ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read this discussion together with the Financial Statements, related Notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following discussion contains assumptions, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides a historical and prospective narrative on the Company’s financial condition, and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. The discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 is included in Part II, Item 7. Below includes Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Overview
We are a biotechnology company focused on developing personalized immune therapies for cancer. We have developed a platform technology, DCVax®, which uses activated dendritic cells to mobilize a patient’s own immune system to attack their cancer.
Our lead product, DCVax®-L, is designed to treat solid tumor cancers in which the tumor can be surgically removed. We have completed a 331-patient international Phase III trial of DCVax-L for glioblastoma brain cancer (GBM). As previously reported, the data collection and confirmation process was conducted by the independent contract research organization (CRO) who managed the trial and by other independent service firms, and the data were analyzed by independent statisticians.
On May 10, 2022, top line data from the Phase III trial of DCVax-L were presented in a scientific conference at the New York Academy of Sciences by one of the investigators in the trial. The presentation was made available publicly on a third-party site. On November 17, 2022, the Phase III trial results were reported in a peer reviewed publication in JAMA Oncology, a top scientific and medical journal.
The Company is now working on preparations for an application for regulatory approval of DCVax-L. The Company is working with teams of specialized consultants on pre-requisites for the application, and on portions of the application package itself. One of the pre-requisites — obtaining regulatory approval of a Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) — was completed during 2022 on an accelerated basis, including regulatory approval to use the same trial design with external controls as was used in the Company’s Phase 3 trial.
24
Table of Contents
Additionally, substantial progress was made with the CRO and specialized consultants on preparing the Trial Master File to be inspection-ready for regulators.
Post-COVID difficulties continue to impact the Company’s programs and operations, due to backlogs in the supply chain, at clinical trial sites, and at regulators. The supply chain backlogs include service firms and also vendors and suppliers of a wide variety of items, ranging from major equipment to particular reagents required for the manufacturing process. Shortages of certain key materials and supplies have also occurred. The clinical trial site backlogs involve delays for various clinical trial follow-up matters, such as queries and additional documentation. With regulators, committee processes and regulatory processes were focused on COVID matters during the pandemic, and a substantial backlog of non-COVID matters accumulated. The Company is hopeful that the various backlog circumstances will improve in 2023.
In the future, we plan to conduct clinical trials of DCVax-L for other types of solid tumor cancers, beyond brain cancer, when resources permit. Our second product, DCVax®-Direct, is designed to treat inoperable solid tumors. A 40-patient Phase I trial has been completed and included treatment of a diverse range of more than a dozen types of cancers. We plan to work on preparations for Phase II trials of DCVax-Direct as resources permit.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to derivative liabilities, accrued expenses and stock-based compensation. We based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates, particularly given the significant social and economic disruptions and uncertainties associated with the ongoing coronavirus pandemic (“COVID-19”) and the COVID-19 control responses.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for sale of an asset or paid for transfer of a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). These tiers include:
●Level 1 - defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
●Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
●Level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
We account for the issuance of common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with the equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). We classify as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). We account for certain common stock warrants outstanding as a liability at fair value and adjust the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the warrants issued by us has been estimated using Monte Carlo simulation and or a Black Scholes model. The warrant liabilities are valued using Level 3 valuation inputs.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company has derivative financial instruments that are not hedges and do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
25
Table of Contents
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be fully recoverable. To analyze recoverability, the Company projects undiscounted net future cash flows over the remaining lives of such assets. If these projected cash flows are less than the carrying amounts, an impairment loss would be recognized, resulting in a write-down of the assets with a corresponding charge to earnings. The impairment loss is measured based upon the difference between the carrying amounts and the fair values of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amounts or fair value less cost to sell. Management determines fair value using the discounted cash flow method or other accepted valuation techniques.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the undiscounted net future cash flows of the U.K. property were greater than the carrying value. Therefore, no impairment loss was considered necessary.
Stock Based Compensation
Share-based compensation cost is recorded for all option grants and awards of non-vested stock based on the grant date fair value of the award using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized over the service period required for the award.
The estimated fair value of stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment.
Expected Term - The expected term of options represents the period that the Company’s stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method, which is the half-life from vesting to the end of its contractual term.
Expected Volatility - The Company computes stock price volatility over expected terms based on its historical common stock trading prices.
Risk-Free Interest Rate - The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield available on U. S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term.
Expected Dividend - The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common shares and does not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and, therefore, uses an expected dividend yield of zero in its valuation models.
We recognize forfeitures when they occur.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Income Taxes
In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. On January 1, 2021, we adopted this standard without any material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Debt
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, which simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception and it also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption was permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. This update permits the use of either the modified retrospective or fully
26
Table of Contents
retrospective method of transition. We adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2021, we adopted this standard without any material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options
In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). This ASU reduces diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. This ASU provides guidance for a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that is not within the scope of another Topic. It specifically addresses: (1) how an entity should treat a modification of the terms or conditions or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange; (2) how an entity should measure the effect of a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange; and (3) how an entity should recognize the effect of a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange. This ASU will be effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. An entity should apply the amendments prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after the effective date of the amendments. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. On January 1, 2022, we adopted this standard without any material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, ASC Subtopic 820 “Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions”. The FASB is issuing this Update (1) to clarify the guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to contractual restrictions that prohibit the sale of an equity security, (2) to amend a related illustrative example, and (3) to introduce new disclosure requirements for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions that are measured at fair value in accordance with Topic 820.
For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for both interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance.
We are still evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Operating costs:
Our operating costs and expenses consist primarily of research and development (R&D) expenses. Such R&D expenses include clinical trial expenses while we are conducting trials, and additional costs related to completion of a trial, including substantial one-time expenses such as for final site visits, query resolutions, additional data collection and documentation, and related matters. There are also increased costs after completion of a Phase III trial, such as for statistical analyses and preparations for an application for product approval.
In addition to clinical trial and post-trial costs, our operating costs may include ongoing work relating to our DCVax products, including R&D, product characterization, manufacturing process development, quality control process development, and related matters. Additional substantial costs relate to the development and expansion of manufacturing capacity.
Our operating costs also include the costs of preparations for the launch of new or expanded clinical trial programs, such as our planned Phase II clinical trials. The preparation costs include payments to regulatory consultants, lawyers, statisticians, sites and others, evaluation of potential investigators, the clinical trial sites and the CROs managing the trials and other service providers, and expenses related to institutional approvals, clinical trial agreements (business contracts with sites), training of medical and other site personnel, trial supplies and other.
Our operating costs also include legal and accounting costs in operating the Company.
27
Table of Contents
The foregoing operating costs include the costs for Flaskworks’ ongoing operations and intellectual property filings, and the operations of our subsidiary in the Netherlands.
Research and development:
R&D expenses include costs for substantial external scientific personnel, technical and regulatory advisers, and others, costs of laboratory supplies used in our internal research and development projects, travel, regulatory compliance, and expenditures for preclinical and clinical trial operation and management when we are actively engaged in clinical trials.
Because we are pre-revenue company, we do not allocate R&D costs on a project basis. We adopted this policy, in part, due to the unreasonable cost burden associated with accounting at such a level of detail and our limited number of financial and personnel resources.
General and administrative:
General and administrative expenses include personnel related salary and benefit expenses, cost of facilities, insurance, travel, legal services, property and equipment and amortization of stock options and warrants.
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
We recognized a net loss of $105 million, a net income of $179.1 million and a net loss of $529.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The net income of $179.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 included a non-cash gain of $239.3 million from change in fair value derivative liabilities. The net loss of $105 million and a loss of $529.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2020 included a non-cash loss of $25.8 million and $435.4 million from the change in fair value derivative liabilities, respectively.
Net cash used in operations was $52.8 million, $38.3 million and $32.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in cash used in operating activities in 2022 compared to 2021 was mainly due to an increase in R&D expenses.
Research and development expense
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, research and development expense was $35.5 million, $20.3 million and $33.6 million, respectively. The R&D expenses in 2022 were similar to the level of such expenses in 2020, when the Phase 3 trial was reaching completion and undergoing final data collection, query resolution and other requirements to reach Data Lock. The decrease in 2021 compared to 2020 was mainly related to a decrease of $12.0 million stock-based compensation that represented the vesting of a portion of previously granted equity-based awards, and that was recognized in research and development expense.
The R&D expenses in 2022 primarily reflected extensive one-time activities (i) to accomplish a number of pre-requisites that are required before making an application for regulatory of DCVax-L, (ii) to prepare the application package and (iii) to prepare other materials, such as the Trial Master File, to be inspection-ready in addition to the application package. The pre-requisites and preparations included developing, submitting and obtaining regulatory approval for a Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP), preparing and qualifying for manufacturing licenses required for the Sawston facility, completing the technology transfer from the London facility (where the Company had done all its manufacturing before 2022) to the Sawston facility to enable GMP manufacturing to begin in February 2022 at Sawston (while also continuing in the London facility), and 6 workstreams related to product matters involving Comparability, Stability, Potency, Product Profile, Mechanism of Action and Fill/Finish which are needed for the application package to seek regulatory approval of DCVax-L.
The 2022 R&D expenses we incurred for these activities included payments to numerous teams of specialized external consultants and the CRO, as well as to Advent BioServices. The majority of the payments to Advent were for one-time expenses for 10 key one-time milestones for pre-requisites and preparations for an application for product approval. These included 3 milestones for obtaining the 3 licenses required for the Sawston facility, 6 milestones for the 6 product workstreams, and 1 milestone related to preparing key portions of an application for regulatory approval of the DCVax-L product. We paid $3.0 million for the cash component of 7 milestones, and accrued $4.7 million for the cash component of future milestones. We issued 7.5 million shares at fair value of $5.9 million for the stock component of 8 milestones, and we accrued $3.6 million for the stock component of future milestones.
28
Table of Contents
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses were $33.4 million, $33.4 million and $54.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Expenses incurred in 2022 and 2021 were consistent with rounding, but there was a slight decrease of approximate $46,000 which was mainly related to a decrease of $7.0 million stock-based compensation that represented the vesting of a portion of previously granted equity-based awards, and that was recognized in general and administrative expense, and offset by an increase of approximately $1.8 million related to legal and professional expenses, an increase of $1.5 million in insurance premiums, an increase of $1.6 million related to accrued but unpaid employees’ bonus for 2021 and 2022 performances and an increase of $1.7 million of travel and conference expenses.
The decrease in 2021 compared to 2020 was mainly related to a decrease of $24.2 million stock-based compensation that represented the vesting of a portion of previously granted equity-based awards, and that was recognized in general and administrative expense, and offset by an increase of approximately $3.3 million related to consulting expenses.
Change in fair value of derivatives
We recognized a non-cash loss of $25.8 million, a non-cash gain of $239.3 million and a non-cash loss of $435.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The non-cash loss was primarily due to the increase of our stock price, and the non-cash gain was primarily due to the decrease of our stock price. Our closing stock prices as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
Debt Extinguishment
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized approximately $2.7 million net debt extinguishment loss. We issued approximately 18.1 million shares of common stock at fair value of $13.8 million to certain lenders in lieu of cash payment of $11.3 million debt, including $1.8 million accrued interest. We also extinguished approximately $0.2 million embedded derivative liability upon the conversion. We recognized approximately $2.3 million debt extinguishment loss. Additionally, pursuant to exchange agreements executed various holders, the Company is required to potentially issue additional common stock (the “Share liability”) if the stock price is less than the price defined in the exchange agreement as of the true-up date. We recognized additional $0.7 million debt extinguishment loss related to the Share liability during the year ended December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we also issued approximately 0.2 million shares of Series C preferred stock at fair value of $3.5 million to certain lenders in lieu of cash payments of $3.4 million debt, including $0.4 million accrued interest. We recognized approximately $0.1 million debt extinguishment loss. We also recognized $0.4 million debt extinguishment gain from PPP loan forgiveness during the year ended December 31, 2022.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we entered into multiple note extension agreements whereby the maturity dates of the notes were extended for an additional 2-4 months. Certain amendments were accounted for as a debt extinguishment. We recognized $0.2 million debt extinguishment loss from the amendment.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we converted debt of approximately $12.7 million principal and $1.2 million accrued interest into approximately 58.4 million shares of common stock and 6.2 million warrants. We also extinguished $6.6 million embedded derivative liabilities, wrote off $0.9 million unamortized debt discount and made some debt amendment upon the conversion. We recorded an approximate $1.6 million debt extinguishment loss from the conversion.
Our PPP Loan forgiveness application for Round 1 was approved on December 7, 2020. We recorded approximately $0.4 million debt extinguishment gain from the forgiveness of PPP Loan during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Inducement Expense
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded inducement expense of $0.6 million, which was related to certain warrants exercise.
29
Table of Contents
Interest expense
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we recorded interest expense of $6.1 million, $5.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively.
Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, we recognized foreign currency transaction loss of $3.3 million, loss of $1.7 million and gain of $2.3 million, respectively. The gain was due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound sterling. The loss was due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound sterling. The fluctuation of the exchange rates was larger in 2022 compared to the same period in 2021.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have experienced recurring losses from operations since inception. We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenues and must cover our operating expenses through debt and equity financings to allow us to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on the ability to obtain adequate capital to fund operating losses until we generate adequate cash flows from operations to fund our operating costs and obligations. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease operations.
We depend upon our ability, and will continue to attempt, to secure equity and/or debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Our management determined that there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the consolidated financial statements were issued, and management’s concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern within the year following this report persist.
Contingent Contractual Payment
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):
Payment Due by Period
Less than 1 to 2 3 to 5
Total 1 Year Years Years
Short term convertible notes payable (1)
6% unsecured $ 242 $ 242 $ — $ —
Short term notes payable (2)
9% unsecured 884 884 — —
Long term notes payable (3)
Minimum commitment obligation (5) 5,298 — 5,298 —
30
Table of Contents
Operating Activities
We used $52.8 million, $38.3 million and $32.1 million in cash for operating activities during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to an increase in clinical trial related expenditures.
Investing Activities
We spent approximately $2.9 million, $6.0 million and $6.6 million in cash for purchase of additional equipment in the UK and our build out in Sawston, UK during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We spent approximately $1.5 million related to the Flaskworks acquisition during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Financing Activities
We received approximately $18.7 million cash from issuance of 1.2 million shares of Series C convertible preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2022.
We received approximately $9.5 million, $4.1 million and $26.8 million in cash proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, in both public and private offerings during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We received approximately $11.1 million, $20.0 million and $13.9 million cash proceeds from the exercise of warrants and options during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We received approximately $5.6 million, $29.7 million and $13.7 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of multiple notes payable during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We received approximately $0.3 million in cash proceeds from issuances of debt with a related party during the year ended December 31, 2020.
We made aggregate debt payments of $5.5 million and $5.8 million and $2.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business primarily related to interest rate sensitivities and the volatility of our common stock price.
Interest Rate Risk
We have assessed our exposure to changes in interest rates by analyzing the sensitivity to our operating results assuming various changes in market interest rates. A hypothetical increase of one percentage point in the eurocurrency rate as of December 31, 2022 would have no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
31
Table of Contents
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are not currently exposed to significant market risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates; however, we do contract with vendors that are located outside of the United States and may be subject to fluctuations in foreign currency rates. We may enter into additional contracts with vendors located outside of the United States in the future, which may increase our foreign currency exchange risk.
Common Stock Price Volatility
Our common stock has experienced periods of high trading volatility. We negotiate the settlement of debt payment obligations in exchange for equity securities of the Company, which can create a non-cash charge upon extinguishment of debt as the price of our common stock fluctuates. If we continue to enter into these settlements, the increased levels of volatility in our common stock trading price will result in increased dilution and extinguishment gains or losses.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, begins on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We, the management of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the Company.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including to our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).
Our management concluded that as of December 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management of the Company, including our CEO and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. Based on this assessment, we determined that we have
32
Table of Contents
effectively designed and implemented, consistently performed, and tested the functioning of these controls. Accordingly, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.
Cherry Bekaert, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, was appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors and ratified by the Company’s stockholders. They were engaged to render an opinion regarding the fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as well as conducting an audit of internal control over financial reporting for the period ending December 31, 2022. Their reports included at F-2 of this Form 10-K are based upon audits conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On February 25, 2022, the Company amended its existing Equity Compensation Plan, which was adopted in 2020 as previously reported. The amendment provides that the possible forms of awards under the Plan include awards paid in cash or awards paid in a combination of cash and equity, in addition to the existing provisions for awards made in any form of equity. The amendment also clarifies that a delegation of authority from the Board to a Committee may be either a general delegation or a delegation for a specific occasion.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
DIRECTORS
Name Age Position
J. Cofer Black 73 Class I Director
Dr. Alton L. Boynton 78 Class I Director, Chief Scientific Officer
Jerry Jasinowski 83 Class II Director
Dr. Navid Malik 54 Class III Director
Director Biographies
Linda F. Powers. Ms. Powers has served as the Chairperson of our Board of Directors since her appointment on May 17, 2007, Chief Executive Officer and President since June 8, 2011 and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer since June 8, 2020. Ms. Powers served as a managing director of Toucan Capital Fund II from 2001 to 2010, and Toucan Capital Fund III from 2010 to 2018. She also has over 16 years’ experience in corporate finance and restructurings, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and intellectual property licensing. Ms. Powers is or was previously a Board member of the Rosalind Franklin Society, M2GEN (an affiliate of Moffitt Cancer Center) and the Chinese Biopharmaceutical Association. She was the Chair of the Maryland Stem Cell Research Commission for the first two years of the state’s stem cell funding program, and has served an additional thirteen years on the Commission. Ms. Powers served for several years on a Steering Committee of the National Academy of Sciences, evaluating government research funding, and was appointed to three Governors’ commissions created to determine how to build the respective states’ biotech and other high-tech industries. For more than six years, Ms. Powers taught an annual internal course at the National Institutes of Health for the bench scientists and technology transfer personnel on the development and commercialization of medical products. Ms. Powers serves on the boards of several private biotechnology companies. Ms. Powers holds a B.A. from Princeton University, where she graduated magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. She also earned a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School. We believe Ms. Powers’ background and experience make her well qualified to serve as a Director.
33
Table of Contents
Dr. Navid Malik. Dr. Malik was appointed to the Board of Directors in April 2012. Dr. Malik is currently Head of Research and an Executive Director at The Life Sciences Division, a UK Investment Bank (since 2018). From January 2012 to December 2015, Dr. Malik was previously the Head of Life Sciences Research at Cenkos Securities Plc. in the U.K., an institutional stockbroking securities firm. From September 2011 through January 2012, Dr. Malik was the Head of Life Sciences Research at Sanlam (Merchant Securities), a global financial services firm. Dr. Malik was Partner and Head of Life Sciences at Matrix Investment Banking Division, Matrix Group, a financial services firm in London, from December 2008 through September 2011. Dr. Malik was a Senior Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Analyst at Wimmer Financial LLP from September 2008 through December 2008, and was the Senior Life Sciences Analyst at Collins Stewart Plc from January 2005 through September 2008. In 2011, Dr. Malik was awarded two StarMine Awards (awarded each year by Thomson Reuters and the Financial Times): Number One Stock Picker in the European Pharmaceutical Sector, and Number Two Stock Picker in the U.K. and Ireland Healthcare Sector. Dr. Malik holds a Ph.D. in Drug Delivery within Pharmaceutical Sciences, as well as degrees in Biomedical Sciences Research (M.Sc.) and Biochemistry and Physiology (B.Sc., joint honors). Dr. Malik also holds an MBA in finance from the City University Business School, London. We believe that Dr. Malik’s extensive experience in the life sciences fields and investment banking sector make him well qualified to serve as a Director.
J. Cofer Black. Ambassador Black was appointed to the Board of Directors in January 2016. Ambassador Black is an internationally renowned U.S. government leader and expert in cybersecurity, counterterrorism and national security. In addition to serving on company and bank boards, he presently serves as an independent consultant. Between 2009 and 2016, he served as Vice President for Global Operations at Blackbird Raytheon Technologies, a division of Raytheon Company, a NYSE-listed security company. From 2004 until 2008, he provided strategic guidance and business development as Vice Chairman of Blackwater Worldwide and as Chairman of Total Intelligence Solutions. During 2002 – 2005, he was appointed by the President of the United States to serve as the Ambassador, Coordinator for Counterterrorism, reporting directly to the Secretary of State for developing, coordinating and implementing American counterterrorism policy. Prior to his role as Ambassador, he served a 28-year career in the Central Intelligence Agency, reaching Senior Intelligence Service (SIS-4) level as Director, Counterterrorist Center (D/CTC), where he managed 1,300 professional personnel and an annual operational budget of more than one billion dollars. Ambassador Black is experienced representing the United States at the Head of State level, managing media as a diplomatic spokesperson and in public speaking as keynote speaker both as a senior U.S. Government official and business leader. Ambassador Black has received numerous awards and recognitions throughout his career, including the Distinguished Intelligence Medal (the CIA’s highest award for achievement). Ambassador Black received a B.A. in International Affairs from the University of Southern California in 1973 and an M.A. in International Affairs from the University of Southern California in 1974. We believe Ambassador Black’s background and experience in business management and information technology make him well qualified to serve as a Director.
Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D. Dr. Boynton co-founded our Company, has served as our Chief Scientific Officer and a Director since our inception in 1998, was appointed our Chief Operating Officer in August 2001, was appointed President in May 2003, and served as Chief Executive Officer from June 2007 to June 2011. Prior to founding our Company, Dr. Boynton headed the Molecular Oncology research lab at the Pacific Northwest Research Foundation (the original foundation of Bill Hutchinson, from which the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center was spun off). Dr. Boynton also served as Director of the Department of Molecular Medicine of Northwest Hospital from 1995 to 2003 where he coordinated the establishment of a program centered on carcinogenesis. Prior to joining Northwest Hospital, Dr. Boynton was Associate Director of the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, The University of Hawaii, where he also held the positions of Director of Molecular Oncology of the Cancer Research Center and Professor of Genetics and Molecular Biology. Dr. Boynton received his Ph.D. in Radiation Biology from the University of Iowa in 1972. We believe Dr. Boynton’s background and experience make him well qualified to serve as a Director.
Jerry Jasinowski. Mr. Jasinowski was appointed to the Board of Directors in April 2012. Mr. Jasinowski retired in 2007. Mr. Jasinowski currently serves on the boards of directors of Procurian and the Washington Tennis and Education Foundation and has held directorships in several other companies since 1990. From 2004 through 2007, Mr. Jasinowski served as the President of the Manufacturing Institute, an organization dedicated to improving and expanding manufacturing in the United States, of which he was a founder. Mr. Jasinowski was also the President and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers, a trade association with 13,000 corporate members from 1990 to 2004. Mr. Jasinowski holds an A.B. in Economics from Indiana University and an M.A. in Economics from Columbia University. We believe that Mr. Jasinowski’s extensive experience across a wide range of manufacturing, technology, and financial firms, including Fortune 1000 and Fortune 500 companies, make him well qualified to serve as a Director.
34
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s current executive officers.
Name Age Position
Dr. Alton L. Boynton 78 Class I Director, Chief Scientific Officer
Leslie J. Goldman 77 Senior Vice President, General Counsel
Dr. Marnix L. Bosch 63 Chief Technical Officer
Linda F. Powers. Please see “Director Biographies” above.
Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D. Please see “Director Biographies” above.
Leslie J. Goldman. Mr. Goldman joined us in June 2011, and serves as Senior Vice President and General Counsel. In this capacity, Mr. Goldman has responsibility for legal matters, investor relations and financing activities. Prior to joining us, Mr. Goldman was a partner at the law firm of Skadden, Arps for over 30 years, specializing in a wide array of advanced technologies and their commercialization. Mr. Goldman also serves as an advisor to a number of other technology companies. In addition, for eight years, Mr. Goldman served as Chairman of the Board of a group of TV stations in four mid-size cities across the country. Mr. Goldman received a B.A. from the University of Michigan in 1967 and a J.D. from the University of Michigan in 1970.
Marnix L. Bosch, Ph.D. Dr. Bosch joined us in 2000, and serves as our Chief Technical Officer. In this capacity, Dr. Bosch plays a key role in the preparation and submission of our regulatory applications, as well as ongoing development of our product lines, and ongoing development and/or acquisition of new technologies. Dr. Bosch led the process of designing the protocols, and managed the successful preparation and submission of our Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for FDA approval to conduct clinical trials for prostate cancer, brain cancer, ovarian cancer and multiple other cancers. He also led the processes for other regulatory submissions in both the U.S. and abroad (including the successful applications for orphan drug status in both the U.S. and Europe for DCVax-L for brain cancer). He spearheaded the development of our manufacturing and quality control processes. Prior to joining us in 2000, Dr. Bosch worked at the Dutch National Institutes of Health (RIVM) as head of the Department of Molecular Biology, as well as in academia as a professor of Pathobiology. He has authored more than 40 peer-reviewed research publications in immunology and virology, and is an inventor on several patent applications on dendritic cell product manufacturing.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Leadership Structure
The Board believes that Ms. Powers’ service as both Chairperson of the Board and Chief Executive Officer is in the Company’s and our stockholders’ best interests. Ms. Powers possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing us, and is thus, we believe, best positioned to develop Company strategies, business plans and priorities, and corresponding Board agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. The Company has multiple major programs under way, with operations and infrastructure on two continents, which require heightened efficiency and involvement between the Board and management. Ms. Powers’ combined role enables decisive leadership, and, we believe, facilitates this efficiency and involvement. Our lead independent director is Mr. Jerry Jasinowski.
Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight
The Board plays an active role in risk oversight of our Company. The Board does not have a formal risk management committee, but administers this oversight function through various standing committees of the Board of Directors and/or through the full Board. The Audit Committee maintains responsibility for oversight of financial reporting-related risks, including those related to our accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee also reviews reports and considers any material allegations regarding potential violations of our Company’s Code of Conduct. The Compensation Committee oversees risks arising from our compensation
35
Table of Contents
policies and programs and has responsibility for evaluating and approving our executive compensation and benefit plans, policies and programs. The Company also performed an enterprise-wide risk assessment as well as an enterprise-wide fraud risk assessment during 2021 and will continue to update such assessments on an annual basis.
Director Independence
Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the independence of our directors and has determined that a majority of the Board consists of members who are currently “independent” as that term is defined within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Board of Directors has determined each of Messrs. Malik and Jasinowski, and Ambassador Black to be independent.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has responsibility for recommending the appointment of our independent accountants, supervising our finance function (which includes, among other matters, our investment activities), reviewing our internal accounting control policies and procedures, and providing the Board such additional information and materials as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant financial matters which require the attention of the Board. The Audit Committee discusses the financial statements with management, approves filings made with the SEC and maintains the necessary discussions with the Company’s independent accountants. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/.
The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Malik and Jasinowski. Our Board of Directors has determined that Jerry Jasinowski, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules as well as pursuant to the additional test for independence for audit committee members imposed by SEC regulation and Section 5605(c)(2)(A) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Audit Committee is established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the overall compensation levels of our executive officers and administering our equity compensation plans. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Malik and Jasinowski. Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is “independent” under the current listing standards of Nasdaq. The Compensation Committee acts under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/.
Conflicts Committee
The Conflicts Committee is responsible for review and evaluation of related party matters including related party transactions. The Conflicts Committee currently consists of Ambassador Black, Mr. Jasinowski and Dr. Malik. Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Conflicts Committee is “independent” within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Conflicts Committee acts under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/. The Conflicts Committee does not delegate its authority pursuant to its written charter.
Nominations Committee
The Nominations Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in, among other things, effecting Board organization, membership and function, including: identifying qualified Board nominees; and effecting the organization, membership and function of Board committees, including composition and recommendation of qualified candidates and reviewing the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominations Committee shall identify and evaluate the qualifications of all candidates for nomination for election as directors. Potential nominees are identified by the Board of Directors based on the criteria, skills and qualifications that have been recognized by the Nominations Committee. While our nomination policy does not prescribe specific diversity standards, the Nominations Committee and its independent members seek to identify nominees who have a variety of perspectives, professional experience, education, difference in viewpoints and skills, and personal qualities that will result in a well-rounded Board of Directors. The Nominations Committee operates under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/.
36
Table of Contents
The Nominations Committee currently consists of Messrs. Malik and Jasinowski. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominations Committee is “independent” under the current listing standards of Nasdaq. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter setting forth the authority and responsibilities of the Nominations Committee.
Information Regarding Meetings of the Board and Committees
The business of our Company is under the general oversight of our Board, as provided by the laws of Delaware and our bylaws. During 2022, the Board held 22 meetings and also conducted business by written consent. During 2022, the Audit Committee held 4 meetings, the Conflicts Committee held 6 meetings, and the Compensation Committee held 2 meetings. The Nominations Committee did not hold any meetings. Each person who was a director during 2022 attended at least 75% of the 22 Board meetings. We do not have a formal written policy with respect to Board members’ attendance at our annual meeting of stockholders. All five of our directors attended our last annual meeting of stockholders.
Code of Conduct
We have an established Code of Conduct applicable to all Board members, executive officers, employees and contractors. Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation program for the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officer, and our three most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive and financial officer who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2022. We refer to these individuals as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs.”
For purposes of this executive compensation discussion, the names and positions of our named executive officers for the 2022 fiscal year were:
● Leslie Goldman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel;
● Marnix L. Bosch, Ph.D., Chief Technical Officer; and
● Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer and Secretary.
Philosophy and Objectives
Our success is highly dependent on our ability to attract, engage and retain executive officers who possess the skills, competencies and passion that are consistent with our vision. To this end, our compensation program has been developed with the following overarchingprinciples in mind:
Periodically, the Compensation Committee reviews the objectives and components of our executive compensation program to assess whether they continue to align with these philosophies. To establish compensation parameters for our named executive officers, our
37
Table of Contents
Compensation Committee evaluated each element of compensation separately and the total compensation for each named executive officer, as well as the compensation levels at similarly situated companies. Based on this review and analysis, our Compensation Committee determined that our process for determining executive compensation is aligned with stockholder interests.
Risk Management and Mitigation
In reviewing our compensation structure in 2022, the Compensation Committee also considered whether our compensation policies and practices could affect our risk profile and whether such compensation policies and practices could potentially encourage excessive risk taking by our employees. In considering these issues, the Compensation Committee did not find that our compensation policies and other policies generally raised undue risks for the Company or potentially could encourage excessive risk taking by our employees.
Elements of 2022 Compensation
Our 2022 executive compensation program consisted of two primary elements:
● Base salary;
● Annual bonus.
Base Salary
Base salary is the fixed portion of an executive’s annual compensation. Base salaries for our NEOs are established based on the individual’s scope of responsibilities, experience, and market factors. The Compensation Committee typically reviews base salaries on an annual basis, referencing salary levels at similarly situated companies to understand the marketplace for individuals in similar positions. The Committee annually reviews the base salary of our CEO in executive session and recommends her base salary to the independent members of the Board for approval, based on the criteria described above.
The Compensation Committee does not use a formulaic approach when setting an executive officer’s base salary. However, taking into account the recommendations of our CEO, the Compensation Committee considers the following factors when determining (or, in the case of the CEO, recommending to the Board) individual base salary levels:
● the nature and responsibility of the executive’s position,
● market trends for individuals in similar positions at comparable companies,
● the executive’s expertise, tenure, responsibilities and performance, and
● competitiveness of the market for the executive’s services.
In April, May and November 2022, our Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation of each of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee and Board considered the factors described above, and determined to leave Ms. Powers’, Mr. Goldman’s, Dr. Bosch’s and Dr. Boynton’s salaries unchanged.
Annual Bonus Awards
Our NEOs are eligible to receive an annual bonus in respect of their individual performance and the performance of the Company. The Company determines Annual Bonus Awards based upon progress achieved in the Company’s programs (including clinical development, manufacturing, intellectual property and finances) and progress toward potential eventual commercialization, as well as the individual’s roles and contributions toward the progress.
38
Table of Contents
Restricted Stock Awards
The Company did not make any restricted stock or option awards to the NEOs in 2022. The Company also made no restricted stock or option awards in 2021. The Company has made no equity awards in nearly three years. However, the equity pool established under the Company’s Equity Compensation Plan remains in place.
Additional information regarding the stock options granted to NEOs in 2020 is set forth below in the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal-Year End” table.
Other Compensation Plans
401(k) Plan. The NEOs are eligible to participate in employee benefit plans and programs, including long-term disability, to the same extent as the Company’s other full-time employees, subject to the terms and eligibility requirements of those plans. The NEOs also participate in our 401(k) plan, subject to limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, to the same extent as the Company’s other full-time employees.
Other Benefits. We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans or any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Limited Perquisites. Perquisites or other personal benefits are not a significant component of the compensation to our NEOs. We provide only limited perquisites to our NEOs, such as coverage of phone and internet costs.
Employment Agreements, The Company entered into employment agreements with each of Ms. Powers, Mr. Goldman, Dr. Bosch and Dr. Boynton in 2011. The 2011 agreements have expired. The Company entered into a new employment agreement with Dr. Bosch, which is currently in effect. The Company plans to enter into new employment agreements with Ms. Powers, Mr. Goldman and Dr. Boynton in due course.
Process for Setting Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee Review
Our Compensation Committee reviews the elements of our NEOs’ total compensation throughout the year, to evaluate whether each element remains competitive. In making compensation decisions, the Committee relies on its own judgment after reviewing external data about similarly situated companies, and also considers the following factors:
● overall Company and individual performance;
● retention needs; and
● the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to her own compensation)..
Each year, the Compensation Committee expects to evaluate all elements of executive officer compensation, after reviewing the prior year’s results and the achievement of Company operational and financial objectives. The purpose of this annual evaluation is to determine whether any changes in an officer’s compensation may be appropriate. The CEO does not participate in the Committee’s deliberations regarding her own compensation. At the Committee’s request, the CEO may review with the Committee the performance of the other executive officers. Our Compensation Committee gives substantial weight to the CEO’s evaluations and recommendations because she is particularly able to assess the other executive officers’ performance and contributions.
Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee does currently not retain an independent compensation consultant.
39
Table of Contents
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the amount of compensation that may be deducted per covered employee, including each of our NEOs, to $1 million per taxable year. Thus, it is expected that compensation deductions for any covered individual will be subject to a $1 million annual deduction limitation. However, the Company does not currently have significant taxable income and hence this issue is not currently a significant consideration. If the tax deductibility of compensation becomes a significant consideration to be evaluated by our Compensation Committee, the Committee may still conclude that the lost deduction on compensation for our NEOs is outweighed by the benefit of being able to attract and retain talented management. Accordingly, the Committee may continue to approve executive compensation that it believes is best for the Company without regard to whether the compensation is fully deductible.
Compensation Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the compensation discussion and analysis included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the compensation committee recommended to our board of directors that the compensation discussion and analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The foregoing report has been furnished by the Compensation Committee.
Dr. Navid Malik (Chairperson)
Jerry Jasinowski
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation paid to or accrued for our executive officers, referred to as our Named Executive Officers, during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
The dollar values listed in the table below for option awards are a non-cash accounting measure (based on the Black Scholes formula, under which high volatility of share price contributes to high valuations) and do not constitute intrinsic value or exercise value for the options. The options had no intrinsic or exercise value when they were awarded.
40
Table of Contents
The options awarded in 2020, listed in the table below, were granted for employee performance during 2018, 2019 and 2020. The options were awarded at prices that were generally at or above the market price or the price paid by unrelated investors for the Company’s shares at the time of the award.
Option
Salary Bonus Awards Total
Name and Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($)
41
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and un-exercisable as of December 31, 2022:
Securities Underlying Unexercised Option Awards
Number of Number of
Unexercised Unexercised Option
Options (#) Options (#) Exercise Price Option
On July 2, 2020, we granted 32,558,724 stock options to Ms. Powers for service during 2018, 2019 and 2020. These options were subject to certain vesting requirements which have been fulfilled. The options are exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, and have a 10-year exercise period. Following entry into previous securities suspension agreements, in 2021, Ms. Powers entered into a voluntary blocking agreement on an ongoing rolling basis with the Company under which Ms. Powers cannot exercise or convert any options, warrants or other derivative securities, unless Ms. Powers provides the Company at least 61 days’ advance notice. As
42
Table of Contents
a result, such derivative securities are not considered “beneficially owned” within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Ms. Powers received no consideration for entry into such arrangement.
On July 2, 2020, we granted 21,822,937 stock options to Mr. Goldman for service during 2018, 2019 and 2020. The options are exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, and have a 10-year exercise period. These options are subject to certain vesting requirements. Following entry into previous securities suspension agreements, in 2021 Mr. Goldman entered into a voluntary blocking agreement on an ongoing rolling basis with the Company under which Mr. Goldman cannot exercise or convert any options, warrants or other derivative securities, as applicable, to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock, unless Mr. Goldman provides the Company at least 61 days’ advance notice. As a result, such derivative securities are not considered “beneficially owned” within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Mr. Goldman received no consideration for entry into such arrangement.
On January 14, 2021, Mr. Goldman assigned 20,000,000 options that were granted on July 2, 2020 to The Goldman NWBIO GRAT Trust for no consideration. On April 28, 2022, Sue Goldman, Trustee of The Goldman NWBIO GRAT Trust transferred 12,709,287 options to Mr. Goldman in satisfaction of the first annuity amount due to Mr. Goldman. As of December 31, 2022, 7,290,713 options were remaining in The Goldman NWBIO GRAT Trust.
43
Table of Contents
On July 27, 2022, Dr. Boynton assigned 3,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration. On December 6, 2022, Dr. Boynton assigned 9,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration.
Non-qualified Defined Contribution and Other Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans
We do not maintain either a non-qualified defined contribution or non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control
The Company does not currently have any arrangements that would trigger payments upon termination of a NEO or upon a change in control of the Company. However, the Company plans to enter into employment agreements with Ms. Powers, Mr. Goldman and Dr. Boynton in due course, which may contain such arrangements.
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure
We are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO. Based on the information for fiscal year 2022, we reasonably estimate that the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 4:1. Our pay ratio estimate has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions summarized below.
We identified the median employee by examining the 2022 annual base salary compensation for all individuals, excluding our CEO. We identified our median compensation employee by examining total compensation paid for fiscal year 2022 to all individuals, excluding Ms. Powers, who were employed by us on December 31, 2022, the last day of our fiscal year based on payroll records. No assumptions, adjustments or estimates were made in respect of total compensation, except that we annualized the compensation of any
44
Table of Contents
employee that was not employed with us for all of fiscal year 2022.We excluded independent contractors retained on an as needed basis, whose compensation is determined by an unaffiliated third party, and who are therefore are not considered our employees for purposes of the pay ratio calculation.
Once we identified our median employee, we calculated such employee’s annual total compensation for 2022 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in that employee’s annual total compensation of $161,000. The median employee’s annual total compensation includes annualized base salary, annualized bonus during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
With respect to the CEO, we used the amount reported as total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table included in this annual report on Form 10-K. Any estimates and assumptions used to calculate total annual compensation are described in footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more officers serving on our board of directors.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation paid or accrued to our non-executive directors during the years ended December 31, 2022.
The dollar values listed in the table for option awards are a non-cash accounting measure (based on the Black Scholes formula, under which high volatility of share price contributes to high valuations) and do not constitute intrinsic or exercise value for the options. The options had no intrinsic or exercise value when they were awarded.
The options were awarded at prices that were at the market price of the Company’s shares at the time of the award (at $0.34 per share).
Fees Earned
or Option
Paid in Awards Total
Name Year Cash ($) (2) ($) (1) ($)
45
Table of Contents
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS-EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 31, 2023 by:
● our directors and nominees for director;
● our directors and executive officers as a group.
Shares of common stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of common stock assume the exercise of all options, warrants and other securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2022. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants exercisable on or prior to the date 60 days after March 31, 2022 are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such options or warrants for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by any other person.
Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and the entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws, if any. The table below is based upon the information supplied by our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., the Company’s records and from Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC.
Except as otherwise noted, the address of the individuals in the following table is c/o Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc., 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Number of
Shares or Options
Beneficially
Name of Beneficial Owner Owned Percentage(1)
Directors and Officers:
Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D. 9,773,445 * %
* Less than 1%
46
Table of Contents
2023. However, we did not deem such shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Advent BioServices, Ltd.
Advent BioServices, Ltd. (“Advent”) is a related party based in the U.K. and owned by Toucan Holdings, which is controlled by our Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer, Linda F. Powers. Advent was previously the U.K. branch of Cognate until it was spun off from Cognate in late 2016. Since then, Advent has operated independently of Cognate, providing manufacturing and related services for production of DCVax-L products.
The Company had three operational programs with Advent during 2022: (a) an ongoing manufacturing program at the existing GMP facility in London, (b) an ongoing development and manufacturing program at the Sawston facility, and (c) a one-time program for specialized work, organized into 10 sets of one-time milestones, for the following:
● Drafting of key portions of the application for product approval itself.
On November 8, 2019, the Company entered into an Ancillary Services Agreement with an initial eight-month term for the U.K. Facility Development Activities and Compassionate Use Program Activities, which is described in Note 10 of the financial statements included in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report. The total amount paid by the Company to Advent during 2022 was approximately $12.7 million, which included $3.1 million for services rendered and invoiced in 2021 but not paid by the Company until 2022, and $9.6 million for services in 2022. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid, for 8 one-time milestones, an aggregate of $3.0 million in cash and 7.5 million shares at fair value of approximately $5.9 million. On December 31, 2021, the Company entered into a Sub-lease Agreement with Advent for 14,459 of the 88,000 square foot space in the Sawston facility which is leased by the Company under a separate head lease with a different counterparty.
47
Table of Contents
Related-Party Transaction Approval Policy
Under SEC rules, related-party transactions are those transactions to which we are or may be a party in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of our directors or executive officers or any other related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, excluding, among other things, compensation arrangements with respect to employment or board membership. Any transactions with any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of the Company’s fiscal year was, a director or executive officer or a nominee to become a director of the Company, any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family member or person sharing the household of any of the foregoing persons, any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is a partner or principal, is subject to approval or ratification in accordance with the procedures of the Company’s Related-Party Transaction Policy.
Conflicts Committee
The Conflicts Committee of the Board reviews and approves all related-party matters and transactions for potential conflicts of interests and reasonableness, as described in the Corporate Governance Matters section above. The Conflicts Committee’s one-time review and approval of any series of similar related-party transactions (such as a series of transactions governed by a single contract) suffices to satisfy this policy with respect to each and every transaction in the series.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the independence of our directors and has determined that a majority of the Board consists of members who are currently “independent” as that term is defined within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Board of Directors has determined each of Messrs. Malik and Jasinowski, and Ambassador Black to be independent.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Fees Paid to Independent Public Accountants
Cherry Bekaert was engaged in January 2021 to serve as our independent public accounting firm beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Marcum served as our independent public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, and was engaged to serve in such capacity for 2020.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 for professional services rendered by Cherry Bekaert for the audit of our annual financial statements for 2022, an independent audit of the Company’s internal controls for 2022, and the review our financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for 2022 was $550,000. The fees billed in connection with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 for consultation and consents from Marcum for the audit of our annual financial statement for 2021 was approximately $31,000.
The aggregate fees billed in connection with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 for professional services rendered by Cherry Bekaert for the audit of our annual financial statement for 2020, including the review of the financial statement information included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during 2020, was $300,000.
Audit-Related Fees
There were no fees billed in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 for assurance and related services rendered by Cherry Bekaert or Marcum related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements.
48
Table of Contents
Tax and Other Non-Audit Professional Services
There were no fees billed in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 for professional services rendered by Cherry Bekaert or Marcum for tax related services or other non-audit professional services fees.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
Consistent with SEC policies and guidelines regarding audit independence, the Audit Committee is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our principal accountants on a case-by-case basis. Our Audit Committee has established a policy regarding approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our principal accountants. Our Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category and service. Our Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services provided by our principal accountants during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The Exhibits listed below are identified by numbers corresponding to the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The Exhibits designated by an asterisk (*) are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15.
49
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
ExhibitNumber Description
4.1 Description of Securities
50
Table of Contents
10.81 Equity Compensation Plan, dated May 29, 2020.
10.83 Agreement to acquire Flaskworks, L.L.C, August 28, 2020.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent.
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH Inline XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB Inline XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
*Confidential information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed separately with the SEC pursuant to a confidential treatment request.
ITEM 16.FORM 10–K SUMMARY
None.
51
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.(Registrant)
Date: February 28, 2023 By: /s/ Linda F. Powers
Linda F. Powers,
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
/s/ Linda F. Powers President and Chief Executive Officer February 28, 2023
Linda F. Powers Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
/s/ Alton L. Boynton Director February 28, 2023
Alton L. Boynton
/s/ Navid Malik Director February 28, 2023
Dr. Navid Malik
/s/ Jerry Jasinowski Director February 28, 2023
Jerry Jasinowski
/s/ J. Cofer Black Director February 28, 2023
J. Cofer Black
52
Table of Contents
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 00677) F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 F-5
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-10
F-1
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Bethesda, Maryland
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s evaluations of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Item 9A—Controls and Procedures in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-2
Table of Contents
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matter – Debt and Equity Accounting Considerations
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Critical Audit Matter Description
As disclosed in Notes 4, 5, 7, 10, and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company had various debt, derivative, mezzanine equity and equity transactions, including related party and non-related party stock-based compensation, where management evaluated required accounting considerations, significant estimates, and judgements around certain features, the possibility of conversion or redemption, and the valuation of certain components of the financings, including the valuation around certain freestanding and embedded derivatives. Certain features were initially measured at fair value and have been subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting period.
There is no current observable market for these types of features and, as such, the Company determined the fair value of the freestanding instruments or embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes-Merton model or the Monte Carlo option pricing model, as applicable, to measure the fair value of the debt and/or equity instrument both with and without the derivative liability features. As a result, a high degree of auditor judgment and effort was required in performing audit procedures to evaluate the various components of these instruments.
How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit
Our principal audit procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:
F-3
Table of Contents
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
/s/ Cherry Bekaert LLP
Cherry Bekaert LLP
Tampa, Florida
February 28, 2023
F-4
Table of Contents
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31, December 31,
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,965 $ 15,169
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,460 2,121
Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment, net 13,418 15,027
Construction in progress 2,028 —
Right-of-use asset, net 4,189 4,889
Indefinite-lived intangible asset 1,292 1,292
LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY, AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 10,687 $ 6,976
Convertible notes, net 135 135
Contingent payable derivative liability 8,668 8,232
Share liability 678 —
Lease liabilities 354 317
Non-current liabilities:
Notes payable, net of current portion, net 5,991 25,156
Lease liabilities, net of current portion 4,370 5,226
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12)
Mezzanine equity:
Stockholders’ deficit:
Stock subscription receivable (79) (79)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 3,145 357
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-5
Table of Contents
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except per share data)
For the years ended
December 31,
Revenues:
Operating costs and expenses:
Other income (expense):
Change in fair value of share liabilities 33 — —
Loss from extinguishment of debt (2,691) (165) (1,582)
Inducement expense — (647) —
Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain (3,304) (1,696) 2,261
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 2,788 1,505 (1,984)
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-6
Table of Contents
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEZZANINE EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(in thousands)
Mezzanine equity Accumulated
Series C Convertible Additional Other Total
Shares Amount Shares Par value Capital Receivable Deficit Income Deficit
Cashless warrants exercise — — 7,086 7 (7) — — — —
Cashless option exercise — — 71 — — — — — —
Cumulative translation adjustment — — — — — — — (1,984) (1,984)
Net income — — — — — — 179,126 — 179,126
Net loss — — — — — — (105,032) — (105,032)
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-7
Table of Contents