Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

NWBO US Equity

Northwest Biotherapeutics IncHealth Care · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1072379 · FY ends Dec 31
$0.18
+0.00 (+1.13%)
USD · as of 2026-08-19 · marketstack

NWBO · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

← all NWBO documents
filed 2026-04-15 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 341940 of 1,774321k characters rendered

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read this discussion together with the Financial Statements, related Notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following discussion contains assumptions, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides a historical and prospective narrative on the Company’s financial condition, and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.

We are a biotechnology company focused on developing personalized immune therapies for cancer. We have developed a platform technology, DCVax®, which uses activated dendritic cells to mobilize a patient’s own immune system to attack their cancer.

21

Table of Contents

Our lead product, DCVax®-L, is designed to treat solid tumor cancers in which the tumor can be surgically removed. We have completed a 331-patient international Phase III trial of DCVax-L for Glioblastoma multiforme brain cancer (GBM), published the results in the JAMA Oncology peer reviewed journal, and on December 20, 2023 we submitted a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) for commercial approval in the U.K. We plan to conduct clinical trials of DCVax-L for other solid tumor cancers in the future, when resources permit. Our second product, DCVax®-Direct, is designed to treat inoperable solid tumors. A 40-patient Phase I trial has been completed, and included treatment of a diverse range of more than a dozen types of cancers. We plan to work on preparations for Phase II trials of DCVax-Direct as resources permit.

During 2025, the Company continued its progress on multiple fronts, including the following:

MAA Application. Much of the Company’s time and resources were devoted to active engagement in the MAA review process. The Company continued to work with large teams of consultants on this process. As is typical, and as the Company has previously stated, the Company does not plan to make any interim announcements while its MAA is going through the regulatory process. The Company plans to announce the results when the regulatory review and decision-making is finished.

Management Change. The Company’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel passed away unexpectedly. Other Company personnel took on new and/or additional roles in his place.

Advent Acquisition. On October 24, 2025, the Company completed its acquisition of Advent BioServices Ltd. (Advent). Advent then became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company believes the acquisition will facilitate efficiencies and scale-up of its manufacturing capacity.

UK Clinics. The Company pursued clinic arrangements or collaborations in the UK to secure dedicated leukapheresis capacity, including potential in-house operations. Leukapheresis procedures are required to obtain the immune cells for DCVax products and there is a general shortage of capacity in the UK.

Secondary Manufacturing. The Company has identified a collaboration that could potentially lead to a second source of capacity for DCVax production. If the second source is needed, the Company anticipates that it could be brought online with significant cost savings. The Company is pursuing planning discussions with this party.

Development of the Sawston, UK Facility. The Company and developed the design and engineering for an initial Grade C lab in the Sawston facility which is anticipated to add double the manufacturing capacity of the two existing Grade B labs combined (thereby tripling the current capacity). Contractors began onsite construction-related activities. Advent recruited substantial additional manufacturing personnel and began their DCVax-specific training, which typically takes about six months. Advent also continued working to source key equipment required for the C lab while seeking ways to mitigate the high costs and 10-12 month procurement backlogs to purchase such equipment new. The Company purchased two major pieces of such equipment which cost nearly $1 million each when purchased new, and the Company is considering purchasing additional key equipment that Advent has found.

Manufacturing in the US.The Company evaluated facilities in multiple states for establishment of GMP manufacturing in the US, both for technologies in-licensed from the University of Pittsburgh and Roswell Park Cancer Center and for DCVax products. The Company finalized its selections and undertook contract negotiations. The negotiations continued through year-end and into the new year. In parallel, the Company continued the hiring process for personnel with the special types of expertise and prior experience, reviewing over 80 candidates in the process during the fourth quarter and preparing an additional recruitment process for the new year.

Potential Compassionate Use Programs in the US. The Company continues to receive an ongoing stream of patient requests for compassionate use of DCVax therapies for a variety of cancers. The Company has previously treated compassionate use cases involving a variety of solid tumor cancers with its DCVax therapies. The Company believes that those compassionate use cases have been helpful for the patients involved, and have also generated useful real world experience and data. The Company continued to explore the potential for expanded access/compassionate use in the US, particularly under state laws. Over a dozen states have enacted expanded compassionate use legislation, and expanded access programs are also possible at the federal level. The Company continued pursing multiple potential hospital or clinic arrangements for such programs.

DCVax-Direct Program. A 2-year program of technology transfer to the Company’s Sawston, UK facility and further development of the DCVax-Direct technology there was completed in 2025. Another version of the DCVax-Direct technology was developed using similar biologic components to provide flexibility for the program to proceed despite periods of worldwide shortages of a biologic

22

Table of Contents

component in the original technology. The Company also developed new DCVax-Direct clinical trial plans to supersede the clinical trials plans for which the IND packages were previously being developed, in order to take account of developments in the field. The manufacturing and product-related portions of the IND packages were completed. The Company determined the initial cancer indications to be addressed in the new clinical trials, and worked with leading clinicians in the US and UK to develop the protocol. The Company continued its analyses of additional treatment elements to potentially include in the trials from among the in-licensed technologies as described below.

Enhanced DCVax Products. The Company continued its internal testing of certain immune booster agents that it has identified and/or in-licensed, to identify the most useful booster agent(s) and combination(s) of agents for enhanced DCVax products. The Company made its first public presentation about this at a scientific conference at the NY Academy of Sciences. The internal research and testing has continued to progress since then, and the Company anticipates making further presentations. The Company is in discussions with clinicians about which version(s) of enhanced DCVax products should be selected and for which cancers for the initial clinical trials.

Clinical Trials With In-Licensed Technologies. The Company has continued working with Dr. Kalinski to develop arrangements for clinical trials of his dendritic cell (DC) technologies that have been in-licensed. Certain program changes were necessitated by Dr. Kalinski’s move back from Roswell Park Cancer Center to the University of Pittsburgh, where he had previously been for many years, and necessitated by certain investigators for the planned trials also moving institutions. US manufacturing arrangements are being developed as described above to supply the products for these trials. The potential trial plans under development include both trials built around DC products manufactured ex vivo and trials targeting in vivo mobilization of endogenous DCs using only certain biologics, which are part of the in-licensed portfolios of Dr. Kalinski’s technologies.

Litigation Progress. The Company’s litigation in New York against certain market makers reached a key milestone during 2025: the court’s decision on the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Company’s Complaint trying to prevent the case from proceeding. The court’s decision allowed the case to go forward into the long-awaited discovery period. The Company has been vigorously pursuing documents and information both from the defendants and from third parties. The Company also added counsel with substantial experience in market manipulation cases. The Company plans to continue pursuing its case vigorously. See Item 1, Legal Proceedings, above.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to derivative liabilities, accrued expenses and stock-based compensation. We based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, provides guidance on the development and disclosure of fair value measurements. Under this accounting guidance, fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability.

The accounting guidance classifies fair value measurements in one of the following three categories for disclosure purposes:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 prices for similar assets or liabilities that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity and values determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.

23

Table of Contents

The Company accounts for the issuance of common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with the equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company accounts for certain common stock warrants outstanding as a liability at fair value and adjusts the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in its Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The fair value of the warrants and convertible notes issued by the Company has been estimated using Monte Carlo simulation and or a Black Scholes model. The warrant liabilities are valued using Level 3 valuation inputs (see Note 4).

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company has derivative financial instruments that are not hedges and do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in other income (expense), on a net basis in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

The Company reassesses the classification of its derivative instruments at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification. As a result of entering into a convertible debt instrument (see Note 9) for which such instrument contained a variable conversion feature with no floor price, the Company has adopted a sequencing policy as described below within Note 3 in accordance with ASC 815-40-35-12 “Derivatives and Hedging” (provides comprehensive guidance on derivative and hedging transactions) whereby all future instruments may be classified as a derivative liability with the exception of instruments related to share-based compensation issued to employees or directors.

Business Combination

The Company allocates the fair value of the purchase consideration of a business acquisition to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. To the extent the fair value of net assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, exceeds the purchase price, a bargain purchase gain is recognized. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from contingencies are also recognized at fair value if the fair value can be determined during the measurement period, which is no more than one year from the acquisition date. Results of operations of an acquired business are included in the consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be fully recoverable. To analyze recoverability, the Company projects undiscounted net future cash flows over the remaining lives of such assets. If these projected cash flows are less than the carrying amounts, an impairment loss would be recognized, resulting in a write-down of the assets with a corresponding charge to earnings. The impairment loss is measured based upon the difference between the carrying amounts and the fair values of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amounts or fair value less cost to sell. Management determines fair value using the discounted cash flow method or other accepted valuation techniques.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the undiscounted net future cash flows of the U.K. property were greater than the carrying value. Therefore, no impairment loss was considered necessary.

Modification of Equity Classified Warrants

A change in the terms or conditions of a warrant is accounted for as a modification. For a warrant modification accounted for under ASC 815, the effect of a modification shall be measured as the difference between the fair value of the modified warrant and the fair value of the original warrant immediately before its terms are modified, with each measured on the modification date. The accounting for any incremental fair value of the modified warrants over the original warrants is based on the specific facts and circumstances related to the modification. When a modification is directly attributable to an equity offering, the incremental change in fair value of the warrants is accounted for as an equity issuance cost. When a modification is directly attributable to a debt financing, the incremental change in fair value of the warrants is accounted for as a debt discount or debt issuance cost. For all other modifications, the incremental change in fair value is recognized as a deemed dividend.

24

Table of Contents

Convertible Notes under Fair Value Option

The Company accounts for certain convertible notes issued on an instrument-by-instrument basis under the fair value option (“FVO”) election of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825”). The convertible notes accounted for under the FVO election are each debt host financial instruments containing embedded features wherein the entire financial instrument is initially measured at its issue-date estimated fair value and then subsequently remeasured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period date. Changes in the estimated fair value of the convertible notes are recorded as a component of Other (expense) income in the consolidated statements of operations, except that the change in estimated fair value attributable to a change in the instrument-specific credit risks is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. As a result of electing the FVO, issuance costs related to the convertible notes are expensed as incurred.

Stock Based Compensation

Share-based compensation cost is recorded for all option grants and awards of non-vested stock based on the grant date fair value of the award using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized over the service period required for the award.

We estimate the fair value of stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment.

Expected Term - The expected term of options represents the period that the Company’s stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method, which is the half-life from vesting to the end of its contractual term.

Expected Volatility - The Company computes stock price volatility over expected terms based on its historical common stock trading prices.

Risk-Free Interest Rate - The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield available on U. S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term.

Expected Dividend - The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common shares and does not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and, therefore, uses an expected dividend yield of zero in its valuation models.

We recognize forfeitures when they occur.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (ASU 2023-09), which improves the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. It also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures. This guidance will be effective for the annual periods beginning the year ended December 31, 2025. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the guidance can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025, and applied the new disclosure requirements retrospectively to the all periods presented. Prior period disclosures have been adjusted to reflect the new disclosure requirements. See Note 15, “Income Taxes,” for further detail.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03 (“ASU 2024-03”), Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (DISE) which requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. The standard requires public business entities to disclose disaggregated information about specific natural expense categories underlying certain income statement expense line items that are considered relevant. The FASB also issued ASU No. 2025-01 (“ASU 2025-01”), Clarifying the Effective Date, which clarifies the adoption date of ASU 2024-03 as annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

25

Table of Contents

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025 - 06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal - Use Software (“ASU 2025 – 06”), which amends the guidance for accounting for software costs to reflect current software development practices, including iterative and agile methodologies, by removing references to development stages. It also clarifies the criteria for capitalization, which begins when both of the following occur: (1) management has authorized and committed to funding the software project and (2) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. ASU 2025 - 06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments may be applied either prospectively, retrospectively, or utilizing a modified transition approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2025 - 06 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07. This update clarifies the application of derivative accounting to certain contracts and refines the guidance for share-based noncash consideration received from customers. Specifically, ASU 2025-07 introduces a scope exception for contracts that are not exchange-traded and whose underlying is tied to operations or activities specific to one party. It also clarifies that share-based noncash consideration from a customer should initially be accounted for under Topic 606 until the right to receive or retain such consideration becomes unconditional, at which point financial instruments guidance may apply. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2025-07 should be applied either prospectively or by utilizing a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements. This update clarifies interim disclosure requirements and centralizes such requirements within Topic 270. Among other changes, ASU 2025-11 introduces a disclosure principle requiring entities to provide information about significant events or changes since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact, clarifies when duplicative annual disclosures may be omitted from interim reports, and aligns interim reporting requirements with applicable SEC guidance for registrants. This guidance is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2025-11 should be applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements. This update addresses shareholder suggestions on the Accounting Standards Codification and makes other incremental improvements to U.S. GAAP. The amendments make codification updates to a broad range of topics arising from technical corrections, unintended application of the codification, clarifications and other minor improvements. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted and may be elected on an issue-by-issue basis. The amendments in ASU 2025-12 are to be applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Results of Operations

Operating costs:

Our operating costs and expenses consist primarily of research and development (R&D) expenses. R&D expenses include clinical trial expenses, and increased costs after completion of a Phase III trial, especially for the extensive preparations, and teams of expert consultants, required for an application for product approval.

In addition to clinical trial and post-trial costs, our operating costs may include ongoing work relating to our DCVax products, including R&D, product characterization, manufacturing process development, quality control process development, and related matters. Additional substantial costs relate to the development and expansion of manufacturing capacity.

Our operating costs also include the costs of preparations for the launch of new or expanded clinical trial programs, such as our anticipated trials of combination treatment regimens. The preparation costs include payments to regulatory consultants, lawyers, statisticians, sites and others, evaluation of potential investigators, the clinical trial sites and the CROs managing the trials and other service providers, and expenses related to institutional approvals, clinical trial agreements (business contracts with sites), training of medical and other site personnel, trial supplies and other.

Our operating costs also include legal and accounting costs in operating the Company.

26

Table of Contents

The foregoing operating costs include the costs for Flaskworks’ ongoing operations and intellectual property filings, and the operations of our subsidiaries in the U.K., the Netherlands and Germany.

Research and development:

R&D expenses include costs for substantial external scientific personnel, technical and regulatory advisers, and others, costs of laboratory supplies used in our internal research and development projects, travel, regulatory compliance, and expenditures for preclinical and clinical trial operation and management when we are actively engaged in clinical trials.

Because we are a company with no commercial product sales revenue, we do not allocate research and development costs on a project basis. We adopted this policy, in part, due to the unreasonable cost burden associated with accounting at such a level of detail and our limited number of financial and personnel resources.

General and administrative:

General and administrative expenses include personnel related salary and benefit expenses, cost of facilities, insurance, travel, legal services, property and equipment and amortization of stock options and warrants.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and, 2024

We recognized a net loss of $60.2 million and $83.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Net cash used in operations was $44.8 million and $57.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Research and development expense

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, research and development expense were $28.8 million and $34.9 million, respectively. The decrease in 2025 was primarily related to the decrease in stock-based compensation, the costs related to the MAA application at the MHRA and the acquisition of Advent in the 4th quarter in 2025.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses were $32.5 million and $33.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

The decrease was mainly related to a reduction in D&O insurance premium, scientific conference expenses and stock-based compensation. The decreases were offset by an increase in legal expenses.

Change in Fair Value of Derivatives

We recognized a non-cash loss of $0.2 million and a non-cash gain of $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The fluctuations were mainly due to the movement of our stock price.

Change in Fair Value of Share Payable

We recognized non-cash loss of $0.4 million and a non-cash gain of $16,000 from the change in fair value of share payable during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The fluctuations were mainly due to the movement of our stock price.

Change in Fair Value of Convertible Notes

We recognized non-cash gain of $25.6 million and $7.7 million from the change in fair value of the convertible notes during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The non-cash gains resulted from the decrease of the Company’s stock price. The increase in the non-cash gains in 2025 was attributable to a change in certain assumptions used in the valuation of the convertible notes.

Debt Extinguishment

27

Table of Contents

We recognized approximately $17.4 million and $14.4 million debt extinguishment loss during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, from debt redemptions and debt amendments. The increase during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 was mainly due to multiple amendments on the existing convertible notes.

Loss from Issuance of Debt

We recognized approximately $4.7 million and $0.8 million loss from issuance of certain convertible notes, which we elected to account for under the FVO during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The loss was calculated as the difference between the principal amount and the fair value of these convertible notes.

Loss from warrant modification

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized a $0.8 million loss from warrant modifications related to an amendment to certain warrants that were liability classified and such amendment was in conjunction with an equity offering.

Interest expense

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded interest expense of $8.7 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense in 2025 was mainly related to an increase of outstanding debt balance.

Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recognized foreign currency transaction gain of $4.9 million and a loss of $1.5 million, respectively. The gain was due to the strengthening of British pound sterling relative to the U.S. dollar and vice versa for the loss.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have experienced recurring losses from operations since inception. We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenue and must cover our operating expenses through debt and equity financings to allow us to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on the ability to obtain adequate capital to fund operating losses until we generate adequate cash flows from operations to fund our operating costs and obligations. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease operations.

We depend upon our ability, and will continue to attempt to secure equity and/or debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Our management determined that there was substantial doubt about our ability

to continue as a going concern within one year after the consolidated financial statements were issued, and management’s concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern within the year following this report persist.

28

Table of Contents

Contingent Contractual Payment

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Payment Due by Period

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Less than ​ 1 to 2 ​ 3 to 5

​ ​ ​ ​ Total ​ ​ ​ 1 Year ​ ​ ​ Years ​ ​ ​ Years

Short term convertible notes payable (1) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

6% unsecured $ 267 ​ $ 267 ​ $ — ​ $ —

8% unsecured ​ ​ 515 ​ ​ 515 ​ ​ — ​ ​ —

Short term convertible notes payable at fair value (2) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Short term notes payable (3) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Long term convertible notes payable (1) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Long term convertible notes payable at fair value (2) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Long term notes payable (4) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Operating Activities

We used $44.8 million and $57.0 million in cash for operating activities during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease in cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to lower payments for clinical trial related expenditures, insurance costs and certain consulting expenditures.

Investing Activities

We spent approximately $1.8 million and $1.0 million in cash for purchases of equipment in the U.K. and the build-out of our facility in Sawston, U.K. during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We also provided a short-term loan of approximately $0.3 million to an unrelated third party in the U.K. in connection with certain clinic facilities.

29

Table of Contents

Financing Activities

We received approximately $8.2 million cash from issuances of 0.8 million shares of Series C convertible preferred stock during the years ended December 31, 2024.

We received approximately $19.3 million and $14.2 million from issuances of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

We received approximately $23,000 and $1.5 million of cash proceeds from the exercise of warrants and options during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

We received approximately $12.0 million and $14.0 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of multiple notes payable during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

We received approximately $19.3 million and $20.0 million cash proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable to individual lenders during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

We received $50,000 from issuance of non-dilutive funding agreements during the year ended December 31, 2024.

We received $0.2 million from investor advance during the year ended December 31, 2024.

We made aggregate debt payments of $1.3 million and $1.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, begins on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We, the management of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the Company.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including to our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2025. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

30

Table of Contents

Our management concluded that as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management of the Company, including our CEO and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025.

In accordance with SEC staff interpretative guidance for newly acquired businesses, companies are allowed to exclude certain acquisitions from the assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year after completion of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company. Consistent with this guidance, management’s evaluation of, and conclusion on, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Advent BioServices, Ltd (“Advent”) , which was acquired on October 24, 2025, whose financial statements constitute approximately 4.9 % and 15.9% of total assets (excluding acquired intangible assets) and revenue, respectively of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. This acquisition is discussed in Note 5, “Business Combination” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The Company will include the Acquisition in the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting by year end 2026.

Based on this assessment, we determined that we have effectively designed and implemented, consistently performed, and tested the functioning of these controls. Accordingly, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.

Attestation Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm because we qualified as a “smaller reporting company and non-accelerated filer.”

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We acquired Advent on October 24, 2025, and the addition of Advent’s financial systems and processes represent a change in our internal controls over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

None.

31

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

DIRECTORS

Name ​ ​ ​ Age ​ ​ ​ Position

J. Cofer Black 75 Class I Director

Dr. Alton L. Boynton 81 Class I Director, Chief Scientific Officer

Pat Sarma 80 Class II Director

Dr. Navid Malik 56 Class III Director

Director Biographies

Linda F. Powers. Ms. Powers has served as the Chairperson of our Board of Directors since her appointment on May 17, 2007, Chief Executive Officer and President since June 8, 2011 and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer since June 8, 2020. Ms. Powers was last elected by stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2022. Ms. Powers served as a managing director of Toucan Capital Fund II from 2001 to 2010, and Toucan Capital Fund III from 2010 to 2018. She also has over 20 years’ experience in corporate finance and restructurings, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and intellectual property licensing. Ms. Powers was previously a Board member of the Rosalind Franklin Society and M2GEN (an affiliate of Moffitt Cancer Center). She was the Chair of the Maryland Stem Cell Research Commission for the first two years of the state’s stem cell funding program, and has served an additional 15 years on the Commission. Ms. Powers served for several years on a Steering Committee of the National Academy of Sciences, evaluating government research funding, and was appointed to three Governors’ commissions created to determine how to build the respective states’ biotech and other high-tech industries. For more than six years, Ms. Powers taught an annual internal course at the National Institutes of Health for the bench scientists and technology transfer personnel on the development and commercialization of medical products. Ms. Powers serves on the boards of several private biotechnology companies. Ms. Powers holds a B.A. from Princeton University, where she graduated magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. She also earned a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School. We believe Ms. Powers’ background and experience make her well qualified to serve as a Director.

J. Cofer Black. Ambassador Black was appointed to the Board of Directors in January 2016 and was last elected by stockholders at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. Ambassador Black is an internationally renowned U.S. government leader and expert in cybersecurity, counterterrorism and national security. In addition to serving on company and bank boards, he presently serves as an independent consultant. Between 2009 and 2016, he served as Vice President for Global Operations at Blackbird Raytheon Technologies, a division of Raytheon Company, a NYSE-listed security company. From 2004 until 2008, he provided strategic guidance and business development as Vice Chairman of Blackwater Worldwide and as Chairman of Total Intelligence Solutions. During 2002 – 2005, he was appointed by the President of the United States to serve as the Ambassador, Coordinator for Counterterrorism, reporting directly to the Secretary of State for developing, coordinating and implementing American counterterrorism policy. Prior to his role as Ambassador, he served a 28-year career in the Central Intelligence Agency, reaching Senior Intelligence Service (SIS-4) level as Director, Counterterrorist Center (D/CTC), where he managed 1,300 professional personnel and an annual operational budget of more than one billion dollars. Ambassador Black is experienced representing the United States at the Head of State level, managing media as a diplomatic spokesperson and in public speaking as keynote speaker both as a senior U.S. Government official and business leader. Ambassador Black has received numerous awards and recognitions throughout his career, including the Distinguished Intelligence Medal (the CIA’s highest award for achievement). Ambassador Black received a B.A. in International Affairs from the University of Southern California in 1973 and an M.A. in International Affairs from the University of Southern California in 1974. We believe Ambassador Black’s background and experience in business management and information technology make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

32

Table of Contents

Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D. Dr. Boynton co-founded our Company, has served as our Chief Scientific Officer and a Director since our inception in 1998, was appointed our Chief Operating Officer in August 2001, was appointed President in May 2003, and served as Chief Executive Officer from June 2007 to June 2011. Dr. Boynton was last elected by stockholders at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. Prior to founding our Company, Dr. Boynton headed the Molecular Oncology research lab at the Pacific Northwest Research Foundation (the original foundation of Bill Hutchinson, from which the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center was spun off). Dr. Boynton also served as Director of the Department of Molecular Medicine of Northwest Hospital from 1995 to 2003 where he coordinated the establishment of a program centered on carcinogenesis. Prior to joining Northwest Hospital, Dr. Boynton was Associate Director of the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, The University of Hawaii, where he also held the positions of Director of Molecular Oncology of the Cancer Research Center and Professor of Genetics and Molecular Biology. Dr. Boynton received his Ph.D. in Radiation Biology from the University of Iowa in 1972. We believe Dr. Boynton’s background and experience make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Pat Sarma. Mr. Sarma was appointed to the Board of Directors in March 2024 and was last elected by stockholders at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Sarma brings decades of experience as a business executive and as a venture capital investor. One of the companies he founded and built was American Megatrends Inc. (AMI), which developed hardware, software and firmware components of PC-based systems. AMI developed the AMIBIOS firmware program for IBM-PC compatibility. The BIOS (Basic Input Output System) is the heart of PC-compatibility and all application programs access the BIOS in reading from or writing to peripheral units such as drives, keyboards, mouse, etc. AMI also developed, among other software, the AMI RAID Controller and Management software that was the fastest performer in the industry during the 1990’s and early 2000’s. Mr. Sarma’s interests in AMI were acquired in 2001, and thereafter he became a venture capital investor in the private equity markets. He was an owner for a number of years of the N.J. Devils team in the National Hockey League, and has invested in a diverse range of industries including medical and environmental companies. Mr. Sarma received a Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from Georgia Tech and a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Madras. We believe that Mr. Sarma’s background and experience make him well qualified to serve as a director.

Dr. Navid Malik. Dr. Malik was appointed to the Board of Directors in April 2012 and was last elected by stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2022. Dr. Malik is currently Chief Scientific Officer of London Growth Capital (LGC), an FCA regulated Investment Fund. He was previously Head of Research and an Executive Director at The Life Sciences Division, a UK Investment Bank. From January 2012 to December 2015, Dr. Malik was previously the Head of Life Sciences Research at Cenkos Securities Plc. in the U.K., an institutional stockbroking securities firm. From September 2011 through January 2012, Dr. Malik was the Head of Life Sciences Research at Sanlam (Merchant Securities), a global financial services firm. Dr. Malik was Partner and Head of Life Sciences at Matrix Investment Banking Division, Matrix Group, a financial services firm in London, from December 2008 through September 2011. Dr. Malik was a Senior Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Analyst at Wimmer Financial LLP from September 2008 through December 2008, and was the Senior Life Sciences Analyst at Collins Stewart Plc from January 2005 through September 2008. In 2011, Dr. Malik was awarded two StarMine Awards (awarded each year by Thomson Reuters and the Financial Times): Number One Stock Picker in the European Pharmaceutical Sector, and Number Two Stock Picker in the U.K. and Ireland Healthcare Sector. He has won a number of other awards for earnings accuracy. Dr. Malik holds a Ph.D. in Drug Delivery within Pharmaceutical Sciences, as well as degrees in Biomedical Sciences Research (M.Sc.) and Biochemistry and Physiology (B.Sc., joint honors). Dr. Malik also holds an MBA in finance from the City University Business School, London. Dr. Malik has led financings totaling $2 billion across approximately 200 transactions. We believe that Dr. Malik’s extensive experience in the life sciences fields and investment banking sector make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

33

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s current executive officers.

Name ​ ​ ​ Age ​ ​ ​ Position

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Dr. Alton L. Boynton 81 Class I Director, Chief Scientific Officer

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Dr. Marnix L. Bosch 66 Chief Technical Officer

Linda F. Powers. Please see “Director Biographies” above.

Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D. Please see “Director Biographies” above.

Marnix L. Bosch, Ph.D. joined us in 2000, and serves as our Chief Technical Officer. In this capacity, Dr. Bosch plays a key role in the preparation and submission of our regulatory applications, as well as ongoing development of our product lines, and ongoing development and/or acquisition of new technologies. Dr. Bosch led the process of designing the protocols, and managed the successful preparation and submission of our Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for FDA approval to conduct clinical trials for prostate cancer, brain cancer, ovarian cancer and multiple other cancers. He also led the processes for other regulatory submissions in both the U.S. and abroad (including the successful applications for orphan drug status in both the U.S. and Europe for DCVax-L for brain cancer). He spearheaded the development of our manufacturing and quality control processes. Prior to joining us in 2000, Dr. Bosch worked at the Dutch National Institutes of Health (RIVM) as head of the Department of Molecular Biology, as well as in academia as a professor of Pathobiology. He has authored more than 40 peer-reviewed research publications in immunology and virology, and is an inventor on several patent applications on dendritic cell product manufacturing.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has responsibility for recommending the appointment of our independent accountants, supervising our finance function (which includes, among other matters, our investment activities), reviewing our internal accounting control policies and procedures, and providing the Board such additional information and materials as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant financial matters which require the attention of the Board. The Audit Committee discusses the financial statements with management, approves filings made with the SEC and maintains the necessary discussions with the Company’s independent accountants. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/.

The Audit Committee currently consists of Dr. Malik and Mr. Sarma. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Sarma, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules as well as pursuant to the additional test for independence for audit committee members imposed by SEC regulation and Section 5605(c)(2)(A) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Audit Committee is established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the overall compensation levels of our executive officers and administering our equity compensation plans. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Dr. Malik, Ambassador Black and Mr. Sarma. Our

Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is “independent” under the current listing standards of Nasdaq. The Compensation Committee acts under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/.

34

Table of Contents

Conflicts Committee

The Conflicts Committee is responsible for review and evaluation of related party matters including related party transactions. The Conflicts Committee currently consists of Ambassador Black, Mr. Sarma and Dr. Malik. Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Conflicts Committee is “independent” within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Conflicts Committee acts under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/. The Conflicts Committee does not delegate its authority pursuant to its written charter.

Nominations Committee

The Nominations Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in, among other things, effecting Board organization, membership and function, including: identifying qualified Board nominees; and effecting the organization, membership and function of Board committees, including composition and recommendation of qualified candidates and reviewing the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominations Committee shall identify and evaluate the qualifications of all candidates for nomination for election as directors. Potential nominees are identified by the Board of Directors based on the criteria, skills and qualifications that have been recognized by the Nominations Committee. While our nomination policy does not prescribe specific diversity standards, the Nominations Committee and its independent members seek to identify nominees who have a variety of perspectives, professional experience, education, difference in viewpoints and skills, and personal qualities that will result in a well-rounded Board of Directors. The Nominations Committee operates under a written charter, which is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com/board-committee-charters/.

The Nominations Committee currently consists of Dr. Malik and Ambassador Black. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominations Committee is “independent” under the current listing standards of Nasdaq. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter setting forth the authority and responsibilities of the Nominations Committee.

Information Regarding Meetings of the Board and Committees

The business of our Company is under the general oversight of our Board, as provided by the laws of Delaware and our bylaws. During 2025, the Board held 11 meetings and also conducted business by written consent. During 2025, the Audit Committee held 4 meetings and the Conflicts Committee held 1 meeting; and the Compensation Committee held 7 meetings. The Nominations Committee did not hold any meetings. Each person who was a director during 2025 attended at least 75% of the 11 Board meetings. We do not have a formal written policy with respect to Board members’ attendance at our annual meeting of stockholders. All five of our directors attended our last annual meeting of stockholders.

Code of Conduct

We have an established Code of Conduct applicable to all Board members, executive officers, employees and contractors. Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website at www.nwbio.com.

Insider Trading Policy

We have adopted an insider trading policy that we believe is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, as well as applicable listing standards. Our insider trading policy applies to directors, officers, and employees and prohibits the trading of our securities on the basis of material, nonpublic information. For additional details, please refer to the information under the heading “Insider Trading Policy” in our Code of Conduct, which we filed as Exhibit 19.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recommendation of Director Candidates

The Nominations Committee is responsible for annually reviewing with the Board the requisite skills and criteria for prospective directors and the structure, size and composition of the Board as a whole. Although there are no set criteria considered by the Nominations Committee in evaluating potential director nominees, the committee does consider the skills and expertise that need to be represented on the Board, succession planning and the time commitments required of directors.

35

Table of Contents

For a stockholder to submit a candidate for the consideration of the Nominations Committee, the stockholder must timely notify our corporate secretary at the address set forth under “Communication with the Board of Directors” below. To make such a recommendation in advance of next year’s annual meeting, a stockholder must provide written notification to our corporate secretary not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days in advance of the first anniversary of the date on which the proxy statement in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting was first mailed. However, if we do not hold an annual meeting or the date of such annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date first contemplated by the previous year’s proxy statement, we must receive the stockholder’s notice at least 80 days prior to the date on which we distribute the proxy statement with respect to the upcoming meeting.

The notice must include the information specified in our bylaws, including the following: (a) as to each proposed candidate, (i) such person’s exact name, (ii) such person’s age, principal occupation, business address and telephone number, and residence address and telephone number, (iii) the number of shares (if any) of each class of our capital stock owned directly or indirectly by each such nominee, and (iv) any other information concerning the nominee that must be disclosed as to nominees in proxy solicitations pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s notarized written acceptance of such nomination, consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and statement of intention to serve as a director if elected); and (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear in our records, of such stockholder, (ii) such stockholder’s principal occupation, business address and telephone number, and residence address and telephone number, (iii) the class and number of our shares which are held of record or beneficially owned by such stockholder, and (iv) the dates upon which such stockholder acquired such shares of stock and documentary support for any claims of beneficial ownership. In addition, notices must include a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder giving the notice and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by such stockholder.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation paid to or accrued for our executive officers, referred to as our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Option ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ Salary ​ Bonus ​ Awards ​ Total

Name and Principal Position ​ ​ ​ Year ​ ​ ​ ($) ​ ​ ​ ($) * ​ ​ ​ ($) ​ ​ ​ ($)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

* The Company plans to award performance bonuses for NEOs for 2025, but these bonuses have not yet been determined.

(3) This represents compensation between January 1, 2025 and August 18, 2025.

(4) This 2024 bonus for Mr. Goldman has been approved but has not been paid.

36

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and un-exercisable as of December 31, 2025:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ Securities Underlying Unexercised Option Awards

​ ​ Number of ​ Number of ​ Option ​ ​

​ ​ Unexercised ​ Unexercised ​ Exercise ​ Option

​ ​ Options (#) ​ Options ​ Price ​ Expiration

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Chief Scientific Officer and Secretary ​ — (12)​ — ​ $ 0.35 ​ 7/2/2030

On July 2, 2020, we granted 32,558,724 stock options to Ms. Powers for service during multiple years. These options were subject to certain vesting requirements which have been fulfilled. The options are exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, and have a 10-year exercise period. Following entry into previous securities suspension agreements, in 2021, Ms. Powers entered into a voluntary blocking agreement on an ongoing rolling basis with the Company under which Ms. Powers cannot exercise or convert any options, warrants or other derivative securities, unless Ms. Powers provides the Company at least 61 days’ advance notice. As a result, such

37

Table of Contents

derivative securities are not considered “beneficially owned” within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

On July 2, 2020, we granted 21,822,937 stock options to Mr. Goldman for service during multiple years. The options are exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, and have a 10-year exercise period. These options are subject to certain vesting requirements. Following entry into previous securities suspension agreements, in 2021 Mr. Goldman entered into a voluntary blocking agreement on an ongoing rolling basis with the Company under which Mr. Goldman cannot exercise or convert any options, warrants or other derivative securities, as applicable, to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock, unless Mr. Goldman provides the Company at least 61 days’ advance notice. As a result, such derivative securities are not considered “beneficially owned” within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

On January 14, 2021, Mr. Goldman assigned 20,000,000 options that were granted on July 2, 2020 to The Goldman NWBIO GRAT Trust for no consideration. On April 28, 2022, Sue Goldman, Trustee of The Goldman NWBIO GRAT Trust transferred 12,709,287 options to Mr. Goldman in satisfaction of the first annuity amount due to Mr. Goldman. As of December 31, 2022, 7,290,713 options were remaining in The Goldman NWBIO GRAT Trust.

38

Table of Contents

On March 29, 2023, Dr. Bosch cashless exercised 200,000 options.

On August 9, 2024, Dr. Bosch assigned 3,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration.

On August 8, 2024, Dr. Boynton assigned 1,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration. On August 28, 2024, Dr. Boynton assigned 1,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration.

On April 4, 2023, Dr. Boynton assigned all 3,096,498 of these options to his relatives for no consideration.

On July 27, 2022, Dr. Boynton assigned 3,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration. On December 6, 2022, Dr. Boynton assigned 9,000,000 options to his relatives for no consideration. On April 4, 2023, Dr. Boynton assigned the remaining 3,697,693 options to his relatives for no consideration.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

No options were vested during 2025 for any of our Named Executive Officers, and none were exercised by our Named Executive Officers.

39

Table of Contents

Employment Agreements

The Company entered into employment agreements with each of Ms. Powers, Mr. Goldman and Dr. Bosch in 2011. The 2011 agreements have expired. The Company entered into a new employment agreement with Dr. Bosch, which is currently in effect. The Company plans to enter into a new employment agreement with Ms. Powers in due course.

Pay Versus Performance

As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the relationship between executive compensation and our financial performance for each of the last two completed calendar years. In determining the “compensation actually paid” to our named executive officers (“NEOs”), we are required to make various adjustments to amounts that have been previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years, as the SEC’s valuation methods for this section differ from those required in the Summary Compensation Table.

The following tables and related disclosures provide information about (i) the total compensation (“SCT Total”) of our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and our non-PEO Named Executive Officers (collectively, the “Other NEOs”) as presented in the Summary Compensation Table, (ii) the “compensation actually paid” (“CAP”) to our PEO and our Other NEOs, as calculated pursuant to Item 402(v), (iii) certain financial performance measures, and (iv) the relationship of the CAP to those financial performance measures.

Pay Versus Performance Table

The amounts set forth below under the headings “Compensation Actually Paid to PEO” and “Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs” have been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. Use of the term “compensation actually paid” is required by the SEC’s rules, and as a result of the calculation methodology required by the SEC, such amounts differ from compensation actually received by the individuals for the fiscal years listed below.

In calculating the compensation actually paid amounts reflected in these columns, the fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, of the equity award adjustments included in such calculations were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The valuation assumptions used to calculate such fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. During fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023, the PEO was Linda Powers, and the non-PEO NEOs were Les Goldman, Marnix Bosch and Alton Boynton.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Value of Initial ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Average Summary ​ ​ ​ ​ Fixed $100 ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Summary ​ ​ ​ ​ Compensation ​ Average ​ Investment Based ​ ​ ​

Year ​ PEO ​ PEO (1) ​ NEOs ​ Non-PEO NEOs (2) ​ Return (3) ​ (in thousands)

40

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the adjustments made to the SCT total for each year represented in the pay versus performance table to arrive at “compensation actually paid” to our PEO, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ 2024 ​ ​ ​ 2023

Outstanding and unvested awards: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Awards granted and vesting in the same year: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

41

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the adjustments made to the SCT total for each year represented in the pay versus performance table to arrive at “compensation actually paid” to our Non-PEO NEOs, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ 2024 ​ ​ ​ 2023

Outstanding and unvested awards: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Awards granted and vesting in the same year: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

42

Table of Contents

Relationship Between CAP Amounts and Performance Measures

The following charts show graphically the relationships over the past two years of the CAP Amounts for the PEO and the Other NEOs as compared to our (i) cumulative total shareholder return and (ii) net loss.

While the Compensation Committee makes executive compensation decisions in consideration of a variety of factors, including corporate and individual performance, the decisions of the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors in 2025, 2024 and 2023 were made independently of these.

43

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more officers serving on our board of directors.

Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information

The Company does not have any formal policy that requires the Company to grant, or avoid granting, stock options at particular times. The timing of any equity grants to executive officers or directors in connection with new hires, promotions, or other non-routine grants is tied to the event giving rise to the award (such as an executive officer’s commencement of employment or promotion effective date), and the Company does not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, there were no equity grants made to our executive officers during any period beginning four business days before the filing of a periodic report or current report disclosing material non-public information and ending one business day after the filing or furnishing of such report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

44

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation paid or accrued to our non-executive directors during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Fees Earned ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ or ​ Option ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ Paid in Cash ​ Awards ​ Total

Name ​ ​ ​ Year ​ ​ ​ ($) ​ ​ ​ ($) ​ ​ ​ ($)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

The non-executive independent directors were compensated on a monthly basis $12,500 ($150,000 annually) for their consistent availability on short notice, participation in the frequent meetings of the board of directors, leadership of at least one board committee, participation on multiple committees of the Board, commitment to corporate governance initiatives, and frequent consultations with management on operational matters. The Company owed Mr. Jasinowski $153,226 as of December 31, 2025.

Ms. Powers and Dr. Boynton are executives of the Company and do not receive separate compensation for their services as a Director.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS-EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 27, 2026 by:

· our directors and nominees for director;

● our directors and executive officers as a group.

Shares of common stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of common stock assume the exercise of all options, warrants and other securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 27, 2026. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants exercisable on or prior to the date 60 days after March 27, 2026 are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such options or warrants for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by any other person.

45

Table of Contents

Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and the entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws, if any. The table below is based upon the information supplied by our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., the Company’s records and from Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC.

Except as otherwise noted, the address of the individuals in the following table is c/o Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc., 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20814.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ Amount and Nature of ​ ​ ​ Percent of class of

Name and address of beneficial owner ​ Beneficial Ownership ​ Common Stock (1)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Directors and Officers: ​ ​ ​

Alton L. Boynton, Ph.D. 979,254 * %

J. Cofer Black (3) — * %

All executive officer s and directors as a group (six persons) 70,064,876 4.3 %

* Less than 1%

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

On May 29, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a new equity compensation plan (the “Plan”). The Company’s prior plan was adopted in 2007, was updated in amended and restated plans that were approved by shareholders in 2012 and 2013, and expired in 2017 (the “Prior Plan”).

The Plan is substantially similar to the Prior Plan. The Plan has a 10-year life, and allows for awards to employees, directors and consultants of the Company, as did the Prior Plan. The Plan allows for any type of equity security to be awarded, as did the Prior Plan. The awards and their terms (including vesting) will be determined by the Board and applicable Committees, as was the case under the Prior Plan. The Plan establishes a pool of potential equity compensation equal to twenty percent of the outstanding securities of the Company, which is on an evergreen basis as under the Prior Plan.

46

Table of Contents

On February 25, 2022, the Company amended its existing Plan, which was adopted in 2020 as previously reported. The amendment provides that the possible forms of awards under the Plan include awards paid in cash or awards paid in a combination of cash and equity, in addition to the existing provisions for awards made in any form of equity. The amendment also clarifies that a delegation of authority from the Board to a Committee may be either a general delegation or a delegation for a specific occasion.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Advent BioServices, Ltd.

Advent BioServices, Ltd. (“Advent”) was a related party based in the U.K., which carried out the Company’s product development, manufacturing, cryostorage and distribution on a contract services basis. As previously reported, the Company entered into an Agreement to acquire Advent on August 27, 2025, and the acquisition closed on October 24, 2025. Upon the closing, Advent became a wholly owned subsidiary. The following sections describe the contractual arrangements between the Company and Advent prior to the acquisition, and the operational activities and milestones pursuant to those contracts.

The Company had three operational programs with Advent: (a) an ongoing development and manufacturing program at the GMP facility in London, (b) an ongoing development and manufacturing program at the Sawston GMP facility, and (c) periodic specialized programs such as the program related to the MAA pre-requisites, drafting and submission. The Company also executed a new SOW #8 covering the work required to establish the DCVax-Direct program in the U.K. and manufacture DCVax-Direct products for global use.

Each of the operational programs was covered by a separate contract. The ongoing manufacturing in the London facility was covered by a Manufacturing Services Agreement (“MSA”) entered into on May 14, 2018. The development and manufacturing program at the Sawston facility was covered by an Ancillary Services Agreement entered into on November 18, 2019. Each periodic specialized program was covered by an SOW that set forth the role and activities to be undertaken by Advent for that program, and provides for milestone payments upon completion of key elements of the program.

The Ancillary Services Agreement established a structure under which the Company and Advent negotiated and agreed upon the scope and terms for Statements of Work (“SOWs”) for facility development activities and compassionate use program activities, as well as for the periodic specialized programs. After an SOW was agreed and approved by the Company, Advent proceeded with, or continued, the applicable services and invoiced the Company pursuant to the SOW. Since both the facility development and the compassionate use program involved pioneering and uncertainties in most aspects, the invoicing under the Ancillary Services Agreement was on the basis of costs incurred plus fifteen percent. The SOWs involved ongoing activities or specialized one-time projects and related one-time milestone payments. The Ancillary Services Agreement was to end in July 2023, but the Company extended the term year by year, to July 2024, to July 2025 and to July 2026.

SOW 8

On November 8, 2024, the Company entered into a Statement of Work #8 (“SOW 8”) with Advent that was incorporated into the Ancillary Services Agreement that was originally entered into dated November 8, 2019 and was extended as described above. SOW 8 covered the work required to establish the DCVax-Direct program in the U.K and manufacture DCVax-Direct products for global use. Under SOW 8, the compensation consisted solely of one-time cash milestone payments for each stage of the work and Advent would only receive the compensation when the applicable work was successfully completed. (When the Company previously contracted with a different company for restart of DCVax-Direct manufacturing, the contract required payment as work was performed, regardless of whether the work was successful or not, as is typical for such contract services. The other company did not succeed in producing any DCVax-Direct products meeting the specifications.)

47

Table of Contents

SOW 8 included the following 5 one-time milestones with corresponding milestone payments (which were only payable after the milestone had been achieved):

(a) Basic Technology Transfer, New SOPs & Regulatory Documents.

Review of documents, specifications and data from the prior DCVax-Direct program conducted by Cognate BioServices. Development of a new set of SOPs for DCVax-Direct production in Sawston and new regulatory documents for the U.K. Initial implementation in Sawston; many engineering runs. Data generation for comparability analyses of both the process and the product. Milestone payment of £0.55 million (approximately $0.7 million) upon completion.

As of October 24, 2025, this milestone had been completed and paid.

(b) Process Development: TFF System vs. Other Systems.

Evaluation of the TFF system used in the prior DCVax-Direct manufacturing. Evaluation of the remaining TFF equipment from the prior program, parts needed to re-establish functional TFF systems, potential sourcing and timelines. Evaluation of remaining disposables from the prior program, requirements for new molds to enable new production of disposables (which are used for each manufacturing run with the TFF system), production arrangements for new disposables, development of new sealing method for disposables, potential sourcing and timelines for disposables. Identification and evaluation of commercially available systems to potentially substitute for TFF system. Engineering runs. Data generation for comparability analyses of TFF system vs. others. Milestone payment of £0.45 million (approximately $0.6 million) upon completion.

As of October 24, 2025, this milestone had been completed but had not yet been paid. The Company had an accrued liability of $0.6 million related to this milestone, which was reclassed to consideration payable to the Seller as of the closing of the acquisition.

(c) Process Development: Existing and New Product Composition.

Worldwide search for sourcing of BCG (1 of 2 essential reagents/ingredients required for DCVax-Direct besides the DCs), due to a severe worldwide shortage. Evaluation of the BCG mechanism of action (MoA) in DCVax-Direct, search for other agents that could have similar MoA or effects, with similar safety profile too. Sourcing of other agents, testing and selection of other agents for a new DCVax-Direct product composition. Many engineering runs. Data generation for comparability analyses of new reagents vs BCG and new composition of DCVax-Direct vs prior composition. Milestone payment of £0.60 million (approximately $0.8 million) upon completion.

As of October 24, 2025, this milestone had been completed but had not yet been paid. The Company had an accrued liability of $0.8 million related to this milestone, which was reclassed to consideration payable to the Seller as of the closing of the acquisition.

(d) Technology Transfer: Clean Room Implementation.

After the choice of system (TFF vs commercial) and the choice of product composition are decided, development of new SOPs and transfer of production into the clean rooms. This includes pre-clean room engineering runs, establishment of critical quality attributes, and process performance qualifications. For technology transfer into the clean rooms, each employee operator individually must pass 3 consecutive and successful aseptic process simulations in the clean room and also 3 consecutive and successful PQQ runs at scale in the clean room; microbial analysis (sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma all need to pass); growth promotion tests; validation of all equipment used after being placed in the clean room; validation of all cell analysis assays used via flow cytometry and validation of the fill and finish protocols. Milestone payment of £0.35 million (approximately $0.5 million) upon completion.

As of October 24, 2025, this milestone had been completed but had not yet been paid. The Company had an accrued liability of $0.5 million related to this milestone, which was reclassed to consideration payable to the Seller as of the closing of the acquisition.

(e) New IMPD and New IND.

Draft a new IMPD (Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier) for the revised DCVax-Direct product composition and production process, containing all changes to the manufacturing system, reagents and product composition, processes, sources and/or Mechanism of Action vs. those used in the prior DCVax-Direct program. Also draft a new IND (CMC section), for the first clinical trial with the

48

Table of Contents

new manufacturing process and new product composition. Obtain the first approval or clearance of the new IND by a regulator. Milestone payment of £0.35 million (approximately $0.5 million) upon completion.

Advent had completed the new IND CMC section (comprising part of this milestone) but the new IND had not yet been submitted to and approved by regulators (comprising the other part of this milestone).

As of October 24, 2025, the Company had an accrued liability of $0.6 million related to this milestone, which was reclassed to consideration payable the Seller as of the closing of the acquisition.

SOW 6

SOW 6 provides for ongoing baseline costs for manufacturing at the Sawston facility and one-time milestone incentives for (a) regulatory approval of each of the three licenses required for the Sawston facility, (b) successful completion of each of the six workstreams and (c) completion of drafting key portions of an application for product approval (see Note 5 for additional description regarding SOW 6). The milestone incentives are a combination of cash and stock, and are not paid until the milestone is achieved and earned.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company paid an aggregate of $5.0 million in cash, of which $1.0 million was related to two milestones that were completed and fully expensed in 2022, but were unpaid as of December 31, 2022, $4.0 million was payment for four completed one-time milestones (MAA workstream for Mechanism of Action, obtaining a commercial manufacturing license from the MHRA on March 2023 and completion of drafting key portions of the application and submit the application to MHRA for product approval). The Company issued 4.5 million common shares as a result of completion of the two one-time milestones (obtaining a commercial manufacturing license from the MHRA and completion of drafting of the application) at a fair value of $3.2 million, of which $0.6 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024 and $2.6 million had already been recognized (but not paid) in 2022.

Acquisition of Advent

The Company entered into an agreement to acquire Advent on August 27, 2025, and closed on the acquisition on October 24, 2025. Prior to the acquisition, Advent was wholly owned by Toucan Holdings LLC (“Seller”). The Company’s Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer, Linda Powers, was the controlling member of the Seller. Following the acquisition, Advent is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

The consideration for the acquisition will be paid in installments over two years, beginning 3 months after the closing of the acquisition, with potential acceleration after regulatory approval of the Company’s DCVax®-L product. The consideration includes a combination of a cash purchase price of approximately $1.9 million (£1.4 million) and cash payment of an amount equal to the net amount of accounts payable (“Net AP”) that was due from the Company to Advent prior to the acquisition for services already performed under the existing service contracts, totaling $6.0 million, which is net of $2.3 million buyer assumed liabilities, and Excluded Amounts (relating to non-Company matters prior to the acquisition date) were retained by the Seller, totaling approximately $0.7 million (collectively, the “Purchase Consideration”). The unpaid balance will accrue interest at 7.5% annually.

Related-Party Transaction Approval Policy

The company maintains a written Related-Party Transactions Policy. Under SEC rules, related-party transactions are those transactions to which we are or may be a party in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of our directors or executive officers or any other related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, excluding, among other things, compensation arrangements with respect to employment or board membership. Any transactions with any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of the Company’s fiscal year was, a director or executive officer or a nominee to become a director of the Company, any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family member or person sharing the household of any of the foregoing persons, any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is a partner or principal, is subject to approval or ratification in accordance with the procedures of the Company’s Related-Party Transaction Policy.

49

Table of Contents

Conflicts Committee

The Conflicts Committee of the Board reviews and approves all related-party matters and transactions for potential conflicts of interests and reasonableness, as described in the Corporate Governance Matters section above. The Conflicts Committee’s one-time review and approval of any series of similar related-party transactions (such as a series of transactions governed by a single contract) suffices to satisfy this policy with respect to each and every transaction in the series.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the independence of our directors and has determined that a majority of the Board consists of members who are currently “independent” as that term is defined within the meaning of Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Malik, Mr. Sarma and Ambassador Black are independent.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees Paid to Independent Public Accountants

Cherry Bekaert has served as our independent public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2025.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 for professional services rendered by Cherry Bekaert for the audit of our annual financial statements for 2025, and the review our financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for 2025 was $728,000.

The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 for professional services rendered by Cherry Bekaert for the audit of our annual financial statements for 2024, and the review our financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for 2024 was $611,000.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 for assurance and related services rendered by Cherry Bekaert related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements.

Tax and Other Non-Audit Professional Services

There were no fees billed in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 for professional services rendered by Cherry Bekaert for tax related services or other non-audit professional services fees.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

Consistent with SEC policies and guidelines regarding audit independence, the Audit Committee is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our principal accountants on a case-by-case basis. Our Audit Committee has established a policy regarding approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our principal accountants. Our Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category and service. Our Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services provided by our principal accountants during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

50

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

ExhibitNumber ​ ​ ​ Description

4.1 Description of Securities

51

Table of Contents

21.1 ​ Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1 ​ Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent.

101.INS ​ Inline XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH Inline XBRL Schema Document.

101.CAL Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB Inline XBRL Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.

ITEM 16.FORM 10–K SUMMARY

None.

52

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

​ NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.(Registrant)

Date: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ Linda F. Powers

​ ​ Linda F. Powers,

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

​ ​

Signature ​ ​ ​ Title ​ ​ ​ Date

/s/ Linda F. Powers ​ President and Chief Executive Officer ​ April 15, 2026

Linda F. Powers ​ Principal Executive Officer ​ ​

​ ​ Principal Financial and Accounting Officer ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

/s/ Alton L. Boynton ​ Director ​ April 15, 2026

Alton L. Boynton ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

/s/ Navid Malik ​ Director ​ April 15, 2026

Dr. Navid Malik ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

/s/ Pat Sarma ​ Director ​ April 15, 2026

Pat Sarma ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

/s/ J. Cofer Black ​ Director ​ April 15, 2026

J. Cofer Black ​ ​ ​ ​

53

Table of Contents

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 00677) F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-5

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-10

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Bethesda, Maryland

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s evaluations of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

F-2

Table of Contents

Debt, Derivative, Mezzanine Equity, and Equity Transactions

Critical Audit Matter Description

As disclosed in Notes 4, 9, 12, and 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company had various debt, derivative, mezzanine equity, and equity transactions, and convertible notes elected to be carried at fair value, where management evaluated required accounting considerations, significant estimates, and judgements around certain features, the possibility of conversion or redemption, and the valuation of certain components of the financings, including the valuation around certain freestanding and embedded derivatives. Certain features were initially measured at fair value and have been subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting period.

There is no current observable market for these types of features and, as such, the Company determined the fair value of the freestanding instruments or embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes-Merton model, Lattice-based models or the Monte Carlo option pricing model, as applicable, to measure the fair value of the debt and/or equity instrument both with and without the derivative liability features. As a result, a high degree of auditor judgment and effort was required in performing audit procedures to evaluate the various components of these instruments.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

Our principal audit procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Valuation of Acquired Intangible Assets

Critical Audit Matter Description

As disclosed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company completed the acquisition of Advent BioServices Ltd. (“Advent”). The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination and the business combination resulted in the recording of $51.5 million of intangible assets, including trademarks and trade name, customer relationships and an indefinite-lived license. The fair value of the trademarks and trade name were estimated based on a relief from royalty method. The fair value of the customer relationships was estimated based on the with-and-without method, which measures the incremental cash flows generated by these relationships compared to a scenario in which they did not exist. The fair value of the indefinite-lived license was estimated using the multi-period excess earning method. These valuation methodologies require the use of estimates and assumptions related to cash flow forecasts, royalty rates, discount rates, terminal values and income tax rates.

The determination of the acquisition date fair value of the intangible assets required the Company to make significant estimates and assumptions. As a result, testing these assumptions, which were used to calculate the fair values, involved a high degree of auditor judgment and effort, including involving the use of our valuation specialists. In addition, the fair values of these intangible assets were challenging to audit due to the sensitivity of the fair value determination to changes in these assumptions.

F-3

Table of Contents

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

Our principal audit procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

/s/ Cherry Bekaert LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.

Nashville, Tennessee

April 15, 2026

F-4

Table of Contents

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ December 31, ​ ​ ​ December 31,

ASSETS ​ ​ ​ ​

Current assets: ​ ​ ​ ​

Cash and cash equivalents ​ $ 3,040 ​ $ 2,175

Prepaid expenses and other current assets ​ 2,166 ​ 1,887

Loan receivable ​ ​ 311 ​ ​ —

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Non-current assets: ​ ​ ​ ​

Property, plant and equipment, net ​ 17,406 ​ 16,196

Right-of-use asset, net ​ ​ 4,197 ​ ​ 4,187

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT ​ ​ ​ ​

Current liabilities: ​ ​ ​ ​

Accounts payable and accrued expenses ​ $ 30,816 ​ $ 16,969

Convertible notes, net ​ 640 ​ 1,870

Contingent payable derivative liability ​ ​ 9,416 ​ ​ 9,578

Warrant liability ​ — ​ 2,219

Investor advances ​ ​ 207 ​ ​ 207

Lease liabilities ​ ​ 374 ​ ​ 326

Due to seller-related party ​ ​ 8,350 ​ ​ —

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Non-current liabilities: ​ ​ ​ ​

Convertible notes, net of current portion ​ ​ 325 ​ ​ —

Convertible notes at fair value, net of current portion ​ ​ 5,220 ​ ​ 15,900

Notes payable, net of current portion, net ​ 12,333 ​ 12,396

Lease liabilities, net of current portion ​ ​ 4,411 ​ ​ 4,438

Contingent payment obligation ​ ​ 1,700 ​ ​ 4,700

Deferred tax liability ​ ​ 13,171 ​ ​ —

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12) ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Mezzanine equity: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Stockholders’ deficit: ​ ​ ​ ​

Stock subscription receivable ​ (79) ​ (79)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ​ (925) ​ 3,043

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

F-5

Table of Contents

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except per share data)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ For the year ended

​ ​ December 31,

Revenues: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Operating costs and expenses: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total operating costs and expenses ​ ​ 61,292 ​ 67,890

Other income (expense): ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities ​ ​ (151) ​ 364

Change in fair value of share payable ​ ​ (414) ​ ​ 16

Change in fair value of convertible notes ​ ​ 25,633 ​ ​ 7,715

Loss from extinguishment of debt ​ ​ (17,397) ​ (14,393)

Loss from issuance of debt ​ ​ (4,676) ​ ​ (835)

Loss from warrant modifications ​ ​ — ​ ​ (822)

Foreign currency transaction gain (loss) ​ ​ 4,915 ​ (1,548)

Income tax benefit ​ ​ 537 ​ ​ —

Deemed dividend related to warrant modifications ​ ​ (1,315) ​ ​ (1,414)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders ​ $ (61,477) ​ $ (85,192)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Other comprehensive income (loss) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Foreign currency translation adjustment ​ ​ (3,968) ​ 1,507

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Net loss per share applicable to common stockholders ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Basic and diluted ​ $ (0.04) ​ $ (0.07)

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2025-12-31, filed 2026-04-15 · accession 0001104659-26-043806

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 22 headings are on that chain and 18 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.