acrx20231231_10k.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-35068

TALPHERA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1850 Gateway Drive, Suite 175

San Mateo, CA94404

(650) 216-3500

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par value TLPH The Nasdaq Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§-232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☑ Smaller reporting company ☑

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes ☐ No ☑

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2023 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), based upon the last sale price reported on the Nasdaq Global Market on that date, was approximately $12,073,654. The calculation excludes 116,936 shares of the registrant’s common stock held by current executive officers and directors that the registrant has concluded are affiliates of the registrant. Exclusion of such shares should not be construed to indicate that any such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the registrant or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the registrant.

As of February 29, 2024, the number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock was 16,969,103.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant's notice of annual meeting of stockholders and proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after Registrant's fiscal year end of December 31, 2023 (the “2024 Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Talphera,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Talphera, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiary. “Niyad” and “Fedsyra” are trademarks, and “Zalviso” are registered trademarks, all owned by Talphera, Inc. This Annual Report also contains trademarks and trade names that are the property of their respective owners.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Annual Report, contains statements that discuss future events or expectations, projections of results of operations or financial condition, trends in our business, business prospects and strategies and other “forward-looking” information. In some cases, you can identify “forward-looking statements” by the following words: “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or development and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are in some cases beyond our control. These forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, our expectations regarding the scope, progress, expansion, and costs of researching, developing and commercializing our product candidates; our opportunity to benefit from various regulatory incentives; expectations for our financial results, revenue, operating expenses and other financial measures in future periods; and the adequacy of our sources of liquidity to satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other liquidity requirements. These are only some of the factors that may affect the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. For a discussion identifying additional important factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. You should review these risk factors for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in our securities. However, we operate in a competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks and uncertainties emerge, are identified or become apparent from time to time. It is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. You should be aware that the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report are based on our current views and assumptions. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.

Summary of Principal Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks, as more fully described in this section below this summary. You should read these risks before you invest in our common stock. We may be unable, for many reasons, including those that are beyond our control, to implement our business strategy. In particular, our risks include:

● Our development efforts might not generate successful product candidates.

● Business interruptions could delay our operations and sales efforts.

● Litigation may substantially increase our costs and harm our business.

The summary risk factors described above should be read together with the text of the full risk factors below in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and the related notes, as well as in other documents that we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The risks summarized above or described in full below are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not precisely known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth prospects.

TALPHERA, INC.

2023 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Summary of Principal Risk Factors

PART I 7

Item 1. Business 7

Item 1A. Risk Factors 21

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 46

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 46

Item 2. Properties 47

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 47

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 47

Item 6. Reserved 48

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 60

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 60

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 61

Item 9B. Other Information 62

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections. 62

PART III 62

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 62

Item 11. Executive Compensation 62

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 62

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 63

SIGNATURES 67

PART I

Item1. Business

Overview

We are a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies for use in medically supervised settings.

Our Portfolio

Our portfolio consists of nafamostat product candidates and pre-filled syringe product candidates, as further described below.

In January 2022, we acquired Lowell Therapeutics, Inc., or Lowell, a privately held company, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 14, 2021, or the Merger Agreement, in a transaction for consideration of approximately $32.5 million plus net cash acquired and certain other adjustments, and which includes up to approximately $26.0 million of contingent consideration payable in cash or stock at our option, upon the achievement of regulatory and sales-based milestones, or the Merger Agreement. In connection with the Merger Agreement we acquired NiyadTM and LTX-608 (lyophilized vials of nafamostat for injection into the extracorporeal circuit or direct IV infusion to the patient, respectively), an in-process research and development, or IPR&D, asset. For additional information regarding the Merger Agreement, see Note 4, “Asset Acquisition” to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Nafamostat Product Candidates

Product/Product Candidate Description Target Use Status

Niyad

We are developing Niyad to become the first and currently only FDA-approved regional anticoagulant for injection into the extracorporeal circuit, such as the dialysis circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy, or CRRT, for acute kidney injury, or AKI, patients in the hospital, and for chronic kidney disease patients undergoing intermittent hemodialysis, or IHD, in dialysis centers. Niyad is expected to be used during renal replacement therapy for AKI patients in the hospital and for end-stage renal disease, or ESRD, patients receiving dialysis in outpatient clinics. Niyad is being studied under an Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, and has received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA and an ICD-10 procedural code from the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. While not approved for commercial use in the United States, the active drug component of Niyad, nafamostat, has been approved in Japan and South Korea as a regional anticoagulant for the dialysis circuit, disseminated intravascular coagulation and acute pancreatitis. Niyad has the potential for six years of data exclusivity upon FDA approval of the device. Niyad is a lyophilized formulation of nafamostat, a broad-spectrum, synthetic serine protease inhibitor, which has a half-life of 8 minutes, with anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory and potential anti-viral activities.

The Niyad NEPHRO CRRT Study, which has received both IDE approval from the FDA and central Institutional Review Board, or IRB, approval, is designed as a prospective, double-blinded trial to be conducted at up to 10 U.S. hospital intensive care units. NEPHRO CRRT stands for Nafamostat Efficacy in Phase 3 Registrational Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Study. The NEPHRO study is set to begin enrolling patients in the first quarter of 2024, with top-line data expected by the third quarter of 2024 and submission of an application for PMA planned by the end of 2024. The study will enroll and evaluate 166 adult patients undergoing renal replacement therapy, who cannot tolerate heparin or are at risk for bleeding. The primary endpoint of the study is mean post-filter activated clotting time using Niyad versus placebo over the first 24 hours. Key secondary endpoints include filter lifespan, number of filter changes over 72 hours, number of transfusions over 72 hours and dialysis efficacy (based on urea concentration) over the first 24 hours. We believe that decades of nafamostat studies on anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit can help guide and support our Niyad development efforts.

LTX-608

LTX-608 is our nafamostat formulation for direct IV infusion being explored as an investigational product for one or more of the following indications: antiviral treatment, or treatment of ARDS, DIC or acute pancreatitis. For example, third-party studies have been conducted outside the U.S. in COVID patients where initial results demonstrated that nafamostat shortens time to clinical improvement, increasing the recovery rate and lowering the mortality rate when combined with standard of care, or SOC, compared to SOC alone, in the category of the sickest COVID patients. We are currently evaluating the initial indication on which we will target and focus our resources. Nafamostat is already approved for DIC and acute pancreatitis in Japan and South Korea, which may favor focusing on one of those indications first. Nafamostat has the potential for five years of data exclusivity as a new chemical entity, or NCE, upon the first FDA approval of a new drug application that is independent from any exclusivity arising from issuance of our pending patent applications. We currently have a pending patent application for Niyad with claims drawn to priming of the extracorporeal circuit and blood flow when using nafamostat, and multiple LTX-608 pending patent applications that include claims drawn to use of nafamostat in DIC, acute pancreatitis, as an antiviral agent, in ARDS and in other conditions.

Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) Product Candidates

Product/Product Candidate Description Target Use Status

Fedsyra and Phenylephrine

The PFS product candidates are ready-to-use formulations of active ingredients that are currently approved in the United States in concentrated formulations that must be diluted prior to administration to patients, and more recently in ready-to-use vial, and in the case of ephedrine, ready-to-use pre-filled syringe formulations. Hospitals currently purchase ready-to-use, pre-filled syringe presentations of these active ingredients mainly from compounding facilities that have not obtained FDA approval for the products, or manually dilute the products in-house. There have been two recently FDA-approved pre-filled ephedrine syringe products made available on the market. Our product candidates have been developed in a ready-to-use strength and pre-filled into syringes that can be immediately administered to patients, eliminating the need for calculations and additional dilution and filling steps. Aguettant pre-filled syringes are focused on delivering commonly used medicines safely and efficiently. Perioperative medication errors continue, and pre-filled syringes are preferred for improving safety while containing costs. We believe that, if approved, our pre-filled syringe products may offer significant benefits to hospitals and surgery centers and avoid potential disadvantages of the currently available compounded products. We are currently evaluating the timing of submitting the NDA for our ephedrine pre-filled syringe given the two other FDA-approved products recently made available on the market.

The Market Opportunity for Nafamostat Products

The current market landscape for anticoagulants used during CRRT includes heparin, a systemic anticoagulant that anticoagulates both the patient and the extracorporeal circuit, and citrate, a regional anticoagulant used for anticoagulation of the circuit only. Regiocit, which is the branded form of citrate in the United States, has not been approved for regional anticoagulation and is authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization, or EUA, while other forms of citrate are being used off-label for regional anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit. No anticoagulant is used during CRRT in 29% of cases, the default decision when physicians are concerned with the safety of heparin or citrate. According to our market research, when an anticoagulant is not used for CRRT, frequent filter clogging is the most commonly encountered unintended result, with 20-25% of research respondents stating that due to such clogging issues increased blood transfusions were needed. Since the citrate anticoagulant alternative has not received FDA approval for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit, we believe that nafamostat, if approved for use in regional anticoagulation in CRRT and other procedures, may be beneficial in certain patient populations where current products may be contraindicated. Our market research indicated physicians chose not to use current anticoagulation products because of a number of concerns, including hypocalcemia, citrate lock, calcium shortages, and nursing time required to administer and monitor citrate, among other concerns.

We believe that nafamostat, which has a short half-life, may provide regional anticoagulation with potential benefits over existing products. For example, in a 1991 clinical study undertaken to elucidate the relationship between various anticoagulants and the incidence of bleeding complications during continuous hemofiltration, or CHF, and continuous hemodiafiltration, or CHDF, the incidence of bleeding during CHF and/or CDHF with heparin was 66.7% as compared to 4.3% with nafamostat.

We believe Niyad’s peak sales potential may exceed $200 million annually in the United States if it is approved for use in CRRT and IHD, based on an estimated addressable population of 500,000 patients undergoing CRRT of $575 million, and an estimated addressable population of 350,000 patients undergoing IHD of $3.5 billion. Exposure of blood to the dialysis filter causes clotting, which is a major limitation to care during CRRT, as it leads to inefficient dialysis, causes blood loss and depletes limited resources. Circuit clotting is the most frequent cause of therapy interruption in circuit dialysis procedures.

We also believe that nafamostat has the potential for use in other indications. LTX-608 is the name for our potential second nafamostat product candidate. We are currently evaluating the first targeted indication for LTX-608; however, since nafamostat is approved in Japan and South Korea for DIC and acute pancreatitis, one of these may be the first targeted indication for LTX-608. We have pending patent applications directed to the use of nafamostat in DIC, acute pancreatitis, as an antiviral agent, in ARDS and other conditions. Our estimate of the number of DIC patients annually is over 250,000.

The Market Opportunity for Pre-Filled Syringe Products

Our product candidates are innovative ready-to-use formulations of molecules that are currently approved in a concentrated formulation that must be diluted prior to administration to patients, and more recently in ready-to-use vial and, in the case of ephedrine, pre-filled syringe formulations. Hospitals currently purchase non-FDA approved ready-to-use, pre-filled syringe products mainly from compounding facilities, or manually dilute the products in-house. Our product candidates have been developed in a ready-to-use strength and pre-filled into syringes that can be immediately administered to patients, potentially eliminating the need for on-the-spot calculations and additional dilution and filling steps. We therefore believe that, if approved, our products could offer significant benefits to hospitals and surgery centers over the current compounded products. We believe our two pre-filled syringe product candidates could have a peak sales potential of over $100 million. We are evaluating the timing of an NDA submission for our ephedrine pre-filled syringe product candidate given two other ephedrine pre-filled syringe products have recently been FDA-approved and are being marketed.

Our Strategy

Our strategy is focused on developing, obtaining approval, and commercializing our product candidates, first and foremost, Niyad. Accordingly, we divested DSUVIA to Alora Pharmaceuticals, LLC, or Alora, in April 2023, who will continue to commercialize the product and pay us royalties, sales-based milestone and other payments, as defined in the DSUVIA Agreement (see below). Further, we will continue marketing DSUVIA to the Department of Defense, or DoD. We believe this will maximize the value of DSUVIA as Alora has more available resources to invest on DSUVIA commercialization and as a result can execute a more robust commercial plan to support DSUVIA sales expansion. We have no plans to further develop or commercialize any of our other sufentanil sublingual products that were previously our product candidates. As described below, we entered into an agreement with XOMA (US) LLC, or XOMA, whereby we have sold our rights to all royalties, milestones and other payments until XOMA receives a certain specified return on its investment, after which we will share equally in the royalties earned on sales to the DoD, milestones and other payments from Alora. This transaction was consummated to provide further funding for the development of our lead product candidate, Niyad. We are focused on submitting our PMA application for Niyad by the end of 2024 and expect to enroll the first patient in our Niyad registrational study in the first quarter of 2024.

In April 2023, Vertical Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Alora acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Talphera relating to our sufentanil sublingual tablet product referred to as DSUVIA or DZUVEO, or any other single-dose pharmaceutical product for use in medically supervised settings containing a sublingual tablet that includes sufentanil as the sole active ingredient, as a 30 mcg tablet or other dosage form or strength as reasonably necessary for lifecycle management, or the Product, pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, or the DSUVIA Agreement. Under the DSUVIA Agreement, we are entitled to receive quarterly payments in an amount equal to 15% of net Product sales to all customers excluding net sales to the DoD, and sales by or on behalf of Aguettant, and quarterly payments in an amount equal to 75% of net Product sales to the DoD. We are also entitled to receive sales milestones up to $116.5 million based on the achievement of Alora attaining certain levels of annual sales. In January 2024, we entered into an agreement to monetize these payments from Alora under the XOMA Agreement (as defined below) until the XOMA Threshold (as defined below) has been achieved. Refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations” to the consolidated financial statements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the DSUVIA Agreement. We do not have plans to further develop any sufentanil sublingual product candidates.

In July 2021, we entered into a License and Commercialization Agreement, or the DZUVEO Agreement, with Aguettant, pursuant to which Aguettant obtained the exclusive right to develop and commercialize DZUVEO in the European Union, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Andorra, Vatican City, Monaco, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, or the DZUVEO Territory, for the management of acute moderate to severe pain in adults in medically monitored settings. We supplied Aguettant with primary packaged product and Aguettant then completed secondary packaging of the finished product. Pursuant to the DSUVIA Agreement, we and Aguettant entered into an amendment to the DZUVEO Agreement, or the Amended DZUVEO Agreement, and an amendment and restatement to the supply agreement with respect to the manufacture and supply of DZUVEO, or the Amended and Restated Supply Agreement. The rights and obligations under the Amended DZUVEO Agreement and the Amended and Restated Supply Agreement were assumed by Alora, as part of the DSUVIA asset divestment agreement. We received €2.5 million, or approximately $2.9 million, in 2021 under the DZUVEO Agreement. Refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations” to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

In July 2021, we entered into a License and Commercialization Agreement, or the PFS Agreement, with Aguettant, pursuant to which we obtained the exclusive right to develop and, subject to FDA approval, commercialize in the United States (i) an ephedrine pre-filled syringe for injection and (ii) a phenylephrine pre-filled syringe for injection. Aguettant will supply us with the products for use in commercialization and, if they are approved in the U.S., Aguettant was originally entitled to receive up to $24 million in sales-based milestone payments. In connection with our and Aguettant’s agreement to enter into the Amended DZUVEO Agreement (as defined below) and the Amended and Restated Supply Agreement, we entered into an amendment to the PFS Agreement with Aguettant pursuant to which, effective on April 3, 2023, (a) Aguettant paid us a complementary payment in the amount of €1.5 million, and (b) the maximum amount in sales-based milestone payments that Aguettant is entitled to receive reduced to $21 million. Refer to Note 5, “In-License Agreement” to the consolidated financial statements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

In January 2024, we entered into a Payment Interest Purchase Agreement, or the XOMA Agreement, with XOMA, pursuant to which we sold to XOMA our right amounts payable to us by Alora under the DSUVIA Agreement in exchange for $8.0 million in order to monetize certain future royalties and potential sales-based milestone payments, retaining the right, after XOMA has received a certain minimum amount of payments in respect of such royalties and potential sales-based milestone payments, or the XOMA Threshold, to 50% of the royalties in respect of net sales of DSUVIA to the DoD, 50% of potential sales-based milestones in respect of net sales of DSUVIA and 50% of certain associated license and acquisition payments relating to DSUVIA. Refer to Note 16, “Subsequent Events” to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing resources are focused on pre-launch activities for Niyad. We are currently evaluating the market opportunity as well as the strategy for a potential launch of Niyad with either internal resources, or with a potential commercial partner. The pre-filled syringe product candidates will not require a significant sales force as we expect this will mainly be sold through contracting with hospital networks, wholesalers and group purchasing organizations.

Intellectual Property

We seek patent protection in the United States and internationally for our product candidates. Our policy is to pursue, maintain and defend patent rights developed internally or acquired externally and to protect the technology, inventions and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business. We cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents granted to us in the future will be commercially useful in protecting our technology. We also rely on trade secrets to protect our commercial products and product candidates. Our commercial success also depends in part on our non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third parties. For a more comprehensive discussion of the risks related to our intellectual property, please see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property” appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Our success will depend significantly on our ability to:

• defend our patents;

• preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets; and

We have established and continue to build proprietary positions for our product candidates in the United States and abroad. We continue to seek to obtain and expand our patent protection directed to both compositions of matter and delivery devices, as well as methods of treatment related to our product candidates Niyad and LTX-608.

We have recently filed for additional patent coverage in the United States and Europe. If issued, and if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity or other governmental fees are paid, we expect that these patents will extend into 2040, excluding any additional term for potential patent term adjustments or patent term extensions in the United States. We note that the patent laws of foreign countries differ from those in United States, and the degree of protection afforded by foreign patents may be different from the protection offered by U.S. patents. The patent applications that we have filed and have not yet been granted may fail to result in issued patents in the United States or in foreign countries. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties may challenge the patents.

Pursuant to the DSUVIA Agreement, Alora acquired all patents and trademarks related to DSUVIA and DZUVEO. In addition, we and Alora entered into an intellectual property agreement pursuant to which Alora granted fully-paid, royalty-free and perpetual licenses to us under certain specified intellectual property rights acquired by Alora under the DSUVIA Agreement for, among other things, the development, manufacture, commercialization and exploitation of certain products, including Zalviso.

Further, we seek trademark protection in the United States and internationally where available and when appropriate.

Competition

Nafamostat Products

Niyad is the first nafamostat product candidate we are developing to be used as a regional anticoagulant for the extracorporeal circuit. There are currently no products approved by the FDA for use as an anticoagulant in the extracorporeal circuit. Niyad would be the first and only product approved for this indication, if approved. As discussed above, the current standards of care being used today are heparin and citrate. Heparin is a systemic anticoagulant and cannot be used in patients who are at risk of bleeding. Citrate is complex to administer and requires significant human resource time and attention given the nature of the product, and cannot be used in patients with liver failure, which is approximately 43% of acute kidney injury patients. Based on our market research of the CRRT market, heparin is used approximately 43% of the time, while citrate is used approximately 28% of the time. The remaining 29% of the time there is no anticoagulant used which is partly driven by the safety concerns with heparin or citrate. We believe the primary opportunity for Niyad is within the 57% of the market that uses either citrate or no anticoagulant.

We are evaluating the second targeted indication for our nafamostat product development candidate, LTX-608. Since nafamostat is approved in Japan and South Korea for the treatment of DIC and acute pancreatitis, we may focus on of these indications for development of our first LTX-608 product candidate. We have pending patent applications directed to the use of nafamostat in DIC, acute pancreatitis, as an antiviral agent, in ARDS and other conditions.

Pre-filled Syringe Products

Hospitals currently purchase non-FDA approved ready-to-use, pre-filled syringe ephedrine and phenylephrine products from compounding facilities and, in the case of ephedrine, two recently FDA-approved pre-filled syringe formulations, or manually dilute the products in-house. Our pre-filled syringe product candidates are being developed in a ready-to-use strength and pre-filled into syringes that can be immediately administered to patients, potentially eliminating the need for calculations and additional dilution and filling steps. We therefore believe that, if approved, our products may offer significant benefits to hospitals and surgery centers over the current compounded products. In addition, our pre-filled syringe product candidates will also compete with existing generic versions of concentrated vial forms of product, ready-to-use diluted vial forms of product, and for Fedsyra, a recently FDA-approved pre-filled syringe with a different formulation and concentration than our product candidate.

Pharmaceutical and Device Manufacturing and Supply

For Niyad, we rely on contract manufacturers to produce our development batches, and if approved by the FDA, we will rely on contract manufacturers for commercial supply of Niyad. We currently have a single contract manufacturer that is producing the nafamostat API for Niyad, and a separate contract manufacturer producing the finished product used for development, both of which can support eventual commercial needs. We are in discussions with a back-up manufacturer of Niyad to ensure there is not a single source of supply.

Aguettant will be our sole sourced manufacturer of our commercial supply of pre-filled syringe products. Aguettant currently has their own manufacturing facilities, where they produce pre-filled syringes for the European market. We will purchase the pre-filled syringes from Aguettant under our existing supply agreement if and when the FDA approves the pre-filled syringe products for marketing.

Government Regulation

Government authorities in the United States at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, marketing, export and import of pharmaceutical and medical device products, which must be approved by the FDA before they may legally be marketed in the United States.

In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and its implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and complying with applicable laws and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply at any time during the product development and approval process, or after approval, may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an approval, a clinical hold, Warning Letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties.

The process required by the FDA before a drug product may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

• submission to the FDA of an NDA for a new drug product;

• payment of application, annual program fees; and

• FDA review and approval of the NDA.

The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources and we cannot be certain that approval for our product candidates will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and safety reports must be submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events. The FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the drug or biological product has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.

Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal trials and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP and QSR for medical device requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

The results of product development, preclinical trials and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on our drug products, proposed labeling and other relevant information, will be submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA for a new drug product, requesting approval to market the product in the United States. The submission of an NDA is subject to the payment of a substantial user fee; a waiver of such fee may be obtained under certain limited circumstances. During its review of an NDA, the FDA may inspect our manufacturers for GMP and QSR compliance, and our pivotal clinical trial sites for GCP compliance.

In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, an NDA or supplement to an NDA must contain data to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may grant deferrals for submission of data or full or partial waivers.

The approval process is lengthy and difficult, and the FDA may refuse to approve an NDA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical data or other data and information. Even if such data and information is submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive and the FDA may interpret data differently than we interpret the same data. The FDA issues a Complete Response Letter at the conclusion of its review if the NDA is not yet deemed ready for approval. A Complete Response Letter generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require substantial additional testing or information for the FDA to reconsider the application. If, or when, those deficiencies have been addressed to the FDA’s satisfaction in a resubmission of the NDA, the FDA will issue an approval letter. The FDA has committed to reviewing such resubmissions in two or six months depending on the type of information included.

If a product candidate does receive regulatory approval, the approval may be limited to specific conditions and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. A REMS, which can include a medication guide, patient package insert, a communication plan, elements to assure safe use and implementation system, must include a timetable for assessment of the REMS. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling and may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized. In addition, the FDA may require post-approval testing which involves clinical trials designed to further assess a drug product’s safety and effectiveness after the NDA.

Post-Approval Requirements

Any drug products for which we receive FDA approval are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, providing the FDA with updated clinical safety and efficacy information, product sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements. Phase 4 clinical trials are conducted after approval to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication or when otherwise requested by the FDA in the form of post marketing requirements or commitments. Failure to promptly conduct any required Phase 4 clinical trials could result in withdrawal of NDA approval. The FDA strictly regulates labeling, advertising, promotion and other types of information on products that are placed on the market. Drug products may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. Further, manufacturers of drug products must continue to comply with cGMP requirements, which are extensive and require considerable time, resources and ongoing investment to ensure compliance. In addition, changes to the manufacturing process generally require prior FDA approval before being implemented and other types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications and additional labeling claims, are also subject to further FDA review and approval.

Drug product manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacturing and distribution of approved drug products are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws. The cGMP requirements apply to all stages of the manufacturing process, including the production, processing, packaging, labeling, storage and shipment of the drug product. Manufacturers must establish validated systems to ensure that products meet specifications and regulatory standards, and test each product batch or lot prior to its release.

The FDA may withdraw a product approval if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market. Further, the failure to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements may result in administrative or judicial actions, such as fines, Warning Letters, holds on clinical trials, product recalls or seizures, product detention or refusal to permit the import or export of products, refusal to approve pending applications or supplements, restrictions on marketing or manufacturing, injunctions or civil or criminal penalties.

Medical Devices

Niyad, our nafamostat product in development for use as a regional anticoagulant for injection into the extracorporeal circuit, is regulated by the FDA as a medical device since it achieves its primary intended purposes outside the body. Niyad is being studied under an Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, and has received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA. Under the FDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes—Class I, Class II or Class III—depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurances with respect to safety and effectiveness. Niyad is a Class III device as it is novel and not eligible to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device under the 510(k) process. Class III devices are subject to the PMA application process, which is generally more costly and time consuming than the 510(k) process. Through the PMA application process, the applicant must submit data and information demonstrating reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use to the FDA’s satisfaction. Accordingly, a PMA application typically includes, but is not limited to, extensive technical information regarding device design and development, nonclinical study and clinical trial data, manufacturing information and labeling. The PMA application must provide valid scientific evidence that demonstrates to the FDA’s satisfaction a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use.

In the United States, a device that presents a “significant risk” to human health, as defined by the FDA, must be the subject of an IDE application to the FDA that has to be approved by the FDA prior to the commencement of human clinical trials. The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory testing results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. All clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s IDE regulations that govern investigational device labeling, prohibition of promotion, recordkeeping, and reporting and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. Clinical trials must further comply with the FDA’s good clinical practice regulations for IRB approval and for informed consent and other human subject protections. Required records and reports are subject to inspection by the FDA. The commencement or completion of any clinical trial may be delayed or halted, by the FDA or an IRB.

Following receipt of a PMA application, the FDA conducts an administrative review to determine whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If it is not, the agency will refuse to file the PMA. The FDA, by statute and by regulation, has 180 days to review a filed PMA application, although the review of an application more often occurs over a significantly longer period of time. During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification of information already provided, and the FDA may issue a major deficiency letter to the applicant, requesting the applicant’s response to deficiencies communicated by the FDA. Before approving or denying a PMA, an FDA advisory committee may review the PMA at a public meeting and provide the FDA with the committee’s recommendation on whether the FDA should approve the submission, approve it with specific conditions, or not approve it. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

Prior to approval of a PMA, the FDA may conduct inspections of the clinical trial data and clinical trial sites, as well as inspections of the manufacturing facility and processes. Overall, the FDA’s review of a PMA application generally takes between one and three years, but may take significantly longer. The FDA can delay, limit or deny approval of a PMA application for many reasons.

If the FDA evaluation of a PMA is favorable, the FDA will issue either an approval letter, or an approvable letter, the latter of which usually contains a number of conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the PMA. When and if those conditions have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the FDA, the agency will issue a PMA approval letter authorizing commercial marketing of the device, subject to the conditions of approval and the limitations established in the approval letter. If the FDA’s evaluation of a PMA application or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the FDA will deny approval of the PMA or issue a not approvable letter. The FDA also may determine that additional tests or clinical trials are necessary, in which case the PMA approval may be delayed for several months or years while the trials are conducted and data is submitted in an amendment to the PMA, or the PMA is withdrawn and resubmitted when the data are available.

In approving a PMA application, as a condition of approval, the FDA may also require some form of post-approval study or post-market surveillance, whereby the applicant conducts a follow-up study or follows certain patient groups for a number of years and makes periodic reports to the FDA on the clinical status of those patients when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional or longer-term safety and effectiveness data for the device. The FDA may also approve a PMA application with other post-approval conditions intended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, such as, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale, distribution and use.

The Breakthrough Devices Program is a voluntary program intended to expedite the review, development, assessment and review of certain medical devices that provide for more effective treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating human diseases or conditions for which no approved or cleared treatment exists or that offer significant advantages over existing approved or cleared alternatives. All submissions for devices designated as breakthrough devices will receive priority review, meaning that the review of the submission is placed at the top of the appropriate review queue and receives additional review resources, as needed. Although breakthrough designation or access to any other expedited program may expedite the development or approval process, it does not change the standards for approval. Breakthrough designation may also be withdrawn by the FDA if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Additionally, breakthrough designation does not ensure that we will ultimately obtain FDA approval.

Pervasive and Continuing Regulation

After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements continue to apply. These include:

Foreign Regulation

In addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of our products to the extent we choose to sell any products outside of the United States.

Controlled Substances Regulations

Ephedrine is a scheduled listed chemical product under the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005. Under this law, DEA applies strict controls and quotas on importation of ephedrine containing drug products.

The Drug Supply Chain Security Act of 2013, or DSCSA, imposes obligations on manufacturers of pharmaceutical products, among others, related to product tracking and tracing. Among the requirements are that manufacturers must provide certain information regarding the drug product to individuals and entities to which product ownership is transferred, label drug product with a product identifier, and keep certain records regarding the drug product. Further, manufacturers have drug product investigation, quarantine, disposition, and notification responsibilities related to counterfeit, diverted, stolen, and intentionally adulterated products, as well as products that are the subject of fraudulent transactions or which are otherwise unfit for distribution such that they would be reasonably likely to result in serious health consequences or death.

Unforeseen delays to the drug substance and drug product manufacture and supply chain may occur due to delays, errors or other unforeseen problems with the permitting and quota process. Also, any one of our suppliers, contract manufacturers, laboratories, packagers and/or distributors could be the subject of DEA violations and enforcement could lead to delays or even loss of DEA license by the contractors.

Federal and State Fraud and Abuse and Data Privacy and Security and Transparency Laws and Regulations

In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical and medical device products, federal and state healthcare laws restrict certain business practices in the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. These laws include, but are not limited to, anti-kickback, false claims, data privacy and security, and transparency statutes and regulations.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or in return for, purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchasing, leasing or ordering of any item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare program. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including for example, gifts, discounts, the furnishing of supplies or equipment, credit arrangements, payments of cash, waivers of payment, ownership interests and providing anything at less than its fair market value. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on one hand and prescribers, purchasers and/or formulary managers on the other. Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices involving remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce purchasing, leasing or ordering may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor. The failure to satisfy all of the requirements of an applicable exception or safe harbor do not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all of its facts and circumstances.

Additionally, the intent standard under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute was amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively, the Affordable Care Act to a stricter standard such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. Rather, if “one purpose” of the remuneration is to induce referrals, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute is violated. In addition, the Affordable Care Act codified case law that a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute also constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act (discussed below).

The federal civil False Claims Act and related laws prohibit, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval to the federal government or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. Pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for, among other things, allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product. Companies also have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies’ marketing of the product for unapproved, and thus non-reimbursable, uses.

Further, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law imposes civil penalties against any person or entity who, among other things, is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to, among others, a federal healthcare program that the person knows or should know is for a medical or other item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third party payers, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense, and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation.

In addition, we may be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their implementing regulations, imposes certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information primarily on covered entities, business associates and their covered subcontractors. Among other things, HITECH makes HIPAA’s privacy and security standards directly applicable to business associates that are independent contractors or agents of covered entities that receive or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also created four new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, state laws govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts. International laws, such as the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, (EU 2016/679) and Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection, regulate the processing of personal data within the European Union and between countries in the European Union and countries outside of the European Union, including the United States. Failure to provide adequate privacy protections and maintain compliance with safe harbor mechanisms could jeopardize business transactions across borders and result in significant penalties.

Additionally, the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act within the Affordable Care Act and its implementing regulations, require that certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals and medical supplies, for which federal healthcare program payment is available, report information related to certain payments or other transfers of value made or distributed to physicians, (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, or to entities or individuals at the request of, or designated on behalf of such providers and teaching hospitals and to report annually certain ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.

Also, many states have similar healthcare statutes or regulations that apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payer. FDA and some states require the posting of information relating to clinical studies. In addition, certain states such as California require pharmaceutical companies to implement a comprehensive compliance program that includes a limit on expenditures for, or payments to, individual medical or health professionals. Moreover, several states have enacted legislation requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to, among other things, file periodic reports with the state, make periodic public disclosures on sales and marketing activities, report information related to drug pricing, require the registration of sales representatives, and prohibit certain other sales and marketing practices.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the health regulatory laws described above or any other laws that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including potentially significant criminal, civil and/or administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion of products from reimbursement under government programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting requirements and/or oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. To the extent that any of our products will be sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws and regulations, which may include, for instance, applicable post-marketing requirements, including safety surveillance, anti-fraud and abuse laws and implementation of corporate compliance programs and reporting of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.

Pharmaceutical Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement

In both domestic and foreign markets, sales of any approved products will depend in part on the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payers. Third-party payers include government health administrative authorities, managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. Sales of approved products will depend substantially, both domestically and abroad, on the extent to which the costs of such products will be paid by third-party payers. These third-party payers are increasingly focused on containing healthcare costs by challenging the price and examining the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services. In addition, significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of newly approved healthcare products. Such payers may limit coverage to specific drug products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. Third-party payers and hospitals may refuse to include a particular branded drug in their formularies or otherwise restrict patient access to a branded drug when a less costly generic equivalent or other alternative is available. For products administered under the supervision of a physician, obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices often associated with such products. Additionally, separate reimbursement for the product itself or the treatment or procedure in which the product is used may not be available, which may impact utilization. Because each third-party payer individually approves coverage and reimbursement levels, obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement is a time-consuming, costly and sometimes unpredictable process. We or our providers may be required to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of any product to each third-party payer and hospital separately with no assurance that approval would be obtained, and we may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of products for which we receive regulatory approval. This process could delay the market acceptance of any such product and could have a negative effect on our future revenues and operating results. We cannot be certain that any approved product will be considered medically necessary or cost-effective. Because coverage and reimbursement determinations are made on a payer-by-payer basis, obtaining acceptable coverage and reimbursement from one payer does not guarantee that we will obtain similar acceptable coverage or reimbursement from another payer. If we or our partners are unable to obtain and maintain coverage of, and adequate reimbursement and payment levels for, the products from third-party payers, physicians may limit how much or under what circumstances they will prescribe or administer them. This in turn could affect our or our partners’ ability to successfully commercialize products and impact our profitability, results of operations, financial condition and future success. Third-party payers, government healthcare programs, wholesalers, group purchasing organizations, and hospitals frequently require that companies negotiate agreements that provide discounts or rebates from list prices. We expect increasing pressure to offer larger discounts or discounts to a greater number of these organizations to maintain acceptable reimbursement levels for and access to products for which we receive regulatory approval. Net prices for drugs may be reduced by these mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs, private payers, wholesalers, group purchasing organizations, hospitals, and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement policies. In addition, if competitors reduce the prices of their products, or otherwise demonstrate that they are better or more cost effective than products for which we receive regulatory approval, this may result in a greater level of reimbursement for their products relative to our products, which would reduce sales of our products and harm our results of operations.

There have been, and there will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could impact our ability to commercialize products profitably. We anticipate that the federal and state legislatures and the private sector will continue to consider and may adopt and implement healthcare policies, such as the Affordable Care Act, intended to curb rising healthcare costs. These cost containment measures may include: controls on government-funded reimbursement for drugs; new or increased requirements to pay prescription drug rebates to government health care programs; controls on healthcare providers; challenges to or limits on the pricing of drugs, including pricing controls, or limits or prohibitions on reimbursement for specific products through other means; requirements to try less expensive products or generics before a more expensive branded product; and public funding for cost effectiveness research, which may be used by government and private third-party payers to make coverage and payment decisions. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

In addition, in many foreign countries, particularly the countries of the European Union, the pricing of prescription drugs is subject to government control. In some non-U.S. jurisdictions, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, the EU provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product, or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. We may face competition for our products from lower-priced products in foreign countries that have placed price controls on pharmaceutical products. In addition, there may be importation of foreign products that compete with our own products, which could negatively impact our profitability.

Healthcare Reform

In the United States and foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the United States federal and state level that seek to reduce healthcare costs. Government payment for some of the costs of prescription drugs may increase demand for our products for which we receive marketing approval. However, any negotiated prices for our future products will likely be lower than the prices we might otherwise obtain from non-governmental payers. Moreover, private payers often follow federal healthcare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates.

Furthermore, political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry in the United States to fundamental change. Initiatives to reduce the federal deficit and to reform healthcare delivery are increasing cost-containment efforts. We anticipate that Congress, state legislatures and the private sector will continue to review and assess alternative benefits, controls on healthcare spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums and Medicare and Medicaid spending, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, price controls on pharmaceuticals and other fundamental changes to the healthcare delivery system. Any proposed or actual changes could limit or eliminate our spending on development projects and affect our ultimate profitability.

In the United States, the Affordable Care Act was enacted in an effort to, among other things, broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. There have been judicial, executive branch and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act. For example, on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. In addition, there have been a number of health reform initiatives by the Biden administration that have impacted the Affordable Care Act. For example, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or the IRA, into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in Affordable Care Act marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program. In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. Aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers went into effect on April 1, 2013 and will stay in effect through 2032 unless Congressional action is taken. The American Taxpayer Relief Act further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals. Additionally, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, which began on January 1, 2024. It is possible that there will be additional health reform measures.

Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and further restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical and medical device products. We are not sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes will be, if any, on products for which we receive regulatory approval.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we or our collaborators are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or our collaborators are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our products may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business.

There has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically, there have been several U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. For example, at the federal level, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , or HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA, among other things (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 29, 2023, HHS announced the list of the first ten drugs that will be subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare drug price negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented but is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. In response to the Biden administration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing by the CMS Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the future. Further, on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework. At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, measures designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

Further, there may continue to be additional proposals relating to the reform of the U.S. healthcare system, some of which could further limit the prices we are able to charge for products for which we receive marketing approval, or the amounts of reimbursement available for our products once approved. If future legislation were to impose direct governmental price controls and access restrictions, it could have a significant adverse impact on our business. Managed care organizations, as well as Medicaid and other government agencies, continue to seek price discounts. Some states have implemented, and other states are considering, price controls or patient access constraints under the Medicaid program, and some states are considering price-control regimes that would apply to broader segments of their populations that are not Medicaid-eligible. Due to the volatility in the current economic and market dynamics, we are unable to predict the impact of any unforeseen or unknown legislative, regulatory, payer or policy actions, which may include cost containment and other healthcare reform measures. Such policy actions could have a material adverse impact on our profitability.

Employees and Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2023, we employed 15 full-time employees, approximately 90% of whom work out of our corporate offices in San Mateo, CA. Talphera is committed to pay equity, regardless of gender or race/ethnicity, and conducts pay equity analyses on an annual basis.

We invest in our workforce by offering competitive salaries, wages, and benefits. We endeavor to foster a strong sense of ownership by offering all employees stock options and restricted stock units under our broad-based stock incentive program. We also offer comprehensive and locally relevant benefits for all eligible employees. We recognize and support the growth and development of our employees.

None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Corporate Information

We were originally incorporated as SuRx, Inc. in Delaware on July 13, 2005. We subsequently changed our name to AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and in January 2024, to Talphera, Inc. We file electronically with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We make available on our website at www.talphera.com, free of charge, copies of these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing these reports with, or furnishing them to, the SEC.

Item1A. Risk Factors

Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information in this report, including our financial statements and notes thereto. If any of the following risks actually materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and future prospects could be materially harmed, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Need for Additional Capital

We have incurred significant losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses in the future.

We have incurred significant net losses since our inception in July 2005, and as of December 31, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $444.2 million. In addition, we have generated negative cash flows from operations and we expect to incur significant losses in 2024 and may incur significant losses and negative cash flows from operations in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have devoted most of our financial resources to research and development, including our non-clinical development activities and clinical trials. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through the issuance of equity securities, borrowings, payments from Grünenthal GmbH, or Grünenthal, the monetization of certain future royalties and commercial sales milestones from the European sales of Zalviso by Grünenthal, funding from the Department of Defense, or DoD, with revenues from sales of DSUVIA, and payments under the Amended DZUVEO Agreement with Aguettant. On January 12, 2024, we entered into the XOMA Agreement to monetize future royalties and potential sales-based milestone payments arising under the DSUVIA Agreement, retaining the right, after XOMA has received a certain minimum amount of payments in respect of such royalties and potential sales-based milestone payments, or the XOMA Threshold, to 50% of the royalties in respect of net sales of DSUVIA to the DoD, 50% of potential sales-based milestones in respect of net sales of DSUVIA and 50% of certain associated license and acquisition payments relating to DSUVIA. The size of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future expenditures and our ability to generate revenues. We expect to continue to incur substantial expenses as we support research and development activities for our product candidates. If our product candidates are not successfully developed or commercialized in the U.S., or if revenues are insufficient following marketing approval, we will not achieve profitability and our business may fail. Our success is also dependent on current and future collaborations to market our products outside of the United States, which may not materialize or prove to be successful.

We require additional capital and may be unable to raise such capital, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our commercialization efforts and product development programs and could cause us to be unable to continue to operate as a going concern and cease operations.

Launch of a commercial pharmaceutical or medical device product and the required development activities associated with those products can be time consuming and costly. We expect to incur significant expenditures in connection with supporting our research and development activities for our product candidates.

Clinical trials, regulatory reviews, and the launch of a commercial product are expensive activities. In addition, commercialization costs for our product candidates, if approved, in the United States may be significantly higher than estimated as a result of technical difficulties or otherwise. Revenues may be lower than expected and costs to produce such revenues may exceed those revenues. We will need to seek additional capital to continue operations. Such capital demands could be substantial. In the future, we may seek to raise such additional capital through public or private equity offerings, including under the Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement, or the ATM Agreement, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor, debt securities, a new debt facility, monetizing or securitizing certain assets, entering into product development, license or distribution agreements with third parties, or divesting any of our product candidates. Such arrangements may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

If we are unsuccessful in efforts to raise additional capital, based on our current levels of operating expenses, our current capital is not expected to be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023 were prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates that we will be able to realize our assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Future events and circumstances, including those beyond our control, may cause us to consume capital more rapidly than we currently anticipate. Furthermore, any product development, licensing, distribution or sale agreements that we enter into may require us to relinquish valuable rights. We may not be able to obtain sufficient additional funding or enter into a strategic transaction in a timely manner. If adequate funds are not available, we would be required to reduce our workforce, reduce the scope of, or cease, the development and subsequent potential commercial launch of our product candidates in advance of the date on which we exhaust our cash resources to ensure that we have sufficient capital to meet our obligations and continue on a path designed to preserve stockholder value.

Securing additional financing may divert our management from our day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop our product candidates. In addition, we cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, we may be required to:

• further scale back or discontinue the development of our product candidates;

During the past several years, domestic and international financial markets have experienced, and they may continue to experience, extreme disruption from time to time, including, among other things, high volatility, significant declines in stock prices and severely diminished liquidity and credit availability for both borrowers and investors. Such adverse capital and credit market conditions could make it more difficult to obtain additional capital on favorable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and growth prospects. For example, our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by deteriorating global economic conditions and the disruptions to and volatility in the credit and financial markets in the U.S. and worldwide resulting from the ongoing military conflicts between Hamas and Israel, and between Russia and Ukraine and related sanctions imposed against Russia.

To fund our operations and capital requirements, we may sell additional equity securities, which may result in dilution to our stockholders, or debt securities, or enter into a new debt facility which may impose restrictions on our business.

We expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue our planned operations and capital requirements. In the long-term, our existing capital resources will not be sufficient to fund our operations until such time as we may be able to generate sufficient revenues to sustain our operations. In order to raise additional funds to support our operations, we may sell additional equity securities, including under the ATM Agreement with Cantor. We may sell common stock, convertible securities, or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. Selling additional equity securities may result in dilution to our existing stockholders and new investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Incurring additional indebtedness, including through the sale of debt securities or entering into a new debt facility, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and could also result in additional restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions, such as minimum cash balances, that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. Sales of equity or debt securities may also provide new investors with rights superior to our existing stockholders. If we are unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected, and we may not be able to meet our debt service obligations.

We have not yet generated significant product revenue and may never be profitable.

Our ability to generate revenue from commercial sales and/or royalties and achieve profitability depends on our ability, alone and with collaborators, to successfully complete the development of, obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for, and commercialize our products. We do not anticipate generating significant near-term revenues from our product candidates, if approved, in the United States. Our ability to generate future revenues from product sales depends heavily on the success in:

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with launching a commercial pharmaceutical or medical device product, necessary product development activities and the regulatory environment, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses, or when, or if, we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are delayed in receiving regulatory approval for our product candidates in the United States, or if we are required by the FDA to complete activities in addition to those we currently anticipate or have already completed.

There can be no assurance that Alora will successfully commercialize DSUVIA pursuant to the DSUVIA Agreement. The XOMA Threshold may never be attained, and we may never realize sufficient payments from our retained future interest in DSUVIA from Alora to become profitable. Although we had a collaboration agreement with Grünenthal for commercialization of Zalviso in Europe and Australia, Grünenthal was unable to achieve a level of commercial sales of Zalviso to trigger sales milestone payments that would have been payable to us.

Even if our product candidates are approved in the United States, or the XOMA Threshold is attained, we may not become profitable and may need to obtain additional funding to continue operations.

Future sales of DSUVIA to the DoD are not predictable, may occur on an irregular basis and may not meet our expectations due to various U.S. government-related factors that are beyond our control and into which we have little to no visibility, including the timing and extent of future U.S. military deployments.

Under the DSUVIA Agreement, Alora is responsible for commercializing DSUVIA except that we retain the responsibility for driving the demand within the DoD, and, if the XOMA Threshold is achieved, we will be entitled to receive quarterly payments in an amount equal to one-half of the 75% of net DSUVIA sales to the DoD. Refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations” to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. Future sales of DSUVIA by Alora to the DoD are not predictable, may occur on an irregular basis, and may not meet expectations due to various U.S. government-related factors that are beyond our control and into which we have little to no visibility, including the timing and extent of future U.S. military deployments. Even if Alora does generate revenue from such sales and XOMA receives the minimum amount of certain royalties and potential sales-based payments such that we receive payments, we may never generate revenue that is significant or predictable, which could impair our value and our ability to raise capital, expand our business or continue our operations.

Risks Related to Drug Development and Commercialization

We may fail to realize the benefits expected from our acquisition of Lowell, which could adversely affect our stock price.

Our acquisition of Lowell is our largest acquisition to date. Our primary business strategy is focused on developing, obtaining approval, and commercializing our product candidates, including Niyad and LTX-608 that we acquired from Lowell. The anticipated benefits we expect from this acquisition are, necessarily, based on projections and assumptions about the combined businesses of our company and Lowell, which may not materialize as expected or which may prove to be inaccurate. The value of our common stock could be adversely affected if we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition on a timely basis or at all. Achieving the benefits of the acquisition of Lowell will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to integrate the business, operations and products of Lowell successfully and efficiently with our business. The challenges involved in this integration include, but are not limited to, (i) difficulties entering new markets and integrating new product candidates with which we have no or limited direct prior experience; and (ii) successfully managing relationships with our combined supplier base.

Our failure to identify or accurately assess the magnitude of certain liabilities we assumed in the acquisition could result in unexpected litigation or regulatory exposure, unfavorable accounting charges, unexpected increases in taxes due, a loss of anticipated tax benefits or other adverse effects on our business, operating results or financial condition.

Whether we receive royalties from DSUVIA sales to the DoD after the XOMA Threshold is reached is dependent on the ability of Alora to successfully commercialize DSUVIA.

We have divested DSUVIA to Alora, who will continue to commercialize the product and we may in the future share in certain royalties and other payments including sales milestone payments from Alora pursuant to the XOMA Agreement. In particular, we divested to XOMA our rights to payments from Alora, subject to our retained interest in certain future payments in the event the XOMA Threshold is met. The commercial success of DSUVIA will depend heavily on numerous factors, including:

• Alora’s ability to market, sell, and distribute DSUVIA;

• acceptance of pricing and placement on payers’ formularies;

• continued demonstration of an acceptable safety profile of DSUVIA; and

Delays in clinical trials are common and have many causes, and any delay could result in increased costs to us and jeopardize or delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commence product sales.

We have experienced and may in the future experience delays in clinical trials of our product candidates. Our FDA-required clinical trials for our product candidates could be delayed for a variety of reasons, including:

• inability to raise funding necessary to initiate or continue a trial;

• inability to pay significant FDA filing fees;

• delays in obtaining regulatory approval to commence a trial;

• delays in reaching agreement with the FDA on final trial design;

• delays in obtaining required IRB approval at each site;

• delays in recruiting suitable patients or subjects to participate in a trial;

• time required to add new clinical sites;

If any future FDA-required clinical trials are delayed for any reason, our development costs may increase, our approval process for our product candidates could be delayed, our ability to commercialize and commence sales of our product candidates could be materially harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our development efforts might not generate successful product candidates.

We plan to invest a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the identification or asset acquisition of our product candidates. Our ability to generate product revenue from our product candidates, which may not occur for many years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of these product candidates. The success of these product candidates and any other product candidates we may develop, in-license or acquire will depend on many factors, including the following:

• successful enrollment in, and completion of, clinical trials;

• demonstrating safety and efficacy;

• receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

• effectively competing with other products;

• a continued acceptable safety profile of the products following approval;

• enforcing and defending intellectual property rights and claims; and

• other legal, regulatory, compliance, privacy, and fraud and abuse matters.

If we do not accomplish one or more of these goals in a timely manner, or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which would harm our business.

If clinical trials of our product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities or do not otherwise produce positive results, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our product candidates.

Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our product candidates, we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials could occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of a particular clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results of that trial.

Moreover, clinical data is often susceptible to multiple interpretations and analyses. Many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products.

We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including that:

If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may:

• be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates;

• not obtain marketing approval at all;

• be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements; or

• have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval.

Product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or in receiving marketing approvals. We do not know whether any clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, or at all. Significant clinical trial delays also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates, could allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, and could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, any of which may harm our business and results of operations.

If we experience delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to identify and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA, or analogous regulatory authorities outside the United States. In addition, some of our competitors may have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that would treat the same indications as our product candidates, and patients who would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead enroll in clinical trials of our competitors’ product candidates. Patient enrollment is also affected by other factors, including:

• severity of the disease under investigation;

• eligibility criteria for the trial in question;

• perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;

• efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;

• patient referral practices of health care professionals;

• the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment; and

• proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients.

Our inability to enroll enough patients for our clinical trials would result in significant delays or may require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Enrollment delays in our clinical trials may result in increased development costs for our product candidates, which would cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing.

If serious adverse effects or unexpected characteristics of our product candidates are identified during development, we may need to abandon or limit our development of some or all of our product candidates.

It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will prove effective or safe in humans or will receive marketing approval. Adverse events or undesirable side effects caused by, or other unexpected properties of, our product candidates could cause us, any current or future collaborators, an institutional review board or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials of one or more of our product candidates and could result in a more restrictive label, or the delay or denial of marketing approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If adverse effects were to arise in patients being treated with any of our product candidates, it could require us to halt, delay or interrupt clinical trials of such product candidate or adversely affect our ability to obtain requisite approvals to advance the development and commercialization of such product candidate. If our product candidates are associated with undesirable side effects or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective.

We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

We have limited financial and managerial resources. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements.

The process for obtaining approval of a PMA or NDA is time consuming, subject to unanticipated delays and costs, and requires the commitment of substantial resources.

If the FDA determines that any of the clinical work submitted, including the clinical trials, Human Factors studies and bench testing submitted for a product candidate in support of a PMA or NDA were not conducted in full compliance with the applicable protocols for these trials, studies and testing as well as with applicable regulations and standards, or if the FDA does not agree with our interpretation of the results of such trials, studies and testing, the FDA may reject the data and results. The FDA may audit some or all of our clinical trial sites to determine the integrity of our clinical data. The FDA may audit some or all of our study sites to determine the integrity of our data and may audit the data and results of bench testing. Any rejection of any of our data would negatively impact our ability to obtain marketing authorization for our product candidates and would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. In addition, an NDA or PMA may not be approved, or approval may be delayed, as a result of changes in FDA policies for drug or device approval during the review period. For example, although many products have been approved by the FDA in recent years under Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA, objections have been raised to the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If challenges to the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b) (2) are successful, the FDA may be required to change its interpretation, which could delay or prevent the approval of such an NDA. Any significant delay in the acceptance, review or approval of an NDA or PMA that we have submitted would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition and would require us to obtain significant additional funding.

Our expectations for FDA approvability of our product candidates may be inaccurate, and we may be required to conduct additional manufacturing, nonclinical or clinical development work in order to obtain FDA approval for these products, which would add to our expenses and delay any associated revenue.

Nafamostat is being developed for both medical device and drug indications for use. Although nafamostat is approved for certain uses in Japan, our ability to leverage that for an expedited development and approval pathway with the FDA may be limited, and we may be required to conduct additional unanticipated nonclinical studies and clinical trials in order to seek approval in the U.S. We are studying NiyadTM in the NEPHRO CRRT study under an investigational device exemption, or IDE. Niyad has received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA for regional anticoagulant for injection into the extracorporeal circuit and is expected to be used during renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients in the hospital and for end-stage renal disease patients receiving dialysis in outpatient clinics. We expect that Niyad will require approval of a PMA application for commercialization in the U.S., and as a company we have never submitted nor received approval for a PMA.

The active drug component of Niyad, nafamostat, is also being developed for drug indications as LTX-608, for which we expect to submit Investigational New Drug applications once IND-enabling studies have been completed. We may be delayed in the submission of our planned INDs if there are unexpected findings in our nonclinical studies, which could also adversely impact our ongoing NEPHRO CRRT study and planned PMA submission.

On July 14, 2021, we entered into the PFS Agreement with Aguettant pursuant to which we obtained the exclusive right to develop and, subject to FDA approval, commercialize in the United States (i) an ephedrine pre-filled syringe for injection, and (ii) a phenylephrine pre-filled syringe for injection. Aguettant will supply us with the products for use in commercialization, if they are approved in the U.S. Our current expectation based on our communication with the FDA is that Fedsyra, the PFS ephedrine product candidate, will be approvable by the FDA without additional manufacturing changes or clinical development. We have not yet received all the available data to support the planned NDA submission for the PFS phenylephrine product. If we or the FDA determine that additional development work will be needed for U.S. approval of either of the PFS product candidates, we would incur additional expense and be delayed in obtaining any revenue from that product.

A key part of our business strategy is to establish collaborative relationships to commercialize and fund development and approval of our products, particularly outside of the United States. We may not succeed in establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships, which may significantly limit our ability to develop and commercialize our products successfully, if at all.

We will need to establish and maintain successful collaborative relationships to obtain international sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for our products. The process of establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships is difficult, time-consuming and involves significant uncertainty. For example:

If any collaborator fails to fulfill its responsibilities in a timely manner, or at all, any research, clinical development, manufacturing or commercialization efforts pursuant to that collaboration could be delayed or terminated, or it may be necessary for us to assume responsibility for expenses or activities that would otherwise have been the responsibility of our collaborator. If we are unable to establish and maintain collaborative relationships on acceptable terms we may have to undertake development and commercialization activities at our own expense.

We may experience difficulties in retaining our existing employees and managing our operations.

We need to retain and maintain our existing managerial, operational, regulatory, developmental, finance and other personnel and resources in order to develop our product candidates and manage our operations. Our current infrastructure may be inadequate to support our strategy and any future workforce reduction, such as the reduction that eliminated approximately 40% of our workforce in May 2022 and subsequent related workforce reductions, may be disruptive to our operations, may negatively affect our productivity, and may constrain our commercialization activities. For example, a further workforce reduction could yield unanticipated consequences, such as attrition beyond planned staff reductions, negatively impacting employee morale and our corporate culture, or increased difficulties in our day-to-day operations, and prevent us from developing our product candidates as rapidly as planned. If we encounter such unanticipated consequences, we may have difficulty retaining and attracting personnel. In addition, the implementation of any additional workforce or expense reduction programs may divert the efforts of our management team and other key employees, which could adversely affect our business. Furthermore, we may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits, savings and improvements in our cost structure from our cost reduction plan, due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If we are unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from the cost reduction plan, our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

If we, or current and potential partners, are unable to compete effectively, our products may not reach their commercial potential.

The U.S. biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by intense competition and cost pressure. Our Niyad product candidate, if approved in the U.S., may compete with currently available anticoagulants such as heparin and citrate. The LTX-608 nafamostat product candidates, if approved in the U.S., may compete with existing or emerging third party products. The PFS product candidates, if approved in the U.S., may compete with other ready-to-use formulations of ephedrine and phenylephrine.

Key competitive factors affecting the commercial success of our approved products are likely to be efficacy, safety profile, reliability, convenience of dosing, price and reimbursement. Many of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than we do and significantly greater experience in the discovery and development of drug candidates, obtaining FDA and other regulatory approval of products, and the commercialization of those products. Accordingly, our competitors may be more successful than we are in obtaining FDA approval for drugs and devices and achieving widespread market acceptance. Our competitors’ drugs, devices or drug delivery systems may be more effective, have fewer adverse effects, be less expensive to develop and manufacture, or be more effectively marketed and sold than any product we may seek to commercialize. This may render our products obsolete or non-competitive. We anticipate that we will face intense and increasing competition as new drugs and devices enter the market, additional technologies become available, and competitors establish collaborative or licensing relationships, which may adversely affect our competitive position. These and other competitive risks may materially adversely affect our ability to attain or sustain profitable operations.

Coverage and adequate reimbursement may not be available for our product candidates, if approved, in the United States and in Europe, which could make it difficult for us, or our partners, to sell our products profitably.

Our and our partners’ ability to commercialize our product candidates in the future, if approved, in the United States will depend, in part, on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement will be available from government payer programs at the federal and state levels, authorities, including Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers, managed care plans and other third-party payers.

No uniform policy requirement for coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payers in the United States or Europe. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payer to payer. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us or our partners to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of the approved products to each payer separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. For products administered under the supervision of a physician, obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices often associated with such products. Additionally, separate reimbursement for the product itself or the treatment or procedure in which the product is used may not be available, which may impact utilization. Our or our partners’ inability to promptly obtain and sufficiently maintain coverage and adequate reimbursement rates from third party payers could significantly harm our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize our approved drugs and our overall financial condition.

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and other third-party payers have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medical products. There have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in the United States and in some foreign jurisdictions that could affect our or our partners’ ability to sell the products profitably. These legislative and/or regulatory changes may negatively impact the reimbursement for our products, following approval. The availability of numerous generic pain medications may also substantially reduce the likelihood of reimbursement for approved products in Europe and elsewhere. The application of user fees to generic drug products may expedite the approval of additional pain medication generic drugs. We would expect that our product candidates will experience pricing pressures in connection with the product sale due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative changes. If we or our partners fail to successfully secure and maintain reimbursement coverage for our products or are significantly delayed in doing so, there may be difficulty achieving market acceptance of our products and our business will be harmed.

Furthermore, market acceptance and sales of our products will depend on reimbursement policies and may be affected by future healthcare reform measures. Government authorities and third-party payers, such as private health insurers, hospitals and health maintenance organizations, decide which drugs and devices they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for our product candidates, if approved, in the United States or in Europe. Also, reimbursement amounts may reduce the demand for, or the price of, our products. For example, additional studies in Europe may be needed to ensure premium reimbursement in certain countries. If reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, we, or our partners, may not be able to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved, in the United States or in Europe. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

Additionally, the regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing, coverage and reimbursement for new drugs and devices vary widely from country to country. Current and future legislation may significantly change the approval requirements in ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a product before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, and negatively impact the revenues able to be generated from the sale of the product in that country.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses.

If we are found to have improperly promoted off-label uses of our products in the United States, we may become subject to significant liability. Such enforcement has become more common in the industry. The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate the promotional claims that may be made about prescription drug and medical device products. In particular, a product may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA or such other regulatory agencies as reflected in the product’s approved labeling. If the FDA determines that our or our partners’ public disclosures, promotional materials or training constitutes promotion of non-approved or off-label use, it could request modifications to disclosure policies, training or promotional materials or subject us or our partners to regulatory or enforcement actions, including the issuance of an untitled letter, a Warning Letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties and a requirement for corrective advertising, including Dear Doctor letters. It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they consider our or our partners’ promotional or training materials to constitute promotion of non-approved or off-label use, which could result in significant civil, criminal and/or administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, contractual damages, reputational harm, increased losses and diminished profits and the curtailment or restructuring of operations, any of which could adversely affect our or our partners’ ability to operate and, thus, adversely impact our business and our financial results. The FDA or other enforcement authorities could also request that we enter into a consent decree or a corporate integrity agreement or seek a permanent injunction against us under which specified promotional conduct is monitored, changed or curtailed. If we cannot successfully manage the promotion of our product candidates, if approved, in the United States, we could become subject to significant liability, which would materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

If we or our partners are unable to establish and maintain relationships with group purchasing organizations any future revenues or future profitability could be jeopardized.

Many end-users of pharmaceutical and medical device products have relationships with group purchasing organizations, or GPOs, whereby such GPOs provide such end-users access to a broad range of pharmaceutical and medical device products from multiple suppliers at competitive prices and, in certain cases, exercise considerable influence over the drug and device purchasing decisions of such end-users. Hospitals and other end-users contract with the GPO of their choice for their purchasing needs. We expect to derive revenue from end-user customers that are members of GPOs for our product candidates, if approved. Establishing and maintaining strong relationships with these GPOs will require us to be a reliable supplier, remain price competitive and comply with FDA regulations. We currently do not have any commercial products that we can distribute through our existing GPO partners. In addition, the GPOs with whom we do have relationships may have relationships with manufacturers that sell competing products, and such GPOs may earn higher margins from these products or combinations of competing products or may prefer products other than ours for other reasons. If we, or our partners, are unable to establish or maintain our GPO relationships, sales of our product candidates, if approved, and related revenues could be negatively impacted.

Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates and Other Legal Compliance Matters

Existing and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us to commercialize our products and affect the prices we may obtain.

In the United States, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively, the Affordable Care Act, was enacted in an effort to, among other things, broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms.

The Affordable Care Act continues to substantially change health care financing and delivery by both governmental and private insurers, which may increase our regulatory burdens and operating costs.

There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act. For example, on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. In addition, there have been a number of health reform initiatives by the Biden administration that have impacted the Affordable Care Act . For example, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or the IRA, into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in Affordable Care Act marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program. It is possible that there will be additional health reform measures. It is possible that the Affordable Care Act will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is also unclear how any such challenges and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the Affordable Care Act. We expect that the Affordable Care Act and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our industry generally and on our ability to successfully commercialize our products. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we or our collaborators are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or our collaborators are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our products may lose regulatory approval and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. Aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers went into effect on April 1, 2013 and due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute will stay in effect until 2032, unless Congressional action is taken. The American Taxpayer Relief Act further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals. Additionally, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, which began on January 1, 2024.

In the United States, there has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically, there have been several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. At the federal level, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA, among other things (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 29, 2023, HHS announced the list of the first ten drugs that will be subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare drug price negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented but is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. In response to the Biden administration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing by the CMS Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the future. Further, on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework. At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, measures designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Furthermore, even after initial price and reimbursement approvals, reductions in prices and changes in reimbursement levels can be triggered by multiple factors, including reference pricing systems and publication of discounts by third party payers or authorities in other countries. In Europe, prices can be reduced further by parallel distribution and parallel trade (i.e., arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced countries). If any of these events occur, revenue from sales of our products in Europe would be negatively affected.

Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and further restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical products. We are not sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our products, if any, may be.

We expect that additional healthcare reform measures will be adopted within and outside the United States in the future, any of which could negatively impact our business. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payers of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare may adversely affect the demand for any drug or device products for which we have obtained or may obtain regulatory approval, our ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our products, our ability to obtain coverage and reimbursement approval for a product, our ability to generate revenues and achieve or maintain profitability, and the level of taxes that we are required to pay.

Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties

We will rely on third party manufacturers to produce clinical supplies of our product candidates. The failure of third-party manufacturers to provide us with adequate clinical supplies, and if approved, commercial supplies, could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

We currently use third party manufacturers to produce clinical supplies of our product candidates. Reliance on third party manufacturers entails many risks including:

• a delay or inability to procure or expand sufficient manufacturing capacity;

• manufacturing and product quality issues related to scale-up of manufacturing;

• costs and validation of new equipment and facilities required for scale-up;

• a failure to comply with cGMP and similar foreign standards;

Any of these events could lead to stock outs, inability to successfully commercialize our products, if approved, clinical trial delays, or failure to obtain regulatory approval. Some of these events could be the basis for FDA action, including injunction, recall, seizure, or total or partial suspension of production. If any of these events were to occur, our business would be materially adversely affected.

We rely on limited sources of supply for the active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, and finished product of our nafamostat-based product candidates and any disruption in the chain of supply may cause a delay in developing our product candidates.

We currently have a single source of supply of API and finished product for our nafamostat-based product candidates. If supply from those vendors is interrupted or discontinued, or if we are unable to negotiate supply agreements with them, there could be a significant impact on our development activities for those product candidates.

Manufacturing issues may arise that could delay or increase costs related to product development and regulatory approval.

We have relied, and will continue to rely, on contract manufacturers, fabricators and third-party service providers to produce the necessary Niyad product for clinical and non-clinical development and eventually for commercial sales. We currently outsource manufacturing and packaging of Niyad to third parties and intend to continue to do so. These purchases were made and will continue to be made utilizing short-term purchase order agreements and we may not be able to enter into long-term agreements for commercial supply with these third-party manufacturers or may be unable to do so on acceptable terms. In addition, we may encounter production issues with our current or future contract manufacturers and other third-party service providers, including the reliability of the production equipment, quality of the finished goods produced, their inability to meet demand or other unanticipated delays.

As we scale up manufacturing of Niyad in the future to support commercial demand, and conduct required production and stability testing, these processes may require refinement or resolution. For example, as we scale up, we may identify significant issues which could result in failure to maintain regulatory approval of Niyad, increased scrutiny by regulatory agencies, delays in clinical development and regulatory approval, increases in our operating expenses, or failure to obtain approval for our product candidates in the United States.

The facilities of any of our future manufacturers of Niyad must be approved by the FDA before commercial distribution from such manufacturers occurs. We do not fully control the manufacturing process and are completely dependent on these third-party manufacturing partners for compliance with the FDA or other foreign regulatory agency’s requirements for manufacture. In addition, although our third-party manufacturers are well-established manufacturers, we are dependent on their continued adherence to cGMP manufacturing and acceptable changes to their processes. If our manufacturers do not meet the FDA or other foreign regulatory agency’s strict regulatory requirements, they will not be able to secure FDA or other foreign regulatory agency approval for their manufacturing facilities. If the FDA or the relevant foreign regulatory agency does not approve these facilities for the commercial manufacture of Niyad, we will need to find alternative suppliers, which would result in significant delays in obtaining regulatory agency approval. These challenges may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

We may not be able to establish additional sources of supply for Niyad. Such suppliers are subject to FDA and other foreign regulatory agency’s regulations requiring that materials be produced under cGMPs or Quality System Regulations, or QSR. Failure by any of our suppliers to comply with applicable regulations may result in delays. In addition, due to the recent strains on the global supply chain, the lead times for many items used in our production are getting longer and may impact our ability to manufacture our products in a timely manner.

We rely on third parties to conduct, supervise and monitor our clinical trials, and if those third parties perform in an unsatisfactory manner, it may harm our business.

We will utilize CROs for the development of our product candidates. We will rely on such CROs, as well as clinical trial sites, to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and document preparation. While we have agreements or will enter into such agreements governing their activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance. We have plans to rely upon CROs to monitor and manage data for post-approval clinical programs or any FDA-required clinical programs for our product candidates, as well as the execution of nonclinical and clinical trials. We control only certain aspects of our CROs’ activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities.

We and our CROs are required to comply with the FDA’s current good clinical practices, or cGCPs, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA for all product candidates in clinical development. The FDA enforces these cGCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. If we or our CROs fail to comply with applicable cGCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. Upon inspection, the FDA may determine that our clinical trials do not comply with cGCPs. Accordingly, if our CROs or clinical trial sites fail to comply with these regulations, we may be required to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory process.

Our CROs are not our employees, and we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing clinical and nonclinical programs. These CROs may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials, or other drug or medical device development activities which could harm our competitive position. We face the risk of potential unauthorized disclosure or misappropriation of our intellectual property by CROs, which may allow our potential competitors to access our proprietary technology. If our CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations, fail to meet expected deadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements, or for any other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our financial results and the commercial prospects for our product candidates, if approved, would be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.

Risks Related to Our Business Operations and Industry

Our relationships with clinical investigators, health care professionals, consultants, commercial partners, third-party payers, hospitals, and other customers are subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws, which could expose us to significant penalties.

Healthcare providers, including physicians, and others play a primary role in the recommendation and prescribing of any products for which we may obtain marketing approval. Our business operations and arrangements with investigators, healthcare professionals, consultants, commercial partners, hospitals, third-party payers and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws. These laws may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we research, market, sell and distribute the products for which we obtain marketing approval. Applicable federal and state healthcare laws include, but are not limited to, the following:

Recently, there has been a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement activity by U.S. regulators, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the Department of Justice and the SEC. A determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with United States or foreign laws or regulations could result in the imposition of substantial fines, interruptions of business, loss of supplier, vendor or other third-party relationships, termination of necessary licenses and permits, and other legal or equitable sanctions. Other internal or government investigations or legal or regulatory proceedings, including lawsuits brought by private litigants, may also follow as a consequence.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our or our partners’ business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these or any other healthcare regulatory laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, contractual damages, reputational harm, increased losses and diminished profits, additional oversight and reporting obligations if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses or divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business.

Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or data security incidents could result in significant financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us.

We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure, including mobile technologies, to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store, process and transmit large amounts of sensitive information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, personal information and other confidential information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of such sensitive information. We have also outsourced elements of our operations (including elements of our information technology infrastructure) to third parties, and as a result, we manage a number of third-party vendors who may or could have access to our computer networks or our confidential information. In addition, many of those third parties in turn subcontract or outsource some of their responsibilities to third parties. While all information technology operations are inherently vulnerable to inadvertent or intentional security breaches, incidents, attacks and exposures, the accessibility and distributed nature of our information technology systems, and the sensitive information stored on those systems, make such systems potentially vulnerable to unintentional or malicious internal and external attacks on our technology environment. Potential vulnerabilities can be exploited from inadvertent or intentional actions of our employees, third-party vendors, business partners, or by malicious third parties. Attacks of this nature are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage) and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states and others. In addition to the extraction of sensitive information, such attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices increases the risk of data security incidents.

Significant disruptions of our third-party vendors’ and/or business partners’ information technology systems or other similar data security incidents could adversely affect our business operations and result in the loss, misappropriation, and/or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, sensitive information, which could result in financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us. In addition, information technology system disruptions, whether from attacks on our technology environment or from computer viruses, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data.

There is no way of knowing with certainty whether we have experienced any data security incidents that have not been discovered. While we have no reason to believe this to be the case, attackers have become very sophisticated in the way they conceal access to systems, and many companies that have been attacked are not aware that they have been attacked. Any event that leads to unauthorized access, use or disclosure of personal information, including but not limited to personal information regarding our patients or employees, could disrupt our business, harm our reputation, compel us to comply with applicable federal and state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, subject us to time consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action, require us to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject us to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to us, and result in significant legal and financial exposure and/or reputational harm. In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us or our vendors or business partners to comply with our privacy, confidentiality or data security-related legal or other obligations to third parties, or any further security incidents or other inappropriate access events that result in the unauthorized access, release or transfer of sensitive information, which could include personally identifiable information, may result in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory fines, litigation, or public statements against us by advocacy groups or others, and could cause third parties, including clinical sites, regulators or current and potential partners, to lose trust in us or we could be subject to claims by third parties that we have breached our privacy- or confidentiality-related obligations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects. Moreover, data security incidents and other inappropriate access can be difficult to detect, and any delay in identifying them may lead to increased harm of the type described above. While we have implemented security measures and obtained and maintain cybersecurity insurance intended to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, there can be no assurance that such measures will successfully prevent service interruptions or security incidents, or adequately protect us against any such occurrences.

Business interruptions could delay our operations and sales efforts.

TLPH US Equity

TLPH · 10-K · period ended 2023-12-31

Item1. Business

Item1A. Risk Factors

TLPH US Equity☆

TLPH · 10-K · period ended 2023-12-31

Item1. Business

Item1A. Risk Factors

TLPH US Equity