Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

CYN US Equity

Cyngn Inc.Information Technology · Services-Computer Programming Services · CIK 1874097 · FY ends Dec 31
$1.09
+0.02 (+1.87%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack
Returns are measured from 2021-12-08 — the price history has a 2228-day gap before it.

CYN · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

← all CYN documents
filed 2025-03-06 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 6531,252 of 3,637330k characters rendered

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Technology, Business,

and Industry

Autonomous driving is an emerging technology

and involves significant risks and uncertainties.

We develop and deploy a suite

of autonomous driving software products that are compatible with existing sensors and hardware to enable autonomous driving on industrial

vehicle platforms manufactured and designed by OEMs and other third-party industrial vehicle suppliers. Our autonomous driving technology

is highly dependent on internally developed software, as well as on partnerships with third parties such as industrial OEMs and other

suppliers.

We partner with OEMs that

are seeking to manufacture purpose-built industrial vehicles capable of incorporating our autonomous driving technology. The collaborative

partnerships are established through mutually beneficial, non-binding memorandums of understanding or partnership agreements for

the purpose of joint go-to-market efforts. In addition to OEMs, we depend on other third parties to produce hardware components,

and, in some cases adjacent software solutions, that support our core suite of autonomous driving software products and tools. The timely

development and performance of our autonomous driving programs is dependent on the materials, cooperation, and quality delivered by these

partners. Further, we do not control the initial design of the industrial vehicles we work with and therefore have limited influence

over the production and design of systems for braking, gear shifting, and steering. There can be no assurance that these systems and supporting

technologies can be developed and validated at the high reliability standard required for deployment of autonomous industrial vehicles

using our technology in a cost-effective and timely manner. Our dependence on these relationships exposes us to the risk that components

manufactured by OEMs or other suppliers could contain defects that would cause our autonomous driving technology not to operate as intended.

Our autonomous driving technology

is available for production release and is currently being licensed to customers. We plan to continue our scaled commercialization throughout

2025 and beyond. Although we believe that our algorithms, data analysis and processing, and artificial intelligence technology are promising,

we cannot assure you that our technology will achieve the necessary reliability for scaled commercialization of autonomous industrial

vehicles. For example, we are still improving our technology in terms of handling edge cases, unique environments, and discrete objects.

There can be no assurance that our data analytics and artificial intelligence could predict every single potential issue that may arise

during the operation of an autonomous industrial vehicle utilizing our autonomous vehicle technology. Furthermore, the release and adoption

of EAS and our other technologies and products may not be successful and may take longer than anticipated. If the development of EAS and

our other technologies and products is delayed or customers do not adopt and buy our solutions to the extent we anticipate, our business

and operating results will be adversely impacted.

15

We have a limited operating history in a

new market and face significant challenges as our industry is rapidly evolving.

You should consider our business

and prospects in light of the risks and challenges we face as a new entrant into a novel industry, including, among other things, with

respect to our ability to:

● navigate an evolving and complex regulatory environment;

● improve and enhance our software and autonomous technology;

● establish and expand our customer base;

● properly price our products and services;

● improve and maintain our operational efficiency;

● attract, retain, and motivate talented employees;

● build a well-recognized and respected brand.

If we fail to address any

or all of these risks and challenges, our business may be materially and adversely affected. There are also a number of additional challenges

to the execution and adoption of autonomous vehicle technology in industrial markets, many of which are not within our control, including

market acceptance of autonomous driving, governmental licensing requirements, concerns regarding data security and privacy, actual and

threatened litigation (whether or not a judgment is rendered against us), and the general perception that an autonomous vehicle is not

safe because there is no human driver. There can be no assurance that the market will accept our technology, in which case our future

business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The autonomous industrial

vehicle industry is in its early stages and is rapidly evolving. Our autonomous driving technology has not yet been commercialized at

scale. We cannot assure you that we will be able to adjust to changing market or regulatory conditions quickly or cost-effectively. If

we fail to do so, our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Our business model has yet to be tested

and any failure to commercialize our strategic plans would have an adverse effect on our operating results and business.

Investors should be aware

of the difficulties normally encountered by a relatively new enterprise that is beginning to scale its business, many of which are beyond

our control, including unknown future challenges and opportunities, substantial risks and expenses in the course of entering new markets

and undertaking marketing activities. The likelihood of our success must be considered in light of these risks, expenses, complications,

delays, and the competitive environment in which we operate. There is, therefore, substantial uncertainty that our business plan will

prove successful, and we may not be able to generate significant revenue, raise additional capital, or operate profitably. We will continue

to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by early commercial stage companies, including securing market acceptance for

our product and service offerings, scaling up our infrastructure and headcount. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, or

delays in connection with our growth. In addition, as a result of the capital-intensive nature of our business, we can be expected

to continue to sustain substantial operating expenses without generating sufficient revenue to cover expenditures. Any investment in our

company is therefore highly speculative and could result in the loss of your entire investment.

16

Our future business depends

in large part on our ability to continue to develop and successfully commercialize our suite of software products and tools. Our ability

to develop, deliver, and commercialize at scale our technology to support or perform autonomous operation of industrial vehicles is still

unproven.

Our technology suite is currently

available on stockchasers and tuggers for production release. However, this technology will need to be continually developed and enhanced

for further scaled commercialization. Continued enhancement of our autonomous driving technology is and will be subject to risks, including

with respect to:

● our ability to continue to enhance our data analytics and software technology;

● our ability to attract and retain customers;

● our ability to pay for research and development costs;

● our ability to attract, recruit, hire, and train skilled employees;

We operate in a highly competitive market

and will face competition from both established competitors and new market entrants.

The market for autonomous

industrial vehicles and industrial automation solutions is highly competitive. Many companies are seeking to develop autonomous driving

and delivery solutions. Competition in these markets is based primarily on technology, innovation, quality, safety, reputation, and price.

Our future success will depend on our ability to further develop and protect our technology in a timely manner and to stay ahead of existing

and new competitors. Our competitors in this market are working towards commercializing autonomous driving technology and may have substantial

financial, marketing, research and development, and other resources.

In addition, we also face

competition from traditional industrial vehicle and solution companies. Traditional vehicle and solution providers operating with human

drivers are still the predominant operators in the market. Because of the long history of such traditional companies serving our potential

customers and industries, there may be many constituencies in the market that would resist a shift towards autonomous industrial vehicles,

which could include lobbying and marketing campaigns, particularly because our technology will displace machine operators and drivers.

In addition, the market leaders

in our target industries, such as Industrial Material Handling, may start, or have already started, pursuing large scale deployment of

autonomous industrial vehicle technology on their own. These companies may have more operational and financial resources than we do. We

cannot guarantee that we will be able to effectively compete with them.

We may also face competition

from component suppliers and other technology and industrial solution companies if they decide to expand vertically and develop their

own autonomous industrial vehicles, some of whom have significantly greater resources than we do. We do not know how close these competitors

are to commercializing autonomous driving systems.

Many established and new market

participants have entered or have announced plans to enter the autonomous industrial vehicle market. Most of these participants have significantly

greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the design,

development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale, and support of their products. If existing competitors or new entrants commercialize

earlier than expected, our competitive advantage could be adversely affected.

17

Business collaboration with third parties

is subject to risks and these relationships may not lead to significant revenue.

Strategic business relationships

are and will continue to be an important factor in the growth and success of our business. We have alliances and partnerships, through

mutually beneficial non-binding memoranda of understanding or partnering arrangements with other companies in the industrial equipment,

automation and automotive industries to help us in our efforts to continue to enhance our technology, commercialize our solutions, and

drive market acceptance.

Collaboration with these third

parties is subject to risks, some of which are outside our control. For example, certain agreements with our partners grant our partner

or us the right to terminate such agreements for cause or without cause. If any of our collaborations with third parties are terminated,

it may delay or prevent our efforts to deploy our software products and tools on purpose-built autonomous industrial vehicles at

scale. In addition, such agreements may contain certain exclusivity provisions which, if triggered, could preclude us from working with

other businesses with superior technology or with whom we may prefer to partner with for other reasons. We could experience delays to

the extent our partners do not meet agreed upon timelines or experience capacity constraints. We could also experience disagreement in

budget or funding for joint development projects. There is also a risk of other potential disputes with partners in the future, including

with respect to intellectual property rights. Our ability to successfully commercialize could also be adversely affected by perceptions

about the quality of our or our partners’ vehicles or products.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and

Need for Additional Capital

Losses for the foreseeable future.

We incurred net losses of

$29.3 million and $22.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. We have not recognized a substantial

amount of revenue to date, and we had an accumulated deficit of $189.3 million and $160.0 million as of December 31, 2024 and December

31, 2023, respectively. We have developed and tested our autonomous driving technology but there can be no assurance that it will be commercially

successful at scale. Our potential profitability is dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. If we are

unable to achieve and sustain profitability, the value of our business and common stock may significantly decrease.

We expect the rate at which

we will incur losses to be significantly higher in future periods as we:

● expand our design, development, maintenance, and repair capabilities;

● increase our sales and marketing activities; and

18

Because we will incur the

costs and expenses from these efforts before we receive any substantial revenue, our losses in future periods will be significant. In

addition, we may find that these efforts are more expensive than we currently anticipate or that these efforts may not result in revenue,

which would further increase our losses. In particular, we expect to incur substantial and potentially increasing research and development

(“R&D”) costs as we continue to develop and enhance EAS and other technology and products for commercialization. While

our R&D costs were $11.3 million and $12.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and are likely

to grow in the future, we have minimal recurring revenues. Further, because we account for R&D as an operating expense, these expenditures

will adversely affect our results of operations in the future. Our R&D program may not produce successful results, and our new products

may not achieve market acceptance, create additional revenue, or become profitable.

We have a limited operating history, which

makes it difficult to forecast our future results of operations.

We were founded in 2013. As

a result of our limited operating history, our ability to accurately forecast our future results of operations is limited and subject

to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to plan for and model future growth. Our historical performance should not be considered

indicative of our future performance. Further, in future periods, our revenue growth could fluctuate for a number of reasons, including

shifts in our offering and revenue mix, slowing demand for our offering, increasing competition, decreased effectiveness of our sales

and marketing organization, and our sales and marketing efforts to acquire new customers, failure to retain existing customers, changing

technology, a decrease in the growth of our overall market, or our failure, for any reason, to continue to take advantage of growth opportunities.

We anticipate that we will encounter, risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries,

such as the risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report.

If our assumptions regarding

these risks and uncertainties and our future revenue growth are incorrect or change, or if we do not address these risks successfully,

our operating and financial results could differ materially from our expectations, and our business could suffer.

We expect fluctuations in our financial

results making it difficult to project future results.

Our results of operations

may fluctuate in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. As a result, our past results may not

be indicative of our future performance. In addition to the other risks described herein, factors that may affect our results of operations

include the following:

● changes in our revenue mix and related changes in revenue recognition;

● fluctuations in demand for or pricing of our product offerings;

● our ability to attract new customers;

● our ability to retain our existing customers, particularly large customers;

● investments in new offerings, features, and functionality;

19

● our ability to control costs;

● the effects of acquisitions and their integration;

● the impact of new accounting pronouncements;

● the impact of global events, including the outbreak of war or conflicts

● health epidemics or pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic;

Any of these and other factors,

or the cumulative effect of some of these factors, may cause our results of operations to vary significantly. If our quarterly results

of operations fall below the expectations of investors and securities analysts who follow our stock, the price of our common stock could

decline substantially, and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.

We may need to raise additional funds and

these funds may not be available to us on attractive terms when we need them, or at all.

The commercialization of autonomous

vehicles is capital intensive. This includes autonomous industrial vehicles outfitted with our technology and purpose-built autonomous

industrial vehicles manufactured by OEMs we intend to partner with. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through the issuance

of equity securities in private and public placements. We may need to raise additional capital to continue to fund our commercialization

activities, sales and marketing efforts, enhancement of our technology and to improve our liquidity position. Our ability to obtain the

necessary financing to carry out our business plan is subject to a number of factors, including general market volatility, investor acceptance

of our business plan, regulatory requirements and the successful development of our autonomous technology. These factors may make the

timing, amount, terms, and conditions of such financing unattractive or unavailable to us.

20

We may raise these additional

funds through the issuance of equity, equity related, or debt securities. To the extent that we raise additional financing by issuing

equity securities or convertible debt securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution, and to the extent we engage in

debt financing, we may become subject to restrictive covenants that could limit our flexibility in conducting future business activities.

Financial institutions may request credit enhancement such as third-party guarantee and pledge of equity interest in order to extend

loans to us. We cannot be certain that additional funds will be available to us on attractive terms when required, or at all. If we cannot

raise additional funds when we need them, our financial condition, results of operations, business, and prospects could be materially

adversely affected.

We have incurred significant losses, have

limited cash on hand and there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a goingconcern.

The Company incurred net losses

of approximately $29.3 million and $22.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In addition, the Company

had accumulated deficits of approximately $189.3 million and $160.0 million as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively,

and net cash used in operating activities was approximately $9.5 million and $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023,

respectively. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s unrestricted cash balance was $23.6 million. As of December 31, 2023,

the Company’s cash balance was approximately $3.6 million, and the short-term investments balance was $4.6 million. Based on cash

flow projections from operating and financing activities and the existing balance of cash and short-term investments, management is of

the opinion that the Company has insufficient funds for sustainable operations, and it may not be able to meet its payment obligations

from operations and related commitments, if the Company is not able to complete the required funding transactions to allow the Company

to continue as a going concern. Based on these factors, the Company has substantial doubt that it will continue as a going concern for

the 12 months following the issuance date of the financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

The Company’s plan to

alleviate the going concern issue is to increase revenue while controlling operating costs and expenses and obtaining funds from outside

sources of financing to generate positive financing cash flows. While management is optimistic about its ability to raise substantial

funds to continue as a going concern for one year following the financial statement issuance date, there can be no assurance that any

such measures will be successful. We currently do not generate substantial revenue from product sales. Accordingly, we expect to rely

primarily on equity and/or debt financings to fund our continued operations. The Company’s ability to raise additional funds will

depend, in part, on the success of our product development activities, and other events or conditions that may affect the share value

or prospects, as well as factors related to financial, economic and market conditions, many of which are beyond our control. There can

be no assurances that sufficient funds will be available to us when required or on acceptable terms, if at all. Accordingly,

management has concluded that these plans do not alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going

concern. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability could negatively impact the value of our common stock.

We may be subject to risks associated with

potential future acquisitions.

Although we have no current

acquisition plans, if appropriate opportunities arise, we may acquire additional assets, products, technology or businesses that are complementary

to our existing business. Any future acquisitions and the subsequent integration of new assets and businesses would require significant

attention from our management and could result in a diversion of resources from our existing business, which in turn could have an adverse

effect on our operations, and consequently our results of operations and financial condition. Acquired assets or businesses may not generate

the financial results we expect. Acquisitions could result in the use of substantial amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of

equity securities, significant goodwill impairment charges, amortization expenses for other intangible assets and exposure to potential

unknown liabilities of the acquired business. Moreover, the costs of identifying and consummating acquisitions may be significant.

21

Risks Related to Our Business Operations

Our success depends largely on the continued

services of our senior management team, technical engineers, and certain key employees.

We rely on our executive officers

and key employees in the areas of business strategy, research and development, marketing, sales, services, and general and administrative

functions. From time to time, there may be changes in our executive management team or key employees resulting from the hiring or departure

of executives or key employees, which could disrupt our business. We do not maintain key-man insurance for any member

of our senior management team or any other employee. None of the employment agreements and offer letters with our executive officers or

other key personnel require them to continue to work for us for any specified period and, therefore, they could terminate their employment

with us at any time. The loss of one or more of our executive officers or key employees could have a serious adverse effect on our business.

To execute our growth plan,

we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense in the technology industry, especially

for engineers with high levels of experience in artificial intelligence and designing and developing autonomous driving related algorithms.

Furthermore, it can be difficult to recruit personnel from other geographies to relocate to our California location. We may also need

to recruit highly qualified technical engineers internationally and therefore subject us to the compliance of relevant immigration laws

and regulations. We have, from time to time, experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining

employees with appropriate qualifications. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel have greater resources

than we have and can offer more attractive compensation packages for new employees. If we hire employees from competitors or other companies,

their former employers may attempt to assert that these employees or our company have breached their legal obligations, resulting in a

diversion of our time and resources and potentially in litigation. In addition, job candidates and existing employees often consider the

value of the share incentive awards they receive in connection with their employment. If the perceived value of our share awards declines,

it may adversely affect our ability to recruit and retain highly skilled employees. If we fail to attract new personnel on a timely basis

or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, we may not be able to commercialize and then expand our solutions and services in

a timely manner and our business and future growth prospects could be adversely affected.

If we fail to manage our growth effectively,

we may be unable to execute our business plan, maintain high levels of service, or adequately address competitive challenges.

We expect to invest in our

growth for the foreseeable future. Any growth in our business is expected to place a significant strain on not only our managerial, administrative,

operational, and financial resources, but also our infrastructure. We plan to continue to expand our operations in the future. Our success

will depend in part on our ability to manage this growth effectively and execute our business plan. To manage the expected growth of our

operations and personnel, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial, and management controls and our reporting systems

and procedures.

We rely heavily on information

technology (“IT”) systems to manage critical business functions. To manage our growth effectively, we must continue to improve

and expand our infrastructure, including our IT, financial, and administrative systems and controls. In particular, we may need to significantly

expand our IT infrastructure as the amount of data we store and transmit increases over time, which will require that we both utilize

existing IT products and adopt new technology. If we are not able to scale our IT infrastructure in a cost-effective and secure manner,

our ability to offer competitive solutions will be harmed and our business, financial condition, and operating results may suffer.

We must also continue to manage

our employees, operations, finances, research and development, and capital investments efficiently. Our productivity and the quality of

our solutions may be adversely affected if we do not integrate and train our new employees quickly and effectively or if we fail to appropriately

coordinate across our executive, research and development, technology, service development, analytics, finance, human resources, marketing,

sales, operations, and customer support teams. As we continue to grow, we will incur additional expenses, and our growth may continue

to place a strain on our resources, infrastructure, and ability to maintain the quality of our solutions. If we do not adapt to meet these

evolving challenges, or if the current and future members of our management team do not effectively manage our growth, the quality of

our solutions may suffer and our corporate culture may be harmed. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could cause our business

to suffer, which, in turn, could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

We may be subject to product liability or

warranty claims that could result in significant direct or indirect costs, including reputational harm, increased insurance premiums or

the need to self-insure, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our technology is used for

autonomous driving, which presents the risk of significant injury, including fatalities. We may be subject to claims if one of our or

a customer’s industrial vehicles is involved in an accident and persons are injured or purport to be injured or if property is damaged.

Any insurance that we carry may not be sufficient or it may not apply to all situations. If we experience such an event or multiple events,

our insurance premiums could increase significantly or insurance may not be available to us at all. Further, if insurance is not available

on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we might need to self-insure. In addition, lawmakers or governmental agencies could pass

laws or adopt regulations that limit the use of autonomous driving or industrial automation technology or increase liability associated

with its use. Any of these events could adversely affect our brand, relationships with users, operating results, or financial condition.

22

If our autonomous driving software fails

to perform as expected our ability to market, sell or lease our autonomous driving software could be harmed.

Our autonomous industrial

vehicle software products and tools as well as the vehicles, sensors, and hardware they utilize and are deployed on may contain defects

in design and manufacture that may cause them not to perform as expected or require repair. For example, our autonomous vehicle software

will require modification and updates over the life of the vehicle it is deployed on. Software products are inherently complex and often

contain defects and errors when first introduced. There can be no assurance that we will be able to detect and fix any defects in the

industrial vehicles’ hardware or software prior to commencing user sales or during the life of the vehicle. Autonomous industrial

vehicles utilizing our suite of products and tools may not perform consistent with users’ expectations or consistent with other

vehicles that may become available. Any product defects or any other failure of our software, supportive hardware, or deployment vehicle

platform or to perform as expected could harm our reputation, result in adverse publicity, lost revenue, delivery delays, product recalls,

product liability claims, and significant warranty and other expenses, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial

condition, operating results, and prospects.

If we are unable to establish and maintain

confidence in our long-term business prospects among users, securities and industry analysts, and within our industries, or are subject

to negative publicity, then our financial condition, operating results, business prospects, and access to capital may suffer materially.

Users may be less likely to

purchase or use our technology and the industrial vehicles it is deployed on if they are not convinced that our business will succeed

or that our service and support and other operations will continue in the long term. Similarly, suppliers and other third parties will

be less likely to invest time and resources in developing business relationships with us if they are not convinced that our business will

succeed. Accordingly, in order to build and maintain our business, we must maintain confidence among users, suppliers, securities and

industry analysts, and other parties in our long-term financial viability and business prospects. Maintaining such confidence may

be particularly complicated by certain factors including those that are largely outside of our control, such as our limited operating

history at scale, user unfamiliarity with our solutions, any delays in scaling manufacturing, delivery, and service operations to meet

demand, competition and uncertainty regarding the future of autonomous vehicles, and our performance compared with market expectations.

Catastrophic events,

such as pandemics and epidemics, or outbreak of an infectious disease, such as COVID-19 and subsequent variants, natural disasters,

terrorist activities, political unrest, and other manmade problems such as war could have a material adverse impact on our business,

results of operations, financial condition and cash flows or liquidity.

Our business is vulnerable

to damage or interruption from pandemics and epidemics, or outbreak of an infectious disease, such as COVID-19 and subsequent variants,

natural disasters, terrorist attacks, political unrest, acts of war (such as the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, and Israel

and Palestine).

The recent inflation in the

United States, foreign and domestic government sanctions imposed on Russia as a result of its invasion of Ukraine, and the conflicts in

Israel and Palestine has caused or may continue to result in extreme volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets, which

may adversely affect investor’s confidence and, in turn may affect our ability to raise additional capital.

The occurrence of an epidemic

or a pandemic, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our operating results. The extent

to which epidemics and pandemics impact our financial condition or results of operations will depend on many factors outside of our control

and whether there is a material impact on the businesses or productivity of our customers, employees, suppliers and other partners.

Other considerations related

to the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, and Israel and Palestine that may affect the Company include possible cyberattacks

and potential disruptions in the banking systems and capital market, as well as supply chain and increased costs and expenditures on domestic

and internationally-sourced materials and services. As an example, we engage third-party software development engineers who reside in

Russia. Due to the ongoing conflict, we may experience an interruption in the services provided by these parties.

We are also vulnerable to

natural disasters and other calamities. Although we have servers that are hosted in an offsite location, our backup system does not capture

data on a real-time basis, and we may be unable to recover certain data in the event of a server failure. We cannot assure you that

any backup systems will be adequate to protect us from the effects of fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications

failures, break-ins, war, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events. Any of the foregoing events may give rise to interruptions,

breakdowns, system failures, technology platform failures or internet failures, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunctions

of software or hardware as well as adversely affect our ability to provide services.

23

International trade policies, including

protectionist trade policies, such as tariffs and sanctions, could adversely affect our financial performance.

Due to the interconnectedness

of the global economy, policy changes in one area of the world can have an immediate and material adverse impact on markets around the

world. Changes in international trade policies, including: (i) changes to existing trade agreements; (ii) greater restrictions on free

trade generally; and (iii) significant increases in customs duties and tariffs on goods imported into the United States and reciprocal

actions by other countries, can adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

On March 3, 2025, the President

of the United States announced the imposition of new tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada, to take effect on March 4, 2025. Effective

at 12.01 a.m. ET on March 4, 2025, all goods arriving at U.S. ports and originating from Canada or Mexico are subject to 25 percent tariffs.

Certain Canadian energy resources are subject to a lower 10 percent tariff. Effective February 4, 2025, all goods presented for entry

at U.S. ports and originating from China, including Hong Kong, are subject to a 10 percent tariff on Chinese imports. The impact of these

potential tariffs on our business and financial condition, if any, is subject to a number of factors that are not yet known, including

any countermeasures that the target countries may take in response to such tariffs. In light of these uncertainties, we can provide no

assurance that any mitigating actions that may become available to us, such as our ability to pass along some or all of the costs of any

tariffs to some or all of our customers, will be successful.

In addition to potential increases

in customs duties and tariffs in the United States and other countries, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement ("USMCA")

is subject to renewal in 2026. There can be no assurance that any newly negotiated terms in the USMCA will not adversely affect our business

and the business of our customers. It remains unclear what specific actions the current U.S. administration may take to resolve trade-related

issues with China and other countries.

Any of the above factors could

impact our supply chain, as well as our operations, and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We have a material weakness in our internal

control over financial reporting, and our inability to remediate this weakness or otherwise implement and maintain effective internal

control over financial reporting, or the inability of our independent registered public accounting firm to provide an unqualified report

thereon, could have a material adverse effect on us.

If we fail to maintain an

effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results. As a result, our stakeholders could

lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could adversely affect the results of our business and our enterprise value. In connection

with our assessment of internal control over financial reporting, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial

reporting as of December 31, 2024 (see Item 9A. Controls and Procedures for additional detail). The deficiency above

led to a misstatement which was corrected prior to the issuance of the current year’s financial statements. This material weakness

creates a reasonable possibility that material misstatements to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected

in a timely manner. Accordingly, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not

effective as of December 31, 2024. The disclosure of this material weakness, even if quickly remediated, could reduce the market’s

confidence in our financial statements and harm our enterprise value.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property,

Information Technology and Data Privacy

We may become subject to litigation brought

by third parties claiming infringement, misappropriation or other violation by us of their intellectual property rights.

The industry in which our

business operates is characterized by a large number of patents, some of which may be of questionable scope, validity or enforceability,

and some of which may appear to overlap with other issued patents. As a result, there is a significant amount of uncertainty in the industry

regarding patent protection and infringement. In recent years, there has been significant litigation globally involving patents and other

intellectual property rights. Third parties may in the future assert, that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their

intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition and as a public company, the possibility of intellectual property rights

claims against us grows. Such claims and litigation may involve one or more of our competitors focused on using their patents and other

intellectual property to obtain competitive advantage, or patent holding companies or other adverse intellectual property rights holders

who have no relevant product revenue, and therefore our own pending patents and other intellectual property rights may provide little

or no deterrence to these rights holders in bringing intellectual property rights claims against us. There may be intellectual property

rights held by others, including issued or pending patents and trademarks, that cover significant aspects of our technologies or business

methods, and we cannot assure that we are not infringing or violating, and have not infringed or violated, any third-party intellectual

property rights or that we will not be held to have done so or be accused of doing so in the future. In addition, because patent applications

can take many years until the patents issue, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, which may later result in

issued patents that our products may infringe. We expect that in the future we may receive notices that claim we or our collaborators

have misappropriated or misused other parties’ intellectual property rights, particularly as the number of competitors in our market

grows.

To defend ourselves against

any intellectual property claims brought by third parties, whether with or without merits, can be time-consuming and could result

in substantial costs and a diversion of our resources. These claims and any resulting lawsuits, if resolved adversely to us, could subject

us to significant liability for damages, impose temporary or permanent injunctions against our products, technologies or business operations,

or invalidate or render unenforceable our intellectual property.

24

If our technology is determined

to infringe a valid and enforceable patent, or if we wish to avoid potential intellectual property litigation on any alleged infringement,

misappropriation or other violation of third party intellectual property rights, we may be required to do one or more of the following:

(i) cease development, sales, or use of our products that incorporate or use the asserted intellectual property right; (ii) obtain

a license from the owner of the asserted intellectual property right, which may be unavailable on commercially reasonable terms, or at

all, or which may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed

to us; (iii) pay substantial royalties or other damages; or (iv) redesign our technology or one or more aspects or systems of

our autonomous industrial vehicles to avoid any infringement or allegations thereof. The aforementioned options sometimes may not be commercially

feasible. Additionally, in our ordinary course of business, we agree to indemnify our customers, partners, and other commercial counterparties

for any infringement arising out of their use of our intellectual property, along with providing standard indemnification provisions,

so we may face liability to our users, business partners or third parties for indemnification or other remedies in the event that they

are sued for infringement.

We may also in the future

license third party technology or other intellectual property, and we may face claims that our use of such in-licensed technology

or other intellectual property infringes, misappropriates or otherwise violates the intellectual property rights of others. In such cases,

we will seek indemnification from our licensors. However, our rights to indemnification may be unavailable or insufficient to cover our

costs and losses.

We also may not be successful

in any attempt to redesign our technology to avoid any alleged infringement. A successful claim of infringement against us, or our failure

or inability to develop and implement non-infringing technology, or license the infringed technology on acceptable terms and

on a timely basis, could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, such lawsuits, regardless of

their success, would likely be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management’s time and attention from

our business, which could seriously harm our business. Also, such lawsuits, regardless of their success, could seriously harm our reputation

with users and in the industry at large.

Our business may be adversely affected if

we are unable to adequately establish, maintain, protect, and enforce our intellectual property and proprietary rights or prevent third

parties from making unauthorized use of our technology and other intellectual property rights.

Our intellectual property

is an essential asset of our business. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could result in our competitors

offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss of our competitive advantage, and a decrease in our revenue which would adversely

affect our business prospects, financial condition, and operating results. Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect

our core technology and intellectual property. We rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, such as patents, trademarks,

copyrights, and trade secrets (including know-how), in addition to employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements, intellectual

property licenses, and other contractual rights, to establish, maintain, protect, and enforce our rights in our technology, proprietary

information, and processes. Intellectual property laws and our procedures and restrictions provide only limited protection and any

of our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented, infringed or misappropriated. If we fail to protect

our intellectual property rights adequately, we may lose an important advantage in the markets in which we compete. While we take measures

to protect our intellectual property, such efforts may be insufficient or ineffective, and any of our intellectual property rights may

be challenged, which could result in them being narrowed in scope or declared invalid or unenforceable. Other parties may also independently

develop technologies that are substantially similar or superior to ours. We also may be forced to bring claims against third parties,

or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property. However, the

measures we take to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use by others may not be effective and there can be no assurance

that our intellectual property rights will be sufficient to protect against others offering products, services, or technologies that are

substantially similar or superior to ours and that compete with our business.

25

Litigation may be necessary

in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights and to protect our trade secrets. Our efforts to enforce our intellectual property

rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims, and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property.

Any litigation initiated by us concerning the violation by third parties of our intellectual property rights is likely to be expensive

and time-consuming and could lead to the invalidation of, or render unenforceable, our intellectual property, or could otherwise

have negative consequences for us. Furthermore, it could result in a court or governmental agency invalidating or rendering unenforceable

our patents or other intellectual property rights upon which the suit is based. We will not be able to protect our intellectual property

if we are unable to enforce our rights or if we do not detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Our inability to protect

our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, as well as any costly litigation or diversion of our management’s

attention and resources, could delay the introduction and implementation of new technologies, result in our substituting inferior or more

costly technologies into our products or injure our reputation. Moreover, policing unauthorized use of our technologies, trade secrets,

and intellectual property may be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not be

as protective of intellectual property rights as those in the United States and where mechanisms for enforcement of intellectual property

rights may be weak. If we fail to meaningfully establish, maintain, protect, and enforce our intellectual property and proprietary rights,

our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Changes in U.S. patent law could diminish

the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products.

There are a number of recent

changes to the patent laws that may have a significant impact on our ability to protect our technology and enforce our intellectual property

rights. For example, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “AIA”) enacted in September 2011, resulted in significant

changes in patent legislation. An important change introduced by the AIA is that, as of March 16, 2013, the United States transitioned

from a “first-to-invent” to a “first-to-file” system for deciding which party should be granted

a patent when two or more patent applications are filed by different parties claiming the same invention. Under a “first-to-file” system,

assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will be entitled

to a patent on the invention regardless of whether another inventor had made the invention earlier. A third party that files a patent

application in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) after that date but before us could therefore be awarded

a patent covering an invention of ours even if we made the invention before it was made by the third party. Circumstances could prevent

us from promptly filing patent applications on our inventions.

The AIA also includes a number

of significant changes that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and also may affect patent litigation. These include

allowing third party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of

a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and

derivation proceedings. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in United States

federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient

for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in

a district court action. Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our patent claims that would

not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. The AIA and its implementation

could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our

issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Further, the standards applied

by the USPTO and foreign patent offices in granting patents are not always applied uniformly or predictably. For example, there is no

uniform worldwide policy regarding patentable subject matter or the scope of claims allowable for business methods. As such, we do not

know the degree of future protection that we will have on our technologies, products, and services. While we will endeavor to try to protect

our technologies, products, and services with intellectual property rights such as patents, as appropriate, the process of obtaining patents

is time-consuming, expensive, and sometimes unpredictable.

26

Additionally, the U.S. Supreme

Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, such as Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., Association

for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. and Alice Corporation Pty.

Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights

of patent owners in certain situations. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future,

this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained.

Depending on decisions by

the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that

could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.

Our patent applications may not issue as

patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours.

We cannot be certain that

we are the first inventor of the subject matter to which we have filed a particular patent application, or if we are the first party to

file such a patent application. If another party has filed a patent application to the same subject matter as we have, we may not be entitled

to the protection sought by the patent application. Further, the scope of protection of issued patent claims is often difficult to determine.

As a result, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we file will issue, or that our issued patents will be broad enough

to protect our proprietary rights or otherwise afford protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, the issuance

of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability. Our competitors may challenge or seek to invalidate

our issued patents, or design around our issued patents, which may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition or operating

results. Also, the costs associated with enforcing patents, confidentiality and invention agreements, or other intellectual property rights

may make aggressive enforcement impracticable.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual

property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting, maintaining,

defending, and enforcing patents and other intellectual property rights on our product candidates in all countries throughout the world

would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive

than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same

extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions

in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States

or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection or other intellectual

property rights to develop their own products and may export otherwise infringing, misappropriating, or violating products to territories

where we have patent or other intellectual property protection, but enforcement rights are not as strong as those in the United States.

These products may compete with our product candidates, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or

sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Many companies have encountered

significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of some countries

do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property rights, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement,

misappropriation, or other violation of our intellectual property rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights

in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could

put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke

third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded,

if any, may not be commercially meaningful.

Many countries, including

European Union countries, India, Japan, and China, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled under specified

circumstances to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies

or government contractors. In those countries, we may have limited remedies if patents are infringed or if we are compelled to grant a

license to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities.

Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial

advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results

of operations, and prospects.

27

In addition to patented technology, we rely

on our unpatented proprietary technology, trade secrets, processes, and know-how.

We rely on proprietary information

(such as trade secrets, know-how, and confidential information) to protect intellectual property that may not be patentable,

or that we believe is best protected by means that do not require public disclosure. We generally seek to protect this proprietary information

by entering into confidentiality agreements, or consulting, services, or employment agreements that contain non-disclosure and non-use provisions

with our employees, consultants, contractors, scientific advisors, and third parties. However, we cannot guarantee that we have entered

into such agreements with each party that has or may have had access to our trade secrets or proprietary information and, even if entered

into, these agreements may be breached or may otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation

of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure

or use of proprietary information. We have limited control over the protection of trade secrets used by our third-party manufacturers

and suppliers and could lose future trade secret protection if any unauthorized disclosure of such information occurs. In addition, our

proprietary information may otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. To the extent

that our employees, consultants, contractors, and other third parties use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us,

disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions. Costly and time-consuming litigation

could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain protection for our

proprietary information could adversely affect our competitive business position. Furthermore, laws regarding trade secret rights in certain

markets where we operate may afford little or no protection to our trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained

or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them from using that trade secret to

compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed (whether lawfully or otherwise) to or independently developed by a competitor

or other third party, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We also rely on physical and

electronic security measures to protect our proprietary information, but we cannot guarantee that these security measures provide adequate

protection for such proprietary information or will never be breached. There is a risk that third parties may obtain unauthorized access

to and improperly utilize or disclose our proprietary information, which would harm our competitive advantages. We may not be able to

detect or prevent the unauthorized access to or use of our information by third parties, and we may not be able to take appropriate and

timely steps to mitigate the damages (or the damages may not be capable of being mitigated or remedied).

We utilize open-source software, which may

pose particular risks to our proprietary software, technologies, products, and services in a manner that could harm our business.

We use

open-source software in our products and services and anticipate using open-source software in the future. We utilize a

distribution of the open-source Linux system, and tools such as ROS (open-source publish-subscribe tool) in the

technical stack. Professional open-source license scanning systems such as WhiteSource and ScanCode are used in both places.

Both Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (“CI/CD”) level open-source scan and overall system

opensource scan is performed to protect the systems and our intellectual property. In the event that our scanning and

open-source check protocols fail, the Company could be negatively affected Some open-source software licenses require

those who distribute open-source software as part of their own software products to publicly disclose all or part of the source

code to such software product or to make available any modifications or derivative works of the open-source code on unfavorable

terms or at no cost. This could result in our proprietary software being made available in the source code form and/or licensed to

others under open-source licenses, which could allow our competitors or other third parties to use our proprietary software

freely without spending the development effort, and which could lead to a loss of the competitive advantage of our proprietary

technologies and, as a result, sales of our products and services. The terms of many open-source licenses to which we are

subject have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and there is a risk that open-source software licenses could be

construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to provide or distribute our products or

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2024-12-31, filed 2025-03-06 · accession 0001213900-25-021260

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 21 headings are on that chain and 17 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.