ser-20251231

Table of Contents

Park

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission file number 1-38519

Serina Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

601 Genome Way, Suite 2001

Huntsville, Alabama35806

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (256)327-9630

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share SER NYSE American

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes oNox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes oNox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yesx No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company x

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed based on the closing price for such stock as reported on the NYSE American on June 30, 2025 (the last trading day of the registrant's second fiscal quarter of 2025) was $21.8 million.

As of March 18, 2026, there were outstanding 12,314,159 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed for the registrant’s 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Serina Therapeutics, Inc.

Table of Contents

PageNumber

Part I

Item 1. Business 5

Item 1A. Risk Factors 29

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 74

Item 1C Cybersecurity 74

Item 2. Properties 75

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 75

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 75

Part II

Item 6. Reserved 76

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 87

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 88

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 119

Item 9B. Other Information 120

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 120

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 1

Item 11. Executive Compensation 1

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 1

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 122

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report” or this "Annual Report") contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Report are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these words or other comparable terminology.

Any forward-looking statements in this Report reflect our current views with respect to future events or to our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those discussed in this Report under Part 1, Item 1A in this Report. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future.

The description or discussion, in this Report, of any contract or agreement is a summary only and is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of the applicable contract or agreement.

Table of Contents

Summary of Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks that, if realized, could materially affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. These risks are discussed more fully in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

•We have a history of operating losses that are expected to continue for the foreseeable future, and we are unable to predict the extent of future losses, or whether we will generate significant revenues or achieve or sustain profitability.

•We need additional financing to execute our operating plan and continue to operate as a going concern.

•Our product candidates are at an early stage of development and may not be successfully developed or commercialized.

•Preliminary results from our nonclinical studies and clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data becomes available and as the data undergoes audit and verification procedures.

•The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our regulatory plans, and we may fail to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates.

•Failure of our technology would significantly harm our business, results of operations, and prospects.

•We may seek designations under FDA programs designed to facilitate and potentially expedite product candidate development, such as fast track or breakthrough therapy designation. Our product candidates may not receive any such designations or if they do receive such designations they may not lead to faster development or regulatory review or approval and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.

•If we are unable to obtain approval via the accelerated approval pathway, we may be required to conduct additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials. Even if we receive accelerated approval from the FDA, the FDA may seek to withdraw accelerated approval.

•If we apply for orphan drug designation from the FDA, there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain this designation, receive this designation for any of our other product candidates, or receive or maintain any corresponding benefits, including periods of exclusivity.

•We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

•If we encounter difficulties enrolling patients in our clinical trials, our clinical development activities could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected.

•Any product candidate we advance into clinical trials may cause unacceptable adverse events or have other properties that may delay or prevent our regulatory approval or commercialization or limit our commercial potential.

•We may form or seek strategic partnerships or enter into additional licensing arrangements in the future, and we may not realize the benefits of such alliances or licensing arrangements.

•We rely on contract manufacturing organizations to manufacture our nonclinical and clinical pharmaceutical supplies and expect to continue to rely on CMOs to produce commercial supplies of any approved product candidate, and our dependence on CMOs could adversely impact our business.

•We rely on third parties to conduct some of our nonclinical studies and all of our clinical trials. If these third parties do not meet our deadlines or otherwise conduct the trials as required, our development programs could be delayed or unsuccessful and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, our product candidates when expected or at all.

•We rely on other third parties to store and distribute our product candidates for nonclinical studies and clinical trials that we conduct.

•We may incur substantial product liability or indemnification claims relating to the clinical testing of our product candidates. If any product candidate that we successfully develop does not achieve broad market acceptance

Table of Contents

among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community, the revenues that we generate from their sales will be limited.

•If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market any product candidates we may develop, we may not be successful in commercializing those product candidates if and when they are approved.

•We face significant competition in an environment of rapid technological change, and there is a possibility that our competitors may achieve regulatory approval before us or develop therapies that are safer or more advanced or effective than ours, which may harm our financial condition and our ability to successfully market or commercialize any product candidates we may develop.

•Even if we are able to commercialize any product candidates, such products may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, reimbursement practices, or health care reform initiatives, which would harm our business.

•Our success is largely based upon our ability or partner's ability to scale our intellectual property and proprietary technologies, and we may be unable to protect and/or enforce our intellectual property.

•We may be forced to litigate to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights, and/or the intellectual property rights of our licensors.

•If we or our partners are sued for infringing on the intellectual property rights of third parties, it could be costly and time consuming, and an unfavorable outcome in any such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

•Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment, and other requirements imposed by government patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

•If we do not obtain patent term extension for our drug candidates, our business may be materially harmed.

•Changes in patent law in the United States and in non-U.S. jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our technologies and product candidates.

•Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our product candidates for an adequate amount of time.

•If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position could be harmed.

•The FDA regulatory approval process is lengthy, time consuming, and inherently unpredictable, and we may experience significant delays in the clinical development and regulatory approval, if any, of our product candidates.

•Even if we receive regulatory approval of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense, and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements.

•Our future success depends on our ability to recruit and retain our executive team and key scientists and to attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel.

•We expect to expand our development, regulatory, and future sales and marketing capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

•If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis could be impaired.

•If we do not continue to satisfy the NYSE American continued listing requirements, our Common Stock could be delisted from NYSE American.

•Anti-takeover provisions in our governance documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of Serina more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management.

•We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

•Conflicts of interest may arise from our relationship with Juvenescence, which will own a significant percentage of our common stock as well as warrants to purchase additional shares of our common stock and will be able to substantially influence the Company and exert control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing a pipeline of wholly-owned drug product candidates to treat neurological diseases and other indications. Our POZ drug delivery technology is designed to enable certain existing drugs and novel drug candidates to be modified in a way that provides the potential to improve the integrated efficacy and safety profile of multiple modalities including small molecules, RNA-based therapeutics and antibody-based drug conjugates (ADCs).The Company’s proprietary POZ technology is based on a synthetic, water soluble, low viscosity polymer called poly(2-oxazoline) and is engineered to provide greater control in drug loading and more precision in the rate of release of attached drugs delivered via easy-to-administer, long-acting subcutaneous injection.

The therapeutic agents in our small molecule product candidates are typically well-understood and marketed drugs that are effective but are limited by pharmacokinetic (“PK”) profiles that can include toxicity, side effects and short half-life. We believe that by using POZ technology, drugs with narrow therapeutic windows can be designed to maintain more desirable and stable levels in the blood. We believe that POZ technology can be applied to small molecules, proteins, ADCs, and other classes of molecules.

The chemical attachment of water-soluble polymers, in particular polyethylene glycol (“PEG”), to drugs has become a valuable technique for improving the properties of pharmaceuticals. This technique has been successfully employed in producing many FDA-approved drugs. We believe that there is an unmet need for polymer delivery technology that addresses the limitations of PEG and other biocompatible polymers and that the POZ technology has the following advantages:

Table of Contents

Our business is largely focused on the development of a wholly-owned pipeline of POZ-enabled drug candidates for CNS indications, including Parkinson’s disease. Our lead product candidate, SER 252 (POZ-apomorphine), is a POZ conjugate of the potent dopamine agonist apomorphine being developed for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and is in clinical development. SER 252 is designed to provide CDS via a subcutaneous injection delivered one to two times per week. CDS is a long-sought clinical strategy for Parkinson’s disease that currently approved therapies fall short of delivering.

We intend to develop other potential applications of the POZ technology, such as therapeutics delivered through Antibody Drug Conjugates ("ADCs") and Lipid Nanoparticle ("LNP") technology, through partnerships. Our SER 214, a POZ conjugate of rotigotine for the treatment of early Parkinson’s and Restless Leg Syndrome, was our first product candidate advanced into human study and has completed a Phase Ia study in 19 subjects. This product candidate served as a proof of principle for our POZ technology. This candidate is not being advanced internally. We intend to potentially out-license this product candidate.

Our Development Pipeline

We believe that our POZ platform delivery technology has potential for use across a broad range of payloads and indications. Among our development candidates, we intend to internally advance SER 252 for advanced Parkinson’s disease. We do not believe we will require a license to the API associated with SER 252. We are advancing our research and development efforts for POZ technology in LNP delivered ribonucleic acid (“RNA”) vaccines for infectious diseases. We intend to advance additional applications of the POZ platform via out-licensing, co-development, or other partnership arrangements. These applications may include other CNS disorders and POZ LNP relevant disease fields. In January 2026, we received FDA clearance of IND application for our lead product candidate, SER-252 for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. In February 2026, we enrolled and dosed our first patient in our Phase 1b clinical trial for SER-252.

Table of Contents

Our Strategy

Our strategy is to develop and commercialize polymer therapeutics based on conjugation of suitable small molecules to our proprietary POZ. While prior polymer technologies such as PEG focused primarily on protein conjugation, we envisioned the need to develop a polymer therapeutics platform that could address the vast universe of small molecules and program their release. We have demonstrated in multiple preclinical animal studies that POZ can program the release of small molecules, particularly those that have solubility challenges and PK limitations. We believe that specific POZ conjugated small molecules can be delivered continuously following a single injection. As a “platform technology,” we anticipate this technology has the potential for development of drug candidates across a broad range of payloads and indications. We intend to focus on our current pipeline of candidates and selectively explore new molecules for potential internal development. In parallel, we intend to expand our collaboration activity with prospective partners that have compounds that could potentially benefit from our POZ polymer platform technology. To achieve this, we intend to:

POZ Development Background

Over the past 25 years, chemical attachment of water-soluble polymers, in particular, polyethylene glycol, to drugs has become a valuable technique for improving the properties of pharmaceuticals. This technique has been successfully employed in producing second-generation forms of several FDA-approved drugs.

A polymer drug delivery approach involves using polymers, which are large molecules composed of repeating subunits, to design drug delivery systems that can control the release of medications in a controlled and targeted manner. Polymer-based drug delivery systems can enhance the therapeutic outcomes of drugs by optimizing their PKs, improving patient compliance, and reducing side effects. Some key aspects of polymer drug delivery are as follows:

Table of Contents

Common polymer-based drug delivery systems include:

Polymer drug delivery approaches offer versatility and customization, allowing for the design of drug delivery systems tailored to the specific needs of a drug and our intended therapeutic application. These approaches have the potential to enhance the safety and efficacy of medications while improving patient compliance and convenience.

Serina was formed with the goal of inventing a polymer that was distinct from PEG that could be used for modification of drugs. Our research over the past fifteen years has led to the development of a new polymer technology based on poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline). Our POZ technology is designed to be a “platform technology” in that we anticipate that multiple products can be developed using the same basic polymer. Serina was first to develop and patent methods to produce polymers of POZ suitable for pharmaceutical applications.

Our Product Candidates

Serina intends to focus on advancing our SER 252 POZ-apomorphine drug candidate and selectively explore new molecules for potential internal development, co-development and partnering. Current candidates include:

SER 214 (POZ-rotigotine) was the first product from our pipeline to be advanced into humans. Serina initiated a Phase Ia trial in July 2015 in 19 stably treated Parkinson’s subjects. The trial was completed in January 2017 with data published in a June 2020 article in Movement Disorders. This was a single and multi-dose, dose-escalation study in patients who were not experiencing significant motor fluctuations. Patients in the study were allowed to be on existing therapy for Parkinson’s disease, or be on no therapy, but have a definitive diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. We have not internally advanced SER 214 beyond Phase Ia and will seek to partner on any further development. We believe the SER 214 program, while not being advanced internally, provided data important to the development of a POZ dopamine agonist (such as rotigotine and apomorphine) conjugate to enable CDS in Parkinson’s patients. This research led to the development of SER 252.

SER 252 (POZ-apomorphine). We have advanced SER 252 into Phase I clinical trials in February 2026 for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. The treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease relies on multiple therapies, including levodopa (“L-DOPA”), compounds that inhibit the breakdown of L-DOPA in the brain (catechol-O-methyl transferase, or COMT; for example, opicopone), dopamine agonists (transdermal rotigotine; for example, NeuproTM) and others. L-DOPA in escalating doses is the mainstay of therapy for advanced Parkinson’s disease but is also the proximate cause of LIDs, one of the most troubling complications of prolonged high dose L-DOPA therapy. Approximately 90% of Parkinson’s disease patients who use L-DOPA for ten years will develop irreversible LIDS. An infusion therapy known as Onapgo (apomorphine) is now available in the United States after its approval by the FDA on Feb. 4, 2025. Onapgo must be administered as a 12–16-hour continuous infusion through an electronic pump and a standard insulin infusion set. While effective in reducing daily “OFF” time, and simultaneously increasing daily “ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia, usage frequently requires a healthcare provider to hook up the device and infusion each day and remove it at night. “OFF” time refers to the time period the patient is unable to perform routine daily activities. “ON” time refers to those periods where the patient is able to perform routine daily activities. Onapgo is confounded by significant skin reactions in approximately 40% of patients, often leading to permanent scarring (nodules) on the abdomen. Our preclinical studies in

Table of Contents

monkeys suggest SER 252 may be administered as a single subcutaneous injection twice a week, provides continuous delivery of apomorphine and has no skin liabilities. Our use is designed to be administered in the convenience of the patient’s home without the need for a healthcare provider. We believe that SER 252 may allow some patients to titrate completely off L-DOPA, thus simultaneously addressing the LIDS that is associated with our prolonged use.

POZ-lipids. We are advancing preclinical research focused on POZ-lipids as a non-immunogenic (or markedly reduced immunogenic) alternative to the PEG-lipids in the lipid nanoparticles (LNP) currently approved for the COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna. Both of the currently approved vaccines contain 1-2 mol% PEG-lipid, which is required to stabilize the LNP and prevent fusion of nascent particles. We have prepared LNPs from POZ-lipids and demonstrated these can stably incorporate oligonucleotides and transfect cell lines. We believe that it is likely that the global population is being progressively immunized against PEG due to the presence of PEG-lipids in the currently approved vaccines, combined with upwards of 70% of the population already having some level of anti-PEG antibodies. PEG is used at low molecular weights in a wide range of consumer products including cosmetics, toothpaste, deodorants, and laxatives. Anti-PEG antibodies are implicated in some of the serious adverse reactions such as anaphylactic reactions seen following the COVID-19 vaccine administration. Most infectious disease experts believe that COVID-19 will become an endemic challenge and that booster immunizations will be required. We believe that the anti-PEG antibody issue potentially has the unintended consequence of compromising the efficacy of the next generation of vaccines due to accelerated blood clearance. We previously entered into preclinical feasibility studies with two major pharmaceutical companies toward the goal of developing “PEG-alternative” LNP vaccines for infectious diseases. The LNP delivered RNA therapeutics field represents one of the most promising areas of drug development, with over 1,200 LNP delivered RNA-based therapeutics in development. Our intent is to license the POZ technology to companies developing LNP approaches in infectious diseases, cancer immunology, and gene therapy.

Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s disease is a chronic, disabling disorder that results from a deficiency of dopamine in the brain. Dopamine deficiency results from a degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in a portion of the brain known as the substantia nigra. Treatment for Parkinson’s disease has focused on mechanisms for delivery of dopamine precursors (levodopa, which can be delivered by daily pills or intestinal infusion), or on mechanisms that delay or prevent the breakdown of dopamine in the brain. The majority of patients who are diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease are treated with oral formulations of levodopa that include carbidopa, a compound that inhibits the breakdown of levodopa. Other approaches include selective inhibitors of monoamine oxidase enzymes in the brain (“MAO-B”), or dopamine agonists, such as rotigotine (the active ingredient in the transdermal patch NeuproTM), ropinirole or pramepexole. In almost all instances of oral treatment with any of these compounds, patients may experience “wearing off” where the drug fails to deliver an adequate dopaminergic stimulus after being used for months to years or the drugs may promote a disabling side effect known as dyskinesia (involuntary movements of the extremities). We believe that there is a major need for new therapies that can treat patients with Parkinson’s disease, extend their productive years, and ameliorate these unwanted side effects.

In recent years, the clinical strategy of CDS has been advanced in both animal and human studies. Most oral drugs deliver dopaminergic stimulation in a phasic peak and trough fashion. Animal studies show that such phasic alterations in dopaminergic tone may result in accelerated degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the brain, and lead to motor complications known as dyskinesia. Preclinical animal studies also suggest that continuous delivery of apomorphine appears to delay the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the brains of affected animals, thus delaying some of the side effects of dopaminergic therapy as well as the onset of late-stage Parkinsonism. In a double-blind, double-dummy study in humans employing an intestinal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa gel (“LCIG”) in advanced Parkinson’s patients, continuous intestinal infusion of levodopa gel was shown to be superior in outcomes to oral, sustained release levodopa-carbidopa capsules. The results showed that an intestinal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa gel in the proximal small intestine (delivered by a percutaneous catheter) increased patients’ “ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia by approximately two hours per day, and decreased “OFF” time by the same amount. The approach was the first CDS product approved by the FDA (AbbVie’s Duopa). Notwithstanding the significant increase in patient clinical outcomes in advanced Parkinson’s patients, the approach is invasive, requires surgery to place a percutaneous catheter (with risk of infection, perforation of the intestine or inadvertent removal), frequent loading of levodopa-carbidopa gel packs, and frequent flushing to keep the catheter flowing. Subsequently, another product providing CDS (Abbvie - Vyalev) was approved by the FDA (October 2024). The Vyalev product is a liquid formulation of the prodrugs foslevodopa-foscarbidopa that is continuously infused subcutaneously using an electronic pump. This represented a substantial new treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease patients.

Table of Contents

Our POZ technology platform has attributes that we believe has the potential to allow POZ-conjugates to deliver on the approach of prolonging the PKs of attached drugs, thus enabling continuous drug delivery.

SER 214 – Provides Continuous Release of Rotigotine Following a Single Weekly Subcutaneous Injection in Parkinson’s Disease Patients with Early Stable Disease

The potent dopamine agonist rotigotine is attached to pendent POZ with programmable linkers that allow the rotigotine to be released slowly, following a single subcutaneous injection of SER 214 in a standard insulin syringe. Preclinical animal studies in rats and monkeys have shown that SER 214 appears to provide a continuous state of dopaminergic tone for approximately one week following a single subcutaneous injection. Repeat-dose preclinical studies in rats (12 weeks), dogs (single dose maximum tolerated dose study) and monkeys (results of a 4-week study, plus the 90-day study in cynomolgus macaques that was part of the IND toxicology program) show the week-to-week variation in plasma release of rotigotine (plasma half-life) and drug exposure do not change dramatically following a single subcutaneous injection each week. Based on these IND enabling studies, SER-214 was advanced into a Phase Ia study in humans.

SER-214 was our first product candidate to be advanced into humans, completing a Phase Ia study in 19 patients. While SER-214 has not been advanced beyond this Phase Ia trial, the program provided clinical data important to the development of our POZ platform's capability to enable CDS of a dopamine agonist for treatment of Parkinson’s patients. This research led directly to the development of our follow on IND candidate, SER 252. The Phase Ia study demonstrated SER 214 was well-tolerated when delivered in a standard insulin syringe. The data for the final two weeks of Cohort 3 (high dose cohort) are shown in Figure 3. Subjects received an initial dose in week one of 50 mg SER 214, followed by a single dose of 100 mg SER 214 in week two, and then followed by a single 200 mg dose of SER 214 in weeks three and four. This dosing was followed by a one-week wash-out period. The SER 214 Phase Ia study was not designed with a placebo arm, and therefore statistical analysis of the observed data does not have p-values. SER 214 demonstrated predictable PK that paralleled the PK results observed in preclinical studies in monkeys. The results of the PK for released drug (rotigotine) are shown below, along with the published data for the 3 mg transdermal rotigotine patch.

Figure 1: Pharmacokinetic profile of SER 214 in Parkinson’s disease subjects in Phase Ia

Figure 1: PK profile of released drug in Parkinson’s disease subjects who received an initial dose of 50 mg SER 214, followed by a single dose of 100 mg SER 214, and then two weekly doses of 200 mg SER 214. Levels of released drug (rotigotine) are indicated in ng/ml. The yellow shaded area is the therapeutic window for rotigotine. Also shown in green is a 24-hour period for plasma levels of rotigotine from the 3 mg NeuproÔ patch (UCB, published data). From the data, it would appear a weekly injection of SER 214 of 200 mg (in 1 mL) approximates the levels of rotigotine from the daily 3 mg transdermal patch.

Table of Contents

The results in Figure 1 show that a single weekly injection of SER 214 provided continuous drug delivery in the predicted therapeutic window where plasma levels of rotigotine would be expected to provide control of symptoms of early Parkinson’s (yellow shaded area). The 200 mg dose of SER 214 provided plasma levels of rotigotine that are approximately the same as the 3 mg NeuproTM patch but did so for an entire week. In data not shown, plasma levels of released rotigotine fell below detectable levels approximately nine days after the final injection, indicating that released rotigotine is released at a near steady-state level for an entire week following a single weekly subcutaneous injection.

The Phase Ia study also measured the potential for efficacy, which relies on a change from baseline in the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Score (“UPDRS”). One component of the UPDRS measures the change in motor scores; this is known as UPDRS (Part III) and is measured by the physician who evaluates if there is a change in scores when the patient returns to the clinic for follow-up. A change from baseline of negative scores indicates improvement and the FDA has used UPDRS (Part III) as part of an approvable endpoint. In Cohort 3, subjects had a mean change from baseline of approximately-6 at day 28 – indicating that SER 214 may be improving their signs and/or symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. There appeared to be a dose-dependent change from baseline as the doses were increased. This is shown in Figure 3 below.

Table of Contents

Figure 2: Effect of dose of SER 214 on change from baseline in UPDRS (Part III)

Subjects who completed the final two weeks of dosing were shown to be at steady-state release. The plot above shows the relationship between dose and change from baseline in UPDRS (Part III). At the highest dose evaluated (200 mg) there was an approximate -6 point change in UPDRS. When extrapolated to a 400 mg dose, which would approximate the 6 mg NeuproTM patch in terms of released rotigotine, there would be an estimated -13 point change in UPDRS (Part III). We believe such a degree of change would achieve an approvable endpoint. The extrapolated data was not an actual result of the study and there can be no assurance that this result is able to be achieved. The method of extrapolation is industry standard based on a near linear relationship (shown in figure as linear r2 = 0.88) with the data from the actual study.

The relationship between dose and steady-state PK levels of released rotigotine revealed a linear relationship as shown in Figure 3. Extrapolation of the dose of SER 214 to higher doses of 400-600 mg is predicted to result in steady-state levels of rotigotine equivalent to the 6 mg and 8 mg NeuproTM patch. Such higher doses would require a device to deliver the higher volumes (2-3 mL).

Figure 3:

Figure 3: Relationship between dose of SER 214 administered in the last two weeks of dosing in the 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg cohorts and mean (+/- SD) steady-state levels of released rotigotine.

The primary safety endpoint for the SER 214 Phase Ia study was adverse events. There were no deaths or serious adverse events during the study. One subject in cohort 2 discontinued because of the development of generalized hives shortly after the 50-mg injection of SER 214. These rapidly cleared with administration of a single antihistamine dose and were not associated with any additional systemic complaints. All adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and all recovered by the end of the study. There was no apparent dose relationship, and no patient experienced new onset or worsening of dyskinesia.

Table of Contents

In summary, the Phase Ia study demonstrated SER 214 is a well-tolerated injection when administered subcutaneously in stable patients with early signs of Parkinson’s disease. Steady-state levels of released rotigotine were linear with dose, and physician assessment of UPDRS (Part III) suggested evidence of a dose-dependent decline from baseline - even in these stably treated patients. We believe that SER 214 is a promising product candidate that may be used to treat patients with early Parkinson’s disease, and market research suggests patients and physicians would readily use this approach at home without the need for an office visit or home health care professional. In June 2020, the results of the Phase Ia trial were published in Movement Disorders. We have not internally advanced SER 214 beyond Phase Ia and will seek to partner on any further development.

SER 252 (POZ-apomorphine) – Addressing the Need for a Potent Dopamine Agonist to Treat Advanced Parkinson’s disease

We believe that the same polymer chemistry used in SER 214 to provide continuous delivery of rotigotine might be used to provide continuous release of other drugs that would be effective in advanced Parkinson’s disease. One such drug is apomorphine, one of the most potent dopamine agonists known and the one most closely aligned chemically with the natural substance in the brain (dopamine). Apomorphine is approved as a “rescue” medication that is delivered as an injection (Supernus - Apokyn) analogous to an epinephrine injection for acute anaphylaxis. In Europe and some other parts of the world, there is an approved liquid formulation called Apo-go (Supernus) that has been used to manage the symptoms of advanced Parkinson's patients. Recently (February 2025), this product was approved by the FDA. In PD patients who develop severe “OFF” periods as a result of advancing disease associated with the “wearing off” of their medications, an Apokyn injection can promote “ON” periods within a few minutes. Many patients carry an Apokyn injection pen as a precaution for abrupt “OFF” periods. In contrast, Apo-go is administered via an electronic pump as a daily subcutaneous infusion 12-16 hours a day. In July 2018, the first randomized, placebo-controlled study of Apo-go versus placebo was published (known as the TOLEDO study). The results showed that daily subcutaneous delivery of apomorphine for 12-16 hours during the waking day resulted in a significant reduction of daily “OFF” time of approximately 2 hours.

While Apo-go resulted in a substantial improvement in “OFF” time, the subcutaneous route of administration is confounded by severe skin reactions. An example of these types of skin reactions is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Skin reactions from subcutaneous Apo-go administration

Figure 4: A patient with advanced Parkinson’s disease who uses daily subcutaneous infusions of Apo-go to reduce “OFF” time. Subcutaneous delivery of apomorphine resulted in ulceration of the skin with draining abscesses, and in rare instances, skin necrosis.

In the TOLEDO study, approximately 60% of subjects dose-adjusted their daily infusions of Apo-go downward based on skin reactions, and about 40% of patients experienced nodule formation. Nodules that result from subcutaneous apomorphine generally do not resolve.

While Apo-go represents a non-surgical approach to treatment of advanced disease in PD patients and provides the same degree of improvement in “OFF” time as the LCIG catheter and deep brain stimulation, many patients do not tolerate the daily subcutaneous infusions. The daily set-up often requires a healthcare provider to come in each day to help the patient

Table of Contents

administer the drug. We believe that development of a more convenient method of delivering apomorphine, without having to use a complicated infusion device or confounded by serious skin reactions, would be a major contribution to patient care.

SER 252 (POZ-apomorphine)

In early 2018, Serina initiated work on developing a polymer conjugate of apomorphine that could be delivered as a subcutaneous injection that is devoid of any skin reactions. The first step was attachment of apomorphine to the polymer. The chemistry of attachment and controlled release required attachment of ester-linked groups to bothof the hydroxyl groups in apomorphine; one ester linkage attaches the apomorphine to the polymer backbone (linking group) and the other ester linkage caps the second hydroxyl (capping group). In the course of these studies, Serina discovered that the rate-limiting step in the release of apomorphine from the polymer was the release of the “capping linker.” After three and a half years of dedicated efforts to control the release kinetics of apomorphine, Serina identified SER 252 as the IND candidate. Importantly, SER 252 provides linear dose kinetics when administered in preclinical multi-dose studies in monkeys as shown in Figure 5 below.

Figure 5: Dose response of SER 252 in monkeys

Figure 5: Young adult monkeys were dosed subcutaneous with SER 252 semi-weekly (n=4) at three different dose levels (1.5 mg equivalents Apo/kg, 4.5 mg equivalents Apo/kg and 15 mg equivalents Apo/kg) and daily levels of released apomorphine were determined. The AUC (area under the curve) for each set of doses was plotted versus dose administered.

PK Simulations for SER 252 in Patients with Advanced Disease

Although studies in humans are required for confirmation, Serina conducted a simulation of human PK based on the results from our preclinical studies in monkeys. The PK parameters of SER 252 in monkeys were modeled with a standard one-compartment fit of the data with V/F (volume of distribution) derived from imputed data from NeuroDerm, Ltd. published human PK on ND0701, an apomorphine product being developed by NeuroDerm; the V/F was 13 L/kg. The following results, which represent industry standard methodology for simulation, were obtained:

Figure 6:

Table of Contents

Figure 6: Simulations for human PK. The simulation demonstrated that doses from 0.25 mg eq Apo/kg to 1 mg eq Apo/kg would cover the PK profile of Apo-go and provide a range of doses that we intend to evaluate in early studies in humans.

There can be no assurance that the simulated result is able to be achieved. We believe these simulations suggest it may be possible to dose patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease with a subcutaneous injection that would provide levels of released apomorphine similar to the Apo-go infusion pump (a) without a trough level that would lead to an “OFF” period, (b) no need to have a healthcare provider hook up the device each day, and (c) no onerous skin reactions. We believe that the requisite trough level is likely in the range of about 3-5 ng/mL free apomorphine; plasma levels of apomorphine that “rescue” an acute “OFF” period about 4-5 ng/mL and persist for approximately 50 minutes (data from Cynapsus/Sunovion publications on development of a buccal apomorphine). The range of doses employed in an individual patient will likely vary, but the doses envisioned may potentially treat advanced disease and provide consistent “ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia and prevent the patient going into an “OFF” state. In multiple experiments in monkeys, SER 252 has not led to any skin reactions as a single or multi-dose regimen to date. We believe that it may be possible that this product candidate can be delivered in the patient’s home without the need for a healthcare provider.

If the results show SER 252 is well-tolerated with predictable PK, we expect to proceed to a Phase I MAD study in advanced patients in 2027. The results of the combined SAD/MAD studies will measure not only safety, PK and tolerability in these advanced patients but also daily “OFF” and “ON” time and will inform the design of the Phase II study. If Phase I is successful, we plan to have a meeting with the FDA to aid in design of a Phase II study.

Summary of Our Parkinson’s Disease Programs

SER 214 served as our proof-of-principle molecule to determine if our POZ conjugate technology could enable a long acting dopamine agonist in Parkinson’s disease. Our SER 252 product candidate leverages that research and development to potentially enable CDS in patients with advanced disease. A critically important observation was made in the TOLEDO study in that many patients down-titrated their oral L-DOPA doses by greater than 50% from their baseline dose. L-DOPA therapy is considered the mainstay of treatment of both early and advanced Parkinson’s disease, despite evidence that dopamine agonists are equally effective for early disease and do not promote the same degree of dyskinesia as levodopa. Approximately 50% of PD patients will develop LIDS within five years, and 90% within 10 years, of initiation of levodopa therapy. In one specialized center in Scotland, the Lees group has shown that fastidious titration of apomorphine (Apo-go) during the waking day can lead to complete off-titration of levodopa with a dramatic reduction in motor complications (45 of 64 patients achieved apomorphine monotherapy and titrated completely off oral levodopa). Patients who achieved monotherapy had an increase in “ON” time to 85% of the waking day. If SER 252 effectively prevents “OFF” time and delays or prevents dyskinesia in advanced disease, it might be possible to use SER 252 in patients with mid-stage disease to achieve significant control of symptoms without initiating levodopa therapy. At present, we are not aware of an effective alternative to oral levodopa. For patients who experience advancing disease that no longer responds to oral agonists, the default approach is to continue to escalate doses of levodopa with the consequence of accelerated onset of motor complications. We believe that there is significant potential for SER 252 to become such an alternative, potentially leading

Table of Contents

to a paradigm shift in how patients with Parkinson’s disease might be treated. We believe that SER 214 and SER 252 may be administered in the home setting with the convenience and compliance of a single or twice-weekly subcutaneous injection that does not require a healthcare provider to administer, and patients may not need to continue therapy with levodopa (levodopa sparing strategy).

Licensing, Collaboration and Partnership Agreements

In early 2021, Serina entered into FSAs with several large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to advance POZ-lipids as a replacement strategy for PEG-lipids in the current mRNA vaccines. After two years of work with these partners, Serina entered into licensing discussions to advance POZ-lipids as a replacement for PEG-lipids.

In October 2023, Serina entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with Pfizer to use our POZ polymer technology for use in lipid nanoparticle drug delivery formulations. The agreement grants Pfizer non-exclusive rights to certain intellectual property, know-how, and proprietary technologies. Under the terms of the agreement, Pfizer is authorized to develop, manufacture, market, and commercialize products incorporating the licensed technology with respect to a specific POZ polymer structure in one field. The agreement outlines the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights related to the licensed technology. Pfizer is obligated to use commercially reasonable diligent efforts to develop and commercialize licensed products, and to use such efforts to accomplish specified development and commercial objectives. The agreement includes a one-time upfront payment of $3 million that was received on December 15, 2023, milestone payments payable to us upon the achievement of specific development, regulatory, and commercial milestones, and a royalty on net sales of products incorporating the licensed technology in accordance with the terms outlined in the license agreement. The range of royalties on sales of products is between 2.75% – 3.5% and is tiered to achievement of certain sales milestones.

Intellectual Property

Intellectual property is of vital importance in our field and in biotechnology generally. We seek to protect and enhance proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business by seeking, maintaining, and defending patent rights, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties. We will also seek to rely on regulatory protection afforded through inclusion in expedited development and review, data exclusivity, market exclusivity and patent term extensions where available.

We have sought patent protection in the United States and internationally related to the POZ technology. We own an extensive issued patent estate covering POZ technology and certain product candidates enabled by the POZ technology. We have applied for additional patents seeking to further protect and extend the POZ patent portfolio we own. Such applications may not result in issued patents and, even if patents do issue, such patents may not be in a form or scope that will provide us with meaningful protection for our product candidates. We also rely on trade secrets that are important to the development of our business. Trade secrets are difficult to protect and provide us with only limited protection, as trade secrets do not protect against independent development of technology by third parties.

We expect to file additional patent applications in support of current and new clinical candidates as well as in support of new applications of POZ platform technology. Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining patent protection and trade secret protection of current and future product candidates and the methods used to develop and manufacture them, as well as successfully defending any such patents against third party challenges and operating without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing our product candidates will depend on the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that cover these activities. We cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications we file in the future, nor can we be sure that any patents that may be granted in the future will be commercially useful in protecting our product candidates, discovery programs and processes.

Serina-Owned Intellectual Property

We have been issued a series of patents on various forms of POZ. The following is a list of patents that have been issued and published pending applications in the United States and worldwide. The list is presented by the individual family dockets. Expiration dates for non-domestic patent rights are based on a strict calculation of 20 years from the earliest filing date and, as such, Patent Term Adjustment in accordance with the jurisdiction could extend this term further than indicated.

Table of Contents

SER 01 Family: “Activated Polyoxazolines and Compositions Comprising the Same” (J. M. Harris et al.).

This family of patents provides methods of synthesis and compositions of terminally activated linear poly(oxazolines) having various terminal functional groups suitable for attaching to other molecules such as enzymes, proteins, lipids, and antibodies by stable linkages.

SER 02 Family: “Multi-armed Forms of Activated Polyoxazoline and Methods of Synthesis Thereof” (J. M. Harris et al.)

This patent provides branched poly(oxazolines) having a terminal activating group that can be linked to a second moiety such as a drug molecule. The branched or multi-arm composition generally comprises two or more linear poly(oxazolines) linked to a single branching point.

SER 03/07 Family: “Multifunctional Forms of Polyoxazoline Copolymers and Drug Compositions Comprising the Same” (K. Yoon et al.)

This family of patents provides for poly(oxazolines) having a set of pendent functional groups on the polymer backbone and a terminal functional group, wherein the pendent functional groups and the terminal functional groups are chemically orthogonal to one another. This family also covers mixtures of oxazoline monomers on the same polymer backbone e.g., ethyl oxazoline and pentynyl oxazoline. This family covers every class of molecule attached to POZ, including but not limited to small molecules, proteins, oligonucleotides, and lipids where the attached molecule can be a therapeutic, diagnostic, or targeting molecule. The family also covers such poly(oxazoline) polymers linked to various target molecules, such as therapeutic agents and targeting agents and of using such conjugates in the treatment or diagnosis of cancer:

Table of Contents

SER-08 family: “Poly(oxazoline) with Inert Terminating Groups, Polyoxazolines Prepared from Protected Initiating Groups and Related Compounds” (M. D. Bentley et al.)

This family of patentsrelates to linear, branched, multi-arm and pendant POZTM with initiating functional groups.This patent family also covers compositions of POZTM conjugates of phospholipids and glycolipids for use in making lipid nanoparticles (LNP):

SER-16 Family: “Subcutaneous Delivery of Poly(oxazoline) Conjugates” (R. W. Moreadith et al.)

This family of patents provides for poly(oxazoline) conjugates of dopamine agonists and subcutaneous delivery of these conjugates for treatment of conditions related to dopamine insufficiency, such as Parkinson’s disease.In particular, this family includes claims to conjugates containing rotigotine, i.e., SER-214.The ʼ633 patent(US) has broader claims and would cover other molecules administered as subcutaneous injections, including but not limited to SER-226/227, SER-228/229 SER-232 and SER-252.

Table of Contents

SER 18 Family: “Polyoxazoline Antibody Drug Conjugates” (R. W. Moreadith et al.)

This patent family describes and claims polymer-ADCs to treat human disease. They provide a large DAR.

SER 22 Family: “Cleavable Conjugates of Catechol Compounds and Water-Soluble Polymers and Methods of Treatment Using the Same” (M. D. Bentley et al.)

This family covers conjugates including a water-soluble polymer linked to a compound including a catechol moiety via a cleavable linkage, wherein the cleavable linkage is formed between the water-soluble polymer and a first phenolic hydroxyl group of the catechol moiety and a second phenolic hydroxyl group of the catechol moiety is linked to a blocking group. The rate of hydrolytic release of the compound including the catechol moiety is controlled, at least in part, through structure or design of the blocking group on the second phenolic hydroxyl group of the catechol moiety such that the rate of hydrolytic release of the compound including the catechol moiety can be tuned through structural design of the group on the second phenolic hydroxyl group of the catechol moiety.

Table of Contents

SER 23 Family: “Polyoxazoline-Drug Conjugates with Novel Pharmacokinetic Properties” (J. M. Harris et al.)

This family relates to all POZ polymer conjugates of cannabinoids, including and not limited to SER 228, SER 229, SER 232 and POZ-cannabinoids of cannabidivarin, cannabigerol and cannabichromene.

SER 24 family: “Polyoxazoline-lipid Conjugates and Lipid Nanoparticles and Pharmaceutical Compositions Including Same” (J. M. Harris et al.)

This family relates to the chemical synthesis of POZ polymer conjugates of lipids that may be used to make lipid nanoparticles. The patent application discloses multiple different architectures of POZ, including but not limited to releasable linkages, stable linkages, therapeutic oligonucleotides (DNA, mRNA) and use in, and manufacture of, vaccines for infectious diseases and various therapeutic approaches.

Table of Contents

SER-25: “Targeting of Antigen-Presenting Cells by Nanoparticles Containing POZ-Lipid Conjugates” (R. Moreadith et al.)

We co-own, along with Georgia Tech Research Corporation, a patent application related to a method of targeting antigen-presenting cells with LNPs including polyoxazoline-lipid conjugates (or pharmaceutical compositions including such LNPs).

SER-26: “Poly(oxazoline) Conjugates with Pendant Cationic Groups and Lipid Nanoparticles Including Same” (Moreadith et al.)

Serina has begun to cultivate a patent family related to polyoxazoline (POZ) conjugates with pendent and terminal cationic groups (cationic POZ) and methods of synthesis.In addition, the present disclosure relates to lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) including cationic POZ and pharmaceutical compositions including such LNPs.LNPs incorporating oligonucleotides such as mRNA, DNA, saRNA and siRNA for delivery into living cells is also contemplated.

Competition

We face substantial competition from multiple sources, including large and specialty pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and biotechnology companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies, and public and private research institutions. Our competitors compete with us on the level of the technologies employed, or on the level of development of product candidates. In addition, many small biotechnology companies have formed collaborations with large, established companies to (i) obtain support for their research, development, and commercialization of products or (ii) combine several treatment approaches to develop longer lasting or more efficacious treatments that may potentially directly compete with our current or future product candidates. We anticipate we will continue to face increasing competition as new therapies and combinations thereof, technologies, and data emerge within the field of drug delivery generally and, furthermore, within the treatment of diseases in which we expect to compete in the future.

In addition to the current treatments for patients, numerous commercial and academic preclinical studies and clinical trials are being undertaken by many parties to assess novel technologies and product candidates in the field of CNS disorders. Results from these studies and trials have fueled increasing levels of interest in the CNS field.

Several companies are in the business of developing and marketing polymer-modified therapeutics, with the majority using PEG polymers. The covalent attachment of PEG to therapeutic agents, termed PEGylation, is a well-established and clinically proven drug delivery approach to improve the PK and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Specifically, PEGylation can improve the parent drug’s solubility, extend our circulation time, and reduce our immunogenicity, with minimal undesirable properties. PEGylation technology has been applied to various therapeutic modalities or payloads including small molecules, aptamers, peptides, and proteins, leading to over 30 FDA approved PEGylated drugs currently in use and many investigational PEGylated agents under clinical trials.

Table of Contents

Government Regulation

Our operations and activities are subject to extensive regulation by numerous government authorities in the U.S., Europe and other countries. In the United States, Europe and other countries, our products are subject to rigorous regulations governing their testing, manufacture, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, and advertising and promotion. As a result of these regulations, product development and product approval processes are very expensive and time consuming. The regulatory requirements applicable to drug and biologic development, approval, and marketing are subject to change. In addition, regulations and administrative guidance often are revised or reinterpreted by the agencies in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, or FDA or comparable ex-U.S. regulations, guidance or interpretations will change.

United States Government Regulation

New Drug Application and Biologics License Application Approval Processes

The process required by the FDA before a drug or biologic may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

•completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies conducted according to Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”), and other applicable regulations;

•submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”), which must become effective before clinical trials in the United States may begin;

•performance of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials according to Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”), and other clinical trial-related regulations to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug for its intended use;

•submission to the FDA of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) or a Biologics License Application (“BLA”);

•satisfactory completion of a pre-approval FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product will be produced to assess compliance with cGMP; and

•FDA review and approval of the NDA or BLA.

Once a drug or biologic is identified for development, it enters the preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal pharmacology and toxicology studies. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, to the FDA as part of the IND, which seeks FDA approval to test the drug or biologic in humans. Preclinical or nonclinical testing typically continues even after the IND is submitted.

If the FDA accepts the IND, the drug or biologic can then be studied in human clinical trials to determine if the product candidate is safe and effective. Clinical trials typically involve three separate phases that often overlap, can take many years and are expensive. These three phases, which are subject to considerable regulation, are as follows:

•Phase 1. The drug or biologic initially is introduced into a limited number of healthy human subjects or patients with the target disease or condition and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and elimination. In the case of some drugs or biologics for severe or life-threatening diseases, such as cancer, especially when the drug or biologic may be inherently too toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients.

•Phase 2. Clinical trials are next initiated in a limited patient population with the specified disease or condition the drug or biologic is intended to treat to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the drug or biologic candidate for the disease or condition it is intended to treat and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.

•Phase 3. Clinical trials are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. These clinical trials are intended to establish the

Table of Contents

overall risk-benefit ratio of the drug or biologic and provide an adequate basis for regulatory approval and product labeling.

It is possible that Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 testing may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA or the sponsor may, at any time during the initial 30-day IND review period or while clinical trials are ongoing under the IND, impose a partial or complete clinical hold or suspend a clinical trial at any time for a variety of reasons, including a finding that the healthy volunteers or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently in other situations, and the occurrence of serious adverse events must also be reported. Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on the www.clinicaltrials.gov website.

Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication and are commonly intended to generate additional safety data regarding use of the product in a clinical setting. In certain instances, the FDA may mandate the performance of Phase 4 clinical trials as a condition of approval of an NDA or BLA.

The results of drug or biologic development, preclinical studies and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on the chemistry of the drug or biologic, proposed labeling and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA or BLA requesting approval to market the drug or biologic. The FDA reviews each NDA or BLA submitted to ensure that it is sufficiently complete for substantive review before it accepts it for filing. It may request additional information rather than accept an NDA or BLA for filing.

Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review. The FDA reviews an NDA or BLA to determine, among other things, whether a drug or biologic is safe and effective for its intended use and whether its manufacturing is cGMP-compliant to assure and preserve the drug or biologic’s identity, strength, quality and purity. The FDA may refer the NDA or BLA to an advisory committee for review and recommendation as to whether the NDA or BLA should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations. Before approving an NDA or BLA, the FDA will inspect the facility or facilities where the drug or biologic is manufactured and tested. Additionally, before approving an NDA or BLA, the FDA may inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCP requirements.

The FDA may require, as a condition of approval, restricted distribution and use, enhanced labeling, special packaging or labeling, expedited reporting of certain adverse events, submission of promotional materials, restrictions on direct-to-consumer advertising or commitments to conduct additional research post-approval. The FDA will issue a complete response letter if the agency decides not to approve the NDA or BLA in its present form.

Expedited Review and Approval

The FDA has developed a number of distinct approaches to make new drugs or biologics available as rapidly as possible in cases where there is no available treatment or there are advantages over existing treatments.

The FDA may grant “accelerated approval” to products that have been studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments. For accelerated approval, the product must have an effect on a surrogate endpoint or an intermediate clinical endpoint that is considered reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of a drug, such as an effect on irreversible morbidity and mortality. When approval is based on surrogate endpoints or clinical endpoints other than survival or morbidity, the sponsor will be required to conduct additional post-approval clinical studies to verify and describe the clinical benefit. These studies are known as “confirmatory trials.” Approval of a drug may be withdrawn, or the labeled indication of the drug changed if these trials fail to verify clinical benefit or do not demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit to justify the risks associated with the drug or biologic.

The FDA may grant “fast track” status to products that treat serious diseases or conditions and demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need. Fast track is a process designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of such products by providing, among other things, more frequent meetings with the FDA to discuss the product’s development plan and rolling review, which allows submission of individually completed sections of an NDA or BLA for FDA review before the entire submission is completed. Fast track status does not ensure that a product will be developed more quickly or receive FDA approval.

Table of Contents

“Breakthrough Therapy” designation is a process designed to expedite the development and review of drugs or biologics that are intended to treat a serious condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug or biologic may demonstrate substantial improvement over available therapy on one or more clinically significant endpoints. Breakthrough Therapy designation provides all of the benefits of fast-track designation in addition to robust FDA-sponsor interaction and communication to help to identify the most efficient and expeditious path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens.

“Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy” (“RMAT”) designation is a process created by the 21st Century Cures Act in December 2016. A product is eligible for RMAT designation if it is a regenerative medicine therapy that is intended to treat, modify, reverse or cure a serious disease or condition, and if preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product has the potential to address unmet medical needs for such disease or condition. The benefits of RMAT designation include the benefits available to breakthrough therapies, including potential eligibility for priority review and accelerated approval based on surrogate or intermediate endpoints.

The FDA may grant “priority review” status to a product that, if approved, would provide significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions. Priority review is intended to reduce the time it takes for the FDA to review an NDA or BLA, with the goal to take action on the application within six months from when the application is filed, compared to ten months for a standard review.

Manufacturing Quality Control

Among the conditions for NDA or BLA approval is the requirement that the prospective manufacturer’s quality control and manufacturing procedures continually conform with cGMP. Manufacturers must devote substantial time, money and effort in the areas of production, quality control, and quality assurance to maintain cGMP compliance. Material changes in manufacturing equipment, location, or process, may result in additional regulatory review and approval. The FDA, and other regulatory agencies, conduct periodic visits to inspect equipment, facilities, and processes following the initial approval of a product. If a manufacturing facility is not in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations and requirements imposed when the product was approved, regulatory or judicial enforcement action may be initiated, which may include a warning letter, suspension of manufacturing, product seizure, or an injunction against shipment of products from the facility and/or recall of products previously shipped. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the production of our products. Future FDA, state, and foreign inspections may identify compliance issues at the facilities of our contract manufacturers that may disrupt manufacture or distribution of our products or require substantial resources to correct.

Post-approval Requirements

Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or complete withdrawal of the product from the market. In addition, the sponsor of an approved drug in the United States may not promote that drug for unapproved, although a physician may prescribe a drug for an unapproved use in accordance with the practice of medicine. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of unapproved uses, as well as false or misleading promotion. Further, after approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval. In addition, the FDA may require testing, including Phase 4 trials, and surveillance programs to monitor the effect of approved products that have been commercialized, and the FDA has the power to prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of these post-marketing programs.

Products manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things:

•record-keeping requirements;

•reporting of adverse experiences with the product;

•providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information;

Table of Contents

•drug sampling and distribution requirements;

•notifying the FDA and gaining its approval of specified manufacturing or labeling changes;

•complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements; and

•complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements.

Failure to comply with the applicable United States requirements at any time during the drug or biologic development process, approval process or after approval, may subject us or our collaborators to administrative or judicial sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. These sanctions could include:

•restrictions on marketing or manufacturing of the product;

•safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases, or other communications containing warnings or other safety information about the product;

•refusal to approve or delay in review of pending applications;

•withdrawal of an approval or the implementation of limitations on a previously approved indication for use;

•imposition of a clinical hold, a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) or other safety-related limitations;

•warning letters or “untitled letters;”

•product seizures, recalls, or detentions, or refusal to permit the import or export of products;

•total or partial suspension of production or distribution;

•consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, debarment or exclusion from federal healthcare programs; or

•injunctions, fines, disgorgement, refusals of government contracts, or civil or criminal penalties.

United States Patent Term Restoration and Regulatory Exclusivity

Upon approval, products may be entitled to certain kinds of exclusivity under applicable intellectual property and regulatory regimes. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (commonly known as the Hatch-Waxman Act) permits a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. The length of the patent extension is roughly based on 50 percent of the period of time from the filing of an IND for a compound to the submission of the NDA for such compound, plus 100 percent of the time period from NDA submission to regulatory approval. The extension, however, cannot exceed five years and the patent term remaining after regulatory approval cannot exceed 14 years.

If the FDA approves a drug product that contains a new chemical entity not previously approved, the product is typically entitled to five years of non-patent regulatory exclusivity. Other products may be entitled to three years of exclusivity if approval was based on the FDA’s reliance on new clinical studies essential to approval submitted by the NDA applicant.

Biologics are also entitled to exclusivity under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (the “BPCIA”), which was passed as Title VII to the ACA. The law provides a pathway for approval of products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, a reference biological product is granted 12 years of data exclusivity, the period of time during which an innovator’s clinical data cannot be used by other companies, from the time of first licensure of the product, and an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. The BPCIA also created certain exclusivity periods for biosimilars approved as interchangeable products. At this juncture, it is unclear whether products deemed “interchangeable” by the FDA will, in fact, be readily substituted by pharmacies, which are governed by state pharmacy law. Biologics are also eligible for orphan drug

Table of Contents

exclusivity, as discussed below. The law also includes an extensive process for the innovator biologic and biosimilar manufacturer to litigate patent infringement, validity, and enforceability prior to the approval of the biosimilar. There have been ongoing federal legislative and administrative efforts as well as judicial challenges seeking to repeal, modify or invalidate some or all of the provisions of the ACA. While none of those efforts have focused on changes to the provisions of the ACA related to the biosimilar regulatory framework, if the ACA is repealed, substantially modified, or invalidated, it is unclear what, if any, impact such action would have on biosimilar regulation. If the NDA or BLA applicant studies the product for use by children, the FDA may grant pediatric exclusivity, which extends by 180 days each existing exclusivity (patent and regulatory) related to the product.

Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to drugs or biologics intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United States.

If a drug or biologic that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for that drug or biologic for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same disease or condition for seven years following marketing approval, except in certain very limited circumstances, such as if the later product is shown to be clinically superior to the orphan product. Orphan drug exclusivity, however, also could block the approval of our products for seven years if a competitor first obtains approval of the same drug, as defined by the FDA, for the same disease or condition for which we were seeking approval.

We may pursue orphan drug designation for certain of our future product candidates. Even if we obtain orphan drug designation for a product candidate, we may not be the first to obtain marketing approval for the product candidate for any particular orphan indication due to the uncertainties associated with developing novel therapies. Further, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product candidate, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent different drugs from being approved for the same condition. Moreover, orphan drug exclusivity may not prevent the approval of another sponsor’s product that is considered to be the same drug for a different disease or condition, even where such product could be prescribed for an unapproved indication that is protected by orphan drug exclusivity. Even after an orphan drug is approved, regulators may subsequently approve the same drug made by another manufacturer for the same condition if the regulator concludes that the later drug is safer, more effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug or biologic nor gives the drug or biologic any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

Foreign Regulation

We conduct clinical trials and market our products in numerous jurisdictions outside the U.S. Most of these jurisdictions have clinical trial, product approval and post-approval regulatory processes that are similar in principle to those in the U.S. Thus, whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product candidate, we must obtain approval from the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries or economic areas, such as the European Union, before we can commence clinical trials or market products in those countries or areas. The approval process and requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from place to place, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval.

Under the European Union regulatory system, a company may submit marketing authorization applications either under a centralized or decentralized procedure. The centralized procedure, which is compulsory for orphan medicines, medicines produced by biotechnology, and those medicines intended to treat AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or diabetes, and optional for those medicines that are highly innovative, provides for the grant of a single marketing authorization that is valid for all European Union member states. In addition to the centralized procedure, the European Union also has a nationalized procedure, which requires a separate application to and approval determination by each country; a decentralized procedure, whereby applicants submit identical applications to several countries and receive simultaneous approval; and a mutual recognition procedure, where applicants submit an application to one country for review and other countries may accept or reject the initial decision.

Despite the U.K. formally withdrawing from the European Union on January 31, 2020, a number of European Union regulations were retained in U.K. law. The U.K. government has communicated an intent to remove or replace some of

Table of Contents

these European Union provisions, which may increase some regulatory divergence between the U.K. and the European Union

Regulations Concerning Reimbursement

Sales of products depend, to a large degree, on the extent to which products will be reimbursed by third-party payors, such as government health programs, commercial insurance, and managed health care organizations. Increasingly, these third-party payors are becoming stricter in the ways they evaluate and reimburse medical products and services. Additionally, the containment of health care costs has become a priority of many governments, and the prices of drugs have been a focus in this effort. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit our revenues. Decisions by third-party payors to not cover a product could reduce physician usage of the product.

There are a number of governmental pricing programs in the United States, including the Medicaid Drug Rebate program, Medicare. Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that is administered by the states for low-income and disabled beneficiaries. Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate program, companies are required to pay a rebate to each state Medicaid program for their covered outpatient drugs, which includes select inpatient drugs for which there is “direct reimbursement.” Medicaid rebates are based on pricing data reported by us on a monthly and quarterly basis to CMS, the federal agency that administers the Medicaid and Medicare programs.

Any company that participates in the Medicaid Drug Rebate program also must participate in the 340B drug pricing program (the “340B program”), and the Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) pricing program. The 340B program, which is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration, requires participating companies to agree to charge statutorily defined “covered entities” no more than the 340B “ceiling price” for covered outpatient drugs. The 340B ceiling price is calculated using a statutory formula, which is based on pricing data calculated under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. The FSS pricing program, which is administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), also requires participating companies to extend discounted prices to the VA, Department of Defense, Coast Guard, and Public Health Service. Similar to the 340B program, FSS prices are calculated utilizing pricing data reported by us to the VA on a quarterly and annual basis.

The Medicare program includes “Part A” that generally covers certain hospital services for eligible beneficiaries. In general, Part A covers inpatient hospital services, skilled nursing, and hospice care. Most individuals are enrolled in Medicare Part A upon reaching age 65 (although other individuals qualify for Part A, including those receiving services for end stage renal disease). Prescription drugs that are used as part of an inpatient hospital stay will be covered by Medicare Part A, and these products typically are paid as part of a bundled or composite rate (e.g., diagnosis related group).

The Medicare Part D program provides a voluntary prescription drug benefit to Medicare beneficiaries. Under “Part D,” Medicare beneficiaries may enroll in prescription drug plans offered by private entities, which provide coverage of outpatient prescription drugs such as our acute pain and CF medicines. Unlike Medicare Part A and B, Part D coverage is not standardized. Part D prescription drug plan sponsors are not required to pay for all covered Part D drugs, and each drug plan can develop its own drug formulary that identifies which drugs it will cover and at what tier or level. Any formulary used by a Part D prescription drug plan must be developed and reviewed by a pharmacy and therapeutics committee. U.S. government payment for some of the costs of prescription drugs may increase demand for products for which we receive marketing approval.

Private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates. As a result, any reduction in payment that results from Part D reimbursement may result in a similar reduction in payments from non-governmental payors for our products. Additionally, private payors, including health maintenance organizations and pharmacy benefit managers in the U.S., are adopting more aggressive utilization management techniques, and are increasingly applying restrictive plan designs that can impact patients and manufacturers and they continue to push for significant discounts and rebates from manufacturers. As a consequence, these payors may not cover or adequately reimburse for use of our products or may do so at levels that disadvantage them relative to competitive products.

The U.S. government has shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs for medicines and has enacted reforms at the state and federal level designed to, among other things, modify prescription drug reimbursement amounts and methodologies, and otherwise control health care costs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Table of Contents

(“ACA”) was enacted in March 2010 and was designed to expand coverage for the uninsured while at the same time containing overall health care costs. With regard to pharmaceutical products, among other things, the ACA was designed to expand and increase industry rebates for drugs covered under Medicaid programs, impose an annual fee on branded pharmaceutical manufacturers, subject biological products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars, and make changes to the coverage requirements under the Medicare Part D program. Additionally, in August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) was enacted, establishing a Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, a Medicare inflationary rebate, and a redesign of the Part D benefit structure. Certain drugs are excluded from the IRA negotiation program. Nevertheless, other elements of the IRA may have a material impact on companies in our industry, including the redesign of the Part D benefit and the new Manufacturer Discount Program, which will require manufacturers to take on more of the beneficiary cost previously subsidized by the federal government through the application of increased drug discounts. Under the Non-Opioids Prevent Addiction in the Nation (“NOPAIN”) Act, CMS reimbursement for novel, oral, non-opioids will include an add-on payment when the drug is used in the hospital outpatient and ambulatory surgery center settings.

We anticipate that the U.S. government will continue to engage in activities seeking to address drug pricing and reimbursement. Furthermore, certain states have enacted laws establishing Prescription Drug Affordability Boards (“PDABs”). Some state PDABs, including those in Colorado, Maryland, Washington, and Minnesota, either have the authority or have defined a pathway pursuant to which they may be granted the authority to establish upper payment limits for prescription drugs. In certain states, there is pending litigation that would establish a PDAB or expand the authority of an existing PDAB.

In Europe and other foreign jurisdictions, the success of our products depends largely on obtaining and maintaining government reimbursement, because patients are generally unable to access prescription pharmaceutical products that are not reimbursed by their governments. In some countries, such as Germany, commercial sales of a new product may begin while pricing and reimbursement terms are under discussion. In other countries, a company must complete reimbursement negotiations prior to the commencement of commercial supply of the pharmaceutical product. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely country-by-country and region-by-region. For example, the member states of the European Union can restrict the range of drugs for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and can control the prices of prescription drugs. In addition, many ex-U.S. government payors require companies to provide health economic assessments of products, which are evaluated by government agencies set up for this purpose. A member state may approve a specific price for the drug, or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the total amount of money that a company may receive for supply of a drug. Countries also may consider increasing mandatory discounts over time in an attempt to manage increased demands on healthcare budgets. Reimbursement discussions in foreign countries often result in a reimbursement price that is lower than the net price that companies can obtain for the product in the U.S. In addition, reimbursement discussions may take a significant period of time resulting in commercialization delays. In some countries where reimbursement has not yet been obtained, or where there are a limited number of eligible people and our medicines or therapies are unregistered, the governments of such countries may agree to purchase our medicines and therapies on an unlicensed and/or named patient basis. Reimbursement for our products cannot be assured because a country or region may only provide for reimbursement on terms that we do not deem adequate. Further, many ex-U.S. governments have introduced or are in the process of introducing legislation focusing on cost containment measures in the pharmaceutical industry. The impact of these laws where finalized, the final form of laws under consideration, and their relevant practical application, are unknown at this time, but may lead to lower prices, paybacks, or other forms of discounts or special taxes.

Other Regulations

Pharmaceutical companies are also subject to various laws pertaining to healthcare “fraud and abuse,” including the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), the False Claims Act (“FCA”), and other state and federal laws and regulations. In the U.S., the Anti-Kickback Statute generally makes it illegal to knowingly and willfully solicit, offer, receive or pay any remuneration in return for or to induce the referral of business, including the purchase or prescription of a particular drug that is reimbursed by a state or federal health care program. The FCA prohibits knowingly and willingly presenting or causing to be presented for payment to third-party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid), any claims for reimbursed drugs or services that are false or fraudulent, claims for items or services not provided as claimed or claims for medically unnecessary items or services. Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, as well as by the possibility of exclusion from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid). Liability under the FCA may also arise when a violation of certain laws or regulations related to the underlying products (e.g., violations regarding improper promotional activity, manufacturing regulations, or

Table of Contents

unlawful payments) contributes to the submission of a false claim. If we were subject to allegations concerning, or convicted of violating, these laws, our business could be harmed.

Laws and regulations also have been enacted by the federal government and various states to regulate the sales and marketing practices of pharmaceutical manufacturers. The laws and regulations generally limit financial interactions between manufacturers and health care providers, require manufacturers to adopt certain compliance standards or require disclosure to the government and public of such interactions. The laws include U.S. federal and state “sunshine” provisions. The federal sunshine provisions apply to pharmaceutical manufacturers with products reimbursed under certain government programs and require those manufacturers to disclose annually to the federal government (for re-disclosure to the public) certain payments and other transfers of value made to physicians, physicians assistants, advanced practice registered nurses, and teaching hospitals. State laws may also require disclosure of pharmaceutical pricing information and marketing expenditures. Many of these laws and regulations contain requirements that are subject to interpretation. Outside the U.S., other countries have implemented requirements for disclosure of financial interactions with healthcare providers and additional countries may consider or implement such laws.

Our collection and use of personal data as part of our business activities is subject to various privacy and data security laws and regulations, including oversight by various regulatory or other governmental bodies, in the U.S., European Union, U.K., Canada, Australia, Brazil, Saudi Arabia and other jurisdictions. Such laws and regulations have the potential to affect our business materially, continue to evolve and increasingly are being enforced.

Our present and future business has been and will continue to be subject to various other laws and regulations. Various laws, regulations, and recommendations relating to safe working conditions, laboratory practices, the experimental use of animals, and the purchase, storage, movement, import, export and use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances are or may be applicable to our activities.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2025, we had sixteen full time employees. We do not have any employees represented by a labor union or covered under a collective bargaining agreement.

Facilities

Our current headquarters located in Huntsville, Alabama is comprised of approximately 7,600 square feet of office and laboratory space. The lease term is two years for the office space and five years for the laboratory space. The lease termination date is October 31, 2028 for the office space and January 31, 2028 for the laboratory space.

Investor Information

Financial and other information about us is available on our website at https://www.serinatx.com/. We make available on our website, free of charge, copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with or furnish it to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In addition, we have previously filed registration statements and other documents with the SEC. Any document we file may be inspected without charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. (These website addresses are not intended to function as hyperlinks, and the information contained in our website and in the SEC’s website is not intended to be a part of this filing.)

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves risks. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Report, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before deciding whether to purchase any of our securities. Our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Unless otherwise indicated, references in these risk factors to our business

Table of Contents

being harmed will include harm to our business, reputation, brand, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. In such event, the market price of our securities could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Operating History, Financial Position and Capital Requirements

We have a history of operating losses that are expected to continue for the foreseeable future, and we are unable to predict the extent of future losses, or whether we will generate significant revenues or achieve or sustain profitability.

We have focused on research and product development and have not generated any revenues to date from product sales. Additionally, we expect to continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future. These operating losses have adversely affected, and are likely to continue to adversely affect, our working capital, total assets, and stockholders’ deficit.

Because we are an early-stage company, our prospects must be considered in light of the uncertainties, risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of operations.

We expect to make substantial expenditures and incur increasing operating costs in the future and our accumulated deficit will increase significantly as we expand development and clinical trial activities for our product candidates. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses, whether we will ever generate significant revenues or if we will ever achieve or sustain profitability.

We are dependent on obtaining, and will continue to pursue, necessary funding from outside sources, including obtaining additional funding from the issuance of securities in order to continue our operations. Without adequate funding, we may not be able to meet our financial obligations.

We have not demonstrated an ability to perform the functions necessary for the successful commercialization of any products. The successful commercialization of any of our products will require us to perform a variety of functions, including:

● continuing to undertake preclinical and clinical development;

● engaging with payors and other pricing and reimbursement authorities;

We have a limited operating history and expect a number of factors to cause our operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis, which may make it difficult to predict our future performance.

Table of Contents

Our operations to date have been primarily limited to organizing and staffing our company, developing and securing our proprietary technology and preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates. We have not yet successfully completed all clinical trial phases for any of our product candidates, manufactured our product candidates at commercial scale or conducted sales and marketing activities that will be necessary to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved.

Our financial condition has varied significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter or year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors relating to our business that may contribute to these fluctuations include other factors described elsewhere in this annual report and also include, among other things:

● our ability to obtain additional funding to develop our product candidates;

● our ability to conduct and complete nonclinical studies and clinical trials,

● delays in the commencement, enrollment, and timing of clinical trials;

● market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved;

● potential product liability claims.

Accordingly, the results of any quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of future operating performance.

We need additional financing to execute our operating plan and continue to operate as a going concern.

As required under Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (ASC 205-40), we have the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about our ability to meet our future financial obligations as they become due within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. Based on our most recent projected cash flows, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents would not be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated operating and other funding requirements for the next twelve months from December 31, 2025. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the report of our

Table of Contents

independent registered public accountant accompanying our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report contains a qualification to such effect.

We have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows since inception and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $63.5 million as of December 31, 2025. We expect to continue to incur operating losses and negative cash flows. Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash. We will require substantial additional funds to support our continued research and development activities, including the anticipated costs of nonclinical studies and clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and potential commercialization. Additionally, our estimates on future financial needs may be based on assumptions that prove to be wrong, and we may spend our available financial resources much faster than we expect. Because we expect to continue to experience operating losses, our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to obtain necessary capital from outside sources, including obtaining additional capital from the sale of our capital stock or other equity securities or assets, obtaining additional loans from financial institutions or investors, and entering into collaborative research and development arrangements or licensing some or all of our patents and know-how to third parties while retaining a royalty and other contingent payment rights related to the development and commercialization of products covered by the licenses. Our continued operating losses and the risks associated with the development of our product candidates and technologies have increased the difficulty in obtaining such capital, and there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain such capital on favorable terms or at all. Furthermore, geopolitical instability, including the ongoing military conflicts between the United States and Iran, Russia and Ukraine, and Israel and Hamas, as well as the impact of inflationary pressures and resulting rise in interest rates, on global financial markets could make the terms of any available financing less attractive to us and more dilutive to our existing stockholders. If we are unable to raise additional capital, we will have to delay, curtail, or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs or ultimately not be able to continue as a going concern. Additionally, raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders.

We have never generated revenue from product sales and may never become profitable.

Our ability to generate product sales and achieve profitability depends on our ability, alone or with collaborative partners, to successfully complete the development of, and obtain the regulatory approvals necessary to commercialize, our current and future product candidates. We do not anticipate generating product sales for the next several years, if ever.

Our product candidates will require additional clinical, manufacturing, and non-clinical development, regulatory approval, commercial manufacturing arrangements, establishment of a commercial organization, significant marketing efforts, and further investment before we generate any product sales. We cannot guarantee that we will meet our timelines for our development programs, which may be delayed or not completed for a number of reasons. Our ability to generate future revenues from product sales depends heavily on our, or our collaborators’, ability to successfully:

Table of Contents

● address competing technological and market developments;

● implement internal systems and infrastructure, as needed;

● attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel.

Even if one or more of our current and future product candidates are approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with commercializing any approved product candidate. Our expenses could increase beyond our expectations if we are required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities to perform clinical and other studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates that we develop beyond those that we currently expect, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive, or if there are safety concerns, we may be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates, not obtain marketing approval at all, or obtain more limited approvals. Even if we are able to generate revenues from the sale of any approved product candidates, we may not become profitable and may need to obtain additional funding to continue operations.

Risks Related to the Development of Our Products

Our product candidates are at an early stage of development and may not be successfully developed or commercialized.

Some of our current product candidates are in preclinical development and will require substantial further capital expenditures, development, testing, and regulatory approval prior to commercialization. We have limited experience designing clinical trials and have not yet filed or supported a marketing application. We may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial that ultimately supports marketing approval.

The time required to obtain approval from the FDA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of regulatory authorities. The outcome of studies is also inherently uncertain. Of the large number of drugs in development, only a small percentage successfully complete the regulatory approval process and are commercialized. The results of nonclinical studies, interim or top line studies, and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later stage clinical trials. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety, purity, and potency traits despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and initial clinical trials. Nonclinical and early clinical studies may also reveal unfavorable product candidate characteristics, including safety concerns. A number of companies have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. In some instances, there can be significant variability in results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the clinical trial protocols, and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants.

Table of Contents

Accordingly, even if we are able to obtain the requisite financing to fund our development programs, we cannot assure you that our product candidates will be successfully developed or commercialized. Our failure to develop, manufacture or receive regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize any of, our product candidates could result in the failure of our business and a loss of all of our stockholders’ investment.

Our product candidates may fail at any stage of preclinical or clinical development, and may also reveal unfavorable product candidate characteristics, including safety concerns or the failure to demonstrate efficacy in initial clinical trials. Further, our product candidates may not receive regulatory approval even if they are successful in clinical trials. Although we anticipate completing the preclinical development, including toxicology testing and clinical supply manufacturing development, necessary to file an investigational new drug application (“IND”) for SER 252 and additional INDs for other product candidates in the future, we may experience numerous unforeseen events before, during, or as a result of clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to commence or complete development, commence or complete clinical trials, receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:

Table of Contents

Furthermore, we expect to rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and, while we expect to enter into agreements governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance.

A clinical trial may be suspended or terminated by us, our partners, the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug or therapeutic biologic, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of any of our potential future product candidates, the commercial prospects of such product candidate will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenue from such product candidates will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow our product development and approval process, and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenue, and we may not have the financial resources to continue development of the product candidate that is affected or any of our other product candidates. We may also lose, or be unable to enter into, collaborative arrangements for the affected product candidate and for other product candidates that we are developing. Any of these occurrences may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our potential future product candidates.

Preliminary results from our nonclinical studies and clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data becomes available and as the data undergoes audit and verification procedures.

From time to time, we may publish interim, topline, or preliminary results from our nonclinical studies and clinical trials. Preliminary and interim results from our clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of final results and are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary, interim, and topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data previously published. As a result, preliminary, interim, and topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes in the final data compared to the preliminary, interim, or topline data could significantly harm our business prospects.

Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approval or commercialization of the particular product candidate or therapeutic product, if any, and us in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular nonclinical study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular therapeutic product, if any, product candidate or our business. If the preliminary, interim, and topline data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects, or financial condition.

The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our regulatory plans, and we may fail to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates.

The FDA standard for approval of a drug or biologic generally requires two adequate, well-controlled clinical trials, each convincingly demonstrating the product candidate’s safety and effectiveness, or one large and robust, well-controlled trial providing substantial evidence that the product candidate is safe and effective for proposed indication. Phase III clinical trials typically involve hundreds of patients, have significant costs and take years to complete. Product candidates studied

Table of Contents

for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments may be eligible for accelerated approval and may be approved on the basis of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials establishing that the product candidate has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality (“IMM”), that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of accelerated approval, the FDA usually requires a sponsor of a drug or biologic receiving accelerated approval to perform post-marketing studies to verify and describe the predicted effect on IMM or other clinical endpoint, and the drug or biologic may be subject to withdrawal procedures by the FDA that are more accelerated than those available for regular approvals.

Our clinical trial results may not support either accelerated or regular approval. The results of nonclinical studies and clinical trials may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials, and product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and initial clinical trials. In addition, our product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including the following:

Failure to obtain regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates would significantly harm our business, results of operations, and prospects.

Failure of our technology would significantly harm our business, results of operations, and prospects.

We may not be successful in our efforts to use and expand our discovery engine to build a pipeline of product candidates.

Table of Contents

A key element of our strategy is to use and expand our POZ Platform drug delivery technology to build a pipeline of product candidates and progress these product candidates through preclinical and clinical development for the treatment of various diseases. Although our research efforts to date suggest that the POZ Platform technology can deliver payloads including small molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids, this hypothesis may prove incorrect, or we may not be able to identify a product candidate that is safe or effective as a treatment for various diseases. Further, the scientific evidence to support the feasibility of developing viable product candidates based on our platform has not been established.

Even if we are successful in building our pipeline of product candidates, the potential product candidates that we identify may not be suitable for clinical development or generate acceptable clinical data, including as a result of being shown to have unacceptable toxicity or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be products that will receive marketing approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities or achieve market acceptance. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development involves significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval, and become commercially viable. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to successfully advance any of these additional product candidates through the development process. Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development or commercialization for many reasons, including the following:

● our product candidates may not succeed in nonclinical or clinical testing;

If any of these events occur, we may be forced to abandon our development efforts for a program or programs, or we may not be able to identify, discover, develop, or commercialize additional product candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and could potentially cause it to cease operations. Even if we receive FDA approval to market additional product candidates, we cannot assure you that any such product candidates will be successfully commercialized, widely accepted in the marketplace or more effective than other commercially available alternatives.

We may seek designations under FDA programs designed to facilitate and potentially expedite product candidate development, such as fast track or breakthrough therapy designation. Our product candidates may not receive any such designations or if they do receive such designations they may not lead to faster development or regulatory review or approval and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.

We may seek designations under the FDA’s expedited programs for serious conditions, such as fast track or breakthrough therapy designation, which are intended to facilitate and expedite the development or regulatory review or approval process for product candidates.

Table of Contents

The granting of fast track or breakthrough therapy designation to an investigational product is entirely within the FDA’s discretion. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the criteria for a designation, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to grant such designation. In any event, the receipt of a fast track or breakthrough therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to product candidates considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate marketing approval by the FDA. In addition, the FDA may later decide that the product candidate no longer meets the designation conditions, in which case any granted designations may be revoked, or the agency may decide that the time period for review or approval of the product candidate will not be shortened.

If we are unable to obtain approval via the accelerated approval pathway, we may be required to conduct additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials. Even if we receive accelerated approval from the FDA, the FDA may seek to withdraw accelerated approval.

We may seek an accelerated approval development pathway for our product candidates.

If we choose to pursue accelerated approval, we intend to seek feedback from the FDA or will otherwise evaluate our ability to seek and receive such accelerated approval. After our evaluation of the feedback from the FDA or other factors, we may decide not to pursue or submit an NDA for accelerated approval or any other form of expedited development, review, or approval. Furthermore, if we submit an application for accelerated approval, there can be no assurance that such application will be accepted or that approval will be granted on a timely basis, or at all. The FDA also could require us to conduct further studies or trials prior to considering our application or granting approval of any type and may require it to have a confirmatory trial to verify the clinical benefit of the product underway and partially or fully enrolled before granting approval. We might not be able to fulfill the FDA’s requirements in a timely manner, which would cause delays, or approval might not be granted because our submission is deemed incomplete by the FDA.

Even if we receive accelerated approval from the FDA, we will be subject to rigorous post marketing requirements, including the completion of confirmatory post market clinical trials, submission to the FDA of periodic progress reports on confirmatory trials, and submission to the FDA of all promotional materials prior to their dissemination. The FDA could seek to withdraw accelerated approval for multiple reasons, including if we fail to conduct any required post market study with due diligence; a post market study does not confirm the predicted clinical benefit; other evidence shows that the product is not safe or effective under the conditions of use; or if we disseminate promotional materials that are found by the FDA to be false and misleading. Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2023 (the “CAA”), the FDA may use expedited procedures to withdraw any product for which we receive accelerated approval if our confirmatory trials fail to verify the purported clinical benefits.

A failure to obtain accelerated approval or any other form of expedited development, review or approval for a product candidate that we may choose to develop would delay our commercialization of such product candidate, could increase the cost of development of such product candidate and could harm our competitive position in the marketplace.

If we apply for orphan drug designation from the FDA, there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain this designation, receive this designation for any of our other product candidates, or receive or maintain any corresponding benefits, including periods of exclusivity.

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug or biologic intended to treat a rare disease or condition, defined as a disease or condition with a patient population of fewer than 200,000 in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States when there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available the drug or biologic in the United States will be recovered from sales in the United States for that drug or biologic. Orphan drug designation (“ODD”) must be requested before submitting an NDA. In the United States, ODD entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages, and user fee waivers. After the FDA grants ODD, the generic identity of the drug and our potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. ODD does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process.

If a product that has ODD subsequently receives the first FDA approval for a particular active ingredient for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not

Table of Contents

approve any other applications, including an NDA, to market the same drug for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity or if FDA finds that the holder of the orphan drug exclusivity has not shown that it can assure the availability of sufficient quantities of the orphan drug to meet the needs of patients with the disease or condition for which the drug was designated. As a result, even if one of our drug candidates receives orphan exclusivity, the FDA can still approve other drugs that have a different active ingredient for use in treating the same indication or disease. Furthermore, the FDA can waive orphan exclusivity if we are unable to manufacture sufficient supply of our product.

We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus on research programs and product candidates that we identify for specific indications. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing, or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate.

If we encounter difficulties enrolling patients in our clinical trials, our clinical development activities could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected.

We may experience difficulties in patient enrollment in our clinical trials for a variety of reasons. The timely completion of clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of subjects who remain in the trial until its conclusion. We may not be able to initiate or continue conducting clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible subjects to participate in these trials. The enrollment of patients depends on many factors, including:

● the size and nature of the patient population;

Table of Contents

● our ability to obtain and maintain subject informed consents; and

In addition, our clinical trials will compete with other clinical trials for product candidates that are in the same therapeutic areas as our product candidates, and this competition will reduce the number and types of patients available to us, because some patients who might have opted to enroll in our trials may instead opt to enroll in a trial being conducted by one of our competitors. Because the number of qualified clinical investigators is limited, we may conduct some of our clinical trials at the same clinical trial sites that some of our competitors use, which will reduce the number of patients who are available for our clinical trials at such clinical trial sites. Moreover, because our product candidates represent a departure from more commonly used methods for disease treatment, potential patients and their doctors may be inclined to use conventional therapies, rather than enroll patients in any future clinical trial.

Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of subjects for our clinical trials would result in significant delays and could require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Moreover, a significant number of withdrawn subjects would compromise the quality of our data. Enrollment delays in our clinical trials may result in increased development costs for our product candidates, or the inability to complete development of our product candidates, which could cause the value of our company to decline, limit our ability to obtain additional financing, and materially impair our ability to generate revenues.

Any product candidate we advance into clinical trials may cause unacceptable adverse events or have other properties that may delay or prevent our regulatory approval or commercialization or limit our commercial potential.

As with most new drugs, use of our product candidates could be associated with side effects or adverse events, which can vary in severity from minor reactions to death and in frequency from infrequent to prevalent. Undesirable side effects caused by any potential future product candidate could cause regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. We have not yet completed all clinical trial phases for any of our current product candidates, and it is possible that there will be side effects associated with their use. Results of our clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of these side effects. In such an event, our trials could be suspended or terminated, and the FDA or other regulatory authorities could order it to cease further development of, or deny approval of, a product candidate for any or all targeted indications. Such side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition and impair our ability to generate revenues.

Further, clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population. With a limited number of patients and limited duration of exposure, rare and severe side effects of a product candidate may only be uncovered when a significantly larger number of patients are exposed to the product candidate or when patients are exposed for a longer period of time.

If one or more of our product candidates receives marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such products, including during any long term follow up observation period recommended or required for

Table of Contents

patients who receive treatment using our products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

● regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit their approvals of such products;

● our reputation may suffer.

In addition, adverse side effects caused by any therapeutics that may be similar in nature to our product candidates could delay or prevent regulatory approval of our product candidates, limit the commercial profile of an approved label for our product candidates, or result in significant negative consequences for our product candidates following marketing approval.

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidates and could substantially increase the costs of commercializing our product candidates, if approved, and significantly impact our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and generate revenues.

We may form or seek strategic partnerships or enter into additional licensing arrangements in the future, and we may not realize the benefits of such alliances or licensing arrangements.

From time to time, we may form or seek strategic partnerships or collaborations or enter into additional licensing arrangements with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our development and commercialization efforts with respect to our product candidates and any future product candidates that we may develop. Any such relationships may require us to incur non-recurring and other charges, increase our near and long term expenditures, issue securities that dilute our existing stockholders or disrupt our management and business. These relationships also may result in a delay in the development of our product candidates if we become dependent upon the other party and such other party does not prioritize the development of our product candidates relative to our other development activities. Additionally, any collaborations or licensing arrangements would be subject to the same product candidate development and compliance risks and obligations as we would be if we were to develop the product candidate on our own. Should any third party with which we enter into any of these arrangements not comply with the applicable regulatory requirements, we or they may be subject to regulatory enforcement action and we or they may be delayed or prevented from obtaining marketing approval for the applicable product candidate.

In addition, we face significant competition in seeking appropriate strategic partners and the negotiation process is time consuming and complex. Moreover, we may not be successful in our efforts to establish a strategic partnership or other alternative arrangement for our product candidates because they may be deemed to be at too early of a stage of development for collaborative effort, and third parties may not view our product candidates as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy. If we license products, we may not be able to realize the benefit of such transactions if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. Any licensed products may also subject us to the risk of regulatory enforcement should the product or business not be compliant with applicable

Table of Contents

regulatory requirements. We cannot be certain that, following a strategic transaction or licensing arrangement, we will achieve the revenue or specific net income that justifies such a transaction.

We rely on contract manufacturing organizations to manufacture our nonclinical and clinical pharmaceutical supplies and expect to continue to rely on CMOs to produce commercial supplies of any approved product candidate, and our dependence on CMOs could adversely impact our business.

We rely on contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) for the manufacture of nonclinical and clinical supplies for our product candidates and plans to continue to do so for commercial supplies should we receive marketing approval for any of our product candidates. This reliance also results in our reduced control over the manufacture of our product candidates and the protection of our trade secrets and know-how from misappropriation or inadvertent disclosure, which may adversely affect our future business prospects. Nevertheless, as the developer of the product candidates and sponsor of clinical trials involving such product candidates, we continue to have regulatory obligations to maintain oversight of the CMOs to ensure compliance with, among other things, contractual obligations, specifications, and the current good manufacturing regulations enforced by the FDA (“cGMP”).

In complying with the manufacturing regulations of the FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities, we and our third-party suppliers must spend significant time, money, and effort in the areas of design and development, testing, production, record keeping and quality control to assure that the products meet applicable specifications and other regulatory requirements. Although our agreements with our CMOs require them to perform according to certain cGMP such as those relating to quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel, we cannot control the conduct of our CMOs to implement and maintain these standards. If our CMOs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or manufacture our product candidates in accordance with regulatory requirements, if there are disagreements between us and such parties, or if such parties are unable to support the commercialization of any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval, we may not be able to produce, or may be delayed in producing sufficient product to meet our supply requirements. Any delays in obtaining adequate supplies on adequate terms with respect to our product candidates and components, due to manufacturing issues, global trade policies, or for other reasons, may delay the development, approval, or commercialization of our product candidates.

We may not succeed in our efforts to establish manufacturing relationships on commercially reasonable terms. Our product candidates may compete with other products and product candidates for access to manufacturing facilities, of which there are a limited number that operate under cGMP conditions and that are both capable of manufacturing our product candidates and willing to do so. Even if it does establish such collaborations or arrangements, our CMOs may breach, terminate, or not renew these agreements. These facilities may also be affected by a global pandemic, natural disasters such as floods, fires, explosions or such facilities could face manufacturing issues, such as contamination or adverse regulatory findings following a regulatory inspection. Further, our CMOs may be temporarily unable to manufacture our product candidates due to government restrictions, requirements, or limitations. If our CMOs cease to manufacture our product candidates for any reason, we would experience delays in obtaining sufficient quantities of our product for us to meet commercial demand if we receive marketing approval or in advancing our development programs while we identify and qualify replacement suppliers. We could also incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacements and transferring any necessary technology and processes. The terms of a new arrangement may also be less favorable than any prior arrangements if we are able to negotiate a new arrangement at all. The addition of a new or alternative CMO may also require FDA approval and may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We or our CMOs may also encounter shortages in the raw materials or substances necessary to produce our product candidates in the quantities and at the quality needed for our nonclinical studies and clinical trials or, if any of our product candidates are approved for commercialization, to produce our products on a commercial scale, meet an increase in demand, or compete effectively. Such shortages may occur for a variety of reasons, including capacity constraints, delays or disruptions in the market, and shortages caused by the purchase of such materials by our competitors or others. Our or our third-party manufacturers’ failure to obtain the raw materials or substances necessary to manufacture sufficient quantities of our product candidates may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Moreover, any problems or delays we experience in preparing for commercial scale manufacturing of a product candidate or component, including manufacturing validation, may result in a delay in a future marketing approval, if any, or commercial launch of any of our product candidates, should they receive regulatory approval, or may impair our ability to manufacture commercial quantities or manufacture such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could result in the delay, prevention, or impairment of commercialization of our product candidates, if approved, and could adversely affect our

Table of Contents

business. Furthermore, if the future manufacturers of the commercial supplies of our products, if approved, fail to deliver the required commercial quantities of our product candidates on a timely basis and at commercially reasonable prices, we would likely be unable to meet demand for our products and we could lose potential revenues. The manufacture of drugs requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. Manufacturers of drugs often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling up initial production. These problems include difficulties with production costs and yields, quality control, including stability of the product candidate and quality assurance testing, shortages of qualified personnel, and compliance with strictly enforced federal, state, and foreign regulations. If our manufacturers were to encounter any of these difficulties and were unable to perform as agreed, our ability to provide our product candidates for use in nonclinical studies or our current and planned clinical trials, or, if any of our product candidates are approved, our ability to produce our product for commercial use, could be jeopardized.

In addition, all manufacturers of our product candidates used in clinical trials and of our products for commercial supply, should any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval, must comply with cGMP regulations promulgated by the FDA and equivalent foreign regulatory authorities that are applicable to both finished products and their active components used both for clinical and commercial supply. Regulatory authorities enforce these requirements through facility inspections. CMO facilities must be satisfactory to the FDA and equivalent foreign regulatory authorities as determined by inspections that will be conducted after we submit our marketing applications to the appropriate agencies and prior to product approval and commercialization. Our CMOs will also be subject to continuing, periodic regulatory authority inspections should our product candidates receive marketing approval. Further, we, in cooperation with our CMOs, must supply all necessary chemistry, manufacturing, and control documentation to the FDA and equivalent foreign regulatory authorities in support of a marketing application on a timely basis.

The cGMP include quality control, quality assurance, and the maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturers of our product candidates may be unable to comply with our specifications, cGMP or with other applicable regulatory requirements. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of adventitious agents or other contaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of a product candidate that may not be detectable in final product testing. If our CMOs cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the applicable regulatory requirements, they may not be able to secure or maintain regulatory acceptance of their manufacturing facilities for the purpose of producing our product candidates.

Deviations from manufacturing requirements may also require reporting and remedial measures that may be costly and/or time consuming for us or a third party to implement and that may include the temporary or permanent suspension of a clinical trial or commercial sales, if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval, or the temporary or permanent closure of a facility. Any such remedial measure could materially harm our business. Any delay in obtaining products or product candidates that comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may result in delays to nonclinical studies and clinical trials, or potential product approvals or commercialization. Any such delay may also require that we conduct additional studies.

SER US Equity

SER · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

SER US Equity☆

SER · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

SER US Equity