10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

For the transition period from to

Commission file number:001-38787

CYCLERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(857) 327-8778

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, no par value CYCN The Nasdaq Capital Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect

the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of

the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $4.8 million, computed using the closing price on that day of $2.30.

As of February 28, 2025, there were 2,710,096 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business. 5

Item 1A. Risk Factors. 18

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. 49

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 49

Item 2. Properties 50

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 51

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. 51

PART II

Item 6. Selected Financial Data. 52

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 60

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. 60

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. 60

Item 9B. Other Information. 62

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections. 62

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. 63

Item 11. Executive Compensation. 63

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. 63

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. 64

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, or this Annual Report, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in Part I, Item 1. “Business,” Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” and Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” but are also contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the words “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” “expects,” “plans,” “seeks,” “intends,” “evaluates,” “pursues,” “anticipates,” “continues,” “designs,” “impacts,” “affects,” “forecasts,” “target,” “outlook,” “initiative,” “objective,” “designed,” “priorities,” “goal” or the negative of those words or other similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements that represent our current judgment about possible future events, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, by their nature, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. As a result, our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory conditions and the following:

•

We are currently considering a new potential product candidate and we may not be successful in acquiring license and other rights necessary to develop this technology, establish and successfully complete clinical studies, obtain necessary regulatory governmental approvals and successfully commercialize this product candidate;

•

there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern and we will need to raise capital in the near term in order to maintain our operations;

•

we may be unable to access capital, capabilities, and transactions necessary to advance the development of the product candidate under evaluation and any future product candidates;

•

there is substantial uncertainty regarding our future financial performance, potential revenues, expense levels, payments, cash flows, profitability, tax obligations, concentration of voting control, as well as the timing and drivers thereof;

•

there is uncertainty regarding the impact of government funding and regulation in the life sciences industry, particularly with regard to funding for new drug development, staffing levels at government agencies and healthcare reform generally;

•

there may be substantial delays to timing, investment and associated activities involved in developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, launching and commercializing the product candidate under evaluation and potential future product candidates;

•

we may be unable to maintain our relationships with third parties, collaborators and our employees or execute our strategic priorities;

•

we may fail to maintain our Nasdaq listing;

•

there are significant risks in our investment in Tisento Therapeutics Inc. (“Tisento”) tied to Tisento developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, launching and commercializing its product candidates and such risks may negatively impact our investment in Tisento;

•

there is uncertainty regarding any liquidity or monetizable value of our equity interest in Tisento, which faces all the risks of an early-stage pharmaceutical development company;

•

there is uncertainty as to whether any future development, regulatory, and commercialization milestones or royalty payments provided for in the agreement with Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. will be achieved;

•

we are seeking to out-license our olinciguat technology to a third party which holds an option to negotiate a license to this technology and if the third party elects not to exercise the option or if we are unable to reach agreement on license terms, we may not reach agreement on the terms of a license arrangement;

•

our product candidates and those we have sold or out-licensed have not been approved for sale by regulatory agencies and may not prove to meet safety and efficacy requirements and if we are unable to comply with U.S. and non-U.S. regulatory requirements, including any post-approval development and regulatory requirements, or our potential future product candidates are unable to comply with such requirements, our operating results may suffer;

•

we may be unable to obtain reimbursement from the U.S. government and third-party payors for potential future product candidates if and when commercialized;

•

if we are unable to attract and retain employees needed to execute our business plans and strategies and or manage the impact of any loss of key employees our financial condition and results of operations may suffer;

•

our business may be negatively impacted if we are unable to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our current and potential future product candidates;

•

third parties may allege we infringe their intellectual property rights, which could result in adverse outcomes;

•

we may fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;

•

we may be impacted by trends and challenges in the market affecting our product candidates;

•

a determination that we constitute an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and if we are required to register thereunder, could have a material adverse effect on us;

•

we may be unable to compete with other companies that are or may be developing or selling products that are competitive with any potential future product candidates;

•

a pandemic or natural disaster may disrupt our business, including our development activities, resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations; and

•

other factors that are described in Part 1, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

You should refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all. The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report represent our views as of the date of this Annual Report. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments may cause our views to change. However, while we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date following the date of this Annual Report.

You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “Cyclerion,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. and, where appropriate, our consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview and Strategy

Our strategy for Cyclerion is to build a new pipeline with therapeutics to treat certain neuropsychiatric diseases. Over the past year, Cyclerion’s diligence team which is composed of committed external experts and internal personnel in their respective fields, have been conducting asset evaluations in many therapeutic areas. Throughout this process, the team identified and assessed dozens of products and other opportunities directed at addressing patient’s needs and increasing shareholder value. The team prioritized an individualized therapy for treatment resistant depression (“TRD”) as our foundational product candidate and we have entered into a non-binding option to license agreement for the intellectual property associated with this product. With the large unmet medical need in TRD, the clinical development stage of this asset, and the strong commercial opportunity, we believe that this product is well suited to be the foundation moving forward for Cyclerion. The program team is currently developing an integrated development and commercial strategy in TRD.

In addition to significantly reducing operating expenses and the potential to obtain revenues from our legacy soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator clinical assets, we intend to raise funds to support the execution of the product plans in TRD. As such, we have developed a financing strategy plan and recently filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (the “Shelf Registration”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) which would allow us to sell registered shares of our common stock if we choose to do so. The Shelf Registration was declared effective by the SEC in February 2025.

We continue to build our infrastructure, and Regina Graul, Ph.D. was promoted to Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Director to our Board in August of 2024 after she was hired as President in late 2023. Dr. Graul has significant experience in research and development, product search and evaluation and has extensive knowledge growing and leading integrated high-functioning teams. We also retained as our Chief Financial Officer, Rhonda Chicko, who has extensive experience working with early and later-stage drug development companies. To limit our operating expenses, we have used consultants (including Ms. Chicko) rather than hiring additional full-time employees; Dr. Graul is the only current employee to date. Our goal is to hire additional C-suite executives later this year.

Background

We were founded in 2018 to focus on the treatment of serious diseases with novel sGC stimulators in both the central nervous system (CNS) and the periphery. Since that time, our strategy for Cyclerion has changed and our sGC assets zagociquat and CY3018 were sold in 2023 to Tisento, we out-licensed praliciguat in 2021 and we have entered into a non-binding license option agreement for olinciguat in 2024. Our prior strategy to conduct research and development on sGC stimulators has been discontinued and we do not intend to internally pursue research and development or commercialization with any sGC asset. We are leveraging our legacy sGC stimulator assets with the goal of generating revenues which, if realized, will be used to help fund our strategic building plan and provide value to our stockholders.

The following table is a high-level summary of our historical sGC portfolio:

Program Indication(s) Description Status

Research and Development Programs

The following table presents the status of sGC stimulator assets that are either licensed or optioned to other entities:

Akebia License Agreement

On June 3, 2021, we entered into a License Agreement with Akebia (the “Akebia License Agreement”) relating to the exclusive worldwide license to Akebia of our rights to the development, manufacture, medical affairs and commercialization of pharmaceutical products containing the pharmaceutical compound known as praliciguat and other related products and forms thereof enumerated in the Akebia License Agreement. Pursuant to the Akebia License Agreement, Akebia will be responsible for all future research, development, regulatory, and commercialization activities for the out-licensed praliciguat products.

On December 13, 2024, we announced that Cyclerion and Akebia re-negotiated a mutually beneficial amendment to Akebia's exclusive license agreement for praliciguat, a systemic sGC stimulator. Under this new license amendment, we will receive $1.75 million in amendment payments, of which $1.25 million was paid in December 2024 and an additional payment of $0.5 million is due in September 2025. In addition, Akebia is responsible for all intellectual property expenses associated with praliciguat at an earlier date than as originally agreed between the parties. We are eligible to receive additional milestone cash payments of up to approximately $558.5 million in total

related to potential future development, regulatory, and commercialization milestone payments for praliciguat. In exchange for a reduction in certain development milestone payments, we are eligible to receive certain higher-tiered sales-based royalties ranging from mid-single-digits to twenty percent. In 2021, Akebia paid a $3.0 million upfront payment to us upon signing of the Akebia License Agreement, and subsequently paid us an additional $1.25 million in December 2024 and is obligated to pay us an additional $0.5 million in September 2025.

Unless earlier terminated, the Akebia License Agreement will expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis upon the expiration of the last royalty term, which ends upon the longest of (i) the expiration of the patents licensed under the Akebia License Agreement, (ii) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such product, and (iii) 10 years from first commercial sale of such product. Akebia may terminate the Akebia License Agreement in its entirety or only with respect to a particular licensed compound or product upon 180 days’ prior written notice to Cyclerion, subject to certain obligations to license back to Cyclerion licensed compounds and candidates and related assets. The parties also have customary termination rights, subject to a cure period, in the event of the other party’s material breach of the Akebia License Agreement or in the event of certain additional circumstances.

Olinciguat Option to License with CVCO Therapeutics, Inc. (CVCO)

Olinciguat is a Phase 2, orally administered, once-daily, vascular sGC stimulator. On July 22, 2024, we entered into an Option to License Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with a third party (the “Optionee”), pursuant to which the Optionee has an option (the “Option”) to enter into an exclusive license to olinciguat for human therapeutics, subject to certain carveouts. Under the terms of the Option Agreement, the Optionee paid us an Option fee of $150,000 in August 2024. The Optionee may exercise the Option on or before March 20, 2025, which may be extended for an additional two-month period for an additional fee of $25,000. If the Optionee exercises the Option during the Option Period, the Parties shall promptly commence negotiations of the definitive license agreement. The terms of the license agreement will be negotiated in good faith within a period not to exceed 90 days after the date of exercise of the Option. If the parties cannot reach agreement, all rights revert to us. In addition, the Optionee has agreed to reimburse us for certain patent expenses incurred during the Option period.

Tisento Asset Purchase Agreement

On May 11, 2023, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with an investor group that included Peter Hecht (our former CEO), JW Celtics Investment Corp and JW Cycle Inc. which subsequently changed their names to Tisento Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (“Tisento Parent”) and Tisento Therapeutics Inc. (“Tisento”). Upon the closing on July 28, 2023 following receipt of approval by the Cyclerion stockholders of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement, we sold to Tisento the Transferred Assets and Tisento assumed certain liabilities relating thereto, including, but not limited to (i) liabilities, costs and expenses arising after the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement relating to the employment of certain Cyclerion employees and the conduct of certain preclinical and clinical trial activities prior to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement, and (ii) liabilities relating to such assets to the extent relating to the period after the closing of the transaction. In consideration for such sale and assumption, at the closing we received proceeds of $8.0 million as cash consideration, $2.4 million as reimbursement for certain operating expenses related to such assets for the period between signing and closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement, and shares of common stock of Tisento Parent comprising 10% of the then issued and outstanding equity securities of Tisento Parent immediately following such closing, subject to certain protections against dilution.

Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, we agreed not to compete with Tisento through July 2028 either alone or directly or indirectly with or through any affiliate or third party, initiate investigational new drug ("IND")-enabling preclinical development, develop, commercially manufacture, commercialize, or otherwise exploit any compound or product that is (A) a CNS-penetrant sGC stimulator, (B) developed for the treatment of a program indication, and (C) reasonably expected to compete with any compound or product in a purchased program for the treatment of a program indication (any such compound or product, a “Cyclerion Competing Product”) anywhere in the world, or (ii) license, convey, grant, or otherwise transfer any rights to any third party to initiate IND-enabling preclinical development, develop, commercially manufacture, commercialize, or otherwise exploit a Cyclerion Competing Product anywhere in the world.

On January 27, 2025, Tisento Therapeutics announced that the first patient has been dosed in its global Phase 2b PRIZM study. The study is investigating the impact of once-daily oral zagociguat treatment on fatigue, cognitive impairment, and other key aspects of the rare mitochondrial disease MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like Episodes).

PRIZM – a Phase 2b Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Investigating Zagociguat in MELAS – is evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral zagociguat 15 mg or 30 mg compared to placebo when administered once-daily for 12 weeks in participants with genetically and phenotypically defined MELAS. The PRIZM study has a crossover design, with two 12-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week washout period. All participants will receive zagociguat during one of the 12-week periods and placebo during the other. Participants who complete the study may be eligible for an open-label extension study. PRIZM is a global study that will enroll approximately 44 participants at mitochondrial disease centers of excellence in the U.S., Italy, Germany, United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06402123) for more information.

Intellectual Property

We protect the intellectual property and proprietary technology that we believe is important to our business, including by pursuing and maintaining U.S. and foreign patents that cover our product candidates and compositions, their methods of use and the processes for their preparation, as well as any other relevant inventions and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business. We also rely on trade secrets to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection. We expect to also rely on licenses for patented intellectual property owned by third parties.

Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important technology, inventions, improvements and know-how related to our business, defend and enforce our patents, preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets and operate without infringing the valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties.

We have 20 issued U.S. patents, 11 pending U.S. patents applications and numerous foreign patents and pending patent applications related to our sGC programs. Patent families are filed either as utility U.S. patents or under an international patent law treaty (PCT) that provides a unified procedure for filing a single initial patent application to seek patent protection for an invention simultaneously in each of the 157 contracting states, followed by the process of entering national phase, which requires a separate application in each of the member states in which national patent protection is sought.

The technology underlying our sGC patents and pending patent applications has been developed by us and was not acquired from any in-licensing agreement. We own all of the issued patents and pending applications.

The intellectual property portfolios for our most advanced product candidates (praliciguat and olinciguat) are summarized below.

Praliciguat Patent Portfolio

Our praliciguat patent portfolio includes 13 U.S. issued patents, seven pending U.S. patent applications, and numerous patents and pending patent applications in foreign jurisdiction.

One of the U.S. patents, US 9,481,689, which will expire in 2034, is directed to praliciguat and pharmaceutical compositions thereof. The term of this U.S. patent may be eligible for patent term extension as described below. Three other U.S. patents, US 8,748,442, US 9,139,564, and 10,189,809, expire in 2031, and provide generic coverage of praliciguat and intermediates used in the preparation of praliciguat, as well as compounds related to praliciguat, respectively. A fifth U.S. patent, US 10,183,021 will expire in 2034 and is directed to the treatment of resistant hypertension with praliciguat or combinations of praliciguat and known anti-hypertensives. A sixth U.S. patent, US 209,639,308 will expire in 2034 and is directed to the treatment of diabetic nephropathy with praliciguat or combinations of praliciguat with other agents. The seventh U.S. patent, US 10,927,136 covers phosphorus prodrugs of praliciguat and will expire in 2037. The eighth U.S. Patent, US 11,389,449, is directed to the treatment of metabolic

syndrome with praliciguat and will expire in 2038. The ninth U.S. Patent, US 11,357,777, is directed to the treatment of a severe form of liver disease named nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with praliciguat and other compounds and will expire in 2039. The tenth to thirteenth, U.S. Patents, US 11,319,308 (expiring in 2039), US 11,773,089 (expiring in 2037), US 11,274,096 (expiring in 2039) and US 11,708,361 (expiring in 2039) are directed to the syntheses of praliciguat or of intermediates useful in the manufacture of praliciguat.

Two pending U.S. patent applications that, if issued, will expire in 2031 and 2034, respectively, provide generic coverage for praliciguat composition of matter. Two additional U.S. patent applications that, if issued, will expire in 2037 and 2039, respectively, provide coverage for methods of large-scale preparation of praliciguat. We also have a pending U.S. application directed to a praliciguat formulation, that, if issued, will expire in 2036. Another pending U.S. application is directed to phosphorous prodrugs of praliciguat and, if issued, will expire in 2037.

Another of the U.S. pending applications is directed to methods of treating diabetic nephropathy with praliciguat, and if issued, will expire in 2040 or later.

Furthermore, we have eight granted European patents expiring between 2031 and 2039. Each of these patents is validated in multiple countries or registered in multiple countries as a European Unitary Patent. We hold nine granted Japanese patents expiring between 2031 and 2040. We also have numerous patent applications pending in foreign jurisdictions.

Olinciguat Patent Portfolio

Our olinciguat patent portfolio includes 14 U.S. issued patents, five pending U.S. patent applications and numerous patents and pending applications in foreign jurisdictions.

One of the U.S. patents, US 9,586,937, which will expire in 2034, is directed to olinciguat and pharmaceutical compositions thereof. The term of this U.S. patent may be eligible for patent term extension as described below. Three other U.S. patents, US 8,748,442, US 9,139,564, and US 10,189,809, expire in 2031, and provide generic coverage of olinciguat, intermediates used in the preparation of olinciguat, and compounds related to olinciguat, respectively. The fifth U.S. patent, US 10,517,874, which will expire in 2034 is directed to the treatment of SCD using olinciguat alone or in combinations with other therapeutic agents. The sixth and seventh U.S. issued patents, US 10,889,577, and US 11,572,358, will expire in 2037 and are directed to polymorphs of olinciguat. The eighth issued patent, US 11,207,323, will expire in 2034 and provides coverage for stereoisomers of olinciguat. Five more U.S. issued patents, US 11,319,308 (expiring in 2039), US 11,773,089 (expiring in 2037), US 11,274,096 (expiring in 2039), US 11,834,444 (expiring in 2038) and US 12,030,874 (expiring in 2039) are directed to the chiral syntheses of olinciguat or the syntheses of intermediates useful in the manufacture of olinciguat. The last U.S. issued patent, US 11,357,777, is directed to the treatment of NASH with olinciguat and other compounds and will expire in 2039.

One pending U.S. patent application, if issued, will expire in 2037 and provides additional coverage for polymorphs of olinciguat. Another pending U.S. patent application, if issued, will expire in 2031, and provides generic coverage for olinciguat. Two pending U.S. patent applications are directed to processes and synthetic intermediates for preparing olinciguat and, will expire in 2039 and 2037, respectively. These third and fourth patent applications have recently been allowed. A fifth pending U.S. patent application is directed to the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in post-menopausal women with olinciguat and other sGC stimulators. If issued, the corresponding patent will expire in 2042.

Furthermore, we have nine granted European patents expiring between 2031 and 2039 each of them validated in multiple countries or registered in multiple countries as Unitary European Patents; eight granted Japanese patents expiring between 2031 and 2039; seven granted Chinese patents expiring between 2031 and 2039; and a large number of issued patents in other foreign jurisdictions, expiring between 2031 and 2039. We also have numerous pending patent applications in foreign jurisdictions. Some of these patents may be eligible for patent term extension or the foreign jurisdiction equivalent, depending on the jurisdiction.

Patent Term

The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we file, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non-provisional patent application, assuming that all applicable maintenance or annuity fees are paid. In the United States, and China, a patent’s term may be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee for administrative delays by the respective patent offices, in examining and granting a patent, or, in the US, the term may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier-filed patent. The duration of foreign patents varies in accordance with provisions of applicable local law, but typically is also 20 years from the earliest effective filing date. However, the actual protection afforded by a patent varies on a product-by-product basis, from country to country, and depends upon many factors, including the type of patent, the scope of its coverage, the availability of regulatory-related extensions, the availability of legal remedies in that country, and the validity and enforceability of the patent.

In addition, the term of a U.S. patent that covers an US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug may be eligible for patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Hatch-Waxman Act, to account for some of the time the drug is under development and regulatory review after the patent is granted. For a drug for which FDA approval is the first permitted marketing of the active ingredient, the Hatch-Waxman Act allows for extension of the term of one U.S. patent that includes at least one claim covering the composition of matter of an FDA-approved drug (drug substance or drug product), an FDA-approved method of treatment using the drug and/or a method of manufacturing the FDA-approved drug. The extended patent term cannot exceed the shorter of five years beyond the non-extended expiration of the patent or 14 years from the date of the FDA approval of the drug. Some foreign jurisdictions, including Europe, Japan, and China, have similar patent term extension provisions, which allow for extension of the term of a patent that covers a drug approved by the applicable foreign regulatory agency.

Trade Secrets and Proprietary Information

In addition to patents, we rely upon unpatented trade secrets and know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We typically rely on trade secrets to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection. We protect our proprietary information, including trade secrets and know-how, by establishing confidentiality agreements with our commercial partners, collaborators, scientific advisors, employees and consultants and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. These agreements generally provide that all confidential information developed or made known during the course of an individual or entities’ relationship with us must be kept confidential during and after the relationship. These agreements also typically provide that all inventions resulting from work performed for us or relating to our business and conceived or completed during the period of employment or assignment, as applicable, shall be our exclusive property. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the invention assignment agreements, to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed through a relationship with a third party. However, these agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. We also take other appropriate precautions, such as physical and technological security measures, to guard against misappropriation of our proprietary information by third parties. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our commercial partners, collaborators, employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

Government Regulation

United States Regulation

The FDA regulates medical products, including prescription drugs under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and its implementing regulations. Products are also subject to other federal, state and local statutes and regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal, state, local and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval may subject an applicant and/or sponsor to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, including imposition of a clinical hold, refusal by the FDA to approve applications, withdrawal of an approval, import/export delays, issuance of warning letters and other types of enforcement letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution,

disgorgement of profits, debarment, or civil or criminal investigations and penalties brought by the FDA, the Department of Justice, State Attorneys General, or other governmental entities.

The process required by the FDA before a drug may be approved and marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

•

completion of extensive nonclinical laboratory and animal studies conducted in accordance with applicable regulations, including Good Laboratory Practices, or GLP, regulations and applicable requirements for the humane use of laboratory animals;

•

submission to the FDA of an IND application for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may commence;

•

approval by an independent institutional review board ("IRB") to proceed with initiating the clinical trial at each corresponding investigational site.

•

performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with applicable IND regulations, GCPs and other clinical-trial related regulations to establish the safety and efficacy of the product for each proposed indication;

•

preparation and submission to the FDA of an NDA;

•

satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections such as pre-approval inspection(s) of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product, or components thereof, are made to assess compliance with current GMP;

•

payment of user fees for FDA review of the NDA; and

•

FDA acceptance, review and approval of the NDA, which may include an Advisory Committee review.

The development and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources and the receipt and timing of any approval is uncertain.

Nonclinical and Clinical Trials in Support of an NDA

Before testing any drug product candidate in humans, the product candidate must undergo rigorous nonclinical testing. Nonclinical studies include laboratory evaluations of the product candidate, as well as in vitro and animal studies to assess the potential safety and efficacy of the product candidate. The conduct of nonclinical studies that determine the product safety information for administration to humans must comply with federal regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations. The sponsor must submit the results of the nonclinical studies, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and a proposed clinical study protocol, to the FDA as part of an IND, which must become effective before clinical trials in a given indication may be commenced. The IND will become effective automatically 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA raises concerns or questions about the content of the IND or the conduct of the proposed trial(s) as outlined in the IND prior to that time. In such a case, the IND sponsor must resolve any outstanding concerns with the FDA before the clinical trial(s) can proceed.

Clinical trials involve the administration of the product candidate to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements. Each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an IRB for the sites at which the trial will be conducted to ensure that the risks to individuals participating in the clinical trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB will consider, among other things, ethical factors, the safety of human subjects and the possible liability of the institution. The IRB also approves the informed consent form, including a privacy statement, which must be provided to each clinical trial participant or his or her legal representative, and must monitor the clinical trial until completed.

Clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases prior to approval, which may overlap or be combined:

•

Phase 1. Phase 1 clinical trials generally involve a small number of healthy participants or disease-affected participants who are initially exposed to a single dose and then multiple doses of the product candidate. The primary purpose of these clinical trials is to assess the metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacologic action, side effect tolerability and safety of the drug.

•

Phase 2. Phase 2 clinical trials usually involve studies in a limited population of participants with a disease or disorder to evaluate the efficacy of the product candidate for specific indications, determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage, and identify possible adverse effects and safety risks.

•

Phase 3. Phase 3 clinical trials generally involve a larger number of participants at multiple sites and are designed to provide the data necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of the product for its intended use, its safety in use, to establish the overall benefit/risk profile of the product and to provide an adequate basis for product approval by the FDA.

•

Phase 4. Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may be required to be conducted after approval to gain additional experience from the treatment of participants in the intended therapeutic indication and to document a clinical benefit in the case of drugs approved under accelerated approval regulations, or when otherwise requested by the FDA. Failure to conduct the Phase 4 clinical trials per the plan required by the FDA could result in enforcement action or withdrawal of approval.

Progress reports detailing new information and changes such as the results of clinical trials, new nonclinical studies, new product quality data, or changes to manufacturing controls must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if serious adverse events occur. The FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time, or the FDA may impose other sanctions on various grounds, including a finding that the research participants are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the requirements of the IRB or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to participants. There are also requirements related to registration and reporting of certain clinical trials and completed clinical trial results to public registries.

Submission and Review of an NDA

Assuming successful completion of the required nonclinical and clinical testing, the results of nonclinical studies and clinical trials, together with detailed information on the product’s manufacture, composition, quality controls and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA in the form of an NDA, requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications. The application must be accompanied by a significant user fee payment, which typically increases annually, although waivers may be granted in limited cases (e.g., for products that have received an Orphan Designation).

The FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or decide that the data is insufficient for approval and may require additional nonclinical or clinical studies, or other information (e.g., product quality data or manufacturing controls) before it accepts the filing. If an NDA has been accepted for filing, which occurs 60 days after submission, the FDA sets a user fee goal date that informs the applicant of the specific date by which the FDA intends to complete its review. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, for original NDAs, the FDA has ten months from the filing date in which to complete its review of a standard application, and six months from the filing date for an application with priority review. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA goal dates, and the review process may be significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information and clinical data or clarification.

The FDA reviews NDAs to determine, among other things, whether the proposed product is safe and effective for its intended use, and whether the product is being manufactured in accordance with current GMP to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity. Before approving an NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the facilities at which the product is manufactured and will not approve the product unless the manufacturing facilities comply with current GMP. Additionally, the FDA will frequently inspect one or more clinical trial sites for compliance with GCPs and integrity of the data supporting safety and efficacy.

During the approval process, the FDA will also prepare an integrated benefit-risk assessment and determine whether a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, is necessary to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks and to assure the safe use of the product. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor of the application must submit a proposed REMS. A REMS that includes elements to assure safe use, or ETASU, can substantially increase the costs of commercializing a drug. The FDA could also require a special warning, known as a boxed warning, to be included in the product label in order to highlight a particular safety risk. Boxed warnings may limit the type of advertising for a drug. The FDA may also convene an advisory committee of external experts to provide input on certain review issues relating to risk, benefit and interpretation of clinical trial data.

On the basis of the FDA’s evaluation of the NDA and accompanying information, including the results of the inspection of the manufacturing facilities, FDA will issue either an approval letter or a Complete Response Letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug and is accompanied by specific prescribing information for specific conditions of use. A Complete Response Letter indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete and the application will not be approved in its present form. A Complete Response Letter usually describes all of the specific deficiencies in the submission identified by the FDA and may require additional clinical or other data, additional pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial(s) and/or other significant and time-consuming requirements related to clinical trials, nonclinical studies or manufacturing. If a Complete Response Letter is issued, the applicant may either amend the NDA with data to address the raised concerns, resubmit the NDA addressing all the deficiencies identified in the letter, engage in dispute resolution with the FDA about the identified deficiencies in the CRL, or withdraw the application. Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA may ultimately decide that the re-submitted application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.

Orphan Drug Designation

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition affecting fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or in other limited cases. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process, though companies developing orphan drugs may be eligible for certain incentives, including tax credits for qualified clinical testing.

Generally, if a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same active component parts for the same indication for seven years from the date of such approval, except in limited circumstances. Competitors, however, may receive approval of different active component parts for the same indication or obtain approval for the same active component parts for a different indication. If one of our product candidates designated as an orphan drug receives marketing approval for an indication broader than that which is designated, it may not be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity.

Expedited Review and Approval Application Process

The FDA has various programs that are intended to expedite development and approval of drugs intended for the treatment of serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions and that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.

An application may be eligible for a “fast track” designation for a product that is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrates the potential to address an unmet medical need. Fast track designation provides opportunities for more frequent interactions with the FDA review team and permits FDA to consider sections of the NDA on a rolling basis before the complete application is submitted.

In addition, a sponsor can request designation of a product candidate as a “breakthrough therapy”. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, where preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. The FDA must take certain actions with respect to breakthrough therapies, such as holding timely meetings with and providing advice to the product sponsor.

An application may be eligible for “accelerated approval” where the product candidate is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening illness and provides meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments; applications eligible for accelerated approval may be approved on the basis of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials establishing that the product has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of approval, the FDA requires a sponsor to conduct confirmatory studies to verify the predicted effect on IMM or another clinical endpoint, and the product may be subject to expedited withdrawal procedures.

Once an NDA is submitted for a product intended to treat a serious condition, the FDA may assign a priority review designation if the FDA determines that the product, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness. Under priority review, the FDA must review an application in six months, compared to ten months for a standard review. A product may be eligible for more than one expedited approval program. Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, however, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened. Furthermore, these expedited review pathways do not change the standards for approval and may not ultimately expedite the development or approval process.

Non-Patent Exclusivity

In addition to patent exclusivity, the holder of the NDA for the listed drug may be entitled to a period of non-patent exclusivity, during which the FDA cannot approve an ANDA for approval of a generic or 505(b)(2) application that relies on the listed drug as protected by regulatory exclusivity.

An NDA for a new chemical entity may receive five years of exclusivity, whereby the FDA will not accept for filing, with limited exceptions, a product seeking to rely upon the FDA’s findings of safety or effectiveness for such new chemical entity. An ANDA containing a paragraph IV patent certification can be filed after four years. Alternatively, an NDA may obtain a three-year period of non-patent market exclusivity for a particular condition of approval, or change to a marketed product, such as a new formulation for a previously approved product, if one or more new clinical studies (other than bioavailability or bioequivalence studies) was essential to the approval of the application and was conducted/sponsored by the applicant.

Pediatric Exclusivity

Pediatric exclusivity is another type of non-patent marketing exclusivity in the United States and, if granted, provides for the attachment of an additional six months of marketing protection to the term of any existing regulatory exclusivity for both drugs and biologics, and also unexpired Orange Book listed patents in the case of drugs. This six-month exclusivity may be granted if a sponsor submits pediatric data that fairly respond to a written request from the FDA for such data. The data do not need to show the product to be effective in the pediatric population studied; rather, if the clinical trial is deemed to fairly respond to the FDA’s request, the additional protection is granted.

Post-Approval Requirements

Following approval of a new product, the manufacturer and the approved product are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product. After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims and some manufacturing and supplier changes, are subject to prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing annual user fee requirements for marketed products and the establishments where such products are manufactured, as well as new application fees for certain supplemental applications. The FDA may impose a number of post-approval requirements as a condition of approval of an NDA, such as Phase 4 clinical trials or a REMS.

In addition, entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA

and such state agencies for compliance with current GMP requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from current GMP requirements and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain current GMP compliance.

Once an approval is granted, the FDA may issue enforcement letters or withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Corrective action could delay product distribution and require significant time and financial expenditures. Later discovery of previously unknown safety issues with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences include:

•

restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, suspension of the approval, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls;

•

fines, warning letters or other enforcement-related letters of clinical holds on post-approval clinical trials;

•

refusal of the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, or suspension or revocation of product approvals;

•

product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products;

•

injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties; and

•

consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, debarment, or exclusion from federal healthcare programs.

The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications, in accordance with the provisions of the approved label and FDA guidance. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including investigation by federal and state authorities. Additionally, all promotional material must be truthful and non-misleading, and present balanced information regarding the risks and benefits of the drug product.

Other Regulatory Requirements

Outside the U.S., our abilities to develop and market a product are contingent upon receiving approval and ultimately marketing authorization from the appropriate regulatory authorities. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, marketing authorization, pricing and reimbursement vary widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. At present, foreign marketing authorizations are applied for at a national level, although within the E.U. registration procedures are available to companies wishing to market a product in more than one E.U. member state.

We are subject to U.S. federal and foreign anti-corruption laws. Those laws include the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, which prohibits U.S. corporations and their representatives from offering, promising, authorizing, or making payments to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain or retain business abroad. The scope of the FCPA encompasses certain healthcare professionals in many countries. We are also subject to similar laws of other countries that have enacted anti-corruption laws and regulations.

Pediatric Development

In the European Union, companies developing a new medicinal product must agree to a Pediatric Investigation Plan, or PIP, with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and must conduct pediatric clinical trials in accordance with that PIP, unless a deferral or waiver applies, (e.g., because the relevant disease or condition occurs only in adults). The MAA for the product must include the results of pediatric clinical trials conducted in accordance

with the PIP, unless a waiver applies or a deferral has been granted, in which case the pediatric clinical trials must be completed at a later date. Where the MAA includes the results of all pediatric studies conducted in accordance with the PIP and the results are reflected in the approved summary of product characteristics, the holder of a patent or supplementary protection certificate is entitled to receive a six-month extension of the protection under a supplementary protection certificate or, in the case of orphan medicinal products, the product is eligible for a two-year extension of the orphan market exclusivity. This pediatric reward is subject to specific conditions and is not automatically available when data in compliance with the PIP are developed and submitted.

In the US, under Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA), a pediatric development plan is required to accompany an NDA for all drugs, except those receiving non-oncology Orphan Drug Designation. This may include waiver or deferral of pediatric studies. The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) also allows for agreement with FDA on a pediatric written request that, if fulfilled, may extend data exclusivity for the molecule for an additional 6 months.

We believe that our plans for a potential new drug candidate for TRD under consideration may be applicable for the treatment of pediatric patients.

Competition

Despite our belief that the potential product that we intend to develop and commercialize in TRD will be differentiated, we will face competition from many different sources. Potential competition includes major/specialty pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, device and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies and medical research organizations. Additionally, we would expect that, if approved, our product will compete with the standard of care and any new therapies that may become available in the future. Several biopharmaceutical companies have therapies in clinical development for TRD and we are aware that many more are investigating treatments for TRD (e.g., psychedelic-related therapies are currently in development for TRD but have not yet been approved).

TRD is a disease with high unmet need and is associated with multiple serious public health implications. The FDA and the EMA have adopted the most used definition of TRD (i.e., inadequate response to a minimum of two antidepressants despite adequacy of the treatment trial and adherence to treatment). A number of published sources estimate that at least 30% of persons with depression meet this definition. There are many treatment paradigms that have been employed for the management of TRD. In general, these treatment paradigms /therapies can be bucketed into categories of: pharmacotherapies, somatic therapies and psychotherapeutic approaches. It is well known that the majority of these treatments have serious limitations despite their benefit.

•

Pharmacotherapies: antidepressants and antipsychotics indicated for use in major depressive disorder are frequently prescribed, combined or augmented with a second agent to treat TRD. Additionally, mood stabilizers (e.g. lithium) are utilized as treatments, alone or in combination for TRD. Only two pharmacotherapies are approved for TRD in the U.S.: Spravato (esketamine), marketed by Janssen, and Symbyax (olanzapine/fluoxetine hydrochloride capsules), developed by Eli Lilly and Company.

•

Somatic Therapies: multiple somatic therapies are used for the management of TRD such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS).

•

Psychotherapeutic Approaches: manual-based psychotherapies are not proven to be efficacious as a standalone intervention in TRD, but their efficacy in combination with antidepressants has been noted.

The biopharmaceutical industry is highly competitive within and across therapeutic categories and indications. There are many public and private biopharmaceutical companies, universities, government agencies and other research organizations actively engaged in the research and development and commercialization of products that may be similar to our product candidates or address similar markets. In addition, the number of companies seeking to develop and commercialize products and therapies competing with our product candidates is likely to increase. However, we seek to build our portfolio with key differentiating attributes to provide a competitive advantage in the markets we target. The success of all of our product candidates, if approved, will likely depend upon their efficacy,

safety, convenience, price, the level of generic competition and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors.

Many of our competitors may have greater financial resources and broader expertise in research and development, manufacturing, nonclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved medicines than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostic industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. These competitors could also compete with us in establishing clinical trial sites and participant registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.

Competition can also impact Tisento (in which we hold an equity interest), as well as companies which we have out-licensed or seek to out-license our product candidates. To date, the product candidates we have sold to Tisento or out-licensed to Akebia are either in early stage clinical or pre-clinical stages or not yet received any approval allowing for the commercial sale of these product candidates.

Manufacturing

We do not own or operate, and currently have no plans to establish, any manufacturing facilities. We intend to depend on third-party contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, for all our requirements of raw materials, drug substance and drug products for clinical trials and nonclinical research. We intend to continue to rely on CMOs for the supply of our retained assets for all stages of clinical development and commercialization, as well as for the supply of any other product candidates that we may identify. We require all our CMOs to conduct manufacturing activities in compliance with current GMP requirements.

Human Capital Resources

As a small, innovative company, if in the future we elect to start growing our internal operations, our success will depend on attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled and experienced scientific, medical and other personnel. We plan to provide compensation and benefits programs which may include competitive salaries, potential annual discretionary bonuses, stock awards, a 401(k) plan with employer match, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, unlimited vacation time, among other benefits. Our employees will be further guided by our code of conduct and our cultural values of seeking to serve patients, acting with integrity, empowering people and innovating for solutions.

Employee Profile

As of December 31, 2024, we had one employee and several consultants, including our Chief Financial Officer. We may in the future seek to expand our employee base, hire additional consultants and also outsource certain functions to other firms.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on September 6, 2018. Our principal executive offices are located at 245 First Street, Riverview II, 18th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02142. Our telephone number is (857) 327-8778. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CYCN.”

Available Information

Our internet website address is www.cyclerion.com. In addition to the information contained in this Annual Report, information about us can be found on our website. Our website and information included in or linked to our website are not part of this Annual Report.

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information. The address of the SEC’s website is www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following information sets forth risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements we have made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and those we may make from time to time. You should carefully consider the risks described below, in addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other public filings. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed by any of these risks. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or other factors not perceived by us to present significant risks to our business at this time also may impair our business operations. In this section, we first provide a summary of the more significant risks and uncertainties we face and then provide a full set of risk factors and discuss them in greater detail.

Risk Factors Summary

Risks Related to our Financial Position and Capital Needs

•

We are a biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history and no products approved for commercial sale.

•

We have incurred significant losses and have never generated revenue from product sales; we anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future and may never be profitable.

•

There is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. We will need to raise additional funding, which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, to continue as a going concern and advance our current and any potential future product candidates. Failure to obtain capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts or other operations. Raising additional capital may dilute our existing shareholders, restrict our operations or cause us to relinquish valuable rights.

•

We are in the process of in-licensing a product candidate for treatment resistant depression and our approach to the discovery and development of this and any future product candidates we may develop may never lead to marketable products.

Risks Related to Development and Clinical Testing of Our Products and Product Candidates

•

We may encounter substantial delays in our activities, or we may fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities in the development of our compounds.

•

We could encounter difficulties in enrolling participants in any future clinical studies, which could delay or prevent progress of our product candidates.

•

We may be unable to obtain regulatory approval f and unable to generate product revenue for any product candidate.

•

Any future product candidates may cause side effects that may result in label restrictions.

•

We may have to change our nonclinical or clinical study protocols due to regulatory reasons or unanticipated events, which could result in increased costs to us and could delay our development timeline.

Risks Related to Reliance on Licensees, Tisento and Third Parties

•

There are risks in our investment in Tisento tied to Tisento developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, launching and commercializing its product candidates.

•

There is uncertainty as to any liquidity or monetizable value of our equity interest in Tisento, which faces all the risks of an early-stage pharmaceutical development company.

•

Akebia may not be successful in developing and commercializing any therapies through its praliciguat out-license with the Company.

•

We may not be successful in entering into necessary licenses or collaboration agreements and we may enter into collaboration or license arrangements in the future that ultimately are not successful.

•

We expect that we will continue to rely on third parties to conduct nonclinical and clinical studies and to manufacture drug supplies for our product candidates. If these third parties do not execute successfully, our business could be substantially harmed.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

•

We share confidential information with third-party vendors, including trade secrets and know-how, which increases the possibility that our confidential information will be misappropriated or disclosed.

•

We may be unable to adequately protect our proprietary technologies or obtain and maintain issued patents that are sufficient to protect our product candidates.

•

We may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may prevent or delay our product development efforts.

•

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

•

We may not seek to protect our intellectual property rights in all jurisdictions throughout the world and we may not be able to adequately enforce our intellectual property rights even in the jurisdictions where we seek protection.

•

We may not be able to obtain additional protection under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Act, and similar foreign legislation by extending the patent terms and obtaining data exclusivity for our product candidates.

•

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees, consultants or advisors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their current or former employers.

Risks Related to the Future Commercialization of our Potential Future Product Candidates

•

If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we estimate, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability may be harmed.

•

We may fail to comply with healthcare and other regulations and could face substantial penalties.

•

Our competitors may achieve regulatory approval before us or develop therapies that are safer, more advanced or more effective than ours.

•

The impact of healthcare reform and other governmental and private payor initiatives, as well as the potential for reductions in federal government funding for development and clinical trials may harm our business.

•

Our prospects for success depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

•

We will need to expand our organization and we may experience difficulties in managing growth of our employee base.

•

We face potential product liability exposure, and, if claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability.

•

We could fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls and our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired.

•

If our information technology systems or data, or those of third parties upon which we rely, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse impacts resulting from such compromise, including, but not

limited to, regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; interruptions to our commercial operations, clinical trials or other operations; harm to our reputation; loss of revenue or profits; loss of sales and other adverse consequences.

•

If we or any contract manufacturers and suppliers we engage fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur.

•

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and other worldwide anti-bribery laws.

•

The pandemic and future pandemics may disrupt our business, including our development activities.

Risks Related to the holders of Our Common Stock

•

We have limited trading history and a relatively limited public float for our shares and our common stock market price may fluctuate widely.

•

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely and you could lose all or part of your investment in our common stock as a result.

•

Any future failure to comply with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements could result in the delisting of our common stock.

•

We have adopted anti-takeover provisions in our articles of organization and bylaws and are subject to provisions of Massachusetts law that may frustrate any attempt to remove or replace our current board of directors or to effect a change of control or other business combination involving our company.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Capital Needs

As we are a biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history and no products approved for commercial sale, valuing our business and predicting our prospects are challenging.

We are a biopharmaceutical company that was incorporated in 2018. Our business was conducted within Ironwood prior to that time, and we had no history as an independent company prior to the completion of the separation which occurred in 2019. We are seeking to develop new products for treatment resistant depression. We have also developed a pipeline of sGC stimulators, but we have no products approved for commercial sale, and we have never generated revenue from product sales nor have Tisento or Akebia ever generated product sales from products incorporating our compounds. Our operating activities to date have been limited primarily to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, developing our technology, identifying potential product candidates, pursuing partnership opportunities, and conducting early-stage clinical trials for our product candidates.

To date, we have not obtained marketing approval for any of our product candidates; engaged on our own or through a third party, in commercial scale manufacturing or conducted sales and marketing activities necessary for the successful commercialization of our product candidates. Our short operating history offers limited insight into our prospects for success or even viability. We expect our operating performance to fluctuate. We will encounter challenges frequently experienced by early-stage biopharmaceutical companies in rapidly evolving fields and we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully navigate such challenges. If we do not successfully address the challenges we face, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be materially harmed.

Our business has incurred significant losses and we anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future. We have never generated revenue from product sales and may never be profitable.

Our business has incurred operating losses due to costs incurred in connection with our research and development activities and general and administrative expenses associated with our operations. Our net losses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $3.1 million and $5.3 million, respectively. We expect to incur significant losses for at least the next several years, as we continue our research activities and conduct development of, and seek regulatory approvals for, our product candidates.

Our ability to generate revenue from our current and any potential future product candidates and achieve profitability depends on our ability, alone or with strategic partners, to complete the development of, and obtain the necessary regulatory and essential pricing and reimbursement approvals to commercialize, our product candidates. We do not know when, if ever, we will generate revenues from sales of our product candidates.

Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required by the FDA, the EMA, or other regulatory agencies, domestic or foreign, to perform clinical and other studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Even if one or more of the product candidates that we develop is approved for commercial sale, we may never generate revenue in amounts sufficient to achieve and maintain profitability.

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We will need to raise additional funding in the near term, which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all to continue as a going concern and advance our product candidates. Failure to obtain capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts or other operations. Raising additional capital may dilute our existing shareholders, restrict our operations or cause us to relinquish valuable rights.

There is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As of December 31, 2024, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.2 million. Our management believes that such cash and cash equivalents will not be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital requirements beyond the second quarter, whether or not we curtail efforts with respect to certain of our current and future product candidates. We will require significant additional funding to advance any of our product candidates beyond the short term and to sustain our operations.

We may also seek to raise such capital through public or private financing of our securities, royalty financing or debt financing. Raising funds in the current economic environment may be challenging, and such financing may not be available in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms, if at all. The terms of any financing may harm existing shareholders. The issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. The sale of additional equity or convertible securities may dilute the ownership of existing shareholders.

If we sell shares or other equity securities in one or more other transactions, or issue stock, stock options or other securities pursuant to our current equity plans, investors may be materially diluted by such subsequent issuances. We will need significant additional capital in the near term to continue our current plans. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain such funds upon favorable terms and conditions, if at all. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution. We may sell common stock, preferred stock, convertible securities or other equity or convertible securities in one or more transactions that may include voting rights (including the right to vote as a series on particular matters), preferences as to dividends and liquidation, antidilution, and conversion and redemption rights, subject to applicable law, and at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. Such issuances and the exercise of any convertible securities will dilute the percentage ownership of our stockholders and may affect the value of our capital stock and could adversely affect the rights of the holders of such stock, thereby reducing the value of such stock. Moreover, any exercise of convertible securities may adversely affect the terms upon which we will be able to obtain additional equity capital, since the holders of such convertible securities can be expected to exercise them at a time when we would, in all likelihood, not be able to obtain any needed capital on terms more favorable to us than those provided in such convertible securities.

Incurring debt would result in increased fixed payment obligations, and we may agree to restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt or limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights that could impede our ability to conduct our business. In the event we are unable to raise financing, we may need to reduce or cease operations.

We also intend to seek funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, or licensing arrangements with third parties. Such agreements may adversely impact retained rights to our assets, technologies, future revenue streams and programs, especially those that receive regulatory approval.

Risks Related to Development and Clinical Testing of Our Products and Product Candidates

Our approach to the discovery and development of product candidates for the treatment of serious diseases may never lead to marketable products.

The development of drug therapies presents unique challenges, including an imperfect understanding of the biology, a frequent lack of translatability of nonclinical study results in subsequent clinical trials and dose selection, and the product candidate having an effect that may be too small to be detected using the outcome measures selected in clinical trials or if the outcomes measured do not reach statistical significance. Our future success is highly dependent on the successful development of our technology and our current and any potential future product candidates. The scientific evidence to support the feasibility of developing our current product candidates is both preliminary and limited. If we do not successfully develop and commercialize product candidates, we will not become profitable and the value of our common stock may decline.

Research and development of biopharmaceutical products is inherently risky. We may encounter substantial delays in our activities, including our clinical studies, or we may fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities in the development of products to treat patients with serious diseases.

Our business depends heavily on the successful development, clinical testing, regulatory approvals and commercialization of olinciguat (optioned to CVCO) and praliciguat (out-licensed to Akebia), and any future potential product candidates we may acquire or license as well as both the Transferred Assets product candidates we have sold to Tisento. Any of our current or potential product candidates will require regulatory approval.

Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of our product candidates, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive nonclinical and clinical studies that our product candidates are both safe and effective for use in each target indication. Each product candidate must demonstrate an adequate benefit-risk profile for its intended use in its intended patient population. In some instances, significant variability in safety or efficacy appear in different clinical studies of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in study protocols, differences in the number and characteristics of the enrolled study participants, variations in the dosing regimen and other clinical study parameters or the dropout rate among study participants. Product candidates in later stages of clinical studies often fail to demonstrate adequate safety and efficacy despite promising nonclinical testing and early clinical studies. Companies in the biopharmaceutical industry often suffer significant setbacks in later-stage clinical studies; most product candidates that begin clinical studies are never approved for commercialization by regulatory authorities. Favorable results in earlier stage trials may not be replicated in later stage trials. If we fail to produce positive results in our clinical trials, the development timeline, regulatory approval and commercialization prospects of our assets and, correspondingly, our business and financial prospects, would be materially adversely affected.

In the event of difficulties in enrolling participants in any clinical studies conducted on our product candidates, those clinical trials could be delayed or prevented from proceeding.

Identifying and qualifying participants to participate in any clinical studies of our product candidates would be critical to the success of those clinical trials. The timing of any clinical studies will depend in part on the speed at which participants can be recruited to participate in testing these product candidates. Estimates of the prevalence of target indications may vary considerably. Determining the incidence of these conditions, including in specific geographies or demographic groups, would be challenging. The lower the actual prevalence of these conditions, the more challenges would be encountered enrolling participants in those clinical studies, which could delay development of those product candidates. Clinical trial enrollment may also encounter difficulties for a variety of other reasons. The number of participants eligible for a clinical trial may be substantially limited by stringent eligibility criteria in a study protocol, such as the inclusion of biomarker-driven identification or other highly specific criteria related to stage of disease progression or to specific patient reported outcome measures. The number of participants required to power the statistical analysis of the study’s endpoints may be very large leading to an extended enrollment period. Issues such as the proximity of participants to a study site, the complexity of the study design, the ability to recruit investigators with appropriate skill and experience, competing clinical studies for similar therapies or targeting similar participants, perceptions of the benefit-risk profile of the product candidate relative to other available therapies or product candidates, and ability to obtain and maintain institutional review board, or IRB, or ethics committee, or EC, approvals

and participant consents all could have a substantial impact on the timing of clinical trial enrollment. If sufficient participants cannot be enrolled in clinical studies in a timely way, obtaining study results would be delayed, which may harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. If we, Akebia and any other future licensees, as applicable, are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for the product candidates, we will be unable to generate product revenue and our business will be substantially harmed.

A product candidate cannot be commercialized until the appropriate regulatory authorities have reviewed and approved the product candidate. The time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable, typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical studies and depends upon numerous factors, including the type and complexity of the product candidates involved. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept an application for review or may decide that data are insufficient for approval and require additional nonclinical, clinical, or other information (e.g., product quality data or manufacturing controls). No regulatory approval for any of our product candidates we own, licensed to Akebia or sold to Tisento has been requested or obtained, and it is possible that none of these existing product candidates or any product candidates we or our licensees or Tisento may seek to develop in the future will ever obtain regulatory approval.

Any ongoing clinical studies may not be completed on schedule, and any planned clinical studies may not begin on schedule, if at all. The completion or commencement of clinical studies can be delayed or prevented for a number of reasons, including, among others:

•

the FDA or other regulatory bodies may not authorize us or our investigators to commence planned clinical studies, or require that ongoing clinical studies be suspended through imposition of clinical holds;

•

negative results from ongoing studies or other industry studies involving product candidates modulating the same or similar mechanism of action;

•

delays in reaching or failing to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical study sites, the terms of which can be subject to considerable negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and study sites;

•

inadequate quantity or quality of a product candidate or other materials necessary to conduct clinical studies, for example delays in the manufacturing of sufficient supply of finished drug product;

•

difficulties obtaining EC or IRB approval(s) to conduct a clinical study at a prospective site or sites;

•

challenges in recruiting and enrolling participants in clinical studies, the proximity of participants to study sites, eligibility criteria for the clinical study, the nature of the clinical study protocol, the availability of approved effective treatments for the relevant disease and competition from other clinical study programs for similar indications;

•

severe or unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by participants in a clinical study;

•

the presence of unanticipated metabolites in participants in a clinical study may require considerable nonclinical and clinical assessment;

•

we, our licensees or Tisento may decide, or regulatory authorities may require the conduct of additional clinical studies or abandonment of product development programs;

•

delays in validating, or inability to validate, any endpoints utilized in a clinical study;

•

the FDA or other regulatory bodies may disagree with a clinical study’s design and the interpretation of data from clinical studies, or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for clinical studies;

•

reports from nonclinical or clinical testing of other competing candidates that raise safety or efficacy concerns;

•

cutbacks in funding for the FDA may result in delays in reviewing and approving applications; and

•

difficulties retaining participants who have enrolled in a clinical study but may be prone to withdraw due to rigors of the clinical studies, lack of efficacy, side effects, personal issues, or loss of interest.

Clinical studies may also be delayed or terminated as a result of ambiguous or negative interim results. In addition, a clinical study may be suspended or terminated by us, our licensees, Tisento, the FDA or other comparable authorities, the IRBs or ECs overseeing a clinical study, a data and safety monitoring board overseeing the clinical study, or other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including, among others:

•

failure to conduct the clinical study in accordance with regulatory requirements or clinical protocols;

•

inspection of the clinical study operations or study sites by the FDA or other regulatory authorities that reveals deficiencies or violations that require undertaking corrective action, including in response to the imposition of a clinical hold;

•

unforeseen safety issues, including any that could be identified in ongoing studies, adverse side effects or lack of effectiveness;

•

changes in government regulations or administrative actions;

•

problems with clinical supply materials; and

•

lack of adequate funding to continue clinical studies.

Our product candidates may cause side effects or adverse events that are presented in the product labeling approved by regulatory authorities. Some may result in label restrictions.

Our current and any potential future product candidates may cause serious side effects which could cause us, our licensees, Tisento, or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical studies and could result in restrictive label language or delay or denial of regulatory approval.

Changes in regulatory requirements, FDA guidance or unanticipated events during nonclinical studies and clinical studies of our product candidates, which may result in changes to nonclinical or clinical study protocols or additional nonclinical or clinical study requirements, which could result in increased costs and could delay development timelines.

Changes in regulatory requirements, FDA guidance or unanticipated events during nonclinical studies and clinical studies may force amendment to nonclinical studies and clinical study protocols or the FDA may impose additional nonclinical studies and clinical study requirements. Amendments or changes to clinical study protocols would require resubmission to the FDA and IRBs for review and approval, which may increase the cost or delay the timing or successful completion of clinical studies. Similarly, amendments to nonclinical studies may increase the cost or delay the timing or successful completion of those nonclinical studies. In the event of delays in completing, or the termination of, any of nonclinical or clinical studies, or if it is required that additional nonclinical or clinical studies be conducted, the commercial prospects for product candidates may be harmed and our ability to generate product revenue will be delayed for those product candidates we retain our out-license or to realize value in our equity position in Tisento.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that there will be success in obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in other jurisdictions.

In order to market any product outside of the United States, compliance with the numerous and varying safety, efficacy and other regulatory requirements of other countries is required. Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that obtaining or maintaining regulatory approval in any other jurisdiction will be possible, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. For example, even if the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authority grants marketing approval of a product candidate, comparable regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion of the product candidate in those

countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from those in the United States, including additional nonclinical or clinical studies, as studies conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. The marketing approval processes in other countries may implicate all of the risks detailed above regarding FDA approval in the United States, as well as other risks. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price intended to be charged for a product candidate is also subject to approval.

Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs and could delay or prevent the introduction of product candidates in certain countries. Failure to obtain marketing approval in other countries or any delay or other setback in obtaining such approval would impair the ability to market product candidates in such countries. Any such impairment would reduce the size of the potential market, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Data/market exclusivity may be more limited than we expect based upon the competitive landscape and other factors outside of our control that may occur during development or after approval.

There are many types of data/market exclusivity mechanisms that we or our licensees may seek to secure for our product candidates. Many of these have risk of loss of exclusivity if the competitive landscape changes or regulations are revised. If we, our licensees or Tisento seek and are awarded orphan drug designation in the US and/or the EU based upon criteria in effect at the time, this designation may be rescinded if a similar drug or another therapy that confers a significant benefit over these product candidates is subsequently approved. If these product candidates were to fail to obtain orphan drug status, or lose such status after it is obtained, or the marketing exclusivity that such status provides, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed. There are other types of data/market exclusivity rights granted after approval that may not confer exclusivity anticipated if the competitive landscape changes and our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.

Future pandemics may disrupt our business, including our development activities.

Many nations, including the United States, continue to implement mitigation measures that have in the past and may in the future limit our ability to access patients and physicians at certain local clinical centers that are participating in any future development activities.

We may face limitations and difficulties enrolling patients in our planned and future clinical trials if the patient populations that are eligible for our clinical trials are affected by the coronavirus and/or the COVID-19 vaccines or other pandemics. Any such restrictions at trial sites could delay any future clinical studies. In addition, if the patients enrolled in any future clinical trials become infected with COVID-19 or other viruses, we may have more adverse events and deaths in our clinical trials as a result. Vulnerable patients may be at a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 and other viruses may experience more severe symptoms from the disease, adversely affecting our chances for regulatory approval or requiring further clinical studies. The adverse effects that may occur from administration of vaccines to patients participating in our future clinical trials could adversely affect clinical trial outcomes or data analysis. Furthermore, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic, or future outbreaks of infectious disease, hinders access to facilities, procurement of resources, raw materials or components necessary for research studies or preclinical or clinical development is not fully predictable. Delays and disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, or future outbreaks of infectious disease, may increase our capital needs while potentially interfering with our access to capital.

Risks Related to Reliance on Licensees, Tisento and Other Third Parties

We may not succeed in our pursuit of capital, capabilities, and transactions for the development and commercialization of our future clinical stage assets, which would affect our financial condition.

We are seeking capital, capabilities, and transactions to advance the development of product candidates we may acquire rights to in the future. There can be no assurance that this process will result in any effective negotiations toward, reaching terms of, executing agreements relating to, or completing any transaction or that any such transaction

will be successful. Failure to complete any of the foregoing efforts would materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Akebia may not be successful in developing any therapies through the praliciguat out-license and we may not realize any future revenue from the out-license.

On June 3, 2021, we entered into a license agreement with Akebia relating to the exclusive worldwide license to Akebia of our rights to the development, manufacture, medical affairs and commercialization of pharmaceutical products containing the pharmaceutical compound praliciguat and other related products and forms thereof enumerated in such agreement. Under the agreement, Akebia is responsible for all research, development, regulatory, and commercialization activities for certain products. On December 13, 2024, we and Akebia entered into Amendment #1 to License Agreement (the “2024 Amendment”) to the original 2021 license agreement. Under the terms of the 2024 Amendment, Akebia paid the Company (i) $1.25 million in December 2024 and has agreed to pay an additional $0.5 million on or before September 30, 2025. In addition, Akebia has agreed to assume control of the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of certain Cyclerion patents, and the expenses associated therewith, at an earlier date than as originally agreed between the parties. The parties have agreed to the reduction of certain development milestones and the increase of certain royalty rates on net sales and sublicense income. Pursuant to the terms of the 2021 License Agreement, as amended, Akebia will pay Cyclerion tiered royalties ranging from mid-single digit to twenty percent of net sales. Cyclerion’s obligations to deliver certain drug products have also ceased. The agreement may be terminated by either party in the event of a material breach by the other party or by us in the event of certain patent disputes. There can be no assurances that the agreement will result in any therapies or that it will not be terminated prior to the realization by us of any remaining eligible revenues or that Akebia will be able to successfully bring any of the licensed product candidates to market due to financial limitations or other business factors in the future or if Akebia is unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms, if at all. Akebia may at any time terminate the Akebia License Agreement upon 180 days written notice. subject to Akebia’s obligation to grant Cyclerion a non-exclusive, royalty-free license, with the right to grant multiple tiers of sublicenses, to certain licensed compounds or products as defined in the Akebia License Agreement as well as certain rights to regulatory submissions, product trademarks, contracts with third party suppliers and certain other rights.

Tisento may not be successful in developing any therapies and we may not realize any future value from the Tisento common stock we received under the Asset Purchase Agreement with Tisento.

Our investment in Tisento is subject to all of the risks associated with an earlier stage biotechnology company. The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. While we believe that Tisento’s technology, development experience and scientific knowledge provide it with competitive advantages, it may face potential competition from many different sources, including large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of similar products. Any investigational products that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with new immunotherapies that may become available in the future. As a result, our investment in Tisento is risky and our equity interest in Tisento could be significantly diluted in the future if Tisento seeks to raise additional capital or is unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms, if at all. If Tisento suffers adverse effects, it may not be able to continue as a going business concern, and we may lose our entire investment.

We lack operational control over Tisento.

Our investment in Tisento represents a minority or passive stake and we may have little to no participation, input or control over the management, policies, and operations of Tisento. Further, we may lack sufficient ownership of voting securities to impact, without the vote of additional equity holders, any matters submitted to stockholders or members of such business for a vote. There is inherent risk in making minority equity investments in companies over which we have little to no control. Without control of the management and decision-making of these businesses, we cannot control their direction, strategy, policies and business plans, and we may be powerless to improve any declines in their performance, operating results and financial condition.

Any collaboration or license arrangements that we enter into in the future may not be successful, which could impede our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

We may seek additional collaboration or license arrangements for the commercialization, and/or potentially for the development, of certain of our product candidates depending on the merits of retaining commercialization rights for ourselves as compared to entering into collaboration or license arrangements. We face significant challenges in seeking appropriate partners. Moreover, collaboration and license arrangements are complex and time-consuming to negotiate, document, implement and maintain. We may not be successful in our efforts to establish and implement such arrangements. The terms of any collaborations, licenses or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.

Any future collaboration or license arrangements that we enter into may not be successful. The success of such arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and activities of our partners. Collaboration and license arrangements are subject to numerous risks, including that:

•

partners have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to collaborations;

•

a partner with marketing, manufacturing and distribution rights to one or more products may not commit sufficient resources to or otherwise not perform satisfactorily in carrying out these activities;

•

partners may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our intellectual property or proprietary information in a way that gives rise to actual or threatened litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property or proprietary information or expose us to potential liability;

•

collaboration and license arrangements may be terminated, and, if terminated, this may result in a need for additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable current or any potential future product candidates;

•

partners may own or co-own intellectual property covering products that results from our collaborating with them, and in such cases, we would not have the exclusive right to develop or commercialize such intellectual property;

•

disputes may arise with respect to the ownership of any intellectual property developed pursuant to our collaboration or license arrangements; and

•

a partner’s sales and marketing activities or other operations may not be in compliance with applicable laws resulting in civil or criminal proceedings.

We expect in the future to rely on third parties to conduct any nonclinical or clinical studies for any potential future product candidates. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, necessary regulatory approvals for or commercialization of any potential future product candidates may not be obtainable and our business could be substantially harmed.

We do not have the infrastructure or internal resources and capabilities to independently conduct nonclinical or clinical studies. We expect to rely on contract laboratories, medical institutions, clinical investigators, licensees and other third parties, such as CROs, to conduct nonclinical studies on any future discovery compounds and product candidates and clinical studies on product candidates. We expect to rely heavily on such parties for execution of nonclinical and clinical studies and as a result that we will only be able to control certain aspects of their activities. As a result, we expect we will have limited direct control over the conduct, timing and completion of our nonclinical and clinical studies and the management of data developed through these studies. Communicating with outside parties can also be challenging, potentially leading to mistakes as well as difficulties in coordinating activities. Outside parties may have staffing difficulties, fail to comply with contractual obligations, experience regulatory compliance issues, undergo changes in priorities, become financially distressed or form relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors.

These factors may materially impede the willingness or ability of third parties to complete quality nonclinical and clinical studies and may subject us to unexpected cost increases that are beyond our control. Nevertheless, we may

be responsible for ensuring that each of any future nonclinical and clinical studies is conducted in accordance with any applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific requirements and standards, and our reliance on CROs and other third parties does not necessarily relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We, and any future CROs and other third parties are required to comply with regulations and guidelines, such as good laboratory practices (GLPs), good clinical practices (GCPs), and current Good Manufacturing Practices. These regulations are enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for any products in clinical development. The FDA enforces compliance to regulations through periodic inspections of clinical study sponsors, principal investigators, and third parties. If the FDA determines there was a failure to comply with the regulations the clinical data generated in any clinical studies may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require the performance of additional clinical studies before approving any marketing applications. We cannot assure you that, upon inspection, the FDA will determine that any potential future nonclinical studies, clinical studies or product manufacturing will comply with these regulations. Our failure or the failure of our CROs or other third parties to comply with these regulations may require the repeat of those clinical studies, which would delay the regulatory approval process and could also result in enforcement action up to and including civil and criminal penalties.

Although we or our current licensee or any future licensees may design or approve the designs of our product candidate clinical studies, CROs and other third parties conduct those clinical studies. As a result, many important aspects of the execution of the development programs for our product candidates may be outside of our direct control. In addition, the CROs, or other third parties, may not perform all of their obligations under arrangements with us or our licensees or in compliance with regulatory requirements, but we may remain responsible and are subject to enforcement action that may include civil penalties and criminal prosecution for any violations of FDA laws and regulations during the conduct of clinical studies. If the CROs, or our licensees, do not perform clinical studies in a satisfactory manner, breach their obligations to us or fail to comply with regulatory requirements, the development and commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed, or our development program materially and irreversibly harmed. We may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources these CROs or our licensees devote to our clinical products.

If any relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, arrangements with alternative CROs may not be achievable. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to required clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, any clinical studies such CROs are associated with may be extended, delayed or terminated, and required regulatory approval for or successfully commercialization of our product candidates may not be obtainable. As a result, we believe that our financial results and the commercial prospects for our product candidates in the approved indication would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed or lost.

Except as out-licensed, we must rely completely on third-party suppliers to manufacture any nonclinical and clinical drug supplies for our product candidates, and we intend to rely on third parties to produce commercial supplies of any product candidates that are approved.

We do not currently have, nor do we plan to acquire, the infrastructure or capability to internally manufacture the drug supply of our current or any potential future product candidates, for use in the conduct of our nonclinical and clinical studies. We lack the internal resources and the capability to manufacture any product candidates on any scale. We expect to depend on third-party contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, for all our requirements of raw materials, drug substances and drug product for any future nonclinical studies and clinical trials. We do not have long-term supply agreements in place with any CMO and we expect that any potential future product candidates will be individually contracted under a services agreement on a purchase order basis. We expect to rely on CMOs for the supply of later-stage development and commercialization, as well as for the supply of any other discovery compounds or product candidates that we may identify, and we may not be able to enter into long-term supply agreements with such CMOs on favorable terms. As a further result, we are subject to price fluctuations for any clinical drug supplies. If the prices charged by these CMOs increase, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed. We expect in the future to apply industry risk management practices to minimize the impact to nonclinical and clinical timelines associated with delays to our clinical supplies. However, these delays could still lead to clinical trials delays that could adversely impact our business.

In addition, any facilities which may be used by contract manufacturers to manufacture the active pharmaceutical ingredient and final drug product must complete a pre-approval inspection by the FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory agencies to assess compliance with applicable requirements, including current GMP, after we submit our new drug application, or NDA, or relevant foreign regulatory submission to the applicable regulatory agency. If the FDA or an applicable foreign regulatory agency determines now or in the future that these facilities are noncompliant, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would impede our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates.

Our anticipated reliance on third parties requires us to share our confidential information, including trade secrets and know-how, which increases the possibility that our confidential information will be misappropriated or disclosed.

Because we seek to involve third party licensees and collaborators on current and potential future product candidates, we expect we will rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, and because we expect to collaborate with various CROs and other third parties to conduct our nonclinical studies and clinical trials, we must, at times, share our trade secrets or know-how with them. We seek to protect our confidential information, including know-how and trade secrets, in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, collaborative research agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our collaborators, advisors and consultants prior to beginning our collaborations or disclosing confidential information to such parties. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, such as trade secrets and know-how. Despite these contractual provisions, the need to share our confidential information with third parties increases the risk that confidential information such as trade secrets and know-how becomes known by our competitors, is inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or is disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our confidential information including know-how and trade secrets, a competitor's discovery of our confidential information or other unauthorized use or disclosure could impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property Rights

If we or our licensees or Tisento are unable to adequately protect proprietary technologies, or obtain and maintain issued patents that are sufficient to protect their respective product candidates, others could compete against us, our licensees and Tisento more directly, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success will depend in part on our and our licensees and Tisento’s ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection in the United States and other countries for commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business, defend and enforce patents, should they issue, preserve the confidentiality of trade secrets and operate without infringing the valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties. We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technologies that we believe are important to our business, including seeking patents intended to cover our product candidates and compositions, their methods of use and any other Inventions that are important to the development of our business.

We have 20 issued U.S. patents, eleven pending U.S. patents applications and numerous foreign patents and pending patent applications. Patent families are filed either as utility U.S. patents or under an international patent law treaty (PCT) that provides a unified procedure for filing a single initial patent application to seek patent protection for an invention simultaneously in each of the 157 contracting states, followed by the process of entering national phase, which requires a separate application in each of the member states in which national patent protection is sought.

See “Business — Intellectual Property.” We also rely on trade secrets to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection.

The patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including ours, involve complex legal and factual questions, which in recent years have been the subject of much litigation, and, therefore, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of any patent claims that we may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty. Patent applications may not be granted as issued patents in any particular jurisdiction and, even if they do,

these patents may not include claims with a sufficient scope to protect our product candidates or otherwise provide any competitive advantage.

Even if patent applications are issued, competitors and other third parties may infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate patents and other intellectual property rights. We may not be able to prevent infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, filing infringement claims may be required, which can be expensive and time-consuming and divert the attention of management and key personnel from business operations.

Moreover, patents, if issued, may be challenged, deemed unenforceable, invalidated or circumvented in the United States and abroad. U.S. patents and patent applications may also be subject to interference, derivation, ex-parte reexamination, post-grant review, or inter-partes review proceedings, supplemental examination and challenges in district or other courts. Interference proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us or our licensees may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to patents or patent applications. An unfavorable outcome could require ceasing the use of the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer a license on commercially reasonable terms. Involvement in litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs, and distract management and other employees. Furthermore, an adverse decision in an interference or derivation proceeding can result in a third party receiving the sought-out patent right, which in turn could affect the ability to develop, market or otherwise commercialize our product candidates.

Patents may also be subjected to opposition, post-grant review or comparable proceedings lodged in various foreign, both national and regional, patent offices or courts. Such proceedings could result in revocation or amendment of patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product candidates or competitive products. In addition, such proceedings may be costly. Thus, any patents, should they issue, may not provide any protection against competitors.

Furthermore, though a patent, if it were to issue, is presumed valid and enforceable, its issuance is not conclusive as to its validity or its enforceability and it may not provide adequate protection to exclude competitors from making similar products. Even if a patent issues and is held to be valid and enforceable, competitors may be able to design around or circumvent our patents, such as by using pre-existing or newly developed technology or products in a non-infringing manner. If these developments were to occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Any litigation to enforce or defend patent rights, even if successful, would be costly and time-consuming and would divert the attention of management and key personnel from business operations. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded if we were to prevail may not be commercially meaningful.

In addition, proceedings to enforce or defend any patents, if and when issued, put those patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable or not infringed, or interpreted narrowly. Such proceedings could also provoke third parties to assert counterclaims, including that some or all of the claims in one or more patents are invalid, not infringed or unenforceable. Grounds for a validity challenge include alleged failures to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for unenforceability assertions of a patent include allegations that someone connected with prosecution of the patent application that matured into the patent withheld relevant information from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution of the patent application. In an infringement proceeding, a court may disagree with allegations and refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that patents do not cover the technology in question or may decide that a patent is invalid or unenforceable. An adverse result in any litigation, defense or post-grant proceedings could result in one or more patents being invalidated or interpreted narrowly. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim

proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it would have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to validity, for example, there cannot be certainty that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we, our licensees and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our product candidates could be lost.

If any patents, if and when issued, covering our product candidates are invalidated or found not infringed or unenforceable, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.

We may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may prevent or delay our product development efforts and stop us from commercializing or increase the costs of commercializing our product candidates, if approved.

Our success will depend in part on our ability to operate without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property and proprietary rights of third parties. Other parties may allege that our product candidates or the use of our technologies infringes or otherwise violates patent claims or other intellectual property rights held by them or that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization. There may be third-party patents or patent applications with claims to compositions, materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to our product candidates. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, third parties may have currently pending patent applications which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe, or which such third parties claim are infringed by our technologies.

The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. Patent and other types of intellectual property litigation can involve complex factual and legal questions, and their outcome is uncertain and cannot be adequately quantified in advance. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform. If we are sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our product candidates, products or methods either does not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent or that the patent claims are invalid or unenforceable, and we may not be able to do this. Even if we are successful in these proceedings, we may incur substantial costs and the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel could be diverted in pursuing these proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In addition, we may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion.

If we are unable to avoid infringing the patent rights of others, we may be required to seek a license, defend an infringement action or challenge the validity of the patents in court, or redesign our product candidates. In addition, if any such claim were successfully asserted against us and we could not obtain such a license, we may be forced to stop or delay developing, manufacturing, selling or otherwise commercializing our product candidates. Any claim relating to intellectual property infringement that is successfully asserted against us may require us to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to be willfully infringing another party’s patents, for past use of the asserted intellectual property and royalties and other consideration going forward if we are forced to take a license.

Any of these risks coming to fruition could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

Our employee, consultants, non-academic outside scientific collaborators and other advisors enter into confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with us or have entered into confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with Ironwood. We seek to have inventions assigned to us by the parties rendering services whenever possible. However, we may not be able to enter into these agreements with all parties (for

example with academic collaborators) or these agreements may not be honored and may not effectively assign intellectual property rights to us.

Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or ownership. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property, or we may have to in-license intellectual property owned by another party. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies and patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions over the lifetime of owned patents and applications. In some cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules. However, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors or other third parties might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case and this circumstance could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We and our licensees and Tisento may not seek to protect our intellectual property rights in all jurisdictions throughout the world and we may not be able to adequately enforce our intellectual property rights even in the jurisdictions where we seek protection.

The statutory deadlines for pursuing patent protection in individual foreign jurisdictions are based on the priority date of each of our patent applications and we may not timely file foreign patent applications. Thus, for each of the patent families that are believed to provide coverage for our product candidates, we, and our licensees, will need to decide whether and where to pursue protection outside the United States. Filing and prosecuting patent applications and defending patents on product candidates in all countries and jurisdictions throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and so it is unlikely to pursue and maintain patents in all countries worldwide. As such, competitors may use technologies in jurisdictions where patent protection is not pursued and obtained to develop their own products.

The laws of some foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Consequently, it may not be possible to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States even if there is a patent in that jurisdiction. Further, a competitor may export otherwise infringing products to territories where patent protection exists, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our product candidates and patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing. Even pursuing and obtaining issued patents in particular jurisdictions, patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent third parties from so competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of some countries, particularly developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, especially those relating to biotechnology or pharmaceuticals. This could make it difficult to stop the infringement of patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation of or marketing of competing products in violation of other intellectual property rights. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Patent protection must ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process with uncertain outcomes. Accordingly, patent protection might not be sought in certain countries, and there will not be a benefit of patent protection in such countries.

Proceedings to enforce patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, could put patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims. We, or our licensees, may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, efforts to enforce intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that developed or licensed.

If we, or our licensees, do not obtain additional protection under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Act, and similar foreign legislation by extending the patent terms and obtaining data exclusivity for our product candidates, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, one or more of the U.S. patents owned may be eligible for a limited patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act, which permits a patent term extension as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. A maximum of five years can be restored to the eligible patent. In all cases, the total patent life for the product with the patent extension cannot exceed 14 years from the product's approval date, or in other words, 14 years of potential marketing time. However, an extension might not be granted because of, for example, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If unable to obtain a patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the duration of patent protection obtained for our product candidates may not provide any meaningful commercial or competitive advantage, competitors may obtain approval of competing products earlier than they would otherwise be able to do so, and our ability to generate revenues could be harmed.

Changes in U.S. patent law could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our product candidates.

As is the case with other biotechnology companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biotechnology industry involves both technological and legal complexity, and is therefore costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain. In addition, the United States has recently enacted and is currently implementing wide-ranging patent reform legislation: the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the America Invents Act. The America Invents Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These provisions affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. It is not yet clear what, if any, impact the America Invents Act will have on the operation of our business. However, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of any patents that may issue from our patent applications, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain future patents, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents once obtained. Depending on these and other decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce any patents that may issue in the future.

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees, consultants or advisors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their current or former employers.

Our current employee and any employees we may hire in the future may have been previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We also engage and, in the future, intend to engage advisors and consultants who are concurrently employed at universities or who perform services for other entities.

We may be subject to claims that we or our employees, advisors or consultants have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former

employer or other third party. We may be subject to claims that an employee, advisor or consultant performed work for us that conflicts with that person's obligations to a third party, such as an employer, and thus, that the third party has an ownership interest in the intellectual property arising out of work performed for us. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management. If we fail in defending such claims, in addition to paying money claims, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our product candidates, which would materially harm our commercial development efforts.

Risks Related to the Future Commercialization of Our Current or Potential Future Product Candidates

The incidence and prevalence for target patient populations of our current and any potential future product candidates we may acquire have not been established with precision. If the market opportunities for our current and potential future product candidates are smaller than we estimate, or if any approval that we obtain is based on a narrower definition of the patient population, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability may be harmed.

The incidence and prevalence for all the conditions we aim to address with our current and any potential future programs vary considerably. Projections of both the number of people who have these diseases, as well as the subset of people with these diseases who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on beliefs and estimates. These estimates have been derived from a variety of sources, including scientific literature, surveys of clinics, patient foundations or market research, and may prove to be incorrect. Further, new trials may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of these diseases. The total addressable market across all of our product candidates will ultimately depend upon, among other things, the diagnosis criteria included in the final label for each of our product candidates, if approved for sale for these indications, acceptance by the medical community and patient access, drug pricing and reimbursement. The number of patients in the United States and other major markets and elsewhere may turn out to be lower than expected, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our product candidates or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, all of which would harm our results of operations and our business. Further, even if significant market share for our product candidates is obtained, because the potential target populations are very small, we may never achieve profitability despite obtaining such significant market share.

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market any product candidates, if approved, we may not be successful in commercializing those product candidates if and when they are approved.

We do not currently have an infrastructure for the sale, marketing, market access, patient service and distribution of pharmaceutical products. In order to market our product candidates, if approved by the FDA or any other regulatory authority outside the United States, we must build our sales, marketing, managerial and other non-technical capabilities, or arrange with third parties to perform these services. There are risks involved with both establishing our own commercial capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a sales force or reimbursement specialists is expensive and time-consuming and could delay any product candidate launch. If commercialization is delayed or does not occur, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred such expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our commercialization personnel.

If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing, commercial support and distribution services, any product candidate revenue or the profitability of that revenue may be lower than if we were to market and sell any products we may develop ourselves. In addition, we may fail to enter into arrangements with third parties to commercialize our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We may have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our product candidates effectively. If we do not establish commercialization capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, or if we are unable to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates if approved and our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be materially harmed.

Even if we obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, our product candidates may not achieve broad market acceptance by patients, physicians, healthcare payors or others in the medical community, which would limit the revenue that we generate from their sales.

The future commercial success of our product candidates, if approved by the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities outside the United States, will depend upon the awareness and acceptance of our product candidates among the medical community, including patients, physicians and healthcare payors. If any of our product candidates are approved but do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by patients, physicians, healthcare payors and others in the medical community, we may not generate sufficient revenue to become, or remain, profitable. Market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved, will depend on a number of factors, including, among others:

•

the efficacy and safety of our approved product candidates as demonstrated in clinical trials;

•

the clinical indications and labeling claims for our product candidates that are approved;

•

CYCN US Equity

CYCN · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

CYCN US Equity☆

CYCN · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

CYCN US Equity