AKBA US Equity☆

akba-20241231

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

OR

For the transition period from _to_

Commission File Number 001-36352

AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 871-2098

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.00001 par value per share AKBA The Nasdaq Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☒

Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market on June 28, 2024, was $210,916,948.

The number of shares of registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 10, 2025 was 236,231,057.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Portions of the proxy statement are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.

Form 10-K

For the Year Ended December 31, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements 2

Risk Factors Summary 4

PART I

Item 1. Business 6

Item 1A. Risk Factors 49

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 105

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 105

Item 2. Properties 107

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 107

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 107

PART II

Item 6. [Reserved] 108

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 122

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 123

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 165

Item 9B. Other Information 167

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 167

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 168

Item 11. Executive Compensation 168

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 168

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 169

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Form 10-K, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, references to “Akebia,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” "our Company" and similar references refer to Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. and, where appropriate, its consolidated subsidiaries. On December 12, 2018, in connection with the consummation of the merger, or Merger, with Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Keryx, Keryx became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

AURYXIA®, AKEBIA Therapeutics®, Vafseo® and their associated logos are trademarks of Akebia and/or its affiliates. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, trademarks, trade names and service marks referred to in this Form 10-K may appear without the ® or TM

symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that the applicable licensor will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, its rights to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other company.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 1

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Form 10-K, contains forward-looking statements that are being made pursuant to the provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of that Act. All statements contained in this Form 10-K other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may be accompanied by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “build,” “can,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “should,” “designed,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “goal,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “strategy,” “seek,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and other words and terms of similar meaning, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•our plans with respect to commercializing Vafseo® (vadadustat) and label expansion opportunities currently under evaluation for Vafseo;

•our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations for the sale of Auryxia® (ferric citrate) and Vafseo in the U.S.;

•the potential therapeutic benefits, safety profile, and effectiveness of Vafseo;

•our pipeline and portfolio, including its potential, and our related research and development activities;

•the timing, investment and associated activities involved in continued commercialization of Auryxia, its growth opportunities and our ability to execute thereon;

•the potential indications, demand and market opportunity, potential and acceptance of Auryxia and Vafseo, including the size of eligible patient populations;

•the potential therapeutic applications of the hypoxia inducible factor pathway;

•our competitive position, including estimates, developments and projections relating to our competitors and their products and product candidates, and our industry;

•our expectations, projections and estimates regarding our capital requirements, need for additional capital, financing our future cash needs, costs, expenses, revenues, capital resources, cash flows, financial performance, profitability, tax obligations, liquidity, growth, contractual obligations and the period of time our cash resources will fund our current operating plan, estimates with respect to our ability to operate as a going concern, our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, and any future deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls and procedures;

•delivering value broadly to the kidney community, as well as others who may benefit from our medicines, will result in delivering value for stockholders;

•the direct or indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, operations and the markets and communities in which we and our partners, collaborators, vendors, and customers operate;

•our manufacturing, supply and quality matters and any recalls, write-downs, impairments or other related consequences or potential consequences;

•estimates, beliefs and judgments related to the valuation of goodwill, debt and other assets and liabilities, including classification of expenses, assets and liabilities, our impairment analyses and our methodology and assumptions regarding fair value measurements;

•the timing of the availability and disclosure of clinical trial data and results;

•the designs of our studies, and the type of information and data expected from our studies and the expected benefits thereof;

•our and our collaborators’ strategy, plans and expectations with respect to the development, manufacturing, supply, commercialization, launch, marketing and sale of Auryxia and Vafseo and the associated timing thereof;

•our ability to maintain any marketing authorizations we currently hold or will obtain, including our marketing authorizations for Auryxia and our ability to complete post-marketing requirements with respect thereto;

•our ability to negotiate, secure and maintain adequate pricing, coverage and reimbursement terms and processes on a timely basis, or at all, with third-party payors for Auryxia and Vafseo;

•the timing of initiation of our clinical trials and plans to conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials in the future;

•the timing and amounts of payments from or to our collaborators and licensees, and the anticipated arrangements and benefits under our collaboration and license agreements, including with respect to milestones and royalties;

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 2

Table of Contents

•our intellectual property position, including obtaining and maintaining patents, and the timing, outcome and impact of administrative, regulatory, legal and other proceedings relating to our patents and other proprietary and intellectual property rights, patent infringement suits that we have filed or may file, or other actions that we may take against companies, and the timing and resolution thereof;

•expected ongoing reliance on third parties, including with respect to the development, manufacturing, supply and commercialization of Auryxia and Vafseo;

•accounting standards and estimates, their impact, and their expected timing of completion;

•estimated periods of performance of key contracts;

•our facilities, lease commitments, and future availability of facilities;

•cybersecurity;

•insurance coverage;

•management of personnel, including our management team, and our employees, including employee compensation, employee relations, and our ability to attract, train and retain high quality employees;

•the implementation of our business model, current operating plan, and strategic plans for our business, product candidates and technology, and business development opportunities including potential collaborations, alliances, mergers, acquisitions or licensing of assets;

•additional costs we may incur due to events associated with or resulting from our prior workforce reductions or other operating expenses, including additional costs related to vadadustat and selling, general and administrative expenses; and

•the timing, outcome and impact of current and any future legal proceedings.

Any or all of these forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K may turn out to be inaccurate. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those that are discussed below under the heading "Risk Factors Summary", and the risk factors identified further in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" included in this Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-K and in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports filed after this report, that could cause our actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements to be materially different from those indicated in these forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason. Unless otherwise stated, our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.

This Form 10-K also contains estimates and other information concerning our industry and the markets for certain diseases, including data regarding the estimated size of those markets, and the incidence and prevalence of certain medical conditions. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 3

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS SUMMARY

Investing in our common stock involves numerous risks, including the risks summarized below and described in further detail in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K, any one of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following.

•We have incurred significant losses since our inception, and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses and cannot guarantee when, if ever, we will become profitable or attain positive cash flows.

•We may require substantial additional financing to fund our business. A failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed, or on acceptable terms, could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts.

•Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our products and product candidates on unfavorable terms to us.

•We may not be successful in our efforts to identify, acquire, in-license, discover, develop and commercialize additional products or product candidates or our decisions to prioritize the development of certain product candidates over others may not be successful, which could impair our ability to grow.

•We may engage in strategic transactions to acquire assets, businesses, or rights to products, product candidates or technologies or form collaborations or make investments in other companies or technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute our stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt, or cause us to incur significant expense.

•Our obligations in connection with the BlackRock Credit Agreement and requirements and restrictions in the BlackRock Credit Agreement could adversely affect our financial condition and restrict our operations.

•Our Royalty Interest Acquisition Agreement with HealthCare Royalty Partners IV, L.P. contains various covenants and other provisions, which, if violated, could materially adversely affect our financial condition.

•Our business is substantially dependent on the commercial success of Auryxia and Vafseo. If we are unable to continue to successfully commercialize Auryxia and Vafseo, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially harmed.

•If we are unable to maintain or expand sales and marketing capabilities or enter into additional agreements with third parties, we may not be successful in commercializing Auryxia, Vafseo or any other product candidates that may be approved.

•Our, or our partners', failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage, pricing and reimbursement for Auryxia, Vafseo or any other future approved products, could have a material adverse effect on our or our collaboration partners’ ability to sell such approved products profitably and otherwise have a material adverse impact on our business.

•We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before, or more successfully than, we do.

•The commercialization of ferric citrate, branded as Riona in Japan, Vafseo in Europe, Japan and other territories where it is approved, and our current and potential future efforts with respect to the development and commercialization of our products and product candidates outside of the United States, or U.S., subject us to a variety of risks associated with international operations, which could materially adversely affect our business.

•Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and we will incur additional costs in connection with, and may experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development of any of our product candidates.

•Auryxia, Vafseo or any other product or product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that may delay or prevent marketing approval or limit their commercial potential.

•We may not be able to obtain marketing approval for any label expansion for Vafseo or any current or future product candidate, or we may experience significant delays in doing so, any of which would materially harm our business.

•If we are unable to obtain or maintain marketing approval in jurisdictions outside the United States, we and our partners will not be able to market any product or product candidates outside of the United States.

•Products approved for marketing are subject to extensive post-marketing regulatory requirements, including post-approval pediatric studies for Auryxia and Vafseo, and could be subject to post-marketing restrictions or withdrawal from the market, and we may be subject to penalties, including withdrawal of marketing approval, if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, or product candidates, when and if approved.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 4

Table of Contents

•We are subject to complex regulatory schemes that require significant resources to ensure compliance and our failure to comply with applicable laws could subject us to government scrutiny or enforcement, potentially resulting in costly investigations, fines, penalties or sanctions, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

•We will incur significant liability if it is determined that we are promoting any “off-label” use of Auryxia, Vafseo or any other product we may develop, in-license or acquire or if it is determined that any of our activities violates the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.

•Policy changes or disruptions at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, regulatory authorities outside the U.S. and other government agencies caused by funding shortages, global health concerns or other events could prevent products, product candidates and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, with expected terms or at all, which could negatively impact our business.

•Legislative and regulatory healthcare reform may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our product candidates and affect the prices we may obtain for any products that are approved in the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions.

•We depend on collaborations with third parties for the development and commercialization of Auryxia, including an authorized generic version of Auryxia,Riona and Vafseo and, if these collaborations are not successful or if our collaborators terminate their agreements with us, we may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of Auryxia, Riona and Vafseo, and our business could be materially harmed.

•We rely upon third parties to conduct all aspects of our product manufacturing and commercial distribution, and in many instances only have a single supplier or distributor, and the loss of these manufacturers or distributors, their failure to supply us on a timely basis, or at all, or their failure to successfully carry out their contractual duties or comply with regulatory requirements, cGMP requirements, or guidance could cause delays in or disruptions to our supply chain and substantially harm our business.

•We rely upon third parties to conduct our clinical trials and certain of our preclinical studies. If they do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, comply with regulatory requirements or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain or maintain marketing approval for Auryxia, Vafseo or any of our product candidates, and our business could be substantially harmed.

•If the licensor of certain intellectual property relating to Auryxia terminates, modifies or threatens to terminate existing contracts or relationships with us, our business may be materially harmed.

•Changes in U.S. and international trade policies, particularly with respect to China and Canada, may adversely impact our business and operating results.

•If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, third parties may be able to use our intellectual property, which could adversely affect our ability to compete in the market.

•We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

•The intellectual property that we own or have licensed and related non-patent exclusivity relating to our current and future products is, and may be, limited, which could adversely affect our ability to compete in the market and adversely affect the value of Auryxia, Vafseo or other future products.

•The market entry of one or more generic competitors or any third party’s attempt to challenge our intellectual property rights will likely limit Auryxia and Vafseo sales and have an adverse impact on our business and results of operation.

•Litigation and administrative proceedings, including third party claims of intellectual property infringement and opposition/invalidation proceedings against third party patents, may be costly and time consuming and may delay or harm our drug discovery, development and commercialization efforts.

•We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 relating to our accounting for inventory and inventory related transactions. If we are not able to remediate this material weakness, or if we experience additional material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial results or prevent fraud, and we may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, which may adversely affect our business.

•Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for holders or future purchasers of our common stock and lawsuits against us and our officers and directors and could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 5

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

We are a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company with two commercial products for patients impacted by kidney disease. We have built a business focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutics that we believe serve as a foundation for future growth. Our team has significant expertise in hypoxia-inducible factor, or HIF, science having developed and commercialized Vafseo® (vadadustat), an oral HIF prolyl hydroxylase, or HIF-PH, inhibitor and have selected two additional HIF-based molecules for preclinical development.

We have established the company as a leader in the kidney community, and we believe our cross-organizational expertise in renal disease positions us for success. Chronic kidney disease, or CKD, is a condition in which the kidneys are progressively damaged to the point that they cannot properly filter the blood circulating in the body. This damage causes waste products to build up in the patient’s blood, leading to other health problems, including anemia, cardiovascular disease and bone disease. CKD significantly impacts the United States, or U.S., healthcare system, potentially affecting approximately 37 million patients and costing Medicare nearly $125 billion annually for treating Medicare beneficiaries with CKD or end-stage renal disease, or ESRD, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Our two commercial products address certain complications of kidney disease.

Our current portfolio includes:

Vafseo was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, in March 2024 for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients on dialysis for at least three months. Shipment of Vafseo commenced in January 2025. We have commercial supply agreements for the purchase of Vafseo in place with dialysis organizations caring for nearly 100% of dialysis patients in the U.S. The current U.S. market opportunity for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in patients with dialysis is approximately $1 billion based on current erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, or ESA, pricing, and Vafseo is the only oral HIF-based treatment available in the U.S.

In the European Union, or EU, the United Kingdom, or UK, Switzerland and Australia, Vafseo is approved for the treatment of symptomatic anemia associated with CKD in adults on chronic maintenance dialysis. Our partner MEDICE Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH & Co. KG, or Medice, has an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Vafseo for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD in defined territories and launched Vafseo in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the Netherlands and certain other countries in Europe in 2024.

In Japan, Vafseo is approved as a treatment for anemia due to CKD in both dialysis dependent and non-dialysis dependent patients and is marketed and sold by our collaborator Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, or MTPC. In Taiwan, Vafseo is approved for the treatment of symptomatic anemia due to CKD in adult patients on chronic maintenance dialysis and was launched in October 2024 by Tai Tien Pharmaceutical Company, an affiliate of MTPC. In Korea, Vafseo is approved as an anemia treatment for patients with CKD on hemodialysis.

Auryxia® (ferric citrate) is an orally administered medicine approved and marketed in the U.S. for two indications: (1) the control of serum phosphorus levels in adult patients with dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease, or DD-CKD, and (2) the treatment of iron deficiency anemia, or IDA, in adult patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease, or NDD-CKD.

Today, we market Auryxia in the U.S. Auryxia became part of our portfolio in 2018 and has historically contributed meaningful revenue to the business. In March 2025, Auryxia will lose exclusivity, or LoE. We believe the dynamics of Auryxia reimbursement being included in the ESRD bundle under Medicare Part B could result in slower revenue decline after the LoE date than in other LoE situations, but the impact of LoE on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of generics and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia.

Ferric citrate hydrate has also been approved in Japan, and is marketed and sold by our Japanese sublicensee, Japan Tobacco, Inc., and its subsidiary, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., collectively, JT and Torii, as an oral treatment for the improvement of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD, including DD-CKD and NDD-CKD, and for the treatment of adult patients with IDA under the trade name Riona in Japan. Averoa SAS, or Averoa, has an exclusive license to develop and commercialize ferric citrate in the European Economic Area, or EEA, Turkey, Switzerland, the UK, the Balkans and certain countries in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Averoa applied for marketing authorization for ferric citrate in Europe in April 2024.

Our HIF-based product candidates and other pipeline assets are being evaluated to target areas of unmet needs. The discovery of HIF laid the foundation to explore the central role of oxygen sensing in many diseases. As we have

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 6

Table of Contents

seen through the development of Vafseo as a treatment for anemia due to CKD, when stabilized, HIF triggers wide-ranging adaptive, protective responses during hypoxic or ischemic conditions. We have selected two additional HIF molecules for preclinical development: AKB-9090, potentially for cardiac surgery-related acute kidney injury, or CS-AKI, or acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS, and AKB-10108 for retinopathy of prematurity, or ROP, in neonates.

In June 2021, we acquired from Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc., or Cyclerion, an exclusive global license under certain intellectual property rights to research, develop and commercialize praliciguat, an investigational oral soluble guanylate cyclase, or sGC, stimulator. We believe there is potential to explore the use of praliciguat for indications within kidney disease.

We continue to explore additional commercial and development opportunities to expand our pipeline and portfolio of novel therapeutics through both internal research and external innovation to leverage our fully integrated team.

Strategy

Our deep understanding of kidney disease helps us serve the unmet needs of kidney patients and others impacted by chronic and debilitating illness. Our commitment to patients informs our business decisions and short and long-term planning. There is a clear need to improve quality of life outcomes for people living with kidney disease. The prevalence and incidence of CKD is increasing in the U.S. population. The progression of CKD towards renal failure is complicated by multiple conditions which further deteriorate kidney function and the general health of patients if left untreated. Typically, the prevalence of these conditions increases as CKD progresses.

With two revenue-generating products and the research and development capabilities to discover, advance and commercialize new therapies, our intention is to both fulfill our purpose to better the lives of those impacted by kidney disease as well as leverage our internally developed innovations and explore therapies in other disease areas with high unmet needs.

Our strategic imperatives are threefold:

1.We aim to drive Vafseo to be the standard of care for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in the U.S. in both dialysis and, if approved, non-dialysis patient populations. We are commercializing Vafseo in the U.S. for adult patients on dialysis and began shipping product in January 2025. We have also advanced a plan to explore label expansion to the non-dialysis patient population and submitted a protocol to the FDA for VALOR, a Phase 3 cardiovascular outcome study of approximately 1,500 patients in the U.S. with late-stage CKD anemia not on dialysis. We expect to meet with the FDA to discuss VALOR.

2.Powered by Nobel prize-winning HIF science and in-licensed technology, we plan to work to create a future for Akebia both within and beyond kidney disease. We intend to leverage our cross organizational experience in nephrology gained through the commercialization of Auryxia and our team’s robust discovery and research and development capabilities to advance our pipeline.

3.We continue to explore strategic growth, which includes additional commercial and development opportunities to expand our pipeline and portfolio of novel therapeutics, through external innovation to leverage our fully integrated team.

We plan to make strategic use of capital and will also continue our approach of financial discipline, cross-organizational efficiency and operational effectiveness.

Drive Vafseo to be Standard of Care in the Treatment of Anemia due to CKD

Anemia is common in patients with CKD, and its prevalence increases with disease progression. Anemia due to CKD results from inadequate erythropoietin, or EPO, levels, negatively affecting red blood cell production. Left untreated, anemia accelerates the overall deterioration of patient health with increased morbidity and mortality. According to the U.S. Renal Data System 2022 Annual Data Report, there were nearly 558,000 patients in the U.S. on dialysis in 2020, of which 86% were on in-center hemodialysis and the remainder on home dialysis, which includes both peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis.

The current standard of care for anemia due to CKD is treatment by injectable recombinant human ESAs such as Epogen® (epoetin alfa), Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa) or Mircera® (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta), or blood transfusion. When administered to a patient, injectable ESAs provide supraphysiological levels of exogenous EPO to stimulate production of red blood cells, or RBCs. While injectable ESAs can be effective in raising hemoglobin levels, they have the potential to cause significant side effects and need to be injected subcutaneously or intravenously.

The current market opportunity for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients on dialysis is approximately $1 billion in the U.S. based on current ESA pricing. We believe there is a significant opportunity for Vafseo to become the standard of care for the treatment of anemia due to CKD for adult patients on dialysis and, if approved, not on dialysis.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 7

Table of Contents

Vafseo is an oral HIF-PH inhibitor that stimulates the body's natural response to hypoxia. Through activation of the HIF pathway, Vafseo stimulates the body's natural production of EPO and improves mobilization of stored iron to help dialysis patients with CKD manage their anemia. Our data from the INNO2VATE trials show Vafseo corrected and maintained hemoglobin within target range through a gradual increase over time with evidence of fewer hemoglobin overshoots. Further, we saw in our studies fewer dose adjustments in an once daily oral dose for patients. Our clinical data showed that Vafseo has a safety profile similar to the ESA standard of care. These findings contribute to why we believe Vafseo offers a compelling new choice for physicians for anemia management.

Vafseo – An oral treatment for anemia due to CKD for adult patients on dialysis

Upon Vafseo approval, we implemented a launch plan to commercialize Vafseo for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients on dialysis, the critical first step toward Vafseo potentially becoming the standard of care. We have completed certain critical commercialization initiatives, including securing reimbursement for Vafseo under the Transitional Drug Add-on Payment Adjustment, or TDAPA, and securing access to Vafseo for patients through commercial supply agreements with dialysis organizations. In addition, we continue to work to help dialysis organizations establish protocols and to drive prescriber demand.

Medications covered under the ESRD Prospective Payment System, or PPS, in Medicare are known as the ESRD Bundle, a payment structure with a flat base rate per dialysis session adjusted for individual patient and facility characteristics. Dialysis-related drugs are included in the ESRD Bundle if they fall into functional categories such as anemia management. In a final ESRD PPS rule published in November 2018, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, confirmed that it will expand the TDAPA to all new dialysis drugs approved by the FDA after January 1, 2020. The TDAPA provides separate payment for new drugs for two years based on the drug’s Average Sales Price that is in addition to the base rate in the bundle in order to facilitate the adoption of innovative therapies. Vafseo met the criteria for TDAPA in the anemia management ESRD PPS functional category beginning on January 1, 2025. The TDAPA program provides two years of reimbursement for Vafseo in addition to the ESRD bundled rate to dialysis organizations.

Most dialysis clinics operate within dialysis organization networks, the largest of which are DaVita, Inc., or DaVita, Fresenius KidneyCare Group LLC, or Fresenius, and U.S. Renal Care, or USRC. Following Vafseo's U.S. approval, we engaged with dialysis organizations to secure commercial supply agreements for Vafseo. Prior to first shipping Vafseo in the U.S. in January 2025, we had contracts in place with dialysis organizations caring for nearly 100% of dialysis patients.

Treatment is usually driven by medical protocols that dialysis organizations implement across their entire network of clinics. With commercial supply contracts in place, our medical team is working closely with dialysis organization medical professionals to develop protocols for the use of Vafseo in appropriate patient populations as dictated by the Vafseo label. When implemented, protocols can result in rapid change applicable to large segments of the patient population covered by the protocol.

Today, we have an established and embedded commercial team with approximately 35 key account managers, or KAMs, supported by our commercial operations team. Upon Vafseo's U.S. approval and in parallel with contracting and protocol development, our KAMs began detailing Vafseo to prescribers.Nephrologists have identified particularly underserved patient groups: home dialysis patients, a segment in which injectable ESAs are cumbersome, and patients on a higher ESA dose as higher doses of ESAs may be associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular complications independent of hemoglobin level. We anticipate Vafseo near-term adoption in these patient populations.

Effective commercialization provides the foundation for a new treatment to potentially become the standard of care. We believe it is also important to generate new data to educate physicians. We initiated a collaborative clinical trial with USRC. In December 2024 the Vafseo Outcomes In-Center Experience trial began to enroll up to approximately 2,200 patients randomized to oral Vafseo 300 mg tablets administered three times per week or standard-of-care ESAs. The trial will end approximately 18 months after the last patient is randomized. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint is all-cause hospitalization. The trial was powered to demonstrate non-inferiority for all-cause mortality and superiority for a 10% reduction in all-cause hospitalization. As of early March, USRC has enrolled more than half of the total target of 2,200 patients in the trial, and we expect the trial to be fully enrolled by the end of 2025.

Separately, additional studies might provide relevant data to support Vafseo label expansion specific to alternative dosing to complement existing alternative dosing data. We previously completed the FO2CUS study and the MO2DIFY study which both evaluated alternative dosing. See Part I, Item 1, Clinical Development Programs, for additional information on the FO2CUS study and the MO2DIFY study.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 8

Table of Contents

Vafseo – The potential for label expansion for the treatment of anemia due to CKD for patients not on dialysis.

There are approximately 550,000 patients with stage 4 or stage 5 CKD who are anemic and not receiving dialysis. Of these patients, only 25 percent are treated for anemia. As CKD is progressive and irreversible, these patients are likely to advance to ESRD and dialysis. Data suggests that if patients start dialysis with a hemoglobin level that is in the range of 9 g/dL to 10 g/dL, they have a significantly higher mortality rate at three months, six months and 12 months, even once their anemia is adequately managed. However, despite an appreciation of the risks of starting dialysis with unmanaged anemia, industry research suggests that the use of ESAs is low and declining in the non-dialysis patient population. Today, ESAs in the non-dialysis CKD patient population are approved but use is limited, typically following label guidance when a patient’s hemoglobin is below 10 g/dL and to reduce the likelihood of requiring a red blood cell transfusion. Concerns with the potential risk of hemoglobin instability that is a result of labeling could contribute to non treatment with an ESA. Further, data suggests patients are hesitant to self-administer an injection.

We believe the availability of an oral HIF-PH inhibitor within the non-dialysis patient population could address the issues contributing to the decline in ESA use among that patient population. We believe physicians agree, as third-party data from a 2024 Spherix Global Insights report indicated that 87% of physicians agreed with the statement that their treatment of anemia in CKD non-dialysis dependent patients would increase substantially if HIF-PH inhibitors are FDA approved.

We are committed to pursuing a path for label expansion for Vafseo for CKD non-dialysis dependent patients. We initially submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, to the FDA for vadadustat in March 2021 and in March 2022, the FDA issued a complete response letter, or CRL, to our NDA. The FDA concluded that the data in the NDA did not support a favorable benefit-risk assessment of vadadustat for dialysis and non-dialysis patients. The FDA expressed safety concerns, noting failure to meet non-inferiority in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, or MACE, in the non-dialysis patient population. While we have since secured FDA approval for use in dialysis patients, we believe there are compelling data supporting a positive benefit-risk profile for the use of Vafseo broadly in patients with CKD. In addition, we submitted a protocol to the FDA for VALOR, a Phase 3 cardiovascular outcome study of approximately 1,500 U.S. subjects with late-stage CKD anemia not on dialysis with a comparator to standard of care. We received FDA feedback on the protocol and expect to meet with the FDA to discuss VALOR. We intend to initiate the study by the second half of 2025. The study will be one part of what we believe will be a robust data package that will likely include data from the 1,700 U.S. patients in the Global Phase 3 PRO2TECT Program, as well as safety data from the commercial use of Vafseo in the U.S. in dialysis patients, and data on the use of Vafseo in Japan in dialysis and non-dialysis patients where Vafseo has been in the market since 2020.

Create a Future for Akebia both within and beyond Kidney Disease

We believe our leadership in the kidney community and deep understanding of the CKD market creates a competitive advantage and positions us for success particularly through the launch of Vafseo. We seek to explore opportunities where we can leverage our commercial excellence attained over the past decade commercializing Auryxia in the kidney space.

Hyperphosphatemia is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated serum phosphorus levels. Phosphorus is a vital element required for most cellular processes and, in individuals with normal kidney function, excess dietary phosphorus is removed by the kidneys and excreted in urine. In adults with functioning kidneys, normal serum phosphorus levels are 2.5 to 4.5 mg/dL. In adults with DD-CKD, elevated phosphorus levels, or hyperphosphatemia, can be associated with adverse effects, including increased risk for cardiovascular disease, bone disease and death.

Phosphate binders and phosphate inhibitors are the only interventions marketed for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia. According to the U.S. Renal Data System 2022 Annual Data Report, there were nearly 558,000 patients in the U.S. on dialysis in 2020, of which approximately 80% were treated with a phosphate binder. Phosphate binders need to be taken with meals and snacks, and it is not uncommon for CKD patients receiving dialysis to be prescribed as many as 12 or more phosphate binder pills per day, among other medications. Patients taking phosphate binders also experience gastrointestinal tolerability issues. As a result of the pill burden and tolerability issues associated phosphate binders, prescribed phosphate binders are often intolerable for many patients, leading to lack of treatment adherence.

In addition, in 2020 approximately 44% of patients treated with a phosphate binder were treated solely with a calcium-based binder, which can lead to side effects such as increased cardiovascular risk, hypercalcemia and gastrointestinal-related adverse events. Due to the risks associated with calcium-based binders, in 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes, recommended that clinicians limit the use of calcium-based binders.

IDA is a common form of anemia that is caused by patients not having enough iron to manufacture healthy RBCs. Although anyone can develop IDA, it is particularly common in NDD-CKD patients. IDA is associated with fatigue, lethargy, decrease quality of life, cardiovascular complications, hospitalizations and increased mortality.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 9

Table of Contents

We estimate that there are more than 500,000 adult patients in the U.S. with NDD-CKD diagnosed with IDA and managed by a nephrologist. Currently, there are two forms of iron therapy used to treat IDA: oral iron supplements and iron delivered via intravenous infusion, or IV. Oral iron is currently the first-line iron replacement therapy for most physicians; however, oral iron supplements are poorly absorbed by many patients, which may adversely impact their effectiveness, and are associated with certain side effects, such as constipation, diarrhea and cramping, that may adversely affect treatment adherence. IV iron is viewed as an effective treatment; however, like other intravenous medicines, it is logistically difficult to administer in an office setting, where NDD-CKD patients are more often treated.

Auryxia – An oral treatment for hyperphosphatemia and iron deficiency anemia

We market Auryxia in the U.S. through our well-established, nephrology-focused sales force and commercial organization.

Auryxia, an oral-only phosphate binder, was included in the ESRD PPS bundle payment beginning in January 2025, representing a shift, as Auryxia was previously covered by Medicare under Part D and commercial channels. In addition, dialysis organizations will receive a TDAPA payment for claims that include phosphate binders for the next two years. After two years, CMS will adjust the bundle price based on the amount spent on phosphate binders during that time and no longer include an extra TDAPA payment in claims. The shift in reimbursement initiated a change in the distribution of Auryxia to patients and a change in our contracting strategy. We had previously distributed Auryxia primarily in the retail channel through wholesalers or through large dialysis organization pharmacies, such as Fresenius Rx. Now, patients with hyperphosphatemia have access to Auryxia through dialysis organizations in the U.S. and distribution of Auryxia sits with the dialysis organization through dialysis organizations’ pharmacies, or other specialty pharmacies or distributors.

In preparation for this change, throughout 2024 we began contracting directly with dialysis organizations for Auryxia. Some of the dialysis organizations had their own specialty pharmacies and could distribute medication to patients, while others needed to partner with a specialty pharmacy to provide this service. We determined that, in order to ensure patient access, we needed to contract with distribution partners of the dialysis organizations as well. We enabled broad access to Auryxia by executing contracts with dialysis organizations that care for nearly 100% of patients on dialysis in the U.S. Akebia now delivers Auryxia directly to dialysis organizations or to their distribution partners rather than to wholesalers.

We currently have exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S. that protect us from generic drug competition until March 2025. We believe the dynamics of Auryxia reimbursement being included in the ESRD bundle under Medicare Part B could result in slower revenue decline after the LoE date than in other LoE situations, but the impact of LoE on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of generics and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia.

Outside the U.S., JT and Torii market Riona in Japan, and we receive tiered double-digit royalties based on their sales in Japan. Averoa applied for marketing authorization for ferric citrate in Europe.

We also leverage our research and development competency and expertise in HIF-based technology to both build on our commitment to kidney disease and also address areas of unmet medical need outside of kidney disease. We have invested resources to build out a preclinical portfolio and have selected two candidates for further preclinical development: AKB-9090 and AKB-10108. We intend to explore AKB-9090 for potential use in CS-AKI and ARDS, and AKB-10108 for potential use in ROP.

Cardiac Surgery-related Acute Kidney Injury

AKI is a sudden decline in the ability of the kidneys to work and perform their normal functions. AKI occurs in many settings including in 20-30% of the approximately two million patients who undergo cardiac surgery with use of cardio-pulmonary bypass each year worldwide. There are no current treatments available for CS-AKI. Stabilization of HIF by prolyl hydroxylase inhibition leads to the release of erythropoietin, a shift to anaerobic metabolism (glycolysis) and decreased inflammatory responses that collectively lessen kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury and ameliorate the decline in kidney function seen in many clinical settings including CS-AKI. Data from our preclinical studies showed AKB-9090 to be highly active in lessening the severity of AKI in an animal model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. We expect to initiate a Phase 1 trial of AKB-9090 in 2025.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

ARDS is a life-threatening acute form of lung disease characterized by acute bilateral pulmonary edema and severe hypoxemia (low blood oxygen). Despite improvement in supportive care, a third-party study indicated high hospital mortality rates for patients with ARDS admitted to participating intensive care units. The mortality rate among patients with ARDS in the study was: 34.9% with mild ARDS; 40.3% with moderate ARDS and 46.1% with severe ARDS. There are currently no treatments

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 10

Table of Contents

available for ARDS except for supportive care. Stabilization of HIF by prolyl hydroxylase inhibition leads to the release of erythropoietin, increased extracellular adenosine signaling, increased glycolytic activity and decreased inflammation in lung epithelial cells that promote resolution of the lung injury. Our plan is to first study HIF activity in vadadustat for the treatment of ARDS due to suspected aspiration, pathogen-associated pneumonia, or sepsis in hospitalized patients, which could provide clinical data from an investigator-initiated trial, and then to use these findings to support clinical development of an alternative HIF-based molecule such as AKB 9090 for ARDS. In earlier studies, vadadustat lessened the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia in a clinical trial (NCT04478071) and improved outcomes in animal models of acute lung injury.

Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)

ROP is the leading cause of blindness in preterm infants globally and occurs due to incomplete retinal development and abnormal blood vessel growth in the retina. ROP is caused by the high oxygen therapy used to treat preterm babies, which prevents retina growth. Annually, there are approximately 100,000 new cases of infant blindness worldwide due to ROP and currently no preventative therapy. HIF-PH inhibitors can protect the retina by stabilizing HIF, which degrades during hyperoxia, allowing normal retinal development and preventing abnormal blood vessel growth that can lead to scarring, bleeding, retinal detachment and blindness. Data from our preclinical studies of AKB-10108 in mouse and rat models of ROP showed significant improvements in retinal development under hyperoxic conditions, as well as significant reductions in abnormal blood vessel growth after returning to normal oxygen levels.

Clinical Development Programs

Below is a summary of the clinical development work completed for vadadustat.

Vadadustat Global Phase 3 Clinical Program in Anemia Due To CKD

We conducted a global Phase 3 clinical development program for vadadustat, which included two programs, INNO2VATE and PRO2TECT. INNO2VATE evaluated vadadustat in adult DD-CKD patients with anemia due to CKD in two studies, and PRO2TECT evaluated vadadustat in adult NDD-CKD patients with anemia due to CKD in two studies. Combined, we enrolled approximately 7,500 patients in these studies and evaluated a once daily oral dosing of vadadustat against an injectable ESA active comparator, darbepoetin alfa.

Both the INNO2VATE and PRO2TECT Phase 3 programs were global, multicenter, open-label, sponsor-blind, active-controlled non-inferiority programs. In both programs, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral vadadustat or injectable darbepoetin alfa. The primary efficacy endpoint for each study in the INNO2VATE and PRO2TECT programs was the mean change in hemoglobin between baseline and the primary evaluation period. Non-inferiority, or NI, for the primary efficacy endpoint was achieved if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference of the mean hemoglobin change did not fall below the pre-specified NI margin. Both the INNO2VATE and PRO2TECT programs included the primary safety endpoint of the assessment of MACE, with a comparison of vadadustat to darbepoetin alfa. MACE is defined as the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. The primary safety analysis for each program was based on the combined MACE events from the two studies in each of INNO2VATE and PRO2TECT. NI for the primary safety analysis was achieved if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio, or HR, of vadadustat to darbepoetin alfa did not exceed the pre-specified NI margin. We prospectively defined and agreed to non-inferiority margins with the U.S. and European regulatory authorities and agreed with the U.S. regulatory authorities on the key components of our statistical analysis plan.

Top-line Results from Global Phase 3 INNO2VATE Program within DD-CKD Adult Patients

The two INNO2VATE studies (Correction/Conversion and Conversion), which collectively enrolled 3,923 patients, evaluated the efficacy and safety of vadadustat versus darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD adult patients.

Vadadustat achieved the primary and key secondary efficacy endpoint in each of the two INNO2VATE studies, demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa as measured by a mean change in hemoglobin, or Hb, between baseline and the primary evaluation period (weeks 24 to 36) and secondary evaluation period (weeks 40 to 52). Vadadustat also achieved the primary safety endpoint of the INNO2VATE program, defined as non-inferiority of vadadustat versus darbepoetin alfa in time to first occurrence of MACE across both INNO2VATE studies.

Vadadustat achieved the INNO2VATE program’s primary safety endpoint of non-inferiority for MACE. In the primary analysis of time to first MACE event, vadadustat demonstrated non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa using a non-inferiority margin of 1.25 based on discussion with the FDA and a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 based on discussion with the EMA. INNO2VATE results on key secondary safety endpoints showed that vadadustat also demonstrated non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa in analyses of expanded MACE, cardiovascular MACE, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality.

Top-line Results from Global Phase 3 PRO2TECT Program within NDD-CKD Adult Patients

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 11

Table of Contents

The two PRO2TECT studies (Correction and Conversion), which collectively enrolled 3,476 patients, evaluated the efficacy and safety of vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in NDD-CKD adult patients.

Vadadustat achieved the primary and key secondary efficacy endpoint in each of the two PRO2TECT studies, demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa as measured by a mean change in Hb between baseline and the primary evaluation period (weeks 24 to 36) and secondary evaluation period (weeks 40 to 52). Vadadustat did not meet the primary safety endpoint of the PRO2TECT program, defined as non-inferiority of vadadustat versus darbepoetin alfa in time to first occurrence of MACE, across both PRO2TECT studies.

Primary and Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results

Vadadustat achieved each of the PRO2TECT studies' primary efficacy endpoints of mean change in Hb between baseline and the primary evaluation period compared to darbepoetin alfa, in adult patients on dialysis, demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa using an NI margin of -0.75 g/dL.

In PRO2TECT's Correction study (n=1,751):

•Primary Efficacy Endpoint Result: Vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. The least square mean difference in Hb was 0.05 g/dL (95% CI: -0.04, 0.15), achieving the pre-specified NI criterion of -0.75 g/dL. The mean (SD) Hb level at week 24 to week 36 was 10.39 (0.99) g/dL for vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.35 (1.03) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.

•Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Result: Vadadustat sustained the target Hb efficacy response at weeks 40 to 52 achieving non-inferiority compared to darbepoetin alfa. The least square mean difference in Hb was 0.04 g/dL (95% CI: -0.06, 0.14). The mean (SD) Hb level at week 40 to week 52 was 10.48 (1.05) g/dL for vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.45 (1.01) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.

In PRO2TECT's Conversion study (n=1,725):

•Primary Efficacy Endpoint Result: Vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. The least square mean difference in Hb was -0.01 g/dL (95% CI: -0.09, 0.07), achieving the pre-specified NI criterion of -0.75 g/dL. The mean (SD) Hb level at week 24 to week 36 was 10.77 (0.98) g/dL for vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.77 (0.99) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.

•Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Result: Vadadustat sustained efficacy in the Conversion study demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin with a least square mean difference in Hb of 0.00 g/dL (95% CI: -0.10, 0.09). The mean (SD) Hb level at week 40 to week 52 was 10.80 (1.04) g/dL in the vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.79 (1.05) g/dL for darbepoetin alpha-treated patients.

Primary Safety Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) Endpoint Result

The PRO2TECT program (Correction and Conversion studies) (n=3,471):

•Primary Safety MACE Endpoint Result: Vadadustat did not meet the PRO2TECT program's primary safety endpoint of non-inferiority for MACE. The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the HR was above the pre-specified NI margin of 1.25 for primary MACE analysis (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36).

Analysis of MACE events conducted by the Company in the PRO2TECT program revealed that the greater number of MACE events observed among vadadustat patients as compared to the active comparator was primarily related to an excess of non-cardiovascular death and death-of-unknown-cause in regions outside of the U.S. where significant differences in treatment patterns for NDD-CKD patients were observed.

The PRO2TECT analysis plan was prospectively designed to analyze the effect of regional differences, most notably, well-known differences in Hb treatment targets. Within PRO2TECT, U.S. patients were treated to a target Hb range of 10 to 11 g/dL and non-U.S. patients were treated to a target Hb range of 10 to 12 g/dL. In October of 2020, we presented a pre-specified regional analysis that showed vadadustat was not associated with a clinically meaningful increase in cardiovascular risk compared to darbepoetin alfa in U.S. patients treated to a target Hb range of 10 to 11 g/dL, in an analysis of MACE (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.29).

The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events, or TEAEs, during the Correction study in the vadadustat-treated patients was 90.9%, and 91.6% in darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most common TEAEs reported in vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal disease (34.7%/ 35.2%), hypertension (17.7%/ 22.1.%), hyperkalemia (12.3.%/ 15.6%), urinary tract infection (12.9%/ 12.0%), diarrhea (13.9%/ 10.0%), peripheral oedema (12.5%/ 10.5%), fall (9.6%/ 10%) and nausea (10%/ 8.2%). Serious TEAEs were 65.3% for vadadustat-treated patients and 64.5% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. The incidence of TEAEs during the Conversion study in vadadustat treated patients was 89.1% and 87.7% in darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most common TEAEs reported in vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal disease (27.5%/ 28.4%), hypertension (14.4%/ 14.8%), urinary tract

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 12

Table of Contents

infection (12.2%/ 14.5%), diarrhea (13.8.%/ 8.8.%), peripheral oedema (9.9%/ 10.1%) and pneumonia (10.0%/ 9.7%). Serious TEAEs were 58.5% for vadadustat-treated patients and 56.6% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.

Hepatic Safety Profile of Vadadustat in Clinical Studies

During the conduct of our Phase 3 program our team and hepatic experts analyzed hepatic cases (unblinded to treatment). Further, following the completion of our global Phase 3 clinical program for vadadustat, there was a review of hepatic safety across the vadadustat clinical program, which included eight completed Phase 2 and 3 studies in NDD-CKD patients, 10 completed Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies, and two then-ongoing Phase 3b studies in DD-CKD patients, and 18 completed studies in healthy subjects (17 Phase 1 and one Phase 3). This review consisted of a blinded re-assessment of hepatic events conducted by a separate panel of hepatic experts. While hepatocellular injury attributed to vadadustat was reported in less than 1% of patients, there was one case of severe hepatocellular injury with jaundice, and we cannot guarantee that similar events will not happen in the future. In the clinical review of our NDA in March 2024, the FDA concluded that there is a hepatocellular injury risk with the use of vadadustat in patients with CKD, although the risk of serious liver injury appears rare.

Modified Dosing Studies

From May 2020 to January 2023, we also conducted additional studies of vadadustat evaluating a modified approach to a once-daily and three-times weekly dosing, including assessment of a vadadustat starting dose based on an individual’s pre-conversion ESA dose prior to study entry and higher titration doses of vadadustat (up to 1200 mg).

The FO2CUS study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vadadustat in hemodialysis patients who were converted from a long-acting ESA to three-times weekly oral vadadustat dosing for the maintenance treatment of anemia. FO2CUS was an open-label, active-controlled, sponsor-blinded study that evaluated 456 hemodialysis patients who were randomized (1:1:1) into a vadadustat 600mg starting dose, vadadustat 900mg starting dose, or a long-acting ESA (Mircera®) treatment arms.

The MO2DIFY study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vadadustat in hemodialysis patients using a modified once-daily dosing regimen different from the INNO2VATE program dosing and a three-times-weekly dosing regimen of oral vadadustat compared to darbepoetin alfa.

FO2CUS Study

Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results

In the FO2CUS study, each vadadustat starting dose regimen (600 mg, 900 mg) and the combined vadadustat-treated group achieved the primary efficacy endpoint of the mean change in Hb between baseline and the primary evaluation period (weeks 20-26) compared to Mircera in adult patients on hemodialysis, demonstrating non-inferiority to Mircera based on a non-inferiority margin of -0.75 g/dL. Similarly, each starting dose regimen of vadadustat and the combined vadadustat-treated group achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of the mean change in Hb between baseline and the secondary evaluation period (weeks 46-52).

In the FO2CUS study in hemodialysis patients (n=456):

•Primary Efficacy Endpoint Results: Vadadustat demonstrated non-inferiority to Mircera. The least square mean difference in Hb was -0.43 g/dL (-0.67, -0.20) for the vadadustat 600 mg starting dose group, -0.23 g/dL (-0.46, 0.01) for the vadadustat 900 mg starting dose group, and -0.33 g/dL (-0.53, -0.13) for the combined vadadustat-treated group, achieving the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -0.75 g/dL. The mean Hb level during the primary evaluation period was 10.11 (0.061) g/dL for the combined vadadustat-treated group compared to 10.41 (0.068) g/dL for Mircera-treated group.

•Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results: Vadadustat demonstrated non-inferiority to Mircera. The least square mean difference in Hb was -0.27 g/dL (-0.54, -0.00) for the vadadustat 600 mg starting dose group, -0.38 g/dL (-0.67, -0.10) for the vadadustat 900 mg starting dose group, and -0.33 g/dL (-0.56, -0.09) for the combined vadadustat-treated group. The mean Hb level during the secondary evaluation period was 10.03 (0.066) g/dL for the combined vadadustat-treated group compared to 10.28 (0.076) g/dL for the Mircera-treated group.

Safety Results

In the FO2CUS study, a total of 78.7% of patients experienced any TEAEs in the combined vadadustat-treated group, and 75.3% experienced any TEAEs in the Mircera-treated group. The data demonstrated that 44.5% of patients experienced any serious TEAEs in the combined vadadustat-treated group, and 44.7% of patients experienced any serious TEAEs in the Mircera-treated group. During the study, the most common TEAEs reported in vadadustat-/Mircera- treated patients were COVID-19 (14.6%/16.0%), diarrhea (12.3%/8.0%) and hyperkalaemia (9.0%/10.7%).

MO2DIFY Study

Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 13

Table of Contents

In the MO2DIFY study, the vadadustat once-daily, or QD, treatment (starting dose: 300 or 450 mg) achieved the primary efficacy endpoint of the mean change in Hb from baseline to the primary evaluation period (weeks 20-26) compared to darbepoetin alfa in adult patients on hemodialysis, demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa based on a non-inferiority margin of -0.75 g/dL. Vadadustat three-times-weekly, or TIW, treatment (starting dose: 600 or 750) did not demonstrate noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa. Based on a sensitivity analysis using the per protocol population, both vadadustat dosing regimens demonstrated noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa of the mean change in Hb between baseline and the primary evaluation period.

Neither dosing regimen of vadadustat achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of the mean change in Hb between baseline and the secondary evaluation period (weeks 46-52).

In the MO2DIFY study in hemodialysis patients (n=319):

•Primary Efficacy Endpoint Results: Vadadustat QD treatment was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. The least square mean difference in Hb was -0.27 g/dL (-0.55, 0.01) for the vadadustat QD-treated group, meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -0.75 g/dL. The least square mean difference in Hb was -0.53 g/dL (-0.80, -0.25) for the vadadustat TIW-treated group. The mean Hb level during the primary evaluation period was 10.23 (1.07) g/dL and 10.02 (0.87) g/dL for the vadadustat QD and vadadustat TIW groups respectively, compared to 10.45 (0.83) g/dL for the darbepoetin alfa group.

•Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results: The secondary efficacy endpoint was the change in average Hb between baseline and the secondary evaluation period (Weeks 46 to 52). The least square mean difference in Hb was -0.40 g/dL (-0.79, -0.02) for the vadadustat QD-treated group and -0.42 g/dL (-0.81, -0.02) for the vadadustat TIW-treated group. Since noninferiority for the secondary efficacy endpoint of vadadustat TIW to darbepoetin alfa was not established, no claims of noninferiority were made for the secondary efficacy endpoint.

•Other efficacy Endpoint: The proportion of subjects with an average Hb value within the target range (US [10.0 to 11.0 g/dL] and Europe [10.0 to 12.0 g/dL]) was similar in the vadadustat QD, vadadustat TIW and darbepoetin alfa treatment groups during the primary evaluation period (weeks 20 to 26) (51.0%, 50.7%, and 54.5%, respectively) and secondary evaluation period (weeks 46 to 52) (50.4%, 48.3%, and 51.3%, respectively).

Safety Results

Among all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the study medication (n=317), 84.8% and 84.6% of patients in the vadadustat QD and TIW groups, respectively, experienced any TEAEs, compared to 80.6% in the darbepoetin alfa group. The data showed that 44.8% of patients in the vadadustat QD group and 45.2% in the vadadustat TIW group experienced any treatment-emergent serious adverse events, compared to 43.5% of patients in the darbepoetin alfa group. The most commonly reported TEAEs in patients treated with vadadustat QD, vadadustat TIW, and darbepoetin alfa were COVID-19 (13.3%, 12.5%, and 13.0% respectively), diarrhea (13.3%, 14.4%, and 5.6% respectively), and anemia (7.6%, 10.6%, and 9.3% respectively).

Manufacturing and Supply

Overview

We neither own nor operate, and currently have no plans to own or operate, any manufacturing or distribution facilities. We rely on third-party contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, to produce all of our preclinical, clinical and commercial supply, and third-party distributors to distribute Auryxia and Vafseo. We have established relationships with several CMOs and expect to continue to rely on either existing or alternative CMOs and distributors to manufacture or distribute our products to support ongoing and planned preclinical, clinical and commercial distribution activities. Our CMOs have other clients and may have other priorities that could affect manufacturing line capacity and/or delivery schedules. Both of these occurrences would be beyond our control. All clinical and commercial supplies are manufactured under current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMPs, which is a regulatory requirement for the production of pharmaceuticals that will be used in humans.

Vafseo

We currently rely on suppliers for the direct manufacture of our drug substance and drug product for clinical and commercial supply of Vafseo. We have entered into supply agreements with STA Pharmaceutical Hong Kong Limited, or STA, for the manufacture of Vafseo drug substance and drug product for commercial use and Patheon Inc. for the manufacture of Vafseo drug product for commercial use. In addition, we and Esteve Química, S.A. have agreed to negotiate the terms of a new supply agreement for the manufacture of Vafseo drug substance for commercial use. We plan to mitigate potential commercial supply risks for Vafseo, if any, through inventory management and we may enter into additional manufacturing arrangements for both drug substance and drug product. For more information about our manufacturing agreements for Vafseo, see Part II,

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 14

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Vadadustat is a small molecule. The synthesis of vadadustat is reliable and reproducible from starting materials available from multiple sources at commercially relevant scale using no unusual manufacturing equipment. Vadadustat can be formulated into compressed tablets using proprietary processes. As with any supply program, obtaining raw materials and finished drug product of the required quality and quantity cannot be guaranteed, and we cannot ensure that we will be successful in this endeavor.

Auryxia

The active pharmaceutical ingredient of Auryxia, ferric citrate, is a small molecule. The synthesis of ferric citrate is reliable and reproducible from starting materials available from multiple sources at a commercial scale. Ferric citrate can be formulated into compressed tablets using proprietary manufacturing processes. As with any supply program, obtaining raw materials and finished drug product of the required quality and quantity cannot be guaranteed, and we cannot ensure that we will be successful in this endeavor.

We have established CMO relationships for the supply of Auryxia to help ensure that we will have sufficient material for ongoing commercial sales and clinical trials. We currently rely on single-source suppliers for the manufacture of our drug substance and drug product for clinical and commercial supply of Auryxia. The drug substance for Auryxia is supplied by Siegfried Evionnaz SA, or Siegfried, pursuant to a supply agreement, as amended, with pricing structured on a per-kilogram basis. Auryxia drug product is supplied by Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC (Thermo Fisher) pursuant to a Master Manufacturing Service Agreement with per-bottle pricing structured on a tiered basis, with the price reduced as the product volume increases. The supply agreement with Siegfried requires that we satisfy certain minimum purchase requirements, but we are not obligated to use Siegfried as our exclusive supplier. For more information about our manufacturing agreements for Auryxia, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

We utilize third parties for the commercial distribution of Auryxia, including wholesale distributors and certain specialty pharmacy providers. We have also engaged Cardinal Health, Inc., as the exclusive third-party logistics distribution agent for commercial sales of Auryxia and Vafseo. The third-party logistics provides services to the Company that include storage, distribution, processing product returns, customer service support, logistics support, electronic data interface and system access support.

License and Collaboration Agreements

Vafseo License and Collaboration Agreements

Medice License Agreement

On May 24, 2023, or the Medice Effective Date, we entered into a License Agreement, or the Medice License Agreement, with Medice, under which we granted to Medice an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Vafseo for the treatment of anemia in adult patients with chronic kidney disease in the EEA, UK, Switzerland and Australia, or the Medice Territory.

Under the Medice License Agreement, we received an up-front payment of $10.0 million and are eligible to receive the following payments:

(i) commercial milestone payments up to an aggregate of $100.0 million, and

(ii) tiered royalties ranging from 10% to 30% of Medice's annual net sales of Vafseo in the Medice Territory, subject to reduction in certain circumstances.

The royalties will expire on a country-by-country basis upon the latest to occur of (i) the date of expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of ours, Medice or joint patent that covers Vafseo in such country in the Medice Territory, (ii) the date of expiration of data or regulatory exclusivity for Vafseo in such country in the Medice Territory and (iii) the date that is 12 years from first commercial sale of Vafseo in such country in the Medice Territory.

Under the Medice License Agreement, we retain the right to develop Vafseo for non-dialysis patients with anemia due to CKD in the Medice Territory. If we develop Vafseo for non-dialysis patients and Vafseo receives marketing approval for non-dialysis patients in the Medice Territory, Medice will commercialize Vafseo for both indications in the Medice Territory. In this instance, we would receive 70% of the net product margin of any sales of Vafseo in the non-dialysis patient population, unless Medice requests to share the cost of the development necessary to gain approval to market Vafseo for non-dialysis patients in the Medice Territory and the parties agree on alternative financial terms.

We and Medice established a joint steering committee to oversee the development and commercialization of Vafseo in the Medice Territory.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 15

Table of Contents

The Medice License Agreement expires on the date of expiration of all payment obligations due thereunder with respect to Vafseo in the last country in the Medice Territory, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the Medice License Agreement. Either party may, subject to a cure period, terminate the Medice License Agreement in the event of the other party's uncured material breach. Medice has the right to terminate the Medice License Agreement in its entirety for convenience upon twelve months' prior written notice delivered on or after the date that is twelve months after the Medice Effective Date.

The Medice License Agreement includes customary terms relating to, among others, indemnification, confidentiality, remedies, and representations and warranties.

On September 13, 2024, we entered into a supply agreement, or the Medice Supply Agreement, with Medice under which we supply Vafseo drug product to Medice for commercial and developmental use in the Medice Territory.

MTPC Collaboration Agreement

In December 2015, we entered into a collaboration agreement with MTPC, as amended, or the MTPC Agreement, providing MTPC with exclusive development and commercialization rights to Vafseo in Japan and certain other Asian countries, or the MTPC Territory. In addition, we supply Vafseo to MTPC for both clinical and commercial use in the MTPC Territory, subject to MTPC’s option to manufacture commercial drug product in the MTPC Territory. On July 15, 2020, we entered into a supply agreement with MTPC for the commercial supply of Vafseo for use in Japan and certain other Asian countries, as contemplated by the MTPC Agreement, which was amended effective as of December 5, 2022.

Unless earlier terminated, the MTPC Agreement will continue in effect on a country-by-country basis until the later of the following: (i) expiration of the last-to-expire patent covering Vafseo in such country in the MTPC Territory; (ii) expiration of marketing or regulatory exclusivity in such country in the MTPC Territory; or (iii) ten years after the first commercial sale of Vafseo in such country in the MTPC Territory. MTPC may terminate the MTPC Agreement upon twelve months’ notice. Either party may terminate the MTPC Agreement upon the material breach of the other party that is not cured within a specified time period or upon the insolvency of the other party.

Under the terms of the MTPC Agreement, we are eligible to receive payments from MTPC of up to approximately $225.0 million in the aggregate based on the achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales milestones, as well as tiered royalty payments ranging from 13% to 20% on annual net sales of Vafseo in the MTPC Territory, subject to reduction upon launch of a generic product on a country-by-country basis.

In February 2021, we entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement with HealthCare Royalty Partners IV, L.P., or HCR, whereby we sold our right to receive royalties and sales milestones for Vafseo in Japan and certain other Asian countries in the MTPC territory under the MTPC Agreement, subject to certain caps and other terms and conditions. For more information on our royalty interest acquisition agreement with HCR, see Note 8, Liability Related to Settlement Royalties, Working Capital Fund Liability and Liability Related to Sale of Future Royalties, to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

CSL Vifor License Agreement

On February 18, 2022, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated License Agreement, or the Vifor License Agreement, with Vifor (International) Ltd. (now a part of CSL Limited), or CSL Vifor, which amended and restated the License Agreement dated as of May 12, 2017. The Vifor License Agreement granted CSL Vifor an exclusive license to sell Vafseo to Fresenius Medical Care North America and its affiliates, including Fresenius Kidney Care Group LLC, to certain third-party dialysis organizations approved by us, to independent dialysis organizations that are members of certain group purchasing organizations and certain non-retail specialty pharmacies, collectively, the Supply Group, in the U.S.

The Vifor License Agreement was structured as a profit share arrangement between us and CSL Vifor in which we would receive approximately 66% of the profits, net of certain pre-specified costs. CSL Vifor made an upfront payment to us of $25.0 million in February 2022 in connection with the amendment and restatement of the Vifor License Agreement. In addition, we entered into certain investment agreements with CSL Vifor, pursuant to which we sold CSL Vifor an aggregate of 7,571,429 shares of our common stock for a total of $70.0 million. The shares have not been registered pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and were issued and sold in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder as the transaction did not involve any public offering within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

On July 10, 2024, we and CSL Vifor entered into the Vifor Termination and Settlement Agreement, or the Vifor Termination Agreement, pursuant to which we and CSL Vifor agreed, among other things, to terminate, effective immediately, the Vifor License Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Vifor Termination Agreement, we will pay CSL Vifor decreasing quarterly tiered royalty payments ranging from a high single-digit percentage of our net sales of Vafseo up to $450.0 million to mid-single digit percentage of

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 16

Table of Contents

our net sales of Vafseo above $450.0 million, in each case, in the U.S. during a calendar year, or the Settlement Royalty Payments. The Settlement Royalty Payments will commence upon the first sale of Vafseo by us, our affiliates or third-party licensees to a third party for use in the U.S., and will continue until the later of the (i) expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim listed in the FDA Orange Book that would be infringed by the making, using, selling or importing of Vafseo in the U.S. or (ii) the expiration of marketing or regulatory exclusivity for Vafseo in the U.S., or the Settlement Royalty Term. Beginning on July 1, 2027 and throughout the Settlement Royalty Term, we have the option to make a one-time payment to CSL Vifor, or the Royalty Buy-Down Option, upon which the Settlement Royalty Payments will be adjusted as of the date of exercise of the Royalty Buy-Down Option such that we will then only pay CSL Vifor quarterly royalty payments based on a mid-single digit percentage of our net sales of Vafseo up to $450.0 million in the U.S. during a calendar year in lieu of the above Settlement Royalty Payments. If we exercise the Royalty Buy-Down Option, the WCF Royalty Payments, as described below, will continue.

The WCF Royalty Payments, as described below, the Settlement Royalty Payments and the Royalty Buy-Down Option are in consideration for the termination of the Vifor License Agreement and all obligations thereunder, and the covenants and agreements set forth in the Vifor Termination Agreement, including the settlement and release of all disputes and claims which could arise from the Vifor License Agreement.

Pursuant to the Vifor License Agreement, CSL Vifor contributed $40.0 million to a working capital facility, or Working Capital Fund, established to partially fund our costs of purchasing Vafseo from our contract manufacturers. On May 3, 2024, we and CSL Vifor entered into Amendment #1 to the Vifor License Agreement, or the Vifor Amendment. Pursuant to the Vifor Amendment, and as modified by the Vifor Termination Agreement, we and CSL Vifor agreed to modify the method of repayment of the Working Capital Fund such that the Working Capital Fund will be repaid through quarterly tiered royalty payments ranging from 8% to 14% of our net sales of Vafseo in the U.S., or the WCF Royalty Payments. The WCF Royalty Payments will commence on July 1, 2025, and will continue until the earlier of (i) the cumulative total of the WCF Royalty Payments equals $40.0 million, or (ii) May 31, 2028, or the WCF Royalty Term. The WCF Royalty Payments are subject to minimum true-up milestones of $10.0 million, $20.0 million and $40.0 million, or the WCF Royalty True-Up Payments, on each of May 31, 2026, May 31, 2027 and May 31, 2028, respectively, or the WCF Royalty True-Up Dates. If the cumulative total of the WCF Royalty Payments paid to CSL Vifor on any given WCF Royalty True-Up Date is less than the respective WCF Royalty True-Up Payment, we will pay CSL Vifor a one-time payment equal to the difference between the WCF Royalty True-Up Payment and the cumulative total of the WCF Royalty Payments paid by us through such WCF Royalty True-Up Date.

Auryxia License and Collaboration Agreements

Averoa License Agreement

On December 22, 2022, we and Averoa entered into a license agreement, or Averoa License Agreement, pursuant to which we granted to Averoa an exclusive license to develop and commercialize ferric citrate, or Averoa Licensed Product, in the EEA, Turkey, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, and in August 2024, we also granted Averoa an exclusive license to develop and commercialize ferric citrate in the Balkans and certain countries in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, or collectively, the Averoa Territory. We and Averoa have established a joint steering committee to oversee the development, manufacturing and commercialization of the Averoa Licensed Product in the Averoa Territory. In April 2024, Averoa submitted its marketing authorization application for ferric citrate in Europe and the application is still under review.

Under the Averoa License Agreement, we are entitled to receive tiered, escalating royalties ranging from a mid-single digit percentage to a low double-digit percentage of Averoa's annual net sales of the Averoa Licensed Product in the Averoa Territory, including certain minimum royalty amounts in certain years, and subject to reduction in certain circumstances. The royalties will expire on a country-by-country basis upon the last to occur of (a) ten years following the date of first commercial sale of the Licensed Product in such country; (b) expiration of the last valid claim of our patent rights and joint patent rights in such country; and (c) the date of expiration of the data, regulatory, or marketing exclusivity period conferred by the applicable regulatory authority in such country with respect to the Licensed Product. As of December 31, 2024, we have not received any royalties under this agreement.

The Averoa License Agreement expires on the date of expiration of all royalty obligations due thereunder with respect to the Averoa Licensed Product on a country-by-country basis in the Averoa Territory, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the Averoa License Agreement.

The Averoa License Agreement provides that we and Averoa will enter into a supply agreement pursuant to which we will supply the Averoa Licensed Product to Averoa for commercial use in the Averoa Territory. We will have the right to terminate the supply agreement upon twenty-four months' notice. We have not yet entered into a supply agreement with Averoa.

Sublicense Agreement with Japan Tobacco Inc. and Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

In September 2007, we entered into a Sublicense Agreement with JT and Torii, under which JT and Torii obtained the exclusive sublicense rights for the development and commercialization of ferric citrate in Japan. Effective June 8, 2009, we entered into

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 17

Table of Contents

an Amended and Restated Sublicense Agreement, which was amended in June 2013, or the Revised Agreement, with JT and Torii.

In January 2014, JT and Torii received manufacturing and marketing approval of ferric citrate from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Ferric citrate hydrate, which launched in May 2014 and is being marketed in Japan by Torii under the brand name Riona, is indicated as an oral treatment for the improvement of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD, including NDD-CKD and DD-CKD. In July 2019, JT and Torii, reported positive top-line results from a pivotal Phase 3 comparative study evaluating Riona for the treatment of IDA in adult patients in Japan, which was approved in March 2021. In May 2020, JT and Torii filed an application for approval of IDA as an additional indication for Riona in Japan. Under the terms of the Revised Agreement with JT and Torii, we are eligible to receive royalty payments based on a tiered low double-digit percentage of net sales of Riona in Japan inclusive of amounts that we must pay to Panion & BF Biotech, Inc., or Panion, on JT and Torii’s net sales of Riona under the Panion Amended License Agreement, subject to certain reductions upon expiration or termination of the Panion Amended License Agreement, and may also receive up to an additional $55.0 million upon the achievement of certain annual net sales milestones. We recorded $5.4 million in license revenue related to royalties earned on net sales of Riona in Japan during the year ended December 31, 2024.

The sublicense under the Revised Agreement terminates upon the expiration of all underlying patent rights. Also, JT and Torii may terminate the Revised Agreement with or without cause upon at least six months prior written notice to us. Additionally, either party may terminate the Revised Agreement for cause upon 60 days’ prior written notice after the breach of any uncured material provision of the Revised Agreement, or after certain insolvency events.

License Agreement with Panion & BF Biotech, Inc.

On April 17, 2019, we and Panion entered into a second amended and restated license agreement, or the Panion Amended License Agreement, which amended and restated in full the license agreement between us and Panion. The Panion Amended License Agreement provides us with an exclusive license under Panion-owned know-how and patents covering the rights to sublicense, develop, make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and export ferric citrate worldwide, excluding certain Asian Pacific counties, or the Licensor Territory. The Panion Amended License Agreement also provides Panion with an exclusive license under our patents covering the rights to sublicense (with our written consent), develop, make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and export ferric citrate in certain countries in the Licensor Territory. Consistent with the Panion License Agreement, under the Panion Amended License Agreement, Panion is eligible to receive from us or any sublicensee royalty payments based on a mid-single digit percentage of net sales of ferric citrate in our licensed territories. We are eligible to receive from Panion or any sublicensee royalty payments based on a mid-single digit percentage of net sales of ferric citrate in Panion’s licensed territories.

The Panion Amended License Agreement terminates upon the expiration of each of our and Panion’s obligations to pay royalties thereunder. In addition, we may terminate the Panion Amended License Agreement (i) in its entirety or (ii) with respect to one or more countries in our licensed territory, in either case upon 90 days’ notice. We and Panion also each have the right to terminate the Panion Amended License Agreement upon the occurrence of a material breach of the Panion Amended License Agreement by the other party, subject to certain cure provisions, or certain insolvency events. The Panion Amended License Agreement also provides that, on a country-by-country basis, during the term and until the second anniversary of the expiration of our or Panion’s obligation, as applicable, to pay royalties in a country in which such party has ferric citrate for sale on the date of such expiration, neither the other party nor its affiliates will, directly or indirectly, sell, distribute or otherwise commercialize or supply or cause to supply ferric citrate to a third party for sale or distribution in such country. In addition, the Panion Amended License Agreement provides that each of us and Panion has the right, but not the obligation, to conduct litigation against any infringer of certain patent rights under the Panion Amended License Agreement in certain territories.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded $9.1 million in royalties due to Panion relating to the sales of Auryxia in the U.S. and JT and Torii net sales of Riona in Japan.

Cyclerion Therapeutics License Agreement

In June 2021, we entered into a license agreement, or the Cyclerion Agreement, with Cyclerion under which Cyclerion granted us an exclusive global license under certain intellectual property rights to research, develop and commercialize praliciguat, an investigational oral sGC stimulator.

Under the terms of the Cyclerion Agreement, we paid $3.0 million in cash upfront to Cyclerion and expensed the amount to research and development, or R&D, expense in June 2021. In December 2024, we amended the terms of the Cyclerion Agreement, pursuant to which we paid an additional $1.25 million in cash upfront to Cyclerion and we will pay an additional $0.5 million to Cyclerion on or before September 30, 2025. In addition, the parties agreed to the reduction of certain development milestones and the increase of certain royalty rates on net sales and sublicense income. We now control all

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 18

Table of Contents

clinical and commercial manufacturing of praliciguat, which will be conducted by a third party manufacturer. We will also control patent prosecution and pay intellectual property costs starting April 1, 2025.

In addition, Cyclerion is eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $198.5 million from us in specified development and regulatory milestone payments on a product-by-product basis. Cyclerion will also be eligible to receive specified commercial milestones as well as tiered royalties ranging from a mid-single-digit percentage to twenty percent of net sales, on a product-by-product basis, and subject to reduction upon expiration of patent rights or the launch of a generic product in the territory.

Unless earlier terminated, the Cyclerion Agreement will expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis upon the expiration of the last royalty term, which ends upon the longest of (i) the expiration of the patents licensed under the Cyclerion Agreement, (ii) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such product and (iii) 10 years from first commercial sale of such product. We may terminate the Cyclerion Agreement in its entirety or only with respect to a particular licensed compound or product upon 180 days' prior written notice to Cyclerion. We and Cyclerion also have customary termination rights, subject to a cure period, in the event of the other party’s material breach of the Cyclerion Agreement or in the event of certain additional circumstances.

Intellectual Property

The proprietary nature of, and protection for, our products, product candidates and our discovery programs, processes and know-how are important to our business. Our policy is to seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development and implementation of our business. We also rely on know-how, continuing technological innovation and potential in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position. Additionally, we may benefit from a variety of statutory frameworks in the U.S., Europe and other countries that provide periods of non-patent-based exclusivity for qualifying molecules.

Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining patent protection of our current products as well as current and future product candidates, methods of their use and the methods used to develop and manufacture them, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our products depends on the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents that cover these activities. We cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents that may be granted to us in the future will be commercially useful in protecting our product candidates, discovery programs and processes. Even once patents successfully issue, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability, inventorship, or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held not infringed or unenforceable. For this and more comprehensive risks related to our intellectual property, please see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Intellectual Property” in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Individual patents extend for varying periods of time depending on the date of filing of the patent application or the date of patent issuance and the legal term of patents in the countries in which they are obtained. Generally, patents issued from applications filed in the U.S. are effective for 20 years from the earliest filing date of a U.S. non-provisional application or an international application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. In addition, in certain instances, a patent term can be extended to recapture a portion of the term effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory review period, however, the restoration period cannot be longer than five years and the total patent term including the restoration period must not exceed 14 years following FDA approval. The duration of foreign patents varies in accordance with provisions of applicable local law, but typically is also 20 years from the earliest international filing date. Patent term recapture for loss of term as a result of the regulatory review period is available in some foreign jurisdictions. In the U.S., a patent’s term may also be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee for administrative delays by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, in granting a patent, or may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier‐filed patent.

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretations of patent laws in the U.S. and other countries can diminish our ability to protect our inventions and enforce our intellectual property rights. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth or enforceability of claims that may be granted in our patents or in third-party patents. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. Our ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary position for our drugs and technology will depend on our success in obtaining effective claims and enforcing those claims once granted. We do not know whether any of the patent applications that we may file or license from third parties will result in the issuance of any patents. The issued patents that we own or license or may receive or acquire in the future may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with sufficient protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, our competitors may be able to independently develop and commercialize similar drugs or duplicate our technology, business model or strategy without infringing our patents. Because of the extensive time required for clinical

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 19

Table of Contents

development and regulatory review of a drug we may develop, it is possible that, before any of our drugs can be commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing any advantage of any such patent. The patent positions for vadadustat and Auryxia are summarized below.

Vadadustat Patent Portfolio

We hold 19 issued patents covering the composition of matter, polymorph, method of treating anemia, pharmaceutical compositions of vadadustat, and processes for manufacturing vadadustat in the U.S. and additional patents issued or pending in many other major jurisdictions worldwide, including Europe, Japan, China, South Korea, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Israel and India. The expected expiration dates for these patents are between 2027 and 2039 plus any extensions or adjustments of term available under national law.

We also hold patents and patent applications directed to starting materials and intermediates in the processes for manufacturing vadadustat, dosing regimens, formulations and various other aspects relating to the treatment of anemia using vadadustat that are expected to expire between 2032 and 2042 exclusive of possible patent term extensions or adjustments.

We have ongoing opposition proceedings relating to vadadustat. See Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings for further information relating to these matters.

Auryxia Patent Portfolio

Pursuant to the Panion Amended License Agreement, we have the exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia worldwide, excluding certain Asian-Pacific countries. These patents and patent applications include claims directed to compositions of matter, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, as well as methods for the manufacture of Auryxia.

Our patent rights currently include 3 issued patents that are listed in the Orange Book covering the composition of matter, method of treating hyperphosphatemia, and pharmaceutical compositions of Auryxia. The expected expiration dates for these patents are between 2026 and 2030 plus any additional patent term extensions that may be available.

Pursuant to the sublicense with our Japanese partner, Japan Tobacco Inc., or JT, and its subsidiary, Torii Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., or Torii, we have exclusively sublicensed certain Japanese patent rights to JT and Torii. These sublicensed rights include several Japanese patents and pending patent applications with composition of matter claims, methods of synthesizing claims, and methods of use claims covering Riona, the trade name under which JT and Torii market ferric citrate in Japan. The expected expiration dates for these patents and pending patent applications are between 2025 and 2028. To date, to our knowledge, no contested proceedings or third-party claims have been lodged against any of these Japanese patents.

Pursuant to the sublicense with our European partner, Averoa, we have exclusively sublicensed certain European patent rights to Averoa. These sublicensed rights include several European patents and pending patent applications with composition of matter claims and methods of use claims covering ferric citrate. The expected expiration dates for these patents and pending patent applications are between 2024 and 2036. To date, to our knowledge, no contested proceedings or third-party claims have been lodged against any of these European patents.

We received Paragraph IV certification notice letters regarding abbreviated new drug applications, or ANDAs, submitted to the FDA by third parties requesting approval for generic versions of Auryxia tablets (210 mg ferric iron per tablet). In response we filed certain complaints for patent infringement against six third parties, and have entered into settlement and license agreements with each of the six ANDA filers. Each settlement agreement granted the defendants a license to market a generic version of Auryxia in the U.S. beginning on March 20, 2025 (subject to FDA approval).

Other Intellectual Property Rights

We depend upon trademarks, trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological advances to develop and maintain our competitive position. To maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information, we require our employees, scientific advisors, consultants and collaborators, upon commencement of a relationship with us, to execute confidentiality agreements and, in the case of parties other than our research and development collaborators, to agree to assign their inventions to us. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed in connection with their relationship with us. These agreements may not, however, provide protection for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized disclosure of such information.

In addition to patent protection, we may utilize orphan drug regulations, pediatric exclusivity or other provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended, or FDCA, such as new chemical entity exclusivity or new formulation exclusivity, to provide market exclusivity for a product candidate. In the U.S., the FDA has the authority to grant additional data protection for approved drugs where the sponsor conducts specified testing in pediatric or adolescent populations. If granted, this pediatric exclusivity may provide an additional six months which are added to the term of data protection as well as to the term of a relevant patent, to the extent these protections have not already expired. We may also seek to utilize market

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 20

Table of Contents

exclusivities in other territories. We cannot assure you that our products or any product candidates we may acquire or in-license, will obtain such orphan drug designation, pediatric exclusivity, new chemical entity exclusivity or any other market exclusivity in the U.S., EU, or any other territory, or that we will be the first to receive the respective regulatory approval for such drugs so as to be eligible for any market exclusivity protection.

Know-How

In addition to patents, we rely upon unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, using confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees and consultants and invention assignment provisions in the confidentiality agreements with our employees. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the invention assignment provisions, to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed by our employees. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach.

To the extent that our commercial partners, collaborators, employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

The Hatch-Waxman Act

Orange Book Listing

In seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, sponsors are required to list with the FDA each patent whose claims cover the sponsor’s product. Upon approval of a drug, each of the patents listed in the application for the drug is then published in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly known as the Orange Book. Drugs listed in the Orange Book can, in turn, be cited by potential generic competitors in support of approval of an ANDA. An ANDA provides for marketing of a drug product that has the same active ingredients in the same strengths and dosage form as the listed drug and has been shown through bioequivalence testing to be therapeutically equivalent to the listed drug. Other than the requirement for bioequivalence testing, ANDA sponsors are usually not required to conduct, or submit results of, nonclinical or clinical tests to prove the safety or effectiveness of their drug product. Drugs approved in this way are commonly referred to as “generic equivalents” to the listed drug and can often be substituted by pharmacists under prescriptions written for the original listed drug.

The ANDA sponsor is required to make certain certifications to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the FDA’s Orange Book. Specifically, the sponsor must certify that: (i) the required patent information has not been filed; (ii) the listed patent has expired; (iii) the listed patent has not expired but will expire on a particular date and approval is sought after patent expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the new product. The ANDA sponsor may also elect to submit a Section viii statement, certifying that its proposed ANDA label does not contain or carve out any language regarding the patented method-of-use, rather than certify to a listed method-of-use patent.

If the sponsor does not challenge the listed patents, the ANDA will not be approved until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired. A certification that the new product will not infringe the already approved product’s listed patents, or that such patents are invalid, is called a Paragraph IV certification. If the ANDA sponsor has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the sponsor must also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to the NDA and patent holders once the ANDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent holders may then initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response to the notice of the Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of a Paragraph IV certification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the ANDA until the earlier of 30 months from receiving the Paragraph IV certification, expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA sponsor. Also, the ANDA will not be approved until any applicable non-patent exclusivity listed in the Orange Book for the referenced product has expired.

Exclusivity

Upon NDA approval of a new chemical entity, or NCE, which is a drug that contains an active moiety that has not been approved by the FDA in any other NDA, that drug receives five years of marketing exclusivity during which time the FDA cannot accept any ANDA seeking approval of a generic version of that drug. Certain changes to a drug, such as the addition of a new indication to the package insert, are associated with a three-year period of exclusivity during which the FDA cannot approve an ANDA for a generic drug that includes such changes.

An ANDA may be submitted one year before NCE exclusivity expires if a Paragraph IV certification is filed. If there is no listed patent in the Orange Book, there may not be a Paragraph IV certification, and, thus, no ANDA may be filed before the expiration of the exclusivity period.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 21

Table of Contents

Patent Term Extension

After NDA approval, owners of relevant drug patents or their agents may apply for up to a five-year patent extension for delays caused by FDA regulatory review. The allowable patent term extension is calculated as half of the drug’s testing phase which is the time between Investigational New Drug application, or IND submission, and NDA submission, and all of the review phase, which is the time between NDA submission and approval, up to a maximum of five years. The time can be shortened if the FDA determines that the sponsor did not pursue approval with due diligence. The total patent term after the extension may not exceed 14 years from the date of approval by virtue of the patent term extension.

We have filed applications under the patent term extension provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 156 for U.S. Patent Nos. 8,299,298, 8,093,423, 7,767,851 and 8,338,642 each of which covers Auryxia for delays caused by FDA regulatory review. We have also filed patent term extension applications for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,811,595, 8,343,952, 8,323,671, 8,598,210, and 8,940,773 each of which covers Vafseo for delays caused by FDA regulatory review. If granted, we can utilize the patent term extension on one of the Auryxia patents and one of the Vafseo patents, however, we cannot assure you that we can obtain any extension of the term of these patents. Upon expiration of these patents, competitors who obtain the requisite regulatory approval may potentially offer products with the same composition and/or method of use as our product, so long as the competitors do not infringe any other patents that we may own or license.

For patents that might expire before a determination regarding patent term extension, the patent owner or its agent may request an interim patent term extension. An interim patent extension increases the patent term by one year and may be renewed up to four times. For each interim patent extension granted, the post-approval patent extension is reduced by one year. The director of the USPTO must determine that approval of the drug covered by the patent for which a patent extension is being sought is likely.

In addition, certain jurisdictions outside of the U.S., including Japan, have provisions that provide for patent term extension. In October 2014, following the regulatory approval of Riona in Japan, the Japan Patent office granted the patent term extensions filed by our sublicensee, JT, for Japanese Patents Nos. 4964585 and 4173553. As a result of the extension of patent term, Japanese Patent No. 4173553 expired in November 2022 and Japanese Patent No. 4964585 will expire in November 2025 for hyperphosphatemia and December 2028 for iron deficiency anemia. We also sought and obtained patent term extension for Japanese Patent Nos. 5113838, 6290781, and 6612479 following regulatory approval of Vafseo in Japan. As a result of the extension of patent term, Japanese Patent No. 5113838 will expire in June 2032, Japanese Patent No. 6290781 will expire in October 2034, and Japanese Patent No. 6612479 will expire in January 2035.

In the future, if and when our product candidates receive approval by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on issued patents covering those drugs, depending upon the length of the clinical trials for each product candidate and other factors. There can be no assurance that any of our pending patent applications will issue or that we will benefit from any patent term extension or favorable adjustment to the term of any of our patents.

Competition

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are highly competitive, with several key players offering innovative solutions. The growing prevalence of CKD and the increasing demand for better anemia management solutions continue to drive competition innovation in this market. Our competitors include public and private pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, and public and private research institutions. In addition, companies that are active in different but related fields represent substantial competition for us. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in a larger concentration of resources among a smaller number of our competitors. These organizations, as well as others in the broader industries, compete with us to recruit qualified personnel, attract partners for joint ventures or other collaborations and license competitive technologies to ours.

While major pharmaceutical companies are continuously investing in R&D and have significantly greater capital resources, larger R&D teams and facilities and more experience in drug development, regulation, manufacturing and marketing than we do; we believe our novel HIF-PH inhibitors have the potential to revolutionize the treatment landscape in multiple areas, including anemia due to CKD. To compete successfully in these industries, we must continue to identify novel and unique drugs or treatment methods and complete the development of those drugs as treatments before our competitors.

Vadadustat Competitors

Drugs that may compete with Vafseo include Epogen® (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa), both commercialized by Amgen, Procrit® (epoetin alfa) and Eprex® (epoetin alfa), commercialized by Johnson & Johnson in the U.S. and Europe, respectively, and Mircera® (methoxy PEG-epoetin beta), commercialized by CSL Vifor in the U.S. and Roche Holding Ltd. outside of the U.S. and Evrenzo(R) (roxadustat) in Europe commercialized by Astellas Pharma Inc., or Astellas, Eporatio® (epoetin theta) in Europe commercialized by Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Silapo® (epoetin zeta) in Europe commercialized by Stada Arzneimittel AG, Epoetin Alfa Hexal® (epoetin alfa) in Europe commercialized by Hexal AG, Binocrit® (epoetin alfa-biosimilar) in Europe commercialized by Sandoz, and NeoRecormon® (epoetin beta) in Europe commercialized by Roche.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 22

Table of Contents

We and our partners may also face competition from potential new anemia therapies. There are several other HIF-PH inhibitor product candidates in various stages of development for anemia indications in territories outside of the U.S. that may be in direct competition with Vafseo. These candidates are being developed by companies such as JT and Bayer HealthCare AG, or Bayer. In Europe, roxadustat is approved for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD.

Furthermore, certain companies are developing new therapies for renal-related diseases that potentially could reduce injectable ESA utilization and thus limit the market potential for Vafseo. Other new therapies are in development for treating conditions, including renal anemia, that may impact the market for anemia-targeted treatment.

In Japan, vadadustat is sold under the name Vafseo, which is approved for patients with CKD, including both DD-CKD and NDD-CKD, and competes with roxadustat, daprodustat and enarodustat. Roxadustat is approved for the treatment of DD-CKD patients and NDD-CKD patients. In addition, daprodustat, GSK’s product candidate, and enarodustat, JT’s product candidate, are approved in Japan for the treatment of anemia due to CKD, and molidustat, Bayer HealthCare AG's product, is approved in Japan for the treatment of renal anemia. In China, roxadustat is commercialized for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD patients and for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in NDD-CKD patients.

A biosimilar is a biologic product that is licensed based on demonstrating that it is highly similar to an existing, FDA-approved branded biologic product (i.e., a reference biologic product). The patents for the existing, branded biologic product must expire in a given market before biosimilars may enter that market without the risk of being sued for patent infringement. In addition, an application for a biosimilar product can only be approved by the FDA 12 years after the existing, branded product was licensed under a Biologics License Application, or BLA. The patents for epoetin alfa, an injectable ESA, expired in 2004 in the EU, and the remaining patents expired between 2012 and 2016 in the U.S. Because injectable ESAs are biologic products, introducing biosimilars into the injectable ESA market in the U.S. will constitute additional competition for Vafseo. In the U.S., Pfizer’s biosimilar version of injectable ESAs, Retacrit® (epoetin alfa-epbx), was approved by the FDA in May 2018 and launched in November 2018 and several biosimilar versions of injectable ESAs are available for sale in the EU.

Furthermore, Vafseo's commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective, safer or offer greater patient convenience than Vafseo.

Auryxia Competitors

Hyperphosphatemia Competition

Auryxia is competing in the hyperphosphatemia market in the U.S. with other FDA-approved phosphate binders such as Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate), both marketed by Sanofi, PhosLo® and Phoslyra® (calcium acetate), marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fosrenol® (lanthanum carbonate), marketed by Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc, and Velphoro® (sucroferric oxyhydroxide), marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, as well as over-the-counter calcium carbonate products such as TUMS® and metal-based options such as aluminum, lanthanum and magnesium. Most of the phosphate binders listed above are now also available in generic forms. In addition, other agents are in development, including OPKO Health Inc.’s AlpharenTM Tablets (fermagate tablets) and Unicycive’s RENAZORBTM (lanthanum dioxycarbonate) or could otherwise enter the market that may impact the market for Auryxia. In October 2023, the FDA approved XPHOZAH® (tenapanor), a phosphate absorption inhibitor that is marketed by Ardelyx, Inc., or Ardelyx and indicated to reduce serum phosphorus in adults with CKD on dialysis as add-on therapy in patients who have an inadequate response to phosphate binders or who are intolerant of any dose of phosphate binder therapy, which may adversely impact the market for Auryxia.

Iron Deficiency Anemia Competition

Auryxia is competing in the IDA market in the U.S. with over-the-counter oral iron, ferrous sulfate, other prescription oral iron formulations, including ferrous gluconate, ferrous fumerate, and polysaccharide iron complex, and intravenous iron formulations, including Feraheme® (ferumoxytol injection), Venofer® (iron sucrose injection), Ferrlicit® (sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose injection), Injectafer® (ferric carboxymaltose injection), and Triferic® (ferric pyrophosphate citrate). In addition, other new therapies for the treatment of IDA may impact the market for Auryxia, such as Shield Therapeutic’ plc's Feraccru® (ferric maltol), which is available in Europe for the treatment of IDA, and Accrufer® (ferric maltol), which was launched in the U.S. for the treatment of IDA in July 2021.

In Japan, our Japanese sublicensee, JT and Torii, commercialize Riona (ferric citrate hydrate). In the hyperphosphatemia market, Riona competes with Fosrenol® (lanthanum carbonate hydrate) marketed by Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., generic lanthanum carbonate hydrate products, and Phozevel® (tenapor hydrochloride) marketed by Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. In the IDA market in Japan, Riona competes with Ferromia® (sodium ferrous citrate) marketed by Alfresa Pharma Corporation and Fero-Gradumet® (dried ferrous sulfate) marketed by Viatris Inc.

Furthermore, Auryxia’s commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective, safer or offer greater patient convenience than Auryxia. Other companies

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 23

Table of Contents

have product candidates in various stages of preclinical or clinical development to treat diseases and complications of the diseases for which we are marketing Auryxia. We currently have exclusive rights under a series of patents and patent applications to commercialize Auryxia in the U.S. that protect us from generic drug competition until March 20, 2025. Following LoE, in March 2025, the timing and number of generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market will affect our revenue from Auryxia. We and our licensors, Panion, and, as applicable, Dr. Hsu, entered into settlement agreements with all of the third parties who submitted Paragraph IV certification notice letters regarding ANDAs submitted to the FDA, pursuant to which we granted licenses to market a generic version of Auryxia in the U.S. beginning on March 20, 2025 (subject to FDA approval).

On February 5, 2025, we entered into an Authorized Generic Distribution and Supply Agreement with Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pursuant to which, on or after March 20, 2025, they will sell an authorized generic version of Auryxia. We believe the dynamics of Auryxia reimbursement being included in the ESRD bundle under Medicare Part B could result in slower revenue decline after the LoE date than in other LoE situations, but the impact of LoE on future Auryxia revenues will depend on many factors, including our ability to maintain contracts with dialysis organizations, the timing and number of generics and the pricing of generics and other products on the market that compete with Auryxia.

Government Regulation and Product Approvals

Government authorities in the U.S., at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries and jurisdictions, including the EU, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, sales, pricing, reimbursement, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and import and export of pharmaceutical products. The processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the U.S. and in foreign countries and jurisdictions, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations and other regulatory requirements, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.

Review and Approval of Drug Products in the U.S.

In the U.S., the FDA approves and regulates drugs under the FDCA and applicable implementing regulations and guidance.

Our product candidates must be approved by the FDA for therapeutic indications before we or our partners are able to market them in the U.S. A company, institution, or organization which takes responsibility for the initiation and management of a clinical development program for such products is referred to as a sponsor. A sponsor seeking approval to market and distribute a new drug product in the U.S. must typically undertake the following:

•completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies in compliance with the FDA’s good laboratory practice, or GLP, regulations and consistent with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, or ICH, requirements;

•design of a clinical protocol and submission to the FDA of an IND for human clinical testing, which must be reviewed and allowed by the FDA before human clinical trials may begin;

•approval by an independent local or central institutional review board, or IRB, representing each clinical site before each clinical trial may be initiated;

•performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with good clinical practices, or GCP, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed product candidate for each indication;

•preparation and submission to the FDA of an NDA requesting marketing for one or more proposed indications;

•review of the product candidate by an FDA advisory committee, where appropriate or if applicable;

•satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product candidate, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMP requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product candidate’s identity, strength, quality and purity;

•satisfactory completion of FDA audits of clinical trial sites and records to assure compliance with GCPs and good practices, or GxPs, the integrity of the clinical data and that adequate controls and oversight are in place regarding manufacturing, clinical trials, pharmacovigilance, safety, data management, vendor oversight, collection and reporting of serious adverse events and other activities;

•payment of user fees pursuant to the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA;

•approval of an NDA for the new drug product authorizing marketing for particular indications in the U.S.; and

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 24

Table of Contents

•compliance with any post-approval requirements and/or commitments, including the potential requirement to implement a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS, and potentially post-market requirement, or PMR, and post-market commitment, or PMC, studies.

Preclinical Tests

Before a sponsor begins testing a product candidate with potential therapeutic value in humans, the product candidate enters the preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as other studies to evaluate, among other things, the toxicity of the product candidate. The conduct of the preclinical tests and formulation of the compounds for testing must comply with federal regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations and standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal Welfare Act, if applicable. The results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND and are generally referred to as IND-enabling studies. Some long-term preclinical testing, such as animal tests of reproductive adverse events and carcinogenicity, and long-term toxicity studies, may continue after the IND is submitted.

The IND and IRB Processes

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product to human patients under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include, among other things, the requirement that all research patients provide their voluntary informed consent in writing before their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under written study protocols detailing, among other things, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the objectives of the study, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. In support of a request for an IND, sponsors must submit a protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND.

An IND is an exemption from the FDCA that allows an unapproved drug to be shipped through interstate commerce for use in an investigational clinical trial and a request for FDA authorization to administer an investigational drug to humans. Such authorization must be obtained prior to interstate shipment and administration of any new drug that is not the subject of an approved NDA. In addition to reviewing an IND to assure the safety and rights of patients, the FDA also focuses on the quality of the investigation and whether it will be adequate to permit an evaluation of the drug’s safety and efficacy. The results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and plans for clinical trials, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND. The FDA requires a 30-day waiting period after the submission of each IND before clinical trials may begin. This waiting period is designed to allow the FDA to review the IND to determine whether human research patients will be exposed to unreasonable health risks. At any time during this 30-day period, or thereafter, the FDA may raise concerns or questions about the conduct of the trials as outlined in the IND and impose a clinical hold or partial clinical hold or require that the sponsor amend the clinical protocol to include additional safety measurements. In this case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before clinical trials can begin.

Following commencement of a clinical trial under an IND, the FDA may also place a clinical hold or partial clinical hold on that trial. A clinical hold is an order issued by the FDA to the sponsor to delay a proposed clinical trial or to suspend an ongoing investigation. A partial clinical hold is a delay or suspension of only part of the clinical work requested under the IND. For example, a partial clinical hold might state that a specific protocol or part of a protocol may not proceed, while other parts of a protocol or other protocols may do so. No more than 30 days after the imposition of a clinical hold or partial clinical hold, the FDA will provide the sponsor with a written explanation of the basis for the hold. Following the issuance of a clinical hold or partial clinical hold, a clinical trial may only resume once the FDA has notified the sponsor that the investigation may proceed. The FDA will base that determination on information provided by the sponsor correcting the deficiencies previously cited or otherwise satisfying the FDA that the investigation can proceed or recommence. Occasionally, clinical holds are imposed due to manufacturing issues that may present safety issues for the clinical trial subjects.

In addition to the foregoing requirements related to the IND submission and ongoing review, an IRB representing each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must conduct a continuing review and reapprove the trial at least annually. The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the trial protocol and informed consent information to be provided to study patients. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA regulations. An IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution, or an institution it represents, if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the product candidate has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.

Additionally, some trials are overseen by a Data Monitoring Committee, which is an independent group of qualified experts organized by the trial sponsor. This group provides authorization for whether or not a trial may move forward at designated check points based on access that only the group maintains to available data from the trial. Suspension or termination of development during any phase of clinical trials can occur if it is determined that the participants or patients are being exposed

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 25

Table of Contents

to an unacceptable health risk. Other reasons for suspension or termination may be made by a sponsor based on evolving business objectives and/or competitive climate.

A sponsor may choose, but is not required, to conduct a foreign clinical study under an IND. When a foreign clinical study is conducted under an IND, all IND requirements must be met unless waived by the FDA. When a foreign clinical study is not conducted under an IND, the sponsor must ensure that the study complies with certain regulatory requirements of the FDA in order to use the study as support for an IND or application for marketing approval. Specifically, the studies must be conducted in accordance with GCP, including undergoing review and receiving approval by an independent ethics committee and seeking and receiving informed consent from subjects. GCP requirements encompass both ethical and data integrity standards for clinical trials. The FDA’s regulations are intended to help ensure the protection of human subjects enrolled in non-IND foreign clinical trials, as well as the quality and integrity of the resulting data. They further help ensure that non-IND foreign studies are conducted in a manner comparable to that required for IND studies.

Reporting Clinical Trial Results

Under the Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, sponsors of certain clinical trials of certain FDA-regulated products, including prescription drugs and biologics, are required to register and disclose certain clinical trial information on a public registry (clinicaltrials.gov) maintained by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, or NIH. In particular, information related to the product, patient population, phase of investigation, study sites and investigators and other aspects of the clinical trial is made public as part of the registration of the clinical trial. Although sponsors are also obligated to disclose the results of their clinical trials after completion, disclosure of the results can be delayed in some cases for up to two years after the date of completion of the trial. The NIH’s Final Rule on registration and reporting requirements for clinical trials became effective in 2017, and both NIH and the FDA have signaled the government’s willingness to begin enforcing those requirements against non-compliant clinical trial sponsors.

The PHSA grants the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, the authority to issue a notice of noncompliance to a responsible party for failure to submit clinical trial information as required. The responsible party, however, is allowed 30 days to correct the noncompliance and submit the required information. As of December 19, 2024, the FDA has issued six notices of non-compliance, thereby signaling the government’s willingness to begin enforcing these requirements against non-compliant clinical trial sponsors. While these notices of non-compliance did not result in civil monetary penalties, the failure to submit clinical trial information to clinical trials.gov is a prohibited act under the FDCA with violations subject to potential civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 for each day the violation continues. Violations may also result in injunctions and/or criminal prosecution or disqualification from federal grants.

Expanded Access to an Investigational Drug for Treatment Use

Expanded access, sometimes called “compassionate use,” is the use of investigational new drug products outside of clinical trials to treat patients with serious or immediately life-threatening diseases or conditions when there are no comparable or satisfactory alternative treatment options. The rules and regulations related to expanded access are intended to improve access to investigational drugs for patients who may benefit from investigational therapies. FDA regulations allow access to investigational drugs under an IND by the company or the treating physician for treatment purposes on a case-by-case basis for: individual patients (single-patient IND applications for treatment in emergency settings and non-emergency settings); intermediate-size patient populations; and larger populations for use of the drug under a treatment protocol or Treatment IND Application.

There is no obligation for a sponsor to make its investigational products available for expanded access; however, as required by amendments to the FDCA included in the 21st Century Cures Act passed in 2016, if a sponsor has a policy regarding how it responds to expanded access requests with respect to product candidates in development to treat serious diseases or conditions, it must make that policy publicly available. Sponsors are required to make such policies publicly available upon the earlier of initiation of a Phase 2 or Phase 3 trial for a covered investigational product; or 15 days after the investigational product receives designation from the FDA as a breakthrough therapy, fast track product, or regenerative medicine advanced therapy.

On May 30, 2018, the Right to Try Act was signed into law. The law, among other things, provides a federal framework for certain patients to access certain investigational new drug products that have completed a Phase I clinical trial and that are undergoing investigation for FDA approval. Under certain circumstances, eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical trials and without obtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded access program. There is no obligation for a drug manufacturer to make its product candidates available to eligible patients as a result of the Right to Try Act, but the manufacturer must develop an internal policy and respond to patient requests according to that policy.

Human Clinical Trials in Support of an NDA

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product to human patients under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include, among other things, the requirement that all research

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 26

Table of Contents

patients provide their informed consent in writing before their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under written study protocols detailing, among other things, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the objectives of the study, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in four sequential phases, which may overlap or be combined:

•Phase 1. The product candidate is initially introduced into a small number of healthy human patients or, in certain indications such as cancer, patients with the target disease or condition (e.g., cancer) and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, excretion and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its effectiveness and to determine optimal dosage.

•Phase 2. The product candidate is administered to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product candidate for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.

•Phase 3. These clinical trials are commonly referred to as “pivotal” studies, which denote a study that presents the data that the FDA or other relevant regulatory agency will use to determine whether or not to approve a product candidate. The product candidate is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, in well-controlled clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the product candidate for approval, identify adverse effects, establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product candidate and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the product candidate.

•Phase 4. Post-approval studies may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These studies are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication.

A clinical trial may combine the elements of more than one phase and the FDA often requires more than one Phase 3 trial to support marketing approval of a product candidate. Moreover, as noted above, a pivotal trial is a clinical trial that is believed to satisfy FDA requirements for the evaluation of a product candidate’s safety and efficacy such that it can be used, alone or with other pivotal or non-pivotal trials, to support regulatory approval. Generally, pivotal trials are Phase 3 trials, but they may be Phase 2 trials if the design provides a well-controlled and reliable assessment of clinical benefit, particularly in an area of unmet medical need. A company’s designation of a clinical trial as being of a particular phase is not necessarily indicative that the study will be sufficient to satisfy the FDA requirements of that phase because this determination cannot be made until the protocol and data have been submitted to and reviewed by the FDA.

In December 2022, with the passage of the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act, or FDORA, Congress required sponsors to develop and submit a diversity action plan, or DAP, for each phase 3 clinical trial or any other “pivotal study” of a new drug or biological product. These plans are meant to encourage the enrollment of more diverse patient populations in late-stage clinical trials of FDA-regulated products. Specifically, action plans must include the sponsor’s goals for enrollment, the underlying rationale for those goals, and an explanation of how the sponsor intends to meet them. In June 2024, as mandated by FDORA, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining the general requirements for DAPs.Unlike most guidance documents issued by the FDA, the DAP guidance when finalized will have the force of law because FDORA specifically dictates that the form and manner for submission of DAPs are specified in FDA guidance. On January 27, 2025, in response to an Executive Order issued by President Trump on January 21, 2025, on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, the FDA removed this draft guidance from its website. As a result, the applicability of statutory obligations to submit DAPs and the agency’s current thinking on best practices for clinical development remain unclear and we will need to carefully navigate such uncertainty.

In June 2023, the FDA issued draft guidance with updated recommendations for GCPs aimed at modernizing the design and conduct of clinical trials. The updates are intended to help pave the way for more efficient clinical trials to facilitate the development of medical products. The draft guidance is adopted from the ICH’s recently updated E6(R3) draft guideline that was developed to enable the incorporation of rapidly developing technological and methodological innovations into the clinical trial enterprise. In addition, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining recommendations for the implementation of decentralized clinical trials.

Interactions with the FDA During the Clinical Development Program

Following the clearance of an IND and the commencement of clinical trials, the sponsor will continue to have interactions with the FDA. Progress reports detailing the results of clinical trials must be submitted annually within 60 days of the anniversary dates that the IND went into effect and more frequently if serious adverse events occur. These reports must include a development safety update report. In addition, IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA for any of the following: serious and unexpected suspected adverse reactions; findings from other studies or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the product; and any clinically important increase in the occurrence of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all. The FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP and the integrity of the clinical data submitted.

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. | Form 10-K | Page 27

Table of Contents

In addition, a sponsor will continue to have interactions with the FDA and the sponsor may meet with the FDA at certain points in the clinical development program. Specifically, sponsors may meet with the FDA prior to the submission of an IND, or a pre-IND meeting, at the end of Phase 2 clinical trials and before an NDA is submitted, or a pre-NDA meeting. Meetings at other times may also be requested. These meetings provide an opportunity for the sponsor to share information about the data gathered to date with the FDA and for the FDA to provide advice on the next phase of development.