Item 1A. Risk Factors 27
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 55
Item 1C. Cybersecurity 55
Item 2. Properties 55
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 55
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 55
Item 6. [Reserved] 56
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 64
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data F-1 to F-20
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 65
Item 9B. Other Information 65
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 65
PART III 66
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 66
Item 11. Executive Compensation 66
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 66
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 67
Signatures 71
i
NOTES
In
this annual report on Form 10-K, and unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “us”
and “our” refer to Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Citius Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Leonard-Meron
Biosciences, Inc. and Citius Oncology, Inc. (formerly Citius Acquisition Corp.), and its majority-owned subsidiary, NoveCite, Inc.,
taken as a whole.
Mino-Lok®
and LYMPHIRTM (denileukin diftitox) are our registered trademarks. All other trade names, trademarks and service marks
appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners. We have assumed that the reader understands that all such terms
are source-indicating. Accordingly, such terms, when first mentioned in this report, appear with the trade name, trademark or service
mark notice and then throughout the remainder of this report without trade name, trademark or service mark notices for convenience only
and should not be construed as being used in a descriptive or generic sense.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, plans, strategies, predictions, or any other statements relating to
our future activities or other future events or conditions. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections
about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and are likely to, differ
materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors discussed from time to time
in this report, including the risks described under Item 1A - “Risk Factors,” and Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report and in other documents which we file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In addition, such statements could be affected by risks and uncertainties related to:
● the cost, timing, and results of our pre-clinical and clinical trials;
Any
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except as may be required under applicable securities
laws, we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the filing
date of this report.
ii
SUMMARY
OF RISK FACTORS
An
investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks summarized in Item 1A, “Risk
Factors” included in this report. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
● We face significant risks in our product candidate development efforts.
iii
● Our business depends on protecting our intellectual property.
iv
PART
I
Item
1. Business
Overview
Citius
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Citius Pharma”, and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company” or “we”),
headquartered in Cranford, New Jersey, is a late-stage pharmaceutical company dedicated to the development and commercialization of first-in-class
critical care products with a focus on oncology, anti-infectives in adjunct cancer care, unique prescription products and stem cell therapy.
Our goal generally is to achieve leading market positions by providing therapeutic products that address unmet medical needs yet have
a lower development risk than usually is associated with new chemical entities. New formulations of previously approved drugs with substantial
existing safety and efficacy data are a core focus. We seek to reduce development and clinical risks associated with drug development,
yet still focus on innovative applications. Our strategy centers on products that have intellectual property and regulatory exclusivity
protection, while providing competitive advantages over other existing therapeutic approaches.
The
Company was founded as Citius Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company, on January 23, 2007. On September 12,
2014, Citius Pharmaceuticals, LLC entered into a Share Exchange and Reorganization Agreement, with Citius Pharma (formerly Trail One,
Inc.), a publicly traded company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. Citius Pharmaceuticals, LLC became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Citius Pharma. On March 30, 2016, Citius Pharma acquired Leonard-Meron Biosciences, Inc. (“LMB”) as a wholly-owned
subsidiary. LMB was a pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of critical care products with a concentration
on anti-infectives. On September 11, 2020, we formed NoveCite, Inc. (“NoveCite”), a Delaware corporation, of which we own
75% of the issued and outstanding capital stock. NoveCite is focused on the development and commercialization of its proprietary mesenchymal
stem cells for the treatment of acute respiratory disease syndrome (“ARDS”).
On
August 23, 2021, we formed Citius Oncology, Inc. (formerly Citius Acquisition Corp.) (“Citius Oncology”) as a wholly-owned
subsidiary in conjunction with the acquisition of LYMPHIRTM, but Citius Oncology did not begin operations until April 2022,
when Citius Pharma transferred the assets related to LYMPHIR to Citius Oncology, including the related license agreement with Eisai Co.,
Ltd. (“Eisai”) and the related asset purchase agreement with Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories SA, a subsidiary of Dr. Reddy’s
Laboratories, Ltd. (collectively, “Dr. Reddy’s”). Since its inception, Citius Pharma has funded Citius Oncology, and
Citius Pharma and Citius Oncology are party to a shared services agreement, which governs certain management and scientific services
that Citius Pharma provides Citius Oncology.
Since
its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its efforts to business planning, acquiring our proprietary technology, research
and development, recruiting management and technical staff, and raising capital. We are developing five proprietary products: LYMPHIR,
in-licensed in September 2021 (now owned by Citius Oncology), an engineered IL-2 diphtheria toxin fusion protein, for the treatment of
patients with persistent or recurrent cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (“CTCL”); Mino-Lok, an antibiotic lock solution used to treat
patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections by salvaging the infected catheter; Halo-Lido, a corticosteroid-lidocaine topical
formulation that is intended to provide anti-inflammatory and anesthetic relief to persons suffering from hemorrhoids; Mino-Wrap, a liquifying
gel-based wrap for reduction of tissue expander infections following breast reconstructive surgeries; and NoveCite, a mesenchymal stem
cell therapy for the treatment of ARDS. We believe these unique markets for our products are large, growing, and underserved by the current
prescription products or procedures.
We
are subject to a number of risks common to companies in the pharmaceutical industry including, but not limited to, risks related to the
development by us or our competitors of research and development stage products, market acceptance of its products that receive regulatory
approval, competition from larger companies, dependence on key personnel, dependence on key suppliers and strategic partners, the Company’s
ability to obtain additional financing and the Company’s compliance with governmental and other regulations.
1
Recent
Developments
As
previously disclosed, on October 23, 2023, Citius Pharma and Citius Oncology entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization
(the “Merger Agreement”) with TenX Keane Acquisition, a Cayman Islands exempted company (“TenX”), and TenX Merger
Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of TenX (“Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides, among
other things, (i) on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, that Merger Sub will merge with and into Citius Oncology,
with Citius Oncology to be renamed and to survive as a wholly owned subsidiary of TenX (the “Merger”), and (ii) that prior
to the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), TenX will migrate to and domesticate as a Delaware corporation
in accordance with Section 388 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Cayman Islands Companies Act (As Revised)
(the “Domestication”). The newly combined publicly traded company is to be named “Citius Oncology, Inc.” (the
“Combined Company”). The Domestication, Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are referred
to herein as the “Business Combination”.
In
the Merger, all shares of Citius Oncology would be converted into the right to receive common stock of the Combined Company. As a result,
upon closing, Citius Pharma would receive 67.5 million shares of common stock of the Combined Company which, at an implied value of $10.00
per share, would be $675 million in equity of the Combined Company, before fees and expenses. As part of the transaction, Citius Pharma
will contribute $10 million in cash to the Combined Company. An additional 12.6 million existing options will be assumed by the Combined
Company. Citius Pharma and the Combined Company will also enter into an amended and restated shared services agreement, which, among
other things, will govern certain management and scientific services that Citius Pharma will continue to provide to the Combined Company
following the Effective Time.
The
Merger Agreement, Business Combination and the transactions contemplated thereby were unanimously approved by the boards of directors
of each of Citius Pharma, Citius Oncology and TenX. The transaction is expected to be completed in the first half of 2024, subject to
approval by stockholders of TenX and other customary closing conditions, including final regulatory approvals and SEC filings. There
can be no assurance regarding the ultimate timing of the proposed transaction or that the transaction will be completed at all.
LYMPHIRTM (denileukin
diftitox-cdxl)
Overview
In
September 2021, the Company announced that it had entered into an asset purchase agreement with Dr. Reddy’s to acquire its exclusive
license of E7777 (denileukin diftitox), a late-stage oncology immunotherapy for the treatment of CTCL, a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Dr. Reddy’s had previously licensed E777 to Eisai and as part of the transaction, Eisai entered into a license agreement whereby
Eisai assigned all of its rights to E7777 to Citius Pharma. In April 2022, Citius Pharma transferred the assets related to E7777 to Citius
Oncology, including the related license agreement with Eisai and the related asset purchase agreement with Dr. Reddy’s. Renamed
LYMPHIR, E7777 is an improved formulation of ONTAK®, which was previously approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration
(“FDA”) marketed for the treatment of patients with persistent or recurrent CTCL. At times in this annual report on Form
10-K, LYMPHIR may be referred as E7777.
LYMPHIR
is recombinant DNA-derived fusion protein designed to direct the cytocidal action of diphtheria toxin (DT) to cells which express the
IL-2 receptor. After uptake into the cell, the DT fragment is cleaved and the free DT fragments inhibit protein synthesis, resulting
in cell death. Consequently, LYMPHIR’s differentiated mechanism of action supports two therapeutic effects: (i) killing tumors
by binding to IL-2 receptors to deliver diphtheria toxin directly to the tumor cells, and (ii) depleting immunosuppressive regulatory
T lymphocytes (Tregs) to enhance antitumor activity.
2
Phase
3 Trial (E7777-G000-302) Design
In
2013, a global, multicenter, open label single arm pivotal clinical trial for the treatment of patients with persistent or recurrent
CTCL was initiated. Inclusion criteria for the study were to evaluate patients in advanced stage CTCL (Mycosis Fungoides or Sézary
Syndrome), who received at least one prior CTCL therapy.
The
pivotal trial was divided into two phases, a lead-in phase with 21 subjects that evaluated dose finding, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity,
and assessed the Objective Response Rate (the “ORR”). An ORR is defined as a greater than 50% reduction in tumor burden.
Patients received a daily intravenous infusion of denileukin diftitox from Day 1 through Day 5 of each 21-day cycle.
Based
on safety, tolerability, and efficacy data of the lead-in phase, 9 mcg/kg/dose was selected for the main phase of the study. No new safety
signals were identified compared to ONTAK. In addition, an ORR of 38.1% in the intent to treat population and 44.4% in the efficacy evaluable
populations were observed. In the second and main phase of the pivotal trial, 70 patients were administered the 9 mcg/kg/dose rate for
5 consecutive days in 21-day cycles. The inclusion criteria were identical to the lead-in study and the primary objective was to evaluate
the ORR.
Phase
3 Trial Efficacy & Safety Results
The
efficacy population of the main study includes 69 patients with relapsed or refractory stage I to III CTCL. Of the 69 patients, the median
age was 64 years (range: 28 to 87 years), 65% were male, 73% were White, 19% Black or African American, 1% Asian, and 14% Hispanic or
Latino. The CTCL disease stage was IA in 7%, IB in 23%, IIA in 13%, IIB in 35%, IIIA in 12%, and IIIB in 10%. The median number of prior
therapies was 4 (range: 1 to 18), including both skin-directed and systemic therapies. Prior therapies included photodynamic therapy
(56%), total skin electron beam therapy (42%), systemic retinoids (49%), methotrexate/pralatrexate (49%), histone deacetylase inhibitor
(35%), brentuximab vedotin (26%) and mogamulizumab (12%).
Efficacy
was established based on ORR, according to ISCL/EORTC Global Response Score (GRS) per Independent Review Committee (Olsen 2011). Efficacy
results are shown in the table below.
LYMPHIR
ORR (GRS)%a 36%
Complete Response 9%
Partial Response 27%
Duration of Response
Median (range), months 6.5 (3.0 +, 23.5 +)
Duration ≥ 6 months, n (%) 52%
Median Time to Response, months 1.4
b) CI = confidence interval
Overall,
LYMPHIR was well-tolerated with the use of pre-medications, close patient monitoring, and prompt initiation of supportive measures and
drug management. There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity and most patients experienced low grade 1 or 2 treatment emergent adverse
events.
Serious
adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients who received LYMPHIR. Serious adverse reactions in > 2% of patients included capillary
leak syndrome (10%), infusion-related reaction (9%), sepsis (7%), skin infection (2.9%), pyrexia (2.9%), and rash (2.9%).
3
Adverse
Reactions (≥ 10%) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Stage I-III CTCL Who Received
LYMPHIR
in E7777-G000-302
LYMPHIR N = 69
Adverse Reaction All Grades (%) Grade 3 or 4 (%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation 12 0
General disorders and administration site conditions
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal paind 27 2.9
Arthralgiae 12 0
Nervous system disorders
Mental status changesg 13 0
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion-related reaction 25 6
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Vascular disorders
Capillary leak syndrome 20 6
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite 13 1.4
Eye disorders
Vision changesj 13 0
Investigations
Weight increased 13 0
Infections and infestations
Skin infection 13 1.4
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal insufficiencyl 12 2.9
Psychiatric disorders
(a) Includes fatigue, asthenia, and lethargy.
(c) Includes fever, pyrexia, tumor associated fever.
(f) Includes headache, migraine.
(i) Includes pruritis, itching.
(j) Includes vision blurred, photopsia, visual impairment.
4
Investigator
Initiated Trials
We
believe there is an opportunity in the field of immuno-oncology and have undertaken two investigator-initiated trials to evaluate the
potential safety and efficacy of LYMPHIR for potential as an immuno-oncology combination therapy.
A
Phase 1 trial was initiated in June 2021 at the University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center. This study is a single-arm open-label
trial which has an estimated enrollment of 20 participants who will be administered denileukin diftitox prior to Chimeric Antigen Receptor,
(“CAR-T”) therapies. The Phase 1 study consists of two components: dose finding to establish a maximum tolerated dose (“MTD”)
of denileukin diftitox in combination with CART-T therapies, and an extension component to provide an estimate of efficacy at that MTD.
(Title: Phase I/II Trial Using E7777 to Enhance Regulatory T-Cell Depletion Prior to CAR-T Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma
(DLBCL). NCT04855253)
A
second Phase 1 Study was initiated in September 2022 at the University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center. This study
is an open-label, Phase 1/1b study to investigate the safety and efficacy of a combined regimen of pembrolizumab with T-regulatory cell
depletion and denileukin diftitox in patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic solid tumors in the second line setting. (Title:
The efficacy of T-regulatory cell depletion with E7777 combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab, in recurrent or metastatic
solid tumors: Phase I/II Study. NCT05200559).
The
study consists of two parts. Part I is a dose escalation study of four cohorts (3,6,9,12 mcg of LYMPHIR) and is expected to enroll 18-30
patients. Part II is a dose expansion study of approximately 40 patients to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the recommended combination
dose of LYMPHIR and pembrolizumab (to include ovarian cancer and MSI-H cancer cohorts). The study will also investigate the alteration
of the immune microenvironment within tumors and peripheral blood. Secondary endpoints include the objective response (complete response
plus partial response), progression-free survival, and overall survival.
Regulatory
Development
In
the 1990’s, denileukin diftitox was developed at Boston University and the National Cancer Institute (“NCI”) in collaboration
with Seragen, Inc.
In
1999, ONTAK® (denileukin diftitox) was granted accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of persistent or recurrent CTCL.
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ligand”) acquired the marketing rights in that same year.
In
2006, Eisai acquired the commercial rights to ONTAK from Ligand.
In
2008, the FDA granted full approval to ONTAK for CTCL.
In
2011, a new formulation of denileukin diftitox was developed under the code name E7777 in response to a post-marketing condition established
by the FDA upon approval. As the FDA considered this a new product, an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”) was filed.
As a part of ensuing discussions, the FDA agreed to a development plan that included a single arm, open label study to confirm the safety
and efficacy of E7777 and a chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (“CMC”) development plan that demonstrates the new process
results in a comparable drug product.
5
In
2011, the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development granted E7777 orphan drug designation status for the treatment of Peripheral T-Cell
Lymphoma (“PTCL”). In 2013, the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development granted E7777 orphan drug designation status for
the treatment of CTCL.
In
2013, the first patient was enrolled into the lead-in phase of the pivotal study for the E7777 United States (“U.S.”) CTCL
clinical trial.
In
2014, commercial sales of ONTAK were discontinued when the product was voluntarily withdrawn from the market due to manufacturing issues
at the contract manufacturer.
In
2015, the last patient enrolled exited the lead-in phase of the E7777 U.S. CTCL clinical trial.
In
March 2016, Dr. Reddy’s acquired the global rights to E7777 from Eisai, other than far east countries, with Eisai retaining the
rights in those countries.
In
June 2016, the first patient was enrolled in the main phase of the Phase 3 U.S. CTCL clinical trial for E7777.
In
March 2020, Eisai filed an NDA for E7777 in Japan for both CTCL and PTCL, and in March 2021 received approvals in both indications.
In
September 2021, Citius Pharma acquired the marketing rights to E7777 in selected markets. Citius Pharma subsequently renamed E7777 as
LYMPHIR.
In
December 2021, patient enrollment for the Phase 3 Pivotal study of E7777 was completed.
In
April 2022, we reported that topline results from the Phase 3 trial were consistent with the prior formulation. Moreover, no new safety
signals were identified.
In
December 2022, a biologics license application (“BLA”) for LYMPHIR was accepted for filing with the FDA and a PDUFA goal
date was set for July 28, 2023.
In
July 2023, the FDA issued a complete response letter requiring us to incorporate enhanced product testing and additional controls agreed
to with the FDA during the market application review. There were no concerns relating to the safety and efficacy clinical data package
submitted with the BLA, or the proposed prescribing information.
In
September 2023, we announced that the FDA has agreed with the plans to address the requirements outlined in the complete response letter,
which guidance has provided the Company with a path for completing the necessary activities to support the resubmission of the BLA for
LYMPHIR.
Market
Opportunity
CTCL’s
are a heterogeneous subset of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (“NHL”) of mature, skin-homing T-cells that are mainly localized
to the skin. The most common types of CTCL are mycosis fungoides (“MF”) and primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large cell
lymphoma (pcALCL), jointly representing an estimated 80 to 85% of all CTCL. Sézary Syndrome (“SS”), a very rare subtype
(~2 to 5% of CTCL) characterized by diffuse inflammatory, often exfoliative, erythroderma and by leukemic and nodal involvement, displays
a significant degree of clinical and biological overlap with MF and has long been considered a clinical variant of MF, although recent
evidence suggests that it may be a separate entity. The rest is represented by extremely rare, generally more aggressive subtypes. In
light of the overlap between MF and SS, and considering that many of the systemic therapy options for the two neoplasms are the same,
some consider the treatment approach to MF and SS as if they were a single disease entity (MF/SS). However, some of the drugs currently
in use, or in development, for MF/SS appear to be more effective in clearing different anatomical compartments (skin versus blood, for
example) and therefore have differential efficacy in MF and SS.
6
Based
on Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data from 2001 to 2007, the estimated incidence rate of MF/SS in the U.S. is 0.5/100,000
or about 2,500 to 3,000 new cases per year representing about 25% of all T-cell lymphomas.
In
total, the Company estimates that there are approximately 30,000 to 40,000 patients living with CTCL in the U.S.
Based
on internal estimates, the Company believes the addressable U.S. market for LYMPHIR exceeds $400,000,000 and may further expand with
the introduction of a new therapeutic.
Proposed
Spinoff
In
May 2022, we announced that we intend to split the Company’s assets into two separate publicly traded entities (the “Spinoff”).
Pursuant to that plan we formed a new company focused on developing and commercializing LYMPHIR. Our other pipeline assets, including
Mino-Lok, remain at Citius Pharma. Following the Spinoff, Citius Pharma would continue to trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market exchange
under its current ticker CTXR. The strategic action is intended to optimize organizational resources and investment capital to support
the successful execution of each development program.
As
discussed above, in October 2023, the Company announced that we entered into the Merger Agreement, dated October 23, 2023, for a proposed
merger whereby TenX would acquire Citius Oncology. Following closing, the Combined Company would continue as a public company listed
on the Nasdaq Global Market. The transaction is expected to be completed in the first half of 2024, subject to approval by stockholders
of TenX and other customary closing conditions, including compliance with the Nasdaq initial listing requirements, final regulatory approvals,
and SEC filings. There can be no assurance regarding the ultimate timing of the proposed transaction or that the transaction will be
completed at all.
Mino-Lok®
Overview
Mino-Lok
is a patented solution containing minocycline, disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (edetate), and ethyl alcohol, all of which act
synergistically to treat and salvage infected central venous catheters (“CVCs”) in patients with catheter related bloodstream
infections (“CRBSIs”). Mino-Lok breaks down biofilm barriers formed by bacterial colonies, eradicates the bacteria, and provides
anti-clotting properties to maintain patency in CVCs.
The
administration of Mino-Lok consists of filling the lumen of the catheter with 0.8 ml to 2.0 ml of Mino-Lok solution. The catheter is
then “locked”, meaning that the solution remains in the catheter without flowing into the vein. The lock is maintained for
a dwell-time of two hours while the catheter is not in use. If the catheter has multiple lumens, all lumens may be locked with the Mino-Lok
solution either simultaneously or sequentially. If patients are receiving continuous infusion therapy, the catheters alternate between
being locked with the Mino-Lok solution and delivering therapy. The Mino-Lok therapy is two hours per day for at least five days, usually
with two additional locks in the subsequent two weeks. After locking the catheter for two hours, the Mino-Lok solution is aspirated,
and the catheter is flushed with normal saline. At that time, either the infusion will be continued, or will be locked with the standard-of-care
lock solution until further use of the catheter is required. In a clinical study conducted by MD Anderson Cancer Center (“MDACC”),
there were no serum levels of either minocycline or edetate detected in the sera of several patients who underwent daily catheter lock
solution with minocycline and edetate (“M-EDTA”) at the concentration level proposed in Mino-Lok treatment. Thus, it has
been demonstrated that the amount of either minocycline or edetate that leaks into the serum is very low or none at all.
Phase
2b Results
From
April 2013 to July 2014, 30 patients with CVC-related bloodstream infection were enrolled at MDACC in a prospective Phase 2b study. Patients
received Mino-Lok therapy for two hours once daily for a minimum of five days within the first week, followed by two additional locks
within the next two weeks. Patients were followed for one month post-lock therapy. Demographic information, clinical characteristics,
laboratory data, therapy, as well as adverse events and outcome were collected for each patient. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years
(range: 21-73 years). In all patients, prior to the use of lock therapy, systemic treatment with a culture-directed, first-line intravenous
antibiotic was started. Microbiological eradication was achieved at the end of therapy in all cases. None of the patients experienced
any serious adverse event related to the lock therapy.
7
The
active arm, which is the Mino-Lok treated group of patients, was then compared to 60 patients in a matched cohort that experienced removal
and replacement of their CVCs within the same contemporaneous timeframe. The patients were matched for cancer type, infecting organism,
and level of neutropenia. All patients were cancer patients and treated at MDACC. The efficacy of Mino-Lok therapy was 100% in salvaging
CVCs, demonstrating equal effectiveness to removing the infected CVC and replacing it with a new catheter.
The
main purpose of the study was to show that Mino-Lok therapy was at least as effective as the removal and replacement of CVCs when CRBSIs
are present, and that the safety was better, that is, the complications of removing an infected catheter and replacing with a new one
could be avoided. In addition to having a 100% efficacy rate with all CVCs being salvaged, Mino-Lok therapy had no significant adverse
events (“SAEs”), compared to an 18% SAE rate in the matched cohort where patients had the infected CVCs removed and replaced
with a fresh catheter. There were no overall complication rates in the Mino-Lok arm group compared to 11 patients with events (18%) in
the control group. These events included bacterial relapse (5%) at four weeks post-intervention, and a number of complications associated
with mechanical manipulation in the removal or replacement procedure for the catheter (10%) or development of deep-seated infections
such as septic thrombophlebitis and osteomyelitis (8%). As footnoted, six patients had more than one complication in the control arm
group.
Mino-Lok® Arm Control Arm
Parameter N (%) N (%)%
Cancer type
ICU Admission 4 (13 ) 4 (7 )
Mech.Ventilator 3 (10 ) 0 (0 )
Bacteremia
- Relapse 0 (0 ) 3 (5 )
Complications 0 (0 ) 8 (13 )
SAEs related R&R 0 (0 ) 6 (10 )
Overall Complication Rate 0 (0 )% 11 ** (18 )%
* 1 Polymicrobial patient had a Gram+ and a Gram- organism cultured
** 6 Patients had > 1 complication
Source:
Dr. Issam Raad, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2016, Vol. 60 No. 6, Page 3429
Phase
3 Trial
In
November 2016, the Company initiated site recruitment for Phase 3 clinical trials. From initiation through the first quarter of 2017,
the Company received input from several sites related to the control arm as being less than standard-of-care for some of the respective
institutions. The Company worked closely with the FDA with respect to the design of the Phase 3 trial and received feedback on August
17, 2017. The FDA stated that they recognized that there is an unmet medical need in salvaging infected catheters and agreed that an
open label, superiority design would address the Company’s concerns and would be acceptable to meet the requirements of a new drug
application. The Company amended the Phase 3 study design to remove the saline and heparin placebo control arm and to use an active control
arm that conforms with today’s current standard-of-care. Patient enrollment commenced in February 2018.
8
The
Mino-Lok Phase 3 Trial was originally planned to enroll 700 patients in 50 participating institutions, all located in the U.S. There
were interim analyses at both the 50% and 75% points of the trial as measured by the number of patients treated.
In
September 2019, the Company announced that the FDA agreed to a new primary efficacy endpoint of “time to catheter failure”
in comparing Mino-Lok to the antibiotic lock control arm. This change in the trial design reduced the required patient sample size of
the trial from 700 subjects to approximately 144 available subjects to achieve the pre-specified 92 catheter failure events needed to
conclude the trial. Additionally, the Company submitted a response to the FDA that it would implement this change in the primary endpoint
and expected it to result in less than 150 subjects needed in its Phase 3 trial. The new primary endpoints require that the time to catheter
failure be at least 38 days for Mino-Lok versus 21 days for the standard of care antibiotic locks.
In
October 2019, the FDA agreed that the patient sample size of approximately 144 patients was acceptable.
In
October 2019, the Company announced that the Phase 3 trial had reached the 40% completion triggering an interim futility analysis by
the data monitoring committee (the “DMC”). The DMC is an independent panel of experts that review progress regarding the
safety and efficacy of drugs in clinical trials, and to determine if the trial may be futile in achieving its endpoints or if the trial
should be modified in any way.
In
December 2019, the DMC convened and recommended that the trial continue with no changes because the analysis showed a positive outcome,
as it met the prespecified interim futility analysis criteria.
In
May 2020, we announced that we are providing free access to Mino-Lok for healthcare providers under an Expanded Access protocol to ease
the burden associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Through the Expanded Access protocol, an infected central venous catheter can now be
treated with Mino-Lok, potentially avoiding the need for the removal and replacement procedure.
In
June 2020, we announced that we had received positive feedback from the FDA on our proposed catheter compatibility studies for Mino-Lok.
The studies, if and when successfully completed, should allow Mino-Lok to be labeled for use with all commercially available CVCs and
peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) on the U.S. market. We further assume that these studies will meet European and world
standards. The ability to be labeled without restrictions with respect to catheter type would allow Mino-Lok unrestricted access to the
full U.S. and world markets for an effective antibiotic lock therapy for central line associated blood stream infections (“CLABSIs”).
In
September 2020, we announced that another DMC meeting was held to review the data being generated and analyzed in the Mino-Lok Phase
3 trial based on progress to date, and to make recommendations to us as to any action that may be necessary regarding the study. After
reviewing these data, the DMC members stated that they did not find any safety signals; and they also recommended continuing the trial
without any modifications. The DMC further conducted an ad hoc meeting and agreed with the Company that a 75% interim analysis
be conducted as planned in which superior efficacy is evaluated. The 75% interim analysis was subsequently changed to a 65% interim analysis
by the Company.
In
September 2020, the Company announced that the three registration batches for all components of Mino Lok were manufactured and that clinical
sites were resupplied with registration product.
In
November 2020, the Company announced that the three components of Mino-Lok, minocycline, disodium edetate (“EDTA”), and ethanol,
were superior to EDTA and ethanol in their ability to eradicate resistant staphylococcal biofilms.
The
65% interim analysis was completed in June 2021. In July 2021, the Company announced that following an unblinded data review of safety
and efficacy, the independent DMC for the trial recommended proceeding with the trial as planned. The DMC did not identify any safety
concerns and no modifications were recommended to the protocol-defined sample size or power to achieve the primary endpoint.
9
In
May 2022, the Company selected Biorasi, LLC (“Biorasi”), a global clinical research organization (“CRO”), to
help expand the Company’s Phase 3 Mino-Lok trial by implementing additional sites outside the U.S. As of December 15, 2023,
there are 12 active sites in the U.S. currently including such academic centers as Henry Ford Health Center, Georgetown University
Medical Center, and others. There currently are 16 sites active in India, making a total of 28 participating Mino-Lok institutions globally.
In
August 2023, the Company announced all 92 events required to complete the trial have been achieved. Several patients remain in active
treatment, which may result in additional events.
In late December 2023, the Company determined that patient enrollment
for the Mino-Lok trial was complete and that it would begin site shutdown activities. Topline results are anticipated in the first half
of 2024.
Fast
Track Designation
In
October 2017, the Company received official notice from the FDA that the investigational program for Mino-Lok was granted “Fast
Track” status. Fast Track is a designation that expedites FDA review to facilitate development of drugs which treat a serious or
life-threatening condition and fill an unmet medical need. A drug that receives Fast Track designation is eligible for the following:
Mino-Lok
International Study
In
October 2017, data from an international study on Mino-Lok was presented at the Infectious Disease Conference, (“ID Week”),
in San Diego, California. The 44-patient study was conducted in Brazil, Lebanon and Japan and showed Mino-Lok therapy was an effective
intervention to salvage long-term, infected CVCs in CRBSIs in patients who had cancer with limited vascular access. This study showed
95% effectiveness for Mino-Lok therapy in achieving microbiological eradication of the CVCs as compared to 83% for the control. The single
failure in the Mino-Lok arm was due to a patient with Burkholderia cepacia that was resistant to all antibiotics tested.
Stability
Patent Application for Mino-Lok
In
October 2018, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued U.S. Patent No. 10,086,114, entitled “Antimicrobial
Solutions with Enhanced Stability.” On October 9, 2019, the European Patent Office (“EPO”) granted European Patent
No. 3370794, entitled “Antimicrobial Solutions with Enhanced Stability.” The grant of this European patent strengthens the
intellectual property protection for Mino-Lok through November of 2036. This invention overcomes limitations in mixing antimicrobial
solutions in which components have precipitated because of physical and/or chemical factors, thus limiting the stability of the post-mix
solutions. The scientists and technologists at MDACC have been able to improve the stability of the post-mixed solutions through adjustments
of the post-mixed pH of the solution. This may allow for longer storage time of the ready-to-use solution. Citius Pharma holds the exclusive
worldwide license which provides access to this patented technology for development and commercialization of Mino-Lok.
10
Market
Opportunity
In
spite of best clinical practice, catheters contribute to approximately 70% of blood stream infections that occur in the intensive care
unit or are associated with hemodialysis or cancer patients (approximately 470,000 per year). Bacteria enter the catheter either from
the skin or intraluminally through the catheter hub. Once in the catheter, bacteria tend to form a protective biofilm on the interior
surface of the catheter that is resistant to most antimicrobial solutions. The most frequently used maintenance flush, heparin, actually
stimulates biofilm formation. Heparin is widely used as a prophylactic lock solution, in spite of the evidence that it contributes to
the promotion of biofilm formation. The formation of bacterial biofilm usually precedes CRBSIs.
The
standard of care in the management of CRBSI patients consists of removing the infected CVC and replacing it with a new catheter at a
different vascular access site. However, in cancer and hemodialysis patients with long-term surgically implantable silicone catheters,
removal of the CVC and reinsertion of a new one at a different site might be difficult, or even impossible, because of the unavailability
of other accessible vascular sites and the need to maintain infusion therapy. Furthermore, critically ill patients with short-term catheters
often have underlying coagulopathy, which makes reinsertion of a new CVC at a different site, in the setting of CRBSIs, risky in terms
of mechanical complications, such as pneumothorax, misplacement, or arterial puncture. Studies have also revealed that CRBSI patients
may be associated with serious complications, including septic thrombosis, endocarditis and disseminated infection, particularly if caused
by Staphylococcus aureus or Candida species. Furthermore, catheter retention in patients with CRBSIs is associated with
a higher risk of relapse and poor response to antimicrobial therapy.
According
to Maki et al., published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings in 2006, there are approximately 250,000 CRBSIs annually in the U.S.
Subsequent to this study, our estimates have ranged upwards to over 450,000 CLABSIs annually (see analysis in the table below). CRBSIs
are associated with a 12% to 35% mortality rate and an attributable cost of $35,000 to $56,000 per episode.
We
estimate that the potential market for Mino-Lok in the U.S. to be approximately $500 million to $1 billion as shown in the table below
based on a target price of up to $400 per dose of each salvage flush treatment.
Short-Term CVC Long-Term CVC Total
No. of Catheters 3 million 4 million 7 million
Avg. Duration (Days) 12 100 N/A
Catheter Days 36 million 400 million 436 million
Flushes/Catheter 5 7 6.7
Sources:
Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:391-402, Clev Clin J Med 2011; 78(1):10-17, JAVA 2007; 12(1):17-27, J Inf Nurs 2004;27(4):245-250, Joint Commission
website Monograph, CLABSI and Internal Estimates.
Under
various plausible pricing scenarios, we believe that Mino-Lok would be cost-saving to the healthcare system given that the removal of
an infected CVC and replacement of a new catheter in a different venous access site is estimated by us to cost between $8,000 and $10,000.
Furthermore, there are potential additional medical benefits, a reduction in patient discomfort and avoidance of serious adverse events
with the Mino-Lok approach since the catheter remains in place and is not subject to manipulation. We believe there will be an economic
argument to enhance the adoption of Mino-Lok by infection control committees at acute care institutions.
In
January of 2017, we commissioned a primary market research study with MEDACore, a subsidiary of Leerink, a healthcare focused network
with more than 35,000 healthcare professionals, including key opinion leaders, experienced practitioners and other healthcare professionals
throughout North America, Europe, Asia and other locations around the world. This network includes approximately 55 clinical specialties,
21 basic sciences and 20 business specialties. As part of this market research project, we commissioned a third-party survey of 31 physicians
to qualify the need for catheter salvage in patients with infected, indwelling central venous lines, especially when the catheter is
a tunneled or an implanted port. There were 19 infectious disease experts and 12 intensivists surveyed who all agreed that salvage would
be preferable to catheter exchange to avoid catheter misplacements, blood clots, or vessel punctures that can potentially occur during
reinsertion. Most were also concerned that viable venous access may not be available in patients who were vitally dependent on a central
line.
11
Halo-Lido
Overview
Halo-Lido
is a topical formulation of halobetasol propionate, a corticosteroid, and lidocaine that is intended for the treatment of hemorrhoids.
To our knowledge, there are currently no FDA-approved prescription drug products for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Some physicians are
known to prescribe topical steroids for the treatment of hemorrhoids. In addition, there are various topical combination prescription
products containing halobetasol propionate along with lidocaine or pramoxine, each a topical anesthetic, that are prescribed by physicians
for the treatment of hemorrhoids. These products contain drugs that were in use prior to the start of the Drug Efficacy Study Implementation
(“DESI”) program and are commonly referred to as DESI drugs. However, none of these single-agent or combination prescription
products have been clinically evaluated for safety and efficacy and approved by the FDA for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Further, many
hemorrhoid patients use over the counter (“OTC”) products as their first line therapy. OTC products contain any one of several
active ingredients including glycerin, phenylephrine, pramoxine, white petrolatum, shark liver oil and/or witch hazel, for symptomatic
relief.
Development
of Hemorrhoids Drugs
Hemorrhoids
are a common gastrointestinal disorder, characterized by anal itching, pain, swelling, tenderness, bleeding and difficulty defecating.
In the U.S., hemorrhoids affect nearly 5% of the population, with approximately 10 million persons annually admitting to having symptoms
of hemorrhoidal disease. Of these persons, approximately one third visit a physician for evaluation and treatment of their hemorrhoids.
The data also indicate that for both sexes a peak of prevalence occurs from age 45 to 65 years with a subsequent decrease after age 65
years. Caucasian populations are affected significantly more frequently than African Americans, and increased prevalence rates are associated
with higher socioeconomic status in men but not women. Development of hemorrhoids before age 20 is unusual. In addition, between 50%
and 90% of the general U.S., Canadian and European population will experience hemorrhoidal disease at least once in life. Although hemorrhoids
and other anorectal diseases are not life-threatening, individual patients can suffer from agonizing symptoms which can limit social
activities and have a negative impact on the quality of life.
Hemorrhoids
are defined as internal or external according to their position relative to the dentate line. Classification is important for selecting
the optimal treatment for an individual patient. Accordingly, physicians use the following grading system referred to as the Goligher’s
classification of internal hemorrhoids:
Grade I Hemorrhoids not prolapsed but bleeding.
Grade II Hemorrhoids prolapse and reduce spontaneously with or without bleeding.
Grade III Prolapsed hemorrhoids that require reduction manually.
Development
Activities to Date
In
the fall of 2015, we completed dosing patients in a double-blind dose ranging placebo-controlled Phase 2a study where six different formulations
containing hydrocortisone and lidocaine in various strengths were tested against the vehicle control. The objectives of this study were
to: (1) demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the formulations when applied twice daily for two weeks in subjects with Grade I or II
hemorrhoids, and (2) assess the potential contribution of lidocaine hydrochloride and hydrocortisone acetate, alone or in combination
for the treatment of symptoms of Goligher’s Classification Grade I or II hemorrhoids.
12
Symptom
improvement was observed based on a global score of disease severity (“GSDS”) and based on some of the individual signs and
symptoms of hemorrhoids, specifically itching and overall pain and discomfort. Within the first few days of treatment, the combination
products (containing both hydrocortisone and lidocaine) were directionally favorable versus the placebo and their respective individual