Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

ORRF US Equity

Orrstown Financial Services IncFinancials · State Commercial Banks · CIK 826154 · FY ends Dec 31
$42.02
-0.08 (-0.19%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

ORRF · 10-K · period ended 2021-12-31

← all ORRF documents
filed 2022-03-11 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 247774 of 1,891423k characters rendered

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect us are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report and our other filings with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair our business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.

If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Credit

If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual losses, our earnings would decrease.

There is no precise method of predicting loan losses. The required level of reserves, and the related provision for loan losses can fluctuate from year to year, based on charge-offs and/or recoveries, loan volume, credit administration practices, and local and national economic conditions, among other factors. The ALL, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, represents management’s best estimate of probable incurred losses within the existing portfolio

13

Table of Contents

of loans. The level of the ALL reflects management’s evaluation of, among other factors, the status of specific impaired loans, historical loss experience, delinquency, credit concentrations and economic conditions within our market area. The determination of the appropriate level of the ALL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require us to increase our ALL.

If loan charge-offs in future periods exceed the ALL, there would be a need to record additional provisions to increase our ALL. Furthermore, growth in the loan portfolio would generally lead to an increase in the provision for loan losses. The deterioration of one or more of our significant lending relationships could result in a substantial increase in nonperforming loans and the provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact our results of operations. Generally, increases in our ALL will result in a decrease in net income and stockholders’ equity, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Further, we have elected to delay implementation of ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, under the three-year delay permitted by the FASB in 2019. For a more complete description of the potential impact ASU 2016-13 may have on our financial statements and ALL, please refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Commercial real estate lending may expose us to a greater risk of loss and impact our earnings and profitability.

Our business strategy includes making loans secured by commercial real estate. These types of loans generally have higher risk-adjusted returns and shorter maturities than other loans. Loans secured by commercial real estate properties are generally for larger amounts and may involve a greater degree of risk than other loans. Payments on loans secured by these properties are often dependent on the income produced by the underlying properties which, in turn, depends on the successful operation and management of the properties. Accordingly, repayment of these loans is subject to conditions in the real estate market or the local economy. In challenging economic conditions, these loans represent higher risk and could result in an increase in our total net charge-offs, requiring us to increase our ALL, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. While we seek to minimize these risks in a variety of ways, there can be no assurance that these measures will protect against credit-related losses.

Our loan portfolio has a significant concentration in commercial real estate loans.

Our loan portfolio is made up largely of commercial real estate loans. The federal banking agencies have promulgated guidance governing banks with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that a bank has a concentration in commercial real estate lending if (i) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of total risk-based capital or (ii) total commercial real estate loans represent 300% or more of total risk-based capital and that bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior thirty-six months. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans are excluded from this second category. If the Bank is deemed to have a concentration in commercial real estate loans, we will be required to employ heightened risk management practices that address board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending. At December 31, 2021, the Bank’s construction, land development and other land concentration was 38%, commercial real estate loan concentration was 270% and the Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio increased by 99% during the prior thirty-six months. The Bank believes it has taken the appropriate steps to comply with the risk management practices, which are subject to regulatory examination. If our regulators conclude that we have not implemented appropriate risk management practices, it could adversely affect our business, and could result in the requirement to maintain increased capital levels or restrict our ability to originate new loans secured by commercial real estate. We can provide no assurance that capital would be available, or available on terms favorable to the Company, at that time.

The credit risk related to commercial and industrial loans is greater than the risk related to residential loans.

Commercial and industrial loans generally carry larger loan balances and involve a greater degree of risk of nonpayment or late payment than home equity loans or residential mortgage loans. Commercial and industrial loans include advances to local and regional businesses for general commercial purposes and include permanent and short-term working capital, machinery and equipment financing, and may be either in the form of lines of credit or term loans. Although commercial and industrial loans may be unsecured to our highest rated borrowers, the majority of these loans are secured by the borrower’s accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment. In a significant number of these loans, the collateral also includes the business real estate or the business owner’s personal real estate or assets. Commercial and industrial loans are more susceptible to risk of loss during a downturn in the economy, as borrowers may have greater difficulty in meeting their debt service requirements and the value of the collateral may decline. We attempt to mitigate this risk through our underwriting

14

Table of Contents

standards, including evaluating the creditworthiness of the borrower, regular monitoring, and, to the extent available, credit ratings on the business. However, these procedures cannot entirely eliminate the risk of loss associated with commercial and industrial lending.

Environmental liability associated with our lending activities could result in losses.

In the course of business, we may acquire, through foreclosure, properties securing loans originated or purchased that are in default. Particularly in commercial real estate lending, there is a risk that material environmental violations could be discovered on these properties. In this event, we might be required to remedy these violations at the affected properties at our sole cost and expense. The cost of remedial action could substantially exceed the value of affected properties. We may not have adequate remedies against the prior owner or other responsible parties and could find it difficult or impossible to sell the affected properties. These events could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As a participating lender in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), we are subject to additional risks of litigation from our clients or other parties regarding our processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the CARES Act, which included a $349 billion loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP. Under the PPP, small businesses and other entities and individuals applied for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enrolled in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. We participated as a lender in the PPP, which commenced on April 3, 2020. Lenders participating in the PPP have faced scrutiny about their loan application process and procedures, and the nature and type of the borrowers receiving PPP loans. We depend on our reputation as a trusted and responsible financial services company to compete effectively in the communities that we serve. Any negative public or client response to, or any litigation or claims that might arise out of, our participation in the PPP and any other legislative or regulatory initiatives and programs that were enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, could adversely impact our business. We may be exposed to the risk of litigation regarding our process and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP and in connection with our processing of PPP loan forgiveness applications. If any such litigation is filed against us and is not resolved in a manner favorable to us, it may result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations or adversely affect our reputation. In addition, litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome.

We also have credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which a loan was originated, funded, or serviced by us. In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by us, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from us. The Company had $195.3 million in gross outstanding balance of SBA PPP loans at December 31, 2021.

Risks Related to Interest Rates and Investments

Changes in interest rates could adversely impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to risks and uncertainties surrounding our exposure to changes in the interest rate environment. Operating income, net income and liquidity depend to a great extent on our net interest margin. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including competition, general economic conditions, and monetary and fiscal policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities, including the FRB. The nature and timing of any changes in interest rates or general economic conditions and their effect on us cannot be controlled and are difficult to predict. If the rate of interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities increases more than the rate of interest we receive on our interest-earning assets, our net interest income, and therefore our earnings and liquidity, could be materially adversely affected. Our earnings and liquidity could also be materially adversely affected if the rates on interest-earning assets fall more quickly than those on our interest-bearing liabilities.

Changes in interest rates also can affect our ability to originate loans, our ability to obtain and retain deposits, and the value of interest-earning assets, and the ability to realize gains from the sale of such assets, which could all negatively impact shareholder's equity. The FRB recently has signaled its intention to raise interest rates in 2022. An increase in interest rates could also have a negative impact on our results of operations by reducing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations, which could not only result in increased loan defaults, foreclosures and charge-offs, but could also necessitate further increases to our ALL. A decrease in interest rates may trigger loan prepayments, which may serve to reduce net interest income if we are unable to lend these funds to other borrowers or invest the funds at the same or higher interest rates. In addition, based on our interest rate sensitivity analyses, an increase in the general level of interest rates will negatively affect the market value of the investment portfolio because of the relatively higher duration of certain securities included in the investment portfolio.

15

Table of Contents

Our subordinated notes, issued in December 2018, have a 6.0% fixed interest rate through December 2023, after which the interest rate will convert to a variable rate, equivalent to three-month LIBOR, or any replacement reference rate, plus 3.16% through maturity in December 2028. Depending on our financial condition at the time of the rate changing from fixed to variable, an increase in the interest rate on our subordinated debt could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and results of operations.

Our securities portfolio performance in difficult market conditions could have adverse effects on our results of operations.

Unrealized losses on investment securities result from changes in credit spreads and liquidity issues in the marketplace, along with changes in the credit profile of individual securities issuers. Under GAAP, we are required to review our investment portfolio periodically for the presence of impairment of our securities, taking into consideration current and future market conditions, the extent and nature of changes in fair value, issuer rating changes and trends, volatility of earnings, current analysts' evaluations, our ability and intent to hold investments until a recovery of fair value, as well as other factors. Adverse developments with respect to one or more of the foregoing factors may require us to deem particular securities to be impaired, with the credit-related portion of the reduction in the value recognized as a charge to our earnings through a valuation allowance. Subsequent valuations, in light of factors prevailing at that time, may result in significant changes in the values of these securities in future periods. Any of these factors could require us to recognize further impairments in the value of our securities portfolio, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods.

In addition, deterioration or defaults made by issuers of the underlying collateral of our investment securities may cause additional credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges to our income statement. Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to access the debt or equity capital markets on favorable terms or at all could be adversely affected by disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including actions by rating agencies and deteriorating investor expectations.

Potential downgrades of U.S. government securities by one or more of the credit ratings agencies could have a material adverse effect on our operations, earnings and financial condition.

A possible future downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government and a decline in the perceived creditworthiness of U.S. government-related obligations could impact our ability to obtain funding that is collateralized by affected instruments, as well as affect the pricing of that funding when it is available. A downgrade may also adversely affect the market value of such instruments. We cannot predict if, when or how any changes to the credit ratings or perceived creditworthiness of these organizations will affect economic conditions. Among other things, a downgrade in the U.S. government’s credit rating could adversely impact the value of our securities portfolio and may trigger requirements that the Company post additional collateral for trades relative to these securities. A downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government or the credit ratings of related institutions, agencies or instruments would significantly exacerbate the other risks to which we are subject and any related adverse effects on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

The expected discontinuance of LIBOR presents risks to the financial instruments originated, issued or held by us that use LIBOR as a reference rate.

LIBOR is used as a reference rate for many of our transactions and contracts, which means it is the base on which relevant interest rates are determined. Transactions include those in which we lend and borrow money and issue, purchase and sell securities and engage in derivative transactions. Stemming from recent regulatory guidance and proposals to reform, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), which regulates the process for setting LIBOR, announced that it intended to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR to the administrator of LIBOR. This announcement created market uncertainty as to whether and to what extent panel banks would continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021 and as to the continued existence of LIBOR after 2021. The uncertainty lessened in November 2020, when the administrator of LIBOR, and the FCA, announced a proposal to extend the publication of the most commonly utilized tenors of USD LIBOR until June 30, 2023.

While certain U.S. dollar LIBOR tenors are expected to continue to be published until June 30, 2023, the U.S. banking agencies have encouraged banks to cease entering into new contracts referencing LIBOR no later than December 31, 2021. These reforms may cause such rates to perform differently than in the past, or to disappear entirely, or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. It is also possible that LIBOR quotes will become unavailable prior to 2023 if a sufficient number of banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition from LIBOR would be accelerated and magnified. These risks may also be increased due to the shorter time frame for preparing for the transition.

With the phase out of LIBOR, there are alternative reference rates in circulation as a replacement. It is expected to be replaced primarily by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, which is a median of rates that market participants pay to borrow cash on an overnight basis, using U.S. Treasury Securities as collateral. Should SOFR ultimately replace LIBOR, risks will remain for us with respect to outstanding loans or other instruments using LIBOR. Those risks arise in connection

16

Table of Contents

with transitioning those instruments to a new reference rate and the corresponding value transfer that may occur in connection with that transition. Risks related to transitioning instruments to SOFR, how LIBOR is calculated and LIBOR's availability include impacts on the yield on loans or securities held by us and amounts paid on securities we have issued, and ultimately, adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. The value of loans, securities, derivatives or borrowings tied to LIBOR and the trading market for LIBOR-based securities could also be negatively impacted upon its discontinuance or phase out.

The Company has formed a cross-functional working group to lead the transition from LIBOR to a planned adoption of an alternate index. As of December 31, 2021, the Company ceased issuance of new LIBOR loans. The Company has elected to replace LIBOR with the 30-Day Average SOFR or Term SOFR in its loan agreements. Certain systems and products have been effectively transitioned away from LIBOR and are utilizing alternative reference rates. Remaining LIBOR transition project activities include remediation of remaining LIBOR products by June 2023. The Company is in the process of implementing fallback language for loans that will mature after 2021. The manner and impact of the transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate, as well as the effect of these developments on our funding costs, loan, investment securities and derivative portfolios, asset-liability management, and business, is uncertain.

Risks Related to Competition and to Our Business Strategy

If we cannot replace interest income on PPP loans, our net income would be adversely affected.

Interest income recognized on PPP loans totaled $16.8 million and $10.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As the balance of our PPP loan portfolio continues to decline, we expect interest income recognized on these loans to decline in 2022. If we are not able to replace interest income on PPP loans through non-PPP loan growth or otherwise, our net income could be adversely affected.

Difficult economic and market conditions can adversely affect the financial services industry and may materially and adversely affect the Company.

Our operations are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in the U.S. If the growth of the U.S. economy slows, or if the economy worsens or enters into a recession, our growth and profitability could be constrained. In addition, economic conditions in foreign countries can affect the stability of global financial markets, which could impact the U.S. economy and financial markets. Weak economic conditions, which could directly impact our operations, are characterized by deflation, fluctuations in debt and equity capital markets, including a lack of liquidity and/or depressed prices in the secondary market for mortgage loans, increased loan delinquencies on real estate price declines and lower home sales and commercial activity, and increased problem assets and foreclosures. All of these factors are detrimental to our business. In addition, our business is significantly affected by monetary and related policies of the U.S. federal government, its agencies and government-sponsored entities. Changes in any of these policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Because our business is concentrated in south central Pennsylvania, the greater Baltimore region, and Washington County, Maryland, our financial performance could be materially adversely affected by economic conditions and real estate values in these market areas.

Our operations and the properties securing our loans are primarily located in south central Pennsylvania, the greater Baltimore region, and Washington County, Maryland. Our operating results depend largely on economic conditions and real estate valuations in these and surrounding areas. A deterioration in economic conditions, increased unemployment, inflation, and a decline in real estate values in these market areas or other factors beyond our control could materially adversely affect our operations.

Competition from other banks and financial institutions in originating loans, attracting deposits and providing other financial services may adversely affect our profitability and liquidity.

We experience substantial competition in our market area. This competition comes principally from other banks, savings institutions, credit unions, mortgage banking companies and other lenders. Some of our competitors enjoy advantages, including greater financial resources and higher lending limits, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. This competition could reduce our net income and liquidity by decreasing the number and size of loans that we originate and the interest rates we are able to charge on these loans.

Emerging technologies have the potential to intensify competition and accelerate disruption in the financial services industry. In recent years, non-financial services firms, such as financial technology companies, have been offering services traditionally provided by financial institutions. These firms use technology and mobile platforms to enhance the ability of

17

Table of Contents

companies and individuals to borrow money, save and invest. Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including our ability to develop and execute strategic plans and initiatives; to develop competitive products and technologies; and to attract, retain and develop a highly skilled employee workforce. If we are not able to compete successfully, we could be placed at a competitive disadvantage, which could result in the loss of clients and market share, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer.

In attracting deposits, we face substantial competition from other insured depository institutions such as banks, savings institutions and credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives, including money market funds. Some of our competitors enjoy advantages, including more expansive marketing campaigns, better brand recognition and more branch locations. These competitors may offer higher interest rates than we do, which could decrease the deposits that we attract or require us to increase our rates to retain existing deposits or obtain new deposits. Increased deposit competition could materially adversely affect our ability to fund lending operations. As a result, we may need to seek other sources of funds that could increase our cost of funds.

Our business may be adversely affected if we fail to adapt our products and services to technological advances, evolving industry standards and consumer preferences.

The banking industry undergoes constant technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet services, cryptocurrencies and payment systems, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we grow and develop our internet banking and mobile banking channel strategies in addition to remote connectivity solutions. We might not be successful in developing or introducing new products and services, integrating new products or services into our existing offerings, responding or adapting to changes in consumer behavior, preferences, spending, investing and/or saving habits, achieving market acceptance of our products and services, reducing costs in response to pressures to deliver products and services at lower prices or sufficiently developing and maintaining loyal clients. Our future success may depend, in part, on our ability to address the needs of our current and prospective clients by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in operations.

The Company’s business strategy includes the continuation of moderate growth plans, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

Over the long term, we expect to continue to experience organic growth in loans and total assets, the level of our deposits and the scale of our operations. Achieving our growth targets requires us to successfully execute our business strategies, which includes continuing to grow our loan portfolio. Our ability to successfully grow will also depend on the continued availability of loan opportunities that meet underwriting standards. In addition, we may consider the acquisition of other financial institutions and branches within or outside of our market area to the extent permitted by our regulators. The success of any such acquisition will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to integrate the acquired institutions or branches into the current operations of the Company; our ability to limit the outflow of deposits held by clients of the acquired institution or branch locations; our ability to control the incremental increase in noninterest expense arising from any acquisition; and our ability to retain and integrate the appropriate personnel of the acquired institution or branches. We believe we have the resources and internal systems in place to successfully achieve and manage our future growth. If we do not manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to achieve our business plan goals and our business and prospects could be harmed.

We may incur significant losses as a result of ineffective risk management processes and strategies.

We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a risk and control framework encompassing a variety of separate but complementary financial, credit, operational, compliance, and legal reporting systems; internal controls; management review processes; and other mechanisms. While we employ a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques, those techniques and the judgments that accompany their application may not be effective and may not anticipate every economic and financial outcome in all market environments or the specifics and timing of such outcomes.

We face security risks, including denial-of-service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks targeting our colleagues and clients, malware intrusion or data corruption attempts, and identity theft that could result in the disclosure of confidential information, adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.

Our computer systems and network infrastructure and those of third parties, on which we are highly dependent, are subject to security risks and could be susceptible to cyber-attacks, such as denial-of-service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks, malware intrusion or data corruption attempts, terrorist activities, or identity theft. Our business relies on the secure processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval of confidential, proprietary, and other information in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties. In addition, in order to access our network, products, and services, our clients and other third parties may use personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network environment and are subject to their own cybersecurity risks. We

18

Table of Contents

also are subject to heightened cybersecurity, information security and operational risks as a result of work-from-home arrangements that we have put in place for our employees in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic.

We, our clients, regulators, and other third parties, including other financial services institutions and companies engaged in data processing, have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber-attacks. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents. Despite efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems and implement controls, processes, policies, and other protective measures, we may not be able to anticipate all security breaches, nor may we be able to implement sufficient preventive measures against such security breaches, which may result in material losses or consequences for us.

Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, and the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions. For example, cybersecurity risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our mobile-payment and other internet-based product offerings to meet client demand and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications. In addition, cybersecurity risks have significantly increased in recent years, in part due to the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations, hostile foreign governments, disgruntled employees or vendors, activists, and other external parties, including those involved in corporate espionage. Even the most advanced internal control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. Due to increasing geopolitical tensions, nation state cyber-attacks and ransomware are both increasing in sophistication and prevalence. Targeted social engineering and email attacks (i.e. “spear phishing” attacks) are becoming more sophisticated and are extremely difficult to prevent. Persistent attackers may succeed in penetrating defenses given enough resources, time, and motive. The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently, may not be recognized until launched, or until well after a breach has occurred. The speed at which new vulnerabilities are discovered and exploited often before security patches are published continues to rise. The risk of a security breach caused by a cyber-attack at a vendor or by unauthorized vendor access has also increased in recent years. Additionally, the existence of cyber-attacks or security breaches at third-party vendors with access to our data may not be disclosed to us in a timely manner.

We also face indirect technology, cybersecurity, and operational risks relating to the clients and other third parties with whom we do business or upon whom we rely to facilitate or enable our business activities, including, for example, financial counterparties, regulators, and providers of critical infrastructure such as internet access and electrical power. As a result of increasing consolidation, interdependence, and complexity of financial entities and technology systems, a technology failure, cyber-attack, or other information or security breach that significantly degrades, deletes, or compromises the systems or data of one or more financial entities could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including us. This consolidation, interconnectivity, and complexity increases the risk of operational failure, on both individual and industry-wide bases, as disparate systems need to be integrated, often on an accelerated basis. Any third-party technology failure, cyber-attack, or other information or security breach, termination, or constraint could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service our clients, manage our exposure to risk, or expand our business.

Cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber-attack on our systems has been successful, whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with clients and third parties with whom we do business. Hacking of personal information and identity theft risks, in particular, could cause serious reputational harm. A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause us serious negative consequences, including our loss of clients and business opportunities, costs associated with maintaining business relationships after an attack or breach; significant business disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation, exposure, or destruction of our confidential information, intellectual property, funds, and/or those of our clients; or damage to our or our clients’ and/or third parties’ computers or systems, and could result in a violation of applicable privacy laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, additional compliance costs, and could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for losses from a cybersecurity event.

Cybersecurity and data privacy are areas of heightened legislative and regulatory focus.

Cybersecurity and data privacy issues have recently become the subject of increasing legislative and regulatory focus. The federal bank regulatory agencies have in the past proposed, and may in the future propose, regulations that would enhance cyber risk management standards, which would apply to a wide range of large financial institutions and their third-party service providers and would focus on cyber risk governance and management, management of internal and external dependencies, and incident response, cyber resilience, and situational awareness. Several states have also proposed or adopted cybersecurity legislation and regulations, which require, among other things, notification to affected individuals when there has been a security breach of their personal data.

19

Table of Contents

We receive, maintain, and store non-public personal information of our clients and counterparties, including, but not limited to, personally identifiable information and personal financial information. The sharing, use, disclosure, and protection of these types of information are governed by federal and state law. Both personally identifiable information and personal financial information are increasingly subject to legislation and regulation, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of personal information and personal financial information that is collected and handled.

We may become subject to new legislation or regulation concerning cybersecurity or the privacy of personally identifiable information and personal financial information or of any other information we may store or maintain. We could be adversely affected if new legislation or regulations are adopted or if existing legislation or regulations are modified such that we are required to alter our systems or require changes to our business practices or privacy policies. If cybersecurity, data privacy, data protection, data transfer, or data retention laws are implemented, interpreted, or applied in a manner inconsistent with our current practices, we may be subject to fines, litigation, or regulatory enforcement actions or ordered to change our business practices, policies, or systems in a manner that adversely impacts our operating results.

We may not be able to successfully implement future information technology system enhancements, which could adversely affect our business operations and profitability.

We invest significant resources in information technology system enhancements in order to provide functionality and security at an appropriate level. We may not be able to successfully implement and integrate future system enhancements, which could adversely impact the ability to provide timely and accurate financial information in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which could negatively impact the Company's growth, revenue and profit and could result in regulatory scrutiny. In addition, future system enhancements could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations.

Failure to properly utilize system enhancements that are implemented in the future could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components, which would adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expenses during and after systems implementations, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time.

We may become subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.

We provide fiduciary services through OFA. From time to time, clients may make claims and take legal action with regard to the performance of our fiduciary responsibilities. Whether such claims and legal actions are founded or unfounded, if such claims or legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, the claims or related actions may result in significant financial expense and liability to us and/or adversely affect our reputation in the marketplace, as well as adversely impact client demand for our products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Climate change may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

There is an increasing concern over the current and anticipated effects of climate change, which could negatively impact the Company and its clients. Weather-related events, such as severe storms, hurricanes, flooding and droughts, can present risks to the Company and its clients, including property damage, change in the value of properties securing our loans, changes in client behavior and preferences, and disruption of business operations, all which can increase credit risk and result in loss of revenue and additional expenses. These concerns over the impacts of climate change have gained political and social attention resulting in many legislative and regulatory initiatives to lessen the effects of climate change, which also may result in heightened supervisory expectations on banks’ risk management practices. Ongoing legislative and regulatory uncertainties and expanded requirements for climate risk management practices may result in increases to compliance and operating costs, which could have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Mergers and Acquisitions

Growing by acquisition involves risks.

We intend to pursue a growth plan consistent with our business strategy, including growth by acquisition, as well as leveraging our existing branch network. To the extent that we acquire other companies in the future, our business may be negatively impacted by certain risks inherent with such acquisitions. Some of these risks include the following:

•We may incur substantial expenses in pursuing potential acquisitions;

•management may divert its attention from other aspects of our business;

•we may assume potential and unknown liabilities of the acquired company;

20

Table of Contents

•the acquired business may not perform in accordance with management's expectations, including potentially losing key clients of the acquired business;

•difficulties may arise in connection with the integration of the operations of the acquired business with our businesses; and

•we may lose key employees of the combined business.

Our ability to manage growth successfully will depend on our ability to attract qualified personnel and maintain cost controls and asset quality while attracting additional loans and deposits on favorable terms, as well as on factors beyond our control, such as economic conditions and competition. If we grow too quickly and are not able to attract qualified personnel, control costs and maintain asset quality, this continued rapid growth could materially adversely affect our financial performance.

Goodwill generated in acquisitions may negatively affect our financial condition.

To the extent that merger consideration, consisting of cash and shares of our common stock, exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired, including identifiable intangibles, that amount will be reported as goodwill by us. In accordance with current accounting guidance, goodwill will not be amortized but will be evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently as warranted by specific events or circumstances. A failure to realize the expected benefits of a merger could adversely impact the carrying value of the goodwill recognized in the merger and, in turn, negatively affect our financial results.

We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations of acquired entities over time.

Acquisitions involve the integration with companies that previously operated independently. The potential difficulties of combining the operations of the acquired companies with Orrstown include integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds, integrating departments, systems operating procedures and information technologies, combining different corporate cultures, attracting new clients and retaining existing clients and key employees.

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined company and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the merger and the integration process could have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the combined company.

The success of an acquisition depends, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the businesses acquired with the Company. If we are unable to successfully execute on integration, the anticipated earnings and cost savings expected to be derived from an acquisition may not be realized fully or may take longer to realize than anticipated.

The market price of our common stock after acquisitions may be affected by factors different from those affecting our shares currently.

The businesses of the Company and acquired entities may differ and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of the shares of common stock of the combined company may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations and market prices of common stock of each separate entity. The market value of our common stock fluctuates based upon various factors, including changes in our business, operations or prospects, market assessments of the merger, regulatory considerations, market and economic considerations, and other factors. Further, the market price of our common stock after an acquisition may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting our common stock. Additionally, future business acquisitions may result in the issuance and payment of additional shares of stock, which would dilute current shareholders’ ownership interests, and may involve the payment of a premium over book and market values. Therefore, dilution of our tangible book value and net income per common share could occur in connection with any future transaction.

Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance and Legal Matters

Governmental regulation and regulatory actions against us may impair our operations or restrict our growth.

The Company is subject to regulation and supervision under federal and state laws and regulations. The requirements and limitations imposed by such laws and regulations limit the manner in which we conduct our business, undertake new investments and activities and obtain financing. These regulations are designed primarily for the promotion of the safety and soundness of financial institutions and the protection of the deposit insurance funds and consumers, and not to benefit our shareholders. Applicable laws and regulations impose capital adequacy requirements and restrict our ability to repurchase stock or to receive dividends from our subsidiaries. Our ability to service our obligations and pay dividends to shareholders is largely dependent on the receipt of dividends from our subsidiaries, primarily the Bank. The FRB requires a BHC to act as a source of

21

Table of Contents

financial and managerial strength for its subsidiary banks. The FRB could require us to commit resources to the Bank when doing so is not otherwise in the interests of our shareholders or creditors.

We are subject to supervision and examination by numerous governmental bodies. The results of these supervisory or examination activities could limit our ability to engage in new activities or expand. These activities also could result in significant fines, penalties, or required corrective actions, some of which could be difficult to implement. As we expand our product and service offerings, there could be an increase in state regulation affecting our operations. Different approaches to regulation by different jurisdictions could increase our compliance costs or risks of non-compliance.

Financial institution regulation has been the subject of significant legislation in recent years and may be the subject of further significant legislation in the future, none of which is within our control. Federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied or enforced. The Company cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation, regulation or the application thereof. Compliance with such current and potential regulation and scrutiny may significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital and limit our ability to efficiently pursue business opportunities. Bank regulations can hinder our ability to compete with financial services companies that are not subject to the same regulation. A failure to comply, or to have adequate policies and procedures designed to comply, with regulatory requirements and expectations could expose us to damages, fines and regulatory penalties and other regulatory or enforcement actions or consequences, such as limitations on activities otherwise permissible for us or additional requirements for engaging in new activities, and could also injure our reputation with clients and others with whom we do business.

Altering our overdraft fee practices could materially adversely affect the Company’s fee income and results of operations.

Overdraft fee practices of banks have recently come under increased regulatory scrutiny. This scrutiny, along with threats of litigation, have prompted many larger banks to reform their overdraft fee practices or cease charging overdraft fees altogether. Reforming, reducing or eliminating overdraft fees could materially adversely affect our fee income and results of operations.

Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that are required to be paid for FDIC insurance. If there are bank or financial institution failures, the Company may be required to pay significantly higher premiums than the levels currently imposed or additional special assessments or taxes that could adversely affect earnings. Any future increases or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums may materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Legislative, regulatory and legal developments involving income and other taxes could materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal and U.S. state income, payroll, property, sales and use, and other types of taxes, including the Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company's provisions for income taxes. Changes in tax rates, enactments of new tax laws, revisions of tax regulations, and claims or litigation with taxing authorities could result in substantially higher taxes, and therefore, could have a significant adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Increases in the assessment rate for the Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax, which is calculated on the outstanding equity of the Bank, may also materially adversely affect results of operations.

The Company is required to use judgment in applying accounting policies and different estimates and assumptions in the application of these policies could result in a decrease in capital and/or other material changes to the reports of financial condition and results of operations.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the ALL, the fair value of certain financial instruments, particularly securities, and goodwill and purchase accounting. While we have identified those accounting policies that we consider critical and have procedures in place to facilitate the associated judgments, different assumptions in the application of these policies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

22

Table of Contents

Changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect how we report our financial results and condition.

From time to time, the FASB, SEC and other regulatory bodies change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. These changes can be operationally complex to implement and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations.

The short-term and long-term impact of changing regulatory capital requirements and new capital rules is uncertain.

The Basel III Capital Rules have targeted higher levels of base capital, certain capital buffers, and a migration toward common equity as the key source of regulatory capital, as domestic and international bank regulatory agencies have sought to require financial institutions, including depository institutions, to maintain generally higher levels of capital. The application of more stringent capital requirements to the Company and the Bank could, among other things, result in lower returns on invested capital, result in the need for additional capital, and result in regulatory actions if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements, including limitations on our ability to make distributions, including paying out dividends or buying back shares. Furthermore, the imposition of liquidity requirements in connection with the implementation of Basel III could result in our having to lengthen the term of our funding, restructure our business models, and/or increase our holdings of liquid assets.

Noncompliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations could cause us material financial loss.

The Bank Secrecy Act and the PATRIOT Act contain anti-money laundering and financial transparency provisions intended to detect and prevent the use of the U.S. financial system for money laundering and terrorist financing activities. The Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the PATRIOT Act, requires depository institutions and their holding companies to undertake activities including maintaining an anti-money laundering program, verifying the identity of clients, monitoring for and reporting suspicious transactions, reporting on cash transactions exceeding specified thresholds, and responding to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, a unit of the Treasury Department that administers the Bank Secrecy Act, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the federal bank regulatory agencies, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, and IRS.

There is also increased scrutiny of compliance with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. If our policies, procedures, and systems are deemed deficient or the policies, procedures, and systems of the financial institutions that we have already acquired or may acquire in the future are deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions such as restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain planned business activities, including acquisition plans, which would negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us.

We are subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.

The Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and other fair lending laws and regulations impose community investment and nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The CFPB, the FRB, the Department of Justice and other federal agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act or other fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may become subject to enforcement actions even though noncompliance was inadvertent or unintentional.

The financial services industry is subject to intense scrutiny from bank supervisors in the examination process and aggressive enforcement of federal and state regulations, particularly with respect to mortgage-related practices and other consumer compliance matters, and compliance with anti-money laundering, Bank Secrecy Act and Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations, and economic sanctions against certain foreign countries and nationals. Enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. We maintain systems and procedures designed to ensure that we comply with applicable laws and regulations; however, some legal/regulatory frameworks provide for the imposition of fines or penalties for noncompliance even though the noncompliance was inadvertent or unintentional and even though systems and procedures designed to ensure compliance were in place at the time. Failure to comply with these and other

23

Table of Contents

regulations, and supervisory expectations related thereto, may result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions, reputation damage, or restrictions on our business.

Pending litigation and legal proceedings and the impact of any finding of liability or damages could adversely impact the Company and its financial condition and results of operations.

As more fully described in Note 23, Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data," of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company believes that the allegations of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's third amended complaint are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend itself against those claims. It is not possible at this time to estimate reasonably possible losses, or even a range of reasonably possible losses, in connection with the litigation. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will not incur any losses associated with this litigation or that any losses that are incurred will not be material.

Indemnification costs associated with litigation and legal proceedings could adversely impact the Company and its financial condition and results of operations.

We are generally required, to the extent permitted by Pennsylvania law, to indemnify our current and former directors and officers who are named as defendants in lawsuits. We also have certain contractual indemnification obligations to third parties regarding litigation including, with respect to the SEPTA litigation, the underwriters of our March 2010 public offering of common stock. Generally, insurance coverage is not available for such indemnification costs we could incur to third parties. Current or future litigation could result in indemnification expenses that could have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Liquidity

We are subject to liquidity risk, which could negatively affect our funding levels.

Market conditions or other events could negatively affect our access to or the cost of funding, affecting our ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, or fund asset growth and new business initiatives at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse consequences.

Although we maintain a liquid asset portfolio and have implemented strategies to maintain sufficient and diverse sources of funding to accommodate planned, as well as unanticipated, changes in assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet commitments under various economic conditions, a substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in the level or cost of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on us. If the cost effectiveness or the availability of supply in these credit markets is reduced for a prolonged period of time, our funding needs may require us to access funding and manage liquidity by other means. These alternatives may include generating client deposits, securitizing or selling loans, extending the maturity of wholesale borrowings, borrowing under certain secured borrowing arrangements, using relationships developed with a variety of fixed income investors, and further managing loan growth and investment opportunities. These alternative means of funding may result in an increase to the overall cost of funds and may not be available under stressed conditions, which would cause us to liquidate a portion of our liquid asset portfolio to meet any funding needs.

Loss of deposits or a change in deposit mix could increase our cost of funding.

Deposits are a low cost and stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial institutions for deposits. Funding costs may increase if we lose deposits and are forced to replace them with more expensive sources of funding, if clients shift their deposits into higher cost products or if we need to raise interest rates to avoid losing deposits. Higher funding costs reduce our net interest margin, net interest income and net income.

Wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits at maturity and support our operations and future growth.

The Company must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers. To manage liquidity, we draw upon a number of funding sources in addition to core deposit growth and repayments and maturities of loans and investments. These sources include Federal Home Loan Bank advances, proceeds from the sale of investments and loans, and liquidity resources at the holding company. Our ability to manage liquidity will be severely constrained if we are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable costs. In addition, if we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our costs. In this case, operating margins and profitability would be adversely affected. Turbulence in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition and the willingness of certain counterparties and clients to do business with us.

24

Table of Contents

The Parent Company is a holding company dependent on liquidity through payments, including dividends, from its bank subsidiary, which is subject to restrictions.

The Parent Company is a holding company, separate from the Bank, and must provide for its own liquidity. The Parent Company depends on dividends, distributions and other payments from the Bank to fund dividend payments and stock repurchases, if permitted, and to fund all payments on obligations. The Bank is subject to laws that restrict dividend payments or authorize regulatory bodies to prohibit or reduce the flow of funds from it to us. If the Bank is unable to pay dividends to us, we may not be able to service our debt, pay dividends on our common stock or engage in stock repurchases. Further, as a result of the capital conservation buffer requirement, our ability to engage in stock repurchases, pay dividends on our common stock or service our debt could be restricted if we do not maintain a capital conservation buffer. A reduction or elimination of dividends could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and would adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.In addition, our right to participate in a distribution of assets upon the Bank’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the Bank’s creditors, including its depositors. Restrictions on the Bank’s ability to dividend funds to the Company are included in Note 17, Shareholders' Equity and Regulatory Capital, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company.

Our ability to engage in routine funding and other transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have historically led to market-wide liquidity problems, losses of depositor, creditor and counterparty confidence and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. We could experience increases in deposits and assets as a result of other banks’ difficulties or failure, which would increase the capital we are required to maintain to support such growth.

Risks Related to Owning Our Stock

If the Company wants, or is compelled, to raise additional capital in the future, that capital may not be available when it is needed or on terms favorable to current shareholders.

Federal banking regulators require us to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. These capital levels are determined and dictated by law, regulation and banking regulatory agencies. In addition, capital levels are also determined by our management and board of directors based on capital levels that they believe are necessary to support our business operations. At December 31, 2021, all four capital ratios applicable to us were above regulatory minimum levels to be deemed “well capitalized” under current bank regulatory guidelines. To be “well capitalized,” banks generally must maintain a tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0%, CET1 capital ratio of 6.5%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%.

Changes in our financial condition or results of operations, applicable accounting standards, laws and regulations and other factors could make it necessary or advisable for the Company to raise additional capital. Under such circumstances, the Company’s ability to raise additional capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance of our ability to raise additional capital on terms and time frames acceptable to us or to raise additional capital at all. Additionally, the inability to raise capital in sufficient amounts may adversely affect our operations, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are nonspecific to us, such as severe disruption of the financial markets or negative news and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole. If we raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other securities, we would likely dilute the ownership interests of current investors by diluting earnings per share of our common stock and potentially diluting book value per share, depending on the issuance price. The price at which we issue additional shares of stock could be less than the current market price of our common stock. Furthermore, a capital raise through the issuance of additional shares may have an adverse impact on our stock price. In addition, a capital raise involving the issuance of debt securities could negatively impact our earnings and liquidity.

25

Table of Contents

The market price of our common stock is subject to volatility.

The market price of the Company’s common stock has been subject to fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include actual or anticipated variations in our operational results and cash flows, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, trading volume, large purchases or sales of our common stock, market conditions within the banking industry, the general state of the securities markets and the market for stocks of financial institutions, as well as general economic conditions. In addition, if the Company’s common stock ceases to be included in the Russell 2000 index, which is reconstituted in June of each year, this could result in decreased liquidity in, and demand for, our common stock, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

A reduction in our credit rating could adversely affect our access to capital and could increase our cost of funds.

A credit rating agency regularly evaluates the Parent Company and the Bank, and credit ratings are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength and ability to generate earnings, as well as factors not entirely within our control, including conditions affecting the financial services industry, the economy, and changes in rating methodologies. There can be no assurance that we will maintain our current credit ratings. A downgrade of the credit ratings of the Parent Company or the Bank could adversely affect our access to liquidity and capital, and could significantly increase our cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements, and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to us or purchase our securities. This could affect our growth, profitability, and financial condition, including liquidity.

General Risk Factors

The COVID-19 pandemic may continue to adversely affect our employees, clients, business and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic has, and may continue to, severely impact the national economy and the regional and local markets in which we operate, lower equity market valuations, create significant volatility and disruption in capital and debt markets, and increase unemployment levels. Although the economy recovered somewhat in 2021, supply chain challenges and workforce shortages have contributed to rising inflationary pressures. Our business operations may be disrupted if significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic. We are subject to heightened cybersecurity, information security and operational risks as a result of work-from-home arrangements that we have put in place for our employees. Government policies and directives relating to the pandemic response are subject to change. Increases in deposit balances due, among other things, to government stimulus and relief programs could adversely affect our financial performance if we are unable to successfully lend or invest those funds. The extent to which the pandemic continues to impact our business is dependent on future developments, including the severity and duration of emerging COVID-19 variants, the availability, effectiveness and distribution of vaccines and other public health measures, and the impact of the pandemic on our employees, clients, vendors, counterparties and service providers, all of which are highly uncertain and difficult to predict.

The Company may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.

Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by us can be intense, and we may not be able to attract and hire sufficiently skilled people to fill open and newly created positions or to retain current or future employees. This competition for talented, skilled and diverse employees has been intensified by the increase in remote and flexible work arrangements, wage pressures and opportunities in the labor market, as well as the national trend of large numbers of employees resigning from their jobs throughout 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is referred to as the “Great Resignation.” Although the Company has not experienced a significant level of resignations, these trends have resulted in labor shortages in many of the Company’s markets, which has made attracting new employees and replacing existing employees more difficult. An inability to attract and retain individuals with the necessary skills to fill open positions, or the unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel, could have a material adverse impact on our business due to the loss of their skills, knowledge of our markets, years of industry experience or the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

We believe that our continued growth and future success will depend in large part on the skills of our management team and our ability to motivate and retain these individuals and other key personnel. The loss of service of one or more of our executive officers or key personnel could delay or reduce our ability to successfully implement our long-term business strategy, our business could suffer, and the value of our stock could be materially adversely affected. Leadership changes will occur from time to time, and we cannot predict whether significant resignations will occur or whether we will be able to recruit additional qualified personnel. We believe our management team possesses valuable knowledge about the banking industry and that their knowledge and relationships could be very difficult to replicate. Our success also depends on the experience of our branch managers and lending officers and on their relationships with the clients and communities they serve. The loss of these key personnel could negatively impact our banking operations. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.

26

Table of Contents

We could be adversely affected by a failure in our internal controls.

We rely on our employees to design, manage, and operate our systems and controls to assure that we properly enter into, record and manage processes, transactions and other relationships with clients, suppliers and other parties with whom we do business. In some cases, we rely on employees of third parties to perform these tasks. We also depend on employees and the systems and controls for which they are responsible to assure that we identify and mitigate the risks that are inherent in our relationships and activities. When we change processes or procedures, introduce new products or services, or implement new technologies, we may fail to adequately identify or manage operational risks resulting from such changes.

As a result of our necessary reliance on employees, whether ours or those of third parties, we are subject to human vulnerabilities. These range from innocent human error to misconduct or malfeasance, potentially leading to operational breakdowns or other failures. Our controls may not be adequate to prevent problems resulting from human involvement in our business, including risks associated with the design, operation and monitoring of automated systems. Errors by our employees or others responsible for systems and controls on which we depend and any resulting failures of those systems and controls could result in significant harm to us. This could include client remediation costs, regulatory fines or penalties, litigation or enforcement actions, or limitations on our business activities. We could also suffer damage to our reputation, impacting our ability to attract and retain clients and employees.

Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well-designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Negative public opinion could damage our reputation and adversely affect our earnings.

Reputational risk, or the risk to the Company's earnings and capital from negative public opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion can result from the actual or perceived manner in which we conduct our business activities, including banking operations and trust and investment operations, our management of actual or potential conflicts of interest and ethical issues, and our protection of confidential client information. Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company's ability to keep and attract clients and can expose the Company to litigation and regulatory action. Although we take steps to minimize reputation risk in the way we conduct our business activities and deal with our clients, communities and vendors, these steps may not be effective.

Acts of terrorism, natural disasters, global climate change, pandemics and global conflicts may have a negative impact on our business and operations.

Acts of terrorism, natural disasters, global climate change, pandemics, global conflicts or other similar events could disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties, reduce or destroy the value of the collateral for our loans and otherwise have a negative impact on our business and operations. While we have in place business continuity plans, such events could still damage our facilities, disrupt or delay the normal operations of our business (including communications and technology), result in harm to, or cause travel limitations on, our employees, and have a similar impact on our clients, suppliers, third-party vendors and counterparties. These events also could impact us negatively to the extent that they result in reduced capital markets activity, lower asset price levels, or disruptions in general economic activity in the U.S. or abroad, or in financial market settlement functions. In addition, these or similar events may impact economic growth negatively, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operations, and may have other adverse effects on us in ways that we are unable to predict.

Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.

Provisions of Pennsylvania law and provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us or have the effect of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire control of us, even if a merger might be in the best interest of our shareholders. Our articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval and such preferred stock could be issued as a defensive measure in response to a takeover proposal. These and other provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

27

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices are located at 77 East King Street, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, with additional executive and administrative offices at 4750 Lindle Road, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. These facilities are owned by the Bank, which also maintains its principal and additional executive and administrative offices at those locations.

We own or lease other premises for use in conducting our business activities, including bank branches, an operations center, and offices in Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin, Lancaster, and Perry Counties, Pennsylvania and Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Howard, and Washington Counties, Maryland. We believe that the properties currently owned and leased are adequate for present levels of operation. We are constantly evaluating the best and most efficient mix of branch locations to service our clients due to evolving trends in our industry and increased client engagement through digital channels.

In January 2020, Orrstown consolidated five Pennsylvania branches in Franklin and Perry Counties that averaged less than $20.0 million in deposits per location into other, larger Bank branches and sold an operation's center facility in the second quarter of 2020. These efforts improved the profitability of the remaining branch locations and eliminated close to 50,000 square feet of excess back office space. In the first quarter of 2021, the Company consolidated an additional six branch locations, discontinued three loan production offices, and reduced its back-office real estate, which reduced approximately 27,000 square feet.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information regarding legal proceedings is included in Note 23, Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data."

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

28

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ORRF.” At the close of business on March 7, 2022, there were 2,938 shareholders of record.

The Board declared cash dividends of $0.74 and $0.68 per common share in 2021 and 2020, respectively. Although the Company cannot guarantee the amount of future dividend payments, the Board understands the importance of the dividend to our shareholders and is committed to paying regular cash dividends; however, there can be no assurance as to future dividends because they are dependent on our future earnings, capital requirements and financial condition. Restrictions on the payment of dividends are discussed in Note 17, Shareholders' Equity and Regulatory Capital, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." On January 19, 2022, the Board declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per common share, which was paid on February 8, 2022, to shareholders of record as of February 1, 2022.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Information regarding the Company's equity compensation plans is included in Part III, Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a) (b) (c) (d)

In September 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to 5% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock, or approximately 416,000 shares, in accordance with all applicable securities laws and regulations, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. On April 19, 2021, the Board of Directors authorized the additional future repurchase of up to 562,000 shares of its outstanding common stock. When and if appropriate, repurchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions, regulatory requirements and other corporate considerations, as determined by management. Share repurchases may not occur and may be discontinued at any time. For the three months and full year ended December 31, 2021, the Company repurchased 32,652 and 79,490 shares of its common stock at an average price of $24.17 per share and $23.38, respectively. At December 31, 2021, 234,170 shares had been repurchased under the program at a total cost of $4.5 million, or $19.08 per share. Common stock available for future repurchase totals approximately 743,830 shares, or 7% of the Company's outstanding common stock at December 31, 2021.

29

Table of Contents

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The performance graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with other indexes: the S&P U.S. SmallCap Banks index of banks with assets between $1.0 billion and $5.0 billion, the S&P 500 Index, and the NASDAQ Composite index. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2016 and reinvestment of dividends on the date of payment without commissions. Shareholder returns on our common stock are based on trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market. The performance graph represents past performance and should not be considered to be an indication of future performance.

Period Ending

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence © 2022

In accordance with the rules of the SEC, this section captioned “Performance Graph” shall not be incorporated by reference into any of our future filings made under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act. The Performance Graph and its accompanying table are not deemed to be soliciting material or to be considered filed under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The Company has not, within the past three years, sold any equity securities, which were not registered under the Securities Act.

ITEM 6 – [RESERVED]

30

Table of Contents

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis is intended to assist readers in understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain prior period amounts presented in this discussion and analysis have been reclassified to conform to current period classifications.

Overview

The results of our operations are highly dependent on economic conditions and market interest rates. Our profitability for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was influenced by our continued organic growth and ongoing expansion into targeted markets, the acquisitions of Mercersburg and Hamilton, and a continued focus on maintaining strong asset quality. The Company's financial results in 2021 and 2020 reflected the significant impact of the SBA PPP fee income of $16.8 million and $10.9 million, respectively. These and other matters are discussed more fully below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized charges associated with the consolidation of six branch locations, the discontinuance of three loan production offices, a reduction in back-office real estate and staffing reductions. These actions were initiated due to evolving client preferences for the digital delivery of products and services. The cost reductions resulting from these actions and the consolidation of five branches earlier in 2020, enabled the Company to invest in technology and people to facilitate its continued growth. A charge of $1.6 million was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2020, which included $1.3 million related to branch consolidations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, and follow general practices within the financial services industry. The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." In applying those accounting policies, the Company's management is required to exercise judgment in determining many of the methodologies, assumptions and estimates to be utilized. Certain of the critical accounting estimates are more dependent on such judgment and, in some cases, may contribute to volatility in our reported financial performance should the assumptions and estimates used change over time due to changes in circumstances. Some of the more significant areas in which the Company's management applies critical assumptions and estimates include the following:

Accounting for loan losses — The loan portfolio is the largest asset on the Company's balance sheet. The allowance for loan losses represents the amount that, in management’s judgment, appropriately reflects credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. A provision for loan losses is recorded to adjust the level of the ALL as deemed necessary by management. In estimating losses inherent in the loan portfolio, assumptions and judgment are applied to measure amounts and timing of expected future cash flows, collateral values and other factors used to determine the borrowers’ abilities to repay its obligations. Historical loss trends are also considered, as are economic conditions, industry trends, portfolio trends and borrower-specific financial data. Loans acquired at a discount, that is, in part, attributable to credit quality, are initially recorded at fair value with no carry-over of an acquired entity’s previously established ALL. Cash flows expected at acquisition, in excess of estimated fair value, are recognized as interest income over the remaining lives of the loans. Subsequent decreases in the expected principal cash flows require the Company to evaluate the need for additions to the ALL. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result, first, in the recovery of any applicable ALL and, then, in the recognition of additional interest income over the remaining lives of the loans. Changes in the circumstances considered when determining management’s estimates and assumptions could result in changes to those estimates and assumptions and also in adjustment of the ALL, or, in the case of loans acquired at a discount, increases in interest income in future periods. The Company has delayed the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The implementation deadline of ASU 2016-13 was extended for smaller reporting and other companies until the fiscal year and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022. The Company will implement ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2023. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to the allowance for credit losses as of the date of adoption of the new standard.

Accounting for income taxes — The Company is subject to federal and state income taxes in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Due to the complexity of the tax laws, management may make judgments in computing income tax expense, which are subject to varying interpretations by management and the taxing authorities, and could result in changes upon final determination. Income tax expense is based upon income before taxes, adjusted for the effect of certain tax-exempt income, non-deductible expenses and credits. Temporary differences may occur as a result of certain income and expense items being reported in different periods for financial reporting and tax purposes. Deferred taxes are calculated, using the applicable enacted marginal tax rate, based on the differences between the tax basis and carrying value of the asset or liability on the financial

31

Table of Contents

statement. The Company recognizes, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Under FASB ASC 740, the Company must apply a more likely than not probability threshold on its tax positions before a financial statement benefit is recognized. A valuation allowance would be recognized if any deferred tax assets were determined to be more likely than not unrecoverable. See Note 8, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplemental Data," to the consolidated financial statements for details on our income tax expense and deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Valuation methodologies — Management applies various valuation methodologies to assets and liabilities which often involve a significant degree of judgment, particularly when liquid markets do not exist for the particular items being valued. Quoted market prices are referred to when estimating fair values for certain assets, such as most investment securities. However, for those items for which an observable liquid market does not exist, management utilizes significant estimates and assumptions to value such items. Examples of these items include derivatives and mortgage servicing assets. These valuations require the use of various assumptions, including, among others, discount rates, rates of return on assets, repayment rates, cash flows, default rates, costs of servicing and liquidation values. The use of different assumptions could produce significantly different results, which could have material positive or negative effects on our results of operations, financial condition or disclosures of fair value information. In addition to valuation, the Company must assess whether there are any declines in value below the carrying value of certain assets that should be considered other than temporary or otherwise require an adjustment in carrying value and recognition of a loss in the consolidated statements of income. Examples include investment securities, mortgage servicing rights, goodwill and core deposit intangible assets.

Readers of the Company's consolidated financial statements should be aware that the estimates and assumptions used may need to be updated in future financial presentations for changes in circumstances, business or economic conditions, in order to fairly represent the condition of the Company at that time.

Economic Climate, Inflation and Interest Rates

Preliminary real GDP for the fourth quarter of 2021 reflected an annualized increase of 7.0%. This is an increase from the third quarter 2021 growth rate of 2.3% and annualized growth of 4.3% for the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in the fourth quarter was driven by increases in private inventory investment, exports including travel, personal consumption expenditures within healthcare, recreation and transportation, and nonresidential fixed investments in intellectual property products, partially offset by decreases in government spending. Restrictions and disruptions continued due to COVID-19 cases throughout the country. There were decreases in government assistance payments as many federal programs expired or were tapered. For the year 2021, real GDP increased 5.7% compared to a 3.4% decrease in 2020. Although there has been a strong economic recovery in 2021, increased COVID-19 cases, inclusive of the new delta and omicron variants, resulted in labor shortages and an increase in inflation.

The national unemployment rate declined to 3.9% in December 2021, down from 4.8% in September 2021 and from 6.7% in December 2020. There were notable job gains in leisure and hospitality, education, professional and business services, retail trade and transportation and warehousing during the year. The personal consumption expenditures ("PCE") price index increased 6.5% in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared with an increase of 5.3% in the third quarter of 2021. For the full 2021 year, the PCE price index increased 3.9% compared to an increase of 1.2% in 2020.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, market interest rates had declined significantly, with the 10-year Treasury bond falling for the first time below 1.00% on March 3, 2020; it was at 0.93% on December 31, 2020 and has since recovered to 1.51% as of December 31, 2021. In 2020, in reaction to the increase in market uncertainty, the FRB cut the Fed Funds rates by 150 basis points to 0.25%. In its most recent meeting in January 2022, the Federal Reserve Open Markets Committee left the Fed Funds rate unchanged; however, with inflation elevating and the labor market recovering, the Committee expects that it will be appropriate to raise the target range for the Fed Funds rate. In December 2021, the Committee forecasted at least three 25 basis point rate increases in 2022 and noted that it expects to conclude its asset purchase program as early as March 2022.

It is unknown how long the adverse conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the evolution of new variants will continue and what the complete financial effect will be to the Company. It is reasonably foreseeable that estimates made in the financial statements could be materially and adversely impacted in the near term as a result of these conditions, including expected credit losses on loans and the fair value of financial instruments that are carried at fair value.

The majority of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature, and therefore, differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. However, inflation does have an impact to the Company on the growth of total assets and on noninterest expenses, which tend to rise during

32

Table of Contents

periods of general inflation. Risks also exist due to supply and demand imbalances, job growth, geopolitical tensions and uncertainty on the course of the COVID-19 virus.

As the Company’s balance sheet consists primarily of financial instruments, interest income and interest expense are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates and the slope of the yield curve, as well as the mix of assets and funding. The Company has been able to grow its net interest income by $3.4 million from 2020 to 2021 through the recognition of SBA PPP processing fee income, organic commercial loan growth and a reduction in the cost of funds. Competition for quality lending opportunities and deposits remains intense, which, together with a flattening yield curve, will continue to challenge the Company's ability to grow its net interest margin and to manage its overhead expenses.

Results of Operations

Summary

Earnings in 2021 reflected an increase in net interest income from SBA PPP processing fee recognition, the impact of commercial loan growth, reductions in the cost of funds and a decrease in the provision for loan loss expense.

The Company recorded net income of $32.9 million, $26.5 million and $16.9 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Diluted earnings per share totaled $2.96, $2.40 and $1.61 for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Net interest income totaled $87.0 million, $83.6 million and $69.3 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, principally reflecting our expanded geographic footprint, organic growth in commercial loans from an expanded sales force as we continued to take advantage of market opportunities, and SBA PPP processing fee income. As previously noted, interest rates increased during 2019, but decreased throughout 2020, contributing to reductions in yields on loans and investment securities and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

Asset quality trends continued to exhibit low levels of charge-offs and non-performing loans. The provision for loan losses totaled $1.1 million, $5.3 million and $900 thousand in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In 2021, improvement in borrowers' performances and the economic recovery resulted in a reduction in certain qualitative factors, and the COVID-19 related factor. The increase in provision for loan losses in 2020 was primarily a result of increased uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Noninterest income totaled $29.2 million, $28.3 million and $28.5 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The increase from 2020 to 2021 included increases of $1.7 million in wealth management income, $706 thousand in interchange income, $635 thousand in mortgage banking activities, and investment securities gains of $654 thousand due to the sales of $148.4 million of investments securities during 2021. These increases in 2021 were partially offset by gains on the sale of portfolio loans of $2.8 million recorded in 2020. There were no sales of portfolio loans in 2021.

Noninterest expenses totaled $74.1 million, $74.1 million and $77.3 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The changes in certain components of noninterest expenses between 2019 and 2020 reflect the Hamilton acquisition, and the Company's continued focus on aligning its talent and locations with its business model. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $3.9 million from 2019 to 2020 due primarily to Hamilton and $652 thousand from 2020 to 2021 due to key staff additions to facilitate the Company's continued growth. Occupancy and furniture and fixture costs increased $468 thousand from 2019 to 2020 and $330 thousand from 2020 to 2021. In 2020, the Company incurred $1.3 million in pretax branch consolidation expenses, with $9.0 million incurred in 2019 for pretax merger related and branch consolidation expenses. During 2020, the Company recorded a loss of $736 thousand associated with the sale of an operations facility, and recorded a recovery from settlement on a cybersecurity insurance claim of $486 thousand.

Income tax expense totaled $8.0 million, $6.0 million and $2.7 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, or an effective tax rate of 19.6%, 18.6% and 13.8% respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate is less than the 21% federal statutory rate, principally due to tax-free income, which includes interest income on tax-free loans and securities and income from life insurance policies, federal income tax credits, and the impact of non-tax deductible expenses, including merger related expenses. The difference in the effective tax rate in 2021 from prior years was primarily due to an increase in earnings before income taxes.

33

Table of Contents

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the primary component of the Company's net income. Interest-earning assets include loans, investment securities and federal funds sold. Interest-bearing liabilities include deposits and borrowed funds.

Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates, the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the composition of those assets and liabilities. “Net interest spread” and “net interest margin” are two common statistics related to changes in net interest income. Net interest spread represents the difference between the yields earned on interest-earning assets and the rates paid for interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income to average earning asset balances.

The FRB influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates offered by many financial institutions. The Company's loan portfolio is affected by changes in the prime interest rate. In 2019, 25 basis point reductions in the prime rate occurred in August, September and October and the prime rate ended the year at 4.75%. In March 2020, the prime rate was reduced by 150 basis points and ended at 3.25% in 2020. The prime rate remained at that level throughout 2021.

Core deposits are deposits that are stable, lower cost and generally reprice more slowly than other deposits when interest rates change. Core deposits, which exclude certificates of deposit, are typically funds of local clients who also have a borrowing or other relationship with the Bank. The Company is primarily funded by core deposits, with noninterest-bearing demand deposits historically being a significant source of funds. This lower-cost funding base is expected to have a positive impact on our net interest income and net interest margin in a rising interest rate environment.

The following table presents net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin on a taxable-equivalent basis for 2021, 2020 and 2019. Taxable-equivalent adjustments are the result of increasing income from tax-free loans and investments by an amount equal to the taxes that would be paid if the income were fully taxable based on a 21% federal corporate tax rate for 2021, 2020 and 2019, reflecting our statutory tax rates for those years.

34

Table of Contents

Assets

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Taxable-equivalent net interest margin 3.25 % 3.44 % 3.43 %

NOTES TO ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME:

(2) Average balances include nonaccrual loans.

(3) Interest income on loans includes prepayment and late fees.

35

Table of Contents

The following table presents changes in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis for 2021, 2020 and 2019 by rate and volume components.

AverageVolume AverageRate Total AverageVolume AverageRate Total

Interest Income

Interest Expense

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 23 (77) (54) 118 (145) (27)

average rate. The remainder is attributable to rate.

2021 versus 2020

In 2021, net interest income increased by $3.4 million, or 4%, compared with 2020. Net interest income for 2021 on a taxable-equivalent basis increased by $3.4 million, or 4%, compared with 2020. The Company’s net interest spread decreased by twelve basis points to 3.17% for 2021 compared with 2020.

The taxable-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets and cost of interest-bearing liabilities both decreased from 2020 to 2021, reflecting a decreasing interest rate environment. Average commercial loans increased in 2021 due to SBA PPP loans and commercial loan production. Average balances in taxable investment securities declined as a result of sales and paydowns. Average interest-bearing liabilities declined due to decreased average balances in time deposits and overnight borrowings.

Taxable-equivalent interest income on loans decreased by $3.4 million, or 4%, from 2020 to 2021. The decline resulted from a decrease of 31 basis points in loan yield from 4.56% in 2020 to 4.25% in 2021 due to a decreasing interest rate environment. The impact of the reduced yield was partially offset by the increase in average loans of $56.9 million, or 3%, which was driven by SBA PPP and commercial loan production. Accretion of purchase accounting adjustments included in interest income was $2.3 million, $2.3 million, and $3.8 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Taxable-equivalent interest income earned on investment securities decreased by $2.7 million, or 21%, from 2020 to 2021, with decreases in both average volume and yield. Average investment securities decreased by $32.3 million, or 7%, and the taxable-equivalent yield decreased by 40 basis points from 2.52% in 2020 to 2.12% in 2021. Sales of taxable securities of $148.4 million between the first and third quarters of 2021 contributed to the decrease in average investment securities. The Company purchased investment securities of $195.0 million during 2021; however, the timing and size of the purchases for the year led to a decrease in the average balance.

Interest expense on deposits and borrowings decreased by $9.3 million from 2020 to 2021, despite an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $49.9 million, or 2%. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined by 47 basis points from 0.80% in 2020 to 0.33% in 2021 due to deposit rate reductions in the first and third quarters of 2021 combined with the continued maturity of higher yielding certificates of deposit and the repayment and maturities of overnight borrowings.

The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased by $183.9 million, or 10% from 2020 to 2021. Average interest-bearing demand deposits increased by $236.7 million, or 20%, in 2021. Interest expense for interest-bearing demand

36

Table of Contents

deposits decreased by $3.5 million, with the cost of funds decreasing from 0.41% in 2020 to 0.09% in 2021 as a result of deposit rate reductions during 2021, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $4.4 million. Average time deposits decreased $92.0 million, or 20%, in 2021, which reduced interest expense on time deposits by $1.4 million. The cost of time deposits declined by 80 basis points from 1.55% in 2020 to 0.75% in 2021 due to rate reductions.

Interest expense on all borrowings decreased by $1.5 million in 2021 from 2020 due primarily to reduced balances. The average balance of FHLB advances decreased by $138.9 million from 2020 to 2021 due to maturities and repayments, while the average balance of short-term borrowings increased by $4.8 million.

2020 versus 2019

In 2020, net interest income increased by $14.3 million, or 21%, compared with 2019. Net interest income for 2020 on a taxable-equivalent basis increased by $14.1 million, or 20%, compared with 2019. The Company’s net interest spread increased by five basis points to 3.29% for 2020 compared with 2019. Taxable-equivalent yields on interest-earning assets and costs of interest-bearing liabilities both decreased from 2019 to 2020, reflecting increased average balances from SBA PPP loans, organic growth and acquisitions, partially offset by changes in the interest rate environment between years. Other factors impacting the comparison of taxable-equivalent yields between 2019 and 2020 include the effect of purchase accounting related to the Hamilton acquisition and the timing of our adjustments to rates paid on interest-bearing deposits in response to market demand.

Taxable-equivalent interest income on loans increased by $12.3 million, or 16%, from 2019 to 2020. The increase resulted from SBA PPP loans originated in 2020, which drove an increase in average loan volume and a decrease in yield, with average loans increasing $435.7 million, or 29%, and yield decreasing 50 basis points from 5.06% in 2019 to 4.56% in 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, SBA PPP loans had an average balance of $318.4 million and an average yield of 3.5%. Accretion of purchase accounting adjustments in connection with acquisitions increased interest income by $2.3 million, $3.8 million and $335 thousand in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Taxable-equivalent interest income earned on securities decreased by $4.7 million, or 27%, from 2019 to 2020, with both average volume and yield decreasing. Average securities decreased by $5.2 million, or 1%, and the taxable-equivalent yield decreased from 3.43% in 2019 to 2.52% in 2020. Contributing to the overall decrease in interest income on securities was a decrease in average securities balances of $5.2 million from 2019 to 2020. This was partially offset by declines in the yield on floating rate securities, which fell as the FRB reduced short-term rates by 75 basis points in the second half of 2019 and an additional 150 basis points in the first half of 2020.

Interest expense on deposits and borrowings decreased by $7.7 million from 2019 to 2020, despite an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $247.9 million, or 14%. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined by 55 basis points from 1.35% in 2019 to 0.80% in 2020 due to a decline in market interest rates. In addition, there was an increase in non-interest bearing liabilities of $147.5 million, or 63%, from 2019 to 2020 due primarily to the funding of SBA PPP loans in 2020.

The Company's ability to attract new deposits in all categories, but in particular interest-bearing demand deposits, resulted in an increase in average interest-bearing deposits totaling $236.3 million, or 26%, in 2020. Interest expense for these deposits decreased by $3.5 million, with the cost of funds decreasing from 0.90% in 2019 to 0.41% in 2020. The decrease was driven by the decreasing market rates from 2019 through 2020 due to the rate decreases commenced by the FRB.

The Company also increased its average FHLB advances in 2020. Borrowings generally have higher interest rates associated with them than interest-bearing deposits. Interest expense on all borrowings decreased $374 thousand in 2020, with average balances decreasing $9.2 million for short-term borrowings while FHLB advances increased $75.7 million. The average rate paid on short-term borrowings decreased from 1.28% in 2019 to 0.48% in 2020 and the average rate paid on FHLB advances decreased from 2.21% in 2019 to 1.07% in 2020.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $1.1 million, $5.3 million and $900 thousand in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In calculating the provision for loan losses, both quantitative and qualitative factors, including the Company's favorable historical charge-off data and economic and market conditions, were considered. Commercial loan growth resulted in the determination that provision expense was required in 2021, 2020 and 2019. The increase in provision from 2019 to 2020 was due primarily to the impact of COVID-19 on the Company's loan portfolio as a new qualitative factor was created to address the potential associated risk. The COVID-19 qualitative factor was fully reversed in 2021 based on the sustained performance of the impacted borrowers.

37

Table of Contents

See further discussion in the “Asset Quality” and “Credit Risk Management” sections of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Noninterest Income

The following table compares noninterest income for 2021, 2020 and 2019.

2021 versus 2020

Noninterest income increased by $843 thousand from 2020 to 2021. The Company continues to focus on growth in relationship fee-based revenue for commercial and retail clients. The following were significant factors in that net increase:

•Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $173 thousand due to the lifting of fee waivers implemented in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and increased deposit account activity associated with the re-opening of the economy in the second quarter of 2021.

•Interchange income increased by $706 thousand due to increased consumer spending upon the re-opening of the economy, expanded distribution of debit cards by the Bank and increased usage by consumers.

•Swap fee income decreased by $554 thousand due to reduced interest from potential clients in a low interest rate environment.

•Wealth management income, which includes both trust and investment management income and brokerage income, grew to $11.5 million, an increase of $1.7 million, from 2020 to 2021. Strong market conditions and the addition of new clients continue to drive growth in the wealth management business. Assets under management have increased by $149.1 million to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2021 from $1.7 billion at December 31, 2020.

•Mortgage banking income increased by $635 thousand from 2020 to 2021 due primarily to mortgage servicing right valuation allowance reversals in 2021, partially offset by reduced gains on sale in 2021. There was higher refinancing activity during 2020 and into the first half of 2021. Due to market conditions, the margins and production declined, which resulted in a reduced pipeline at December 31, 2021. Mortgage loans sold totaled $200.8 million in 2021 compared with $205.2 million in 2020, and as of December 31, 2021, the Bank serviced $502.5 million of residential mortgage loans, which is up by $61.4 million from December 31, 2020.

•Gains on sale of portfolio loans decreased by $2.8 million from 2020 to 2021. During 2020, the Bank recorded $2.8 million in gains due to the sale of $10.9 million of classified loans for a net gain of $2.5 million and the sale of an $11.0 million portfolio of recreational vehicle loans for a gain of $314 thousand.

•Other income increased by $298 thousand from 2020 to 2021 primarily due to gains recorded on the sales of two shuttered properties in 2021.

•Investment securities gains increased by $654 thousand from 2020 to 2021. During 2021, the Company recorded net investment securities gains of $638 thousand from the sales of $148.4 million of commercial mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities. There were no sales of debt securities during 2020.

38

Table of Contents

2020 versus 2019

Noninterest income decreased by $230 thousand from 2019 to 2020. The Company continues to focus on growth in relationship fee-based revenue for commercial and retail clients. The following were significant factors in that net decrease:

•A decline of $530 thousand in service charges on deposit accounts reflects the impact of COVID-19, as the Company waived certain fees for a period of time and experienced an overall decline in account usage.

•Interchange income reflected an overall increase in our clients' activity and card usage due to COVID-19.

•Mortgage banking income increased by $2.2 million due to an increase in loans sold to $205.2 million in 2020 from $106.7 million in 2019 as interest rate declines led to significant refinancing activity.

•Swap fee income declined by $350 thousand from 2019 to 2020. In 2020, the Bank began entering into interest rate swap agreements directly with its commercial customers. This offering replaced the third-party swap transactions initiated in the prior year. This fee revenue will fluctuate from quarter to quarter, but client demand to fix loan interest rates declined slightly in the current rate environment.

•Trust and brokerage income reflected increased revenue from strong stock market performance.

•Income from life insurance included death benefit proceeds of $58 thousand in 2020 and $255 thousand in 2019.

•During 2020, the Bank recorded $2.8 million in gains due to the sale of $10.9 million of classified loans for a net gain of $2.5 million and the sale of an $11.0 million portfolio of recreational vehicle loans for a gain of $314 thousand.

•There was a decline of $4.8 million in investment gains from 2019 to 2020 due to prior year asset/liability management strategies, which resulted in net gains of $4.8 million on sales of securities, as market conditions presented opportunities to improve responsiveness of the portfolio to interest rate conditions.

Noninterest Expenses

The following table compares noninterest expenses for 2021, 2020 and 2019.

$ Change % Change

39

Table of Contents

2021 versus 2020

Noninterest expenses increased by $61 thousand from 2020 to 2021. The following were significant factors within that net increase:

•Salaries and employee benefit expense increased by $652 thousand due primarily to performance-based incentive compensation earned from strong individual production, the Company exceeding targets and other employee incentives. There were also additions to staff in 2021. The impact of these items was partially offset by a decrease in employee medical benefits that resulted from favorable claims history.

•Data processing expense increased by $487 thousand due primarily to increased core system costs, investments in new technology and trust data processing activity.

•Advertising and bank promotions increased by $518 thousand due to increased marketing efforts to promote our commitment to the new round of SBA PPP funding in early 2021, followed by increased advertising and promotions in the post-pandemic environment.

•FDIC insurance expense increased by $130 thousand due to increases in the FDIC assessment base driven by the rise in the Bank's average total assets in 2021, an increase in the assessment rate due to commercial loan growth and credits received in 2020 that did not recur in 2021.

•Professional services decreased by $565 thousand due to higher legal costs incurred in 2020 in connection with the reimbursement of the Company's underwriters in connection with the SEPTA litigation.

•Taxes other than income increased by $177 thousand due to an increase in the Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax expense that was impacted by an increase in the Bank's total equity balance.

•Intangible asset amortization decreased by $294 thousand principally due to the elimination of a customer intangible associated with the discontinuance of Wheatland on July 31, 2020 and full amortization of a covenant not to compete in 2020.

•Branch consolidation expenses were $1.3 million in 2020 related to the branch and loan product office consolidations. There were no similar charges in 2021.

•In 2020, the Company recorded $486 thousand of refunds received from an insurance company related to a 2018 cyber security incident. There were no such refunds in 2021.

•Other operating expenses decreased by $639 thousand from 2020 to 2021. The reserve for unfunded commitments was reduced by $454 thousand in 2021 due to reductions in qualitative factors, which were previously elevated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Also in 2021, certain loss rate assumptions were reduced following a review of historical loss and line utilization experience. In 2020, there was a write-down of $544 thousand in the carrying value of a property held for sale and an impairment charge of $152 thousand on a customer list intangible asset due to the discontinuance of Wheatland. These did not recur in 2021. Partially offsetting these expense reductions was a loss of $514 thousand in 2021 as compared to a gain of $226 thousand in 2020 from the termination of cash flow hedge derivatives. Other normal fluctuations are in the ordinary course of business.

2020 versus 2019

Noninterest expenses decreased by $3.2 million from 2019 to 2020. The following were significant factors in that net decrease:

•The salaries and employee benefit increase includes the impact in 2020 of additional employees, including new client-facing employees in new branches in targeted expansion markets and others that were hired throughout 2019, as well as additional new relationship managers. Higher costs in 2020 also include annual merit and incentive compensation increases in 2020, increased stock compensation expense from additional share-based awards granted in 2020, and higher medical costs for claims activity and the expanded workforce.

•Occupancy expense in 2020 reflects a full period of expense for our expanded presence in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, with two branch banking locations added in the first quarter of 2019. In addition, lease termination costs of $588 thousand were recognized in 2020 as a part of the Company's restructuring plan.

•Advertising and bank promotions expense declined from 2019 to 2020 due to additional costs incurred in 2019 for the celebration of the Bank's 100th anniversary year, as well as marketing associated with the acquisitions.

•FDIC insurance expense reflects credits received in the second half of 2019 under the FDIC's regulations to provide credits, when the reserve ratio reaches 1.38%, to banks with consolidated assets below $10 billion. FDIC insurance expense increased in 2020 after the remaining credits were used to partially offset first quarter 2020 expense.

40

Table of Contents

•In 2020, branch consolidation costs totaled $1.3 million and there were no merger related costs. These costs primarily represented lease termination costs. Merger related costs incurred in 2019 totaled $8.0 million. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company recorded $1.0 million in expenses associated with the announced consolidation of five branches into other, larger Bank branches, which was completed in January 2020. The expenses principally represented owned real estate write downs, lease termination costs, severance benefits for impacted employees and other branch exit related expenses.

•The insurance claim receivable (recovery) write off relates to an expense recorded in 2019 to write off an insurance claim receivable from a 2018 cyber security incident, net of an initial insurance reimbursement. In 2019, the Company received reimbursement totaling $59 thousand for the write off. In February 2020, the Company received an additional $486 thousand reimbursement from the insurance company in a final settlement of the matter.

•Other line items within noninterest expenses are generally attributable to normal fluctuations in the ordinary course of business.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense totaled $8.0 million, $6.0 million and $2.7 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2021 was 19.6% compared with 18.6% for 2020 and 13.8% for 2019. Generally, the Company’s effective tax rate is less than the 21% federal statutory rate, principally due to tax-free income, which includes interest income on tax-free loans and investment securities and income from life insurance policies, federal income tax credits, and the impact of non-tax deductible expenses, including merger related expenses. The differences in the effective tax rate in 2021 and 2020 from prior years was primarily due to higher levels of pre-tax income. In 2019, the Company's effective tax rate included benefits realized from a $185 thousand expense reduction related to a favorable tax law clarification on the treatment of life insurance assets of an acquired entity, as well as a $334 thousand expense reduction related to an increase in deferred state income taxes due to a state tax rate change resulting from the Hamilton acquisition.

Note 8, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," includes a reconciliation of our federal statutory tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate, which is a meaningful comparison between years and measures income tax expense as a percentage of pretax income.

Financial Condition

Management devotes substantial time to overseeing the investment of funds in loans and securities and the formulation of policies directed toward the profitability and management of the risks associated with these investments.

Investment Securities

The Company utilizes available for sale securities to manage interest rate risk, to enhance income through interest and dividend income, to provide liquidity and to collateralize certain deposits and borrowings.

The Company has established investment policies and an asset management policy to assist in administering its investment portfolio. Decisions to purchase or sell these securities are based on economic conditions and management’s strategy to respond to changes in interest rates, liquidity, pledges to secure deposits and repurchase agreements and other factors while trying to maximize return on the investments. The Company may segregate its investment portfolio into three categories: “securities held to maturity,” “trading securities” and “securities available for sale.” At December 31, 2021 and 2020, management has classified the entire investment securities portfolio as available for sale, which is accounted for at current market value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in OCI, net of income taxes.

The Company's investment securities portfolio includes debt investments that are subject to varying degrees of credit and market risks, which arise from general market conditions, and factors impacting specific industries, as well as news that may impact specific issues. Management monitors its debt securities, using various indicators in determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired, including the amount of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position, and the cause and extent of the unrealized loss. In addition, management assesses whether it is likely we will have to sell the security prior to recovery, or if we are able to hold the security until the price recovers. For those debt securities in which management concludes the security is other-than-temporarily impaired, it recognizes the credit component of an OTTI impairment in earnings and the remaining portion in OCI. The Company did not record any OTTI expense in 2021, 2020 or 2019.

41

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the fair value of available for sale securities at December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.

U.S. Treasury securities $ 19,702 $ — $ —

The Company increased its investment portfolio at December 31, 2021; however, the average balance of the investment securities decreased from $494.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $462.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

In 2020, management planned for the loan portfolio to continue to grow and, in part, be funded by monthly cash flows from asset-backed securities and CMOs. In 2021, the Company sold $148.4 million of commercial MBS and asset-backed securities, which were offset by purchases of GSE residential MBS, non-agency CMOs, municipal securities and United States Treasury notes of $195.0 million. Due to improvements in the capital markets, the Company strategically exited its private label commercial CMO portfolio. The external environment, with tightening credit spreads, presented an opportunity to execute these sales in March 2021. Proceeds from the sales were deployed into agency-backed securities and taxable municipal bonds given the elevated level of liquidity. In September 2021, the Company sold certain asset-backed securities to reduce the risk profile of the investment portfolio and improve yields based on the market conditions and interest rate environment.

42

Table of Contents

The following table shows the maturities of investment securities at book value at December 31, 2021, and weighted average yields of such investment securities. Yields are shown on a tax equivalent basis, assuming a 21% federal income tax rate.

U.S. Treasury securities

Yield — % — % 1.05 % — % 1.05 %

Average maturity (years) — — 0.1 — 0.1

States and political subdivisions

GSE residential mortgage-backed securities

Yield — % — % — % 0.89 % 0.89 %

Average maturity (years) — — — 0.4 0.4

GSE residential CMOs

Yield — % — % — % 1.33 % 1.33 %

Average maturity (years) — — — 28.6 28.6

Non-agency CMOs

Average maturity (years) — — 6.0 33.4 28.9

Asset-backed

Average maturity (years) — 4.1 — 22.0 21.9

Other

Yield — % 2.45 % — % — % 1.53 %

Average maturity (years) — 1.4 — — 1.4

Total

The average maturity is based on the contractual terms of the debt or mortgage-backed securities, and does not factor in required repayments or anticipated prepayments. At December 31, 2021, the weighted average estimated life is 34 years for mortgage-backed and CMO securities, and 22 years for asset-backed securities, based on current interest rates and anticipated prepayment speeds.

43

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the credit ratings and collateral associated with the Company's available for sale security portfolio, excluding equity securities, at December 31, 2021:

Bank CDs — 249 249 — — — — 100 FDIC Insured CD

(1) Minimum of 97% guaranteed by U.S. government

(3) 100% guaranteed by U.S. government agencies

(4) PACE acronym represents Property Assessed Clean Energy loans

Loan Portfolio

The Company offers a variety of products to meet the credit needs of its borrowers, principally commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, retail loans secured by residential properties, and to a lesser extent, installment loans. No loans are extended to non-domestic borrowers or governments.

Generally, the Bank is permitted under applicable law to make loans to single borrowers (including certain related persons and entities) in aggregate amounts of up to 15% of the sum of total capital and excess ALL not included in Tier 2 capital. The Bank’s legal lending limit to one borrower was $38.0 million at December 31, 2021. No borrower had an outstanding exposure exceeding the limit at year-end.

The risks associated with lending activities differ among loan classes and are subject to the impact of changes in interest rates, market conditions of collateral securing the loans and general economic conditions. Any of these factors may adversely impact a borrower’s ability to repay loans, and also impact the associated collateral. A further discussion on the classes of loans the Company makes and related risks is included in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 4, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

44

Table of Contents

The following table presents the loan portfolio, excluding residential LHFS, by segments and classes at December 31st.

Commercial real estate:

Acquisition and development:

Residential mortgage:

(1) Includes $189.9 million and $403.3 million of SBA PPP loans, net of deferred fees and costs, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The loan portfolio at December 31, 2021 increased by $296 thousand from December 31, 2020 due primarily to commercial loan production, which was offset by SBA PPP loan forgiveness of $442.8 million and reductions in mortgage loans and installment and other loans of $54.6 million in 2021. Overall loan growth, excluding SBA PPP loans, was $213.7 million or 14% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020.

From 2019 to 2020, the increase in total loans was due primarily to the origination of SBA PPP loans, which was partially offset by a reduction in mortgage loans resulting from significant refinancing activity in the low interest rate environment. The increase in the loan portfolio from 2018 to 2019 was approximately 75% attributable to loans acquired in the Hamilton transaction. The Mercersburg acquisition in 2018 and Hamilton acquisition in 2019 increased the loan portfolio, principally in the residential mortgage - first lien and commercial real estate - owner and non-owner occupied classes.

The Company's organic growth has occurred in both legacy and newer markets, principally in commercial real estate, but also in commercial and industrial loans as we focused on increasing diversification in the portfolio. The growth in installment and other loans in 2018 and 2019 was principally attributable to purchased automobile financing loans at higher returns than comparable cash flows in the investment securities portfolio.

45

Table of Contents

In addition to monitoring the loan portfolio by loan class as noted above, the Company also monitors concentrations by segment. The Bank’s lending policy reports segment concentrations that exceed 20% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital ("RBC"). The following segments met this criterion at December 31, 2021.

Balance % of Total Loans % of Total RBC

The following table presents expected maturities of loan classes by fixed rate or adjustable-rate categories at December 31, 2021.

Due In

Commercial real estate:

Owner occupied

Non-owner occupied

Multi-family

Non-owner occupied residential

Acquisition and development:

1-4 family residential construction

46

Table of Contents

Commercial and land development

Commercial and industrial

Municipal

Residential mortgage:

First lien

Home equity - term

Home equity - lines of credit

Installment and other loans

The final maturity is used in the determination of maturity of acquisition and development loans that convert from construction to permanent status. Variable rate loans shown above include semi-fixed loans that contractually will adjust with prime or another variable rate index after the interest lock period, which may be up to 10 years. At December 31, 2021, these semi-fixed loans totaled $446.7 million.

Asset Quality

Risk Elements

The Company’s loan portfolio is subject to varying degrees of credit risk. Credit risk is managed through the Company's underwriting standards, on-going credit reviews, and monitoring of asset quality measures. Additionally, loan portfolio diversification, which limits exposure to a single industry or borrower, and collateral requirements also mitigate the Company's risk of credit loss.

47

Table of Contents

The following table presents the Company’s risk elements and relevant asset quality ratios at December 31 of each of the years set forth below.

Asset quality ratios:

Total nonperforming assets to total assets 0.23 % 0.37 % 0.46 % 0.27 % 0.69 %

Total risk assets to total loans and OREO 0.43 % 0.60 % 0.86 % 0.52 % 1.19 %

(1) Includes $214 thousand and $456 thousand, respectively, of purchased credit impaired loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020. As of December 31, 2021, there was one loan for $891 thousand, which was in the process of collection and guaranteed by the SBA.

The following table provides detail of impaired loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Commercial real estate:

Acquisition and development

Commercial and land development — — — 814 — 814

Residential mortgage:

Home equity – term 7 — 7 10 — 10

Installment and other loans 40 — 40 17 — 17

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and foreclosed real estate. Risk assets, which include nonperforming assets and restructured and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing, totaled $8.5 million at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $3.3 million or 28%, from $11.8 million at December 31, 2020. Nonaccrual loans totaled $6.4 million at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $3.9 million from December 31, 2020, which included the payoff of one loan of $2.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2021. The decrease in nonaccrual loan amounts also impacted other asset quality ratios detailed above.

48

Table of Contents

The ALL totaled $21.2 million at December 31, 2021, a $1.0 million increase from $20.2 million at December 31, 2020, resulting from a provision for loan losses of $1.1 million and net charge-offs of $61 thousand for 2021. At December 31, 2021, the ALL is higher as a percentage of the total loan portfolio at 1.07% compared to 1.02% in 2020 and 0.89% in 2019. Commercial loan growth drove provision expense for the year ended December 31, 2021. However, during 2021, the Company fully reversed the prior year's COVID-19 qualitative factor of $2.7 million which partially offset the provision increase from commercial loan growth. In addition. qualitative factors were reduced in the Classified Loans Trends and National and Local Economic Conditions categories, due in part to improved conditions from the pandemic, which were partly offset by an increase in the qualitative factor for Concentrations of Credit caused by significant growth in commercial real estate loans. From December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, special mention loans decreased $63.6 million and substandard loans decreased $7.2 million. The decrease reflects upgrades to commercial loans that were previously downgraded due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Management believes its coverage ratios are adequate for the risk profile of the loan portfolio given ongoing monitoring of the portfolio and its quantitative and qualitative analysis performed at December 31, 2021. As new information is learned about borrowers or updated appraisals on real estate with lower fair values are obtained, the Company may experience an increase in impaired loans.

For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, recoveries of $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $606 thousand, respectively, were credited to the ALL. These recoveries on previously charged-off relationships are the result of successful loan monitoring and workout solutions. Recoveries are difficult to predict, and any additional recoveries that the Company receives will be used to replenish the ALL. Recoveries favorably impact historical charge-off factors, and contribute to changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors used in our allowance adequacy analysis. However, as the loan portfolio continues to grow, future provisions for loan losses may result.

The Company takes partial charge-offs on collateral-dependent loans when carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, as determined by the most recent appraisal adjusted for current (within the quarter) conditions, less costs to dispose. Impairment reserves remain in place if updated appraisals are pending, and represent management’s estimate of potential loss.

The following table presents exposure to relationships with an impaired loan balance, which excludes accruing PCI loans, and the partial charge-offs taken to date and specific reserves established on those relationships at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

# ofRelationships RecordedInvestment PartialCharge-offsto Date SpecificReserves

Relationships greater than $1 million 1 $ 2,535 $ — $ —

Relationships greater than $500 thousand but less than $1 million 1 602 17 —

Relationships greater than $250 thousand but less than $500 thousand 2 601 — —

Relationships greater than $1 million 2 $ 5,639 $ — $ —

Relationships greater than $500 thousand but less than $1 million 2 1,211 17 —

Relationships greater than $250 thousand but less than $500 thousand 2 637 — —

Internal loan reviews are completed annually on all commercial relationships with a committed loan balance in excess of $1.0 million, which includes confirmation of risk rating by an independent credit officer. In addition, all commercial relationships greater than $500 thousand rated Substandard, Doubtful or Loss are reviewed and corresponding risk ratings are reaffirmed by the Bank's Problem Loan Committee, with subsequent reporting to the Management ERM Committee.

49

Table of Contents

In its individual loan impairment analysis, the Company determines the extent of any full or partial charge-offs that may be required, or any reserves that may be needed. The determination of the Company’s charge-offs or impairment reserve include an evaluation of the outstanding loan balance and the related collateral securing the credit. Through a combination of collateral securing the loans and partial charge-offs taken to date, the Company believes that it has adequately provided for the potential losses that it may incur on these relationships at December 31, 2021. However, over time, additional information may result in increased reserve allocations or, alternatively, it may be deemed that the reserve allocations exceed those that are needed.

The Company’s foreclosed real estate balance at December 31, 2021 was zero for both residential and commercial properties. During 2021, no expense was recorded for the write-down of other real estate owned properties.

In an effort to assist clients which were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank offered various mitigation options, including a loan payment deferral program. Under this program, most commercial deferrals were for a 90-day period, while most consumer deferrals were for a 180-day period. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had loan deferrals under this program for commercial and consumer clients with a total loan balance of zero and $56 thousand, respectively, compared to $15.7 million and $2.5 million for commercial and consumer clients as of December 31, 2020, respectively. The decrease from 2020 to 2021 reflects the majority of loans exiting COVID-19 modification on the basis of upgraded risk rating, payment status and debt service coverage. In accordance with the revised Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications by Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus issued on April 7, 2020, these deferrals are exempt from TDR status as they meet the specified requirements. Below is a summary of select loan concentrations and the deferrals within those categories at December 31, 2021.

The following table summarizes COVID-19 related modifications, including deferrals and forbearances:

Loan Type Amount of Loans Percent of Non-PPP Loans

Credit Risk Management

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company maintains the ALL at a level deemed adequate by management for probable incurred credit losses. The ALL is established and maintained through a provision for loan losses which is charged to earnings. On a quarterly basis, management assesses the adequacy of the ALL utilizing a defined methodology which considers specific credit evaluation of impaired loans, historical loss experience and qualitative factors. Management addresses the requirements for loans individually identified as impaired, loans collectively evaluated for impairment, and other bank regulatory guidance in its assessment.

The ALL is evaluated based on review of the collectability of loans in light of historical experience; the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay; estimated value of any underlying collateral; and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. A description of the methodology for establishing the allowance and provision for loan losses and related procedures in establishing the appropriate level of reserve is included in Note 4, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

50

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Company’s internal risk ratings at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Commercial real estate:

Acquisition and development:

Residential mortgage:

Commercial real estate:

Acquisition and development:

Residential mortgage:

Non-Impaired Substandard loans are performing loans, which have characteristics that cause management concern over the ability of the borrower to perform under present loan repayment terms and which may result in the reporting of these loans as nonperforming, or impaired, loans in the future. Generally, management feels that substandard loans that are currently

51

Table of Contents

performing and not considered impaired result in some doubt as to the borrower’s ability to continue to perform under the terms of the loan, and represent potential problem loans. Non-impaired Substandard loans totaled $13.5 million at December 31, 2021.

Additionally, the Special Mention classification is intended to be a temporary classification reflective of loans that have potential weaknesses that may, if not monitored or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Company’s position at some future date. Special mention loans represent an elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a more severe, or classified, rating. These loans require inquiry by lenders on the cause of the potential weakness and, once analyzed, the loan classification may be downgraded to Substandard or, alternatively, could be upgraded to Pass. Special mention loans decreased by $63.6 million from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021 due to the recovery in commercial loans previously downgraded due to the economic weakness created by COVID-19, as well as related loan modifications completed in 2020. Any loans with second modifications that are COVID-19 related are classified as special mention.

The following tables, which excludes accruing PCI loans, summarize the average recorded investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized, on a cash basis, and interest income earned but not recognized for years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

AverageImpairedBalance InterestIncomeRecognized InterestEarnedBut NotRecognized

Commercial real estate:

Non-owner occupied — — 20

Non-owner occupied residential 225 — 24

Acquisition and development:

Commercial and land development 187 — —

Commercial and industrial 3,030 — 36

Residential mortgage:

Home equity – term 11 — —

Home equity – lines of credit 521 — —

Installment and other loans 25 — —

Commercial real estate:

Non-owner occupied 83 — —

Multi-family 205 — —

Non-owner occupied residential 388 — 21

Acquisition and development:

Commercial and land development 641 — 23

Commercial and industrial 1,196 — 20

Residential mortgage:

Home equity – term 11 — 1

Home equity – lines of credit 692 1 36

Installment and other loans 25 — 1

52

Table of Contents

AverageImpairedBalance InterestIncomeRecognized InterestEarnedBut NotRecognized

Commercial real estate:

Non-owner occupied 46 — —

Non-owner occupied residential 217 — 21

Acquisition and development:

Commercial and land development 21 — —

Commercial and industrial 683 — 130

Residential mortgage:

Home equity – term 13 — 1

Home equity – lines of credit 750 2 64

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2021-12-31, filed 2022-03-11 · accession 0000826154-22-000079

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 22 headings are on that chain and 16 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.