ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, stockholders or prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors:
Risks Relating to General Economic Conditions
A downturn in general economic or business conditions, nationally or in markets where our business is concentrated, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success depends upon the business activity, population, employment rates, income levels, deposits and real estate activity in our markets in northern and central Indiana. Although our customers’ business and financial interests may extend well beyond these market areas, adverse economic conditions that affect these market areas could reduce our growth rate, diminish the ability of our customers to repay their loans to us, decrease the value of any collateral securing our loans and generally adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, because of our geographic concentration, we are less able than other regional or national financial institutions to diversify our credit risks across multiple markets.
Monetary policies of the Federal Reserve could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In the current environment, economic and business conditions are significantly affected by U.S. monetary policy, particularly the actions of the Federal Reserve to raise short-term interest rates in an effort to fight elevated levels of inflation. The Federal Reserve is mandated to pursue the goals of maximum employment and price stability, and beginning in March 2022 it made a series of significant increases to the target Federal Funds rate as part of an effort to combat elevated levels of inflation affecting the U.S. economy, which is expected to continue in the near term. The significant increases to short-term interest rates has benefited our net interest income during 2022 due to loans repricing faster than deposits. However, the rising interest rate environment has negatively impacted the fair value of our investment securities portfolio, which had $215.3 million in net unrealized losses from available-for-sale investment securities at December 31, 2022. The investment securities net unrealized losses are recorded as a reduction of tangible equity and tangible book value per share. Higher interest rates can also negatively affect our customers’ businesses and financial condition, and the value of collateral securing loans in our portfolio.
Given the complex factors affecting the strength of the U.S. economy, including uncertainties regarding the persistence of inflation, geopolitical developments such as the war in Ukraine and resulting disruptions in the global energy market, the effects of the pandemic in China, tight labor market conditions and supply chain issues, there is a meaningful risk that the Federal Reserve and other central banks may raise interest rates too much. Restrictive monetary policies could limit economic growth and potentially cause an economic recession. As noted above, this could decrease loan demand, harm the credit characteristics of our existing loan portfolio and decrease the value of collateral securing loans in the portfolio.
Continued elevated levels of inflation could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
The United States has recently experienced elevated levels of inflation, with the consumer price index climbing 6.5% in 2022. Continued high levels of inflation could have complex effects on our business and results of operations, some of which could be materially adverse. For example, elevated inflation harms consumer purchasing power, which could negatively affect our retail customers and the economic environment and, ultimately, many of our business customers, and could also negatively affect our levels of non-interest expense. In addition, if interest rates continue to rise in response to elevated levels of inflation, the value of our securities portfolio would be negatively impacted. Continued elevated levels of inflation could also cause increased volatility and uncertainty in the business environment, which could adversely affect loan demand and our clients' ability to repay indebtedness. It is also possible that governmental responses to the current inflation environment could adversely affect our business, such as changes to monetary and fiscal policy that are too strict, or the imposition or threatened imposition of price controls. The duration and severity of the current inflationary period cannot be estimated with precision.
The COVID-19 pandemic could continue to have adverse effects on our business.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant economic impact on the communities in which we operate, our borrowers and depositors, and the national economy generally. These effects have diminished in the past year, but future developments and uncertainties will be difficult to predict, such as the potential emergence of a new variant, the course of the pandemic in China and other major economies, the persistence of pandemic-related work and lifestyle changes, changes in consumer preferences associated with the emergence of the pandemic, and other market disruptions. Any such developments could have a complex and negative effect on our business, including with respect to the prevailing economic environment, our lending and investment activities, and our business operations.
15
Table of Contents
Labor shortages and failure to attract and retain qualified employees could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A number of factors may adversely affect the labor force available to us or increase labor costs, including high employment levels, and decreased labor force size and participation rates. Although we have not experienced any material labor shortage to date, we have recently observed an overall tightening and competitive local labor market, especially for commercial lenders. As of December 31, 2022, Indiana's unemployment rate was 3.1%. A sustained labor shortage or increased turnover rates within our employee base could lead to increased costs, such as increased compensation expense to attract and retain employees.
In addition, if we are unable to hire and retain employees capable of performing at a high-level, or if mitigation measures we may take to respond to a decrease in labor availability have unintended negative effects, our business could be adversely affected. An overall labor shortage, lack of skilled labor, increased turnover or labor inflation could have a material adverse impact on our operations, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
Interest rate shifts may reduce net interest income and otherwise negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Shifts in short-term interest rates may reduce net interest income, which is the principal component of our earnings. Net interest income is the difference between the amounts received by us on our interest bearing assets and the interest paid by us on our interest bearing liabilities. When interest rates rise the rate of interest we pay on our liabilities may rise more quickly than the rate of interest that we receive on our interest bearing assets, which may cause our profits to decrease. Conversely, when interest rates fall our interest bearing assets generally reprice more quickly than our interest bearing liabilities, given our asset-sensitive balance sheet, which may cause our net interest income to decrease. The impact on earnings is more adverse when the slope of the yield curve flattens, i.e. when short-term interest rates increase more than corresponding changes in long-term interest rates or when long-term interest rates decrease more than corresponding changes in short-term interest rates. In addition, when competition for deposits increases and deposit costs rise more quickly than loan yields, net interest income may be negatively impacted.
Interest rate increases often result in larger payment requirements for our borrowers, which increase the potential for default. At the same time, the value and marketability of any underlying assets securing a loan may be adversely affected by any reduced demand resulting from higher interest rates. In a declining interest rate environment, there may be an increase in prepayments on fixed rate loans, such as mortgages, as borrowers may seek to refinance these loans at lower rates.
Changes in interest rates also can affect the value of loans, securities and other assets. An increase in interest rates that adversely affects the ability of borrowers to pay the principal and interest on loans may lead to an increase in nonperforming assets and a reduction of income recognized, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. Thus, an increase in the amount of nonperforming assets would have an adverse impact on net interest income.
Risks Relating to Our Business
If we do not effectively manage our credit risk, we may experience increased levels of nonperforming loans, charge offs and delinquencies, which could require further increases in our provision for credit losses.
There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, risks of nonpayment, risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral and risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions. In general, these risks have increased as a result of the recent increases in prevailing interest rates and uncertainties associated with inflation, which have potentially increased the risk of a near-term decline in growth or an economic downturn. We cannot assure you that our loan application approval procedures, use of loan concentration limits, credit monitoring, use of independent reviews of outstanding loans or other procedures will reduce these credit risks. If the overall economic climate in the United States, generally, and our market areas, specifically, does not perform in the manner we expect, or even if it does, our borrowers may experience difficulties in repaying their loans, and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require increases in the provision for credit losses, which would cause our net income and return on equity to decrease.
16
Table of Contents
If our allowance for credit losses is not sufficient to absorb losses that may occur in our loan portfolio, our financial condition and liquidity could suffer.
We establish our allowance for credit losses and maintain it at a level considered adequate by management to absorb expected credit losses within the portfolio. Allocations of the allowance are made for specific loans and for pools of similar types of loans, although the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management's judgment, should be charged against the allowance. Additions to the allowance for credit losses, which are charged to earnings through the provision for credit losses, are determined based on a variety of factors, including an analysis of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience and an evaluation of current economic conditions in our market areas. The actual amount of credit losses is affected by changes in economic, operating and other conditions within our markets, which may be beyond our control, and such losses may exceed current estimates.
At December 31, 2022, our allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.54% and as a percentage of total nonperforming loans was 425%. Because of the nature of our loan portfolio and our concentration in commercial and industrial loans, which tend to be larger loans, the movement of a small number of loans to nonperforming status can have a significant impact on these ratios. Although a formal evaluation of the adequacy of the credit loss allowance is conducted monthly, we cannot predict credit losses with certainty and we cannot provide assurance that our allowance for credit losses will prove sufficient to cover actual credit losses in the future. Credit losses in excess of our reserves may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Commercial and industrial loans make up a significant portion of our loan portfolio.
Commercial and industrial loans were $1.493 billion, or approximately 32% of our total loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2022. Commercial and industrial loans are often larger and involve greater risks than other types of lending. Because payments on such loans are often dependent on the successful operation of the borrower involved, repayment of such loans is often more sensitive than other types of loans to adverse conditions in the general economy. For example, the cumulative effects of changes in the economy and overall business environment, labor availability shortages and supply chain constraints have adversely affected commercial and industrial loans, and we expect this trend to continue for certain portions of our loan portfolio, particularly if general economic conditions worsen.
Negative economic trends can also harm the value of security for our commercial and industrial loans. These loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Most often, this collateral is accounts receivable, inventory, machinery or real estate. As a result of the recent increase in interest rates and other factors, we have observed a corresponding decline in the value of commercial real estate securing these loans. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers, which could decline in the case of an economic recession.
The collateral securing other loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Due to the larger average size of each commercial loan as compared with other loans such as residential loans, as well as collateral that is generally less readily-marketable, losses incurred on a small number of commercial loans could adversely affect our business, results of operations and growth prospects. Historically, the Bank's largest charge offs have been in this segment of the loan portfolio.
Our loan portfolio includes commercial real estate loans, which involve risks specific to real estate value.
Commercial real estate loans were $2.179 billion, or approximately 46% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of interest rates and market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located, and, as a general matter, some of these values have been significantly and negatively affected by the recent rise in prevailing interest rates.
Although a significant portion of such loans are secured by real estate as a secondary form of collateral, these developments and any future adverse developments affecting real estate values in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio. Additionally, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the control of the borrower or lender could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties.
17
Table of Contents
If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled and the value of the real estate has been significantly impaired, then we may not be able to recover the full contractual amount of principal and interest that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our loan portfolio has a notable concentration in agri-business, which has a higher level of uncontrolled risk.
Our agri-business loans, which totaled $432.1 million, or approximately 9% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022, are subject to risks outside of our or the borrower’s control. Although our agriculture portfolio is well-diversified, the risks, specific to the agricultural industry, include decreases in livestock and crop prices, increases in labor and input prices, increase in stockpiles of agricultural commodities, the strength of the U.S. dollar, the potential impact of tariffs and other trade restrictions on commodities and the nature of climate and weather conditions. To the extent these or other factors affect the performance or financial condition of our agri-business borrowers, our results of operations and financial performance could suffer.
Our consumer loans generally have a higher degree of risk of default than our other loans.
At December 31, 2022, consumer loans totaled $88.1 million, or 2% of our total loan portfolio. Consumer loans typically have shorter terms and lower balances with higher yields as compared to commercial loans, but generally carry higher risks of default. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on these loans.
Nonperforming assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and could result in further losses in the future.
Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or other real estate owned, which adversely affects our net income and returns on assets and equity, increases our loan administration costs and adversely affects our efficiency ratio. When we take collateral in foreclosure and similar proceedings, we are required to mark the collateral to its current fair market value at the time of transfer, which may result in a loss. These nonperforming loans and other real estate owned also increase our risk profile and our regulatory capital requirements may increase in light of such risks. The resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant time commitments from management and can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities. If we experience increases in nonperforming loans and other nonperforming assets, our net interest income and provision expense may be negatively impacted and our loan administration costs could increase, each of which could have an adverse effect on our net income and related ratios, such as return on assets and equity.
Liquidity risks could affect operations and jeopardize our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial, negative effect on our liquidity. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposits, cash from operations and investment security maturities and sales. Additional liquidity is provided by brokered deposits, CD Option of IntraFi Network Deposits (“CD Option”, formerly known as CDARS), American Financial Exchange overnight borrowings, IntraFi Network’s insured cash sweep program. We are able to borrow from several federal funds lines at correspondent banks and are eligible borrowers from the Federal Reserve and the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”) subject to collateral availability. At December 31, 2022, $995.3 million of unpledged investment securities were eligible to serve as collateral for liquidity availability at FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities or on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. In addition, increased competition with banks and credit unions in our fooprint, brokerage firms and online deposit gatherers for retail deposits may impact our ability to raise funds through deposits and could have a negative effect on our liquidity. For example, as customer deposit levels have decreased over the past year, we have observed that our sensitivity to rising deposits costs has increased as competition for deposits has risen.
Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, purchase investment securities, meet our expense obligations, pay dividends to our stockholders, or fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition.
18
Table of Contents
Any action or steps to change coverages or eliminate Indiana’s Public Deposit Insurance Fund could require us to find alternative, higher-cost funding sources to replace public fund deposits or to provide for collateralization of these deposits.
At December 31, 2022, approximately 26% of our deposits are concentrated in public funds from a small number of municipalities and government agencies located in the Bank’s geographic footprint. A shift in funding away from public fund deposits would impact liquidity availability and could increase our cost of funds, as the alternate funding sources, such as brokered certificates of deposit, can be higher-cost, are less favorable deposits and could require additional collateral to be pledged. The inability to maintain these public funds on deposit could result in a material adverse effect on the Bank’s liquidity and could materially impact our ability to grow and remain profitable.
Declines in asset values may result in impairment charges and adversely affect the value of our investment securities, financial performance and capital.
We maintain an investment securities portfolio that includes, but is not limited to, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The market value of these investment securities may be affected by factors other than the underlying performance of the servicer of the securities or the mortgages underlying the securities, such as changes in the interest rate environment, negative trends in the residential and commercial real estate markets, ratings downgrades, adverse changes in the business climate and a lack of liquidity in the secondary market for certain investment securities. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate investment securities and other assets for credit and other impairment indicators. We may be required to record additional credit reserve charges if our investment securities suffer a decline in fair value that has resulted from credit losses or other factors. If we determine that a significant reserve is needed, we would be required to charge against earnings the credit-related portion, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the periods in which the write-offs occur. In addition, we may determine to sell securities in our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio, and any such sale could cause us to realize currently unrealized losses that resulted from the recent increases in the prevailing interest rates.
We may be adversely impacted by the discontinuance of LIBOR as a short-term interest rate utilized for loans and other financing agreements.
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intended to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. In March 2021, the ICE Benchmark Administration, which administers LIBOR, announced that it would stop publishing all LIBOR tenors by June 30, 2023. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") has proposed that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR from USD-LIBOR and organizations are continuing to work on industry-wide and company-specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to USD-LIBOR. The Company has material contracts that are indexed to USD-LIBOR and is monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks. This includes identifying outstanding USD-LIBOR-based loans without ARRC recommended fallback language, internal training and education, and working with our core provider to ensure proper integration once an alternative reference is implemented. At December 31, 2022, the Bank had 95 commercial loans with an outstanding balance of $460.6 million to transition from a USD-LIBOR index. The Company has formed a cross-functional project team to lead the transition from LIBOR to adoption of alternative reference rates which include SOFR, CME Term SOFR, American Interbank Offered Rate, and Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index. Management is monitoring ARRC publications for best practices as the Company transitions legacy LIBOR loans by the June 30, 2023 deadline.
Risks Relating to Our Corporate Strategy
We may need to raise additional capital in the future to achieve our growth plans, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.
We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. Accordingly, we may need to raise additional capital to support our future growth plans. Our ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot make assurances of our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us. In particular, if we were required to raise additional capital in the current interest rate environment, we believe the pricing and other terms investors may require in such an offering may not be attractive to use. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our financial condition and our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth or acquisitions could be materially impaired.
19
Table of Contents
We may experience difficulties in managing our growth, and our growth strategy involves risks that may negatively impact our net income.
In addition to our continuing expansion in Indianapolis and larger cities in Northern Indiana, we may expand into additional communities or attempt to strengthen our position in our current markets through opportunistic acquisitions of all or part of other financial institutions, or by opening new branches in or within two hours of our contiguous geographic footprint. To the extent that we undertake acquisitions or new branch openings, we are likely to experience the effects of higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations, which may have an adverse effect on our levels of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets. Other effects of engaging in such growth strategies may include potential diversion of our management’s time and attention and general disruption to our business.
To the extent that we grow through acquisitions and branch openings, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately and profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks and businesses will involve similar risks to those commonly associated with branching but may also involve additional risks, including:
•potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of banks and businesses we acquire;
•exposure to potential asset quality issues of the acquired bank or related business;
•difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of banks and businesses we acquire; and
•the possible loss of key employees and customers of the banks and businesses we acquire.
We face intense competition in all phases of our business from other banks, financial institutions and nonbank financial service providers.
The banking and financial services business in our market is highly competitive. Our competitors include large national, regional and local community banks, credit unions, Fintech and nonbank financial service providers, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market mutual funds and farm credit services. Many of these competitors are not subject to the same operating costs or regulatory restrictions as we are and are able to provide customers with a feasible alternative to traditional banking services.
Increased competition may also result in a decrease in the amounts of our loans and deposits, reduced spreads between loan rates and deposit rates or loan terms that are more favorable to the borrower, particularly in the case of incremental loan growth. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow and remain profitable. If increased competition causes us to significantly discount the interest rates we offer on loans or increase the amount we pay on deposits, our net interest income could be adversely impacted. If increased competition causes us to relax our underwriting standards, we could be exposed to higher losses from lending activities. Moreover, we rely on deposits to be a low-cost source of funding, and a loss in our deposit base could cause us to incur higher funding costs from wholesale funding sources.
The financial services industry is constantly undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. We invest from time to time in investment funds that seek to promote the development of such new and emerging financial technologies. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively incorporate, or otherwise benefit from, such developments.
Additionally, many of our competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets, possess larger lending limits and offer a broader range of financial services than we can offer.
Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future.
We expect that other banking and financial service companies, many of which have significantly greater resources than we do, will compete with us in acquiring other financial institutions if we pursue such acquisitions. This competition could increase prices for potential acquisitions that we believe are attractive. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals. If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals. Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and stockholders’ equity per share of our common stock.
20
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to Regulation, Tax and Accounting
We may be materially and adversely affected by the highly regulated environment in which we operate.
We are subject to extensive federal and state regulation, supervision and examination. A more detailed description of the primary federal and state banking laws and regulations that affect us is contained in the section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K captioned “Supervision and Regulation”. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, FDIC funds, customers and the banking system as a whole, rather than our shareholders. These regulations affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things.
As a bank holding company, we are subject to extensive regulation and supervision and undergo periodic examinations by our regulators, who have extensive discretion and authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law by banks and bank holding companies. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil monetary penalties and/or damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Although we have policies and procedures designed to mitigate the risk of any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur.
The laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies and interpretations governing us are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. For example, on July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law, which significantly changed the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act, together with the regulations to be developed thereunder, includes provisions affecting large and small financial institutions alike, including several provisions that affect how community banks, thrifts and small bank and thrift holding companies operate. In addition, the Federal Reserve, in recent years, has adopted numerous new regulations addressing banks’ overdraft and mortgage lending practices. Further, the CFPB has broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws, and additional consumer protection legislation and regulatory activity is anticipated in the near future, including with respect to fees charged by banks and other financial companies. Any enforcement actions or other rule making in these areas could negatively affect our business and our ability to maintain or grow levels of noninterest income.
These provisions, as well as any other aspects of current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry, may impact the profitability of our business activities and may change certain of our business practices, including our ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans and achieve satisfactory interest spreads and could expose us to additional costs, including increased compliance costs.
Regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results.
An important function of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our business, financial condition and results of operations cannot be predicted.
We are required to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, and, if we fail to maintain sufficient capital, whether due to losses, an inability to raise additional capital or otherwise, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as our ability to maintain regulatory compliance, would be adversely affected.
The Company, on a consolidated basis, and the Bank, on a stand-alone basis, must meet certain regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. We face significant capital and other regulatory requirements as a financial institution, which were heightened with the implementation of the Basel III Rule and the phase-in of capital conservation buffer requirement. Our ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
21
Table of Contents
We may be subject to a higher consolidated effective tax rate if there is a change in tax laws relating to LCB Investments II, Inc. or if LCB Funding, Inc. fails to qualify as a real estate investment trust.
The Bank holds certain investment securities in its wholly owned subsidiary LCB Investments II, Inc., which is incorporated in Nevada. Pursuant to the State of Indiana’s current tax laws and regulations, we are not subject to Indiana income tax for income earned through that subsidiary. If there are changes in Indiana’s tax laws or interpretations thereof requiring us to pay state taxes for income generated by LCB Investments II, Inc., the resulting tax consequences could increase our effective tax rate or cause us to have a tax liability for prior years.
The Bank also holds certain commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans and other loans in a real estate investment trust through LCB Investments II, Inc., which is incorporated in Maryland. Qualification as a real estate investment trust involves application of specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to various asset tests. If LCB Funding, Inc. fails to meet any of the required provisions for real estate investment trusts, it could no longer qualify as a real estate investment trust and the resulting tax consequences would increase our effective tax rate or cause us to have a tax liability for prior years. Additionally, changes to the State of Indiana's current tax laws and regulations for real estate investment trust income disallowance could increase our effective tax rate or cause us to have a tax liability for prior years.
Our accounting policies and methods are the basis for how we prepare our consolidated financial statements and how we report our financial condition and results of operations, and they require management to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Our management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods in order to ensure they comply with GAAP and reflect management’s judgment as to the most appropriate manner in which to record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances. The application of that chosen accounting policy or method might result in the Company reporting different amounts than would have been reported under a different alternative. If management’s estimates or assumptions are incorrect, the Company may experience material losses.
Management has identified one accounting policy as being “critical” to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations because it requires management to make particularly subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. This critical accounting policy relates to the allowance for credit losses. Because of the inherent uncertainty of this estimate, no assurance can be given that the application of alternative policies or methods might not result in the reporting of a different amount of the allowance for credit losses and, accordingly, net income.
From time to time, the FASB and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of our external financial statements. In addition, trends in financial and business reporting, including environmental, social and governance (ESG) related disclosures, could require us to incur additional reporting expense. These changes are beyond our control, can be difficult to predict and could materially impact how we report our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in these standards are continuously occurring, and given the current economic environment, more drastic changes may occur. The implementation of such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience increases to, and volatility in, the balance of the allowance for credit losses and related provision expense due to the adoption of the Current Expected Credit Loss ("CECL") methodology.
We adopted CECL, effective as of January 1, 2021, following the delayed adoption period permitted by the CARES Act and extended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. The CECL methodology requires measurement of anticipated credit losses to occur when a financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. These measurements require significant use of management judgments as well as forward-looking information and forecasts. Any failure of these judgments or forecasts to be correct could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.
22
Table of Contents
We may be adversely affected by changes in U.S. tax laws and regulations.
Any change in federal or state tax laws or regulations, including any increase in the federal corporate income tax rate from the current level of 21%, could negatively affect our business and results of operations, including as a result of our income tax expense and any impact to the profitability of our loan customers.
Risks Relating to our Operations
Our ability to attract and retain management and key personnel and any damage to our reputation may affect future growth and earnings.
Much of our success and growth has been influenced strongly by our ability to attract and retain management experienced in banking and financial services and familiar with the communities in our market areas. Our ability to retain the executive officers, management teams, branch managers and loan officers at the Bank will continue to be important to the successful implementation of our strategy. It is also critical, as we grow, to be able to attract and retain qualified additional management and loan officers with the appropriate level of experience and knowledge about our market areas to implement our community-based operating strategy. The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, our business depends on earning and maintaining the trust of our customers and communities. Harm to our reputation could arise from numerous sources, including employee misconduct, compliance failures, litigation or our failure to deliver appropriate levels of service. If any events or circumstances occur which could undermine our reputation, there can be no assurance that the additional costs and expenses we may incur as a result would not have an adverse impact on our business.
We have a continuing need to adapt to technological change and we may not have the resources to effectively implement new technology.
The financial services industry is constantly undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our market areas. Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products to those that we will be able to offer, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurances that we will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to our customers.
The Company’s information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security and cyber-attacks, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
The Company relies heavily on internal and outsourced technologies, communications, and information systems to conduct its business, particularly with respect to our core processing provider and our digital banking provider. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Company collects, processes and retains sensitive and confidential information regarding our customers. As the Company’s reliance on technology has increased, so have the potential risks of a technology-related operation interruption (such as disruptions in the Company’s core provider, general ledger, deposit, loan, digital banking or other systems) or the occurrence of a cyber-attack (such as unauthorized access to the Company’s systems). These risks have increased for all financial institutions as new technologies, the use of the Internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others have increased. In addition to cyber-attacks or other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information, hackers recently have engaged in attacks against financial institutions, particularly denial of service attacks, which are designed to disrupt key business services, such as customer-facing web sites and social engineering attacks that could influence an employee of the Company to click on a link that downloads malware or ransomware to the Company’s system. The Company is not able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. In addition, it is possible that we may not be able to detect security breaches on a timely basis, or at all, which could increase the costs and risks associated with any such breach.
23
Table of Contents
The Company also faces risks related to cyber-attacks and other security breaches in connection with credit card and debit card transactions that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding the Company’s customers through various third parties, including merchant acquiring banks, payment processors, payment card networks and its processors. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber-attacks, and because the transactions involve third parties and environments such as the point of sale that the Company does not control or secure, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact the Company through no fault of its own, and in some cases it may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. In addition, the Company offers its customers protection against fraud and certain losses for unauthorized use of debit cards in order to stay competitive with other financial institutions. Offering such protection exposes the Company to losses that could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. Further cyber-attacks or other breaches in the future, whether affecting the Company or others, could intensify consumer concern and regulatory focus and result in reduced use of payment cards and increased costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. To the extent we are involved in any future cyber-attacks or other breaches, the Company’s reputation could be affected, which could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud and data processing system failures and errors.
Employee errors and misconduct could subject us to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm our reputation. Misconduct by our employees could include hiding their own unauthorized activities from us, improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of our customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject us to financial claims for negligence, among others.
In addition, as a bank, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against us, third parties or our clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. For example, as previously disclosed, in the third quarter of 2019, the Bank discovered potentially fraudulent activity by a former treasury management client involving multiple banks. In the context of resulting bankruptcy proceedings involving the former client, the liquidating trustee has filed a complaint against the Bank, focused on a series of business transactions among the former client, related entities and the Bank.
We maintain a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors, cyber-attacks, and customer or employee fraud. Should our internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company is or may become involved from time to time in suits, legal proceedings, information-gathering requests, investigations and proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies that may lead to adverse consequences.
Many aspects of our business and operations involve the risk of legal liability, and in some cases we or our subsidiaries have been named or threatened to be named as defendants in various lawsuits arising from our business activities. In addition, companies in our industry are frequently the subject of governmental and self-regulatory agency information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings. The results of such proceedings could lead to significant civil or criminal penalties, including monetary penalties, damages, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restrictions on the way in which we conduct our business, or reputational harm.
Although we establish accruals for legal proceedings when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, we do not have accruals for all legal proceedings where we face a risk of loss. In addition, due to the inherent subjectivity of the assessments and unpredictability of the outcome of legal proceedings, amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate loss to us from the legal proceedings in question. Accordingly, our ultimate losses may be higher, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued for legal loss contingencies, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
We have no unresolved SEC staff comments.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company is headquartered in the main office building of the Bank at 202 E. Center Street, Warsaw, Indiana 46580. The Company operates in 59 locations, 51 of which are owned by the Bank and eight of which are leased from third parties.
None of the Company’s real property assets are the subject of any material encumbrances.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Lakeland Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and threatened legal proceedings and other matters in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. On an ongoing basis management, after consultation with legal counsel, assesses the Company's liabilities and contingencies in connection with such proceedings. For those matters where it is probable that the Company will incur losses and the amounts of the losses can be reasonably estimated, the Company records an expense and corresponding liability in its consolidated financial statements. To the extent the pending or threatened litigation could result in exposure in excess of that liability, the amount of such excess is not currently estimable. Although the Company does not believe that the outcome of pending legal matters will be material to the Company's consolidated financial position, it cannot rule out the possibility that such outcomes will be material to the consolidated results of operations for a particular reporting period in the future.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
25
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The quarterly high and low prices for the Company’s common stock and the cash dividends declared and paid on that common stock are set forth in the table below.
High* Low* Cash Dividend High* Low* Cash Dividend
The common stock of the Company was first quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “LKFN” on August 14, 1997. Currently, the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “LKFN.” On February 15, 2023, the Company had approximately 310 stockholders of record.
The Company paid dividends on its common stock as set forth in the table above. The Company’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders is largely dependent upon the dividends it receives from the Bank, and the Bank is subject to regulatory limitations on the amount of cash dividends it may pay. See “Supervision and Regulation – Dividend Payments” for additional information.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets forth the following information as of December 31, 2022 for (i) all compensation plans previously approved by the Company’s stockholders and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by the Company’s stockholders:
(a)the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights;
(b)the weighted-average exercise price of such outstanding options, warrants and rights; and
(c)other than securities to be issued upon the exercise of such outstanding options, warrants and rights, the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plans.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) 0 $ 0 387,388
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 0 0 0
(1)Lakeland Financial Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan was adopted on April 12, 2017 by the board of directors.
26
Table of Contents
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph below compares the cumulative total return of the Company, the Nasdaq Market Index, the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, and the S&P U.S. BMI Banks Index.
Lakeland Financial Corporation
Period Ending
The above returns assume that $100 was invested on December 31, 2017 and that all dividends were reinvested.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
On January 8, 2019, the Company's board of directors approved a share repurchase program, under which the Company is authorized to repurchase, from time to time as the Company deems appropriate, shares of the Company's common stock with an aggregate purchase price of up to $30 million. Repurchases may be made in the open market, through block trades or otherwise, and in privately negotiated transactions. On April 13, 2021, the Company's board of directors reauthorized and extended the share repurchase program through April 30, 2023. As extended, the repurchase program has an aggregate purchase price cap of $30 million. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares, and the program may be extended, modified, suspended or discontinued at any time. There were no repurchases under this plan during the year ended December 31, 2022.
27
Table of Contents
The following table provides information about purchases by the Company and its affiliates during the quarter ended December 31, 2022 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
The shares purchased during the quarter were credited to the deferred share accounts of non-employee directors under the Company’s directors’ deferred compensation plan. These shares are held in treasury stock of the Company and were purchased in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The information previously required by Item 6 of this Form 10-K has been intentionally omitted, as permitted by the SEC in connection with its adoption of its final rules regarding the amendments to modernize, simplify, and enhance identified disclosure requirements of registrants.
28
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Net income in 2022 was $103.8 million, up 8.4% from $95.7 million in 2021. Net income for 2021 was 13.5% higher than $84.3 million in 2020.
Diluted net income per common share was $4.04 in 2022, $3.74 in 2021 and $3.30 in 2020. Return on average total assets was 1.62% in 2022 versus 1.56% in 2021 and 1.55% in 2020. Return on average total equity was 17.40% in 2022 versus 14.19% in 2021 and 13.51% in 2020. The dividend payout ratio, with respect to diluted earnings per share, was 39.60% in 2022, 36.36% in 2021 and 36.36% in 2020. The average equity to average assets ratio was 9.28% in 2022 compared to 10.96% in 2021 and 11.51% in 2020.
Net income in 2022 was positively impacted by a $24.8 million increase in net interest income. Offsetting these positive impacts were a $5.9 million increase in noninterest expense, a $2.9 million decrease in noninterest income, and an $8.3 million increase in provision for credit losses.
Net income in 2021 was positively impacted by a $15.1 million increase in net interest income and a $13.7 million decrease in provision for credit losses. Offsetting these positive impacts were a $13.1 million increase in noninterest expense and a $2.1 million decrease in noninterest income.
Total assets were $6.432 billion as of December 31, 2022 versus $6.557 billion as of December 31, 2021, a decrease of $125.0 million or 1.9%. Early in 2022, the Company deployed $250.0 million of excess liquidity to the investment securities portfolio. Loan growth of $422.6 million during 2022 was funded by cash and cash equivalents as well as deposits. During the fourth quarter, deposit outflows from commercial and retail depositors contributed to the decline in deposits of $274.8 million during 2022. Borrowings increased $222.0 million during 2022. The increase was due to a $297.0 million increase in short-term borrowings at December 31, 2022, offset by the payoff of a $75.0 million long-term FHLB advance outstanding at December 31, 2021.
Total investment securities decreased $84.8 million during the year. The decrease was driven primarily by a decrease in market value of available-for-sale securities as a result of the increased rate environment driven by the Federal Reserve's monetary tightening policy. The decrease in fair value of available-for-sale investment securities was $236.9 million for the year 2022, from an unrealized gain position of $21.6 million at December 31, 2021 to an unrealized loss position of $215.3 million at December 31, 2022. In addition, the Company elected to transfer securities from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity as an overall balance sheet management strategy in 2022. The fair value of securities transferred during the second quarter of 2022 was $127.0 million, with $24.4 million in unrealized losses recorded in accumulated comprehensive income (loss) to be amortized over the remaining life of the securities transferred.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Some of the facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for credit losses.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for expected credit losses. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the principal is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Allocations of the allowance are made for specific loans and for pools of similar types of loans, although the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged against the allowance. A provision for credit losses is taken based on management’s ongoing evaluation of the appropriate allowance balance. A formal evaluation of the adequacy of the credit loss allowance is conducted monthly. The ultimate recovery of all loans is susceptible to future market factors beyond the Company’s control.
The level of credit loss provision is influenced by growth in the overall loan portfolio, emerging market risk, emerging concentration risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentration, new industry lending activity, general economic
29
Table of Contents
conditions and historical loss analysis. In addition, management gives consideration to changes in the facts and circumstances of watch list credits, which includes the security position of the borrower, in determining the appropriate level of the credit loss provision. Furthermore, management’s overall view on credit quality is a factor in the determination of the provision.
The determination of the appropriate allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires significant estimates by management. The Company has an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses that generally includes consideration of changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio and overall portfolio quality, along with current and forecasted economic conditions that may affect borrowers’ ability to repay. Consideration is not limited to these factors although they represent the most commonly cited factors. To determine the specific allocation levels for individual credits, management considers the current valuation of collateral and the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows as the primary measures. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon an ongoing review of those credits. With respect to pools of similar loans, an appropriate level of general allowance is determined by portfolio segment using a probability of default-loss given default (“PD/LGD”) model, subject to a floor. A default can be triggered by one of several different asset quality factors, including past due status, nonaccrual status, material modification to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty or if the loan has had a charge-off. This PD is then combined with a LGD derived from historical charge-off data to construct a default rate. This loss rate is then supplemented with adjustments for reasonable and supportable forecasts of relevant economic indicators, particularly the unemployment rate forecast from the Federal Open Market Committee’s Summary of Economic Projections, and other environmental factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These environmental factors include consideration of the following: levels of, and trends in, delinquencies and nonperforming loans; trends in volume and terms of loans; changes in collateral strength; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedure, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations. It is also possible that these factors could include social, political, economic, and terrorist events or activities. All of these factors are susceptible to change, which may be significant. As a result of this detailed process, the allowance results in two forms of allocations, specific and general. These two components represent the total allowance for credit losses deemed adequate to cover expected losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
Commercial loans are subject to a dual standardized grading process administered by the credit administration function. These grade assignments are performed independent of each other and a consensus is reached by credit administration and the loan officer. Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to an individual credit that indicate it should be evaluated on an individual basis. Considerations with respect to specific allocations for these individual credits include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the sufficiency of the customer’s cash flow or net worth to repay the loan; (b) the adequacy of the discounted value of collateral relative to the loan balance; (c) whether the loan has been criticized in a regulatory examination; (d) whether the loan is nonperforming; (e) any other reasons the ultimate collectability of the loan may be in question; or (f) any unique loan characteristics that require special monitoring.
Allocations are also applied to categories of loans considered not to be individually analyzed, but for which the rate of loss is expected to be consistent with or greater than historical averages. Such allocations are based on past loss experience and information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values. These general pooled loan allocations are performed for portfolio segments of commercial and industrial; commercial real estate, multi-family, and construction; agri-business and agricultural; other commercial loans; and consumer 1-4 family mortgage and other consumer loans. General allocations of the allowance are determined by a historical loss rate based on the calculation of each pool’s probability of default-loss given default, subject to a floor. The length of the historical period for each pool is based on the average life of the pool. The historical loss rates are supplemented with consideration of economic conditions and portfolio trends.
Due to the imprecise nature of estimating the allowance for credit losses, the Company’s allowance for credit losses includes an unallocated component. The unallocated component of the allowance for credit losses incorporates the Company’s judgmental determination of potential expected losses that may not be fully reflected in other allocations. As a practical expedient, the Company has elected to state accrued interest separately from loan principal balances on the consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, when a loan is placed on non-accrual, interest payments are reversed through interest income.
For off balance sheet credit exposures outlined in the ASU at 326-20-30-11, it is the Company’s position that nearly all of the unfunded amounts on lines of credit are unconditionally cancellable, and therefore not subject to having a liability recorded.
The allowance is inherently uncertain as it represents the Company’s expectation of the future collectability of loans in its portfolio; actual collections may be greater than or less than expectations. Actual collections may be impacted by wider economic conditions such as changes in the competitive environment or in the levels of business investment or consumer
30
Table of Contents
spending, or by the quality of borrowers’ management teams and the success of their strategy execution. Borrowers’ ability to repay may also change due to the effects of government monetary or fiscal policy, which could affect the level of demand for borrowers’ products or services.
The Company’s allowance for credit losses is subject to changes in the inputs to the model, including the following: the number of delinquent loans, nonaccrual loans, material modification due to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, or charge offs; the levels of charge offs and recoveries; projected unemployment rates and other economic indicators; the Company’s collateral position on adversely classified loans; or management’s qualitative judgment of the implication of trends in its loan portfolio or in the broader economy.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
In 2022, the Company continued to grow loans organically in its geographic footprint of northern Indiana and in central Indiana in the Indianapolis market. The Company had 52 branches as of December 31, 2022. The Company’s net interest income was positively affected by the monetary tightening policy of the Federal Reserve during 2022. The rise in short-term interest rates and loan growth were the primary drivers of the 13.9% increase in net interest income for 2022. The increase in net interest income was the primary driver for the 8.4% increase in net income of $8.1 million, as noninterest expense increased 5.7%, noninterest income decreased 6.4% and the provision for credit losses increased 770.5%. Asset quality metrics remained stable with watch list loans as a percentage of total loans at a historic low of 3.42%. Fee based lines of business including treasury management services, commercial loan fees, interchange fee income and merchant interchange fee income positively contributed to growth in noninterest income. Overall, expense growth has reflected the Company's continued investment in people, technology and our branch infrastructure. The outlook for 2023 includes plans for continued loan growth, disciplined credit philosophy, continued investments in human capital, enhancements to the Lake City Bank digital platform, and targeted expansion of our branch network in the Indianapolis market with two new offices planned in the next 18 months.
Selected income statement information for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 is presented in the following table.
Income Statement Summary:
Other Data:
Net charge-offs to average loans 0.10 % 0.09 % 0.09 %
Net interest margin excluding PPP loans (4) 3.40 % 2.95 % 3.19 %
(1)Noninterest expense/Net interest income plus Noninterest income.
(2)Non-GAAP financial measure. Calculated by subtracting intangible assets, net of deferred tax, from total assets and total equity. Management believes this is an important measure because it is useful for planning and forecasting purposes. See reconciliation on the next page.
(3)Non-GAAP financial measure. Calculated by removing the fair market value adjustment impact of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio from tangible equity and tangible assets. Management believes this is an important measure because it provides better comparability to prior periods. See reconciliation on the next page.
31
Table of Contents
(4)Non-GAAP financial measure. Calculated by subtracting the impact PPP loans had on average earnings assets, loan interest income, average interest bearing liabilities, and interest expense. Management believes this is an important measure because it provide for better comparability to prior periods, given the expectation that PPP represents a limited governmental intervention in the lending market, designed to support small businesses through the pandemic, its low fixed interest rate of 1.0% and because the accretion of net loan fee income can be accelerated upon borrower forgiveness and repayment by the SBA. Management is actively monitoring net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis with and without PPP loan impact for the duration of this program. See reconciliation on the next page.
(5)Non-GAAP financial measure. Pretax pre-provision earnings is calculated by adding net interest income to noninterest income and subtracting noninterest expense. Management believes this is an important measure because it may enable investors to identify the trends in the Company's earnings exclusive of the effects of tax and provision expense, which may vary significantly from period to period. See reconciliation on the next page.
The Company believes that providing non-GAAP financial measures provides investors with information useful to understanding the company's financial performance. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided below (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
Year Ended
Plus: Deferred Tax Assets Related to Goodwill 1,167 1,176 1,176
Plus: Deferred Tax Assets Related to Goodwill 1,167 1,176 1,176
Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets 8.79 % 10.70 % 11.21 %
Adjusted Tangible Common Equity/Adjusted Tangible Assets 11.30 % 10.47 % 10.78 %
32
Table of Contents
The impact of the Paycheck Protection Program on Net Interest Margin FTE is provided below (dollars in thousands).
Year Ended
Adjusted Earning Asset Yield, net of PPP Impact 4.00 % 3.21 % 3.80 %
Adjusted Cost of Funds, net of PPP Impact 0.60 % 0.26 % 0.61 %
Net Interest Margin FTE, net of PPP Impact 3.40 % 2.95 % 3.19 %
Net Income
Net income was $103.8 million in 2022, an increase of $8.1 million, or 8.4%, versus net income of $95.7 million in 2021. The increase in net income from 2021 to 2022 was primarily due to an increase in net interest income of $24.8 million, or 13.9%. Offsetting the increase in net interest income, noninterest expense increased $5.9 million, or 5.7%, noninterest income decreased $2.9 million, or 6.4%, and the provision for credit losses increased $8.3 million, or 770.5%. Net interest income for 2022 included $772,000 in PPP interest and fee income compared to $14.9 million for 2021. The increase in provision expense for 2022 was driven primarily by the downgrade of a single commercial relationship that occurred in late December 2022. The remaining increase in provision was driven by loan growth during the year.
Net income was $95.7 million in 2021, an increase of $11.4 million, or 13.5%, versus net income of $84.3 million in 2020. The increase in net income from 2020 to 2021 was primarily due to an increase in net interest income of $15.1 million, or 9.3%, and a decrease in the provision for credit losses of $13.7 million, or 92.7%. Noninterest expense increased $13.1 million, or 14.3%, and noninterest income decreased $2.1 million, or 4.5%. Net interest income for 2021 included $14.9 million in PPP interest and fee income. The decrease in provision expense for 2021 was driven by improved economic conditions, which were supported by government stimulus programs and accommodative Federal Reserve Board's Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") monetary policy.
Net Interest Income
The following table presents a three-year average balance sheet and, for each major asset and liability category, its related interest income and yield or its expense and rate for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
33
Table of Contents
THREE YEAR AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND NET INTEREST ANALYSIS
Earning Assets
Loans:
Investments: (3)
Nonearning Assets
Interest Bearing Liabilities
Time deposits:
Noninterest Bearing Liabilities
Interest Margin Recap
(1)Loan fees are included as taxable loan interest income. Net loan fees attributable to PPP loans were $692,000, $12.5 million and $9.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2)Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of taxable loans.
34
Table of Contents
(3)Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 21 percent tax rate. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt securities acquired after January 1, 1983 included the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”) adjustment applicable to nondeductible interest expenses. Taxable equivalent basis adjustments were $5.6 million, $3.6 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The following table shows fluctuations in net interest income attributable to changes in the average balances of assets and liabilities and the yields earned or rates paid for the years ended December 31.
NET INTEREST INCOME – RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS (fully tax equivalent basis, dollars in thousands)
Attributable to Total Change Attributable to Total Change
Volume Rate Volume Rate
Interest Income (2)
Loans:
Investments:
Interest Expense
Time deposits:
Long-term borrowings and
(1)The earning assets and interest bearing liabilities used to calculate interest differentials are based on average daily balances for 2022, 2021 and 2020. The changes in net interest income are created by changes in interest rates and changes in the volumes of loans, investments, deposits and borrowings. In the table above, changes attributable to volume are computed using the change in volume from the prior year multiplied by the previous year’s rate, and changes attributable to rate are computed using the change in rate from the prior year multiplied by the previous year’s volume. The change in interest or expense due to both rate and volume has been allocated between factors in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
(2)Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 21 percent tax rate. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt securities acquired after January 1, 1983 included the TEFRA adjustment applicable to nondeductible interest expense.
Net interest income increased by $24.8 million to $202.9 million in 2022 compared to 2021, partially due to a $216.5 million, or 3.7%, increase in average earning assets. The increase in average assets was primarily driven by a $364.0 million increase in average investment securities offset by a decrease in interest bearing deposits. The yield on average earning assets increased 67 basis points to 4.00% in 2022 from 3.33% in 2021. The higher earning asset yields and cost of funds were driven by the 425 basis points increase to the target Federal Funds rate implemented by the Federal Reserve Board beginning in 2022 to combat elevated levels of inflation affecting the U.S. economy. The target Federal Funds rate increased from a zero-bound range of 0.00% - 0.25% in March 2022 to a range of 4.25% - 4.50% at December 31, 2022. Additionally, net interest margin during the year ended December 31, 2022 was positively impacted by the recognition of nonaccrual interest resulting from the interest recovery of two nonaccrual commercial borrowers during the fourth quarter of 2022. The interest recovery was from
35
Table of Contents
two loans placed on nonaccrual status in 2009 and 2021. The $1.9 million of nonaccrual interest income was recognized into loan interest income and contributed 3 basis points to the Company's net interest margin during 2022. The net interest margin increased to 3.40% in 2022 versus 3.07% in 2021. The net interest margin decreased to 3.07% in 2021 versus 3.19% in 2020, driven by margin compression from the lower interest rate environment and excess liquidity on the Company's balance sheet.
During 2022, average loans increased $6.1 million and average investment securities increased $364.0 million. The growth in average assets and average investment securities was funded by a reduction of interest bearing deposits of $153.5 million, growth in interest bearing liabilities of $151.7 million and growth in average demand deposits of $171.6 million. The increase in average deposits for 2022 resulted from excess liquidity on our customers’ balance sheets resulting from a combination of PPP and economic stimulus. As a result of this excess liquidity on the Company's balance sheet, management deployed an additional $250 million into the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio during 2022, bringing total excess liquidity deployment to the investment securities portfolio of $902 million since the beginning of 2021.
The utilization of commercial and retail lines of credit remained unchanged at 42% in 2022 and 2021 and down from 43% at December 31, 2020. However, available lines of credit have increased by a record $651 million to $4.752 billion at December 31, 2022 compared to $4.101 billion at December 31, 2021, or 16% growth. While overall line usage as a percentage of total line availability remained unchanged, management remains encouraged because of the healthy expansion in overall line availability due to strong demand for traditional working capital from our commercial and industrial client base as well as continued development activity within our commercial real estate markets.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $9.4 million in 2022 compared to $1.1 million in 2021 and $14.8 million in 2020. The increased provision in 2022 was driven by provision expense of $7.0 million related to the downgrade of a single $10.7 million commercial relationship. The remainder of the increase was due to growth in the overall loan portfolio. The Company’s allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2022 was $72.6 million compared to $67.8 million as of December 31, 2021 and $61.4 million as of December 31, 2020. The allowance for credit losses represented 1.54% of total loans as of December 31, 2022 versus 1.58% at December 31, 2021 and 1.32% at December 31, 2020. The company’s credit loss reserve to total loans, excluding PPP loans, was 1.54% at December 31, 2022 compared to 1.59% at December 31, 2021 and 1.45% at December 31, 2020. PPP loans are guaranteed by the United States SBA and have not been allocated for within the allowance for credit losses. Net charge-offs of $4.5 million, or 0.10%, and $3.8 million, or 0.09%, of average loans, were recorded in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The charge offs for 2022 and 2021 resulted primarily from a single commercial credit each year. Management believes the charge offs were isolated instances that were negatively impacted by unique circumstances resulting from the pandemic and are not reflective of deteriorating trends in the loan portfolio. The Company’s management continues to monitor the adequacy of the provision based on loan levels, asset quality, economic conditions including inflation and the resulting impact on the interest rate environment, and other factors that may influence the assessment of the collectability of loans.
The Company adopted CECL on January 1, 2021. Prior to this date, provision expense was recorded under the incurred loss methodology. The day one impact of the adoption was an increase in the allowance for credit losses of $9.1 million, with an offset, net of taxes, to stockholders' equity.
36
Table of Contents
Noninterest Income
The following table presents changes in the components of noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
% Change From Prior Year
Noninterest income to total revenue 17.1 % 20.1 % 22.3 %
Noninterest income was $41.9 million in 2022 versus $44.7 million in 2021, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 6.4%. Market value declines impacted the overall decrease in noninterest income. Bank owned life insurance income for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased by $2.0 million, primarily due to declines in the market value of variable life insurance policies that are tied to the equity markets. A reduction of market value of $950,000 was recorded during 2022 compared to market value gains of $1.1 million for 2021. The valuation changes to the variable life insurance policies are offset by similar changes to the deferred compensation expense that is recognized in salary and employee benefits. Excluding the impact of the variable life insurance policy market value changes, noninterest income was $42.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $43.7 million for the year-ended December 31, 2021, a decline of $840,000, or 2.1%. In addition, other income decreased $851,000, mortgage banking income decreased by $785,000, gains on securities sales decreased by $776,000 and interest rate swap fee income decreased by $456,000. Notably, fee-based noninterest income increased by a cumulative $2.0 million primarily due to volume, including improvements in service charges on deposit accounts of $987,000, or 9.3%, merchant and interchange fee income of $537,000, or 17.8%, investment brokerage fees of $343,000, or 17.4%, and loan and service fees of $292,000, or 2.4%. Wealth advisory fees declined by $114,000, or 1.3%, and were negatively impacted by market value declines of 8.0% in trust assets from $2.5 billion at December 31, 2021 to $2.3 billion at December 31, 2022.
Noninterest income was $44.7 million in 2021 compared to $46.8 million in 2020, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 4.5%. The decrease was primarily driven by a $4.1 million decrease in interest rate swap fees generated from commercial lending transactions, as well as a $2.5 million decrease in mortgage banking income. Demand for interest rate swap arrangements decreased in 2021. The carrying value of mortgage servicing rights was negatively impacted by increased prepayment speeds, resulting from the low interest rate environment. Offsetting these decreases were an increase in loan service fees of $1.8 million, an increase in wealth advisory and investment brokerage fees of $1.6 million, an increase in merchant and interchange fees of $615,000, and an increase in service charges on deposit accounts of $498,000. The increases in fee income were driven by growth in fee-based business including from the wealth advisory group, merchant services, debit card interchange and institutional services areas due to higher transaction volumes and increased economic activity.
37
Table of Contents
Noninterest Expense
The following table presents changes in the components of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
% Change From Prior Year
Noninterest expense increased by $5.9 million, or 5.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2022, to $110.2 million compared to $104.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was due primarily to an increase of $4.2 million in other expense caused by accruals for ongoing legal matters of $3.5 million. See "Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional details regarding loss contingencies. Corporate and business development expense increased $936,000, or 22.0%, driven by increased corporate development spending, advertising expense and charitable and foundation contributions, including contributions associated with the Company's sesquicentennial celebration. Salaries and benefits expense increased $648,000, or 1.1%. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in professional fees of $581,000, or 8.2%, due to a decrease in legal expense incurred during the year. FDIC insurance and other regulatory fee expense decreased by $243,000, or 10.8%, due to declining deposits and reduced total assets of the Company.
Noninterest expense increased by $13.1 million, or 14.3%, to $104.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $91.2 million for 2020. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $8.5 million due primarily to increased performace-based compensation, increased salaries and increased health insurance expense. Additionally, increased legal fees and costs associated with the digital platform conversion to LCB Digital contributed to an overall increase of $1.8 million in professional fees. Corporate and business development expenses increased as the 2021 economy re-opened, and client events and contributions increased in 2021.
Income Taxes
The Company recognized income tax expense in 2022 of $21.3 million, compared to $21.7 million in 2021 and $19.5 million in 2020. The effective tax rate was 17.1% in 2022, compared to 18.5% in 2021 and 18.8% in 2020. The effective tax rate declined due to the Indiana Financial Institution Tax rate being 5.0% in 2022, 5.5% in 2021 and 6.0% in 2020 as well as an increase in tax-free interest income from municipal securities and loans during 2022 and 2021. For a detailed analysis of the Company’s income taxes see "Note 12 – Income Taxes".
CERTAIN STATISTICAL DISCLOSURES BY BANK HOLDING COMPANIES
We are required to provide certain statistical disclosures as a bank holding company under the SEC's Industry Guide 3. The following table provides certain of those disclosures.
Year ended December 31,
38
Table of Contents
Return on average assets is computed by dividing net income by average assets for each indicated fiscal year. Average assets is computed by adding total assets as of each date during the indicated fiscal year and dividing by the number of days in the fiscal year.
Return on average total equity is computed by dividing net income by average equity for each indicated fiscal year. Average equity is computed by adding the total equity attributable to the Company as of each date during the indicated fiscal year and dividing by the number of days in the fiscal year.
Average equity to average assets is computed by dividing average equity by average assets for each indicated fiscal year, as calculated in accordance with the previous explanation.
Dividend payout ratio is computed by dividing dividends declared per common share by earnings per diluted common share for each indicated fiscal year.
Refer to the "Financial Condition - Loan Portfolio", "Financial Condition - Sources of Funds" and "Risk Management - Loan Portfolio" sections of this MD&A and to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K for the other required statistical disclosures.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Overview
Total assets of the Company were $6.432 billion as of December 31, 2022, a decrease of $125.0 million, or 1.9%, when compared to $6.557 billion as of December 31, 2021. Total loans, excluding PPP loans, increased by $447.2 million, or 10.5%, to $4.709 billion as of December 31, 2022 from $4.262 billion at December 31, 2021. Total loans outstanding increased by $422.6 million, or 9.9%, to $4.710 billion at December 31, 2022 from $4.288 billion at December 31, 2021. PPP loans outstanding were $1.5 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $26.2 million at December 31, 2021. Total deposits decreased $274.8 million, from $5.735 billion at December 31, 2021, to $5.461 billion at December 31, 2022, as retail and commercial depositors utilized excess liquidity on their balance sheets. Deposits contracted $274.8 million in 2022 and $203.5 million of that decrease occurred during the fourth quarter.
The $553.0 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents was utilized to fund $447.2 million in net organic loan growth during 2022. Additionally, the Company deployed $250.0 million for the purchase of available-for-sale investment securities during the first quarter of 2022. In mid 2022, the Company elected to utilize principal and interest cash flows from the investment securities portfolio to supplement liquidity for funding loans. Cash flows from the investment securities portfolio provided $114.0 million of liquidity during 2022. In addition, the Company utilized short-term borrowings of $297.0 million to offset deposit outflows.
Uses of Funds
Investment Portfolio
At year end 2022, 2021 and 2020, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government, government agencies and government sponsored agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity. See "Note 2 – Securities" for more information on these investments.
On April 1, 2022, the Company elected to transfer $151.4 million in net book value of municipal bonds from the available-for-sale securities portfolio to held-to-maturity as an overall balance sheet management strategy. The fair value of these securities transferred was $127.0 million.
Purchases of securities available-for-sale totaled $315.3 million in 2022, $835.0 million in 2021 and $216.5 million in 2020. Growth of the investment portfolio during the past three years served to provide an earning asset alternative for excess balance sheet liquidity stemming from increased levels of core deposits as a result of the U.S. government's COVID-19 pandemic stimulus programs. The Company deployed $250 million of excess liquidity to the investment securities portfolio during 2022, $652 million in 2021 and $100 million in 2020 to preserve net interest margin prior to the Federal Reserve Board's tightening cycle, which began in March of 2022. Investment securities represented 20% of total assets on December 31, 2022 compared to 21% on December 31, 2021 and 13% on December 31, 2020. Management expects the investment securities portfolio as a percentage of assets to decrease over time and return to historical levels of approximately 14% as the proceeds from paydowns and maturities of these investment securities are used to fund future loan portfolio growth.
39
Table of Contents
Securities sales totaled $25.3 million in 2022, $14.0 million in 2021 and $8.0 million in 2020. Paydowns from prepayments and scheduled payments of $98.8 million, $113.1 million and $90.4 million were received in 2022, 2021 and 2020, and the amortization of premiums, net of the accretion of discounts, was $6.3 million, $5.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively. Maturities and calls of securities totaled $9.3 million, $24.7 million and $7.6 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. No provision for allowance for credit loss was recorded in connection with the investment securities portfolio in 2022 or 2021, and no other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in 2020. The investment portfolio is managed to provide for an appropriate balance between liquidity, credit risk and investment return and to limit the Company’s exposure to risk to an acceptable level. The longer duration of the investment security portfolio serves to balance the shorter duration of the loan portfolio.
The weighted average yields and maturity distribution for the securities portfolio at December 31, 2022, were as follows:
The Company does not trade or invest in or sponsor certain unregistered investment companies defined as hedge funds and private equity funds in the Volcker Rule.
Real Estate Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
Real estate mortgages held for sale decreased by $7.1 million to $357,000 at December 31, 2022 from $7.5 million at December 31, 2021 as a result of reduced mortgage refinancing demand caused by the rising interest rate environment. This asset category is subject to a high degree of variability depending on, among other things, recent mortgage loan rates and the timing of loan sales into the secondary market. The Company generally sells almost all of the conforming mortgage loans it originates in the secondary market. Proceeds from sales totaled $36.5 million in 2022, $126.4 million in 2021 and $114.2 million in 2020.
40
Table of Contents
Loan Portfolio
The loan portfolio by class as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was as follows:
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans:
Agri-business and agricultural loans:
Consumer 1-4 family mortgage loans:
The ratio of loans to total loans by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was as follows:
Agri-business and agricultural loans 9.17 % 10.39 % 9.23 %
41
Table of Contents
In 2022, net loan balances increased by $417.7 million to $4.638 billion, and excludes approximately $28.7 million in loans originated for sale. In 2021, net loan balances decreased by $367.7 million to $4.220 billion, and excluded approximately $119.4 million in loans originated for sale. In 2020, net loan balances increased by $572.6 million to $4.588 billion, and excluded approximately $117.6 million in loans originated for sale. PPP loans of $1.5 million, $26.2 million and $412.0 million were included in non-working capital loans of commercial and industrial loans at December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The mix of The Company's loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial loans and the Bank's lending focus is on the commercial sector of the Lake City Bank footprint. Owner occupied commercial real estate loans represent in many instances the buildings and factories of our commercial and industrial borrowers. Commercial and industrial loans together with owner occupied commercial real estate loans represented 47.8% and 49.6% of total loans as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loans to the agriculture and agri-business sector of our Indiana footprint represent a significant loan segment of the overall loan portfolio. This loan segment is well diversified with loans to corn, soybean, poultry, dairy, swine, beef and egg growers.
The residential construction and land development loans class included construction loans totaling $12.0 million and $3.3 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. Increases in consumer loans during 2022 resulted from an increased focus on indirect lending to consumers and the introduction of a new adjustable rate mortgage product. The Bank generally sells conforming mortgage loans, which it originates locally, into the secondary market. These loans generally represent mortgage loans that are made to clients with long-term or substantial relationships with the Bank on terms consistent with secondary market requirements. The loan classifications are based on the nature of the loans as of the loan origination date. There were no foreign loans included in the loan portfolio for the periods presented.
Repricing opportunities of the loan portfolio occur either according to predetermined float rate indices, adjustable rate schedules included in the related loan agreements or upon maturity of each principal payment. The following table indicates the scheduled maturities of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022:
At maturity, credits are reviewed and, if renewed, are renewed at rates and conditions that prevail at the time of maturity.
Based upon the table above, all loans due after one year which have a predetermined interest rate and loans due after one year which have floating or adjustable interest rates as of December 31, 2022 amounted to $1.729 billion and $1.622 billion, respectively.
Bank Owned Life Insurance
Bank owned life insurance increased by $10.8 million to $108.4 million at December 31, 2022 and by $2.4 million to $97.7 million at December 31, 2021 from $95.2 million at December 31, 2020. The increase during 2022 was primarily due to the purchase of additional life insurance policies on officers of the Bank. The increase during 2021 was primarily due to investment returns on the life insurance policies of pre-existing life insurance policies. Bank owned life insurance investment income is used as an offset to the cost of life insurance purchased by the Bank as a benefit for bank officers.
42
Table of Contents
Sources of Funds
The average daily deposits and borrowings together with the average rates paid on those deposits and borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 are summarized in the following table:
(dollars in thousands) Balance Rate Balance Rate Balance Rate 2022 2021
Savings and transaction accounts:
Time deposits:
Time deposits as of December 31, 2022 will mature as follows:
(dollars in thousands) $100,000or more $100,000 or less Total % of Total
Deposits
Total deposits decreased by $274.8 million to $5.461 billion, at December 31, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021. The decrease in deposits was attributable to a decrease in core deposits. Total deposit contraction was led by a decrease of $243.7 million, or 11.2%, in retail deposits. In addition, commercial deposits decreased $176.3 million, or 7.8%, while public funds deposits increased by $145.2 million, or 11.3%. The decrease in deposits during 2022 reflects the normalization of excess liquidity in our customer's deposit accounts and occurred primarily during the fourth quarter of 2022. Rising inflation is considered a contributor to the decline in deposits during 2022 after the surge in deposits experienced during 2020 and 2021 from PPP funding and COVID-related stimulus programs.
Total deposits increased by $698.6 million to $5.735 billion, at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020. The growth in deposits consisted of $703.6 million in core deposit growth offset by a decrease of $5.0 million in brokered deposits. Total deposit growth was led by an increase of $321.9 million, or 16.6%, in commercial deposits. In addition, retail deposits increased by $259.5 million, or 13.5%, while public funds deposits increased by $122.2 million, or 10.5%. PPP loan proceeds to borrowers and government stimulus to consumers impacted the increase in deposits during 2021 as loan proceeds and other stimulus payments were deposited into customer checking and savings accounts at the Bank. Proceeds from the sale of customer businesses also contributed to the increase in deposits during 2021.
43
Table of Contents
As previously noted, 26% of the Company’s deposit base is attributable to public fund entities which primarily represent customers in the Company’s geographic footprint. A majority of public fund balances represent customers with operating accounts at the Bank. A shift in funding away from public fund deposits could require the Company to execute alternative funding plans under the Contingency Funding Plan discussed in further detail under “Liquidity Risk”. The following table presents total deposits by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
FHLB Advances and OtherBorrowings
During 2022, average total short-term borrowings increased by $6.2 million to $6.6 million, as the Company's excess liquidity position normalized after experiencing a reduction in cash and short-term investments. Ending balances of short-term and miscellaneous borrowings increased to $297.0 million at December 31, 2022, from $0 at December 31, 2021. Average total long-term borrowings decreased by $42.9 million to $32.1 million, due to the repayment of a $75.0 million long-term, putable FHLB advance. The FHLB excercised its putable option during the second quarter of 2022.
During 2021, average total short-term borrowings decreased by $33.9 million to $408,000, primarily due to lower short-term FHLB borrowings and lower usage of the Company's holding company line of credit. Ending balances of short-term and miscellaneous borrowings decreased by $10.5 million during 2021 to $0. The decrease was due to the payoff of the Company's holding company line of credit which was used in connection with its share repurchase activity during 2020. The holding company's line repayment was funded by a dividend from the Bank.
Capital
The Company believes that a strong, appropriately managed capital position is critical to support continued growth of loans and earnings. Capital is used primarily to fund continued organic loan growth and to support dividends to shareholders. The Company had a total risk-based capital ratio of 15.07%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 13.82% and a common Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 13.82% as of December 31, 2022. These ratios met or exceeded the Federal Reserve Bank’s “well-capitalized” minimums of 10.0%, 8.0% and 6.5%, respectively. The Company also had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 11.50% and a tangible equity ratio of 8.79%. When excluding the impact of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on tangible common equity, the Company's adjusted tangible common equity to adjusted tangible assets was 11.30%. See "Note 15 – Capital Requirements and Restrictions on Retained Earnings" for more information.
The ability to maintain these ratios is a function of the balance between net income and a prudent dividend policy. Total stockholders’ equity decreased by 19.3% to $568.9 million as of December 31, 2022 from $704.9 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company earned $103.8 million in 2022 and $95.7 million in 2021. The Company declared cash dividends of $1.60 per share in 2022, which decreased equity by $40.9 million. The Company declared cash dividends of $1.36 per share in 2021, which decreased equity by $34.7 million. Total stockholder's equity has been impacted by declines in the market value of the Company's available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. The market value decline, resulting from rising interest rates during 2022, has generated unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio. Unrealized losses from the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio are recorded, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of stockholders' equity. Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities and the defined benefit pension plan negatively impacted equity by $205.0 million in 2022 compared to a decrease of $11.7 million in 2021. The impact to equity due to other comprehensive income (loss) is not included in regulatory capital.
44
Table of Contents
RISK MANAGEMENT
Overview
The Company, with the oversight of the Corporate Risk Committee of the board of directors, has developed a company-wide risk management program intended to help identify, manage and mitigate the various business risks it faces. Following is a discussion addressing the risks identified as most significant to the Company – Credit, Liquidity, Interest Rate and Market Risk. Item 7A. includes additional discussion about market risk.
Credit Risk
Credit risk represents the risk of loss arising from an obligor’s inability or failure to meet contractual payment or performance terms. Our primary credit risks result from lending and to a lesser extent, investment activities.
Investment Portfolio
The Company’s investment portfolio consists of U.S. treasuries, government agencies and municipal bonds subject to an investment security policy that is approved annually by the board of directors. During 2022, purchases in the securities portfolio consisted of primarily municipal bonds, agency securities and mortgage-backed securities. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s investment in U.S government sponsored mortgage-backed securities represented approximately 38% of total investment securities fair value consisting of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities and mortgage pools issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities are each guaranteed by their respective agencies as to principal and interest. All mortgage securities purchased by the Company in 2022 were within risk tolerances for price, prepayment, extension and original life risk characteristics contained in the Company’s investment policy. As of December 31, 2022, all mortgage-backed securities were performing in a manner consistent with management’s expectations at time of purchase. Municipal securities represent 52% of total investment securities fair value as of December 31, 2022 and were rated investment grade at the time of purchase and continue to be rated investment grade. The Company uses analytics provided by its third party portfolio advisor to evaluate and monitor credit risk for all investments on a quarterly basis. Based upon these analytics as of December 31, 2022, the securities in the combined available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios had an effective duration of approximately 6.5 years. The analysis indicated a negative 17.98% change in market value in the event of a 300 basis point upward, instantaneous rate shock and an approximate positive 6.54% change in market value in the event of a 100 basis point downward, instantaneous rate shock.
Loan Portfolio
The Company has a relatively high percentage of commercial and commercial real estate loans extended to businesses with a broad range of revenue and within a wide variety of industries. Traditionally, this type of lending may have more credit risk than other types of lending because of the size and diversity of the credits. The Company manages this risk by utilizing conservative credit structures, by adjusting its pricing to the perceived risk of each individual credit and by diversifying the portfolio by customer, product, industry and market area and by obtaining personal loan guarantees.
There were no loan concentrations within industries, which exceeded ten percent of total loans, except commercial real estate. Commercial real estate was $2.179 billion, or 46.2%, of total loans at December 31, 2022. The owner occupied commercial real estate portfolio generally represents the financing of factories and operational facilities for the Bank's commercial and industrial borrowers. The Company’s in-house lending limit is $40.0 million. Manufacturing loans are included in the commercial and industrial loans total and are well diversified by industry. Agri-business and agricultural loans represent 9.2% of total loans as of December 31, 2022 and are not concentrated to any agricultural sector. Nearly all of the Bank’s commercial, industrial, agricultural real estate mortgage, real estate construction mortgage and consumer loans are made within its geographic market areas and to diverse industries.
45
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Commercial and industrial loans
Past due accruing loans (90 days or more) 1 0
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans
Past due accruing loans (90 days or more) 0 0
Agri-business and agricultural loans
Past due accruing loans (90 days or more) 0 0
Subtotal nonperforming loans 145 335
Other commercial loans
Past due accruing loans (90 days or more) 0 0
Nonaccrual loans(1) 0 0
Subtotal nonperforming loans 0 0
Consumer 1-4 family mortgage loans
Past due accruing loans (90 days or more) 122 117
Subtotal nonperforming loans 603 270
Other consumer loans
Past due accruing loans (90 days or more) 0 0
Subtotal nonperforming loans 209 289
Ratio:
Nonperforming loans to total loans 0.36 % 0.35 %
(1)Includes nonaccrual troubled debt restructured loans at December 31, 2021.
Nonperforming assets of the Company include nonperforming loans (as indicated above), nonaccrual investments and other real estate owned and repossessions, the total of which amounted to $17.2 million and $15.3 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Nonperforming loans increased by $2.0 million during 2022, due primarily to one commercial relationship, partially offset by paydowns and upgrades.
During the fourth quarter 2022, the Company downgraded a single $10.7 million commercial relationship that the Bank became aware of in early 2023. As a result of the deterioration of this credit, $3.7 million of the balance was charged off with the remaining $7.0 million placed on nonaccrual status. The relationship was downgraded due to the severe impact on the business caused by the improving conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The borrower is a manufacturer of name brand home and commercial cleaning and disinfecting products that are sold through third party firms to regional and national grocery and retail chains. Demand for these products substantially declined during 2022 as the pandemic subsided. As a result, the borrower's largest customer encountered financial challenges, precipitated by the dramatic decline in demand for these products, and ceased operations. The credit is supported by an unlimited personal guarantee of the business owner and the Bank
46
Table of Contents
is actively working with the borrower to structure a long-term repayment plan. Offsetting the increase to nonperforming assets caused by the placement of this credit on nonaccrual status were payoffs to other nonaccrual notes during 2022.
Loans for which the borrower appears to be unable or unwilling to repay its debt in full or on time, and the collateral is insufficient to cover all principal and accrued interest, will be reclassified as nonperforming to the extent they are unsecured, on or before the date when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent, with the exception of small dollar other consumer loans which are not placed on nonaccrual status since these loans are charged-off when they have been delinquent from 90 to 180 days, and when the related collateral, if any, is not sufficient to offset the indebtedness. When a loan is classified as a nonaccrual loan, interest on the loan is no longer accrued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed and interest income is subsequently recorded only to the extent cash payments are received. Accrual status is resumed when all contractually due payments are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
A loan is individually analyzed when full payment under the original loan terms is not expected. Reserves are evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature not in nonaccrual status such as residential mortgage, consumer, and credit card loans, and on an individual loan basis for other loans including material modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. If a loan is individually analyzed, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flow or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.
Total nonperforming loans were $17.1 million, or 0.36% of total loans, at December 31, 2022 versus $15.1 million, or 0.35% of total loans, at December 31, 2021. There were 39 loans totaling $31.3 million classified as individually analyzed as of December 31, 2022 versus 34 loans totaling $25.6 million at the end of 2021. The increase in individually analyzed loans during 2022 resulted primarily from the downgrade of the previously described $10.7 million commercial loan relationship placed on nonaccrual status. The credit is supported by an unlimited personal guarantee of the business owner and the Bank is actively working with the borrower to structure a long-term repayment plan. Paydowns and upgrades of other individually analyzed loans offset the increase to individually analyzed loans for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Loans renegotiated as modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are those loans for which either the contractual interest rate has been reduced below market rates and/or other concessions to market terms are granted to the borrower because of a deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower which results in the inability of the borrower to meet the terms of the loan. No loans received a material modification as a result of borrower financial difficulty during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Prior to January 1, 2022, loans renegotiated as troubled debt restructurings are those for which either the contractual interest rate has been reduced below market rates and/or other concessions to market terms are granted to the borrower because of a deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower which results in the inability of the borrower to meet the terms of the loan.
As of December 31, 2021, there were 27 loans totaling $11.3 million renegotiated as troubled debt restructurings of which $217,000 were modified in 2021. Of these loans, $6.2 million were included in nonaccrual loans in the previous table and the remaining $5.1 million were performing under their modified terms. The Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to any of the borrowers.
47
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the credit loss experience for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Loans charged-off:
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans 597 70 72
Agri-business and agricultural loans 0 0 0
Other commercial loans 0 0 0
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans 277 14 315
Agri-business and agricultural loans 0 320 0
Other commercial loans 0 0 0
Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average daily loans outstanding:
Commercial and industrial loans 0.09 % 0.09 % 0.09 %
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans 0.01 0.00 0.00
Agri-business and agricultural loans 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) 0.10 % 0.09 % 0.09 %
Allowance for credit losses on loans to:
Total loans (excluding PPP loans) 1.54 % 1.59 % 1.45 %
48
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the allocation for credit losses as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Allocated allowance for credit losses:
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential loans 27,394 26,535
Agri-business and agricultural loans 4,429 5,034
Total allocated allowance for credit losses 72,052 67,323
Unallocated allowance for credit losses 554 450
Total allowance for credit losses $ 72,606 $ 67,773
At December 31, 2022, the allowance for credit losses was 1.54% of total loans outstanding, versus 1.58% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2021. The allowance for credit losses was 1.54% of total loans outstanding, excluding PPP loans of $1.5 million, as of December 31, 2022 versus 1.59% of total loans outstanding, excluding PPP loans of $26.2 million, as of December 31, 2021. This reflects a more comparable ratio to prior periods, as PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and have not been allocated for within the allowance for credit losses calculation. Management believes the allowance for credit losses is at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. The process of identifying expected credit losses is a subjective process. Therefore, the Company maintains a general allowance to cover expected credit losses within the entire portfolio. The methodology management uses to determine the adequacy of the credit loss reserve includes the considerations below.
Loans are charged against the allowance for credit losses when management believes that the principal is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate for expected credit losses relating to specifically identified loans based on an evaluation of the loans by management, as well as other expected credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current and forecasted economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon a monthly review of those credits. An appropriate level of qualitative and environmental allowance is determined after considering the following factors: changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, changes in collateral strength and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers’ ability to repay. Consideration is not limited to these factors although they represent the most commonly cited factors. Federal regulations require insured institutions to classify their own assets on a regular basis. The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans: Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. The regulations also contain a Special Mention category. Special Mention is defined as loans that do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention. The Company’s policy is to establish a specific allowance for credit losses for any assets where management has identified conditions or circumstances that indicate an asset is nonperforming. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the Company’s policy is to either establish specific allocations for credit losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss or charge-off such amount.
At December 31, 2022, on the basis of management’s review of the loan portfolio, the Company had 58 credits totaling $161.0 million on the classified loan list versus 81 credits totaling $234.5 million on December 31, 2021. These amounts represent outstanding balances, excluding deferred fees and costs. The decrease in classified loans during 2022 reflects the continued strengthening of the Company’s asset quality to historically strong levels and is reflective of the resilience of the Company's borrowers despite recent economic challenges presented by disruptions to the supply chain, the availability of labor, and elevated levels of inflation. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $115.7 million of assets classified as Special Mention, $45.3 million classified as Substandard, $0 classified as Doubtful and $0 classified as Loss as compared to $176.6 million, $57.9 million, $0 and $0, respectively, at December 31, 2021. The balances reported in "Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality" include deferred fees and costs.
49
Table of Contents
There were no material modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty performed during 2022 included in the classified loan amounts for December 31, 2022. Included in the classified loan amounts for December 31, 2021 were the following troubled debt restructured loans: 13 mortgage loans totaling $1.2 million with total allocations of $209,000, and 7 commercial loans totaling $3.9 million with total allocations of $1.6 million.
In accordance with Section 4013 of the CARES Act, loan deferrals granted to customers that resulted from the impact of COVID-19 and who were not past due at the time of deferral were not considered trouble debt restructurings as of December 31, 2021. This provision expired January 1, 2022 under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. At the time of the expiration of the provision, one retail borrower in the amount of $11,000 had a COVID-19 related deferral and was not considered to be a troubled debt restructuring.
Allowance estimates are developed by management taking into account actual loss experience, subject to a floor, adjusted for current economic conditions and a reasonably supportable forecast period. The Company has regular discussions regarding this methodology with regulatory authorities. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the Company's loan portfolio based upon loan segment. In accordance with accounting guidance, the allowance is based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amounts. For a more thorough discussion of the allowance for credit losses methodology see the "Critical Accounting Policies" section of this Item 2.
The allowance for credit losses increased 7.1%, or $4.8 million, from $67.8 million at December 31, 2021 to $72.6 million at December 31, 2022 due primarily to provision expense of $7.0 million recorded in the fourth quarter related to the previously described commercial loan placed on nonaccrual status. Pooled loan allocations decreased $492,000 from $58.7 million at December 31, 2021 to $58.2 million at December 31, 2022. The unallocated component of the allowance for credit losses was $554,000 at December 31, 2022, which increased from $450,000 reported at December 31, 2021. The unallocated component of the allowance for credit losses incorporates the Company’s judgmental determination of expected losses that may not be fully reflected in other allocations.
The Company has experienced growth in total loans, excluding PPP loans, over the last several years with organic growth exclusive of PPP loans of $447.2 million, or 10.5%, from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022. The concentration of this loan growth was in the commercial loan portfolio, which can result in overall asset quality being influenced by a small number of credits. Management has historically considered growth and portfolio composition when determining credit loss allocations. Management believes that it is prudent to continue to provide for credit losses in a manner consistent with its historical approach due to the loan growth described above and current economic conditions.
Watch list loans were $73.5 million lower at $161.0 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $234.5 million at December 31, 2021. Watch list loans represent 3.42% of total loans at December 31, 2022 compared to 5.47% at December 31, 2021. Watch list loans excluding PPP loans reached a historic low of 3.42% of total loans at December 31, 2022 compared to 5.50% at December 31, 2021. This reflects a more comparable ratio to prior periods, as PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and have not been allocated for within the allowance for credit losses calculation. The reduction in watch list loans resulted primarily from upgrades of $19.3 million and payoffs of $43.2 million. The Company's continued growth strategy promotes diversification among industries as well as continued focus on the enforcement of a disciplined credit culture and a conservative portion in loan work-out situations.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Company may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. Liquidity is monitored and closely managed by the ALCO Committee.
Management maintains a liquidity position that it believes will adequately provide funding for loan demand and deposit run-off that may occur in the normal course of business. The liquidity structure is expressly detailed in the Company’s Contingency Funding Plan, which is discussed below. The Company relies on a number of different sources in order to meet these potential liquidity demands. The primary sources are increases in deposit accounts and cash flows from loan payments and the securities portfolio. The cash flow from the securities portfolio is expected to provide approximately $115.6 million of potential contingent funding in 2023.
50
Table of Contents
During 2022, the Company's liquidity levels normalized as commercial and retail depositors utilized liquidity that had built up in their accounts during 2020 and 2021. Management expects future liquidity needs to be met by a combination of proceeds from paydowns, calls and maturities from the investment securities portfolio, deposit growth and borrowings.
The Company has approval of $3.292 billion in secondary funding sources available as of December 31, 2022, of which $307.0 million was utilized. The Company had $350.0 million of availability in federal funds lines with eleven correspondent banks, of which $22.0 million was drawn on as of December 31, 2022. The Company has board of directors approval to borrow up to $800.0 million at the FHLB, but given the Company’s current collateral structure and outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2022, the Company could have only borrowed up to $66.5 million under this authority. The Company has additional collateral that could be pledged to the FHLB of $486.2 million as of December 31, 2022 to generate additional liquidity. Further, the Company had available capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago of up to $758.3 million given its current collateral structure at the Federal Reserve Bank discount window program and the terms of that facility at December 31, 2022, with no balances outstanding at December 31, 2022. The Company also has established relationships in the brokered time deposit and brokered money market sectors, as well as the IntraFi Network CD Option One-Way Buy program, to access these funds when desired with settlement of funds in one to two weeks’ time. Additionally, the Bank has entered agreements with IntraFi Network relative to their Insured Cash Sweep One-Way Buy program. As of December 31, 2022, the total amount available to the Bank via this program was $100.0 million, of which $10.0 million was drawn. The Bank is also a member of the American Financial Exchange (AFX) where overnight fed funds purchased can be obtained from other banks on the exchange that have approved the Bank for an unsecured, overnight line. These funds are only available if the approving banks have an ‘offer’ out to sell that day. As of December 31, 2022, the total amount approved for the Bank via AFX banks was $319.0 million and none was outstanding at year end.
The Company had 91% of its securities in the available-for-sale portfolio at December 31, 2022, allowing the Company extensive flexibility to sell securities to meet funding demands. The remaining portion of investments securities were designated as held-to-maturity. Management believes the majority of the securities in investment portfolio are of high quality and marketable. Approximately 48% of this portfolio is comprised of U.S. government agency securities or mortgage-backed securities directly or indirectly backed by the U.S. government. At December 31, 2022, 93% of municipal securities owned by the Company were AAA or AA rated with a diversified geography of state issuer. In addition, the Company has historically sold the majority of its originated mortgage loans on the secondary market to reduce interest rate risk and to create an additional source of funding.
The Company has a formalized Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”). The Board and management recognize the importance of liquidity during times of normal operations and in times of stress. The CFP was developed to ensure that the multiple liquidity sources available to the Company are readily available. The CFP specifically considers liquidity at the Bank and the Company level. The CFP identifies the potential funding sources at the Bank level, which includes the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank, brokered deposits, one-way buy products via the IntraFi Network (CD Option and ICS) and Federal Funds. The CFP also addresses the Bank’s ability to liquidate its securities portfolio. The CFP funding sources at the holding company level include a holding company committed line of credit, as well as the ability to transfer securities from the investment subsidiary of the Bank to the Company. The Company’s committed line of credit has availability up to $30.0 million, of which $0 was drawn upon as of December 31, 2022.
Further, the CFP identifies CFP team members and expressly details their respective roles. Potential risk scenarios are identified and the plan includes multiple scenarios, including short-term and long-term funding crisis situations. Under the long-term funding crisis, two additional scenarios are identified: a moderate risk scenario and a highly stressed scenario. The CFP details the responsibilities and the actions to be taken by the CFP team under each scenario. Quarterly reports to management and the Board under the CFP include an early warning indicator matrix and pro forma cash flows for the various scenarios.
The following table discloses information on the maturity of the Company’s contractual long-term obligations as of December 31, 2022.
Payments Due by Period
(dollars in thousands) Total One year or less 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years
51
Table of Contents
During the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to make loans and open-ended revolving lines of credit. The Company follows the same credit policy (including requiring collateral, if deemed appropriate) to make such commitments as it follows for those loans that are recorded in its financial statements.
The Company’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance is represented by the contractual amount of the commitments. Management does not expect any significant losses as a result of these commitments. Off-balance sheet transactions are more fully discussed in "Note 17 – Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Risks and Contingencies".
The following table discloses information on the maturity of the Company’s commitments.
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
(dollars in thousands) Total Amount Committed One year or less Over one year
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the estimated fair value of the Company’s assets, liabilities and derivative financial instruments will decline as a result of changes in interest rates or financial market volatility, or that net income will be significantly reduced by interest rate changes.
Interest rate risk represents the Company’s primary market risk exposure. The Company does not have material exposure to foreign currency exchange risk and does not maintain a trading portfolio. The Corporate Risk Committee of the Board annually reviews and approves the ALCO policy and the Derivatives and Hedging policy used to manage interest rate risk. These policies set guidelines for balance sheet structure, which are designed to protect the Company from the impact that interest rate changes could have on net income, but it does not necessarily indicate the effect on future net interest income. Given the Company’s mix of interest bearing liabilities and interest bearing assets on December 31, 2022 and using changes in the interest rate environment over a one-year period, the net interest margin could be expected to decline in a falling interest rate environment and increase in a rising interest rate environment. Earnings can also be affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board.
During 2022 the FOMC increased the target federal funds rate a total of 425 basis points through seven rate moves. Commencing in March 2022, rate increases were implemented at every remaining FOMC meeting for the year. The combined effect of these actions increased the target federal funds rate to a range of 4.25% to 4.50%. The FOMC statement released for the meeting in December 2022 repeated their commitment to lowering inflation to 2% and to further tightening, while also noting modest economic growth, strong employment growth and an unemployment rate that remains low. The FOMC anticipates that ongoing increases to the target range will be appropriate to attain a stance of monetary policy that is sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2% over time. The updated economic projections released at the December meeting project the median federal funds rate rising to 5.1% in 2023 before easing to 4.1% in 2024. Additionally, the longer run median forecast for the federal funds rate was left unchanged at 2.50%. The combined result of the increase in the yield on earning assets offset by an increase in the cost of funding earning assets led to increase net interest margin from 3.07% for 2021 to 3.40% for 2022 given the Company’s asset sensitive balance sheet. The Company’s yield on earning assets increased 67 basis points during 2022 as assets repriced at higher rates primarily due to the FOMC rate increases noted above and a significantly higher yield curve as when compared to 2021. The commercial loan portfolio represents 89% of the total loan portfolio. Approximately 67% of the commercial loan portfolio are variable rate loans which are primarily indexed to Prime, 1 Month Term SOFR, 1 Month LIBOR and FHLB indices. The rate paid on deposit accounts and purchased funds increased 36 basis points for 2022 mainly due to increased rates paid on public fund transactional accounts as these accounts are typically more sensitive to interest rates. The realized increase in the rate paid on deposit accounts and purchased funds was lessened by an increase in the average balance of non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts for 2022 verses 2021, primarily in commercial deposit accounts.
52
Table of Contents
Future changes in the net interest margin will be dependent upon multiple factors including further actions by the FOMC during 2023 in response to inflation, economic conditions and geopolitical concerns, the results of any of the administration’s changes to economic policy and laws, competitive pressures in the various markets served, and changes in the structure of the balance sheet as a result of changes in customer demands for products and services. In general, we expect loans to reprice quicker than deposits in a rising and falling rate environment as quantified in the sensitivity to market rates table in Item 7A.
The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the growth of total assets, it believes that it is difficult to assess the overall impact. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of the inflationary changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”) coincides with changes in interest rates. The price of one or more of the components of the CPI may fluctuate considerably and thereby influence the overall CPI without having a corresponding effect on interest rates or upon the cost of those goods and services normally purchased by the Company. In years of high inflation and high interest rates, intermediate and long-term interest rates tend to increase, thereby adversely impacting the market values of investment securities, mortgage loans and other long-term fixed rate loans. In addition, higher short-term interest rates caused by inflation tend to increase the cost of funds. In other years, the reverse situation may occur.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The Company does not have a material exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk and does not maintain a trading portfolio.
The following table provides information regarding the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For loans, securities and liabilities with contractual maturities, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by contractual maturities, as well as the Company’s assumptions relative to the impact of interest-rate fluctuations on the prepayment of certain commercial, residential and home equity loans and mortgage-backed securities. Core deposits such as noninterest bearing deposits, interest bearing checking, savings and money market deposits that have no contractual maturity, are shown based on management’s judgment and historical experience that indicates some portion of the balances are retained over time. Weighted-average variable rates are based upon rates existing at the reporting date.
53
Table of Contents
Principal/Notional Amount Maturing in:
Rate sensitive assets:
Rate sensitive liabilities:
Cumulative rate sensitivity ratio
The Company utilizes computer modeling software to stress test the balance sheet under a wide variety of interest rate scenarios. The model quantifies the income impact of changes in customer preference for products, basis risk between the assets and the liabilities that support them and the risk inherent in different yield curves as well as other factors. The ALCO committee reviews these possible outcomes and makes loan, investment and deposit decisions that maintain reasonable balance sheet structure in light of potential interest rate movements. It is the objective of the Company to monitor and manage risk exposure to net interest income caused by changes in interest rates. It is the goal of the Company’s asset/liability function to provide optimum and stable net interest income. To accomplish this, management uses two asset liability tools: GAP/Interest Rate Sensitivity Reports and Net Interest Income Simulation Modeling, which are constructed, presented and monitored quarterly. Management believes that the Company’s liquidity and interest sensitivity position at December 31, 2022, remained adequate to meet the Company’s primary goal of achieving optimum interest margins while avoiding undue interest rate risk. The Company places a greater level of credence in net interest income simulation modeling. The GAP/Interest Rate Sensitivity Report is believed by the Company’s management to have two major shortfalls. The GAP/Interest Rate Sensitivity Report fails to precisely gauge how often an interest rate sensitive product reprices, nor is it able to measure the magnitude of potential future rate movements. Although management does not consider GAP ratios in planning, the information can be used in a general fashion to look at asset and liability mismatches. The Company’s cumulative repricing GAP ratio as of December 31, 2022 for the next 12 months using a scenario in which interest rates remained unchanged was a negative 6.49% of earning assets.
54
Table of Contents
Net interest income simulation modeling, or earnings-at-risk, measures the sensitivity of net interest income to various interest rate movements. The Company’s asset liability process monitors simulated net interest income under three separate interest rate scenarios; base, rising and falling. Estimated net interest income for each scenario is calculated over a twelve-month horizon. The immediate and parallel changes to the base case scenario used in the model are presented below. The interest rate scenarios are used for analytical purposes and do not necessarily represent management’s view of future market movements. Rather, these are intended to provide a measure of the degree of volatility interest rate movements may introduce into the earnings of the Company.
The base scenario is highly dependent on numerous assumptions embedded in the model. While the base sensitivity analysis incorporates management’s best estimate of interest rate and balance sheet dynamics under various market rate movements, the actual behavior and resulting earnings impact will likely differ from that projected. For certain assets, the base simulation model captures the expected prepayment behavior under changing interest rate environments. Assumptions and methodologies regarding the interest rate or balance behavior of indeterminate maturity core deposit products, such as savings, money market, NOW and demand deposits reflect management’s best estimate of expected future behavior.
Results for the base, falling 300 basis points, falling 200 basis points, falling 100 basis points, falling 50 basis points, falling 25 basis points, rising 25 basis points, rising 50 basis points, rising 100 basis points, rising 200 basis points, and rising 300 basis points interest rate scenarios are listed below based upon the Company’s rate sensitive assets and liabilities at December 31, 2022. The net interest income shown represents cumulative net interest income over a twelve-month time horizon.
For more information on the Company’s interest rate sensitivity see the Interest Rate Risk discussion in Item 7A. above.
55
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Lakeland Financial Corporation
Warsaw, Indiana
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lakeland Financial Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for credit losses effective January 1, 2021 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification No. 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASC 326”). The Company adopted the new credit loss standard using the modified retrospective method such that prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
56
Table of Contents