibitor sustained strong tumor regressions and the induction of immune memory against re-implantation of tumors. We expect to advance a development candidate in the second quarter of 2022 and file an IND in 2023. We are also developing a ubiquitin-specific protease 1, or USP1, inhibitor that is synthetic lethal with BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutant tumors.In vitro and in vivo preclinical data for USP1 demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity. We expect this molecule to have both single agent activity in PARPi-naïve and PARPi-resistant BRCA1/2 mutant cancers and to synergize with PARP inhibitors. We anticipate declaring a development candidate in the second half of 2022 and filing an IND for this program in 2023.

Business Combination

On April 13, 2021, the Company, BCTG Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (now known as Tango Therapeutics Sub, Inc., or “Old Tango”) signed a definitive merger agreement, or the Merger Agreement, memorializing the terms of BCTG’s acquisition of 100% of Old Tango’s issued and outstanding equity securities in exchange for $550.0 million worth of consideration in the form of BCTG common stock, or the Business Combination. The Business Combination was approved on August 9, 2021 by shareholders of BCTG, resulting in BCTG acquiring 100% of our issued and outstanding equity securities on August 10, 2021. Upon the closing of the Business Combination, BCTG Merger Sub Inc. merged with and into Tango, with Tango as the surviving company in the Merger, and BCTG changed its name to “Tango Therapeutics, Inc.”, or New Tango. For additional information on the Business Combination, see Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

90

We received gross proceeds of $167.1 million upon the closing of the Business Combination. Simultaneous with the closing of the Business Combination, Tango entered into agreements with certain investors, the PIPE Investors, pursuant to which these PIPE Investors purchased 18,610,000 shares of our common stock at $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $186.1 million, upon the closing of the PIPE financing. Total transaction costs and redemptions totaled $26.9 million, resulting in total net proceeds of $326.3 million.

Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Business Combination, each share of Old Tango redeemable convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Business Combination was converted into a share of New Tango common stock. At the effective time of the Business Combination, each option to purchase Old Tango common stock became an option to purchase shares of New Tango common stock, subject to adjustment in accordance with the exchange ratio.

Financial Overview

Since the Company's inception, we have focused primarily on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, discovering product candidates, securing related intellectual property, and conducting research and development activities for our programs. Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through equity financings and from the proceeds received from our collaboration agreement with Gilead Sciences, Inc., or Gilead. Since inception, we have raised an aggregate of $166.9 million of gross proceeds from the sale of our preferred shares, $342.1 million in gross proceeds through the closing of the Business Combination and PIPE Financing transactions (as described below) and another $212.1 million through our collaboration with Gilead.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand as of December 31, 2021 of $485.3 million will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements at least into the second half of 2024. Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, our net losses were $58.2 million and $52.0 million, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $161.3 million as of December 31, 2021. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, as we advance our product candidates through preclinical and clinical development and seek regulatory approvals, manufacture drug product and drug supply, maintain and expand our intellectual property portfolio, as well as hire additional personnel, pay for accounting, audit, legal, regulatory and consulting services, and pay costs associated with maintaining compliance with Nasdaq listing rules and the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, director and officer liability insurance, investor and public relations activities and other expenses associated with operating as a public company. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending on the timing of our preclinical studies, our clinical trials and our expenditures on other research and development activities.

We do not have any product candidates approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We will not generate revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, if ever. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates and do not enter into a third-party commercialization partnership, we expect to incur significant expenses related to developing our commercialization capability to support product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution activities. As a result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private equity offerings and debt financings or other sources, such as potential collaboration agreements, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise capital or enter into such agreements as, and when needed, could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate revenues from the sale of our therapies, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce our operations.

Revenue

To date, we have not recognized any revenue from product sales, and we do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the next several years. If our development efforts for our product candidates are successful and result in regulatory approval, or license agreements with third parties, we may generate revenue in the future from product sales. However, there can be no assurance as to when we will generate such revenue, if at all.

91

Collaboration Agreements with Gilead Sciences

In October 2018, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Gilead, or the 2018 Gilead Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the 2018 Gilead Agreement, we received an initial upfront payment of $50.0 million. The upfront payment was initially recorded as deferred revenue on our balance sheet and is recognized as revenue as or when the performance obligation under the contract is satisfied.

In July 2019, Gilead licensed a program from us, and also separately contracted for additional services related to the program through a letter agreement. By December 2019, we had substantially completed our required obligations under the license and side letter agreement, and as a result, recognized $9.4 million of revenue. By December 2020, all remaining obligations under the license and side letter agreement were completed, resulting in the recognition of the remaining consideration of $0.7 million of revenue.

In August 2020, the 2018 Gilead Agreement was expanded into a broader collaboration via an amended and restated research collaboration and license agreement, or the Gilead Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Gilead Agreement, we received an upfront payment of $125.0 million. Consistent with the treatment of the previously received upfront payment, this upfront payment was recorded as deferred revenue on our balance sheet and is recognized as revenue as or when the performance obligation under the contract is satisfied.

In December 2020 and September 2021, Gilead elected to extend two programs for research extension fees totaling $24.0 million, which was added to our estimate of the transaction price to total $199.0 million. A total of $10.0 million of fees related to the research extensions have not been received as of December 31, 2021 as these were determined to be conditional upon the satisfaction of additional research obligations, and thus a contract asset, however, we determined that achievement of the entire research extension fees was probable and that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized would not occur.

In April 2021, Gilead licensed a program for an $11.0 million fee. The $11.0 million license fee was received and recognized as revenue in the second quarter of 2021 since we have no continued involvement in the advancement of the program, Gilead can benefit from the license on its own and the license is separately identifiable from the research services.

As of December 31, 2021, $50.3 million has been recognized as collaboration revenue related to the upfront and research extension payments from the Gilead Agreement.

During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized $26.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively, of collaboration revenue associated with the Gilead Agreements based on performance completed during each period.

Refer to Note 2 and Note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our revenue recognition accounting policy and our collaboration agreement with Gilead.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for our research activities, including our drug discovery efforts and the development of our product candidates. We expense research and development costs as incurred, which include:

employee-related expenses, including salaries, bonuses, benefits, stock-based compensation, other related costs for those employees involved in research and development efforts;

external research and development expenses incurred under agreements with contract research organizations, or CROs, as well as consultants that conduct our preclinical studies and development services;

costs related to manufacturing material for our preclinical and clinical studies;

laboratory supplies and research materials;

costs to fulfill our obligations under the collaboration with Gilead;

costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements; and

92

facilities, depreciation and other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent, utilities and insurance.

Costs for certain activities are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using data such as information provided to us by our vendors and analyzing the progress of our preclinical studies or other services performed. Significant judgment and estimates are made in determining the accrued expense balances at the end of any reporting period.

Our direct external research and development expenses consist primarily of fees paid to CROs and outside consultants in connection with our preclinical and clinical development and manufacturing activities. Our direct external research and development expenses also include fees incurred under license agreements. We track these external research and development costs on a program-by-program basis once we have identified a product candidate.

We do not allocate employee costs, costs associated with our target discovery efforts, laboratory supplies, and facilities, including depreciation or other indirect costs, to specific programs because these costs are deployed across multiple programs and, as such, are not separately classified. We characterize research and development costs incurred prior to the identification of a product candidate as discovery costs. We use internal resources primarily to conduct our research and discovery activities as well as for managing our preclinical development and manufacturing activities.

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Unallocated research and development expenses:

Facilities and other related expenses 9,308 9,547

Total research and development expenses $ 77,636 $ 49,991

The successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. We plan to substantially increase our research and development expenses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of our product candidates and manufacturing processes and conduct discovery and research activities for our preclinical programs. We cannot determine with certainty the timing of initiation, the duration or the completion costs of current or future preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates or the timing of regulatory filings in connection with clinical trials or regulatory approval, due to the inherently unpredictable nature of preclinical and clinical development. Clinical and preclinical development timelines, the probability of success and development costs can differ materially from expectations. We anticipate that we will make determinations as to which product candidates to pursue and how much funding to direct to each product candidate on an ongoing basis in response to the results of ongoing and future preclinical studies and clinical trials, regulatory developments and our ongoing assessments as to each product candidate’s commercial potential. Our clinical development costs are expected to increase significantly as we commence clinical trials. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially, particularly due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing product candidates, including the uncertainty of:

the scope, rate of progress, and expenses of our ongoing research activities as well as any preclinical studies, clinical trials and other research and development activities;

establishing an appropriate safety profile with IND enabling studies;

successful enrollment in and completion of clinical trials;

whether our product candidates show safety and efficacy in our clinical trials;

receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

the progress of our collaboration with Gilead;

establishing commercial manufacturing capabilities or making arrangements with third-party manufacturers;

93

obtaining and maintaining patent and trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates;

commercializing product candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others; and

continued acceptable safety profile of products following any regulatory approval.

Any changes in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of our product candidates in preclinical and clinical development could mean a significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of these product candidates. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. We may obtain unexpected results from our clinical trials. We may elect to discontinue, delay or modify clinical trials of some product candidates or focus on other product candidates. For example, if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or another regulatory authority were to delay our planned start of clinical trials or require us to conduct clinical trials or other testing beyond those that we currently expect or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our planned clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development of that product candidate.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expense consists primarily of employee related costs, including salaries, bonuses, benefits, stock-based compensation and other related costs. General and administrative expense also includes professional services, including legal, accounting and audit services and other consulting fees as well as facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses, insurance and other general administrative expenses.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our headcount to support our continued research activities and development of our product candidates. We also anticipate that we will incur significantly increased accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, compliance and director and officer insurance costs as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with operating as a public company.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest Income

Interest income consists of income earned and losses incurred in connection with our investments in money market funds, U.S. Treasury bills and U.S. government agency bonds.

Other (Expense) Income, Net

Other (expense) income, net consists of miscellaneous income and expense unrelated to our core operations.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our provision for income tax consists of an estimate for U.S. federal and state income taxes based on enacted rates, as adjusted for allowable credits, deductions, uncertain tax positions, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax law. We have recorded a provision for income taxes in the amount of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. There was no provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2020 because we have historically incurred net operating losses and maintain a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

94

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Operating expenses:

Other income (expense), net:

Provision for income taxes (292 ) — (292 )

Collaboration Revenue

Collaboration revenue of $26.0 million and $7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, was derived from the Gilead collaboration. The increase of $19.1 million is primarily due to the charge against revenue of $11.3 million in the third quarter of 2020 driven by a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the revenue previously recognized from the Gilead collaboration due to a change to the transaction price resulting from the execution of the Gilead Agreement as well as incremental costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2021 resulting in greater collaboration revenue recognition.

License Revenue

License revenue of $11.0 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, was derived from the Gilead collaboration. The increase of $10.3 million is primarily due to Gilead licensing a program for $11.0 million during the second quarter of 2021 as compared to residual 2019 Gilead Letter Agreement revenue of $0.7 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expense was $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $50.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $27.6 million was primarily due to a$18.6 millionincrease in external CRO expenses and lab supplies primarily relating to the advancement of our programs. Additionally, personnel-related costs increased $6.8 million primarily due to an increase of share-based compensation expense and additional headcount to support our research and development activities, as well as a $2.5 million increase in IT spend, consulting and professional fees.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expense was $17.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $7.7 million was primarily due to a $4.8 million increase in personnel-related costs due to an increase in share-based compensation expense and additional headcount, as well as a $1.4 million increase in consulting and professional fees.

95

Interest Income

Interest income was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $0.4 million was primarily due to an increase in cash invested and interest rates in 2021 as compared to 2020.

Other (Expense) Income, Net

Other expense, net was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to other income of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Other (expense) income was not significant for both the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of $0.3 million is primarily attributable to taxable deferred revenue partially offset by the utilization of federal and state net operating losses and federal and state tax credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

Since our inception, we have generated recurring net losses. We have not yet commercialized any product and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any products for several years, if at all. Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through proceeds from the issuance of equity in the form of stock and from the proceeds received from our collaboration with Gilead. To date, we have raised an aggregate of $166.9 million of gross proceeds from the private placement of preferred shares, $342.1 million of gross proceeds from the Business Combination and PIPE Financing transactions, and $212.1 million through the collaboration and license agreement with Gilead. As of December 31, 2021, we had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $485.3 million.

Funding Requirements

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand as of December 31, 2021 of $485.3 million will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements at least into the second half of 2024. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could expend our capital resources sooner than we expect.

Cash Flows

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

The following table summarizes our cash flows for each of the years presented:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $59.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $70.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily driven by the net loss of $58.2 million as a direct result of higher operating expenses related to the advancement of our programs and personnel-related costs. The net cash provided by operations for the year

96

ended December 31, 2020 was primarily driven by a $125.0 million non-refundable upfront payment received from Gilead that was recorded as deferred revenue in 2020 and was partially offset by a net loss of $52.0 million.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $183.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $145.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to increased purchases of marketable securities and was partially offset by an increase in sales and maturities of marketable securities.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $357.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $80.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily due to net proceeds of $326.3 million received upon the closing of the Business Combination and PIPE Financing in August 2021, as well as $30.0 million in proceeds related to the issuance of shares of redeemable convertible Series B preferred stock in March 2021. The net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily due to net proceeds of $30.0 million related to the issuance of shares of redeemable convertible Series B preferred stock in April 2020 and net proceeds of $51.2 million related to the issuance of shares of redeemable convertible Series-B-1 preferred stock in August 2020.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2021 and the effects that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

Payments Due by Period

Total Less than1 Year 1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years More than5 Years

(in thousands)

Operating lease commitments $ 1,572 $ 1,572 $ — $ — $ —

The commitment amounts in the table above reflect the minimum payments due under our amended operating lease for office and laboratory space at our 100 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts location. These commitments are also recognized as operating lease liabilities in our balance sheet at December 31, 2021. In November 2021, we entered into a lease termination agreement for our leased office and laboratory space at 100 Binney Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The lease termination agreement is a modification of the lease agreement for these premises that provides, among other things, the acceleration of the expiration of the original term of the lease from June 30, 2026 to an earlier lease termination date, for which the earlier date shall be no later than October 15, 2022. Refer to Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion of the impact resulting from the lease termination agreement.

The table does not include the minimum payments due under our new operating lease for office and laboratory space at the 201 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts as we have not occupied the premises and the lease payments in connection with this lease are yet to commence as of December 31, 2021. Commitments pertaining to the 201 Brookline Avenue lease will be added to the table above, and also recognized as operating lease liabilities on our balance sheet upon achievement of the new lease commencement date. The fixed annual rent payable under the lease is $5.1 million, increasing by 3% annually from the rent commencement date.

Purchase Obligations

In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts with third parties for preclinical studies, clinical operations and research and development supplies. These contracts generally do not contain minimum purchase commitments and provide for termination on notice, and therefore are cancellable contracts. These payments are not included in the table above as the amount and timing of such payments are not known as of December 31, 2021.

97

License Agreement Obligations

We have also entered into license agreements under which we may be obligated to make milestone and royalty payments. We have not included future milestone or royalty payments under these agreements in the table above since the payment obligations are contingent upon future events, such as achieving certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones or generating product sales. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, we were unable to estimate the timing or likelihood of achieving these milestones or generating future product sales. Refer to Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of our license agreements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances and at the time these estimates are made, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Some of the judgments and estimates we make can be subjective and complex. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our judgments and estimates in light of changes in circumstances, facts, and experience. The effects of material revisions in estimates, if any, will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of change in estimates.

While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we believe that the following accounting policies are those most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

The terms of our collaboration agreements may include consideration such as non-refundable up-front payments, license fees, research extension fees, and clinical, regulatory and sales-based milestones and royalties on product sales.

We recognize revenue under ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC 606, which applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards, such as leases, insurance, collaboration arrangements and financial instruments. ASC 606 provides a five-step framework whereby revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that we determine are within the scope of the revenue standard, we perform the following five steps: (i) identify the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determine whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measure the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy each performance obligation. We only apply the five-step model to contracts when collectability of the consideration to which we are entitled in exchange for the goods or services we transfer to the customer is determined to be probable. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, we assess whether the goods or services promised within each contract are distinct and, therefore, represent a separate performance obligation. Goods and services that are determined not to be distinct are combined with other promised goods and services until a distinct bundle is identified. We then allocate the transaction price (the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to from a customer in exchange for the promised goods or services) to each performance obligation and recognize the associated revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied. Our estimate of the transaction price for each contract includes all variable consideration to which we expect to be entitled.

We recognize the transaction price allocated to license payments as revenue upon delivery of the license to the customer and resulting ability of the customer to use and benefit from the license, if the license is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the contract. If the license is considered to not be distinct from other performance obligations, we utilize judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied (i) at a point in time, but only for licenses determined to be distinct from other performance obligations in the contract, or (ii) over time; and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue from license payments. We evaluate the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjust the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

98

We evaluate whether it is probable that the consideration associated with each milestone payment will not be subject to a significant reversal in the cumulative amount of revenue recognized. Amounts that meet this threshold are included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method, whereas amounts that do not meet this threshold are considered constrained and excluded from the transaction price until they meet this threshold. Milestones tied to regulatory approval, and therefore not within our control, are considered constrained until such approval is received. Upfront and ongoing development milestones under our collaboration agreements are not subject to refund if the development activities are not successful. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, we re-evaluate the probability of a significant reversal of the cumulative revenue recognized for the milestones, and, if necessary, adjust the estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues from collaborators in the period of adjustment. We exclude sales-based milestone payments and royalties from the transaction price until the sale occurs (or, if later, until the underlying performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied or partially satisfied), because the license to our intellectual property is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate as it is the primary driver of value.

ASC 606 requires us to allocate the arrangement consideration on a relative standalone selling price basis for each performance obligation after determining the transaction price of the contract and identifying the performance obligations to which that amount should be allocated. The relative standalone selling price is defined in ASC 606 as the price at which an entity would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer. If other observable transactions in which we have sold the same performance obligation separately are not available, we are required to estimate the standalone selling price of each performance obligation. Key assumptions to determine the standalone selling price may include forecasted revenues, development timelines, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, discount rates and probabilities of technical and regulatory success.

Whenever we determine that multiple promises to a customer are not distinct and comprise a combined performance obligation that includes services, we recognize revenue over time using the cost-to-cost input method, based on the total estimated cost to fulfill the obligation. Significant management judgment is required in determining the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which we are expected to complete our performance obligations under an arrangement.

Consideration that does not meet the requirements to satisfy the above revenue recognition criteria is a contract liability and is recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. We have recorded short-term and long-term deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheets based on our best estimate of when such revenue will be recognized. Short-term deferred revenue consists of amounts that are expected to be recognized as revenue in the next 12 months. Amounts that we expect will not be recognized within the next 12 months are classified as long-term deferred revenue.

In certain instances, the timing of and total costs of satisfying these obligations under our collaboration agreement can be difficult to estimate. Accordingly, our estimates may change in the future. Such changes to estimates would result in a change in revenue recognition amounts. If these estimates and judgments change over the course of these agreements, it may affect the timing and amount of revenue that we will recognize and record in future periods.

Under ASC 606, we will recognize revenue when we fulfill our performance obligations under the agreement with Gilead. As the required performance obligation is satisfied, we will recognize revenue for the portion satisfied and record a receivable for any fees that have not been received. Amounts are recorded as short-term collaboration receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. A contract liability is recognized when a customer prepays consideration or owes payment to an entity in advance of our performance according to a contract. We do not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less. We expense incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred if the expected amortization period of the asset that we would have recognized is one year or less or the amount is immaterial.

Accrued Research and Development Expenses

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our accrued research and development expenses. This process involves estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of actual costs. The majority of our service providers invoice us in arrears for services performed, on a pre-determined schedule or when contractual milestones are met; however, some require advance payments, which would be recorded as a prepaid expense in other assets, or if there is the right of offset, offset against our liability balance with the counterparty. We make estimates of our accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in the consolidated financial statements based on facts and circumstances known to us at that time. At

99

each period end, we corroborate the accuracy of these estimates with the service providers and make adjustments, if necessary.

We record the expense and accrual related to research and development activities performed by our vendors based on our estimates of the services received and efforts expended considering a number of factors, including our knowledge of the progress towards completion of the research and development activities; invoicing to date under the contracts; communication from the vendors of any actual costs incurred during the period that have not yet been invoiced; and the costs included in the contracts and purchase orders. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be instances in which payments made to our vendors will exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the expense. In accruing service fees, we estimate the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, we adjust the accrual or prepaid expense accordingly. Although we do not expect our estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, our understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and may result in reporting amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period. To date, there have not been any material adjustments to our prior estimates of accrued research and development expenses.

Stock-Based Compensation

We estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the Black-Scholes method utilizing the “simplified method,” for determining the expected life of the award, which is based on the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term as all options granted after becoming a public entity will be granted “at-the-money.” We determine the volatility for options granted based on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies. The expected volatility of granted options has been determined using a weighted-average of the historical volatility measures of this peer group of companies. We will continue to apply this method until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our own stock price becomes available. The fair value of each share of common stock underlying stock-based awards is based on the closing price of our common stock as reported by Nasdaq on the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate utilized in our calculations is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. The expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero as we have never paid dividends and do not have current plans to pay any dividends on our common stock.

We measured stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and directors based on their fair value on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for options or the difference between the purchase price per share of the award, if any, and the fair value of our common stock for restricted common stock awards.

Prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, as there was not a public market for our common stock prior to becoming publicly traded in August 2021, the estimated fair value of our common stock was determined by our board of directors as of the date of grant of each option or restricted stock award, considering our most recently available third-party valuations of common stock and our board of directors’ assessment of additional objective and subjective factors that it believed were relevant and which may have changed from the date of the most recent valuation through the date of the grant. These third-party valuations were performed in accordance with the guidance outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. Our common stock valuations were prepared using either an option pricing method, or OPM, or a hybrid method, both of which used market approaches to estimate our enterprise value. The OPM treats common stock and preferred stock as call options on the total equity value of a company, with exercise prices based on the value thresholds at which the allocation among the various holders of a company’s securities changes. Under this method, the common stock had value only if the funds available for distribution to stockholders exceed the value of the preferred stock liquidation preferences at the time of the liquidity event, such as a strategic sale or a merger. The hybrid method was a probability-weighted expected return method, or PWERM, where the equity value in one or more scenarios is calculated using an OPM. The PWERM is a scenario-based methodology that estimated the fair value of common stock based upon an analysis of future values for the company, assuming various outcomes. The common stock value was based on the probability-weighted present value of expected future investment returns considering each of the possible outcomes available as well as the rights of each class of stock. The future value of the common stock under each outcome was discounted back to the valuation date at an appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate and probability weighted to arrive at an indication of value for the common stock. A discount for lack of marketability of the common stock is then applied to arrive at an indication of value for the common stock. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model also uses as inputs the fair value of our common stock and assumptions we make for the

100

volatility of our common stock, the expected term of our common stock options, the risk-free interest rate for a period that approximates the expected term of our common stock options, and our expected dividend yield.

Compensation expense for awards is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award for employees and directors and the period during which services are performed for non-employees. We use the straight-line method to record the expense of awards with service-based vesting conditions.

We believe our methodologies are reasonable based upon our internal peer company analyses. If different assumptions had been made, equity-based compensation expense, consolidated net loss and consolidated net loss per share could have been significantly different.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that may potentially impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows is disclosed in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Emerging Growth Company and Smaller Reporting Company Status

We are an “emerging growth company,” under the JOBS Act. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of delayed adoption of new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same requirements to adopt new or revised accounting standards as private entities. As an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain exemptions and reduced reporting requirements under the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions, as an emerging growth company:

we may present only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our periodic reports and registration statements, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K;

we may avail ourselves of the exemption from providing an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

we may provide reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements; and

we may not require nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation or stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) December 31, 2025, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more, (iii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700.0 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of such year, provided we have been subject to the Exchange Act for at least 12 calendar months and have filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Exchange Act or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period. We may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these exemptions.

We are also a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million and our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company if either (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

101

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates.

Interest Rate Risk

We had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $485.3 million and $190.3 million as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, which consisted of cash, money market funds, U.S. Treasury bills and U.S. government agency bonds. Interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates; however, due to the nature of these investments, an immediate 1% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our investment portfolio.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our reporting and functional currency is the U.S. dollar. We currently do not have significant exposure to foreign currencies as we hold no foreign exchange contracts, option contracts, or other foreign hedging arrangements. Our operations may be subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in the future.

Effects of Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our operations may be subject to inflation in the future.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Our consolidated financial statements, together with the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are appended to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and an index of those consolidated financial statements can be found beginning on page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2021. Management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2021.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2021 that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our management, including our Chief

102

Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the independent registered public accounting firm due to an exemption established by the JOBS Act for “emerging growth companies."

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

103

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Management

The following sets forth certain information, as of February 1, 2022, concerning our directors and executive officers.

Name Age Position

Barbara Weber, M.D. 65 President, Chief Executive Officer and Class III Director

Daniella Beckman 43 Chief Financial Officer

Alan Huang, Ph.D. 49 Chief Scientific Officer

Marc Rudoltz, M.D. 58 Chief Medical Officer

Alexis Borisy 50 Class III Director and Chair

Lesley Calhoun 56 Class I Director

Aaron Davis 43 Class III Director

Reid Huber, Ph.D. 50 Class I Director

Malte Peters, M.D. 59 Class II Director

Mace Rothenberg, M.D. 65 Class II Director

Executive Officers

Barbara Weber, M.D. has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since March 2017. Dr. Weber has been a Venture Partner at Third Rock Ventures since March 2015. Previously, Dr. Weber served as Senior Vice President, Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis from 2009 to 2015, Vice President, Oncology, GSK from 2005 to 2009 and Professor, Medicine and Genetics, University of Pennsylvania from 1994 to 2005. Dr. Weber has served on the board of directors of Revolution Medicines, Inc. (NASDAQ: RVMD), a biotechnology company, since April 2018, Fog Pharma, a private biopharmaceutical company, since October 2018, and OPY Acquisition Corp. I (NASDAQ: OHAA), a special purpose acquisition company, since October 2021. Dr. Weber received a B.S. in Chemistry and an M.D. from the University of Washington, was a resident in internal medicine at Yale University and fellow in Medical Oncology at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute. We believe Dr. Weber qualifies to serve on our board based on her position as our President and Chief Executive Officer, her leadership experience and her extensive experience in the biopharmaceutical industry.

Daniella Beckman has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2019 and served as our interim Chief Financial Officer from October 2016 to August 2019. Prior to joining us, she provided consulting and interim chief financial officer services for early-stage biotechnology companies since November 2015. Previously, Ms. Beckman was the Chief Financial Officer of Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from June 2011 until it was acquired by Merck & Co., Inc., a pharmaceutical company, in August 2014. Ms. Beckman has served on the board of directors of Translate Bio, Inc., a clinical-stage mRNA therapeutics company, since October 2017, and currently serves on the board of directors of Vor Biopharma Inc. (NASDAQ: VOR), a cell therapies company, since July 2020, on the board of directors of 5:01 Acquisition Corp (NASDAQ: FVAM), a special purpose acquisition company, since October 2020, and on the board of directors of Blueprint Medicines Corporation (NASDAQ: BPMC), a global precision therapy company, since December 2021. Ms. Beckman holds a B.S. in business administration-accounting from Boston University.

Alan Huang, Ph.D., has served as our Chief Scientific Officer since April 2018. Before being appointed as Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Huang served as Senior Vice President, Head of Biology. From 2016 to 2017, he served as a consultant at Third Rock Ventures. Previously, Dr. Huang was Senior Director and interim Global Head of Oncology Translational Research at Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research. Prior to joining Novartis, Dr. Huang was a senior scientist at Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Huang obtained his B.S. in biochemistry from Fudan University and his doctorate in biochemistry & molecular biology from the University of South Alabama. He completed a postdoctoral fellowship at Schepen’s Eye Research Institute of Harvard Medical School.

Marc Rudoltz, M.D. has served as our Chief Medical Officer since October 2021. From December 2012 through October 2021, Dr. Rudoltz was the founder and served as the principal of MSR Healthcare Consultants LLC, which provides clinical,

104

regulatory, business development, and organizational (executive) management support to companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. In his capacity as principal at MSR Healthcare Consultants, Dr. Rudoltz served as interim Chief Medical Officer for a number of companies including Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, and Constellation Pharmaceuticals and as a clinical consultant for Blueprint Medicines. Prior to December 2012, he worked in clinical development roles for several companies, including Novartis where he played a role in the development and commercialization of imatinib (Gleevec®) and nilotinib (Tasigna®). Dr. Rudoltz obtained his B.S. in Chemical Biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and M.D. from SUNY-Upstate Medical University. He completed his residency training in Radiation Oncology at Thomas Jefferson University followed by fellowship training in Cancer Biology at the University of Pennsylvania.

Douglas Barry has served as our General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary since August 2021. Mr. Barry has been practicing law for over 20 years, and joins Tango from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, a biopharmaceutical company the develops and commercializes therapies that serve patients affected by certain rare diseases, where he served as Vice President of Corporate Law from May 2018 to July 2021. Prior to Alexion, he was Associate General Counsel at Alere Inc., a manufacturer and seller of point-of-care diagnostic equipment, from 2015 to March 2018 (Alere was acquired by Abbott Laboratories in 2018). Earlier in his career, Mr. Barry spent 10 years as an attorney in the corporate department at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. Mr. Barry has a B.A. degree in Political Science from Hobart College, a Master’s degree from University of Virginia in International Relations and a juris doctor from Northwestern University School of Law.

Non-Employee Directors

Alexis Borisy has served as a member of our board of directors since our founding in 2017 and as the chairman of the board of directors since August 2021. Since June 2019, Mr. Borisy has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of EQRx, Inc., a biotechnology company. From2010 to June 2019, Mr. Borisy was a partner at Third Rock Ventures, a series of venture capital funds investing in life science companies. Mr. Borisy co-founded Blueprint Medicines Corporation (NASDAQ: BPMC), a biopharmaceutical company, and served as its Interim Chief Executive Officer from 2013 to 2014 and has served as a member of its board of directors since 2011. Mr. Borisy co-founded Foundation Medicine, Inc. and served as its Interim Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to 2011 and served as a member of its board of directors from 2009 to July 2018, until its acquisition by Roche. In addition, during the past five years Mr. Borisy has served as a member of the board of directors of various public companies, including Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: RLAY), Revolution Medicines, Inc. (NASDAQ: RVMD), Magenta Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MGTA) and Editas Medicine, Inc. (NASDAQ: EDIT). Mr. Borisy received an A.B. in Chemistry from the University of Chicago and an A.M. in Chemistry and Chemical Biology from Harvard University. We believe Mr. Borisy’s extensive experience as an executive of, and working with and serving on the boards of directors of, multiple biopharmaceutical and life sciences companies, his educational background and his experience working in the venture capital industry provide him with the qualifications and skills necessary to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Lesley Ann Calhoun has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2021. Since June 2020, Ms. Calhoun has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Aligos Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company. From August 2016 to June 2020, Ms. Calhoun served as Senior Vice President of Finance & Administration and Chief Accounting Officer at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. From January 2013 to September 2015, Ms. Calhoun served as Vice President of Finance at Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc., a commercial pharmaceutical company, which was acquired by Horizon Pharma plc, a biopharmaceutical company, in May 2015. Prior to Horizon Pharma, Ms. Calhoun served as Senior Director of Finance and Corporate Controller at Theravance, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from August 2005 to January 2013. Prior to Theravance, Ms. Calhoun held various senior finance positions of increasing responsibility where she oversaw all aspects of finance and accounting operations for U.S. and multinational, publicly-traded and pre-IPO stage technology companies and in the biopharmaceutical industry. Earlier in her career, Ms. Calhoun was a member of the audit practice of Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1989 to 2001. Ms. Calhoun holds a B.S. in business administration with a concentration in accounting from San Francisco State University and is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). We believe that Ms. Calhoun’s financial and accounting expertise and her experience in the finance and life sciences industries qualify her to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Aaron Davis has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2020. Mr. Davis is Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Boxer Capital, LLC. After joining Tavistock Group as Portfolio Manager in 2005, Mr. Davis scaled Tavistock Group’s public healthcare investing activities and founded Boxer Capital, LLC. Prior to the Business Combination, Mr. Davis was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BCTG Acquisition Corp., our predecessor company. Mr. Davis is a Member of the Board of Directors of iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITOS), Mirati Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: MRTX), and Rain Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: RAIN). From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Davis served as a director of Kalypsys, Inc., and from 2000 to 2004, Mr. Davis worked in the Global Healthcare Investment Banking and Private Equity Group at

105

UBS Warburg, LLC. Mr. Davis received an M.A. degree in biotechnology from Columbia University and a B.B.A. degree in finance from Emory University. We believe that Mr. Davis is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience serving as a director of biotechnology companies and as a manager of funds specializing in the area of life sciences. We believe that Mr. Davis’s experience serving as a director of multiple biotechnology companies and his knowledge of funds specializing in the area of life sciences makes him qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Reid M. Huber, Ph.D., has served as a member of our board of directors since July 2019. Dr. Huber has served as a Partner at Third Rock Ventures since December 2018. From April 2014 to December 2018, Dr. Huber served as Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer at Incyte Corporation, a pharmaceutical company. From 2002 to 2014, Dr. Huber held various roles of increasing responsibility at Incyte. Prior to joining Incyte, Dr. Huber held scientific research positions at DuPont Pharmaceuticals and Bristol-Myers Squibb from 1997 to 2002. Dr. Huber has served on the board of directors of Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLCM) since October 2014 and also currently serves on the board of MOMA Therapeutics, Asher Bio, Insitroand The American Cancer Society. Dr. Huber received his Ph.D. in molecular genetics from the Washington University School of Medicine and held pre- and post-doctoral fellowships at the National Institutes of Health. We believe that Dr. Huber’s extensive background in the pharmaceutical industry and senior management experience qualify him to serve on our board of directors.

Malte Peters, M.D., has served on our board of directors since September 2018. Since March 2020, Dr. Peters has served as Chief Research and Development Officer of MorphoSys AG, a biopharmaceutical company, and prior to that served as its Chief Development Officer and member of its management board since March 2017. Prior to his time at MorphoSys, Dr. Peters served as the Global Head of Clinical Development of the Biopharmaceuticals Business Unit at Sandoz International. From 2004 to 2015, he served as Clinical Head and Site Head for Basel and East Hanover in the Department of Oncology Translational Medicine at Novartis. Dr. Peters has also held teaching appointments in Internal Medicine and Biochemistry at the University of Mainz, Germany, served as Research Scientist at the Amgen Research Institute in Toronto, Canada, as Director of Cancer Research at Merck KGaA and as Medical Director at Micromet AG. Dr. Peters received his Doctor of Medicine from the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, and was trained at the Universities of Padova, Italy, and Bochum and Berlin, Germany. After scientific work at different universities he habilitated in Internal Medicine at the University of Mainz, Germany. We believe Dr. Peters’ extensive knowledge of the biotechnology industry makes him qualified to serve on our board of directors.

Mace Rothenberg, M.D., has served on our board of directors since March 2021. Dr. Rothenberg was previously at Pfizer, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, where he served as Chief Medical Officer and Head of Worldwide Medical and Safety from 2019 to 2021, Chief Development Officer for Oncology from 2016 to 2018, and Senior Vice President for Clinical Development and Medical Affairs for Pfizer Oncology from 2008 to 2016. Prior to joining Pfizer, Dr. Rothenberg spent 25 years in academia, serving on the faculties of the University of Texas Health Science Center — San Antonio and Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Dr. Rothenberg is a fellow of the American College of Physicians and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and is board-certified in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology. Dr. Rothenberg has been a member of the board of directors of Surrozen, Inc., a biotechnology company discovering and developing drug candidates to selectively modulate the Wnt pathway, since May 2021 and Aulos Bioscience, a privately-held immuno-oncology company, since March 2021. Dr. Rothenberg received his B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, his M.D. from the New York University School of Medicine, completed his residency in Internal Medicine at Vanderbilt University and his fellowship in Medical Oncology at the National Cancer Institute. We believe Dr. Rothenberg’s industry experience and life science expertise make him qualified to serve on our board of directors.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Our Board of Directors

Our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors, with each director assigned to one of the three classes. At each annual meeting of our stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the directors of the same class whose terms are then expiring. The terms of the directors will expire upon the election and qualification of successor directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held during the year 2022 for Class I directors, 2023 for Class II directors and 2024 for Class III directors. Lesley Calhoun and Reid Huber currently serve as our Class I directors, Malte Peters and Mace Rothenberg currently serve as our Class II directors and Alexis Borisy, Aaron Davis and Barbara Weber currently serve as our Class III directors.

106

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed solely and exclusively by a resolution adopted from time to time by our board of directors.

The division of our board of directors into staggered classes may delay or prevent stockholder efforts to effect a change of our management or a change in our control.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established three standing committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by our board of directors. The current members of our audit committee are Lesley Calhoun, Mace Rothenberg and Alexis Borisy, and Lesley Calhoun serves as the chairperson of the audit committee. The current members of our compensation committee are Malte Peters, Mace Rothenberg and Alexis Borisy, and Malte Peters is the chairperson of the compensation committee. The current members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Reid Huber, Aaron Davis, and Lesley Calhoun, and Reid Huber is the chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Audit Committee

The audit committee currently consists of Lesley Calhoun, Mace Rothenberg and Alexis Borisy. Our board has determined that each member of our audit committee is independent under Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. The chairperson of the audit committee is Lesley Calhoun. Our board has determined that Lesley Calhoun is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Our board has also determined that each member of the audit committee has the requisite financial expertise required under the applicable requirements of Nasdaq. In arriving at this determination, our board has examined each audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector.

The primary purpose of our audit committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors with respect to our accounting, financial, and other reporting and internal control practices and to oversee the independent registered accounting firm. Specific responsibilities of our audit committee include:

• reviewing related party transactions;

107

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee currently consists of Malte Peters, Mace Rothenberg and Alexis Borisy. Our board has determined each member of our compensation committee is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The chairperson of the compensation committee is Malte Peters. The primary purpose of our compensation committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors to oversee our compensation policies, plans and programs and to review and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors and other senior management, as appropriate.

Specific responsibilities of our compensation committee include:

• reviewing and recommending to our board the compensation of our directors;

• administering our stock and equity incentive plans;

• reviewing our overall compensation philosophy.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our compensation committee has at any time during the prior three years been one of our officers or employees. None of our named executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our nominating and corporate governance committee currently consists of Reid Huber, Aaron Davis, and Lesley Calhoun. Our board has determined each member is independent under Nasdaq listing standards. The chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee is Reid Huber.

108

Specific responsibilities of our nominating and corporate governance committee include:

• evaluating the performance of our board and of individual directors;

• evaluating the adequacy of our corporate governance practices and reporting;

• reviewing management succession plans; and

Role of Our Board of Directors in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through our board as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure and our audit committee is responsible for considering and discussing our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management will take to monitor and control such exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. Our audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Our compensation committee assesses and monitors whether our compensation plans, policies and programs comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at https://www.tangotx.com under “Investors – Corporate Governance”. Information contained on or accessible through such website is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the inclusion of the website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.

We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Code of Conduct and disclose any amendments to the Code of Conduct by posting such information on our website, at the address and location specified above and, to the extent required by the listing standards of Nasdaq, by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC, disclosing such information.

Director Nomination Process

In considering candidates for Board membership, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations by: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members and other Board members; management; our shareholders; third-party search firms; and any other appropriate sources. If a shareholder submits a nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the qualifications of such shareholder nominee using the same selection criteria the Committee uses to evaluate other potential nominees. Our bylaws contain provisions addressing the process by which a shareholder may recommend a person for consideration as a nominee for director at an annual meeting.

Our bylaws provide that stockholders seeking to nominate candidates for election as directors at our annual meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice of their intent in writing. To be timely, a stockholder’s written notice will need to be delivered to our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day prior to the scheduled date of the annual meeting of stockholders. In the event that no annual meeting was held during the preceding year (as will be the case for our first annual meeting that will be held in 2022) or the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 days before, or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, a timely notice must be received not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the scheduled date of such annual meeting

109

or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Our bylaws also specify certain requirements as to the form and content of a stockholders’ notice. These provisions may preclude our stockholders from bringing matters before our annual meeting of stockholders or from making nominations for directors at our annual meeting of stockholders.

Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee requires the following qualifications to be satisfied by any nominee for a position on the Board:

High standards of personal and professional ethics and integrity;

Proven achievement and competence in the nominee’s field and the ability to exercise sound business judgment;

Skills that are complementary to those of members of the existing Board;

The ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to the Company’s success; and

An understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities required of a director and a commitment to devote the time and energy necessary to perform those responsibilities.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Historically, our executive compensation program has reflected our growth and development-oriented corporate culture. To date, the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and President and our other executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table below, who we refer to as the named executive officers, has consisted of a combination of base salary, bonuses and long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock. The Company awarded restricted stock to certain executives in 2017, and the restrictions on such awards have lapsed. Our named executive officers who are full-time employees, like all other full-time employees, are eligible to participate in our retirement and health and welfare benefit plans. As a publicly traded company, we plan to evaluate our compensation values and philosophy and compensation plans and arrangements as circumstances merit. At a minimum, we expect to review executive compensation annually with input from an independent compensation consultant. As part of this review process, we expect the board of directors and the compensation committee to apply our values and philosophy, while considering the compensation levels needed to ensure our executive compensation program remains competitive with our peers. In connection with our executive compensation program, we will also review whether we are meeting our retention objectives and the potential cost of replacing a key employee.

Tango has assembled a team of highly experienced senior leaders and oncology drug developers who combine a flexible and adaptive approach to drug development that follows cutting-edge science with the proven expertise of large pharmaceutical company drug discovery and development. The management team and the employees at Tango are what, we believe, will be the ultimate differentiator that sets us apart from the competition as we move our products toward the market. This is based on our innovative approach to target drug-discovery using synthetic lethality and our innovative capabilities and expertise in drug discovery, research and drug development. Building a management team to provide structure and direction will require retaining talent with proven leadership and results, extensive technical expertise, broad experience in building and constructing a drug development and commercialization organization, all the while establishing the broader vision of improving care and therapeutic options for cancer patients. Attracting, recruiting and hiring talent who have the requisite skill set, background and track record to lead and manage a growing business in a competitive environment is one of our primary goals.

Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation philosophy is focused on building a world-class research and development organization with deep experience and understanding in synthetic lethality in order that we may identify novel targets and develop new drugs directed at tumor suppressor gene loss in defined patient populations with high unmet medical need. Attracting and retaining executives and employees that position Tango to meet these objectives, particularly as we move toward initiating a Phase 1/2 clinical trial for TNG908 in the second quarter of 2022 (following the FDA's clearance of the IND application in the first quarter of 2022), is a paramount goal of the Company's compensation program. By building a talented and motivated organization around extraordinary leaders, we believe we can advance our product candidates, grow our pipeline and, ultimately, drive long-term and sustainable stockholder value creation.

110

Tango's compensation programs are designed by our Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors around the following imperatives:

Attract, Retain and Incentivize: We are committed to attracting and retaining industry-leading talented individuals and designing our compensation programs and pay-outs that incentivize our employees to achieve rigorous corporate and individual objectives that are important to our long-term business and success.

Performance-based compensation pay-outs: Rewarding performance is the keystone of our total compensation program. In our annual bonus program, performance is measured by research and development advances, operating and strategic and individual contributions. The amount actually earned is scaled with the achievement of these performance metrics.

Compensation structure competitive with peers: We believe that compensation paid by our peer companies matters when we determine overall compensation. We evaluate the practices of our peers to validate that we are competitive with other companies with whom we compete for talent.

Balanced combination of compensation components: We strive for an appropriate balance between cash and equity incentives. The rationale being that annual cash incentive motivates individuals to successfully execute on short-term financial and strategic objectives and equity incentives focus executives on the long-term success of the organization and align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

Named Executive Officer Compensation

The following table shows the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 to (1) our principal executive officer, (2) our two next most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and were serving as executive officers as of such date.

Our named executive officers, or the NEOs, for 2021 who appear in the Summary Compensation Table are:

• Barbara Weber, M.D., our President and Chief Executive Officer

• Daniella Beckman, our Chief Financial Officer; and

• Alan Huang, Ph.D., our Chief Scientific Officer

2021 Summary Compensation Table

(1) Salary amount represents actual amounts paid during year noted. See “— Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table —Base Salaries” below.

(2) Dr. Weber earned a base salary of $506,479 for the period between January 1, 2021 and August 10, 2021. Upon the closing of Business Combination on August 10, 2021, her salary was increased to $526,000.

(3) Mrs. Beckman earned a base salary of $370,800 for the period between January 1, 2021 and August 10, 2021. Upon the closing of Business Combination on August 10, 2021, her salary was increased to $390,000.

(4) Mrs. Beckman earned a base salary of $288,000 for the period between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020, which reflected her part-time status. Upon her appointment to full-time on July 1, 2020, her salary was increased to $360,000. Her base salary and bonus were prorated to reflect her partial year of full-time employment from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.

111

(5) Mr. Huang earned a base salary of $385,107 for the period between January 1, 2021 and August 10, 2021. Upon the closing of Business Combination on August 10, 2021, his salary was increased to $411,000.

(6) Dr. Weber also serves as a member of our board of directors but does not receive any additional compensation for her service as a director.

(7) In accordance with SEC rules, this column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards granted during fiscal years 2021 and 2020 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718, for share-based compensation transactions. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that will be realized by the named executive officer upon the vesting of the share options, the exercise of the share options or the sale of the common shares underlying such share options.

(8) The amounts reflected include an increase to Mrs. Beckman’s stock options to reflect her appointment full-time status, effective on July 1, 2020.

(9) Reflects performance-based cash bonuses awarded to our named executive officers. See “— Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” below for a description of the material terms of the program pursuant to which this compensation was awarded.

(10) The amounts reported reflect $1,390 of commuter benefits and $3,219 for life & disability premiums that our company paid for on behalf of Dr. Weber.

(11) The amounts reported reflect $4,320 of commuter benefits, $2,865 of health benefits and life & disability insurance and $5,603 of expenses for phone services and home office expenses that our company paid for on behalf of Dr. Weber.

(12) The amounts reported reflect $1,390 of commuter benefits and $1,927 for life & disability premiums that our company paid for on behalf of Mrs. Beckman.

(13) The amounts reported reflect $4,320 of commuter benefits, $1,684 for life & disability premiums and $4,772 of expenses for phone services and home office expenses that our company paid for on behalf of Mrs. Beckman.

(14) The amounts reported reflect $1,390 of commuter benefits and $2,006 for life & disability premiums that our company paid for on behalf of Mr. Huang.

(15) The amounts reported reflect $4,320 of commuter benefits, $1,684 for life & disability premiums and $3,372 of expenses for phone services and home office expenses that our company paid for on behalf of Mr. Huang.

Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table

With respect to our 2021 compensation program, our board of directors reviewed compensation for all employees, including our named executive officers. In setting executive base salaries and bonuses and granting equity incentive awards, the board of directors considered compensation for comparable positions in the market, historical compensation level of our executives, individual performance as compared to our expectations and objectives, our desire to motivate employees to achieve short- and long-term results that are in the best interests of our stockholders and a long-term commitment to value creation for our company.

Our board of directors established a compensation committee, and delegated to such committee certain compensation-related functions for the Company in early 2021. Prior to establishing the compensation committee, the board of directors made compensation decisions with respect to our named executive officers.

When setting named executive officer compensation, our board of directors, and now our compensation committee, targets a general competitive position, based on independent third-party benchmark analytics to inform the mix of compensation of base salary, bonus and long-term incentives.

Our compensation committee is primarily responsible for determining the compensation for all of our executive officers. Our compensation committee reviews and discusses management’s proposed compensation with our Chief Executive Officer for all executives other than the Chief Executive Officer. Based on those discussions and its discretion, taking into account the factors noted above, the compensation committee then sets the compensation for each executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer and recommends the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer to our board of directors for approval. Our board of directors discusses the compensation committee’s recommendation and ultimately approves the compensation of our Chief Executive officer without the Chief Executive Officer present. Our compensation committee has the authority to engage the services of a consulting firm or other outside advisor to assist it in designing our executive compensation programs and in making compensation decisions. During 2020 and 2021, the board of directors and the compensation committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC as external compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters including our overall compensation program design and collection of market data to inform our compensation programs for our executive officers and members of our board of directors. Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC reports directly to our compensation committee. Prior to engaging Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC, our compensation committee assessed its independence consistent with Nasdaq listing standards and concluded that the engagement of such consultant did not raise any conflict of interest.

112

Base Salaries

The annual base salaries of our named executive officers are generally determined, approved and reviewed periodically by our compensation committee in order to compensate our named executive officers for their satisfactory performance of duties to our company. Annual base salaries are intended to provide a fixed component of compensation to our named executive officers, reflecting their skill sets, experience, roles and responsibilities. Base salaries for our named executive officers have generally been set at levels deemed necessary to attract and retain individuals with superior talent.

Name 2020 Base Salary ($) 2021 Base Salary ($)(2)

(1) Mrs. Beckman transitioned to full-time employment on July 1, 2020 and her 2020 base salary was adjusted to reflect her employment status with our company.

(2) 2021 Base Salary became effective upon the closing of the Business Combination on August 10, 2021.

The compensation committee determined that, in connection with the Business Combination and the Company becoming a publicly-traded company, the base salaries for each of the NEOs should be increased in order to reflect the additional responsibilities of each of these executive officers, as well as to align this fixed cash component of overall compensation at levels that are comparable to those companies in our compensation peer group.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

Our bonus program is intended to recognize and reward associates for achieving established objectives that are linked to the company’s growth and success, with the goal of increasing the Company's intrinsic long-term value. The program rewards performance based on corporate and individual accomplishments. The board endeavors to deliver a meaningful portion of total cash compensation in the form of performance-based annual cash incentives. Doing so, the board believes, is critical because the opportunity for a meaningful cash award will, together with strong management and accountability, drive executives to individually and collectively achieve and exceed our annual objectives.

The compensation committee and the board of directors established bonus metrics in connection with the 2021 bonus plan. As with 2021 base salary, the target bonus percentage for each of the NEOs was increased in connection with the Business Combination and the Company becoming a publicly-traded company in order to reflect the additional responsibilities of each of these executive officers, as well as to align this variable portion of the cash component of overall compensation at levels that are comparable to those companies in our compensation peer group.

The 2021 corporate bonus plan provides for formula-based incentive payments based upon the achievement of certain corporate and individual performance goals and objectives approved by our compensation committee and board of directors. These targets were established early in 2021 and communicated to the executives (and remained unchanged during the year). Bonuses are targeted at a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary during the year, and are expected to be paid out in the first quarter of the following year. The following are the target percentages for the periods indicated:

Name 2020 Bonus Target (%) 2021 Bonus Target (%)(1)

Barbara Weber, M.D. 40 % 50 %

Daniella Beckman 35 % 40 %

Alan Huang, Ph.D. 35 % 40 %

The corporate bonus component of the 2021 bonus plan consisted of 5 separate metrics that were weighted as follows:

Target Discovery - weighted 20%. This target is designed to encourage our employees to identify validated targets to meet our goal of filing INDs in the future to establish an enhanced product pipeline.

Drug Discovery - weighted 30%. This target was established to incentivize our employees to continue to advance our identified programs into advanced drug discovery phases.

Preclinical Development - weighted 30%. This target is designed to meet our goal of filing an IND for TNG908 in the 4th quarter of 2021.

113

Corporate Strategy - weighted 10%. This target was established to incentivize our employees to meet budgetary and other important cash-based goals that are designed to allow for continued development of our product pipeline in the future.

People - weighted 10%. This target was designed to reward results with respect to building out critical functions of our organization as we advanced our first product into clinical trials, and to reduce employee turnover in a competitive environment for talent.

In connection with the 2021 annual cash bonus program, all corporate targets were met at 110% of the established target, with the exception of: (i) corporate strategy, which was met at 150% of target and (ii) people, which was met at 115% of target. These achievements, which were confirmed by our compensation committee, reflected, among other things, our continued advancements in drug discovery in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, our continued advancement of our product candidates, including the acceleration of the Target 3 IND timeline, the hiring of our Chief Medical Officer, our successful IPO in August 2021 and our current strong cash position. As a result of this performance, which exceeded the objective goals set earlier in the year, the bonus payout was achieved at 115% of target. The following table reflects the target bonus as a percentage of base salary, the cash bonus payment at target and the actual bonus payout based on the success Tango achieved in 2021.

Name 2021 Bonus Target (%) 2021 Bonus Target ($) 2021 Bonus Achieved ($)

All final bonus payments to our named executive officers, if any, are determined by our compensation committee, which retains full discretion to adjust individual actual bonus awards based on the achievement of corporate and individual performance objectives, and may also adjust bonus awards based on other factors in their discretion. Individual performance objectives are generally related to each named executive officer’s performance in his area of responsibility and his contributions to Tango.

Equity Incentive Compensation

Our equity-based incentive awards granted to our named executive officers are designed to align their interests with those of our stockholders.

We have historically used share options as an incentive for long-term compensation to our executive officers because the share options allow our executive officers to profit from this form of equity compensation only if our share price increases relative to the share option’s exercise price, which exercise price is set at the fair market value of our common shares on the date of grant. We may grant equity awards at such times as our board of directors or compensation committee determines appropriate.

Along with the 2021 cash bonus program, stock options are a critical component of the variable portion of overall compensation that is designed to reward executive officer performance. Stock options align the interests of executives with those of our stockholders since the executive officers can only recognize increased compensation from these equity awards to the extent that our share price increases above the exercise price. These awards encourage our executives to focus on those corporate actions that drive increase in long-term value as reflected in the share price. Further, the four-year vesting schedule encourages executives to remain employed by the Company for an extended period.

Our executives generally are awarded an initial grant in the form of a share option in connection with their commencement of employment with us. Additional grants may occur periodically in order to specifically incentivize executives with respect to achieving corporate goals or to reward certain performance. Our stock options typically vest as to 25% of the underlying shares on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and in 36 equal monthly installments over the following three years, subject to the holder’s continued employment with us. From time to time, the board of directors or compensation committee may also construct alternative vesting schedules as it determines are appropriate to motivate particular employees. All options are granted with an exercise price that is no less than the fair market value of our common shares on the date of such grant of such award.

114

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End

The following table presents information regarding all outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2021.

(1) All of the option awards listed in the table were granted with an exercise price per share that is no less than the fair market value of our common shares on the date of grant of such award. For information regarding the valuation of equity awards, see Note 2 and Note 12 to our audited financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

(2) 25% vesting after 1st anniversary of the vesting commencement date and monthly vesting for 36 monthly installments thereafter, subject to continued employment with the company.

(3) Monthly vesting for 48 monthly installments following the vesting commencement date, subject to continued employment with our company.

Executive Compensation Arrangements

We initially entered into an offer letter with each of the named executive officers in connection with such officer’s employment with us, which set forth the terms and conditions of this officer’s employment, including base salary, target annual bonus opportunity, initial equity awards and standard employee benefit plan participation. Effective upon the closing of the Business Combination, we entered into an employment agreements with each of Dr. Weber, Ms. Beckman and Dr. Huang that replaced the offer letters and provide for specified payments and benefits in connection with a termination of employment in certain circumstances. Our goal in providing these severance and change in control payments and benefits is to offer sufficient cash continuity protection such that the named executive officers will focus their full time and attention on the requirements of the business rather than the potential implications for their respective positions. We prefer to have certainty regarding the potential severance amounts payable to the named executive officers, rather than negotiating severance at the time that a named executive officer’s employment terminates. We have also determined that accelerated vesting provisions with respect to outstanding equity awards in connection with a qualifying termination of employment in certain circumstances are appropriate because they encourage our named executive officers to stay focused on the business in those circumstances, rather than focusing on the potential implications for them personally. The employment agreements with our named executive officers require the named executive officers to execute a separation agreement containing a general release of claims in favor of us to receive any severance payments and benefits. The material terms of the employment agreements with Dr. Weber, Ms. Beckman and Dr. Huang are summarized below.

Barbara Weber, M.D.

Effective upon the closing of the Business Combination, we entered into a new employment agreement with Dr. Weber. Under Dr. Weber’s employment agreement, or the Weber Employment Agreement, Dr. Weber will serve as our Chief Executive Officer on an at-will basis. Dr. Weber’s 2022 annual base salary is $575,000, which is subject to periodic review and adjustment, and she is eligible to earn an annual bonus with a target amount equal to 50% of her base salary. Dr. Weber is eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans available to our employees, subject to the terms of those plans.

115

Pursuant to the Weber Employment Agreement, in the event that her employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Dr. Weber resigns for “good reason” (as each term is defined in the Weber Employment Agreement), subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims in our favor, (i) she will be entitled to receive base salary continuation for twelve (12) months following termination, (ii) she will be entitled to receive a prorated portion of her target annual cash incentive compensation for the year of termination, payable over the twelve (12) months following termination, (iii) subject to Dr. Weber’s copayment of premium amounts at the applicable active employees’ rate and proper election to continue COBRA health coverage, we will cover the portion of the premium amount equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Dr. Weber had she remained employed with us until the earliest of (A) twelve (12) months following termination, (B) Dr. Weber’s eligibility for group medical plan benefits under any other employer’s group medical plan or (C) the end of Dr. Weber’s COBRA health continuation period, and (iv) acceleration by 12 months of the unvested portion of all stock options and other stock-based awards subject solely to time-based vesting held by Dr. Weber.

In lieu of the payments and benefits described in the preceding sentence, in the event that Dr. Weber’s employment is terminated by us without cause or Dr. Weber resigns for good reason on or within twelve (12) months following a “change in control” (as defined in the Weber Employment Agreement), subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims in our favor, (i) she will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to 1.5 times Dr. Weber’s then-current annual base salary (or Dr. Weber’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control, if higher), (ii) she will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to 1.5 times Dr. Weber’s target annual cash incentive compensation for the year of termination, (iii) she will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to a prorated portion of her target annual cash incentive compensation for the year of termination, (iv) subject to Dr. Weber’s copayment of premium amounts at the applicable active employees’ rate and proper election to continue COBRA health coverage, we will cover the portion of the premium amount equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Dr. Weber had she remained employed with us until the earliest of (A) eighteen (18) months following termination, (B) Dr. Weber’s eligibility for group medical plan benefits under any other employer’s group medical plan or (C) the end of Dr. Weber’s COBRA health continuation period, and (iv) 100% of all stock options and other stock-based awards subject solely to time-based vesting held by Dr. Weber shall be accelerated.

Daniella Beckman

Effective upon the closing of the Business Combination, we entered into a new employment agreement with Ms. Beckman. Under Ms. Beckman’s employment agreement, or the Beckman Employment Agreement, Ms. Beckman will serve as our Chief Financial Officer on an at-will basis. Ms. Beckman’s 2022 annual base salary is $425,100, which is subject to periodic review and adjustment, and she is eligible to earn an annual bonus with a target amount equal to 40% of her base salary. Ms. Beckman is eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans available to our employees, subject to the terms of those plans.

Pursuant to the Beckman Employment Agreement, in the event that her employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Ms. Beckman resigns for “good reason” (as each term is defined in the Beckman Employment Agreement), subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims in our favor, (i) she will be entitled to receive base salary continuation for twelve (12) months following termination, and (ii) subject to Ms. Beckman’s copayment of premium amounts at the applicable active employees’ rate and proper election to continue COBRA health coverage, we will cover the portion of the premium amount equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Ms. Beckman had she remained employed with us until the earliest of (A) twelve (12) months following termination, (B) Ms. Beckman’s eligibility for group medical plan benefits under any other employer’s group medical plan or (C) the end of Ms. Beckman’s COBRA health continuation period.

In lieu of the payments and benefits described in the preceding sentence, in the event that Ms. Beckman’s employment is terminated by us without cause or Ms. Beckman resigns for good reason on or within twelve (12) months following a “change in control” (as defined in the Beckman Employment Agreement), subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims in our favor, (i) she will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to 1.0 times Ms. Beckman’s then-current annual base salary (or Ms. Beckman’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control, if higher), (ii) she will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to Ms. Beckman’s target annual cash incentive compensation for the year of termination, (iii) subject to Ms. Beckman’s copayment of premium amounts at the applicable active employees’ rate and proper election to continue COBRA health coverage, we will cover the portion of the premium amount equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Ms. Beckman had she remained employed with us until the earliest of (A) twelve (12) months following termination, (B) Ms. Beckman’s eligibility for group medical plan benefits under any other employer’s group medical plan or (C) the end of Ms.

116

Beckman’s COBRA health continuation period, and (iv) 100% of all stock options and other stock-based awards subject solely to time-based vesting held by Ms. Beckman shall be accelerated.

Alan Huang, Ph.D.

Effective upon the closing of the Business Combination, we entered into a new employment agreement with Dr. Huang. Under Dr. Huang’s employment agreement, or the Huang Employment Agreement, Dr. Huang will serve as our Chief Scientific Officer on an at-will basis. Dr. Huang’s 2022 annual base salary is $425,385, which is subject to periodic review and adjustment, and he is eligible to earn an annual bonus with a target amount equal to 40% of his base salary. Dr. Huang is eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans available to our employees, subject to the terms of those plans.

Pursuant to the Huang Employment Agreement, in the event that his employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Dr. Huang resigns for “good reason” (as each term is defined in the Huang Employment Agreement), subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims in our favor, (i) he will be entitled to receive base salary continuation for twelve (12) months following termination, and (ii) subject to Dr. Huang’s copayment of premium amounts at the applicable active employees’ rate and proper election to continue COBRA health coverage, we will cover the portion of the premium amount equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Dr. Huang had he remained employed with us until the earliest of (A) twelve (12) months following termination, (B) Dr. Huang’s eligibility for group medical plan benefits under any other employer’s group medical plan or (C) the end of Dr. Huang’s COBRA health continuation period.

In lieu of the payments and benefits described in the preceding sentence, in the event that Dr. Huang’s employment is terminated by us without cause or Dr. Huang resigns for good reason on or within twelve (12) months following a “change in control” (as defined in the Huang Employment Agreement), subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims in our favor, (i) he will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to 1.0 times Dr. Huang’s then-current annual base salary (or Dr. Huang’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control, if higher), (ii) he will be entitled to receive a lump sum in cash equal to Dr. Huang’s target annual cash incentive compensation for the year of termination, (iii) subject to Dr. Huang’s copayment of premium amounts at the applicable active employees’ rate and proper election to continue COBRA health coverage, we will cover the portion of the premium amount equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Dr. Huang had he remained employed with us until the earliest of (A) twelve (12) months following termination, (B) Dr. Huang’s eligibility for group medical plan benefits under any other employer’s group medical plan or (C) the end of Dr. Huang’s COBRA health continuation period, and (iv) 100% of all stock options and other stock-based awards subject solely to time-based vesting held by Dr. Huang shall be accelerated.

Other Elements of Compensation; Perquisites

Health and Welfare Plans

During their employment, our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans and programs, including medical and dental benefits, life insurance & disability benefits, to the same extent as our other full-time employees, subject to the terms and eligibility requirements of those plans.

Retirement Plan

We maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan for our employees, including our named executive officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. The savings plan is intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 401(a) of the Code and contains a cash or deferred feature that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Code. Participants may make pre-tax and certain after-tax (Roth) salary deferral contributions to the plan from their eligible earnings up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit under the Code. Participants who are 50 years of age or older may contribute additional amounts based on the statutory limits for catch-up contributions. Participant contributions are held in trust as required by law. Under this plan, we did not, during the year ended December 31, 2021 offer company matching contributions to participants in the 401(k) plan. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on the same terms as other full-time employees.

Compensation Risk Assessment

We believe that although a portion of the compensation provided to our executive officers and other employees is performance-based, our executive compensation program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking. Our

117

compensation programs are designed to encourage our executive officers and other employees to remain focused on both short-term and long-term strategic goals. As a result, we do not believe that our compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

Effective upon the closing of the Business Combination, we adopted a compensation program for our non-employee directors under which each non-employee director will receive the following amounts for their services on our board of directors.

• An annual director fee of $40,000,

• Non-executive chairperson, $30,000

• Lead independent director, $15,000

• Audit committee chairperson, $15,000

• Audit committee member, $7,500

• Compensation committee chairperson, $10,000

• Compensation committee member, $5,000

• Nomination and governance committee chairperson, $8,000

• Nomination and governance committee member, $4,000

Options granted to our non-employee directors under the director compensation program will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and will expire not later than ten years after the date of grant. The options granted upon a director’s initial election or appointment vest in 48 substantially equal monthly installments following the date of grant. In addition, all unvested options vest in full upon the occurrence of a change in control.

118

2021 Non-Employee DirectorCompensation Table

The table below shows the cash fees paid to our directors in connection with their service on our board of directors, and the stock option awards granted, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

Name Fees Earned or PaidIn Cash ($)(1) Option Awards ($)(2) Total ($)

(1) Amounts represent cash compensation earned and paid pursuant to our non-employee director compensation policy.

(2) The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options awarded to certain directors in 2021, calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718. The amounts presented do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the named director upon vesting of the applicable awards.

(3) Ms. Calhoun and Dr. Rothenberg were each granted an option to purchase 84,925 shares of common stock on March 18, 2021, the date on which they were appointed to the board of directors.

The table below shows the aggregate number of total stock option awards (exercisable and unexercisable) held as of December 31, 2021 by each non-employee director who was serving as of December 31, 2021.

Name Shares Subject to Outstanding Options

Aaron Davis —

Reid Huber —

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2021 regarding shares of common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, consisting of our 2021 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or the 2021 Plan, and our 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP. Upon the closing of the Business Combination in August 2021, the 2021 Plan replaced our previous 2017 Stock Option and Grant Plan. We do not have any non-stockholder approved equity compensation plans.

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — — —

(1) The 2021 Plan provides that the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2021 Plan will automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2022, by 5.0% of the outstanding number of shares of Common Stock on the immediately preceding December 31, or such lesser amount as determined by the Board, or the

119

Annual Increase. This limit is subject to adjustment in the event of a reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, stock dividend, reverse stock split or other similar change in the Company's capitalization.

(2) Includes 949,873 shares available under the 2021 ESPP.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information, to the extent known by us or ascertainable from public filings, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 1, 2022 by:

• each of Tango’s executive officers and directors; and

• all of Tango’s executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she, or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power over that security. Under those rules, beneficial ownership includes securities that the individual or entity has the right to acquire, such as through the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock awards, within 60 days of February 1, 2022. Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022, or subject to restricted stock awards that vest within 60 days of February 1, 2022, are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such options or restricted stock awards for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as noted by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, based on the information provided to us, we believe that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of our directors and executive officers is 100 Binney St, Suite 700, Cambridge, MA 02142. The percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated based on 87,649,385 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 1, 2022.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares %

Named Executive Officers and Directors:

Reid Huber Ph.D. — —

Mace Rothenberg, M.D.(7) 21,231 *

5% Stockholders:     

Entities affiliated with Boxer Capital, LLC(8) 13,988,577 16.0

* Less than one percent.

(1) Consists of 1,367,592 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase 702,592 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

(2) Consists of 63,867 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase 189,675 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

(3) Consists of options to purchase 87,642 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

120

(4) Consists of options to purchase 21,231 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

(5) Consists of 135,887 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase 331,157 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

(6) Consists of options to purchase 104,033 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

(7) Consists of options to purchase 21,231 shares of Common Stock exercisable within 60 days of February 1, 2022.

(8) This information is solely based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by Boxer Capital, LLC (“Boxer Capital”), Boxer Asset Management Inc. (“Boxer Management”), Joe Lewis, Aaron Davis, BCTG Holdings, LLC (“BCTG Holdings”), MVA Investors, LLC (“MVA Investors”), Braslyn Ltd. (“Braslyn,” together with Boxer Capital, Boxer Management, Joe Lewis, BCTG Holdings, MVA Investors and Aaron Davis, the “Reporting Persons”) with the SEC on January 4, 2022 Consists of 6,988,450 shares beneficially owned by BCTG Holdings, 6,871,642 shares beneficially owned by Boxer Capital and Boxer Management, 26,961 shares beneficially owned by Braslyn and 101,524 shares beneficially owned by MVA Investors. Boxer Capital, Boxer Management, and Joseph Lewis share voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Boxer Capital, and Aaron Davis has shared voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by MVA. Each of the individuals and entities listed above expressly disclaims beneficial interest of the shares listed above except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. The principal business address of the Reporting Persons is: 12860 El Camino Real, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92130. The principal business address of Boxer Management, Braslyn and Joe Lewis is: c/o Cay House P.O. Box N-7776 E.P. Taylor Drive Lyford Cay, New Providence, Bahamas. Aaron Davis serves as the Chief Executive Officer of MVA Investors. A board consisting of Aaron Davis, Christopher Fuglesang and Andrew Ellis makes voting and dispositive decisions with respect to securities owned by BCTG Holdings. Each of Aaron Davis, Christopher Fuglesang and Andrew Ellis disclaims any pecuniary interest in BCTG Holdings except to the extent of his beneficial interest in the securities owned by BCTG Holdings.

(9) This information is solely based on a Schedule 13G filed by Casdin Capital, LLC, Casdin Partners Master Fund, L.P., Casdin Partners GP, LLC and Eli Casdin with the SEC on August 19, 2021. The general partner of Casdin Partners Master Fund, L.P. is Casdin Partners GP, LLC, or Casdin Partners GP. Casdin Capital, LLC is the investment manager of Casdin Master Fund, L.P. Eli Casdin is the managing member of Casdin Capital, LLC and makes the sole voting and investment decisions with respect to shares held by Casdin Master Fund, L.P. The address of Casdin Capital, LLC is 1350 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2405, New York, NY 10019.

(10) This information is solely based on a Schedule 13G filed by Gilead Sciences, Inc. with the SEC on September 9, 2021. The address of Gilead Science, Inc. is 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, California 94404.

(11) This information is solely based on a Schedule 13G filed by Third Rock Ventures IV, L.P. (“TRV IV”), Third Rock Ventures GP IV, L.P. (“TRV GP IV”) and TRV GP IV, LLC (“TRV GP IV LLC,” and collectively with TRV IV and TRV GP IV, the “Reporting Persons”) with the SEC on August 19, 2021. The general partner of TRV IV is TRV GP IV. The general partner of TRV GP IV. is TRV GP IV LLC. Abbie Celniker, Ph.D., Robert Tepper, M.D., Craig Muir and Cary Pfeffer, M.D. are the managing members of TRV GP IV, LLC who collectively make voting and investment decisions with respect to shares held by TRV IV L.P. Dr. Huber is a partner at Third Rock Ventures, LLC, and a member of our board of directors. The address for each of the Reporting Persons is 29 Newbury Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02116.

(12) This information is solely based on a Schedule 13G filed by Cormorant Asset Management, LP with the SEC on February 14, 2022. Consists of 4,899,184 shares held for the benefit of private funds and a managed account for which Cormorant Asset Management, LP serves as investment manager. Bihua Chen serves as the general partner of Cormorant Asset Management, LP. The address of Cormorant Asset Management, LP is 200 Clarendon Street, 52nd Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

(13) This information is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by FMR LLC and its affiliates with the SEC on February 9, 2022, which reported ownership as of December 31, 2021. The address for FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Other than the compensation agreements and other arrangements described under the sections entitled “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the transactions described below, since January 1, 2020, there has not been and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which:

• we were, or will be, a participant;

• the amount involved exceeded, or will exceed, $120,000; and

121

Amended and Restated Registration and Shareholder Rights Agreement

On the Closing Date, we entered into an Amended and Restated Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement, or the Amended and Restated Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement, with BCTG Holdings, LLC, or the Sponsor, certain persons and entities holding securities of New Tango, and entities receiving Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement (the foregoing persons and entities, together with other persons or entities who become party to the Amended and Restated Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement collectively referred to as the Holders), pursuant to which we (i) agreed to register for resale (1) certain shares of Common Stock held by, or issuable upon exercise of options held by, the Holders and (2) any warrants, shares of capital stock or other securities of our company issued as a dividend or other distribution with respect to, or in exchange for or in replacement of the shares specified in clause (1) (the securities in clauses (1) and (2) collectively referred to as the Registrable Securities) and (ii) granted certain other registration rights to the Holders.

In particular, the Amended and Restated Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement provides for the following registration rights:

Our securities shall cease to be Registrable Securities when (i) a registration statement with respect to the sale of such securities shall have become effective under the Securities Act and such securities shall have been disposed of in accordance with such registration statement, (ii) such securities are freely saleable under Rule 144 under the Securities Act without any volume limitations or (iii) such securities shall have ceased to be outstanding.

The Amended and Restated Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of (i) the 10th anniversary of the date of the agreement and (ii) with respect to any Holder, on the date that such Holder no longer holds any Registrable Securities.

122

Lock-Up Agreements

In connection with the Merger, on the Closing Date, we entered into lock-up agreements with our directors, officers and certain of our stockholders, or collectively, the Lockup Holders. The terms of the lock-up agreements provide for the Common Stock held by the Lockup Holders as of immediately after the effective time of the Business Combination to be subject to transfer restrictions for a period of 180 days after the Closing Date, subject to certain exceptions. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, such transfer restrictions in effect for such 180 days have lapsed.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions — BCTG

Founders Shares

On June 4, 2020, BCTG issued 3,593,750 shares of common stock to the Sponsor in exchange for a payment of $25,000. We refer to such issued shares in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the Founder Shares. On September 2, 2020, BCTG declared a dividend of 0.16 shares for each outstanding share of common stock (an aggregate of 575,000 shares), resulting in an aggregate of 4,168,750 Founder Shares outstanding. The Sponsor had agreed to forfeit up to an aggregate of 543,750 Founders Shares, so that the Founders Shares would represent 20% of BTCG’s issued and outstanding shares after BCTG’s initial public offering, to the extent the underwriters’ over-allotment option was not exercised in full or in part. On September 8, 2020, the underwriters exercised their 15% over-allotment option in full; thus, the Founders Shares were no longer subject to forfeiture. The Sponsor currently owns an aggregate of 4,493,450 shares of our common stock, and its independent directors and advisors collectively own 208,800 shares of our common stock.

The initial stockholders have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Founders Shares (except to certain permitted transferees) until the earlier of (i) one year after the date of the consummation of the Business Combination or (ii) the date on which the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after the Business Combination, or earlier if, subsequent to the Business Combination, we consummate a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction which results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.

Private Shares

Concurrently with the closing of BCTG’s initial public offering, the Sponsor purchased 533,500 Private Shares, at a price of $10.00 per share, in a private placement for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.3 million. The Private Shares are identical to the shares of common stock sold in BCTG’s initial public offering, subject to certain limited exceptions.

Related Party Loans

On May 21, 2020 and June 10, 2020, the Sponsor agreed to loan BCTG up to $25,025 and $274,975, respectively, for an aggregate amount of $300,000 to be used for the payment of costs related to BCTG’s initial public offering pursuant to a promissory note, or each, a Note, and collectively, the Notes. The Notes were non-interest bearing, unsecured and due upon the date BCTG consummated its initial public offering. BCTG borrowed approximately $127,000 under the Notes and repaid the Notes in full on September 10, 2020.

In order to fund working capital deficiencies or finance transaction costs in connection with the Business Combination, the initial stockholders, officers and directors and their affiliates could have, but were not obligated to, loan BCTG funds as may be required, or the Working Capital Loans. Each loan would be evidenced by a promissory note. The notes would either be paid upon consummation of the Business Combination, without interest, or, at the lender’s discretion, up to $1.5 million of the notes may be converted upon consummation of the Business Combination into additional private placement shares at a conversion price of $10.00 per share. If BCTG did not complete a business combination, the loans would not be repaid. Such private placement shares would be identical to the Private Shares. BCTG did not have any borrowings under the Working Capital Loans.

Administrative Support Agreement

Commencing on September 2, 2020, BCTG agreed to pay an affiliate of the Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space and certain office and secretarial services. Upon completion of the Business Combination, BCTG ceased paying these monthly fees. For the period from May 21, 2020 (inception) through the completion of the Business Combination, BCTG

123

incurred approximately $110,000 related to these services. As of the date hereof, no amounts are payable related to this agreement.

Share Purchase Commitment

The Sponsor entered into an agreement to purchase an aggregate of at least 2,500,000 shares of BCTG’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $25.0 million, or $10.00 per share, prior to, concurrently with, or following the closing of the Business Combination in a private placement. The funds from such private placement could be used as part of the consideration to the sellers in the Business Combination, and any excess funds from such private placement may be used for working capital in the post-transaction company.

PIPE Financing

At Closing, PIPE Investors subscribed for and purchased an aggregate of 18,610,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $10.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $186,100,000.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions — Old Tango

Series B Preferred Stock Financing

On April 7, 2020, Old Tango entered into a Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, or the Series B Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which Old Tango issued 45,372,050 shares of its Series B Preferred Stock for a per share price of $1.3224, for aggregate gross proceeds in the amount of $60.0 million in two closings. The first closing of the Series B Preferred Stock financing occurred on April 7, 2020, and the second closing of the Series B Preferred Stock financing occurred on March 11, 2021. The following holders of more than 5% of Old Tango’s capital stock participated in the Series B Preferred Stock financing.

(1) Includes Boxer Capital LLC, which purchased 8,417,650 shares at the first closing and 8,417,650 shares at the second closing; and MVA Investors, LLC, which purchased 89,610 shares at the first closing and 89,610 shares at the second closing. Aaron Davis, a member of our board of directors, is Chief Executive Officer of Boxer Capital, LLC. Boxer Capital, LLC and Mr. Davis are each affiliated with BCTG and the Sponsor.

(2) Includes Cormorant Private Healthcare Fund II, LP, which purchased 3,027,828 shares at the first closing and 3,027,828 shares at the second closing; Cormorant Global Healthcare Master Fund, LP, which purchased 707,048 shares at the first closing and 707,048 shares at the second closing; and CRMA SPV, LP, which purchased 46,128 shares at the first closing and 46,128 shares at the second closing.

Series B-1 Preferred Stock Financing

On August 17, 2020, Old Tango held the closing of its Series B-1 Preferred Stock financing, pursuant to its Series B-1 Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, or the Series B-1 Purchase Agreement, at which Old Tango issued 27,152,255 shares of its Series B-1 Preferred Stock for a per share price of $1.885, for aggregate gross proceeds in the amount of $51.2 million. The following holders of more than 5% of Old Tango’s capital stock participated in the Series B-1 Preferred Stock financing.

124

(1) Includes Boxer Capital LLC, which purchased 3,392,141 shares; and MVA Investors, LLC, which purchased 119,628 shares. Aaron Davis, a member of our Board of Directors, is Chief Executive Officer of Boxer Capital, LLC. Boxer Capital, LLC and Mr. Davis are each affiliated with BCTG and the Sponsor.

(2) Includes Cormorant Private Healthcare Fund II, LP, which purchased 1,235,518 shares; and Cormorant Global Healthcare Master Fund, LP, which purchased 325,268 shares.

Gilead Collaboration Agreement

In October 2018, we entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement with Gilead Sciences, Inc. which collaboration was amended and restated on August 17, 2020, concurrently with the closing of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock financing in which Gilead Sciences, Inc. participated. Gilead Sciences, Inc. holds 5% or more of our capital stock. See the section titled “Business — Collaboration and License Agreements — Collaboration and License Agreement with Gilead Sciences” for more information.

Investors Rights Agreement

In connection with the initial closing of the Series B Preferred Stock financing, Old Tango entered into an Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement, or the Investors Rights Agreement with certain of its investors, including its 5% stockholders. Pursuant to the Investors Agreement, the investors were granted certain demand and registration rights as well as certain information rights. In connection with the Merger, the Investors Rights Agreement was terminated at the closing of the Business Combination.

Voting Agreement

In connection with the initial closing of the Series B Preferred Stock financing, Old Tango entered into an Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, or the Voting Agreement with certain of its investors, including its 5% stockholders. Pursuant to the Investors Agreement, certain investors were given the right to designate certain members of Old Tango’s board of directors. In connection with the Merger, the Voting Agreement was terminated at the closing of the Business Combination.

Indemnification Agreements

We are party to indemnity agreements with our directors and executive officers. These agreements, among other things, require us to indemnify these individuals for certain expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts reasonably incurred by such persons in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in our right, on account of any services undertaken by such person on behalf of our company or that person’s status as a member of our board of directors to the maximum extent allowed under Delaware law.

Policies for Approval of Related Party Transactions

Our Audit Committee reviews and approves transactions with directors, officers and holders of 5% or more our capital stock and their affiliates, or each, related party. Prior to the transaction, the material facts as to the related party’s relationship or interest in the transaction are disclosed to our Audit Committee prior to their consideration of such transaction, and the transaction is not considered approved unless approved by the Audit Committee. Further, when stockholders are entitled to vote on a transaction with a related party, the material facts of the related party’s relationship or interest in the transaction are disclosed to the stockholders, who must approve the transaction in good faith.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a written related person transaction policy that sets forth the following policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related person transactions.

A “Related Person Transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we or any our subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, the amount of which involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A “Related Person” means:

125

We have policies and procedures designed to minimize potential conflicts of interest arising from any dealings we may have with our affiliates and to provide appropriate procedures for the disclosure of any real or potential conflicts of interest that may exist from time to time. The audit committee has the responsibility to review related party transactions.

Director Independence

The rules of the Nasdaq require that a majority of our board of directors be independent. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an executive officer or employee of our company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgement in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our board of directors has determined that each individual who serves on our board, other than Dr. Weber, qualifies as an independent director under the rules of Nasdaq and the SEC.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the fees of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed to us for each of the last two fiscal years for audit services and billed to us in each of the last two fiscal years for other services:

Audit-Related Fees — —

Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, review of the interim consolidated financial statements, and the review of registration statements.

Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of aggregate fees for tax compliance and tax analysis related services.

All Other Fees. All other fees consist of fees for accounting research tools.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy (the “Pre-Approval Policy”) that sets forth the procedures and conditions pursuant to which audit and non-audit services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor may be pre-approved. The Pre-Approval Policy generally provides that we will not engage PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to render any audit, audit-related, tax or permissible non-audit service unless the service is either (i) explicitly approved by the Audit Committee (“specific pre-approval”) or (ii) entered into pursuant to the pre-approval policies and procedures described in the Pre-Approval Policy (“general pre-approval”). Unless a type of service to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has received general pre-approval under the Pre-Approval Policy, it requires specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee or by a designated member of the Audit Committee to whom the committee has delegated the authority to grant pre-approvals. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval. For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the

126

most effective and efficient service, for reasons such as its familiarity with the Company’s business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Company’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor should necessarily be determinative. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee reviews and generally pre-approves the services (and related fee levels or budgeted amounts) that may be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP without first obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.

127

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(1) Financial Statements

See the Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements section beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes to the financial statements.

(3) Exhibits

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(b) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed in the Exhibit Index below.

128

Exhibit Index

ExhibitNumber Description

4.2* Description of Securities.

24.1* Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto).

129

101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

* Filed herewith.

† Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K.

# Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

+ Portions of this exhibit (indicated by brackets and asterisks) have been omitted because the registrant has determined that the information is both not material and is the type that the registrant treats as private or confidential.

** The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32 hereto are deemed to be furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

Not applicable.

130

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

Date: March 28, 2022 By: /s/ Barbara Weber

Barbara Weber, MD

President and Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2021-12-31, filed 2022-03-28 · accession 0000950170-22-004721

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 22 headings are on that chain and 16 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.