UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-36829
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
9 Cedarbrook Drive Cranbury, NJ 08512
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(609) 659-8001
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value RCKT NASDAQ Global Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes ☐No☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check
mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that
required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2022 (the last business day of
the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $644.3 million, based upon the closing price on the
NASDAQ Global Market reported for such date.
As of February 22, 2023, there were 79,347,760
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference information (to the extent specific sections are referred to
herein) from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”). The Proxy Statement will be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end
of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
PART I. Page
Item 1. Business 5
Item 1A. Risk Factors 32
Item 1B. Unresolved SEC Comments 62
Item 2. Properties 62
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 63
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 63
PART II.
Item 6. Reserved 64
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 73
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 73
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 73
Item 9B. Other Information 74
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 74
Item 11. Executive Compensation 74
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 75
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 75
Signatures 79
2
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove
incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words
such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “design,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “pursue,” “seek,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,”
“will,” “would,” or the negative of these words or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
• our estimates regarding our capital requirements; and
We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report.
Any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report reflect our current views with respect to future events or to our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual
results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future.
This Annual Report also contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business, and the markets for certain diseases, including data regarding the estimated size of those
markets, and the incidence and prevalence of certain medical conditions. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events, or
circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances reflected in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar
data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. Unless stated otherwise, references in this Annual Report to “us,” “we,” “our,” or our “Company”
and similar terms refer to Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3
Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF THE MATERIAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that you should be aware of in evaluating our business. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
4
Table of Contents
The summary risk factors described above should be read together with the text of the full risk factors below and in the other information set forth in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes, as well as in other documents that we file with the SEC. If any such risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and
adversely affected. The risks summarized above or described in full elsewhere in this Annual Report are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial
may also materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
We are a clinical-stage, multi-platform biotechnology company focused on the development of first, only and best-in-class gene therapies, with direct on-target mechanism of action and clear clinical endpoints,
for rare and devastating diseases. We have three clinical-stage ex vivo lentiviral vector (“LV”) programs. These include programs for Fanconi Anemia (“FA”), a genetic defect in the bone marrow that reduces production of blood cells or promotes
the production of faulty blood cells, Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (“LAD-I”), a genetic disorder that causes the immune system to malfunction and Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (“PKD”), a rare red blood cell autosomal recessive disorder that
results in chronic non-spherocytic hemolytic anemia. Of these, both the Phase 2 FA program and the Phase 1⁄2 LAD-I program are in potentially registration-enabling studies in the United States (“U.S.”) and Europe (“EU”). Additional work on a gene
therapy program for the less common FA subtypes C and G is ongoing. In the U.S., we also have a clinical stage in vivo adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) program for Danon disease, a multi-organ lysosomal-associated disorder leading to early death
due to heart failure. The Danon program is currently in an ongoing Phase 1 trial. Additionally, we have an AAV vector program targeting Plakophilin-2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (“PKP2-ACM”), an inheritable cardiac disorder that is
characterized by a progressive loss of cardiac muscle mass, severe right ventricular dilation, dysplasia, fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium and a high propensity to arrhythmias and sudden death. As a result of our acquisition of
Renovacor, Inc. (“Renovacor”), we are now able to utilize recombinant AAV9-based gene therapy designed to slow or halt progression of BAG3 Dilated Cardiomyopathy (“DCM”), which is the most common form of cardiomyopathy and is characterized by
progressive thinning of the walls of the heart resulting in enlarged heart chambers that are unable to pump blood. We have global commercialization and development rights to all of these product candidates under royalty-bearing license
agreements.
Effective December 2021, a decision was made to no longer pursue Rocket-sponsored clinical evaluation of RP-L401; this program was returned to academic innovators. Although we believe that gene therapy may be
beneficial to patients afflicted with this disorder, we have opted to focus available resources towards advancement of RP-A601, RP-A501, RP-L102, RP-L201, RP-L301, and BAG3-DCM based on the compelling clinical data to date and potential for
therapeutic advancement in these severe disorders of childhood and young adulthood.
Gene Therapy Overview
Genes are composed of sequences of deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”), which provide the code for proteins that perform a broad range of physiologic functions in all living organisms. Although genes are passed on
from generation to generation, genetic changes, also known as mutations, can occur in this process. These changes can result in the lack of production of proteins or the production of altered proteins with reduced or abnormal function, which
can in turn result in disease.
Gene therapy is a therapeutic approach in which an isolated gene sequence or segment of DNA is administered to a patient, most commonly for the purpose of treating a genetic disease that is caused by genetic
mutations. Currently available therapies for many genetic diseases focus on administration of large proteins or enzymes and typically address only the symptoms of the disease. Gene therapy aims to address the disease-causing effects of absent
or dysfunctional genes by delivering functional copies of the gene sequence directly into the patient’s cells, offering the potential for curing the genetic disease, rather than simply addressing symptoms.
We are using modified non-pathogenic viruses for the development of our gene therapy treatments. Viruses are particularly well suited as delivery vehicles because they are adept at penetrating cells and
delivering genetic material inside a cell. In creating our viral delivery vehicles, the viral (pathogenic) genes are removed and are replaced with a functional form of the missing or mutant gene that is the cause of the patient’s genetic
disease. The functional form of a missing or mutant gene is called a therapeutic gene, or the “transgene.” The process of inserting the transgene is called “transduction.” Once a virus is modified by replacement of the viral genes with a
transgene, the modified virus is called a “viral vector.” The viral vector delivers the transgene into the targeted tissue or organ (such as the cells inside a patient’s bone marrow). We have two types of viral vectors in development, LV and
AAV. We believe that our LV and AAV-based programs have the potential to offer a significant therapeutic benefit to patients that is durable (long-lasting).
The gene therapies can be delivered either (1) ex vivo (outside the body), in which case the patient’s cells are extracted and the vector is delivered to these cells in
a controlled, safe laboratory setting, with the modified cells then being reinserted into the patient, or (2) in vivo (inside the body), in which case the vector is injected directly into the patient,
either intravenously (“IV”) or directly into a specific tissue at a targeted site, with the aim of the vector delivering the transgene to the targeted cells.
5
Table of Contents
We believe that scientific advances, clinical progress, and the greater regulatory acceptance of gene therapy have created a promising environment to advance gene therapy products as these products are being
designed to restore cell function and improve clinical outcomes, which in many cases include prevention of death at an early age. The FDA approval of several gene therapies in recent years indicates that there is a regulatory pathway forward
for gene therapy products.
Essential Terminology
Set forth below is an abbreviated index of certain key terms and optimal ranges of values used in the discussion of LV and AAV gene therapies.
Term Definition Optimal Ranges
LV Therapy (hematopoietic disorders)
AAV Therapy
Pipeline Overview
The chart below shows the current phases of development of Rocket’s programs and product candidates:
Cardiovascular Programs
Danon Disease
Danon disease (“DD”) is a multi-organ lysosomal-associated disorder leading to early death due to heart failure. DD is caused by mutations in the gene encoding lysosome-associated membrane
protein 2 (“LAMP-2”), a mediator of autophagy. This mutation results in the accumulation of autophagic vacuoles, predominantly in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Male patients often require heart transplantation and typically die in their teens or
twenties from progressive heart failure. Along with severe cardiomyopathy, other DD-related manifestations can include skeletal muscle weakness and intellectual impairment. There are no specific therapies available for the treatment of DD and
medications typically utilized for the treatment of congestive heart failure (“CHF”) are not believed to modify progression to end-stage CHF. Patients with end-stage CHF may undergo heart transplant, which currently is available to a minority
of patients, is associated with significant short- and long-term complications and is not curative of the disorder in the long-term. RP-A501 is in clinical trials as an in vivo therapy for DD, which is
estimated to have a prevalence of 15,000 to 30,000 patients in the U.S. and the EU.
6
Table of Contents
DD is an X-linked dominant, monogenic rare inherited disorder characterized by progressive cardiomyopathy which is almost universally fatal in males even in settings where cardiac transplantation
is available. DD predominantly affects males early in life and is characterized by absence of LAMP2B expression in the heart and other tissues. Preclinical models of DD have demonstrated that
AAV-mediated transduction of the heart results in reconstitution of LAMP2B expression and improvement in cardiac function.
We currently have one adeno-associated viral vector program targeting DD, RP-A501. We have treated seven patients in the RP-A501 Phase 1 clinical trial, which enrolled adult/older adolescent and
pediatric male DD patients. This includes a first cohort evaluating a low-dose (6.7e13 genome copies (gc)/kilogram (kg)) in adult/older adolescent patients aged 15 or greater (n=3), a second cohort evaluating a higher dose (1.1e14 gc/kg) in
adult/older adolescent patients aged 15 or greater (n=2), and a pediatric cohort at a low dose level (6.7e13 gc/kg; n=2). As previously disclosed, a patient receiving therapy on the high dose cohort (1.1e14 gc/kg dose) had progressive heart
failure and underwent a heart transplant at month five following therapy. This patient had more advanced disease than the four other adult/older adolescent patients who received treatment in the low and high dose cohorts, as evidenced by
diminished baseline left ventricle (“LV”) ejection fraction (35%) on echocardiogram and markedly elevated LV filling pressure prior to treatment. The patient’s clinical course was characteristic of DD progression. The patient is doing well
post-transplant.
Based on the initial efficacy observed in the low dose cohort and to mitigate complement-mediated safety concerns observed in the high dose cohort (thrombotic microangiopathy (“TMA”)) and in
agreement with the FDA, we are focusing on the low dose (6.7e13 gc/kg) and we will no longer administer doses of 1.1e14 gc/kg or higher in this trial. Additional safety measures have been implemented and are reflected in the updated trial
protocol. These measures include exclusion of patients with end-stage heart failure, and a refined immunomodulatory regimen involving transient B- and T-cell mediated inhibition, with emphasis on preventing complement activation, while also
enabling lower steroid doses and earlier steroid taper, with all immunosuppressive therapy discontinued 2-3 months following administration of RP-A501.
We are conducting a variety of efficacy assessments in the Phase I clinical study to measure the prospect of benefit for patients. These assessments include the following:
In May 2022 at the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (“ASGCT”) we disclosed
data from our Phase I study that included safety and efficacy updates from the three patients treated with the low dose of 6.7e13 gc/kg and from two patients treated with the higher dose of 1.1e14 gc/kg, and initial safety information from the
two pediatric patients (pediatric cohort is age 8-14 years) treated with the low dose of 6.7e13 gc/kg.
7
Table of Contents
We reported that RP-A501 continued to be well-tolerated at 12-24 months post treatment in both the high and low-dose adult/older adolescent cohorts (age ≥15 years). As previously presented, there
were no drug product related SAEs observed in the low dose (6.3e13 gc/kg) adult/older adolescent cohort. The most common adverse events were predominantly mild, not associated with clinical symptoms and were related to elevated transaminases
post-treatment. Elevation in transaminases and creatinine kinases was observed in all three low-dose adult/older adolescent cohort patients and returned to baseline levels within the first one to two months post-treatment. There was also a
transient and reversible decline in platelets observed in two of three of these patients. These changes were responsive to corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapies. Two patients in the low dose cohort and one patient in the high
dose cohort experienced skeletal myopathy related to corticosteroid administration, which resolved with steroid taper. As disclosed in 2020, one patient in the high dose cohort (the same patient who later went to cardiac transplant as described
above) experienced a non-persistent, immune-related event that was classified as a drug product-related serious adverse event. This TMA event (which was later reclassified as a Sudden Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (“SUSAR”) was believed
to be likely due to immune-mediated complement activation, resulting in reversible thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury requiring eculizumab and transient hemodialysis. This patient received the highest absolute dose secondary to high
baseline weight and the higher (1.1e14 gc/kg) dose level. The TMA resolved fully with supportive therapy and the patient regained normal kidney function within three weeks. The patient’s progression to heart transplant is not associated with
this event, but instead due to advanced DD at the time of treatment. Across the adult/older adolescent patients, no additional SAEs were observed following the first 2-4 months from treatment and all treatment-related adverse events were
reversible with no lasting renal, hepatic or other sequelae. Initial safety assessment of the two pediatric patients showed normal-range platelets, diminished complement activation relative to the adult/older adolescent cohorts, and no
complement-related adverse events. Corticosteroid taper commenced at day 10 following therapy for both pediatric patients and there was no significant worsening of the patients’ baseline DD-related skeletal myopathy during the weeks following
RP-A501. Of note, transaminases and parameters of liver inflammation (including blood levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase, bilirubin and coagulation parameters) were not significantly increased during the weeks following therapy.
All 4 adult/older adolescent (age ≥15 years) patients with observed immunomodulatory regimen compliance and preserved (>40%) left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline demonstrated
disease modification across molecular, echocardiographic, and functional parameters. These patients demonstrated evidence of sustained cardiac LAMP2B expression by immunohistochemistry and reduced levels of autophagic vacuoles on histologic
evaluation. Echocardiograms showed stabilized or decreased cardiac wall thickness with improved or stabilized ejection fraction in these patients. Patients in the adult/older adolescent cohorts demonstrated sustained improvement or
stabilization in BNP and NYHA class, 6-minute walk test and reported increases in physical activity.
In September 2022, we presented interim data for the ongoing Phase 1 trial of RP-A501 at the Heart Failure Society of America (“HFSA”) meeting, including updated safety and initial efficacy parameters for the
pediatric cohort and longer-term efficacy parameters for the low and high dose adult/older adolescent cohort (patients aged 15 and older; n=5) (data cut-off September 27, 2022). This data was also presented in November 2022 at the 75th American Heart Association (“AHA”) Annual Meeting. During these presentations we provided incremental safety updates across cohorts. As previously outlined, RP-A501 was generally well tolerated at the 6.7e13 gc/kg dose level and no unexpected and serious drug product-related adverse events or severe adverse events were observed in both adult/older adolescent
and pediatric low dose cohorts. All observed adverse effects at both doses were reversible and no lasting sequelae were observed with follow-up of 2-3 years from treatment for the adult/older adolescent cohort and 6-11 months for the
pediatric cohort. Any early transaminase and creatinine kinase elevations returned to baseline or decreased, and any transient exacerbation of DD-associated skeletal myopathy resolved upon discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. The
updated safety data presented at HFSA in September 2022 and AHA in November 2022 reconfirmed that RP-A501 was generally well tolerated at the low dose with a manageable safety profile across pediatric and adult/older adolescent cohorts.
In the pediatric cohort, an improvement in NYHA Class (from Class II to I) was reported in both patients after 6 and 9 months of follow-up post-RP-A501. In the adult/older adolescent cohorts, improvement in NYHA
Class (from II to I) was observed in three patients (two low-dose and one high-dose) who had closely monitored immunomodulation and stabilization of NYHA Class was observed in one low-dose adult patient without a closely monitored
immunomodulatory regimen. Substantial improvements (reductions) in BNP, a key marker of heart failure, were observed in both pediatric patients at 6 and 9 months of follow-up, with levels at these assessments less than 50% of baseline values.
Improvements (reductions) in hsTnI, a key marker of myocardial injury, were observed in both pediatric patients at 6 and 9 months of follow-up, with levels at these assessments less than 20% of baseline values. In the adult/older adolescent
cohorts, reductions in hsTnI were observed in three low-dose patients and one high-dose patient, with reductions greater than 50% of baseline levels identified in these four patients on at least one assessment, and reductions sustained through
24-36 months of follow-up. Reductions in BNP of at least 25% below baseline values were identified in three low-dose patients and one high-dose patient on at least one assessment. In two of the adult/older adolescent patients, BNP levels were
modestly above baseline at the most recent assessment; however baseline BNP levels were either within normal limits or mildly elevated for these two patients. In adult/older adolescent cohort patients with closely monitored immunomodulation
(two low-dose and one high-dose) left ventricular (LV) posterior wall thickness improved (approximately 15-25% decrease compared to pretreatment baseline) and reductions in left ventricular mass were identified in four patients, including the
patient in the low-dose cohort for whom immunomodulation was not closely monitored. Severe and progressive wall thickening is a hallmark of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy of Danon disease and is a major contributor to early mortality in male
patients. Evidence of sustained cardiac LAMP2B gene expression by immunohistochemistry with qualitative improvement of vacuoles and cardiac tissue architecture on standard H&E and electron microscopy was observed at both dose levels in four
of five patients in the adult/older adolescent cohorts and both patients in the pediatric cohort. Sustained cardiac LAMP2B gene expression by immunohistochemistry was observed in all three adult/older adolescent patients with a closely
monitored immunomodulatory regimen through 24 months of follow-up. Importantly, genetic correction (as evidenced by myocardial vector copy numbers (“VCNs”) and LAMP2 protein expression were accompanied by reductions in the relative area of
autophagic vacuoles relative to overall myocardial area, with decreases in this ratio of at least 20% relative to baseline identified in four adult/older adolescent cohort patients (three of whom had reductions of at least 50%). Substantial
reductions (>50% baseline) in vacuolar area were also identified in the one pediatric cohort patient for whom this parameter was evaluable at 6 months post-therapy. In addition to the improvements identified in NYHA Class, improvements in
quality of life (“QOL”) as reported via the KCCQ were noted in three of the adult/older adolescent patients who had closely monitored immunomodulation, and both of the pediatric cohort patients; KCCQ score at baseline was 50 for the initial
pediatric patient and was 93 at the most recent 9 month assessment; KCCQ score at baseline was 52 for the second pediatric patient and was 81 at a preliminary 3 month assessment.
8
Table of Contents
On December 22, 2022, we announced updates from our end-of-Phase 1 meeting with the FDA regarding RP-A501. During the meeting, we reviewed the positive Phase 1 dataset with the FDA and proposed a
study design and endpoints for ongoing clinical development of the investigational gene therapy. Following discussions with the FDA, we anticipate proceeding with a dose of 6.7e13 GC/kg, and we anticipate utilizing a single arm open-label trial
design with a robust natural history comparator, pursuant to the FDA’s acknowledgment of the challenges associated with executing a randomized controlled trial in Danon Disease. The FDA has also expressed an openness to considering a
biomarker-based composite endpoint supported by functional and quality-of-life assessments as measures of patient benefit. We look forward to continued dialogue with the FDA on the design for our proposed pivotal trial, including discussion of
appropriate external controls for the study and appropriate endpoints to support accelerated approval. We are now in discussion with the FDA about a trial design that will enable evaluation of two pediatric patients treated with drug product
manufactured at our in-house cGMP AAV facility as an initial component of a modestly sized global pivotal study.
On January 9, 2023, we presented additional positive efficacy updates from our Phase I study of RP-A501 during the 41st Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference. The data presented included several additional months of follow-up, which showed further improvements in key
biomarkers, echocardiographic and functional measures. A summary of these updates is provided in the table below. We also provided additional natural history comparator data, which showed the marked divergence of the course of Phase I
patients from that of untreated patients in terms of key biomarkers (BNP) and functional measures (NYHA Class). Furthermore, RP-A501 continued to be well tolerated at 2-3 years post treatment in both adult/older adolescent high and low-dose cohorts and at 8 to 13 months in the pediatric cohort. In the pediatric cohort, no significant immediate or delayed toxicities, significant skeletal myopathy, or late transaminase elevations
have been observed.
Improvement or Stabilization Observed Across Key Biomarker, Echo Findings and Functional Measures in Phase 1 RP-A501 study
Darker Green = improved; Lighter Green = minimal change (stabilization)
Does not include pt 1007 in Ph1 trial who had advanced HF with EF<40% at enrollment and received HTx 5M following tx due to pre-existing advanced HF. Patient is currently stable.
1Patient 1008 echocardiographic parameters are M9 visit (M12 pending).
2Patient 1002 NYHA class depicted for M30 visit (M36 pending).
3Patient 1005 KCCQ score depicted for M24 visit (M30 pending).
In addition to these clinical updates, we also provided updates on our in-house manufacturing activities. We have successfully produced 2 cGMP RP-A501 batches that have superior specifications to
Phase I material in both titer and full versus empty particles. We believe the improved quality of our in-house manufactured product will allow for full dosing with lower total viral particles, potentially further optimizing the safety profile
of RP-A501. Furthermore, we have agreement from the FDA on the continued utilization of HEK-293 cell-based process through commercialization as well as our comparability approach and potency assay.
Results from the ongoing Phase 1 Danon Disease trial represent one of the most comprehensive investigational gene therapy datasets for any cardiac condition. RP-A501 was generally well tolerated
with evidence of durable treatment activity and improvement of Danon Disease for both pediatric patients with up to nine months of follow-up and four adult/older adolescent patients with up to 36 months of follow-up. All adult/older adolescent
and pediatric patients who received a closely monitored immunomodulatory regimen showed improvements across tissue, laboratory, and imaging-based biomarkers, as well as in NYHA class (from II to I) and KCCQ scores with follow-up of six to 36
months.
9
Table of Contents
Anticipated Milestones
On February 7, 2023, we announced that RP-A501 received RMAT designation from the FDA. We are very encouraged by the highly collaborative ongoing dialogue with the FDA for RP-A501 in Danon
Disease and subject to the continued dialogue and agreement with the FDA anticipate initiating the initial component of the global study in Q2 of 2023.
Plakophilin-2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (PKP2-ACM)
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (“ACM”) is an inheritable cardiac disorder that is characterized by a high propensity for arrhythmias and sudden death, a progressive loss of cardiac muscle mass, severe right
ventricular dilation, dysplasia, and fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium. Most commonly, the cardiomyopathy initially manifests in the right ventricular free wall, so the disease was termed arrhythmogenic right ventricular
dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/ARVC). However, since left dominant and biventricular forms have also been observed, this has led more recently to the use of the term ACM. Mutations in the PKP2 gene comprise the most frequent genetically
identified etiology of familial ACM. PKP2 encodes for the protein Plakophilin-2, which is a component of the desmosome, an intercellular complex involved in cell-cell adhesion. PKP2 is also involved in transcriptional regulation of calcium
signaling between cardiomyocytes. Patients with mutations in PKP2 are typically heterozygous and demonstrate reduced expression of PKP2 in the myocardium. Mean presentation is at the age of 35, and patients have a very high lifetime risk of
ventricular arrhythmias, structural ventricular abnormalities, and sudden cardiac death (“SCD”).
There are no specific available medical therapies available that have been shown to be highly effective for ACM, and current treatment protocols follow standard ventricular arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy
guidelines, which involve lifestyle modifications (i.e. exercise limitation) and include drug treatments such as beta blockers, anti-arrhythmics and diuretics. The use of these therapies is driven by the arrhythmia burden and severity of
cardiomyopathy. These therapies do not modify the course of the disease, and generally provide only symptomatic and/or palliative support. Upon diagnosis, a substantial percentage of patients receive an implantable cardiac defibrillator
(“ICD”) for primary or secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias and SCD. Of note, ICDs are not curative, and breakthrough life-threatening arrythmias may persist with ongoing risk of death; ICDs furthermore do not prevent the
progression to end-stage heart failure. ICD firings, although lifesaving, are physically and emotionally traumatic events. Patients whose condition progresses to end-stage heart failure are considered for cardiac transplantation which, while
curative of underlying disease, is itself associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hence there exists a high unmet medical need in this population. PKP2-ACM is estimated to have a prevalence of 50,000 patients in the US and EU.
We currently have one adeno-associated viral vector program targeting PKP2-ACM, RP-A601, which is a recombinant AAVrh.74 vector expressing PKP2a. PKP2-ACM is typically caused by heterozygous pathogenic
mutations in the PKP2 gene resulting in reduced PKP2 expression in the myocardium. A once-administered gene therapy that addresses the root cause of the disease (PKP2 deficiency) early in the disease course, could mitigate the early
electrical remodeling and diminish the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and SCD associated with ACM, potentially impeding the development of irreversible cardiac structural changes. Prevention of syncopal episodes, life-threatening
arrythmias, SCD, ICD shocks and the resulting anxiety, discomfort and hospitalizations is anticipated to result in a vastly improved quality of life and survival benefit. Furthermore, such an approach could spare patients the need for
lifelong adherence to multiple arrhythmia and heart failure drugs that are nonspecific for PKP2-ACM and are associated with their own side effects, enabling patients an opportunity to live without exercise restrictions and with diminished
concern for arrhythmias, palpitations, ICD shocks and progression to end-stage heart failure.
In nonclinical studies conducted by the Sponsor, RP-A601 has demonstrated efficacy in altering the natural history of PKP2-driven ACM. PKP2 cKO animals treated with the study drug have exhibited extended
survival to the longest timepoint measured (5 months), reduced cardiac dilation and fibrofatty replacement / fibrosis of the myocardium, preserved LV function, and mitigation of the arrhythmic phenotype. Untreated PKP2 cKO mice had a median
survival of approximately one month.
Anticipated Milestones
We have achieved pre-clinical proof-of-concept for RP-A601 in an animal model representative of PKP2-ACM, completed pharmacology and GLP toxicology studies, produced GMP drug product, and developed an
appropriate potency assay to support a Phase I study. We anticipate filing an IND in Q2 of 2023.
BAG3 Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dilated cardiomyopathy (“DCM”) is the most common form of cardiomyopathy and is characterized by progressive thinning of the walls of the heart resulting in enlarged heart chambers that are unable to pump
blood. A familial association of DCM can be identified in 20-50% of DCM patients, with up to 40% of familial patients having an identifiable genetic cause. Mutations in the BAG3 gene (BCL-2-associated athanogene 3) are among the more common
pathogenic genetic variants observed in familial DCM and these variants are highly penetrant, with approximately 80% of individuals with disease-causing genetic variants in the BAG3gene developing DCM
at > 40 years of age. BAG3 protein is associated with a variety of cellular functions including cardiac contractility, protein quality control (as a co-chaperone), cardiomyocyte structural support and anti-apoptosis. BAG3 associated
dilated cardiomyopathy (BAG3-DCM) leads to early onset, rapidly progressing heart failure and significant mortality and morbidity. We estimate that the prevalence of BAG3-associated DCM in the United
States to be as many as 30,000 individuals.
10
Table of Contents
Currently, DCM patients with a BAG3mutation are treated with the standard of care for heart failure, which include angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin
receptor blockers, neprilysin inhibitors, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, or beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and/or diuretics, along with certain lifestyle changes, and do not address the underlying cause of disease. Patients who
meet specific parameters may also undergo placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, a cardiac resynchronization device or a combination of the two. There is no current therapy directly targeting the underlying mechanism of BAG3
associated DCM, and patients diagnosed with BAG3 associated DCM appear to progress to end-stage heart failure and death more rapidly than patients with DCM not associated with BAG3 variants. For example, approximately 19% of patients with BAG3
DCM require mechanical cardiac support, heart transplant, or have heart failure related death at 12 months after diagnosis, nearly twice the rate of similarly staged non-BAG3 DCM patients.
In December 2022 we completed our acquisition of Renovacor which provided Rocket with Renovacor’s most advanced program, a recombinant AAV9-based gene therapy designed to deliver a fully functional BAG3 gene
to augment BAG3 protein levels in cardiomyocytes and slow or halt progression of BAG3 DCM. Initial proof of concept for AAV9-BAG3 has been demonstrated in studies of BAG3-knockout mouse models, which show treated mice have improved ejection
fraction versus untreated knockout mice and comparable ejection fraction to walk test controls at timepoints 4- and 6-weeks post injection.
Anticipated Milestones
We are in the process of evaluating the optimal development pathway for this program and plan to submit an IND for BAG3-DCM in the first half of 2024.
Hematology Programs
Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group A (FANCA)
FA, a rare and life-threatening DNA-repair disorder, generally arises from a mutation in a single FA gene. An estimated 60 to 70% of cases arise from mutations in the Fanconi-A (“FANCA”) gene,
which is the focus of our program. FA results in bone marrow failure, developmental abnormalities, myeloid leukemia, and other malignancies, often during the early years and decades of life. Bone marrow aplasia, which is bone marrow that no
longer produces any or very few red and white blood cells and platelets leading to infections and bleeding, is the most frequent cause of early morbidity and mortality in FA, with a median onset before 10 years of age. Leukemia is the next most
common cause of mortality, ultimately occurring in about 20% of patients later in life. Solid organ malignancies, such as head and neck cancers, can also occur, although at lower rates during the first two to three decades of life.
Although improvements in allogeneic (donor-mediated) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (“HSCT”), currently the most frequently utilized therapy for FA, have resulted in more frequent hematologic
correction of the disorder, HSCT is associated with both acute and long-term risks, including transplant-related mortality, graft versus host disease (“GVHD”), a sometimes fatal side effect of allogeneic transplant characterized by painful
ulcers in the GI tract, liver toxicity and skin rashes, as well as increased risk of subsequent cancers. Our gene therapy program in FA is designed to enable a minimally toxic hematologic correction using a patient’s own stem cells during the
early years of life. We believe that the development of a broadly applicable autologous gene therapy can be transformative for these patients.
Each of our hematology programs utilize third-generation, self-inactivating lentiviral vectors to correct defects in patients’ HSCs, which are the cells found in bone marrow that are capable of
generating blood cells over a patient’s lifetime. Defects in the genetic coding of HSCs can result in severe, and potentially life-threatening anemia, which is when a patient’s blood lacks enough properly functioning red blood cells to carry
oxygen throughout the body. Stem cell defects can also result in severe and potentially life-threatening decreases in white blood cells resulting in susceptibility to infections, and in platelets responsible for blood clotting, which may result
in severe and potentially life-threatening bleeding episodes. Patients with FA have a genetic defect that prevents the normal repair of genes and chromosomes within blood cells in the bone marrow, which frequently results in the development of
acute myeloid leukemia (“AML”), a type of blood cancer, as well as bone marrow failure and congenital defects. The average lifespan of an FA patient is estimated to be 30 to 40 years. The prevalence of FA in the U.S. and EU is estimated to be
approximately 4,000 patients in total. In light of the efficacy seen in non-conditioned patients, the addressable annual market opportunity is now believed to be 400 to 500 patients collectively in the U.S. and EU.
11
Table of Contents
We currently have one ex-vivo LV-based program targeting FA, RP-L102. RP-L102 is our lead lentiviral vector-based program that we in-licensed from Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas,
Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (“CIEMAT”), which is a leading research institute in Madrid, Spain. RP-L102 is currently being studied in our Phase 2 registrational enabling clinical trials treating FA patients at the Center for Definitive and
Curative Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine (“Stanford”), the University of Minnesota, Great Ormond Street Hospital (“GOSH”) in London and Hospital Infantil de Nino Jesus (“HNJ”) in Spain. The trial has enrolled a total of ten
patients from the U.S. and EU. Two additional patients were treated in the US Phase 1 study at Stanford such that a total of 12 patients have received RP-L102 on Rocket-sponsored clinical trials. Patients receive a single intravenous infusion
of RP-L102 that utilizes fresh cells and “Process B” which incorporates a modified stem cell enrichment process, transduction enhancers, as well as commercial-grade vector and final drug product.
Resistance to mitomycin-C, a DNA damaging agent, in bone marrow stem cells at a minimum time point of one year post treatment is the primary endpoint for our ongoing Phase 2 study. Per agreement
with the FDA and EMA, engraftment leading to bone marrow restoration exceeding a 10% mitomycin-C resistance threshold could support a marketing application for approval.
In December 2021, we presented encouraging clinical data at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of
Hematology (“ASH”). The preliminary results from the Phase 1/2 trials presented in a poster at ASH were from eleven pediatric patients and showed increasing evidence of engraftment in at least six of eight patients for whom there are at least
12 months of follow-up, including bone marrow progenitor cell resistance to MMC ranging from 16-63% in six patients (bone marrow cells in FA patients are highly sensitive to DNA-damaging agents including MMC; this susceptibility to DNA damage
is believed to mediate the FA-associated bone marrow failure and predisposition to malignancy. In addition to the development of MMC-resistance in BM hematopoietic cells, sustained peripheral VCN levels were seen in six of seven patients with
at least 12-months of follow-up. One patient experienced an Influenza B infection approximately 9 months following treatment with concomitant progressive hematologic failure requiring allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, which was
administered successfully; the remaining patients have not required transfusions. RP-L102 demonstrated a highly favorable tolerability profile with all subjects being treated without cytotoxic conditioning and no signs of dysplasia. The only
RP-L102 related serious adverse event to-date has been a Grade 2 transient infusion-related reaction in one patient.
In May 2022, we presented topline data for RP-L102 at ASGCT’s 25th Annual Meeting. Five of nine evaluable
patients as of the April 4, 2022 cut-off date had increased resistance to MMC in bone marrow-derived colony forming cells, ranging from 21% to 42% at 12 to 18 months, increasing to 51% to 94% at 18 – 21 months. The primary endpoint has been
achieved, based on a trial protocol in which statistical and clinical significance requires a minimum of five patients to attain increased MMC resistance at least 10% above baseline at two or more timepoints, and concomitant evidence of
genetic correction and clinical stabilization. A sixth patient has displayed evidence of progressively increasing genetic correction as evidenced by peripheral VCN. Three additional patients were less than 12 months post-treatment at the time
of presentation. One patient had progressive bone marrow failure following therapy and underwent successful allogeneic transplant as previously disclosed. The tolerability profile of RP-L102 appears favorable with no signs of dysplasia,
clonal dominance or oncogenic integrations; as previously reported, one patient experienced a Grade 2 transient infusion-related reaction, which resolved.
In October 2022, we presented data for RP-L102 at the European Society for Cell and Gene Therapy 29th
Annual Meeting, including the clinical activity results presented at the ASGCT 2022 meeting. We also disclosed at least one of the additional three patients in our Phase 2 trial of RP-L102 for FA for whom there is less than 12 months of
follow-up has demonstrated initial evidence of engraftment (as demonstrated by bone marrow mitomycin-C resistance and VCN in blood and bone marrow) at levels comparable to those seen in the five patients for whom there is longer-term evidence
of progressive engraftment and phenotypic correction. We also disclosed that one of the initial five patients in this trial who had evidence of engraftment developed a T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma approximately 22 months after RP-L102
administration. A surgical biopsy of the lymphoma indicated negligible gene markings (VCN of 0.003) at a juncture when concomitant VCN in blood and bone marrow were 0.26 and 0.42 respectively. These findings conclusively indicate that the
lymphoma did not result from a LV-mediated insertion, as there were essentially no gene markings in the tumor (the very low but detectable VCN is likely the result of blood cells in the tumor specimen). FA is a cancer-predisposition syndrome
and cancers may develop in patients under the age of 10. Importantly, the patient tolerated induction chemotherapy for the lymphoma without significant complications and is currently in a complete response. The presence of gene-corrected
hematopoietic cells may have contributed to this patient’s overall tolerance of chemotherapy.
In December 2022, we presented positive clinical data for RP-L102 at the 64th Annual Meeting of ASH.
RP-L102 conferred phenotypic correction in at least six of 10 evaluable patients with ≥12 months of follow-up as demonstrated by increased resistance to MMC in bone marrow derived colony forming cells, concomitant genetic correction and
hematologic stabilization. A seventh patient has displayed evidence of progressively increasing genetic correction as demonstrated by peripheral blood and bone marrow VCN’s, with recent development of MMC resistance and possible indicators of
hematologic stability after 36 months of follow-up. The primary endpoint has been achieved, based on a trial protocol in which statistical and clinical significance requires a minimum of five patients to attain increased MMC resistance at
least 10% above baseline at two or more timepoints and concomitant evidence of genetic correction and clinical stabilization. The safety profile of RP-L102 has been highly favorable, and the treatment, administered without any cytotoxic
conditioning, has been well tolerated. No signs of bone marrow dysplasia, clonal dominance or insertional mutagenesis related to RP-L102 have been observed.
12
Table of Contents
Anticipated Milestones
Based on achievement of the primary endpoint as defined in our pivotal Phase 2 study for FA, we have initiated FDA dialogue around biologics license application (“BLA”) filing plans for RP-L102 for the treatment
of FA and anticipate making such filing in Q4 of 2023.
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I)
LAD-I is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of white blood cell adhesion and migration, resulting from mutations in the ITGB2 gene encoding for the Beta-2 Integrin component, CD18. Deficiencies
in CD18 result in an impaired ability for neutrophils (a subset of infection-fighting white blood cells) to leave blood vessels and enter tissues where these cells are needed to combat infections. As is the case with many rare diseases,
accurate estimates of incidence are difficult to confirm; however, several hundred cases have been reported to date. Most LAD-I patients are believed to have the severe form of the disease. Severe LAD-I is notable for recurrent,
life-threatening infections and substantial infant mortality in patients who do not receive an allogeneic HSCT. Mortality for severe LAD-I has been reported as 60 to 75% by age two in the absence of allogeneic HCST.
We currently have one ex-vivo program targeting LAD-I, RP-L201. RP-L201 is a clinical program that we in-licensed from CIEMAT. We have partnered with
UCLA to lead U.S. clinical development efforts for the LAD-I program. UCLA and its Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research is serving as the lead U.S. clinical research center for the registrational clinical
trial for LAD-I, and HNJ and GOSH serving as the lead clinical sites in Spain and London, respectively. This study has received a $6.6 million CLIN2 grant award from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”) to support the
clinical development of gene therapy for LAD-I.
The open-label, single-arm, Phase 1/2 registration-enabling clinical trial of RP-L201 has treated nine severe LAD-I patients to assess the safety and tolerability of RP-L201
to date. The first patient was treated at UCLA with RP-L201 in the third quarter of 2019. Enrollment is now complete in both the Phase 1 and 2 portions of the study; nine patients have received RP-L201 at 3 investigative centers in the U.S. and
Europe.
In December 2021, we presented positive clinical data at the 63rd Annual Meeting of ASH. The ASH oral presentation included preliminary data from eight of nine severe LAD-I patients, as defined
by CD18 expression of less than 2%, who received RP-L201 treatment as of the November 8, 2021, data cut-off date. Eight patients had follow-up data of at least three months, and four of the eight patients had been followed for 12 months or
longer. All infusions of RP-L201 were well tolerated and no drug product-related serious adverse events were reported. Evidence of preliminary efficacy was observed in all eight evaluable patients. All eight patients demonstrated neutrophil
CD18 expression that exceeded the 4-10% threshold associated with survival into adulthood and consistent with reversal of the severe LAD-I phenotype including six patients with at least 6 months of follow-up. Peripheral blood VCN levels have
been stable and in the 0.54 – 2.94 copies per genome range. No patients had LAD-I related infections requiring hospitalization after hematopoietic reconstitution post-RP-L201. Additional updates presented in January 2022 included a ninth
patient achieving CD18 expression of 61% at 3 months, with the preliminary observation that all nine of nine patients have demonstrated 26% to 87% CD18 expression at timepoints ranging from 3 to 24 months following RP-L102, with stable CD18
expression levels for each patient subsequent to month 3.
In May 2022, we presented updated data at ASGCT’s 25th Annual Meeting. The presentation included efficacy and safety interim data at three to 24 months of follow-up after infusion for all nine
treated patients and overall survival data, including survival data for the seven patients with at least 12 months of follow-up after infusion as of the March 9, 2022 cut-off date. All patients, aged three months to nine years, demonstrated
sustained CD18 restoration and expression on more than 10% of neutrop hils (range: 20%-87%, median: 56%). At one year, the overall survival without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation across the cohort is 100% based on the
Kaplan-Meier estimate. As of the data cut-off, all nine patients are alive and clinically stable. All patients demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the rate of all-cause hospitalizations and severe infections, relative to
pre-treatment. Evidence of resolution of LAD-I-related skin rash and restoration of wound repair capabilities has been shown along with sustained phenotypic correction. The tolerability profile of RP-L201 has been highly favorable in all
patients with no RP-L201-related adverse events. Adverse events related to other study procedures, including busulfan conditioning, have been previously disclosed and consistent with the tolerability profiles of those agents and procedures.
In December 2022, we presented positive clinical data at the 64th Annual Meeting of ASH. The presentation
included previously disclosed top-line data at three to 24 months of follow-up after RP-L201 infusion for all patients and overall survival data for seven patients at 12 months or longer after infusion. We observed 100% overall survival at 12
months post-infusion via Kaplan Meier estimate and a statistically significant reduction in all hospitalizations, infection and inflammatory-related hospitalizations and prolonged hospitalizations for all nine LAD-I patients with three to 24
months of available follow-up. Data also shows evidence of resolution of LAD-I-related skin rash and restoration of wound repair capabilities. The safety profile of RP-L201 has been highly favorable in all patients with no RP-L201-related
serious adverse events to date.
13
Table of Contents
Anticipated Milestones
Based on the positive efficacy and safety data from the Phase 2 pivotal LAD-I trial, we have initiated discussions with the FDA on BLA filing plans for RP-L201 for the
treatment of severe LAD-I and anticipate making such filing in Q2 of 2023.
Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)
Red blood cell PKD is a rare autosomal recessive disorder resulting from mutations in the pyruvate kinase L/R (“PKLR”) gene encoding for a component of the red blood cell (“RBC”) glycolytic
pathway. PKD is characterized by chronic non-spherocytic hemolytic anemia, a disorder in which RBCs do not assume a normal spherical shape and are broken down, leading to decreased ability to carry oxygen to cells, with anemia severity that can
range from mild (asymptomatic) to severe forms that may result in childhood mortality or a requirement for frequent, lifelong RBC transfusions. The pediatric population is the most commonly and severely affected subgroup of patients with PKD,
and PKD often results in splenomegaly (abnormal enlargement of the spleen), jaundice and chronic iron overload which is likely the result of both chronic hemolysis and the RBC transfusions used to treat the disease. The variability in anemia
severity is believed to arise in part from the large number of diverse mutations that may affect the PKLR gene. Estimates of disease incidence have ranged between 3.2 and 51 cases per million in the white U.S. and EU population. Industry
estimates suggest at least 2,500 cases in the U.S. and EU have already been diagnosed despite the lack of FDA-approved molecularly targeted therapies. Market research indicates the application of gene therapy to broader populations could
increase the market opportunity from approximately 250 to 500 patients per year.
We currently have one ex-vivo LV-based program targeting PKD, RP-L301. RP-L301 is a clinical stage program that we in-licensed from
CIEMAT. The IND for RP-L301 to initiate the global Phase 1 study cleared in October 2019. This program has been granted US and EMA orphan drug disease designation.
This global Phase 1 open-label, single-arm, clinical trial is expected to enroll four to five adult and pediatric PKD patients in the U.S. and Europe. The trial will be comprised of two cohorts
to assess RP-L301 in pediatric (age 8-17) and adult populations. The trial is designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of RP-L301, and initial safety evaluation will occur in the adult cohort before evaluation in
pediatric patients. Stanford will serve as the lead site in the U.S. for adult and pediatric patients, HNJ will serve as the lead site in Europe for pediatrics, and Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz will serve as the lead site in
Europe for adult patients. In July 2020, we treated the first patient in our clinical trial of RP-L301.
In December 2021, we presented positive clinical data at the 63rd Annual Meeting of ASH. The ASH poster
presentation included preliminary data from two adult patients with severe anemia and substantial transfusion requirements who were treated as of the November 3, 2021 cut-off date. Each of these patients had experience extensive PKD-related
disease complications including hepatic iron overload. Both patients have had marked improvement in hemoglobin levels, from baselines of 7.4 and 7.0 g/dL to 12-month values of 13.3 and 14.8 g/dL respectively; this represents an improvement from
severe (Hb <8g/dL) to normal levels. Both patients have been transfusion independent subsequent to post-treatment hematopoietic reconstitution. Anemia resolution has been accompanied by marked improvement in additional markers of hemolysis,
including bilirubin, erythropoietin, and reticulocyte counts. RP-L301 has been well tolerated in these adult patients, with no drug product related serious adverse events or infusion-related complications observed through 12-months
post-treatment. Both patients have reported improved QOL following treatment with increases on FACT-An and additional designated QOL evaluations sustained through 12 months following therapy.
In May 2022, we presented updated data at the 25th Annual Meeting of the ASGCT. The presentation included
data from two adult patients with severe or transfusion-dependent anemia as of the April 13, 2022 cut-off date. At 18 months post-infusion, both patients had sustained transgene expression, normalized hemoglobin, improved hemolysis, no red
blood cell transfusion requirements post-engraftment and improved QOL both reported anecdotally and as documented via formal QOL assessments. The tolerability profile of RP-L301 appears favorable, with no RP-L-301-related serious adverse
events through 18 months post-infusion. Transient transaminase elevation was seen in both patients post-therapy/conditioning, with no clinical stigmata of liver injury and subsequent resolution without clinical sequelae. The pediatric cohort
is currently enrolling.
In December 2022, we presented positive clinical data at the 64th Annual Meeting of ASH. The presentation included
positive updated data from two adult patients with significant anemia. At 24 months post-infusion, both patients have robust and sustained efficacy demonstrated by normalized hemoglobin (from baseline levels in the 7.0-7.5 g/dL range), improved
hemolysis parameters, independence from red blood cell transfusions and improved quality of life both reported anecdotally and as documented via formal quality of life assessments. The safety profile appears highly favorable, with no
RP-L301-related serious adverse events through 24 months post-infusion in both adult patients. Insertion site analyses in peripheral blood and bone marrow in both adult patients up to 12 months post-RP-L301 demonstrated highly polyclonal
patterns and there has been no evidence of insertional mutagenesis.
Anticipated Milestones
Enrollment in the PKD adult and pediatric cohort is completed in the Phase 1 study. Initiation of the phase 2 pivotal trial is anticipated in Q4 of 2023.
14
Table of Contents
cGMP Manufacturing
Our new, 103,720 square foot manufacturing facility in Cranbury, New Jersey has been scaled up to manufacture AAV drug product for a planned Phase 2 pivotal study in Danon disease. The facility also houses lab
space for research & development and quality. We reached an understanding with the FDA on chemistry, manufacturing, and controls requirements to start AAV cGMP manufacturing at our in-house facility as well as potency assay plans for a
Phase 2 pivotal trial in Danon disease. To further strengthen our manufacturing and commercial capabilities during 2022, we appointed Mayo Pujols, one of the most seasoned cell and gene therapy technical operations and manufacturing leaders in
the industry, as our Chief Technical Officer.
Strategy
We seek to bring hope and relief to patients with devastating, undertreated, rare pediatric diseases through the development and commercialization of potentially curative first-in-class gene
therapies. To achieve these objectives, we intend to develop into a fully-integrated biotechnology company. In the near and medium-term, we intend to develop our first-in-class product candidates, which are targeting devastating diseases with
substantial unmet need, develop proprietary in-house analytics and manufacturing capabilities and continue to commence registration trials for our currently planned programs. In the medium and long-term, pending favorable data, we expect to
submit BLAs for the rest of our suite of clinical programs, and establish our gene therapy platform and expand our pipeline to target additional indications that we believe to be potentially compatible with our gene therapy technologies. In
addition, during that time, we believe that our currently planned programs will become eligible for priority review vouchers from the FDA that provide for expedited review. We have assembled a leadership and research team with expertise in cell
and gene therapy, rare disease drug development and product approval.
We believe that our competitive advantage lies in our disease-based selection approach, a rigorous process with defined criteria to identify target diseases. We believe that
this approach to asset development differentiates us as a gene therapy company and potentially provides us with a first-mover advantage.
Intellectual Property
We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business, including seeking, maintaining,
and defending patent rights, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties. We also rely on trade secrets relating to our proprietary technology platform and on know-how, continuing technological innovation and in-licensing
opportunities to develop, strengthen and maintain our proprietary position in the field of gene therapy that may be important for the development of our business. We additionally intend to rely on regulatory protection afforded through orphan
drug designations, data exclusivity, market exclusivity, and patent term extensions where available.
Our commercial success may depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business;
defend and enforce our patents; preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets; and operate without infringing the valid enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using,
selling, offering to sell or importing its future products may depend on the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that cover these activities. With respect to both licensed and company-owned
intellectual property, we cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing
patents or any patents that may be granted to us in the future will be commercially useful in protecting our commercial products and methods of manufacturing the same.
We have developed and in-licensed numerous patents and patent applications and possess substantial know-how and trade secrets relating to the development and commercialization of gene therapy products. Our
proprietary intellectual property, including patent and non-patent intellectual property, is generally directed to gene expression vectors and methods of using the same for gene therapy. As of February 22, 2023, our patent portfolio includes
both owned and in-licensed patent families relating to our product candidates and related technologies, discussed more fully below.
Fanconi Anemia
Our Fanconi Anemia patent portfolio includes granted patents in Australia and Japan and pending applications in the U.S., Europe, Japan, China and other countries with claims directed to polynucleotide cassettes
and expression vector compositions containing Fanconi Anemia complementation group genes and methods for using such vectors to provide gene therapy in mammalian cells for treating Fanconi Anemia. These applications were exclusively in-licensed
from CIEMAT, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica En Red, (“CIBER”), Fundacion Instituto de investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, (“FIISFJD”), and Fundacion Para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Del Nino Jesus. We expect any
patents in this family, if issued, and if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or other governmental fees are paid, to expire in 2037, absent any patent term adjustments or extensions.
15
Table of Contents
Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)
Our PKD patent portfolio includes granted patents in Europe, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and the United States and a pending patent application in the U.S., EU, Japan, China and other countries
with claims directed to polynucleotide cassettes and expression vector compositions containing pyruvate kinase genes and methods for using such vectors to provide gene therapy in mammalian cells for treating pyruvate kinase deficiency. These
applications are exclusively in-licensed from CIEMAT, CIBER, and FIISFJD. We expect any patents in this portfolio, if issued, and if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or other governmental fees are paid, to expire in 2037-2038,
absent any patent term adjustments or extensions.
Danon Disease
Our Danon disease patent portfolio includes both proprietary intellectual property and a patent family in-licensed from the University of California, San Diego, which includes patent applications in the U.S.,
Europe, Japan, China and other countries with claims directed to the treatment of Danon disease. We expect any patents in this portfolio, if issued, and if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or other governmental fees are paid, to
expire in 2037 absent any patent term adjustments or extensions. We also own a U.S. patent and pending patent application in the EU, Japan, China and other countries with claims directed to gene therapy vectors for the treatment of Danon
disease; the U.S. patent issued in 2020. Any patents, if issued, arising from these patent applications, are expected to expire in 2039, absent any patent term adjustments or extensions, if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or
other governmental fees are paid. We have also filed additional patent applications directed to methods for treatment of Danon disease. Any patents, if issued, arising from these patent applications, are expected to expire in 2040-2041, absent
any patent term adjustments or extensions, if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or other governmental fees are paid.
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD-I)
Our patent portfolio includes pending patent applications in the U.S., EU, Japan, China and other countries with claims directed to transduction of allogeneic HSCT, which may be relevant to our LAD-I program. We
expect any patents arising from these patent applications, if issued, and if the appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or other governmental fees are paid, to expire in 2039, absent any patent term adjustments or extensions.
Our objective is to continue to expand its portfolio of patents and patent applications in order to protect our gene therapy product candidates and manufacturing processes. From time to time, we may also
evaluate opportunities to sublicense our portfolio of patents and patent applications that we own or exclusively license, and we may enter into such licenses from time to time. The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the
patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we file, the patent term is 20 years from the date of filing the non-provisional application. In the U.S., a patent’s term may be lengthened by patent term
adjustment, which compensates a patentee for administrative delays by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in granting a patent or may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier-filed patent.
The term of a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug may also be eligible for patent term extension, which permits patent term restoration of a U.S. patent as compensation for the patent term lost during the
FDA regulatory review process. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent term extension of up to five years beyond the expiration of the patent. The length of the patent term extension is related to the length of time the drug is under regulatory
review. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval and only one patent applicable to an approved drug may be extended. Moreover, a patent can only be
extended once, and thus, if a single patent is applicable to multiple products, it can only be extended based on one product. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers
an approved drug. When possible, depending upon the length of clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of a BLA, we expect to apply for patent term extensions for patents covering our product candidates and their methods of use.
We may rely, in some circumstances, on trade secrets to protect our technology. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by
entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and third parties. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of its
premises and physical and electronic security of its information technology systems. While we have confidence in these individuals, organizations and systems, agreements or security measures may be breached, and we may not have adequate
remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our consultants or collaborators use intellectual property owned by others in their work for
us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
16
Table of Contents
Material Contracts
License Agreements with CIEMAT
In March 2016, we entered into a license agreement with CIEMAT, CIBER, and FIISFJD, (collectively, “CIEMAT”), granting us worldwide, exclusive rights to certain patents, know-how and other intellectual property
relating to lentiviral vectors containing the human PKLR gene solely within the field of treating PKD. Under the terms of the agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to (a) develop and obtain regulatory approval for
one or more products or processes covered by the licensed intellectual property, introduce such products or processes into the commercial market and then make them reasonably available to the public (b) develop or commercialize at least one
product or process covered by the licensed intellectual property in at least one country for at least two uninterrupted years following regulatory approval, and (c) use the licensed intellectual property in an adequate, ethical and legitimate
manner. In exchange for the license, we are obligated to pay CIEMAT an up-front payment, royalty payments based on net sales of products or processes involving any of the licensed intellectual property, developmental and regulatory milestone
payments, and sublicense revenue payments. We are responsible for prosecuting and maintaining the licensed patents at our expense, in cooperation with CIEMAT. We also have the first responsibility to enforce and defend the licensed patents
against infringement and/or challenge, in cooperation with CIEMAT. For five years following the effective date of the license agreement, we had a right of first refusal to license any improvements to the licensed intellectual property obtained
by CIEMAT at market value. We are obligated to license (without charge) to CIEMAT for non-commercial use any improvements to the licensed intellectual property that we create.
As consideration for the licensed rights, we paid CIEMAT an initial upfront license fee of €0.03 million (approximately $0.03 million) which was expensed as research and development (“R&D”) costs. We are
obligated to make aggregate milestone payments of up to €1.4 million (approximately $1.5 million) to CIEMAT upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones. With respect to any commercialized products covered by the PKD
license, we are obligated to pay a low to mid-single digit percentage royalty on net sales, subject to specified adjustments, by us or our sublicensees or affiliates. In the event that we enter into a sublicense agreement with a sublicensee, we
will be obligated to pay a portion of any consideration received from such sublicensees in specified circumstances.
We may terminate this agreement at any time by providing CIEMAT with 90 days advance notice. The license is in effect for a duration for each of the countries defined in this agreement for as long as a license
right exists that covers the licensed product or process in such country, or until the end of any additional legal protection that should be obtained for the license rights in each country.
In July 2016, we entered into a license agreement with CIEMAT granting us worldwide, exclusive rights to certain patents, know-how, data and other intellectual property relating to lentiviral vectors containing
the FA-A gene solely within the field of human therapeutic uses of VSV-G packaged integration component lentiviral vectors for FA type-A gene therapy. This license is only sublicensable with the prior consent of CIEMAT, not to be unreasonably
withheld. Under the terms of the agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to (a) develop and obtain regulatory approval for one or more products or processes covered by the licensed intellectual property, introduce
such products or processes into the commercial market and then make them reasonably available to the public (b) develop or commercialize at least one product or process covered by the licensed intellectual property in at least one country for
at least two uninterrupted years following regulatory approval, and (c) use the licensed intellectual property in an adequate, ethical and legitimate manner. In exchange for the license, we are obligated to pay CIEMAT an up-front payment,
royalty payments based on net sales of products or processes involving any of the licensed intellectual property, regulatory and financing milestone payments, and sublicense revenue payments. We are responsible for prosecuting and maintaining
the licensed patents at our expense, in cooperation with CIEMAT. We also have the first responsibility to enforce and defend the licensed patents against infringement and/or challenge, in cooperation with CIEMAT. For five years following the
effective date of the license agreement, we have a right of first refusal to license any improvements to the licensed intellectual property obtained by CIEMAT at market value. We are obligated to license (without charge) to CIEMAT for
non-commercial use any improvements to the licensed intellectual property that we create.
As consideration for the licensed rights, we paid CIEMAT an initial upfront license fee of €0.1 million (approximately $0.1 million), which was expensed as R&D costs. We are obligated to make aggregate
milestone payments of up to €5.0 million (approximately $6.0 million) to CIEMAT upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones. With respect to any commercialized products covered by the license, we are obligated to pay
a mid-single digit percentage royalty on net sales, subject to specified adjustments, by us or our sublicensees or affiliates. In the event that we enter into a sublicense agreement with a sublicensee, we will be obligated to pay a portion of
any consideration received from such sublicensees in specified circumstances.
We may terminate this agreement at any time by providing CIEMAT with 90 days’ advance notice. The license is in effect for a duration for each of the countries defined in this agreement for as long as a license
right exists that covers the licensed product or process in such country, or until the end of any additional legal protection that should be obtained for the license rights in each country.
License Agreement for LAD-I with CIEMAT and UCLB
We entered into a license agreement in November 2017, effective September 2017, with CIEMAT and UCL Business PLC (“UCLB”), collectively referred to as (“Licensors”), granting us worldwide, exclusive rights to
certain patents, know-how and other intellectual property relating to lentiviral vectors containing the human LAD-I gene solely within the field of treating LAD-I. Under the terms of the agreement, we are obligated to use commercially
reasonable efforts to (a) develop and obtain regulatory approval for one or more products or processes covered by the licensed intellectual property, introduce such products or processes into the commercial market and then make them reasonably
available to the public, (b) develop or commercialize at least one product or process covered by the licensed intellectual property in at least one country for at least two uninterrupted years following regulatory approval, and (c) use the
licensed intellectual property in an adequate, ethical and legitimate manner. In exchange for the license, we are obligated to pay Licensors an up-front payment, royalty payments in the mid-single digit percentages based on net sales of
products or processes involving any of the licensed intellectual property, developmental and regulatory milestone payments, and sublicense revenue payments. We are responsible for prosecuting and maintaining the licensed patents at our expense,
in cooperation with Licensors. We also have the first responsibility to enforce and defend the licensed patents against infringement and/or challenge, in cooperation with Licensors. For five years following the effective date of the license
agreement, we have a right of first refusal to license any improvements to the licensed intellectual property obtained by Licensors at market value. We are obligated to license (without charge) to Licensors for non-commercial use any
improvements to the licensed intellectual property that we create.
17
Table of Contents
As consideration for the licensed rights, we paid Licensors an initial upfront license fee of €0.03 million (approximately $0.04 million), which was expensed as R&D costs. We are obligated to make aggregate
payments of up to €1.4 million (approximately $1.5 million) to Licensors upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones. With respect to any commercialized products covered by the LAD-I license, we are obligated to pay
a mid-single digit percentage royalty on net sales, subject to specified adjustments, by us or our sublicensees or affiliates. In the event that we enter into a sublicense agreement with a sublicensee, we will be obligated to pay a portion of
any consideration received from such sublicensees in specified circumstances.
We may terminate this agreement at any time by providing the Licensors with 90 days advance notice. The license is in effect for a duration for each of the countries defined in this
agreement for as long as a license right exists that covers the licensed product or process in such country, or until the end of any additional legal protection that should be obtained for the license rights in each country.
License Agreement for Danon Disease with UCSD
In February 2017, we entered into a license agreement with The Regents of the University of California, represented by its San Diego campus (“UCSD”), under which UCSD granted us an exclusive, sublicensable,
worldwide license to certain intellectual property rights for the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases, including Danon disease. In exchange for the license, we became obligated to make an up-front payment, certain clinical and commercial
milestone payments, royalty payments (on net sales of products covered by a valid claim within the licensed intellectual property), maintenance fees and sublicense revenue payments. Rocket paid an upfront license fee of $0.05 million. We are
obligated to make aggregate milestone payments of up to $1.5 million to UCSD upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones for the treatment of Danon disease. A reduced schedule of milestone payments applies to
achieving the same milestones for additional indications. With respect to any commercialized products covered by the agreement, we are obligated to pay a low single digit percentage royalty on net sales, subject to specified adjustments. If we
enter into a sublicense agreement with a sublicensee, we will be obligated to pay a portion of any consideration received from such sublicensees in specified circumstances. We are also subject to certain diligence milestones for development of
a product using the intellectual property licensed from UCSD under this agreement.
The term of the license agreement with UCSD is through the expiration of the licensed patents, some of which are still in the pending application phase.
REGENXBIO, Inc. License
On November 19, 2018, we entered into a license agreement with REGENXBIO Inc. (“RGNX”), pursuant to which we obtained an exclusive license for all U.S. patents and patent applications related to RGNX’s NAV AAV-9
vector for the treatment of Danon disease in humans by in vivo gene therapy using AAV-9 to deliver any known LAMP2 transgene isoforms and all possible combinations of LAMP2 transgene isoforms (the
“Field”), as well as an exclusive option to license (the “Option Right”) all U.S. patents and patent applications for two additional NAV AAV vectors in the Field (each, a “Licensed Patent” and collectively, the “Licensed Patents”).
In consideration for the rights granted to us under the license agreement, we made an upfront payment to RGNX of $7.0 million which was expensed to R&D costs in the 2018 consolidated statement of operations.
A fee of $2.0 million per additional vector would be due if we exercise our Option Right to purchase additional vectors. The license agreement provides for royalties payable to RGNX in the high-single digits to low-teens on net sales levels of
products incorporating the Licensed Patents (the “Licensed Products”) during the royalty term. If successful, we will be required to make milestone payments to RGNX of up to $13.0 million for each Licensed Product upon the achievement of
specified clinical development and regulatory milestones in the U.S. and EU. In addition, we shall pay RGNX 20% of the payment fees received from a priority review voucher issued in connection with or otherwise related to a Licensed Product.
These royalty obligations are subject to specified reductions if additional licenses from third parties are required. We must also pay RGNX a portion of all non-royalty sublicense income (if any) received from sublicensees. We paid a $1.0
million license fee payment under the RGNX agreement upon the dosing of the first Danon patient in 2019. There were no additional milestones achieved or related payments made during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
At-the-Market Offering Program
On February 28, 2022, we entered into the Sales Agreement with Cowen with respect to an at-the-market offering program pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares
through Cowen as our sales agent. The shares to be offered and sold under the Sales Agreement are being offered and sold pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-253756). We filed a prospectus supplement with the
SEC on February 28, 2022, in connection with the offer and sale of the shares and have agreed to pay Cowen a cash commission of 3.0% of gross proceeds from the sale of the shares, pursuant to the Sales Agreement. We also agreed to provide
Cowen with customary indemnification and contribution rights and will also reimburse Cowen for certain expenses incurred in connection with the Sales Agreement. Through December 31, 2022, we have sold
3.3 million shares of common stock pursuant to the at-the-market offering program for gross proceeds of $48.0 million, less commissions of $1.4 million for net proceeds of $46.6 million.
18
Table of Contents
Competition
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, including in the field of gene therapy, are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products and
novel therapies. While we believe that our experience and scientific knowledge provides it with competitive advantages, we face potential competition from many different sources, including larger and better-funded pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, new market entrants and new technologies, as well as from academic institutions, government agencies and private and public research institutions, which may in the future develop products to treat the indications
targeted by our pipeline that have not yet been conceived. Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies such as bone marrow transplantation and new therapies that may become
available in the future. We believe that the key competitive factors affecting the success of our product candidates, if approved, are likely to be efficacy, safety, convenience, price, pharmaco-economic value, tolerability and the availability
of coverage and adequate reimbursement from governmental authorities and other third-party payors. In addition, we intend to develop single treatment curative therapies for clinical indications that address mortality or high morbidity, which
could differentiate us from potential competitors developing alternative competitive therapies that may require chronic or repetitive treatment.
Other early-stage companies may also compete through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in
even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of companies developing gene therapies. These companies also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial
sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
We anticipate that we will face intense and increasing competition as new drugs and therapeutic modalities enter the market and advanced technologies become available. Our commercial opportunity could be reduced
or eliminated if our potential competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer adverse effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our potential competitors
also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our products.
Manufacturing
Our gene therapy platform has two main components: the production of LV vectors and AAV vectors and the target cell transduction process, which results in drug product. We commenced GMP manufacturing at our
facility in Cranbury, New Jersey in 2022. We plan to supplement our own direct manufacturing capabilities with third-party manufacturers for our AAV programs. For our LV programs, we currently rely on third-party manufacturers to produce the
plasmids, vectors, cell banks and final drug product for our clinical trials. We manage such production with our vendors on a purchase order basis in accordance with applicable master service and supply agreements. We have long-term agreements
with these manufacturers. Whenever possible, we procure materials from redundant and multiple sources to mitigate risk. If any of our existing third-party suppliers should become unavailable to us for any reason, we believe that there are a
number of potential replacements, although we might experience a delay in our ability to obtain alternative suppliers. We also do not have any current contractual relationships for the manufacture of commercial supplies of our product
candidates if they become registered. With respect to commercial production of our product candidates in the future, we plan to pursue multiple options including direct manufacturing as well as outsourcing production of the active
pharmaceutical (drug substance) ingredients and final drug product manufacturing (drug product) to contract manufacturing organizations if these products are approved and registered for marketing authorization by the applicable regulatory
bodies.
We expect to continue to develop drug candidates that can be produced in a cost-effective manner through direct manufacturing or at contract manufacturing facilities. Should a supplier or manufacturer on which
we have relied to produce a product candidate provide us with a faulty product or such product is later recalled, or should we experience such problems for our own products produced through direct manufacturing, we would likely experience
delays and additional costs, each of which could be significant.
Government Regulation
FDA Regulation and Marketing Approval
In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and biologics under the Public Health Service Act, the regulations promulgated under both laws and other federal,
state, and local statutes and regulations. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. regulatory requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval may subject an applicant to administrative or
judicial sanctions and non-approval of product candidates. These sanctions could include, among other things, the imposition by the FDA of a clinical hold on trials, the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications or related supplements,
withdrawal of an approval, untitled or warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties, or criminal prosecution. Such
actions by government agencies could also require us to expend a large amount of resources to respond to the actions. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us.
19
Table of Contents
The FDA and comparable regulatory agencies in state and local jurisdictions and in foreign countries impose substantial requirements upon the clinical development, approval, manufacture, distribution and
marketing of pharmaceutical products. These agencies and other federal, state and local entities regulate R&D activities and the testing, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution,
record keeping, approval, post-approval monitoring, advertising, promotion, sampling and import and export of our products. Rocket’s drugs must be approved by the FDA as biologics through the BLA approval process applicable to gene therapy
product candidates, before they may be legally marketed in the U.S.
Within the FDA, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) regulates gene therapy products and has published guidance documents with respect to the development of these
types of products. The FDA also has published guidance documents related to, among other things, gene therapy products in general, their preclinical assessment, observing subjects involved in gene therapy studies for delayed adverse events,
potency testing, and chemistry, manufacturing and control information in gene therapy INDs.
The process required by the FDA before a biologic may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:
• preparation and submission to the FDA of a BLA;
• submission of a user fee for FDA review of the BLA;
Preclinical Studies
Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of the purity and stability of the manufactured drug substance or active pharmaceutical ingredient and the formulated drug or drug product, as well as in vitro
and animal studies to assess the safety and activity of the drug for initial testing in humans and to establish a rationale for therapeutic use. The conduct of preclinical studies is subject to federal regulations and requirements, including
GLP regulations. The results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data, or literature and plans for clinical studies, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of
an IND.