cbsh-20211231
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
________________________________________________________
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
________________________________________________________
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-36502
COMMERCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (816) 234-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of class Trading symbol(s) Name of exchange on which registered
$5 Par Value Common Stock CBSH NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesþ No ̈
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ̈Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ No ̈
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yesþ No ̈
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerþ Accelerated Filer ̈ Non-accelerated filer ̈ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ̈
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐No ☑
As of June 30, 2021, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $8,097,000,000.
As of February 17, 2022, there were 121,110,096 shares of Registrant’s $5 Par Value Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2021, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
INDEX Page
PART I Item 1. Business 3
Item 1a. Risk Factors 9
Item 1b. Unresolved Staff Comments 15
Item 2. Properties 15
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 15
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 15
Item 6. RESERVED 18
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 66
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 66
Item 9a. Controls and Procedures 142
Item 9b. Other Information 144
Item 9c. Disclosure regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 144
PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 144
Item 11. Executive Compensation 144
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 144
PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 145
2
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
General
Commerce Bancshares, Inc., a bank holding company as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, was incorporated under the laws of Missouri on August 4, 1966. Through a second tier wholly-owned bank holding company, it owns all the outstanding capital stock of Commerce Bank (the “Bank”), which is headquartered in Missouri. The Bank engages in general banking business, providing a broad range of retail, mortgage banking, corporate, investment, trust, and asset management products and services to individuals and businesses. Commerce Bancshares, Inc. also owns, directly or through the Bank, various non-banking subsidiaries. Their activities include private equity investment, securities brokerage, insurance agency, specialty lending, and leasing activities. A list of Commerce Bancshares, Inc.'s subsidiaries is included as Exhibit 21.
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is one of the nation’s top 50 bank holding companies, based on asset size. At December 31, 2021, the Company had consolidated assets of $36.7 billion, loans of $15.2 billion, deposits of $29.8 billion, and equity of $3.4 billion. The Company's principal markets, which are served by 152 branch facilities, are located throughout Missouri, Kansas, and central Illinois, as well as Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Denver, Colorado. Its two largest markets are St. Louis and Kansas City, which serve as central hubs for the Company. The Company also has offices supporting its commercial customers in Dallas, Houston, Cincinnati, Nashville, Des Moines, Indianapolis, and Grand Rapids, and operates a commercial payments business with sales representatives covering the continental United States of America (“U.S.”).
The Company’s goal is to be the preferred provider of financial services in its communities, based on strong customer relationships built through providing top quality service with a strong risk management culture, and employing a strong balance sheet with strong capital levels. The Company operates under a super-community banking format which incorporates large bank product offerings coupled with deep local market knowledge, augmented by experienced, centralized support in select, critical areas. The Company’s focus on local markets is supported by an experienced team of bankers assigned to each market coupled with industry specialists. The Company also uses regional advisory boards, comprised of local business persons, professionals and other community representatives, who assist the Company in responding to local banking needs. In addition to this local market, community-based focus, the Company offers sophisticated financial products usually only available at much larger financial institutions.
The markets the Bank serves are mainly located in the lower Midwest, which provides natural sites for production and distribution facilities and serve as transportation hubs. The economy has been well-diversified in these markets with many major industries represented, including telecommunications, automobile, technology, financial services, aircraft and general manufacturing, health care, numerous service industries, and food and agricultural production. The personal real estate lending operations of the Bank are predominantly centered in its lower Midwestern markets.
From time to time, the Company evaluates the potential acquisition of various financial institutions. In addition, the Company regularly considers the purchase and disposition of real estate assets and branch locations. The Company seeks merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar, have experienced management and either possess significant market presence or have potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale and expanded services. The Company has not completed any bank acquisitions since 2013.
Employees and Human Capital
The Company employed 4,387 persons on a full-time basis and 150 persons on a part-time basis at December 31, 2021. None of the Company's employees are represented by collective bargaining agreements.
Attracting and retaining talented team members is key to the Company’s ability to execute its strategy and compete effectively. The Company values the unique combination of talents and experiences each team member contributes toward the Company’s success and strives to offer rewards that meet team members’ individual, evolving needs. Well-being is much more than a paycheck and that’s why the Company takes a comprehensive approach to Total Rewards, supporting team members’ physical well-being, financial well-being, and emotional well-being and career development. The Company’s financial well-being program includes a company-matching 401(k) plan and health savings accounts, educational and adoption assistance programs. Emotional well-being programs include paid time off, an employee assistance program (EAP) and company-paid membership to Care.com. Physical well-being is supported by the Company’s health, dental, vision, life and various other insurances, and a wellness program that incentivizes team members to live a healthy and balanced lifestyle. Career development is also a key component of the Company’s Total Rewards, and the Company has a variety of programs to support team members as they continue to grow within their current role or develop for their next role. Job shadowing, leadership
3
Table of Contents
development programs, Aspiring Managers program, Managing at Commerce, competency assessments and education assistance are just a few of the ways the Company helps team members excel.
During 2021 the ongoing impacts of the pandemic continued to create challenges for our team members. The Company continued focused efforts on providing team members support and resources to navigate the ever-changing environment. Initiatives included routine communications providing relevant updates and information, resources for leaders to help keep their teams engaged and connected, new resources for working parents, and access to emotional support resources. The Company implemented a phased-in approach to returning to on-site work and created more flexible work categories for team members to provide for ongoing flexibility.
The Company believes diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) builds stronger companies with better results. In 2021, the Company’s efforts continued around a key initiative focusing on DEI through the lens of our workforce, our suppliers, our community and our customers. Internal teams continue to iterate to build plans for growth in all four areas. The Company continues to build a sense of belonging by engaging team members in a variety of Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) to support its diverse workforce. RISE (empowering women), EMERGE (connecting young professionals), VIBE (valuing multicultural perspectives), and PRIDE (engaging the LGBTQIA+ community) are important forums that provide team members opportunities to connect, learn, and encourage diverse perspectives. All programs were moved to a virtual environment to enable team members to continue to network and learn even in the environment brought on by the pandemic. Other internal DEI efforts have included unconscious bias training, book clubs, listen, talk, and learn sessions, courageous conversation training, mentoring programs, and review of talent at all levels of the organization. The Company’s longstanding approach of “doing what’s right” continues to guide its focus on its team members and communities.
The Company’s robust listening strategy allows it to stay connected to the team member experience to understand the evolving needs of its team members and to focus on what matters most to them. This strategy includes a balance of surveys, focus groups, and one on one conversations to allow for two-way conversation and provides trends over time by key demographics. The Company’s goal is to create a sense of belonging which it believes is connected to high levels of engagement, enablement, retention, and results. The Company’s intentional strategy has allowed it to maintain levels of engagement that have been recognized by its annual survey partner, Korn Ferry, for being “best-in-class" and to be recognized by Forbes as one of the best mid-sized employers.
Competition
The Company operates in the highly competitive environment of financial services. The Company regularly faces competition from banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, trust companies, credit card companies, private equity firms, leasing companies, securities brokers and dealers, financial technology companies, e-commerce companies, mutual fund companies, and other companies providing financial services. Some of these competitors are not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as domestic banks and bank holding companies. Some other competitors are significantly larger than the Company, and therefore have greater economies of scale, greater financial resources, higher lending limits, and may offer products and services that the Company does not provide. The Company competes by providing a broad offering of products and services to support the needs of customers, matched with a strong commitment to customer service. The Company also competes based on quality, innovation, convenience, reputation, industry knowledge, and price. In its two largest markets, the Company has approximately 12% of the deposit market share in Kansas City and approximately 8% of the deposit market share in St. Louis.
Operating Segments
The Company is managed in three operating segments: Commercial, Consumer, and Wealth. The Commercial segment provides a full array of corporate lending, merchant and commercial bank card products, payment solutions, leasing, and international services, as well as business and government deposit, investment, and cash management services. The Consumer segment includes the retail branch network, consumer installment lending, personal mortgage banking, and consumer debit and credit bank card activities. The Wealth segment provides traditional trust and estate planning services, brokerage services, and advisory and discretionary investment portfolio management services to both personal and institutional corporate customers. In 2021, the Commercial, Consumer and Wealth segments contributed 53%, 23% and 23% of total segment pre-tax income, respectively. See the section captioned "Operating Segments" in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this report and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for additional discussion on operating segments.
Government Policies
The Company's operations are affected by federal and state legislative changes, by the U.S. government, and by policies of various regulatory authorities, including those of the numerous states in which they operate. These include, for example, the
4
Table of Contents
statutory minimum legal lending rates, domestic monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. fiscal policy, international currency regulations and monetary policies, the U.S. Patriot Act, and capital adequacy and liquidity constraints imposed by federal and state bank regulatory agencies.
Supervision and Regulation
The following information summarizes existing laws and regulations that materially affect the Company's operations. It does not discuss all provisions of these laws and regulations, and it does not include all laws and regulations that affect the Company presently or may affect the Company in the future.
General
The Company, as a bank holding company, is primarily regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHC Act). Under the BHC Act, the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval is required in any case in which the Company proposes to acquire all or substantially all the assets of any bank, acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank, or merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company. With certain exceptions, the BHC Act also prohibits the Company from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares of any non-banking company. Under the BHC Act, the Company may not engage in any business other than managing and controlling banks or furnishing certain specified services to subsidiaries, and may not acquire voting control of non-banking companies unless the Federal Reserve Board determines such businesses and services to be closely related to banking. When reviewing bank acquisition applications for approval, the Federal Reserve Board considers, among other things, the Bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the communities it serves in accordance with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (CRA). Under the terms of the CRA, banks have a continuing obligation, consistent with safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including providing credit to individuals residing in low- and moderate-income areas. The Bank has a current CRA rating of “outstanding.”
The Company is required to file various reports and additional information with the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regularly performs examinations of the Company. The Bank is a state-chartered Federal Reserve member bank and is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the Missouri Division of Finance. The Bank is also subject to regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). In addition, there are numerous other federal and state laws and regulations which control the activities of the Company, including requirements and limitations relating to capital and reserve requirements, permissible investments and lines of business, transactions with affiliates, loan limits, mergers and acquisitions, issuance of securities, dividend payments, and extensions of credit. The Bank is subject to federal and state consumer protection laws, including laws designed to protect customers and promote fair lending. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and their respective state law counterparts. If the Company fails to comply with these or other applicable laws and regulations, it may be subject to civil monetary penalties, imposition of cease and desist orders or other written directives, removal of management and, in certain circumstances, criminal penalties. This regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the preservation of the federal deposit insurance funds. Statutory and regulatory controls increase a bank holding company’s cost of doing business and limit the options of its management to employ assets and maximize income.
In addition to its regulatory powers, the Federal Reserve Bank affects the conditions under which the Company operates by its influence over the national supply of bank credit. The Federal Reserve Board employs open market operations in U.S. government securities and oversees changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings, changes in the federal funds rate on overnight inter-bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements on bank deposits in implementing its monetary policy objectives. These methods are used in varying combinations to influence the overall level of the interest rates charged on loans and paid for deposits, the price of the dollar in foreign exchange markets, and the level of inflation. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions, most notably on the interest rate environment. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, as well as the effect of credit policies of monetary and fiscal authorities, the Company makes no prediction as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels or loan demand, or their effect on the financial statements of the Company.
The financial industry operates under laws and regulations that are under regular review by various agencies and legislatures and are subject to change. The Company currently operates as a bank holding company, as defined by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (GLB Act), and the Bank qualifies as a financial subsidiary under the GLB Act, which allows it to engage in investment banking, insurance agency, brokerage, and underwriting activities that were not available to banks prior to the GLB Act. The GLB Act also included privacy provisions that limit banks’ abilities to disclose non-public information about customers to non-affiliated entities.
5
Table of Contents
The Company must also comply with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The BSA is designed to help fight drug trafficking, money laundering, and other crimes. Compliance is monitored by the Federal Reserve. The BSA was enacted to prevent banks and other financial service providers from being used as intermediaries for, or to hide the transfer or deposit of money derived from, criminal activity. Since its passage, the BSA has been amended several times. These amendments include the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 which made money laundering a criminal act, as well as the Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1994 which required regulators to develop enhanced examination procedures and increased examiner training to improve the identification of money laundering schemes in financial institutions.
The USA PATRIOT Act, established in 2001, substantially broadened the scope of U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. The regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent, and report money laundering and terrorist financing. The regulations include significant penalties for non-compliance.
The Company is subject to regulation under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2011 (Dodd-Frank Act). Among its many provisions, the Dodd-Frank Act required stress-testing for certain financial services companies and established a new council of “systemic risk” regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) which is authorized to supervise certain financial services companies and has responsibility to implement, examine for compliance with, and enforce “Federal consumer financial law.” The Company is subject to examinations by the CFPB. The Dodd-Frank Act, through Title VI, commonly known as the Volcker Rule, placed trading restrictions on financial institutions and separated investment banking, private equity and proprietary trading (hedge fund) sections of financial institutions from their consumer lending arms. The Volcker Rule also restricts financial institutions from investing in and sponsoring certain types of investments.
In May 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law which provides a number of limited amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act. Notable provisions of the legislation include: an increase in the asset threshold from $50 billion to $250 billion, above which the Federal Reserve is required to apply enhanced prudential standards; an exemption from the Volcker Rule for insured depository institutions with less than $10 billion in consolidated assets; modifications to the Liquidity Coverage and Supplementary Leverage ratios; and the elimination of Dodd-Frank company-run stress tests for banks and bank holding companies with less than $250 billion in assets. Most of these provisions affect institutions larger than the Company, and the Company is not required to prepare stress testing as specified by the Dodd-Frank Act.
Subsidiary Bank
Under Federal Reserve policy, the bank holding company, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (the "Parent"), is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its bank subsidiary and to commit resources to support it in circumstances when it might not otherwise do so. In addition, loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.
Deposit Insurance
Substantially all of the deposits held by the Bank are insured up to applicable limits (generally $250,000 per depositor for each account ownership category) by the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. In 2011, the FDIC released a final rule to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that affected deposit insurance assessments. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act raised the minimum designated reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits, removed the upper limit of the designated reserve ratio, required that the designated reserve ratio reach 1.35% by September 30, 2020, and required the FDIC to offset the effect of increasing the minimum designated reserve ratio on depository institutions with total assets of less than $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act provided the FDIC flexibility in the implementation of the increase in the designated reserve ratio and also required that the FDIC redefine the assessment base to average consolidated assets minus average tangible equity. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company's deposit insurance expense was $9.1 million.
Payment of Dividends
The Federal Reserve Board may prohibit the payment of cash dividends to shareholders by bank holding companies if their actions constitute unsafe or unsound practices. The principal source of the Parent's cash revenues is cash dividends paid by the Bank. The amount of dividends paid by the Bank in any calendar year is limited to the net profit of the current year combined
6
Table of Contents
with the retained net profits of the preceding two years, and permission must be obtained from the Federal Reserve Board for dividends exceeding these amounts. The payment of dividends by the Bank may also be affected by factors such as the maintenance of adequate capital.
Capital Adequacy
The Company is required to comply with the capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve, which are based on the risk levels of assets and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to judgments by regulators regarding qualitative components, risk weightings, and other factors.
A comprehensive capital framework was established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which was effective for large and internationally active U.S. banks and bank holding companies on January 1, 2015. A key goal of the Basel III framework was to strengthen the capital resources of banking organizations during normal and challenging business environments. Basel III increased minimum requirements for both the quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. The rule includes a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The capital conservation buffer is intended to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Failure to maintain the buffer will result in constraints on dividends, stock repurchases and executive compensation. The rule also adjusted the methodology for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance risk sensitivity. At December 31, 2021, the Company's capital ratios are well in excess of those minimum ratios required by Basel III.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) requires each federal banking agency to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of insured depository institutions, including but not limited to those that fall below one or more prescribed minimum capital ratios. Pursuant to FDICIA, the FDIC promulgated regulations defining the following five categories in which an insured depository institution will be placed, based on the level of its capital ratios: well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Under the prompt corrective action provisions of FDICIA, an insured depository institution generally will be classified as well-capitalized (under the Basel III rules mentioned above) if it has a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8%, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6.5%, a total capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5%. An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as “well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” or “undercapitalized,” may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition, or an unsafe or unsound practice warrants such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions and prohibitions, including restrictions on growth, restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, restrictions or prohibitions on payment of dividends, and restrictions on the acceptance of brokered deposits. Furthermore, if a bank is classified in one of the undercapitalized categories, it is required to submit a capital restoration plan to the federal bank regulator, and the holding company must guarantee the performance of that plan. The Bank has consistently maintained regulatory capital ratios above the “well-capitalized” standards.
Stress Testing
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company performed stress tests as specified by the Federal Reserve requirement and published results beginning in 2014 through 2017. On May 24, 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act was enacted, which eliminated the required stress testing under the Dodd-Frank Act for banks with consolidated assets of less than $250 billion. The Company continues to perform periodic stress-testing based on its own internal criteria.
Executive and Incentive Compensation
Guidelines adopted by federal banking agencies prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice, and describe compensation as "excessive" when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. The Federal Reserve Board has issued comprehensive guidance on incentive compensation intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies do not undermine safety and soundness by encouraging excessive risk taking. This guidance covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, based on key principles that (i) incentives do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization's ability to identify and manage risk, (ii) compensation arrangements are compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) compensation arrangements are supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective board oversight. Deficiencies in compensation practices may affect
7
Table of Contents
supervisory ratings and enforcement actions may be taken if incentive compensation arrangements pose a risk to safety and soundness.
Transactions with Affiliates
The Federal Reserve Board regulates transactions between the Bank and its subsidiaries. Generally, the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, limit the Company’s banking subsidiary and its subsidiaries to lending and other “covered transactions” with affiliates. The aggregate amount of covered transactions a banking subsidiary or its subsidiaries may enter into with an affiliate may not exceed 10% of the capital stock and surplus of the banking subsidiary. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates may not exceed 20% of the capital stock and surplus of the banking subsidiary.
Covered transactions with affiliates are also subject to collateralization requirements and must be conducted on arm’s length terms. Covered transactions include (a) a loan or extension of credit by the banking subsidiary, including derivative contracts, (b) a purchase of securities issued to a banking subsidiary, (c) a purchase of assets by the banking subsidiary unless otherwise exempted by the Federal Reserve, (d) acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate to the banking subsidiary as collateral for a loan, and (e) the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit by the banking subsidiary on behalf of an affiliate.
Certain transactions with the Company's directors, officers or controlling persons are also subject to conflicts of interest regulations. Among other things, these regulations require that loans to such persons and their related interests be made on terms substantially the same as for loans to unaffiliated individuals, and must not create an abnormal risk of repayment or other unfavorable features for the financial institution. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on loans to related parties.
Available Information
The Company’s principal offices are located at 1000 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri (telephone number 816-234-2000). The Company makes available free of charge, through its website at www.commercebank.com, reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as soon as reasonably practicable after the electronic filing. Additionally, a copy of our electronically filed materials can be found at www.sec.gov. These filings include the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports.
8
Table of Contents
Item 1a. RISK FACTORS
Making or continuing an investment in securities issued by the Company, including its common stock, involves certain risks that you should carefully consider. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected, the market price for your securities could decline, and you could lose all or a part of your investment. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set forth below also are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
Market Risks
Difficult market conditions may affect the Company’s industry.
The concentration of the Company’s banking business in the United States particularly exposes it to downturns in the U.S. economy. Almost two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, the uncertainty in the economic outlook as of December 31, 2021 continued to affect the Company's financial results and operations.
In particular, the Company may face the following risks in connection with market conditions:
•In 2020, the U.S. economy entered a recession, driven by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the mitigating strategies implemented to attempt to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. The U.S. economy improved significantly in 2021. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet subsided and could continue to materially and adversely impact the U.S. economy.
•The U.S. economy is affected by global events and conditions, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the Company does not directly hold foreign debt or have significant activities with foreign customers, the global economy, the strength of the U.S. dollar, international trade conditions, and oil prices may ultimately affect interest rates, business import/export activity, capital expenditures by businesses, and investor confidence. Unfavorable changes in these factors may result in declines in consumer credit usage, adverse changes in payment patterns, reduced loan demand, and higher loan delinquencies and default rates. These could impact the Company’s future credit losses and provision for credit losses, as a significant part of the Company’s business includes consumer and credit card lending.
•In addition to the COVID-19 slowdown noted above, further slowdowns in economic activity may cause additional declines in financial services activity, including declines in bank card, corporate cash management and other fee businesses, as well as the fees earned by the Company on such transactions.
•The process used to estimate losses expected in the Company’s loan portfolio requires difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including consideration of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of its borrowers to repay their loans. If an instance occurs that renders these predictions no longer capable of accurate estimation, this may in turn impact the reliability of the process.
•Competition in the industry could intensify as a result of the increasing consolidation of financial services companies in connection with current market conditions, thereby reducing market prices for various products and services which could in turn reduce the Company’s revenues.
The performance of the Company is dependent on the economic conditions of the markets in which the Company operates.
The Company’s success is heavily influenced by the general economic conditions of the specific markets in which it operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, the Company provides financial services primarily throughout the states of Missouri, Kansas, central Illinois, Oklahoma, and Colorado. It also has a growing presence in additional states through its commercial banking offices in: Texas, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. As the Company does not have a significant banking presence in other parts of the country, a prolonged economic downturn in these markets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Company operates in a highly competitive industry and market area.
The Company operates in the financial services industry and has numerous competitors including other banks and insurance companies, securities dealers, brokers, trust and investment companies, mortgage bankers, and financial technology companies. Consolidation among financial service providers and new changes in technology, product offerings and regulation continue to challenge the Company's marketplace position. As consolidation occurs, larger regional and national banks may enter the Company's markets and add to existing competition. Large, national financial institutions have substantial capital, technology and marketing resources. These new competitors may lower fees to grow market share, which could result in a loss of customers and lower fee revenue for the Company. They may have greater access to capital at a lower cost than the Company,
9
Table of Contents
and may have higher loan limits, both of which may adversely affect the Company’s ability to compete effectively. The Company must continue to make investments in its products and delivery systems to stay competitive with the industry, or its financial performance may suffer.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company.
The Company’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institution counterparties. Financial services institutions are interrelated because of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. The Company has exposure to many different industries and counterparties and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual funds, and other institutional clients. Transactions with these institutions include overnight and term borrowings, interest rate swap agreements, securities purchased and sold, short-term investments, and other such transactions. Because of this exposure, defaults by, or rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions or the financial services industry in general, could lead to market-wide liquidity problems and defaults by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose the Company to credit risk in the event of default of its counterparty or client, while other transactions expose the Company to liquidity risks should funding sources quickly disappear. In addition, the Company’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the exposure due to the Company. Any such losses could materially and adversely affect results of operations.
Regulatory and Compliance Risks
The Company is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision.
As part of the financial services industry, the Company is subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds, and the banking system, not shareholders. These regulations affect the Company’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy, and growth, among other things. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations, and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations, or policies, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Company to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products it may offer, and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations, or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties, and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur.
Significant changes in federal monetary policy could materially affect the Company’s business.
The Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its policies determine in large part the cost of funds for lending and interest rates earned on loans and paid on borrowings and interest-bearing deposits. Credit conditions are influenced by its open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the member bank discount rate, and bank reserve requirements. Changes in Federal Reserve Board policies are beyond the Company’s control and difficult to predict, and such changes may result in lower interest margins and a lack of demand for credit products.
Liquidity and Capital Risks
The Company is subject to both interest rate and liquidity risk.
With oversight from its Asset-Liability Management Committee, the Company devotes substantial resources to monitoring its liquidity and interest rate risk on a monthly basis. The Company's net interest income is the largest source of overall revenue to the Company, representing 60% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021. The interest rate environment in which the Company operates fluctuates in response to general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the U.S. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence loan originations, deposit generation, demand for investments and revenues and costs for earning assets and liabilities, and could significantly impact the Company’s net interest income.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve Board lowered the benchmark interest rate to between zero and 0.25%. Future economic conditions or other factors could shift monetary policy resulting in increases or additional decreases in the benchmark rate. Furthermore, changes in interest rates could result in unanticipated changes to customer deposit balances and funding costs and affect the Company’s source of funds for future loan growth.
10
Table of Contents
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. relies on dividends from its subsidiary bank for most of its revenue.
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a separate and distinct legal entity from its banking and other subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiary bank. These dividends, which are limited by various federal and state regulations, are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on its common stock and to meet its other cash needs. In the event the subsidiary bank is unable to pay dividends, the Company may not be able to pay dividends or other obligations, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Operational Risks
The impact of the phase-out of LIBOR is uncertain.
In 2017, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that LIBOR would likely be discontinued at the end of 2021 as panel banks would no longer be required to submit estimates that are used to construct LIBOR. U.S. regulatory authorities voiced similar support for phasing out LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, LIBOR’s regulator and its administrator announced that the publication of certain LIBOR tenors will cease immediately after December 31, 2021 and the remaining LIBOR tenors, including 1-month USD LIBOR, will cease immediately after June 30, 2023. The Alternative Rates Reference Committee (the “ARRC”), a group of market participants convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the New York Fed to help ensure a successful transition from LIBOR, identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative rate.
The Company established a LIBOR Transition Program, which is led by the LIBOR Transition Steering Committee (Committee) whose purpose is to guide the overall transition process for the Company. The Committee is an internal, cross-functional team with representatives from all relevant business lines, support functions and legal counsel. A LIBOR impact and risk assessment has been performed, and the Company has developed and prioritized action items. All financial contracts that reference LIBOR have been identified and are being monitored on an ongoing basis. The process of remediating these contracts has started. LIBOR fallback language has been included in key loan provisions of new and renewed loans in preparation for the transition from LIBOR. Changes to the Company's systems have been identified, and the process of installing and testing code was started in the third quarter of 2021. The process of installing and testing code on impacted systems is expected to be completed in 2022.
The Company has a significant number of loans, derivative contracts, and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR, mostly 1-month LIBOR. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $1.9 billion of commercial loans, $1.4 billion of derivative contracts (notional value), and $840 million of investment securities that are expected to mature after June 30, 2023. These amounts will decrease in future periods as the Company works with customers to replace contracts that use LIBOR with alternative reference rates. The Company ceased entering any new loan contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate in December 2021. The impact of alternatives to LIBOR on the valuations, pricing and operation of the Company's financial instruments is not yet known.
The Company may be adversely affected if the interest rates currently tied to LIBOR on the Company's loans, derivatives, and other financial instruments are not able to be transitioned to an alternative rate. Furthermore, the Company may be faced with disputes or litigation with customers regarding interpretation and enforcement of fallback language used in loan agreements as the transition to a new benchmark rate continues to evolve.
The Company’s asset valuation may include methodologies, models, estimations and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to asset valuations that may materially adversely affect its results of operations or financial condition.
The Company uses estimates, assumptions, and judgments when certain financial assets and liabilities are measured and reported at fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in greater financial statement volatility. Fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based on quoted market prices and/or other observable inputs provided by independent third-party sources, when available. When such third-party information is not available, fair value is estimated primarily by using cash flow and other financial modeling techniques utilizing assumptions such as credit quality, liquidity, interest rates and other relevant inputs. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these areas could materially impact the Company’s future financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if models used to calculate fair value of financial instruments are inadequate or inaccurate due to flaws in their design or execution, upon sale, the Company may not realize the cash flows of a financial instrument as modeled and could incur material, unexpected losses.
During periods of market disruption, including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain assets if trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. There may be certain asset classes in active markets with significant observable data that become illiquid due to the current financial environment. In such cases, certain asset valuations may require more subjectivity and management judgment.
11
Table of Contents
As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation. Further, rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of assets as reported within the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on results of operations or financial condition.
The Company’s operations rely on certain external vendors.
The Company relies on third-party vendors to provide products and services necessary to maintain day-to-day operations. For example, the Company outsources a portion of its information systems, communication, data management, and transaction processing to third parties. Accordingly, the Company is exposed to the risk that these vendors might not perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements or service level agreements because of changes in the vendor’s organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services, or strategic focus. Such failure to perform could be disruptive to the Company’s operations, which could have a materially adverse impact on its business, financial condition and results of operations. These third parties are also sources of risk associated with operational errors, system interruptions or breaches and unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. If the vendors encounter any of these issues, the Company could be exposed to disruption of service, damage to reputation and litigation. Because the Company is an issuer of both debit and credit cards, it is periodically exposed to losses related to security breaches which occur at retailers that are unaffiliated with the Company (e.g., customer card data being compromised at retail stores). These losses include, but are not limited to, costs and expenses for card reissuance as well as losses resulting from fraudulent card transactions.
The Company converted its core customer and deposit systems during 2022 and may encounter significant adverse developments.
The Company replaced its core customer and deposit systems and other ancillary systems (collectively referred to as core system) during the first quarter of 2022. The core system is used to track customer relationships and deposit accounts and is integrated with channel applications that are used to service customer requests by bank personnel or directly by customers (such as online banking and mobile applications). The new core system provides a platform based on current technology, enables the Company to integrate other systems more efficiently, and is a significant improvement compared to the Company's previous core system. The initial conversion was completed successfully, however, the Company may face operational risks in the months following conversion, including disruptions to its technology systems, which may adversely impact customers. The Company has plans, policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the risks of a failure after the conversion of its core system. However, there can be no assurance that any such adverse development will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be timely and adequately remediated. The ultimate impact of any adverse development could damage the Company's reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Company to regulatory scrutiny, or expose it to civil litigation and possibly financial liability, any of which could have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Credit Risks
The allowance for credit losses may be insufficient or future credit losses could increase.
The allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments at December 31, 2021 reflect management's estimate of credit losses expected in the loan portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, as of the balance sheet date. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and the section captioned “Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans and Liability for Unfunded Lending Commitments” in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this report for further discussion related to the Company’s process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments at December 31, 2021.
In 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard "Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" (ASU 2016-13), which became effective January 1, 2020 and was adopted by the Company at that time. This new standard significantly altered the way the allowance for credit losses is determined and utilizes a life of loan loss concept and required significant operational changes, especially in data collection and analysis. The level of the allowance is based on management’s methodology that utilizes historical net charge-off rates, and adjusts for the impacts in the reasonable and supportable forecast and other qualitative factors. Key assumptions include the application of historical loss rates, prepayment speeds, forecast results of a reasonable and supportable period, the period to revert to historical loss rates, and qualitative factors. The Company’s allowance level is subject to review by regulatory agencies, and that review could also result in adjustments to the allowance for credit losses. Additionally, the Company's provision for credit losses may be more volatile in the future under the new standard, due to macroeconomic variables that influence the Company's loss estimates, and the volatility in credit losses may be material to the Company's earnings.
12
Table of Contents
The Company’s investment portfolio values may be adversely impacted by deterioration in the credit quality of underlying collateral within the various categories of investment securities it owns.
The Company generally invests in liquid, investment grade securities, however, these securities are subject to changes in market value due to changing interest rates and implied credit spreads. While the Company maintains prudent risk management practices over bonds issued by municipalities and other issuers, credit deterioration in these bonds could occur and result in losses. Certain mortgage and asset-backed securities (which are collateralized by residential mortgages, credit cards, automobiles, mobile homes or other assets) may decline in value due to actual or expected deterioration in the underlying collateral. Under accounting rules, when an available for sale debt security is in an unrealized loss position, the entire loss in fair value is required to be recognized in current earnings if the Company intends to sell the security or believes it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before the value recovers. Additionally, the current expected credit loss model (CECL) implemented by the Company on January 1, 2020, requires that lifetime expected credit losses on securities be recorded in current earnings. This could result in significant losses.
Strategic Risk
New lines of business or new products and services may subject the Company to additional risk.
From time to time, the Company may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and new products or services, the Company may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and new products or services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business, or new product or service, could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and new products or services could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
General Risks
A successful cyber attack or other computer system breach could significantly harm the Company, its reputation and its customers.
The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business, and as part of its business, the Company maintains significant amounts of data about its customers and the products they use. Information security risks continue to increase due to new technologies, the increasing use of the Internet and telecommunication technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, and others. The Company makes significant investments in various technology to identify and prevent intrusions into its information system. The Company also has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, offers ongoing training to employees, hosts tabletop exercises to test response readiness, and performs regular audits using both internal and outside resources. However, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur, or if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. In addition to unauthorized access, denial-of-service attacks or other operational disruptions could overwhelm Company websites and prevent the Company from adequately serving customers. Should any of the Company's systems become compromised or customer information be obtained by unauthorized parties, the reputation of the Company could be damaged, relationships with existing customers may be impaired, and the Company could be subject to lawsuits, all of which could result in lost business and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company continually encounters technological change.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, including the entrance of financial technology companies offering new financial service products. The Company regularly upgrades or replaces technological systems to increase efficiency, enhance product and service capabilities, eliminate risks of end-of-lifecycle products, reduce costs, and better serve our customers. The Company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in the Company’s operations. Many of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Company may encounter significant problems and may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services and may not be successful in marketing the new products and services to its customers. These problems might include significant time delays, cost overruns, loss of key people, and technological system failures. Failure to
13
Table of Contents
successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry or failure to successfully complete the replacement of technological systems could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company must attract and retain skilled employees.
The Company’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people can be intense, and the Company spends considerable time and resources attracting, hiring, and retaining qualified people for its various business lines and support units. Companies throughout the U.S. saw significant turnover during 2021, and the number of candidates in the job market was generally much lower than the demand for talent. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of the Company’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business because of their skills, knowledge of the Company’s market, and years of industry experience, as well as the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases have adversely affected, and are expected to continue to adversely effect, the Company's operations and financial results.
The Company may face risks related to public health threats or outbreaks of communicable diseases. A widespread healthcare crisis, such as an outbreak of a communicable disease could adversely affect the global economy and the Company’s financial performance. For example, the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic has destabilized the financial markets in which the Company operates and may continue to cause significant disruption in the global economies and financial markets, including the Company's local markets. The Company is dependent upon the willingness and ability of its customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. In reaction to and as preventative measures to attempt to slow the spread of the pandemic that began in 2020, government authorities in many states and municipalities implemented mandatory closures, shelter-in-place orders, and social distancing protocols, including orders within many of the geographic areas that the Company operates. Although the Company is considered an essential business, access to its branches and office locations were previously and may again be restricted, for the safety of its employees and customers. Restricting customers' access to the Company's physical business locations has limited some customers from transacting with the Company and lowered demand for certain lending and other services offered by the Company and could continue to do so for an indefinite period of time. Conversely, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has increased demand for certain other products and services, requiring the Company to pivot its focus in certain strategic initiatives. The Company's ability to meet customer demand in this changing environment could result in increased expenses, and this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. In particular, the continued spread of COVID-19 and efforts to contain the virus could:
•continue to impact customer demand of the Company’s lending and related services, leading to lower revenue;
•cause the Company to experience an increase in costs as a result of the Company implementing operational changes to accommodate its remote workforce;
•cause delayed payments from customers and uncollectible accounts, defaults, foreclosures, and declining collateral values, resulting in losses to the Company;
•result in losses on the Company's investment portfolio, due to volatility in the markets and lower trading volume driven by economic uncertainty;
•cause market interest rates to continue to decline, which could adversely affect the Company's net interest income and profitability;
•cause the Company's credit losses to grow substantially;
•impact availability of qualified personnel; and
•cause other unpredictable events.
The situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain and the potential for a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity increases the longer the virus impacts activity levels in the United States and globally. The Company continues to adapt to the changing dynamics of the COVID-19 impacts to the economy and the needs of its employees and customers. New information regarding the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing reactions to the pandemic by customers, vendors, and government authorities will continue to impact access to the Company's business, as well as the economies and markets in which the Company operates. While the U.S. economy improved significantly during 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic or fallout from economic and societal changes resulting from the pandemic may cause prolonged global or national recessionary economic conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. Beyond the current COVID-19 pandemic, the potential
14
Table of Contents
impacts of epidemics, pandemics, or other outbreaks of an illness, disease, or virus could therefore materially and adversely affect the Company's business, revenue, operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows.
Our business and financial results may be affected by societal and governmental responses to climate change and related environmental issues.
The current and anticipated effects of climate change have raised concerns for the condition of the global environment. These concerns have changed and will continue to change the behavior of consumers and businesses. Further, governments have increased their attention on the issue of climate change. As a result, international agreements have been signed to attempt to reduce global temperatures and federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives have been proposed to seek to mitigate the effects of climate change. The Company and its customers may need to respond to new laws and regulations as well as new consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. These changes may result in cost increases, asset value reductions, and operating process changes to the Company and its customers. The impact on our customers will likely vary depending on their specific attributes, including reliance on or role in carbon intensive activities. Among the impacts to the Company could be a drop in demand for our products and services, particularly in certain industries. In addition, the Company could experience reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans. The Company’s efforts to take these risks into account in making lending and other decisions, including by increasing the Company’s business with climate-friendly companies, may not be effective in protecting the Company from the adverse impact of new laws and regulations or changes in consumer or business behavior.
Item 1b. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The main offices of the Company are located in Kansas City and St. Louis, Missouri. The Company owns its main offices and leases unoccupied premises to the public. The larger office buildings include:
Building Net rentable square footage % occupied in total % occupied by Bank
The Company has an additional 152 branch locations in Missouri, Illinois, Kansas, Oklahoma and Colorado which are owned or leased.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable
Information about the Company's Executive Officers
The following are the executive officers of the Company as of February 23, 2022, each of whom is designated annually. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the persons so named and any other person pursuant to which such person was designated an executive officer.
15
Table of Contents
Name and Age Positions with Registrant
16
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
Common Stock Data
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol CBSH. The Company had 3,467 common shareholders of record as of December 31, 2021. Certain of the Company's shares are held in "nominee" or "street" name and the number of beneficial owners of such shares is approximately 128,250.
Performance Graph
The following graph presents a comparison of Company (CBSH) performance to the indices named below. It assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2016 with dividends reinvested on a cumulative total shareholder return basis.
The Company has a long history of paying dividends. 2021 marked the 53rd consecutive year of growth in our regular common dividend, and the Company has also issued an annual 5% common stock dividend for the past 28 years. However, payment of future dividends is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend, among other factors, on earnings, capital requirements, and the operating and financial condition of the Company. The Board of Directors makes the dividend determination quarterly.
17
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth information about the Company’s purchases of its $5 par value common stock, its only class of common stock registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, during the fourth quarter of 2021.
The Company’s stock purchases shown above were made under authorizations by the Board of Directors. Under the most recent authorization in November 2019 of 5,000,000 shares, 1,737,322 shares remained available for purchase at December 31, 2021.
Item 6. RESERVED
18
Table of Contents
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This report may contain “forward-looking statements” that are subject to risks and uncertainties and include information about possible or assumed future results of operations. Many possible events or factors could affect the future financial results and performance of Commerce Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"). This could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, variations of such words and other similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Readers should not rely solely on the forward-looking statements and should consider all uncertainties and risks discussed throughout this report. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Such possible events or factors include the risk factors identified in Item 1a Risk Factors and the following: changes in economic conditions in the Company’s market area; changes in policies by regulatory agencies, governmental legislation and regulation; fluctuations in interest rates; changes in liquidity requirements; demand for loans in the Company’s market area; changes in accounting and tax principles; estimates made on income taxes; failure of litigation settlement agreements to become final in accordance with their terms; and competition with other entities that offer financial services.
Overview
The Company operates as a super-community bank and offers a broad range of financial products to consumer and commercial customers, delivered with a focus on high-quality, personalized service. The Company is headquartered in Missouri, with its principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis, Missouri. Customers are served from 287 locations in Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Oklahoma and Colorado and commercial offices throughout the nation's midsection. A variety of delivery platforms are utilized, including an extensive network of branches and ATM machines, full-featured online banking, a mobile application, and a centralized contact center.
The core of the Company’s competitive advantage is its focus on the local markets in which it operates, its offering of competitive, sophisticated financial products, and its concentration on relationship banking and high-touch service. In order to enhance shareholder value, the Company targets core revenue growth. To achieve this growth, the Company focuses on strategies that will expand new and existing customer relationships, offer opportunities for controlled expansion in additional markets, utilize improved technology, and enhance customer satisfaction.
Various indicators are used by management in evaluating the Company’s financial condition and operating performance. Among these indicators are the following:
• Net income and earnings per share — Net income attributable to Commerce Bancshares, Inc. was $530.8 million, an increase of 49.9% compared to the previous year. The return on average assets was 1.55% in 2021, and the return on average common equity was 15.37%. Diluted earnings per share increased 55.6% in 2021 compared to 2020.
• Total revenue — Total revenue is comprised of net interest income and non-interest income. Total revenue in 2021 increased $60.1 million, or 4.5%, from 2020, as net interest income grew $5.6 million, and non-interest income grew $54.5 million. Growth in net interest income resulted principally from a decrease in interest expense, while the increase in non-interest income in 2021 was mainly due to growth in trust fees and bank card fees.
• Non-interest expense — Total non-interest expense increased 4.9% this year compared to 2020, mainly due to higher salaries and employee benefits expense, data processing and software expense and other non-interest expense.
• Asset quality — Net loan charge-offs totaled $18.6 million in 2021, a decrease of $16.3 million from those recorded in 2020, and averaged .12% of loans compared to .22% in the previous year. Total non-performing assets, which include non-accrual loans and foreclosed real estate, amounted to $9.3 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $26.6 million at December 31, 2020, and represented .06% of loans outstanding at December 31, 2021.
• Shareholder return — During 2021, the Company paid cash dividends of $1.00 per share on its common stock, representing an increase of 2.0% over the previous year. In 2021, the Company issued its 28th consecutive annual 5% common stock dividend, and in February 2022, the Company's Board of Directors authorized an increase of 6.0% in the common cash dividend. The Company purchased 1,807,257 shares in 2021. Total shareholder return, including
19
Table of Contents
the change in stock price and dividend reinvestment, was 10.5%, 13.9%, and 9.9% over the past 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes. The historical trends reflected in the financial information presented below are not necessarily reflective of anticipated future results.
Key Ratios
(Based on average balances)
(Based on end of period data)
(1) Includes loans held for sale.
(2) Revenue includes net interest income and non-interest income.
(3) The efficiency ratio is calculated as non-interest expense (excluding intangibles amortization) as a percent of revenue.
(4) The tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio is a measurement which management believes is a useful indicator of capital adequacy and utilization. It provides a meaningful basis for period to period and company to company comparisons, and also assist regulators, investors and analysts in analyzing the financial position of the Company. Tangible common equity and tangible assets are non-GAAP measures and should not be viewed as substitutes for, or superior to, data prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The following table is a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measures of total equity and total assets to the non-GAAP measures of total tangible common equity and total tangible assets.
* Intangible assets other than mortgage servicing rights.
20
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
$ Change % Change
N.M. - Not meaningful.
Net income attributable to Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (net income) for 2021 was $530.8 million, an increase of $176.7 million, or 49.9%, compared to $354.1 million in 2020. Diluted income per common share was $4.31 in 2021, compared to $2.77 in 2020. The increase in net income resulted from a decrease of $203.5 million in the provision for credit losses, as well as an increase of $54.5 million in non-interest income. These increases in net income were partly offset by increases in non-interest expense and income tax expense of $37.5 million and $58.4 million, respectively. The return on average assets was 1.55% in 2021 compared to 1.20% in 2020, and the return on average common equity was 15.37% in 2021 compared to 10.64% in 2020. At December 31, 2021, the ratio of tangible common equity to assets decreased to 9.01%, compared to 9.92% at year end 2020.
During 2021, net interest income grew mainly due to a decrease of $29.9 million in interest expense on deposits and borrowings, due to lower average rates paid, coupled with an increase of $19.5 million in interest income earned on investment securities, mainly due to higher average balances. These increases in net interest income were partly offset by a decline of $41.5 million in interest earned on loans, mainly due to lower rates earned. Total rates earned on average interest earning assets fell 53 basis points this year, while funding costs for deposits and borrowings decreased 19 basis points. The provision for credit losses decreased due to an improved credit outlook and the release of loan loss reserves provided for anticipated credit losses in the prior year, which did not occur. Net loan charge-offs decreased $16.3 million in 2021 compared to 2020, mainly due to lower credit card loan net charge-offs and net recoveries on business loans.
Non-interest income grew 10.8% in 2021, mainly due to growth in trust and net bank card fee income. Net gains on investment securities in 2021 were comprised mainly of net fair value gains on the Company's private equity investment portfolio, partly offset by net losses on bond sales. Non-interest expense increased $37.5 million in 2021 compared to 2020, largely due to higher salaries and benefits expense and data processing and software expense, as well as lower deferred loan origination costs and non-recurring litigation settlement costs recorded in the third quarter of 2021.
Net income for 2020 was $354.1 million, a decrease of $67.2 million, or 15.9%, compared to $421.2 million in 2019. Diluted income per common share was $2.77 in 2020, compared to $3.25 in 2019. The decline in net income resulted from an increase of $86.8 million in the provision for credit losses, as well as a decrease of $18.8 million in non-interest income. These decreases to net income were partly offset by increases of $8.6 million in net interest income and $7.4 million in investment securities gains, coupled with decreases of $21.8 million in income taxes and $1.7 million in non-controlling interest expense. The return on average assets was 1.20% in 2020 compared to 1.67 in 2019, and the return on average common equity was 10.64% in 2020 compared to 14.06% in 2019. At December 31, 2020, the ratio of tangible common equity to assets decreased to 9.92%, compared to 10.99% at year end 2019.
As compared to 2019, the growth in net interest income in 2020 resulted mainly from an increase of $24.7 million in interest income on securities purchased under agreements to resell, mainly due to higher rates earned, coupled with a decrease of $60.6 million in interest expense on deposits and borrowings, due to lower rates paid. These increases in net interest income were partly offset by declines in interest earned on loans and investment securities, resulting mainly from lower yields. Total rates earned on average earning assets fell 76 basis points in 2020, while funding costs for deposits and borrowings decreased 41 basis points. The provision for credit losses totaled $137.2 million, reflecting an increase in the provision for credit losses on the Company's loan portfolio and liability for unfunded loan commitments, resulting from deteriorating economic conditions
21
Table of Contents
driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Net loan charge-offs decreased $14.8 million in 2020 compared to 2019, mainly due to lower credit card loan net charge-offs.
Non-interest income fell 3.6% in 2020, mainly due to a one-time gain of $11.5 million resulting from the sale of the Company's corporate trust business in the fourth quarter of 2019, coupled with a decline in net bank card fees. Net investment securities gains of $11.0 million were recorded in 2020 and were comprised mainly of net gains realized on sales of mortgage-backed securities. Non-interest expense grew $980 thousand in 2020 compared to 2019, largely due to higher salaries and benefits expense, mostly offset by higher deferred loan originations costs and lower supplies and communication expense and travel and entertainments expense.
The Company distributed a 5% stock dividend for the 28th consecutive year on December 17, 2021. All per share and average share data in this report has been restated for the 2021 stock dividend.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Related Policies
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of certain accounting policies, the most significant of which are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Certain of these policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or be subject to variations which may significantly affect the Company's reported results and financial position for the current period or future periods. The use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when financial assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at, or adjusted to reflect, fair value. Current economic conditions may require the use of additional estimates, and some estimates may be subject to a greater degree of uncertainty due to the current instability of the economy. The Company has identified several policies as being critical because they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These estimates and related policies are the Company's allowance for credit losses and fair value measurement policies.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company's Allowance for Credit Losses policies govern the processes and procedures used to estimate the collectability of its loan portfolio and unfunded lending commitments, and the potential for credit losses in its available for sale investment portfolio.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans and Unfunded Lending Commitments
The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its loan portfolio and unfunded lending commitments to assess overall collectability. The level of the allowance for credit losses on loans and unfunded lending commitments reflects the Company's estimate of the losses expected in the loan portfolio and unfunded lending commitments over the assets’ contractual term.
The allowance for credit loss is an estimate that is subject to uncertainty due to the various assumptions and judgements used in the estimation process.
The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective (pool) basis. Loans are aggregated into pools based on similar risk characteristics including borrower type, collateral type and expected credit loss patterns. Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics, primarily large loans on non-accrual status, are evaluated on an individual basis.
The allowance for credit losses is measured using an average historical loss model which incorporates relevant information about past events (including historical credit loss experience on loans with similar risk characteristics), current conditions, and an economic forecast that may affect the collectability of the remaining cash flows over the contractual term of the loans. The calculated loss rate is increased or decreased to reflect expectations of future losses given a single path economic forecast. These adjustments to the loss rate are based on results from various regression models projecting the impact of the macroeconomic variables. The forecast is used for a reasonable and supportable period before reverting to historical averages using a straight-line method.
Additionally, the allowance for credit losses considers other qualitative factors not included in historical loss rates or macroeconomic forecast such as changes in portfolio composition, underwriting practices, or significant unique events or conditions.
22
Table of Contents
Adjustments to the allowance for credit losses are made by increases to or reductions in the provision for credit losses, which are reflected in the consolidated statements of income.
Assumptions, Judgments, and Uncertainties: The uncertainty in the estimation of the allowance for credit losses is created because key assumptions and judgements are applied throughout the process. Key assumptions include segmentation of the portfolio into pools, calculations of life of a loan using a combination of contractual terms and expected prepayment speeds and forecast of macroeconomic conditions. The Company utilizes a third-party macro-economic forecast that continuously changes due to economic conditions and events. The single path economic forecast includes key macroeconomic variables including GDP, disposable income, unemployment rate, various interest rates, consumer price index (CPI) inflation rate, housing price index (HPI), commercial real estate price index (CREPI) and market volatility. Each reporting period, the base macroeconomic forecast scenario is evaluated to ensure it is not inconsistent with management’s expectations. Changes in the forecast cause fluctuations in the estimates of the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments. Potential changes in any one economic variable may or may not affect the overall allowance because a variety of economic variables and inputs are considered in estimating the allowance, and changes in those variables and inputs may not occur at the same rate, may not be consistent across product types and may have offsetting impacts to other changing variables and inputs.
Data points such as loan mix, level of loan balances outstanding, portfolio performance, line utilization trends and risk ratings change throughout the life of a portfolio which could cause changes to the expected credit losses.
Qualitative factors not included in historical information or macroeconomic forecast require significant judgement to identify and determine how to apply to the estimate for credit losses. The qualitative factors continuously evolve in reaction to other changing assumptions, data inputs and industry trends.
The Company uses its best judgment to assess the macroeconomic forecast, key assumptions and internal and external data in estimating the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments. These estimates are subject to continuous refinement based on changes in the underlying external and internal data.
Impact if actual results differ from assumptions: The allowance for credit losses represents management’s best estimate of expected current credit losses in the loan portfolio and within the Company’s unfunded lending commitments, but changes in the inputs and assumptions described above could significantly impact the calculated estimated credit losses. Therefore, actual credit losses may differ significantly from estimated results. Significant deterioration in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, changes could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Available for Sale Debt Securities
The level of the allowance for credit losses on available for sale securities reflects the Company’s estimate of the losses expected in the available for sale debt security portfolio. In order to estimate the allowance for credit losses on available for sale debt securities, the Company performs quarterly reviews of its investment portfolio to identify securities in an unrealized loss position. If the unrealized loss is not expected to be recovered, the Company performs further analyses to determine whether any portion of the unrealized loss indicates that a credit loss exists.
Changes to the allowance for credit losses are made by changes to or reductions in the provision for credit losses, which are reflected in the consolidated statements of income.
Assumptions, Judgments, and Uncertainties: The Company’s model for establishing its allowance for credit losses uses cash flows projected to be received over the estimated life of the securities, discounted to present value, and compared to the current amortized cost bases of the securities. Securities for which fair value is less than amortized cost are reviewed for impairment. Special emphasis is placed on securities whose credit rating has fallen below Baa3 (Moody's) or BBB- (Standard & Poor's), whose fair values have fallen more than 20% below purchase price, or who have been identified based on management’s judgment. These securities are placed on a watch list and cash flow analyses are prepared on an individual security basis. Credit impairment is determined using input factors such as contractual payments required, expected delinquency rates, credit support from other tranches, prepayment speeds, collateral loss severity rates, and various other information related to the underlying collateral.
Impact if actual results differ from assumptions: The allowance for credit losses represents management’s best estimate of expected credit losses in the available for sale debt portfolio, but significant deterioration in interest rates and economic
23
Table of Contents
conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an increase in interest rates and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, anticipated changes could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Fair Value Measurement
Investment securities, including available-for-sale debt, trading, equity and other securities, residential mortgage loans held for sale, derivatives and deferred compensation plan assets and associated liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, other assets and liabilities may be recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as loan values that have been reduced based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, other real estate (primarily foreclosed property), non-marketable equity securities and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve write-downs of individual assets or application of lower of cost or fair value accounting.
Assumptions, Judgments, and Uncertainties: Fair value is an estimate of the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (i.e., not a forced transaction, such as a liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date and is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
Fair value is measured based on a variety of inputs. Fair value may be based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets (Level 1 valuations). If market prices are not available, quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market are used (Level 2 valuations). Where observable market data is not available, the valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market (Level 3 valuations). Unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s estimates for assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques typically include discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, but may also include the use of market prices of assets or liabilities that are not directly comparable to the subject asset or liability.
The selection and weighting of the various fair value techniques may result in a fair value higher or lower than carrying value. Considerable judgment may be involved in determining the amount that is most representative of fair value.
For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, the Company looks to active and observable market data when developing fair value measurements for those items where there is an active market. Certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets, and the Company must use alternative valuation techniques to derive an estimated fair value measurement. In doing so, the Company may be required to make judgments about assumptions market participants would use in estimating the fair value of the financial instrument. The assumptions used to determine fair value adjustments are regularly evaluated by management for relevance under current facts and circumstances.
Changes in market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or observable data. For example, reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities could result in observable market inputs becoming unavailable. When market data is not available, the Company uses valuation techniques requiring more management judgment to estimate the appropriate fair value.
Impairment analysis also relates to long-lived assets and core deposit and other intangible assets. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset is not likely to be recoverable and exceeds its fair value. In determining the fair value, management uses models and applies the techniques and assumptions previously discussed.
At December 31, 2021, assets and liabilities measured using observable inputs that are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 represented 98.9% and 99.2% of total assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, respectively. Valuations generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market are considered Level 3, and the Company's Level 3 assets totaled $150.2 million, or 1.0% of total assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value hierarchy, the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities, and the valuation methodologies and key inputs used are discussed in Note 17 on Fair Value Measurements.
Impact if actual results differ from assumptions: Changes in fair value are recorded either in earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income. Adjustments in the inputs and assumptions described above could significantly impact the fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities and have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
24
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the largest source of revenue, results from the Company’s lending, investing, borrowing, and deposit gathering activities. It is affected by both changes in the level of interest rates and changes in the amounts and mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The following table summarizes the changes in net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis, by major category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, identifying changes related to volumes and rates. Changes not solely due to volume or rate changes are allocated to rate.
Change due to Change due to
Interest income, fully taxable equivalent basis
Loans:
Investment securities:
Interest expense
Interest bearing deposits:
Net interest income totaled $835.4 million in 2021, increasing $5.6 million, or .7%, compared to $829.8 million in 2020. On a tax equivalent (T/E) basis, net interest income totaled $847.1 million, and increased $4.3 million over 2020. This increase was mainly due to a decline of $29.9 million in interest expense on deposits and borrowings, due to lower average rates paid, coupled with an increase of $19.0 million in interest earned on investment securities, mainly due to higher average balances. These increases to net interest income (T/E) were partly offset by lower interest earned on loans, which declined $42.3 million, mainly due to lower rates earned. The net yield on earning assets (T/E) was 2.58% in 2021 compared with 2.99% in 2020.
25
Table of Contents
During 2021, loan interest income (T/E) fell $42.3 million from 2020 mainly due to a decline in rates earned for most loan categories and lower average business and consumer credit card loan balances. The average tax equivalent rate earned on the loan portfolio decreased 21 basis points to 3.67% in 2021 compared to 3.88% in 2020. Average loan balances decreased $232.5 million, or 1.5%, this year. The decrease in consumer credit card loan interest income was the main driver of overall lower interest income. Consumer credit card loan interest declined $14.4 million due to lower average balances of $91.4 million and a decrease of 64 basis points in the average rate earned. Business loan interest income declined $9.3 million mainly due to a decrease of $548.7 million in average balances, partly offset by a 13 basis point increase in the average rate earned. Average balances of business loans included average balances of $854.1 million in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans at December 31, 2021, which was a decline of $204.9 million from balances of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2020. The average rate earned on PPP loans increased 193 basis points to 4.81% in 2021 compared to 2.88% in 2020, partly offsetting the decline in average balances. During 2021, the Company recognized $41.0 million in interest income on PPP loans. As of December 31, 2021, 93% of the PPP loans originated by the Company had been forgiven, and the Company expects almost all of the remaining loans to be forgiven in 2022. Business real estate loan interest was lower by $5.8 million in 2021 compared to 2020 as a result of a decrease of 25 basis points in the average rate, partly offset by higher average balances of $46.9 million. Interest on personal real estate loans decreased $2.6 million as the average rate earned declined 32 basis points, while average balances increased $178.4 million. Interest on consumer loans declined $9.7 million from the prior year as the average rate earned decreased 58 basis points, but was partly offset by growth in average balances of $42.4 million. These decreases to loan interest income (T/E) were partly offset by an increase of $2.1 million in interest earned on construction and land loans. This increase resulted from higher average balances of $187.7 million, partly offset by a 48 basis point decrease in the average rate earned.
Tax equivalent interest income on total investment securities increased $19.0 million during 2021, as average balances grew $3.2 billion, while the average rate earned decreased 38 basis points. The average rate on the total investment securities portfolio was 1.81% in 2021 compared to 2.19% in 2020, while the average balance of the total investment securities portfolio (excluding unrealized fair value adjustments on available for sale debt securities) was $13.5 billion in 2021 compared to an average balance of $10.3 billion in 2020. The increase in interest income was mainly due to higher interest income earned on U.S. government securities, state and municipal obligations, asset-backed securities and other securities. Interest earned on U.S. government securities grew $15.5 million and was mainly impacted by growth of the same amount in inflation income on treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS). Average balances of U.S. government securities increased $15.1 million and the average rated earned grew 191 basis points. The increase in interest earned on state and municipal obligations resulted mainly from growth of $453.2 million in average balances, partly offset by a 33 basis point decrease in the average rate earned. Interest on asset-backed securities increased $2.9 million mainly due to growth of $1.4 billion in the average balance, partly offset by an 87 basis point decrease in the average rate earned. Other securities interest increased $11.9 million mainly due to higher interest earned on equity securities, largely as a result of one-time dividend payments of $5.5 million received on private equity portfolio investments in 2021. Partly offsetting these increases in interest income was a decline of $14.7 million in interest income on mortgage-backed securities, due to a decrease of 56 basis points in the average rate earned, partly offset by higher average balances of $1.3 billion.
Interest on securities purchased under resell agreements decreased $3.3 million compared to 2020 due to a decrease of 185 basis points in the average rate, partly offset by growth in balances of $425.8 million. Interest earned on deposits with banks increased $929 thousand over 2020, mainly due to growth in average balances of $1.3 billion, partly offset by a seven basis point decrease in the average rate earned.
During 2021, interest expense on deposits decreased $24.5 million from 2020 and resulted mainly from a 17 basis point decrease in the overall average rate paid on deposits. Interest expense on interest checking and money market accounts decreased $10.4 million mainly due to lower rates paid, which fell 10 basis points, but was partly offset by higher average balances of $1.8 billion. Interest expense on certificates of deposit over $100,000 declined $10.4 million, mainly due to a 74 basis point decline in the average rate paid. The overall rate paid on total deposits decreased from .24% in 2020 to .07% in the current year. Interest expense on borrowings decreased $5.5 million mainly due to lower rates paid on securities sold under repurchase agreements, partly offset by higher average balances. The overall average rate incurred on all interest bearing liabilities was .07% in 2021, compared to .26% in 2020.
During 2020, net interest income totaled $829.8 million, increasing $8.6 million, or 1.0%, compared to $821.3 million in 2019. On a tax equivalent (T/E) basis, net interest income totaled $842.8 million, and increased $7.4 million over 2019. This increase was mainly due to a decline of $60.6 million in interest expense on deposits and borrowings, due to lower average rates paid, as well as an increase of $24.7 million in interest earned on securities purchased under agreements to resell. These increases to net interest income (T/E) were largely offset by lower interest earned on loans and investment securities, which declined $52.6 million and $20.5 million, respectively, mainly due to lower rates earned. The net yield on earning assets (T/E) was 2.99% in 2020 compared with 3.48% in 2019.
26
Table of Contents
During 2020, loan interest income (T/E) fell $52.6 million from 2019 mainly due to lower rates earned, partly offset by higher average balances for business, personal real estate, business real estate, consumer and construction and land loan categories. The average tax equivalent rate earned on the loan portfolio decreased 83 basis points to 3.88% in 2020 compared to 4.71% in 2019. The Federal Reserve lowered short-term interest rates during the first quarter of 2020, which impacted the Company's interest income on loans, as many of its loans contain variable interest rate terms. Partly offsetting lower interest rates were increases in average loan balances of $1.7 billion, or 11.8%, this year. The largest decrease in loan interest income (T/E) occurred in business real estate loans, which was lower by $17.6 million as a result of a decline in the average rate earned of 74 basis points, partly offset by growth of $100.1 million in average balances. Business loan interest income declined $6.1 million mainly due to an 81 basis point decrease in the average rate earned, partly offset by an increase of $1.2 billion in average balances. Average balances of business loans included average balances of $1.1 billion in PPP loans at December 31, 2020. Interest income on consumer credit card loans declined $15.1 million as a result of a decreases in the average balance of $96.0 million and the average rate of 49 basis points. Construction and land loan interest income decreased $11.1 million, mainly due to a 143 basis point decrease in the average rate earned, partly offset by growth in average balances of $47.6 million. Interest on consumer loans declined $6.3 million from the prior year as the average rate earned decreased 41 basis points, but was partly offset by growth in average balances of $36.3 million. These decreases to loan interest income (T/E) were partly offset by an increase of $9.2 million in interest earned on personal real estate loans. This increase resulted from higher average balances of $440.5 million, partly offset by a 31 basis point decrease in the average rate earned.
Tax equivalent interest income on total investment securities decreased $20.5 million during 2020, as the average rate earned decreased 62 basis points, while average balances grew $1.5 billion. The average rate on the total investment securities portfolio was 2.19% in 2020 compared to 2.81% in 2019, while the average balance of the total investment securities portfolio (excluding unrealized fair value adjustments on available for sale debt securities) was $10.3 billion in 2020 compared to an average balance of $8.7 billion in 2019. The decrease in interest income was mainly due to lower interest income earned on mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, U.S. government securities and government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) obligations. Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased $14.0 million, due to a decrease of 77 basis points in the average rate earned, partly offset by higher average balances of $1.1 billion. Interest on asset-backed securities decreased $7.7 million mainly due to a 70 basis point decrease in the average rate earned, partly offset by a $94.9 million increase in the average balance. Interest earned on U.S. government securities fell $3.6 million and was mainly impacted by a decline of $3.0 million in inflation income on TIPS. Average balances of U.S. government securities declined $70.2 million and the average rated earned decreased 24 basis points. Interest income on GSE's decreased $1.2 million, due to a decline in average balances of $86.3 million, partly offset by an increase of 80 basis points in the average rate earned. Partly offsetting these decreases in interest income was growth of $3.9 million and $1.8 million in interest earned on state and municipal obligations and other debt securities, respectively. The growth in interest earned on state and municipal obligations resulted mainly from an increase of $341.5 million in average balances, partly offset by a 44 basis point decrease in the average rate earned. Other debt securities interest increased due to growth of $111.4 million in average balances, partly offset by a decline of 27 basis points in the average rate earned.
Interest on securities purchased under resell agreements increased $24.7 million in 2020 due to an increase in the average rate of 263 basis points, as these assets were structured with floor spreads to protect against falling interest rates. Of the $850.0 million in securities purchased under agreements to resell held by the Company throughout 2020, $450.0 million of those agreements matured in 2021. Interest earned on deposits with banks fell $4.4 million from 2019, mainly due to a 192 basis point decrease in the average rate earned, partly offset by an increase in average balances of $799.3 million.
During 2020, interest expense on deposits decreased $37.3 million from 2019 and resulted mainly from a 30 basis point decrease in the overall average rate paid on deposits. Interest expense on interest checking and money market accounts decreased $21.9 million due to lower rates paid, which fell 21 basis points, while interest expense on certificates of deposit over $100,000 declined $14.0 million, mainly due to a 98 basis point decline in the average rate paid. The overall rate paid on total deposits decreased from .54% in 2019 to .24% in 2020. Interest expense on borrowings decreased $23.4 million mainly due to lower rates paid on federal funds purchased and customer repurchase agreements. The overall average rate incurred on all interest bearing liabilities was .26% in 2020, compared to .67% in 2019.
27
Table of Contents
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses is comprised of provisions for credit losses on loans and for unfunded lending commitments and is recorded to adjust the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments to a level deemed adequate by management based on the factors mentioned in the “Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans and Liability for Unfunded Lending Commitments” section of this discussion. The provision for credit losses was a recovery of $66.3 million in 2021, which was a decrease of $203.5 million from the 2020 provision of $137.2 million.
The provision for credit losses on loans in 2021 was a recovery of $52.2 million, compared to a provision for credit losses on loans of $116.1 million in 2020. The allowance for credit losses on loans totaled $150.0 million at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $70.8 million compared to the prior year, and represented .99% of loans at year end 2021, compared to 1.35% at December 31, 2020.
The provision for unfunded lending commitments was a recovery of $14.1 million during 2021, compared to a provision of $21.1 million in 2020, and the liability for unfunded lending commitments was $24.2 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $38.3 million at December 31, 2020.
Non-Interest Income
% Change
Non-interest income as a % of total revenue* 40.1 % 37.9 % 39.0 %
Total revenue per full-time equivalent employee $ 305.6 $ 280.3 $ 277.1
* Total revenue is calculated as net interest income plus non-interest income.
Below is a summary of net bank card transaction fees for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
% Change
Non-interest income totaled $560.4 million, an increase of $54.5 million, or 10.8%, compared to $505.9 million in 2020. Bank card fees increased $16.1 million, or 10.6%, over the prior year, due to increases in net corporate card fees of $9.3 million, net debit card fees of $3.4 million, net credit card fees of $1.8 million and net merchant fees of $1.7 million. The growth in net corporate and credit card fees over the prior year was due to higher interchange income, partly offset by higher rewards expense. Net debit card fees increased due to higher interchange income, partly offset by an increase in network expense. Net merchant fees were up due to an increase in merchant discount fees, partly offset by higher rewards expense. Trust fee income increased $27.6 million, or 17.2%, as a result of continued growth in private client trust fees (up 19.1%) and higher institutional trust fees (up 11.0%). Private client trust fees comprised 78.4% of trust fee income in 2021. The market value of total customer trust assets totaled $69.3 billion at year end 2021, which was an increase of 13.2% over year end 2020 balances. Deposit account fees increased $4.0 million, or 4.3%, mainly due to growth in corporate cash management fees and overdraft and return item fees of $3.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, partly offset by lower personal deposit account service charge fees of $1.2 million. In 2021, corporate cash management fees comprised 51.5% of total deposit fees, while overdraft fees comprised 24.8% of total deposit fees. Capital market fees grew $1.4 million, or 9.3%, compared to the prior year, while revenue from consumer brokerage services increased $3.3 million, or 21.6%, due to growth in advisory and annuity
28
Table of Contents
fees. Loan fees and sales increased $3.0 million, or 11.4%, mainly due to growth in mortgage banking revenue and loan commitment fees. Mortgage banking revenue was stronger in the first half of 2021 than during the second half of the year. As interest rates and competition for mortgage loans increased during 2021, loan fees and sales declined in the second half of 2021. Other non-interest income decreased $812 thousand, or 1.9%, from the prior year mainly due to lower cash sweep commissions of $7.9 million and a $2.2 million loss recorded on an equity method investment in 2021. These decreases were partly offset by gains of $5.6 million recorded mainly on sales of branch properties during 2021 and increases in interest rate swap fees and check sales and wire fees of $2.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
During 2020, non-interest income totaled $505.9 million, a decrease of $18.8 million, or 3.6%, compared to $524.7 million in 2019. Bank card fees decreased $16.1 million, or 9.6%, from 2019, due to declines in net corporate card fees of $12.0 million, net debit card fees of $2.4 million, net merchant fees of $903 thousand and net credit card fees of $784 thousand. The decline in net corporate card fees from 2019 was due to lower transaction volume, partly offset by lower network and rewards expense. The decline in net credit and debit card fees was mainly due to lower interchange income. The decline in net credit card fees was partly offset by lower rewards expense. Net merchant fees fell due to lower merchant discount fees, partly offset by higher interchange income and lower network expense. Trust fee income increased $5.0 million, or 3.2%, as a result of growth in private client trust fees (up 4.3%), which comprised 77.2% of trust fee income in 2020. The market value of total customer trust assets totaled $61.2 billion at year end 2020, which was an increase of 7.9% over year end 2019 balances. Deposit account fees decreased $2.8 million, or 2.9%, mainly due to a decline of $7.6 million in overdraft and return item fees, partly offset by growth of $5.3 million in corporate cash management fees. In 2020, corporate cash management fees comprised 50.2% of total deposit fees, while overdraft fees comprised 24.6% of total deposit fees. Capital market fees grew $6.4 million, or 79.0%, compared to 2019, mostly due to higher sales volume, while consumer brokerage services fees fell $709 thousand, or 4.5%. Loan fees and sales increased $10.9 million, or 69.2%, mainly due to growth in mortgage banking revenue. Mortgage banking revenue totaled $20.7 million in 2020 compared to $10.8 million in 2019 and increased as a result of higher loan originations in 2020. Other non-interest income decreased $21.7 million, or 33.1%, mainly due to a one-time gain of $11.5 million resulting from the sale of the Company's corporate trust business in the fourth quarter of 2019.In addition, cash sweep commissions and interest rate swap fees decreased $2.1 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
29
Table of Contents
Investment Securities Gains (Losses), Net
Net gains on sales and fair value adjustments of equity securities 187 39 3,606
Net gains and losses on investment securities during 2021, 2020 and 2019 are shown in the table above. Included in these amounts are gains and losses arising from sales of securities from the Company’s available for sale debt portfolio and gains and losses relating to private equity investments, which are primarily held by the Parent’s majority-owned private equity subsidiary. The gains and losses on private equity investments include fair value adjustments, in addition to gains and losses realized upon disposition. The portions of private equity investment gains and losses that are attributable to minority interests are reported as non-controlling interest in the consolidated statements of income, and resulted in expense of $6.5 million in 2021, compared to income of $1.4 million in 2020 and expense of $348 thousand in 2019.
Net securities gains of $30.1 million were recorded in 2021, which included $1.5 million in net gains realized on sales of private equity investments, net gains totaling $31.7 million of fair value adjustments on private equity investments, and $187 thousand of fair value adjustments on equity investments. These net gains were offset by losses of $3.3 million realized on bond sales resulting from the Company's sale of approximately $73 million (book value) of bonds, mainly mortgage-backed securities.
Net securities gains of $11.0 million were recorded in 2020, which included $21.1 million in net gains realized on bond sales resulting from the Company's sale of approximately $602 million (book value) of bonds, mainly mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. These gains were offset by net losses totaling $10.1 million of fair value adjustments on private equity investments.
Net securities gains of $3.6 million were recorded in 2019, which included $214 thousand in net losses realized on bond sales resulting from the Company's sale of approximately $400 million (book value) of bonds, mainly municipal securities, treasuries and asset-backed securities. Net securities gains also included $3.3 million in gains from sales of equity investments, net gains of $344 thousand in fair value adjustments on equity investments, and a $1.1 million in gain from the sale of a private equity investment. These gains were offset by net losses totaling $727 thousand of fair value adjustments on private equity investments.
30
Table of Contents
Non-Interest Expense
% Change
Salaries and benefits as a % of total non-interest expense 65.2 % 66.8 % 64.2 %
Non-interest expense was $805.9 million in 2021, an increase of $37.5 million, or 4.9%, over the previous year. Salaries and benefits expense increased $12.3 million, or 2.4%, mainly due to higher incentive compensation and healthcare expense, partly offset by lower salaries expense. Incentive compensation increased due to higher incentives in wealth and commercial, while full-time and part-time salaries expense declined mainly due to lower retail banking salaries expense. Full-time equivalent employees totaled 4,567 at December 31, 2021, reflecting a 4.2% decrease from 2020. Net occupancy expense increased $1.5 million, or 3.3%, mainly due to lower external rent income. Equipment expense decreased $750 thousand, or 4.0%, mainly due to lower depreciation and equipment service expense, while supplies and communication expense decreased $301 thousand, or 1.7%. Data processing and software expense increased $6.5 million, or 6.8%, primarily due to higher costs for service providers, bank card processing fees and software expense, while marketing expense increased $2.1 million, or 10.8%. Other non-interest expense increased $16.2 million, or 28.2%, over the prior year mainly due to $8.2 million in non-recurring litigation settlement costs recorded in the third quarter of 2021. In addition, deferred origination costs declined $3.5 million and deposit insurance expense increased $1.3 million. These increases were partly offset by a reduction in impairment expense of $3.6 million on the Company's mortgage servicing rights.
In 2020, non-interest expense was $768.4 million in 2020, an increase of $980 thousand, or .1%, over 2019. Salaries and benefits expense increased $20.1 million, or 4.1%, mainly due to higher costs for full-time salaries and incentive compensation. Full-time salaries expense increased due to growth in commercial, information technology, wealth management and other support unit salaries expense, while incentive compensation saw increases in mortgage, capital markets, and in association with the origination of PPP loans. Full-time equivalent employees totaled 4,766 at December 31, 2020, reflecting a 1.9% decrease from 2019. Occupancy expense decreased $512 thousand, or 1.1%, mainly due to lower utilities and outside services expense, partly offset by higher building depreciation expense. Equipment expense decreased $222 thousand, or 1.2%, while supplies and communication expense decreased $3.0 million, or 14.6%, as a result of lower supplies, postage and bank card issuance fees. Data processing and software expense increased $2.4 million, or 2.6%, primarily due to higher costs for service providers and software expense, partly offset by lower bank card processing fees, while marketing expense decreased $2.2 million, or 9.9%. Other non-interest expense decreased $15.6 million, or 21.4%, from 2019 mainly due to higher deferred origination costs (up $3.7 million) and lower travel and entertainment (down $8.7 million) and education expense (down $1.2 million). These decreases were partly offset by higher deposit insurance expense (up $1.2 million), as well as higher impairment expense (up $1.8 million) and amortization (up $2.4 million) on the Company's mortgage servicing rights.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $145.7 million in 2021, compared to $87.3 million in 2020 and $109.1 million in 2019. The effective tax rate, including the effect of non-controlling interest, was 21.5% in 2021 compared to 19.8% in 2020 and 20.6% in 2019. The increase in effective tax rate in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily driven by higher net income before taxes. Additional information about income tax expense is provided in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
31
Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Loan Portfolio Analysis
Classifications of consolidated loans by major category at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are shown in the table below. This portfolio consists of loans which were acquired or originated with the intent of holding to their maturity. Loans held for sale are separately discussed in a following section. A schedule of average balances invested in each loan category below is disclosed within the Average Balance Sheets section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below.
Balance at December 31
Commercial:
Personal banking:
The contractual maturities of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2021, and a breakdown of those loans between fixed rate and floating rate loans are as follows.
Principal Payments Due
Commercial:
Personal banking:
32
Table of Contents
The following table shows loan balances at December 31, 2021, segregated between those with fixed interest rates and those with variable rates that fluctuate with an index.
(In thousands) Fixed Rate Loans Variable Rate Loans Total % Variable Rate Loans
Total loans at December 31, 2021 were $15.2 billion, a decrease of $1.2 billion, or 7.1%, over balances at December 31, 2020. The decline in loans during 2021 occurred in the business, consumer credit card, revolving home equity and personal real estate loan categories, while construction, consumer, business real estate and overdraft loan categories increased from the prior year. Business loans decreased $1.2 billion, or 19.0%, mainly due to a $1.2 billion decline in PPP loan balances. As of December 31, 2021, 93% of PPP loan balances have been forgiven. Excluding PPP loans, business loans increased $204.5 million, or 4.1%, over balances at December 31, 2020. Lease lending and tax-advantaged lending, included within Business loans, declined during 2021, but these declines were partly offset by growth in commercial card lending. Construction loans increased $96.7 million, or 9.5% mainly due to growth in commercial construction lending. Business real estate loans increased $32.7 million, or 1.1%, due mainly to increases in multi-family, owner-occupied, and industrial lending, while hotel and senior living lending declined. Personal real estate loans declined $14.6 million, or .5%. The Company sells certain long-term fixed rate mortgage loans to the secondary market, and loan sales in 2021 totaled $547.1 million, compared to $275.1 million in 2020. Consumer loans increased $81.7 million, or 4.2%, mainly due to growth in private banking lending. Other vehicle and equipment lending (mostly comprised of motorcycle loans) also increased, offset by declines in auto lending, fixed rate home equity loans and continued run off of marine and recreational vehicle loan balances. Consumer credit card loans decreased $79.7 million, or 12.2%, and revolving home equity loan balances declined $31.1 million, or 10.1%, compared to balances at year end 2020.
The Company currently holds approximately 31% of its loan portfolio in the Kansas City market, 26% in the St. Louis market, and 43% in other regional markets. The portfolio is diversified from a business and retail standpoint, with 62% in loans to businesses and 38% in loans to consumers. The Company believes a diversified approach to loan portfolio management, strong underwriting criteria and an aversion toward credit concentrations from an industry, geographic and product perspective, have contributed to low levels of problem loans and credit losses on loans experienced over the last several years.
The Company participates in credits of large, publicly traded companies which are defined by regulation as shared national credits, or SNCs. Regulations define SNCs as loans exceeding $100 million that are shared by three or more financial institutions. The Company typically participates in these loans when business operations are maintained in the local communities or regional markets and opportunities to provide other banking services are present. At December 31, 2021, the balance of SNC loans totaled approximately $1.2 billion, with an additional $1.9 billion in unfunded commitments, compared to a balance of $1.0 billion, with an additional $1.7 billion in unfunded commitments, at year end 2020.
Commercial Loans
Business
Total business loans amounted to $5.3 billion at December 31, 2021 and include loans used mainly to fund customer accounts receivable, inventories, and capital expenditures. The business loan portfolio includes tax-advantaged loans and leases which carry tax-free interest rates. These loans totaled $729.9 million at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $131.1 million, or 15.2%, from December 31, 2020 balances. In addition to tax-advantaged leases, the business loan portfolio also includes other direct financing and sales type leases totaling $536.9 million at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $47.4 million, or 8.1%, from December 31, 2020. These loans are used by commercial customers to finance capital purchases ranging from computer equipment to office and transportation equipment. Additionally, the Company has outstanding oil and gas energy-related loans totaling $260.6 million at December 31, 2021, which are further discussed within the Oil and Gas Energy Lending section of
33
Table of Contents
the Risk Elements of Loan Portfolio section located within Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Also included in the business portfolio are corporate card loans, which totaled $346.9 million at December 31, 2021 and are made in conjunction with the Company’s corporate card business for corporate trade purchases. Corporate card loans are made to corporate, non-profit and government customers nationwide, but have very short-term maturities, which limits credit risk.
Business loans, excluding corporate card loans, are made primarily to customers in the regional trade area of the Company, generally the central Midwest, encompassing the states of Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, and nearby Midwestern markets, including Iowa, Oklahoma, Colorado, Texas, Tennessee, Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio. This portfolio is diversified from an industry standpoint and includes businesses engaged in manufacturing, wholesaling, retailing, agribusiness, insurance, financial services, public utilities, health care, and other service businesses. Emphasis is upon middle-market and community businesses with known local management and financial stability. Consistent with management’s strategy and emphasis upon relationship banking, most borrowing customers also maintain deposit accounts and utilize other banking services. Net loan recoveries in this category totaled $4.8 million in 2021 compared to net loan charge-offs of $3.7 million in 2020. Non-accrual business loans were $7.3 million (.1% of business loans) at December 31, 2021 compared to $22.5 million at December 31, 2020.
Real Estate-Construction and Land
The portfolio of loans in this category amounted to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $96.7 million, or 9.5%, from the prior year and comprised 7.4% of the Company’s total loan portfolio. Commercial construction and land development loans totaled $971.1 million, or 86.8% of total construction loans at December 31, 2021. These loans increased $103.6 million from 2020 year end balances, driving the growth in the total construction portfolio. Commercial construction loans are made during the construction phase for small and medium-sized office and medical buildings, manufacturing and warehouse facilities, apartment complexes, shopping centers, hotels and motels, and other commercial properties. Commercial land development loans relate to land owned or developed for use in conjunction with business properties. Residential construction and land development loans at December 31, 2021 totaled $147.1 million, or 13.2% of total construction loans. A stable construction market has contributed to low loss rates on these loans, with net loan charge-offs of nearly zero in both 2021 and 2020.
Real Estate-Business
Total business real estate loans were $3.1 billion at December 31, 2021 and comprised 20.2% of the Company’s total loan portfolio. This category includes mortgage loans for small and medium-sized office and medical buildings, manufacturing and warehouse facilities, distribution facilities, multi-family housing, farms, shopping centers, hotels and motels, churches, and other commercial properties. The business real estate borrowers and/or properties are generally located in local and regional markets where Commerce does business, and emphasis is placed on owner-occupied lending (38.9% of this portfolio), which presents lower risk levels. Additional information about business real estate loans by borrower is disclosed within the Real Estate - Business Loans section of the Risk Elements of Loan Portfolio section located within Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. At December 31, 2021, balances of non-accrual loans amounted to $214 thousand, less than .1% of business real estate loans, down from $2.2 million at year end 2020. The Company experienced net loan recoveries of $64 thousand in 2021, compared to net loan recoveries of $47 thousand in 2020.
Personal Banking Loans
Real Estate-Personal
At December 31, 2021, there were $2.8 billion in outstanding personal real estate loans, which comprised 18.5% of the Company’s total loan portfolio. The mortgage loans in this category are mainly for owner-occupied residential properties. The Company originates both adjustable and fixed rate mortgage loans, and at December 31, 2021, 27% of the portfolio was comprised of adjustable rate loans, while 73% was comprised of fixed rate loans. The Company does not purchase any loans from outside parties or brokers and has never maintained no-document products.
The Company originates certain mortgage loans with the intent to sell to the secondary market, generally FNMA or FHLMC conforming fixed rate loans. The remaining loans are originated with the intent to hold to maturity. Of the $1.3 billion of mortgage loans originated in 2021, $547.1 million were sold to the secondary market. This compares to $1.5 billion of mortgage loans originated and $275.1 million of loans sold to the secondary market in 2020. The increase in loan sales during 2021 compared to 2020 was partly due to the Company temporarily pausing loan sales for the second quarter of 2020.
The Company has experienced lower credit losses on loans in this category than many others in the industry and believes this is partly because of its conservative underwriting culture and the fact that it does not purchase loans from brokers. Net loan
34
Table of Contents
recoveries in 2021 totaled $98 thousand, and net loan recoveries were $291 thousand in 2020. Balances of non-accrual loans in this category were $1.6 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $1.8 million at year end 2020.
Consumer
Consumer loans consist of private banking, automobile, motorcycle, marine, tractor/trailer, recreational vehicle (RV), fixed rate home equity, patient health care financing and other types of consumer loans. These loans totaled $2.0 billion at December 31, 2021. Approximately 42% of the consumer portfolio consists of automobile loans, 29% in private banking loans, 11% in fixed rate home equity loans, and 9% in healthcare financing loans. Total consumer loans increased $81.7 million at year end 2021 compared to year end 2020. Growth of $109.6 million in private banking loans was supplemented by increases in other executive lines of credit and motorcycle loans. These increases in consumer loan balances were partially offset by declines of $24.5 million in automobile loans, $19.3 million in fixed rate home equity loans, $7.3 million in marine and RV loans, and $1.5 million in patient healthcare financing. Net charge-offs on total consumer loans were $2.6 million in 2021, compared to $4.4 million in 2020, averaging .13% and .23% of consumer loans in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Revolving Home Equity
Revolving home equity loans, of which more than 99% are adjustable rate loans, totaled $275.9 million at year end 2021. An additional $784.3 million was available in unused lines of credit, which can be drawn at the discretion of the borrower. Home equity loans are secured mainly by second mortgages (and less frequently, first mortgages) on residential property of the borrower. The underwriting terms for the home equity line product permit borrowing availability, in the aggregate, generally up to 80% or 90% of the appraised value of the collateral property at the time of origination. Net loan charge-offs were nearly zero in 2021, compared to net loan recoveries of $166 thousand in 2020.
Consumer Credit Card
Total consumer credit card loans amounted to $575.4 million at December 31, 2021 and comprised 3.8% of the Company’s total loan portfolio. The credit card portfolio is concentrated within regional markets served by the Company. The Company offers a variety of credit card products, including affinity cards, rewards cards, and standard and premium credit cards, and emphasizes its credit card relationship product, Special Connections. Approximately 39% of the households that own a Commerce credit card product also maintain a deposit relationship with the subsidiary bank. Approximately 95% of the outstanding credit card loan balances had a floating interest rate at year end 2021, unchanged from year end 2020. Net charge-offs amounted to $20.0 million in 2021, a decrease of $6.0 million from $26.0 million in 2020.
Loans Held for Sale
At December 31, 2021, loans held for sale were comprised of certain long-term fixed rate personal real estate loans and loans extended to students while attending colleges and universities. The personal real estate loans are carried at fair value and totaled $5.6 million at December 31, 2021. The student loans, carried at the lower of cost or fair value, totaled $3.0 million at December 31, 2021. Both of these portfolios are further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
35
Table of Contents
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans and Liability for Unfunded Lending Commitments
To determine the amount of the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments, the Company has established a process which assesses the risks and losses expected in its portfolios. This process provides an allowance based on estimates of allowances for pools of loans and unfunded lending commitments, as well as a second, smaller component based on certain individually evaluated loans and unfunded lending commitments. The Company's policies and processes for determining the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments are discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and in the "Allowance for Credit Losses" discussion within Critical Accounting Policies above.
Loans subject to individual evaluation generally consist of business, construction, business real estate and personal real estate loans on non-accrual status. These non-accrual loans are evaluated individually for impairment based on factors such as payment history, borrower financial condition and collateral. For collateral dependent loans, appraisals of collateral (including exit costs) are normally obtained annually but discounted based on date last received and market conditions. From these evaluations of expected cash flows and collateral values, specific allowances are determined.
Loans which are not individually evaluated are segregated by loan type and sub-type and are collectively evaluated. These loans consist of commercial loans (business, construction and business real estate) which have been graded pass, special mention, or substandard, and also include all personal banking loans except personal real estate loans on non-accrual status. Collectively-evaluated loans include certain troubled debt restructurings with similar risk characteristics.
The allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments are estimates that require significant judgment including projections of the macro-economic environment. The Company utilizes a third-party macro-economic forecast that continuously changes due to economic conditions and events. These changes in the forecast cause fluctuations in the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments. The Company uses its best judgment to assess the macro-economic forecast and internal loss data in estimating the allowance for credit losses on loans and the liability for unfunded lending commitments. These estimates are subject to periodic refinement based on changes in the underlying external and internal data.
The Company has internal credit administration and loan review staff that continuously review loan quality and report the results of their reviews and examinations to the Company’s senior management and Board of Directors. Such reviews also assist management in establishing the level of the allowance. The Company’s subsidiary bank continues to be subject to examination by several regulatory agencies, and examinations are conducted throughout the year, targeting various segments of the loan portfolio for review. Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional discussion on the allowance and charge-off policies.
At December 31, 2021, the allowance for credit losses on loans was $150.0 million, compared to $220.8 million at December 31, 2020. The allowance for credit losses related to commercial loans decreased $23.8 million during 2021, due to decreases in the allowance for business and construction loans of $19.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Compared to December 31, 2020, the allowance for credit losses on consumer credit card, personal real estate, and consumer loans decreased $38.5 million, $3.0 million, and $5.2 million, respectively. These large decreases resulted from an improved forecast utilized in the Company’s estimate of future credit losses at December 31, 2021, coupled with lower than projected net loan charge-offs during the year. The allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2020 included an uncertain economic projection defined by high unemployment and other business and personal disruptions caused by COVID-19. Through various governmental stimulus programs and improvements in the public health crisis due to the development and increasing availability of a COVID-19 vaccine, the projected net charge-offs were not realized and the economic forecast improved, thus allowing the release of the allowance for credit losses during 2021. As a result, the provision for credit losses, which includes the provision for loans and unfunded lending commitments, was a benefit of $66.3 million for the year, compared to a provision of $137.2 million in 2020. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the various model assumptions utilized in the Company's CECL estimate at December 31, 2021.
The percentage of allowance to loans decreased to .99% at December 31, 2021, compared to 1.35% at December 30, 2020. The percentage of allowance to commercial portfolio loans decreased to 1.03% at December 31, 2021, compared to 1.15% at December 30, 2020, and the percentage of allowance to personal banking loans decreased to .92% at December 31, 2021 from 1.73% at December 31, 2020. The allowance fell as a percentage of loans at December 31, 2021 because the economic forecast utilized in the Company’s CECL model improved over the forecast utilized at December 31, 2020, and the net charge-offs projected at December 31, 2020 did not come to fruition. Additionally, included within business loans at December 31, 2020 are approximately $1.4 billion PPP loans that are fully guaranteed by the government, and therefore, no allowance for credit losses was estimated for these loans. At December 31, 2021, PPP loans outstanding were approximately $129.2 million.
36
Table of Contents
Excluding the PPP loans, the allowance for credit losses on loans was 1.00% of loans at December 31, 2021 and 1.48% at December 31, 2020. Most of the PPP loans originated by the Company during 2020 and 2021 have been forgiven, and the Company expects nearly all of the remaining outstanding PPP loans to be forgiven during 2022.
Total loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing were $11.7 million at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $10.5 million compared to year end 2020. The decrease was mainly driven by decreases of $7.0 million in consumer credit card, $3.0 million in business, and $1.1 million in consumer loans delinquent 90 days or more, partly offset by an increase of $411 thousand in revolving home equity loan delinquencies. Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2021 were $9.2 million, a decrease of $17.4 million over the prior year, mainly due to a decrease in business and business real-estate non-accrual loans of $15.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans was 1,638.6% at December 31, 2021, compared to 832.1% at December 31, 2020. The increase in the ratio of the allowance to non-accrual loans was driven by the decrease in non-accrual loans outstanding. The 2021 year-end balance of non-accrual loans was comprised of $7.3 million of business loans, $1.6 million of personal real estate loans, and $214 thousand of business real estate loans.
Net loan charge-offs totaled $18.6 million in 2021, representing a $16.3 million decrease compared to net charge-offs of $34.9 million in 2020. The decrease was largely due net recoveries of $4.8 million on business loans during 2021, compared to net charge-offs of $3.7 million in the prior year, and lower net charge-offs in consumer credit card and consumer loans of $6.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Consumer credit card net charge-offs were 3.47% of average consumer credit card loans in 2021, compared to 3.88% in 2020. Consumer credit card loan net charge-offs as a percentage of total net charge-offs increased to 107.8% in 2021, compared to 74.5% in 2020. Consumer loan net charge-offs were .13% of average consumer loans in 2021, compared to .23% in 2020, and represented 13.8% of total net loan charge-offs in 2021. The ratio of net charge-offs to total average loans outstanding in 2021 was .12%, compared to .22% in 2020 and .35% in 2019.
At December 31, 2021, the liability for unfunded lending commitments was $24.2 million, a decrease of $14.1 million compared to December 31, 2020. The decrease in the liability for unfunded lending commitments during 2021 was driven by the improved economic forecast. The Company's unfunded lending commitments primarily relate to construction loans, and the Company's estimate for credit losses in its unfunded lending commitments utilizes the same model and forecast as its estimate for credit losses on loans. See Note 2 for further discussion of the model inputs utilized in the Company's estimate of credit losses.