FRST US Equity☆

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses year-to-year comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Discussions of comparisons between 2021 and 2020 are not included in this Form10-K but can be found in “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Management’s discussion and analysis is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of Primis. This discussion and analysis should be read with the consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We follow accounting and reporting policies that conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and to general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. While we base estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed to be relevant, actual results could differ from those estimates.

We consider accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on our financial statements.

Allowance for credit losses

Accounting policies related to the allowance for credit losses on financial instruments including loans and off-balance-sheet credit exposures are considered to be critical as these policies involve considerable subjective judgment and estimation by management. In the case of loans, the allowance for credit losses is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected.

In the case of off-balance-sheet credit exposures, the allowance for credit losses is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326. The allowance is reported as a component of other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of other expenses.

The amount of each allowance account represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on these financial instruments considering available information, from internal and external sources, relevant to assessing exposure to credit loss over the contractual term of the instrument. Relevant available information includes historical credit loss experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. While historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses, adjustments to historical loss information may be made for differences in current portfolio-specific risk characteristics, environmental conditions or other relevant factors. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance accounts is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control, including the performance of our portfolios, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward classification of assets.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the sum of the estimated fair values of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed in a business combination. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of goodwill was $104.6 million and $101.9 million, respectively. Goodwill

37

Table of Contents

has an indefinite useful life and is evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on Step one of the previous accounting guidance’s two-step impairment test under ASC Topic 350. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The new standard eliminates the requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step two which involved calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated impairment. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step one of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before proceeding to the quantitative step of determining whether the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds it fair value.

For our assessment of goodwill as of September 30, 2022, our annual test date, we performed a step one quantitative assessment to determine if the fair value of all our Bank reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. We concluded that the fair value of all our Bank reporting unit exceeded their carrying amounts and no impairment was present based on management’s assessment. No impairment was indicated in 2022, 2021 or 2020. We determined that for Primis Mortgage, we did not need a quantitative assessment and performed a qualitative assessment. No impairment was indicated for 2022 for the Primis Mortgage segment.

We will continue to monitor the impact of current economic conditions and other events on the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. If the current economic conditions and other events were to deteriorate and our stock price falls below current levels, we will have to reevaluate the impact on our financial condition and potential impairment of goodwill.

OVERVIEW

Primis Financial Corp. (“Primis,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) is the bank holding company for Primis Bank (“Primis Bank” or the “Bank”), a Virginia state-chartered bank which commenced operations on April 14, 2005. Primis Bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. At December 31, 2022, Primis Bank had thirty-two full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland and also provides services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. Thirty full-service retail branches are in Virginia and two full-service retail branches are in Maryland. The Company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia and has administrative offices in Tysons Corner, Virginia and Glen Allen, Virginia and an operations center in Atlee, Virginia.

While Primis Bank offers a wide range of commercial banking services, it focuses on making loans secured primarily by commercial real estate and other types of secured and unsecured commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses in a number of industries, as well as loans to individuals for a variety of purposes. Primis Bank invests in real estate-related securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations and agency mortgage backed securities. Primis Bank’s principal sources of funds for loans and investing in securities are deposits and, to a lesser extent, borrowings. Primis Bank offers a broad range of deposit products, including checking (NOW), savings, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Primis Bank actively pursues business relationships by utilizing the business contacts of its senior management, other bank officers and its directors, thereby capitalizing on its knowledge of its local market areas.

​

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

38

Table of Contents

​

​

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Income

Net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $17.7 million, or $0.72 per basic and per diluted share, compared to $31.0 million, or $1.27 basic and $1.26 diluted earnings per share, for the year ended December 31, 2021. The 42.8% decrease in the net income during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily driven by higher noninterest expenses from an increase in employee compensation and benefits expense in the current year. The decrease in net income was also attributable to provision for credit losses in 2022 compared to a recovery of credit losses in 2021 primarily as a result of robust loan growth.

Net income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 was zero, or zero basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to net income from discontinued operation for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $0.23 million, or $0.01 basic and diluted earnings per share. The net income from discontinued operation for the year ended December 31, 2021 was related to the closing of the STM transaction in 2021, as discussed in Note 1 - Organization and significant accounting policies.

Net Interest Income

Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income on interest-earning assets such as loans and investments, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings.

Net interest income was $104.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $94.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Primis’ net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 3.39%, compared to 3.01% for the year ended December 31, 2021. Net interest margin was impacted heavily by the origination of PPP loans in 2021. Net PPP fee income recognized was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 versus $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Total income on interest-earning assets was $126.1 million and $113.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 4.09% and 3.62% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase was primarily driven by market conditions. The cost of average interest-bearing deposits increased 4 basis points to 0.64% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 0.60% cost on average interest-bearing deposits for the year ended December 31, 2021. Interest and fees on loans totaled $117.9 million and $107.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The

39

Table of Contents

accretion of the discount on loans acquired in the acquisitions contributed $0.9 million to net interest income during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $2.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in accretion was due to slowdown in the volume of acquired loan prepayments and payoffs. Average loans during the year ended December 31, 2022 were $2.61 billion compared to $2.34 billion during the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company’s loan growth over the past year and the improved asset mix has been the driver of positive movements in both margins and net interest income.

​

The following table details average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amount of interest earned/paid on such assets and liabilities, and the yield/rate for the periods indicated:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest

​ ​ Analysis For the Year Ended

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Interest ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Interest ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Interest ​ ​

​ Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate

​ ​ (Dollar amounts in thousands)

Assets ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Interest-earning assets: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Loans held for sale ​ $ 12,722 ​ $ 705 ​ 5.54 % $ - ​ $ - ​ - % $ - ​ $ - ​ - %

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Liabilities and stockholders' equity ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Interest-bearing liabilities: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Noninterest-bearing liabilities: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Other liabilities ​ ​ 23,825 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 22,358 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 24,693 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Interest rate spread ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 3.14 % ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2.97 % ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 3.10 %

Net interest margin ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 3.39 % ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 3.01 % ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 3.35 %

(2) Calculations include non-accruing loans in average loan amounts outstanding.

​

40

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes changes in net interest income attributable to changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities compared to changes in interest rates. The change in interest, due to both rate and volume, has been proportionately allocated between rate and volume.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Year Ended ​ Year Ended

​ ​ Increase (Decrease) ​ Increase (Decrease)

​ ​ Due to Change in: ​ Due to Change in:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Net ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Net

​ Volume Rate Change Volume Rate Change

​ ​ (in thousands)

Interest-earning assets: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Loans held for sale ​ $ 705 ​ $ — ​ $ 705 ​ $ — ​ $ — ​ $ —

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Interest-bearing liabilities: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​

​

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses is a current charge to earnings made in order to adjust the allowance for credit losses to an appropriate level for current expected losses in the loan portfolio based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of lending, historical loan experience and other known internal and external factors affecting loan collectability. Our allowance for credit losses is calculated by segmenting the loan portfolio by loan type and applying risk factors to each segment. The risk factors are determined by considering historical loss data, peer data, as well as applying management’s judgment.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $11.3 million, compared to a recovery for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $5.8 million, primarily as a result of robust loan growth. The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $19.5 million. We had charge-offs totaling $8.1 million during 2022, $2.5 million during 2021 and $2.3 million during 2020. There were recoveries totaling $2.2 million during 2022, $1.1 million during 2021 and $0.69 million during 2020.

The Financial Condition Section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides information on our loan portfolio, past due loans, nonperforming assets and the allowance for credit losses.

41

Table of Contents

Noninterest Income

The following tables present the major categories of noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ For the Year Ended

​ ​ December 31,

Account maintenance and deposit service fees ​ $ 5,745 ​ $ 7,309 $ (1,564)

Income from bank-owned life insurance ​ 1,994 ​ 1,687 ​ 307

Mortgage banking income ​ 5,054 ​ — ​ 5,054

Gain on debt extinguishment ​ ​ — ​ ​ 573 ​ ​ (573)

Gain on sale of other investments ​ ​ 4,144 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 4,144

Credit enhancement income ​ ​ 3,042 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 3,042

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​

​

Noninterest income increased 91.5% to $21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in noninterest income was primarily driven by a $5.1 million increase in mortgage banking income in the current year associated with the Primis Mortgage acquisition in the second quarter of 2022, a $4.1 million gain on sale of other investments, and $3.0 million of credit enhancement income related to third party loan originations. These increases were offset by a decrease of $1.6 million from the previous year period in income on account maintenance and deposit service fees primarily due to a reduction in income from new debit card contracts driven by lower fees and $0.6 million gain on debt extinguishment in 2021.

Noninterest Expense

The following tables present the major categories of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ For the Year Ended

​ ​ December 31,

Amortization of core deposit intangible ​ 1,325 ​ 1,364 ​ (39)

Telephone and communication expense ​ 1,433 ​ 1,790 ​ (357)

Net (gain) loss on other real estate owned ​ 72 ​ 87 ​ (15)

Net loss on bank premises and equipment ​ ​ 684 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 684

Credit enhancement costs ​ ​ 1,369 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 1,369

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​

Noninterest expenses were $92.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $71.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. The 29.2% increase in noninterest expenses was primarily attributable to a $12.3 million increase in employee compensation driven by increased head count at the Bank, Primis Mortgage and Panacea and higher benefits expense mainly related to branch closures and consolidations in 2022. The increase in noninterest expense during the year ended December 31, 2022 was also driven by a $2.2 million increase in data processing expense in 2022 driven by higher technology expenses in the current year. Other notable drivers of the increase in the current year include

42

Table of Contents

$1.3 million of higher marketing and advertising costs tied to the digital bank launch and V1BE adoption campaigns and $1.4 million of credit enhancement costs related to third party loan originations. Occupancy and furniture and equipment expenses increased $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to year ended December 31, 2021. Professional fees decreased $0.7 million in 2022 compared to 2021 due to increased consulting fees and legal expenses in 2021 largely related to the STM transaction and from increased recruiter fees for management and Life Premium hires.

​

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Balance Sheet Overview

Total assets were $3.57 billion as of December 31, 2022 and $3.40 billion as of December 31, 2021. Total cash and cash equivalents were $77.9 million as of December 31, 2022 and $530.2 million as of December 31, 2021. Investment securities decreased from $294.3 million as of December 31, 2021 to $249.8 million as of December 31, 2022. Total loans increased 26.0%, from $2.34 billion at December 31, 2021 to $2.95 billion at December 31, 2022. Excluding PPP loans, loans outstanding increased $681 million, or 30.1%, since December 31, 2021. Total deposits were $2.72 billion at December 31, 2022, compared to $2.76 billion at December 31, 2021 and total equity was $394.4 million and $411.9 million at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Stockholder’s equity balances decreased $27.0 million from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022 as a result of unrealized mark-to-market adjustments on the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio due to dramatic increases in market interest rates during 2022. The Company expects to hold these securities until maturity or recovery of the value and does not anticipate realizing any losses on the investments.

Loans

Total loans were $2.95 billion and $2.34 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. PPP loans totaled $4.6 million and $77.0 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Excluding PPP loans, loans outstanding increased $681.6 million, or 30.1%, since December 31, 2021.

​

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, majority of our loans were to customers located in Virginia and Maryland. We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on our operations.

​

43

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the composition of our loans, net of unearned income, at December 31 for the years indicated (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ Amount Percent Amount Percent

Loans secured by real estate: ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Paycheck protection program loans ​ ​ 4,564 ​ 0.2 % ​ 77,319 ​ 3.3 %

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​

The following table sets forth the contractual maturity ranges of our loan portfolio and the amount of those loans with fixed and floating interest rates in each maturity range as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ After 1 Year ​ After 5 Years ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Through 5 Years ​ Through 15 Years ​ After 15 Years ​ ​

​ ​ One Year ​ Fixed ​ Floating ​ Fixed ​ Floating ​ Fixed ​ Floating ​ ​

​ or Less Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Total

Loans secured by real estate: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​

Asset Quality; Past Due Loans and Nonperforming Assets

Asset quality remained good during 2022, despite an increase in classified balances, which was largely due to a downgrade of one secured relationship, recognizing anticipated loss in the fourth quarter of 2022. While the impact of COVID-19 subsided, the residual effect of COVID-19 and its variants, as well as new risks emerging from geopolitical conflict, inflation and the threat of recession continue to cause economic instability and uncertainty in evaluating the impact on our asset quality. We will generally place a loan on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days past due. Loans will also be placed on nonaccrual status in cases where we are uncertain whether the borrower can satisfy the contractual

44

Table of Contents

terms of the loan agreement. Cash payments received while a loan is categorized as nonaccrual will be recorded as a reduction of principal as long as doubt exists as to future collections.

We maintain appraisals on loans secured by real estate, particularly those categorized as nonperforming loans and potential problem loans. In instances where appraisals reflect reduced collateral values, we make an evaluation of the borrower’s overall financial condition to determine the need, if any, for impairment or write-down to their fair values. If foreclosure occurs, we record OREO at the lower of our recorded investment in the loan or fair value less our estimated costs to sell.

Our loan portfolio losses and delinquencies have been primarily limited by our underwriting standards and portfolio management practices. Whether losses and delinquencies in our portfolio will increase significantly depends upon the value of the real estate securing the loans and economic factors, such as the overall economy in our market area, rising interest rates, historically high inflation, global supply chain issues and potential recession.

Calculated reserves (prior to qualitative adjustments) increased at the end of December 31, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021, primarily due to a growth in unguaranteed loan balances, coupled with worsened economic forecasts, specifically in the House Price Index and Gross State Product factors. At December 31, 2022, the qualitative reserve decreased $2.5 million from the qualitative reserve applied at December 31, 2021. This decrease in qualitative reserves observed in 2022 is attributed to adjustments to the qualitative reserve framework’s thresholds and key risk indicators as part of the annual model refresh.

The following table presents a comparison of nonperforming assets as of December 31, for the years indicated (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ December 31, ​ December 31, ​

Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest ​ 3,361 ​ 283 ​

Other real estate owned ​ — ​ 1,163 ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Troubled debt restructurings ​ $ 3,599 ​ $ 3,401 ​

SBA guaranteed amounts included in nonperforming loans ​ $ 3,969 ​ $ 1,388 ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Allowance for credit losses to total loans ​ 1.17 % 1.24 %

Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans ​ 97.35 % 193.66 %

Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans ​ 88.93 % 190.09 %

Nonaccrual to total loans ​ 1.20 % 0.64 %

​

OREO at December 31, 2022 was zero, compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily driven by sale of properties and write-downs on OREO during 2022.

Nonaccrual loans were $35.5 million (excluding $0.6 million of loans fully covered by SBA guarantees) at December 31, 2022, compared to 15.0 million (excluding $1.1 million of loans fully covered by SBA guarantees) at December 31, 2021, an increase of 136.1%. These increases were driven largely by one relationship that was criticized in the second quarter of 2022 and was subsequently downgraded further in the third quarter of 2022 and placed on nonaccrual. The primary businesses in the relationship are multiple assisted living facilities. Management has a receiver appointed by the court ahead of an anticipated foreclosure and aggressively valued the properties for that sale. Provisions associated with this single borrower in the fourth quarter of 2022 were approximately $5.0 million. The ratio of nonperforming assets (excluding the SBA guaranteed loans) to total assets was 0.98% and 0.44% at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

At December 31, 2022, our total substandard loans was $41.0 million. Included in the total substandard loans were SBA guarantees of $0.8 million. Special mention loans totaled $32.3 million at December 31, 2022.

45

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2022, there were eighteen TDR loans in the amount of $3.6 million. There have been no defaults of TDRs modified during the past twelve months.

We identify potential problem loans based on loan portfolio credit quality. We define our potential problem loans as our substandard loans less total nonperforming loans noted above. At December 31, 2022, our potential problem loans totaled $2.2 million.

Allowance for Credit Losses

We are very focused on the asset quality of our loan portfolio, both before and after a loan is made. We have established underwriting standards that we believe are effective in maintaining high credit quality in our loan portfolio. We have experienced loan officers who take personal responsibility for the loans they originate, a skilled underwriting team and highly qualified credit officers that review each loan application carefully. We have designed a credit matrix, which requires dual authority to approve any credit over $2.5 million. We have two specialty Executive Credit Officers with extensive industry experience in medical practice and life premium credit financing with authority up to $4.0 million and joint authority with the Chief Credit Officer up to $10.0 million. All credit exposures over $10.0 million are reviewed and approved by Executive Loan Committee consisting of all named Credit Officers with concurrence from the Chief Executive Officer on any credit in excess of $25.0 million. Loans in excess of 60% of the Bank’s legal lending limit are approved by the full Board of Directors or two outside directors.

Our allowance for credit losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for credit losses. Management evaluates the allowance at least quarterly. In addition, on a quarterly basis our board of directors reviews our loan portfolio, evaluates credit quality, reviews the loan loss provision and the allowance for credit losses and makes changes as may be required. In evaluating the allowance, management and the board of directors consider the growth, composition and industry diversification of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience, current delinquency levels and all other known factors affecting loan collectability.

The allowance for credit losses is based on the CECL methodology and represents management’s estimate of an amount appropriate to provide for expected credit losses in the loan portfolio in the normal course of business. This estimate is based on historical credit loss information adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts applied to various loan types that compose our portfolio, including the effects of known factors such as the economic environment within our market area will have on net losses. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determination by the regulatory agencies as to the appropriate level of the allowance.

Loan Review

Our loan review program is administrated by the Chief Risk Officer and the Loan Review Manager who reports the results directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. In 2022, the Loan Review Program performed reviews on loan balances totaling $894.8 million or 56.0% of the commercial loan portfolio outstanding as of December 31, 2021. Internal loan review performed reviews on loans totaling 17.9%, and an independent third party consultant performed reviews on 38.1% of this portfolio and $94.9 million in unfunded commitments.

​

Primis Bank’s 2023 Loan Review Program was approved by the Audit Committee on January 26, 2023. The Program’s annual goal is to have an overall review penetration rate of at least 50% of the Commercial Loan Portfolio outstanding as of December 31, 2022. The Program incorporates a robust risk-based approach review of the Bank’s Loan Portfolio that will include process, targeted portfolio and full-scope loan reviews. The Program’s review goal remains well within regulatory standards and industry best practices. In accordance with Credit Policy, the Bank’s Loan Review Program will utilize and incorporate both internal and 3rd party external resources in a complementary fashion to achieve the objectives of the Program.

46

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the allowance for credit losses allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ As of December 31,

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Percent of ​ ​ ​ ​ Percent of ​

​ ​ Allowance ​ Loans by ​ Allowance ​ Loans by ​

​ ​ for Credit ​ Category to ​ for Loan ​ Category to ​

​ Losses Total Loans Losses Total Loans

Commercial real estate - owner occupied ​ $ 5,558 ​ 15.6 % $ 4,562 ​ 16.6 %

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied ​ ​ 7,147 ​ 19.7 % ​ 9,028 ​ 25.1 %

Secured by farmland ​ ​ 25 ​ 0.2 % ​ 56 ​ 0.4 %

Construction and land development ​ ​ 1,373 ​ 5.0 % ​ 998 ​ 5.2 %

Home equity lines of credit ​ ​ 329 ​ 2.2 % ​ 437 ​ 3.2 %

Paycheck Protection Program loans ​ ​ — ​ 0.2 % ​ — ​ 3.3 %

Allowance for acquired loans ​ ​ — ​ ​ ​ ​ — ​ ​ ​

Total allocated allowance ​ ​ 34,544 ​ ​ ​ ​ 29,105 ​ ​ ​

Unallocated allowance ​ ​ — ​ ​ ​ — ​ ​

​

The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ For the Years Ended December 31,

Balance, beginning of period ​ $ 29,105 ​ $ 36,345 ​

Provision charged to operations: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Adoption of ASC 326 ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​

Total provisions (recovery) ​ ​ 11,271 ​ ​ (5,801) ​

Recoveries credited to allowance: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied ​ ​ 502 ​ ​ — ​

Residential 1-4 family ​ 59 ​ 11 ​

Home equity lines of credit ​ 3 ​ 2 ​

Consumer loans ​ ​ 35 ​ ​ 39 ​

Loans charged off: ​ ​ ​

Commercial real estate - owner occupied ​ ​ 14 ​ ​ 176 ​

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied ​ ​ 5,027 ​ ​ — ​

Residential 1-4 family ​ — ​ 469 ​

Home equity lines of credit ​ 14 ​ — ​

Total loans charged-off ​ 8,069 ​ 2,496 ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Net charge-offs to average loans, net of unearned income ​ 0.22 % 0.07 %

​

We believe that the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2022 is sufficient to absorb probable incurred credit losses in our loan portfolio based on our assessment of all known factors affecting the collectability of our loan portfolio.

47

Table of Contents

Our assessment involves uncertainty and judgment; therefore, the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses cannot be determined with precision and may be subject to change in future periods. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic examination, may require additional charges to the provision for credit losses in future periods if the results of their reviews warrant additions to the allowance for credit losses.

Net charge-offs were $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, up from $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Increase in net charge-offs were primarily related to an impaired relationship in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Investment Securities

Our investment securities portfolio provides us with required liquidity and investment securities to pledge as collateral to secure public deposits, certain other deposits, advances from the FHLB of Atlanta, and repurchase agreements.

Our investment securities portfolio is managed by our Treasurer, who has significant experience in this area, with the concurrence of our Asset/Liability Committee. In addition to our Treasurer (who is the chairman of the Asset/Liability Committee) and our Controller, this committee is comprised of outside directors and other senior officers of the Bank, including but not limited to our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Investment management is performed in accordance with our investment policy, which is approved annually by the Board of Directors. Our investment policy authorizes us to invest in:

● Collateralized mortgage obligations

● U.S. Treasury securities

● SBA guaranteed loan pools

● Agency securities

● Obligations of states and political subdivisions

● Corporate debt securities, with rated securities at investment grade

● Collateralized Loan Obligations (“CLOs”)

​

MBS are securities that have been developed by pooling a number of real estate mortgages and which are principally issued by agency/government-sponsored entities (“GSEs”) such as the GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC. These securities are deemed to have high credit ratings, and minimum regular monthly cash flows of principal and interest are guaranteed by the issuing agencies.

Collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) are bonds that are backed by pools of mortgages. The pools can be GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC pools or they can be private-label pools. The CMOs are designed so that the mortgage collateral will generate a cash flow sufficient to provide for the timely repayment of the bonds. The mortgage collateral pool can be structured to accommodate various desired bond repayment schedules, provided that the collateral cash flow is adequate to meet scheduled bond payments. This is accomplished by dividing the bonds into classes to which payments on the underlying mortgage pools are allocated. The bond’s cash flow, for example, can be dedicated to one class of bondholders at a time, thereby increasing call protection to bondholders. In private-label CMOs, losses on underlying mortgages are directed to the most junior of all classes and then to the classes above in order of increasing seniority, which means that the senior classes have enough credit protection to be given the highest credit rating by the rating agencies.

Obligations of states and political subdivisions (municipal securities) are purchased with consideration of the current tax position of the Bank. Both taxable and tax-exempt municipal bonds may be purchased, but only after careful assessment of the market risk of the security. Appropriate credit evaluation must be performed prior to purchasing municipal bonds.

48

Table of Contents

Primis’ corporate bonds consist of senior and/or subordinated notes issued by banks. Bank subordinated debt, if rated, must be of investment grade and non-rated bonds are permissible if the credit-worthiness of the issuer has been properly analyzed.

CLOs are actively managed securitization vehicles formed for the purpose of acquiring and managing a diversified portfolio of senior secured corporate bank loans, otherwise known as “broadly syndicated loans”. The loan portfolio is transferred to bankruptcy-remote special-purpose vehicle, which finances the acquisition through the issuance of various classes of debt and equity securities with varying levels of senior claim on the underlying loan portfolio. CLOs must be rated AA or better at the time of purchase.

We classify our investment securities as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Debt investment securities that Primis has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are those debt securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs or other similar factors. Investment securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses net of deferred taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Investment securities totaling $13.5 million were in the held-to-maturity portfolio at December 31, 2022, compared to $22.9 million at December 31, 2021. Investment securities totaling $236.3 million were in the available-for-sale portfolio at December 31, 2022, compared to $271.3 million at December 31, 2021. During 2022 and 2021, $37.4 million and $160.5 million, respectively, of available-for-sale investment securities were purchased. No held-to-maturity investments were purchased in 2022 or 2021. No investment securities were sold during 2022 or 2021.

Investment securities in our portfolio as of December 31, 2022 were as follows:

● agency commercial mortgage-backed securities in the amount of $113.4 million;

● corporate bonds in the amount of $14.8 million;

● collateralized loan obligations of $4.9 million;

● callable agency securities in the amount of $14.6 million;

● commercial mortgage-backed securities in the amount of $37.4 million;

● SBA loan pool securities in the amount of $5.98 million; and

For additional information regarding investment securities refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 3-Investment Securities.”

49

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a summary of the investment securities portfolio as of the dates indicated. Available-for-sale investment securities are reported at fair value, and held-to-maturity investment securities are reported at amortized cost (in thousands).

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ December 31, ​ December 31,

Available-for-sale investment securities: ​ ​

Obligations of states and political subdivisions ​ 29,178 ​ 31,231

Collateralized loan obligations ​ 4,876 ​ 5,010

Government-sponsored agency securities ​ 14,616 ​ 17,488

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities ​ 37,417 ​ 52,667

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Held-to-maturity investment securities: ​ ​

Obligations of states and political subdivisions ​ 2,721 ​ 3,805

Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations ​ 277 ​ 519

Government-sponsored agency securities ​ — ​ 5,000

​

​

50

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the amortized cost, fair value, and weighted average yield of our investment securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2022. Weighted average yield is calculated as the tax-equivalent yield on a pro rata basis for each security based on its relative amortized cost. Yields on tax-exempt securities have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties (in thousands).

​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Weighted

​ ​ Amortized ​ ​ ​ ​ Average

​ Cost Fair Value Yield

Obligations of states and political subdivisions ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ $ 3,152 ​ $ 3,038 2.98 %

Collateralized loan obligations ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Corporate securities ​ ​ ​ ​

Due after five years through ten years ​ ​ 14,000 ​ ​ 13,100 ​ 4.50 %

Government-sponsored agency securities ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ 6,865 ​ 6,062 1.31 %

Due after five years through ten years ​ ​ 4,866 ​ ​ 3,743 ​ 1.80 %

Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ 4,138 ​ 3,966 2.49 %

Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ ​ 435 ​ ​ 418 ​ 0.03 %

Due after five years through ten years ​ 3,626 ​ 3,481 2.76 %

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ 7,045 ​ 6,723 2.46 %

SBA pool securities ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ ​ 618 ​ ​ 580 ​ 2.68 %

Due after five years through ten years ​ 1,422 ​ 1,426 5.38 %

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Weighted

​ ​ Amortized ​ ​ ​ ​ Average

​ Cost Fair Value Yield

Obligations of states and political subdivisions ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ $ 867 ​ $ 865 2.62 %

Due after five years through ten years ​ 1,519 ​ 1,477 2.63 %

Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities ​ ​ ​ ​

Due after one year through five years ​ ​ 639 ​ ​ 611 ​ 2.12 %

Due after five years through ten years ​ 686 ​ 649 2.83 %

Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations ​ ​ ​

​

51

Table of Contents

Deposits and Other Borrowings

The market for deposits is competitive. We offer a line of traditional deposit products that currently include noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing checking (or NOW accounts), commercial checking, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. We compete for deposits through our banking branches with competitive pricing, advertising and online banking. We use deposits as a principal source of funding for our lending, purchasing of investment securities and for other business purposes.

Total deposits decreased 1.5% to $2.72 billion at December 31, 2022 from $2.76 billion at December 31, 2021. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased from $530.3 million as of December 31, 2021 to $582.6 million as of December 31, 2022. Time deposits increased from $360.6 million to $465.1 million and savings accounts increased from $222.9 million to $245.7 million over the same period.

The following table sets forth the average balance and average rate paid on each of the deposit categories for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ Average Average Average Average

​ ​ Balance ​ Rate ​ Balance ​ Rate ​

​ ​ (in thousands)

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits ​ $ 614,285 ​ $ 522,683 ​

Interest-bearing deposits: ​ ​ ​

​

The variety of deposit accounts we offer allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and in responding to the threat of disintermediation (the flow of funds away from depository institutions such as banking institutions into direct investment vehicles such as government and corporate securities). Our ability to attract and maintain deposits, and the effect of such retention on our cost of funds, has been, and will continue to be, significantly affected by the general economy and market rates of interest.

The following table sets forth the maturities of certificates of deposit of $100 thousand and over as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

3 Months ​ Months ​ Months ​ Months ​ Total

​

We use borrowed funds to support our liquidity needs and to temporarily satisfy our funding needs from increased loan demand and for other shorter term purposes. We are a member of the FHLB and are authorized to obtain advances from the FHLB from time to time as needed. The FHLB has a credit program for members with different maturities and interest rates, which may be fixed or variable. We are required to collateralize our borrowings from the FHLB with our FHLB stock and other collateral acceptable to the FHLB. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, total FHLB borrowings were $325.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2022, we had $437.7 million of unused and available FHLB lines of credit.

Other borrowings can consist of FHLB convertible advances, FHLB overnight advances, other FHLB advances maturing within one year, federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repo”) that mature within one year, which are secured transactions with customers. The balance in repo accounts at December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $6.4 million and $10.0 million, respectively.

52

Table of Contents

Other borrowings consist of the following (in thousands):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ December 31,

FHLB convertible advances maturing 3/1/2030 ​ $ — ​ $ 100,000 ​

Short-term FHLB advances maturing 6/27/2019 ​ ​ 50,000 ​ ​ — ​

Short-term FHLB advances maturing 6/12/2019 ​ ​ 50,000 ​ ​ — ​

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ​ 6,445 ​ 9,962 ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Weighted average interest rate at year end ​ 4.19 % 0.36 %

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

For the periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2021: ​ ​ ​

Average interest rate during the year ​ 2.72 % 0.39 %

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Maximum month-end outstanding balance ​ $ 331,445 ​ $ 116,445 ​

​

Junior Subordinated Debt and Senior Subordinated Notes

In 2017, the Company assumed $10.3 million of trust preferred securities that were issued on September 17, 2003 and placed through a trust in a pooled underwriting totaling approximately $650.0 million. The trust issuer invested the total proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities in Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, there was $10.3 million outstanding, net of approximately $0.6 million of debt issuance costs. These securities pay cumulative cash distributions quarterly at a variable rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.95%. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the interest rate was 7.69% and 3.17%, respectively. The dividends paid to holders of these securities, which are recorded as interest expense, are deductible for income tax purposes.

​

The trust preferred securities may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. At December 31, 2022, all of the trust preferred securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.

On January 20, 2017, Primis completed the sale of $27.0 million of its fixed-to-floating rate senior Subordinated Notes due 2027. These notes initially bore interest at 5.875% per annum until January 31, 2022; interest is currently payable at an annual floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus a spread of 3.95% until maturity or early redemption. At December 31, 2022, 80% of these notes qualified as Tier 2 capital.

In 2017, the Company assumed a Senior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated April 22, 2015, entered into with certain institutional accredited investors, pursuant to which $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.50% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2025 was sold to the investors. On February 1, 2021, the Company redeemed all of these notes.

On August 25, 2020, Primis completed the sale of $60.0 million of its fixed-to-floating rate Subordinated Notes due 2030. These notes will bear interest at an initial rate of 5.40% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing on March 1, 2021. From and including September 1, 2025 to, but excluding the maturity date or the date of earlier redemption (the “floating rate period”), the interest rate will reset quarterly to an annual interest rate equal to the Benchmark rate, which is expected to be three-month Term SOFR, plus 531 basis points, for each quarterly interest period during the floating rate period, payable quarterly in arrears on March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1 of each year, commencing on December 1, 2025. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the Benchmark rate is less than zero, the Benchmark rate shall be deemed to be zero. At December 31, 2022, all of these notes qualified as Tier 2 capital.

53

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk

We are engaged primarily in the business of investing funds obtained from deposits and borrowings into interest-earning loans and investments. Consequently, our earnings depend to a significant extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income on loans and other investments and the interest expense on deposits and borrowings. To the extent that our interest-bearing liabilities do not reprice or mature at the same time as our interest-earning assets, we are subject to interest rate risk and corresponding fluctuations in net interest income. Our Asset-Liability Committee (“ALCO”) meets regularly and is responsible for reviewing our interest rate sensitivity position and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to interest rate risk. The policies established by the ALCO are reviewed and approved by our Board of Directors. We have employed asset/liability management policies that seek to manage our net interest income, without having to incur unacceptable levels of credit or investment risk.

We use simulation modeling to manage our interest rate risk, and review quarterly interest sensitivity. This approach uses a model which generates estimates of the change in our economic value of equity (“EVE”) over a range of interest rate scenarios. EVE is the present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts using assumptions including estimated loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates and deposit decay rates.

The following tables are based on an analysis of our interest rate risk as measured by the estimated change in EVE resulting from instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve (plus 400 basis points or minus 100 basis points, measured in 100 basis point increments) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. All changes are within our Asset/Liability Risk Management Policy guidelines.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Sensitivity of Economic Value of Equity

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Economic Value of

​ ​ Economic Value of Equity ​ Equity as a % of

Change in Interest Rates ​ ​ ​ ​ $ Change ​ % Change ​ Total ​ Equity

in Basis Points (Rate Shock) Amount From Base From Base Assets Book Value

​ ​ (dollar amounts in thousands)

​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Sensitivity of Economic Value of Equity

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Economic Value of

​ ​ Economic Value of Equity ​ Equity as a % of

Change in Interest Rates ​ ​ ​ ​ $ Change ​ % Change ​ Total ​ Equity

in Basis Points (Rate Shock) Amount From Base From Base Assets Book Value

​ ​ (dollar amounts in thousands)

​

​

54

Table of Contents

Our interest rate sensitivity is also monitored by management through the use of a model that generates estimates of the change in the net interest income (“NII”) over a range of interest rate scenarios. NII depends upon the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them. In this regard, the model assumes that the composition of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at December 31, 2022 and 2021 remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. All changes are within our ALM Policy guidelines at December 31, 2022 and 2021.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Sensitivity of Net Interest Income

​ ​ Adjusted Net Interest Income

Change in Interest Rates ​ ​ ​ ​ $ Change

in Basis Points (Rate Shock) Amount From Base

​ ​ (dollar amounts in thousands)

​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Sensitivity of Net Interest Income

​ ​ Adjusted Net Interest Income

Change in Interest Rates ​ ​ ​ ​ $ Change

in Basis Points (Rate Shock) Amount From Base

​ ​ (dollar amounts in thousands)

​

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes in EVE and NII sensitivity requires the making of certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, although the EVE tables and NII tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to, and do not, provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net worth and NII. Sensitivity of EVE and NII are modeled using different assumptions and approaches.

Liquidity and Funds Management

The objective of our liquidity management is to ensure the ability to meet our financial obligations. These obligations include the payment of deposits on demand or at maturity, the repayment of borrowings at maturity and the ability to fund commitments and other new business opportunities. We obtain funding from a variety of sources, including customer deposit accounts, customer certificates of deposit and payments on our loans and investments. If our level of core deposits are not sufficient to fully fund our lending activities, we have access to funding from additional sources, including borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, institutional certificates of deposit and the sale of available-for-sale investment securities. In addition, we maintain federal funds lines of credit with two correspondent banks and utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase and reverse repurchase agreement borrowings from approved securities dealers. For additional information about borrowings and anticipated principal repayments refer to the discussion about Contractual Obligations below and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 10 – Securities Sold Under Agreements To Repurchase And Other Short-Term Borrowings and Note 11 – Junior Subordinated Debt and Senior Subordinated Notes.”

55

Table of Contents

We prepare a cash flow forecast on a 30, 60 and 90 day basis along with a one and a two year basis. The projections incorporate expected cash flows on loans, investment securities, and deposits based on data used to prepare our interest rate risk analyses.

At December 31, 2022, we had $540.6 million of unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds. The amount of certificate of deposit accounts maturing in less than one year was $338.4 million as of December 31, 2022. Management anticipates that funding requirements for these commitments can be met from the normal sources of funds.

As of December 31, 2022, Primis was not aware of any known trends, events or uncertainties that have or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our liquidity. As of December 31, 2022, Primis has no material commitments or long-term debt for capital expenditures.

Capital Resources

Capital management consists of providing equity to support both current and future operations. Primis Financial Corp. and its subsidiary bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action (“PCA”), we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under regulatory framework for PCA.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Primis to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2022, that Primis meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

See “Item 1. Business, Supervision and Regulation—Capital Requirements” for more information.

The following table provides a comparison of the leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios of Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank at the periods indicated to the minimum and well-capitalized required regulatory standards:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Minimum ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Required for ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ Capital ​ To Be ​ Actual Ratio at

​ ​ Adequacy ​ Categorized as ​ December 31, ​ December 31, ​

Primis Financial Corp. ​

Common equity tier 1 capital ratio 4.50 % n/a 10.30 % 13.09 %

Total risk-based capital ratio 8.00 % n/a 14.57 % 18.52 %

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Primis Bank ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank are required to meet minimum capital requirements set forth by regulatory authorities. Bank regulatory agencies have approved regulatory capital guidelines (“Basel III”) aimed at strengthening existing capital requirements for banking organizations. The Basel III Capital Rules require Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%,

56

Table of Contents

plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer”, (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer, (iii) a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements may result in certain actions by regulators which could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank remain well-capitalized under Basel III capital requirements. Primis Bank had a capital conservation buffer of 5.84% at December 31, 2022, which exceeded the 2.50% minimum requirement below which the regulators may impose limits on distributions.

Primis Bank’s capital position is consistent with being well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The financial statements and related financial data presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K concerning Primis Financial Corp. have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, changes in interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than do the effects of changes in the general rate of inflation and changes in prices. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. Many factors impact interest rates, including the FRB, inflation, recession, changes in unemployment, the money supply, and international disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets. Like most financial institutions, changes in interest rates can impact our net interest income which is the difference between interest earned from interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, as well as the valuation of our assets and liabilities.

Our interest rate risk management is the responsibility of the Bank’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (the “Asset/Liability Committee”). The Asset/Liability Committee has established policies and limits for management to monitor, measure and coordinate our sources, uses and pricing of funds. The Asset/Liability Committee makes reports to the board of directors on a quarterly basis.

Seasonality and Cycles

We do not consider our commercial banking business to be seasonal.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Primis is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees of credit card accounts. These instruments involve elements of credit and funding risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by Primis to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. We had letters of credit outstanding totaling $10.7 million and $13.1 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is based on the contractual amount of these instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. Unless noted otherwise, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments are made predominately for adjustable rate loans, and generally have fixed

57

Table of Contents

expiration dates of up to three months or other termination clauses and usually require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds totaling $540.6 million and $411.0 million, respectively. Virtually all of our unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds are variable rate.

Allowance For Credit Losses - Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures

The allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, representing expected credit losses over the contractual period for which we are exposed to credit risk resulting from a contractual obligation to extend credit. No allowance is recognized if we have the unconditional right to cancel the obligation. Off-balance-sheet credit exposures primarily consist of amounts available under outstanding lines of credit and letters of credit detailed above. For the period of exposure, the estimate of expected credit losses considers both the likelihood that funding will occur and the amount expected to be funded over the estimated remaining life of the commitment or other off-balance-sheet exposure. The likelihood and expected amount of funding are based on historical utilization rates. The amount of the allowance represents management's best estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over the contractual life of the commitment. Estimating credit losses on amounts expected to be funded uses the same methodology as described for loans in Note 4 - Loans and Allowance, as if such commitments were funded.

​

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

This information is incorporated herein by reference from “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

​

​

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

​

58

Table of Contents

​

​

​

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​

​

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors

Primis Financial Corp.

​

​

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We did not audit the financial statements of Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC (“STM”) for the year ended December 31, 2020. STM, an affiliate of the Company as of December 31, 2020, was accounted for as an equity method investment. The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 reported income from discontinued operations $8.4 million, or approximately 36% of the Company’s net income. STM’s financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report was furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for STM for the year ended December 31, 2020, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

59

Table of Contents

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the Audit Committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company’s allowance for credit losses (ACL) on loans held for investment was $34.5 million as of December 31, 2022. The determination of the ACL has been identified by the Company as a critical accounting policy. The ACL is measured on a collective basis when similar loan risk characteristics exist, and by individually evaluating loans that do not share similar risk characteristics. As further described in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company measures the ACL using a combination of probability of default (PD), probability of attrition (PA), loss given default (LGD), and exposure at default (EAD), calculated based on the application of historical loss experience, and adjusted for a reasonable and supportable forecast. Estimates are qualitatively adjusted for risk factors that are not considered within the quantitative modeling process. Estimating an appropriate allowance requires management to make numerous assumptions about losses that will occur over the remaining contractual life of loans recorded as of the balance sheet date. The most significant judgments in the ACL as of December 31, 2022 included the determination of a reasonable and supportable forecast and the impact of qualitative factors.

We identified the Company’s estimate of the ACL as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for that determination were the degree of subjectivity and judgment required to audit management’s identification of reasonable and supportable forecasts and the identification and measurement of the qualitative factors.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

o Completeness and accuracy of inputs into the model used to determine the ACL;

o The determination of a reasonable and supportable forecast, and;

o The determination of qualitative factors.

​

60

Table of Contents

Goodwill Impairment Assessment

The Company has recorded goodwill of $104.6 million as of December 31, 2022. The determination of the annual goodwill impairment assessment has been identified by the Company as a critical accounting policy. As further described in Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level, occurring as of September 30th every year, or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant. The Company engaged a third-party valuation specialist in performing its quantitative impairment analysis, which included a combination of valuation approaches to determine the fair value of the Bank reporting unit. These valuation approaches required certain assumptions such as the discount rate, economic conditions impacting interest and growth rates, the control premium, and a relative weighting given to the fair value derived by each of the valuation approaches used.

We identified the Company’s quantitative goodwill impairment assessment for the Bank reporting unit, as of September 30, as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for that determination were the degree of subjectivity and judgment required to audit management’s goodwill impairment assessment. Specifically, evaluating the valuation approaches selected and key assumptions used by management in performing its assessment, such as the selection of comparable publicly-traded companies and control premium utilized in the valuation approaches.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

/s/ FORVIS, LLP (Formerly, Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP)

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

Greenville, North Carolina

March 15, 2023

​

​

​

​

61

Table of Contents

​

​

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors

Primis Financial Corp.

​

​

Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Primis Financial Corp.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and our report dated March 15, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, the scope of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, has excluded Primis Mortgage Company (“Primis Mortgage,” formerly named SeaTrust Mortgage Company) acquired on May 31, 2022. We have also excluded Primis Mortgage from the scope of our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Primis Mortgage represented one percent of consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2022 and four percent of consolidated revenues for the year then ended.

Definitions and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of reliable financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting

62

Table of Contents

principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ FORVIS, LLP (Formerly, Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP)

Greenville, North Carolina

March 15, 2023

​

​

63

Table of Contents

​

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​

​

To the Board of Directors

Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC

Virginia Beach, Virginia

​

Opinion on the Financial Statements

​

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related statements of operations, changes in membersʹ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

​

Basis for Opinion

​

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

​

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

​

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

​

Critical Audit Matters

​

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgements. We determined that there are no critical audit matters.

​

​

/s/ Richey, May & Co., LLP.

​

We have served as Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC’s auditor since 2014.

​

Englewood, Colorado

March 12, 2021

64

Table of Contents

PRIMIS FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ December 31, December 31,

ASSETS ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Cash and cash equivalents: ​ ​

Cash and due from financial institutions ​ $ 6,868 $ 8,380

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions ​ 70,991 ​ 521,787

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Securities available-for-sale, at fair value ​ 236,315 ​ 271,332

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Loans held for sale, at fair value ​ ​ 27,626 ​ ​ —

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Less: allowance for credit losses ​ (34,544) ​ (29,105)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Assets held for sale ​ ​ 3,115 ​ ​ —

Operating lease right-of-use assets ​ ​ 5,335 ​ ​ 5,866

Other real estate owned ​ — ​ 1,163

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY ​ ​

Interest-bearing deposits: ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - short term ​ 6,445 ​ 9,962

Junior subordinated debt - long term ​ 9,781 ​ 9,731

Senior subordinated notes - long term ​ 85,531 ​ 85,297

Operating lease liabilities ​ ​ 5,767 ​ ​ 6,498

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 15) ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Stockholders' equity: ​ ​

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ​ (25,850) ​ 1,112

​

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

​

​

65

Table of Contents

PRIMIS FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ For the Years Ended December 31,

Interest and dividend income: ​ ​ ​