ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to those set forth under “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company assumes no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements. Readers of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K should consider these risks and uncertainties in evaluating forward-looking statements and should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
49
Table of Contents
The following consolidated selected financial data is derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2023. This information should be read in connection with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Income Statement
Per Common Share Data
Selected Performance Ratios
Return on Average Assets (ROA) 0.89 % 1.38 % 1.43 % 1.04 % 1.49 %
Yield on Interest Earning Assets 5.08 4.35 4.16 4.51 5.01
Balance Sheet
Capital Ratios (Consolidated)
Growth Ratios
Percentage Change in Total Assets 6.1 % 25.0 % 18.8 % 29.0 % 15.0 %
50
Table of Contents
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Selected Asset Quality Data
Foreclosed Assets $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Nonaccrual Loans to Total Loans 0.02 % 0.02 % 0.03 % 0.03 % 0.02 %
Overview
The Company is a financial holding company headquartered in St. Louis Park, Minnesota. The principal sources of funds for loans and investments are transaction, savings, time, and other deposits, and short-term and long-term borrowings. The Company’s principal sources of income are interest and fees collected on loans, interest and dividends earned on investment securities and service charges. The Company’s principal expenses are interest paid on deposit accounts and borrowings, employee compensation and other overhead expenses. The Company’s simple, efficient business model of providing responsive support and unconventional experiences to clients continues to be the underlying principle that drives the Company’s profitable growth.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared based on the application of certain accounting policies, the most significant of which are described in “Note 1 – Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included as a part of this report. Certain policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or subject to variation and may significantly affect the reported results and financial position for the current period or in future periods. The use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when financial assets and liabilities are required to be recorded or adjusted to reflect fair value. Assets carried at fair value inherently result in more financial statement volatility. Fair values and information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based on either quoted market prices or are provided by other independent third-party sources, when available. When such information is not available, management estimates valuation adjustments. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on the future financial condition and results of operations. Management has discussed each critical accounting policy and the methodology for the identification and determination of critical accounting policies with the Company’s Audit Committee.
The following is a discussion of the critical accounting policies and significant estimates that require the Company to make complex and subjective judgments.
Allowance for Credit Losses
In accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, the allowance for credit losses on loans is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be
51
Table of Contents
collected on the loans. Loans are charged against the allowance for credit losses on loans when management determines all or a portion of the loan balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is increased (decreased) by provisions (or recovery of) reported in the income statement as a component of provisions for credit loss. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is a liability account representing expected credit losses over the contractual period for which the Company is exposed to credit risk resulting from an off-balance sheet exposure.
The amount of each allowance account represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on such financial instruments using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The allowance for credit losses on loans is measured on a collective basis for portfolios of loans when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis and excluded from the collective evaluation. For determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses on a collective basis, the loan portfolio is segmented into pools based upon similar risk characteristics and a lifetime loss-rate model is utilized. Management qualitatively adjusts model results for reasonable and supportable forecasts and risk factors that are not considered within the modeling processes but are relevant in assessing the expected credit losses within the loan segment. These qualitative factor adjustments may increase or decrease management's estimate of expected credit losses by a calculated percentage or amount based upon the estimated level of risk. Due to the subjective nature of these estimates the various components of the calculation require significant management judgment and certain assumptions are highly subjective. Volatility in certain credit metrics and variations between expected and actual outcomes are likely.
Investment Securities Impairment
In accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, available for sale securities in unrealized loss positions are evaluated for impairment related to credit losses. For any securities classified as available for sale that are in an unrealized loss position, the Company assesses whether or not it intends to sell the security, or if it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security, before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either criteria is met, the security's amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income with the establishment of an allowance. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the Company evaluates whether any portion of the decline in fair value is the result of credit deterioration. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which the amortized cost of the security exceeds its fair value, changes in credit ratings and any other known adverse conditions related to the specific security, among other factors. If the assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds the present value of cash flows expected to be collected, limited by the amount by which the amortized cost exceeds fair value. Any impairment not recognized in the allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income.
The fair values of investment securities are generally determined by various pricing models. The Company evaluates the methodologies used to develop the resulting fair values. The Company performs a periodic analysis on the pricing of investment securities to ensure that the prices represent reasonable estimates of fair value. The procedures include initial and ongoing reviews of pricing methodologies and trends. The Company seeks to ensure prices represent reasonable estimates of fair value through the use of broker quotes, current sales transactions from the portfolio and pricing techniques, which are based on the net present value of future expected cash flows discounted at a rate of return market participants would require. As a result of this analysis, if the Company determines there is a more appropriate fair value, the price is adjusted accordingly.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts business. A framework has been established for measuring the fair value of financial instruments that considers the attributes specific to particular assets or liabilities and includes a three-level hierarchy for determining fair value based on the transparency of inputs to each valuation as of the measurement date. The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using a variety of valuation methods. When financial instruments are actively traded and have quoted market prices, quoted market prices are used for fair value and are classified as Level 1. When financial
52
Table of Contents
instruments, such as investment securities and derivatives, are not actively traded, the Company determines fair value based on various sources and may apply matrix pricing with observable prices for similar instruments where a price for the identical instrument is not observable. The fair values of these financial instruments, which are classified as Level 2, are determined by pricing models that consider observable market data such as interest rate volatilities, yield curve, credit spreads, prices from external market data providers and/or nonbinding broker-dealer quotations. When observable inputs do not exist, the Company estimates fair value based on available market data, and these values are classified as Level 3. Imprecision in estimating fair values can impact the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the amount of revenue or loss recorded.
Deferred Tax Asset
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as prescribed by GAAP. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. If currently available information indicates it is “more likely than not” that the deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Accounting for deferred income taxes is a critical accounting estimate because the Company exercises significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. Management’s determination of the realization of deferred tax assets is based upon management’s judgment of various future events and uncertainties, including the timing and amount of future income, reversing temporary differences which may offset, and the implementation of various tax plans to maximize realization of the deferred tax asset. These judgments and estimates are inherently subjective and reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require the Company to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in such period, which would negatively affect earnings.
Results of Operations
Net Income
2023 Compared to 2022
Net income was $40.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to net income of $53.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. Earnings per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $1.27, compared to $1.72 per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2022. ROA was 0.89% and 1.38% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. ROE was 9.73% and 13.90% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
2022 Compared to 2021
Net income was $53.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to net income of $45.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Earnings per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $1.72, compared to $1.54 per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2021. ROA was 1.38% and 1.43% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. ROE was 13.90% and 14.45% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Net Interest Income
The Company’s primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is impacted by the level of interest earning assets and related funding sources, as well as changes in the level of interest rates. The difference between the average yield on earning assets and the average rate paid for interest bearing liabilities is the net interest spread. Noninterest bearing sources of funds, such as demand deposits and shareholders’ equity, also support earning assets. The impact of the noninterest bearing sources of funds is captured in the net interest margin, which is calculated as net
53
Table of Contents
interest income divided by average earning assets. Both the net interest margin and net interest spread are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, which means that tax-free interest income has been adjusted to pretax-equivalent income, assuming a 21% federal tax rate. Management’s ability to respond to changes in interest rates by using effective asset-liability management techniques is critical to managing the net interest margin and the Company’s primary source of earnings. The FOMC increased the targeted federal funds rate by a total of 100 basis points throughout 2023 and 425 basis points throughout 2022. These rapid increases may impact the comparability of net interest income between periods.
54
Table of Contents
Average Balances and Yields
The following table presents, for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the average balances of each principal category of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, and an analysis of net interest income. The average balances are principally daily averages and, for loans, include both performing and nonperforming balances. Interest income on loans includes the effects of net deferred loan origination fees and costs accounted for as yield adjustments. These tables are presented on a tax-equivalent basis, if applicable.
Balance & Fees Rate Balance & Fees Rate Balance & Fees Rate
(dollars in thousands)
Interest Earning Assets:
Investment Securities:
Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Taxable Equivalent Adjustment:
55
Table of Contents
Interest Rates and Operating Interest Differential
Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense result from changes in average balances (volume) of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, as well as changes in average interest rates. The following table presents the effect that these factors had on the interest earned on interest earning assets and the interest incurred on interest bearing liabilities. The effect of changes in volume is determined by multiplying the change in volume by the previous period’s average rate. Similarly, the effect of rate changes is calculated by multiplying the change in average rate by the previous period’s volume. The changes not attributable specifically to either volume or rate have been allocated to the changes due to volume. The following table presents the changes in the volume and rate of interest bearing assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Year Ended December 31, 2022
Compared with Compared with
Year Ended December 31, 2022 Year Ended December 31, 2021
Change Due To: Interest Change Due To: Interest
(dollars in thousands) Volume Rate Variance Volume Rate Variance
Interest Earning Assets:
Investment Securities:
Loans:
Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Interest Income, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin
2023 Compared to 2022
Net interest income was $105.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $24.5 million compared to $129.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in net interest income was due to
56
Table of Contents
increased volumes and higher rates paid on interest bearing liabilities in the rising interest rate environment, offset partially by higher rates earned on increased volumes of securities and loans.
Net interest margin (on a fully tax-equivalent basis) for the year ended December 31, 2023 was 2.42%, a 103 basis point decline from 3.45% for the year ended December 31, 2022. Core net interest margin (on a fully tax-equivalent basis), a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes the impact of loan fees, and prior to 2023, PPP balances, interest, and fees, for the year ended December 31, 2023 was 2.34%, a 93 basis point decline from 3.27% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decline in the margin was primarily due to higher funding costs, offset partially by higher earning asset yields.
Average interest earning assets were $4.40 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $614.1 million, or 16.2%, compared to $3.79 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in average interest earning assets was primarily due to growth in the loan portfolio and purchases of investment securities. Average interest bearing liabilities were $3.25 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $717.8 million, or 28.4%, compared to $2.53 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in average interest bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in interest bearing transaction deposits, brokered deposits and FHLB advances.
Average interest earning assets produced a fully tax-equivalent yield of 5.08% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 4.35% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in the yield on interest earning assets was primarily due to growth and repricing of the loan and securities portfolios in the rising interest rate environment. The cost of interest bearing liabilities was 3.61% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 1.34% for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to the rapid increase in market interest rates that occurred between the periods, which impacted all funding sources.
Interest Income. Total interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, was $223.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $164.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The $59.0 million, or 35.8%, increase in total interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, was primarily due to solid organic growth in the loan portfolio, purchases of investment securities, and higher earning asset yields in the rising interest rate environment.
Interest income on cash investments increased $2.6 million, or 430.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to the interest rate increases during the year. Interest income on the investment securities portfolio on a fully-tax equivalent basis increased $9.5 million, or 55.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to an $85.2 million, or 16.4%, increase in average balances between the two periods and higher rates earned on securities.
Interest income on loans, on a fully-tax equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $192.7 million, compared to $146.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The $45.9 million, or 31.2%, increase was primarily due to a $508.5 million, or 15.9%, increase in the average balance of loans outstanding from organic loan growth and a rising yield in the higher interest rate environment.
Loan interest income and loan fees remain the primary contributing factors to the changes in yield on interest earning assets. The aggregate loan yield, increased to 5.21% for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was 61 basis points higher than 4.60% for the year ended December 31, 2022. While loan fees have historically maintained a relatively stable contribution to the aggregate loan yield, the recent periods saw fewer loan prepayments, which historically has accelerated the recognition of loan fees. Despite the overall decrease in fee recognition, the Company is encouraged that the core loan yield continues to rise as new loan originations and the existing portfolio reprice in the higher rate environment.
57
Table of Contents
The following table presents a summary of interest and fees recognized on loans for the year ended December 31, 2023 and, excluding PPP loans, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
For the year ended December 31,
Interest Expense. Interest expense on interest bearing liabilities was $117.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $83.2 million, or 244.7%, compared to $34.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to growth and upward repricing of the deposit and FHLB advances portfolios in the higher interest rate environment.
Interest expense on deposits was $96.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $23.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The $72.7 million, or 310.8%, increase in interest expense on deposits was primarily due to the upward repricing of the deposit portfolio in the higher interest rate environment and the average balance of interest bearing deposits increasing by $523.6 million, or 23.6%. The cost of total deposits was 2.73% for the year ended December 31, 2023, a 198 basis point increase, compared to 0.75% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to the upward repricing of the deposit portfolio in the higher interest rate environment.
Interest expense on borrowings was $21.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $10.5 million, compared to $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily due to the increased utilization of federal funds purchased and FHLB advances in the higher interest rate environment.
2022 Compared to 2021
Net interest income was $129.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $20.2 million, or 18.4%, compared to $109.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to growth in average interest earning assets and higher yields on investment securities and core loans,
offset partially by higher rates paid on deposits and borrowings and lower PPP fee recognition.
Net interest margin (on a fully tax-equivalent basis) for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 3.45%, a decrease of nine basis points, compared to 3.54% for the year ended December 31, 2021. Core net interest margin (on a fully tax-equivalent basis), a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes the impact of loan fees and PPP balances, interest, and fees, for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 3.27%, a one basis point decrease from 3.28% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company remains focused on managing the impact of continued interest rate hikes and the evolving shape of the yield curve during this unique interest rate environment.
The Company recognized $898,000 of PPP origination fees for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. There were no remaining PPP origination fees to be recognized as of December 31, 2022. At December 31, 2022, the Company had three PPP loans outstanding totaling $1.0 million, compared to 153 PPP loans outstanding totaling $26.2 million at December 31, 2021.
Average interest earning assets were $3.79 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $674.4 million, or 21.6%, compared to $3.12 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in average interest earning assets was primarily due to strong organic growth in the loan portfolio and purchases of investment securities, offset partially by the forgiveness of PPP loans and the reduction of cash balances. Average interest bearing liabilities were $2.53 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $442.3 million, or 21.2%, compared to $2.09 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in average interest bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in savings and money market deposits and federal funds purchased, offset partially by a decrease in time deposits.
58
Table of Contents
Average interest earning assets produced a fully tax-equivalent yield of 4.35% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 4.16% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in the yield on interest earning assets was primarily due to growth and repricing of the loan and securities portfolios in the rising interest rate environment, offset partially by the lower recognition of PPP origination fees. The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities was 1.34% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 0.93% for the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to the rapid increase in market interest rates that occurred between the periods, which impacted all funding sources.
Interest Income. Total interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $164.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $129.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The $35.2 million, or 27.1%, increase in total interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was primarily due to strong organic growth in the loan portfolio and purchases of investment securities, offset partially by a reduction in the recognition of PPP origination fees.
Interest income on cash investments increased $398,000, or 199.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, despite a $66.1 million decrease in average balances, primarily due to the interest rate hikes during the year. Interest income on the investment securities portfolio, on a fully-tax equivalent basis, increased $6.8 million, or 66.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to a $127.6 million, or 32.4%, increase in average balances between the two periods and higher rates earned on securities.
Interest income on loans, on a fully-tax equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $146.8 million, compared to $119.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The $27.8 million, or 23.4%, increase was primarily due to a $605.9 million, or 23.4%, increase in the average balance of loans outstanding from continued organic loan growth and a four basis point increase in the average yield on loans, excluding PPP, partially offset by a $5.5 million decline of interest and fees earned on PPP loans. The aggregate loan yield, excluding PPP loans increased to 4.58% for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was four basis points higher than 4.54% for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Interest Expense. Interest expense on interest bearing liabilities was $34.0, an increase of $14.6 million, or 75.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily due to the rapid increase in market interest rates that occurred between periods, which impacted all funding sources.
Interest expense on deposits was $23.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The $9.5 million, or 68.9%, increase in interest expense on deposits was primarily due to the upward repricing of the deposit portfolio consistent with the higher rate environment and the average balance of interest bearing deposits increasing by $276.2 million, or 14.2%. The cost of total deposits was 0.75% for the year ended December 31, 2022, a 24 basis point increase, compared to 0.51% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily due to the upward repricing of the deposit portfolio in the higher interest rate environment.
Interest expense on borrowings was $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $5.1 million, compared to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This increase was primarily due to the increased utilization of federal funds purchased and FHLB advances in the rising interest rate environment.
Provision for Credit Losses
2023 Compared to 2022
On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-13 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments,” more commonly referred to as “CECL.” Upon adoptionof CECL, the Company’s allowance for credit losses on loans increased $650,000 and the allowance for off-balancesheet credit exposures increased $4.9 million. The tax-effected impact of these two items totaled $3.9 million and was recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2023.
59
Table of Contents
The allowance for credit losses on loans increased $2.5 million as of December 31, 2023, compared to December 31, 2022, reflecting the impact of adopting CECL of $650,000, a provision for credit losses of $2.1 million and net charge-offs of $202,000 during 2023. The provision for credit losses on loans was $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $5.7 million, compared to the provision for credit losses on loans of $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in the provision for credit losses on loans was due to continued strong asset quality and a more managed pace of loan growth. The allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans was 1.36% at December 31, 2023, compared to 1.34% at December 31, 2022.
The provision for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures was a negative provision of $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $-0- for the year ended December 31, 2022. The negative provision for the year ended December 31, 2023 was due to a reduction in outstanding unfunded commitments primarily attributable to the migration of unfunded commitments to funded loans, as well as a moderation of volume of newly originated projects with unfunded commitments. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was $3.0 million as of December 31, 2023, compared to $360,000 as of December 31, 2022.
2022 Compared to 2021
The allowance for loan losses increased $8.0 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, reflecting a provision for loan losses of $7.7 million and net recoveries of $276,000 during 2022. The provision for loan losses was $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $2.6 million, compared to the provision for loan losses of $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in the provision for loan losses was primarily attributable to the growth of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.34% at December 31, 2022, compared to 1.42% at December 31, 2021.
The following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses on loans for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021:
Year Ended December 31,
Impact of Adopting CECL 650 — —
Charge-offs (224) (37) (74)
The following table presents a summary of the activity in the provision for credit losses for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021:
Year Ended December 31,
Provision for Credit Losses on Loans 2,050 7,700 5,150
Provision for (Recovery of) Credit Losses $ (175) $ 7,700 $ 5,150
Noninterest Income
2023 Compared to 2022
Noninterest income was $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $161,000, or 2.5%. The increase was primarily due to increases in
60
Table of Contents
customer service fees, bank-owned life insurance income and FHLB prepayment income, offset partially by lower swap fees and other income.
2022 Compared to 2021
Noninterest income was $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $1.0 million, or 19.3%. The increase was primarily due to increases in customer service fees, swap fees, bank-owned life insurance income and other income, offset partially by lower gains on sales of securities.
The following table presents the major components of noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, Increase/ December 31, Increase/
Noninterest Income:
FHLB Prepayment Income 792 — 792 — — —
Noninterest Expense
2023 Compared to 2022
Noninterest expense totaled $59.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a $2.7 million, or 4.8%, increase from $56.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by a $2.3 million increase in the FDIC insurance assessment as the result of industry-wide increases, a $1.2 million increase in derivative collateral fees, and a $417,000 increase in professional and consulting fees, offset partially by decreases in salaries and employee benefits, marketing and advertising expenses, and the amortization of tax credit investments due to the early adoption of ASU 2023-02. The Company early adopted ASU 2023-02 applying the modified retrospective method which reclassified noninterest expense to income taxexpense effective January 1, 2023, impacting comparability to prior years.
The Company had 255 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2023, compared to 246 employees at December 31, 2022.
Efficiency Ratio. The efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, reports total noninterest expense, less amortization of intangible assets, as a percentage of net interest income plus total noninterest income less gains (losses) on sales of securities. Management believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides a meaningful comparison of operational performance and facilitates investors’ assessments of business performance and trends in comparison to peers in the banking industry.
The efficiency ratio was 53.0% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 41.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The efficiencies of the Company's “branch-light” model have positioned the Company well to continue navigating a challenging environment of a more spread-based revenue model.
61
Table of Contents
2022 Compared to 2021
Noninterest expense totaled $56.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an $8.5 million, or 17.7%, increase from $48.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily driven by a $6.1 million increase in salaries and employee benefits as the result of merit increases and increased staff to meet the needs of the Company’s growth, a $684,000 increase in derivative collateral fees, and a $796,000 increase in other expense, offset partially by a decrease in debt prepayment fees. The Company had 246 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2022, compared to 220 employees at December 31, 2021.
The efficiency ratio was 41.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 42.0% for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The following table presents the major components of noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021:
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, Increase/ December 31, Increase/
Noninterest Expense:
Intangible Asset Amortization 100 191 (91) 191 191 —
Debt Prepayment Fees — — — — 582 (582)
Income Tax Expense
The provision for income taxes includes both federal and state taxes. Fluctuations in effective tax rates reflect the differences in the inclusion or deductibility of certain income and expenses for income tax purposes and the recognition of tax credits. The Company’s future effective income tax rate will fluctuate based on the mix of taxable and tax-free investments and loans, the recognition and availability of tax credit investments, and overall taxable income.
2023 Compared to 2022
Income tax expense was $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $18.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The effective combined federal and state income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2023 was 23.9%, compared to 25.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The lower effective tax rate was primarily due to an increase in tax credits recognized. The Company early adopted ASU 2023-02 applying the modified retrospective method which reclassified noninterest expense toincome tax expense effective January 1, 2023.
62
Table of Contents
2022 Compared to 2021
Income tax expense was $18.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $15.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The effective combined federal and state income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 25.5%, compared to 25.8% for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Financial Condition
Overview
Total assets at December 31, 2023 were $4.61 billion, an increase of $266.3 million, or 6.1%, compared to December 31, 2022. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents, solid organic loan growth and purchases of investment securities. Total gross loans at December 31, 2023 were $3.72 billion, an increase of $154.8 million, or 4.3%, compared to December 31, 2022. The pace of loan growth moderated due to active balance sheet management to align loan growth with the funding outlook, sales of participations on larger originations, and ultimately the impact of the higher interest rate environmenton the number of prospective deals that meet underwriting standards.
Total liabilities at December 31, 2023 were $4.19 billion, an increase of $234.9 million, or 5.9%, compared to December 31, 2022. Total deposits at December 31, 2023 were $3.71 billion, an increase of $293.4 million, or 8.6%, compared to December 31, 2022. Total borrowings were $412.5 million, a decrease of $64.1 million, or 13.5%, compared to December 31, 2022.
Investment Securities Portfolio
The investment securities portfolio is used to make various term investments and is intended to provide the Company with adequate liquidity, a source of stable income, and at times, serve as collateral for certain types of deposits or borrowings. Investment balances in the investment securities portfolio are subject to change over time based on funding needs and interest rate risk management objectives. The liquidity levels take into account anticipated future cash flows and are maintained at levels management believes are appropriate to ensure future flexibility in meeting anticipated funding needs.
The investment securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities, and corporate securities comprised primarily of subordinated debentures of banks and financial holding companies. In addition, the Company also holds other mortgage backed and other debt securities, all with varying contractual maturities. These maturities do not necessarily represent the expected life of the securities as the securities may be called or paid down without penalty prior to their stated maturities. All investment securities are held as available for sale.
Securities available for sale were $604.1 million at December 31, 2023, compared to $548.6 million at December 31, 2022, an increase of $55.5 million, or 10.1%. At December 31, 2023, government agency mortgage-backed securities represented 23.5% of the portfolio, municipal securities represented 21.9% of the portfolio, corporate securities represented 21.6% of the portfolio, other mortgage-backed securities represented 15.5% of the portfolio, asset-backed securities represented 14.4% of the portfolio, and SBA securities represented 3.1% of the portfolio.
63
Table of Contents
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale, by type, at December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
Amortized Fair Amortized Fair Amortized Fair
(dollars in thousands) Cost Value Cost Value Cost Value
U.S. Treasury Securities $ — $ — $ 2,621 $ 2,580 $ 756 $ 754
Residential Pass-Through:
Loan Portfolio
The Company focuses on lending to borrowers located or investing in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area across a diverse range of industries and property types. The Company lends primarily to commercial clients, consisting of loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties, multifamily residential properties, land, and non-real estate business assets. Responsive service, local decision making, and an efficient turnaround time from application to closing have been significant factors in growing the loan portfolio.
The Company manages concentrations of credit exposure through a risk management program which implements formalized processes and procedures specifically for managing and mitigating risk within the loan portfolio. The processes and procedures include board and management oversight, commercial real estate exposure limits, portfolio monitoring tools, management information systems, market reports, underwriting standards, internal and external loan review, and stress testing.
Total gross loans increased $154.8 million, or 4.3%, to $3.72 billion at December 31, 2023, compared to $3.57 billion at December 31, 2022. The 1-4 family mortgage, multifamily and commercial real estate, or CRE, nonowner occupied categories contributed most significantly to the $154.8 million of loan growth. As of December 31, 2023, 1-4 family mortgage loans increased $46.9 million, or 13.2%, multifamily loans increased $81.8 million, or 6.3%, and nonowner occupied CRE loans increased $40.3 million, or 4.3%, when compared to December 31, 2022. The Bank’s pace of loan growth slowed in 2023 from historical levels as the Company actively managed the balance sheet to better align loan growth with the funding outlook and market loan demand declined due to the rising interest rate environment.
64
Table of Contents
The following table presents the dollar and percentage composition of the loan portfolio by category, at the dates indicated:
Real Estate Mortgage:
The Company primarily focuses on real estate mortgage lending, which constituted 79.3% of the portfolio as of December 31, 2023. The composition of the portfolio has remained relatively consistent with prior periods and the Company does not expect any significant changes in the foreseeable future in the composition of the loan portfolio or in the emphasis on real estate lending.
As of December 31, 2023, investor CRE loans totaled $2.67 billion, consisting of $987.3 million of loans secured by nonowner occupied CRE, $1.39 billion of loans secured by multifamily residential properties, $65.1 million of 1-4 family construction loans and $232.8 million of construction and land development loans. Investor CRE loans represented 71.8% of the total gross loan portfolio and 482.4% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital at December 31, 2023, compared to 73.4% and 514.9%, respectively, at December 31, 2022.
The following table provides a breakdown of CRE nonowner occupied loans by collateral types as of December 31, 2023:
Percent of Percent of
CRE Nonowner Total Loan
(dollars in thousands) Balance Occupied Portfolio Portfolio
Collateral Type:
Mini Storage Facility 92,527 9.4 2.5
65
Table of Contents
The following tables present time to contractual maturity and sensitivity to interest rate changes for the loan portfolio at December 31, 2023 and 2022:
Due in One Year More Than One More Than Five After
Real Estate Mortgage:
Interest Rate Sensitivity:
Due in One Year More Than One More Than Five After
Paycheck Protection Program — 1,049 — —
Real Estate Mortgage:
Interest Rate Sensitivity:
Asset Quality
The Company emphasizes credit quality in the originating and monitoring of the loan portfolio, and success in underwriting is measured by the levels of classified and nonperforming assets and net charge-offs. Federal regulations and internal policies require the use of an asset classification system as a means of managing and reporting problem and potential problem assets. The Company has incorporated an internal asset classification system, substantially consistent with federal banking regulations, as a part of the credit monitoring system. Federal banking regulations set forth a classification scheme for problem and potential problem assets as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the financial institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all
66
Table of Contents
of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are required to be designated “watch.”
The following table presents information on loan classifications at December 31, 2023. The Company had no assets classified as doubtful or loss at December 31, 2023.
Risk Category
(dollars in thousands) Watch Substandard Total
Construction and Land Development — 80 80
1-4 Family Construction — 249 249
Real Estate Mortgage:
Loans that have potential weaknesses that warranted a watchlist risk rating at December 31, 2023 totaled $26.5 million, compared to $32.3 million at December 31, 2022.Loans that warranted a substandard risk rating at December 31, 2023 totaled $35.9 million, compared to $28.0 million at December 31, 2022. Management continues to actively work with these borrowers and closely monitor substandard credits.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming loans include loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis and loans 90 days past due and still accruing. Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans plus foreclosed assets (i.e., real or personal property acquired through foreclosure). Nonaccrual loans totaled $919,000 at December 31, 2023 and $639,000 at December 31, 2022, an increase of $280,000. There were no loans 90 days past due and still accruing as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. There were no foreclosed assets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
67
Table of Contents
The following table presents a summary of nonperforming assets, by category, at the dates indicated:
December 31,
The balance of nonperforming assets can fluctuate due to changes in economic conditions. The Company has established a policy to discontinue accruing interest on a loan (that is, place the loan on nonaccrual status) after it has become 90 days delinquent as to payment of principal or interest, unless the loan is considered to be well-collateralized and is actively in the process of collection. In addition, a loan will be placed on nonaccrual status before it becomes 90 days delinquent unless management believes that the collection of interest is expected. Interest previously accrued but uncollected on such loans is reversed and charged against current income when the receivable is determined to be uncollectible. If management believes that a loan will not be collected in full, an increase to the allowance for credit losses on loans is recorded to reflect management’s estimate of any potential exposure or loss. Generally, payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied directly to principal. There are no loans, outside of those included in the tables above, that cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of borrowers to comply with present repayment terms. Due to the low levels of nonaccrual loans, gross income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was approximately $79,000 and $60,000, respectively.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses on loans is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for credit losses. The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level management considers adequate to provide for expected lifetime losses in the portfolio. Although management strives to maintain an allowance it deems adequate, future economic changes, deterioration of borrowers’ creditworthiness, and the impact of examinations by regulatory agencies, among other factors, all could cause changes to the allowance for credit losses on loans.
At December 31, 2023 the allowance for credit losses on loans was $50.5 million, an increase of $2.5 million from $48.0 million at December 31, 2022. Net charge-offs (recoveries) totaled $202,000 during the year ended December 31, 2023 and ($276,000) during the year ended December 31, 2022. The allowance for credit losses on loans as a percentage of total loans was 1.36% at December 31, 2023, compared to 1.34% at December 31, 2022.
68
Table of Contents
The following table presents a summary of net charge-offs for the periods indicated:
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Net Charge-offs (Recoveries)
Construction and Land Development — — — — (1)
Real Estate Mortgage:
CRE Owner Occupied — — (32) (10) —
Total Real Estate Mortgage Loans (5) (288) (53) 80 27
Consumer and Other 37 9 32 16 27
Total Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) $ 202 $ (276) $ (29) $ 435 $ 205
Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans
Construction and Land Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Real Estate Mortgage:
Total Real Estate Mortgage Loans 0.00 (0.01) 0.00 0.01 0.00
The following table presents a summary of the allocation of the allowance for credit losses on loans by loan portfolio segment as of the periods indicated:
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
Real Estate Mortgage:
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill was $2.6 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022. Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired, which originated from the acquisition of First National Bank of the Lakes in May of 2016. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to, at a minimum, an annual test for impairment. Other intangible assets consist of core deposit relationships and favorable lease term intangibles. Total other intangible assets
69
Table of Contents
at December 31, 2023 and 2022 were $188,000 and $288,000, respectively. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful life.
Deposits
The principal sources of funds for the Company are deposits, consisting of demand deposits, money market accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit. The following table presents the dollar and percentage composition of the deposit portfolio, by category, at the dates indicated:
Total deposits at December 31, 2023 were $3.71 billion, an increase of $293.4 million, or 8.6%, compared to total deposits of $3.42 billion at December 31, 2022. The growth in deposits was primarily due to an increase in interest bearing transaction deposits and brokered deposits. Brokered deposits continue to be used as a supplemental funding source, as needed, to support loan portfolio growth.
The Company relies on increasing the deposit base to fund loans and other asset growth. The Company is in ahighly competitive market and competes for local deposits by offering attractive products with competitive rates. TheCompany expects to have a higher average cost of funds for local deposits compared to competitor banks due to the lackof an extensive branch network. The Company’s strategy is to offset the higher cost of funding with a lower level ofoperating expense. When appropriate, the Company utilizes alternative funding sources such as brokered deposits. Thebrokered deposit market provides flexibility in structure, optionality and efficiency not afforded in traditional retaildeposit channels. At December 31, 2023, total brokered deposits were $1.02 billion, an increase of $248.3 million, compared to total brokered deposits of $776.2 million at December 31, 2022.
The following table presents the average balance and average rate paid on each of the following deposit categories for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021:
As of and for the As of and for the As of and for the
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
Average Average Average Average Average Average
(dollars in thousands) Balance Rate Balance Rate Balance Rate
70
Table of Contents
The following table presents time deposits, including brokered time deposits, that are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit, currently $250,000, by time remaining until maturity:
December 31,
(dollars in thousands) 2023
Three Months or Less $ 32,818
Over Three Months through Six Months 25,057
Over Six Months through 12 Months 57,951
The Company’s total uninsured deposits, which are the amounts of deposit accounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limit, currently $250,000, were approximately $900.0 million, or 24% of total deposits, at December 31, 2023 and $1.32 billion, or 38% of total deposits, at December 31, 2022. These amounts were estimated based on the same methodologies and assumptions used for regulatory reporting purposes.
Borrowed Funds
Federal Funds Purchased
In addition to deposits, the Company utilizes overnight borrowings to meet the daily liquidity needs as a supplemental funding source for loan growth. The Company had $-0- and $287.0 million federal funds purchased as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Other Borrowings
At December 31, 2023, the Company had outstanding FHLB advances of $319.5 million, compared to $97.0 million at December 31, 2022. The Company’s borrowing capacity at the FHLB is determined based on collateral pledged, generally consisting of loans. The Company had additional borrowing capacity under this credit facility of $498.7 million and $390.9 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The Company has an outstanding Loan and Security Agreement and revolving note with a third party correspondent lender, which is secured by 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of the Bank. On September 1, 2022, the Company entered into a second amendment to the agreement which increased the maximum principal amount of the Company’s revolving line of credit from $25.0 million to $40.0 million and extended the maturity date from February 28, 2023 to September 1, 2024. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had $13.8 million of outstanding balances under the revolving line of credit.
Additionally, the Company has borrowing capacity from other sources. As of December 31, 2023, the Bank was eligible to use the Federal Reserve discount window for borrowings. Based on assets pledged as collateral as of the applicable date, the Bank’s borrowing availability was approximately $979.4 million and $157.8 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had no outstanding advances from the discount window or the BTFP.
Subordinated Debentures
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had subordinated debentures, net of issuance costs of $79.3 million and $78.9 million, respectively
For additional information, see “Note 12 – Subordinated Debentures” of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included as part of this report.
71
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents supplemental information regarding total contractual obligations at December 31, 2023:
Within One to Three to After
Deposits Without a Stated Maturity $ 2,558,838 $ — $ — $ — $ 2,558,838
Notes Payable 13,750 — — — 13,750
Subordinated Debentures — — — 80,000 80,000
Commitment to Fund Tax Credit Investments 9,932 — — — 9,932
Operating lease obligations are in place for facilities and land on which banking branches are located. See “Note 8 – Leases” of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included as part of this report for additional information.
The Company believes that it will be able to meet all contractual obligations as they come due through the maintenance of adequate cash levels. The Company expects to maintain adequate cash levels through earnings, loan and securities repayments and maturity activity and continued deposit gathering activities. As described above, the Company has in place various borrowing mechanisms for both short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
Capital
Total shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2023 was $425.5 million, an increase of $31.5 million, or 8.0%, over shareholders’ equity of $394.1 million at December 31, 2022, primarily due to net income retained and a decrease in unrealized losses in the securities portfolio, offset partially by a decrease in unrealized gains in the derivatives portfolio, the adoption of the CECL accounting methodology, preferred stock dividends, and stock repurchases.
Tangible book value per share, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $12.84 as of December 31, 2023, an increase of 9.8% from $11.69 as of December 31, 2022. Tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 7.73% at December 31, 2023, compared to 7.48% at December 31, 2022.
Stock Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company repurchased 423,749 shares of its common stock, representing 1.5% of the Company’s outstanding shares. Shares were repurchased during this period at a weighted average price of $10.72 for a total of $4.5 million. All shares repurchased under the stock repurchase program were converted to authorized but unissued shares. The Company remains committed to maintaining strong capital levels while enhancing shareholder value as it strategically executes its stock repurchase program based on various factors including valuation, capital levels and other uses of capital.
Regulatory Capital. The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by federal banking regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Bank’s business.
Management believes the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject as of December 31, 2023. The regulatory capital ratios for the Company and the Bank to meet the minimum capital adequacy standards and for the Bank to be considered well capitalized under the prompt corrective action
72
Table of Contents
framework are set forth in the following tables. The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are as of the dates indicated.
Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy To be Well Capitalized
Actual Purposes Conservation Buffer Action Regulations
(dollars in thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2023
Company (Consolidated):
Bank:
Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy To be Well Capitalized
Actual Purposes Conservation Buffer Action Regulations
(dollars in thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2022
Company (Consolidated):
Bank:
The Company and the Bank are subject to the rules of the Basel III regulatory capital framework and related Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The rules require a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% that was added to the minimum requirements for capital adequacy purposes. A banking organization with a conservation buffer of less than the required amount is subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments, stock repurchases and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. At December 31, 2023, the ratios for the Company and the Bank were sufficient to meet the conservation buffer.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions to meet the financing needs of clients, which, in accordance with GAAP, are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. These transactions include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Most of these commitments mature within two years and the standby letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon. All off-balance sheet commitments are included in the determination of the amount of risk-based capital that the Company and the Bank are required to hold.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit is represented by
73
Table of Contents
the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Company decreases its exposure to losses under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures. The Company assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit and establishes a liability for expected credit losses.
The following table presents credit arrangements and financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
Fixed Variable Fixed Variable
(dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit beyond current funding are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Such commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on our management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate trade or commerce and are paid directly when the underlying transaction is consummated. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
The Company had outstanding letters of credit with the FHLB in the amount of $114.4 million and $78.4 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, on behalf of customers and to secure public deposits.
Liquidity
Liquidity is the Company’s capacity to meet cash and collateral obligations at a reasonable cost. Maintaining an adequate level of liquidity depends on the Company’s ability to efficiently meet both expected and unexpected cash flows and collateral needs without adversely affecting either daily operations or financial condition. The Bank’s ALM Committee, is responsible for managing commitments to meet the needs of customers while achieving the Company’s financial objectives. The ALM Committee meets regularly to review balance sheet composition, funding capacities, and current and forecasted loan demand.
The Company manages liquidity by maintaining adequate levels of cash and other assets from on- and off-balance sheet arrangements. Specifically, on-balance sheet liquidity consists of cash and due from banks and unpledged investment securities available for sale, which are referred to as primary liquidity. In regards to off-balance sheet capacity, the Company maintains available borrowing capacity under secured borrowing lines with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, and a correspondent lender, as well as unsecured lines of credit for the purpose of overnight funds with various correspondent banks, which the Company refers to as secondary liquidity.
In addition, the Bank is a member of the American Financial Exchange, or AFX, through which it may either borrow or lend funds on an overnight or short-term basis with a group of approved commercial banks. The availability of funds changes daily. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had no borrowings outstanding through the AFX.
Total on- and off-balance sheet liquidity was $2.23 billion as of December 31, 2023, compared to $1.38 billion at December 31, 2022. The Company did not utilize the BTFP or Federal Reserve Discount Window during the year ended December 31, 2023.
74
Table of Contents
The following tables present a summary of primary and secondary liquidity levels as of the dates indicated:
Primary Liquidity—On-Balance Sheet December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022
(dollars in thousands)
Less: Pledged Securities (170,727) —
Ratio of Primary Liquidity to Total Deposits 14.3 % 17.5 %
Secondary Liquidity—Off-Balance Sheet Borrowing Capacity
Net Secured Borrowing Capacity with the FHLB $ 498,736 $ 390,898
Unsecured Borrowing Capacity with Correspondent Lenders 200,000 208,000
Secured Borrowing Capacity with Correspondent Lender 26,250 26,250
Ratio of Primary and Secondary Liquidity to Total Deposits 60.2 % 40.4 %
During the year ended December 31, 2023, primary liquidity decreased $66.7 million due to an increase in pledged securities of $170.7 million, offset partially by a $48.5 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a $55.5 million increase in securities available for sale. Secondary liquidity increased $916.5 million as of December 31, 2023 due to a $107.8 million increase in the borrowing capacity with the FHLB and an $821.6 million increase in the borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank, offset partially by an $8.0 million decrease in the unsecured borrowing capacity with a correspondent lender.
In addition to primary liquidity, the Company generates liquidity from cash flows from the loan and securities portfolios and from the large base of core customer deposits, defined as noninterest bearing transaction, interest bearing transaction, savings, non-brokered money market accounts and non-brokered time deposits less than $250,000. At December 31, 2023, core deposits totaled approximately $2.55 billion and represented 68.7% of total deposits. These core deposits are normally less volatile, often with customer relationships tied to other products offered by the Company, which promote long-standing relationships and stable funding sources.
The Company uses brokered deposits, the availability of which is uncertain and subject to competitive market forces and regulation, for liquidity and interest rate risk management purposes. At December 31, 2023, brokered deposits totaled $1.02 billion, consisting of $850.5 million of brokered time deposits and $174.0 million of non-maturity brokered money market and transaction accounts. At December 31, 2022, brokered deposits totaled $776.2 million, consisting of $591.9 million of brokered time deposits and $184.3 million of non-maturity brokered money market and transaction accounts.
The Company’s liquidity policy includes guidelines for On-Balance Sheet Liquidity (a measurement of primary liquidity to total deposits plus borrowings), Total On-Balance Sheet Liquidity with Borrowing Capacity (a measurement of primary and secondary liquidity to total deposits plus borrowings), Wholesale Funding Ratio (a measurement of total wholesale funding to total deposits plus borrowings), and other guidelines developed for measuring and maintaining liquidity. As of December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all established liquidity guidelines in the policy.
75
Table of Contents
GAAP Reconciliation and Management Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Some of the financial data included in this report are not measures of financial performance recognized by GAAP. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in the analysis of performance:
76
Table of Contents
The Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to management and investors that is supplementary to the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows computed in accordance with GAAP; however, the Company acknowledges that these non-GAAP financial measures have a number of limitations. As such, you should not view these disclosures as a substitute for results determined in accordance with GAAP, and they are not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP financial measures that other companies use. The following reconciliation table provides a more detailed analysis of these non-GAAP financial measures:
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Pre-Provision Net Revenue
Less: FHLB Advance Prepayment Income (792) — — — —
Less: Debt Prepayment Fees — — (582) (7,043) —
Plus:
Non-Operating Revenue Adjustments 759 82 750 1,503 516
Less:
Non-Operating Expense Adjustments — 408 1,144 7,781 3,225
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Core Net Interest Margin
Less: PPP Interest and Fees NM (970) (6,441) (4,143) —
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Efficiency Ratio
77
Table of Contents
As of and for the year ended December 31,
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
As a financial institution, the Company’s primary market risk is interest rate risk, which is defined as the risk of loss of net interest income or net interest margin because of changes in interest rates. The Company continually seeks to measure and manage the potential impact of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk occurs when interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities mature or re-price at different times, on a different basis or in unequal amounts. Interest rate risk also arises when assets and liabilities each respond differently to changes in interest rates.
The Company’s management of interest rate risk is overseen by its ALM Committee, based on a risk management infrastructure approved by the board of directors that outlines reporting and measurement requirements. In particular, this infrastructure sets limits and management targets for various metrics, including net interest income simulation involving parallel shifts in interest rate curves, steepening and flattening yield curves, and various prepayment and deposit duration assumptions. The Company’s risk management infrastructure also requires a periodic review of all key assumptions used, such as identifying appropriate interest rate scenarios, setting loan prepayment rates based on historical analysis and noninterest bearing and interest bearing transaction deposit durations based on historical analysis. The Company does not engage in speculative trading activities relating to interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equities or credit.
The Company manages the interest rate risk associated with interest earning assets by managing the interest rates and terms associated with the investment securities portfolio by purchasing and selling investment securities from time to time. The Company manages the interest rate risk associated with interest bearing liabilities by managing the interest rates and terms associated with wholesale borrowings and deposits from customers which the Company relies on for funding. For example, the Company occasionally uses special offers on deposits to alter the interest rates and terms associated with interest bearing liabilities.
78
Table of Contents
The Company has entered into certain hedging transactions including interest rate swaps and caps, which are designed to lessen elements of the Company’s interest rate exposure. Cash flow hedge relationships mitigate exposure to the variability of future cash flows or other forecasted transactions. The Company utilizes cash flow hedges to manage interest rate exposure for the brokered deposit and wholesale borrowing portfolios. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, these cash flow hedges had a total notional amount of $308.0 million and $288.0 million, respectively. In the event that interest rates do not change in the manner anticipated, such transactions may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
Net Interest Income Simulation
The Company uses a net interest income simulation model to measure and evaluate potential changes in net interest income that would result over the next 12 months from immediate and sustained changes in interest rates as of the measurement date. This model has inherent limitations and the results are based on a given set of rate changes and assumptions as of a certain point in time. For purposes of the simulation, the Company assumes no growth in either interest-sensitive assets or liabilities over the next 12 months; therefore, the model’s results reflect an interest rate shock to a static balance sheet. The simulation model also incorporates various other assumptions, which the Company believes are reasonable but which may have a significant impact on results, such as: (1) the timing of changes in interest rates, (2) shifts or rotations in the yield curve, (3) re-pricing characteristics for market-rate-sensitive instruments, (4) differing sensitivities of financial instruments due to differing underlying rate indices, (5) varying loan prepayment speeds for different interest rate scenarios, (6) the effect of interest rate limitations in assets, such as floors and caps, and (7) overall growth and repayment rates and product mix of assets and liabilities. Because of the limitations inherent in any approach used to measure interest rate risk, simulation results are not intended as a forecast of the actual effect of a change in market interest rates on the results, but rather as a means to better plan and execute appropriate asset-liability management strategies and to manage interest rate risk.
Potential changes to the Company’s net interest income in hypothetical rising and declining rate scenarios calculated as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, are presented in the table below. The projections assume an immediate, parallel shift downward of the yield curve of 100, 200, and 300 basis points and immediate, parallel shifts upward of the yield curve of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points. In the current interest rate environment, a downward shift of the yield curve of 400 basis points does not provide meaningful results and thus is not presented.
(dollars in thousands) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022
Change (basis points) Forecasted Percentage Forecasted Percentage
in Interest Rates Net Interest Change Net Interest Change
(12-Month Projection) Income from Base Income from Base
The table above indicates that as of December 31, 2023, in the event of an immediate and sustained 400 basis point increase in interest rates, the Company would experience a 2.39% decrease in net interest income. In the event of an immediate 300 basis point decrease in interest rates, the Company would experience an 8.86% increase in net interest income.
The results of this simulation analysis are hypothetical, and a variety of factors might cause actual results to differ substantially from what is depicted. For example, if the timing and magnitude of interest rate changes differ from those projected, net interest income might vary significantly. Non-parallel yield curve shifts such as a flattening or steepening of the yield curve or changes in interest rate spreads would also cause net interest income to be different from that depicted. An increasing interest rate environment could reduce projected net interest income if deposits and other
79
Table of Contents
short-term liabilities re-price faster than expected or re-price faster than the Company’s assets. Actual results could differ from those projected if the Company grows assets and liabilities faster or slower than estimated, if the Company experienced a net outflow of deposit liabilities, or if the mix of assets and liabilities otherwise changes. Actual results could also differ from those projected if the Company experienced substantially different prepayment speeds in the loan portfolio than those assumed in the simulation model. Finally, these simulation results do not contemplate all the actions that the Company may undertake in response to potential or actual changes in interest rates, such as changes to the Company’s loan, investment, deposit, or funding strategies.
80
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2022, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 6, 2023
We have served as the Company’s auditor from 2005 through 2022.
CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) is an independent network member of CLA Global. See CLAglobal.com/disclaimer.
81
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2023, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 6, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for credit losses on financial instruments in 2023 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Credit Losses).
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for credit losses on loans
As described in Note 1 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for credit losses on loans (allowance) totaled $50.5 million at December 31, 2023. The allowance is a valuation account that is deducted from the Company’s amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount of loans for investment expected to be collected over their contractual life. The allowance is measured on a collective (pool) basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis at the balance sheet date. At December 31, 2023, the general reserve on loans collectively evaluated for impairment totaled $50.4 million and there was $103 thousand on loans individually evaluated.
82
Table of Contents
The measurement of the allowance is based on relevant information from internal and external sources, related to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company uses the weighted-average remaining maturity (WARM) method as a basis for estimated expected credit loss. The WARM method uses a historical average annual charge off rate. This average annual charge off rate contains loss content over a historical lookback period and is used as a foundation for estimating the allowance on loans for the remaining outstanding balances of loans by segment at the balance sheet date. The average annual charge off rate is applied to the contractual term to determine the unadjusted historical charge off rate. The calculation of the unadjusted historical charge off rate is then adjusted for current conditions and for reasonable and supportable forecast periods through qualitative factors prior to being applied to the current balance of the loan segments.
Forecast adjustments to the historical loss rate are based on a forecast of the U.S. national unemployment rate, a forecast of the difference between the 10-year and 3-month treasury rates, and the most recent available BBB rated corporate bond spreads to U.S. Treasury securities, or BBB Spread. The forecast overlay adjustment for the reasonable and supportable forecast assumes an immediate reversion after a one-year forecast period to historical loss rates for the remaining life of the respective loan segment. Qualitative factors are used to cover losses that are expected but, in the Company’s assessment, may not be adequately represented in the quantitative (historical loss factors) analysis or the forecasts described above. These qualitative factors serve to compensate for additional areas of uncertainty inherent in the portfolio that are not reflected in the historic loss factors. Each qualitative loss factor, for each loan segment within the portfolio, incorporates consideration for a minimal to maximum range for loss factors. These qualitative factor adjustments may increase or decrease the Company’s estimate of expected credit losses and are applied to each loan segment. The qualitative factors applied to each loan segment include changes in lending policies and procedures, general economic and business conditions, the nature, volume and terms of the loans, the experience, depth and ability of lending staff, quality of the loan review function, the value of underlying collateral, competition, legal and regulatory factors, the volume and severity of watchlist and past due loans and the level of concentrations.
We identified the qualitative factors and forecasted adjustments applied to the allowance as a critical audit matter as auditing management’s determination of the qualitative factors required significant auditor judgement as the estimate is highly sensitive to changes in significant assumptions.
Our audit procedures related to the Company’s qualitative factors and forecasted adjustments applied to the allowance included the following, among others:
/s/ RSM US LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2022.
Des Moines, Iowa
March 6, 2024
83
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm